大正蔵検索 INBUDS
|
阿毘達磨倶舍論法義 (No. 2251_ 快道撰 ) in Vol. 64 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:有/無] [CITE]
T2251_.64.0412a01: 色滅。此是受想行識。此是受想行識集。此是
T2251_.64.0412a06: 内淨一心無覺不觀。定生喜樂。成就二禪行一。 T2251_.64.0412a07: 離レ喜捨行念正智身受樂。如諸聖人解二捨念 T2251_.64.0412a08: 樂行一成二三禪行一。斷二苦樂一先滅二憂喜一。不苦不
T2251_.64.0412a11: 集異所擧契經一。故會二初靜慮第四靜慮一。而義 T2251_.64.0412a12: 意全附同佛意一。如二舍利弗略所唱契經一。視可 T2251_.64.0412a13: レ知。又解。設無二初靜慮等言一。而云二離生喜樂一。 T2251_.64.0412a14: 云二捨念清淨等一。是初定。第四定故依レ義會
T2251_.64.0412a18: 名爲レ修。若習。若修。若多所作者。顯下於二此定一。 T2251_.64.0412a19: 能得二自在一。能令中證得上。現法樂住者。謂於二此 T2251_.64.0412a20: 定一。若習。若修。若多所作。於二現法中一。證得樂 T2251_.64.0412a21: 住可愛可樂可欣可意一。無レ所二希望一。無レ所二思 T2251_.64.0412a22: 慕一。寂靜安隱故名二樂住一。於二此樂住一。得獲成
T2251_.64.0412a28: 或即依二現樂一。説爲二得言一。如レ言二石子體一。故無
T2251_.64.0412b05: 盛。如レ遊二砂磧一。熱渇疲勞。創飮二濁水一。亦生二勝 T2251_.64.0412b06: 樂一。或聖道樂。此具有故。謂具二一切菩提分法 T2251_.64.0412b07: 四沙門果九斷遍知三界對治一。又諸定首諸 T2251_.64.0412b08: 定樂因是故遍説
T2251_.64.0412b11: 樂一。説二現定樂一。令二其欣樂一。或現樂住是後樂 T2251_.64.0412b12: 依。但説二所依一能依已顯。如二契經説一。先住二此 T2251_.64.0412b13: 間一。入二諸等至一。後方生レ彼。不現正理作二樂現一。 T2251_.64.0412b14: 顯宗作二喜樂現一。竝誤也。今依二寶疏一
T2251_.64.0412b17: 正理論曰。本靜慮中有二遍縁智一。此遍照故立 T2251_.64.0412b18: 以二見名一。見體即知。故名二知見一。眼根名レ見。世
T2251_.64.0412b23: 曰。若修二三界諸加行善及無漏善一。得二分別 T2251_.64.0412b24: 慧一。謂從二欲界一。乃至二有頂一。諸聞思修所成善 T2251_.64.0412b25: 法。及餘無漏有爲。總説名爲二加行善法一。能引 T2251_.64.0412b26: レ慧生。於二諸境中一差別而轉故。言二修此得分
T2251_.64.0412c01: 一切不善慧。非理所引慧。所有不善障礙定 T2251_.64.0412c02: 慧。皆悉破壞。捨置不起。此相違惠。生長堅
T2251_.64.0412c06: 可レ知。由レ依二第四定一時分別故。準レ彼四皆依二 T2251_.64.0412c07: 佛自一説。故於二初修定一。無二別通文一。準レ此可 T2251_.64.0412c08: レ知。正理論釋二知見一云。修二此等持一。即是爲 T2251_.64.0412c09: レ求二決定照義一。此亦善逝。依レ自而説。謂爲レ顯下 T2251_.64.0412c10: 佛以二天眼通一。觀二諸有情死生險難一。方爲二拔 T2251_.64.0412c11: 濟一。起中靜慮等上。故爲二知見一修二天眼通一。新舊竝 T2251_.64.0412c12: 無レ妨 T2251_.64.0412c13: 倶舍論二十八卷法義終 T2251_.64.0412c14: T2251_.64.0412c15: T2251_.64.0412c16: T2251_.64.0412c17: T2251_.64.0412c18: 十九 T2251_.64.0412c19: 豐山寓居上毛沙門快道記 T2251_.64.0412c20: 分別定品第八之二
T2251_.64.0412c26: 等一故。名爲二梵堂一。比丘當レ知。有二梵大梵一名 T2251_.64.0412c27: 千。無與等者。無過上者。統二千國界一。是彼之 T2251_.64.0412c28: 堂故。名爲二梵堂一。比丘此四梵堂所有力勢。能 T2251_.64.0412c29: 觀二此千國界一。是故名爲二梵堂一。是故比丘若 T2251_.64.0413a01: 有二比丘一。欲下度二欲界之天一處中無欲之地上者。彼 T2251_.64.0413a02: 四部之衆當下求二方便一成中此四梵堂上
