大正蔵検索 INBUDS
|
弘明集 (No. 2102_ 僧祐撰 ) in Vol. 52 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:無/有] [CITE]
T2102_.52.0048a01: 同奉聖眞。豈有惡乎。想必不逆。允於佳示 T2102_.52.0048a02: 耳 T2102_.52.0048a03: 弘明集卷第七 T2102_.52.0048a04: T2102_.52.0048a05: T2102_.52.0048a06: T2102_.52.0048a07: T2102_.52.0048a08: 梁*楊都建初寺釋僧祐*律師撰 T2102_.52.0048a09: 玄光法師辯惑論 記室劉勰滅惑論 T2102_.52.0048a10: 僧順法師析三破論
T2102_.52.0048a13: 縁想増靄奚識明政。由淳風漓薄。使衆魔紛 T2102_.52.0048a14: 競矣。若矯詐謀榮必行五逆。威強導矇必施 T2102_.52.0048a15: 六極。蟲氣滿致患非一念。東呉遭水仙之 T2102_.52.0048a16: 厄。西夷載鬼卒之名。閩藪留種民之穢。漢葉 T2102_.52.0048a17: 感思子之歌。忠賢撫歎民治凌歇。攬地沙草 T2102_.52.0048a18: 寧數其罪。涓流末學莫知宗本。世教訛辭詭 T2102_.52.0048a19: 蔽三寶。老鬼民等詠嗟盈路。皆是炎山之 T2102_.52.0048a20: 煨燼。河洛之渣糝。淪湑險難。余甚悼焉。聊 T2102_.52.0048a21: 詮往迹庶鏡未然。照迷童於玄郷。顯妙趣於 T2102_.52.0048a22: 塵外。休風冥被彼我情判。豈是言聲所能攄 T2102_.52.0048a23: 寫 T2102_.52.0048a24: 禁經上價是一逆 T2102_.52.0048a25: 夫玄籍雲舒貫空有之美。聖賢功績何莫由 T2102_.52.0048a26: 斯。實學者之淵海。生民之日月。所以波崙 T2102_.52.0048a27: 菩薩慈悲等照。震聲光於冥塗。弭塵賊於 T2102_.52.0048a28: 險澤。汎靈舟於信風。接浮生於苦水。聞道 T2102_.52.0048a29: 諸經製雜凡意教迹邪險。是故不傳怪哉。道 T2102_.52.0048b01: 化空被禁錮。觀今學者不顧嚴科。但得金帛。 T2102_.52.0048b02: 便與其經。貧者造之至死不覩。貪利無慈逆 T2102_.52.0048b03: 莫過此。又其方術穢濁不清。乃扣齒爲天鼓。 T2102_.52.0048b04: 咽唾爲醴泉。馬屎爲靈薪。老鼠爲芝藥。資 T2102_.52.0048b05: 此求道焉能得乎。昔秦皇漢武不獲輕身。使 T2102_.52.0048b06: 徐福公孫遠冥雲波祈候通仙。影響無陳。夫 T2102_.52.0048b07: 閑心祛欲則事與道隣。豈假驟渉之勞。咽唾 T2102_.52.0048b08: 嗑齒者乎 T2102_.52.0048b09: 妄稱眞道*是二逆 T2102_.52.0048b10: 夫質懋纁霞者。言神丹之功。開明淨智者。必 T2102_.52.0048b11: 𦿆花之氣。雖保此爲眞。而未能無終。況復張 T2102_.52.0048b12: 陵妄稱天師。既侮慢人鬼。即身受報。漢興平 T2102_.52.0048b13: 末爲蟒蛇所噏。子衡奔尋無處。畏負清議之 T2102_.52.0048b14: 報譏。乃假設權方。以表靈化之迹。生縻鵠 T2102_.52.0048b15: 足置石崔頂。謀事辦畢。剋期發之。到建安 T2102_.52.0048b16: 元年遣使告曰。正月七日天師昇玄都。米民 T2102_.52.0048b17: 山獠蟻集閾外。雲臺治民等稽首再拜言。伏 T2102_.52.0048b18: 聞聖駕玄都。臣等長辭蔭接尸塵。方亨九幽 T2102_.52.0048b19: 方夜衡入。久之乃出詭稱曰。吾旋駕辰華。爾 T2102_.52.0048b20: 各還所治。淨心持行存師念道。衡便密抽遊 T2102_.52.0048b21: 羂鵠。直衝虚空。民獠愚憃僉言登仙。販死 T2102_.52.0048b22: 利生欺罔天地 T2102_.52.0048b23: 合氣釋罪是其三逆 T2102_.52.0048b24: 夫滅情去欲則道心明眞。群斯班姓妄造黄
