大正蔵検索 INBUDS
|
阿毘達磨順正理論 (No. 1562_ 衆賢造 玄奘譯 ) in Vol. 29 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:無/有] [CITE]
T1562_.29.0735a01: 此中先離欲染。後見諦者苦集法忍。及見道 T1562_.29.0735a02: 中苦智集智。但名爲厭縁厭境故。忍不名離 T1562_.29.0735a03: 惑先斷故。智不名離非斷治故。并修道中加 T1562_.29.0735a04: 行解脱勝進道攝。苦智集智但名爲厭縁厭 T1562_.29.0735a05: 境故。不名爲離非斷治故。有離非厭。謂縁滅 T1562_.29.0735a06: 道能令惑斷。所有忍智能離染故。縁欣境故。 T1562_.29.0735a07: 應知此中未離欲染。入見諦者滅道法忍。及 T1562_.29.0735a08: 諸所有滅道類忍。并修道中無間道攝。滅智 T1562_.29.0735a09: 道智但名爲離。是斷治故不名爲厭縁欣境 T1562_.29.0735a10: 故。有厭亦離。謂縁苦集能令惑斷所有忍智。 T1562_.29.0735a11: 應知此中未離欲染。入見諦者苦集法忍。及 T1562_.29.0735a12: 諸所有苦集類忍。并修道中無間道攝苦智 T1562_.29.0735a13: 集智。有非厭離。謂縁滅道不令惑斷所有忍 T1562_.29.0735a14: 智。應知此中先離欲染後見諦者。滅道法忍 T1562_.29.0735a15: 及見道中滅智道智。并修道中加行解脱勝 T1562_.29.0735a16: 進道攝。滅智道智 T1562_.29.0735a17: *説一切有部順正理論*卷第七十二 T1562_.29.0735a18: T1562_.29.0735a19: T1562_.29.0735a20: T1562_.29.0735a21: T1562_.29.0735a22: 尊者衆賢造 T1562_.29.0735a23: *三藏法師玄奘奉 *詔譯 T1562_.29.0735a24: *辯智品第七之一 T1562_.29.0735a25: 如是已依諸道差別。建立賢聖補特伽羅。所 T1562_.29.0735a26: 依道中作如是説。正見正智名無學支。故於 T1562_.29.0735a27: 此中應審思擇。爲有慧見非智。及有慧智非 T1562_.29.0735a28: 見。而別建立見智二支。亦有云何。頌曰 T1562_.29.0735a29: 聖慧忍非智 盡無生非見 T1562_.29.0735b01: 餘二有漏慧 皆智六見性 T1562_.29.0735b02: 論曰。慧有二種有漏無漏。唯無漏慧立以聖 T1562_.29.0735b03: 名。此聖慧中八忍非智性。所以者何。非決斷 T1562_.29.0735b04: 性故唯決斷義是智義故。如何八忍不能決 T1562_.29.0735b05: 斷。自所斷疑得隨相續生故。或求見境意樂 T1562_.29.0735b06: 止息。加行奢緩説名爲智。諸忍正起推度意 T1562_.29.0735b07: 樂。加行猛利故非智攝。而名見者推度性故。 T1562_.29.0735b08: 盡及無生二智非見性。推度意樂一向止息 T1562_.29.0735b09: 故。所起加行極奢緩故。而名智者決斷性故。 T1562_.29.0735b10: 所餘皆通智見二性。已斷自疑推度性故。謂 T1562_.29.0735b11: 前八忍盡無生餘。有學八智無學正見。一一 T1562_.29.0735b12: 皆通見智性攝。豈不忍餘諸無間道。亦自所 T1562_.29.0735b13: 治惑得隨生。無非正起推度意樂。加行猛 T1562_.29.0735b14: 利應非智攝。盡無生餘解脱道等。此相違故 T1562_.29.0735b15: 皆應非見。此難不然。餘無間道無自品疑得 T1562_.29.0735b16: 隨相續生故。又彼唯見曾所見境。非如八忍 T1562_.29.0735b17: 極違智故。餘解脱等非全息求。所起加行非 T1562_.29.0735b18: 極奢緩。以皆於後有所作故。由此一切皆通 T1562_.29.0735b19: 二種。並具推度決斷用故。諸有漏慧皆智性 T1562_.29.0735b20: 攝。於中唯六亦是見性。謂五染汚見世正見 T1562_.29.0735b21: 爲六。有餘師説。能發身語五識所引。及命終 T1562_.29.0735b22: 時意識相應。善有漏慧亦非見性。外門轉故 T1562_.29.0735b23: 如能引故。勢力劣故。此亦不然。不應許故。非 T1562_.29.0735b24: 決定故。契經説故。謂不應許唯内門轉。方是 T1562_.29.0735b25: 見性勿聖慧中。外身命住非見性攝。然契經 T1562_.29.0735b26: 説。於外身循身觀是見性攝。亦非決定如五 T1562_.29.0735b27: 識身。所引意識如是性轉。以彼善等所引意 T1562_.29.0735b28: 識。有時亦是不善等故。由此不應所引意識 T1562_.29.0735b29: 同。能引五識是無分別性。如契經説。有命終 T1562_.29.0735c01: 時得正見倶善心心所。故説所有意地善慧。 T1562_.29.0735c02: 皆見性攝於理爲善。如是所説聖有漏慧。皆 T1562_.29.0735c03: 擇法故並慧性攝。智有幾種相別云何。頌曰 T1562_.29.0735c04: 智十總有二 有漏無漏別 T1562_.29.0735c05: 有漏稱世俗 無漏名法類 T1562_.29.0735c06: 世俗遍爲境 法智及類智 T1562_.29.0735c07: 如次欲上界 苦等諦爲境 T1562_.29.0735c08: 論曰。