大正蔵検索 INBUDS
|
阿毘達磨順正理論 (No. 1562_ 衆賢造 玄奘譯 ) in Vol. 29 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:無/有] [CITE]
T1562_.29.0652a01: 餘相遠性等。是遠性攝自相非無。既許去來 T1562_.29.0652a02: 是遠性攝。必應許彼自相非無。説自相無而 T1562_.29.0652a03: 名遠性。故彼偏與正理相違。等聲爲明擧法 T1562_.29.0652a04: 未盡 T1562_.29.0652a05: *説一切有部順正理論*卷第五十五 T1562_.29.0652a06: T1562_.29.0652a07: T1562_.29.0652a08: T1562_.29.0652a09: T1562_.29.0652a10: 尊者衆賢造 T1562_.29.0652a11: *三藏法師玄奘奉 詔譯 T1562_.29.0652a12: *辯隨眠品第五之十二 T1562_.29.0652a13: 如是已辯諸惑對治。修能對治勝進位中。所 T1562_.29.0652a14: 斷諸惑爲再斷不。所得離繋有重得耶。頌曰 T1562_.29.0652a15: 諸惑無再斷 離繋有重得 T1562_.29.0652a16: 謂治生得果 練根六時中 T1562_.29.0652a17: 論曰。所斷諸惑由得自分。無間道故便頓永 T1562_.29.0652a18: 斷。離退後時無再斷義。斷已復斷則爲唐捐。 T1562_.29.0652a19: 所得離繋雖無隨道漸勝進理。而道進時容 T1562_.29.0652a20: 有重起彼勝得理。以離繋得道所攝故捨得 T1562_.29.0652a21: 道時彼亦捨得。故諸離繋有重得理此依容 T1562_.29.0652a22: 有。時總有六謂治道起得果練根。説治生言 T1562_.29.0652a23: 通目二義。若據住此能證離繋目無間道。若 T1562_.29.0652a24: 據住此正證離繋目解脱道。言得果者。謂得 T1562_.29.0652a25: 預流一來不還阿羅漢果。言練根者謂増進 T1562_.29.0652a26: 根。由此六時得未曾道。有捨曾道得離繋故。 T1562_.29.0652a27: 説得果言既無差別。如攝四果應攝練根。以 T1562_.29.0652a28: 轉根時必得果故。何勞長説此練根言。爲顯 T1562_.29.0652a29: 練根異斷惑得果故。得果外説練根無失。然 T1562_.29.0652b01: 得離繋隨其所應。有具六時乃至唯二。謂欲 T1562_.29.0652b02: 界繋見四諦斷。及色無色見三諦斷。所得離 T1562_.29.0652b03: 繋得具六時。色無色界見道諦斷。所得離繋 T1562_.29.0652b04: 得唯五時。由治生時即得果故。説得果已不 T1562_.29.0652b05: 説治生。欲界修斷五品離繋。亦五時得除預 T1562_.29.0652b06: 流果。第六離繋得唯四時。得果治生時無別 T1562_.29.0652b07: 故第七八品亦唯四時。得果四中除前二故。 T1562_.29.0652b08: 第九離繋得唯三時。亦治生時即得果故。色 T1562_.29.0652b09: 無色界修所斷中。唯除有頂第九離繋。所餘 T1562_.29.0652b10: 離繋亦唯三時。得果四中除前三故。有頂第 T1562_.29.0652b11: 九得唯二時。得果治生同一時故。此約鈍説 T1562_.29.0652b12: 若就利根。前諸位中除練根得。豈不八地容 T1562_.29.0652b13: 世俗道斷。應分二種對治生時得不爾。此説 T1562_.29.0652b14: 漸次得故。惑此唯約無漏得故。若依越次通 T1562_.29.0652b15: 有漏得。則世俗道八地染中隨離少多。入聖 T1562_.29.0652b16: 道者彼得離繋。隨其所應有具六時。乃至唯 T1562_.29.0652b17: 一以利根故除練根時。謂欲界中先斷五品 T1562_.29.0652b18: 入見諦者。彼見所斷五品離繋。具六時得。謂 T1562_.29.0652b19: 有二種自治生時。及得果時復四成六。彼修 T1562_.29.0652b20: 所斷五品離繋。唯五時得除預流果。先斷六 T1562_.29.0652b21: 品入見諦者。彼見所斷六品離繋。亦五時得 T1562_.29.0652b22: 除一如前。彼修所斷六品離繋。唯世俗道治 T1562_.29.0652b23: 生時得。必不起彼無漏對治。是一來果向道 T1562_.29.0652b24: 攝故。非住果時起彼向道。以住勝果不起劣 T1562_.29.0652b25: 故。先斷八品入見諦者。彼見所斷八品離繋。 T1562_.29.0652b26: 亦五時得除一如前。彼修所斷前六離繋。唯 T1562_.29.0652b27: 一時得如前應知。七八離繋唯四時得。謂二 T1562_.29.0652b28: 治生及二得果。先斷九品依未至地入見諦 T1562_.29.0652b29: 者。彼見所斷九品離繋。亦四時得如前應知。 T1562_.29.0652c01: 依根本地入見諦者。彼見所斷九品離繋。亦 T1562_.29.0652c02: 一時得如前應知。根本非欲斷對治故。若依 T1562_.29.0652c03: 未至若依根本。彼修所斷九品離繋。亦一時 T1562_.29.0652c04: 得如前應知。必不起彼無漏對治。是不還果 T1562_.29.0652c05: 向道攝故。先斷上七地入見諦者。彼見三諦 T1562_.29.0652c06: 斷七地。離繋亦四時得如前應知。見道諦斷 T1562_.29.0652c07: 七地離繋。唯三時得謂一治生。及二得果無 T1562_.29.0652c08: 漏治生即得果故。彼修所斷七地離繋唯三 T1562_.29.0652c09: 時得。謂二治生及一得果。具離八地入聖道 T1562_.29.0652c10: 者。見修位中斷有頂惑。見三諦斷離繋三時。 T1562_.29.0652c11: 謂一治生及二得果。見道諦斷離繋二時。由 T1562_.29.0652c12: 治生時即得果故。修斷八品離繋二時。謂一 T1562_.29.0652c13: 治生及一得果。第九離繋唯一時得。以治生 T1562_.29.0652c14: 時即得果故。諸分離染見修位中。進斷所餘 T1562_.29.0652c15: 准此應説。以何因證得後果時。重得先時所 T1562_.29.0652c16: 斷離繋。由至教故。謂契經中依正證得阿羅 T1562_.29.0652c17: 漢果。説如是言應如是知應如是見。彼從欲 T1562_.29.0652c18: 漏心得解脱。乃至廣説。由此位中亦得欲界。 T1562_.29.0652c19: 厭患對治等無學法智故。知彼離繋亦應重 T1562_.29.0652c20: 得前言。斷欲六品九品入見諦者。彼先修斷 T1562_.29.0652c21: 六九離繋無無漏得。爲永不得暫不得耶。應 T1562_.29.0652c22: 決定言彼永不得。豈不證得阿羅漢。時必 T1562_.29.0652c23: 得先時見修所斷。一切離繋諸無漏得。若彼 T1562_.29.0652c24: 先時所斷離繋。有無漏得今時捨者。於彼今 T1562_.29.0652c25: 應得無漏得。若先無者今時亦無。得離繋時 T1562_.29.0652c26: 唯自治起。及捨劣道得勝時故。諸有先依根 T1562_.29.0652c27: 本靜慮入見諦者。得無學時寧從欲漏心得 T1562_.29.0652c28: 解脱。就依未至入見諦者。及次第者説故無 T1562_.29.0652c29: 失。或諸證得阿羅漢者。定得無學法智品攝。 T1562_.29.0653a01: 厭患對治由此數能厭患欲界。令欲界結無 T1562_.29.0653a02: 復繋能。依此故言彼從欲漏心得解脱。由此 T1562_.29.0653a03: 即釋契經所言。阿羅漢果永斷瞋恚。就厭患 T1562_.29.0653a04: 彼説爲斷故。若爾何故引此契經。證後果時。 T1562_.29.0653a05: 得前離繋。經言從欲漏心得解脱者。有具二 T1562_.29.0653a06: 因有一因故。謂於欲離繋得。無漏得者二因 T1562_.29.0653a07: 故言心脱欲漏。一得彼無學離繋得故。二得 T1562_.29.0653a08: 彼無學厭患治故。若不得者唯由一因。故此 T1562_.29.0653a09: 契經義皆成立。此中理趣如前已*辯。復云何 T1562_.29.0653a10: 知得阿羅漢二界離繋。必捨學得得無學得 T1562_.29.0653a11: 非欲界耶。學位定應先得彼故。謂設先離無 T1562_.29.0653a12: 所有染。隨依何地入見諦時。必得二界諸見 T1562_.29.0653a13: 所斷無漏斷治。彼見所斷是一斷治頓所斷 T1562_.29.0653a14: 故。上地見道現在前時。必修未來下地道故。 T1562_.29.0653a15: 下靜慮遍能爲上斷治故。豈不已離無所有 T1562_.29.0653a16: 處染。依第三定等入見諦時。應修未來上地 T1562_.29.0653a17: 見道。同爲有頂斷對治故。不爾未離此地染 T1562_.29.0653a18: 者。即依此地入見諦時。自及上諸地見諦所 T1562_.29.0653a19: 斷。見一一諦時能頓斷故。如有未離第四定 T1562_.29.0653a20: 染。依第四定入見諦時。頓斷五地見所斷染。 T1562_.29.0653a21: 乃至未離初靜慮染。依初靜慮入見諦時。頓 T1562_.29.0653a22: 斷八地見所斷染。上地曾無斷下地故。非第 T1562_.29.0653a23: 四等與第三等。所對治法一切皆同。由是已 T1562_.29.0653a24: 離第三等染。依第三等入見諦時。雖上地能 T1562_.29.0653a25: 治自上地。而非與下所治恒同。故依下時不 T1562_.29.0653a26: 能修上。諸異生位以世俗道斷見所斷。所有 T1562_.29.0653a27: 離繋唯由下地。見道勢力於自上地無漏得 T1562_.29.0653a28: 起。謂依上地見道現前。必修未來下地見道。 T1562_.29.0653a29: 由彼勢力於下離繋。得無漏得非上地故。由 T1562_.29.0653b01: 此學位定應遍於色無色攝。見斷離繋得無 T1562_.29.0653b02: 漏得非欲理成。欲唯未至地見道所斷故。