SAT DB

0597頁, c01 行 - 0598頁, a01 行

T1562_.29.0597c01: 説名隨眠。因性恒隨而眠伏故。以契經説幼
T1562_.29.0597c02: 稚童子嬰孩眠病。雖無染欲而有欲貪隨眠隨
T1562_.29.0597c03: 増。此唯説有諸隨眠性。又説一類於多時中
T1562_.29.0597c04: 爲欲貪纒纒心而住。此文唯説有煩惱纒。又
T1562_.29.0597c05: 説一類非於多時爲欲貪纒纒心而住。設心
T1562_.29.0597c06: 暫爾起欲貪纒尋如實知出離方便。彼由此
T1562_.29.0597c07: 故於欲貪纒能正遣除并隨眠斷。此文通説
T1562_.29.0597c08: 纒及隨眠由此故知。現起煩惱煩惱隨界名
T1562_.29.0597c09: 纒隨眠。若隨眠聲目煩惱得此不應理曾無
T1562_.29.0597c10: 説故。又已除遣別有得故如是隨眠以何爲
T1562_.29.0597c11: 體。若彼隨眠以彼爲體。是隨彼法功能性故。
T1562_.29.0597c12: 或此通用四蘊爲體功能隨逐心心所故。此
T1562_.29.0597c13: 相應性亦不相應如諸心所。然其自體不可
T1562_.29.0597c14: 説故而不記別。遣此多同破經主義。再詳仍
T1562_.29.0597c15: 有麁過未除。且彼叙前宗隨眠聲目得。便作
T1562_.29.0597c16: 是斥此不應理。復辨因言曾無＊説故。又已
T1562_.29.0597c17: 除遣別有得故。此因無能隨界同故。謂曾無
T1562_.29.0597c18: 處説隨界名隨眠。不説雖同而許得理勝。以
T1562_.29.0597c19: 契經説并隨眠斷故非無實體。法可與有倶
T1562_.29.0597c20: 斷。由此已遣已遣得言。離得説何爲隨眠性。
T1562_.29.0597c21: 而説遣纒位并隨眠斷耶。非經部師能定顯
T1562_.29.0597c22: 示。此隨眠性是有可斷又非隨眠體。有説。隨
T1562_.29.0597c23: 眠聲故隨眠聲目得無失。謂佛但説有七隨
T1562_.29.0597c24: 眠而隨眠聲有處説色。如契經説。有色隨
T1562_.29.0597c25: 眠。若覺若思便隨増故。如是隨眠得雖非隨
T1562_.29.0597c26: 眠而説隨眠聲理亦爲善。又彼所釋前後相
T1562_.29.0597c27: 違。許貪等言説隨眠故。謂彼先釋貪等非隨
T1562_.29.0597c28: 眠。後釋經言隨眠即貪等。又審思擇上座所
T1562_.29.0597c29: 宗。纒與隨眠斷倶非理。是故應捨隨眠異纒
T1562_.29.0598a01: 倶非理因如後當辯。今引違彼前所引經。謂

Footnote: