大正蔵検索 INBUDS
|
大日經疏指心鈔 (No. 2217_ 頼瑜撰 ) in Vol. 59 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:無/有] [CITE]
T2217_.59.0742a01: 故非盡理也。又觀蘊即空時斷法倒故云 T2217_.59.0742a02: 空。然未空相不可得故非盡理也。非盡理 T2217_.59.0742a03: 者以第二劫中道觀降初劫觀之意也 T2217_.59.0742a04: 今以如幻等門照有空不二等者。唯識宗立
T2217_.59.0742a09: 故離有離無則離言中道也。詮門離言倶非 T2217_.59.0742a10: 偏有偏空。故云空有不二歟。故唯識論第七 T2217_.59.0742a11: 云。我法非有空識非無。離有離無故契中
T2217_.59.0742a14: 有。寂然説空。是偏有偏空也。第二劫説縁 T2217_.59.0742a15: 生中道。故云不二也。又義云。有空觀門一 T2217_.59.0742a16: 念同時故云空有不二歟。唯識章云。由無 T2217_.59.0742a17: 始來執我法爲有撥事理爲空故。此觀中 T2217_.59.0742a18: 遣者空觀對破有執。存者有觀對遣空執。今
T2217_.59.0742b04: 有類空有不二歟。章謂要觀彼遍計所執者 T2217_.59.0742b05: 同疏人法二空之相亦不當心也。以章空爲 T2217_.59.0742b06: 門故人於眞性釋疏眞入法空悟唯識性
T2217_.59.0742b09: 乃名眞入法空悟唯識性者。有空不二者幻 T2217_.59.0742b10: 有空謂眞空。而此有空相性是異故不一。相 T2217_.59.0742b11: 性不離故不異。且約不離云不二也。故上 T2217_.59.0742b12: 文云唯識無境體法難解之空即是麁相轉 T2217_.59.0742b13: 融。唯識無境者幻有。難解之空者眞空。轉融 T2217_.59.0742b14: 者明不二。然帶不一故云麁相。人法二空 T2217_.59.0742b15: 者人法謂初二性。二空謂眞實性。三性妄假 T2217_.59.0742b16: 眞實有空諸相皆不當於心也。故下文結 T2217_.59.0742b17: 此第二劫云然上來原始要終。自發一毫
T2217_.59.0742b23: 先年比以高野山傳法會談義之次草之畢 T2217_.59.0742b24: 文永十年春比託理性院上野公令清書 T2217_.59.0742b25: 畢 T2217_.59.0742b26: 同九月中旬拭老眼加點畢。披覽人必可 T2217_.59.0742b27: 令訪菩提給耳
T2217_.59.0742c01: T2217_.59.0742c02: T2217_.59.0742c03: T2217_.59.0742c04: 疏卷第二之五 T2217_.59.0742c05: 經云。祕密主彼如是捨無我等者。鈔云。疏捨 T2217_.59.0742c06: 無我心主等者。捨者離義。無我者謂前劫離 T2217_.59.0742c07: 倒時有法執當心。故以五喩達諸法即空。 T2217_.59.0742c08: 遣彼法倒。雖遣其有仍滯空相。今第二劫 T2217_.59.0742c09: 以六喩對治前劫即空。既有去空亡方順
T2217_.59.0742c12: 眞入法空悟唯識性義。故云故經云祕密主 T2217_.59.0742c13: 等。不置者字也。宗家御意於第二劫中有 T2217_.59.0742c14: 他縁覺心二心。引前復次大乘行發無縁乘 T2217_.59.0742c15: 心等文證第六住心。又引今彼如是捨無我 T2217_.59.0742c16: 等文證第七住心也。故知今經文更牒釋 T2217_.59.0742c17: 成覺心乘義也。更牒經文作釋時不置者 T2217_.59.0742c18: 字。疏前後例多。故字又屬上段也 問。案經 T2217_.59.0742c19: 文起盡。初大乘行發無縁乘心法無我性者。 T2217_.59.0742c20: 總標。何以故以下別説。如是知自心性下總 T2217_.59.0742c21: 結也。於別説中依何以故徴問設答釋。中 T2217_.59.0742c22: 初擧古昔菩薩修行成三界唯心義。後明 T2217_.59.0742c23: 此唯心者捨初劫即空無我而成縁生中道 T2217_.59.0742c24: 即心無我性也。故云彼如是等。非指上義 T2217_.59.0742c25: 乎。故疏釋中初標第二重法無我性釋二段 T2217_.59.0742c26: 文畢云更作一轉開明倍勝於前劫。指第二 T2217_.59.0742c27: 劫望初劫云一轉。定知非有二心勝劣 T2217_.59.0742c28: 也。故六無畏中法無我無畏存他縁覺心。未 T2217_.59.0742c29: 開二重淺深乎。又疏下擧寶珠譬喩示修 T2217_.59.0743a01: 行次第出三重之心盡三劫之旨。然第二重 T2217_.59.0743a02: 但擧無縁乘無示覺心。又疏第三擧十六 T2217_.59.0743a03: 重阿闍梨時。證寂然阿闍梨後擧覺心不生 T2217_.59.0743a04: 阿闍梨。不出無縁乘心。爰知無縁覺心一重 T2217_.59.0743a05: 心非二種心也。是以安然教時義第二難大 T2217_.59.0743a06: 師意云。經中觀蘊阿頼耶乃至心主自在覺 T2217_.59.0743a07: 自心本不生越二劫行文。義釋以爲一種阿 T2217_.59.0743a08: 闍梨亦攝諸經八識三性三無性等。此法相 T2217_.59.0743a09: 宗所用經論。而海和尚以觀蘊阿頼耶等名 T2217_.59.0743a10: 無縁大乘心攝法相宗。以心主自在覺自心
T2217_.59.0743a13: 無我觀解。惑品又細妄執一種也。若惑智無 T2217_.59.0743a14: 勝劣。誰信住心淺深耶。況復大師所成色 T2217_.59.0743a15: 即是空諸法亦爾之義不超他縁大乘之談。 T2217_.59.0743a16: 他縁乘又言如幻依他即圓成空理故。若爾 T2217_.59.0743a17: 於一文一義之中何開覺心不生之重哉。 T2217_.59.0743a18: 如何。答。宗家依大日經菩提心論立十住 T2217_.59.0743a19: 心。非無起盡也。其中於第二劫開二心。 T2217_.59.0743a20: 經疏起盡明鏡也。謂他縁心文説觀蘊阿頼 T2217_.59.0743a21: 耶知自性等明業種生有爲識。是則法相所 T2217_.59.0743a22: 明眞異熟識也。故疏云知自性者明蘊阿頼
T2217_.59.0743a25: 法藏章云。若依始教。於阿頼耶但得一分
T2217_.59.0743a28: 如來藏眞識也。此宗以無爲眞理爲第八。 T2217_.59.0743a29: 故云心本不生。又此心理與七轉妄心和合 T2217_.59.0743b01: 非一非異故云心主自在也。故嘉祥勝鬘寶 T2217_.59.0743b02: 崛云。佛性與六七妄心和合生時不可眞 T2217_.59.0743b03: 外求妄妄外求眞。故言不異。而妄盡眞顯
T2217_.59.0743b06: 又有經説云。是故七識有生有滅。如來藏者
T2217_.59.0743b19: 既遣境遺智。所以如滯有無。又許有爲智 T2217_.59.0743b20: 體故心不免罣礙。今覺心乘境智皆亡。何 T2217_.59.0743b21: 智滯有無。自心即如。寧心有罣礙乎。既悟 T2217_.59.0743b22: 境智倶眞空而凝然不生故立覺心不生稱
T2217_.59.0743b25: 向記。故不可説是本性常。許從因生説
T2217_.59.0743c02: 但至難者經疏了簡不可然。其故二段文 T2217_.59.0743c03: 各有標釋。總合成標釋等義耶。所以二段 T2217_.59.0743c04: 各總説初置祕密主言。又各別説初存何以 T2217_.59.0743c05: 故句。故疏中二段文各別牒釋。若爾覺心文 T2217_.59.0743c06: 義既全別。何致二心無別難乎。次彼如是 T2217_.59.0743c07: 者。彼者指覺心乘行者也捨無我者今此心 T2217_.59.0743c08: 捨他縁心法無我故云爾也意云。如彼他 T2217_.59.0743c09: 縁乘行人捨即空法無我觀即心法無我。覺 T2217_.59.0743c10: 心行人捨蘊頼耶無我證覺心不生無我。故 T2217_.59.0743c11: 云彼如是也。又一轉開明者應有多意。二 T2217_.59.0743c12: 心雖異第二一劫故且云一轉也。非無二 T2217_.59.0743c13: 心淺深矣。又云。他縁心既勝初劫。覺心更勝 T2217_.59.0743c14: 故云倍勝也。又云。於第二劫中二心相望 T2217_.59.0743c15: 覺心勝他縁故云一轉。彌成覺心別重也。 T2217_.59.0743c16: 他縁半劫云前劫。例如望前二劫中一道 T2217_.59.0743c17: 心耳。六無畏文者開合隨宜。彼法無我義 T2217_.59.0743c18: 同故雖立一種無畏。非不存二心別。例如 T2217_.59.0743c19: 第二第三劫同雖所知障有細極異矣。又 T2217_.59.0743c20: 如寂然智法無我爲第二劫所離矣。又寶珠 T2217_.59.0743c21: 譬文幷深行阿闍梨説者擧一顯一。或又開 T2217_.59.0743c22: 合隨宜歟。故寶珠譬三重心中不示寂然。 T2217_.59.0743c23: 十六重中彼爲一重。故知出沒隨宜歟。況 T2217_.59.0743c24: 復十六重中前六重是六無畏也。然六無畏 T2217_.59.0743c25: 第五無縁覺心倶擧。故擧他縁攝覺心也。 T2217_.59.0743c26: 若安然不分二心淺深唯爲法相一重。三 T2217_.59.0743c27: 論宗是三劫不攝法門歟。如何。恐不合疏 T2217_.59.0743c28: 意者歟。又至惑智倶一重者法門廢立非 T2217_.59.0743c29: 一。三劫相望時雖惑智同爲一種。住心對 T2217_.59.0744a01: 辨日非斷證是無二重。例如麁妄執中或
T2217_.59.0744a05: 言獨覺心之談永超他縁也。其故法相家遣 T2217_.59.0744a06: 相證性觀門前都雖遣依他之假相。能觀正 T2217_.59.0744a07: 智尚留眞空外存體。既有爲無爲各別境智 T2217_.59.0744a08: 不混。豈會諸法亦爾之詞乎。覺心乘起實 T2217_.59.0744a09: 智見中道理時萬法皆歸眞空。自心即如 T2217_.59.0744a10: 也。何物不爾。故云諸法亦爾也。故大師叙
T2217_.59.0744a13: 以何者。疏第三云。如説觀蘊阿頼耶覺自
T2217_.59.0744a16: 寶性勝鬘等義證覺心義爲勝劣二心明 T2217_.59.0744a17: 證乎。又經疏文起盡未必見二重。所以彼 T2217_.59.0744a18: 如是者彼指上所擧法。猶如彼出世間心及 T2217_.59.0744a19: 彼離違順八心何指未擧之法乎。故知彼
T2217_.59.0744a22: 二故云不滯有無等也。又第八識是種子 T2217_.59.0744a23: 識能成流轉還滅故。經云心王自在疏云 T2217_.59.0744a24: 所爲妙業隨意能成也。又心本不生者識相 T2217_.59.0744a25: 識性雖識中約識性邊云爾。故上文云眞 T2217_.59.0744a26: 入法空悟唯識性。即此意也。故知他縁覺心 T2217_.59.0744a27: 文言雖異義理是一。依之第三劫釋云。前劫 T2217_.59.0744a28: 悟萬法唯心心外無法。今觀此心即是如來
T2217_.59.0744b02: 第三劫淺深何異耶。故疏第三立三種幻 T2217_.59.0744b03: 中。第二劫但名即心幻。又萬法唯心意哉。如 T2217_.59.0744b04: 何。答。二心勝劣如先成矣。所以深密唯識 T2217_.59.0744b05: 勝鬘寶性等經論性相二宗依據顯密一同之 T2217_.59.0744b06: 掟權實二宗之理也。疏家引憑非無所由。宗 T2217_.59.0744b07: 家釋義甚有深意者歟。是以唯識論第三引 T2217_.59.0744b08: 大乘阿毘達磨經云。無始時來界一切法等
T2217_.59.0744b20: 論宗所依。何不解其義乎。故云即攝八識 T2217_.59.0744b21: 三性等。意疏第二且約他縁乘故至第三
T2217_.59.0744b26: 經。今云諸經。故通性相二宗經説八識三
T2217_.59.0744b29: 依經論別擧故。或又上雖擧他縁覺心下 T2217_.59.0744c01: 且約他縁云八識三無性也。何分八識三 T2217_.59.0744c02: 無性成二宗義。三無性專出深密唯識故。 T2217_.59.0744c03: 又他縁乘意雖空有不二三性終別即滯有 T2217_.59.0744c04: 無。雖理智平等心境不混。豈無罣礙乎。或 T2217_.59.0744c05: 云。三論家雖煩惱性空即眞理未云眞如