智有十種攝一切智。一世俗智。二法 T1562_.29.0735c09: 智。三類智。四苦智。五集智。六滅智。七道智。 T1562_.29.0735c10: 八他心智。九盡智。十無生智。如是十智總唯 T1562_.29.0735c11: 二種。有漏無漏性差別故。如是二智相別有 T1562_.29.0735c12: 三。謂世俗智法智類智。前有漏智總名世俗。 T1562_.29.0735c13: 瓶衣等物性可毀壞。顯在俗情故名世俗。此 T1562_.29.0735c14: 智多取世俗境故。多順世間俗事轉故。從多 T1562_.29.0735c15: 建立世俗智名。非無取勝義順勝義事轉。然 T1562_.29.0735c16: 是愛境無勝功能。息内衆惑故非無漏。或復 T1562_.29.0735c17: 出世引發世間得世俗名。體即無智智隨屬 T1562_.29.0735c18: 彼得彼智名。意顯此名目有漏智。有説。諸 T1562_.29.0735c19: 趣名爲世俗。此智多是往諸趣因。從果爲名 T1562_.29.0735c20: 名世俗智。有説。此智無始時來。生死身中顯 T1562_.29.0735c21: 現而轉。由此故立世俗智名。或諸有中隨流 T1562_.29.0735c22: 無絶名世俗智。以一切時隨順諸有相續轉 T1562_.29.0735c23: 故。或復此智於一切境。能遍映發得世俗名。 T1562_.29.0735c24: 獨能遍縁一切法故。後無漏智分爲二種。法 T1562_.29.0735c25: 類二名所目別故。此二名義如前已釋。然有 T1562_.29.0735c26: 師釋。類謂比類以所現見事比不現見境。比 T1562_.29.0735c27: 量所攝得類智名。此釋不然。説實見故。謂非 T1562_.29.0735c28: 比量智可立實見名。諸契經中總説法類。若 T1562_.29.0735c29: 如實見苦則定見非我。於四聖諦如實見故。 T1562_.29.0736a01: 能如實見四聖諦故。有如是等無量契經。又 T1562_.29.0736a02: 聖位中等決定故。謂見迹者等決定知諸行 T1562_.29.0736a03: 非常。諸法非我涅槃寂靜。非眞現見可與比 T1562_.29.0736a04: 知等是決定。謂以此類彼名爲比知。彼非決 T1562_.29.0736a05: 定然亦有異故。由此眞見與比度知。理不應 T1562_.29.0736a06: 言等是決定。非諸聖智有比度理。故有智者 T1562_.29.0736a07: 必不應言。有聖諦境比智所證。又聖應無縁 T1562_.29.0736a08: 滅智故。謂若類智比智攝者。則應縁滅法智 T1562_.29.0736a09: 亦無。以滅總非現見事故。然許現量總有三 T1562_.29.0736a10: 種。依根領納覺慧別故。依根現量。謂依五根 T1562_.29.0736a11: 現取色等五外境界。領納現量。謂受想等心 T1562_.29.0736a12: 心所法正現在前。覺慧現量。謂於諸法隨其 T1562_.29.0736a13: 所應證自共相。此中若就依根領納。説類智 T1562_.29.0736a14: 境非現見事。則滅法智理亦應無。滅非依根 T1562_.29.0736a15: 領納境故。若就覺慧則不應言。類智所縁是 T1562_.29.0736a16: 比智境。是故一切如理所引。實義決擇皆現 T1562_.29.0736a17: 量智。類智既然故現量攝。是名二智相別成 T1562_.29.0736a18: 三。定心相應聖行相轉。有漏無漏二智何別。 T1562_.29.0736a19: 無漏於境行相明利。彼有漏智與此相違。如 T1562_.29.0736a20: 朅地羅餘木二炭。於所燒煉勢用不同。及勝 T1562_.29.0736a21: 劣香能熏用別。炎鐵草火熱勢有殊。二智相 T1562_.29.0736a22: 望差別亦爾。或俗智後起増上慢。無漏不然 T1562_.29.0736a23: 故有差別。又世俗智與法類智。境有寛陜故 T1562_.29.0736a24: 有差別。謂世俗智遍以一切有爲無爲爲所 T1562_.29.0736a25: 縁境。以契經説有世俗智能遍知苦。廣説乃 T1562_.29.0736a26: 至遍知虚空非擇滅。故亦有以非我行相。總 T1562_.29.0736a27: 縁一切法爲境。以契經説諸行非常。一切法 T1562_.29.0736a28: 非我涅槃寂靜故。然有經説。能以正慧觀一 T1562_.29.0736a29: 切法爲非我者。雖一切法實皆非我。而此一 T1562_.29.0736b01: 切聲非總目。諸法唯目苦諦所攝法盡故。次 T1562_.29.0736b02: 復言此能厭苦。有餘於此作是釋言。此慧實 T1562_.29.0736b03: 能縁一切法。然此行相本爲厭果。故偏依彼 T1562_.29.0736b04: 説厭苦言。如爲燒舍而縱於火。然火起時亦 T1562_.29.0736b05: 燒餘物。此不應理。此經復言此道力能得清 T1562_.29.0736b06: 淨故。聞思二慧亦能遍縁。作一切法非我行 T1562_.29.0736b07: 相。此道豈能得清淨果。若謂説此能得清淨。 T1562_.29.0736b08: 不言即此是能清淨故無有過。理亦不然。如 T1562_.29.0736b09: 遮餘道説此言故。如契經説。唯有此道能得 T1562_.29.0736b10: 清淨更無餘道。豈可於彼亦作是言。能得清 T1562_.29.0736b11: 淨非是能淨。故知此經説以正慧。觀一切法 T1562_.29.0736b12: 爲非我者唯目苦諦。所攝諸法非收餘法説 T1562_.29.0736b13: 一切聲。如言諸行皆非常苦。而非聖道是苦 T1562_.29.0736b14: 非常。