豈 T1562_.29.0653b03: 不應如第四定等。非第三等下地對治。然第 T1562_.29.0653b04: 四等見道現前。能修未來下地所攝。一切見 T1562_.29.0653b05: 道由彼道力。於諸下地見斷離繋得無漏得。 T1562_.29.0653b06: 如是根本雖非欲治。然根本地見道現前應 T1562_.29.0653b07: 修未來。未至地攝一切見道。由彼道力應於 T1562_.29.0653b08: 欲界見斷離繋得無漏得。此例不齊。見道有 T1562_.29.0653b09: 二。一欲界對治。二上界對治。欲治有三。謂斷 T1562_.29.0653b10: 對治厭患對治遠分對治。色無色治三種亦 T1562_.29.0653b11: 然。欲治三中初斷對治。唯未至攝餘通六地。 T1562_.29.0653b12: 上治三種皆通六地。然上二界斷治見道。唯 T1562_.29.0653b13: 能對治自上地染。餘治見道亦治下地。上地 T1562_.29.0653b14: 雖非下地斷治。而上見道現在前時。遍修未 T1562_.29.0653b15: 來下地見道。下與上地同所治故。無有欲界 T1562_.29.0653b16: 斷治見道。能與根本同一所治。可根本地見 T1562_.29.0653b17: 道現前。能修未來未至地攝。欲見斷法斷治 T1562_.29.0653b18: 見道。由彼道力能於欲界見斷離繋得無漏 T1562_.29.0653b19: 得故彼所引爲例不齊。諸根本地欲界厭患 T1562_.29.0653b20: 遠分對治。色無色界三種對治。見道現前還 T1562_.29.0653b21: 修未來未至地攝。如是二種三種對治非由 T1562_.29.0653b22: 未來。欲界厭遠對治力故。便於欲界見斷 T1562_.29.0653b23: 離繋得無漏得。唯斷對治力能斷繋得故諸 T1562_.29.0653b24: 先離欲。若依未至入見諦者。欲界厭患遠分 T1562_.29.0653b25: 對治。見道現前亦修未來。欲斷對治欲斷治 T1562_.29.0653b26: 地道正現在前故。由如是理非先。離欲入見 T1562_.29.0653b27: 諦者。皆於欲界見斷離繋得無漏得。諸先離 T1562_.29.0653b28: 欲入見諦者。畢竟無容於欲修斷。所有離繋 T1562_.29.0653b29: 得無漏得。以未至攝欲界修斷。斷對治收無 T1562_.29.0653c01: 漏修道。於不還果身中現前。及未來修倶非 T1562_.29.0653c02: 理故。理無容有不還果身中。有一來不還二 T1562_.29.0653c03: 向道。故諸有先離無所有染入聖道者唯除 T1562_.29.0653c04: 菩薩。餘亦定於二界一切修斷離繋得無漏 T1562_.29.0653c05: 得。彼皆必於二界修斷。自勝果道遍現前故。 T1562_.29.0653c06: 如是理趣以何證知。説聖者生第四靜慮。以 T1562_.29.0653c07: 上諸地定成樂根。及説聖者生於無色。定有 T1562_.29.0653c08: 色貪盡斷遍知得故。菩薩何縁不亦如是。不 T1562_.29.0653c09: 由加行一切功徳。能現前故如滅定等。謂聲 T1562_.29.0653c10: 聞獨覺無自在功力。能超間起諸對治道。欲 T1562_.29.0653c11: 證後道必藉前道。以爲加行方能證故。菩薩 T1562_.29.0653c12: 亦有超起功力。以於諸法相連接中。得殊勝 T1562_.29.0653c13: 智加行廣故。若爾菩薩應見道中。不起法智 T1562_.29.0653c14: 品唯起類智品。因同前故無如是事。於色無 T1562_.29.0653c15: 色蘊有無我智生。必以有執受蘊無我智爲 T1562_.29.0653c16: 先故。或初業地於法類品次第觀中。曾極串 T1562_.29.0653c17: 習後次觀苦。世第一法有苦現觀。見道續生 T1562_.29.0653c18: 一切如前任運起故。或異生位從無始來。數 T1562_.29.0653c19: 以世間有欺誑智。觀察欲色苦集滅道。故雖 T1562_.29.0653c20: 已斷欲色二界見所斷或。爲以出世無欺誑 T1562_.29.0653c21: 智重遍觀察。菩薩亦修彼對治道。諸先離染 T1562_.29.0653c22: 隨其所應。後見道生至住果位。勝果道障既 T1562_.29.0653c23: 先已除。得勝果道斯有何失。許如是義便爲 T1562_.29.0653c24: 善通。十門品説亦善安立。菩薩成下修斷無 T1562_.29.0653c25: 爲理不應然。且住果者得非果道違毘婆沙。 T1562_.29.0653c26: 非住果時未趣後果。可有已得非果道義。又 T1562_.29.0653c27: 理必然非此斷治現在前位。如何由彼能得 T1562_.29.0653c28: 未來此斷治道。又見具縛漸得果者。於後成 T1562_.29.0653c29: 就勝果道時。果所攝道必不行故。諸先離染 T1562_.29.0654a01: 至得果時。若有亦得勝果道理。彼果攝道應 T1562_.29.0654a02: 永不行。又非住有頂見道諦斷斷對治時。亦 T1562_.29.0654a03: 有得欲界諸修所斷斷對治理。又諸獲得勝 T1562_.29.0654a04: 果道時。隨應亦得諸世俗道。世出世道相繋 T1562_.29.0654a05: 屬故。若先離染隨其所應。後見道生至住果 T1562_.29.0654a06: 位。必亦獲得勝果道者。得預流時應修俗智。 T1562_.29.0654a07: 同對治故等離障故。由此我説得離繋等。符 T1562_.29.0654a08: 教順理爲善安立。即諸離繋彼彼位中。得遍 T1562_.29.0654a09: 知名隨勝立故。遍知有二。一智遍知。二斷遍 T1562_.29.0654a10: 知。智遍知者體即是慧。有説此通有漏無漏。 T1562_.29.0654a11: 有漏慧者謂除勝解作意相應。所餘世間分 T1562_.29.0654a12: 別法性。能取諸法自相共相。聞思所成及暖 T1562_.29.0654a13: 頂忍。世第一等修所成慧無漏慧者謂出世 T1562_.29.0654a14: 間。見道修道無學道慧。前有漏慧順無漏智。 T1562_.29.0654a15: 現觀性故亦名遍知。如契經説。我作如是如 T1562_.29.0654a16: 理思時。實現觀生便知老死由生故有。又言 T1562_.29.0654a17: 於一法未達未遍知。我説不能作苦邊際。非 T1562_.29.0654a18: 無漏慧遍知一切法故。智遍知亦通有漏慧。 T1562_.29.0654a19: 唯無漏慧爲智遍知。是我宗中正意所許。如 T1562_.29.0654a20: 説爲於未現觀法起現觀故。思惟取蘊非由 T1562_.29.0654a21: 聞等所成俗慧可證。得預流至阿羅漢果。説 T1562_.29.0654a22: 預流等九根得故。又轉法輪契經中説。以無 T1562_.29.0654a23: 漏慧遍知苦等。應知此即是未知當知根。然 T1562_.29.0654a24: 菩薩言實現觀生者。於世間慧假立現觀名。 T1562_.29.0654a25: 彼行相轉似現觀故。言於一法未達等者。依 T1562_.29.0654a26: 於此法若未遍知。障苦盡者密説無過。故定 T1562_.29.0654a27: 無漏慧方得遍知名。斷遍知者體即離繋。能 T1562_.29.0654a28: 遍知故名爲遍知。是智異名如何目斷。是智 T1562_.29.0654a29: 果故如業解果。謂契經説六處名業是業果 T1562_.29.0654b01: 故。又説無爲應果名解是解果故。如是遍知 T1562_.29.0654b02: *目斷無失。若爾忍果應非遍知。毘婆沙師 T1562_.29.0654b03: 作如是釋。諸忍皆是智眷屬故。於忍所作立 T1562_.29.0654b04: 智作名。如臣所爲亦名王作。有餘師釋。諸解 T1562_.29.0654b05: 脱道於所得斷。亦有功能以於斷得能任持 T1562_.29.0654b06: 故。令諸繋得不復生故。由此忍果有智果義。 T1562_.29.0654b07: 此釋不然。以説諸斷唯是諸無間道。離繋士 T1562_.29.0654b08: 用果故。或金剛喩等持相應無漏。叡智力能 T1562_.29.0654b09: 總集諸斷。無漏離繋得故。忍果爾時亦成智 T1562_.29.0654b10: 果。漸得果等得一來不還忍果。無爲已成智 T1562_.29.0654b11: 果故。許身見等三順下結。永斷無爲名智果 T1562_.29.0654b12: 故。當説餘三是智果故。爲一一斷道所得離 T1562_.29.0654b13: 繋各立一遍知。爲一切斷道所得離繋總立 T1562_.29.0654b14: 一遍知。二倶不然。以有極廣極略過故。若爾 T1562_.29.0654b15: 云何。頌曰 T1562_.29.0654b16: 斷遍知有九 欲初二斷一 T1562_.29.0654b17: 二各一合三 上界三亦爾 T1562_.29.0654b18: 餘五順下分 色一切斷三 T1562_.29.0654b19: 論曰。諸斷總立九種遍知。唯立九縁如後當 T1562_.29.0654b20: 辯。何等名曰九種遍知。且三界繋見諦所斷 T1562_.29.0654b21: 煩惱等。斷立六遍知。謂欲界繋初二部斷立 T1562_.29.0654b22: 一遍知。初二部言即顯見苦見集所斷。次二 T1562_.29.0654b23: 部斷各立一遍知。次二部言顯見滅道斷。如 T1562_.29.0654b24: 欲界三上界亦爾。謂色無色二界所繋。亦初 T1562_.29.0654b25: 二斷一二各一合三。餘三界繋修道所斷。煩 T1562_.29.0654b26: 惱等斷立三遍知。謂欲界繋修道所斷。煩惱 T1562_.29.0654b27: 等斷立一遍知。應知即是五順下分結盡遍 T1562_.29.0654b28: 知并前立故。色界所繋修道所斷。煩惱等斷 T1562_.29.0654b29: 立一遍知。應知此即是色愛盡遍知。無色界 T1562_.29.0654c01: 繋修道所斷。煩惱等斷立一遍知。即一切結 T1562_.29.0654c02: 永盡遍知。此亦并前合立一故。此三前六總 T1562_.29.0654c03: 九遍知。如見道中唯見所斷煩惱等斷得遍 T1562_.29.0654c04: 知名。如是修道中亦唯修斷不一。唯修斷二 T1562_.29.0654c05: 通見修。已説并前而建立故。