T2251_.64.0413a05: 無量。後果無量也。以レ縁二無量有情一故。得二無 T2251_.64.0413a06: 量福一。以二無量福一故。得二無量果一。以三此四行 T2251_.64.0413a07: 有二三無量一故名二無量一。光記初從レ境。次從二等 T2251_.64.0413a08: 流果一。後從二異熟果一。詳曰。此三因展轉相成。 T2251_.64.0413a09: 福謂諸福善爲二未來愛果一之因即現在。雖二光
T2251_.64.0413a14: 體依主。初境第七。後二第五轉有財釋。福因 T2251_.64.0413a15: 及果。竝因レ四所レ得之法故。若總云二四無量一。 T2251_.64.0413a16: 四是慈悲喜捨。必非二無量是四一。故無量之四 T2251_.64.0413a17: 有財釋。必無二帶數一。婆沙八十一更有二三釋一
T2251_.64.0413a21: レ中有レ別。慈治二斷命瞋一。悲治二捶打瞋一。後説慈 T2251_.64.0413a22: 以二無瞋一爲レ性。治レ瞋故。悲以二不害一爲レ性。治 T2251_.64.0413a23: レ害故。於レ彼無レ評。今論主依二後説一。何故如レ是。
T2251_.64.0413a28: レ瞋名二貪瞋一依主釋。若依二論主一相違釋。舊論 T2251_.64.0413a29: 云。多行殺害瞋。逼惱瞋。嫉妬瞋。愛起憎瞋。 T2251_.64.0413b01: 彼最後瞋。通渉而讀。按義解謬。終以成二翻 T2251_.64.0413b02: 誤一。或瞋言非二必六惑隨一一。唯憎逼義。亦名爲 T2251_.64.0413b03: レ瞋。若爾無レ失
T2251_.64.0413b06: 量一。亦斷二欲貪一。此二何別。答有二四復次一。一淫 T2251_.64.0413b07: 欲貪。境界貪。如レ次不淨ト捨トノ對治。二顯色 T2251_.64.0413b08: 貪。形色貪。三細觸貪。容儀貪。四形貌貪。有
T2251_.64.0413b12: 逆於味一。有説不淨想對治婬貪一。厭食想對治 T2251_.64.0413b13: 食貪一。準二此等文一。毘婆沙還同二理實義一如何。
T2251_.64.0413b18: 形貌觸威儀欲一故。母父及兒親等欲對治是 T2251_.64.0413b19: 捨
T2251_.64.0413b23: 會兩釋後義爲レ勝。又頌釋和會兩釋。是亦後 T2251_.64.0413b24: 爲レ勝。若言三不害似二無瞋一。何一無瞋言可レ含二 T2251_.64.0413b25: 眞似一
T2251_.64.0413c05: 彼所起心不相應行皆名爲レ喜。豈有二喜受與 T2251_.64.0413c06: レ受相應一。答。彼文應レ説二謂喜及喜相應想行 T2251_.64.0413c07: 識一。不レ可レ言レ受。而言レ受者。是誦者謬。復次彼 T2251_.64.0413c08: 論總説三五蘊爲二喜無量自性一。雖三喜受與レ受 T2251_.64.0413c09: 不二相應一。而餘心心所法與レ受相應。故作二是
T2251_.64.0413c12: 與レ心相應。有説欣在二喜根相應聚中一可レ得。 T2251_.64.0413c13: 有作是説。喜根後生レ欣。由三喜力所二引起一故。 T2251_.64.0413c14: 若作二是説一。此喜無量與レ受相應。亦不レ違レ理
T2251_.64.0413c23: 由二思擇力一。内所二發起一。色界定善心欣極欣現 T2251_.64.0413c24: 前。極欣欣性欣類。適意悦意喜性喜類。和合 T2251_.64.0413c25: 不二別離一。歡欣悦預有二堪任性一。踊躍踊躍性。 T2251_.64.0413c26: 歡喜歡喜性。總名爲レ喜。復次與レ喜相應受想 T2251_.64.0413c27: 行識。及所等起身語二業。不相應行。亦名爲
T2251_.64.0414a04: 古師説二喜即喜受一。何縁觀行者。其時喜受生。 T2251_.64.0414a05: 若縁二與樂一。與レ慈無レ異。若縁二拔苦一。應二與レ悲 T2251_.64.0414a06: 同一。又契經言二欣故生喜。喜即喜受。如二先已 T2251_.64.0414a07: 辨一。此喜行相與二彼欣一同。喜故生レ喜義有二何 T2251_.64.0414a08: 異一。若言二下上義有異者。輕安與レ樂。義亦應 T2251_.64.0414a09: レ然。差別因縁不レ可レ得。故又違二本論一。云何名 T2251_.64.0414a10: レ喜。謂喜。喜相應受想行識等。此中意顯喜ト T2251_.64.0414a11: 倶ナル品ノ法ハ喜カ増上カ故。總立二喜名一。非二受ト T2251_.64.0414a12: 受ト倶一。其理決定。若喜即喜受。何言二與レ受倶一。 T2251_.64.0414a13: 若言四對法以レ理爲レ量應レ如三無レ過誦二本論文一。 T2251_.64.0414a14: 此亦不レ然。理爲レ量。論要有二經證一。方可レ定 T2251_.64.0414a15: レ文。若與レ經違。理必可レ壞。不レ應三隨レ意輒改二 T2251_.64.0414a16: 論文一。是故此喜定非二喜受一。以レ欣爲レ體。或即 T2251_.64.0414a17: 無貪。謂別有レ貪。是惡心所。於二有情類一。作二是 T2251_.64.0414a18: 思惟一。云何當レ令三諸有樂彼不レ能レ得皆屬二於 T2251_.64.0414a19: 我一。喜能治レ彼。故是無貪。此與二喜根一必倶行 T2251_.64.0414a20: 故。三地可レ得。如二悔憂倶一。喜亦無貪。分明相 T2251_.64.0414a21: 者。於二他盛事一心不二貪著一。知二他獲得一。深生二欣 T2251_.64.0414a22: 慰一。心熱對治。説名爲レ喜。故知此喜亦無貪性
