大正蔵検索 INBUDS
|
阿毘達磨倶舍論法義 (No. 2251_ 快道撰 ) in Vol. 64 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:有/無] [CITE]
T2251_.64.0068a01: 別易二顯了一故
T2251_.64.0068a09: 根是七心界攝。何故後三無漏根一分意根 T2251_.64.0068a10: 唯是意意識二攝。答前六處中意根。故於二界 T2251_.64.0068a11: T2251_.64.0068a12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a16: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a17: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a18: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a19: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a20: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a21: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a22: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a23: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a24: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a25: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a26: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a27: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a28: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a29: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b01: 門一是七心界也。三無漏根中意唯是見道所 T2251_.64.0068b02: レ修心故。無二五識一故。但意意識二也 T2251_.64.0068b03: T2251_.64.0068b04: T2251_.64.0068b05: T2251_.64.0068b06: T2251_.64.0068b07: 豐山寓居上陽沙門釋常快道記
T2251_.64.0068b12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b16: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b17: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b18: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b19: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b20: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b21: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b22: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b23: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b24: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b25: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b26: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b27: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b28: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b29: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068c01: 初後通名二行品一。有二四十四頌一。彼初三十六頌 T2251_.64.0068c02: 説二倶有法及因縁一。當二此論根中後四品一。二
T2251_.64.0068c05: 最後一品極微ト字ト刹那等差別一。未レ説二有情 T2251_.64.0068c06: 器世間成壞等一。不レ得レ名レ世。故總約二有爲法
T2251_.64.0068c10: 根體相一。是依二發智。婆沙等根蘊一。故殊置レ初 T2251_.64.0068c11: 立二根名一。以顯レ不レ同二雜心一。準以顯三餘不レ全 T2251_.64.0068c12: 信彼一。於二二十二根中五一根眼等是色。命是不 T2251_.64.0068c13: 相應。餘皆心心所。後四品總明二色心心所不 T2251_.64.0068c14: 相體相一。兼與二根名一有レ便。故別不レ立二行品名一。 T2251_.64.0068c15: 又此論渉二五品一廣説二二世間體相一。因レ彼説二 T2251_.64.0068c16: 極微字刹那等三分齊一。故立二世間品名一。如レ是 T2251_.64.0068c17: 離分彼行品一不レ立二行名一。正理論名二差別品一 T2251_.64.0068c18: 此品廣辨二有爲差別一。故根名局不レ通レ餘。故 T2251_.64.0068c19: 改レ之作論意別各有二其理一。然未レ盡レ理。何者。 T2251_.64.0068c20: 未レ得二論主名意一。但欲レ約レ初故改レ之。若但約 T2251_.64.0068c21: レ初何迴レ後不レ名二行品一。論主深意學者思レ之。 T2251_.64.0068c22: 光寶辨不也
