大正蔵検索 INBUDS
|
大日經疏指心鈔 (No. 2217_ 頼瑜撰 ) in Vol. 59 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:無/有] [CITE]
T2217_.59.0585a01: 喩而顯通後二歟。問。初二菩薩雖云利 T2217_.59.0585a02: 根猶云久集無量福智。非是頓證人。又初 T2217_.59.0585a03: 菩薩云遇佛聞是大乘。可大品經。*若爾何 T2217_.59.0585a04: 以此二菩薩爲即身頓成證乎 答。既云 T2217_.59.0585a05: 未發心前指宿善云久集福徳智也。故疏 T2217_.59.0585a06: 第四云。若諸衆生未曾於過去無量佛所久 T2217_.59.0585a07: 種善根於此祕密乘未曾修習則造次聞
T2217_.59.0585a10: 乗歟。猶如楞伽經云我乘大乘無上法矣。 T2217_.59.0585a11: 大師住心論云。牛羊等車徐進必經三大無 T2217_.59.0585a12: 數劫。神通寶輅凌虚空速飛一生之間必至
T2217_.59.0585a15: 文永十一年於高野山丈六堂坊草之
T2217_.59.0585a18: T2217_.59.0585a19: T2217_.59.0585a20: T2217_.59.0585a21: 疏卷第一之二 T2217_.59.0585a22: 如是我聞等者。智證大師抄云。如是我聞者 T2217_.59.0585a23: 約已開門爲阿難我。若爾阿難非大日侍 T2217_.59.0585a24: 者。何稱我聞。阿闍梨云。約法界通開義無
T2217_.59.0585a27: 遮那對於聲聞。何非阿難我耶。示明文 T2217_.59.0585a28: 佛心經下卷有毘盧遮那對告阿難之文。 T2217_.59.0585a29: 煩故不具引。既有對告文。何故非阿難之
T2217_.59.0585b04: 總持藏爲金剛手受持。祕藏記爲結集者
T2217_.59.0585b11: 約結集伴通阿難歟。若依結集主者金剛 T2217_.59.0585b12: 手也。故安然釋云。若約結集主者是金剛
T2217_.59.0585b15: 題説藏記文唯金剛手結集也。既云顯教中 T2217_.59.0585b16: 依智論等説歟。彼論云。迦葉・阿難於王舍 T2217_.59.0585b17: 城結集三藏爲聲聞藏。文殊・阿難於鐵圍
T2217_.59.0585b20: 手受持。全非阿難傳持也。若爾何撿六度 T2217_.59.0585b21: 經明文撿佛心經一説遮金薩結集義。況 T2217_.59.0585b22: 對告人未必結集者。恐似守株費智耳。但 T2217_.59.0585b23: 祕藏記總別釋是於前四藏作總別也。又 T2217_.59.0585b24: 普賢金薩顯密異。故理趣釋云。是菩薩本是 T2217_.59.0585b25: 普賢。從大日如來受金剛杵之故名金剛
T2217_.59.0585b28: 聞。今疑此經釋迦如來滅度後八百年時*毘 T2217_.59.0585b29: 盧遮那自對普賢執金剛手等而説。爾時阿 T2217_.59.0585b30: 難迦葉等久已滅度。誰言我聞。若言龍樹 T2217_.59.0585c01: 菩薩結集者復從毘*盧遮那佛口傳普賢。 T2217_.59.0585c02: 從普賢傳龍樹。如何龍樹稱我聞。若言普 T2217_.59.0585c03: 賢我聞者不爾。普賢菩薩非二乘凡夫肉眼
T2217_.59.0585c06: 薩出時以爲説經之時出阿難・迦葉生疑。 T2217_.59.0585c07: 是大過也。又龍樹結集不足起言。如是我 T2217_.59.0585c08: 聞是金剛手語也。開題云。之語也。
T2217_.59.0585c11: 乘凡夫不見普賢者。普賢觀經説四衆八
T2217_.59.0585c14: 義訣云。經篋廣長如床厚四五尺有無量
T2217_.59.0585c17: 如來懸記之時。非啻害密藏宗旨亦闇違 T2217_.59.0585c18: 顯經明文矣。言交雜人間結集者智度論 T2217_.59.0585c19: 釋顯結集云。佛滅度後文殊・彌勒等諸大
T2217_.59.0585c22: 不許者又顯經結集同疑 T2217_.59.0585c23: 經初五義等者。抄云。如來説法有五成就言 T2217_.59.0585c24: 如是我聞者信成就也。一時者時成就也。薄 T2217_.59.0585c25: 伽梵者教主成就也。住如來加持法界宮乃 T2217_.59.0585c26: 至生大樓閣寶王等所成就也。其金剛名曰
T2217_.59.0585c29: 成加通序之旨。若五義非五成者何作此 T2217_.59.0586a01: 釋耶。故抄釋五成就畢般若燈論亦有六
T2217_.59.0586a04: 直牒經文不云疏云。可悉之又義云。以 T2217_.59.0586a05: 五字義爲五義非五成也。次下文如智論
T2217_.59.0586a08: 時。問曰。佛經何以故初稱如是語。答曰。佛 T2217_.59.0586a09: 法大海信爲能入智爲能度。如是者即是 T2217_.59.0586a10: 信也。我者佛弟子等。雖知無我隨俗法 T2217_.59.0586a11: 説我非實我也。聞者非耳根。非耳根能 T2217_.59.0586a12: 聞聲。亦非耳識亦非意識。是聞聲事從多 T2217_.59.0586a13: 因縁生。一者。問曰。佛法中數等法實無。陰・ T2217_.59.0586a14: 界・入所不攝故。何以言一。答曰。隨世俗故 T2217_.59.0586a15: 有一。時者。有人言。一切天地好醜皆以時
T2217_.59.0586a18: 也。既智論説分明。定知五義非五成就也。所 T2217_.59.0586a19: 以一時已上讓智論薄伽梵已下牒釋故。私 T2217_.59.0586a20: 更加一解云。通序六句中前五句云五義 T2217_.59.0586a21: 歟。今所牒如是乃至法界宮文六句中五句 T2217_.59.0586a22: 有之故。故准智論文説六成就。開信與聞
T2217_.59.0586a27: 智度者。衆成中又綺所成而文不一純故 T2217_.59.0586a28: 且除之歟。重意云。五字爲五義可爲正 T2217_.59.0586a29: 説。智論略説如是我聞一時五字別義竟之
T2217_.59.0586b03: 總説六義未明所據。今記論意令易可 T2217_.59.0586b04: 知。然案智論。如是我聞一時牒爲一段開 T2217_.59.0586b05: 爲五種結爲三句。謂一如是二我三聞四 T2217_.59.0586b06: 一五時。是爲五語。如是爲一我聞爲二一 T2217_.59.0586b07: 時爲三。是爲三句。聞即我聞一是時數故。 T2217_.59.0586b08: 故結爲三句也。但論旨難尋。依順先聖且
T2217_.59.0586b15: 由來等別説之時置此言歟。大日經供養法 T2217_.59.0586b16: 卷云。右阿闍梨所集大毘*盧遮那成佛神變 T2217_.59.0586b17: 加持經中供養儀式具足竟。傳度者頗會意
T2217_.59.0586b21: 大本有十萬偈等者。開題云。此經總有三本。 T2217_.59.0586b22: 一法爾常恒本。諸佛法曼荼羅是也。二分 T2217_.59.0586b23: 流廣本。龍猛所誦傳十萬頌經是也。三略
T2217_.59.0586c02: 流中廣本故云大本歟。下略有十萬者。望 T2217_.59.0586c03: 常恒本故云略歟海雲記云。此經梵筴有 T2217_.59.0586c04: 三本。廣本十萬偈。若依梵本具譯可有三 T2217_.59.0586c05: 百餘卷已來。廣本在西國不到此土。梵本 T2217_.59.0586c06: 經略本四千偈。更有略本二千五百偈。中天
T2217_.59.0586c13: 經序略本雖同記一本亦背疏文耳 T2217_.59.0586c14: 傳法聖者等者。開元録第九云。大毘*盧遮那