故諸行言唯遍苦諦。此亦應爾唯觀苦 T1562_.29.0736b15: 境。起非我行非觀餘諦。除此以外必應別有。 T1562_.29.0736b16: 總觀諸法非我行相。諸觀行者現所知故。謂 T1562_.29.0736b17: 觀行者必應先修。觀一切法非我行相。淨治 T1562_.29.0736b18: 身器令有堪能。依之趣入縁三義觀。若不爾 T1562_.29.0736b19: 者一合我相。所擾亂故應不能修。建立諸法 T1562_.29.0736b20: 無相雜觀。法智但縁欲界四諦。以本論説法 T1562_.29.0736b21: 智云何。謂縁欲界繋諸行無漏智。縁欲界繋 T1562_.29.0736b22: 諸行因無漏智。縁欲界繋諸行滅無漏智。縁 T1562_.29.0736b23: 欲界繋諸行能斷道無漏智。及縁法智縁法 T1562_.29.0736b24: 智地。無漏智是名法智。豈不法智縁四諦 T1562_.29.0736b25: 境。何故復言及縁法智。縁法智地無漏智耶。 T1562_.29.0736b26: 此二亦縁道諦爲境。以前所説縁欲界繋諸 T1562_.29.0736b27: 行。能斷道無漏智言。不能目一切縁道法智。 T1562_.29.0736b28: 但説能縁能斷道故。爲攝縁餘加行解脱勝 T1562_.29.0736b29: 進道攝法智爲境。及已離欲身中所起法智 T1562_.29.0736c01: 法忍。爲境法智。復説縁法智。縁法智地言。或 T1562_.29.0736c02: 前所言縁斷道智。但目縁未至能對治。欲界 T1562_.29.0736c03: 見修所斷爲境法智。爲攝縁餘五地法智品。 T1562_.29.0736c04: 爲境法智復説後二言。若爾彼文應作是説。 T1562_.29.0736c05: 縁欲界諸行對治無漏智。若作是説總攝能 T1562_.29.0736c06: 縁。一切法智品爲境法智盡。以對治言目多 T1562_.29.0736c07: 義故。不爾應有非愛過故。謂縁色界繋爲 T1562_.29.0736c08: 境。無漏智亦應名法智。有色界行是欲界行 T1562_.29.0736c09: 對治攝故。豈不所言縁欲界行能斷道智。亦 T1562_.29.0736c10: 有此失彼無此失。能斷道言已遮色界欲對 T1562_.29.0736c11: 治故。謂此依諦辯法智境。道言即顯是道諦 T1562_.29.0736c12: 攝。非汝所説亦有道言。故此過失在汝非我。 T1562_.29.0736c13: 又設許彼更置道言。亦不能攝諸法智盡法 T1562_.29.0736c14: 智通能治三界故。又亦應許縁類智品諸無 T1562_.29.0736c15: 漏智是法智攝。類智品亦爲欲遠分對治。許 T1562_.29.0736c16: 對治言目多義故。由此本論所説無失。類智 T1562_.29.0736c17: 能通縁上二界四諦。由此三智境有差別。即 T1562_.29.0736c18: 於如是三種智中。頌曰 T1562_.29.0736c19: 法類由境別 立苦等四名 T1562_.29.0736c20: 皆通盡無生 初唯苦集類 T1562_.29.0736c21: 論曰。法智類智由境差別。分爲苦集滅道四 T1562_.29.0736c22: 智。何縁俗智亦縁苦等。作苦等行相而非苦 T1562_.29.0736c23: 等智。由彼先以苦等行相觀苦等已。後時復 T1562_.29.0736c24: 容觀苦等境爲樂等故。又得如是世俗智已。 T1562_.29.0736c25: 後縁諦疑容現行故。如是六智若無學攝。非 T1562_.29.0736c26: 見性者名盡無生。此二初生唯苦集類。以縁 T1562_.29.0736c27: 苦集六種行相。縁有頂蘊爲境界故。金剛喩 T1562_.29.0736c28: 定若縁苦集。與此境同縁滅道異。若爾豈不 T1562_.29.0736c29: 至教相違。如説。於盡有初智生。從此無間能 T1562_.29.0737a01: 自了達無違教失。此於盡言是有第七聲非 T1562_.29.0737a02: 境第七故。謂有煩惱無餘盡故。有初智生非 T1562_.29.0737a03: 此智生縁盡爲境何所違害。彼言意顯有惑 T1562_.29.0737a04: 身中。無此智生要有惑盡。於前所説九種智 T1562_.29.0737a05: 中。頌曰 T1562_.29.0737a06: 法類道世俗 有成他心智 T1562_.29.0737a07: 於勝地根位 去來世不知 T1562_.29.0737a08: 法類不相知 聲聞麟喩佛 T1562_.29.0737a09: 如次知見道 二三念一切 T1562_.29.0737a10: 論曰。有法類道及世俗智。成他心智。餘則不 T1562_.29.0737a11: 然。豈不道智離法類無。應但言三成他心智。 T1562_.29.0737a12: 理實如是爲顯他心智。但知同類境故作是 T1562_.29.0737a13: 言。謂爲顯成此法類智。知他無漏心心所法。 T1562_.29.0737a14: 是道智攝非苦集智。以無漏智決定不能。知 T1562_.29.0737a15: 他有漏心心所故。他身無漏心心所法細故 T1562_.29.0737a16: 勝故。非己有漏他心智境其理可然。何縁己 T1562_.29.0737a17: 身無漏他心智。不能知他有漏心心所。於有 T1562_.29.0737a18: 漏境無漏智生。行相所縁異此智故。謂無漏 T1562_.29.0737a19: 智縁有漏時。必是總縁厭背行相。是故決定 T1562_.29.0737a20: 不能別縁他心心所成他心智。以諸聖智縁 T1562_.29.0737a21: 有漏時。必於所縁深生厭背。樂總棄捨不樂 T1562_.29.0737a22: 別觀。