T2251_.64.0068c25: 此初也。字界字縁光記具。正理擧二兩種一。今初
T2251_.64.0068c28: 不レ依二界縁一云。又解。根體勝故名二最勝一。根用 T2251_.64.0068c29: 勝故名爲二自在一。體用勝故名爲二光顯一。此増上
T2251_.64.0069a02: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0069a03: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0069a04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0069a05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0069a06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0069a07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0069a08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0069a09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0069a10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0069a11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0069a12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0069a13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0069a14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0069a15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0069a16: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0069a17: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0069a18: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0069a19: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0069a20: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0069a21: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0069a22: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0069a23: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0069a24: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0069a25: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0069a26: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0069a27: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0069a28: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0069a29: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0069b01: 問。何故名レ根。根是何義。答。増上義。是根義。 T2251_.64.0069b02: 明義。現義。喜觀義。端嚴義。最義。勝義主義。
T2251_.64.0069b07: 爲レ義。於二身中最明顯故。是故以二最勝自在 T2251_.64.0069b08: 光飾一爲レ義。準二此等文一。性相作レ釋亦得。如下一 T2251_.64.0069b09: 文約二六釋一依二八轉一。或據二性相一。就中因明上。界縁
T2251_.64.0069b20: 者。由二此二根一。形相言音乳房等別。謂劫初時 T2251_.64.0069b21: 無二男女差別一。後於二是處一少造色生。便有二男 T2251_.64.0069b22: 女體類状貌顯形言音衣著飮食受用差別一。
T2251_.64.0069b25: 乳等形状音聲威儀各異。準二此等文一。言音等
T2251_.64.0070a01: 欲一。此無レ疑故。但由二此二一若壞若缺。於二不律 T2251_.64.0070a02: 儀五無間業一不レ能二受作一。亦復不レ能レ斷二諸善 T2251_.64.0070a03: 根一。於レ淨勝者便不レ能レ起二一切律儀一。亦復不 T2251_.64.0070a04: レ能レ離二三界染一。不レ能レ種植三乘種子一。此論十
T2251_.64.0070a09: レ根名二本性扇搋一。本來無二欲樂一云二本性半擇一。 T2251_.64.0070a10: 初雖レ有レ勢無レ根。後雖レ有レ根無レ勢。故二別 T2251_.64.0070a11: 也。又生後被レ損無レ根名二損壞扇搋一。又被レ損 T2251_.64.0070a12: 無二欲樂一名二損壞半擇一。根有無勢有無如レ前。