T2217_.59.0744c12: 爲不思議常不思議無常故云不滯有無心無 T2217_.59.0744c13: 罣礙所爲妙業隨意能成也。依之大乘玄二 T2217_.59.0744c14: 智義云。眞故無有雖無而有。即是不動眞 T2217_.59.0744c15: 際而建立諸法。俗故無無雖有而無。是不
T2217_.59.0744c18: 不累於有故不常。不滯於無故非斷即
T2217_.59.0744c21: 他縁心指覺心云彼如是也。例如對今大 T2217_.59.0744c22: 乘行云如彼往昔等矣。又至第三劫文釋 T2217_.59.0744c23: 者。唯心言雖同事理心異故。又自然智心不 T2217_.59.0744c24: 生文似同意是異。覺心乘雖許眞妄和合。
T2217_.59.0744c29: 爾也。故彼具釋云。今觀此心即是如來自然
T2217_.59.0745a04: 心主即心王也等者。今此文中有二。初釋 T2217_.59.0745a05: 心主自在文。後心王猶如下釋覺自心本不 T2217_.59.0745a06: 生句也。以不滯有無等者光明山義云。前無 T2217_.59.0745a07: 縁乘心纔雖空境界尚存能證之心智。故 T2217_.59.0745a08: 猶如滯有無。又許有爲智體故心不免罣 T2217_.59.0745a09: 礙。今至覺心乘境智皆亡。何智滯有無。自 T2217_.59.0745a10: 心即如。寧心有罣礙乎。既悟境智倶眞空 T2217_.59.0745a11: 而凝然不生。約此心本眞空之義更立覺心
T2217_.59.0745a14: 有不明。復見空未盡。今以如幻等門照
T2217_.59.0745a17: 耶。況復如所成者第三劫觀解也。故下文 T2217_.59.0745a18: 云。前劫悟萬法唯心。今觀此心以心實相
T2217_.59.0745a21: 第三劫境智倶實相談何異乎。答。私云。望 T2217_.59.0745a22: 第三劫時雖云唯萬法唯心一重。於第二 T2217_.59.0745a23: 劫内細論日非無淺深。事理心異心本不生 T2217_.59.0745a24: 義唯局覺心。故心體自如義與他縁異。故 T2217_.59.0745a25: 宗家以菩提心論心體自如不見心身之文 T2217_.59.0745a26: 證此心矣。但至難者覺心乘雖心體自如 T2217_.59.0745a27: 未談心外影像自如。故云漸入阿字。未云 T2217_.59.0745a28: 皆入阿字。故下第三劫釋云。以心如是故 T2217_.59.0745a29: 諸法亦如是。根塵皆入阿字門。影像不出
T2217_.59.0745b03: 心乘意談眞如縁起義耶。答。木幡義云。雖
T2217_.59.0745b11: 常義也。又至智論文者彼論次下云。無爲
T2217_.59.0745b14: 心王猶如池水性本清淨等者。或云心王者 T2217_.59.0745b15: 第八識。心數者七轉識也。下水波喩准楞伽 T2217_.59.0745b16: 藏海識浪之文。故七轉云心數。是性相分岐 T2217_.59.0745b17: 故。或云。心王者八識心王也。心數者貪等也。
T2217_.59.0745b20: 證文故。又八識倶常住者違楞伽等文。故又 T2217_.59.0745b21: 違嘉祥等釋。故釋論攝相歸性意也。故勝鬘
T2217_.59.0745b24: 自性清淨而客塵煩惱上煩惱所染不思議
T2217_.59.0745b27: 客塵者經客塵煩惱等也。即七轉相應貪等 T2217_.59.0745b28: 煩惱也。又准下文者亦有境界風無塵染。 T2217_.59.0745b29: 前後兩段影略互顯矣。意云。第八識本覺心 T2217_.59.0745c01: 水依境風動。是所縁縛也。數塵被染。即相 T2217_.59.0745c02: 應縛也。自性清淨心依相應所縁二縛而成
T2217_.59.0745c05: 之池水本淨。七轉離垢清淨故喩之客塵清 T2217_.59.0745c06: 淨。七轉離垢清淨即歸第八自性清淨。無 T2217_.59.0745c07: 別體故。云證此性淨時覺心本不生也。故 T2217_.59.0745c08: 大師叙此心云。心王自在得本性之水。心
T2217_.59.0745c12: 有相性。性喩水相譬波。心數類客塵故云
T2217_.59.0745c17: 經疏起盡壞總別二段。何以故已下牒經別 T2217_.59.0745c18: 説文。疏作釋。依無者字經文濫疏釋歟。 T2217_.59.0745c19: 所謂何以故至不可得故。是牒經文也。故 T2217_.59.0745c20: 經具文云。何以故。祕密主心前後際不可得
T2217_.59.0745c23: 説中心王亦復如是者合上海水。無前後際 T2217_.59.0745c24: 以前後際斷者先釋心王離起滅也雖復遇 T2217_.59.0745c25: 境界風從縁起滅者第八眞識縁六塵成七 T2217_.59.0745c26: 轉妄心義也。合上波浪以從縁起故即是先 T2217_.59.0745c27: 無後無文也。譬中但擧識浪合中偏説境 T2217_.59.0745c28: 風。互顯而譬合周備矣。故知以七轉識類波 T2217_.59.0745c29: 浪也。而心性常無生滅者合上而水性以下 T2217_.59.0746a01: 文。第八心體隨境界縁轉作七轉妄心。心
T2217_.59.0746a04: 常住。境界風所轉種種諸識浪騰躍而轉生。 T2217_.59.0746a05: 如海水起波浪非異非不異。佛性亦爾。心 T2217_.59.0746a06: 倶和合亦非異非不異。如是一切。故知眞妄
T2217_.59.0746a09: 而妄盡眞顯故言非不異。亦可在縁常靜故
T2217_.59.0746a13: 下又似疏而水性不爾以下文。合文亦爾也。 T2217_.59.0746a14: 斯則明妄盡眞顯波滅水存義也。但正釋順 T2217_.59.0746a15: 譬説。亦可釋會合説耳。又法藏釋云。經云。 T2217_.59.0746a16: 如來藏者不在阿梨耶中。是故七識有生有 T2217_.59.0746a17: 滅。如來藏者不生不滅。解云。此中唯生滅是 T2217_.59.0746a18: 七識。唯不生滅是如來藏。二義既分遂使梨 T2217_.59.0746a19: 耶無別自體。故云不在中。此約不一義説 T2217_.59.0746a20: 非謂不和合。何以故。此中如來藏不生滅 T2217_.59.0746a21: 即七識之不生滅故。與自生滅不一也。七 T2217_.59.0746a22: 識生滅即如來藏不生滅故。與自不生滅亦
T2217_.59.0746a25: 八云。行陀羅尼菩薩聞是阿字即時入一切
T2217_.59.0746a28: 字一無生門。故經云。四十二字皆歸阿字也
T2217_.59.0746b02: 初門。故云漸入歟。故上文云心王自在即是
T2217_.59.0746b08: 義對第七但約心本不生。第八根塵亦入 T2217_.59.0746b09: 阿字不生故云皆入。若望眞言猶是應漸 T2217_.59.0746b10: 入義歟 T2217_.59.0746b11: 塵沙上煩惱等者。第二劫細妄執唯約法執 T2217_.59.0746b12: 所知障故云塵沙等也。故起信論云。過恒 T2217_.59.0746b13: 沙等上煩惱依無明起差別。我見愛染煩惱
T2217_.59.0746b20: 僞衆生。不思議變易死者謂阿羅漢辟支佛
T2217_.59.0746b25: 自在菩薩爲證如來功徳法身第一彼岸有 T2217_.59.0746b26: 四種障。何等爲四。一者縁相。一者因相。三 T2217_.59.0746b27: 生相。四壞相縁相者。謂無明住地。即此無明 T2217_.59.0746b28: 住地與行作縁如無明縁行。無明住地縁亦 T2217_.59.0746b29: 如是故。因相者。謂無明住地縁行。即此無 T2217_.59.0746c01: 明住地縁爲因。如行縁識。無漏業縁亦如 T2217_.59.0746c02: 是故。生相者。謂無明住地縁依無漏業因 T2217_.59.0746c03: 生三種意生身。如四種取縁依有漏業因而 T2217_.59.0746c04: 生三界。三種意生身生亦如是故。壞相者。 T2217_.59.0746c05: 謂三種意生身縁不可思議變易死。如依生 T2217_.59.0746c06: 縁故有老死。三種意生身縁不可思議變易
T2217_.59.0746c09: 有四種怨障。由此四怨障故不得如來法
T2217_.59.0746c25: 性論曰四怨障。寶性論云四種障。如文 T2217_.59.0746c26: 可知耳。問。引勝鬘・寶性等無爲生死義證 T2217_.59.0746c27: 何義耶。答。光明山義云。謂覺眞如不生時 T2217_.59.0746c28: 知此眞心所變之妄法變易生死因縁所生 T2217_.59.0746c29: 皆生滅法也。今且明祕宗義故此中彼法 T2217_.59.0747a01: 不詳説耳。或又勝鬘所説無爲生死者實是
T2217_.59.0747a04: 隨縁起滅而心性常無生滅。覺此心本不
T2217_.59.0747a07: 念雜起見心性不生者至界外變易位方始 T2217_.59.0747a08: 發此皆。界内分段生之中惠解麁淺故。纔雖 T2217_.59.0747a09: 聞其理未預證見之分。故覺心不生之心 T2217_.59.0747a10: 於變易分齊談之。所以取勝鬘變易生死 T2217_.59.0747a11: 七識生滅如來藏識不生不滅之説爲此宗 T2217_.59.0747a12: 所依也。寶性論等中説三種意生身引爲
T2217_.59.0747a15: 下文中世間八心云一毫善。故覺心云終。第 T2217_.59.0747a16: 二劫滿故。又義云。第二心乃至第九心云始 T2217_.59.0747a17: 終歟。又義云。第一乃至第九云始終。故大
T2217_.59.0747a20: 心外之垢。非九種心拂外塵之義乎。又大 T2217_.59.0747a21: 師釋云。九種住心無自性。轉深轉妙皆是因
T2217_.59.0747a27: 本熏習之力故即自心中厭生死苦求涅槃
T2217_.59.0747b01: 超度人法有無二障者。唯識章云。由無始來 T2217_.59.0747b02: 執我法爲有撥事理爲空故。此觀中遣者
T2217_.59.0747b09: 法有無二障歟。或又我法二種倶情有理無 T2217_.59.0747b10: 法故云爾歟 T2217_.59.0747b11: 尚未開此心中祕密等者。有多意。或云。但第 T2217_.59.0747b12: 八心云祕密不思議事也。覺心一道續生次
T2217_.59.0747b21: 宗故云心中祕密也。故從此已後方乃説之
T2217_.59.0747b24: 也。顯密雖異理祕密義同故。所謂理祕密是 T2217_.59.0747b25: 意地觀門故云心中祕密也。況復非無文
T2217_.59.0747b28: 遠之身寂光海會。乃至不退諸菩薩亦復不
T2217_.59.0747c08: 覺心已後云内。疏第三云。即是無縁乘心法
T2217_.59.0747c13: 開題云。空性等虚空融境智而知一實。然
T2217_.59.0747c20: 地玄隔。具如即身義抄。然三義中第三爲勝。
T2217_.59.0747c23: 中矣。但大師釋疏家宗家影略互顯歟 T2217_.59.0747c24: 常情各翫先習等者。如常顯乘云常情及先 T2217_.59.0747c25: 習也。微妙者眞言也。今約迂迴行者作如 T2217_.59.0747c26: 此説歟 T2217_.59.0747c27: 眞言門修行菩薩行等者。疏釋云。先歎其功
T2217_.59.0748a07: 諸菩薩句經釋全同矣。次若見此心明道時 T2217_.59.0748a08: 者釋經具修諸行也。經云。此菩薩淨菩提心
T2217_.59.0748a13: 具修諸行也。淨菩提心法明道名異義同故。
T2217_.59.0748a23: 八九十三種住心功徳。將如何。答。重譽義云。 T2217_.59.0748a24: 經説第二劫覺心不生畢次文云眞言門修 T2217_.59.0748a25: 行菩薩行。故祕密外有一道極無不許也。今 T2217_.59.0748a26: 經以一道極無二心雖唯關眞言行隱不 T2217_.59.0748a27: 説顯教所談。以實言之顯教亦有故。大師
T2217_.59.0748b02: 義。即一道極無是也。若據大師御心。從此 T2217_.59.0748b03: 下三箇住心也。然約本經文者。總標彼三
T2217_.59.0748b07: 範義云。今眞言門菩薩者唯第十心眞言行 T2217_.59.0748b08: 菩薩也。然前二劫中雖有顯密二人。望第 T2217_.59.0748b09: 十心疎遠故。顯爲表密爲裏。此第三劫雖 T2217_.59.0748b10: 有三箇心。隣第十妄執盡處故。密爲表顯
