SAT DB

T2103_.52.0123a01: 方俟火粒甫爲教萌。於大慈神力不有所躓
T2103_.52.0123a02: 乎。若粳糧未播。殺事難息。未審前時過去諸
T2103_.52.0123a03: 佛。復以何法爲教。此教之萌起在何佛。兼四
T2103_.52.0123a04: 戒犯人爲報乍輕。一殺害獸受對更重。首輕
T2103_.52.0123a05: 末重亦爲未逹。夫立人之道。曰仁與義。周孔
T2103_.52.0123a06: 所云。聞聲不食。斬伐以時者。蓋欲大明仁義
T2103_.52.0123a07: 之道。於鳥獸草木尚曰其然。況在乎人而可
T2103_.52.0123a08: 悖虐。非謂内惕寡。方意在縁報。覩迹或似。論
T2103_.52.0123a09: 情＊頓乖。不審於内外兩聖。其事可得是均
T2103_.52.0123a10: 以不。此中參差難用頓悟。謹備以諮洗。願
T2103_.52.0123a11: 具啓諸蔽
T2103_.52.0123a12: 答曰。民資肉食而火粒未啓。便令不肉教豈
T2103_.52.0123a13: 得行。前論言之已具。不復重釋。衆生縁果所
T2103_.52.0123a14: 遭各有期會。當昔佛教未被。是其惡業盛時。
T2103_.52.0123a15: 後之聞法是其善業萌時。善惡各有其時。何
T2103_.52.0123a16: 關淳厚之與澆薄。五支之戒各有輕重。非殺
T2103_.52.0123a17: 戒偏重四支並輕。且五業雖異而互相發起。
T2103_.52.0123a18: 犯人之戒。人重故先出。犯獸之戒。獸輕故後
T2103_.52.0123a19: 被。訓記之道次第宜然。周公孔子漸弘仁
T2103_.52.0123a20: 惻。前論已詳。請息重辯。若必以釋教乖方
T2103_.52.0123a21: 域之理。外此自一家之學所不敢言
T2103_.52.0123a22: 廣弘明集卷第五
T2103_.52.0123a23:
T2103_.52.0123a24:
T2103_.52.0123a25:
T2103_.52.0123a26:
T2103_.52.0123a27:
T2103_.52.0123a28:
T2103_.52.0123a29:
T2103_.52.0123b01:
T2103_.52.0123b02:
T2103_.52.0123b03: 廣弘明集卷第六
T2103_.52.0123b04:   大唐西明寺沙門釋道宣撰
T2103_.52.0123b05:   辯惑篇第二之二
T2103_.52.0123b06:   列代王臣滯惑解上
T2103_.52.0123b07: 有唐太史傅奕者。本宗李老猜忌釋門。潜圖
T2103_.52.0123b08: 芟剪用逹其鄙。武徳之始上書具述。既非經
T2103_.52.0123b09: 國當時遂寢。奕不勝其憤。乃引古來王臣訕
T2103_.52.0123b10: 謗佛法者二十五人。撰次品目名爲高識傳。
T2103_.52.0123b11: 一帙十卷。抄於市賣欲廣其塵。又加潤飾増
T2103_.52.0123b12: 其罪状。至於張魯據於漢中黄巾反於天下。
T2103_.52.0123b13: 斯並李門勃逆。皆覆而不顯非。謂篤論之文
T2103_.52.0123b14: 乎。若夫城高必頽木秀斯拔。惟我清峻。故
T2103_.52.0123b15: 有異道嫉之。不足怪其鄙吝。未見廝徒。皂隷
T2103_.52.0123b16: 有加惱辱。明非目翳何事屏除。故因其立言
T2103_.52.0123b17: 仍隨開喩。此則古來行事釋判天分。未廣見
T2103_.52.0123b18: 者謂爲新致。聊陳舊解略顯由途。資此神開
T2103_.52.0123b19: 可稱高識。又傅氏寡識才用寄人。集叙時事
T2103_.52.0123b20: 廢興。太半坑殘焚蕩之事。可號非政所。須沙
T2103_.52.0123b21: 汰括撿之條。斯寔王化之本。故僧條俗格。
T2103_.52.0123b22: 代代滋彰。此乃禁非豈成除毀。傅氏通入廢
T2103_.52.0123b23: 限。是謂披毛之夫終淪塗炭。可悲之甚矣。奕
T2103_.52.0123b24: 學周子史意在誅除。搜揚列代論佛法者。莫
T2103_.52.0123b25: 委存廢。通疏二十五人。大略有二。初則崇
T2103_.52.0123b26: 敬佛法恐有婬穢。故須沙汰務得住持。二
T2103_.52.0123b27: 則憎嫉昌顯危身挾怨。故須除蕩以暢胸襟。
T2103_.52.0123b28: 初列住持王臣一十四人。傅奕高識傳。通列
T2103_.52.0123b29: 爲廢除者。今簡則是興隆之人
T2103_.52.0123c01:   宋世祖唐高祖王度顏延之蕭摹
T2103_.52.0123c02: 之周朗虞愿張普惠李 &MT03415;

衞元
T2103_.52.0123c03: 嵩顧歡邢子才高道讓盧思道
T2103_.52.0123c04: 二列毀滅王臣一十一人。傅奕高識傳。列爲
T2103_.52.0123c05: 高識之人。今尋乃是廢滅者
T2103_.52.0123c06: 魏大武周高祖蔡謨劉晝陽衒之
T2103_.52.0123c07: 荀濟章仇子陀劉惠琳范縝李緒

T2103_.52.0123c08:

傅奕

減省除
滅半之

王文同

T2103_.52.0123c09: 初序沙汰僧衆者。夫以稊稂之穢青田。榮華
T2103_.52.0123c10: 之弊白首者。良有以也。故六群之過興舍衞。
T2103_.52.0123c11: 十濫之僞起毘離。大聖因立條章。無學由而
T2103_.52.0123c12: 正犯。遂有七擯量其小失。四法拔其大 &MT01891;