T2217_.59.0586c17: 言歸迴至北天無幸而卒。所持梵本有勅 T2217_.59.0586c18: 迎還北在西京華嚴寺。取掌無畏與沙門 T2217_.59.0586c19: 一行於彼簡得數本梵經。還遂爲沙門一 T2217_.59.0586c20: 行譯大毘*盧遮那經。其經具足梵文有十 T2217_.59.0586c21: 萬頌。今所出者撮其要取最。沙門寶月譯
T2217_.59.0586c28: 部教持念次第共成一卷成七卷共成一
T2217_.59.0587a02: 存第七卷者。應云此經七卷三十六品。故 T2217_.59.0587a03: 知第七卷是六卷所攝也。問。傳法聖者誰 T2217_.59.0587a04: 人耶。答。准録中今經梵本無畏從無行相 T2217_.59.0587a05: 承。傳法聖者指無行歟。或龍智金剛智等 T2217_.59.0587a06: 歟。其故開題中十萬頌。或云龍猛誦出或 T2217_.59.0587a07: 云金剛智誦傳。既彼二聖誦傳是分流廣 T2217_.59.0587a08: 本。故知今三千頌龍智金剛智等取其要歟。 T2217_.59.0587a09: 又十萬頌雖云龍猛誦傳亦不妨金剛手。 T2217_.59.0587a10: 准知三千頌通龍猛歟。問。龍猛誦出未審。 T2217_.59.0587a11: 大日經序云。北天竺國勃嚕羅國中有大石 T2217_.59.0587a12: 山。壁立干雲。於其半腹有藏祕法窟。數 T2217_.59.0587a13: 千猿猴捧經出。暴風*忽至吹一梵篋下來。 T2217_.59.0587a14: 樵夫取之獻王。王歡喜與之善無畏。無畏
T2217_.59.0587a17: *盧遮那佛付屬金剛手菩薩經數百年 T2217_.59.0587a18: 傳中印度那蘭陀寺達磨掬多。達*磨付屬
T2217_.59.0587a21: 屬金剛手。金剛手次傳付屬那蘭陀寺達摩 T2217_.59.0587a22: 掬多阿闍梨。阿闍梨次屬中天竺國主釋迦
T2217_.59.0587a25: 空表製集等專以兩部祕藏之經偏存鐵塔 T2217_.59.0587a26: 流傳之旨。又龍猛論中載今經。若不傳則 T2217_.59.0587a27: 何引自造論乎。故表製集四云。昔毘*盧 T2217_.59.0587a28: 遮那經。以瑜伽無上祕密最大乘教傳於 T2217_.59.0587a29: 金剛*薩埵。金剛*薩埵數百歳方得龍猛菩 T2217_.59.0587b01: 薩而授焉。龍猛又數百歳乃傳龍智阿闍梨。 T2217_.59.0587b02: 龍智又數百歳傳金剛智*阿闍梨。金剛智 T2217_.59.0587b03: 振錫東來傳於和尚。自法身如來至于和
T2217_.59.0587b06: 猶見在南天竺國傳授金剛頂瑜伽經及毘
T2217_.59.0587b09: 傳則龍智何爲傳授法門乎。依此等心大 T2217_.59.0587b10: 師住心論中擧兩部*曼陀羅畢云。若爾誰 T2217_.59.0587b11: 傳。答。初從大日如來至青龍阿闍梨有
T2217_.59.0587b16: 雖唐家人師是惠果二傳之孫弟。展轉設有 T2217_.59.0587b17: 誤大師惠果面授之弟子。親受何有疑乎。又 T2217_.59.0587b18: 惠果行状云。常語門人曰。金剛界大悲胎 T2217_.59.0587b19: 藏兩部大教者諸佛祕藏即身成佛之路。訶 T2217_.59.0587b20: 陵辨弘新羅惠日竝授胎藏師位。釼南惟上 T2217_.59.0587b21: 河北義圓授金剛界大法。義明供奉亦授兩 T2217_.59.0587b22: 部大法。今有日本沙門來求聖教。以兩部 T2217_.59.0587b23: 祕奧壇儀印契漢梵無差悉受於心猶如
T2217_.59.0587b28: 大師。又請來表云。和尚告曰。我先知汝來 T2217_.59.0587b29: 相待久矣。今日相見大好大好。報命欲竭無
T2217_.59.0587c03: 簡餘人而云無人付法。同*門賢弟猶不比 T2217_.59.0587c04: 肩。況孫弟海雲等成同日論哉。次付經序 T2217_.59.0587c05: 者。石窟梵篋無畏直相承翻之歟。然今文 T2217_.59.0587c06: *阿闍梨傳者指無畏也。彼説云。傳法聖者
T2217_.59.0587c09: 之安然又付二過不用之。一違胎藏相承
T2217_.59.0587c15: 軌非大師請來也。何爲難矣。抑南天北天之 T2217_.59.0587c16: 相承自門他門之諍論也。然眞言祕教以東 T2217_.59.0587c17: 寺爲正。故大原長宴僧都四十状云。池上廣 T2217_.59.0587c18: 慶*阿闍梨云。伺習諸家灌頂無過東寺
T2217_.59.0587c21: 南天歸之後唯授惠果一人。惠果和尚又 T2217_.59.0587c22: 唯授弘法大師。不授餘人。是故惠朗紹六 T2217_.59.0587c23: 爲七不得師位。義明印可紹攝不謂入室。 T2217_.59.0587c24: 不空惠果既不授之。隨誰傳哉。而他家與
T2217_.59.0587c28: 云誦出金剛頂百千頌。未云誦持毘*盧遮 T2217_.59.0587c29: 那經。又不思議疏中明今經第七卷由來云。 T2217_.59.0588a01: 無畏三藏於金栗王塔下依聖加被感得
T2217_.59.0588a05: 法明道徳。何於兩部有所殘耶。彼義訣 T2217_.59.0588a06: 中。龍猛未入鐵塔前大日如來現其身授
T2217_.59.0588a09: 得金剛頂經梵本猶誦傳之。況既蒙指授。 T2217_.59.0588a10: 大日經廣本悋何不授*耶。又於今經第七 T2217_.59.0588a11: 卷者。凡雖有鐵塔梵本修持行儀未明故 T2217_.59.0588a12: 求聖加被更感得供養次第法也。非六卷 T2217_.59.0588a13: 梵本外更有第七卷梵本歟。依之第七卷初
T2217_.59.0588b05: 中探取此品所有津要獨成一卷分爲五
T2217_.59.0588b08: 梵本譯成六卷。又總集一部教持念次第
T2217_.59.0588b11: 經同本異譯。而彼經龍猛到鐵塔下時。毘 T2217_.59.0588b12: *盧遮那於空中爲龍猛説也。彼念誦法 T2217_.59.0588b13: 既大日説。此第七卷無畏私撰乎。故同題云。
T2217_.59.0588c06: 窟梵篋譯爲七卷。彼已有第七卷梵本。何 T2217_.59.0588c07: 云私撰出乎。或云。義釋文温古智嚴再治 T2217_.59.0588c08: 時加人言歟。二十卷草本疏中無彼説故。
T2217_.59.0588c11: 門他家相承作圖示之 T2217_.59.0588c12: T2217_.59.0588c13: T2217_.59.0588d14: 大師相承血脈 T2217_.59.0588d15: T2217_.59.0588d16: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0588d17: [IMAGE]弘"/> T2217_.59.0588d18: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0588d19: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0588d20: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0588d21: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0588d22: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0588d23: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0588d24: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0588d25: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0588d26: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0589a01: T2217_.59.0589a02: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0589a03: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0589a04: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0589a05: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0589a06: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0589a07: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0589a08: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0589a09: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0589a10: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0589a11: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0589a12: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0589a13: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0589a14: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0589a15: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0589a16: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0589a17: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0589a18: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0589a19: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0589a20: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0589a21: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0589a22: [IMAGE]弘義圓"/> T2217_.59.0589a23: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0589a24: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0589a25: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0589a26: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0589a27: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0590a01: T2217_.59.0590a02: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0590a03: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0590a04: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0590a05: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0590a06: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0590a07: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0590a08: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0590a09: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0590a10: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0590a11: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0590a12: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0590a13: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0590a14: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0590a15: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0590a16: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0590a17: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0590a18: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0590a19: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0590a20: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0590a21: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0590a22: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0590a23: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0590a24: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0590a25: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0590a26: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0590a27: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0591a01: T2217_.59.0591a02: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0591a03: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0591a04: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0591a05: [IMAGE] T2217_.59.0591a06: [IMAGE]
T2217_.59.0591b14: 加之歟。中川序分義云。十卷本智證裏書 T2217_.59.0591b15: 云。此三千頌不是大本故梵文上不題通
T2217_.59.0591b19: 梵者謂薄伽聲依六義轉。如有頌言。自在 T2217_.59.0591b20: 熾盛與端嚴名稱吉祥及尊貴。如是六種 T2217_.59.0591b21: 義差別。應知總名爲薄伽。如是一切如來 T2217_.59.0591b22: 具有於一切種皆不相離。是故如來名薄 T2217_.59.0591b23: 伽梵。其義云何。謂諸如來永不繋屬諸煩 T2217_.59.0591b24: 惱故具自在義。炎猛智火所燒練故具熾 T2217_.59.0591b25: 盛義。妙三十二大士相等於莊嚴飾故具 T2217_.59.0591b26: 端嚴義。一切殊勝功徳圓滿無不知故具名 T2217_.59.0591b27: 稱義。一切世間親近供養咸稱讃故具吉祥 T2217_.59.0591b28: 義。具一切功徳常起方便利益安樂一 T2217_.59.0591b29: 切有情無懈廢故具尊貴義。或能破壞四
T2217_.59.0591c09: 趣釋云又有六義如聲論所釋者。指聲論 T2217_.59.0591c10: 師云論師歟 T2217_.59.0591c11: 今此宗中薄伽梵是能破義者。問。今此能
T2217_.59.0591c16: 中能破義爲證。況又佛地中六義外擧破 T2217_.59.0591c17: 魔義。故依之。理趣釋云。時薄伽梵者能義 T2217_.59.0591c18: 破義也。所破者破四魔也。又有六義如聲
T2217_.59.0591c22: 其一歟。所以指佛地云其一。非指六義
T2217_.59.0591c29: 彼釋中四六配屬時。有徳配端嚴吉祥巧分 T2217_.59.0591d07: 別爲名稱義有名聲屬餘三義。全無能破 T2217_.59.0591d08: 配當。故知四者言總也。應云三六開合異
T2217_.59.0591d12: 者。彼又顯論難云今宗何。答。或於佛地 T2217_.59.0591d13: 中引聲論頌歟。故指聲論師云論師六義。 T2217_.59.0591d14: 以佛地破魔義云今此宗歟。或佛地中六 T2217_.59.0591d15: 義但以句義釋薄伽梵未及字義。然智論 T2217_.59.0591d16: 必以字義訓釋多名。故二論相望智度義勝 T2217_.59.0591d17: 故爲今宗義也。故抄云。謂彼顯宗之中。具 T2217_.59.0591d18: 足六義都名一薄伽梵。更無別義。今此宗
T2217_.59.0591d21: 祖。親光唯顯師故 T2217_.59.0591d22: 以大智明等者。以大日大圓智明破因海 T2217_.59.0591d23: 無明分位九種戲論妄識義也。無明者智
T2217_.59.0591d26: 始間隔暗惑自除也。是即非斷煩惱體。除 T2217_.59.0591d27: 非菩提之間隔故云能破也。故摩訶衍論
T2217_.59.0592a01: 釋論亦云等者。智論第二云。復次頗伽名破。 T2217_.59.0592a02: 婆名能。能是能破婬怒癡故稱爲頗伽婆。 T2217_.59.0592a03: 問曰。阿羅漢辟支佛亦破婬怒癡。與佛 T2217_.59.0592a04: 何異。答曰。阿羅漢辟支佛雖破三毒亦 T2217_.59.0592a05: 不了了盡。譬如香在器中香雖無餘氣故 T2217_.59.0592a06: 在。有如草木薪火燒之烟盡炭灰不盡火力 T2217_.59.0592a07: 薄故。佛三毒永盡無餘。譬如劫盡火燒須 T2217_.59.0592a08: 彌山一切地都無煙無炭。如舍利弗瞋恚 T2217_.59.0592a09: 氣殘難陀婬欲氣殘畢陵伽婆蹉慢氣殘。譬
T2217_.59.0592a15: 對菩薩云未盡歟。或二乘倶有利鈍故。利 T2217_.59.0592a16: 二類斷種鈍二人不然。今擧鈍二乘。經文 T2217_.59.0592a17: 大師釋約利縁覺歟。或種習別故。抄云。雖
T2217_.59.0592a20: 復次帝釋等者。第二約女人釋薄伽義有 T2217_.59.0592a21: 二義。一息煩惱義二所從生義。此中所從 T2217_.59.0592a22: 生者從所生子能生母立名。謂人子所從 T2217_.59.0592a23: 母生故也。疏十七云。如來即是一切善法
T2217_.59.0592a26: 是從生義。如人胎分成就時出離胎藏。如來 T2217_.59.0592a27: 亦爾。淨菩提心究竟圓滿時出過一切諸觀
T2217_.59.0592b02: 乘大日經宗亦金剛乘故云爾也。又准下若 T2217_.59.0592b03: 解金剛頂十六大生釋可金剛頂部因便明 T2217_.59.0592b04: 彼義也。即翻此義者。暫息永息等異故云
T2217_.59.0592b07: 佛也。故疏第七云。如來無礙知見在一切衆 T2217_.59.0592b08: 生相續中法爾成就無有缺滅。以於此眞 T2217_.59.0592b09: 言體相不如實覺故名爲生死中人。若能
T2217_.59.0592b12: 論中有此例。此者般若佛母也。一切善心 T2217_.59.0592b13: 與此智相應而斷煩惱故。倶舍云。若離擇
T2217_.59.0592b19: 上釋云。據宗心有互出生之義。或顯曰不
T2217_.59.0592b23: 有如是隱語者。抄云。不可説直是般若佛 T2217_.59.0592b24: 母故言女人。此宗多有如此隱密之語。修
T2217_.59.0592b27: 實義。如大乘十法經説聲聞成佛。是佛祕 T2217_.59.0592b28: 密之教。其實不可成佛而説成佛。是密意 T2217_.59.0592b29: *之説故。今眞言教詞淺旨深。是名諸佛密 T2217_.59.0592c01: 語。如説觀音瑜伽中云男女二根和合能 T2217_.59.0592c02: 作佛事。是以定惠和合。生諸佛子。非實男
T2217_.59.0592c07: 礙知見人故云佛母。此智冥會自證境直 T2217_.59.0592c08: 不可説故以男女相應示之。云如是隱語 T2217_.59.0592c09: 觸類思之也。得與相應者理智冥合義也。 T2217_.59.0592c10: 問。相應於心心所云之。何理智冥合云相 T2217_.59.0592c11: 應*耶。答。彼權宗意也。祕教理智又云相 T2217_.59.0592c12: 應。故釋論中理智云相應但有。字義云。理
T2217_.59.0592c17: 皆異佛地論六義。此三義大悲胎藏三部*曼
T2217_.59.0592c20: 釋有名聲語密即蓮華部。増益故云持資財 T2217_.59.0592c21: 者。第二復次相應義即佛部。定惠相應理智
T2217_.59.0592c24: 第也 T2217_.59.0592c25: 釋論亦云婆伽言徳等者。智論第二云。何名 T2217_.59.0592c26: 頗伽婆。天竺語婆伽秦言徳。婆言有。是名 T2217_.59.0592c27: 有徳復次頗伽名分別。婆名巧用。總相別 T2217_.59.0592c28: 相巧分別諸法。是故名頗伽婆。復次頗伽 T2217_.59.0592c29: 名名聲。婆名有。是云有名聲。無有得徳 T2217_.59.0593a01: 名聲如佛者。轉輪聖王釋梵護世者無有
T2217_.59.0593a05: 取故。或有徳名聲離爲二。第二復次中又
T2217_.59.0593a08: 言及尊者等*者。或義云。言及尊者人直不
T2217_.59.0593a12: 智舍利弗等之例言之。應云薄伽梵毘
T2217_.59.0593a22: 身者。即應身他受用也。次疏釋成其所住 T2217_.59.0593a23: 處名佛受用身。言如來心王等者如來是 T2217_.59.0593a24: 所住心王爲能住。如一切諸佛説法儀式。皆 T2217_.59.0593a25: 住於應身即本地身爲教主也○推功歸 T2217_.59.0593a26: 本言法身説○依正尚無礙。豈佛身眞應而
T2217_.59.0593a29: 力加持門之談也。今此他受用雖凝然本有
T2217_.59.0593b03: 與自性身色相莊嚴音聲説法無二無別也。 T2217_.59.0593b04: 故知。自性身加被他受用身即令説自内
T2217_.59.0593b07: 此經。然於薄伽梵本地身説依華嚴作二 T2217_.59.0593b08: 釋。就三乘教云推功歸本。此復馳胸臆而 T2217_.59.0593b09: 會文依一乘教云。眞應無礙則復駈自宗