T2102_.52.0048b29: 勢。用消災散禍。其可然乎。其可然乎。漢時儀 T2102_.52.0048c01: 君行此爲道。魁魅亂俗被斥燉煌。後至孫恩 T2102_.52.0048c02: 侠蕩滋甚。士女溷漫不異禽獸。夫色塵易 T2102_.52.0048c03: 染愛結難消。況交氣丹田延命仙穴。肆兵過 T2102_.52.0048c04: 玉門之禁。變態窮龍虎之勢。生無忠貞之節。 T2102_.52.0048c05: 死有青庭之苦。誠願明天撿鏡。斯輩物我端 T2102_.52.0048c06: 清莫負冥詔 T2102_.52.0048c07: 侠道作亂*是其四逆 T2102_.52.0048c08: 夫眞宗難曉聲華易惑。縁累重淵嶽徳輕風 T2102_.52.0048c09: 露。如黄巾等鳶望漢室。反易天明罪悉伏誅。 T2102_.52.0048c10: 次有子魯復稱鬼道。神祇不佐爲野麋所突。 T2102_.52.0048c11: 末後孫恩復稱紫道。不以民賤之輕。欲圖帝 T2102_.52.0048c12: 貴之重。作雲響於幽竇。發妄想於空玄。水仙 T2102_.52.0048c13: 惑物枉殺老稚。破國壞民。豈非兇逆。是以宋 T2102_.52.0048c14: 武皇帝惟之慨然。乃龍飛千里虎歩三江。掩 T2102_.52.0048c15: 撲群妖不勞浹辰。含識懷歡草木春光 T2102_.52.0048c16: 章書伐徳是其五逆 T2102_.52.0048c17: 夫至化。餘塵不可誣蔽。詮諡靈魄務依明徳。 T2102_.52.0048c18: 道無眞體妄逐妖空。輒言東行醉酒沒故。如 T2102_.52.0048c19: 此頑贈寧非陋僻。又遷達七祖文意淺薄。乞 T2102_.52.0048c20: 免擔沙石長作道鬼。夫聖智窮微有念斯照。 T2102_.52.0048c21: 何煩祭酒横費紙墨。若必須辭訴然後判者。 T2102_.52.0048c22: 始知道君無玄鑒之能。天曹無天明之照。三 T2102_.52.0048c23: 官疲於謹案。伺吏勞於討捕。聞其奏章本擬 T2102_.52.0048c24: 急疾。而戊辰之日上必不達。不達太上則生 T2102_.52.0048c25: 民枉死。嗚呼哀哉。實爲五逆 T2102_.52.0048c26: 畏鬼帶符非法之極第一 T2102_.52.0048c27: 夫眞心履順者妖忤革其氣。是以至聖高賢 T2102_.52.0048c28: 無情於萬化。故能洞遊金石。臥宿煙霞。此純 T2102_.52.0048c29: 誠感通。豈佩帶使然哉。其經辭致慢鬼弊 T2102_.52.0049a01: 云。左佩太極章。右佩崑呉鐵。指日則停暉。 T2102_.52.0049a02: 擬鬼千里血。若受黄書赤章言。即是靈仙 T2102_.52.0049a03: 硠屐入靖不朝太上。至於使六甲神而跪拜