當説二時集 T1562_.29.0654c06: 遍知故。若異此者則不應説。五順下分盡一 T1562_.29.0654c07: 切盡遍知。以何因縁色無色界。見斷法斷合 T1562_.29.0654c08: 立遍知。修斷斷中各別建立。如對治起而建 T1562_.29.0654c09: 立故。謂如色界諸蘊無我。無色諸蘊無我亦 T1562_.29.0654c10: 然。以彼見所斷無事同故。等非身倶故對治 T1562_.29.0654c11: 亦同。如無色中等至殊勝。色界等至則不如 T1562_.29.0654c12: 是。彼修所斷有事別故。對治不同是故別立。 T1562_.29.0654c13: 如是所立九種遍知。應*辯於中幾何道果。頌 T1562_.29.0654c14: 曰 T1562_.29.0654c15: 於中忍果六 餘三是智果 T1562_.29.0654c16: 未至果一切 根本五或八 T1562_.29.0654c17: 無色邊果一 三根本亦爾 T1562_.29.0654c18: 俗果二聖九 法智三類二 T1562_.29.0654c19: 法智品果六 類智品果五 T1562_.29.0654c20: 論曰。於此九中且應先*辯。與忍智道爲果 T1562_.29.0654c21: 差別。忍果有六謂三界繋。見斷法斷六種遍 T1562_.29.0654c22: 知。智果有三。謂順下分色愛一切結盡遍知。 T1562_.29.0654c23: 由此三遍知是修道果故。由此已*辯見修道 T1562_.29.0654c24: 果。與靜慮地爲果別者。未至靜慮果具有九。 T1562_.29.0654c25: 謂此爲依斷一切故。根本靜慮果五或八所 T1562_.29.0654c26: 言五者毘婆沙師説。根本靜慮非欲斷治故。 T1562_.29.0654c27: 所言八者尊者妙音説。根本靜慮亦欲斷治 T1562_.29.0654c28: 故。除順下分結盡遍知。以彼唯是未至果故。 T1562_.29.0654c29: 無容修彼斷對治故。中間靜慮如根本説。豈 T1562_.29.0655a01: 不依止根本慮靜。入見諦時亦修未來。依未 T1562_.29.0655a02: 至地欲斷治道。得斷治故亦應證彼。欲見斷 T1562_.29.0655a03: 法斷無漏離繋得。寧説根本唯得五果。此責 T1562_.29.0655a04: 不然。爾時所修依未至地斷對治者。唯色無 T1562_.29.0655a05: 色斷對治故。根本地道既不能爲欲斷對治。 T1562_.29.0655a06: 彼現起位如何能修欲斷治道。由彼所修未 T1562_.29.0655a07: 至斷治。唯治上界故果唯五。復云何知起餘 T1562_.29.0655a08: 對治。必不能修餘對治道宗所説故。謂於思 T1562_.29.0655a09: 擇先離色染入見諦者。至修位中色盡遍知。 T1562_.29.0655a10: 得不得處如是説故。有言既説離空處染時。 T1562_.29.0655a11: 亦修未來諸靜慮地故。豈不已説餘治修餘。 T1562_.29.0655a12: 此責不然。非誠證故。説斷空處修靜慮時。但 T1562_.29.0655a13: 修未來無色對治。非色對治爲證。豈成此乃 T1562_.29.0655a14: 證餘不修餘治。有作是説。此證倶不成。見 T1562_.29.0655a15: 修道中所修相異故。謂第四定見道現前。唯 T1562_.29.0655a16: 修未來六地見道。修道現起所修不然。又見 T1562_.29.0655a17: 道中一無間道。頓斷八地修道不然。又彼所 T1562_.29.0655a18: 修同不同分智行相異。是故見道與彼修道 T1562_.29.0655a19: 所修各別。又修道中亦有餘治現在前位修 T1562_.29.0655a20: 餘治道。如離欲時修諸類智。離色無色時修 T1562_.29.0655a21: 苦集法智故。見道位理亦應然。又根本靜慮 T1562_.29.0655a22: 亦能治欲界。如世尊言六出離依。喜爲因依 T1562_.29.0655a23: 住。便能捨離六出離依憂。乃至廣説。此捨 T1562_.29.0655a24: 離言説離欲染。非宗邊地許有喜根。由此極 T1562_.29.0655a25: 成根本靜慮能治欲界。是故根本靜慮地果 T1562_.29.0655a26: 有八遍知。此中有餘作如是斥。非不現起斷 T1562_.29.0655a27: 治道力。能引無漏離繋得生名得遍知。如沙 T1562_.29.0655a28: 門果如世俗道得二果時。雖修未來無漏斷 T1562_.29.0655a29: 治。而不名曰得沙門果。如是根本靜慮現前。 T1562_.29.0655b01: 縱修未來欲斷治道。而不由彼引離繋得。故 T1562_.29.0655b02: 不可得八遍知果。此無深理以許聖位用世 T1562_.29.0655b03: 俗道。離諸染時得無漏世俗二離繋得故。非 T1562_.29.0655b04: 俗無漏二智倶行故。由未來無漏道力能引 T1562_.29.0655b05: 無漏離繋得生。非沙門果亦不成證。安立因 T1562_.29.0655b06: 果與得無漏。離繋得理各有別故。言世俗道 T1562_.29.0655b07: 得二果時。有不名爲沙門果者。是現非彼未 T1562_.29.0655b08: 來果義。無漏斷得障得斷故。爾時必起無漏 T1562_.29.0655b09: 斷得。此無漏得亦由未來。無漏引起如何成 T1562_.29.0655b10: 證。又世俗道得二果時。亦許所得名沙門果。 T1562_.29.0655b11: 未來無漏解脱道等。亦得名爲沙門果故。謂 T1562_.29.0655b12: 世俗道得二果時。未來無漏解脱道等。障得 T1562_.29.0655b13: 斷故得皆現起。彼爲是誰沙門之果。是現未 T1562_.29.0655b14: 來沙門之果。謂世俗道現在前時。有無漏得 T1562_.29.0655b15: 名現在道。彼是此道之等流果。亦未來道之 T1562_.29.0655b16: 士用果。相應倶有因通三世故。彼以士用果 T1562_.29.0655b17: 爲其果故。諸無爲法越三世故名沙門果何 T1562_.29.0655b18: 理能遮。由此彼執根本靜慮。八遍知果其理 T1562_.29.0655b19: 還成。然實不成彼證非故。且彼所説謂第四 T1562_.29.0655b20: 定。見道現前唯修未來六地見道。修道現起 T1562_.29.0655b21: 所修異者此不成證。謂所修地雖復不同。然 T1562_.29.0655b22: 倶唯修上界治故。雖所修地少有不同。何理 T1562_.29.0655b23: 即令修餘對治。以離有頂治道起時。雖修未 T1562_.29.0655b24: 來依九地道。而不可以所修異故。即令彼能 T1562_.29.0655b25: 修餘對治。不爾彼應修世俗道。又即由此於 T1562_.29.0655b26: 見道中。雖一刹那頓斷八地。而修八地治道 T1562_.29.0655b27: 非餘。隨斷少多恒修同治。又由同分不同 T1562_.29.0655b28: 分修。見修道中修相有異。即證見道不修未 T1562_.29.0655b29: 來。餘對治道理善成立。見道所修唯同分故。 T1562_.29.0655c01: 如集等忍現在前時。雖先已得苦等忍智。非 T1562_.29.0655c02: 見集等所斷治故。於此位中不能修彼。然餘 T1562_.29.0655c03: 地道於此能修。是此位道同對治故。或見道 T1562_.29.0655c04: 位雖修未來無量功徳。而在忍位修忍非餘。 T1562_.29.0655c05: 於智位中唯能修智。如是忍智尚不互修況 T1562_.29.0655c06: 修未來。餘對治道義可成立。又修道中亦 T1562_.29.0655c07: 定無有。餘治現起修餘治義。雖諸類智離欲 T1562_.29.0655c08: 時。修離色無色時。修苦集法智。而非斷對治。 T1562_.29.0655c09: 非對治故修此何縁修由因長養。*辯智品中 T1562_.29.0655c10: 當廣顯示。又彼所引意近行經。約加行中現 T1562_.29.0655c11: 見憂喜。相對治故説亦無失。或修觀者由先 T1562_.29.0655c12: 現見。耽嗜依憂能爲逼惱。後例觀彼出離依 T1562_.29.0655c13: 憂。行既同前亦爲逼惱。遂欣初定妙喜現前。 T1562_.29.0655c14: 因此勤修斷憂治道。故説因喜能捨離憂。或 T1562_.29.0655c15: 出離依憂斷對治無間。容初靜慮妙喜現前。 T1562_.29.0655c16: 蘊此於心密説現在。出離依憂喜近能相對 T1562_.29.0655c17: 治。爲欲慰喩遭出離憂。所逼惱者令安泰故 T1562_.29.0655c18: 根本靜慮於一切種。定無能爲欲斷對治。誰 T1562_.29.0655c19: 棄樂行依苦勤修。爲欲證得三沙門果。由如 T1562_.29.0655c20: 是理毘婆沙師。説根本靜慮遍知果唯五。我 T1562_.29.0655c21: 能此中更廣決擇。恐遠本義故應且止。與 T1562_.29.0655c22: 無色地爲果別者。無色邊地果唯有一。謂依 T1562_.29.0655c23: 空處近分地道。得色愛盡遍知果故。聖依 T1562_.29.0655c24: 俗道離諸染位。所得斷果亦名遍知。以得 T1562_.29.0655c25: 無漏離繋得故。前三根本果亦唯一。謂依無 T1562_.29.0655c26: 色前三根本。得一切盡遍知果。故由此已 T1562_.29.0655c27: *辯靜慮無色。總得遍知果多少別。與俗聖 T1562_.29.0655c28: 道爲果別者。俗道果二謂俗道力。唯能獲得 T1562_.29.0655c29: 順下分盡。及色愛盡遍知果故聖道果九。謂 T1562_.29.0656a01: 聖道力乃至能越。三有頂故。應知九中二是 T1562_.29.0656a02: 共果七不共果。唯聖果故與法類智爲果別 T1562_.29.0656a03: 者。法智果三謂法智。力能斷三界修所斷故。 T1562_.29.0656a04: 類智果二。謂類智力斷色無色修所斷故。與 T1562_.29.0656a05: 法類品爲果別者。法智品果六。謂即是前法 T1562_.29.0656a06: 智法忍所得六果。類智品果五。謂即是前類 T1562_.29.0656a07: 智類忍所得五果。品言通攝智及忍故。法品 T1562_.29.0656a08: 六中四不共果。三屬法忍一屬法智。