T2217_.59.0593b14: 身之名必由自受法樂之義而作其教主。 T2217_.59.0593b15: 不必從説由。彼身非自受用而爲自受説 T2217_.59.0593b16: 法。能説不受名自性身。能説亦受名受用
T2217_.59.0593b19: 大經藏在華嚴界説。實是華嚴深密祕分。其 T2217_.59.0593b20: 本未來此。是舍那他受用説。其中亦有自 T2217_.59.0593b21: 證化他法門。若大日金剛頂經等在法界宮
T2217_.59.0593b24: 有二重。通自性身通住餘三身説法。諸身 T2217_.59.0593b25: 説法皆自性身所作故。別者四種身各説故。 T2217_.59.0593b26: 又通者四身聖衆各住自證三昧故云通別 T2217_.59.0593b27: 者自性法身皆其主故。獨説一切故。以爲 T2217_.59.0593b28: 教主。所以云別。又二重各翻對通別可知 T2217_.59.0593b29: 之。隨他四身通別義准上二門可知之。大 T2217_.59.0593c01: 師御意以隨自意四種中自性身爲教主兼 T2217_.59.0593c02: 伴通四身。慈覺安然等以自受用身爲教 T2217_.59.0593c03: 主兼餘三身説。覺超云他受用。覺苑云他
T2217_.59.0593c06: 身大毘*盧遮那如來與自眷屬四種法身 T2217_.59.0593c07: 住金剛法界宮及眞言宮殿等自受法樂故
T2217_.59.0593c13: 身癈立歟。故古徳祕釋中引聖位禮懺二文
T2217_.59.0593c17: 教主。何況他受變化等乎。問。住心論十云。 T2217_.59.0593c18: 薄伽梵者總擧塵數諸尊徳號具釋如疏住 T2217_.59.0593c19: 者顯能所二住。言各各諸尊住自證三昧 T2217_.59.0593c20: 句。如來加持廣大金剛法界宮者是則五佛 T2217_.59.0593c21: 之異名。大日寶幢開敷彌陀天鼓如次配。復 T2217_.59.0593c22: 次如來者大*曼荼羅身。金剛則三昧耶身。法 T2217_.59.0593c23: 界則達*磨*曼荼羅身。加持者事業威儀身 T2217_.59.0593c24: *也。此通三種*之身。廣大者明各各身量 T2217_.59.0593c25: 同虚空法界。言宮者顯所住處。今此心王
T2217_.59.0594a02: 梵即毘盧遮那本地法身即心王如來也。論 T2217_.59.0594a03: 意薄伽梵者總擧能住塵數諸尊。住者顯能 T2217_.59.0594a04: 所住。如來乃至宮者顯所住也。所住中有 T2217_.59.0594a05: 二意。一如來乃至法界者五佛也。宮者定也。 T2217_.59.0594a06: 謂以五佛之所證定爲所住處。二如來*等 T2217_.59.0594a07: 者四種*曼荼羅身也。宮如前。謂以四曼廣 T2217_.59.0594a08: 大身之所證爲所住處。准此所住故知。能 T2217_.59.0594a09: 住薄伽梵者五佛四曼塵數諸尊徳號。若爾 T2217_.59.0594a10: 薄伽梵是唯大日*耶。答。疏論意別。疏就 T2217_.59.0594a11: 最勝且云大日。論盡能住故云塵數。若就
T2217_.59.0594a14: 住可有五佛四*曼身故薄伽梵句釋塵數
T2217_.59.0594a17: 慈覺釋中金剛頂經一切如來釋大日。或以 T2217_.59.0594a18: 薄伽梵諸佛通名今名大日故云爾。非取 T2217_.59.0594a19: 諸尊也。故論云具釋如疏。若與疏異者何 T2217_.59.0594a20: 讓疏*耶。但住處句配五佛者今經異顯經 T2217_.59.0594a21: 住所又如來身故云爾。故大師祕經注釋云。
T2217_.59.0594a29: 土中以受用等三身爲説主故。又古徳釋 T2217_.59.0594b01: 既云四*曼身。何爲難。自性身有四*曼身 T2217_.59.0594b02: 故。四*曼義釋一往釋歟。又義云 T2217_.59.0594b03: 次云如來是佛加持身者。智證大師抄云。佛
T2217_.59.0594b06: 身。當報身也。亦名字門道具足佛也。亦名 T2217_.59.0594b07: 具身加持也。其所住處者即通受用變化身
T2217_.59.0594b10: 法門眷屬皆住彼法界宮受法樂内證。遍 T2217_.59.0594b11: 滿生死中利益衆生利他也。爰知自性身 T2217_.59.0594b12: 住加持之時有自他受法樂一切皆無非
T2217_.59.0594b15: 住自性身也。所加持即八葉乃至第四重釋迦 T2217_.59.0594b16: 世天等自他受用變化等流也。攝四重圓壇
T2217_.59.0594b21: 故。本地無相位亡言語。加持身是今經教主 T2217_.59.0594b22: 故云曼荼羅中臺尊也。疏第三云。然以如 T2217_.59.0594b23: 來加持故從佛菩提自證之徳現八葉中臺
T2217_.59.0594b29: 教主義同故云爾也。本地自證位無言語故 T2217_.59.0594c01: 現加持身説今經。故云字門道具足也。故 T2217_.59.0594c02: 經具縁品云。此第一實際以加持力故爲
T2217_.59.0594c06: 身永異受用身以下加持身故云具身加持 T2217_.59.0594c07: 也。然古徳未知自性身中有加持身。或云 T2217_.59.0594c08: 本地自證之境而害經疏自證無言之文。 T2217_.59.0594c09: 或云他受變化之説而同顯教三乘一乘之 T2217_.59.0594c10: 佛。恐隱疏家之深旨失宗家之本意歟。當 T2217_.59.0594c11: 知以中臺尊故不壞大師自性身説法之 T2217_.59.0594c12: 義。又以加持身故不違疏家神力加持三 T2217_.59.0594c13: 昧之説。疏中云本地法身者先擧能現本地 T2217_.59.0594c14: 身爲今教主所依。疏第三云菩提自證徳 T2217_.59.0594c15: 第六云菩提實義是也。具如疏後文中辨 T2217_.59.0594c16: 矣。文點云。次云如來者佛加持身之其所住
T2217_.59.0594c19: 主文句也。住如來下示住所文言也。故知 T2217_.59.0594c20: 以本地身爲教主。故大師以此文判自性 T2217_.59.0594c21: 身説法。然或云加持身或云符同須陀會 T2217_.59.0594c22: 天者神爾不改自性而有利他義。又雖住 T2217_.59.0594c23: 加持自性敢不變。如國王雖出外朝其體 T2217_.59.0594c24: 無替。故云如來金剛幻也。又法身色相無 T2217_.59.0594c25: 比況物故且寄色究竟處示有色相。非全 T2217_.59.0594c26: 隨類應同義耳。木幡義云。薄伽梵者理故 T2217_.59.0594c27: 云本地法身也。如來者即智故云受用身
T2217_.59.0595a04: 受用。又理智相應故云應身。非隨機應現
T2217_.59.0595a07: 爲能住。如一切諸佛説法儀式皆住於應 T2217_.59.0595a08: 身。即本地身爲教主也。推功歸本言法身
T2217_.59.0595a11: 身也。其所住處名佛受用身是智法身自受 T2217_.59.0595a12: 用即所加持身。令一切衆生見開悟三密。
T2217_.59.0595a15: 也。木幡義云。如來心王諸佛者毘盧遮那理 T2217_.59.0595a16: 也。其中者自受用智也。能住理住所住智故 T2217_.59.0595a17: 云住而住也。既遍一切加持力生者。依理 T2217_.59.0595a18: 智冥合加持力生他受用應身人也。理智同 T2217_.59.0595a19: 遍法界人法倶無分限故云遍一切所也。 T2217_.59.0595a20: 即與下釋成生加持身之由*也。而以下釋 T2217_.59.0595a21: 他受用報身義也。此報身義不同如常。如 T2217_.59.0595a22: 先*古徳釋云。大日經教主不二總體本地法
