大正蔵検索 INBUDS
|
阿毘達磨倶舍論法義 (No. 2251_ 快道撰 ) in Vol. 64 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:有/無] [CITE]
T2251_.64.0339a01: T2251_.64.0339a02: T2251_.64.0339a03: T2251_.64.0339a04: 豐山沙門快道記 T2251_.64.0339a05: 分別賢聖品第六之三
T2251_.64.0339a08: 句正明レ向。頌疏云。上兩句明二家家一。下兩句 T2251_.64.0339a09: 明二向果一。此各有レ理。光約二相似一。頌疏約二實 T2251_.64.0339a10: 論一。凡於二四向四果一。義門非一。若約下具經二四 T2251_.64.0339a11: 果一人上有二二門一。一向果別立門。謂見道十五 T2251_.64.0339a12: 心爲二預流向一。道類智爲二預流果一。從レ斷二欲一 T2251_.64.0339a13: 品一至レ五爲二一來向一。斷二第六一爲二一來果一。斷二 T2251_.64.0339a14: 七八品一爲二不還向一。斷二第九品一。爲二不還果一。從二 T2251_.64.0339a15: 初定一品一至二非想第八品一斷爲二羅漢向一。斷二 T2251_.64.0339a16: 第九品一爲二羅漢果一。故契經云二八輩聖人一。一 T2251_.64.0339a17: 攝向合果門。後後向道攝二前前果道一。但預流 T2251_.64.0339a18: 向無二所レ攝前果道一。是一向四果。約レ此從二道 T2251_.64.0339a19: 類智一至レ斷二欲第四品一。爲二預流果一。餘準レ之可 T2251_.64.0339a20: レ知。若據下不三具經二四果一般涅槃人上。攝在不定。 T2251_.64.0339a21: 謂如二家家一者。斷二三四品一。則如下次第人斷二三 T2251_.64.0339a22: 四品一。是一來向上。故今論標結一來向果一。於 T2251_.64.0339a23: レ中説二家家一。又唯斷二三四品一不レ至二一來果一。而 T2251_.64.0339a24: 入二寂滅一無下向二一來一之義上。則爲二預流果攝一。故
T2251_.64.0339b02: 義上故。是故今論別明二家家一。次云。從レ一至レ五。 T2251_.64.0339b03: 次第相續。斷爲二一來向一。而標結言二一來向 T2251_.64.0339b04: 果一者。約二次第人一。令三滿足順次向果一。就レ中 T2251_.64.0339b05: 亦辨二家家一間等一也。古今不レ辨レ之。莫二走行一 T2251_.64.0339b06: 矣
T2251_.64.0339b10: 上下。彼説二家家一。正理云。或於二先異生位一斷。 T2251_.64.0339b11: 或今預流進二修位一斷。今論且約二次第一。云二預 T2251_.64.0339b12: 流進一。問。有漏斷人非レ闕二成根一。答。至二道類智一。 T2251_.64.0339b13: 必起二後勝果道一。其時得二先所斷離繋得一。故
T2251_.64.0339b18: 道一。得二家家道一。何縁名二家家一。謂家家者。是所 T2251_.64.0339b19: 生處。其處彼家。此家異故。是家家義。此人 T2251_.64.0339b20: 以三家家爲二生處一。名二家家一。有財釋。法勝毘曇
T2251_.64.0339b24: 舊生死一。異家受レ生。故云二家家一。瑜伽倫記六 T2251_.64.0339b25: 下云。聖人厭二於生死一故。於二一家處一單不二重 T2251_.64.0339b26: 生一。從レ一至レ一家コトニ受二二生三生一。但易二父 T2251_.64.0339b27: 母一。不二肯重生一。不レ廢二同姓一。張處二東西一。二張
T2251_.64.0339c09: 簡二色無色一云二欲有一。唯局レ欲故。爲レ顯下斷二三 T2251_.64.0339c10: 品一人受二三生一。斷二四品一人受中二生上。逆言二三 T2251_.64.0339c11: 二一
T2251_.64.0339c14: 已成故。謂已進斷二三四品惑一。決定餘有二三生 T2251_.64.0339c15: 二生一。故説二家家相一。不二圓滿一。則應下於三頌更 T2251_.64.0339c16: 説二等聲一。方具收中家家三相上。或應レ不レ説二三二 T2251_.64.0339c17: 生言一。通全同レ之。
T2251_.64.0339c20: 一句擧レ名。謂欲下從二所生處一判二差別一。大有二 T2251_.64.0339c21: 二別一。約二人家一。約二洲處一。總家家所依處。從レ寛 T2251_.64.0339c22: 至レ狹有二四別一。謂。界。趣。處。家。別故。界謂唯 T2251_.64.0339c23: 欲界。此通二人天家家一。趣者若約二天家家一。唯 T2251_.64.0339c24: 欲天趣。非二餘天趣及餘四趣一。故云二欲天趣一。 T2251_.64.0339c25: 處者欲天有レ六。若一天處中。受二三二生一。若 T2251_.64.0339c26: 二天處。若三天處。家者於二彼一二三天處中一。 T2251_.64.0339c27: 或一家。或二家。人家家例レ之可レ知。今顯二同 T2251_.64.0339c28: 父母不二重生一。故不レ云二一人家一天家一。婆沙
T2251_.64.0340a02: 往レ人來レ天往來。爲二局レ人局天。答。天家家 T2251_.64.0340a03: 唯於二天趣一往來。人家家準レ之。是大小乘經 T2251_.64.0340a04: 論一同。然至二滅後九百年一。正理論師創立二人 T2251_.64.0340a05: 天往來義一。先標破彼義一。後當レ辨二正義一。初標
T2251_.64.0340a09: 般涅槃名二一來果一。過レ此以二後更無生故。即 T2251_.64.0340a10: 由二此義一證。家家中。若天家家。受二三生一者。人 T2251_.64.0340a11: 間受レ二。天上受レ三。受二二生一者。人一天二。如 T2251_.64.0340a12: レ應例釋人中家家一。若謂レ不レ然彼一來果。有三
T2251_.64.0340a15: 來名二一來果一。證知家家亦人天往來一。然非 T2251_.64.0340a16: レ如二極七反人天等七生一。其生數不レ等。從二其 T2251_.64.0340a17: 多一立レ名。以或名二天家家一。或名二人家家一。若謂下
T2251_.64.0340a20: 不別失上。同人天一往來故。由レ有二此文一普光
T2251_.64.0340a24: 理一者。大有二二罪一。一人天往來罪。二生數不
T2251_.64.0340b01: 或三天處。受二二三生一。或一天家。或二天家。 T2251_.64.0340b02: 或三天家。受二二三生一。人家家者。謂於二人中一。
T2251_.64.0340b05: 上一。於是依聲依處。局二天上一必矣。釋相中。亦 T2251_.64.0340b06: 唯約レ天。全無二來レ人之相一。人家家文亦爾。舊
T2251_.64.0340b12: 曇兩譯。竝合作レ文。其義縱容也。若於二大乘一。
T2251_.64.0340b17: レ家。若往若來證二苦邊際一。二人家家者。謂於二
T2251_.64.0340b20: 焉。三背二立名旨一。謂既唯於二一趣一。從レ家至レ家。 T2251_.64.0340b21: 不レ渉二餘趣一。故簡別名二天家家一。名二人家家一。若 T2251_.64.0340b22: 人天二趣往來セハ何特可レ得二此名一。四違二前後 T2251_.64.0340b23: 例一。謂七人天往來名二七反有一。一往來名二一來 T2251_.64.0340b24: 果一。今亦人天往來セハ應下名二極三反有。極二 T2251_.64.0340b25: 反有一。不レ名中人家家天家家上。已顯二人天往來 T2251_.64.0340b26: 罪一。當レ辨二生數不等罪一。謂其罪亦有二多失一。一 T2251_.64.0340b27: 何故不等而不レ等。若言二樂欲故一。何故不レ樂二 T2251_.64.0340b28: 等生一。若言二七反一來等生別故一。若爾七反中。 T2251_.64.0340b29: 何故有二不等生一。若言二惑品令然者不レ然。前 T2251_.64.0340c01: 惑有二等不等一。後惑亦有二等不等大小一。中間
T2251_.64.0340c05: 等一。三闕縁之失。若不等者。應レ非レ具二生縁。於二 T2251_.64.0340c06: 生中一有二闕減一故。若言下雖二一生半生異一。倶是
T2251_.64.0340c10: 天七人六等。既以二不等一不レ入二七生數一。今亦 T2251_.64.0340c11: 何不等可レ得レ名二三生二生一。四違二諸聖教一。謂
T2251_.64.0340c19: 等生一。云二二三生往來一。全無二不等説一。是爲二生
T2251_.64.0340c24: 師云。人天二趣。若往。若來。戒賢論師云。二 T2251_.64.0340c25: 生家家唯於二天上一。二生往來。三生準レ之。本
T2251_.64.0340c28: 宗同二小乘諸論一。豈爲レ不レ然。然於二正法藏下一。 T2251_.64.0340c29: 受法稟承。奘三藏未審。爲レ同二師宗一。將異耶。 T2251_.64.0341a01: 應三是背レ師同二難陀謬執一。以レ何知レ之。三藏門 T2251_.64.0341a02: 人基泰光寶等。竝皆迷二正理臆説一。而傳襲彌 T2251_.64.0341a03: 布。悉廢莫レ依矣。基略章云。於レ中有レ四。一 T2251_.64.0341a04: 從レ人至レ人。二從レ天至レ天。三從レ人至レ天。四 T2251_.64.0341a05: 從レ天至レ人。廣章擧二二種一。謂人天往來。普光
T2251_.64.0341a08: 如レ是等義解人不レ得二倶言之。何況從レ之而 T2251_.64.0341a09: 下。問。準二預流天七人六等不等生一。豈無下斷二 T2251_.64.0341a10: 三四品一不等生上。答。誰言レ無レ之。彼不レ具二三縁一。 T2251_.64.0341a11: 唯是預流果攝。問。斷二三四品一。爲二人天往來一 T2251_.64.0341a12: 不。答。雖レ無二文説一。理應レ説レ有。若爾攝レ何。答。 T2251_.64.0341a13: 預流果攝非二一來向一。以レ不レ向レ彼故。然光記
T2251_.64.0341a16: 生一。亦攝二七生一者。應レ言レ攝二預流一。何極七反 T2251_.64.0341a17: 中。可レ攝二未滿者一。設攝レ彼於レ此莫レ攝。彼既 T2251_.64.0341a18: 云レ極。顯レ有二未滿者一。今唯言二家家一。不レ言レ極