T2217_.59.0748b13: 第十唯密也。若眞言行者住心八九則三心倶 T2217_.59.0748b14: 歎之。若指如常佛華法華者但可歎第十
T2217_.59.0748b17: 大師證淺略義故。若爾歎徳總句正歎如常 T2217_.59.0748b18: 佛華法華。兼可歎祕密乎。故知上諸義皆不 T2217_.59.0748b19: 會文理。如何 答。上所擧古徳義皆有其理。 T2217_.59.0748b20: 取捨任意矣。私云。於此經文疏家作二釋。 T2217_.59.0748b21: 先釋意經文擧顯乘僧祇之功徳示眞言行 T2217_.59.0748b22: 者之頓成也。故疏意云。此教餘教相對而明 T2217_.59.0748b23: 此教菩薩直以眞言爲乘見心明道時餘教 T2217_.59.0748b24: 菩薩僧祇福智自然具足義也。故疏云。歎入
T2217_.59.0748b28: 劫通三種心也。又復次釋意今一段經文唯 T2217_.59.0748b29: 局第十無雜擧顯乘。無量那由他劫者眞 T2217_.59.0748c01: 言行者所度妄執也。或眞言行者自證滿已 T2217_.59.0748c02: 果後化他經僧祇故也。故復次釋法譬各置 T2217_.59.0748c03: 雖未言顯眞言行者終可經劫數也。故知二 T2217_.59.0748c04: 義雖異倶唯歎眞言行者徳也。難云。凡經 T2217_.59.0748c05: 疏意三劫顯乘爲本十地密宗爲要。大師十 T2217_.59.0748c06: 住心又此意也。若如所立者。第三劫唯密行 T2217_.59.0748c07: 非顯乘耶。答。於第三劫中有三箇住心。總 T2217_.59.0748c08: 標句但説眞言行別釋文明如常八九也。 T2217_.59.0748c09: 大師三種住心引證分明故。所謂爲歎眞言 T2217_.59.0748c10: 行徳擧所對顯乘也。所謂已下別説委釋 T2217_.59.0748c11: 成所對顯乘義顯八九淺深也。所謂經中總 T2217_.59.0748c12: 標句所對顯乘三乘一乘中未聞何教。故今
T2217_.59.0748c15: 文明第十。所謂以下八九説文。三段各別也。
T2217_.59.0748c19: 在世耳。但眞言行者雖可居三劫後。初擧 T2217_.59.0748c20: 者第三劫是隣第十心同眞言初門故。第 T2217_.59.0748c21: 三劫初殊歎眞言行者徳爲令佛華法華見 T2217_.59.0748c22: 聞者於祕密生信樂尊重心也。故疏云。欲
T2217_.59.0748c25: 爾他縁覺心眞諦廢詮第一義離言又同眞 T2217_.59.0748c26: 言初門。何於第二劫初無此句乎。答。眞言 T2217_.59.0748c27: 立教有二意。横二教對辨竪十住心續生也。 T2217_.59.0748c28: 十住心轉生迂迴行者從顯一乘必迴入眞 T2217_.59.0748c29: 言也。三妄盡處故例如彼華嚴宗中迴小入 T2217_.59.0749a01: 大迴三入一也。故香象釋云。謂諸二乘以 T2217_.59.0749a02: 根鈍故。要先迴入共教大乘捨二乘名得
T2217_.59.0749a06: 警誘故起他縁大乘心。他縁大乘人願最勝 T2217_.59.0749a07: 果故起覺心不生心。覺心不生人無自性 T2217_.59.0749a08: 故起一道如實心。一道如實人蒙諸佛驚覺 T2217_.59.0749a09: 故發極無自性心。極無自性人願究竟最勝
T2217_.59.0749a12: 意三乘教又直入眞言歟。例如彼華嚴清
T2217_.59.0749a18: 歎第十也。又義云。於眞言行有淺略深祕 T2217_.59.0749a19: 二義。深祕行下十地文是也。故准金剛頂十
T2217_.59.0749a22: 各自乘爲極。密遠期祕密莊嚴。如次總句 T2217_.59.0749a23: 中餘教此教類舟車神通是也。所謂已下文 T2217_.59.0749a24: 雙釋顯密二義。十住心中淺略亦有二義 T2217_.59.0749a25: 故。大師引此文證八九心也。故疏中釋第 T2217_.59.0749a26: 八第九文云行者。非眞言行者乎。故知淺 T2217_.59.0749a27: 略門顯密雖異倶一心觀解非深祕三密行 T2217_.59.0749a28: 故云淺略耳 T2217_.59.0749a29: 欲明超第三劫之心等者。於今經文有二 T2217_.59.0749b01: 意。謂或八九十三心皆爲欲顯超第三劫 T2217_.59.0749b02: 之心也。或三心中遲速相對歎密行菩薩徳。 T2217_.59.0749b03: 而爲欲令未來見聞者生信重心故。先歎
T2217_.59.0749b06: 當機一衆。何云未來機乎。答。今此會中無 T2217_.59.0749b07: 正被教因人故約未來人也。故聖位經云。
T2217_.59.0749b11: 如餘教中菩薩行於方便對治道等者。疏第 T2217_.59.0749b12: 一云。如餘乘菩薩志求無上菩提種種勤 T2217_.59.0749b13: 苦不惜身命經無數阿僧祇劫或有成佛 T2217_.59.0749b14: 或不成佛者。今此眞言門菩薩若能不虧 T2217_.59.0749b15: 法則方便修行乃至於此生中逮見無盡莊 T2217_.59.0749b16: 嚴加持境界。非但現前而已。若欲超昇佛
T2217_.59.0749b26: 皆經之矣。問。若經十地何言不歴劫數。 T2217_.59.0749b27: 答。雖經十地而不相似餘教菩薩種種苦 T2217_.59.0749b28: 行不惜身命如是經歴阿僧祇劫或有成
T2217_.59.0749c02: 好後雜諸惡。時時生念。我求佛道以諸功 T2217_.59.0749c03: 徳迴向阿耨多羅三藐三菩提。是人久久無
T2217_.59.0749c06: 劫之後證二空眞如中道。此即寂然界心他 T2217_.59.0749c07: 縁大乘覺心不生所證也。若今宗菩薩以眞 T2217_.59.0749c08: 言爲所乘入菩薩十信位之後。極速人一 T2217_.59.0749c09: 生證淨菩提心。但顯教菩薩無量劫證眞如 T2217_.59.0749c10: 與祕密教菩薩一生入淨菩提心同是初地 T2217_.59.0749c11: 位也。故云。至到之處雖則無異而所乘法有
T2217_.59.0749c14: 云。五祕密文顯教者他縁覺心也。彼宗經三 T2217_.59.0749c15: 僧祇故。私云。疏及經顯教對治道者通三乘 T2217_.59.0749c16: 一乘。對祕宗故。又譬中舟車神通同度五 T2217_.59.0749c17: 百由旬到初地寶所故。度五百由旬舟車 T2217_.59.0749c18: 豈唯三乘耶。故五百由旬出法華中。又大師
T2217_.59.0749c21: 唯六七心也。但至五祕經文者一僧祇福智 T2217_.59.0749c22: 者度第三劫所得福智也。故指第三劫云
T2217_.59.0749c25: 非三乘教所經三祇也。彼三祇大經第二劫 T2217_.59.0749c26: 攝故。又義。餘教對治道者但指天台華嚴 T2217_.59.0749c27: 也。謂第三劫有三心中顯密相對明遲速 T2217_.59.0749c28: 也。既云舟車神通至到一處。第二劫三乘何 T2217_.59.0749c29: 不度極細而到初地寶所乎。就中五百由 T2217_.59.0750a01: 句譬專法華華嚴所用也。況復大師釋今經 T2217_.59.0750a02: 文云。問。抑今無數劫者三劫之中何劫。答。
T2217_.59.0750a05: 三乘談。爾何。答。顯密相對時設雖一乘何 T2217_.59.0750a06: 不屬僧祇。告成三大爲限釋無異論歟。況
T2217_.59.0750a09: 得至菩提或不至人也。又依前義或至是 T2217_.59.0750a10: 一乘或不至三乘。第二劫故。又或云。五百由 T2217_.59.0750a11: 旬中三百由旬度三界義。二百由旬度二乘 T2217_.59.0750a12: 菩薩之義。寶處是一乘也。約迴三入一機 T2217_.59.0750a13: 云至到一處歟。若爾僧祇對治道是唯三乘
T2217_.59.0750a18: 因。皆是地前也。第十即果。即地上也。竪論 T2217_.59.0750a19: 次第淺深皆是眞言地前行相也。横觀智智
T2217_.59.0750a22: 眞言不共談也。智智平等無淺深故。皆眞言 T2217_.59.0750a23: 十地具徳不論地前歟。故疏第三云。又令
T2217_.59.0750a26: 心平等無勝劣之想輒從一門而入皆見
T2217_.59.0750b10: 故 T2217_.59.0750b11: 得達五百由旬者。法華經第三云。譬如五百 T2217_.59.0750b12: 由旬險難惡道曠絶無人怖畏之處。若有多 T2217_.59.0750b13: 衆欲過此道至珍寶處。我等疲極今欲退 T2217_.59.0750b14: 還。導師方便過三百由旬化作一城可隨
T2217_.59.0750b17: 是表三界二乘也。三百由旬化城者越三界 T2217_.59.0750b18: 住二乘果也。過二百由旬到寶處是改二 T2217_.59.0750b19: 乘心入一乘義也。天台嘉祥等釋可見 T2217_.59.0750b20: 及至到之處雖則無異者。或云。以開會意 T2217_.59.0750b21: 云至到無異也。故疏第一云。究竟同歸本
T2217_.59.0750b24: 寶。故云至到一處也。故下文云。而獲寶終
T2217_.59.0750b27: 提心有遮表。顯乘極果寄當密宗遮情。故
T2217_.59.0750c01: 教相對釋意結成也。如上諸心相者指覺心
T2217_.59.0750c04: 有人云。諸心相者上三劫也。如是境界者彼 T2217_.59.0750c05: 各各極位也。眞言三劫共行之時。見彼如情 T2217_.59.0750c06: 淺略他縁覺心等各留自乘極果。眞言行者 T2217_.59.0750c07: 經過彼道故彼未到處想已到不可稽留
T2217_.59.0750c10: 齊何但局八九矣。但説文在後者別説雖 T2217_.59.0750c11: 在後而在所對總標。何不云如上乎。又文 T2217_.59.0750c12: 雖安後意在上。故大師引證即此意矣。或 T2217_.59.0750c13: 又但第三劫之心云諸心相歟。意云。謂如 T2217_.59.0750c14: 常途八九證此心爲佛也。眞言行菩薩誤
T2217_.59.0750c17: 者。教者教誡也。爲教二字但被諸觀行人讀
T2217_.59.0750c20: 云。爲令眞言行人若行至如是境界須明
T2217_.59.0750c23: 留滯。今文見顯乘稽留勸誡眞言行者也。 T2217_.59.0750c24: 隨義轉用矣。謂淨菩提心至到之處若望顯 T2217_.59.0750c25: 教雖是寶處於眞言是中途故云中路稽 T2217_.59.0750c26: 留也。若行至如是境界時者至初地菩提心 T2217_.59.0750c27: 境界之義也。又義。觀行人往至淨菩提心境
T2217_.59.0751a02: 結前段非勸誡也。未到下文結餘教菩薩 T2217_.59.0751a03: 也。此義麁劣也。不得是被下句辭字也。何 T2217_.59.0751a04: 指法乎 T2217_.59.0751a05: 復次如輪王太子等者。光明山義云。顯教菩 T2217_.59.0751a06: 薩發心已後經一阿僧祇登初地故。阿僧 T2217_.59.0751a07: 祇劫間於無量有情所行布施修忍辱。如 T2217_.59.0751a08: 是無數劫間經一一事具殖福智資糧。所 T2217_.59.0751a09: 以如習衆藝。密教菩薩發心已後極速乃至 T2217_.59.0751a10: 一生入淨菩提心。所經時分甚短促故於無 T2217_.59.0751a11: 量有情所不能行布施愛語等。是以疏云。 T2217_.59.0751a12: 未於阿僧祇劫具備普賢行滿足大悲方 T2217_.59.0751a13: 便。如輪王太子未習衆藝。是即發心已後 T2217_.59.0751a14: 時節短故類輪王太子也。然此菩薩頓如來 T2217_.59.0751a15: 功徳皆已成就。入淨菩提心而證毘盧遮那
T2217_.59.0751a18: 者淨菩提心正位在初地故約實證位歎 T2217_.59.0751a19: 其徳也。文中雖未於無數劫等者望二地已 T2217_.59.0751a20: 上大悲萬行云未具也。但此未言對顯行 T2217_.59.0751a21: 無數劫云未也。且論眞言行有三義。一云。 T2217_.59.0751a22: 最初發心即横得無邊行果無別次第行。是 T2217_.59.0751a23: 頓機也。二云。頓修諸行得萬徳。是超機也。 T2217_.59.0751a24: 三云。次第修諸行證佛位。即漸機也。此三