T2102_.52.0049a06: 盧悚紫標孫恩孤虚。並矯惑王師終滅人鬼 T2102_.52.0049a07: 制民課輸欺巧之極*第二 T2102_.52.0049a08: 夫五斗米教出自天師。後生邪濁復立米民。 T2102_.52.0049a09: 世人厭畏。是以子明杜恭倶因魔蟒。又塗炭 T2102_.52.0049a10: 齋者。事起張魯。氏夷難化故制斯法乃驢 T2102_.52.0049a11: 輾泥中。黄鹵泥面。擿頭懸。埏埴使熟。此 T2102_.52.0049a12: 法指在邊陲不施華夏。至義熙初。有王公。其 T2102_.52.0049a13: 次貪寶憚苦。竊省打拍。呉陸修靜甚知源僻。 T2102_.52.0049a14: 猶埿揬額懸縻而已。癡僻之極。幸勿言道 T2102_.52.0049a15: 解廚墓門不仁之極*第三 T2102_.52.0049a16: 夫開闉大施與物通美。左道餘氣乃*墓門解 T2102_.52.0049a17: 廚。矜身奧食。懷吮班之態。昔張子魯漢中
T2102_.52.0049a25: 璋教曰。夫靈仙養命。猶節松霞而厚身。嗜 T2102_.52.0049a26: 味奚能尚道。子魯聞之憤恥。意深罰其掃 T2102_.52.0049a27: 路。世傳道士後會擧標。以防斯難。兼制廚 T2102_.52.0049a28: 命酒限三升。漢末已來謂爲制酒。至王靈期 T2102_.52.0049b01: 削除釁目。先生道民並其賑錫。雖有五利之 T2102_.52.0049b02: 貴。更爲妖物之名 T2102_.52.0049b03: 度厄苦生虚妄之極*第四 T2102_.52.0049b04: 夫質危秋蔕命薄春冰。業風吹蕩蓬迴化境。 T2102_.52.0049b05: 所以景公任於縁命。孫子記爲行尸。迷徒湫 T2102_.52.0049b06: 學不識大方。至有疾病衰禍妄甚。妖祟之原 T2102_.52.0049b07: 淵鬼鴝以爲災。渡危厄於遐川。釣星於懸 T2102_.52.0049b08: 瘤。雪丹章於華山。乃蹙鬚眉貎謑詬。冥鬼 T2102_.52.0049b09: 云。三官使者已送先歸逝者。故然空喪辭 T2102_.52.0049b10: 貨。斯實祭酒頑巾糈之利。蠶食百姓公私並 T2102_.52.0049b11: 損。致使火宅驚於至聖。歸歌動於人思矣 T2102_.52.0049b12: 夢中作罪頑癡之極*第五 T2102_.52.0049b13: 夫天屬化始。乃識照爲原。棄捨身命草木非 T2102_.52.0049b14: 數。然大地丘山莫非我故塵。滄川漫皆是 T2102_.52.0049b15: 我涙血。以此而觀誰非親友。或夢見先亡。輒 T2102_.52.0049b16: 云變怪。夫人鬼雖別生滅固同。恩愛之情時 T2102_.52.0049b17: 復影響。群邪無状不識逆順。召食鬼吏兵奏 T2102_.52.0049b18: 章斷之。割截幽靈單心誰照。幸願未來勿尚 T2102_.52.0049b19: 迷言。使天堂無輟食之思。冰河靜災念之 T2102_.52.0049b20: 聲 T2102_.52.0049b21: 輕作寒暑兇佞之極*第六 T2102_.52.0049b22: 夫淵默心口者。萬行之眞徳。而塵界衆生率 T2102_.52.0049b23: 無慈愛。虓兇邪佞符章競作。懸門帖戸以誑 T2102_.52.0049b24: 愚俗。高賢有識未之安也。造黄神越章用持 T2102_.52.0049b25: 殺鬼。又制赤章用持殺人。趣悦世情不計殃 T2102_.52.0049b26: 罪。陰謀懷嫉經有舊准。死入鐵鉗大獄。生 T2102_.52.0049b27: 出鴟鵙瘖唖。精骸惛朽。淪離永劫。誰知斯 T2102_.52.0049b28: 乎。老鬼民輩道相不然。事之宜質。夫諫刺雖 T2102_.52.0049b29: 苦。智者甘聞故略致言。幸試三思能拂迹改 T2102_.52.0049c01: 圖。即與大化同風矣。良其不革。請俟明徳。備 T2102_.52.0049c02: 照聲曲。以曉長夜。豈是今日弱辭所陳哉 T2102_.52.0049c03: 滅惑論 東莞劉記室勰 T2102_.52.0049c04: 或造三破論者。