大正蔵検索 INBUDS
|
阿毘達磨順正理論 (No. 1562_ 衆賢造 玄奘譯 ) in Vol. 29 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:無/有] [CITE]
T1562_.29.0555a01: 無希求禮敬事者。懼損功徳及壽命故。如契 T1562_.29.0555a02: 經説毘沙門天。請大目連舍利子等五百聖 T1562_.29.0555a03: 衆。至自宮中。設供養已請施頌願。復請從今 T1562_.29.0555a04: 諸出家者及近事等。至我寺中一切皆應施 T1562_.29.0555a05: 我頌願。我等眷屬亦從今時毎以專誠護持 T1562_.29.0555a06: 正法。令佛弟子出家在家。於一切時恒無惱 T1562_.29.0555a07: 害。時二大聖許其所請。遍告一切出家在家 T1562_.29.0555a08: 諸有受持佛禁戒者。從今以去至天寺中皆 T1562_.29.0555a09: 應如法施天頌願。然未曾令合掌敬禮。由此 T1562_.29.0555a10: 等證定知世尊於此經中非許禮敬。言隨念 T1562_.29.0555a11: 故應禮天者。亦不應理迷經義故。謂經意説 T1562_.29.0555a12: 應作念言。彼諸有情成就信等。從此捨命已 T1562_.29.0555a13: 得上生四大王天及餘天衆。我亦成就信等 T1562_.29.0555a14: 善法亦應同彼當得生天。令隨念天與己同 T1562_.29.0555a15: 徳。非令禮敬名隨念天。故引此經於彼非證 T1562_.29.0555a16: 言不遮故。應禮天者亦不應理義已遮故。經 T1562_.29.0555a17: 唯許三事供養天神。豈不此定言已遮禮敬。 T1562_.29.0555a18: 又准略説毘柰耶中亦已義遮禮天神故。謂 T1562_.29.0555a19: 佛曾説略毘柰耶告諸苾芻。我隨文句所遮 T1562_.29.0555a20: 制者皆不應行。所開許者汝等應行。若非所 T1562_.29.0555a21: 遮非所開許順穢違淨皆不應行。順淨違穢汝 T1562_.29.0555a22: 等應行。既執如來不遮近事禮諸天衆。亦不 T1562_.29.0555a23: 曾見開許近事禮諸天神。豈不此應第三聚 T1562_.29.0555a24: 攝。然諸近事若禮天神。如是所爲順穢違淨。 T1562_.29.0555a25: 理應是佛所不許行。是則還成佛已遮制言 T1562_.29.0555a26: 不遮故。因不極成何縁禮天順穢違淨。以若 T1562_.29.0555a27: 近事樂禮天神。便與外道等無差別。愛樂 T1562_.29.0555a28: 邪徒所作業故。又若近事禮敬天神。則應愛 T1562_.29.0555a29: 重讃天邪論。便與愛樂敬天邪徒同禀尸羅 T1562_.29.0555b01: 作諸勞侶。由此方便習近邪師。墮惡趣因漸 T1562_.29.0555b02: 堅増盛。從此展轉乃至多生亦樂多行如是 T1562_.29.0555b03: 邪行。又若禮敬諸邪天神。因此便憎如來 T1562_.29.0555b04: 聖教。以無不敬邪天神者。聞佛功徳生憤恚 T1562_.29.0555b05: 心。乍可處中心無憎愛。又於過失禮敬持心 T1562_.29.0555b06: 必定怨嫌敬功徳者。何縁信奉大力天神而 T1562_.29.0555b07: 説名爲敬過失者。以彼禮敬恒樂於他。摧伏 T1562_.29.0555b08: 背恩害諂誑等。有過失境爲増上故。由此唯 T1562_.29.0555b09: 有無聞愚夫。於彼天神深生敬愛。若諸賢聖 T1562_.29.0555b10: 唯於斷滅遠離寂靜。大智悲等衆徳集成。諸 T1562_.29.0555b11: 佛世尊深生敬愛。依如是義故有。頌*言 T1562_.29.0555b12: 貧賤有希怖 愚類敬天神 T1562_.29.0555b13: 富貴無悕求 智人唯敬佛 T1562_.29.0555b14: 又若近事禮敬天神。引多有情作大衰損。謂 T1562_.29.0555b15: 事天者咸作是言。鄔波索迦深閑佛教。現來 T1562_.29.0555b16: 禮敬我所事天。必於天神有懷敬信。善哉我 T1562_.29.0555b17: 等無倒歸依。又諸世間樂觀察者。推尋佛教 T1562_.29.0555b18: 未究其眞。覩此便生如是僻執。佛教應似世 T1562_.29.0555b19: 間書傳。不能決定辯眞義理。乃令如是解佛 T1562_.29.0555b20: 教人。還來歸依諸天神衆。引如是等無量有 T1562_.29.0555b21: 情。令増邪執名大衰損。近事如是禮敬天神。 T1562_.29.0555b22: 違淨順穢佛所遮止。故不應言不遮止故。又 T1562_.29.0555b23: 不遮止非應作因。如佛不遮苾芻捨戒。以曾 T1562_.29.0555b24: 無處佛作是言。苾芻不應捨所學戒。非於捨 T1562_.29.0555b25: 戒佛曾不遮。則諸苾芻法應捨戒。故不應説 T1562_.29.0555b26: 鄔波索迦應禮天神。佛不遮故言有恩故應 T1562_.29.0555b27: 禮天者亦不應理聞有怨故。傳聞熱病老死 T1562_.29.0555b28: 等苦。亦有是彼天神所作。不應定説於世有 T1562_.29.0555b29: 恩。又婆羅門長者居士。於苾芻衆佛説有恩。 T1562_.29.0555c01: 供給命縁令無乏故。豈苾芻衆應禮施主。既 T1562_.29.0555c02: 不應禮一切有恩。故所立因有不定失。又諸 T1562_.29.0555c03: 含識皆悉受用。自業所招諸異熟果。是故所 T1562_.29.0555c04: 説所事天神於世有恩有不成失。由此亦破 T1562_.29.0555c05: 能損故因。一切有情皆依自業。説誰有力能 T1562_.29.0555c06: 損於誰。又彼於他既能爲損。誰有智者愛敬 T1562_.29.0555c07: 己怨。世有善人能益他者諸蒙益者應敬彼 T1562_.29.0555c08: 人。是諸天神性多憤恚。恒樂損惱他諸有情。 T1562_.29.0555c09: 如嫉己怨不應敬禮。故彼所説成相違因。又 T1562_.29.0555c10: 見世間歸敬天者。天神於彼有時作衰。亦有 T1562_.29.0555c11: 有情不敬天者。天神於彼不能爲害。故彼所 T1562_.29.0555c12: 説非敬天因。若謂如王亦不應理。世間依屬 T1562_.29.0555c13: 法應爾故。非諸近事繋屬天神。自是邪徒相 T1562_.29.0555c14: 率歸附。世間君主衆所依投。非出家人皆應 T1562_.29.0555c15: 致敬。是故近事不應敬禮一切天神。理極成 T1562_.29.0555c16: 立 T1562_.29.0555c17: *阿毘達磨順正理論*卷第三十七 T1562_.29.0555c18: T1562_.29.0555c19: T1562_.29.0555c20: T1562_.29.0555c21: T1562_.29.0555c22: 尊者衆賢造 T1562_.29.0555c23: *三藏法師玄奘奉 詔譯 T1562_.29.0555c24: *辯業品第四之六 T1562_.29.0555c25: 諸有歸依佛法僧者。爲歸何等。頌曰 T1562_.29.0555c26: 歸依成佛僧 無學二種法 T1562_.29.0555c27: 及涅槃擇滅 是説具三歸 T1562_.29.0555c28: 論曰。如本論言歸依佛者爲歸何法。謂若諸 T1562_.29.0555c29: 法妙有現有。由想等想施設言説名爲佛陀 T1562_.29.0556a01: 歸此能成佛。無學法言謂若者即是總標當 T1562_.29.0556a02: 所説義。言諸法者即是顯示無我増言。妙有 T1562_.29.0556a03: 言顯妙有性合。現有即明現可得義。或妙徳 T1562_.29.0556a04: 合。故名妙有。現有即顯是所知性。想者謂 T1562_.29.0556a05: 名言等。想者即是能顯共立能詮標擧。能詮 T1562_.29.0556a06: 故名施設。何故標擧次則答言。由此能成無 T1562_.29.0556a07: 倒言説。覺一切法一切種相不藉他教故名 T1562_.29.0556a08: 佛陀。或此圓成智等衆徳自然開覺故名佛 T1562_.29.0556a09: 陀。或佛陀名顯彼有覺。如質礙物名有質礙。 T1562_.29.0556a10: 或佛陀名顯彼能説己所證覺以開覺他。如 T1562_.29.0556a11: 婆羅門來詣佛所。以妙讃頌問世尊言 T1562_.29.0556a12: 稽首世導師 名最上覺者 T1562_.29.0556a13: 何縁父母等 號尊名佛陀 T1562_.29.0556a14: 世尊哀愍彼婆羅門。亦以伽他而告之曰 T1562_.29.0556a15: 婆羅門當知 我如去來佛 T1562_.29.0556a16: 成就覺者相 故我名佛陀 T1562_.29.0556a17: 婆羅門當知 我觀三世行 T1562_.29.0556a18: 皆有生滅法 故我名佛陀 T1562_.29.0556a19: 婆羅門當知 我於應知斷 T1562_.29.0556a20: 修證事已辨 故我名佛陀 T1562_.29.0556a21: 婆羅門當知 我於一切境 T1562_.29.0556a22: 具一切智見 故我名佛陀 T1562_.29.0556a23: 婆羅門當知 我於無量劫 T1562_.29.0556a24: 修諸純淨行 經無量死生 T1562_.29.0556a25: 今於最後身 離塵垢毒箭 T1562_.29.0556a26: 證得無上覺 故我名佛陀 T1562_.29.0556a27: 能成佛言。顯彼諸法與佛施設爲建立因。如 T1562_.29.0556a28: 何此中於無量法而總建立標一佛名。如依 T1562_.29.0556a29: 衆多和合人上立一僧寶一勝所歸。又於衆 T1562_.29.0556b01: 多無漏道上立一道蘊無有過失。或先已説 T1562_.29.0556b02: 先説者。何謂想等想施設言説。即佛相續無 T1562_.29.0556b03: 學法中立一佛名。無別一佛能成佛法。爲是 T1562_.29.0556b04: 何等謂盡智等及彼眷屬。由得彼法能覺一 T1562_.29.0556b05: 切。以彼勝故身得佛名。非色等身前後等故。 T1562_.29.0556b06: 爲歸一佛一切佛耶。理實應言歸一切佛。以 T1562_.29.0556b07: 諸佛道相無異故。經主此中作如是説。然尋 T1562_.29.0556b08: 本論不見有言唯無學法。即名爲佛。但言無 T1562_.29.0556b09: 學法能成於佛不遮所依身亦是佛體。是故 T1562_.29.0556b10: 於此不可難言。若唯無學法即是佛者。如何 T1562_.29.0556b11: 於佛所惡心出血但損生身成無間罪。今詳 T1562_.29.0556b12: 經主於本論義未甚研尋能成佛言已遮佛體 T1562_.29.0556b13: 攝依身故。謂佛名言依佛義立。唯此所目是 T1562_.29.0556b14: 眞佛體。若佛名言就依身立。於未證得無學 T1562_.29.0556b15: 法時。已有依身應亦名佛。故知佛號不目依 T1562_.29.0556b16: 身。由此依身非能成佛。故本論説能成佛 T1562_.29.0556b17: 言已遮依身亦是佛體。已顯佛體唯無學法。 T1562_.29.0556b18: 或設許然亦非無難。謂佛體性略有二種。一 T1562_.29.0556b19: 者世俗。二者勝義。歸依佛者現對世俗。於 T1562_.29.0556b20: 勝義佛繋念歸依。以託依身而歸依彼。由得 T1562_.29.0556b21: 彼故得佛名法。故唯無學法是勝義佛體成 T1562_.29.0556b22: 無間罪由損勝義。然勝義佛必不可損。依如 T1562_.29.0556b23: 是義理可難言。如何於佛所惡心出血但損 T1562_.29.0556b24: 害生身成無間罪。毘婆沙者作是釋言。壞彼 T1562_.29.0556b25: 所依彼隨壞故。如是釋難深爲應理。又彼經 T1562_.29.0556b26: 主作如是難。若異此者應佛與僧住世俗心。 T1562_.29.0556b27: 非僧非佛云何如是。