T2217_.59.0595a25: 三摩耶身也。謂理佛羯磨人住智身三形宮 T2217_.59.0595a26: 中也。既遍一切等者從理佛法界加持力生 T2217_.59.0595a27: 三摩耶受用住所也。既與下明所住宮與能 T2217_.59.0595a28: 住法身平等無二也。斯則依正輪圓之法界 T2217_.59.0595a29: 能所瑜伽之佛體故。而以下而實依正無二 T2217_.59.0595b01: 爲自受法樂且示依正*之別。猶如唯識論
T2217_.59.0595b05: 者。理佛云此。是能住故。智體云所住。即所 T2217_.59.0595b06: 居故 問。前云無相法身。今何云具三密 T2217_.59.0595b07: 乎 答。無相者約顯教遮情妄假之相。三密 T2217_.59.0595b08: 即就眞言表徳眞實之體故無違耳。或無相 T2217_.59.0595b09: 不具故云無相也。故疏二十云。此心即佛
T2217_.59.0595b19: 意經文如來者中臺加持身之所住也。故加
T2217_.59.0595b22: 以加持力生中臺藏身也。即與等者。顯此 T2217_.59.0595b23: 所生加持身與本地身無別義也。而以等 T2217_.59.0595b24: 者。如來住神變加持説三密法是遠爲
T2217_.59.0595c01: 者。佛住畢竟無相寂滅之法。以大悲故 T2217_.59.0595c02: 住於三昧令一切大會及無量衆生得見 T2217_.59.0595c03: 此大悲胎藏曼荼羅莊嚴大會嚴妙之法。即 T2217_.59.0595c04: 是於無相中而現有相。雖復有相而從因 T2217_.59.0595c05: 縁生即不生義同於性淨之法。而令衆生 T2217_.59.0595c06: 各隨本縁見種種色聞種種聲獲種種法 T2217_.59.0595c07: 各隨心器如法修行。有如是大因縁故又 T2217_.59.0595c08: 爲滿足金剛手所問之法令明白無餘故
T2217_.59.0595c11: 歟。問。自證無相位言心倶絶歟。答。言心 T2217_.59.0595c12: 倶離而心唯存。問。既云倶離何亦存心 T2217_.59.0595c13: 乎 答。雖離如義及一一心然猶不二心存
T2217_.59.0595c17: 提自心自覺。又不思議疏祕祕中祕釋云。本
T2217_.59.0595c20: 問。若爾與顯乘一心無相爲至極。而成契 T2217_.59.0595c21: 證絶言之義何殊乎 答。彼四言九心分位 T2217_.59.0595c22: 未及如義一一心。況不二心乎 問。若爾無 T2217_.59.0595c23: 相位唯識大無五大乎。答。法佛法爾六大 T2217_.59.0595c24: 自證位本有云六大法身。所以隨縁六大是 T2217_.59.0595c25: 色心無礙唯心唯色。故依唯心*之邊雖云 T2217_.59.0595c26: 不二心於法爾六大全無増減異矣彼本 T2217_.59.0595c27: 不生理自有理智者。理五大智識大也。可 T2217_.59.0595c28: 思之。尋云。能造六大色形有無如何。答。 T2217_.59.0595c29: 木幡義云。隨縁六大色心無礙故雖云識大 T2217_.59.0596a01: 亦有色形五大或無色形法位六大識大 T2217_.59.0596a02: 無色形五大有色形也。私云。若法爾若隨 T2217_.59.0596a03: 縁六大論色形是所生四*曼相也。能造六 T2217_.59.0596a04: 大若識若五大不可有色形堅濕燸動。無礙 T2217_.59.0596a05: 了知性故。實四大亦觸境非顯形二色故。但 T2217_.59.0596a06: 與顯異。彼有爲事法此無爲理性故 T2217_.59.0596a07: 次又釋歎加持住處等者。前擧住處體今歎 T2217_.59.0596a08: 住處徳也。論云。如來加持廣大金剛法界宮
T2217_.59.0596a11: 或又五佛縁起次第轉釋故論疏無c違。例如 T2217_.59.0596a12: 下四種身文轉釋又五字文中轉釋也。又住 T2217_.59.0596a13: 處配五佛是三摩耶身五佛歟。宮閣即如來 T2217_.59.0596a14: 三摩耶形故先徳釋云。法界宮者法界塔婆
T2217_.59.0596a17: 文歟 T2217_.59.0596a18: 此與釋論三種金剛三昧者。智論四十七云。 T2217_.59.0596a19: 問曰。三種三昧何以皆言金剛 答曰。初 T2217_.59.0596a20: 言金剛中言金剛輪後言如金剛。如金剛 T2217_.59.0596a21: 三昧佛説能貫穿一切諸法。亦無不見是 T2217_.59.0596a22: 金剛三昧能通達諸三昧。金剛輪三昧者得 T2217_.59.0596a23: 是三昧即能持諸三昧輪。是皆佛自説義。論 T2217_.59.0596a24: 者攝持義。言如金剛三昧者。能破一切諸 T2217_.59.0596a25: 煩惱結使無有遺餘。譬如釋提桓因手執
T2217_.59.0596a28: 故云大同歟。或終一義大同。意云。三種中
T2217_.59.0596b02: 一自受用遍法界宮。義釋云。大謂無邊際故
T2217_.59.0596b07: *耶 答。別圓兩教通有他受用。今此華藏 T2217_.59.0596b08: 世界圓他受用身土。於一世界分二義更
T2217_.59.0596b11: 即能破之義。法界者廣大*之義。即實智之 T2217_.59.0596b12: 體。宮者無相法身妙住之境心王所都心神 T2217_.59.0596b13: 所宅。此宮是古佛成道之處也。故云宮。隨 T2217_.59.0596b14: 如來所應之處無非是宮。所以名爲金剛
T2217_.59.0596b17: 也。又智證大師遮那土總云他受用土。恐 T2217_.59.0596b18: 非理。兩部經是理智法身境界故。當知大師 T2217_.59.0596b19: 御意此宮下釋成深祕法界宮義。釋論下引 T2217_.59.0596b20: 智度淺略宮簡異密宗義。今此宗下還成密 T2217_.59.0596b21: 乘義也、或所謂以下文述淺略義。所謂是後 T2217_.59.0596b22: 次義故 T2217_.59.0596b23: 古佛成菩提處者。疏第十六云。然此五事仍
T2217_.59.0596b29: 云。古佛成菩提者菩提實義也。疏第六云。謂
T2217_.59.0596c03: 加持身。故對彼云古佛耳 T2217_.59.0596c04: 摩醯首羅天宮者。智論第二云。如摩醯首羅
T2217_.59.0596c14: 釋論云第四禪等者。智論第九云。問曰。何以 T2217_.59.0596c15: 故名爲淨居天梵世天。答曰。第四禪有八 T2217_.59.0596c16: 種。五種是阿那含住處。是名淨居。三種凡夫 T2217_.59.0596c17: 聖人共住。過是八種有十住菩薩住所。亦
T2217_.59.0596c20: 報土。第十地居。爲三界所爲不爾乎。佛地 T2217_.59.0596c21: 論説。此他受用所居淨土爲第十地諸菩薩
T2217_.59.0596c24: 十八住處。無想天廣果天攝。非別處所。既 T2217_.59.0596c25: 云十八住處。復言無想攝廣果天。故自在 T2217_.59.0596c26: 宮非五淨居。若淨居攝處應十七非十八
T2217_.59.0596c29: 今疏意非三界攝。故下文非今説云不獨
T2217_.59.0597a03: 最近北邊布列五淨居衆○阿闍梨言此是 T2217_.59.0597a04: 五那含天子耳。過此以上有菩薩受佛識 T2217_.59.0597a05: 位處。亦名淨居天。多是一生補處菩薩。是
T2217_.59.0597a08: 三引起世經云。他化天上有魔波旬屬他
T2217_.59.0597a11: 上別有魔天處。近他化亦他化攝○依大 T2217_.59.0597a12: 智論。五淨居上別更有一菩薩淨居○是第 T2217_.59.0597a13: 十地菩薩住處。以此通前色界合有二十三
T2217_.59.0597a16: 色天攝也。依之或經云。有妙淨土出過三