二是共 T1562_.29.0656a09: 果。謂最後二雙屬法類二種智故。類品五中 T1562_.29.0656a10: 三不共果皆屬類忍。二是共果謂最後二義 T1562_.29.0656a11: 如前釋。何縁一一道所得斷。不各各立爲一 T1562_.29.0656a12: 遍知。以永斷時説遍知故。如契經説吾今爲 T1562_.29.0656a13: 汝宣説遍知。乃至廣説。此中何等名爲遍知。 T1562_.29.0656a14: 謂貪永斷瞋永斷癡永斷。乃至廣説。説永斷 T1562_.29.0656a15: 言顯所得斷。都無隨縛方名遍知。云何名爲 T1562_.29.0656a16: 有隨縛斷。云何名爲無隨縛斷。斷具三種或 T1562_.29.0656a17: 四種縁。名無隨縛不具名有。謂或有斷雖得 T1562_.29.0656a18: 離繋得。而闕餘得故容還永捨。或復有斷餘 T1562_.29.0656a19: 得雖生。未缺堅牢生死之首。以八地染雖數 T1562_.29.0656a20: 曾離。未能缺彼故還墜惡趣獄。或復有斷雖 T1562_.29.0656a21: 亦缺彼。而餘煩惱繋縛未除。於永斷義未得 T1562_.29.0656a22: 圓滿。或復有斷餘縛亦除。而猶未能越所屬 T1562_.29.0656a23: 界。以同類惑未斷無餘。於永斷義亦未圓滿。 T1562_.29.0656a24: 如是諸斷名有隨縛。是故於彼不立遍知。唯 T1562_.29.0656a25: 九位中三四縁具。斷無隨縛可立遍知。何謂 T1562_.29.0656a26: 具縁。頌曰 T1562_.29.0656a27: 得無漏斷得 及缺第一有 T1562_.29.0656a28: 滅雙因越界 故立九遍知 T1562_.29.0656a29: 論曰。見斷法斷具三縁故便立遍知。修斷法 T1562_.29.0656b01: 斷具四縁故方立遍知。見斷法斷具三縁者。 T1562_.29.0656b02: 謂得無漏離繋得故。缺有頂故。滅雙因故。此 T1562_.29.0656b03: 中異生雖復亦有離八地染名滅雙因。而斷 T1562_.29.0656b04: 非遍知闕餘二縁故。見聖諦位第二三刹那 T1562_.29.0656b05: 諸斷。雖有無漏離繋得。餘二縁闕未立遍知。 T1562_.29.0656b06: 第四五刹那雖亦缺有頂。雙因未滅不立遍 T1562_.29.0656b07: 知。見集斷因有未滅故。集法智位欲二部斷。 T1562_.29.0656b08: 具三縁故得遍知名。後五刹那法類智位。斷 T1562_.29.0656b09: 具三縁故皆得遍知名。修斷法斷具四縁者。 T1562_.29.0656b10: 三縁如上越界第四。謂諸界中聖未越地。彼 T1562_.29.0656b11: 所得斷唯具二縁。若已越地未越界者。彼所 T1562_.29.0656b12: 得斷猶闕一縁。若越界時四縁方具。隨應彼 T1562_.29.0656b13: 斷得遍知名。豈不應五縁謂加離倶繋。有餘 T1562_.29.0656b14: 説此即滅雙因。及越界縁故不別説。若爾亦 T1562_.29.0656b15: 勿立越界縁。越界亦即滅雙因故。雙因倶繋 T1562_.29.0656b16: 雖依一物。而繋與因其義各異。謂於五部令 T1562_.29.0656b17: 起名因。即於其中能縛名繋。且苦智生集智 T1562_.29.0656b18: 未生。二部雖無互令起力。而有展轉能爲因 T1562_.29.0656b19: 性。見集斷惑縛義如本。見苦所斷縛義都無。 T1562_.29.0656b20: 故非滅雙因即是離倶繋。又不可説因義即 T1562_.29.0656b21: 繋。以無漏縁惑不繋他聚故。由此我宗二種 T1562_.29.0656b22: 倶説。今不説者但可説言。説此彼自成不可 T1562_.29.0656b23: 言無異。體義寛故且説雙因。雖諸越界位皆 T1562_.29.0656b24: 滅雙因。而滅雙因時非皆越界。故滅雙因外 T1562_.29.0656b25: 別立越界縁。滅三地雙因未立遍知故。誰成 T1562_.29.0656b26: 就幾遍知。頌曰 T1562_.29.0656b27: 住見諦位無 或成一至五 T1562_.29.0656b28: 修成六一二 無學唯成一 T1562_.29.0656b29: 論曰。異生位中雖能離染。乃至八地不成遍 T1562_.29.0656c01: 知。於聖位中依未至定入見諦者。從初乃至 T1562_.29.0656c02: 集法忍位亦無遍知。至集法智集類忍位唯 T1562_.29.0656c03: 成就一。至集類智滅法忍位便成就二。至滅 T1562_.29.0656c04: 法智滅類忍位便成就三。至滅類智道法忍 T1562_.29.0656c05: 位便成就四。至道法智道類忍位便成就五。 T1562_.29.0656c06: 依根本定入見諦者。至集類忍亦無遍知。後 T1562_.29.0656c07: 位隨應如理思擇。住修道位未離欲者。道類 T1562_.29.0656c08: 智爲初乃至未得全離欲界染。及離欲退皆 T1562_.29.0656c09: 成就六。至全離欲以離欲第九解脱道爲初。 T1562_.29.0656c10: 乃至離色界最後無間道。先離欲者從道類 T1562_.29.0656c11: 智。乃至未起色盡道前唯成一遍知。謂順下 T1562_.29.0656c12: 分盡。從色愛盡及無學位。起色纒退亦一如 T1562_.29.0656c13: 前。有色愛者從色愛永盡。先離色者從起色 T1562_.29.0656c14: 盡道。至未全離無色愛前。成下分盡色愛盡 T1562_.29.0656c15: 二。從無學退起無色纒成二遍知名。如前説 T1562_.29.0656c16: 住無學位唯成就一。謂一切結永盡遍知。若 T1562_.29.0656c17: 依根本入正決定道類智時。彼所有斷亦得 T1562_.29.0656c18: 順下分斷遍知名者。寧許根本果唯有五遍 T1562_.29.0656c19: 知。唯色無色界見斷法斷。得彼遍知名故無 T1562_.29.0656c20: 有失。何縁唯此亦得彼名。以漸次得不還果 T1562_.29.0656c21: 者。於此斷上立彼名故。又先俗道所斷下分。 T1562_.29.0656c22: 今聖道力令永不生。故彼所得斷假説爲此 T1562_.29.0656c23: 果。今實不得欲斷遍知。是故此中應作四句。 T1562_.29.0656c24: 謂若將得斷者。亦將得遍知耶。或有將得斷 T1562_.29.0656c25: 非將得遍知。謂諸位中將所得斷未於彼斷 T1562_.29.0656c26: 將立遍知。或將得遍知非將得斷。謂未離 T1562_.29.0656c27: 欲入見諦者。於集法忍正滅位中。欲界見苦 T1562_.29.0656c28: 所斷法斷。將得遍知衆縁具故。非將得斷先 T1562_.29.0656c29: 已得故。於集類忍正滅位中。二界見苦所斷 T1562_.29.0657a01: 法斷。諸先離欲若依根本入見諦者。後三類 T1562_.29.0657a02: 忍正滅位中。隨其所應彼先所斷。色無色界 T1562_.29.0657a03: 見斷法斷。彼欲見修所斷法斷。於一切位非 T1562_.29.0657a04: 將得斷先已得故。非將得遍知此非彼治故。 T1562_.29.0657a05: 若依未至入見諦者。三法類忍正滅位中。隨 T1562_.29.0657a06: 其所應彼先所斷。欲色無色見斷法斷。於修 T1562_.29.0657a07: 道位離欲界染第九無間正滅位中。三界見 T1562_.29.0657a08: 斷及欲八品修斷法斷。離第四定第九無間 T1562_.29.0657a09: 正滅位中。前三九品第四八品。先離色者 T1562_.29.0657a10: 四地九品修斷法斷。金剛喩定正滅位中。一 T1562_.29.0657a11: 切前位所斷法斷。或將得斷亦將得遍知。謂 T1562_.29.0657a12: 諸位中將所得斷。亦於彼斷將立遍知。此諸 T1562_.29.0657a13: 位言顯無間道。自所斷法斷將得遍知名。如 T1562_.29.0657a14: 未離欲入見諦者。於集法忍正滅位中。欲界 T1562_.29.0657a15: 見集所斷法斷。於集類忍正滅位中。二界見 T1562_.29.0657a16: 集所斷法斷。如是乃至於道類忍正滅位中。 T1562_.29.0657a17: 二界見道所斷法斷。諸先離染入見諦者如 T1562_.29.0657a18: 應當思。修道位中於離欲界。第四靜慮有 T1562_.29.0657a19: 頂染時。第九無間所斷法斷。或非將得斷非 T1562_.29.0657a20: 將得遍知。謂除如前所説諸相。何故不還阿 T1562_.29.0657a21: 羅漢果。總集諸斷立一遍知。頌曰 T1562_.29.0657a22: 越界得果故 二處集遍知 T1562_.29.0657a23: 論曰。具二縁故於所得斷。總集建立爲一遍 T1562_.29.0657a24: 知。一者越界。二者得果。所言集者是合一 T1562_.29.0657a25: 義。若於無色分離染故得預流果。全離染故 T1562_.29.0657a26: 得阿羅漢。若於欲界分離染故得一來果。全 T1562_.29.0657a27: 離染故得不還果。若於色界分離全離倶不 T1562_.29.0657a28: 得果。唯於二處具足二縁。謂得果時亦即越 T1562_.29.0657a29: 界故。阿羅漢及不還果。集所得斷立一遍知。 T1562_.29.0657b01: 爾時總起一味得故。餘二果時得雖一味而 T1562_.29.0657b02: 未越界。色愛盡時雖是越界無一味得故。於 T1562_.29.0657b03: 彼位不集遍知。要具二縁方總集故。誰捨誰 T1562_.29.0657b04: 得幾種遍知。頌曰 T1562_.29.0657b05: 捨一二五六 得亦然除五 T1562_.29.0657b06: 論曰。言捨一者謂從無學及色愛盡。全離欲 T1562_.29.0657b07: 退。言捨二者謂諸不還。從色愛盡起欲纒退。 T1562_.29.0657b08: 及彼獲得阿羅漢時。諸先離欲依根本定。入 T1562_.29.0657b09: 見諦者道類忍時。言捨五者經主釋言。謂先 T1562_.29.0657b10: 離欲道類智位。此但應説道類忍時。道類智 T1562_.29.0657b11: 時彼已捨故。夫言得捨據將説故。又應簡言 T1562_.29.0657b12: 依未至定入見諦者。若依根本入見諦者。