T2251_.64.0341a21: 成二道跡一。問。斷二三四品一中。如二所言一者。大有二 T2251_.64.0341a22: 四類一。一唯天中往來受二二生三生一。人中亦爾。 T2251_.64.0341a23: 二唯天中不レ滿二二三生一。唯人亦爾。三人天往 T2251_.64.0341a24: 來受二三二生一。四未レ滿。此四中縁レ何。唯約二三 T2251_.64.0341a25: 縁一據二初門一。立二家家名一廢二餘三一。答。唯於レ天 T2251_.64.0341a26: 唯於レ人受二三二生一。異二餘例一故特立レ之。唯天 T2251_.64.0341a27: 唯人未滿準レ之可レ知。又人天往來準二前後一 T2251_.64.0341a28: 可レ知。故不レ立レ之。問。準レ斷二三四品一有中唯天 T2251_.64.0341a29: 唯人及人天往來上。於二極七反一。應二唯天中七 T2251_.64.0341b01: 反一耶。答。應 T2251_.64.0341b02: レ無。諸經説二人[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b03: 天往來一故。又[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b04: 解。應レ有機類[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b05: 非レ一故。經約二[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b06: 趣別一。且言二人[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b07: 天往來一。依二此[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b08: 義一。家家亦有二[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b09: 人天往來一。互[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b10: 影發故。問。欲[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b11: 界九品惑増[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b12: 損生一其相何。[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b13: 答。古今有二兩[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b14: 義一。一九品別[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b15: 潤義。二九品[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b16: 共潤義。寶疏[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b17: 別潤爲二假立一。[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b18: 共潤爲二實義一。[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b19: 是寔爾也。爾[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b20: 爲レ遮下闇二法相一[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b21: 愚上。亦別潤假[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b22: 立門。不レ可二強[IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0341b26: 唯一義。今爲二[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b27: 初歩一。示レ圖曰。[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b28: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b29: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c01: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c02: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c03: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c16: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c17: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c18: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c19: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c20: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c21: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c22: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c23: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c24: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c25: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c26: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c27: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c28: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c29: [IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0342a05: 相資。但由二道漸上時。惑漸斷盡。生自然少一。 T2251_.64.0342a06: 非三品定二損益一。故有下斷二一品二品五品一家家上。 T2251_.64.0342a07: 於レ理無レ爽。瑜伽但言レ有二天人家家一。不レ同下小
T2251_.64.0342a12: 三四一未レ滿二三二生一。而入レ寂名爲向。無下向二 T2251_.64.0342a13: 一來果一義上故。若不レ爾何但不レ言レ斷二第五一」
T2251_.64.0342a18: 含一。來至此世一。盡二於苦際一。若小遲者。來至此 T2251_.64.0342a19: 世一。盡二於苦際一。若勇猛者即於二此間一。盡二於苦
T2251_.64.0342a28: 有二餘惑別一。無二受生異一如二前數論一。第三句此 T2251_.64.0342a29: 字指レ斷二七八一。非レ謂二一間一。以三一間人非二其 T2251_.64.0342b01: 向一。是故長行更云二斷修惑七八品一
T2251_.64.0342b08: 以下彼有二一有種子一。名中一間上故
T2251_.64.0342b13: 體唯是一故。名二一間一帶數得レ名。是即能障 T2251_.64.0342b14: 法。而行人所有物。故以レ彼呼レ人。是全分有 T2251_.64.0342b15: 財也。不レ可レ謂下有二數字一故。是帶數。自他倶 T2251_.64.0342b16: 三種別即是唯他帶數釋上。具如二六合釋精義
T2251_.64.0342b22: レ云二一種子一。然此中説二翳迦鼻指迦一。此云二一
T2251_.64.0342c01: 於二天上一。唯受二一生一。六欲天中。隨レ應受二一生一。 T2251_.64.0342c02: 人一間者。謂於二人中一。唯受二一生一。三洲隨レ應。
T2251_.64.0342c07: 名曰二家家一間一。治レ彼無漏根。爾時方得故」
T2251_.64.0342c13: 有漏斷一故。次第人於二見道一斷二身戒疑三一。竝 T2251_.64.0342c14: 是從レ斷二第九品一先時。故曰二必先一。二人斷時。 T2251_.64.0342c15: 別故曰二或或一。於二此位中一五數畢故。言二總集
T2251_.64.0342c18: 集斷一。密作二是説一。必無二五結倶時斷理一。或二 T2251_.64.0342c19: 或三。先已斷故。理實應レ説下於二此位中一。斷二二 T2251_.64.0342c20: 或三一得中不還果上
T2251_.64.0342c23: 句明二現般不還一。初中初二句明二四不還一。次一 T2251_.64.0342c24: 行明二上流一。初此言指二不還體一。最後句此指二 T2251_.64.0342c25: 欲界一。顯二現般一。簡二色無色一
T2251_.64.0342c28: 經一之失。豈云レ非三是定爲二涅槃一。若不レ爾次下
T2251_.64.0343a07: 頌文已如レ是。故長行列名釋名亦順レ彼。而論
T2251_.64.0343a12: 前是通レ二。復於二第三以下一無二簡釋一。準知如二 T2251_.64.0343a13: 第二一。寶判決爲レ允
T2251_.64.0343a16: 道一。約二此二道有無一。辨二三種次第一
T2251_.64.0343a24: 者。得二生般涅槃一。彼地未二等覺一者。得二無行般 T2251_.64.0343a25: 槃一。彼地未二等覺一者。得二有行般涅槃一。彼地
T2251_.64.0343a29: 無行般一得二有行般一。若不レ得二有行般一得二上流
T2251_.64.0343b14: 不レ爾。有行爲レ先不レ當レ理。彼經誦者誤也
T2251_.64.0343b19: 利根一故。或有下生已諸無漏道。自然在前不レ加二 T2251_.64.0343b20: 勤行一。而入中涅槃上。是不行滅。以二根中一故。或有下 T2251_.64.0343b21: 生已深畏二受身一。勤修行道一。及入中涅槃上。是名二 T2251_.64.0343b22: 行滅一。以二根鈍一故。初二句標二速進有無一後以二 T2251_.64.0343b23: 二因一釋。初約二所成一。後約下得二涅槃一有用無用上。 T2251_.64.0343b24: 謂由レ無レ行有二速進道一義而成立。由レ有レ行無二。 T2251_.64.0343b25: 速進道一義而成立。不レ由二功用一得二涅槃一。故是 T2251_.64.0343b26: 速進道。由二功用一得二涅槃一。故是無二速進道一普
T2251_.64.0343b29: 故滅不レ由二功用一得。由二功用一得
T2251_.64.0343c03: 由二最速進道一故。由レ得二最上品道一故。由二煩惱 T2251_.64.0343c04: 最劣一故。此中能斷智爲二上品一。隨眠劣是微細 T2251_.64.0343c05: 故。如下以二上上智一斷中下下惑上。舊論云。能運載 T2251_.64.0343c06: 道。及最上品道。今亦無レ行得二涅槃一。例レ彼此 T2251_.64.0343c07: 亦勝二有行一。由レ有二速進道一。光記爲二因便釋一誤 T2251_.64.0343c08: 也。寶爲レ是
T2251_.64.0343c11: 十三處一。有中差別上故。竝是非レ全名レ半
T2251_.64.0343c20: 有行無行上流一。此中上流亦有二全半遍三一。謂 T2251_.64.0343c21: 四無色中。超二中二一全超。超レ一半超。四皆受 T2251_.64.0343c22: 生遍沒。準レ前可レ知。唯總言二生無色一不レ細。婆
T2251_.64.0344a10: 此中起者。中有名。生者生有名。如二論第十
T2251_.64.0344a13: 順起一。順即業故名二順起業一。餘二準レ之。造者 T2251_.64.0344a14: 造作。是先在二欲界一造作古業。聖人必不レ作二 T2251_.64.0344a15: 新業一。正理所引契經誠説。非二但造一。令二増長一 T2251_.64.0344a16: 故。云レ造二増長業一
T2251_.64.0344a19: 皆其業同故。不二由レ彼言一。上流雖レ有二起。生。及 T2251_.64.0344a20: 順次。順後業一。前三竝無レ異。同受二中有生有一。 T2251_.64.0344a21: 同由二順次業一。生二梵衆一故。唯色界第二生後
T2251_.64.0344a25: 雖レ有レ理背二論差別旨一。故論以二起生後不共一。 T2251_.64.0344a26: 成二三別一故
T2251_.64.0344a29: 三及上流七善人一。舊論云二七種賢聖人行一
T2251_.64.0344b03: 無レ別義。文勢明。寶疏屬レ下爲レ答。頌疏似レ依 T2251_.64.0344b04: レ彼。此有二三不可一。一加二雖言一失。義無二所出一 T2251_.64.0344b05: 故。二云二與レ凡無別失。所對凡夫無二所從來一 T2251_.64.0344b06: 故。三餘即不然一句唐捐失。然有人云三寶解 T2251_.64.0344b07: 順二文勢一者。所謂非中非也
T2251_.64.0344b10: 學一難二前釋一。有人云。光不レ辨二正不一。寶疏判談。