T2251_.64.0070a15: 三扇搋半擇迦者。謂本來男根不レ滿。亦不レ能
T2251_.64.0070a21: 迦。伊利沙此云レ妬。謂見二他行欲一即發。不レ見 T2251_.64.0070a22: 即無。亦具二男根一。而不レ生レ子。三扇搋半擇迦。 T2251_.64.0070a23: 謂本來男根不レ滿。亦不レ能レ生レ子。四博叉半 T2251_.64.0070a24: 擇迦。謂半月能男。半月レ不能レ男也。五留拏半 T2251_.64.0070a25: 擇迦。留拏此云レ割。謂被レ刑者也。準二瑜伽五
T2251_.64.0070a28: 云レ及相違釋。故玄應誤也。又本性損壞竝通三
T2251_.64.0070b05: 無一。竝約二正根一故云二成就一。餘處約二扶根一云二無 T2251_.64.0070b06: 根一。若不レ爾者。長途凡夫可レ屬二何句一。而彼論 T2251_.64.0070b07: 不問二正根扶根一。竝隨云二成就一。竝爲二第三句 T2251_.64.0070b08: 所等一。而光通釋三義。第一非。彼丈夫與二男 T2251_.64.0070b09: 根一四句。何妄立二丈夫男根一。後二亦非也。寶 T2251_.64.0070b10: 釋於二扇搋一立二全無根分無根一何謂乎。無根 T2251_.64.0070b11: 必無根。若男根半損爲二分無一者。若爾汝先 T2251_.64.0070b12: 言三損壞全非二無根一。故知非也。又有人依下舊
T2251_.64.0070b16: 故。又九十明説二扇搋成就男根一。今云。迷之 T2251_.64.0070b17: 甚。扇搋半擇二對二二形一云二無形一。若不レ爾者。
T2251_.64.0070b21: 形攝二黄門一義非也。有二及言一故
T2251_.64.0070b25: 唯心一法自在隨行。餘法亦隨行今顯二勝能 T2251_.64.0070b26: 亦言二自在一。皆者於二諸法一言。光記三釋第三 T2251_.64.0070b27: 爲レ正。初二釋配二上二句一。舊僻之穿也。故舊
T2251_.64.0070c01: 間一。意轉令二變異一。是意根一法一切法隨行。彼 T2251_.64.0070c02: 已無二自在言一。而義爾也
T2251_.64.0070c05: 出離依一。第四囀依士釋也。此出離依喜等三 T2251_.64.0070c06: 各縁二六境一名二六出離依一。六之出離依一。境依
T2251_.64.0070c14: 按。經部也。云三見色等用亦不レ異二於識一。亦言 T2251_.64.0070c15: 顯二和合見一。非異言亦亦合作二見用一。不レ爾何
T2251_.64.0070c18: 向遮云二非眼等用一。唯見無二了別一。兒等墮レ穴
T2251_.64.0070c22: 見義一。唯取二増上義一。不レ取二識即見一也
T2251_.64.0070c28: 種類一。無二別極微一。青黄等能造極微各別故。反二 T2251_.64.0070c29: 最後難一云。雖二言同而義別。根見根識見故。 T2251_.64.0071a01: 又單複異。汝具二四義一。今了境増上一義故。 T2251_.64.0071a02: 遮二汝三妄案一
T2251_.64.0071a06: 涅槃等増上言一故。別義已成。不レ應二於レ中後
T2251_.64.0071a12: 故。何容レ疑レ彼。應二是一根一非二女男根一。見二此 T2251_.64.0071a13: 疑一故。今釋二彼言一。更有二別義一。謂顯三離レ九無二 T2251_.64.0071a14: 別三根一。如下從二身根一別立二男女一。離二身根體一 T2251_.64.0071a15: 無中別二根上。三根亦爾。雖レ從二九根一別義建立上。
T2251_.64.0071a18: 竝在二立爲レ根簡別言一。此三根無。故置二亦爾一。 T2251_.64.0071a19: 以顯二三根一一立爲レ根之義言一。得後後等彼 T2251_.64.0071a20: 立爲レ根所由。豈得下混二宗因一致破。次更立二別 T2251_.64.0071a21: 義一。通二無別疑一。例二女男根一。亦不レ應レ理。既隔二 T2251_.64.0071a22: 命受等一頌一。何可レ生二類例智一。復違二作論者一。 T2251_.64.0071a23: 若言二古製頌一未レ信。論主雖レ取二古義一其言音 T2251_.64.0071a24: 必別。如下界品等頌義同二雜心一言各別上。亦復
T2251_.64.0071b04: 攝一。已知根性應攝二第三一。過失衆多。非レ爲二善 T2251_.64.0071b05: 釋一。今以二別義一釋二彼等言一。謂無漏慧於二諸諦 T2251_.64.0071b06: 理一先未レ現觀一。今得二現觀一。有二増上力一立二第一 T2251_.64.0071b07: 根一。若無漏慧已得二現觀一。於二餘煩惱一漸永斷 T2251_.64.0071b08: 中。加行悕望猶未二滿足一。有二増上力一立二第二 T2251_.64.0071b09: 根一。若無漏慧已離二煩惱一。於二諸無漏一現法樂 T2251_.64.0071b10: 住。有二増上力一立二第三根一。慧爲二上首一。具二三現
T2251_.64.0071b17: 有部義。故正理釋二此頌一。廣引レ經通二妨難一破二 T2251_.64.0071b18: 外計一。若餘部者。彼何故不レ加二破斥一。又顯宗 T2251_.64.0071b19: 何故擧二此頌一。而不レ擧二前二頌及次下一頌一。此 T2251_.64.0071b20: 中此別者。指二上所依言一。即六根下皆如レ是」
T2251_.64.0071b27: 六處次一説二意根一。有部違レ經。故第二卷終云三
T2251_.64.0071c05: 是約二濕化二生一致レ難。今答云。今約二六根一論二 T2251_.64.0071c06: 生住一。又約二欲界有對一無レ妨