T2217_.59.0751a27: 也。故譬説云未能遍習衆藝統御四列等。合
T2217_.59.0751b01: 合法説。無數阿僧祇劫文無譬説。法譬互顯。
T2217_.59.0751b04: 藝。時無別體依法而立故。滿足大悲等利 T2217_.59.0751b05: 他方便故合統御四列也。又疏第三云。復 T2217_.59.0751b06: 次初入淨菩提心門見法明道如識種子 T2217_.59.0751b07: 歌羅羅時。前七地以來爲大悲萬行之所含 T2217_.59.0751b08: 養。如在胎藏。無功用以去漸學如來方便 T2217_.59.0751b09: 如嬰童已生習諸伎藝。至如來一切智地 T2217_.59.0751b10: 如伎藝已成施于從政。故名大悲台藏生
T2217_.59.0751b13: 以上化他義不可然。其故以譬説意案初 T2217_.59.0751b14: 地證理。理性無隔故。雖頓成衆徳。未實修 T2217_.59.0751b15: 彼行。何顯果徳耶。例如彼一乘宗有頓悟 T2217_.59.0751b16: 漸修二門也。故疏第一云。當知行人則是位 T2217_.59.0751b17: 同大覺也。以其自覺心故便得佛名。然非
T2217_.59.0751b20: 住。又逾廣逾深作十轉開明乃至第十一地
T2217_.59.0751b25: 心生即是心佛顯現故曰正等覺句。以深 T2217_.59.0751b26: 修觀察故如入大海漸次轉深。乃至毘盧 T2217_.59.0751b27: 遮那以上上智觀方能盡其源底故曰漸
T2217_.59.0751c01: 悟云究竟即心成佛。又名菩提實義也。既 T2217_.59.0751c02: 自證初地極何更修二地行而云到果乎。 T2217_.59.0751c03: 彼華嚴尚云十信終心得究竟果。何況事理 T2217_.59.0751c04: 倶密教即事而眞談乎。故今經開題云。若有 T2217_.59.0751c05: 善男子善女人。纔入此門則三大僧祇越一 T2217_.59.0751c06: 念之阿字。無量福智具三密之金剛。八萬塵
T2217_.59.0751c09: 也。三密金剛者初地金剛寶藏也。醍醐者醍 T2217_.59.0751c10: 醐妙果也。佛惠者第十一地一切智智也。意 T2217_.59.0751c11: 初地一念阿字菩提心位成一切智智醍醐
T2217_.59.0751c15: 無淺深差別。故云從初地得入金剛寶藏
T2217_.59.0751c18: 如天台判法在一心説必次第華嚴釋印紙
T2217_.59.0751c21: 制斷刑賞又果後方便。謂之成佛外迹也。或 T2217_.59.0751c22: 又六大無礙故一念延多劫。三密加持故劫 T2217_.59.0751c23: 海攝半時也。故疏第九云。如初發心時一切 T2217_.59.0751c24: 功徳即與如來等。從此已後經無量阿僧 T2217_.59.0751c25: 祇劫於一念中恒修勝進轉深轉廣不可思
T2217_.59.0752a07: 本覺・始覺成佛也。文點云。覺知自心是不 T2217_.59.0752a08: 生也。始覺義也。別本即身義云。如實知自心
T2217_.59.0752a11: 心月輪也。從本以來不生者釋經本不生。即 T2217_.59.0752a12: 本有阿字也。即身義云。究竟即身成佛者。本
T2217_.59.0752a23: 佛以智度以如實知等文成自證成佛之 T2217_.59.0752a24: 義矣。又如以般若經證一生二生成佛耳。 T2217_.59.0752a25: 依之疏第六云。初有二偈明成佛之外迹。 T2217_.59.0752a26: 謂我初坐道場以此一體速疾力三昧降 T2217_.59.0752a27: 伏天魔軍衆。我將證菩提汝之勢力何能留 T2217_.59.0752a28: 礙耶。爾時大梵天等八部衆生徒見伏魔之
T2217_.59.0752b02: 若常途諸論所明等者。光明山義云。付第三 T2217_.59.0752b03: 劫行言復次祕密主眞言門修行菩薩。至天 T2217_.59.0752b04: 人世間之所歸依者是總先讃歎眞言行之 T2217_.59.0752b05: 功徳也。此即歎初地已上功徳也。淨菩提
T2217_.59.0752b09: 二劫故。八地已上斷極細妄執位云第三 T2217_.59.0752b10: 劫行也。今疏若常途諸論所明以下即釋經 T2217_.59.0752b11: 出過一切聲聞等文也。證此心者淨菩提心 T2217_.59.0752b12: 之證位也。即第八地是也。初地所發觀空心 T2217_.59.0752b13: 至八地而證故。指此地云淨菩提心證位。 T2217_.59.0752b14: 故疏第六釋八地云。入此地時得度空性
T2217_.59.0752b17: 其智惠門難解難入。一切聲聞辟支佛所不
T2217_.59.0752b20: 所説出過一切聲聞之第八地。故疏云。常途 T2217_.59.0752b21: 諸論以此爲佛也。又疏第六云。菩薩至第 T2217_.59.0752b22: 八地時。於心之實際而初證之故。顯教心
T2217_.59.0752b25: 眞言行者第三劫盡處第四妄斷位時初地
T2217_.59.0752b28: 等三人以眞言行人爲面故。作是説云祕 T2217_.59.0752b29: 密也。眞言行者地前一道心時即見法華常
T2217_.59.0752c03: 前義非理。八九極果寄同初地淨菩提心遮 T2217_.59.0752c04: 情義。故大師釋一道心云。云何菩提。謂如
T2217_.59.0752c07: 黄等言幷是明法身眞如一道無爲之眞理。 T2217_.59.0752c08: 佛説此名初法明道。智度名入佛道初門。 T2217_.59.0752c09: 言佛道者指金剛界大日曼荼羅佛。於諸 T2217_.59.0752c10: 顯教是究竟理智法身。望眞言門是則初
T2217_.59.0752c13: 進云第八地耶。又大師釋極無自性心云。 T2217_.59.0752c14: 是因是心望前顯教極果於後祕心初心。 T2217_.59.0752c15: 初發心時便成正覺宜其然也。疏云。心實 T2217_.59.0752c16: 際亦復不可得故曰極無自性心生也。此心 T2217_.59.0752c17: 望前二劫猶蓮華盛敷。若望後二心即是
T2217_.59.0752c25: 料簡今文者。又如王子以下文明成佛外 T2217_.59.0752c26: 迹中有八九十三心也。又如至歸依者正 T2217_.59.0752c27: 明眞言菩提心外迹徳也。若常途至佛地 T2217_.59.0752c28: 也者釋出過等二句兼明一道極無佛即眞 T2217_.59.0752c29: 言外迹成佛義也。諸論地論・法華論・中論・智 T2217_.59.0753a01: 度等也。法華中明佛智非二乘所知。華嚴云 T2217_.59.0753a02: 二乘如聾如盲故云出過二乘地也。今文 T2217_.59.0753a03: 總明八九也。以行者至名爲祕密者別明 T2217_.59.0753a04: 第八心。壽量長遠法華説故。前遮三乘今一 T2217_.59.0753a05: 乘中簡迹門也。又此至後名祕密者別明 T2217_.59.0753a06: 第九心。供養知識是善財訪知識義即華嚴 T2217_.59.0753a07: 説故。此中行者及菩薩者顯行人也。例如初 T2217_.59.0753a08: 劫中學大乘人云然彼行者也。又如云祕 T2217_.59.0753a09: 鍵云行人是七。問。既云此菩薩。可眞言行 T2217_.59.0753a10: 者。故疏第七云。此瑜伽者能不起于座悉 T2217_.59.0753a11: 至如是諸佛會中亦能次第絢求諸善知
T2217_.59.0753a14: 行同義指前行者云此菩薩也。又瑜伽者 T2217_.59.0753a15: 未必密人。順理外人云修瑜伽行者矣。若爾 T2217_.59.0753a16: 指華嚴人何失。況上文云餘如華嚴經説。 T2217_.59.0753a17: 分明者歟。或眞言行人也。今文悉密爲本顯 T2217_.59.0753a18: 爲末明之故。前二劫中至辟支佛地也者 T2217_.59.0753a19: 通結一道極無也。此中祕密一乘者理祕密 T2217_.59.0753a20: 一乘也。非金剛一乘也。是事理倶密故。已 T2217_.59.0753a21: 上釋所謂出過聲聞辟支佛地文畢。時大威 T2217_.59.0753a22: 徳下釋經釋提桓因等句猶歎淨菩提心外 T2217_.59.0753a23: 迹功徳也。問。二心同初地八九淺深難辨。 T2217_.59.0753a24: 依之或義云。一道地前極無地上義成如何。 T2217_.59.0753a25: 答。斷惑證理二位倶雖同位無間位一道勝。 T2217_.59.0753a26: 解脱道極無強。故約無間解脱次第爲淺 T2217_.59.0753a27: 深歟。或同雖斷極細無勝劣觀智有淺深 T2217_.59.0753a28: 故爾也。例如三昧分異漏盡即同也。重意 T2217_.59.0753a29: 云。以實言之。二心同斷妄地前證理地上 T2217_.59.0753b01: 故二心地前者約斷妄也。二心地上者約 T2217_.59.0753b02: 證理也。一道地前極無地上者。一心約斷妄 T2217_.59.0753b03: 一心據證理也。斯乃三義相成非相違矣。 T2217_.59.0753b04: 又問云。八九名祕密一乘。何云理祕密乎。 T2217_.59.0753b05: 依之天台釋中云。一念凡心已有理性三密 T2217_.59.0753b06: 相海。一塵報色同在本理毘盧遮那。方乃名
T2217_.59.0753b12: 密不正明其行相故慈覺釋云。雖粗明印
T2217_.59.0753b15: 時三業又得此名未必我教祕密之義矣」 T2217_.59.0753b16: 即知釋迦牟尼淨土不毀等者。抄第三云以 T2217_.59.0753b17: 行者直以眞言爲乘超入淨菩提心得見 T2217_.59.0753b18: 心明道故。得此心時即知釋迦牟尼淨土 T2217_.59.0753b19: 不毀等。此一段疏。全引法華經。欲顯此劫 T2217_.59.0753b20: 眞實超過二乘之地證不退地。兼彰經之
T2217_.59.0753b23: 薩亦復不能知。當知此法復難信。故法華 T2217_.59.0753b24: 中補處三請如來四誡然後演説。今此經具
T2217_.59.0753b27: 是華臺具體四佛四菩薩醍醐果徳。如衆實
T2217_.59.0753c01: 矣准後文者又第十心也。法華曼荼羅華臺 T2217_.59.0753c02: 具體故。故法華儀軌云。我今依於大教王遍 T2217_.59.0753c03: 照如來成道法若能依此勝義修現世得成
T2217_.59.0753c06: 七云。此經是法王祕寶。不妄示卑賤之人。 T2217_.59.0753c07: 如釋迦出世四十餘年因舍利弗等慇懃三 T2217_.59.0753c08: 請方爲略説妙法蓮華義。今此本地之身又 T2217_.59.0753c09: 是妙法蓮華最深祕處。故壽量品云常在靈 T2217_.59.0753c10: 鷲山及餘諸住處乃至我淨土不毀而衆見燒
T2217_.59.0753c13: 實成爲極。今宗以菩提實義爲要。不改 T2217_.59.0753c14: 九界迷情而本地常身也。又本地常心何指 T2217_.59.0753c15: 久遠成覺耶。故疏第六釋菩提實義云。謂 T2217_.59.0753c16: 覺自心從本以來不生即是成佛。而實無
T2217_.59.0753c28: 同。本地身意鑰・疏是異矣。又天台釋云。常在
T2217_.59.0754a04: 出。檢可見。修對治道等者補處彌勒等也。第 T2217_.59.0754a05: 三卷不退諸菩薩是也。法華經第五云。我於
T2217_.59.0754a08: 故大師開題云。又據大日經顯祕密。妙法
T2217_.59.0754a11: 道。於餘教對治中既開對治祕密也。故法
T2217_.59.0754a16: 云或不至者指此類歟。未至寶處故。終 T2217_.59.0754a17: T2217_.59.0754a18: T2217_.59.0754a19: T2217_.59.0754a20: T2217_.59.0754a21: 疏卷第二之六 T2217_.59.0754a22: 前二劫中雖云度二乘地等者。抄第三云。等 T2217_.59.0754a23: 者等舍利弗目連等。謂須菩提於般若會 T2217_.59.0754a24: 中猶能承佛威神説人法倶空。若離加持 T2217_.59.0754a25: 則不能爲。謂行者於前劫中雖過愚法 T2217_.59.0754a26: 未能出此廣惠人等。至此劫中須菩提等 T2217_.59.0754a27: 而於此祕密一乘不知所趣。故此行者乃
T2217_.59.0754b03: 非甚深般若。第三劫等虚空心無邊智惠一 T2217_.59.0754b04: 切二乘不能思議。乃名甚深般若。堪作祕