T2251_.64.0344b13: 故下答中有二二故一。又擧二二由一已云二故獨結 T2251_.64.0344b14: 通二故。謂七善士趣名中。前就二善士言一云二
T2251_.64.0344b17: 行一故。七善士經云二比丘行當レ如レ是。乃至廣 T2251_.64.0344b18: 説。何以レ彼難。光釋實穩暢。按此論脱二一由一。
T2251_.64.0344b22: 餘聖人一皆無。是故偈曰。善惡行不行 由三往 T2251_.64.0344b23: 不二更還一。釋曰。故於二上流一。立二七賢聖行一。於レ餘
T2251_.64.0344b26: 此七皆能行レ善。不レ行二不善一。餘則不レ然。又唯 T2251_.64.0344b27: 此七往二上界一。生不二復還來一。餘則不レ爾
T2251_.64.0344c03: 無色界一。所以者何。若在二欲界一經生聖者必 T2251_.64.0344c04: 無二三事一。一者不レ退。二者不二轉根一。三者不レ生二 T2251_.64.0344c05: 色無色界一。聖道久住相續中極堅牢故。恐下上 T2251_.64.0344c06: 二界有二長時苦一同中欲界上故。今但加二從レ欲上 T2251_.64.0344c07: 生一爲レ異耳
T2251_.64.0344c13: 不愚癡入レ胎 隨二我意所樂一 T2251_.64.0344c14: 得二身具足一已 速質直正道一 T2251_.64.0344c15: 行具足梵行一 常樂於乞食一 T2251_.64.0344c16: 學レ智。學レ智已若得レ知者。便得二究竟智一。得二究 T2251_.64.0344c17: 竟邊學智一。學智已。若得レ智不レ得二究竟智一者。 T2251_.64.0344c18: 當レ作二最上妙天一。諸天聞レ名二色究竟天一。往生 T2251_.64.0344c19: 彼中一。大仙人願當レ得二阿那含一。大仙人我今定
T2251_.64.0344c22: 故作二是説一。問。彼對二佛前一作二違理語一。世尊何 T2251_.64.0344c23: 故不レ訶制之一。答。佛知下彼言雖二復違理。而 T2251_.64.0344c24: 不障レ道。故不二訶制一。後入二法性一。自當二解了一」
T2251_.64.0344c27: 身極殊勝。婆沙云。彼相續中極堅牢故。光
T2251_.64.0345a01: 此二義一。無二練根及退事一
T2251_.64.0345a04: 初因云。答欲界是不二定界一。非二修地一。非二離染 T2251_.64.0345a05: 地一。多二諸過失災横留難一。住二本有位一。尚難レ得 T2251_.64.0345a06: レ果。況住二中有微劣身一耶。此爲二今初因一。故正
T2251_.64.0345a09: 法極難越故二句應レ入二毘婆沙上一。何者婆沙 T2251_.64.0345a10: 既有二十二因一。若擧二彼初因一。則次第可レ擧二四 T2251_.64.0345a11: 因一。何大爲レ二。於二後中一得。開二三因一。何況於二 T2251_.64.0345a12: 婆沙下一。有二標釋結一。又初論主釋安二彼言二示二 T2251_.64.0345a13: 四因一。次云二彼尚一。若此句別師義者。何無二彼
T2251_.64.0345a16: 善無記二種結一。得二若二若三沙門果一。越度三
T2251_.64.0345a19: 眠惑非二劣品一故。欲界難二出離一故。毘婆沙師 T2251_.64.0345a20: 説レ如レ此。此人所應作事甚多。一應レ滅二惡無記 T2251_.64.0345a21: 性煩惱一。二應レ至得第二第三沙門果一。三應三 T2251_.64.0345a22: 出離三界一。若在二中陰一。不レ能レ成就如レ此事一。 T2251_.64.0345a23: 既標二此人一。云二一二三一。唯局二三因一文勢明。今 T2251_.64.0345a24: 論是亂寫定爾矣。如二正理一者。不レ叙二兩義一。隨 T2251_.64.0345a25: レ思無レ違。若二若三者。光記兩釋。有人云。後
T2251_.64.0345b01: 字一。置二同本舊論明明文一。如二縱容正理一何。況 T2251_.64.0345b02: 彼無二若言一乎
T2251_.64.0345b10: 行一。三乃至最後下明二近加行成滿一。四次後唯 T2251_.64.0345b11: 從下。明二根本成就一正釋二第二句一。此有レ二。初 T2251_.64.0345b12: 正釋。後配二二道一。五如是雜修下。明三第四後 T2251_.64.0345b13: 修二下三定一。六先於下明二起處先後一。此小乘 T2251_.64.0345b14: 宗前無漏中。有漏後無漏雜修。若大乘者。瑜
T2251_.64.0345b17: 顯宗作二旋環一
T2251_.64.0345b21: 靜慮一。頌疏亦云。中間有漏。前後無漏。舊論
T2251_.64.0345b26: 煩天一。漸次倍二三心一。光二釋。初釋爲レ勝。自亦 T2251_.64.0345b27: 取レ初。眞諦及寶師同二初釋一。實會二論意一。後釋
T2251_.64.0345c07: 有一。豈可レ造二新業一。今論熏修有漏一。令レ感二淨 T2251_.64.0345c08: 居一者。約下増益故業一。能感之縁上也。光次證二婆 T2251_.64.0345c09: 沙一。未レ檢二明文一。而彼亦約二古業一無レ妨。光記從
T2251_.64.0345c14: 淨居一。曰亦由二業力一。亦由二雜修靜慮一。謂雖レ有二 T2251_.64.0345c15: 思業現前一。若不レ雜修靜慮一。則不レ得レ生レ彼。雖 T2251_.64.0345c16: レ有レ雜修靜慮一。若無二思業現前一。亦不レ得レ生 T2251_.64.0345c17: レ彼。是故要有二思業牽引雜修靜慮一。令二其決
T2251_.64.0345c26: レ理。故兼擧レ之
T2251_.64.0345c29: 脱一。而有二身證一。云何比丘而有二身證一。若有二比 T2251_.64.0346a01: 丘一。八解脱身觸成就遊。不三以レ惠見證漏已
T2251_.64.0346a05: 言教。亦復不レ信。但任二已性一而遊。是謂三名爲二
T2251_.64.0346a08: 魔。若魔天沙門婆羅門中一。自身作證。爲二他 T2251_.64.0346a09: 人一説二上中下言一。皆悉眞正義味。此佛名二身 T2251_.64.0346a10: 證一也
T2251_.64.0346a24: 能思相一。三如是下釋レ名。此釋名中。初正釋。 T2251_.64.0346a25: 後所由。此義身屬二所證一。證是能證。屬レ身之 T2251_.64.0346a26: 證。第六轉依主。故得下皆置二身言一。又前説 T2251_.64.0346a27: 定中得レ名。此出定而立レ名。是爲二二別一。得及 T2251_.64.0346a28: 智者。身寂靜之能得爲レ得。智者思所成智即 T2251_.64.0346a29: 思惠。光第二釋爲レ勝。順二及言一故。初釋非也。 T2251_.64.0346b01: 文中於二滅定一。不レ施二得言一故。亦復云二從起一。何
T2251_.64.0346b06: 非三唯彼位方得二身證名一。先後二時倶得レ名 T2251_.64.0346b07: 故。由レ此設無下縁二滅定一智上。得勢力故立二身證 T2251_.64.0346b08: 名一。是故前説於レ理爲レ勝。擧二後邊一故。唯作二是 T2251_.64.0346b09: 言一。得二滅定一不還轉名爲二身證一。理實身證於二 T2251_.64.0346b10: 八解脱一無レ不二具足一。由二身證住一。以下滅盡定用二 T2251_.64.0346b11: 餘解脱一爲レ門而入上故。今反破云。身是唯所 T2251_.64.0346b12: 依。何可レ爲二能證一。亦復前後二時倶得レ名者 T2251_.64.0346b13: 不レ爾。能所異故。舊論無二是一段一。梵本寫脱 T2251_.64.0346b14: 乎。若譯後闕文乎
T2251_.64.0346b21: 家家。一種。前三向及果。中等五不還。九無 T2251_.64.0346b22: 學
T2251_.64.0346b25: 作二無漏一。舊論作二無流一。爲レ正也。舊論云二三 T2251_.64.0346b26: 種無流學一。及無流學果一。此四法與二聖人一亦 T2251_.64.0346b27: 爲レ依。亦爲レ因。故云二依因一
T2251_.64.0346c06: 別未至所攝有二一千四百九十二一。今第三無 T2251_.64.0346c07: レ之。起二此定一所依地即九地。故云二通依九地一。 T2251_.64.0346c08: 謂未至中間根本下三無色無漏九地。能 T2251_.64.0346c09: 治道依地故。欲界非二定地一故。有頂非二無漏一
T2251_.64.0346c12: 阿羅漢一。非二一人起多。如二婆沙二十八説一」
T2251_.64.0346c15: 者。苦集竝厭行相。不レ可三厭レ下斷二上惑一故。 T2251_.64.0346c16: 問。何故不レ取二二法智一。答。法智縁レ欲智。唯斷二 T2251_.64.0346c17: 麁惑一力。無下斷二細惑一之殊勝力上故
T2251_.64.0346c20: 智一思惟欲界滅道一。作二四行相一隨一行相得中 T2251_.64.0346c21: 阿羅漢果上。問。法智苦集不レ取。何故特取レ之。 T2251_.64.0346c22: 答。滅道是斷證行相。縁二欲界一勝レ縁二上二界
T2251_.64.0346c25: 滅道勝二上界一故
T2251_.64.0347a02: レ妨
T2251_.64.0347a08: 便通二同類一。以二諸地道互相因一故
T2251_.64.0347a13: 問。此三説是非云何。答。光記第三爲レ正。
T2251_.64.0347a17: 有人云。光寶但以二餘論一決。於二此論前
T2251_.64.0347a20: 三説爲レ正。評家義故。此論無二簡別一故。次第 T2251_.64.0347a21: 亦同レ彼故。光記實得二論旨一。何以二正理一。可レ決二 T2251_.64.0347a22: 論主意一。其相違非二一條一故。今云。論主意初 T2251_.64.0347a23: 説爲レ正。何以故。文勢分明故。謂初説不レ標二
T2251_.64.0347a26: 執言一顯二不正義一。是其一論大例焉。舊論却爲
T2251_.64.0347a29: 無二其所以一。如レ是顯示勝劣是非一。聖教大例
T2251_.64.0347b06: レ理。故正理論師得二此論意一。初説中云下滅唯 T2251_.64.0347b07: 別縁。道則總縁。於二隨眠品一已具成立上。又破二 T2251_.64.0347b08: 後二師一云。彼倶非レ理。道必總縁。滅唯別縁。
T2251_.64.0347b12: 言一。可レ呵可レ去。近人亦愛著普光一。妄諍是二彼 T2251_.64.0347b13: 非一。至レ所レ不レ能レ救。而言二雖レ謬亦復其謬非 T2251_.64.0347b14: 無レ理。豈非レ背二依レ法不レ依レ人。依レ義不レ依レ文 T2251_.64.0347b15: 金言一乎。寶法唯擧二正理判決一。未レ辨二此論起 T2251_.64.0347b16: 盡一。唯偏信二正理一之舊蔽。未レ得二此論旨一。誰爲 T2251_.64.0347b17: レ不レ然乎。更難二第二師一。道互爲二因果一必總縁。 T2251_.64.0347b18: 滅自地各別無二互因果一。何混同同爲二別縁一。 T2251_.64.0347b19: 難二第三師一。謂滅類智各別無二因義一。何可二合 T2251_.64.0347b20: 縁一。若彼合縁道尚應二合縁一。同類相因故。又唯 T2251_.64.0347b21: 別縁能斷二其惑一。有二何不足一用二合縁一爲 T2251_.64.0347b22: 金剛喩定依二九地一多數三師異説圖 論
T2251_.64.0347b27: 九品惑滅離至得一。倶起智名二盡智一。光初釋爲 T2251_.64.0347b28: レ善。寶亦如レ是。第二釋盡得與二倶行盡智一。約 T2251_.64.0347b29: 相違釋一。違二新舊論一也
T2251_.64.0347c18: 應中更學上故。故正理云。諸自利行。修學已成。 T2251_.64.0347c19: 唯應レ作二他利益事一故。次應供義約二所供養一。
T2251_.64.0347c23: 無レ有二相違一
T2251_.64.0347c27: 學一。故名爲レ學。尸婆白レ佛。何所レ學。佛告二尸 T2251_.64.0347c28: 婆一。隨レ時學二増上戒一。學二増上意一。學二増上慧一。舊