以於爾時學無學法不 T1562_.29.0556b28: 現前故。此難不然非所許故。謂我不許學無 T1562_.29.0556b29: 學法。唯現在位方成佛僧。唯言佛僧得彼法 T1562_.29.0556c01: 故。得於諸位曾無間斷。寧住世俗心便非僧 T1562_.29.0556c02: 非佛。設許現在方成佛僧亦無有過。以許 T1562_.29.0556c03: 彼得其體亦是學無學故。得一切時常現前 T1562_.29.0556c04: 故。經主復言又應唯執成苾芻戒即是苾芻。 T1562_.29.0556c05: 是我所宗豈成過失。以得戒故假説依身亦 T1562_.29.0556c06: 名苾芻與前義等。是故經主於對法宗不善 T1562_.29.0556c07: 了知所説文義。婆雌子部作如是言。補特伽 T1562_.29.0556c08: 羅是所歸佛。此非應理。所以者何。彼無差 T1562_.29.0556c09: 別不成歸故。謂歸離繋補特伽羅與歸世尊 T1562_.29.0556c10: 有何差別。善等差別同不記故。若謂如火隨 T1562_.29.0556c11: 依差別。謂如依糠名爲糠火。如是依佛法彼 T1562_.29.0556c12: 亦得佛名。此救不然應無常故。徒設救執無 T1562_.29.0556c13: 所成故。謂彼所執補特伽羅既隨所依應無 T1562_.29.0556c14: 常性。又依糠火非即名糠補特伽羅。若依佛 T1562_.29.0556c15: 法但應名佛補特伽羅。補特伽羅非即名佛。 T1562_.29.0556c16: 如是救執竟何所成。既執補特伽羅隨法成 T1562_.29.0556c17: 差別。應許能差別法即是佛。非餘以歸依名 T1562_.29.0556c18: 顯依。由此能滅所有生死災患。有如是用唯 T1562_.29.0556c19: 此相法。故説此法是所歸依。餘皆不然是説 T1562_.29.0556c20: 爲善。又應許佛補特伽羅成世間法。故契經 T1562_.29.0556c21: 説今見世尊諸根變異。汝等既執補特伽羅。 T1562_.29.0556c22: 由隨所依故成差別。何縁依佛法彼得佛名。 T1562_.29.0556c23: 非佛法爲依不名非佛。此中無有差別理故。 T1562_.29.0556c24: 若謂如人雖有髮等黒。而不隨彼可得名白 T1562_.29.0556c25: 人。是則應成捨前救執。謂彼前救執補特 T1562_.29.0556c26: 伽羅。由隨所依故成差別。今復不許補特伽 T1562_.29.0556c27: 羅隨其所依成差別故。豈亦有火得差別名。 T1562_.29.0556c28: 隨一分依不隨一分。又依有漏無漏所成補 T1562_.29.0556c29: 特伽羅應成二體。不爾應捨前所救執。又 T1562_.29.0557a01: 世尊説我於世間生非補特伽羅亦有生理。 T1562_.29.0557a02: 若異此者世尊應言我現世間。然説不爾是 T1562_.29.0557a03: 故決定法爲所歸。如世尊言但應依法。不應 T1562_.29.0557a04: 依彼補特伽羅。又世尊言若見法者即是見 T1562_.29.0557a05: 我。又契經説佛雖轉變而心無異。非汝所執 T1562_.29.0557a06: 補特伽羅可有轉變。以汝不説補特伽羅是 T1562_.29.0557a07: 無常故。今乘義便且以餘理破汝所歸補特 T1562_.29.0557a08: 伽羅。其體非實餘處廣辯。尊者矩摩邏多作 T1562_.29.0557a09: 如是説。佛有漏無漏法皆是佛體。故契經説 T1562_.29.0557a10: 今者佛身衰老朽邁。又世尊説我今重病生 T1562_.29.0557a11: 隣死受。告阿難陀汝應爲佛於此敷設嗢怛 T1562_.29.0557a12: 羅僧。又契經言。汝應以飮食如法供養佛爲 T1562_.29.0557a13: 上首僧。又契經言諸苾芻衆受持佛語。又契 T1562_.29.0557a14: 經言於如來所惡心出血。又經説佛以足躡 T1562_.29.0557a15: 衣。又契經言我今觀佛威光熾盛如妙金臺。 T1562_.29.0557a16: 又如尊言我今欲往娑多山處報藥叉恩。又 T1562_.29.0557a17: 契經言汝等商主若得見佛獲無上利。又饒 T1562_.29.0557a18: 益他方得名佛。饒益他者多是俗智。又諸佛 T1562_.29.0557a19: 用大悲爲體。此是有漏法有情相轉故。如是 T1562_.29.0557a20: 等類教理衆多。非無漏中可有斯事。故非 T1562_.29.0557a21: 唯無漏佛法爲佛體。此亦非理由無學法力 T1562_.29.0557a22: 於身等法假立佛名故。云何知然。佛眼根 T1562_.29.0557a23: 等與前眼等無差別故。又如有漏名無學明。 T1562_.29.0557a24: 經説三明是無學故。非死生智可是無學此 T1562_.29.0557a25: 縁形顯故。有情相轉故無學身有得無學名。 T1562_.29.0557a26: 餘法亦然與諸佛法墮一相續亦得佛名。又 T1562_.29.0557a27: 佛身等不應是佛以應斷故。夫言佛者都無 T1562_.29.0557a28: 過失非應斷故。又經説身無明集成故。豈可 T1562_.29.0557a29: 説佛亦無明集成。又諸佛身是不淨境。以一 T1562_.29.0557b01: 切欲界色是不淨觀境故。非佛應爲不淨觀 T1562_.29.0557b02: 境。經説縁佛増長善根生欣作意。諸不淨觀 T1562_.29.0557b03: 一向與厭作意相應。故知佛身非眞是佛。又 T1562_.29.0557b04: 説業食爲身因故。佛身諸處業異熟攝。是段 T1562_.29.0557b05: 等食之所資長。豈應於此立眞佛名。若人説 T1562_.29.0557b06: 佛因於業有。誰有智者而不訶責。豈有智人 T1562_.29.0557b07: 誤發此語。後自覺察而無悔愧。若據佛資糧 T1562_.29.0557b08: 依止攝益等。假説爲佛於理無遮。餘處亦曾 T1562_.29.0557b09: 見此例故。如言食是命酪是熱病等。又佛身 T1562_.29.0557b10: 中大悲俗智先菩薩位其體已有。此若是佛 T1562_.29.0557b11: 佛應先成。若有別因令此二種後轉名佛。即 T1562_.29.0557b12: 應許此能差別法是佛非餘。破此亦應同前 T1562_.29.0557b13: 一類違正理教自分別執。然大衆部復作是 T1562_.29.0557b14: 言。如來身中所有諸法皆是無漏盡是所歸。 T1562_.29.0557b15: 以經説身是已修故。謂契經説已修身心。如 T1562_.29.0557b16: 説已修心許心是眞淨身亦應爾。既説已修 T1562_.29.0557b17: 如何可言非眞無漏。如是等證其類寔多。此 T1562_.29.0557b18: 一類宗辯本事品。已廣遮遣無勞重破。然契 T1562_.29.0557b19: 經説已修身者。約對治修故作是説。是已修 T1562_.29.0557b20: 習能離色染無間道義。又契經言彼已修習 T1562_.29.0557b21: 四種念住。復言四念住總攝一切法。則一切 T1562_.29.0557b22: 法應皆無漏。若謂此據自性相離二念住説 T1562_.29.0557b23: 餘亦應同。謂契經言已修身者。何故不許修 T1562_.29.0557b24: 身念住。又有漏善亦是所修故引修言證無 T1562_.29.0557b25: 漏者。此證與理豈得相應。又彼所言若佛眼 T1562_.29.0557b26: 等。是煩惱境故是有漏。豈不亦是離染所縁 T1562_.29.0557b27: 何理能遮。是無漏性此例非等如前已辯。有 T1562_.29.0557b28: 漏無漏相差別故。然契經説煩惱所縁聖道 T1562_.29.0557b29: 所厭名有漏者應共尋求。此經意趣善逝意 T1562_.29.0557c01: 趣極爲難識。今見此經所説意者。若所縁 T1562_.29.0557c02: 境煩惱味著執爲己有。亦爲聖道之所厭惡。 T1562_.29.0557c03: 是名有漏理應眼等。漏所味著執爲己有可 T1562_.29.0557c04: 成有漏。不應例言眼等諸法無漏。所厭惡應 T1562_.29.0557c05: 亦成無漏。欣厭既異爲例不齊。非佛眼等爲 T1562_.29.0557c06: 無漏。諸法作道等行相欣樂而縁。不可説 T1562_.29.0557c07: 言佛眼等法。無漏厭惡而成無漏。又如貪瞋 T1562_.29.0557c08: 於諸漏轉。於眼等轉其相亦然。故可説言眼 T1562_.29.0557c09: 等諸法同諸漏法亦成有漏。非如聖道於聖 T1562_.29.0557c10: 道轉。於眼等轉其相亦然。故不可言眼等諸 T1562_.29.0557c11: 法。同聖道法亦成無漏。故彼劬勞無所成者。 T1562_.29.0557c12: 雖復種種妄率己情。無損我宗經所説相。唯 T1562_.29.0557c13: 有大聖迦多衍尼子説所歸佛體無有過失。 T1562_.29.0557c14: 僧伽差別略有五種。一無恥僧。二唖羊僧。三 T1562_.29.0557c15: 朋黨僧。四世俗僧。五勝義僧。無恥僧者謂 T1562_.29.0557c16: 毀禁戒。而被法服補特伽羅。唖羊僧者謂於 T1562_.29.0557c17: 三藏無所了達補特伽羅。譬如唖羊無辯説 T1562_.29.0557c18: 用。或言唖者顯無説法。能復説羊言顯無聽 T1562_.29.0557c19: 法用。即顯此類補特伽羅。於三藏中無聽説 T1562_.29.0557c20: 用。朋黨僧者謂於遊散營務鬪諍。方便善巧 T1562_.29.0557c21: 結搆朋黨補特伽羅。此三多分造非法業。世 T1562_.29.0557c22: 俗僧者謂善異生。此能通作法非法業。勝義 T1562_.29.0557c23: 僧者謂學無學法。及彼所依器補特伽羅。此 T1562_.29.0557c24: 定無容造非法業。五中最勝是所歸依。如讃 T1562_.29.0557c25: 歸依伽他中説 T1562_.29.0557c26: 此歸依最勝 此歸依最尊 T1562_.29.0557c27: 必因此歸依 能解脱衆苦 T1562_.29.0557c28: 於如是法補特伽羅二勝義僧中。迦多衍尼 T1562_.29.0557c29: 子意但以法爲所歸僧。故本論中作如是説。 T1562_.29.0558a01: 歸能成僧學無學法。豈不此説與經相違。謂 T1562_.29.0558a02: 契經中世尊説有四雙八隻補特伽羅。是福田 T1562_.29.0558a03: 僧皆應供養。經有別義謂彼經中。説福田僧 T1562_.29.0558a04: 應供養故。彼經意顯能受施僧。二勝義僧中 T1562_.29.0558a05: 能受他施者。非學無學法唯補特伽羅。此本 T1562_.29.0558a06: 論中説歸依義。眞能救護方是所歸。眞救護 T1562_.29.0558a07: 能唯在聖法。故契經言但應依法。不應依彼 T1562_.29.0558a08: 補特伽羅。由此論經不相違背。又此應是不 T1562_.29.0558a09: 了義經。待不違理別意趣故。待別意趣方可 T1562_.29.0558a10: 了者。此類名曰不了義經。謂此經中所立四 T1562_.29.0558a11: 八果向差別補特伽羅法。補特伽羅定依何 T1562_.29.0558a12: 建立。據直言義理倶不成。若謂依法應唯立 T1562_.29.0558a13: 五。謂阿羅漢果及四種向。無漏法和合所成 T1562_.29.0558a14: 僧伽。若依補特伽羅亦非定八。以成八數定 T1562_.29.0558a15: 因不可得故。謂無量品別施設僧伽。依一補 T1562_.29.0558a16: 特伽羅乃至無量故。謂或依一施設僧伽。如 T1562_.29.0558a17: 説若能如其次第。以諸飮食供養一僧。便獲 T1562_.29.0558a18: 供養一切僧福。或有依四施設僧伽。如供養 T1562_.29.0558a19: 衆僧説戒羯磨等。或有依五施設僧伽如恣 T1562_.29.0558a20: 擧等。或有依八施設僧伽。如此經説或有依 T1562_.29.0558a21: 十施設僧伽。如依中國受具戒等。或依二十 T1562_.29.0558a22: 施説僧伽。