T2251_.64.0071c18: 問。若前五根皆是色性依二眼等受一名二身受一 T2251_.64.0071c19: 者。何故眼等非二唯是身一。答。由二相異一故。所以 T2251_.64.0071c20: 者何。眼等五根展轉相異。問。若眼等相其相 T2251_.64.0071c21: 異故非二皆身相一。依二彼諸受一由二是因縁一應レ非二 T2251_.64.0071c22: 身受一。答。餘有色根不レ離レ身。故就レ彼爲レ名。此 T2251_.64.0071c23: 亦何過。問。若不レ離レ身故無レ過者。意根亦爾。 T2251_.64.0071c24: 不レ離レ身轉依意根受應レ名二身受一。是即一切皆 T2251_.64.0071c25: 是身受無二心受一耶。答。諸有色根定不レ離レ身。 T2251_.64.0071c26: 意即不レ爾。故無レ有レ過。所以者何。生二無色 T2251_.64.0071c27: 界一有情意根離レ身而轉。是故五根所レ生諸受 T2251_.64.0071c28: 合名二身受一。唯依レ意者獨名二心受一。故總説レ二。
T2251_.64.0072a02: 集義。親二極微聚一。五色根是微聚。總名レ身故
T2251_.64.0072a05: 第六意識所依亦心。故殊立二心名一。爲二差別 T2251_.64.0072a06: 顯了一。身爲二五識一。心爲二第六一。故言二即五識 T2251_.64.0072a07: 相應受一。世間品頌疏云。色根名レ身聚集義。
T2251_.64.0072a16: 亦爾。知者智也。約レ體七智。約レ用是知。七忍 T2251_.64.0072a17: 可レ爾。雖三七智正知レ諦位非二未知當知一。猶後
T2251_.64.0072a20: 非也。論云二未曾知當知行轉一故。光寶文言 T2251_.64.0072a21: 似レ異而義旨同歸
T2251_.64.0072a25: 知諦一故。已之知依主釋也。光記約二智類初 T2251_.64.0072a26: 後一釋二婆沙一非也。寶疏約二刹那初後一爲二盡 T2251_.64.0072a27: 理一
T2251_.64.0072b01: レ二。初釋レ知。後有此下釋レ具。初中知己已知 T2251_.64.0072b02: 者。上知正今知也。次己行人自稱也。次已知
T2251_.64.0072b07: 作二知已已知一。以光爲二知畢已既已知義一。今 T2251_.64.0072b08: 云。誤之甚。不レ足二倶論一也。釋レ具中。有二此知一 T2251_.64.0072b09: 者名二具知一者。初約二有持一。有是持義。正理曰。 T2251_.64.0072b10: 或護レ知護是持義。即同レ此也。前上首知云二 T2251_.64.0072b11: 此知一。其體是盡無生二智也。知之具依主釋 T2251_.64.0072b12: 也。光師云レ約二成就一。義不レ親違二正理一。亂二下成 T2251_.64.0072b13: 性一故非也。次習二此知一已成レ性者者。是依二成 T2251_.64.0072b14: 性一釋レ具。於二學位一數習三此知二盡無生二智一故。 T2251_.64.0072b15: 今在二無學一成二此二智性一。具是成辦義。亦依 T2251_.64.0072b16: 主釋。正理亦同レ此。光記約レ習者非也。混二因 T2251_.64.0072b17: 果一故。論已成性言應二徒然一故。後示二具知相一 T2251_.64.0072b18: 中。體得二二智一故。是故發レ用如レ實自知等。此 T2251_.64.0072b19: 自知知具知之知。然寶疏初知已下唯爲二盡 T2251_.64.0072b20: 智一。或釋約二二智一判爲二利鈍一。正理鈔亦分配二 T2251_.64.0072b21: 盡無生一。今云一。竝非也。知義兩釋無レ別。只釋二 T2251_.64.0072b22: 具名二兩義。然何可レ約二利鈍一
T2251_.64.0072b25: 等二餘二一。竝依主釋。此論且約二總相一。若分別。 T2251_.64.0072b26: 三根是智故。正慧根爲レ體。若兼二助伴一通二餘
T2251_.64.0072b29: 脱。倶解脱。能得二現法樂住一。婆沙百四十三
T2251_.64.0072c07: 知當知等即根持業。今論依主。亦彼唯慧一。 T2251_.64.0072c08: 今周攝二九根一者。竝非也。正理何持業。此論 T2251_.64.0072c09: 何不レ存二兼正一。故正理無レ破也
T2251_.64.0072c14: 法一。論二有無色一。五根。五境。及無表十一。竝名二
T2251_.64.0072c17: 等五根女男根七應二有色一。以二色蘊攝一故。如二五
T2251_.64.0072c20: 論主色蘊攝因成二有漏一致レ破却誤矣。舊論
T2251_.64.0073a06: 人有二有漏信等一。若不レ爾者。何不三唯言二異生一 T2251_.64.0073a07: 而云レ外耶
T2251_.64.0073a10: 不。亦有云何。次引レ經云。又説佛未レ轉二法
T2251_.64.0073a13: 爲二唐捐一
T2251_.64.0073a16: 生。及滅。滋味。過失。及出離我一。未レ能レ從二此世
T2251_.64.0073a19: 如レ實知一者。我不レ得下於二諸天魔梵沙門婆羅 T2251_.64.0073a20: 門衆中一。爲二解脱一。爲レ出。爲レ離。心離二顛倒一。成二 T2251_.64.0073a21: 阿耨多羅三藐三菩提上。進念定慧如レ是。亦説。 T2251_.64.0073a22: 諸比丘我於二信根一。信根集。信根沒。信根味。 T2251_.64.0073a23: 信根患。信根離。如レ實知故。於二諸天魔梵沙 T2251_.64.0073a24: 門婆羅門衆中一。爲二解脱一。爲レ出。爲レ離。心離二顛 T2251_.64.0073a25: 倒一。得レ成二阿耨多羅三藐三菩提一。今上云二信 T2251_.64.0073a26: 等五根一故。取二如實知反顯文一。云二乃至廣説一 T2251_.64.0073a27: 也。天人世間對出世總擧。及下別示。等二沙 T2251_.64.0073a28: 門婆羅門一。光等二已上諸天一者不レ順レ經也。上 T2251_.64.0073a29: 乃至是爲解脱等四。前五如レ次配二五句一。集沒
T2251_.64.0073b05: 漏爲二出離依一。上是言指二信等一。光記初釋言二
T2251_.64.0073b11: 不定一故以レ定釋レ唯
T2251_.64.0073b14: 論。初通中亦二。初就二有部宗一爲二異熟一。後論 T2251_.64.0073b15: 主依二經部一爲二非異熟。初中爲レ三。初約二留行一。 T2251_.64.0073b16: 次兼示二捨行一。後擧二妙音解一。初留行中爲レ二。 T2251_.64.0073b17: 初擧二本論文一。後叙二異説一。難中誰之異熟者。 T2251_.64.0073b18: 異熟是決定。其能感業未レ決。故問言二誰之一。