。張
T2103_.52.0123c13: 網目而示三千。顯律儀而陳八萬。故得正像
T2103_.52.0123c14: 咸稱有道内外同號無塵。自法漸王門。金科
T2103_.52.0123c15: 之刑無墜。僧羅海岳。藏疾之隙滋章。擧統
T2103_.52.0123c16: 以法繩之。烹鮮之儀可覿。隨機以時勸勉。握
T2103_.52.0123c17: 泥之喩自隣。人誰無過。垂珠之誡有津。醜迹
T2103_.52.0123c18: 易欣。掩耳之夫難覩。所以宋唐兩帝王顏等
T2103_.52.0123c19: 賢。鑒物性之昏明曉時縁之淳薄。縱釋門之
T2103_.52.0123c20: 紛蕩。則淄澠一亂。彈僧徒之得失。則涇渭殊
T2103_.52.0123c21: 流斥貪競之鄙夫。毀藏積之僧滓。存高尚之
T2103_.52.0123c22: 道徳。廷重惠以攝人。至如漢魏齊梁之爲政
T2103_.52.0123c23: 也。恢恢天網取漏呑舟。察察王政事兼苛濫。
T2103_.52.0123c24: 所以大弘佛法通濟於五乘。該洽明時陶漸
T2103_.52.0123c25: 於清濁。使濁者知歸令自新於大造。清者容
T2103_.52.0123c26: 養悟適化之多方。其猶大赦天下。逋逃因之
T2103_.52.0123c27: 改容。忘瑕納衆。群小以之遷善。堯舜豈非聖
T2103_.52.0123c28: 主而化不及丹朱。漢祖焉樂亂階而亮貫高
T2103_.52.0123c29: 之逆。孔門季路雖僻而預升堂。釋種逹多乃
T2103_.52.0124a01: 邪而參清衆。是知權道抑揚神機利用。或收
T2103_.52.0124a02: 或縱。事出乘時。後序除廢三寶意者。夫以保
T2103_.52.0124a03: 形存命有生之所貴。重財愛食鄙俗之共珍。
T2103_.52.0124a04: 故位稱大寶。無以摧於死王。力拔青山。莫
T2103_.52.0124a05: 有亡於老病。斯佛教也。故四山常逼王位非
T2103_.52.0124a06: 常。三相恒遷生涯有數。斯實録也。俗有讖記
T2103_.52.0124a07: 之傳。不知由何而得。或云口授。或述符圖。虚
T2103_.52.0124a08: 然顯密布露士俗。竊以五運更襲帝者一人自。
T2103_.52.0124a09: 餘凡叟誰之顧録。周祖已前有忌黒者。云有
T2103_.52.0124a10: 黒人次膺天位。故齊宣惶怖欲誅稠禪師。稠
T2103_.52.0124a11: 以情問。云有黒人當臨天位。稠曰。斯浪言也。
T2103_.52.0124a12: 黒無過漆。漆可作耶。齊宣妄解手殺第七弟
T2103_.52.0124a13: 渙。故可笑也。周太祖初承俗讖。我名黒泰可
T2103_.52.0124a14: 以當之。既入關中改爲黒皂。朝章野服咸悉
T2103_.52.0124a15: 同之。令僧衣黄以從讖緯。武帝雄略初不齒
T2103_.52.0124a16: 之。張賓定覇。元嵩賦詩。重道疑佛將行廢立。
T2103_.52.0124a17: 有實禪師者。釋門之望帝亦欽重。私問後運
T2103_.52.0124a18: 是誰應得。實曰。非僧所知。帝曰。如讖所傳云
T2103_.52.0124a19: 黒者應得。僧多衣黒。竊有所疑。實曰。僧但一
T2103_.52.0124a20: 身誰所扶翼。決非僧也。帝曰。僧非得者。黒者
T2103_.52.0124a21: 是誰。實曰。至尊大人保信浪語。外相若聞豈
T2103_.52.0124a22: 言至聖。黒者大有老烏亦黒。大豆亦黒。如是
T2103_.52.0124a23: 非一。可亦得耶。帝聞有姓。烏姓竇者。假過誅
T2103_.52.0124a24: 之元其情本。疑意在釋。遂即蕩除。魏太武本
T2103_.52.0124a25: 是戎郷。素無文墨。八歳登位。一信崔浩。故兩
T2103_.52.0124a26: 帝厚身信讒信讖。陵殘佛化自取殃及。旋踵
T2103_.52.0124a27: 更興。興由時來。不在人力。故經傳云。佛化惟
T2103_.52.0124a28: 遠終於六萬歳時住持。小聖功在九億無學。
T2103_.52.0124a29: 不可削也。蔡謨已下上事諸賢。並挾私忿於
T2103_.52.0124b01: 僧有隙。發憤忘身。何況佛法。極筆而書罪状。
T2103_.52.0124b02: 深文而掛刑網。禿賊以驚視聽。妖胡而動王
T2103_.52.0124b03: 臣且律令條章。未若凝脂之密。滔滔天網自
T2103_.52.0124b04: 有陷目之夫。言賊斯即盜科。述妖乃當死例。
T2103_.52.0124b05: 書表盛云妖賊。未識妖賊是誰。可謂匿名之
T2103_.52.0124b06: 書。足投諸火。如須勘檢虚迹自形。前後上事
T2103_.52.0124b07: 雖有十賢。荀濟一夫差有才用。自餘連寫未足
T2103_.52.0124b08: 人聞。傅奕後來謂自脱頴。言無典據才氣虚
T2103_.52.0124b09: 劣。瓦礫云寶。賢愚所輕。然素本無道門起
T2103_.52.0124b10: 家。貧賤投僧乞貸。不遂所懷。蓄憤致嫌固其
T2103_.52.0124b11: 本志。武徳之始西來入京。投道士王巋。巋
T2103_.52.0124b12: 道左之望。都邑所知。見其飢寒延居私宅。
T2103_.52.0124b13: 巋通人也。待以上賓。三數日間。遂通其婦入
T2103_.52.0124b14: 堂宴語。曾不避人。巋有兄子爲僧。寺近巋宅。
T2103_.52.0124b15: 因往見之。奕大瞋怒。僧便告巋。巋初不信曰。
T2103_.52.0124b16: 傅奕貧士。我將接在宅。豈爲不軌耶。僧曰。叔
T2103_.52.0124b17: 若有疑。可一往視。相將至宅。果如所言。巋掩
T2103_.52.0124b18: 氣而旋。巋有女婿爲果毅。常以爲言。奕既竊
T2103_.52.0124b19: 妻而傅妖不可算矣。如唐吏部唐臨冥報所
T2103_.52.0124b20: 傳。神爲泥人。固其宜哉。如別所顯
T2103_.52.0124b21: 隋大業八年。天子在遼。有王文同者。郊東王
T2103_.52.0124b22: 堡人也。夙與僧爭水磑之利。勅令巡問軍實。
T2103_.52.0124b23: 乃矯詔集僧。三木加身考令云反。并令引邑
T2103_.52.0124b24: 議同謀遂誅剪僧徒於河間郡。殺道俗近一
T2103_.52.0124b25: 千人。傳符逹於蒲州。酷聲遍於天下。時竇慶
T2103_.52.0124b26: 爲河東太守。以状奏聞。帝大怒。於河間戮之。
T2103_.52.0124b27: 未及加刑。百姓臠之生噉。乃及於土地。以此
T2103_.52.0124b28: 反例下述。反僧亦相符。此然初因僧起謗毀
T2103_.52.0124b29: 佛法。咸因宿忿。不思累劫之溺。而欲一時
T2103_.52.0124c01: 之快。泄在帝臣非關上事。非位不謀。已如
T2103_.52.0124c02: 前咎。徒爲擧斧終陷磨胸。故集者隨傳叙之。
T2103_.52.0124c03: 庶後葉之龜鏡也
T2103_.52.0124c04: 後魏世祖　周高祖　宋世祖　唐高祖　趙
T2103_.52.0124c05: 王度　晋蔡謨　宋顏延之　宋蕭摹之　宋
T2103_.52.0124c06: 周朗　宋虞愿　魏張普濟　魏李 &MT03415;