如出衆餘爲羯磨等。此中後後能 T1562_.29.0558a23: 攝前前。非於前前能攝後後。從此以後數無 T1562_.29.0558a24: 決定。乃至依無量亦施設僧伽。如餘處説苾 T1562_.29.0558a25: 芻僧伽苾芻尼僧伽。或二部僧伽。或賢聖僧 T1562_.29.0558a26: 伽。聲聞僧伽等。於此多種依多品別補特伽 T1562_.29.0558a27: 羅施設。僧内唯此依八補特伽羅名福田僧 T1562_.29.0558a28: 非依餘品。如是差別有何定因。由此二門皆 T1562_.29.0558a29: 不應理。故知此是不了義經。若謂唯齊此補 T1562_.29.0558b01: 特伽羅總攝諸聲聞。所有無漏功徳種類所 T1562_.29.0558b02: 成種種。若二若三相續差別故唯約此顯示 T1562_.29.0558b03: 福田。此亦非理。且許施設補特伽羅僧要待 T1562_.29.0558b04: 法僧故。則應唯法是勝義僧補特伽羅如前 T1562_.29.0558b05: 已説。若前若後無差別故。又依此八補特 T1562_.29.0558b06: 伽羅亦不具能總得一切聲聞無漏法功徳種 T1562_.29.0558b07: 類盡。以非唯一預流果向能得一切。此向 T1562_.29.0558b08: 功徳如是乃至阿羅漢果。若謂向果無差別 T1562_.29.0558b09: 故。唯此總説一切盡者。何不説五。而説八 T1562_.29.0558b10: 耶。以於此中次第可得。餘三攝在此三中 T1562_.29.0558b11: 故。又依法立補特伽羅。唯依四雙道説八補 T1562_.29.0558b12: 特伽羅故。以約殊勝功徳所依顯示有情八 T1562_.29.0558b13: 種差別故。此意説補特伽羅豈不即爲唯依 T1562_.29.0558b14: 於法。自相共相差別理成。以於法中若總若 T1562_.29.0558b15: 別理皆得成立非補特伽羅。是故於此唯依 T1562_.29.0558b16: 於法施設僧伽分明可見。若爾何故不唯説 T1562_.29.0558b17: 五。爲總攝法品類盡故。以非一切一來果向 T1562_.29.0558b18: 總攝一切預流果盡。如是乃至阿羅漢向不 T1562_.29.0558b19: 攝一切不還果盡。是故爲顯聖道差別。應説 T1562_.29.0558b20: 此八補特伽羅。故此契經成不了義。由唯約 T1562_.29.0558b21: 法建立僧伽故。我軌範師迦多衍尼子爲善 T1562_.29.0558b22: 成立所歸僧伽。諸勝施設中説有情故非定 T1562_.29.0558b23: 唯法者理亦不然。彼由法力成差別故。無餘 T1562_.29.0558b24: 方便令所化生能正了知佛等勝徳。故佛方 T1562_.29.0558b25: 便依有情門立勝施設令知無過。於此義中 T1562_.29.0558b26: 復應思擇佛爲僧攝。非僧攝耶。若僧攝者則 T1562_.29.0558b27: 勝施設證淨寶歸數皆應減。又與至教所説 T1562_.29.0558b28: 相違。如契經言 T1562_.29.0558b29: 佛告長者何謂僧寶。謂於當來此世界中有 T1562_.29.0558c01: 善男子。生刹帝利婆羅門家。或生吠舍戍達 T1562_.29.0558c02: 羅家。歸投如來應正等覺。出家修證是名僧 T1562_.29.0558c03: 寶。又契經説佛在僧前。又契經言佛於某處 T1562_.29.0558c04: 與若干數苾芻僧倶。若非僧攝契經何故作 T1562_.29.0558c05: 如是言。汝等若能以少施物。如次供養佛上 T1562_.29.0558c06: 首僧。則於僧田獲得周遍清淨施福。又契經 T1562_.29.0558c07: 説汝喬答彌。若奉施僧亦供養我。又經説有 T1562_.29.0558c08: 四雙八隻補特伽羅名福田僧。不應説佛離 T1562_.29.0558c09: 八而有。僧有多種謂有情人聲聞福田及聖 T1562_.29.0558c10: 僧等。佛於此内非聲聞僧。可是餘僧自然覺 T1562_.29.0558c11: 故。又不成就聲聞法故。又爲聲聞制立學處。 T1562_.29.0558c12: 言不應受畜等佛衣量衣。若佛世尊聲聞僧 T1562_.29.0558c13: 攝。亦應受學如是學處。又云聲聞所有衣 T1562_.29.0558c14: 物世尊聽許苾芻衆分。若佛世尊聲聞僧攝 T1562_.29.0558c15: 世尊衣物亦應許分。既不許分。是故知佛可 T1562_.29.0558c16: 餘僧攝。非聲聞僧。由是極成佛僧無雜然契 T1562_.29.0558c17: 經説。汝等若能以少施物。如次供養佛上首 T1562_.29.0558c18: 僧。獲遍福者約福田説故無有過。由此已解 T1562_.29.0558c19: 喬答彌經。或彼經言。亦供養我亦言意顯簡 T1562_.29.0558c20: 佛非僧。若佛即僧亦言何用。佛所説八補 T1562_.29.0558c21: 特伽羅爲顯聲聞僧位差別。言僧中有八位 T1562_.29.0558c22: 不同。不作是言八皆僧攝。或所説八皆福田 T1562_.29.0558c23: 僧佛亦福田故無有過。施僧施佛何得大果。 T1562_.29.0558c24: 有作是言。施僧果大一切無漏聖法種類。皆 T1562_.29.0558c25: 於僧中具可得故。又言僧是上福田故。又 T1562_.29.0558c26: 有施主將物施佛世尊勸令迴施僧故。然我 T1562_.29.0558c27: 所宗施佛果大。以契經説諸佛世尊。證得一 T1562_.29.0558c28: 切増上自在。殊勝功徳名最尊故。又佛世尊 T1562_.29.0558c29: 一向無失。諸煩惱習皆無餘故。又僧所修梵 T1562_.29.0559a01: 行功徳一切皆由佛所生故。又佛世尊自他利 T1562_.29.0559a02: 徳皆已圓滿至究竟故。經説此徳爲最勝故。 T1562_.29.0559a03: 以能速疾引他心故。廣大願思縁此生故。然 T1562_.29.0559a04: 彼所言一切無漏聖法種類。皆於僧中具可 T1562_.29.0559a05: 得者。此不成證。世尊身内無量無邊不共功 T1562_.29.0559a06: 徳具可得故。如説假使諸世界中一切有 T1562_.29.0559a07: 情。皆阿羅漢或獨勝覺所有功徳。欲比世尊 T1562_.29.0559a08: 不及少分。所言僧是上福田者。亦非證因有 T1562_.29.0559a09: 別意故。謂約僧衆其數甚多。能受用多所施 T1562_.29.0559a10: 財物。能令施主受用福増。是故言僧福田中 T1562_.29.0559a11: 上。或顯僧衆住經久時。及遍諸方故作是説。 T1562_.29.0559a12: 或僧雖復是上福田。然佛福田是上中極。由 T1562_.29.0559a13: 前所説諸因縁故。所言施主將物施佛世尊 T1562_.29.0559a14: 勸令迴施僧者。此證非理。觀別因故。謂佛爲 T1562_.29.0559a15: 欲令僧住持無上正法得久住故。勸以施物 T1562_.29.0559a16: 迴施於衆。毘婆沙師作如是説。爲令施主縁 T1562_.29.0559a17: 聖慈尊金色相身植勝因故。歸依於法謂歸 T1562_.29.0559a18: 愛盡離滅涅槃。如是一切是煩惱斷名之差 T1562_.29.0559a19: 別。或有謂愛味著門轉不應棄捨故。寄愛 T1562_.29.0559a20: 名通顯一切煩惱永盡。愛與餘煩惱同一對 T1562_.29.0559a21: 治故。言愛盡者。謂見所斷諸愛永斷故。預 T1562_.29.0559a22: 流者。此愛盡時便自記別諸惡趣盡。謂我已 T1562_.29.0559a23: 盡那落迦等。所言離者。謂欲界中諸所有貪 T1562_.29.0559a24: 多分已斷。即是已薄欲界貪義。滅謂欲界諸 T1562_.29.0559a25: 愛全斷。此地煩惱當於爾時決定無能繋縛 T1562_.29.0559a26: 義故。言涅槃者。謂色無色諸愛永斷。由此 T1562_.29.0559a27: 盡時諸所有苦皆永寂故。此則顯示四沙門 T1562_.29.0559a28: 果。或此四種如其次第。顯三界愛斷及永般 T1562_.29.0559a29: 涅槃。或愛盡者。三界愛斷所言離者。除愛所 T1562_.29.0559b01: 餘諸煩惱斷。所言滅者。顯有餘依般涅槃界。 T1562_.29.0559b02: 言涅槃者。顯無餘依般涅槃界。有餘師説。歸 T1562_.29.0559b03: 依法者。謂通歸依諸佛世尊。所説雜染及清 T1562_.29.0559b04: 淨法。彼説非理。所以者何。佛説涅槃名最 T1562_.29.0559b05: 上法。又有經説滅爲最上。是故唯應歸依此 T1562_.29.0559b06: 法。此中何法是所歸依。能歸是何。歸依何 T1562_.29.0559b07: 義。所歸依者。謂滅諦全道諦一分。除獨覺乘 T1562_.29.0559b08: 菩薩學位無漏功徳。何縁彼法非所歸依。彼 T1562_.29.0559b09: 不能救生死怖故。謂諸獨覺不能説法教誡。 T1562_.29.0559b10: 諸有情令離生死怖。菩薩學位不起期心故。 T1562_.29.0559b11: 亦無能教誡他義故。彼身中學無學法不能 T1562_.29.0559b12: 救護非所歸依。有餘師言。不和合故不顯了 T1562_.29.0559b13: 故。如其次第。獨覺菩薩非所歸依。縁彼亦 T1562_.29.0559b14: 生無漏意淨。故彼亦是證淨境攝。此中能歸 T1562_.29.0559b15: 語表爲體。自立誓限爲自性故。若并眷屬五 T1562_.29.0559b16: 蘊爲體。以能歸依所有言説。由心等起非離 T1562_.29.0559b17: 於心。如是歸依救濟爲義。他身聖法及善無 T1562_.29.0559b18: 爲。如何能爲自身救濟。以歸依彼。能息無 T1562_.29.0559b19: 邊生死苦輪大怖畏故。非如牧竪防護諸牛。 T1562_.29.0559b20: 提婆達多守餘人等。但令不散非所歸依。不 T1562_.29.0559b21: 能令息生死畏故。雖復亦有歸佛法僧。然彼 T1562_.29.0559b22: 不蒙現救濟者。以彼違越佛教理故。如有依 T1562_.29.0559b23: 王而違王勅。王不救濟此亦應然。有餘師説。 T1562_.29.0559b24: 彼亦能與後邊善根爲種子故。歸依但作正 T1562_.29.0559b25: 行種子。非即由此能息苦輪。故有歸依未蒙 T1562_.29.0559b26: 救者。有餘師説。彼雖歸依未能奉行歸所爲 T1562_.29.0559b27: 故。歸依所爲其體是何。謂見四諦故。伽他 T1562_.29.0559b28: 説 T1562_.29.0559b29: 諸有歸依佛 及歸依法僧 T1562_.29.0559c01: 於四聖諦中 恒以慧觀察 T1562_.29.0559c02: 知苦知苦集 知永超衆苦 T1562_.29.0559c03: 知八支聖道 趣安隱涅槃 T1562_.29.0559c04: 此歸依最勝 此歸依最尊 T1562_.29.0559c05: 必因此歸依 能解脱衆苦 T1562_.29.0559c06: 三所歸依有差別者。佛唯無學。法二倶非。僧 T1562_.29.0559c07: 體貫通學與無學。又佛體是十根少分。僧通 T1562_.29.0559c08: 十二。法體非根。擇滅涅槃非根攝故。又歸依 T1562_.29.0559c09: 佛謂但歸依一有爲沙門果。歸依法者謂通 T1562_.29.0559c10: 歸依四無爲沙門果。歸依僧者謂通歸依四 T1562_.29.0559c11: 有爲沙門果及四果能趣向。又佛譬如能示 T1562_.29.0559c12: 道者。法如安隱所趣方域。僧如同渉正道伴 T1562_.29.0559c13: 侶。應求此等三差別因。應思何縁於餘律儀 T1562_.29.0559c14: 處。立離非梵行爲其所學。唯於近事一律儀 T1562_.29.0559c15: 中。但制令其離欲邪行。頌曰 T1562_.29.0559c16: 邪行最可訶 易離得不作 T1562_.29.0559c17: 論曰。唯欲邪行極爲能觀此他世者共所訶 T1562_.29.0559c18: 責。以能侵毀他妻等故。