T2251_.64.0073b26: 辨二總別二報現非現等別一竝非。以二同分命倶
T2251_.64.0073c04: 同二本論一。但具示二其縁相一。雖レ無二評家一。初説正 T2251_.64.0073c05: 在二目前一。又此論意。彼初説同二本論一。故不二別 T2251_.64.0073c06: 擧一。唯擧下異二本論一義上。以顯二不正義一。正理亦依 T2251_.64.0073c07: 同初説一。解釋結二本論説故一。次示二二異説一。判
T2251_.64.0073c12: 義一別有二麁妙一説一。雖二五説一本論文分明故。 T2251_.64.0073c13: 唯初説爲レ正同レ前。故今論一向不レ擧二異説一。
T2251_.64.0073c19: 妙藥留命毒藥頓死一。又彼中雖レ破下違二自宗一諸 T2251_.64.0073c20: 根勢分義上。而不レ破二妙音一。以レ不レ違二自宗異熟一 T2251_.64.0073c21: 故。又此論唯以二勢分義一爲二非異熟一。準知妙 T2251_.64.0073c22: 音不レ爾也。又次下左壽與レ命分別中。先世業
T2251_.64.0074a03: 經部一乎。彼法勝論師既立二非異熟一故。婆沙 T2251_.64.0074a04: 中亦有二異説一。寶師爲二論主釋一。是依三正理曰二 T2251_.64.0074a05: 經主言一。今文勢全是論主解。其所依應二經部
T2251_.64.0074a11: 一明二留捨因縁一。捨縁中。婆沙兩説。今在レ或 T2251_.64.0074a12: 攝彼也。病等者。光所引婆沙取レ事不レ取レ義。 T2251_.64.0074a13: 彼退因縁故。第二明二處及能者一中。由彼下所
T2251_.64.0074a17: 捨レ壽。猶如レ棄二毒鉢一。第二頌第四句云。如二人 T2251_.64.0074a18: 重病愈一。第三頌第四句云。如二出火燒宅一。前三 T2251_.64.0074a19: 句竝如レ上。今是第二偈。婆沙依二初偈一故。云三 T2251_.64.0074a20: 猶如レ捨二毒器一
T2251_.64.0074a25: 第三分壽一。釋尊壽量應二住百二十一。捨二後四十一 T2251_.64.0074a26: 但受二八十一。有作二是説一。世尊捨二第五分壽一。釋
T2251_.64.0074b08: 行一。順次順後順不定受業果名二壽行一。此第三 T2251_.64.0074b09: 彼第六有説。曰。暫時住名二命行一。一期住名二 T2251_.64.0074b10: 壽行一。第四辨レ置二多言一。三説唯初一説。婆沙 T2251_.64.0074b11: 有レ之。後二説者。婆沙無レ之。第二有部義。遮二 T2251_.64.0074b12: 正量部一多言。第三經部義。遮二有部一實執一 T2251_.64.0074b13: 多言。論主意在二第三一。故反責
T2251_.64.0074b18: 佛以二神足力一更存レ壽三月。佛昇忉利經曰。三 T2251_.64.0074b19: 月將レ盡欲レ入二涅槃一。爲レ度二蘇拔陀羅一延二三
T2251_.64.0074b24: 説當レ理故不レ云二有説一。表レ不レ信二後説一云二毘
T2251_.64.0074b27: 無上妙菩提一時。已伏二二魔一。謂天煩惱。今 T2251_.64.0074b28: 將レ證入涅槃界一時。又伏一二魔一。謂蘊及死。伏二 T2251_.64.0074b29: 蘊魔一故。捨多壽行。伏二死魔一故。留多命行
T2251_.64.0074c03: 中。苦唯五識必非二威儀等三一。樂根亦五識相 T2251_.64.0074c04: 應無レ之。唯第三定中。意地有二威儀變化一。無二
T2251_.64.0074c09: 除レ巧也。五識相應苦樂無二此三一。唯善染汚故
T2251_.64.0074c12: 應意根。不善亦爾。無記有レ二。謂有覆無覆。 T2251_.64.0074c13: 有覆者。欲界身邊二見。及無色一切煩惱倶 T2251_.64.0074c14: 生作意相應意根。無覆者。謂威儀路工巧處 T2251_.64.0074c15: 異熟生通果倶生作意相應意根。如二意根一捨 T2251_.64.0074c16: 根。喜根。樂根。隨レ應亦爾 T2251_.64.0074c17: T2251_.64.0074c18: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0074c19: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0074c20: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0074c21: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0074c22: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0074c23: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0074c24: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0074c25: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0074c26: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0074c27: 準二此文已一捨喜樂三例二意根一。誰可レ生レ疑。於 T2251_.64.0074c28: レ樂第六意。前五有二差別一。故云二隨應一。亦復意 T2251_.64.0074c29: 根無記。非二能相應捨等是不善一。故云二隨應一。 T2251_.64.0075a01: 次別説レ苦云。苦根善謂生得善。不善謂修所