T2251_.64.0414a26: レ依二欲染想一。又契經欣故生レ喜者。是説二由レ相 T2251_.64.0414a27: 顯體。謂欣悦故生二此喜無量一。生是生成義。 T2251_.64.0414a28: 又不レ違二本論一。已善通故。又以レ欣爲二自性一理 T2251_.64.0414a29: 未レ盡。欣厭別有レ體否。未レ定如二世親論主一者。
T2251_.64.0414b03: 適意悦意喜性喜類一。竝是喜樂行相。何偏定 T2251_.64.0414b04: レ欣。又無貪爲レ性。實是臆度無二文説一。亦無レ有 T2251_.64.0414b05: レ理。諸經論竝皆於二慰樂一。説二喜無量一故。又違三 T2251_.64.0414b06: 經説治二不欣慰一。何不レ言レ治レ貪。又喜無量。初
T2251_.64.0414b09: 地。應二無貪唯三地一。若與レ喜相應故者。若爾 T2251_.64.0414b10: 者喜根定現前。何得レ致二前難一。亦復決定與 T2251_.64.0414b11: レ喜倶無貪爲レ性。全無二理教一。憂悔之例不成。 T2251_.64.0414b12: 彼二唯欲故。問。喜受爲レ性。應レ治二憂慼一。何云二 T2251_.64.0414b13: 不欣慰一。答。嫉妬不欣慰是憂慼。行相似故。理 T2251_.64.0414b14: 實治二憂慼一。若依二大乘一。雜集十三四無量竝 T2251_.64.0414b15: 以二定惠一爲レ體。若依二顯揚第四一。無瞋。不害。不 T2251_.64.0414b16: 嫉。及無貪。無瞋。如レ次大同二論主解一
T2251_.64.0414b20: 依レ境判。二自意樂本是善非レ倒。如實意樂 T2251_.64.0414b21: 故。三勝解心所謂二相應唯是自修善行一。不 T2251_.64.0414b22: レ執二有情實得一故
T2251_.64.0414b27: 自體非レ倒
T2251_.64.0414c02: 三四方四維上下普周一切一。心與レ慈倶。無 T2251_.64.0414c03: 結。無怨。無恚。無諍。極廣甚大。無量善修。遍 T2251_.64.0414c04: 滿一切世間一。成就遊。如レ是悲喜心與レ捨倶。 T2251_.64.0414c05: 無結。無怨。無恚。無諍。極廣甚大。無量善修。
T2251_.64.0414c11: 三一。此有二兩説一。三通レ四叙二異説一。婆沙八十一
T2251_.64.0414c15: 悲無量一。有二勝喜受一。歡行轉故。悲慼行故。歡 T2251_.64.0414c16: 慼何竝轉。評曰。初二定有二悲無量一。有二至教一 T2251_.64.0414c17: 故。如二定蘊中説一。初二靜慮攝二初二靜慮四無 T2251_.64.0414c18: 量一等。今論初三説於レ彼未レ見。通二十地一説者。 T2251_.64.0414c19: 喜無量ハ欲ト初二定ト餘ハ通二十地一。故云二隨應一
T2251_.64.0415a01: 説一如二此論一
T2251_.64.0415a04: 一正明二不斷一。二示二伏治一。釋二前文一此亦有レ二。 T2251_.64.0415a05: 初正明二伏治一。後因便明二初修相一。此文正明二
T2251_.64.0415a08: 行相。能斷二煩惱一。無量非二彼行相一。四行相是 T2251_.64.0415a09: 無量。斷二煩惱一不レ以二此行相一故。復次無量是 T2251_.64.0415a10: 勝解作意。惟眞實作意。能斷二煩惱一。復次無量 T2251_.64.0415a11: 是増益作意。惟不増益作意。能斷二煩惱一。復次 T2251_.64.0415a12: 無量惟縁二現在一。要縁二三世或無爲一。道能斷二 T2251_.64.0415a13: 煩惱一。復次無量縁二有情一。要法想能斷二煩惱一。 T2251_.64.0415a14: 復次無量縁二一分境一。非レ縁二一分境一。道能斷二 T2251_.64.0415a15: 煩惱一。復次無間道能斷二煩惱一。無量是解脱道
T2251_.64.0415a18: 有漏根本靜慮攝故。此因有レ失。不レ應レ説三三
T2251_.64.0415a21: 根本一下惑必斷上。有漏根本尚不レ斷レ惑。中間 T2251_.64.0415a22: 不レ斷。理在二絶言一。故不二別簡一