感惡趣故非非梵行。 T1562_.29.0559c19: 又欲邪行易遠離故。諸在家者耽著欲故。離 T1562_.29.0559c20: 非梵行難可受持。觀彼不能長時修學。故不 T1562_.29.0559c21: 制彼離非梵行。謂無始來數習力故。婬欲煩 T1562_.29.0559c22: 惱數起現行。諸在家人隨順欲境。數易和合 T1562_.29.0559c23: 抑制爲難。故不制彼令全遠離。又諸聖者於 T1562_.29.0559c24: 欲邪行一切定得不作律儀。經生聖者亦不 T1562_.29.0559c25: 行故。離非梵行則不如是故。於近事所受律 T1562_.29.0559c26: 儀但爲制立離欲邪行。若異此者。經生有學 T1562_.29.0559c27: 應不能持近事性戒。若諸近事後復從師要 T1562_.29.0559c28: 期。更受離非梵行得未曾得此律儀不。有餘 T1562_.29.0559c29: 師説。得此律儀然不由斯方成近事。亦不由 T1562_.29.0560a01: 此失近事名。亦非先時戒不圓滿。有説不得 T1562_.29.0560a02: 未得律儀。然獲最勝杜多功徳。名獲最勝遠 T1562_.29.0560a03: 離法者。謂能遠離婬欲法故。由此若能遠離 T1562_.29.0560a04: 妻室淨修梵行功不唐捐。若有先時未取妻 T1562_.29.0560a05: 妾。普於有情類受近事律儀。於後取時寧非 T1562_.29.0560a06: 犯戒。今非他攝故如用屬己財。謂於今時以 T1562_.29.0560a07: 呪術力。或財理等種種方便攝彼屬己。不繋 T1562_.29.0560a08: 於他如何難令於彼犯戒。又有別理今取彼 T1562_.29.0560a09: 時。於前律儀無所違犯。頌曰 T1562_.29.0560a10: 得律儀如誓 非總於相續 T1562_.29.0560a11: 論曰。諸受欲者受近事戒。如本受誓而得律 T1562_.29.0560a12: 儀。本受誓云何。謂離欲邪行。於他所攝諸女 T1562_.29.0560a13: 人所。起他攝想而行非法。如是乃名犯欲邪 T1562_.29.0560a14: 行。非於一切有情相續。先立誓言我當於彼。 T1562_.29.0560a15: 離非梵行而得律儀。云何今時可名犯戒。既 T1562_.29.0560a16: 如本誓而得律儀。今正隨行如何名犯。先取 T1562_.29.0560a17: 妻妾後受律儀。於自妻等亦發此戒。以近事 T1562_.29.0560a18: 等別解律儀一切有情處所得故。若異此者 T1562_.29.0560a19: 於自妻妾。非處非時非支非禮。亦應不犯 T1562_.29.0560a20: 欲邪行戒。於舊所受既有犯者。於新所受應 T1562_.29.0560a21: 有不犯。故不應爲如先所難。何縁於四語業 T1562_.29.0560a22: 道中。立離虚誑語爲近事學處。非立離餘離 T1562_.29.0560a23: 間語等。亦由前説三種因故。謂虚誑語最可 T1562_.29.0560a24: 訶故。諸在家者易遠離故。一切聖者得不作 T1562_.29.0560a25: 故。復有別因。頌曰 T1562_.29.0560a26: 以開虚誑語 便越諸學處 T1562_.29.0560a27: 論曰。越諸學處被檢問時。若開虚誑語便言 T1562_.29.0560a28: 我不作。因斯於戒多所違越。故佛爲欲令彼 T1562_.29.0560a29: 堅持。於一切律儀皆遮虚誑語。云何令彼縁 T1562_.29.0560b01: 力犯戒。時尋即生慚如實自發露。何縁一切 T1562_.29.0560b02: 離性罪中。立四種爲近事學處。然於一切離 T1562_.29.0560b03: 遮罪中。於近事律儀唯制離飮酒。頌曰 T1562_.29.0560b04: 遮中唯離酒 爲護餘律儀 T1562_.29.0560b05: 論曰。諸飮酒者心多縱逸。不能守護諸餘律 T1562_.29.0560b06: 儀。故爲護餘令離飮酒。謂飮酒已於惡作説 T1562_.29.0560b07: 別悔墮落。衆餘他勝五部罪中不能防守。或 T1562_.29.0560b08: 有是處由此普於諸學處海擾亂違越。由此 T1562_.29.0560b09: 世尊知飮諸酒是起一切性罪因故。能損正 T1562_.29.0560b10: 念及正智故。能引破戒破見愚故。於一切種 T1562_.29.0560b11: 離遮罪中。唯説此爲近事學處。故離飮酒雖 T1562_.29.0560b12: 遮戒攝。而於一切立學處中。與離性罪相隨 T1562_.29.0560b13: 而制。有言飮酒是性罪攝。相阿笈摩及正理 T1562_.29.0560b14: 故。阿笈摩者謂契經言。身有四惡行。殺生 T1562_.29.0560b15: 至飮酒不應遮罪是惡行攝。又如上座鄔波 T1562_.29.0560b16: 離言。我當如何供給病者。世尊告曰。唯除 T1562_.29.0560b17: 性罪餘隨所應皆可供給。然有染疾釋種須 T1562_.29.0560b18: 酒。世尊不開以酒供給。非佛於彼染疾。苾芻 T1562_.29.0560b19: 自説是師而不憐愍。由正理者。聖者易生亦 T1562_.29.0560b20: 不犯故如殺生等。又離飮酒。世尊説爲。近事 T1562_.29.0560b21: 律儀如殺等故。正理論者作如是言。雖於此 T1562_.29.0560b22: 中若如理辯必遭一類愚者所譏。然彼心遊 T1562_.29.0560b23: 正法相外。無容枉理憚彼邪言。故我必應辯 T1562_.29.0560b24: 正法相。非飮諸酒是性罪攝。由此中無性罪 T1562_.29.0560b25: 相故。性罪遮罪其相云何。未制戒時諸離欲 T1562_.29.0560b26: 者決定不起是性罪相。若彼猶行是名遮罪。 T1562_.29.0560b27: 又若唯託染汚心行。是性罪相。若有亦託不 T1562_.29.0560b28: 染心行是名遮罪。爲防餘失佛遮止故。今於 T1562_.29.0560b29: 此中應共思擇。爲有於酒雖極憎嫌而爲良 T1562_.29.0560c01: 醫令飮除疾。正知強服不起染心。爲無如斯 T1562_.29.0560c02: 無染心者。若許有者既無染心。如何可成性 T1562_.29.0560c03: 罪惡行。若謂無者如何爲疾正知強服而有 T1562_.29.0560c04: 染心。豈不先知飮酒是罪無慚故飮。或於飮 T1562_.29.0560c05: 罪愚謂非罪即是染心。此救不然。謂飮諸 T1562_.29.0560c06: 酒體性是罪。理不成故應審。何縁此皆性罪 T1562_.29.0560c07: 諸有爲疾。以無染心知量而飮能不醉亂。如 T1562_.29.0560c08: 爲除病知量服毒。能令無損豈是罪耶。故非 T1562_.29.0560c09: 飮酒皆惡行攝。若爲憍逸。或爲歡娯。或知 T1562_.29.0560c10: 醉亂。而貪故飮此等皆託染汚心生。約此經 T1562_.29.0560c11: 中説身惡行。應知此是性罪所攝。設佛不遮 T1562_.29.0560c12: 亦是罪故。或飮諸酒由放逸處故名惡行。非 T1562_.29.0560c13: 由性罪。故此獨立放逸處名。非殺生等是性 T1562_.29.0560c14: 罪故。然爲病者總開遮戒。復於異時遮飮酒 T1562_.29.0560c15: 者。爲防因此犯性罪故。謂勿由知飮是遮罪 T1562_.29.0560c16: 無多過失。便縱貪情漸次多飮遂致醉亂。因 T1562_.29.0560c17: 斯放逸造多性罪。爲欲深防造性罪故。至 T1562_.29.0560c18: 茅端量亦不許飮。又令醉亂量無定限故遮。 T1562_.29.0560c19: 乃至飮*茅端所霑量非定遮故。即謂飮酒是 T1562_.29.0560c20: 性罪攝。如博戲故。如説苾芻汝等決定不應 T1562_.29.0560c21: 博戲。非諸博戲決定遮故便是性罪。然博戲 T1562_.29.0560c22: 者。多過患故世極訶故。佛決定遮此。亦應 T1562_.29.0560c23: 然故非性罪。然彼所説。聖者易生亦不犯故。 T1562_.29.0560c24: 如殺生等是性罪者。何故不言有阿羅漢亦 T1562_.29.0560c25: 現行故。應是遮罪攝。如非時食等。若經生聖 T1562_.29.0560c26: 者得不作律儀。則定不應飮諸酒者。諸阿羅 T1562_.29.0560c27: 漢亦應定得不飮律儀如殺生等。若謂大師 T1562_.29.0560c28: 未制戒故容有飮者。不受律儀在家諸聖何 T1562_.29.0560c29: 縁不飮。非離飮酒可是無漏律儀。自性如 T1562_.29.0561a01: 先已説。又若聖者定不行故是性罪攝。則應 T1562_.29.0561a02: 一切聖者所行皆非性罪。是則非梵行應非 T1562_.29.0561a03: 性罪攝。然非所許故。此非因由此亦遮。有作 T1562_.29.0561a04: 是説。以契經説。數習能令墮惡趣故如殺生 T1562_.29.0561a05: 等。故飮諸酒是性罪攝。以非梵行雖是性罪 T1562_.29.0561a06: 而説數行不墮惡趣故。彼所説非決定因。然 T1562_.29.0561a07: 説數習墮惡趣者顯數飮酒。能令身中諸不 T1562_.29.0561a08: 善法相續轉故。又能發引惡趣業故。或能令 T1562_.29.0561a09: 彼轉増盛故。亦見有説斷生草等令墮惡趣。 T1562_.29.0561a10: 故此無能證飮諸酒是性罪攝。有餘師釋。如 T1562_.29.0561a11: 説修慈以密意門説墮惡趣。謂契經説能修 T1562_.29.0561a12: 慈心得八勝利非修慈故。即能令其得不還 T1562_.29.0561a13: 果。但據得果修慈爲先密作是説。飮酒亦爾。 T1562_.29.0561a14: 謂酒能損大種諸根便失正念尋生放逸。遂 T1562_.29.0561a15: 造惡業因墮惡趣依如是義故作是言。又彼 T1562_.29.0561a16: 所言離飮諸酒。世尊説是近事律儀。故此定 T1562_.29.0561a17: 應是性罪者。亦不應理以非定故。應如近住 T1562_.29.0561a18: 所受律儀。如八戒中非時食等。離殺等四立 T1562_.29.0561a19: 近住支。然彼定非性罪所攝。此亦應爾故非 T1562_.29.0561a20: 證因。雖彼謗言爲貪飮酒矯立飮酒是遮罪 T1562_.29.0561a21: 攝。今應徴問。非時食等汝等許是性罪攝耶。 T1562_.29.0561a22: 彼答言非。豈亦汝等貪非時食。耽著博戲歌 T1562_.29.0561a23: 舞掘地斷生草等。矯立此等是遮罪耶。若謂 T1562_.29.0561a24: 不然法相爾故。是則汝等所設謗言無益自 T1562_.29.0561a25: 増非愛業道。如契經説。窣羅迷麗耶末陀放 T1562_.29.0561a26: 逸處。依何義説。言窣羅者。謂米麥等如法 T1562_.29.0561a27: 蒸煮。和麹汁投諸藥物。醞釀具成酒色 T1562_.29.0561a28: 香味飮已惛醉。迷麗耶者。謂諸根莖葉花果 T1562_.29.0561a29: 汁爲前方便。不和麹*醞釀具成酒色香味 T1562_.29.0561b01: 飮已惛醉。於中一類甘蔗成者得施途名。蒱 T1562_.29.0561b02: 桃果汁所醞成酒名爲末途。即此末途令人 T1562_.29.0561b03: 耽醉勝於餘酒故名末陀。或即窣羅迷麗耶 T1562_.29.0561b04: 酒。飮已令醉總名末陀。若*蒱桃汁醞成酒 T1562_.29.0561b05: 味飮已令悶不得自在。如飮毒藥鬼魅所持 T1562_.29.0561b06: 失志猖狂。故不令飮非已成酢及酒。未成亦 T1562_.29.0561b07: 不應飮。如甘蔗汁。不應觀飮量若少若多。但 T1562_.29.0561b08: 眞得酒名皆不應飮。多少皆是放逸處故。爲 T1562_.29.0561b09: 遮一類愚闇増強耽味纒心。作如是説飮酒 T1562_.29.0561b10: 非失但遮過量。能不惛醉飮亦無罪。故説諸 T1562_.29.0561b11: 酒名放逸處。謂雖不醉有令醉。能佛爲深防 T1562_.29.0561b12: 皆不聽飮。故戒經説。若有苾芻飮諸酒者皆 T1562_.29.0561b13: 犯墮落。