T2217_.59.0754b07: 今即上文至第二僧祇乃與二乘異也者。過 T2217_.59.0754b08: *愚法故云爾。不謂與不*愚法二乘異 T2217_.59.0754b09: 也。等虚空心者第八等空心也。無邊智惠者
T2217_.59.0754b15: 文順法華唯獨自明了餘人所不見文故。故 T2217_.59.0754b16: 知三重祕密是前後一致指法華也。又菩提 T2217_.59.0754b17: 心論云。今眞言行人如前觀已復發利益 T2217_.59.0754b18: 安樂無餘衆生界一切衆生心。以大悲決
T2217_.59.0754b21: 行人也。經云出過二乘疏云眞離二乘地。
T2217_.59.0754b24: 言釋提桓因親近供養。何故疏言帝釋奉草 T2217_.59.0754b25: 四王獻鉢梵王請轉法輪。今經略故。故智 T2217_.59.0754b26: 度論云。佛至樹下時釋提桓因奉上好草 T2217_.59.0754b27: 執金剛菩薩常執金剛衞護菩薩梵天王 T2217_.59.0754b28: 請轉法輪。如是等各有常法是以疏主引
T2217_.59.0754c02: 互顯歟。問。今段成佛者顯密中何佛耶。答。凡 T2217_.59.0754c03: 案一段意初直約行者内證外用歎徳。其 T2217_.59.0754c04: 文可知。後出過下重對顯家法身生身讃徳 T2217_.59.0754c05: 也。於中有二。初以顯法身極佛同内證初 T2217_.59.0754c06: 心。故大師云。顯教理智法身。是則眞言初門
T2217_.59.0754c10: 九云。又佛所以自藉此草者除世間憍慢 T2217_.59.0754c11: 心故。爲太子時種種放逸坐臥寶床寶几 T2217_.59.0754c12: 承足等。若出家猶習之即與本在家無異。 T2217_.59.0754c13: 此能捨如是事而坐草藉一切人天皆生
T2217_.59.0754c16: 爲人天所歸又同顯佛極理而歎内證徳 T2217_.59.0754c17: 也。今文眞言菩薩當成四種身之中亦約 T2217_.59.0754c18: 變化法身讃利他之徳也。故菩提心論云。 T2217_.59.0754c19: 成大毘盧遮那佛自性身・受用身・變化身・等
T2217_.59.0754c22: 台三藏佛。何云密佛耶。答。密成佛又四身別 T2217_.59.0754c23: 故變化法身用草座何失。或挫顯釋迦即 T2217_.59.0754c24: 云變化法身歟。或又密意大日成佛用草座 T2217_.59.0754c25: 歟。況彼圓教佛雖虚空爲座又用草座之 T2217_.59.0754c26: 義歟。何況灌頂阿闍梨用草座。可思之。問。 T2217_.59.0754c27: 若爾灌頂阿闍梨授印可時是令弟子成佛 T2217_.59.0754c28: 之儀式也。何唯華座非草座乎。答。私案。初 T2217_.59.0754c29: 後夜位内證故坐華座。後朝歎徳外用故座 T2217_.59.0755a01: 草座。可悉之。今疏釋内證外用此意歟。阿 T2217_.59.0755a02: 闍梨住化他門故坐草座歟。故知今經中 T2217_.59.0755a03: 菩提實義時不用草座成佛外迹可依彼 T2217_.59.0755a04: 座歟。可尋決矣又疏第八云又爲弟子作 T2217_.59.0755a05: 法時阿闍梨此邊藉以生茅使蹲踞而座。 T2217_.59.0755a06: 阿闍梨亦當座於茅座不得加以床褥之 T2217_.59.0755a07: 類也。然受用生茅略有三義。一者其性潔 T2217_.59.0755a08: 淨離處樂觸可以蠲除行者昏怠恣慢之 T2217_.59.0755a09: 心。二者是吉祥草以爲數坐而證菩提。是 T2217_.59.0755a10: 故能除一切諸障。三者以此吉祥茅表惠
T2217_.59.0755a13: 如來成道時所坐故一切世間以爲吉祥。故
T2217_.59.0755a16: 文又可同此歟。或云。奉草獻鉢等有深祕 T2217_.59.0755a17: 釋。疏第九六種震動釋六根煩惱。准知耳」 T2217_.59.0755a18: 經所謂空性等者。有云。住心論等中以所謂 T2217_.59.0755a19: 空性等文證第八九二心中以終極無自性 T2217_.59.0755a20: 心生句爲第九簡別文。此空性者眞如大空 T2217_.59.0755a21: 性隨縁作諸法。故以同文證兩心也。其縁 T2217_.59.0755a22: 起無性中第九心即無性極故以終句爲簡
T2217_.59.0755a25: 故大師云。極無自性心一句悉攝華嚴教盡
T2217_.59.0755a28: 所以六無畏立一無畏三重幻含一種幻。
T2217_.59.0755b09: 二心前後文句各局歟。但寶鑰中兩所引之。 T2217_.59.0755b10: 下所引如疏抄上所引與第八所引者同 T2217_.59.0755b11: 文故來歟。私檢引文論八九鑰八幷第九上 T2217_.59.0755b12: 引皆除無邊至續生之三句。但論鑰倶第九
T2217_.59.0755b15: 三句退安極無自性心生下更加無邊一切 T2217_.59.0755b16: 等三句具引如是初心已下文矣。倩案以 T2217_.59.0755b17: 極無自性句爲第九簡句。鑰論是同。但鑰 T2217_.59.0755b18: 下引以無邊一切佛法依此相續生文似爲 T2217_.59.0755b19: 別句矣。或又下引爲驚覺的據一切佛法 T2217_.59.0755b20: 生者五相成身等曼荼功徳故。上重證時*鑰 T2217_.59.0755b21: 論倶不引此文歟。又義。等虚空一句兼八 T2217_.59.0755b22: 九通句歟。故今所引安極無下也。故上釋 T2217_.59.0755b23: 云。驚一道於彈指覺無爲於未極。等空之心
T2217_.59.0755b29: 二心總句也。離有爲下二心別説也。離有 T2217_.59.0755c01: 至身意第八也。終一句第九也。例如第二 T2217_.59.0755c02: 劫中覺心所度云微細他縁所度云智障 T2217_.59.0755c03: 故。故理實細與極細又各分麁細。故大疏 T2217_.59.0755c04: 抄云六劫。可思之問。若爾第八所度何耶。 T2217_.59.0755c05: 答。經顯文越諸戲論是無間第八心也佛法 T2217_.59.0755c06: 續生即解脱第九心也。然理實各有斷證故。 T2217_.59.0755c07: 此中十喩者第三劫第八覺也。前十喩者第 T2217_.59.0755c08: 二劫覺與第三劫第八所度妄倶故云復成 T2217_.59.0755c09: 戲論也。今第八越彼故云越諸戲論也。越 T2217_.59.0755c10: 者指第八覺也。又等虚空三字顯微細斷 T2217_.59.0755c11: 也。又義。第九證局終一句也。依之疏云。心
T2217_.59.0755c17: 生第九心。故云轉生。又云亦復也。轉及亦 T2217_.59.0755c18: 起盡非是示二心勝劣乎。若空性等文通 T2217_.59.0755c19: 第九則於一重心有轉生義耶。但第九同 T2217_.59.0755c20: 引者。若無彼文則難知無自性心從何心 T2217_.59.0755c21: 轉生。故引爲來由也。例如第五心引證。故 T2217_.59.0755c22: 彼心所引云。又云。聲聞所説眞言一一句安 T2217_.59.0755c23: 布是中辟支佛復有少差別。謂三昧分異淨
T2217_.59.0755c26: 難知與何法差別故。問。迂迴直往二機倶 T2217_.59.0755c27: 以空性爲入門耶答或云。然也。漸機今 T2217_.59.0755c28: 空性者住常寂滅光理性時蒙佛驚即轉 T2217_.59.0755c29: 生極無心然後入祕密也頓機宿善機熟可 T2217_.59.0756a01: 入密者即成空性心。空性者無始生死我執 T2217_.59.0756a02: 轉融性也。此心不生時難入故以機爲空 T2217_.59.0756a03: 性也。斯則字三諦究竟入字三諦也。 T2217_.59.0756a04: 宿善位以字空性爲門而入金剛寶藏中 T2217_.59.0756a05: 三點。開藏内見時三點雙現前於藏
T2217_.59.0756a09: 無得爲要。依之大師開題八不空性談義。
T2217_.59.0756a12: 其文別故。所以二劫三劫隔僧祇三乘一乘 T2217_.59.0756a13: 異境行。故疏云。前劫悟萬法唯心今觀此
T2217_.59.0756a16: 釋者彼宗八不空理云八不空性非依今 T2217_.59.0756a17: 文歟所以宗家第八心獨名空性無境心故 T2217_.59.0756a18: 仍無失。問。大師立十住心專依大日經菩 T2217_.59.0756a19: 提心論。八不空性又非依今文乎。又雖有 T2217_.59.0756a20: 第七所依別文兼通此文何失。例如第九 T2217_.59.0756a21: 心正雖依極無自性句亦通所謂空性等 T2217_.59.0756a22: 文矣。又空性無境心名雖名第八何遮 T2217_.59.0756a23: 通餘心例如如實知自心矣。如何。答。住心 T2217_.59.0756a24: 淺深尤可任別憑經論起盡。此文通第七 T2217_.59.0756a25: 住心優降難辨者歟。但又住心淺深雖依 T2217_.59.0756a26: 眞言經論兼取各宗文理也。故八不空性及 T2217_.59.0756a27: 一心無相等言依彼宗釋義歟。又云。第九引 T2217_.59.0756a28: 證者如先會矣。或八九一劫故設雖通。此 T2217_.59.0756a29: 隔僧祇何同彼*耶。又如實知自心名雖總 T2217_.59.0756b01: 即別名。空性無境心稱可局第八。例如一 T2217_.59.0756b02: 道無爲心矣 T2217_.59.0756b03: 上文無量等者。經云。無量如虚空不染污 T2217_.59.0756b04: 常住諸法不能動。本來寂無相。無量智成
T2217_.59.0756b08: 量智成就。此智成就即是毘盧遮那心佛現
T2217_.59.0756b11: 就同法華諸佛智惠甚深無量文。又心佛顯 T2217_.59.0756b12: 現義如實知自心義故大師引今經文證第 T2217_.59.0756b13: 八心符疏意矣 T2217_.59.0756b14: 前劫悟萬法唯心等者。唯心中有他縁覺心。 T2217_.59.0756b15: 法相唯識是事心也。三論唯心即眞心也。相 T2217_.59.0756b16: 宗遣相證性唯識雖名眞理識實性故云唯 T2217_.59.0756b17: 識。異三論云眞理即唯心耳。故知唯識言 T2217_.59.0756b18: 雖同事理義是別。具如先辨而已 T2217_.59.0756b19: 今觀此心即是如來自然智等者。疏第六云。 T2217_.59.0756b20: 次云離一切戲論法佛自然智。是廣歎不思 T2217_.59.0756b21: 議智而爲世間説滿足衆希願。是廣歎不
T2217_.59.0756b26: 法報常住義。故云如來自然智等也。如來 T2217_.59.0756b27: 自然智者自受用身。毘盧遮那遍一切身者 T2217_.59.0756b28: 法身也。二身倶常住故云自然及遍一切也。 T2217_.59.0756b29: 故天台釋云。境既無量無邊常住不滅。智亦
T2217_.59.0756c03: 疏第二劫文釋心主自在文云。以不滯有
T2217_.59.0756c06: 身有爲之故。理智倶冥會故。云心無罣礙。 T2217_.59.0756c07: 故第七叙覺心云。悟心性不生知境智不
T2217_.59.0756c11: 非理智冥合耶。彼他縁心猶成理智冥會 T2217_.59.0756c12: 義。何況覺心乘乎。答。法身常住言雖同理 T2217_.59.0756c13: 智不二意全別。故彼義疏云。報佛壽量有始 T2217_.59.0756c14: 無終○初證佛果。是故有始。一證已後湛
T2217_.59.0756c17: 始無終故云自然智也。又唯識等論中雖 T2217_.59.0756c18: 明智與眞如平等平等報身唯有爲生滅 T2217_.59.0756c19: 體未及無終談也。故慈恩三身義云。佛受 T2217_.59.0756c20: 用身既墮法數。生者皆滅。是一向記。故不 T2217_.59.0756c21: 可説是本性常。許從因生説是常者違
T2217_.59.0756c24: 般若也。故疏云。以心實相智覺心之實相。
T2217_.59.0756c27: 照影。照影即金水。即知境即般若。般若即境
T2217_.59.0757a01: 嘉祥二諦章云。不見有法出法性者。是
T2217_.59.0757a04: 非云境智倶實相耶。如何。答。雖云境智倶 T2217_.59.0757a05: 實相未談心境同般若歟。例如智論文云。
T2217_.59.0757a08: 宗是別所以第七心遮心外影像但於唯心 T2217_.59.0757a09: 位談理智不二。故疏上文云。覺此心本不