縁無漏時生欣樂故。既總觀已亦樂別 T1562_.29.0737a23: 觀。如有見聞非所愛事。總縁便捨不樂別縁。 T1562_.29.0737a24: 於所愛中則不如是。總見聞已亦樂別縁。是 T1562_.29.0737a25: 故於他有漏心等。必無聖智一一別觀。成縁 T1562_.29.0737a26: 有漏心無漏他心智。以他心智決定於他心 T1562_.29.0737a27: 心所法別別知故。豈不亦有三念住攝苦集 T1562_.29.0737a28: 忍智。雖有而非但縁一法縁多體故。又他心 T1562_.29.0737a29: 智有決定相。謂不知勝去來二世。并法類品 T1562_.29.0737b01: 不互相知。勝復有三。謂地根位。地謂下地智 T1562_.29.0737b02: 不知上地心。義唯能知自地下地。根謂信解 T1562_.29.0737b03: 時解脱根智。不知見至不時解脱心。位謂不 T1562_.29.0737b04: 還聲聞應果獨覺大覺。前前位智不知後後 T1562_.29.0737b05: 勝位者心。義*唯能知自下根位。然他心智 T1562_.29.0737b06: 及所知境。根地既殊知亦有異。所知有漏心 T1562_.29.0737b07: 心所法。曾未曾得各有十五。謂欲四靜慮各 T1562_.29.0737b08: 下中上根能知。但除欲界三品曾未曾得各 T1562_.29.0737b09: 有十二。所知無漏及彼能知。皆除欲三各有 T1562_.29.0737b10: 十二。且諸有漏曾未曾得。下根所攝他心智 T1562_.29.0737b11: 生。隨其所應能知下地三根心品。自地下根 T1562_.29.0737b12: 中品亦知自地中品。上品總了自下地三。無 T1562_.29.0737b13: 漏下根他心智起。唯知自地下地下根。中亦 T1562_.29.0737b14: 知中上兼知上。何縁有漏無漏智生。知下地 T1562_.29.0737b15: 心多少有異。有漏三品。可一身成。無漏隨 T1562_.29.0737b16: 根立聖者別。尚無有一成二品根。況有成三 T1562_.29.0737b17: 故有差別。如何説一補特伽羅成九品道斷 T1562_.29.0737b18: 九品惑。此道差別非根有異。由因漸長後道 T1562_.29.0737b19: 轉増。如次能令多品惑斷。或諸種性各有 T1562_.29.0737b20: 九品。成一九品必不成餘。故前後言無相違 T1562_.29.0737b21: 失。故依上地起下根心。有上根心依下地起。 T1562_.29.0737b22: 地根互勝必不相知。地位位根相對亦爾。此 T1562_.29.0737b23: 他心智不知去來。本爲知能縁心心所法故。 T1562_.29.0737b24: 法類二品不互相知。此二如次以欲上界。全 T1562_.29.0737b25: 分對治爲所縁故。此他心智見道中無。總觀 T1562_.29.0737b26: 諦理極速轉故。然皆容作他心智境。三乘聖 T1562_.29.0737b27: 者起此智時。中下二乘必須加行。聲聞加行 T1562_.29.0737b28: 或上或中。麟喩但須下品加行。佛無加行隨 T1562_.29.0737b29: 欲現前。若諸有情將入見道。聲聞獨覺預修 T1562_.29.0737c01: 加行。爲欲知彼見道位心。彼諸有情入見 T1562_.29.0737c02: 道位。聲聞法分加行若滿。知彼見道初二念 T1562_.29.0737c03: 心。若爲更知類分心故。別修加行至加行滿。 T1562_.29.0737c04: 彼已度至第十六心。雖知此心非知見道。是 T1562_.29.0737c05: 故説彼唯知二念。麟喩法分加行若滿。知彼 T1562_.29.0737c06: 見道初二念心。若爲更知類分心故。別修加 T1562_.29.0737c07: 行至加行滿。知彼第八集類智心。有餘師言。 T1562_.29.0737c08: 知第十五。有説麟喩知四刹那。謂初二心第 T1562_.29.0737c09: 八十四。此言應理。所以者何。許從知初二念 T1562_.29.0737c10: 心已。唯隔五念知第八心。若復更修法分加 T1562_.29.0737c11: 行。經五念頃加行應成。何不許知第十四念。 T1562_.29.0737c12: 有餘亦説知四刹那。謂初二心第十一二。佛 T1562_.29.0737c13: 於一切殊勝功徳。隨欲現前心自在故。於十 T1562_.29.0737c14: 五念能次第知。以佛世尊三無數劫。精勤修 T1562_.29.0737c15: 習無量資糧。故獲難思殊勝妙智。具大勢用 T1562_.29.0737c16: 隨欲能知。雖此智生亦知心所。然修加行本 T1562_.29.0737c17: 爲知心。如空處等名他心智。脇尊者曰。引 T1562_.29.0737c18: 此智生要先知心後方知所。從初但立他心 T1562_.29.0737c19: 智名。引此智時修何加行。先應觀察身之顯 T1562_.29.0737c20: 形。所樂言音表心差別。謂彼行者初修業時。 T1562_.29.0737c21: 爲欲審知他心差別。先審觀察自身顯形。所 T1562_.29.0737c22: 樂言音因何有別。遂知顯等差別由心。次復 T1562_.29.0737c23: 審觀他身顯等。亦由心異有差別生。由此後 T1562_.29.0737c24: 時離欲身意。調柔清淨引勝定生。依定發生 T1562_.29.0737c25: 有威徳智。此智眞實照見他心。如明珠中種 T1562_.29.0737c26: 種色縷。差別之相了然可得。是名修世俗他 T1562_.29.0737c27: 心智加行。若修無漏他心智時。以觀非常等 T1562_.29.0737c28: 苦智爲加行。