契經亦説。若飮諸酒感非愛果其類 T1562_.29.0561b14: 寔多。或於此中爲欲顯示離飮酒意。説諸酒 T1562_.29.0561b15: 已復重説此放逸處言。意顯酒非不淨性罪 T1562_.29.0561b16: 是放逸處故不應飮。言放逸者。不顧應作趣 T1562_.29.0561b17: 不應作故名放逸。是放逸因名放逸處。有作 T1562_.29.0561b18: 是説。醞食成酒名爲窣羅。醞餘物所成名迷 T1562_.29.0561b19: 麗耶酒。即前二酒未熟已壞不能令醉不名 T1562_.29.0561b20: 末陀。若令醉時名末陀酒。簡無用位重立此 T1562_.29.0561b21: 名。然以檳榔及稗子等亦能令醉。爲簡彼故 T1562_.29.0561b22: 須説窣羅迷麗耶酒。雖是遮罪而令放逸廣 T1562_.29.0561b23: 造衆惡墮諸惡趣。爲顯彼是聖所遠離惡行 T1562_.29.0561b24: 應斷言放逸處。若飮酒已不吐未消彼必不 T1562_.29.0561b25: 能受律儀等。酒是放逸所依處故 T1562_.29.0561b26: *説一切有部順正理論*卷第三十八 T1562_.29.0561b27: T1562_.29.0561b28: T1562_.29.0561b29: T1562_.29.0561c01: T1562_.29.0561c02: T1562_.29.0561c03: T1562_.29.0561c04: 尊者衆賢造 T1562_.29.0561c05: *三藏法師玄奘奉 詔譯 T1562_.29.0561c06: *辯業品第四之七 T1562_.29.0561c07: 別解脱律儀從何而得。復從何而得餘二律 T1562_.29.0561c08: 儀。頌曰 T1562_.29.0561c09: 從一切二現 得欲界律儀 T1562_.29.0561c10: 從根本恒時 得靜慮無漏 T1562_.29.0561c11: 論曰。欲界律儀謂別解脱。此從一切根本業 T1562_.29.0561c12: 道。及從前後近分而得。從二得者。謂從二 T1562_.29.0561c13: 類即情非情性罪遮罪。於情性罪謂殺等業。 T1562_.29.0561c14: 遮謂女人同室宿等。非情性罪謂盜外財。遮 T1562_.29.0561c15: 謂掘地斷生草等。從現得者謂從現世蘊處 T1562_.29.0561c16: 界得非從去來。由此律儀有情處轉。去來非 T1562_.29.0561c17: 是有情處故。有情處者謂諸有情及諸有情 T1562_.29.0561c18: 所依止處。現蘊處界内者即是有情所依。外 T1562_.29.0561c19: 者名爲有情所止。非過未故。若得靜慮無漏 T1562_.29.0561c20: 律儀。應知但從根本業道。以定中唯有根本 T1562_.29.0561c21: 業道故。非從前後近分而得。以在定位唯有 T1562_.29.0561c22: 根本。在不定位中無此律儀故。從有情數所 T1562_.29.0561c23: 發遮罪尚不得此二種律儀。況從非情所發 T1562_.29.0561c24: 遮罪。從恒時者謂從過去現在未來蘊處界 T1562_.29.0561c25: 得。如與此戒爲倶有心。由此不同應作四句。 T1562_.29.0561c26: 有蘊處界從彼唯得別解律儀非餘二等。第 T1562_.29.0561c27: 一句者謂從現世前後近分及諸遮罪。第二 T1562_.29.0561c28: 句者謂從去來根本業道。第三句者謂從現 T1562_.29.0561c29: 世根本業道。第四句者謂從去來前後近分。 T1562_.29.0562a01: 有言非得善律儀時。可有現世惡業道等。故 T1562_.29.0562a02: 應別立此四句文。謂應説言有一類法。於彼 T1562_.29.0562a03: 唯得別解律儀非二律儀。乃至廣説。第一句 T1562_.29.0562a04: 者謂於現在得前後近分及遮罪遠離。餘隨 T1562_.29.0562a05: 所應皆如是説。於業道等處置業道等聲。故 T1562_.29.0562a06: 前四句義亦無失。由如是理亦通防護。過現 T1562_.29.0562a07: 業道等非唯防未來。以業道等聲説彼依處 T1562_.29.0562a08: 故。若異此者則應但説防護未來律儀。但能 T1562_.29.0562a09: 防未來罪令不起故。非防過現已滅已生律 T1562_.29.0562a10: 儀於彼無防用故。諸有獲得律不律儀。從一 T1562_.29.0562a11: 切有情支因皆等不。非一切等。其相云何。頌 T1562_.29.0562a12: 曰 T1562_.29.0562a13: 律從諸有情 支因説不定 T1562_.29.0562a14: 不律從一切 有情支非因 T1562_.29.0562a15: 論曰。律儀定由調善意樂。普縁一切有情方 T1562_.29.0562a16: 得。非少分縁惡心隨故。支因不定支謂業道。 T1562_.29.0562a17: 且於別解諸律儀中有從一切支。謂苾芻戒 T1562_.29.0562a18: 有從四支得。謂餘律儀許因不同略有二種。 T1562_.29.0562a19: 一無貪等三種善根。二下中上等起心。別就 T1562_.29.0562a20: 初因説一切律儀。由一切因一心有故。就後 T1562_.29.0562a21: 因説一切律儀。各由一因以下品等不倶時 T1562_.29.0562a22: 起如先説故。此中且就後三因説。或有一類 T1562_.29.0562a23: 住律儀者。於一切有情得律儀。非一切支非 T1562_.29.0562a24: 一切因。謂以下心或中或上受近事勤策戒。 T1562_.29.0562a25: 或有一類住律儀者。於一切有情得律儀。由 T1562_.29.0562a26: 一切支非一切因。謂以下心或中或上受苾芻 T1562_.29.0562a27: 戒。或有一類住律儀者。於一切有情得律儀。 T1562_.29.0562a28: 由一切支及一切因。謂以三心受近事勤策 T1562_.29.0562a29: 苾芻戒。或有一類住律儀者。於一切有情得 T1562_.29.0562b01: 律儀。由一切因非一切支。謂以三心受近事 T1562_.29.0562b02: 近住勤策戒。無有不遍於諸有情得律儀者。 T1562_.29.0562b03: 已説因故非於一分。諸有情所誓受律儀惡 T1562_.29.0562b04: 心全息。今應思擇於佛乃至蟻子身上。所得 T1562_.29.0562b05: 律儀爲有別不。若有別者趣不定故。於諸有 T1562_.29.0562b06: 情所得律儀應有増減。若無別者何縁殺人 T1562_.29.0562b07: 犯他勝罪。殺非人者唯犯麁惡。若殺傍生犯 T1562_.29.0562b08: 墮落罪。非有情境身差別故。令所受戒亦有 T1562_.29.0562b09: 差別。然罰罪業有差別者。應知但由別加行 T1562_.29.0562b10: 故。殺人加行與殺非人。乃至殺蟻皆有差別。 T1562_.29.0562b11: 且殺同趣同部罪中。由加行殊業尚有異。如 T1562_.29.0562b12: 殺香象所獲罪多。若殺蚊虻所獲罪少。何況 T1562_.29.0562b13: 異趣加行有別。異部罪中而無輕重。由總意 T1562_.29.0562b14: 樂建立律儀。謂普於有情無有差別。起調善 T1562_.29.0562b15: 意樂求得律儀。非於一有情不捨惡意樂。而 T1562_.29.0562b16: 可求得別解律儀。故得律儀無有差別。以得 T1562_.29.0562b17: 律儀者必不別觀補特伽羅支處時縁故。謂 T1562_.29.0562b18: 定不作如是別觀於某有情我離殺等。於某 T1562_.29.0562b19: 支戒我定能持。於某方域我離殺等。我唯於 T1562_.29.0562b20: 彼一月等時除戰等縁能離殺等。如是受者不 T1562_.29.0562b21: 得律儀。但得律儀相似妙行。是故無有由諸 T1562_.29.0562b22: 有情身差別故。戒有差別。又於自身不得根 T1562_.29.0562b23: 本業道所攝別解律儀。勿思法等由自殺害 T1562_.29.0562b24: 成無間等所攝罪業。得眷屬攝於理無遮。謂 T1562_.29.0562b25: 離最初衆餘罪等。又此所受別解脱律儀。通 T1562_.29.0562b26: 於一切能不能境得。非唯於能境得此律儀。 T1562_.29.0562b27: 要普於有情起無損惱意樂。無別方可得故。 T1562_.29.0562b28: 若謂不然於睡悶等皆不可殺。故應不得律 T1562_.29.0562b29: 儀。若謂彼覺得本心已還可殺者此亦應然。 T1562_.29.0562c01: 以非所能有可改易爲能境已還可殺故。有 T1562_.29.0562c02: 作是説。若唯於能則此律儀應有増減。以所 T1562_.29.0562c03: 能境與非所能二類有情有轉易故。此不成 T1562_.29.0562c04: 難境轉易時無此律儀得捨因故。謂所能境 T1562_.29.0562c05: 及非所能後轉易爲不能能境。無理令彼捨 T1562_.29.0562c06: 得律儀。總於所能得律儀故。若必欲令能 T1562_.29.0562c07: 不能境有轉易故。戒有捨得則成律儀増減 T1562_.29.0562c08: 過者。豈不有草本無而生有諸有情永入圓 T1562_.29.0562c09: 寂。由此應有捨得律儀亦不離前戒増減 T1562_.29.0562c10: 失。是故前説於理無過。又非過去一一如來。 T1562_.29.0562c11: 及所化生入圓寂故。後佛於彼不得律儀。有 T1562_.29.0562c12: 後律儀減於前失律儀。非對一一有情各異 T1562_.29.0562c13: 相續別發得故。又前後佛戒支等故。謂諸律 T1562_.29.0562c14: 儀隨無貪等。爲因差別生別類支。一一類支 T1562_.29.0562c15: 各一無表。總於一切有情處得。如是無表既 T1562_.29.0562c16: 無細分。不可分析爲少爲多。如何言有後減 T1562_.29.0562c17: 前失。又一切佛遍於有情。具一切支律儀無 T1562_.29.0562c18: 表。以支數等無差別故。無後佛戒減於前失。 T1562_.29.0562c19: 已説從彼得諸律儀得不律儀。定從一切有 T1562_.29.0562c20: 情業道無少分境及不具支。不律儀者此定 T1562_.29.0562c21: 無有由一切因下品等心無倶起故。若有一 T1562_.29.0562c22: 類由下品心得不律儀。後於異時由上品心 T1562_.29.0562c23: 斷衆生命。彼但成就下不律儀。亦成殺生上 T1562_.29.0562c24: 品表等。中品上品例此應知。此中應思於屠 T1562_.29.0562c25: 羊等事。有唯受一得不律儀。不應言亦有受 T1562_.29.0562c26: 一事得。若爾何故無從一切因得不律儀。如 T1562_.29.0562c27: 得律儀者。雖於殺等差別表中先已受一後 T1562_.29.0562c28: 更別受。而不律儀非更新得。謂先總望一 T1562_.29.0562c29: 切有情。起無所遮損害意樂。爲活命故受不 T1562_.29.0563a01: 律儀。彼於今時復何所得。故此無有從一切 T1562_.29.0563a02: 因。然律儀中有從近事受勤策戒。勤策復受 T1562_.29.0563a03: 苾芻律儀。別別受時所受業道。眷屬異故隨 T1562_.29.0563a04: 要期異得先未得。由此可得從一切因。此中 T1562_.29.0563a05: 何名不律儀者。謂諸屠羊屠雞屠猪捕鳥捕 T1562_.29.0563a06: 魚獵獸劫盜魁膾典獄縛龍煮狗。及罝弶等。 T1562_.29.0563a07: 等言類顯讒搆譏刺。伺求人過憙説他非。非 T1562_.29.0563a08: 法追求以活命者。及王典刑罰斷罪彈官 T1562_.29.0563a09: 等。但恒有害心名不律儀者。由如是種類住 T1562_.29.0563a10: 不律儀故。有不律儀故行不律儀故。巧作不 T1562_.29.0563a11: 律儀故數習不律儀故名不律儀者。言屠羊 T1562_.29.0563a12: 者。謂爲活命要期盡壽恒欲害羊。