T2251_.64.0075a05: 爾一何。於レ喜分二分別任運二一。若爾亦婆沙可 T2251_.64.0075a06: レ例レ苦。何不レ爲レ之。第二釋除レ樂非也。雖レ通 T2251_.64.0075a07: レ妨未レ遣レ難。一不二例レ苦而説一故。二於二上地一 T2251_.64.0075a08: 雖レ無二尋伺一發レ業故。第三釋約二縁與似通二苦 T2251_.64.0075a09: 樂一甚非也。於二分別門一何用二如レ是漫説一爲。又 T2251_.64.0075a10: 樂全約二五識一違二婆沙三性門一。又借識及二通
T2251_.64.0075a15: 除二五識相應苦及樂一。取二意相應樂喜捨一。初 T2251_.64.0075a16: 釋非也。十八近行文不レ成レ證。何者。生レ上 T2251_.64.0075a17: 不レ能レ成二下喜樂一故。唯取レ捨非レ謂レ非通果一 T2251_.64.0075a18: 也。如二光第二釋下答一。實婆沙意也。第三釋甚
T2251_.64.0075a23: 正理等無レ設二重難一故。唯引二順憂受業一句一 T2251_.64.0075a24: 也
T2251_.64.0075a27: 者。喜捨亦唯相應。爾違二異熟宗一以レ無レ可レ避 T2251_.64.0075a28: レ難故。致二如レ是通釋一。實義如何。舊論曰。若爾 T2251_.64.0075a29: 由レ無レ能故。皆許レ如レ是。有二何別道理一能立二 T2251_.64.0075b01: 憂非果報一
T2251_.64.0075b05: 擧二後義一。成立憂非異熟一。是故正理。顯宗唯 T2251_.64.0075b06: 依二後説已離欲義一。不レ擧二前分別有無義一
T2251_.64.0075b09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0075b10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0075b11: [IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0075b14: 故言二有無一。謂性是有漏。而善不善有下當レ感二 T2251_.64.0075b15: 異熟果一義上。於二無記無漏者一無二此義一。應レ知謂二 T2251_.64.0075b16: 是有異熟等一。且如レ憂。前非異熟。今唯有異
T2251_.64.0075b20: 他異熟一倶名二有異熟一者。則無漏道應レ名二有 T2251_.64.0075b21: 異熟一故
T2251_.64.0075b24: 此中憂根於二前無間一已説。偈曰。一定有報。 T2251_.64.0075b25: 光記作レ諍。正理鮮本亦如レ今。兩字竝無レ妨。
T2251_.64.0075c01: 今亦指令レ知二其相一。光寶解釋爲レ異。光意。依 T2251_.64.0075c02: 唯等二句總標三定字有二二義一。謂顯下述釋二 T2251_.64.0075c03: 義一。謂顯至二異熟一釋二唯義一。兼具至二次説一釋二越 T2251_.64.0075c04: 義一。具二下別釋二越次中具二義一。由此下總結。 T2251_.64.0075c05: 光由二二義一者。即彼標唯義越義也。寶疏意。 T2251_.64.0075c06: 依唯等二句釋二定字一。謂顯下但以二二由一釋二 T2251_.64.0075c07: 越説所以一。顯言絶二兼具二義一。故越次説一句 T2251_.64.0075c08: 貫二上二由一之結也。具二義下別釋二兼具二 T2251_.64.0075c09: 義一。由此下唯結二越説一。詳二二疏一寶大劣二於光一。 T2251_.64.0075c10: 謂標既二義。何不レ釋二唯義一。又謂言何不レ被 T2251_.64.0075c11: レ二。又唯兼具二義。是越次由。何可レ加二唯有 T2251_.64.0075c12: 異熟一。又唯有異熟有二二義一者何謂。是此越次 T2251_.64.0075c13: 由故。又背二正理論定義。越次別段釋義一故。 T2251_.64.0075c14: 光亦非レ勝。何者。定聲存二唯越二義一故。豈於二 T2251_.64.0075c15: 定聲一可レ有二越義一。今依二正理。顯宗。舊論三文一 T2251_.64.0075c16: 思忖此論一。依唯越義一句。總標二二義一。頌説 T2251_.64.0075c17: 下釋二二義一。謂初釋二定唯義一。兼具下釋二越義一 T2251_.64.0075c18: 也。由此下總結二唯越二義一。結レ越云二越次先
T2251_.64.0075c21: 云二定有一。不レ云二唯有一。答。結二唯義一故還云レ定 T2251_.64.0075c22: 不レ云レ唯。非二作釋一故。若不レ結二唯義一。下一句 T2251_.64.0075c23: 無用。故正理唯云二故越レ次説一不レ安二下句一也。 T2251_.64.0075c24: 依唯越義一句。蓋後人傍附攙入。三論無故。 T2251_.64.0075c25: 義不レ暢故。若爾與二正理一綴文同也。正理論
T2251_.64.0076a01: 有異熟一。越レ次説者。顯二無記無漏若總若別皆 T2251_.64.0076a02: 無異熟因一。非レ如二是中有記有漏要總方是有 T2251_.64.0076a03: 異熟因一。故越レ次説深爲二有用一。兩義各有二標
T2251_.64.0076a08: 無二無流一。在二散動地一故。是故憂根無二無果報一
T2251_.64.0076a16: 未レ知二誰是一焉。第四句除字。光記牒文如レ論。 T2251_.64.0076a17: 別行本頌。正理。顯宗。及頌疏皆作レ餘。圓暉 T2251_.64.0076a18: 釋云。餘色者。眼等五男女根外。名レ之爲レ餘。 T2251_.64.0076a19: 此爲レ正。草誤作レ除。何知レ正者。上首除言 T2251_.64.0076a20: 貫レ句短中長而顯二三界別一。其兼并言示三漸次 T2251_.64.0076a21: 合二前前所除一。故知唯一除還致二深用一。然有人 T2251_.64.0076a22: 云。正顯於レ頌作レ餘。而長行云二并除五色及 T2251_.64.0076a23: 喜樂根一。則明知除字爲レ正。今云。若以二長行一 T2251_.64.0076a24: 改。此論。正理。顯宗釋二色界一。皆同言二兼除男 T2251_.64.0076a25: 女憂苦一。豈第三句應レ加二除言一。不レ曉了論旨一 T2251_.64.0076a26: 而妄談。可レ呵可レ呵。彼長行云二兼除一云二并 T2251_.64.0076a27: 除一。爲レ令レ知二一除字貫下。故云二無色如前除 T2251_.64.0076a28: 三無漏女男憂苦一。於二女男上一不二更加除