T2217_.59.0757a12: 以心如是故諸法亦如是。根塵皆入阿
T2217_.59.0757a15: 今當説。大品若聞無生門則解一切義。初 T2217_.59.0757a16: 阿字攝四十七字。四十七字攝阿字。中間亦
T2217_.59.0757a19: 塵皆入*阿字即事理倶密之義。影像不出 T2217_.59.0757a20: 常寂是即事而眞之談也。若爾何異祕密 T2217_.59.0757a21: 心耶。答。境智倶般若之談雖甚深猶是一 T2217_.59.0757a22: 乘一如理未及十十無盡説。影像歸常寂 T2217_.59.0757a23: 之義雖希有猶是攝相歸性域未入性相歴 T2217_.59.0757a24: 然位也。觀夫祕宗意現覺諸法本初不生也。 T2217_.59.0757a25: 何云入*阿字耶。直約諸法令識其心也。 T2217_.59.0757a26: 豈云歸常寂乎。所以皆入不出言顯示一心 T2217_.59.0757a27: 縁起末歸一心無相本也。寧及性佛性然六 T2217_.59.0757a28: 大四曼乎。故釋云。今所言色者非諸識所
T2217_.59.0757b03: 此中十喩等者。初劫第二劫十種譬喩乃成 T2217_.59.0757b04: 戲論。今此中十喩復爲對治前劫心沒實 T2217_.59.0757b05: 際欲令離有爲界故。觀此十喩亦成 T2217_.59.0757b06: 戲論。今時等虚空性倶不可得故云越諸戲
T2217_.59.0757b09: 沒實際。爲對治之觀此第三劫十喩。尚對 T2217_.59.0757b10: 前十喩成能所。故成戲論。釋歟。謂即空・即 T2217_.59.0757b11: 心・不思議三種幻麁・細・極三妄如次能所治 T2217_.59.0757b12: 也。若三劫十喩爲戲論者。何心爲能治*耶。
T2217_.59.0757b17: 戲論。非妄執也。或云。前位覺即後位迷故 T2217_.59.0757b18: 倶無相違耳。問。四義倶未審。先抄義不明。 T2217_.59.0757b19: 二三劫相望時。何忽第三劫十喩云戲論乎。 T2217_.59.0757b20: 次義非理。十喩望十喩成戲論義何忽 T2217_.59.0757b21: 云妄執耶。作釋合經其文別。何以下釋成 T2217_.59.0757b22: 上義耶。次義非理。此中十喩者第三劫。望 T2217_.59.0757b23: 前十喩者第二劫。不順綴文。若如成者應 T2217_.59.0757b24: 云以前十喩望此十喩成戲論也。後義不 T2217_.59.0757b25: 然。眞妄一體則何分能越所越耶。諸義皆 T2217_.59.0757b26: 非理。如何。答。諸義皆非無理。抄意得綴文 T2217_.59.0757b27: 起盡。故意云。以此第三劫十喩望前初二
T2217_.59.0757c01: 所以觀此十喩者指沒心實際前二劫十 T2217_.59.0757c02: 喩也。意云。今此第三十喩復觀此沒實除
T2217_.59.0757c05: 虚空性等文。故等虚空性*是第三劫十喩故。 T2217_.59.0757c06: 又是能越心故但會難者前劫十喩屬戲論。 T2217_.59.0757c07: 是不斷極細故。其戲論者妄執也。又第三 T2217_.59.0757c08: 重微細等釋雖文在下意指上文也。合經 T2217_.59.0757c09: 屬後者擧前意爲來由耳。佛樹牙生偏當 T2217_.59.0757c10: 等虚空等文故。次義甚深所説義理相順何 T2217_.59.0757c11: 拘綴文。依之唯識論云不可隨文而取其
T2217_.59.0757c20: 十喩猶屬戲論。故以第三劫十喩云復成 T2217_.59.0757c21: 戲論也。故大師叙一道心云。前劫菩薩作
T2217_.59.0757c24: 准知於第三劫中第八望第九非眞是戲
T2217_.59.0758a01: 成第九所度邊也。所以極細中分麁細故 T2217_.59.0758a02: 立微細名歟。若不爾者所越戲論可非極 T2217_.59.0758a03: 細妄執。何故疏第三云。此空智生時極無自 T2217_.59.0758a04: 性心生也。但知心垢盡處戲論不行。即是第
T2217_.59.0758a07: 心故。一道心雖斷一分極無障猶在故。一 T2217_.59.0758a08: 道十喩亦成戲論也。又義。如下辨。問。第二 T2217_.59.0758a09: 劫唯六喩。何云十喩耶。答。十有増減十故 T2217_.59.0758a10: 初二劫五六喩皆云十喩也。故疏第三云。然 T2217_.59.0758a11: 統論此品中十縁生句略有三種。摩訶般若
T2217_.59.0758a17: 説文中第九義未終。前所擧妄執唯可第八 T2217_.59.0758a18: 所度歟。或云。所謂空性等文亘二種心。八 T2217_.59.0758a19: 九有淺深。越諸戲論文又可通二心所度 T2217_.59.0758a20: 也。私一義云。但第九心所斷也。謂等虚空 T2217_.59.0758a21: 句對前望後含無間・解脱二義。前越諸戲 T2217_.59.0758a22: 論者第八無間道斷極細麁分也。若對彼今 T2217_.59.0758a23: 等虚空成第八證理。有智契空理故云等 T2217_.59.0758a24: 虚空也。若望後佛法而生句又爲第九無 T2217_.59.0758a25: 間道。斷極細中細分故云微細。猶如第二 T2217_.59.0758a26: 劫中他縁所度云智障覺心所斷云微細也。 T2217_.59.0758a27: 佛法而生是第九證理故。故知種已上釋等 T2217_.59.0758a28: 虚空以虚空似煩惱滅無歟。復有下釋無 T2217_.59.0758a29: 邊以下文也。但至云第八所引中間文者。 T2217_.59.0758b01: 作釋引證依義理淺深不云文言交雜。今 T2217_.59.0758b02: 經第十心在八九前。又菩提心論七八引證 T2217_.59.0758b03: 未必文前後矣。又大師處處釋。第八第九 T2217_.59.0758b04: 同云等虚空心。八九同引此文通二心義 T2217_.59.0758b05: 顯然者歟。問。下云於業煩惱解脱非第九 T2217_.59.0758b06: 所度*耶。答。彼廣通三妄。煩惱即知佛事
T2217_.59.0758b09: 文智證大師釋云。業壽種者。約第二識有 T2217_.59.0758b10: 三相。謂自相・因相・果相也。開因相爲二。 T2217_.59.0758b11: 謂業與種。所謂業者身口意不清淨業也。言 T2217_.59.0758b12: 種子者癡愛因縁也。言壽者酬因所生之果 T2217_.59.0758b13: 報識故約第八梨耶立種子及果報二名也
T2217_.59.0758b16: 生死歟。問。第一卷釋縁業生云。癡愛因縁
T2217_.59.0758b19: 易等。期即身成佛行者受變易乎。答。上縁 T2217_.59.0758b20: 業生者分段煩惱業現行並別報故在前六 T2217_.59.0758b21: 識。今業壽種是種子幷總報故在第八識。然 T2217_.59.0758b22: 今宗三妄頓斷故極細斷時煩惱障等一時 T2217_.59.0758b23: 斷。故二種生死業種等又頓離也。但上擧分 T2217_.59.0758b24: 段者眞言行者無始本具邊雖有變易業 T2217_.59.0758b25: 果非三妄漸故不云受變易。麁苦先盡細 T2217_.59.0758b26: 苦顯云變易也。今既頓斷故。分段盡時即變 T2217_.59.0758b27: 易無故。成即身成佛義也。華嚴又一斷一切 T2217_.59.0758b28: 斷故云但分段身窮於因位也。但初劫文拔 T2217_.59.0758b29: 業煩惱株机等者。雖同時斷寄如常且作 T2217_.59.0758c01: 次第説也。況第一釋云。二乘雖破三毒亦
T2217_.59.0758c04: 業果者彼業果終不離。況極細法執故變易 T2217_.59.0758c05: 煩惱乎。若爾劣如常斷。又雖有彼種不可 T2217_.59.0758c06: 云受變易。地前凡位無漏未起故。初地以 T2217_.59.0758c07: 上無漏雖起非變易業歟。非有分別無漏 T2217_.59.0758c08: 故。又縁助煩惱已斷故。又雖有微細妄執 T2217_.59.0758c09: 非二死縁助惑歟。又義。但分段業果歟。智 T2217_.59.0758c10: 證釋云六趣業。故又普觀釋云。其實二苦
T2217_.59.0758c13: 記等約助發潤歟。問。等虚空是初地菩提 T2217_.59.0758c14: 心平等種子。何云業壽種除義。佛樹牙生 T2217_.59.0758c15: 又二地以上大悲爲根。何云極無自性心耶。 T2217_.59.0758c16: 故疏第一云。今修平等三業清淨惠門一切 T2217_.59.0758c17: 蘊阿頼耶業・壽種子皆悉焚滅得至虚空 T2217_.59.0758c18: 無垢大菩提心。一切如來平等種子從悲藏 T2217_.59.0758c19: 中生法性牙。乃至莖葉華果遍滿諸法界
T2217_.59.0758c22: 第一云。即時人法戲論淨若虚空。成自然
T2217_.59.0758c25: 菩提心也。心因句中有短三心等故云芽 T2217_.59.0758c26: 也。虚空無垢又業・壽種除義也。又義云。如 T2217_.59.0758c27: 能難。長十心時種子爲因牙等爲根。故疏下
T2217_.59.0759a01: 提心種子疏示所斷妄執也。或除字平等種 T2217_.59.0759a02: 子歟。若不爾者如伊蘭種生栴檀牙。如何。 T2217_.59.0759a03: 又大師引證者爲證驚覺義引此文矣。故 T2217_.59.0759a04: 蒙驚轉入祕密故云牙生也。又義云。經文 T2217_.59.0759a05: 依此相續生文通種牙歟。疏家宗家互顯 T2217_.59.0759a06: 歟。雜問答云。問。何故先住此不生理。答。是 T2217_.59.0759a07: 虚空無垢大菩提心之地故。亦一切如來平等 T2217_.59.0759a08: 種子故。所以眞言行人從初發心住金剛種 T2217_.59.0759a09: 性。時即法性之芽自此而生萬徳之果於此
T2217_.59.0759a14: 釋叙顯密異云。心外䂪垢於是悉盡。曼荼
T2217_.59.0759a19: 既不壞因縁即入法界等者。因縁及生滅釋 T2217_.59.0759a20: 經有爲法界及不生滅釋經無爲也。不壞不 T2217_.59.0759a21: 動即入即是釋經離字經中明捨離前劫隔 T2217_.59.0759a22: 歴三諦故云離有爲等。疏中明今心不思 T2217_.59.0759a23: 議三諦故云即入即是也。故天台釋云。隔
T2217_.59.0759a28: 眞俗法也。何云三諦耶。答。二諦三諦開合 T2217_.59.0759a29: 不同一法二義差別。故疏第三云。今此境界 T2217_.59.0759b01: ○而形聲宛然即是法界。論幻即幻。論法 T2217_.59.0759b02: 界即法界。論遍一切處即遍一切處。論
T2217_.59.0759b05: 即空理異名。中道遍二諦故云遍一切處 T2217_.59.0759b06: 也。前縁起・法界如次俗諦・眞諦也。二諦門 T2217_.59.0759b07: 合假空爲俗以中爲眞諦也。問。不思議幻 T2217_.59.0759b08: 者但約假諦。如何云三諦耶。答。一假一切 T2217_.59.0759b09: 假故以空中即假諦故云不思議。空及中 T2217_.59.0759b10: 相即又爾也。故疏第三云。若於一念心中明 T2217_.59.0759b11: 見十縁生句義則上窮無盡法界下極無 T2217_.59.0759b12: 盡衆生界其中一切心相皆能了了覺知以 T2217_.59.0759b13: 皆從縁起即空即假即中故。故曰如實遍
T2217_.59.0759b20: 故疏第三云。以此中道正觀離有爲無爲
T2217_.59.0759b23: 遮隔*歴二諦也。所謂圓融隔歴同雖明 T2217_.59.0759b24: 三諦且約中道二諦顯其義也。又圓融三 T2217_.59.0759b25: 諦雖倶體倶用中爲經體。故釋籤第一云。 T2217_.59.0759b26: 問。雖云辭異意同空假如何得爲經體。答。 T2217_.59.0759b27: 既是不思議空假還指空假即中。中爲經 T2217_.59.0759b28: 體。中即空假亦指於中。三諦無非遍一切
T2217_.59.0759c02: 若如來出世若不出世等者。鈔第四云。一切 T2217_.59.0759c03: 諸法住阿字本不生中若佛出世若不出世
T2217_.59.0759c08: 非餘天人所作法爾常住。而以加持力出 T2217_.59.0759c09: 興于世利益衆生○如來無礙知見在一切 T2217_.59.0759c10: 衆生相續中法爾成就無有缺減。以於此 T2217_.59.0759c11: 眞言體相不如實覺故名爲生死中人。若 T2217_.59.0759c12: 能自知自見時即名一切知者一切見者。是 T2217_.59.0759c13: 故如是知見非佛自所造作亦非他所傳