餘隨所應 T1562_.29.0563a13: 當知亦爾。諸屠羊者唯於諸羊有損害心非於 T1562_.29.0563a14: 餘類。寧於一切得不律儀。遍於有情界得諸 T1562_.29.0563a15: 律儀。其理可爾。由普欲利樂勝阿世耶而受 T1562_.29.0563a16: 得故。非屠羊等不律儀人。於己至親有損害 T1562_.29.0563a17: 意。乃至爲救自身命縁亦不欲殺。如何可 T1562_.29.0563a18: 説普於一切得不律儀。此亦可然。不律儀者 T1562_.29.0563a19: 遍於有情境善意樂壞故。雖無是處而假説 T1562_.29.0563a20: 言。設諸有情及父母等。一切皆作羊像現 T1562_.29.0563a21: 前。屠者遍縁皆有害意。謂彼久習不律儀心。 T1562_.29.0563a22: 乃至己親亦無所顧。爲活命故。設己至親。現 T1562_.29.0563a23: 變爲羊尚有害意。況命終後實受羊身。於彼 T1562_.29.0563a24: 能無殺害意。樂不律儀者受惡戒時必起如 T1562_.29.0563a25: 斯兇勃意樂。設我母等身即是羊我亦當殺 T1562_.29.0563a26: 況餘生類。由此意樂得不律儀。異此但應得 T1562_.29.0563a27: 處中罪。由此雖了親現非羊而亦有害心。故 T1562_.29.0563a28: 遍得惡戒雖無聖者當作羊身。而同至親亦 T1562_.29.0563a29: 有害意。經主於此作是例言。若觀未來羊等 T1562_.29.0563b01: 自體於現親等得不律儀。羊等未來有親等 T1562_.29.0563b02: 體。既於彼體無損害心。應觀未來至親等體。 T1562_.29.0563b03: 於現羊等不得惡戒。如是等例於理不齊。無 T1562_.29.0563b04: 善意樂故有惡意樂故。謂彼正受不律儀時。 T1562_.29.0563b05: 無正思惟調善意樂。我當不害一切有情。有 T1562_.29.0563b06: 邪思惟兇勃意樂。我當普害一切有情。事雖 T1562_.29.0563b07: 主羊而心寛遍。是故容有觀未來羊。於現聖 T1562_.29.0563b08: 親亦發惡戒。非觀來世聖及至親。於現羊身 T1562_.29.0563b09: 不發惡戒。或無勞諍理應同許。且如有一受 T1562_.29.0563b10: 屠羊人。雖一生中不與不取。於己妻妾住知 T1562_.29.0563b11: 足心。瘂不能言無語四過。而因羊壞善阿世 T1562_.29.0563b12: 耶。具得七支不律儀罪。如是於親等雖無害 T1562_.29.0563b13: 心。而善阿世耶因羊壞故。遍有情界得不律 T1562_.29.0563b14: 儀。若先要期受善學處。後不全損善阿世耶。 T1562_.29.0563b15: 由遇別縁唯受殺者得處中罪非不律儀。但 T1562_.29.0563b16: 得不律儀必應全損善阿世耶故具得七支。 T1562_.29.0563b17: 經部諸師於此僻執。隨所期限支具不具。及 T1562_.29.0563b18: 全分一分皆得不律儀。律儀亦然唯除八戒。 T1562_.29.0563b19: 由隨彼量善惡尸羅性相相違互相遮故。若 T1562_.29.0563b20: 爾應受不律儀人亦名近事。應諸近事亦得 T1562_.29.0563b21: 名爲不律儀者。云何應爾理逼應然。謂屠羊 T1562_.29.0563b22: 人立如是誓。我爲活命雖受殺羊。然受離餘 T1562_.29.0563b23: 不與取等。或諸近事作是誓言。我定受持離 T1562_.29.0563b24: 殺生戒。爲活命故唯受盜等。無如是理一相 T1562_.29.0563b25: 續中二阿世耶互相違故理應如是。所以者 T1562_.29.0563b26: 何。不律儀人若於是處阿世耶壞。唯於是處 T1562_.29.0563b27: 勿有律儀近事亦然。若於是處阿世耶不壞。 T1562_.29.0563b28: 唯於是處勿有不律儀。許隨彼量善惡尸羅 T1562_.29.0563b29: 性相相違互相遮故。若一一處得不律儀。即 T1562_.29.0563c01: 能總遮一切善戒及一一處。得善律儀即能 T1562_.29.0563c02: 總遮一切惡戒。是故無有不律儀人亦名近 T1562_.29.0563c03: 事。及無近事亦得名爲不律儀者。此亦非理 T1562_.29.0563c04: 違前説故。雖屠羊人爲欲活命但受殺業。然 T1562_.29.0563c05: 於有情意樂壞故。亦應成就不與取等諸不 T1562_.29.0563c06: 律儀。由是理應離盜等者。亦應遮止殺不 T1562_.29.0563c07: 律儀。若汝意謂諸屠羊者。於他物等意樂不 T1562_.29.0563c08: 壞不應獲得彼不律儀。豈不亦應離盜等者。 T1562_.29.0563c09: 有於羊所意樂既壞。不應遮遏殺不律儀。如 T1562_.29.0563c10: 是還應不免前過。若於是處有善意樂。即於 T1562_.29.0563c11: 是處唯得善尸羅。及於是處有惡意樂。即 T1562_.29.0563c12: 於是處唯得惡尸羅。則不應許由隨彼量善 T1562_.29.0563c13: 惡尸羅互相遮止。此顯所受善惡尸羅。非 T1562_.29.0563c14: 一一支遍能遮故。若汝意謂如善律儀有不 T1562_.29.0563c15: 具支此亦應爾。謂如有受近事近住勤策律 T1562_.29.0563c16: 儀。雖不具支而亦得彼缺支攝戒。受不律儀 T1562_.29.0563c17: 亦應如是。此例非等律儀不律儀用功不用 T1562_.29.0563c18: 功得有異故。謂諸善戒要藉用功善阿世耶 T1562_.29.0563c19: 方能受得。以難得故理數必應非受一時總 T1562_.29.0563c20: 得一切。若諸惡戒不藉用功惡阿世耶便能 T1562_.29.0563c21: 受得。非難得故理數必應隨受一時總得一 T1562_.29.0563c22: 切。以於欲界不善力強。惡阿世耶任運而 T1562_.29.0563c23: 起。造諸重惡不待用功。善阿世耶易毀壞故。 T1562_.29.0563c24: 隨受一種便總得餘。善則不然故例非等。現 T1562_.29.0563c25: 見穢草不用功生。要設劬勞嘉苗方起。又如 T1562_.29.0563c26: 有受不律儀人作是要期我於盡壽。毎晝或 T1562_.29.0563c27: 夜半月月等。一度屠羊等亦得不律儀。由不 T1562_.29.0563c28: 律儀易受得故。以於欲界不善力強。雖不恒 T1562_.29.0563c29: 爲而得惡戒。諸有欲受出家律儀。若作要期 T1562_.29.0564a01: 我於盡壽毎晝或夜半月月等。一度離殺等 T1562_.29.0564a02: 不得善律儀。由善律儀難受得故。以於欲界 T1562_.29.0564a03: 善法力劣。若不恒持不得善戒此亦應爾爲 T1562_.29.0564a04: 例不齊故。經部師避無根過。而反墮在難拔 T1562_.29.0564a05: 過中。智者應詳無倒取捨。已説從彼得不律 T1562_.29.0564a06: 儀。得不律儀及餘無表。如何方便未説當説。 T1562_.29.0564a07: 頌曰 T1562_.29.0564a08: 諸得不律儀 由作及誓受 T1562_.29.0564a09: 得所餘無表 由田受重行 T1562_.29.0564a10: 論曰。不律儀人總有二種。一者生在不律儀 T1562_.29.0564a11: 家。二生餘家後受此業諸有生在不律儀家。 T1562_.29.0564a12: 若初現行殺等加行。是人由作得不律儀。若 T1562_.29.0564a13: 生餘家後方立誓。謂我當作如是事業。以 T1562_.29.0564a14: 求財物養活自身。初立誓時便發惡戒。是人 T1562_.29.0564a15: 由受得不律儀。由三種因得餘無表。餘無表 T1562_.29.0564a16: 者。謂非律儀非不律儀處中攝故。由三因 T1562_.29.0564a17: 者。一者由田。謂於如斯有徳田所。初施園 T1562_.29.0564a18: 林等善無表便生。如説。有依諸福業事。二者 T1562_.29.0564a19: 由受。謂自要期言。我從今若不供養佛及僧 T1562_.29.0564a20: 衆不先食等。或作誓限於齋日月半月及年 T1562_.29.0564a21: 常施食等。由此有善無表續生。三由重行。謂 T1562_.29.0564a22: 起如是殷重作意行善行惡。謂淳淨信或猛 T1562_.29.0564a23: 利纒。造善惡時能發無表。長時相續乃至信 T1562_.29.0564a24: 纒勢力終盡。如前已説。如是已説得律儀等。 T1562_.29.0564a25: 捨律儀等今次當説。且云何捨別解律儀。頌 T1562_.29.0564a26: 曰 T1562_.29.0564a27: 捨別解調伏 由故捨命終 T1562_.29.0564a28: 及二形倶生 斷善根夜盡 T1562_.29.0564a29: 有説由犯重 餘説由法滅 T1562_.29.0564b01: 迦濕彌羅説 犯二如負財 T1562_.29.0564b02: 論曰。調伏聲顯律儀異名。由此能令根調伏 T1562_.29.0564b03: 故。由五縁捨別解律儀。一由故捨謂於律儀 T1562_.29.0564b04: 由阿世耶不懷欣慕。爲捨學處對有解人發 T1562_.29.0564b05: 起相違表業差別。非但由起捨學處心。如得 T1562_.29.0564b06: 律儀心無能故。又在夢中捨不成故。非但由 T1562_.29.0564b07: 起表業差別忿癲狂等捨不成故。非但由二 T1562_.29.0564b08: 對傍生等起心發表捨不成故。二由命終。謂 T1562_.29.0564b09: 衆同分増上勢力得律儀故。三由依止二形 T1562_.29.0564b10: 倶生。謂身變時心隨變故。又二形者非増上 T1562_.29.0564b11: 故。四由斷滅所因善根。謂表無表業等起心 T1562_.29.0564b12: 斷故。是此律儀因縁斷義。捨盡壽戒由上四 T1562_.29.0564b13: 縁。近住律儀亦由夜盡。謂近住戒由上四縁。 T1562_.29.0564b14: 及夜盡捨過期限故。夜盡者。謂明相出時。諸 T1562_.29.0564b15: 軌範師多分共許如是五種捨律儀縁。有餘 T1562_.29.0564b16: 部師執。隨犯一感墮重罪捨出家戒有餘部 T1562_.29.0564b17: 執。正法滅時別解律儀無不皆捨。以諸學處 T1562_.29.0564b18: 結界羯磨所有聖教皆息滅故。爾時雖無得未 T1562_.29.0564b19: 得律儀。而先得律儀無有捨義。迦濕彌羅國 T1562_.29.0564b20: 毘婆沙師。蘊理教於心作如是説。非犯隨一 T1562_.29.0564b21: 根本罪時一切律儀有皆捨義。然犯重者有 T1562_.29.0564b22: 二種名。一名具尸羅。二名犯戒者。若於所 T1562_.29.0564b23: 犯應可悔除發露。悔除唯名具戒。如有財者 T1562_.29.0564b24: 負他債時。名爲富人及負債者。若還債已但 T1562_.29.0564b25: 名富人。此亦應然故非捨戒。以何理教蘊在 T1562_.29.0564b26: 心中。且辨心中所蘊正理。謂如受一一非遍 T1562_.29.0564b27: 得律儀。應犯一一時非遍捨一切。本於一切 T1562_.29.0564b28: 有情處所受得律儀。不應今時於一犯罪便 T1562_.29.0564b29: 捨一切。若汝意謂出家律儀必無別受還別得 T1562_.29.0564c01: 義。如何可説如非別受遍得律儀。應無犯一 T1562_.29.0564c02: 遍捨一切故例非等此詰不然。自所許故。謂 T1562_.29.0564c03: 汝亦許在家律儀非犯根本便捨一切。或汝 T1562_.29.0564c04: 自許別解律儀。隨別受時還得爾所。如是應 T1562_.29.0564c05: 許犯律儀時。隨所犯捨非捨一切。且所受戒 T1562_.29.0564c06: 有是極成。非犯一時頓捨一切。苾芻勤策理 T1562_.29.0564c07: 亦應然。設犯重時無容皆捨。或先已説。先 T1562_.29.0564c08: 説者何。