　齊劉
T2103_.52.0124c07: 晝　魏楊衒之
T2103_.52.0124c08: 後魏世祖太武皇帝。初立道學。置道壇廢佛
T2103_.52.0124c09: 宗
T2103_.52.0124c10: 帝姓託跋氏。諱伏釐。後名燾。鮮卑胡人之別
T2103_.52.0124c11: 種也。西晋之亂有託跋盧。據有朔方。晋就封
T2103_.52.0124c12: 爲代王。盧孫捨翼鞬或云珪。部落逾盛。衆
T2103_.52.0124c13: 十萬。北連雲中西據陰山。雲中南去漢塞四
T2103_.52.0124c14: 千里。以東晋孝武太元初。南至朔東三百里。
T2103_.52.0124c15: 平城爲都二十餘歳。依華造殿宗事佛道。登
T2103_.52.0124c16: 位三十四年。至晋帝隆安中。第三主託跋燾
T2103_.52.0124c17: 立。時年八歳。尚在幼冲。信任司徒崔浩。浩尤
T2103_.52.0124c18: 不信佛。情重李老仙術。以道徳經授帝令諷
T2103_.52.0124c19: 味。因便重之。登位二年召天下方士。有道士
T2103_.52.0124c20: 寇謙之者。道門之魁傑也。自云於嵩高値天
T2103_.52.0124c21: 尊飛下。召謙賜以天師之號。令奉太平眞君
T2103_.52.0124c22: 置靜輪天宮。可獲仙道。列辟聞之若遺。而浩
T2103_.52.0124c23: 深信之。帝由於平城郊置道場。方二百歩。重
T2103_.52.0124c24: 層崇峻并備厚禮。具如釋老志所述。後改號
T2103_.52.0124c25: 太平眞君。以遂寇謙之道命也。因蓋呉作亂。
T2103_.52.0124c26: 關中有沙門。畜弓矢。浩便進説與呉通謀。遂
T2103_.52.0124c27: 誅長安沙門。焚破佛像。四方亦然。惟留臺
T2103_.52.0124c28: 下。至眞君七年。遂一切蕩除。坑僧破像自以
T2103_.52.0124c29: 爲得志也。爲讒所黷幽殺大子。惡疾殃身方
T2103_.52.0125a01: 族崔浩何嗟及矣。不久爲閹人宗慶。所殺便
T2103_.52.0125a02: 崩。其孫嗣立。即開佛法天下大明
T2103_.52.0125a03: 第六帝孝文是稱文祖。改姓爲元。改代爲魏。
T2103_.52.0125a04: 去胡服定官名。衣冠華夏移都河洛。佛法大
T2103_.52.0125a05: 興。然世祖勇於武略怯於文雄。輕於自審
T2103_.52.0125a06: 重於信僞。而奕叙爲命世之明后。寔誣也
T2103_.52.0125a07: 哉。尋奕搜檢列代上事言及釋門者。大略五
T2103_.52.0125a08: 焉。前已顯之。今重昌辯。一以業運冥昧報
T2103_.52.0125a09: 果交加。二以教指俗僞終歸空滅。三以寺宇
T2103_.52.0125a10: 崇麗顧陵嫉之。四以僧有雜行抄掠財色。五
T2103_.52.0125a11: 以僧本縁俗位隆抗禮。五相雖惑多。以雜行
T2103_.52.0125a12: 者爲言焉。斯不逹之曲士也。夫出家者。取其
T2103_.52.0125a13: 發足超方形心異俗。執持聖種震懾魔王。天
T2103_.52.0125a14: 帝尚來下拜。龍神無不奉者。非無五三雜行
T2103_.52.0125a15: 犯法負心。婆娑於色味。貪餮於名利。斯等行
T2103_.52.0125a16: 乖佛化正法稊稂。涅槃謂爲禿人。梵網呼爲
T2103_.52.0125a17: 大賊。戒海如屍不納僧條。財法絶之斯禁顯
T2103_.52.0125a18: 然。妄咎於佛深不可也。至如俗士純臣有國
T2103_.52.0125a19: 常。有行貞潔者重之。爲貪競者罪之。不可
T2103_.52.0125a20: 以見一士乖僻合國並誅。一官濁濫擧朝同
T2103_.52.0125a21: 剪。斯不可也。事見後魏書及十六國春秋。世
T2103_.52.0125a22: 祖見一寺過起。通國斬僧。無問少長一時殘
T2103_.52.0125a23: 戮。可謂虜官長也。判事雷同奕引以爲明略。
T2103_.52.0125a24: 明者逃矣。又以見僧受供厚禮頻繁。自不能
T2103_.52.0125a25: 拔姤而増状。僧爲福田。奉之自獲其報。官
T2103_.52.0125a26: 是攝政。祿之以盛其功。今王賜臣下。讓祿者
T2103_.52.0125a27: 是誰。俗施僧財。不受者常有。無祿之官不聞
T2103_.52.0125a28: 於國。受俸之士充牣九州。豈以一士受賕朝
T2103_.52.0125a29: 廷爲之廢務。一僧濫施釋門由此致嫌。又不
T2103_.52.0125b01: 可也。是知清濁異途道俗通有。憲臺繩糺於
T2103_.52.0125b02: 失法。詳刑科處於重輕。斯俗政也。戒律以檢
T2103_.52.0125b03: 於七非。擯罰以正於三格。僧制以遮其外犯。
T2103_.52.0125b04: 法令以勗其内心。此佛教也。是則道俗律令。
T2103_.52.0125b05: 具足光明。昭彰於四俗。顯昌於五衆。有何不
T2103_.52.0125b06: 盡。須爾上言。所以
T2103_.52.0125b07: 上帝高居於九重殷鑒四海。列辟靡監於王
T2103_.52.0125b08: 事職司其憂。爾非其司妄行干政。徒爲濫職
T2103_.52.0125b09: 何用當官。故後之上事。希有從之者。故經説