T2251_.64.0415a25: 中有レ問有レ答。答中有レ二。一正明二初修一。二分 T2251_.64.0415a26: 別能修人一。初中亦二。初明二修縁一。二便作下正 T2251_.64.0415a27: 明二修願一。此中亦有。初約二煩惱非増人一。二若 T2251_.64.0415a28: 彼下約二煩惱増盛人一。此中文有レ三。一標二不 T2251_.64.0415a29: 能一。二應於下示二縁境品別一。三先於下正明二修 T2251_.64.0415b01: 相一。此亦有レ二。一修觀七品有情一。二修此下
T2251_.64.0415b06: レ唯。然光法師令レ同二正理中品分三。後釋非 T2251_.64.0415b07: 也 T2251_.64.0415b08: 怨亦分レ三謂下中上 從レ易向レ難。故於二親 T2251_.64.0415b09: 友一上中下次。於二怨三品一列二下中上一
T2251_.64.0415b12: 所以者何。阿羅漢等欲レ求二其失一。亦可レ得故。 T2251_.64.0415b13: 彼於二先時一。亦有二瑕隙一故。令三我等今輕毀之一。 T2251_.64.0415b14: 誰能於レ彼作二饒益事一。若於二有情一。樂求徳一者。 T2251_.64.0415b15: 於二四無量一。多分能修。所以者何。斷二善根一者。 T2251_.64.0415b16: 欲レ求二其徳一。亦可レ得故。彼於二先時一。多修二善 T2251_.64.0415b17: 業一故。今感得尊貴家生。形貌端嚴衆所樂 T2251_.64.0415b18: 見。言詞威肅聞皆敬受一。智惠多聞人皆推仰。 T2251_.64.0415b19: 我應三於レ彼作二饒益事一。今亦約レ多故。不レ言レ唯 T2251_.64.0415b20: 也
T2251_.64.0415b23: 起。偈曰。人道生。光記云二現起分別一未可也。 T2251_.64.0415b24: 二成具門。初二定得レ一必成レ四。第三已上成
T2251_.64.0415b27: 故。慈悲捨與二喜樂捨三根一相應。喜不二與レ受 T2251_.64.0415b28: 相應一。若兼二眷屬一。亦與二喜根一相應。皆通二三世一。 T2251_.64.0415b29: 唯是善而縁二三性一。欲色界繋唯縁二欲界一。唯非 T2251_.64.0415c01: 二學而縁二非二學一。唯修所斷縁二見修所斷一。通 T2251_.64.0415c02: 縁二名義一。唯縁二他相續一。皆通二加行得離染得一。
T2251_.64.0415c07: 雖レ初非レ具レ喜故。二治二非梵一故。非梵謂欲界。 T2251_.64.0415c08: 初定近治二欲界一故。三治二非梵行一故。婬欲事 T2251_.64.0415c09: 名二非梵行一。初定近治レ彼故。四修二梵行一者身 T2251_.64.0415c10: 中可レ得故。五梵謂世尊。此四無量佛所二施 T2251_.64.0415c11: 設一故名二梵住一。六梵謂梵音。此四梵音所説 T2251_.64.0415c12: 故。七修二此四一生二梵天一。爲二大梵王一故。八以下四 T2251_.64.0415c13: 無量於二梵福中一最勝上故。又問。梵住無量有二 T2251_.64.0415c14: 何差別一有二多釋一。有作是説。無二差別一。有説有二 T2251_.64.0415c15: 多復次一。一名既有二差別一。二治二非梵一。治二戲論一 T2251_.64.0415c16: 別故。三治二非梵行一。治二戲論一異故。四非梵行 T2251_.64.0415c17: 者。戲論者。身中可レ得。有レ異故。五治二不信一 T2251_.64.0415c18: 梵。治二放逸一無量。六在二梵世一。在二上地一。有レ殊 T2251_.64.0415c19: 故。七在二未至及梵世一。在二上地一不同故。八在二 T2251_.64.0415c20: 上地一唯無量。在二未至梵世一亦名二梵住一。九外 T2251_.64.0415c21: 道所得唯名二梵住一。内道所得亦得二無量名一。十 T2251_.64.0415c22: 共所得梵住。不共得無量。十一妙音云。共二異 T2251_.64.0415c23: 生一是梵住。不共聖者是無量
T2251_.64.0415c26: 超二諸色想一。滅二有對想一。不三思惟種種想一。入二無 T2251_.64.0415c27: 邊空一。空無邊處具足住解脱。五超二一切空無 T2251_.64.0415c28: 邊處一。入二無邊識一。識無邊處具足住解脱。六 T2251_.64.0415c29: 超二一切識無邊處一。入二無所有無所有處一。具足 T2251_.64.0416a01: 住解脱。七超二一切無所有處一。入二非想非非想
T2251_.64.0416a10: 解脱三解脱。度色想滅瞋恚想住空處四解 T2251_.64.0416a11: 脱。度空處住識處五解脱。度識處住不用處 T2251_.64.0416a12: 六解脱。度不用處住有想無想處七解脱。度 T2251_.64.0416a13: 有想無想處住想知滅八解脱。同第八衆集