於 T1562_.29.0657b13: 欲界斷不得無漏離繋得故。不得欲界見斷 T1562_.29.0657b14: 法斷三種遍知。非先不得可言今捨。言捨六 T1562_.29.0657b15: 者謂未離欲所有聖者。得不還時。得亦然者 T1562_.29.0657b16: 謂有得一得二得六。言得一者謂勝進位。集 T1562_.29.0657b17: 類忍等九種位中。及從無色起色纒退。言 T1562_.29.0657b18: 得二者。謂從無學起無色界諸纒退時。言得 T1562_.29.0657b19: 六者。謂不還退無得五者理無容故。謂先離 T1562_.29.0657b20: 欲依未至定入見諦者。道類忍時捨五遍知 T1562_.29.0657b21: 得不還果。此果若退可得五遍知。此退既無 T1562_.29.0657b22: 故無容得五。豈不勝進得聖果時。於諸無爲 T1562_.29.0657b23: 更起勝得乍可名得。寧捨遍知約斷實然恒 T1562_.29.0657b24: 成就故。但今且據九遍知中。若得異名本名 T1562_.29.0657b25: 便失。説名爲捨亦無有過 T1562_.29.0657b26: *説一切有部順正理論*卷第五十六 T1562_.29.0657b27: T1562_.29.0657b28: T1562_.29.0657b29: T1562_.29.0657c01: T1562_.29.0657c02: T1562_.29.0657c03: T1562_.29.0657c04: 尊者衆賢造 T1562_.29.0657c05: *三藏法師玄奘奉 詔譯 T1562_.29.0657c06: *辯賢聖品第六之一 T1562_.29.0657c07: 如是已辯隨眠等性。雖有無量。總建立爲三 T1562_.29.0657c08: 界五部隨眠等斷。隨所繋事雖亦無量。就勝 T1562_.29.0657c09: 位立九種遍知。然斷必由道力故得。此所由 T1562_.29.0657c10: 道其相云何。頌曰 T1562_.29.0657c11: 已説煩惱斷 由見諦修故 T1562_.29.0657c12: 見道唯無漏 修道通二種 T1562_.29.0657c13: 論曰。世尊唯説煩惱有二。一見所斷。二修 T1562_.29.0657c14: 所斷。如契經言諸漏有二。謂有諸漏是見所 T1562_.29.0657c15: 斷。或有諸漏是修所斷。然諸論中開二爲五。 T1562_.29.0657c16: 即五所斷如先已説。先何處説。謂先頌言欲 T1562_.29.0657c17: 見苦等斷十七七八四。彼二頌中已具分 T1562_.29.0657c18: 別。然就略攝唯二如經。斷彼但由見修道故。 T1562_.29.0657c19: 道唯無漏亦有漏耶。見道應知唯是無漏。修 T1562_.29.0657c20: 道通二此中問答。倶不應説前已説故。謂前 T1562_.29.0657c21: 説忍所害隨眠。有頂地攝唯見斷等。彼言已 T1562_.29.0657c22: 顯有頂見修所斷隨眠。如其次第唯聖見道。 T1562_.29.0657c23: 修道所斷下八地攝。見斷隨眠聖見道斷凡 T1562_.29.0657c24: 修道斷。修斷聖凡倶修道斷。既説見道唯依 T1562_.29.0657c25: 聖身。豈不已成唯是無漏。既説修道通依凡 T1562_.29.0657c26: 聖身。豈不已成通有漏無漏。是則今説義不 T1562_.29.0657c27: 異前。由此不應造頌再説。説已復説成無用 T1562_.29.0657c28: 故。所説見道唯無漏因。謂一刹那斷九品故。 T1562_.29.0657c29: 此因非證有漏亦能一刹那中斷五部故豈能 T1562_.29.0658a01: 頓斷便無漏攝。如向所言由見諦故。此所見 T1562_.29.0658a02: 諦其相云何。頌曰 T1562_.29.0658a03: 諦四名已説 謂苦集滅道 T1562_.29.0658a04: 彼自體亦然 次第隨現觀 T1562_.29.0658a05: 論曰。佛於經中説諦有四。一苦二集三滅四 T1562_.29.0658a06: 道。於此論中亦先已説。於何處説謂初品中。 T1562_.29.0658a07: 分別有漏無漏法處。彼如何説謂彼頌言。及 T1562_.29.0658a08: 苦集世間此説苦集諦。擇滅謂離繋此説滅 T1562_.29.0658a09: 諦。無漏謂聖道此説道諦。如是彼處已顯諦 T1562_.29.0658a10: 名。應知彼文亦已顯體。謂除聖道餘有爲法。 T1562_.29.0658a11: 爲果性邊皆名苦諦。爲因性邊皆名集諦。物 T1562_.29.0658a12: 雖無異數分無失。依彼建立現觀位中。諸忍 T1562_.29.0658a13: 智等行相別故。如四正斷出離尋等。擇滅無 T1562_.29.0658a14: 爲名爲滅諦。學無學法皆名道諦。有説名色 T1562_.29.0658a15: 名爲苦諦。以五取蘊爲其體故。唯業煩惱名 T1562_.29.0658a16: 爲集諦。由煩惱力能繋縛心。令屬餘趣由業 T1562_.29.0658a17: 力故。能令自體差別而生。唯煩惱滅名爲滅 T1562_.29.0658a18: 諦。由煩惱滅故於色等解脱。唯觀與止名爲 T1562_.29.0658a19: 道諦。此二攝受諸聖道故。此非諦相別意説 T1562_.29.0658a20: 故。謂説法者爲應時機。勝解堪能分位差別。 T1562_.29.0658a21: 依別意趣密作是言。非謂此文依諦相説。善 T1562_.29.0658a22: 對法者勿執此文。有餘復言唯八苦相。是苦 T1562_.29.0658a23: 是苦諦除此所餘。諸有漏法是苦非苦諦。唯 T1562_.29.0658a24: 順後有愛是集是集諦。餘愛餘有漏是集非 T1562_.29.0658a25: 集諦。唯順後有愛。滅是滅是滅諦。餘愛餘有 T1562_.29.0658a26: 漏滅是滅非滅諦。唯有學八道支是道是道 T1562_.29.0658a27: 諦。餘有學無學全是道非道諦。此説違教及 T1562_.29.0658a28: 違正理。經説有漏法皆是苦諦故。謂諸有漏 T1562_.29.0658a29: 皆取蘊攝。佛説取蘊名爲苦諦。云何知然。略 T1562_.29.0658b01: 説一切五取蘊苦契經説故。又説有苦非苦諦 T1562_.29.0658b02: 言於理有闕相無別故。又彼何縁不作是執。 T1562_.29.0658b03: 有眼等是色非色蘊。有青等是色非色處。然 T1562_.29.0658b04: 此倶名身非身。念住境既不可爾故理有闕。 T1562_.29.0658b05: 又愛非苦諦與至教相違。如説云何苦滅聖 T1562_.29.0658b06: 諦。謂即諸愛究竟斷盡。非愛自性苦諦不攝。 T1562_.29.0658b07: 可愛斷盡名苦滅諦。若謂諸愛是衆苦因故。 T1562_.29.0658b08: 愛斷盡時説衆苦皆滅此亦無失。許殊勝苦 T1562_.29.0658b09: 得永斷時衆苦滅故。如取蘊一分得永斷盡 T1562_.29.0658b10: 時。可説一切取蘊皆滅。如説於色應斷貪欲。 T1562_.29.0658b11: 貪欲斷時便名色斷。乃至於識説亦如是。復 T1562_.29.0658b12: 有何理決定説愛非苦諦攝。若謂經言是集 T1562_.29.0658b13: 故者有太過失。如説道諦名趣苦滅。應不能 T1562_.29.0658b14: 斷集執義如言故。又詳至教意愛亦苦諦攝。 T1562_.29.0658b15: 如契經中問見諦者。汝於眼觸所生諸愛。復 T1562_.29.0658b16: 等隨觀見爲我我所不。彼便答言不爾大徳。 T1562_.29.0658b17: 又伽他言未如實見苦便見彼爲我。乃至廣 T1562_.29.0658b18: 説。頌顯身見唯見苦所斷。前經顯愛爲身見 T1562_.29.0658b19: 所縁。故知契經意許愛苦諦攝。又説愛之集 T1562_.29.0658b20: 應如實了知。若愛定非苦諦攝者。則愛唯是 T1562_.29.0658b21: 苦果之集。如何復勸知愛之因。愛既有因 T1562_.29.0658b22: 故亦是果。既亦是果亦苦諦攝。故有漏法爲 T1562_.29.0658b23: 果性邊。皆是苦諦理善成立。諸有漏法爲因 T1562_.29.0658b24: 性邊。皆集諦攝非唯是愛。以契經説是應斷 T1562_.29.0658b25: 故。謂世尊言集諦應斷。復作是説苾芻當知。 T1562_.29.0658b26: 若有於色乃至於識。未達未遍知未斷未離 T1562_.29.0658b27: 染。彼定不能永盡衆苦。既於五蘊皆説斷 T1562_.29.0658b28: 言。故非唯愛是集諦攝。此非誠證以愛斷時 T1562_.29.0658b29: 假於色等説斷言故。如説於色應斷貪欲。貪 T1562_.29.0658c01: 欲斷時便名色斷。乃至於識説亦如是。此是 T1562_.29.0658c02: 誠證所以者何。愛雖行蘊攝而是集諦故。豈 T1562_.29.0658c03: 説於行應斷貪欲。便謂愛體非集諦收故。雖 T1562_.29.0658c04: 於彼説應斷貪色等無妨是集諦攝。又應斷 T1562_.29.0658c05: 言無簡別故。謂色等蘊若自體斷。若於彼 T1562_.29.0658c06: 體能縁愛斷。皆可於彼説應斷言。契經復言 T1562_.29.0658c07: 集諦應斷。故五取蘊爲因性邊。皆集諦攝法 T1562_.29.0658c08: 相似故。又説眼等是因性故。如經説眼爲因 T1562_.29.0658c09: 色爲縁生眼識。眼識既是苦諦自性。所言因 T1562_.29.0658c10: 者是集異名。義准識因是集諦攝由此證眼 T1562_.29.0658c11: 等是集諦理成。又於一物説苦集故。謂契經 T1562_.29.0658c12: 言生等是苦。復言生集故老死集。又契經説 T1562_.29.0658c13: 如實了知。此是老死此老死集。故知苦集一 T1562_.29.0658c14: 物分二。不可説言此經所説。雖名苦集非苦 T1562_.29.0658c15: 集諦。此依異門説聖諦故。謂此經文前作是 T1562_.29.0658c16: 説。如實知苦知苦集等。次彼尊者大倶祉羅 T1562_.29.0658c17: 作是問言。唯舍利子更有異門説聖諦不。彼 T1562_.29.0658c18: 答言有。謂如實知此是老死。老死集等此中 T1562_.29.0658c19: 雖闕説聖諦聲。而乘前言知説聖諦。於此文 T1562_.29.0658c20: 後彼復問言。