T2217_.59.0597a19: 則自顯界外義歟。義章釋文點可讀以此
T2217_.59.0597a22: 今此宗明義等者。開題云。若據淺略義摩
T2217_.59.0597a26: 義者宮者無相法身妙住之境。此宮是古佛
T2217_.59.0597a29: 句深義結文也。然今文重釋前深祕意也。 T2217_.59.0597b01: 今指成佛外迹云深祕。對如常淺略故。若 T2217_.59.0597b02: 不爾者何今云有應之處矣。但上文所謂者 T2217_.59.0597b03: 復次義。非釋成上歟。猶如釋論中本論所 T2217_.59.0597b04: 謂云復次矣。或又轉釋深祕即爲淺略也。 T2217_.59.0597b05: 如疏下云轉釋佛莊嚴藏耳。當知智論義 T2217_.59.0597b06: 爲淺今經義爲深也 T2217_.59.0597b07: 神心所宅者靈明性云神心。即靈知神知義 T2217_.59.0597b08: 也。神心是能住自性理佛也。所宅即所住受 T2217_.59.0597b09: 用智身也 T2217_.59.0597b10: 謂隨如來有應之處等者。自在宮處所不定 T2217_.59.0597b11: 意歟。佛地論第一云。如是淨土爲與三界 T2217_.59.0597b12: 同一處所爲各別*耶。有義各別。有處説 T2217_.59.0597b13: 在淨居天上有處説在西方等故。有義同 T2217_.59.0597b14: 處。淨土周圓無有邊際通法界故。如實 T2217_.59.0597b15: 義者。實受用土周遍法界無處不有。不可 T2217_.59.0597b16: 説言離三界處亦不可説即三界處。若隨 T2217_.59.0597b17: 菩薩所宜現者或在色界淨居天上或在西
T2217_.59.0597b20: 若於毘盧遮那之分爲遍法界第四禪乎。 T2217_.59.0597b21: 答。然也。諮問。若遍法界皆是第四禪者。唯 T2217_.59.0597b22: 有遮那住處應無衆生所居乎。答。遮那 T2217_.59.0597b23: 雖遍法界不妨衆生所住。猶如寂光遍於
T2217_.59.0597b26: 色。首戴髻髮被絹縠衣。此是首陀會天成 T2217_.59.0597b27: 最正覺之幖幟也。彼界諸聖天衆衣服輕妙 T2217_.59.0597b28: 本質嚴淨不復假以外飾故世尊俯同其
T2217_.59.0597c04: 四云。第四禪色究竟天有五種名。一名色究 T2217_.59.0597c05: 竟二名有頂三名須陀會四名魔醯首 T2217_.59.0597c06: 羅五名阿那含天。第四禪主亦名*魔醯首
T2217_.59.0597c10: 身云色究竟。色身究竟體故。故大師釋云。
T2217_.59.0597c14: 令一切入不二之道。理法身佛住如如寂 T2217_.59.0597c15: 照法然常住。不動而動現八葉爲自受用 T2217_.59.0597c16: 示三重曼羅令十界證大空。雖是理
T2217_.59.0597c22: 理智不二之理身説。金剛頂又智理不二之 T2217_.59.0597c23: 智佛談也。故金界遮那以止觀一羽而結智 T2217_.59.0597c24: 印胎藏毘盧以定惠兩手而作定印。甚以 T2217_.59.0597c25: 有深意者歟。又金剛頂經。能住佛身擧智
T2217_.59.0597c29: 有味。深思當見矣。問。諸經中皆以器界爲 T2217_.59.0598a01: 住處。何今以佛身心爲住處*耶。答。凡三 T2217_.59.0598a02: 乘教雖云唯識所變猶論心外之依正。一 T2217_.59.0598a03: 乘宗雖談一心縁起屡滯因海之人法。斯 T2217_.59.0598a04: 則洗滌心外之鑛垢未開心中之祕寶故。 T2217_.59.0598a05: 然今教意性徳本具忽陳恒沙已有速顯。是 T2217_.59.0598a06: 故金剛尼吒天本有衆生心上月輪。胎藏法 T2217_.59.0598a07: 界宮豈非我等胸中之蓮臺。所住是依正輪 T2217_.59.0598a08: 圓之法界。何遙擧鷲峰之岫。能住亦理智瑜 T2217_.59.0598a09: 伽之佛體。誰遠尋鵝王之迹。故經中或云三 T2217_.59.0598a10: 十七尊住心城或云大菩提心光明殿此 T2217_.59.0598a11: 意矣。依之序分六動名六根本煩惱之動搖。 T2217_.59.0598a12: 誰混東涌西沒之奇瑞。流通衆退説皆悉禮 T2217_.59.0598a13: 佛隱而不現。寧同作禮而去之儀式。故大師 T2217_.59.0598a14: 釋云。恒沙眷屬鎭住自心之宮無盡莊嚴優
T2217_.59.0598a17: 三密之法。大師釋云。雙圓性海談四*曼自
T2217_.59.0598a22: 日拜諸佛臆中之曼荼妙雲流傳之時開衆 T2217_.59.0598a23: 生心上之鐵塔。五輪本我身。誰求西土之 T2217_.59.0598a24: 雲。兩部即吾心。何仰東流之風。故今疏中 T2217_.59.0598a25: 釋此中祕密謂心爲佛塔也。金剛頂經中説 T2217_.59.0598a26: 此即毘盧遮那聖衆集會便爲現證率都婆 T2217_.59.0598a27: 塔。可悉之。可悉之。又疏第五釋内心曼荼 T2217_.59.0598a28: 羅云。此是如來祕傳之法。不可形於翰墨。 T2217_.59.0598a29: 故寄在圖像以示行人。若得深意者自當
T2217_.59.0598b03: 信證僧正義云。應有二義。一是符應義二相
T2217_.59.0598b08: 一切持金剛者等者。今持金剛可通菩薩。 T2217_.59.0598b09: 衆成就總句。皆悉衆會是廣故。故住心論第 T2217_.59.0598b10: 十釋今金剛云。金剛者五部諸尊所持法界
T2217_.59.0598b13: 大師釋於金剛部中亦有五部故祕藏記 T2217_.59.0598b14: 云。五部即五智。一智所互具五智。所以成
T2217_.59.0598b17: 剛菩薩列擧云及普賢菩薩等。今文外無菩 T2217_.59.0598b18: 薩總句故。又金剛菩薩名互通故。故疏第 T2217_.59.0598b19: 十二云。復次菩薩身即是金剛之體。而十方 T2217_.59.0598b20: 一切佛同以如來金剛智印授其手故名
T2217_.59.0598b23: 有二重。從心以下諸大眷屬。從心已上諸
T2217_.59.0598b26: 持金剛也。住心論釋又此意矣。故寶鑰云。五
T2217_.59.0598b29: 云其金剛也。或雖通二金剛名近内眷屬 T2217_.59.0598c01: 故從勝云其歟。問。金剛頂經中與九十倶 T2217_.59.0598c02: 胝菩薩衆倶之總句置大摩尼殿後。諸經亦 T2217_.59.0598c03: 爾。何今違顯密諸經例衆成總句安樓閣 T2217_.59.0598c04: 前乎。答。或云。處衆各總別二節故*綺文 T2217_.59.0598c05: 也。私云。處衆交擧而顯依正不二人法一體 T2217_.59.0598c06: 義歟 T2217_.59.0598c07: 兼得淺深二釋者。鈔云。淺謂執持。執持金剛
T2217_.59.0598c10: 剛結於義爲勝文起盡無爭執持相望持金
T2217_.59.0598c13: 云然隨文便 何 答。今持金剛亦兼執義
T2217_.59.0598c16: 持金剛。然今經兼得新舊深淺二釋故隨文
T2217_.59.0598c20: 或示五百塵點歟 T2217_.59.0598c21: 心王所住之處等者。准上文云如來在此宮 T2217_.59.0598c22: 中爲獨處耶下文云心王毘盧遮那可局 T2217_.59.0598c23: 大日一尊。今經教主故。心數又第一重等内 T2217_.59.0598c24: 大眷屬歟。下衆成就文列金剛菩薩故今文 T2217_.59.0598c25: 擧内眷屬顯大眷屬歟。云智印及執金剛 T2217_.59.0598c26: 故。疏第四云。曼荼羅者名聚集。乃至十世界 T2217_.59.0598c27: 微塵數差別智印輪圓輻湊翼輔大日心王。
T2217_.59.0599a03: 云。心王如來大毘盧遮那五智四印及心數