謂律儀若名近事。苾芻勤策* T1562_.29.0564c09: 亦應成。故無近事*律儀者。如彼別犯非 T1562_.29.0564c10: 捨一切。苾芻勤策例亦應然。或於此中有何 T1562_.29.0564c11: 理趣。於四重罪隨犯一時。出家律儀一切頓 T1562_.29.0564c12: 捨。非於三種有善意樂。乃至爲救自身命縁 T1562_.29.0564c13: 亦不欲犯非捨一切。如汝宗説得不律儀。若 T1562_.29.0564c14: 爾何縁薄伽梵説。犯四重者不名苾芻。不名 T1562_.29.0564c15: 沙門非釋迦子。破苾芻體害沙門性。壞滅墮 T1562_.29.0564c16: 落立他勝名。依勝義苾芻密意作是説。且汝 T1562_.29.0564c17: 應説何縁犯重便捨一切非犯所餘。以犯所 T1562_.29.0564c18: 餘可悔除故。若犯餘罪未悔除時不失苾芻 T1562_.29.0564c19: 性。悔除何所益。更求何益此令苾芻性不缺 T1562_.29.0564c20: 漏。不朽不雜能令如是成何功徳。若令如是 T1562_.29.0564c21: 便得生天。若爾諸天對持戒者應極可供養。 T1562_.29.0564c22: 執於尸羅無違犯者專求生彼故。然非聖教 T1562_.29.0564c23: 專爲生天。令苾芻等清淨持戒故。非悔者專 T1562_.29.0564c24: 爲生天。既爾應言非犯戒者。可能現證出世 T1562_.29.0564c25: 功徳。故悔除者異不悔除。豈不對於出世功 T1562_.29.0564c26: 徳。可悔除罪未悔除時。彼亦非全破苾芻體。 T1562_.29.0564c27: 何縁不許犯重苾芻。犯不可除他勝罪故。雖 T1562_.29.0564c28: 亦成就所餘律儀。於出世徳畢竟非器。故世 T1562_.29.0564c29: 尊言非苾芻等。又可除罪未悔除時。如何 T1562_.29.0565a01: 有餘苾芻性在。以彼於入正性離生。及餘一 T1562_.29.0565a02: 切無漏功徳皆能爲障。乃至爲修不淨觀等。 T1562_.29.0565a03: 尚不能令心住一境。況能成就。若如是類有 T1562_.29.0565a04: 苾芻體當自歸禮。如是苾芻與犯重人有何 T1562_.29.0565a05: 差別。是故應許犯重苾芻如無子能子説非 T1562_.29.0565a06: 子。於無人用人説非人。於無形男説非男等。 T1562_.29.0565a07: 於苾芻事既不能成。雖有餘律儀説非苾芻 T1562_.29.0565a08: 等。佛如是説於義何違。非唯能持別解脱 T1562_.29.0565a09: 戒。於佛聖教少有所成。由此律儀招有果故。 T1562_.29.0565a10: 然諸佛意憎背有果。持戒無缺尚未稱情。況 T1562_.29.0565a11: 犯重人能適佛意。以違佛意如子違父。所作 T1562_.29.0565a12: 事業不稱本期。由此故言非苾芻等。此言非 T1562_.29.0565a13: 證捨律儀因。毘婆沙師以如是理。蘊在心首 T1562_.29.0565a14: 決判此言。依勝義苾芻密意作是説。此中經 T1562_.29.0565a15: 主作如是説。此言兇勃兇勃者何謂。於世尊 T1562_.29.0565a16: 了義所説以別義釋令成不了。與多煩惱者 T1562_.29.0565a17: 爲犯重罪縁。寧知此言是了義説。由律自釋 T1562_.29.0565a18: 有四苾芻。一名相苾芻。二自稱苾芻。三乞 T1562_.29.0565a19: 匃苾芻。四破戒苾芻。此義中言非苾芻者。謂 T1562_.29.0565a20: 非白四羯磨受具足戒苾芻。非此苾芻先是 T1562_.29.0565a21: 勝義。後由犯重成非苾芻。故知此言是了義 T1562_.29.0565a22: 説。豈唯白四羯磨受具足戒苾芻。有犯重罪 T1562_.29.0565a23: 非由三歸三説。受具足戒苾芻亦犯重罪。何 T1562_.29.0565a24: 理遮此三歸得戒。令不犯重成非苾芻。設許 T1562_.29.0565a25: 此言是了義説。唯白四羯磨受具戒者。若有 T1562_.29.0565a26: 犯重罪成非苾芻。由此苾芻於生聖法無苾 T1562_.29.0565a27: 芻用名非苾芻。非捨律儀失苾芻號。故廣論 T1562_.29.0565a28: 者作是判言。依勝義苾芻密意作是説此爲 T1562_.29.0565a29: 善説。以犯重人無生聖道苾芻用故。非由 T1562_.29.0565b01: 執此是了義言。能遮我宗決判意趣。若異此 T1562_.29.0565b02: 者復有何縁同犯尸羅。於中則有失戒不失 T1562_.29.0565b03: 戒苾芻非苾芻故。離對法宗無令生喜。理雖 T1562_.29.0565b04: 作是謗與多煩惱者爲犯重罪縁。然應詳審 T1562_.29.0565b05: 誰最能作犯重罪縁爲作是言。雖犯一戒而 T1562_.29.0565b06: 有餘戒應勤護者爲作是言。既犯一戒餘戒 T1562_.29.0565b07: 皆失。任造惡者非對法者。此決判言少障生 T1562_.29.0565b08: 天解脱愛果。然唯示導令彼修因。如何謗言 T1562_.29.0565b09: 勸他犯重。謂我但作如是誡言。犯一戒時餘 T1562_.29.0565b10: 戒不捨應於餘戒專精護持。如是眞名遮他 T1562_.29.0565b11: 犯重。汝説犯一頓捨一切豈不專作犯重罪 T1562_.29.0565b12: 縁。故造罪縁在汝非我。雖作是説非此苾芻 T1562_.29.0565b13: 先是勝義後由犯重成非苾芻。此言麁淺雖先 T1562_.29.0565b14: 未證望當證能。若後無能亦名失故。如契經 T1562_.29.0565b15: 説觀此世間及天放逸退失聖慧。又先已説。 T1562_.29.0565b16: 先説者何。謂彼永非出世徳器故。於勝義言 T1562_.29.0565b17: 非苾芻。寧知大師有斯密意。由此中説彼非 T1562_.29.0565b18: 沙門餘處復言沙門有四更無第五。故知於 T1562_.29.0565b19: 此唯就勝義言非苾芻。由彼補特伽羅名汚 T1562_.29.0565b20: 道沙門故。非彼先證道後汚如何成。經主釋 T1562_.29.0565b21: 言雖有此説而彼唯有餘沙門相故名沙門。 T1562_.29.0565b22: 如被燒材假鸚鵡嘴涸池敗種火輪死人。此 T1562_.29.0565b23: 但有言所引衆喩皆無能故。以諸材木少被 T1562_.29.0565b24: 火燒。世間説名被燒材木。非全成炭名被燒 T1562_.29.0565b25: 材。若謂隨燒全分一分二種皆許名被燒材。 T1562_.29.0565b26: 則喩及法二倶猶豫。喩於所喩無證功徳。名 T1562_.29.0565b27: 涸池中容有少水但無池用故立涸名。設水全 T1562_.29.0565b28: 無亦名涸者同前猶豫。於證無能由此已遮 T1562_.29.0565b29: 死人敗種。謂雖猶有少種功能而諸世間亦 T1562_.29.0565c01: 説敗種。或雖不敗被損功能不復生芽亦名 T1562_.29.0565c02: 敗種。有同死法亦名死人。故契經中言放逸 T1562_.29.0565c03: 者。常死假鸚鵡嘴及旋火輪二喩皆違契經 T1562_.29.0565c04: 所説。沙門有四更無第五。若唯形相得名沙 T1562_.29.0565c05: 門。如世有人須沙門相矯設方便作沙門形。 T1562_.29.0565c06: 應名沙門説爲第五。非彼假嘴及旋火輪可 T1562_.29.0565c07: 得説名嘴輪。餘相非實嘴輪爲其先故。如 T1562_.29.0565c08: 是應有先非沙門作沙門形立爲第五。然佛 T1562_.29.0565c09: 説四無第五言。爲止如斯相沙門執故引衆 T1562_.29.0565c10: 喩皆無證能。又經主寧知佛如是意説。以餘 T1562_.29.0565c11: 處説不名苾芻不名沙門非釋子等。豈不數 T1562_.29.0565c12: 勸應審尋思。寧隨一文便爲固執。又先已説。 T1562_.29.0565c13: 先説者何。謂此沙門名汚道故。知此唯約勝 T1562_.29.0565c14: 義苾芻密意説言非苾芻等。故非頓捨一切律 T1562_.29.0565c15: 儀。名非苾芻理極成立。非此唯有餘沙門相 T1562_.29.0565c16: 故名沙門。如被燒材鸚鵡嘴等理可成立。以 T1562_.29.0565c17: 世尊説彼人應名犯戒苾芻惡苾芻故。若彼 T1562_.29.0565c18: 頓捨一切律儀。應但名爲無尸羅等。寧標犯戒 T1562_.29.0565c19: 惡苾芻名。上座此中作如是詰。若言無者無 T1562_.29.0565c20: 何尸羅。以尸羅名亦目串習善惡戒。外亦 T1562_.29.0565c21: 見有言此善尸羅惡尸羅者作如是説何理相 T1562_.29.0565c22: 違。彼最應言無尸羅者。以一切有*串習尸羅。 T1562_.29.0565c23: 然説彼爲無尸羅者。則知彼闕淨戒尸羅。故 T1562_.29.0565c24: 彼詰言無深理趣。經主於此自問答言。若犯 T1562_.29.0565c25: 重人非苾芻者則應無有授學苾芻。不説犯重 T1562_.29.0565c26: 人皆成他勝罪。但成他勝罪定説非苾芻。對 T1562_.29.0565c27: 法諸師豈不應説。經部定是極兇勃人。兇勃 T1562_.29.0565c28: 者何。謂作是説有犯重者非成他勝。以世尊 T1562_.29.0565c29: 説犯四重者不名苾芻乃至廣説。若謂彼據住 T1562_.29.0566a01: 覆藏心故佛説爲非苾芻等。何縁不許犯重 T1562_.29.0566a02: 苾芻無苾芻勝能。言非苾芻等非由頓捨一 T1562_.29.0566a03: 切律儀。我國諸師不作是説。諸犯重者非非 T1562_.29.0566a04: 苾芻。但作是言有餘戒在。本於一切受得律 T1562_.29.0566a05: 儀。非犯一時餘便頓捨。如汝宗説得不律儀。 T1562_.29.0566a06: 經主此中欲排正理。言彼所説非犯一邊一 T1562_.29.0566a07: 切律儀應遍捨者。彼言便是徴詰大師。大師 T1562_.29.0566a08: 此中立如是喩。如多羅樹若被斷頭必不復 T1562_.29.0566a09: 能生長廣大。此喩意顯犯一重時餘戒不能生 T1562_.29.0566a10: 長廣大。戒根既斷理遍捨故。彼於喩意非能 T1562_.29.0566a11: 善釋。此喩但遮餘生長故。若異此者喩應不 T1562_.29.0566a12: 成。然我分明見此喩意。謂餘學處如彼枝葉 T1562_.29.0566a13: 雖越而可得餘律儀。四重如頭若隨犯一必 T1562_.29.0566a14: 不復得所餘律儀。由此定無入見道等。故契 T1562_.29.0566a15: 經説依住尸羅方能進修殊勝止觀。若異此 T1562_.29.0566a16: 釋喩便不成。且汝所宗四重學處。爲總如一 T1562_.29.0566a17: 多羅樹頭。爲一樹頭喩一學處。若四學處 T1562_.29.0566a18: 總喩一頭。應犯一時非捨一切。見斷少分多 T1562_.29.0566a19: 羅樹頭餘分無妨猶生長故。若一學處如一 T1562_.29.0566a20: 樹頭。亦犯一時非捨一切。以見斷一多羅樹 T1562_.29.0566a21: 頭餘頭無妨猶生長故。如前已説。前説者 T1562_.29.0566a22: 何。謂於此中有何理趣。隨犯一重頓捨律儀。 T1562_.29.0566a23: 非護餘三不捨一切。如多羅頂斷一餘存。既 T1562_.29.0566a24: 見世間多羅樹頂雖斷一分餘分猶生。四重 T1562_.29.0566a25: 總如多羅樹頂。應知犯一無損餘三。又諸多 T1562_.29.0566a26: 羅一頭被斷一不生長餘樹不然。汝執尸羅 T1562_.29.0566a27: 一相續斷則餘亦斷故喩不成。由此亦遮上 T1562_.29.0566a28: 座立喩。彼説如大樹具根莖枝葉。若根被斷 T1562_.29.0566a29: 便總乾枯。如是戒根若隨犯一則便頓壞一 T1562_.29.0566b01: 切律儀。誰於此中言餘不壞。已説犯一餘無 T1562_.29.0566b02: 勝能。