T2103_.52.0125b10: 四依擬分僞濫。人識難＊辯法智易明。何得見
T2103_.52.0125b11: 一僧行過。上累佛宗。見一戒或虧便輕正法。
T2103_.52.0125b12: 止可以道廢人。以人不弘道也。不可以人廢
T2103_.52.0125b13: 道。以道高出天人。抑又詳之。今以五常檢人。
T2103_.52.0125b14: 何人能具。五孝檢士。何士備之。讀易而忽陰
T2103_.52.0125b15: 陽。講禮而存倨傲。闇君賊臣代代常有。尸祿
T2103_.52.0125b16: 亂政時時更繁。孔門三千。顏生獨爲徳行。君
T2103_.52.0125b17: 人二十九代。唐堯常據。言初略述。統詳則
T2103_.52.0125b18: 釋門藻鏡者殷矣
T2103_.52.0125b19: 二周祖武皇帝。志存道學。躬受符録猜忌
T2103_.52.0125b20: 佛門
T2103_.52.0125b21: 帝姓宇文氏。諱邕。太祖魏丞相黒泰之第三
T2103_.52.0125b22: 子也。族本鮮卑。元魏之末太祖挾魏。平陽王
T2103_.52.0125b23: 西頓關中。經魏四帝二十三年薨。世子洛陽
T2103_.52.0125b24: 公。受魏禪稱周。當年被廢。立弟寧都公。爲帝
T2103_.52.0125b25: 四年崩。諡明帝。兒小立弟魯國公爲帝。即高
T2103_.52.0125b26: 祖也。改號保定元年。深謀獨斷猜忌爲心。晦
T2103_.52.0125b27: 迹親疏以蒙智術。保定六年改元天和。前後
T2103_.52.0125b28: 經于一紀。大冡宰晋國公宇文護太祖之猶
T2103_.52.0125b29: 子也。躬受遺詔輔翼帝圖。雄略控御光時佐
T2103_.52.0125c01: 國。恐有廢立。便引入内殺之。并子十人。族大
T2103_.52.0125c02: 臣六家。改元建徳。誅除雄武摧剪扜城。慮遠
T2103_.52.0125c03: 權衡英威自若。而能克己勵精。露懷臣下。
T2103_.52.0125c04: 布袍菲食勞謙自持。躬履行陣歩渉山谷。
T2103_.52.0125c05: 故得士卒之心死而不厭。時有讖記忌於黒
T2103_.52.0125c06: 衣。謂沙門中次當襲運。故帝初大信佛。以事
T2103_.52.0125c07: 逼身遂行廢蕩。以建徳三年。納道士張賓佞
T2103_.52.0125c08: 辯。便滅二教。更立通道觀用暢本懷。至建徳
T2103_.52.0125c09: 五年。平齊既訖。自以爲。滅法之福祐也。改元
T2103_.52.0125c10: 宣政。至五月因癘而崩於雲陽。子贇嗣位。殺
T2103_.52.0125c11: 齊王父子十人。正月一日改元大成。禪位其
T2103_.52.0125c12: 子衍。改元大象。自號天元皇帝。便開佛法。然
T2103_.52.0125c13: 則禍深福淺過奄其功。明年五月崩。諡曰文
T2103_.52.0125c14: 宣。後年正月改元大定。二月内禪位有隋。故
T2103_.52.0125c15: 奕述云。觀武帝爲政。果決能斷。此其志也。既
T2103_.52.0125c16: 除妖邪之教。＊惟務強兵。五年之間大勳斯集
T2103_.52.0125c17: 盛矣。其有成功也。集者曰。弈云。無佛則國安
T2103_.52.0125c18: 祚遠。如何周祖誅除纔了凶崩忽臨。則奕爲
T2103_.52.0125c19: 狂矣。然則武帝惟武曾不遲疑。隨心快意便
T2103_.52.0125c20: 行誅戮。害叔毀佛欺惘已深。祚促暦移固其
T2103_.52.0125c21: 宜矣。況復癘及其身呼嗟何及。殃鍾禍集又
T2103_.52.0125c22: 可悲涼。乃以正佛爲妖邪。指僞道爲師奉。
T2103_.52.0125c23: 闇君荒主豈待夏殷固諡法之司。魏周滅法
T2103_.52.0125c24: 之主倶爲武者。不亦宜乎。餘有除毀相状感
T2103_.52.0125c25: 於苦報。如別具述
T2103_.52.0125c26: 三宋世祖孝武皇帝。沙汰僧徒并致敬事。
T2103_.52.0125c27: 帝姓劉氏。諱駿。文帝之第三子也。爲父討逆。
T2103_.52.0125c28: 斬兄邵於南郊。并子三十一人。自立改元孝
T2103_.52.0125c29: 建。二年誅叔義宣。大明二年誅王僧逹父子。
T2103_.52.0126a01: 有羌人高闍反。事及沙門曇標。下詔曰。佛法
T2103_.52.0126a02: 訛替沙門混雜。未足扶濟鴻教而專成逋藪。
T2103_.52.0126a03: 加以姦心頻發凶状屢聞。敗道亂俗人神交
T2103_.52.0126a04: 忿。可付所在精加沙汰。後有違犯嚴其誅坐
T2103_.52.0126a05: 遂設諸條禁。自非戒行精苦。並使還俗。詔雖
T2103_.52.0126a06: 嚴重竟不施行。先是晋成帝時。庾氷專政。
T2103_.52.0126a07: 欲令沙門致敬王者。何充王謐等駁議不同。
T2103_.52.0126a08: 及桓玄簒位。復述前議倶不果行。備如別述。
T2103_.52.0126a09: 世祖以大明六年。使有司奏議令僧致敬。既
T2103_.52.0126a10: 行刳斮之虐。鞭顏竣面而斬之。人不勝其酷
T2103_.52.0126a11: 也。且僧拜非經國之典。亦不行之。大明八年
T2103_.52.0126a12: 崩。子業立。尋爲明帝所奪。而傅奕叙爲高識