T2251_.64.0348a01: T2251_.64.0348a02: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a03: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a16: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a17: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a18: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a19: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a20: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a21: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a22: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a23: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a24: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a25: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a26: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a27: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a28: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a29: [IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0348b05: 亦是物也。是亦坐レ不レ讀二本經一耳。今云。所レ云 T2251_.64.0348b06: 三學云二無漏正法一。光次文云レ學二正所學無漏 T2251_.64.0348b07: 戒等一。漏無漏爲二邪正一。實是本意。還汝未レ了二 T2251_.64.0348b08: 經意一。求二志於彈斥一。亡二於光次文一。設雖レ無二次 T2251_.64.0348b09: 文一。聖人所學戒定慧云二無漏正法一。有二何妨一。
T2251_.64.0348b12: 正定一。成就是名レ學。何等爲二無學一。無學正見成 T2251_.64.0348b13: 就無學正志乃至正定成就。是名二無學一
T2251_.64.0348b16: 預流等住二本性一。不二進修一應レ不二有學一。婆沙百
T2251_.64.0348b19: 但説下不二進修一名中住本性上。謂預流者不レ進修
T2251_.64.0348b22: 除遣。以二邪正相對一故
T2251_.64.0348b29: 乃至七爲レ證得阿羅漢果一行二於道一。八證得 T2251_.64.0349a01: T2251_.64.0349a02: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349a03: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349a04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349a05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349a06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349a07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349a08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349a09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349a10: 阿羅漢果一
T2251_.64.0349a16: 前攝レ果之名一同一上。而其事體與レ彼二物。釋二 T2251_.64.0349a17: 此句一初釋與寶同。約二非レ攝相一如二初釋一。尋二 T2251_.64.0349a18: 所由一如二後釋一。竝存可也
T2251_.64.0349a21: 無二近分一。易レ了不レ具。後約二自不治レ自。此相 T2251_.64.0349a22: 難レ曉具釋。初標立。二自地煩惱下所由。三 T2251_.64.0349a23: 故自下結。其所由中初總釋。後若彼下別釋。 T2251_.64.0349a24: 初順釋・後若此下反顯。光云。復正理云。若彼
T2251_.64.0349a28: 煩惱甲。以四順二生長彼煩惱一故。此二十四字脱 T2251_.64.0349a29: 應レ加レ之 T2251_.64.0349b01: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349b02: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349b03: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349b04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349b05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349b06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349b07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349b08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349b09: [IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0349b14: 世一。捨レ惑不レ應故。有頂半解脱如二上生一不レ應。
T2251_.64.0349b18: 三定近分離二第二定一不上。能離二初定染一
T2251_.64.0349b21: 明。後下三下辨二所以一。初總標二能所治一中。初 T2251_.64.0349b22: 總擧二能治所依一。後總擧二所離一。是爲レ明三近分
T2251_.64.0349b25: 色定。此中從二欲界離欲一。乃至二第二定離欲一。名二 T2251_.64.0349b26: 三地勝一。於二此三地中一。最後解脱道。或從二近 T2251_.64.0349b27: 分定一起。或從二根本定一起。既云レ標二一切衆生一。 T2251_.64.0349b28: 簡別云二此中一。總別之異。由漸正釋差別炳然。 T2251_.64.0349b29: 今亦云二諸道一。有漏無漏諸道依地。故云レ諸。
T2251_.64.0349c03: 宗。竝全同二此論一。今此正所明唯有漏。而唯離 T2251_.64.0349c04: レ下。故前問。及頌。長行。悉云二離下一。然普光不 T2251_.64.0349c05: レ設二分節一。亂解致二二釋一。竝皆違二論旨一。初釋應 T2251_.64.0349c06: レ言二離レ八謂除二有頂一者。未レ曉三總擧二所離一。而 T2251_.64.0349c07: 正二論文一。非中之非也。後釋雖レ非レ無レ理。而全 T2251_.64.0349c08: 謬二今正所明一。謂唯有漏加二無漏一。唯離下加二 T2251_.64.0349c09: 離上一。剩通二釋頌文一。云レ約二多分一。令二初人迷一其 T2251_.64.0349c10: 罪大矣
T2251_.64.0349c13: 唯云二解脱道及滅一
T2251_.64.0349c16: 漏一。此示レ體
T2251_.64.0349c21: 煩熱苦報生老病死因一。是謂二沙門一。問。此經唯 T2251_.64.0349c22: 息惡義。無二勤苦修行一。答。息二煩熱一。必有二勤行一。 T2251_.64.0349c23: 故云二勤勞一。非二相違一。舊論云。如二經言一。此人能 T2251_.64.0349c24: 寂靜多種惡法。不應慧法。染汚法。隨下順生
T2251_.64.0350a01: 惱永斷
T2251_.64.0350a08: 諸過失一故。由レ此異生雖三能已斷二無所有處 T2251_.64.0350a09: 染一。而非二眞沙門一。以二諸過失尚有餘故。暫時 T2251_.64.0350a10: 靜息。非二究竟一故。寶疏唯擧二正理一。實得二論意一。 T2251_.64.0350a11: 然有人此論與二正理一稍異。寶疏直用二正理一 T2251_.64.0350a12: 未者。却泥レ文也
T2251_.64.0350a15: 阿那含果。阿羅漢果。中含二十六師子吼經
T2251_.64.0350a23: 中爲レ二。初釋二八十九相一。二諸無下辨二寛狹一。 T2251_.64.0350a24: 是即四句意。初第一單句。次第三雙亦句。後 T2251_.64.0350a25: 第二單句。就二亦是言一。寶疏二釋。初釋亦二無 T2251_.64.0350a26: 爲性一者謬之甚。以三解脱道非二無爲一故。違三互
T2251_.64.0350a30: 也。無二離レ斷別道位一故
T2251_.64.0350b04: 薄。何等爲二阿那含果一。謂五下分結盡。何等 T2251_.64.0350b05: 爲二阿羅漢果一。謂貪恚癡永盡。一切煩惱永盡。
T2251_.64.0350b09: 此中亦有レ二。初總通二見修一。示二梵輪名一。二後 T2251_.64.0350b10: 一頌。別就二見道一。示二法輪名一。於中者。正理 T2251_.64.0350b11: 釋二梵輪中一。光記爲レ得。寶疏總爲二沙門性中一 T2251_.64.0350b12: 義疎遠。然光記初一頌異名。後一頌明二法 T2251_.64.0350b13: 輪一。豈可レ不二後一頌是異名一。云二於中一云二説名一 T2251_.64.0350b14: 故
T2251_.64.0350b17: 然一者。我即是沙門諸有奉持沙門戒律。我皆 T2251_.64.0350b18: 已得。如レ今欲レ論二婆羅門一者。亦我身是。所以 T2251_.64.0350b19: 然一者。我即是婆羅門也。諸過去婆羅門所持
T2251_.64.0350b22: 之婆羅門。同二沙門一。同二婆羅門一。沙門義婆羅
T2251_.64.0350b25: 法一。名爲二梵志一。更説二異名一。亦名爲二刹利一。以 T2251_.64.0350b26: レ斷二其婬怒癡一故。亦名爲二沐浴一。以三其洗二二十 T2251_.64.0350b27: 一結一故。亦名爲レ覺。以三其覺了愚法慧法一故。 T2251_.64.0350b28: 亦名爲二彼岸一。以下其從二此岸一至中彼岸上故。中含
T2251_.64.0350c01: 生老病死因一。是謂二梵志一。更有下聖與二淨浴一名上」
T2251_.64.0350c05: 輪故名二梵輪一。依主釋。簡二世間初定之假梵 T2251_.64.0350c06: 王一。故云レ眞。問。今沙門性異名。豈佛獨名レ梵。 T2251_.64.0350c07: 何成二異名一。答。約二所懷持一。是佛徳。約二能懷持一
T2251_.64.0350c10: 業佛圖澄一。澄姓帛氏。安以ク師莫レ過二釋文一。乃 T2251_.64.0350c11: 以レ釋稱。人有二議者一。後増一阿含譯出。始服二 T2251_.64.0350c12: 其懸解一云。當時已有二法海經一。西晋法炬譯。 T2251_.64.0350c13: 其經具言レ之。不レ待二増一一。古今鮮下能讀二三藏一