T2251_.64.0076b03: 沙等具分別繋不繋一
T2251_.64.0076b15: 云何得レ有。答。彼二根於レ彼有レ用。令二端嚴一 T2251_.64.0076b16: 故一。非三男女根有二端嚴義一。可二慚鄙一故。而述二有 T2251_.64.0076b17: 部意一故無レ失也。非レ述二論主意一
T2251_.64.0076b21: 大梵王一者。終無二是處一。若男子作二如來無所 T2251_.64.0076b22: 著等正覺。及轉輪王。天帝釋。魔王。大梵王一 T2251_.64.0076b23: 者。有二是處一。依二此契經一説二彼色界一爲レ男。以 T2251_.64.0076b24: レ爲レ男可レ有二男根一。難意如レ是。雖レ無二男根一而 T2251_.64.0076b25: 別有二男子相形一。以レ何知レ男。謂似二欲界中男
T2251_.64.0076b28: 必無レ有レ處。必無レ容レ有。女身爲レ梵。又二十六
T2251_.64.0076c08: 同
T2251_.64.0076c11: 云二二十二根一。自下不レ爾。是故特致二此結前一。 T2251_.64.0076c12: 故光分科爲レ是。寶無二大失一
T2251_.64.0076c19: 故名二色界一。或但名レ色
T2251_.64.0076c23: 各問レ之。此第五問也。非二必八解脱一。故舊論 T2251_.64.0076c24: 曰レ過二於色一非色上。準レ彼今無色言是非二所過一 T2251_.64.0076c25: 也。雖二所釋無一而無色亦略レ界故證レ之。色無
T2251_.64.0076c28: 寶爲レ勝
T2251_.64.0077a06: 能感二微妙異熟一。生果亦勝。故八萬劫壽
T2251_.64.0077a21: 起者非也。豈不三正理如二光寶一。彼曰。復應二思 T2251_.64.0077a22: 擇一。二十二根幾能證得何沙門果一。謂綴文各 T2251_.64.0077a23: 別。同二舊論復次已下一勿レ濫矣
T2251_.64.0077b02: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0077b03: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0077b04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0077b05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0077b06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0077b07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0077b08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0077b09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0077b10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0077b11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0077b12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0077b13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0077b14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0077b15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0077b16: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0077b17: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0077b18: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0077b19: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0077b20: [IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0077b23: 故。初約二次第一。後約二超越一。初次第中有レ二。一 T2251_.64.0077b24: 無二初由レ樂後退義一。二無レ初退後由レ樂義一。以三 T2251_.64.0077b25: 不還果次第必依二未至初定一故。後中有二正示 T2251_.64.0077b26: 所由一。非二越人不還必有退。以二世間出世二 T2251_.64.0077b27: 度所得一故。正理云。超越無容レ有二退失一故。
T2251_.64.0077c03: 擧レ其名竝顯二能成二十二根一。所成不レ定。故 T2251_.64.0077c04: 唯標レ數。又此中初兩句三。遍定成。諸界地一 T2251_.64.0077c05: 切有情具故。次諸句十九根。不遍定成。有界 T2251_.64.0077c06: 地凡聖別故。又此頌中。成眼上及下二句各 T2251_.64.0077c07: 上。若言流至。長行爾也。問。婆沙百五十六
T2251_.64.0077c10: 謂三無漏根餘不定。如レ前應レ知。何今不レ説。 T2251_.64.0077c11: 解云。今二十二根分別。無レ有二二形根名一。故 T2251_.64.0077c12: 不レ説レ之。又解。頌及言兼存レ之。以二兼存一故。 T2251_.64.0077c13: 長行不レ説也。如二十善地中二及言一