齊何名爲諸聖弟子。於此正法 T1562_.29.0658c21: 毘柰耶中。正見神通皆得圓滿成就正見乃 T1562_.29.0658c22: 至廣説非聖弟子。離見聖諦可於正法毘柰 T1562_.29.0658c23: 耶中。正見神通得圓滿等。故知於此意説聖 T1562_.29.0658c24: 諦。又若不説是聖諦言。便非聖諦有太過失。 T1562_.29.0658c25: 謂契經説於苦無知。如是乃至於道無知。非 T1562_.29.0658c26: 此中闕説聖諦聲。便謂無知不迷聖諦。於諦 T1562_.29.0658c27: 現觀無爲障能。若爾彼無知應非見諦斷。又 T1562_.29.0658c28: 契經説知苦并因。此中雖無聖諦言説。而此 T1562_.29.0658c29: 非不説見苦集聖諦。又契經言彼見諸諦。見 T1562_.29.0659a01: 諸諦故名現觀者。此雖説諦不説聖言。而 T1562_.29.0659a02: 彼定名見聖諦者。又於餘經見有此例謂如 T1562_.29.0659a03: 有處具説欲貪。有餘處但言由欲往諸趣。雖 T1562_.29.0659a04: 闕貪想知即欲貪故。闕聖諦言亦知説聖諦。 T1562_.29.0659a05: 由此於一物説苦集。故集諦。非唯愛其理 T1562_.29.0659a06: 極成。又於食等説有二故。謂契經説諸聖弟 T1562_.29.0659a07: 子。如實知食及知食集。廣説乃至。云何名 T1562_.29.0659a08: 爲如實知食。謂食有四廣説乃至。如是名爲 T1562_.29.0659a09: 如實知食。云何名爲如實知食集。謂愛後有 T1562_.29.0659a10: 愛喜倶行愛。彼彼喜愛廣説乃至。齊此名爲 T1562_.29.0659a11: 諸聖弟子。於此正法毘柰耶中。正見神通得 T1562_.29.0659a12: 圓滿等。食既如苦諦説愛等爲因。由此證知 T1562_.29.0659a13: 食亦苦諦。復有經説食是苦集。如説衆苦皆 T1562_.29.0659a14: 由食生。又如經言食集故身集。觸集故受集。 T1562_.29.0659a15: 非身及受非苦諦攝。既於一物説苦苦因。故 T1562_.29.0659a16: 知取蘊皆是集諦。經何唯説愛爲集諦。依別 T1562_.29.0659a17: 意趣故作是説。謂契經説喜倶行愛。喜即是 T1562_.29.0659a18: 愛理定無有愛與愛倶。故知此經以愛聲説。 T1562_.29.0659a19: 愛倶取蘊理必應爾。現見餘經有非彼體説 T1562_.29.0659a20: 爲彼故。謂契經言依愛斷愛。此於善法欲説 T1562_.29.0659a21: 以愛聲。又契經言離愛離熱。此於觸一分説 T1562_.29.0659a22: 以愛聲。此中於渇説愛名故。又契經言愛増 T1562_.29.0659a23: 爲取。又經説業以愛爲因。此二經愛名説一 T1562_.29.0659a24: 切煩惱。然契經説起四種愛。此經但以愛聲 T1562_.29.0659a25: 説貪。經説愛聲義非一故。執經説愛爲集諦 T1562_.29.0659a26: 言。謂唯目貪非爲善説。又此經説定有別 T1562_.29.0659a27: 意。以伽他説業愛無明皆能爲因。招後諸行 T1562_.29.0659a28: 一切煩惱。皆能爲因招後有故。愛聲通説一 T1562_.29.0659a29: 切煩惱非唯*目貪。由此證知喜倶行愛非即 T1562_.29.0659b01: *目愛。後更當辯。復有契經證成此義。謂佛 T1562_.29.0659b02: 於彼有因有縁。有緒經中説業因愛。餘經 T1562_.29.0659b03: 復説一切煩惱皆是業因。以契經言取縁有 T1562_.29.0659b04: 故知前説業愛爲因縁。愛聲通詮一切煩 T1562_.29.0659b05: 惱。譬如經説無明縁行。故非唯愛是集諦攝 T1562_.29.0659b06: 理必應爾。以世尊告西膩迦言。我昔與今 T1562_.29.0659b07: 皆定施設。慢類爲苦慢即是集。若謂如上所 T1562_.29.0659b08: 引契經。非五取蘊皆名集諦。故於所立爲證 T1562_.29.0659b09: 不成。此亦不然遮汝所許我義成故。謂所引 T1562_.29.0659b10: 經證諸煩惱。皆是集諦遮汝所許。集諦唯攝 T1562_.29.0659b11: 順後有愛。既遮汝義我宗所説。諸有漏法爲 T1562_.29.0659b12: 因性邊。皆是集諦無能遮止。故上所引爲證 T1562_.29.0659b13: 理成。設許彼經愛唯説愛亦無有失。於招後 T1562_.29.0659b14: 有愛爲勝因就勝説故。謂愛最是不厭有因。 T1562_.29.0659b15: 以愛力能莊飾諸有。令成種種美妙相故。如 T1562_.29.0659b16: 密怨敵現相詐親。令諸有情不見其過。諸有 T1562_.29.0659b17: 情類愛行最多。愛力能令難趣離欲。故於招 T1562_.29.0659b18: 有愛是勝因。以愛爲因力能引起。不別離欲 T1562_.29.0659b19: 和合欲故。法爾力能違逆解脱。故於宣説衆 T1562_.29.0659b20: 苦因時。爲令有情見彼過失。就勝説彼以爲 T1562_.29.0659b21: 集諦。非謂所餘異彼相法無集諦性。若但如 T1562_.29.0659b22: 文而作解者有太過失。或由此故其義亦成。 T1562_.29.0659b23: 謂契經説。愛集故苦集愛集即無明。故契 T1562_.29.0659b24: 經言。云何爲愛因謂即無明。是既説苦集即 T1562_.29.0659b25: 是愛因。應但無明爲集諦性。或即執愛爲愛 T1562_.29.0659b26: 集者。豈非即苦亦是苦因。由此便成即於一 T1562_.29.0659b27: 物。由因果別立苦集諦。又契經言。受集故愛 T1562_.29.0659b28: 集。觸集故受集。豈非愛受亦苦亦集。由此苦 T1562_.29.0659b29: 集非物故異。是故一切有漏五蘊。爲因性邊 T1562_.29.0659c01: 皆集諦攝。上座於此意謂不然。由契經中無 T1562_.29.0659c02: 此説故。説苦應知集應斷故。謂廣分別聖諦 T1562_.29.0659c03: 經中。曾不説言五種取蘊。皆集諦攝唯説是 T1562_.29.0659c04: 愛。又薄伽梵明二諦別説苦應知説集應斷。 T1562_.29.0659c05: 是故唯愛是集諦攝。又諸無學者後有不續 T1562_.29.0659c06: 故。謂阿羅漢有五取蘊。有苦集故應續後有。 T1562_.29.0659c07: 然無是事故知唯愛。是集諦攝非餘取蘊此 T1562_.29.0659c08: 雖有語而實無義。言契經中無此説者。且不 T1562_.29.0659c09: 應理違自宗故。謂彼上座自作是言。苦因理 T1562_.29.0659c10: 通一切煩惱。以愛勝故説愛非餘。非契經 T1562_.29.0659c11: 中辯聖諦處。説諸煩惱皆是苦因但作是言 T1562_.29.0659c12: 愛爲集諦。故彼所説唯率己情。若謂餘經説 T1562_.29.0659c13: 餘煩惱。是集性故知諸煩惱。皆是苦因並集 T1562_.29.0659c14: 諦攝。但就勝故説愛非餘。豈不所言經不説 T1562_.29.0659c15: 故。唯愛是集言有義空。又非此經不説取 T1562_.29.0659c16: 蘊。愛聲通顯諸有漏故。此前已説後更當辯。 T1562_.29.0659c17: 故彼所言空無有義。又彼所説應知應斷。二 T1562_.29.0659c18: 諦別者理亦不然。二諦倶通由此成故。謂契 T1562_.29.0659c19: 經説五種取蘊。一切應斷前已顯成。既説皆 T1562_.29.0659c20: 是苦諦所攝。故非苦集由物故異。又佛於苦 T1562_.29.0659c21: 亦説斷言。謂説世醫拔毒箭者。不能了達 T1562_.29.0659c22: 一切世間。生爲本苦永斷良藥。廣説乃至。唯 T1562_.29.0659c23: 有諸佛究竟了達。一切世間生爲本苦永斷 T1562_.29.0659c24: 良藥。又經説苦滅滅是斷異名。又應知言亦 T1562_.29.0659c25: 通集諦。經説衆苦盡由遍知法。故由此不應 T1562_.29.0659c26: 就應知斷。辯苦集諦二相差別。言諸無學者 T1562_.29.0659c27: 後有不續。故證知唯愛是集諦者。理亦不然 T1562_.29.0659c28: 餘因闕故。後有不續猶如愛等。謂如經中説 T1562_.29.0659c29: 受縁愛。諸阿羅漢非無有受。但餘縁闕故 T1562_.29.0660a01: 愛不生又如經中説。眼及色爲因縁故眼識 T1562_.29.0660a02: 得生。而或有時雖有眼色餘縁闕故眼識不 T1562_.29.0660a03: 生。應知此中理趣亦爾。馬鳴尊者亦作是言。 T1562_.29.0660a04: 煩惱業身能取後有。爲因引發後有續生。設 T1562_.29.0660a05: 壞業身後有難絶。若煩惱闕後有便無。要闕 T1562_.29.0660a06: 能趣因生身方盡故。如闕種子有地無苗。又 T1562_.29.0660a07: 契經言識爲種子。業爲因故後有得生。非 T1562_.29.0660a08: 應果身無識無業。是故不必因皆無故。方令 T1562_.29.0660a09: 後果不相續生。應果身中雖有眼等。餘因闕 T1562_.29.0660a10: 故後有不續。有作是言。現世諸蘊展轉力生。 T1562_.29.0660a11: 故但可互爲縁。要由彼力令識種子住後有 T1562_.29.0660a12: 田方名集諦。此亦非理除愛餘法亦後有因。 T1562_.29.0660a13: 契經説故如契經説。一類有情餘慢未斷未 T1562_.29.0660a14: 遍知故。彼類便作生般涅槃。又契經説。若有 T1562_.29.0660a15: 於慢未現觀。是慢我記有後生。又説無明愛 T1562_.29.0660a16: 結覆繋。愚夫智者同感有身。又契經言諸有 T1562_.29.0660a17: 情類種種非一。衆多苦生皆欲爲因。乃至廣 T1562_.29.0660a18: 説。又愚癡類愛樂諸有。由愛久處生死瀑 T1562_.29.0660a19: 流。是則無明爲生死本。乍可唯説彼爲集諦。 T1562_.29.0660a20: 不應唯愛是集諦體。或復何縁定知唯愛。能 T1562_.29.0660a21: 續後有非諸惑耶。若謂唯愛名順後有。非餘 T1562_.29.0660a22: 法者理亦不然先已説故。