T2103_.52.0126a13: 之帝。濫刑何識之可高耶。倏忽絶嗣身名倶
T2103_.52.0126a14: 滅。可爲殷鑒矣。案蕭子顯述曰。宋氏自稱水
T2103_.52.0126a15: 徳。承運曲干。正位八君卜年五紀。四經絶
T2103_.52.0126a16: 嫡三號中興。關間禍難相陵骨肉。何可言
T2103_.52.0126a17: 哉
T2103_.52.0126a18: 四大唐高祖太武皇帝。沙汰釋李二宗詔。帝
T2103_.52.0126a19: 以武徳末年僧徒多僻。下詔澄簡肅清遺法。
T2103_.52.0126a20: 非謂除滅。尤爲失旨。故詔云。朕膺期馭宇。興
T2103_.52.0126a21: 隆教法深思利益。情在護持。使玉石區分薫
T2103_.52.0126a22: 蕕有＊辯。長存妙道永固福田。正本澄源宜從
T2103_.52.0126a23: 沙汰。斯正詔也。而奕叙爲滅法則誣君罪
T2103_.52.0126a24: 惘。値容養寛政網漏呑舟。故存其首領耳。
T2103_.52.0126a25: 餘如後述
T2103_.52.0126a26: 奕又引元魏尚書令任城王澄奏議不許邑里
T2103_.52.0126a27: 更造伽藍妨人居住。又引尚書令高肇奏僧
T2103_.52.0126a28: 祇戸粟散給。貧人閲其表奏無除。毀状但在
T2103_.52.0126a29: 匡政理教除其僻險。斯之詳糺弘護之規諫
T2103_.52.0126b01: 乎。後趙中書太原王度。奏議序。石虎下書
T2103_.52.0126b02: 問曰。佛號世尊國家所奉。閭里小人無爵袟。
T2103_.52.0126b03: 者爲應得事佛不。又沙門皆應高潔貞正。行
T2103_.52.0126b04: 能精潔然後可爲道士。今沙門甚衆。或有姦
T2103_.52.0126b05: 宄。避役多非其人可料簡。詳議度奏。以王者
T2103_.52.0126b06: 郊祀天地祭奉百神。故禮有恒饗。佛生西域。
T2103_.52.0126b07: 非中華所奉。漢氏初得其道。＊惟聽西域胡
T2103_.52.0126b08: 人立寺都邑。魏承漢制。趙由舊章請趙人不
T2103_.52.0126b09: 聽詣寺。已爲沙門者遣還初服。朝士多同此
T2103_.52.0126b10: 議。虎下詔曰。度議佛是外神非諸華所奉。朕
T2103_.52.0126b11: 出邊戎。宜從本俗。夫制由上行永世作則。苟
T2103_.52.0126b12: 允事無虧。何拘前代。其夷趙爲道士。樂事佛
T2103_.52.0126b13: 者悉聽餘有。奕爲潤飾多陳妖詐。道家之書
T2103_.52.0126b14: 僞妄自昔。黄書合氣士女淫行。赤章厭祷幽
T2103_.52.0126b15: 明亂起。是知妄作者凶。亂俗者殺。罪有餘
T2103_.52.0126b16: 矣。何者。奕云。佛圖澄令弟子遊説郡國。支遁
T2103_.52.0126b17: 之徒爲其股肱。翻三玄妙旨文飾邪教。斯言
T2103_.52.0126b18: 訾謗天地不容何者。佛圖澄者得聖之人也。
T2103_.52.0126b19: 乳孔流光。不假燈炬之照。瞻鈴映掌。坐觀
T2103_.52.0126b20: 成敗之儀。兩主奉之若神。百辟敬之如佛。預
T2103_.52.0126b21: 啓東儲之貳。前表石葱之禍。及難生妖現。諫
T2103_.52.0126b22: 虎以刑濫法深享壽不遙。斯言甚切。而奕乃
T2103_.52.0126b23: 云。令虎殺姪取其帝位。何斯言之過歟。又云。
T2103_.52.0126b24: 支遁之徒爲其羽翼。晋氏南度止一道林雖是
T2103_.52.0126b25: 同時。江山胡越。安得散身奔北股肱趙朝。又
T2103_.52.0126b26: 云。翻三玄妙旨文飾邪教。此亦虚言何得妄
T2103_.52.0126b27: 指。且道之述作止在五千。自餘千卷都是虚
T2103_.52.0126b28: 詐。備詳魏日姜斌事乎。然則自忖者審。謂僧
T2103_.52.0126b29: 亦然。且佛之教義綸綜有歸。前後文理無相
T2103_.52.0126c01: 乖競。尋繹道經濫竊何甚。不能自立一義。
T2103_.52.0126c02: 並傍佛宗。或四果十地連寫内經。或地獄天
T2103_.52.0126c03: 堂全書佛旨。斯並業行之升沈。報因之盛則
T2103_.52.0126c04: 也。問以位行階級。則事逾河漢。如何叙集
T2103_.52.0126c05: 圖傳迷俗亂眞。無纖毫以助化。有山嶽之負
T2103_.52.0126c06: 犯。抂沒卒歳。又可悲夫
T2103_.52.0126c07: 六蔡謨。字道明。陳留人。晋太常彭城王紘
T2103_.52.0126c08: 表。以肅祖好佛道。手畫形像於樂賢堂。經歴
T2103_.52.0126c09: 寇難而堂猶存。宜勅著作。咸使作頌。顯宗出
T2103_.52.0126c10: 紘表博議。謨曰。佛者夷人。＊惟聞變夷從夏。
T2103_.52.0126c11: 不聞變夏從夷。先帝天縱多才。聊畫此像。未
T2103_.52.0126c12: 是大晋盛徳之形容。今欲發王命勅史官上
T2103_.52.0126c13: 稱先帝好佛之志下爲夷狄作一像之頌。於
T2103_.52.0126c14: 義有疑焉。康帝即位拜司徒。永和四年五月
T2103_.52.0126c15: 詔書下。固執不就。上疏乞骸骨。及孝宗臨軒。