謂必不能入見道等。然就彼喩非失律 T1562_.29.0566b03: 儀。以見世間或有一樹四根齊等深入堅牢。 T1562_.29.0566b04: 非斷一時一切枯死。唯損一分戒亦應然。就 T1562_.29.0566b05: 別樹論准前應説故彼立喩於證無能。經主 T1562_.29.0566b06: 此中復作是説。於此無義苦救何爲。若如是 T1562_.29.0566b07: 人猶有苾芻性應自歸禮。如是類苾芻此言 T1562_.29.0566b08: 便爲輕調於佛。以佛説彼亦是沙門。雖得汚 T1562_.29.0566b09: 道名而有尸羅故。經主此中應作是説。於此 T1562_.29.0566b10: 無義何苦救爲。若如是人猶有沙門性應自 T1562_.29.0566b11: 歸禮。如是類沙門餘相沙門。如前已破非苾 T1562_.29.0566b12: 芻等。亦已釋通由此理成。顯彼所引諸餘聖 T1562_.29.0566b13: 教爲證無能。又彼不能少説正理。證唯犯 T1562_.29.0566b14: 一便捨一切。又於無義徒致推徴。實有律儀 T1562_.29.0566b15: 強言已捨。勸已犯者縱情造惡。豈名持法利 T1562_.29.0566b16: 樂有情。若犯重人有餘戒在。何縁擯出苾芻 T1562_.29.0566b17: 衆外。何用如是無勢用人。於清衆中速擯彌 T1562_.29.0566b18: 善。若由犯重便捨律儀。應如二形生時能捨。 T1562_.29.0566b19: 性相違故如闇與明。不犯律儀應容更受。非 T1562_.29.0566b20: 無慚愧永障尸羅。勿捨彼人不得受戒。故知 T1562_.29.0566b21: 重罪得與戒倶。由汚尸羅不容更受。既無勝 T1562_.29.0566b22: 用故應擯出。上座於此更有多言。由前理教 T1562_.29.0566b23: 已總遮遣。恐文煩廣不別彈斥。然彼堅固煩 T1562_.29.0566b24: 惱纒心。於自論中造文作頌。説麁惡語謗 T1562_.29.0566b25: 聖賢。無故自傷深爲可愍。我國衆聖惑業已 T1562_.29.0566b26: 除。所制法言憑眞理教。而彼兇勃謗法毀人。 T1562_.29.0566b27: 既造深愆當招劇苦。我豈於彼更致酬言。唯 T1562_.29.0566b28: 願當來彼惡無報。靜慮無漏二律儀等云何 T1562_.29.0566b29: 當捨。頌曰 T1562_.29.0566c01: 捨定生善法 由易地退等 T1562_.29.0566c02: 捨聖由得果 練根及退失 T1562_.29.0566c03: 論曰。諸靜慮地所繋善法由二縁捨一由易 T1562_.29.0566c04: 地。謂上下生。二由退失。謂退勝定捨衆同 T1562_.29.0566c05: 分。及離染時亦捨。煖等及退分定爲攝此故 T1562_.29.0566c06: 復説等言。經主釋中應加離染。如捨色善由 T1562_.29.0566c07: 易地退及離染。三無色亦爾。捨無漏善由三 T1562_.29.0566c08: 種縁。一由得果總捨前道。二由練根捨鈍根 T1562_.29.0566c09: 道。三由退失捨諸勝道。此或是果或勝果攝。 T1562_.29.0566c10: 經主於此應説二縁。以得果言攝練根言。謂 T1562_.29.0566c11: 練根位必還得果棄捨鈍果勝果道故。我於 T1562_.29.0566c12: 此中應少分別。若捨見道及道類智。當知但 T1562_.29.0566c13: 由得果非退。若不動法無學倶無所餘無漏 T1562_.29.0566c14: 容具二種。如是已説捨諸律儀。不律儀云何 T1562_.29.0566c15: 捨。頌曰 T1562_.29.0566c16: 捨惡戒由死 得戒二形生 T1562_.29.0566c17: 論曰。諸不律儀由三縁捨。一者由死捨所依 T1562_.29.0566c18: 故。二由得戒。謂若受得別解律儀。或由獲得 T1562_.29.0566c19: 靜慮律儀惡戒便捨。對治力勝捨不律儀。三 T1562_.29.0566c20: 由相續二形倶起。以於爾時所依變故。住惡 T1562_.29.0566c21: 戒者雖或有時由善意樂捨刀網等。若不得 T1562_.29.0566c22: 律儀終不捨惡戒。現見雖避諸發病縁。不服 T1562_.29.0566c23: 良藥病終難愈。不律儀者。受近住戒至夜 T1562_.29.0566c24: 盡位捨律儀時。爲得不律儀爲名處中者。有 T1562_.29.0566c25: 餘師説。得不律儀惡阿世耶非永捨故。如停 T1562_.29.0566c26: 熱鐵赤滅青生。有餘師言。若不更作無縁令 T1562_.29.0566c27: 彼得不律儀。以不律儀依表得故。前説應理。 T1562_.29.0566c28: 先受戒時惡阿世耶非永捨故。依前表業惡 T1562_.29.0566c29: 戒還起。處中無表捨復云何。頌曰 T1562_.29.0567a01: 捨中由受勢 作事壽根斷 T1562_.29.0567a02: 論曰。處中無表捨由六縁。一由受心斷壞故 T1562_.29.0567a03: 捨。謂先誓受恒於某時敬禮制多。及讃頌等 T1562_.29.0567a04: 今作是念。後更不爲彼阿世耶。從茲便息由 T1562_.29.0567a05: 彼棄捨本意樂故。或復別作勢用増強與先 T1562_.29.0567a06: 現行相違。事業本意樂息無表便斷。二由勢 T1562_.29.0567a07: 力斷壞故捨。謂由淨信煩惱勢力所引無表。 T1562_.29.0567a08: 彼二限勢若斷壞時無表便捨。如所放箭及 T1562_.29.0567a09: 陶家輪。故軌範師作如是説。由等起力所引 T1562_.29.0567a10: 發故。雖捨加行及阿世耶無表。或容盡壽隨 T1562_.29.0567a11: 轉。乃至發起極猛利纒捶撃禽獸應知亦爾。 T1562_.29.0567a12: 或先立限齊爾所時今限勢過無表便斷。三 T1562_.29.0567a13: 由作業斷壞故捨。謂雖不捨根本受心。然更 T1562_.29.0567a14: 不爲所受作業。唯除忘念而不作者以此無 T1562_.29.0567a15: 表期加行生。絶加行時無表便捨。四由事物 T1562_.29.0567a16: 斷壞故捨。謂所捨施制多園林。及所施爲罝 T1562_.29.0567a17: 網等事。本由彼事引無表生。彼事壞時無表 T1562_.29.0567a18: 便捨。五由壽命斷壞故捨。謂所依止有轉易 T1562_.29.0567a19: 故。六由依根斷壞故捨。謂起加行斷善惡時。 T1562_.29.0567a20: 各捨彼根所引無表。非至斷善得靜慮時方 T1562_.29.0567a21: 捨。處中善惡無表以羸劣故起加行時便捨。 T1562_.29.0567a22: 處中善惡無表如何。經主於此義中説第六 T1562_.29.0567a23: 縁名爲斷善。若作是説斷善加行亦名斷善 T1562_.29.0567a24: 爲第六縁。是則應言靜慮加行亦名靜慮。便 T1562_.29.0567a25: 成七縁靜慮加行中捨惡無表故。應言根者 T1562_.29.0567a26: 通善惡根。所説斷言是斷加行由依根斷爲 T1562_.29.0567a27: 第六縁。此釋頌文於理無失。欲非色善及 T1562_.29.0567a28: 餘一切非色染法捨復云何。頌曰 T1562_.29.0567a29: 捨欲非色善 由根斷上生 T1562_.29.0567b01: 由對治道生 捨諸非色染 T1562_.29.0567b02: 論曰。欲界一切非色善法捨由二縁。一斷善 T1562_.29.0567b03: 根。二生上界。應言少分亦離染捨。如憂根等 T1562_.29.0567b04: 非色善法。三界一切非色染法捨由一縁。謂 T1562_.29.0567b05: 起治道若此品類能斷道生。捨此品中惑及 T1562_.29.0567b06: 助伴。何有情有善惡律儀。頌曰 T1562_.29.0567b07: 惡戒人除北 二黄門二形 T1562_.29.0567b08: 律儀亦在天 唯人具三種 T1562_.29.0567b09: 生欲天色界 有靜慮律儀 T1562_.29.0567b10: 無漏并無色 除中定無想 T1562_.29.0567b11: 論曰。唯於人趣有不律儀。然除北洲唯三方 T1562_.29.0567b12: 有。於三方内復除扇搋及半擇迦具二形者。 T1562_.29.0567b13: 律儀亦爾。謂於人中除前所除并天亦有故。 T1562_.29.0567b14: 於二趣容有律儀。復以何縁知扇搋等所有 T1562_.29.0567b15: 相續非律儀。依由經律中有誠證故。謂契經 T1562_.29.0567b16: 説佛告大名。諸有在家白衣男子男根成就 T1562_.29.0567b17: 乃至廣説。毘奈耶中亦作是説。汝應除棄此 T1562_.29.0567b18: 色類人。故知律儀非彼類有。復由何理彼無 T1562_.29.0567b19: 律儀。由二所依所起煩惱於一相續倶増上 T1562_.29.0567b20: 故。於正思擇無堪能故。彼起貪欲相續行時 T1562_.29.0567b21: 不能伏除故非戒器。又有猛利慚愧現前。此 T1562_.29.0567b22: 類方能爲戒依止。彼類無故非律儀依。若爾 T1562_.29.0567b23: 何縁彼無惡戒。於彼相續惡阿世耶性羸劣 T1562_.29.0567b24: 故不堅住故。謂扇搋等婬愛多行。無暫伏除 T1562_.29.0567b25: 對治道故。非諸數起猛利愛人能於有情。起 T1562_.29.0567b26: 極猛利勃惡意樂令現在前。設暫能生亦不 T1562_.29.0567b27: 堅住。身無能故心亦無能故彼類身亦無惡 T1562_.29.0567b28: 戒。即由此理善阿世耶。於彼身中劣不堅住。 T1562_.29.0567b29: 要有強盛堅住惡心方有惡戒。及有強盛堅 T1562_.29.0567c01: 住善心方有善戒。彼倶闕故二戒倶無。然二 T1562_.29.0567c02: 形生捨善惡戒二依。貪欲極増上故。非成扇 T1562_.29.0567c03: 搋等捨善惡律儀。起二依貪非極重故。由如 T1562_.29.0567c04: 是理已釋北洲。二阿世耶非猛利故。又不順 T1562_.29.0567c05: 起三摩地故。彼身無有善惡律儀。惡趣無能 T1562_.29.0567c06: 覺耶正理。又非猛利慚愧所依。要此相應 T1562_.29.0567c07: 及損壞者。方可得有善惡律儀。故惡趣中無 T1562_.29.0567c08: 善惡戒。又扇搋等如醎鹵田。故不能生善戒 T1562_.29.0567c09: 惡戒。世間現見諸醎鹵田。不能滋生嘉苗穢 T1562_.29.0567c10: 草。若爾何故契經中言。有卵生龍半月八日 T1562_.29.0567c11: 毎從宮出來至人間。求受八支近住齋戒此 T1562_.29.0567c12: 得妙行非得律儀。是故律儀唯人天有。然 T1562_.29.0567c13: 唯人具三種律儀。謂別解脱靜慮無漏。若生 T1562_.29.0567c14: 欲天及生色界皆容得有靜慮律儀。然無想 T1562_.29.0567c15: 天但容成就。生無色界彼倶非有無漏律儀 T1562_.29.0567c16: 亦在無色。謂若生在欲界天中及生色界中。 T1562_.29.0567c17: 除中定無想皆容得有無漏律儀。生無色中 T1562_.29.0567c18: 唯得成就。以無色故必不現起。無漏上生得 T1562_.29.0567c19: 成下故 T1562_.29.0567c20: *説一切有部順正理論*卷第三十九 T1562_.29.0567c21: T1562_.29.0567c22: T1562_.29.0567c23: T1562_.29.0567c24: T1562_.29.0567c25: 尊者衆賢造 T1562_.29.0567c26: *三藏法師玄奘奉 詔譯 T1562_.29.0567c27: 辨業品第四之八 T1562_.29.0567c28: 因辨諸業性相不同。當釋經中所摽諸業。且 T1562_.29.0567c29: 經中説業有三種。善惡無記其相云何。頌曰 Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:無/有] [CITE] |