此加行位通縁色心。至成滿時 T1562_.29.0737c29: 縁心非色。又加行位縁自他心。至成滿時縁 T1562_.29.0738a01: 他非自。盡無生智二相何別。頌曰 T1562_.29.0738a02: 智於四聖諦 知我已知等 T1562_.29.0738a03: 不應更知等 如次盡無生 T1562_.29.0738a04: 論曰。如本論説云何盡智。謂無學位若正自 T1562_.29.0738a05: 知。我已知苦我已斷集。我已證滅我已修道。 T1562_.29.0738a06: 由此所有智見明覺。解慧光觀是名盡智。云 T1562_.29.0738a07: 何無生智。謂正自知我已知苦不應更知。廣 T1562_.29.0738a08: 説乃至。我已修道不應更修。由此所有廣説 T1562_.29.0738a09: 乃至是名無生智。由本意樂二智轉時。力能 T1562_.29.0738a10: 引起如是解智。非於無漏二智轉時。作如是 T1562_.29.0738a11: 解無分別故。謂出二智後得智中。方作如是 T1562_.29.0738a12: 二類分別。此二分別二智後生。是盡無生力 T1562_.29.0738a13: 所引故。此二俗智是彼士用果。故擧二果表 T1562_.29.0738a14: 二智差別。理必應然説由此故。依爲此義説 T1562_.29.0738a15: 由此聲。即是爲此所有智義。不爾應言如是 T1562_.29.0738a16: 所有。諸觀行者本修行時。定起如斯要期意 T1562_.29.0738a17: 樂。謂我當證阿羅漢時。要應起此自審察智。 T1562_.29.0738a18: 故今出觀此智必生。爲令此生所起之智。隨 T1562_.29.0738a19: 應建立盡無生名。即後智生所依止義。故言 T1562_.29.0738a20: 此釋理必應。然豈不二智非見性攝。如何乃 T1562_.29.0738a21: 言智見明等。有作是釋乘言便故。然實二智 T1562_.29.0738a22: 是於後時。所起見因故亦名見。謂離盡智後 T1562_.29.0738a23: 出觀時。必不現行審察見故。先不動姓及 T1562_.29.0738a24: 後練根。得不動時離無生智。後審察見亦不 T1562_.29.0738a25: 現行。故此見名從果而立。或如見故假立見 T1562_.29.0738a26: 名。如立光名現照轉故。光是色處智體非光。 T1562_.29.0738a27: 照用如光名光無失。如是二智實非見體。現 T1562_.29.0738a28: 照如見立以見名。或諸世間決解名見。如言 T1562_.29.0738a29: 我見齊爾所時。此日月輪當被侵蝕定故名 T1562_.29.0738b01: 見。此亦應然即由此因。經作是説解脱智見 T1562_.29.0738b02: 蘊。謂盡無生智要有解脱。此智得生以智爲 T1562_.29.0738b03: 體名解脱智。由前因故亦得見名。故此蘊名 T1562_.29.0738b04: 解脱智見。何縁本論作如是言。見云何且諸 T1562_.29.0738b05: 智亦是見。然有見而非智。謂八忍豈不應説 T1562_.29.0738b06: 見外有智。如説。智外有別見耶。應知此中 T1562_.29.0738b07: 説亦聲故。見外有智其義已成。若謂不然彼 T1562_.29.0738b08: 論應説所有智皆是見。既言亦是明知有非。 T1562_.29.0738b09: 謂盡無生俗智一分。然智外見分明顯説。不 T1562_.29.0738b10: 分明説見外智者爲遮僻執。譬喩部師。説於 T1562_.29.0738b11: 下智立忍名想。或如前説有多種因。盡無生 T1562_.29.0738b12: 等亦得名見。何縁論説無生智中。復作是言 T1562_.29.0738b13: 我已知苦等。理但應説不復更知等。二行不 T1562_.29.0738b14: 應倶時轉故。若次第轉前與盡智。無差別故 T1562_.29.0738b15: 不應重説。應知此説意爲遣疑。恐有生疑如 T1562_.29.0738b16: 時解脱。先起盡智後得無生。如是應許不 T1562_.29.0738b17: 時解脱。先起無生後得盡智。爲顯一切盡智 T1562_.29.0738b18: 先起。故復先説已知等言。或先但言我已知 T1562_.29.0738b19: 等。顯時解脱唯有盡智。後復重言我已知等。 T1562_.29.0738b20: 顯不時解脱盡後起無生。故雖重言而無有 T1562_.29.0738b21: 失。無生智者何謂無生。正理師言。謂非擇滅 T1562_.29.0738b22: 有無生故。此智得生智託無生名無生智。滅 T1562_.29.0738b23: 雖常有而得非常。得彼滅時此智方轉。要由 T1562_.29.0738b24: 得起方名有滅。於有滅位此智方生。或無生 T1562_.29.0738b25: 言因彼滅得。如涅槃得亦名涅槃。經説以 T1562_.29.0738b26: 涅槃置在心中故。有彼得位此智方生。智託 T1562_.29.0738b27: 無生名無生智。有餘於此作是難言。若託無 T1562_.29.0738b28: 生名無生智。則無生智縁非諦法。是則所説 T1562_.29.0738b29: 違害自宗。無漏慧生唯縁四諦。彼不審察設 T1562_.29.0738c01: 此難詞。我上已言於出觀後。方起如是分別 T1562_.29.0738c02: 智故。或此託聲是有第七。非境第七如盡智 T1562_.29.0738c03: 故。或許此智縁無生得。此苦諦攝非非諦故。 T1562_.29.0738c04: 如是十智互相攝者。謂世俗智攝一全一少 T1562_.29.0738c05: 分。法類智各攝一全七少分。