T2103_.52.0126c16:

徴謨不至。

自且至
中。皇

太后詔罷朝。公卿奏送謨

T2103_.52.0126c17: 廷尉以正刑書。謨率子弟素服詣廷尉待罪。
T2103_.52.0126c18: 詔免爲庶人。便杜門不出。斯並剛愎之鄙
T2103_.52.0126c19: 夫。井坎之固量也。而奕叙爲純臣。未爲篤
T2103_.52.0126c20: 論。何者謨之諷議。局據神州一域。以此爲中
T2103_.52.0126c21: 國也。佛則通據閻浮一洲。以此爲邊地也。即
T2103_.52.0126c22: 目而叙。斯國東據海岸。三方則無。無則不
T2103_.52.0126c23: 可謂無邊可見也。此洲而談四周環海。天竺
T2103_.52.0126c24: 地之中心夏至北行。方中無影則天地之正
T2103_.52.0126c25: 國也。故佛生焉。況復隄封所及。三千日月萬
T2103_.52.0126c26: 億天地之中央也。＊惟佛所統非謨能曉。且庸
T2103_.52.0126c27: 度生常保局氷。執自以古同。謂家自爲我
T2103_.52.0126c28: 土樂。人自以爲我民良。不足怪也。中原嵩洛
T2103_.52.0126c29: 土圭。測景以爲中也。乃是神州之別中耳。至
T2103_.52.0127a01: 時餘分不能定之。江表島夷地卑氣厲情志
T2103_.52.0127a02: 飛揚。故曰揚州。晋氏奔之更稱文國。變夷從
T2103_.52.0127a03: 夏斯言有由。則孔子居九夷非陋也。且有徳
T2103_.52.0127a04: 則君人。無道則勃亂。故夏禹生於西羌。文王
T2103_.52.0127a05: 長於東夷。元魏託跋宗族北狄。並君臨瀆嶽。
T2103_.52.0127a06: 嚮明南面。豈以生不在諸華。而逆其風化
T2103_.52.0127a07: 也。至如由余西戎孤臣。秦穆因而覇立。日
T2103_.52.0127a08: 磾玁狁微類。漢武納而位存。故知道在則尊。
T2103_.52.0127a09: 未拘於夷夏也。蔡謨鏗固自守。未曰通人。
T2103_.52.0127a10: 拒詔違命負罪殿廢。正刑可矣。抑又詳之。盈
T2103_.52.0127a11: 尺徑寸之珠壁本惟絶域。窮神逹理之叡聖
T2103_.52.0127a12: 不限方維。故崆峒非九州之限。崑崙乃五竺
T2103_.52.0127a13: 之地。而黄帝軒轅并西奔而趣之。李老尹喜
T2103_.52.0127a14: 又接武而登之。斯何故耶。知可歸矣。且見機
T2103_.52.0127a15: 而作。無俟准的。至如夏桀之爲政也。焚黄圖
T2103_.52.0127a16: 誅龍逢。秦正之酷暴也。燒經籍坑儒士。時
T2103_.52.0127a17: 俗傳之。無道之君也。然埏埴塼瓦非曰桀功。
T2103_.52.0127a18: 起予皇帝未尊呂徳。然累葉盛行義須褒貶。
T2103_.52.0127a19: 古人有言。堯舜未必全聖。桀紂何能極愚。然
T2103_.52.0127a20: 而並歸咎於夏殷。尊嚴於唐虞者。偏黨不倫
T2103_.52.0127a21: 之詭經也。蔡氏遍隘何足可稱
T2103_.52.0127a22: 唐特進鄭公魏徴策有百條。其一條曰。問經
T2103_.52.0127a23: 佛興行早晩得失
T2103_.52.0127a24: 答珠星夜隕。佛生於周辰。白馬朝來。法興
T2103_.52.0127a25: 於漢世。故唐堯虞舜靡得詳焉。孔子周公
T2103_.52.0127a26: 安能述也。然則法王自在變化無窮。納須
T2103_.52.0127a27: 彌於芥子之中。覆日月於蓮華之下。法雲
T2103_.52.0127a28: 惠雨明珠寶船。出諸子於火宅。濟群生於
T2103_.52.0127a29: 苦海。砮得砥則截骨而斷筋。車得膏則馬
T2103_.52.0127b01: 利而輪疾。誠須精心迴向潔志歸依。宜信
T2103_.52.0127b02: 傅毅之言。無從蔡謨之儀。斯國之重臣也。
T2103_.52.0127b03: 可謂高識有歸。故太宗敬而制碑。手書其石。
T2103_.52.0127b04: 祔葬于昭陵。爲萬代之摸楷也。蔡謨年事倶
T2103_.52.0127b05: 盡功用罕施。自揣無能固辭於公政可也。而
T2103_.52.0127b06: 叙華夷事隔。未曰通人。又不足可稱焉
T2103_.52.0127b07: 七顏延之。瑯琊人。有文章。好飮酒。放逸
T2103_.52.0127b08: 不護細行。宋元嘉中遷太常。沙門慧琳以才
T2103_.52.0127b09: 學迥拔。爲太祖所賞。毎升獨榻之禮。延之嫉
T2103_.52.0127b10: 焉曰。此三台之座。豈可使刑餘居之。帝變色。
T2103_.52.0127b11: 奕叙之爲名士。斯可知也。以琳得寵於文帝。
T2103_.52.0127b12: 延之非莅政之能官。嫉而譏之。既不預朝
T2103_.52.0127b13: 廷。退居里閈。子峻爲楊州刺史。乘軒還宅。
T2103_.52.0127b14: 延之負杖避而譏之。不營産業。布衣蔬食獨
T2103_.52.0127b15: 遊野外。時彦以其不參朝賢。亦顯論所不
T2103_.52.0127b16: 及。豈不以無預獨榻之榮嫉琳而謂刑餘也。
T2103_.52.0127b17: 餘如逹性論所評議也。然顏公著論。褒賛極
T2103_.52.0127b18: 多。至如通佛影迹通佛頂齒爪通佛衣缽杖
T2103_.52.0127b19: 通佛二 &T073554;