T2251_.64.0416a22: 云二諸色一。據二十上經一言二外色一。爲レ治二内色想 T2251_.64.0416a23: 貪一或觀二外色不淨。或内外諸色一故。甘露味
T2251_.64.0416a26: 云二諸色一。具應レ言二外諸色一。二文互現。故八十
T2251_.64.0416a29: 色一釋二外色一。故知外諸色名二諸色一。問。名義如 T2251_.64.0416b01: 何。棄背義名二解脱一。廣如二婆沙一。別釋レ名者。於二 T2251_.64.0416b02: 内色身一有二色想貪一。此所斷貪名二内有色想一。 T2251_.64.0416b03: 内簡レ外。有是能有レ身。色是所有身有レ色。故 T2251_.64.0416b04: 言二有色一有財釋。有色之想依主釋。内即有有 T2251_.64.0416b05: 色想。内之有色想持業。及同體依主釋。觀外 T2251_.64.0416b06: 色者。觀是能觀。外色即所觀。謂觀二外青瘀膿 T2251_.64.0416b07: 爛等一。外色之觀境第七依主。故名二觀外色一。與 T2251_.64.0416b08: レ除二内有色想貪一。觀二外色一以棄背彼一。故名二解 T2251_.64.0416b09: 脱一。内有色想之觀外色。第四轉依主釋。此觀 T2251_.64.0416b10: 即解脱持業釋。或同體依主釋。二中内無色 T2251_.64.0416b11: 想者。約二所依一説。謂呼二前已斷一。觀外色者。約二 T2251_.64.0416b12: 所縁一説。謂雖二已除一貪爲二堅固一故。更觀二外不 T2251_.64.0416b13: 淨青瘀等一。令三貪不二還生一。内無色想之觀外色
T2251_.64.0416b16: 淨相一。彼治二色貪一。此治二不淨觀一。是爲二差別一。上
T2251_.64.0416b20: 三名一諸説異諍。且依二婆沙一如二前辨一。若依二甘
T2251_.64.0416b23: 解脱。分別觀三内外色一切淨色一。是第三解脱
T2251_.64.0416b26: 爲レ顯下通二内外諸色一觀中淨相上。但云二淨解脱一。又
T2251_.64.0416b29: 中説二内無色想觀外色一。以レ破二内色一故。言二内 T2251_.64.0416c01: 無色想一故。知行者。於二初解脱中一漸壞二身色一。 T2251_.64.0416c02: 至二第二解脱中一。内色已壞但有二外色一。第三解
T2251_.64.0416c19: 伴一。總言二五蘊一故。婆沙百四十一亦云。若幷二 T2251_.64.0416c20: 助伴一。即五蘊性。然彼八十四約二隨轉一説。故 T2251_.64.0416c21: 云二欲界四蘊一。以三欲無二隨轉色一故。然光記云。 T2251_.64.0416c22: 此論據レ勝。婆沙兼據レ似説者。未レ得二兩論意一 T2251_.64.0416c23: 也。又婆沙論二界地一者。不レ言二欲界一者。必不
T2251_.64.0416c26: 界一。從二依地一云二色界一。而光記亦約二弱強等一者 T2251_.64.0416c27: 非也
T2251_.64.0417a01: 心。故所縁言二可見色一
T2251_.64.0417a07: 性唯是善非二無記染一。今等二依地三性等一。八十
T2251_.64.0417a12: 受滅解脱一。二據レ實而論滅二一切心心所一。故有 T2251_.64.0417a13: 經總言二滅盡定解脱一。後有説約二倶解脱一。謂諸 T2251_.64.0417a14: 羅得二滅定一者名二倶解脱一。由二慧定力一。解脱煩
T2251_.64.0417a20: 非レ可レ厭二道諦一故。無漏觀則自體是故。不レ縁二 T2251_.64.0417a21: 法智一者。無色於レ欲四遠故。問。何故不レ明二第 T2251_.64.0417a22: 八所縁一。答。滅二心心所一。既無二能縁一。誰可レ縁
T2251_.64.0417a26: 中。無二眼識所引貪一故。於二第三定一無二初二不 T2251_.64.0417a27: 淨解脱一。第三定自地ニハ意地ノ妙樂所二動亂一
T2251_.64.0417b03: 故。遍處亦無。勝處爲レ門。入二遍處一故。兼顯示
T2251_.64.0417b06: 如レ有二眼識所引貪一故。初禪立二解脱一。二禪既 T2251_.64.0417b07: 無二眼識所引貪一故。三禪不レ立。有章本云二三 T2251_.64.0417b08: 禪一者非也。准レ論是二禪故。又論云。初二解 T2251_.64.0417b09: 脱一一通依二初二靜慮一。能治二欲界初靜慮中 T2251_.64.0417b10: 顯色貪一故。既不レ言レ治二二禪一。故知是二禪無二 T2251_.64.0417b11: 眼識引貪一。若爾第三禪既無二眼識引貪一。何故 T2251_.64.0417b12: 四禪立二解脱一。解云。第四禪立二解脱一者。由二先 T2251_.64.0417b13: 離貪。方於二彼地一觀二淨解脱一。不下由レ治二識所 T2251_.64.0417b14: 引貪一立上