T2217_.59.0759c16: 非造自然意。謂欲顯示一切諸法有佛無佛
T2217_.59.0759c19: 如般若中一切法趣眼等者。抄第四云。言一 T2217_.59.0759c20: 切法趣眼等者。一切法者般若中從色等歴 T2217_.59.0759c21: 法是也。趣即歸趣。謂一切法皆歸趣於眼 T2217_.59.0759c22: 處即法界也。是趣不過者無有出過是處 T2217_.59.0759c23: 者也。大品云。云何菩薩摩訶薩得阿耨多羅 T2217_.59.0759c24: 三藐三菩提時爲衆生説色趣空説受想 T2217_.59.0759c25: 行識趣空乃至説一切種智趣空等。何以 T2217_.59.0759c26: 故。是色空相非趣非不趣。乃至云一切法 T2217_.59.0759c27: 趣空是趣不過。何以故。空中趣非趣不可得 T2217_.59.0759c28: 故。又論。問曰。般若波羅蜜非趣非不趣。須 T2217_.59.0759c29: 菩提。何以故。問。行般若者趣至何處。佛何 T2217_.59.0760a01: 以答言趣薩般若。答曰。外道言説法從因 T2217_.59.0760a02: 趣果從先世入今世從今世趣後世。破 T2217_.59.0760a03: 是常顛倒故言無趣不趣。此中須菩提以
T2217_.59.0760a06: 相違如何。答。經論文理隨宜。若爾般若何 T2217_.59.0760a07: 背第八心乎。疏第三云。如説極無自性心 T2217_.59.0760a08: 十縁生句即攝華嚴般若種種不思議境界
T2217_.59.0760a11: 觀第四云○若得此意初心凡夫能於一念 T2217_.59.0760a12: 圓棄諸蓋。故大品云。一切法趣欲事。是趣 T2217_.59.0760a13: 不過。欲事尚不可得。何況當趣不趣。釋云。 T2217_.59.0760a14: 趣即是有。有能趣所趣故即辨俗諦。欲事 T2217_.59.0760a15: 不可得即是明空。空中無能趣所趣即辨 T2217_.59.0760a16: 眞諦。云何當有趣非趣即是辨中道。當知三
T2217_.59.0760a21: 非趣耶者即是辨中道也。此文有雙非雙照 T2217_.59.0760a22: 中道。謂趣不趣如次有空故亦有亦空中道 T2217_.59.0760a23: 也。又互奪兩亡故趣不趣如次非空非有中 T2217_.59.0760a24: 道也。當知三諦只在一眼中耳。耳鼻舌身 T2217_.59.0760a25: 意等應准知之。故云亦如是也。大師以此 T2217_.59.0760a26: 離眼耳鼻等文證第八住心。甚有深意矣。 T2217_.59.0760a27: 彼宗一心三諦爲極故。問。大品文並止觀 T2217_.59.0760a28: 釋三諦義宜然。今經云離眼等未聞三諦 T2217_.59.0760a29: 義。如何。答。謂以大品文合今經意。趣眼是 T2217_.59.0760b01: 有義釋眼字。眼尚不可得即空義當離字。何 T2217_.59.0760b02: 況趣不趣並同離眼二字。故知開爲二諦合 T2217_.59.0760b03: 爲中道也。或又三諦倶在眼一字中以眼 T2217_.59.0760b04: 耳等各三諦歸第一實際故云離也。故次 T2217_.59.0760b05: 爲釋極無重示此意云一切諸法無不從 T2217_.59.0760b06: 縁生者者假諦也。若從縁生即無自性者空 T2217_.59.0760b07: 諦也。若無自性即本不生即中道也。疏第七 T2217_.59.0760b08: 釋*阿字有空不生三義中云又不生者即
T2217_.59.0760b11: *是心之實際也。玄義云。正指實相直爲正
T2217_.59.0760b15: 即空即假即中。遠離一切戲論至於本不生
T2217_.59.0760b20: 諦別義故皆云假立也經眼耳等文也。二義 T2217_.59.0760b21: 雖異心實際爲極故云離也
T2217_.59.0760b24: 多意。如是者指前言也。微細惠者空性心即
T2217_.59.0760b27: 成天台一心三諦義畢重擧其意爲極無 T2217_.59.0760b28: 起因也。心之實際者或中道或所依一心義 T2217_.59.0760b29: 如先成今心實際亦復不可得者。前一道無 T2217_.59.0760c01: 爲心理無自性故起事事無礙故云亦復 T2217_.59.0760c02: 不可得云極無自性也。依之金師子章釋 T2217_.59.0760c03: 第五圓教云。情盡體露繁興大用。起必全
T2217_.59.0760c06: 萬像紛然二句逆次配論二句矣。心實際無 T2217_.59.0760c07: 自性而起事事故云起必全眞等耳。故知 T2217_.59.0760c08: 心實際亦復不可得文正釋極無自性心生 T2217_.59.0760c09: 句也。是即第九心也。故下釋云。行者初觀 T2217_.59.0760c10: 空性時覺一切法皆入心之實際○爾時十 T2217_.59.0760c11: 方諸佛同時現前而勸喩之。以蒙佛教授
T2217_.59.0760c14: 成法之義也。前已成第八心畢欲今更成 T2217_.59.0760c15: 第九心故。微細惠者極無自性心。於前空性 T2217_.59.0760c16: 等文有二意一有爲無爲相即是天台圓融 T2217_.59.0760c17: 三諦也。二縁生無性義即華嚴法界縁起也。
T2217_.59.0760c25: 九也。次下釋此心云。若住不思議地時不
T2217_.59.0760c28: 善無畏三藏説此極無自性一句悉攝華嚴 T2217_.59.0760c29: 教盡。所以者何。華嚴大意原始要終明眞
T2217_.59.0761a03: 稱性具徳。故探玄記中立十重唯識云○六 T2217_.59.0761a04: 轉眞成事唯識。謂如來藏不守自性隨縁 T2217_.59.0761a05: 顯現八識王數相見種現。七理事倶融唯識。 T2217_.59.0761a06: 謂如來藏擧體隨縁成辨諸事。其自性本不 T2217_.59.0761a07: 生業。即此理事混融無礙。是故一心二諦皆 T2217_.59.0761a08: 無礙。故起信云。依一心法有二種門皆各
T2217_.59.0761a11: 不相礙。或一入一切一切入一無所障礙。 T2217_.59.0761a12: 九全事相即唯識。謂依理之事事無別事 T2217_.59.0761a13: 理。既無彼此之異合事一即一切。十帝網 T2217_.59.0761a14: 無礙唯識。謂一中有一切。彼一切中復有一 T2217_.59.0761a15: 切。既一門中如是重重不可窮盡。餘一一
T2217_.59.0761a18: 事事圓融爲圓教。大師何違本宗義以三 T2217_.59.0761a19: 乘教義成一乘義理。誰信用耶。答。有二意。 T2217_.59.0761a20: 一云眞如法界隨縁義者。是一乘無盡法界 T2217_.59.0761a21: 縁起非三乘一相眞如縁起也。故復古記下 T2217_.59.0761a22: 云。太一云。一乘縁起自體法界不同大乘 T2217_.59.0761a23: 縁起但能離執斷常諸過示。此宗不爾一
T2217_.59.0761b02: 心縁起未及三密無盡縁起。故云眞如縁 T2217_.59.0761b03: 起也。又雖以理成事故談事融未明性 T2217_.59.0761b04: 相歴然事常故。故先徳云。顯一乘一心縁起
T2217_.59.0761b07: 別意。一道者佛知見即佛性。此佛性自性清 T2217_.59.0761b08: 淨故云極無自性也。譬如。金眞毎値阿 T2217_.59.0761b09: 練其形萬差而其性不改也。問。爾者可云 T2217_.59.0761b10: 極有自性住心。何云極無自性也。答。其攝
T2217_.59.0761b13: 除三昧見八萬四千煩惱實相成八萬四 T2217_.59.0761b14: 千寶聚門初發心時便成正覺。得如來一身 T2217_.59.0761b15: 無量身。初位得後位功徳猶論明昧是法 T2217_.59.0761b16: 華等顯一乘教相也。或已開淨知見照法性 T2217_.59.0761b17: 圓融解脱一切業煩惱時即知一切業煩 T2217_.59.0761b18: 惱。時即知一切業煩惱無非佛事本自 T2217_.59.0761b19: 無有縛令誰解脱耶。一斷一切斷一成一 T2217_.59.0761b20: 切成在於一地普攝一切諸地功徳。因果無 T2217_.59.0761b21: 二始終無礙。猶明從微至著階位漸次有次 T2217_.59.0761b22: 第行布等是眞言淺略。華嚴等顯一乘表徳 T2217_.59.0761b23: 教門斷惑證理行相也。今眞言祕教金剛一 T2217_.59.0761b24: 乘表徳教門曰能治道品是一一行者本有 T2217_.59.0761b25: 内證祕密金剛智印。論所治惑障即一一 T2217_.59.0761b26: 法佛法然自性三摩地密印標幟也。何捨何
T2217_.59.0761b29: 劫等者。三字誤書。謂此心屬第三劫故○ T2217_.59.0761c01: 第三劫極無自性心生時如蓮華盛敷故云 T2217_.59.0761c02: 望前二劫等。言若望後二心等者。此心喩 T2217_.59.0761c03: 八心中第五華種心第六成果心。後二心者 T2217_.59.0761c04: 第七受用種子第八嬰童心也。望此二心名
T2217_.59.0761c07: 依即是果複成種也。又解。此心是三心中菩 T2217_.59.0761c08: 提心。望前來二劫論時。當第三劫如蓮華 T2217_.59.0761c09: 盛敷。望後二心即根與究竟。此菩提心却
T2217_.59.0761c12: 究竟者以極無自性心爲因句時。次以蒙 T2217_.59.0761c13: 佛警更増進心爲根句此即金剛心一念 T2217_.59.0761c14: 也。後以成正覺位心爲究竟句也。然顯教 T2217_.59.0761c15: 意見今之第八地心爲果位。前二劫顯行滿 T2217_.59.0761c16: 昇此地故。今教以八地已上乃至十地心 T2217_.59.0761c17: 爲成佛因初心佛矣。密教行始成八地故 T2217_.59.0761c18: 此約説三祇漸行而論。若據實尋其行者 T2217_.59.0761c19: 初地已上可云成佛因。故疏第十一釋初 T2217_.59.0761c20: 地徳云。平等清淨離諸分別。劑此名見菩
T2217_.59.0761c23: 補處及八地三昧是約教道法門作如此 T2217_.59.0761c24: 説耳。然祕密乘人於世諦中即能通達第 T2217_.59.0761c25: 一義諦者從初發心時即具行大空三昧。 T2217_.59.0761c26: 其謂不然則於一生之中不能頓滿諸地
T2217_.59.0761c29: 心生疏釋存三劫地前地上二意。今釋何必 T2217_.59.0762a01: 云八地已上菩提心句耶。又大師住心論第
T2217_.59.0762a07: 義。或云。第二第三劫中各擧初攝後云二 T2217_.59.0762a08: 劫也。意於前二劫中極無自性心如蓮華
T2217_.59.0762a12: 中間覺心非三劫義歟。釋二劫者二種住 T2217_.59.0762a13: 心之故。或云。第二劫擧他縁攝覺心第三 T2217_.59.0762a14: 劫唯取一道能所相望異故以一劫半云 T2217_.59.0762a15: 二劫也。半劫又一劫攝故。問。在第三劫指 T2217_.59.0762a16: 前二劫。應是初二劫。例如上文云前二劫 T2217_.59.0762a17: 中雖云度二乘地等。又望初劫未敷蓮第三 T2217_.59.0762a18: 劫總應云開蓮。若爾相對初劫。尤可入前 T2217_.59.0762a19: 劫。故知抄義合疏意。如何。答。宗家釋義深 T2217_.59.0762a20: 冥疏意。總持字義依處隨義可取文義。前 T2217_.59.0762a21: 三劫相對今十住心相望也。又初劫中湛寂 T2217_.59.0762a22: 證寂相望而分水中水上之未敷蓮。准知今 T2217_.59.0762a23: 第三劫中一道極無相望而別未盛已盛之 T2217_.59.0762a24: 開蓮華故疏第一釋無量智成就文云。爾時 T2217_.59.0762a25: 行人爲此寂光所照無量知見自然開發如