T2251_.64.0350c18: 按四有字。考二之餘經一者字誤。亦字又者草 T2251_.64.0350c19: 誤。今云。不二必然一。約二能有一云。佛具二諸梵徳一 T2251_.64.0350c20: 云二梵有一。有二何妨一。亦字分二熱煩一爲二二義一。故 T2251_.64.0350c21: 特云レ亦。非二草誤一也。有云。此所引經三名。 T2251_.64.0350c22: 後二名同文故來。今云。初總名。後二梵所 T2251_.64.0350c23: 有義。故特證レ之。非二同文故來一。故舊論云。 T2251_.64.0350c24: 如二經中説一。世尊是夫嵐摩。如レ此寂靜。如レ此
T2251_.64.0351a02: 初標立。即釋二次二句一。二如世下明下與二輪名一 T2251_.64.0351a03: 所以上。亦二。初約二五種相似一。後約二輻等ノ相ノ T2251_.64.0351a04: 相似一。此二義竝爲二法喩一。如二輪之法一。故名二法
T2251_.64.0351a07: 即法之輪故依主釋。此意佛法能斷レ疑。是輪 T2251_.64.0351a08: 徳故持業也。依主中能所相反應レ言二輪之法一 T2251_.64.0351a09: 也。又輪釋二四義一。一圓滿義。以レ離二缺減一故。二 T2251_.64.0351a10: 具徳義。具二轂輻輞等一故。三有用義。摧輾惑 T2251_.64.0351a11: 障一故。四轉動義。從レ此至レ彼。即從レ佛至二衆 T2251_.64.0351a12: 生一。亦從レ彼向レ此。從二衆生一至二佛果一故。玄賛
T2251_.64.0351a15: 也。動宣言教一。顯揚妙理一。運二聖道一。於二聲前一 T2251_.64.0351a16: 起二眞智一。於二言後一圓摧二煩惱一。名二轉法輪一。義
T2251_.64.0351a27: 有二迴轉義一。今五相中。總不レ離二迴轉一。故不二別 T2251_.64.0351a28: 立一。論主意。若約二一相一義。偏不レ圓。故合集正 T2251_.64.0351a29: 理顯宗亦如レ今。此中有二捨取一故者。婆沙云。 T2251_.64.0351b01: 捨二苦現觀一。趣二集現觀一。乃至捨二滅現觀一。趣二道 T2251_.64.0351b02: 現觀一
T2251_.64.0351b06: 道一。展轉和合。一時至二他相續中一。轉故名二法輪一。 T2251_.64.0351b07: 此八支道。見道位勝。是故見道。獨名二法輪一」 T2251_.64.0351b08: 彼唯以二移轉義一釋レ輪也。彼六説示レ圖曰 T2251_.64.0351b09: T2251_.64.0351b10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0351b11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0351b12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0351b13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0351b14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0351b15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0351b16: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0351b17: 舊論。正理。顯宗竝同二此論一。今配當全同二彼
T2251_.64.0351b22: 道在二見道一。七覺支在二修道一。有餘師。經部。大
T2251_.64.0351c02: 天摩梵沙門婆羅門聞法衆中一爲二解脱一爲レ出 T2251_.64.0351c03: 爲離。亦不三自證二阿耨多羅三藐三菩提一。我 T2251_.64.0351c04: 已於二四聖諦三轉十二行一。生二眼智明覺一故。 T2251_.64.0351c05: 於二諸天摩梵沙門婆羅門聞法衆中一。得レ出得 T2251_.64.0351c06: レ脱。自證得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提一。乃至憍陳 T2251_.64.0351c07: 如。拘隣知法已。地神擧レ聲唱言。諸仁者世尊 T2251_.64.0351c08: 於二婆羅那一三轉十二行法輪。聞二虚空神一。謂 T2251_.64.0351c09: 六欲天。展轉聞二梵天一。乘レ聲唱言。諸仁者世
T2251_.64.0351c15: 正義一。後規二諸師誤一。辨一正義一者。自下爲レ決二法 T2251_.64.0351c16: 輪在位一。論二三轉十二行一。此問也
T2251_.64.0351c19: 此初也。此中麁分爲レ五。一叙二三轉一。二示二十 T2251_.64.0351c20: 二行一。三通二數妨一。四配二三道一。五結レ宗。初中此 T2251_.64.0351c21: 苦聖諦。初轉約二見道一。此應遍知第二轉。約二 T2251_.64.0351c22: 修道一。此已遍知約二無學道一。故下三轉如レ次 T2251_.64.0351c23: 爲二三道一 T2251_.64.0351c24: 規二諸師誤一者。光寶竝因便明者。全不レ得二論 T2251_.64.0351c25: 意一。何者下論主示二正解一中。兩釋倶法輪名爲 T2251_.64.0351c26: レ本故。又釋二三轉一。光約二三道一爲レ是。寶疏約二示 T2251_.64.0351c27: 勸證一。唯就二見道一。釋背二論意一。及違二文勢一也
T2251_.64.0352a01: 言爲二眼肝一。謂渉二三道一。非二唯見一。唯見非二三道一 T2251_.64.0352a02: 故。依レ之正理救釋。必不二成立一。如二下具辨一
T2251_.64.0352a05: 道一。後倶約二三道一。故竝不二且吾一也。此初義也。 T2251_.64.0352a06: 此中爲レ三。初正示三三轉教名二法輪一。二明二三 T2251_.64.0352a07: 轉十二行相一。三叙二轉義一。初中是故者。承二上 T2251_.64.0352a08: 難一起二下正義一。即示二有レ過故改義。唯者簡二修 T2251_.64.0352a09: 無學二道屬二三轉一。即此言唯前唯見道爲二法 T2251_.64.0352a10: 輪一之義。見道三轉十二行教門名二法輪一也。
T2251_.64.0352a13: 云二三轉一。答曰。一見道三周轉故。三轉義成。 T2251_.64.0352a14: 若爾應二三轉三行一。何具二十二一。答。雖二見一道一。 T2251_.64.0352a15: 有二苦集滅道四一。三四十二行成立。別釋約二示 T2251_.64.0352a16: 勸證一可レ知。明二轉義一中。若教門名レ轉。轉義 T2251_.64.0352a17: 何。謂自悟法説往二他身一。令二彼教義證悟一。故 T2251_.64.0352a18: 轉義成。問。此義以レ何知二轉法輪倶唯見道一。 T2251_.64.0352a19: 答。異二第二釋三道法輪一故。云二三周一故。一法 T2251_.64.0352a20: 再二故云レ周。三道別何可レ云レ周。如二減縁減 T2251_.64.0352a21: 行一。云二四聖諦一故。不レ通二已轉契經一故。問。若 T2251_.64.0352a22: 爾於二後二道一。無二三轉十二行一乎。答。世尊所 T2251_.64.0352a23: 説且唯約二見道一。云二已轉一故。若後二道準レ之。 T2251_.64.0352a24: 亦作レ之無レ有レ妨。或諸下第二約二三道一爲二法 T2251_.64.0352a25: 輪一。舊論云二復次一。是亦異三有部爲二唯見道一。三 T2251_.64.0352a26: 轉同レ彼。爲二三道一不二別釋一。而於レ通二已轉言一。 T2251_.64.0352a27: 自成立故。此中爲レ三。初三道爲二法輪一。二 T2251_.64.0352a28: 釋二轉義一。三通釋已轉言一。後辨二先英是非一。
T2251_.64.0352b02: 光約二三道一者誤。若同レ前三道ナラハ何別可二問
T2251_.64.0352b05: レ當如何。是故引レ彼須レ設二反破一。若正師約二通 T2251_.64.0352b06: 中初一。何得レ云レ唯。既云レ唯。其救不レ成。寶疏
T2251_.64.0352b09: 標爲二有説一而加二能破一。彼上下其類非一也。 T2251_.64.0352b10: 又擧二正理此但等能破一。不レ破者非也。次但 T2251_.64.0352b11: 約二示勸證一。不レ言二見修等一。似二無失一。而初
T2251_.64.0352b14: 取乙三道甲。若爾初釋爲二見道一乎。次引二正理
T2251_.64.0352b17: 名二法輪一。是婆沙本意ナラハ何得レ言二唯見道一。言 T2251_.64.0352b18: レ唯故所レ設二難詰一。故種種通釋。竝皆歸二虚妄一。 T2251_.64.0352b19: 汝曲二婆沙師意一致レ救。豈可レ爲レ順二本宗一。又
T2251_.64.0352b22: 法輪方便。即是眞法輪。諸法談義。豈可レ言
T2251_.64.0352b25: 經部宗一。破二薩婆多一言上。又擧二今難詰已下兩
T2251_.64.0352b29: 正義一云。牟尼説。見道速疾名二法輪一。倶舍復 T2251_.64.0352c01: 言。或諸道皆是法輪等。此是薩婆多師本意。 T2251_.64.0352c02: 故顯宗云。毘婆沙本意。總説二一切聖道一。皆 T2251_.64.0352c03: 名二法輪一。以レ説二三輪三道攝一故。於二他相續一見 T2251_.64.0352c04: 道生時已至二轉初一。故名二已轉一。非下唯見道以二 T2251_.64.0352c05: 八支聖道一獨名中法輪上。妙音所説非二正義一故。 T2251_.64.0352c06: 基師不レ破也。今云。依二經部宗一者未レ詳。後有 T2251_.64.0352c07: 釋甚非也。若非二有部正義一。何頌云二唯見道一。
T2251_.64.0352c10: 義一。倶舍第二釋。是論主改正義。全非二有部 T2251_.64.0352c11: 義一。何可レ爲二有部本義一。證二顯宗一練磨不レ足矣。 T2251_.64.0352c12: 彼蒙二論主難一。衆賢致二如レ是轉救一。而毘婆沙 T2251_.64.0352c13: 師云二唯見道一。故終不レ成レ救。然豈爲レ證。可
T2251_.64.0352c19: 覺一。即十二轉四十八行。而云二三轉十六行一。四
T2251_.64.0352c22: 依三界身 問。無色無レ有レ色。何云レ身。答。心 T2251_.64.0352c23: 心所聚義爲レ身。或約二多分一也
T2251_.64.0352c26: 究竟者至二得阿羅漢果一。由二此經一故知。於二上
T2251_.64.0353a02: T2251_.64.0353a03: 法義 T2251_.64.0353a04: 豐山上陽沙門釋林常快道記 T2251_.64.0353a05: 賢聖品六之四
T2251_.64.0353a13: 夫文之承應非二一準一。作論者意樂亦是殊異。 T2251_.64.0353a14: 不レ可三偏準二正理一。但不レ可レ唱二前總説文一。今 T2251_.64.0353a15: 於レ唱二此文一有レ味。未レ嘗レ之者。同レ不レ讀二此論一。
T2251_.64.0353a18: 未二顯説一。故唱二彼不動性一。以爲二基本一
T2251_.64.0353a21: 前五一。此中上句示二能所生一。下句辨二異名一。後 T2251_.64.0353a22: 二句約二最後一一。於レ中上句辨二異名一。下句示二
T2251_.64.0353a25: 受前却何害。答。總名時解脱句。不レ可二前 T2251_.64.0353a26: 説一。未レ蒙二前五言一失二所目體一故。是故依二結頌 T2251_.64.0353a27: 法一從生爲レ先。後不時解脱依二義次一。故從生 T2251_.64.0353a28: 在レ終
T2251_.64.0353b04: 法。不退法。護法。護則不レ退。不レ護則退。安住
T2251_.64.0353b08: 那第二載二福田經一。全同二正理一。又經中護則等 T2251_.64.0353b09: 二句八字。蓋後人道註亂入。有部毘陀那無
T2251_.64.0353b12: 對法説耳者。何爲如是迷亂。正理初擧二六羅 T2251_.64.0353b13: 漢經一。故對以云二餘經一。六種亦經説在レ文照 T2251_.64.0353b14: 然。況今論云二契經説一。若不二經説一。何不下如二六