T2251_.64.0077c16: 沙一一明二定不定一。今就レ初。下準知矣。今云。 T2251_.64.0077c17: 寶疏不レ爾。下十句釋中總別。可二分科見一。又 T2251_.64.0077c18: 婆沙爾也。今論意不レ爾。已下爲レ明二十九根 T2251_.64.0077c19: 成位一故。下云二於非遮等一。前所説者頌所列 T2251_.64.0077c20: 十九根也。若不レ爾樂身等何處何位成レ之而 T2251_.64.0077c21: 兼一餘。故爲二十九根能成位明一此釋來也。故 T2251_.64.0077c22: 後十句釋也。況婆沙定不レ成不定故不レ説。今 T2251_.64.0077c23: 只示二成不成一。餘不レ釋二定不成根一。而約レ處其 T2251_.64.0077c24: 旨別。可レ思也
T2251_.64.0077c27: 留レ心可見也。今云。次上十九根。於二三界九 T2251_.64.0077c28: 地位一有二成不成一。上明二不成遮位一。彼非遮位。 T2251_.64.0077c29: 彼所説十九根皆成可レ思。故作レ應知勸一。位言 T2251_.64.0078a01: 留レ意。故如前所説者。即次上十九根體。有 T2251_.64.0078a02: 云。指二頌十一句一。今云不レ爾。於下正釋二十句頌一 T2251_.64.0078a03: 中上。何可レ云レ前。又舊論但擧二初二句一。其下有二 T2251_.64.0078a04: 此結一。次有二今十句頌一。何可レ云レ前。彼云。於二非 T2251_.64.0078a05: 遮位中一。如二前所説一。應レ知與二餘根一相應
T2251_.64.0078a08: 喜根上。鮮本。正理。光記更有二根字一爲レ勝。分二 T2251_.64.0078a09: 能所具一故。爲レ成レ句故。故舊論及顯宗在二及 T2251_.64.0078a10: 言一。如二次下及已知及未知。次上及此身根一」
T2251_.64.0078a13: 此文意者。難三前喜根必成就樂一。第二靜慮自 T2251_.64.0078a14: 地無レ樂而有二喜根一。初禪有二三識樂一。今已捨 T2251_.64.0078a15: 竟。第三禪意地樂。今復未修得一故。言二捨レ下 T2251_.64.0078a16: 未レ得レ上當成二何樂根一也。釋二答文一曰。未レ斷二 T2251_.64.0078a17: 第三禪染汚一。必成就也。餘未得者。餘樂未得 T2251_.64.0078a18: 也。光記云二餘善無記樂一
T2251_.64.0078a29: 漸命終者一。先已捨二女男等一入二見道一。有無不 T2251_.64.0078b01: 定不レ説。寶師全同。或一義云。念法師善會二
T2251_.64.0078b04: 三一者。謂如二今論一。不レ成就二一者。謂已知。具 T2251_.64.0078b05: 知根。餘不定者。餘七根。或成就。或不成就。
T2251_.64.0078b08: 不成就。謂耳鼻舌根身根具者則成就。不レ具 T2251_.64.0078b09: 者不成就。女根男根。若一形隨成就一一。若二 T2251_.64.0078b10: 形具成就。若無形倶不成就。謂本不得。或得 T2251_.64.0078b11: 已。由二漸命終一或餘縁故失。準二彼文一已一形 T2251_.64.0078b12: 隨成レ一爲二不定一。不二定成攝一。而指レ彼言二如前一。 T2251_.64.0078b13: 詎容レ懷レ疑。又彼無形者。約二半擇迦等一也。彼 T2251_.64.0078b14: 極多極少文竝約二人別一。今約二總相一説二定成一。 T2251_.64.0078b15: 何可二一例一。又如二三世門名與レ數諍論一。就二一 T2251_.64.0078b16: 事一會二難破一云二數定一。今既就レ名列二其名一。最 T2251_.64.0078b17: 應レ依二名字一。何以レ一量レ萬。若不レ爾者。光寶 T2251_.64.0078b18: 此婆沙文何不レ引レ之。故知念法師義爲レ勝。 T2251_.64.0078b19: 今云。似レ是不レ可レ爾。所引文男女隨一者。二 T2251_.64.0078b20: 形無形不定故不レ説也。今亦無形入。有形一 T2251_.64.0078b21: 根入。不定故不レ説。所レ謂所引文中云二漸命
T2251_.64.0078b26: 少八。傍生極多十九。極少十三。斷善根極多 T2251_.64.0078b27: 十三。極少八。正定聚極多十九。極少十一。乃 T2251_.64.0078b28: 至廣説。今約二一切少中極一但説レ八。故總標二 T2251_.64.0078b29: 極少八一。極多亦爾。今擧二二類一。婆沙云。斷善 T2251_.64.0078c01: 根者極少八者。謂身命意。及五受根。即漸命 T2251_.64.0078c02: 終。斷善故無二信等五。及三無漏根一。漸命終故 T2251_.64.0078c03: 無二六有色一。正理云。據レ漸捨命唯餘二身根一。又 T2251_.64.0078c04: 婆沙釋二極少八一中。生二無色界一異生。成二命意 T2251_.64.0078c05: 捨信等五根一
T2251_.64.0078c09: 前於レ受分二自性境界二一。五受唯爲二自性受一。 T2251_.64.0078c10: 其非如レ前已辨白一 T2251_.64.0078c11: 愚謂愚生 鮮本。正理。顯宗作二異生一爲レ正。
T2251_.64.0078c15: 仡那此云レ生。唐云二愚生一是也。準レ之今愚生
T2251_.64.0078c20: 色一者非レ無二無漏根一故。是故舊論但云二凡天一。 T2251_.64.0078c21: 正理。顯宗唯曰二及説愚故一。蓋顯三前頌文非二 T2251_.64.0078c22: 契經等一。後人更附導生無色界四字一
T2251_.64.0078c25: 後相續時必無レ隔レ品。若因便説レ法結二其義一 T2251_.64.0078c26: 必有二品終一。如下彼二十一卷終云中因レ辨二隨眠一 T2251_.64.0078c27: 分別斷一竟上 T2251_.64.0078c28: T2251_.64.0078c29: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:有/無] [CITE] |