T2217_.59.0762a28: 義。無量知見當彼經四佛知見理。然但云蓮 T2217_.59.0762a29: 華敷不云盛敷。故知於第三劫内開敷與 T2217_.59.0762b01: 盛敷相望也。重意云。前三義中初義望字違 T2217_.59.0762b02: 上此心言。不順下猶如等文。大師釋又望前 T2217_.59.0762b03: 顯教者。對極無指一道等云前顯教歟。若 T2217_.59.0762b04: 爾何爲證矣。次義又非理。何唯擧他縁一 T2217_.59.0762b05: 道不擧覺心乎。若又攝覺心者非二劫 T2217_.59.0762b06: 歟。故第三義爲勝。上下文符順故。隨又前諸 T2217_.59.0762b07: 難無故 T2217_.59.0762b08: 世尊以十方三世佛爲證等者。釋心云。極無 T2217_.59.0762b09: 自性心望顯極果。於密初心之義以十方佛 T2217_.59.0762b10: 説而證之義也。故住心論九云。是因是心望 T2217_.59.0762b11: 前顯教極果。於後祕心初心。初發心時便
T2217_.59.0762b14: 以此義開示衆生云一大事因縁。又云淨 T2217_.59.0762b15: 知見也。故知以華嚴文而證顯果爲密因 T2217_.59.0762b16: 之義。源出大日經説。非大師私義耳。問。 T2217_.59.0762b17: 今釋同法華中以大事因縁説四佛知見。 T2217_.59.0762b18: 何云顯果祕因之義*耶。答。隨義轉用矣 T2217_.59.0762b19: 行者解脱一切業煩惱時等者。自此下重釋 T2217_.59.0762b20: 經於業煩惱等文。已上再釋經上二句也。此 T2217_.59.0762b21: 中有法譬法説中初釋初句即知下釋而業 T2217_.59.0762b22: 下句。本自下二句如次釋成上二義。蓮前 T2217_.59.0762b23: 文兩次讀之。如良下譬説有二種。初譬中 T2217_.59.0762b24: 變毒爲藥如次喩脱煩惱時即知佛事。用 T2217_.59.0762b25: 除衆病一句通應譬本自下二句。又義。以 T2217_.59.0762b26: 譬二句對法説二二句。各逆次配矣。又如下 T2217_.59.0762b27: 以譬二句對法説四句而兩次配之。又或 T2217_.59.0762b28: 此譬却顯前開華成種之義。而萬像具依同 T2217_.59.0762b29: 果復成種之意。故若依後意可云萬像即 T2217_.59.0762b30: 空耳。演密抄第四云。知一切業煩惱等者。據 T2217_.59.0762c01: 事則凡情謂之塵勞聖智達爲功徳。約理 T2217_.59.0762c02: 則本離塵染。然與一切煩惱爲依故以變
T2217_.59.0762c06: 即名之爲明。明來暗謝故。即是無明滅則行
T2217_.59.0762c09: 而具明達之智。又云。衆生未成佛以菩提 T2217_.59.0762c10: 爲煩惱。菩薩成佛時以煩惱爲菩提。故華 T2217_.59.0762c11: 嚴疏顯三毒相普有正法。彼有五義。一當 T2217_.59.0762c12: 相即空。空故是道。非謂此三即是佛法○
T2217_.59.0762c17: 同。故無行經云。婬欲即是道。恚癡亦復然。如 T2217_.59.0762c18: 是三法中具一切佛法即斯義。又如虚空 T2217_.59.0762c19: 出過衆相而萬像具依。故下經云。虚空無垢
T2217_.59.0762c22: 入第三劫時先觀性空無相菩提超第三 T2217_.59.0762c23: 重無明極細妄執證得極無自性瑜伽之心 T2217_.59.0762c24: 名超第三劫行。約所度*惑名第三劫行。 T2217_.59.0762c25: 約所證法名淨菩提心○眞言初住於一 T2217_.59.0762c26: 分無明不斷而斷名超第三而極細妄執。然 T2217_.59.0762c27: 猶有四十一品無明故云解脱業煩惱而業 T2217_.59.0762c28: 煩惱具依。變毒爲藥。即是初住以上法性同 T2217_.59.0762c29: 體之無明也。不斷而斷斷而不斷故云解脱
T2217_.59.0763a03: 顯家之佛滯斷常二行未出業煩惱之苦 T2217_.59.0763a04: 依。故大日經中説如是初心佛説成佛因故 T2217_.59.0763a05: 於業煩惱解脱而業煩惱具依等。華嚴・寶雲
T2217_.59.0763a08: 各據一義影略互顯歟。自宗十地有本有性 T2217_.59.0763a09: 徳修生顯徳二義。疏家約本有無垢十地故。 T2217_.59.0763a10: 無間道地前諸惑斷盡故。疏第三云。但知心 T2217_.59.0763a11: 垢盡處戲論不行即是第六無畏依。更欲如
T2217_.59.0763a17: 六分明昧大日經疏第四微細妄執等是也
T2217_.59.0763a20: 上横義也。依十住心論前九種住心皆是因 T2217_.59.0763a21: 也。是地前也。第十即果也。即地上也。竪論 T2217_.59.0763a22: 次第淺深皆是眞言地前行相也。横觀智智 T2217_.59.0763a23: 平等即地上行相也。又義疏中釋今經文
T2217_.59.0763a26: 順成。以此心兩字應流下二句矣。或讀文 T2217_.59.0763a27: 點皆爲順釋。謂如是初心佛成佛・因説。上 T2217_.59.0763a28: 二句釋成佛義下二句釋因義也。故住心論 T2217_.59.0763a29: 中引疏今文合經局成佛因文矣。於業下 T2217_.59.0763b01: 文下別釋。行者已下文是也。故疏第三引 T2217_.59.0763b02: 今文云如前所説解脱一切業煩惱等除 T2217_.59.0763b03: 初二句矣。但佛説兩字廣貫下文故再釋歟。 T2217_.59.0763b04: 二者於業已下文又爲所釋也。置故字以 T2217_.59.0763b05: 反順義成上佛因之義故。所謂上先作盛 T2217_.59.0763b06: 敷成種釋合解脱具依等經。故抄上釋云。 T2217_.59.0763b07: 於業煩惱解脱即是如蓮開敷。而業煩惱具
T2217_.59.0763b10: 斷故云成種。寶鑰云。望前顯教極果於後 T2217_.59.0763b11: 祕心初心者即此意矣。次行者以下釋更述 T2217_.59.0763b12: 別義也。若依頓證人。微細亦初地盡故云 T2217_.59.0763b13: 爾歟。前義約漸證人兼顯顯密差別歟。大 T2217_.59.0763b14: 師顯密分別爲要但依前義也。若爾依後 T2217_.59.0763b15: 義不成佛因義乎。謂知無非佛事即頓證 T2217_.59.0763b16: 之因故云成佛因耳。但疏下釋。不思議幻義 T2217_.59.0763b17: 下句顯故爾也。意異矣。大師釋不引釋不引 T2217_.59.0763b18: 盡歟。或又約顯果後惑不存故云無非佛 T2217_.59.0763b19: 事。依密因後*惑未盡故云果復成種。前後 T2217_.59.0763b20: 相成而成一義矣。或又釋論中熏離・熏倶作 T2217_.59.0763b21: 二釋。今釋當第二是一味故釋歟。問。無非 T2217_.59.0763b22: 佛事悟唯在諸*惑斷盡位*耶。答。准釋論 T2217_.59.0763b23: 染淨始覺悟可爾歟。故仁王經云。菩薩未 T2217_.59.0763b24: 成佛時以菩提爲煩惱。菩薩成佛時以
T2217_.59.0763b27: 者寶鑰云。初發心時便成正覺宜其然也
T2217_.59.0763c03: 果同密初心。故彼具文云。是因是心望前顯 T2217_.59.0763c04: 教極果。於後祕心初心。初發心時便成正
T2217_.59.0763c09: 華嚴文成祕宗義。例如智論是助佛道初 T2217_.59.0763c10: 門之文矣。問。龍樹付法亘顯密報佛唯 T2217_.59.0763c11: 説顯故相例不齊。故大師雖智論爲顯密 T2217_.59.0763c12: 差別之證。華嚴不爾。如何。答。傳持龍樹既 T2217_.59.0763c13: 知密。能説如來不思祕。故大師釋云。應化
T2217_.59.0763c16: 釋論所引大本華嚴成顯密義畢。但初發 T2217_.59.0763c17: 心者如云初心未必發心住歟。或隨義轉 T2217_.59.0763c18: 用矣 T2217_.59.0763c19: 若住此不思議解脱時等者。極無自性心在 T2217_.59.0763c20: 初地故云住不思議等也。故下文云。轉生
T2217_.59.0763c23: 雖地前何不云不思議乎。答。既下文云不 T2217_.59.0763c24: 思議地豈非初地以上乎。今文意迴向滿心 T2217_.59.0763c25: 垢悉盡入初地時。開一切業煩惱無非佛事 T2217_.59.0763c26: 悟。故云不思議地也。故疏第七云。若到修 T2217_.59.0763c27: 行地授不思議果。此修行地即是淨菩提 T2217_.59.0763c28: 心初法明門。例如聲聞見諦已後復入修道
T2217_.59.0764a06: 坊草了是偏爲紹隆佛法回向菩提而已
T2217_.59.0764a09: T2217_.59.0764a10: T2217_.59.0764a11: T2217_.59.0764a12: 疏卷第二之七 T2217_.59.0764a13: 統論三劫始終等者。且約大師十住心者有 T2217_.59.0764a14: 多意。或唯蘊無我爲始。極無自性爲終。上 T2217_.59.0764a15: 三劫文各存二意故疏云。越世間三妄執出
T2217_.59.0764a18: 始。下文中世間八心爲一毫善。故持齊爲 T2217_.59.0764a19: 始。又上文云。若住此不思議解脱時是眞阿
T2217_.59.0764a24: 心初劫除世間心。下六無畏擧世間心無 T2217_.59.0764a25: 祕密心。故前後合論始終各有兼正耳。或 T2217_.59.0764a26: 始可通第一心。彼又有知過義。故寶鑰云。
T2217_.59.0764a29: 尚丘云。金玉未成器。礦古猛反。金璞金玉
T2217_.59.0764b03: 譬如收彼頑石置在家中者。問。譬説中既無 T2217_.59.0764b04: 此意。何合説中示此義耶 答。今文中譬合互 T2217_.59.0764b05: 顯圓世間三心也。故有此句。所謂合中。是
T2217_.59.0764b10: 嬰童心也。受三歸戒是護戒故。前譬中此心 T2217_.59.0764b11: 無文。又譬説中。猶有如意寶在石礦之中
T2217_.59.0764b14: 次以三種三心等者。有人云。見・修・無學三道 T2217_.59.0764b15: 云三種。此三道各有越三妄之心故云三 T2217_.59.0764b16: 種三心。但云拔業煩惱者擧無學三心顯
T2217_.59.0764b19: 聞・縁覺・證寂然界三乘人各經同三道斷彼 T2217_.59.0764b20: 三妄。然聲聞空我故攝唯蘊無我。縁覺與
T2217_.59.0764b23: 心云三種三心。三種即三心也。又有義同第 T2217_.59.0764b24: 二義也。私云。第二義違住心淺深。見道・三 T2217_.59.0764b25: 果是唯蘊心。無學拔業心故。第三義唯三乘 T2217_.59.0764b26: 心可云三種心後三字無用乎。初義無難 T2217_.59.0764b27: 歟 T2217_.59.0764b28: 爾時生於佛家等者。此文有二意。或攝祕 T2217_.59.0764b29: 密或屬極無自性心。合灰水使淨生於佛 T2217_.59.0764c01: 家合在憧雨寶之故。即知極無唯在地前 T2217_.59.0764c02: 也。地前地上是顯密界畔故。故寶鑰釋顯
T2217_.59.0764c08: 密。若行者已下述頓機入祕也。直從眞言 T2217_.59.0764c09: 門直字此意矣。所謂迂迴直往雖巧度拙度 T2217_.59.0764c10: 不同倶入初地金剛寶藏故云獲寶無異 T2217_.59.0764c11: 路也。意漸頓修行雖是顯密異路入初地
T2217_.59.0764c14: 分明故。況復三劫各置次言簡濫若生於 T2217_.59.0764c15: 佛家文更明直言初地。何不置次言乎。又 T2217_.59.0764c16: 結文以此因縁故堪受世間廣大供養也者又 T2217_.59.0764c17: 非釋經世間宗奉常應供養文乎。上疏文見 T2217_.59.0764c18: 歎極無徳。故即知今文成極無義理也。但 T2217_.59.0764c19: 至合譬二重者於極無有斷惑證理二重。 T2217_.59.0764c20: 無間・解脱如次地前地上故。然次生極無自 T2217_.59.0764c21: 性句雖通斷證總句且約斷惑邊合別譬 T2217_.59.0764c22: 也。又大師釋者。大顯密對辨時雖云拂外 T2217_.59.0764c23: 塵於顯中斷證異故非無得寶。故寶鑰叙 T2217_.59.0764c24: 第九心云。初心之佛其徳不思議。萬徳始顯
T2217_.59.0764c27: 乎。然猶望三密寶時彼非眞寶故云未開 T2217_.59.0764c28: 藏也。又於初地位有遮表。顯乘極位寄同 T2217_.59.0764c29: 祕密遮情故云雨藏。一心三密雖異同初地 Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:無/有] [CITE] |