苦集滅智各攝 T1562_.29.0738c06: 一全四少分。道智攝一全五少分。他心智攝 T1562_.29.0738c07: 一全四少分。盡無生智各攝一全六少分。何 T1562_.29.0738c08: 縁二智建立爲十。頌曰 T1562_.29.0738c09: 由自性對治 行相行相境 T1562_.29.0738c10: 加行辨因圓 故建立十智 T1562_.29.0738c11: 論曰。由七縁故立二爲十。一自性故立世俗 T1562_.29.0738c12: 智。以世俗智爲自性故。二對治故立法類智。 T1562_.29.0738c13: 全能對治欲上界故。三行相故立苦集智。此 T1562_.29.0738c14: 二智境體無別故。四行相境故立滅道智。此 T1562_.29.0738c15: 二行相境倶有別故。五加行故立他心智。非 T1562_.29.0738c16: 此不知他心所法。本修加行爲知他心。雖成 T1562_.29.0738c17: 滿時亦知心所。而約加行故立他心智名。加 T1562_.29.0738c18: 行如前已具分別。六事辨故建立盡智。事 T1562_.29.0738c19: *辨身中定初生故。七因圓故立無生智。一切 T1562_.29.0738c20: 聖道爲因生故。謂有盡智非無生智爲因故 T1562_.29.0738c21: 生。無無生智不以盡智爲因故起如上。既言 T1562_.29.0738c22: 法智類智全能對治欲上界法。爲有少分治 T1562_.29.0738c23: 上欲耶。頌曰 T1562_.29.0738c24: 縁滅道法智 於修道位中 T1562_.29.0738c25: 兼治上修斷 類無能治欲 T1562_.29.0738c26: 論曰。修道所攝滅道法智。兼能對治上界修 T1562_.29.0738c27: 斷。望欲界法四諦法智。全能對治於欲見斷 T1562_.29.0738c28: 法智。亦爲持對治故。能治所治皆得全名。望 T1562_.29.0738c29: 上倶缺倶名少分。何縁唯有滅道法智。兼治 T1562_.29.0739a01: 上界非苦集耶。所縁寂靜出離同故。謂欲上 T1562_.29.0739a02: 滅及能治道。展轉相望相無別故。以諸擇滅 T1562_.29.0739a03: 皆善皆常。一切聖道皆能出離。所縁苦集欲 T1562_.29.0739a04: 上不同。少多細麁上下別故。又苦集智縁所 T1562_.29.0739a05: 厭境。無容厭彼於此離貪。理厭此地時斷此 T1562_.29.0739a06: 地煩惱。若許異厭異離貪應異離貪異解脱。 T1562_.29.0739a07: 若許不厭色無色界。而能離彼界貪習厭。離 T1562_.29.0739a08: 貪理則應壞。滅道二智不縁厭境。縁下治上 T1562_.29.0739a09: 亦無過失。又如不淨觀及欣涅槃欲。謂不淨 T1562_.29.0739a10: 觀縁欲界境。唯能令心厭背欲界。欣涅槃欲 T1562_.29.0739a11: 現在前時。普能令心厭背三界。如是縁欲苦 T1562_.29.0739a12: 集智生。唯能令心離欲界染。縁欲界法滅道 T1562_.29.0739a13: 智生。普能令心離三界染。故許滅道法智品 T1562_.29.0739a14: 増。乃至得成金剛喩定。由此大聖妙善了知。 T1562_.29.0739a15: 依全治門立法類智。法智少分有治上能。類 T1562_.29.0739a16: 智必無能治欲界。要於自界所作已周。方可 T1562_.29.0739a17: 兼爲他界所作。非諸類智已事成時。他事未 T1562_.29.0739a18: 成有須助義。故無類智治欲界法。豈不第十 T1562_.29.0739a19: 六道類智生。乘此便則能治欲界惑。將斷欲 T1562_.29.0739a20: 惑類智不行。設許現行由自界障所拘礙故。 T1562_.29.0739a21: 必無勢力能助成他。法智所作由此類智無 T1562_.29.0739a22: 能治欲。於此十智中誰有何行相。頌曰 T1562_.29.0739a23: 法智及類智 行相倶十六 T1562_.29.0739a24: 世俗此及餘 四諦智各四 T1562_.29.0739a25: 他心智無漏 唯四謂縁道 T1562_.29.0739a26: 有漏自相縁 倶但縁一事 T1562_.29.0739a27: 盡無生十四 謂離空非我 T1562_.29.0739a28: 論曰。法智類智一一具有。非常苦等十六行 T1562_.29.0739a29: 相。十六行相後當廣釋。世智有此及更有餘。 T1562_.29.0739b01: 能縁一切法自共相等故。謂世俗智或有具 T1562_.29.0739b02: 作十六行相。如於煖頂忍等位中。或有不具 T1562_.29.0739b03: 如世第一。重三摩地及現觀邊世俗智等。或 T1562_.29.0739b04: 有別作非聖行相。如不淨觀息念慈等。俗智 T1562_.29.0739b05: 此等行相無邊。苦等四智一一各有縁自諦 T1562_.29.0739b06: 境四種行相。他心智中若無漏者。唯有縁道 T1562_.29.0739b07: 四種行相。此即道智一分攝故。若有漏者取 T1562_.29.0739b08: 自所縁。心心所法自相境故。如境自相行相 T1562_.29.0739b09: 亦爾。故此非前十六所攝。如是二種於一切 T1562_.29.0739b10: 時。一念但縁一事爲境。謂縁心時不縁心所。 T1562_.29.0739b11: 縁受等時不縁想等。若爾何故薄伽梵説如 T1562_.29.0739b12: 實了知有貪心等。非倶時取貪等及心。如不 T1562_.29.0739b13: 倶時取衣及垢。有貪心等三。對心相心解脱 T1562_.29.0739b14: 處已辯差別。毘婆沙師作如是説。