先何所説。謂先説 T1562_.29.0660a23: 愛聲説一切煩惱。通説餘法理亦如前。又業 T1562_.29.0660a24: 亦能招感後有。亦順後有寧唯説愛。若謂唯 T1562_.29.0660a25: 愛所引發業能感後有。理亦不然。一切煩惱 T1562_.29.0660a26: 所引發業。無不能爲後有因故。以契經説無 T1562_.29.0660a27: 明縁行。許此無明聲總説諸惑故。或愛亦 T1562_.29.0660a28: 由無明引發。方有勢力能續後有。經説無明 T1562_.29.0660a29: 爲愛因故。乍可集諦唯是無明。無明總爲諸 T1562_.29.0660b01: 有本故。由此爲證非唯愛力。令識種子住後 T1562_.29.0660b02: 有因。故不應言集諦唯愛。又應責彼有漏法 T1562_.29.0660b03: 中。何縁唯執愛爲集諦。若是煩惱故瞋等何 T1562_.29.0660b04: 不然。若通三界故慢等何不然。若牽後有故 T1562_.29.0660b05: 業行何不然。如契經言。若造福行便能引起 T1562_.29.0660b06: 隨福行識非福不動。廣説亦然。若希求相故 T1562_.29.0660b07: 何縁不説欲。若説爲集故何不説食等。若執 T1562_.29.0660b08: 取性故何非身見等。如是餘法亦有彼相。而 T1562_.29.0660b09: 執集諦唯是愛者。但由於經闕觀察智。又未 T1562_.29.0660b10: 曾見有處決定。説集諦唯是續後有因愛。豈 T1562_.29.0660b11: 不經説後有愛言。雖爾不言此愛唯是。能令 T1562_.29.0660b12: 後有相續因性。如説云何如實知食集。謂愛 T1562_.29.0660b13: 後有愛。乃至廣説。非引段食名續後有。是故 T1562_.29.0660b14: 知此後有愛言。爲簡別前非續後有。謂薄伽 T1562_.29.0660b15: 梵觀所化宜。且以愛聲顯集諦體。然於多法 T1562_.29.0660b16: 皆有愛聲。爲簡所餘説後有愛。謂若有愛未 T1562_.29.0660b17: 永斷時。後有可生方名集諦。是此經義非續 T1562_.29.0660b18: 後有。豈不但説喜倶行愛。彼彼喜愛足能簡 T1562_.29.0660b19: 別。皆許無失彼此同故。謂如唯執續後有因 T1562_.29.0660b20: 愛。名集諦論者。後有愛言已能簡餘愛。復説 T1562_.29.0660b21: 餘重簡我宗亦然不應爲難。或愛是總後有 T1562_.29.0660b22: 愛言簡取無明及一果法。以後有愛聲説無 T1562_.29.0660b23: 明等。故後有愛聲亦容通説一切煩惱。或取 T1562_.29.0660b24: 蘊故。未了今説何等無明。故次復言喜倶行 T1562_.29.0660b25: 愛。即是意地貪相應義。意貪名喜有分別故 T1562_.29.0660b26: 彼彼意愛。謂於諸境或於自體起差別貪。此 T1562_.29.0660b27: 中貪名通目一切貪倶生品。爲欲建立貪等 T1562_.29.0660b28: 行倶有差別故。由此與彼相應無明。亦得説 T1562_.29.0660b29: 名彼彼喜愛。故薄伽梵隨所化宜。以別意説 T1562_.29.0660c01: 愛爲集諦。不應隨名便興固執。謂集諦唯 T1562_.29.0660c02: 是續後有因愛。有言聖道爲苦三縁聖道現 T1562_.29.0660c03: 前。亦能長養諸根大種應集諦攝。此亦不然。 T1562_.29.0660c04: 以諸聖道力能永斷衆苦道故。非能畢竟斷 T1562_.29.0660c05: 苦道法。可名苦集義相違故。又若彼是此集 T1562_.29.0660c06: 離彼法此不生。聖道雖無而苦恒起。故知聖 T1562_.29.0660c07: 道定非苦集。又不可説苦是聖道等流。謂等 T1562_.29.0660c08: 流言顯因同類。有漏無漏類既有別。爲因非 T1562_.29.0660c09: 同類爲果非等流。故不應言聖道是集。又非 T1562_.29.0660c10: 聖道是長養因。然聖道現前根大長養者。道 T1562_.29.0660c11: 能遮止損害縁故。今彼自類前爲勝因。後果 T1562_.29.0660c12: 轉増名爲長養。由此聖道定非集諦。故唯有 T1562_.29.0660c13: 漏爲因性邊。皆集諦攝理得成就。契經所説 T1562_.29.0660c14: 業爲生因。愛爲起因斯有何義。謂於後有差 T1562_.29.0660c15: 別芽生。業能爲因如所殖種。愛非愛異熟 T1562_.29.0660c16: 隨業差別故。若於後有無別芽生。愛能爲因 T1562_.29.0660c17: 如能潤水。愛潤諸後有令無別起故。如稻等 T1562_.29.0660c18: 芽隨自類種故有差別。諸芽無別皆得滋長 T1562_.29.0660c19: 由水爲因。應知二因義別如是理必應許愛 T1562_.29.0660c20: 爲起因見有愛者後有起故。謂有愛離愛二 T1562_.29.0660c21: 倶命終。唯見有愛者後有更起。由此理證愛 T1562_.29.0660c22: 爲起因。起有起無定隨愛故。又世現見有希 T1562_.29.0660c23: 求者能攝受故。謂世現見有所希求便能攝 T1562_.29.0660c24: 受。於現既爾於當亦然。必希求爲因能攝受 T1562_.29.0660c25: 後世。若於後有愛必馳趣於彼。故知愛體 T1562_.29.0660c26: 能爲後因。何縁證知有離愛者。現見可盡法 T1562_.29.0660c27: 由因永盡故。謂見水等與火等合。漸減漸微 T1562_.29.0660c28: 乃至都盡。又見數習不淨觀等。貪等漸減善 T1562_.29.0660c29: 法漸増。由此比知無漏智火。至極盛位愛等 T1562_.29.0661a01: 永亡。是故證知有離愛者。有餘師説。愛非愛 T1562_.29.0661a02: 境現在前時。諸根凝寂不變異者是離愛相。 T1562_.29.0661a03: 如不見有風等所生。變異相者比知無病。又 T1562_.29.0661a04: 如闇壞及了境時。知日輪出及諸根有。如是 T1562_.29.0661a05: 行者雖處闇中。身語意業亦清淨者。應比知 T1562_.29.0661a06: 彼必已離愛。心懷過者若處闇中。諸根定應 T1562_.29.0661a07: 有變異故。又如遊履所未行處。離能引導 T1562_.29.0661a08: 及所策杖。盲者定應不正失路。遙觀彼相知 T1562_.29.0661a09: 彼定盲。如是心中懷過失者。身語意業必不 T1562_.29.0661a10: 清淨。諸根定應有變異轉。善比量者於他相 T1562_.29.0661a11: 續。可如是比知離愛未離愛。如是唯有對法 T1562_.29.0661a12: 者宗。辯集諦體理善成立。彼立滅諦亦不應 T1562_.29.0661a13: 理。諸煩惱等滅皆寂靜相故等。寂靜相有滅 T1562_.29.0661a14: 是滅諦。有滅非滅諦。理不成故由此不應作 T1562_.29.0661a15: 如是説。順後有愛滅是滅諦非餘。由此應知 T1562_.29.0661a16: 諸有漏斷。皆是滅諦理善成立。言唯有學八 T1562_.29.0661a17: 聖道支。名爲道諦亦不應理。説一切善法皆 T1562_.29.0661a18: 聖諦攝故。如契經言所有善法。一切攝在四 T1562_.29.0661a19: 聖諦中。由此彼應許除有學八道支外。所有 T1562_.29.0661a20: 聖道亦道諦攝。或非善性。又應已見四聖諦 T1562_.29.0661a21: 者。猶未獲得佛證淨故。以於道諦得現觀時。 T1562_.29.0661a22: 許未現觀無學道故。由此已見四聖諦者。有 T1562_.29.0661a23: 未獲得佛證淨失。縁佛信根猶未得故。又道 T1562_.29.0661a24: 皆有道等相故。謂餘有學無學聖道。若趣生 T1562_.29.0661a25: 死應非無漏。若趣涅槃應道諦攝。若倶不趣 T1562_.29.0661a26: 應不名道。如何彼乃言是道非道諦。是故一 T1562_.29.0661a27: 切學無學道。皆道諦收理善成立。若謂無學 T1562_.29.0661a28: 不能滅苦。如何説是苦滅道攝此難不然。道 T1562_.29.0661a29: 相既等於苦亦有滅功能故。然已滅故不勞 T1562_.29.0661b01: 更滅。非無學道無滅功能。又對治道有多種 T1562_.29.0661b02: 故。由此契經言。不動心解脱珍寶具足能捨 T1562_.29.0661b03: 不善。即由此故諸無學者。修習正斷亦無有 T1562_.29.0661b04: 失。是故最初立諦爲勝。因前果後理數必然。 T1562_.29.0661b05: 由此定應列諦名處。苦居集後道在滅前。何 T1562_.29.0661b06: 故此中果前因後。隨現觀位次第而説。謂隨 T1562_.29.0661b07: 行者現觀位中。前觀前説後觀後説。然或有 T1562_.29.0661b08: 法説次隨生如念住等。或復有法説次隨便 T1562_.29.0661b09: 如正勝等。謂此中無決定理趣。發勤精進先 T1562_.29.0661b10: 斷已生。後遮未生但隨言便。所應斷法已生 T1562_.29.0661b11: 易施設非未生。所應修法未生易施設非已 T1562_.29.0661b12: 生。斷必自麁修必從細。言隨此便故作是説。 T1562_.29.0661b13: 何縁現觀次第必然。加行位中如是觀故。何 T1562_.29.0661b14: 縁加行必如是觀。謂若有法最爲逼惱。修加 T1562_.29.0661b15: 行位理應先觀。次求彼因次求彼脱。後應求 T1562_.29.0661b16: 彼解脱方便。譬如良醫先觀病者。所患病状 T1562_.29.0661b17: 次尋其因。次思病愈後求良藥。故契經言夫 T1562_.29.0661b18: 醫王者。謂具四徳能拔毒箭。一善知病状。二 T1562_.29.0661b19: 善知病因。三善知病愈。四善知良藥。如來 T1562_.29.0661b20: 亦爾爲大醫王。如實了知苦集滅道。故加行 T1562_.29.0661b21: 位依此次觀。現觀位中觀次亦爾。由加行力 T1562_.29.0661b22: 所引發故。如縱心誦先所誦文。故列聖諦名 T1562_.29.0661b23: 隨現觀次第。現等覺故立現觀名。