T2251_.64.0417b18: レ令二攝持一故。又欲二自觀知所二堪能一作二是念一。 T2251_.64.0417b19: 以二不淨觀一不レ起二煩惱一未タシヤ。是爲レ奇。淨觀 T2251_.64.0417b20: 不レ起乃爲レ奇。又現三善根有二所堪能一故
T2251_.64.0417c02: 五曰。淨於二大種造色一邊際故。第八於二心心 T2251_.64.0417c03: 所一邊際故。六曰。淨雖レ取二色淨一。而不レ起二煩 T2251_.64.0417c04: 惱一。以二殊勝一故。立二身證名一。第八以二無心一故。 T2251_.64.0417c05: 身力所起故説二身證一。七曰。經説二八解脱身作 T2251_.64.0417c06: 證一者。皆以二此二解一故。得レ名二身證一。今依二第 T2251_.64.0417c07: 一第三一。若依二舊論一。曰レ在二界地窮際一。亦攝二彼 T2251_.64.0417c08: 第四説一
T2251_.64.0417c17: 觀勝レ彼。故名二勝處一。處之勝依主釋。又百四
T2251_.64.0417c23: 境等同二前三解脱一。故下三句指同以顯レ此。準 T2251_.64.0417c24: レ此應レ知。前第三淨是内無色想觀外色。集異
T2251_.64.0418a02: 如二婆羅痆斯深染青衣。若青青顯青現青光一。 T2251_.64.0418a03: 内無色想觀外諸色。若青青顯青現青光。亦
T2251_.64.0418a06: 華一。或如二婆羅痆斯深染黄衣若黄黄顯黄現
T2251_.64.0418a09: 痆斯喩。及法合等。準レ前可レ知。而彼一一牒
T2251_.64.0418a13: 有漏。以レ空破レ色。則名二無漏一。此是行者所貪 T2251_.64.0418a14: 著處。是故佛爲二弟子一。説名二勝處一。示レ勝此縁 T2251_.64.0418a15: 故
T2251_.64.0418a18: 三小大無量。四因果通二。五能有二棄背一。能 T2251_.64.0418a19: 勝二伏境一。能廣二所縁一。六唯作二勝解一。能伏二煩惱一。 T2251_.64.0418a20: 於レ境無二無量。七如二次下論次第從入差別一。 T2251_.64.0418a21: 今依二彼五六二復次一。唯棄背影顯唯作二勝 T2251_.64.0418a22: 解一
T2251_.64.0418a26: 此論一。西方誦本別乎
T2251_.64.0418b01: 量火處。無量風處。無量青處。無量黄處。無量 T2251_.64.0418b02: 赤處。無量白處。無量空處。無量識處。第十修 T2251_.64.0418b03: 一思惟上下諸方不二。衆生如是樂二一切處一。
T2251_.64.0418b10: 如下地等隨二世想一名上。風亦顯形。故言二亦爾一。如三 T2251_.64.0418b11: 世間説二黒風團風一。此用二顯形一。表示風一故。 T2251_.64.0418b12: 前文即風界爲レ初。假立爲二或説一。今風界爲二
T2251_.64.0418b15: 可レ言三亦縁二色處一。此難非レ理。以三諸世間亦説二 T2251_.64.0418b16: 黒風團風等一故
T2251_.64.0418b19: 必已得二勝處遍處一。若得二勝處一。必已得二解脱一。 T2251_.64.0418b20: 未三必已得二遍處一。若得二遍處一。必得二已得解脱 T2251_.64.0418b21: 及勝處一。所以者何。從二解脱一入二勝處一。從二勝處一
T2251_.64.0418b25: 云。初二句答二初問一者麁也。於二無色一立。若解 T2251_.64.0418b26: 脱。若遍處。皆依二三界一。故總言三無色依二三界一。 T2251_.64.0418b27: 不二別標簡一
T2251_.64.0418c02: 得。非二異生能起一。初起唯在二人中一。後復依二色 T2251_.64.0418c03: 界身一修起
T2251_.64.0418c06: 起一。唯無所所有。亦依二上地一
T2251_.64.0418c09: 力劣無二聖教一故。治二貪欲一故。上二界無。有説 T2251_.64.0418c10: 初起唯在二人趣一。要由二教力一。所二引起一故。人中 T2251_.64.0418c11: 有レトモレ教天趣中無ヲ以設有二著樂一。不レ能二初起一。 T2251_.64.0418c12: 故人初起。退生二欲天一。由二宿習力一。有二後起義一
T2251_.64.0418c18: 爲二數修一。此二竝爲二因力一。唯順後業爲二業力一。 T2251_.64.0418c19: 其不定業非三必定爲二因力業力一。故此不レ説。 T2251_.64.0418c20: 雖二順現受等竝是業一。而分二親疎近遠一。以爲二 T2251_.64.0418c21: 二力一。寶疏論順後受。更加二順生受一。違二理教 T2251_.64.0418c22: 二一。違レ理者。濫二因力一故。違レ教者。此及舊論。 T2251_.64.0418c23: 正理。顯宗竝唯云二順後受業一故。麟云。准二此 T2251_.64.0418c24: 及論一。唯順後受業。以二順生是因力攝一故。若 T2251_.64.0418c25: 寶法師通取二生後二業一。彼意者。謂先得レ定。 T2251_.64.0418c26: 由二此定力一。感二上界順生一。後由二退失一。由二先定