T2217_.59.0599a08: 王如來大毘盧遮那釋薄伽梵句。五智四曼 T2217_.59.0599a09: 釋如來乃至法界文。次下配釋分明故與疏 T2217_.59.0599a10: 釋同。大日普門體故云諸尊徳號。猶如金 T2217_.59.0599a11: 剛頂經一切如來釋大日如來矣。或薄伽梵
T2217_.59.0599a16: 教意帝網瑜伽*故心數心王重重也。故頌云。
T2217_.59.0599a19: 八識心王。別本即身義中。以法界智爲本爲 T2217_.59.0599a20: 證四佛等八識爲心數*耶。實義是互相渉 T2217_.59.0599a21: 入彼此加持故主伴重重王數多多也。雜問答
T2217_.59.0599a24: 餘七十二尊爲心數。約胎藏界五百尊大日
T2217_.59.0599a29: 薩歟。祕藏記云。不動九識其餘十佛刹一
T2217_.59.0599b03: 故 T2217_.59.0599b04: 無不即入金剛界中者。准上文云金剛法界 T2217_.59.0599b05: 宮。指彼宮云金剛界中歟。又第二十卷云。 T2217_.59.0599b06: 一切大會曼荼羅皆是一身無別身也。即普
T2217_.59.0599b09: 名身體也。金剛界儀軌云。應當知自身即
T2217_.59.0599b13: 心王毘盧遮那成自然覺等者。此爲成今經 T2217_.59.0599b14: 説會加持身須先明自證法門身主伴也。故 T2217_.59.0599b15: 云如來内證功徳自證三菩提義也。下卷中
T2217_.59.0599b20: 云。如來妙嚴之相法爾無減。非造作所成
T2217_.59.0599b26: 雖十地菩薩尚非其境界。下卷中。十住菩
T2217_.59.0599b29: 經理佛*云唯佛金界智身云與佛。例如止 T2217_.59.0599c01: 觀唯佛與佛文弘決中釋唯佛釋迦與佛十 T2217_.59.0599c02: 方佛也 T2217_.59.0599c03: 約菩提義等者。抄云。雖法與人能所有異 T2217_.59.0599c04: 然恐難解。謂於曼荼羅中若但置印名法 T2217_.59.0599c05: 曼荼羅。即約菩提義金剛印。若於彼中置 T2217_.59.0599c06: 一切賢聖各持其印依位而住。是約佛陀
T2217_.59.0599c09: 云菩提義。謂自證三菩提故。此自證法門法 T2217_.59.0599c10: 爾所成其性決定不改故云金剛印。非印
T2217_.59.0599c13: 陀義即有無量無邊持金剛者。是即生後也。 T2217_.59.0599c14: 問。第四云。以如是内證之徳無量無邊
T2217_.59.0599c17: 法身三摩地等内證徳也。種子法曼荼羅是 T2217_.59.0599c18: 所現加持身也。四曼身皆説法利生此皆加 T2217_.59.0599c19: 持身故。故即身義云。法身三摩地等亦名
T2217_.59.0599c23: 何皆云智印*耶。答。智所印持故。或與智 T2217_.59.0599c24: 相應故。信進慚等又云智印歟 T2217_.59.0599c25: 由此衆徳等者。此文有二義。一云既云衆 T2217_.59.0599c26: 徳却釋前自證功徳主伴集會義歟。二云 T2217_.59.0599c27: 案經文集會言專指今經會座故。所以約 T2217_.59.0599c28: 佛陀義成衆會義也。又此者目近之辭故。雜 T2217_.59.0599c29: 問答云。此内證境平等界中有過塵數心王 T2217_.59.0600a01: 心數。是會集之義也。此一相平等四種法身 T2217_.59.0600a02: 遍衆生趣説法利益。此説聽處名爲集會
T2217_.59.0600a05: 會義。何今約一人具徳云一切集會*耶。 T2217_.59.0600a06: 答。若少分未等一法未滿等反釋經一切文。 T2217_.59.0600a07: 故知具一切徳。持金剛者一味到實際故 T2217_.59.0600a08: 云皆悉集會歟。或又經疏影略互顯也 T2217_.59.0600a09: 然以自在神力等者。疏第三云。然以如來加 T2217_.59.0600a10: 持故。從佛菩提自證之徳現八葉中胎藏 T2217_.59.0600a11: 身。從金剛密印現第一重金剛手等諸内眷 T2217_.59.0600a12: 屬。從大悲萬行現第二重摩訶薩埵諸大眷 T2217_.59.0600a13: 屬。從普門方便現第三重一切衆生喜見隨 T2217_.59.0600a14: 類之身。若以輪王灌頂方之則第三重如 T2217_.59.0600a15: 萬國君長第二重如朝廷百揆第一重如宗 T2217_.59.0600a16: 枝内弼中胎如垂拱之君。故華臺常智爲大
T2217_.59.0600a19: 即中胎大日非云加持身*耶。疏第六云成 T2217_.59.0600a20: 佛外迹是也。依之疏第四云。大日如來身紫 T2217_.59.0600a21: 磨金色被絹縠衣。此是首陀會天最成正 T2217_.59.0600a22: 覺之幖幟也。如來妙嚴之相法爾無減。非造 T2217_.59.0600a23: 作所成故。十住菩薩猶因承佛神力得見
T2217_.59.0600a27: 異求矣。又般若僧正抄云。加持身者曼荼羅 T2217_.59.0600a28: 中胎尊○亦名字門道具足佛*也。亦名具
T2217_.59.0600b02: 門等也。所現中擧第一重顯二三重眷屬 T2217_.59.0600b03: 也。或又法門眷屬者但智印也。總即別名故。 T2217_.59.0600b04: 問。疏第五云。内心妙白蓮華者是實相自然 T2217_.59.0600b05: 智惠。蓮華葉是大悲方便也。其餘三重是 T2217_.59.0600b06: 從此自證功徳流出諸善知識入法界門
T2217_.59.0600b09: 立名隨宜通而言之。皆法門身。又自證功徳 T2217_.59.0600b10: 也。第三卷中臺八葉云自證約勝。第五三 T2217_.59.0600b11: 重云自證據通門也。故當卷下十九執金 T2217_.59.0600b12: 剛云内證之徳四大菩薩云内證功徳。即 T2217_.59.0600b13: 此意矣。又八葉云大悲者。配因根究竟時 T2217_.59.0600b14: 有此義故歟。疏第二十云。爲以中臺爲菩
T2217_.59.0600b17: 門内自證智遍一切所破諸無明障染義 T2217_.59.0600b18: 名戰具。大空智即戰具名大空戰具。作持 T2217_.59.0600b19: 業釋。或執金剛者各隨一門法界幖幟謂。是
T2217_.59.0600b22: 故云大空。故云一相一味到於實際也。各 T2217_.59.0600b23: 有斷惑功故云戰具也。或又一一智印具 T2217_.59.0600b24: 衆徳而渉入猶如虚空含衆像無礙故云 T2217_.59.0600b25: 大空歟。即身義云法身同虚空而無礙。含
T2217_.59.0600b28: 云大空。虚空遊歩等准知之。擧初二三顯 T2217_.59.0600b29: 餘歟
T2217_.59.0600c11: 建治四年二月七日於醍醐寺中正院加點 T2217_.59.0600c12: 畢 金剛佛子頼瑜 T2217_.59.0600c13: T2217_.59.0600c14: T2217_.59.0600c15: T2217_.59.0600c16: 疏卷第一之三 T2217_.59.0600c17: 次明所住樓閣及師子座者。上法界宮是所 T2217_.59.0600c18: 依國城也。今樓閣即所住堂殿也。故教王
T2217_.59.0600c24: 信解者始從眞正發心等者。智證大師抄云。
T2217_.59.0600c27: 心。二初住已上菩薩初發心。三究竟發心。若 T2217_.59.0600c28: 約實義眞名約究竟而今且依*博地。言眞 T2217_.59.0600c29: 正者所發大心是眞是正不僞不邪故名眞 T2217_.59.0600c30: 正。發此大心位同大覺故名眞正。望前 Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:無/有] [CITE] |