。不然。皆置言。高拔群英之所模楷
T2103_.52.0127b20: 者。刑餘之言。一時之貶琳耳。其四論並見宋
T2103_.52.0127b21: 陸澄續法論
T2103_.52.0127b22: 八蕭摹之。蘭陵人。宋元嘉十二年爲丹陽
T2103_.52.0127b23: 尹。奏稱佛化被於中國已歴四代。塔寺形像
T2103_.52.0127b24: 所在千計。進可以繋心。退足以招勸。自頃
T2103_.52.0127b25: 已來。敬情浮末不以精誠爲至。更以奢競爲
T2103_.52.0127b26: 重。違中越制。宜加檢裁。不爲之防流遁未已。
T2103_.52.0127b27: 請今後鑄銅像造塔寺。先詣所在陳事列言。
T2103_.52.0127b28: 待報聽造。觀斯奏状仰止奔競。非曰除滅。
T2103_.52.0127b29: 斯寔住持之相。居然昌顯矣
T2103_.52.0127b30: 九周朗。汝南人。宋世祖時仕廬陵内史。上
T2103_.52.0127c01: 書曰。自釋氏流教。其來有源。舒引容潤既亦
T2103_.52.0127c02: 廣矣。而假糅醫術託以卜數。外刑不容。内
T2103_.52.0127c03: 教不悔。而横天地之間。莫之糺察。今宜申嚴
T2103_.52.0127c04: 佛律裨重國令。其疵惡顯著者。悉宜罷遣。餘
T2103_.52.0127c05: 則隨其藝行。各爲之條例。使禪義經誦人能
T2103_.52.0127c06: 其一。食不過蔬衣不出布。若更度者。則令先
T2103_.52.0127c07: 習義行本。其神心必能草腐人天竦精。以往
T2103_.52.0127c08: 者雖侯王家子。亦不宜拘。意同前矣
T2103_.52.0127c09: 第十虞愿。會稽人。仕宋明帝爲中書。善
T2103_.52.0127c10: 容止直忤言。帝好奕頗廢政事。愿曰。堯以此
T2103_.52.0127c11: 教丹朱。非人主所好。帝怒令曳下殿。初無
T2103_.52.0127c12: 懼色。二三日復召來明帝以所居故第起湘
T2103_.52.0127c13: 宮寺。製置宏壯。愿曰。此寺穿掘傷螻蟻。塼
T2103_.52.0127c14: 瓦焚虫豸。勞役之苦百姓筋力。販妻貨子呼
T2103_.52.0127c15: 嗟滿路。佛若有知。念其有罪。佛若無知。作之
T2103_.52.0127c16: 何益。忤旨出守晋安。此寔大慈之本懷。得佛
T2103_.52.0127c17: 之遺寄。而奕謂爲除彈匪其意乎
T2103_.52.0127c18: 十一張普濟。常山人。善百家之説。太和中
T2103_.52.0127c19: 遷諫議大夫。至孝明立不親視朝。過崇佛法。
T2103_.52.0127c20: 郊廟之事多委有司。營造寺像略無休息。乃
T2103_.52.0127c21: 上諫略云。伏願淑愼威儀萬邦作式。躬致郊
T2103_.52.0127c22: 廟之虔。親紆朔望之禮。則一人有慶兆民頼
T2103_.52.0127c23: 之。然後精進三寶信心如來。道由化深。故諸
T2103_.52.0127c24: 漏可盡。法隨禮積。故彼岸可登。書奏不報。濟
T2103_.52.0127c25: 諫如此。而奕弄筆妄加。荒穢之婬僧遊於宮
T2103_.52.0127c26: 内。恣行非法。凡是妃主莫不通婬。百姓苦之
T2103_.52.0127c27: 而上不覺。斯言姦蕩。何得妄施。宮禁有限。防
T2103_.52.0127c28: 禦有則。擅言婬僻縱筆妄陳據太史之任。
T2103_.52.0127c29: 總清愼之機。專搆私憤顯行輕毀。梟能食母。
T2103_.52.0128a01: 君子恥聞。亭曰柏人。漢后夜遁。非狂非醉。斯
T2103_.52.0128a02: 言難玷。但奕自行婬穢。其黨例有妻孥。故
T2103_.52.0128a03: 李耳李思王之編戸。張衡張魯天師子孫。宗
T2103_.52.0128a04: 胤顯然無宜不有。不知今日道士何爲。効僧
T2103_.52.0128a05: 遠財絶色。清高獨往不拘俗累。甚可怪也。故
T2103_.52.0128a06: 奕重其財色毀僧同之。如老子化胡經云。既
T2103_.52.0128a07: 化胡王令尹喜爲佛。性強梁者毀形絶好。斷
T2103_.52.0128a08: 其妻娶不令紹嗣。故名沙門。自餘軟善任從
T2103_.52.0128a09: 其本。則妻子不絶也。約斯論事。觀中道士。衣
T2103_.52.0128a10: 冠容制不異俗流。妻子承嗣。義依道法。不可
T2103_.52.0128a11: 怪也。是以仙童玉女侍老君之側。黄庭朱戸
T2103_.52.0128a12: 述命門之事。深欲擬僧斯蹤難泯。遂行流謗。
T2103_.52.0128a13: 固其然哉
T2103_.52.0128a14: 十二李瑒。趙人。魏延昌末爲高陽王友。于
T2103_.52.0128a15: 時人多絶戸爲沙門。瑒上言曰。禮以教世法
T2103_.52.0128a16: 導將來。迹用既殊區流亦別。故三千之罪。
T2103_.52.0128a17: 莫大於不孝。不孝之大。無過於絶祀。然則
T2103_.52.0128a18: 絶＊祀之罪。大莫甚焉。安得輕縱背禮之情而
T2103_.52.0128a19: 肆其向法之意也。寧有棄堂堂之政。而從鬼
T2103_.52.0128a20: 教乎。靈太后責以鬼教謗毀佛法。瑒曰。竊欲
T2103_.52.0128a21: 清明佛法使道俗兼通。非敢排棄眞學妄爲
T2103_.52.0128a22: 訾毀。且鬼神之名皆是通靈逹稱。三皇五帝
T2103_.52.0128a23: 皆號爲鬼。易曰。知鬼神之情状。周公自美。亦