T2251_.64.0353b17: 經一相攝九種一。唯説六不レ説レ九。意六爲二了 T2251_.64.0353b18: 義一。九爲二不了義一。亦在レ文義顯彰。故婆沙一
T2251_.64.0353b28: 答。依二小教一可レ爾。六種皆不レ入二滅定一爲二惠 T2251_.64.0353b29: 解脱一。但惠力解脱煩惱一故。得レ入名二倶解脱一。 T2251_.64.0353b30: 惠力。滅定力。二倶解脱煩惱一故。如二論次下
T2251_.64.0353c03: 於此六中等 自下釋二後一頌一爲レ二。初釋二 T2251_.64.0353c04: 前二句一。此有レ二。初明二所從來一。即此下釋レ名。 T2251_.64.0353c05: 於レ此有二正名亦名二一。亦名中爲レ四。一標レ名。 T2251_.64.0353c06: 二所由。三辨略レ待。四重釋二待時相一 T2251_.64.0353c07: 第二不動下釋二後兩句。有レ五。一釋二後字一。二 T2251_.64.0353c08: 釋二正名一。三示二亦名一。此有レ三。初標名。次所由。 T2251_.64.0353c09: 後重釋二不待時一四或依下更示二別義一。五此從 T2251_.64.0353c10: 下示二所從來一
T2251_.64.0353c13: 脱。是勝解爲レ體。則心王ト相應スル心所。心之 T2251_.64.0353c14: 解脱依士釋。亦時愛亦心解。持業得レ名。文中 T2251_.64.0353c15: 及言欲レ顯示一體兩用一。是義相違非二體相 T2251_.64.0353c16: 違一。如下慈恩傳言詮二作具及作者一。如二六合釋 T2251_.64.0353c17: 有尋及有伺一。次立名準可レ知。光記釋二心解
T2251_.64.0353c22: 義。若尋二其自性一。是無漏勝解心所。必非二別
T2251_.64.0354a01: 衡鈔辨一。光寶盛酥瓶略レ盛。若依二二十唯識基
T2251_.64.0354a04: 言瓜
T2251_.64.0354a07: 所。所説。及人隨順故。舊論曰。命縁。無病住 T2251_.64.0354a08: 處時等。麟記意異二光寶一。此論不レ同二婆沙一。有
T2251_.64.0354a13: 解脱善品加行一。不二恒常殷重修一故。若於二日 T2251_.64.0354a14: 初分一修。於二中後分一。則不レ能レ修。夜亦如レ今。 T2251_.64.0354a15: 雖二暫能修一。而不二殷重一。依二強勝道一。而得二解脱一。 T2251_.64.0354a16: 故名二不時解脱一。強勝道者。與レ上相違。論主 T2251_.64.0354a17: 欲下於二多義中一此因亦通上。故擧示之一。光記云二 T2251_.64.0354a18: 更釋一爲レ得。然寶疏述二異釋一者非也。舊論云二 T2251_.64.0354a19: 復次一。今不レ云二有説一故。凡諸教中云二復次一。云二
T2251_.64.0354a24: 釋二六種名義一。二此六下辨二六種勝劣差別一。三 T2251_.64.0354a25: 退法下辨三得名約二容有一。示二三界具足一。此爲
T2251_.64.0354a28: 無學一是思法上。亦有下先退法性至二無學一轉レ根。 T2251_.64.0354a29: 成レ思。或成レ護。或成中不動上。如レ是有二先護法後 T2251_.64.0354a30: 即不轉護法一。亦有三先護法轉成二餘三一。餘一切 T2251_.64.0354b01: 如レ理應レ思
T2251_.64.0354b04: 別一非也。故正理等已下一章在二前段列名 T2251_.64.0354b05: 下一
T2251_.64.0354b11: 示二界具不具一。初明二欲具一。後明二上界不具一。
T2251_.64.0354b16: 欲レ顯示後是不正一。故説言レ執
T2251_.64.0354b21: 中初總釋。是言鮮本記疏。作レ有。顯二容有不 T2251_.64.0354b22: 定義一。顯宗。正理云。容レ有二退義一。後於中下別 T2251_.64.0354b23: 釋一。初釋二初句一。後五種下釋二第二句上三字一。 T2251_.64.0354b24: 此中種性唯就二一果羅漢中一。五種分別明。果 T2251_.64.0354b25: 者隨レ應所レ得學無學果名レ果
T2251_.64.0354b28: 中有レ三。初總釋。二別釋。三總辨二五人種類 T2251_.64.0354b29: 差別一。此即初也。倶者謂性與レ果。非先者。下 T2251_.64.0354b30: 所レ示先位。然普光未レ曉二此旨一。見三下明二不退一。 T2251_.64.0354c01: 謂下上來總釋二二句頌一。謂諸下別釋中二句頌上。 T2251_.64.0354c02: 以二此文一屬レ上者非也。又唯約二思等四一。除二退 T2251_.64.0354c03: 法一非也。後釋亦約二多分一。及約三退法有二果退一。 T2251_.64.0354c04: 竝全不レ得二論意一也。寶疏屬レ下得二論意一
T2251_.64.0354c07: 後若住下乘明二退相一。初中亦爲レ二。初無學。 T2251_.64.0354c08: 次因明二有學一。初若言對二無學一。後若言對二無 T2251_.64.0354c09: 退一
T2251_.64.0354c12: 是故下結二預流定無退一。顯成宗義一。初中有 T2251_.64.0354c13: レ二。初約二五性一明。後又亦下約二四果一明。初中 T2251_.64.0354c14: 亦二。初正明二思等不退一。後唯先下簡別退法
T2251_.64.0354c18: 一句寶屬レ下。其上文屬二前段一非也 T2251_.64.0354c19: 後所得果容有退義者。此有二兩勢一。一對三前先 T2251_.64.0354c20: 位住二思等一。則住二此性一。後修二練根一是也。二對二 T2251_.64.0354c21: 又亦已下一。四果中後三果。隨レ應爲二後得一。若 T2251_.64.0354c22: 異レ之於二此段一無二練根修文一。爲二何故一。猶唯識
T2251_.64.0354c29: 過上故。然得二勝性一雖レ可レ名レ進。而起レ惑故。亦 T2251_.64.0354c30: 名爲レ退。由レ此彼難於レ理無レ失。又彼退起下障二 T2251_.64.0355a01: 涅槃法一聖欣二涅槃一過上。於二聖道一設得二勝性一。
T2251_.64.0355a04: 譬如下退二富家一而貧貴族是名進
T2251_.64.0355a11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0355a12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0355a13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0355a14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0355a15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0355a16: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0355a17: [IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0355a24: 約二境相有無一。四約二事理迷別一。此即初二也。 T2251_.64.0355a25: 謂於下爲二第二一。謂言又誤也。上下其義別故。 T2251_.64.0355a26: 結文各別説レ之故。而言者誤。是擧二我三名一 T2251_.64.0355a27: 故。又而言無二所詮一故。由レ此舊論曰。若爾何 T2251_.64.0355a28: 惑不レ爾。有二差別一故。何以故。我見於二色等類一。 T2251_.64.0355a29: 由二作者受者自在者一分別故。増益スレトモ非三實 T2251_.64.0355b01: 第得二預流一。亦存二超越一來不還一。故言二先果一。 T2251_.64.0355b02: 不レ云二預流一。不レ言二初果一。然寶疏云二初果一非 T2251_.64.0355b03: 也
T2251_.64.0355b07: 二若爾下難。三非此下答。四諸煩惱下辨二見 T2251_.64.0355b08: 修差別一。成立無事義一。此初三也。事者體義。 T2251_.64.0355b09: 四果退不退。諸部異説。今示レ圖曰 T2251_.64.0355b10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0355b11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0355b12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0355b13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0355b14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0355b15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0355b16: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0355b17: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0355b18: 有二我性一。以二身見一爲二依止一。所餘邊見等惑生 T2251_.64.0355b19: 起。是故説二無類一。修道所滅惑。欲。瞋。慢。無明。 T2251_.64.0355b20: 於二色等類中一愛。増上起。不了。爲二自性一生 T2251_.64.0355b21: 起。是故説二有類一。何以故。彼有二微淨等境一。由 T2251_.64.0355b22: レ縁レ此故。彼得レ起二我等一。皆無髣髴。復次修道 T2251_.64.0355b23: 所滅。有二境類各各相對一。謂可愛不可愛等。一 T2251_.64.0355b24: 切見諦所滅惑。通以二我等相一爲レ境。是故無二 T2251_.64.0355b25: 各相對境類一。邊執見下通妨。妨者。我見可 T2251_.64.0355b26: レ然。邊見等豈可レ然。故通レ之。此中第一爲二境 T2251_.64.0355b27: 事別通一。修惑可意等各別故。見惑通執二我等一 T2251_.64.0355b28: 故。故舊論云二各別通一。第二爲二執相非實實一。 T2251_.64.0355b29: 増二作者等一。而非二實性一。修惑起二染著等一。實有二
T2251_.64.0355c04: 別。答。彼別不別爲レ本。今有無爲レ本。故前云二 T2251_.64.0355c05: 各有別事一。今但明二有無一
T2251_.64.0355c08: 示二退不退相一。光記分科無レ失。寶疏諦理已上 T2251_.64.0355c09: 爲二大文第一釋一。巳下爲二大文第二釋一。謬之甚 T2251_.64.0355c10: 矣
T2251_.64.0355c13: 下別釋。此有レ二。初明二修惑有退。後非由下
T2251_.64.0355c19: 應理由一。四答。五問レ教。六答レ教。七問レ理。
T2251_.64.0355c24: 身口一滅上。又雜含十九卷
T2251_.64.0355c29: 行一。我説レ行二無放逸一。阿羅漢行二無放逸一訖。故 T2251_.64.0355c30: 不二爲レ説應行。經曰。此賢者本已行二無放逸一。
T2251_.64.0356a04: 向二涅槃一住上。如レ是像類比丘。我爲レ其説二不放 T2251_.64.0356a05: 逸行一
T2251_.64.0356a09: 樂レ衆。合會於衆一。不レ欲レ離レ衆。不レ樂二獨住遠 T2251_.64.0356a10: 離處一者。得二時愛樂心解脱。及不時不移動心 T2251_.64.0356a11: 解脱一者。終無二是處一。阿難若有二比丘一。不レ欲二譁 T2251_.64.0356a12: 説一。不レ樂二譁説一。不レ合會譁説一。不レ欲二於衆一。不 T2251_.64.0356a13: レ樂二於衆一不レ合會衆一。欲レ離二於衆一。常樂二獨住 T2251_.64.0356a14: 遠離處一者。得二時愛樂心解脱及不時不移動 T2251_.64.0356a15: 心解脱一者。必有二是處一。舊論曰。若汝言二於阿