聚心者 T1562_.29.0739b15: 謂善心。此於所縁不馳散故。散心者謂染 T1562_.29.0739b16: 心。此與散動相應起故。經主謂此不順契經。 T1562_.29.0739b17: 經言此心云何内聚。謂心若與惛眠倶行。 T1562_.29.0739b18: 或内相應有止無觀。云何外散。謂心遊渉五 T1562_.29.0739b19: 妙欲境隨散隨流。或内相應有觀無止。西方 T1562_.29.0739b20: 者釋乃順契經。謂眠相應説名爲聚。餘染汚 T1562_.29.0739b21: 者名爲散心。而無染眠倶心通聚散失。不許 T1562_.29.0739b22: 眠倶染名爲散心故。不審經意妄爲褒貶。此 T1562_.29.0739b23: 彼二經意各別故。此經中説有貪等心。爲令 T1562_.29.0739b24: 知心染淨品別。謂爲如實了知諸心。黒品白 T1562_.29.0739b25: 品差別理趣。説有貪心離貪心等。彼經中説 T1562_.29.0739b26: 聚心散心。爲令了知修神足障。由彼經説自 T1562_.29.0739b27: 審己心。勿太沈勿太擧勿内聚勿外散。謂彼 T1562_.29.0739b28: 行者修神足時。應自審察修神足障。此心懈 T1562_.29.0739b29: 怠此心掉擧。此心*惛眠此於色等非理作意 T1562_.29.0739c01: 所引流散。此彼經意所爲既殊。不可引彼經 T1562_.29.0739c02: 遮釋此經相。彼經但説修神足時。心於内外 T1562_.29.0739c03: 太聚散失。不欲分別心染淨相。此經所説與 T1562_.29.0739c04: 彼相違雖諸染心皆有怠等。爲顯諸染過失 T1562_.29.0739c05: 差別。隨其増位立沈等心。立策等心應知翻 T1562_.29.0739c06: 此。故我宗釋符順契經。亦善分別諸心異相。 T1562_.29.0739c07: 傍論已了應述本義。如何他心智有行相所 T1562_.29.0739c08: 縁。而説不觀所縁行相。以不觀他心所縁行 T1562_.29.0739c09: 相故。謂但知彼有染等心。不知彼心所染色 T1562_.29.0739c10: 等。亦不知彼能縁行相。不爾他心智應亦縁 T1562_.29.0739c11: 色等。又亦應有能自縁失。無漏他心智應縁 T1562_.29.0739c12: 苦等境。是則亦應許空無相相應。既不許然 T1562_.29.0739c13: 知不觀二。諸他心智有決定相。謂唯能取欲 T1562_.29.0739c14: 色界繋。及非所繋他相續中。現在同類心心 T1562_.29.0739c15: 所法。一實自相爲所縁境。空無相不相應盡 T1562_.29.0739c16: 無生所不攝。不在見道無間道中餘所不遮。 T1562_.29.0739c17: 如應容有盡無生智除空非我。各具有餘十 T1562_.29.0739c18: 四行相。由與出觀心轉相違。故在觀中無二 T1562_.29.0739c19: 行相。謂從二智出觀後時必自了知我生盡 T1562_.29.0739c20: 等。此中意説盡無生智雖是勝義而渉世俗。 T1562_.29.0739c21: 我生盡等是世俗故。空非我是勝義必渉勝 T1562_.29.0739c22: 義。此觀後決了知空非我。故由此二智離空 T1562_.29.0739c23: 非我。爲有無漏。越此十六更是所餘行相攝 T1562_.29.0739c24: 不。頌曰 T1562_.29.0739c25: 淨無越十六 餘説有論故 T1562_.29.0739c26: 論曰。對法諸師有一類説。無越十六無漏行 T1562_.29.0739c27: 相。離此所餘不可得故。豈不有説盡無生智。 T1562_.29.0739c28: 必自了知我生盡等。此不相違前已説故。謂 T1562_.29.0739c29: 前已説無漏觀。後世俗智中作此行相非無 T1562_.29.0740a01: 漏智。此行相轉由盡無生引起俗智。推功 T1562_.29.0740a02: 於本言彼了知。故許此智離空非我。本意 T1562_.29.0740a03: 樂力令此二智。後必引生我生盡等。非由觀 T1562_.29.0740a04: 内此行相轉。令於後時起此行相。我等行相 T1562_.29.0740a05: 觀内雖無。而由不愚自證解脱。義言此位必 T1562_.29.0740a06: 已應有。我生盡等行相勢分。由先世俗行相 T1562_.29.0740a07: 引生。能引後時世俗行相。故離十四無盡無 T1562_.29.0740a08: 生。若謂此應言離十六無者。此不應理除十 T1562_.29.0740a09: 四餘有盡無生非極成故。謂離十四有依密 T1562_.29.0740a10: 説。計我生盡等爲盡無生智。遮彼故説離十 T1562_.29.0740a11: 四無。餘不極成寧對遮此。若爾既有無漏他 T1562_.29.0740a12: 心智。應越十六有無漏行相。謂他心智皆以 T1562_.29.0740a13: 一實自相爲境。道等行相皆以聚集共相爲 T1562_.29.0740a14: 境。彼此既殊知離十六。決定別有無漏行相 T1562_.29.0740a15: 非定許故。所難不然。謂我所宗非決定許。共 T1562_.29.0740a16: 相行相但縁聚集。許有受心二念住故。如觀 T1562_.29.0740a17: 一受體是非常。此智生時以共相行相。觀 T1562_.29.0740a18: 一實自相爲境極成。如是寧不許無漏他心 T1562_.29.0740a19: 智。以共相行相縁一實自相。謂知他心是眞 T1562_.29.0740a20: 道等。即縁一實是道等相。若謂應如受心念 T1562_.29.0740a21: 住。總縁三世所有受心。