T2251_.64.0419a02: 分科竝非也。如二首卷辨一。寶疏非亦爾也
T2251_.64.0419a05: 出體。明レ證中。舊論曰。正修得者。謂阿地伽 T2251_.64.0419a06: 摩。此是三乘人。所修菩提助法。及三乘果。今 T2251_.64.0419a07: 擧レ因以影レ果。於二菩提分一前二十二通二漏無 T2251_.64.0419a08: 漏一。餘十五種唯是無漏。今非二有漏一。故百八十
T2251_.64.0419a15: 擧レ經辨二住世數量一。初中有レ三。一明下隨二持説 T2251_.64.0419a16: 二人一。世俗教法住上。二有能下明下隨二修行者一 T2251_.64.0419a17: 勝義證法住上。三故隨下結勸。然寶疏二明二能 T2251_.64.0419a18: 持人一者非也。爲レ明二法住一而明レ人。何爲二大 T2251_.64.0419a19: 科一。亦復不二是唯明人。明述二法住一故。上來不 T2251_.64.0419a20: レ論二住世年數一。唯明下有二能持人一其法必住上
T2251_.64.0419a27: レ住二千年一。今失二五百歳一。餘有二五百年一。五分律
T2251_.64.0419b03: 諸者。行者。毘奈耶。説我之正法應レ住二千歳一。 T2251_.64.0419b04: 或復過レ此。由下度二女人一出家上。更減二五百一。世尊 T2251_.64.0419b05: 雖下於二處處一説中正法言上。而不三分別云何正法一。 T2251_.64.0419b06: 契經是此論所依根本。彼所未説者。今應レ説 T2251_.64.0419b07: レ之。故作二斯論一。以可二準例一。然光寶竝爲二兩説一。 T2251_.64.0419b08: 初教證倶唯千年義。後説教法至二千歳之後一。 T2251_.64.0419b09: 此釋誤也。光記契經等二句總屬レ上。以爲二一 T2251_.64.0419b10: 説一。若爾何故。正理。顯宗全無二契經已下文一 T2251_.64.0419b11: 耶。舊論云。有餘師説。佛般涅槃後一千年。正 T2251_.64.0419b12: 法得レ住。此説約二正修得一。不レ約二阿含一。若約二阿 T2251_.64.0419b13: 含一。則有二多時一。何以故。於二末世中一。若能此正 T2251_.64.0419b14: 法諸人有二二種諸天一。一隨聞得信。二隨正解 T2251_.64.0419b15: 得レ信。皆擁護彼人一。令三阿含及正修得於レ世 T2251_.64.0419b16: 不二速隱沒一。是故於レ中。如レ文如レ義。應三急修二 T2251_.64.0419b17: 正行一。準二舊論一。於二有餘師後一。擧レ經以分別。豈
T2251_.64.0419b20: 教證。倶爲二千年一。故言二總言一。此雖レ不レ違レ義。 T2251_.64.0419b21: 疎二於文勢一。又忽違二舊論一。問。今云二有釋一。舊論 T2251_.64.0419b22: 云二有餘師一。應三必對二本説一何。答。本説者。如二 T2251_.64.0419b23: 頌下二句一。不レ論二時數一。但隨二能持人有一。對レ此
T2251_.64.0419b26: 此有釋一
T2251_.64.0419b29: 當二流通分一。光寶分文科目非也。正理論曰。阿 T2251_.64.0419c01: 毘達磨此論所依。此攝二彼中眞實要義一。彼論 T2251_.64.0419c02: 中義。釋有二多途一。今此論中。依二何義一釋。頌曰
T2251_.64.0419c05: 顯一。爲レ如二毘婆沙中所顯一。準三正理顯宗倶言二 T2251_.64.0419c06: 眞實要義一。前界品初正理言二諸堅實義。皆 T2251_.64.0419c07: 入レ此攝一者。眞實誤誰可レ容レ疑
T2251_.64.0419c10: 讓レ佛。論主所造二十唯識終頌曰。我已隨二自 T2251_.64.0419c11: 能一。略成二唯識義一。此中一切種。難思佛所行。 T2251_.64.0419c12: 與レ此意同。正理頌同レ此。釋二多言一曰。顯三少 T2251_.64.0419c13: 有二異途一。謂形像色去來世等。由レ是顯宗改作 T2251_.64.0419c14: レ唯。而釋下唯言爲レ顯。更無二異途一。一切皆依中毘 T2251_.64.0419c15: 婆沙上故。少者對レ多。去來世等義。以二經部義一 T2251_.64.0419c16: 貶量有部所立一。是爲二我失一。顯宗改レ此。作下或 T2251_.64.0419c17: 有二差違一是我失上