T2251_.64.0356b02: 兩關一
T2251_.64.0356b05: 後釋二愛名一有二兩義一。初師約二希求一。後師約二愛 T2251_.64.0356b06: 味一。經部宗意。時愛心解脱爲二有漏定一。不レ名二 T2251_.64.0356b07: 無學無漏果一也
T2251_.64.0356b10: 下。引レ經反難有部一。三由此下。結成羅漢局二 T2251_.64.0356b11: 不動一。四然由下約二現法樂一。辨二九種名義一。五 T2251_.64.0356b12: 然喬下通釋經一。此即初三也。此中世尊者。次 T2251_.64.0356b13: 前但説退失經也。經部時愛心解脱爲二有漏 T2251_.64.0356b14: 定一。唯無漏果不動心解脱爲二不動一。故云二必是 T2251_.64.0356b15: 不動一
T2251_.64.0356b18: 別一。初中亦有レ二。初明二退不退一。後例勸思等一。 T2251_.64.0356b19: 初中先配二利鈍一。故於下結二退不退一。例勸中意 T2251_.64.0356b20: 雖二九種性一非レ要。總云二思等一。何以知レ九。下 T2251_.64.0356b21: 明二三別一。不退不動對故。恐レ失二所得現法樂 T2251_.64.0356b22: 住一。恒思二自害一故名二思法一。於レ彼喜自守護名二 T2251_.64.0356b23: 護法一。於二己所得一。不レ退不レ進。故名二安住一。好 T2251_.64.0356b24: レ達二不動所得現法樂住一名二堪達一。是準下於二現 T2251_.64.0356b25: 法樂退與不レ退名言中退不退法上。理應レ如レ是。 T2251_.64.0356b26: 故勸云二如レ理應思一。然普光兩釋。竝似二蛇畫一 T2251_.64.0356b27: 足。又不退即爲二不動一非也。不レ順二下三別文一
T2251_.64.0356c05: 慧難得二現前一。設得レ喜失。故求レ死也。住相
T2251_.64.0356c11: 利故。善取二三昧一。入住起相。故不レ可レ壞。因二滅
T2251_.64.0356c14: 作功徳盡無二退失一。如二經中説一。佛語二比丘一。若
T2251_.64.0356c19: 三故喬下結レ非レ退二應果一。初中爲レ五。初二句 T2251_.64.0356c20: 示二退時位一。二次一句叙二所退定一。三次二句 T2251_.64.0356c21: 叙二退所因一。有二二因一。四次一句正述レ退。五後
T2251_.64.0356c26: レ刀自殺。莫レ令二第七退轉一。次佛頌曰。不レ顧二於 T2251_.64.0356c27: 性命一。見二三有可畏。斷除彼愛欲一。瞿低般涅 T2251_.64.0356c28: 槃。問。何故通レ此耶。答。有部以レ此證二成羅漢
T2251_.64.0357a01: 脱。六反退已於二第七時一。恐二復退失一。以レ刀自
T2251_.64.0357a05: 無放逸品。亦云レ退二羅漢果一。何云三昔在二有學一。 T2251_.64.0357a06: 答。婆沙阿羅漢言是以二自義一標二其事一。正經文
T2251_.64.0357a09: 羅漢果一。又解諸部所誦當レ異也。大乘北本涅
T2251_.64.0357a18: 増至レ十。更重累十十増至レ十。總五百五十法。 T2251_.64.0357a19: 十十報酬亦稱二十報一。今論曰二増十一。舊論曰二
T2251_.64.0357a27: 謬。答。彼經一法有レ十。二等亦各有レ十。於レ中 T2251_.64.0357a28: 今約二其小段一。故曰二皆聚一。普光直解二立名一。故 T2251_.64.0357a29: 爲レ誤也
T2251_.64.0357b06: 證。若汝言三此果應レ生故。故説二應生一。餘果最 T2251_.64.0357b07: 應レ生。今文現前者。顯現義。謂爲レ顯二彼義一。此 T2251_.64.0357b08: 經文句顯現故。故無二重煩失一
T2251_.64.0357b11: 違一。答。前約二無學位所得一。今約二種性一。雖二有學 T2251_.64.0357b12: 位一。其性應果故無レ妨
T2251_.64.0357b16: 二者順二欲貪一纒法現在前故。三者於二彼處一
T2251_.64.0357b22: レ起。論文分明説故。故羅漢不レ起レ惑。定無レ退。 T2251_.64.0357b23: 光二釋。初釋爲レ正。以レ具通餘難。何爲二餘法一。 T2251_.64.0357b24: 舊論曰。何惑由レ不レ具レ因得レ生
T2251_.64.0357b27: 妙欲一。是即炭喩。舊論云二火聚經一。經曰。五欲 T2251_.64.0357b28: 猶如二火坑一。此中初擧レ經。後此經下。經失念 T2251_.64.0357b29: 爲二羅漢一有レ三。初標。次釋。後結。釋中有レ二。 T2251_.64.0357c01: 初由二遠離言一。後由二諸漏永吐文一。初中亦二。 T2251_.64.0357c02: 初擧二當經一。後引二餘教一。成二應果義一。初經文雜
T2251_.64.0357c06: 不善覺一。長養欲一。長養恚一。長養癡一。是鈍根多
T2251_.64.0357c09: レ是多聞聖弟子鈍根生レ念尋滅。由此經者。前
T2251_.64.0357c13: 於二涅槃一。於二有漏處一。寂滅清涼。準二雜含二十一
T2251_.64.0357c18: 輸於離一。順趣於出一。流二注於出一。浚輸於出一。順 T2251_.64.0357c19: 趣於涅槃一。流注於涅槃一。浚輸於涅槃一。若見二 T2251_.64.0357c20: 五欲一猶レ見二火坑一。如レ是見已。於二欲。欲念。欲 T2251_.64.0357c21: 受。欲著一。心不二永住一。修二四念處。四正斷。四如 T2251_.64.0357c22: 意足。五根五力。七覺分。八聖道分一。八力者。 T2251_.64.0357c23: 九力草誤。今論云二順遠離等爲力故。又此經 T2251_.64.0357c24: 者。前炭喩所レ言於レ有漏處一。寂靜清涼文是也。
T2251_.64.0358a03: 遠離已下爲二後文一。故無二別會釋一。光寶但指二 T2251_.64.0358a04: 永吐文一。違レ理不レ順二文勢一。又違二舊論意一也。上
T2251_.64.0358a07: レ無二放逸事一時解脱瞿提 由二火聚譬一退 此 T2251_.64.0358a08: 論唯長行。又終炭喩段大別。曰若爾火聚譬 T2251_.64.0358a09: 經汝宜須レ救。此經言。多聞聖弟子如レ此行。 T2251_.64.0358a10: 如レ此住。有時有處由二念忘失一故。更生二惡不 T2251_.64.0358a11: 應惠覺觀一。是義不レ然。何以故。此文中不三定 T2251_.64.0358a12: 顯現阿羅漢一。云何知。由丁此經言丙阿羅漢心 T2251_.64.0358a13: 長時歸向空寂一。乃乖墮乙涅槃甲。由二此言一故知。 T2251_.64.0358a14: 前非レ證。復有二餘經中説一。阿羅漢有二如レ此力一。 T2251_.64.0358a15: 於二一切流處諸法一。阿羅漢恒時清涼。恒時寂 T2251_.64.0358a16: 靜。由二此言一故。前非レ證。有二如レ此言一。乃至未 T2251_.64.0358a17: 棄捨行。若爾有學人在二行中一。亦有二此義一。於二 T2251_.64.0358a18: 惑生中一。火聚譬經由下依二有學位一説上。故於二阿 T2251_.64.0358a19: 羅漢一。無二如レ此失一
T2251_.64.0358a22: 動故。前文何故説二有退一。此中増上心所者。舊 T2251_.64.0358a23: 論曰二四種依心現法樂住一。心所必依レ王。故云二 T2251_.64.0358a24: 依心一。與二心所一義同。光兩説。初説爲レ善。順三婆
T2251_.64.0358b02: 於二諸所得徳一。隨一現。餘不レ現。顯現如レ進。未 T2251_.64.0358b03: 現如レ退。故亦名レ退。文中二亦兼二前前一也
T2251_.64.0358b06: 此難一耶。答。汎明二不動羅漢一。通望二一切一。有二未
T2251_.64.0358b11: 行。彼愛何因。何集。何生。何轉。彼愛受ヲ因トシ T2251_.64.0358b12: 受ヲ集トシ受ヲ生トシ受ヲ轉トス。彼受何因。何集。 T2251_.64.0358b13: 何生。何轉。彼受觸因。觸集。觸生。觸轉
T2251_.64.0358b16: 脱練根至二不動法一。成就中上品根本種性一。不
T2251_.64.0358b19: 一名二不退一。先利根故。二名二不動一。後修得故。 T2251_.64.0358b20: 麟云。本是利根故。不下因二練根一得上。名爲二不退一。 T2251_.64.0358b21: 若先鈍根。後練得者。但名二不動一。不レ名二不レ退一。
T2251_.64.0358b28: 六百三十一。更三九成二二十七一。總六百五十七。 T2251_.64.0358c01: 以レ此乘二道十五一。成二九千八百五十五一。復以 T2251_.64.0358c02: レ此乘二種性五一。成二四萬九千二百七十五一。以 T2251_.64.0358c03: レ此乘二根三一。則成二十四萬七千八百二十五一 T2251_.64.0358c04: 隨法行等如理應思 且隨法行性故唯一。 T2251_.64.0358c05: 謂不動法。餘同レ前所餘倣レ之
T2251_.64.0358c08: レ還二比世一。是名二増上意學一。何等爲二増上惠學一。 T2251_.64.0358c09: 是比丘重於レ戒戒増上。重於レ定定増上。重 T2251_.64.0358c10: 於レ惠惠増上。彼如レ是知如レ是見。有漏心解 T2251_.64.0358c11: 脱。有有漏心解。無明有漏心解脱。解脱知見。 T2251_.64.0358c12: 我生已盡。梵行已立。所作已作。自知レ不レ受二 T2251_.64.0358c13: 後有一。是名二増上惠學一。經説レ不レ還二此世一。今云。 T2251_.64.0358c14: 不レ可二牽引一。復云下重令二増上一成中無學上。今云不 T2251_.64.0358c15: レ名二滿學一
T2251_.64.0358c18: 中不還爲二果滿一。最上故。所得定中。得二滅盡 T2251_.64.0358c19: 定一爲二定滿一。是則三種滿。若具レ三稱二具滿一。若
T2251_.64.0358c23: 滿。故大乘亦同レ之。瑜伽五十七及顯揚二十 T2251_.64.0358c24: 於二無學一加二果滿一。謂阿羅漢
T2251_.64.0359a06: レ至二後有一故。説二前爲レ後道一。由下是入二無餘涅
T2251_.64.0359a09: 理全別故。後二置二或言一示二別義一。前不レ置顯三 T2251_.64.0359a10: 只是四因非二四説一。然寶疏但爲二三説一。大迷二
T2251_.64.0359a15: 相應。彼人信等五根愚暗。亦不二速疾一。以二愚 T2251_.64.0359a16: 意一求二三昧一。盡二有漏一者。是名爲二樂行跡鈍根 T2251_.64.0359a17: 行道者一也。二樂根行跡速疾。謂無レ欲無レ婬。 T2251_.64.0359a18: 於二貪欲一恒自偏少。不二慇懃爲一。瞋痴極減少。 T2251_.64.0359a19: 信等五根捷疾。無レ有二放逸一。成二三昧一。盡二有漏一。 T2251_.64.0359a20: 成二無漏一。是名爲三利根行二於道跡一。三苦行跡 T2251_.64.0359a21: 所行愚惑。謂貪瞋痴熾盛。彼以二此法一自娯 T2251_.64.0359a22: 樂。盡二有漏一。成二無漏一。是名爲二苦行跡鈍根者一。 T2251_.64.0359a23: 四苦行跡所行速疾。謂少欲少婬。無レ瞋不三起 T2251_.64.0359a24: レ想行二此三昧一。爾時信等五根無レ有二缺漏一。彼 T2251_.64.0359a25: 以二此法一。得二三昧一。盡二有漏一。成二無漏一。是謂二苦
T2251_.64.0359b03: 定無。樂受亦唯第三定。非二第四禪一云何。答。 T2251_.64.0359b04: 難行爲レ苦。易行爲レ樂。非二實苦樂受一。故正理 T2251_.64.0359b05: 次有餘師説。道難二成辨一。故立二苦名一。易レ起故