爲非常等共相行 T1562_.29.0740a22: 相。無漏他心智亦總縁三世。他無漏心等爲 T1562_.29.0740a23: 道等行相。便違自宗他心智起。唯縁現在 T1562_.29.0740a24: 一實自相。此亦不然加行異故。此智加行爲 T1562_.29.0740a25: 欲知他現能縁心。有貪等別修非常等。念住 T1562_.29.0740a26: 加行爲總厭背。諸有漏法由前加行勢力有 T1562_.29.0740a27: 殊。至成滿時現總縁別。是故無有應相例過。 T1562_.29.0740a28: 若謂非常非受自體。故應觀受爲非常時。非 T1562_.29.0740a29: 縁一實自相爲境。寧可引此喩他心智。則彼 T1562_.29.0740b01: 應許受非非常。不應於受起非常觀。如受與 T1562_.29.0740b02: 心其體各別。必定無有觀受爲心。雖即觀受 T1562_.29.0740b03: 以爲無常。而無一物有多體過。領納*無常 T1562_.29.0740b04: 體無別故。如損益等非離領納。所餘行相餘 T1562_.29.0740b05: 法亦然。若爾應與至教相違。如説。於身住 T1562_.29.0740b06: 循身觀應言法智。乃至廣説。又説。觀老死應 T1562_.29.0740b07: 言是四智倶不相違。且初所説非顯法智等。 T1562_.29.0740b08: 離十六行相住循身觀。觀身爲身但如實觀。 T1562_.29.0740b09: 爲非常等我先已許共相行相。亦以一實自 T1562_.29.0740b10: 相爲境。故彼所説於我無違。後老死聲總目 T1562_.29.0740b11: 取蘊。觀五取蘊爲非常等。是四智攝何所相 T1562_.29.0740b12: 違。若爾如説受樂受時。如實了知受於樂受。 T1562_.29.0740b13: 如何是法類世俗道智攝。此應思擇受現在 T1562_.29.0740b14: 時。必不了知不自縁故。亦不可説了知去來。 T1562_.29.0740b15: 去來不名受樂時故。而契經説。受樂受時如 T1562_.29.0740b16: 實了知受於樂受。故知此説別有密意。釋此 T1562_.29.0740b17: 密意如盡無生。謂出觀後時方起此行相。故 T1562_.29.0740b18: 無漏行相越十六外無。有一類言有越十六。本 T1562_.29.0740b19: 論説故如本論言。頗有不繋心能了別。欲界 T1562_.29.0740b20: 繋法耶。曰能了別。謂非常故。苦故空故非 T1562_.29.0740b21: 我故因故集故生故縁故。有是處有是事如 T1562_.29.0740b22: 理所引了別。此證不成迷論意故。論顯不繋 T1562_.29.0740b23: 行相衆多。於中有縁欲界繋者。依容有説有 T1562_.29.0740b24: 是處言有是事言。顯無顛倒即由此故餘無 T1562_.29.0740b25: 此言。謂彼論中復作是説。頗有見斷心能了 T1562_.29.0740b26: 別欲界繋法耶。曰能了別。謂我故我所故。斷 T1562_.29.0740b27: 故常故無因故無作故。損減故尊故勝故上 T1562_.29.0740b28: 故第一故。能清淨故能解脱故。能出離故惑 T1562_.29.0740b29: 故疑故猶預故。貪故瞋故慢故癡故。不如理 T1562_.29.0740c01: 所引了別。除此無容有餘行相。由此不説有 T1562_.29.0740c02: 是處言。由皆顛倒轉不言有是事。故淨行相 T1562_.29.0740c03: 無越十六。理教無違不可傾動 T1562_.29.0740c04: *説一切有部順正理論*卷第七十三 T1562_.29.0740c05: T1562_.29.0740c06: T1562_.29.0740c07: T1562_.29.0740c08: T1562_.29.0740c09: 尊者衆賢造 T1562_.29.0740c10: *三藏法師玄奘奉 *詔譯 T1562_.29.0740c11: *辯智品第七之二 T1562_.29.0740c12: 所言行相有十六者。爲但名別實亦有異。何 T1562_.29.0740c13: 謂行相能行所行。頌曰 T1562_.29.0740c14: 行相實十六 此體唯是慧 T1562_.29.0740c15: 能行有所縁 所行諸有法 T1562_.29.0740c16: 論曰。有説。行相名雖十六實事唯七。縁苦諦 T1562_.29.0740c17: 境治四倒故名實倶四。縁三諦境名四實一。 T1562_.29.0740c18: 如是説者。實亦十六所治所行相有別故。言 T1562_.29.0740c19: 所對治相有別者。爲治常見故修非常行相。 T1562_.29.0740c20: 爲治樂諸行故修苦行相。爲治我所見故修 T1562_.29.0740c21: 空行相。爲治我見故修非我行相。爲治無因 T1562_.29.0740c22: 論故修因行相。爲治自在等一因論故修集 T1562_.29.0740c23: 行相。爲治轉變因常因論故修生行相。爲治 T1562_.29.0740c24: 知爲先能生論故修縁行相。爲治歸自在爲 T1562_.29.0740c25: 涅槃論。顯諸蘊永滅是涅槃。故修滅行相。爲 T1562_.29.0740c26: 治執自體所有解脱。是雜染惑苦不正見。故 T1562_.29.0740c27: 修靜行相。爲治執涅槃如被呪詛。遂致殄滅 T1562_.29.0740c28: 是弊壞論。故修妙行相。爲治執解脱還退見 T1562_.29.0740c29: 故修離行相。爲治執無解脱道。故修道行相。 Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:無/有] [CITE] |