T2103_.52.0128a24: 云。能事鬼神。禮曰。明則有禮樂。幽則有鬼
T2103_.52.0128a25: 神。佛非天非地。本出於人。應世導俗。其道幽
T2103_.52.0128a26: 隱。名之爲鬼。愚謂非謗。靈太后不罪。後遇害
T2103_.52.0128a27: 於河陰。詳瑒上言欲沙汰僻左。非爲疵謗矣｣
T2103_.52.0128a28: 十三劉晝渤海人。才術不能自給。齊不仕
T2103_.52.0128a29: 之。著高才不遇傳。以自況也。上書言。佛法
T2103_.52.0128b01: 詭誑。避役者以爲林藪。又詆訶淫蕩。有尼
T2103_.52.0128b02: 有優婆夷。實是僧之妻妾。損胎殺子其状難
T2103_.52.0128b03: 言。今僧尼二百許萬。并俗女向有四百餘萬。
T2103_.52.0128b04: 六月一損胎。如是則年族二百萬戸矣。驗此
T2103_.52.0128b05: 佛是疫胎之鬼也。全非聖人。亦言道士。非
T2103_.52.0128b06: 老莊之本。籍佛邪説爲其配坐而已。詳晝此
T2103_.52.0128b07: 言。殊塵聽視。專言墮胎殺子。豈是正士言哉。
T2103_.52.0128b08: 孔子見人一善而忘其百非。鮑生見人一惡
T2103_.52.0128b09: 而終身不忘。弘隘之迹斷可知矣。狂哲之心
T2103_.52.0128b10: 相去遠矣。然則天下高尚沙門有逾百萬。財
T2103_.52.0128b11: 色不顧名位莫縁。斯徳隱之妄張婬殺。一年
T2103_.52.0128b12: 誅二子。沙門且然。一歳有二男。編戸誰是。吐
T2103_.52.0128b13: 言孟浪未足廣之。而奕重爲正諫。及後上事
T2103_.52.0128b14: 還陳此略。考校則劉晝之門人矣
T2103_.52.0128b15: 十四陽衒之。北平人。元魏末爲祕書監。見
T2103_.52.0128b16: 寺宇壯麗損費金碧。王公相競侵漁百姓。乃
T2103_.52.0128b17: 撰洛陽伽藍記言。不恤衆庶也。後上書述。釋
T2103_.52.0128b18: 教虚誕有爲徒費。無執戈以衞國有飢寒於
T2103_.52.0128b19: 色養。逃役之流僕隸之類。避苦就樂非修道
T2103_.52.0128b20: 者。又佛言。有爲虚妄皆是妄想。道人深知佛
T2103_.52.0128b21: 理。故違虚其罪。故又廣引財事乞貸貪積
T2103_.52.0128b22: 無厭。又云。讀佛經者尊同帝王。寫佛畫師全
T2103_.52.0128b23: 無恭敬。請沙門等同孔老拜俗。班之國史。行
T2103_.52.0128b24: 多浮險者乞立嚴勅知其眞僞。然後佛法可
T2103_.52.0128b25: 遵師徒無濫。則逃兵之徒還歸本役。國富兵
T2103_.52.0128b26: 多天下幸甚。衒之此奏。大同劉晝之詞。言多
T2103_.52.0128b27: 庸猥不經周孔。故雖上事終委而不施行。而
T2103_.52.0128b28: 奕美之徹於府兪。致使淨遊浪宕之語。備寫
T2103_.52.0128b29: 不遺。斯仍曲士之沈鬱。非通人之留意也
T2103_.52.0128c01: 廣弘明集卷第六
T2103_.52.0128c02:
T2103_.52.0128c03:
T2103_.52.0128c04:
T2103_.52.0128c05: 廣弘明集卷第七
T2103_.52.0128c06: 大唐西明寺沙門釋道宣撰
T2103_.52.0128c07: 辯惑篇第二之三
T2103_.52.0128c08: 叙列代王臣滯惑解下
T2103_.52.0128c09: 梁荀濟齊章仇子陀周衞元嵩宋劉
T2103_.52.0128c10: 慧琳齊顧歡魏邢子才涼高道讓
T2103_.52.0128c11: 齊李公緒隋盧思道唐傅奕
T2103_.52.0128c12: 十五荀濟。頴川人。後居江左。博渉衆書志
T2103_.52.0128c13: 調矯俗。初與梁武布衣相知。及帝登位。仕
T2103_.52.0128c14: 不及之。濟負氣曰。會眉鼻上磨墨作檄耳。
T2103_.52.0128c15: 帝深不平之。梁州刺史陰子春左遷。濟作大
T2103_.52.0128c16: 詩贈之。文傳時俗。或稱于帝者。帝曰。箇人雖
T2103_.52.0128c17: 有才。亂俗好反不可用。濟以不得志。常懷悒
T2103_.52.0128c18: 怏二十餘載。見帝信重釋門寺像崇盛。便于
T2103_.52.0128c19: 時上書論佛教貪淫奢侈妖妄。又譏造同泰
T2103_.52.0128c20: 寺營費太甚必爲災患。其表略。以三墳五典
T2103_.52.0128c21: 帝皇之稱首。四維六紀終古之規模。及漢武
T2103_.52.0128c22: 祀金人。黄新以建國。桓靈祀浮圖。閹竪以
T2103_.52.0128c23: 控權。三國由茲鼎峙。五湖仍其荐食。衣冠
T2103_.52.0128c24: 奔於江東。戎教興於中壤。使父子之親隔。君
T2103_.52.0128c25: 臣之義乖。夫婦之和曠。友朋之信絶海内散
T2103_.52.0128c26: 亂三百年矣。濟所控詞述於僻者。至於貞 &T019598;

T2103_.52.0128c27: 絶俗。固莫叙之。斯偏黨也。述金人之初降致
T2103_.52.0128c28: ＊黄新之簒等。並安擬也。至如周斬紂首豈見
T2103_.52.0128c29: 佛經。秦抗儒士非關釋化。禮崩樂壞未覩浮

Footnote:

120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:有/無] [CITE]