T2251_.64.0359b11: レ頌。二二行下約レ智明二遲速一。通達者。是能縁 T2251_.64.0359b12: 智行相。舊論曰。復次於二此行中一。智遲故説 T2251_.64.0359b13: 名二遲智一。速智亦爾。寶疏云。遲速名在レ道。非 T2251_.64.0359b14: レ人者非也。三或下約レ人明二遲速一。舊論曰。復 T2251_.64.0359b15: 次此行是遲人行。故説名二遲智一。速智亦爾」
T2251_.64.0359b20: 法自智。得二三菩提一。於二未來世一。能説二正法一。覺二 T2251_.64.0359b21: 諸聲聞一。所謂四念處。四正斷。四如意足。五 T2251_.64.0359b22: 根。五力。七覺分。八聖道分。是名二如來應等
T2251_.64.0359b25: 四正斷。四如意足。五根。五力。七覺支。八道 T2251_.64.0359b26: 支涅槃耶。其具説散在二衆經一。四念住在二中含 T2251_.64.0359b27: 二十四四念處經雜含十九等一。四正斷見二雜 T2251_.64.0359b28: 含三十一。増一十八等一。五根五力七覺分見二 T2251_.64.0359b29: 雜含二十六等一。八聖道支見二中含四十九聖 T2251_.64.0359c01: 道經。雜含二十八等一。舊論曰。覺助法。又名二 T2251_.64.0359c02: 助道品一。又名二覺支一。名二菩提分法一
T2251_.64.0359c05: 明下示二覺義一。後三十下釋二分法名一。法軌持 T2251_.64.0359c06: 義。分是因義。分即故名二分法一。持業釋。屬 T2251_.64.0359c07: レ覺之分法。第六聲依主釋也。此帶二三十七 T2251_.64.0359c08: 數一。是帶數釋也
T2251_.64.0359c12: 攝。正念。正定。聖定聚攝。正見。正志。正方便。 T2251_.64.0359c13: 聖惠聚攝。若依二大乘一。九法爲レ體除レ尋。謂伽 T2251_.64.0359c14: 二十九。正思惟爲二惠蘊攝一故。倫記七上
T2251_.64.0359c22: 有二此正一。初一分隣近後全分。具如二前辨一
T2251_.64.0360a05: 三摩地。是神亦足。欲等四唯足非レ神。如二擇
T2251_.64.0360a08: 足定由二欲等四因一。今正呼レ定名二神足一。從レ因 T2251_.64.0360a09: 爲レ名。由レ四而生故名二四神足一。四之神足依
T2251_.64.0360a13: 主釋。四字唯名レ足。此足有レ四。名二四足一帶數 T2251_.64.0360a14: 釋。四足之神故名二四神足一也。有説意。神即 T2251_.64.0360a15: 足持業。神之足依主。渉二兩釋一。總相名爲二神 T2251_.64.0360a16: 足一。若據二神即足持業一加レ四。四之神足依主 T2251_.64.0360a17: 也。依二依主一欲等四名レ足。此有レ四帶數釋也。 T2251_.64.0360a18: 彼無レ評。論主依二九十六義一。竝破二二義一。倶成二 T2251_.64.0360a19: 體十三一故。同違レ經故
T2251_.64.0360a22: 用爲神。是定之果。何爲二即定一。足爲二欲等所 T2251_.64.0360a23: 生果一。是正定。欲等因。足所生故。問。四言所 T2251_.64.0360a24: 詮名二欲等一。非三定體帶二四數一。豈非二自他倶用 T2251_.64.0360a25: 帶數一。答。四之神足第五聲依主也。欲等四所 T2251_.64.0360a26: 生神足故
T2251_.64.0360a29: 爲レ顯三等持有二四種一故。擧レ因顯レ果。説二欲等
T2251_.64.0360b03: 豈得レ云二擧レ因顯果。若又足是定。言二是欲等一。 T2251_.64.0360b04: 違二釋名法一。故不レ成レ救。然正理師意。不レ欲レ信
T2251_.64.0360b10: 動一名レ根。能摧伏他一名レ力。有説勢用増上義。 T2251_.64.0360b11: 是根不レ可二屈伏一。義是力。若以レ位別。下位名 T2251_.64.0360b12: レ根。上位名レ力。若以二實義一。一一位中。皆具二二 T2251_.64.0360b13: 種一
T2251_.64.0360c12: 意存二餘師一。故上結云二毘婆沙師一。而下引レ經。 T2251_.64.0360c13: 成二餘師義一
T2251_.64.0360c17: 勞一。令下樂二正法一修習聖戒上
T2251_.64.0360c24: 念處修習滿足。四正斷。四如意足。五根。五 T2251_.64.0360c25: 力。七覺分。修習滿足。是八道修滿時。亦滿二 T2251_.64.0360c26: 餘七覺等一。故八道亦通二修位一
T2251_.64.0361a01: 惠知二其來去一。當二其城中一。有二四郊道一。安置床 T2251_.64.0361a02: 榻一。城主坐レ上。若東方使來。問二守門者一。城主 T2251_.64.0361a03: 何在。彼即答言。主在二城中四郊道頭床上一而 T2251_.64.0361a04: 坐。彼使問已往詣二城主一受二其教一。令中復道而 T2251_.64.0361a05: 還上。南西北方遠使來。復如レ是受二其教一。令三各 T2251_.64.0361a06: 還二本處一。所レ謂城者。以譬二人身麁色一如二篋毒
T2251_.64.0361a10: 識受陰一。使者謂二正觀一。如實言者。謂二四眞諦一。
T2251_.64.0361a18: 陋哉。皆眼不レ經二三藏一。而乃任レ意説二經義一。多 T2251_.64.0361a19: 見二其妄一爾
T2251_.64.0361b06: 不レ作二律儀一。聖所愛戒所上。善住二出世信及後 T2251_.64.0361b07: 所得一。善住乙世間信甲。以疑レ之。今云。彼通二世間 T2251_.64.0361b08: 信一。亦爲レ境今唯約二無漏一。而云下與二現觀一倶上。及 T2251_.64.0361b09: 於二三寶一云レ信。於レ戒不レ言。況本經亦爾。舊 T2251_.64.0361b10: 論文一段悉同レ今。三寶皆云レ於。戒無レ之
T2251_.64.0361b17: 所下釋二第五六句一。亦有レ二。初正釋二法通四。 T2251_.64.0361b18: 後便明二戒通四。此中亦字有レ三。初亦二於法 T2251_.64.0361b19: 戒二一。次亦二於前三諦一。後亦二於法證淨一
T2251_.64.0361b22: 如三人愛レ寶亦愛二寶器一。如レ是聖者愛樂清淨 T2251_.64.0361b23: 菩提分法功徳寶一故。亦愛二如レ是所依戒器一。 T2251_.64.0361b24: 更有二四復次一
T2251_.64.0361b27: 正信三寶與二妙尸羅一別上。非レ謂三正信言通二妙 T2251_.64.0361b28: 尸羅一。故所由云二不信破戒一。由レ證之淨第三轉
T2251_.64.0361c02: 動淨一。妙音名二見淨或惠淨一。今依二初説一
T2251_.64.0361c05: 戒爲二良藥一。後喩亦彼戒喩二資糧一。今喩二所乘一。
T2251_.64.0361c19: 解脱。恚痴心無欲解脱。如レ是解脱。未滿者爲 T2251_.64.0361c20: レ滿。已滿者隨順攝受欲精進乃至常攝受。是 T2251_.64.0361c21: 名二解脱淨斷苦種一。經文初説二戒清淨一曰。已 T2251_.64.0361c22: 滿者隨順執持。欲精進。方便超出。精勤勇猛。 T2251_.64.0361c23: 堪二能諸身心法常能攝受一。是名二戒淨斷苦種一。 T2251_.64.0361c24: 是則方便超出等語云二乃至一。今論云レ等。光記 T2251_.64.0361c25: 等取信安等一者。全非二經意一。而證二正理第二一。
T2251_.64.0361c28: 謂今云二心從貪瞋痴離染一。是豈非三心離レ垢
T2251_.64.0362a06: 俗心一。今唯簡取世俗心一。以爲二問難一故。今云。 T2251_.64.0362a07: 不レ爾。初釋爲レ善。何則上云二爾時一。是無學心 T2251_.64.0362a08: 生。今云レ亦云二即從一。明所從是無學心生。能 T2251_.64.0362a09: 從即世俗心
T2251_.64.0362a12: 故
T2251_.64.0362a18: 常一一。謂唯一擇滅。又約二離繋得無量一。爲二三 T2251_.64.0362a19: 別體一無レ有レ妨 T2251_.64.0362a20: 厭縁苦集惠 準レ此論主不二欣厭別立一也。 T2251_.64.0362a21: 問。正理頌宗亦同レ此。然彼於二心所中一立二欣 T2251_.64.0362a22: 厭一。何以二此文一。得レ證レ不二別立一。答。彼未盡理。 T2251_.64.0362a23: 忍智名レ厭。何更有レ體。此文爲二盡理一
T2251_.64.0362a26: T2251_.64.0362a27: T2251_.64.0362a28: T2251_.64.0362a29: T2251_.64.0362b01: T2251_.64.0362b02: T2251_.64.0362b03: T2251_.64.0362b04: 十六 T2251_.64.0362b05: 豐山寓居上毛沙門快道記 T2251_.64.0362b06: 分別智品第七之一
T2251_.64.0362b09: 雖二惠與レ智寛狹有異。然依二通門一。以名無レ過。 T2251_.64.0362b10: 當品大分爲レ二。初明二諸智差別一。二明二智所 T2251_.64.0362b11: 成徳一。初中有レ三。一明二忍智見別一。二明二十智 T2251_.64.0362b12: 相別一。三諸門分別。光寶分文未。應レ知至レ文。
T2251_.64.0362b23: 惠。謂眼根。有二惠非見。謂五識身相應慧。盡 T2251_.64.0362b24: 無生智。除二五見及世俗正見一。餘意識相應有 T2251_.64.0362b25: 漏慧。擇法性故。非二推度一故。有二見亦慧一。謂除二 T2251_.64.0362b26: 盡無生智一。餘無漏惠及五見世俗正見。即無 T2251_.64.0362b27: 漏忍學八智。及無學正見等。能推度故。擇法
T2251_.64.0362c01: 非智。謂無漏忍。創觀二諦境一。未二審決一故。見攝 T2251_.64.0362c02: レ智智攝レ見耶。乃至廣説。此中有二二種四句一。
T2251_.64.0362c06: 雖レ忍而未レ決。雖レ觀而未レ審。雖二尋求一而未二 T2251_.64.0362c07: 究竟一。雖二伺察一而未二了知一。雖二現觀一。而未二重 T2251_.64.0362c08: 審一。惟作二功用一。加行不レ息。故不レ名レ智。復次決 T2251_.64.0362c09: 定義。是智義。忍與二所斷疑得一。倶生於二所見 T2251_.64.0362c10: 境一。未レ極二決定一。故不レ名レ智。世友説。忍於二聖 T2251_.64.0362c11: 諦一。雖二正堪忍一。而未二審知一。故不レ名レ智。大徳説 T2251_.64.0362c12: 曰。見レ事究竟。乃立二智名一。非二初忍時見レ事究 T2251_.64.0362c13: 竟一。故無漏忍雖レ不レ名レ智。而實是智。霧尊者 T2251_.64.0362c14: 曰。重觀名レ智。從二無始一來。於二四聖諦一。未レ有二 T2251_.64.0362c15: 一念トシテモ聖慧曾觀一。忍起創觀故未レ名レ智。五 T2251_.64.0362c16: 識倶慧雖下於二所縁一不中能重觀上。而色等境從二 T2251_.64.0362c17: 無始一來。已起二無量有漏慧觀レハ依二種類一説。 T2251_.64.0362c18: 既名二重觀一。故亦名レ智。餘有漏知不二重縁一者。 T2251_.64.0362c19: 準レ此應レ知。不レ應レ爲レ難。今論正依二第二復
T2251_.64.0362c22: 所縁境一。無始時來。數數決擇。故皆名レ智。諸 T2251_.64.0362c23: 無漏惠重決擇者。皆名爲レ智。惟無漏忍於二四 T2251_.64.0362c24: 聖諦一。未二重決擇一。故不レ名レ智。復有説由二二義一。 T2251_.64.0362c25: 故説名爲レ智。一證知義。謂證知苦乃至道一。故
T2251_.64.0362c29: 論與二諸説一未二必違一也。光通二無明例難一。兩釋 Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:有/無] [CITE] |