正覺所縁 T1562_.29.0661b24: 故唯無漏。此覺眞淨故得正名。此聖諦名爲 T1562_.29.0661b25: 目何義。經言聖者諦故得聖諦名。此義意 T1562_.29.0661b26: 言。唯諸聖者於四諦理。能如實見無有虚妄。 T1562_.29.0661b27: 非聖相違故理雖通而名聖諦。依如是義故 T1562_.29.0661b28: 有頌言 T1562_.29.0661b29: 聖者説是樂 非聖説爲苦 T1562_.29.0661c01: 聖者説爲苦 非聖説是樂 T1562_.29.0661c02: 然四諦理無有差別。在聖在凡皆如實故。依 T1562_.29.0661c03: 能見者偏立聖名。或義意言。唯諸聖者於四 T1562_.29.0661c04: 諦理。以聖行觀於一切時。行相無別聖行諦 T1562_.29.0661c05: 理極相稱故。以諦隨行立聖諦名。非如世間 T1562_.29.0661c06: 六非聖行。先觀此地爲靜等三。後復觀爲麁 T1562_.29.0661c07: 等三相。非相稱故不隨彼名。或義意言。唯諸 T1562_.29.0661c08: 聖者於四諦理。以聖智觀一得正決定無還 T1562_.29.0661c09: 不定理。故諦隨智得聖諦名。即由此理聖智 T1562_.29.0661c10: 觀諦。得立苦集滅道智名。凡智雖能見四諦 T1562_.29.0661c11: 理。得決定已容不定故。諦不隨彼得凡諦名。 T1562_.29.0661c12: 由此但應名世俗智。唯受一分是苦自體所 T1562_.29.0661c13: 餘並非。如何可言諸有漏行皆是苦諦。頌曰 T1562_.29.0661c14: 苦由三苦合 如所應一切 T1562_.29.0661c15: 可意非可意 餘有漏行法 T1562_.29.0661c16: 論曰。有三苦性。一苦苦性。二行苦性。三壞苦 T1562_.29.0661c17: 性。諸有漏行如其所應。與此三種苦性合故。 T1562_.29.0661c18: 皆是苦諦亦無有失。所以者何。諸有漏行有 T1562_.29.0661c19: 三可意非可意。餘可意者。何謂諸樂受。及彼 T1562_.29.0661c20: 資具餘二類然。此中可意有漏行法。由壞苦 T1562_.29.0661c21: 合故名爲苦。未離染者於彼壞時。必定應生 T1562_.29.0661c22: 憂愁等故。以薄伽梵契經中言。諸樂受生時 T1562_.29.0661c23: 樂住時樂壞時。苦順樂受諸行如樂受。應知 T1562_.29.0661c24: 諸非可意有漏行法。由苦苦合故名爲苦。苦 T1562_.29.0661c25: 受自體及順苦法現前。必能惱身心故。以薄 T1562_.29.0661c26: 伽梵契經中言。諸苦受生時苦住時苦壞時 T1562_.29.0661c27: 樂順苦受諸行如苦受。應知除此所餘有漏 T1562_.29.0661c28: 行法。由行苦合故名爲苦。因縁所造皆是無 T1562_.29.0661c29: 常。有漏無常無非是苦。故有漏法皆是苦性。 T1562_.29.0662a01: 豈不一切有漏行法。據此皆容是行苦性。不 T1562_.29.0662a02: 應但説非苦樂受。及彼資糧爲行苦性。雖有 T1562_.29.0662a03: 此理然於此中。依不共故作如是説。謂初後 T1562_.29.0662a04: 苦如其所應。唯在可意非可意法。餘有漏法 T1562_.29.0662a05: 唯是行苦。不共所依故作是説。然薄伽梵契 T1562_.29.0662a06: 經中言。苦受生時住時苦者。由彼苦受性是 T1562_.29.0662a07: 苦故。壞 樂者苦受壞時。設無樂受由苦受 T1562_.29.0662a08: 息。似樂顯現故亦名樂。於相續息位立以壞 T1562_.29.0662a09: 名故。苦受息時名苦受壞。此於欲界。二界 T1562_.29.0662a10: 漏盡如次暫時長時。畢竟樂受生時住時樂 T1562_.29.0662a11: 者。由彼樂受性是樂故。壞時苦者。謂諸有情 T1562_.29.0662a12: 未離染時心恒求樂。於樂壞位起憂愁等。故 T1562_.29.0662a13: 説樂受爲壞苦性。樂受壞時設無苦受。似苦 T1562_.29.0662a14: 顯現亦名爲苦。不苦不樂受生時住時。皆 T1562_.29.0662a15: 非苦非樂性是彼故。即彼壞時苦樂隨一容 T1562_.29.0662a16: 現前故。可言倶有苦樂壞時無容有二。故佛 T1562_.29.0662a17: 於此作別異説。謂無智苦智生爲樂。以於此 T1562_.29.0662a18: 受無智増廣。此受無明所隨増故。由無智故 T1562_.29.0662a19: 惡趣等中。具有無邊行苦生起。極微細故甚 T1562_.29.0662a20: 爲難覺。唯聖能覺。故有頌言 T1562_.29.0662a21: 如以一睫毛 置掌人不覺 T1562_.29.0662a22: 若置眼睛上 爲損及不安 T1562_.29.0662a23: 愚夫如手掌 不覺行苦睫 T1562_.29.0662a24: 智者如眼睛 縁極生厭怖 T1562_.29.0662a25: 是故此中無智便苦。若永斷此得阿羅漢。由 T1562_.29.0662a26: 此故言智生爲樂。薄伽梵説應果樂故。此三 T1562_.29.0662a27: 苦性其體是何。應定判言三受爲體。由三受 T1562_.29.0662a28: 故順三受法。如應亦得三苦性名。壞苦亦應 T1562_.29.0662a29: 是行苦攝。壞是無常差別名故。無常所隨名 T1562_.29.0662b01: 行苦故。由此所立三苦不成。此難不然。義有 T1562_.29.0662b02: 異故於可意行。刹那無常亦名行苦。唯相續 T1562_.29.0662b03: 斷得壞苦名故義有別。又障三樂建立三苦。 T1562_.29.0662b04: 謂苦苦性障無逼惱樂。行苦性障涅槃樂。壞 T1562_.29.0662b05: 苦性障受樂。是故行苦與壞苦性。其義各異 T1562_.29.0662b06: 無雜亂失。即由此理聖道雖有爲非行苦攝。 T1562_.29.0662b07: 順涅槃樂故。聖道能引涅槃得故理必應爾。 T1562_.29.0662b08: 以本論中先約三界辯三苦別。此言爲遮有 T1562_.29.0662b09: 執聖道墮苦相攝。以諸聖道理決定非墮界 T1562_.29.0662b10: 法故。既爾欲界苦應無三。於色界中苦應無 T1562_.29.0662b11: 二。由是次約可意等三。諸行不同辯三苦別。 T1562_.29.0662b12: 此何苦合皆得苦名。由此復依樂等三受。自 T1562_.29.0662b13: 性有異辯三苦別。由如是理故本論中。前後 T1562_.29.0662b14: 三重辯三苦相。有説道諦非唯行苦亦是壞 T1562_.29.0662b15: 苦。現見退法退聖道時亦憂愁故。又諸聖道 T1562_.29.0662b16: 是可意攝。聖所愛故應是壞苦。又既許有無 T1562_.29.0662b17: 漏樂受。不苦樂受亦應是苦。所以者何。以契 T1562_.29.0662b18: 經説諸所有受無非苦故。又許道諦體是有 T1562_.29.0662b19: 爲理應是苦。經言諸有所造所爲皆是苦故。 T1562_.29.0662b20: 此説非理所以者何。處無明趣諸無智者。於 T1562_.29.0662b21: 諸因果相屬理愚。不善了知諸法性相。於有 T1562_.29.0662b22: 爲法別離位中。發生憂愁失所著故。如是無 T1562_.29.0662b23: 智者無聖道可失。若處明趣諸有智者。於諸 T1562_.29.0662b24: 因果相屬不迷能善了知諸法性相。於有爲 T1562_.29.0662b25: 法別離位中。不生憂愁無所著故。彼聖道設 T1562_.29.0662b26: 退亦不生壞苦。若以聖道聖所愛故。名爲可 T1562_.29.0662b27: 意執爲壞苦。如是聖道有不愛故。亦名非可 T1562_.29.0662b28: 意應執爲苦苦。是則聖道應苦諦攝三苦合 T1562_.29.0662b29: 故。然非所許故可意攝非壞苦因。契經所言 T1562_.29.0662c01: 諸所有受。所造所爲皆是苦者。依有漏法密 T1562_.29.0662c02: 説無過。如世間説一切燒等。皆依少分説 T1562_.29.0662c03: 一切言。此亦應然理極成故。或此經説其義 T1562_.29.0662c04: 有餘。如別經言我聖弟子。以慧爲劍能斷一 T1562_.29.0662c05: 切。結縛隨眠隨煩惱纒。非染無記有漏善慧。 T1562_.29.0662c06: 力能永斷一切結等。故以慧言顯以聖慧。又 T1562_.29.0662c07: 如經説樂與樂倶行。理不應言受與受倶起。 T1562_.29.0662c08: 此顯除受有爲有漏。諸可意法與樂受倶。應 T1562_.29.0662c09: 知此經義亦如是。聖道非苦由此極成。有餘 T1562_.29.0662c10: 師言。聖道非苦以能違逆是苦相故。非聖道 T1562_.29.0662c11: 起違逆聖心。由此能令衆苦盡故。有餘師言。 T1562_.29.0662c12: 諸有漏法其性樂住。無常逼時違其所樂。是 T1562_.29.0662c13: 故生苦聖道不然故非苦攝。去來世法是現 T1562_.29.0662c14: 種類。同現説苦理亦無失。如契經説一切受 T1562_.29.0662c15: 生皆名苦生。又契經説樂受生時名爲樂生。 T1562_.29.0662c16: 二經如何不相違背。前依行苦皆名苦生。後 T1562_.29.0662c17: 辯受自相名樂生無失。或前契經對還滅樂。 T1562_.29.0662c18: 密説一切受生皆苦。第二契經依流轉樂。説 T1562_.29.0662c19: 樂受起名爲樂生。或前契經從多説苦。後經 T1562_.29.0662c20: 依少亦説有樂。謂生死中苦多樂少。如蜜一 T1562_.29.0662c21: 滴在毒瓶中。故經多言諸受皆苦 T1562_.29.0662c22: *説一切有部順正理論*卷第五十七 T1562_.29.0662c23: T1562_.29.0662c24: T1562_.29.0662c25: T1562_.29.0662c26: T1562_.29.0662c27: T1562_.29.0662c28: T1562_.29.0662c29: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:無/有] [CITE] |