T2251_.64.0419c20: レ依二婆沙一。故舊論曰。罽賓國毘婆沙師二證ヲ T2251_.64.0419c21: 以所二成就一。此阿毘達磨。我今多隨二彼義一説」
T2251_.64.0419c26: 爲レ量。本論非レ量。壞レ之何咎。故世尊言。當 T2251_.64.0419c27: レ依二經量一。今亦頌云二牟尼一。善會二前來一。然長行二 T2251_.64.0419c28: 云及大聖弟子一。蓋應レ畫二蛇足一。或及言應レ作 T2251_.64.0419c29: レ非。由レ是舊論曰。離レ證能正判二正法一。唯佛世 T2251_.64.0420a01: 尊爲二最勝量一。何以故。由三證見一切法一故。若 T2251_.64.0420a02: 佛聖弟子離二阿含及道理一。判二正法一亦非二中 T2251_.64.0420a03: 量一。準二彼論一理前後附爲二最善一。今論文錯誤 T2251_.64.0420a04: 必矣。又正理論曰。諸法正理廣大甚深。要昔 T2251_.64.0420a05: 曾於二無量佛所一親近修習。眞智資糧方於二智 T2251_.64.0420a06: 境一。一切無レ惑。麟喩獨覺尚於二法相一。不レ能二決 T2251_.64.0420a07: 判一。況諸聲聞。彼所證法。隨二他教一故。由レ此決
T2251_.64.0420a12: 二乘凡夫一。然寶疏云。六足發智是大弟子之 T2251_.64.0420a13: 所造。故不二商略一者何。但執レ文未レ觀二前後應 T2251_.64.0420a14: 承等一。光記亦隨二錯本一釋非也。倶舍論序正流 T2251_.64.0420a15: 通三分已訖。自下大師世眼等頌。已下是破 T2251_.64.0420a16: 我論文。如三首卷立二八理一證一。當下至二彼論一解 T2251_.64.0420a17: 釋上。普光等多釋竝妄陋。悉如二首卷評簡一。於 T2251_.64.0420a18: レ此且息
T2251_.64.0420a21: T2251_.64.0420a22: T2251_.64.0420a23: T2251_.64.0420a24: T2251_.64.0420a25: T2251_.64.0420a26: T2251_.64.0420a27: T2251_.64.0420a28: T2251_.64.0420a29: T2251_.64.0420b01: T2251_.64.0420b02: T2251_.64.0420b03: T2251_.64.0420b04: T2251_.64.0420b05: T2251_.64.0420b06: T2251_.64.0420b07: T2251_.64.0420b08: T2251_.64.0420b09: T2251_.64.0420b10: T2251_.64.0420b11: T2251_.64.0420b12: T2251_.64.0420b13: T2251_.64.0420b14: T2251_.64.0420b15: T2251_.64.0420b16: T2251_.64.0420b17: T2251_.64.0420b18: T2251_.64.0420b19: T2251_.64.0420b20: T2251_.64.0420b21: T2251_.64.0420b22: T2251_.64.0420b23: T2251_.64.0420b24: T2251_.64.0420b25: T2251_.64.0420b26: T2251_.64.0420b27: T2251_.64.0420b28: T2251_.64.0420b29: T2251_.64.0420c01: T2251_.64.0420c02: T2251_.64.0420c03: T2251_.64.0420c04: T2251_.64.0420c05: T2251_.64.0420c06: T2251_.64.0420c07: T2251_.64.0420c08: T2251_.64.0420c09: T2251_.64.0420c10: T2251_.64.0420c11: T2251_.64.0420c12: T2251_.64.0420c13: T2251_.64.0420c14: T2251_.64.0420c15: T2251_.64.0420c16: T2251_.64.0420c17: T2251_.64.0420c18: T2251_.64.0420c19: T2251_.64.0420c20: T2251_.64.0420c21: T2251_.64.0420c22: T2251_.64.0420c23: T2251_.64.0420c24: T2251_.64.0420c25: T2251_.64.0420c26: T2251_.64.0420c27: T2251_.64.0420c28: T2251_.64.0420c29: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:有/無] [CITE] |