義證庸近辭體鄙陋。雖至 T2102_.52.0049c05: 理定於深識。而流言惑於淺情。委巷陋説誠 T2102_.52.0049c06: 不足辯。又恐野聽將謂信然。聊擇其可採。 T2102_.52.0049c07: 略標雅致 T2102_.52.0049c08: 三破論云。道家之教妙在精思得一。而無死 T2102_.52.0049c09: 入聖。佛家之化妙在三昧禪通無生可冀。詺 T2102_.52.0049c10: 死爲泥洹。未見學死而不得死者也 T2102_.52.0049c11: 滅惑論曰。二教眞僞煥然易辯。夫佛法練 T2102_.52.0049c12: 神道教*練形。形器必終礙於一垣之裏。神識 T2102_.52.0049c13: 無窮再撫六合之外。明者資於無窮教以勝 T2102_.52.0049c14: 慧。闇者戀其必終誑以飛仙。仙術極於餌 T2102_.52.0049c15: 藥。慧業始於觀禪。禪練眞識故精妙而泥洹 T2102_.52.0049c16: 可冀。藥駐僞器故精思而翻騰無期。若迺棄 T2102_.52.0049c17: 妙寶藏。遺智養身。據理尋之其僞可知。假使 T2102_.52.0049c18: 形翻天際神闇鳶飛戻天。寧免爲鳥。夫泥 T2102_.52.0049c19: 洹妙果道惟常住。學死之談豈*析理哉 T2102_.52.0049c20: 三破論云。若言太子是教主。主不落髮而使 T2102_.52.0049c21: 人剃頭。主不棄妻使人斷種。實可笑哉。明 T2102_.52.0049c22: 知佛教是滅惡之術也。伏聞。君子之徳身體 T2102_.52.0049c23: 髮膚受之父母。不敢毀傷。孝之始也 T2102_.52.0049c24: 滅惑論曰。太子棄妻落髮事顯於經。而反白 T2102_.52.0049c25: 爲黒。不亦罔乎。夫佛家之孝所包蓋遠。理 T2102_.52.0049c26: 由乎心無繋於髮。若愛髮棄心何取於孝。昔 T2102_.52.0049c27: 泰伯虞仲斷髮文身。夫子兩稱至徳。中權以 T2102_.52.0049c28: 俗内之賢。宜修世禮。斷髮讓國聖哲美談。況 T2102_.52.0049c29: 般若之教業勝中權。菩提之果理妙克讓者 T2102_.52.0050a01: 哉。理妙克讓故捨髮取道。業勝中權故棄迹 T2102_.52.0050a02: 求心。准以兩賢無缺於孝。鑒以聖境夫何怪 T2102_.52.0050a03: 乎 T2102_.52.0050a04: 第一破曰。入國而破國者。誑言説爲興造無 T2102_.52.0050a05: 費。苦剋百姓使國空民窮。不助國生人減損。 T2102_.52.0050a06: 見人不蠶而衣不田而食。國滅人絶由此爲 T2102_.52.0050a07: 失。日用損費無纖毫之益。五災之害不復過 T2102_.52.0050a08: 此。滅惑論曰。大乘圓極窮理盡妙故。明二諦 T2102_.52.0050a09: 以遣有。辯三空以標無。四等弘其勝心。六度 T2102_.52.0050a10: 振其苦業。誑言之訕豈傷日月。夫塔寺之興 T2102_.52.0050a11: 闡揚靈教。功立一時而道被千載。昔禹會諸 T2102_.52.0050a12: 侯玉帛萬國。至于戰伐存者七君。太始政 T2102_.52.0050a13: 阜民戸殷盛。赤眉兵亂千里無煙。國滅人絶。 T2102_.52.0050a14: 寧此之由。亥嬰之時石穀十萬。景武之世積 T2102_.52.0050a15: 粟紅腐。非秦末多沙門而漢初無佛法也。驗 T2102_.52.0050a16: 古准今。何損於政 T2102_.52.0050a17: 第二破曰。入家而破家。使父子殊事兄弟異 T2102_.52.0050a18: 法。遺棄二親孝道頓絶。憂娯各異歌哭不同。 T2102_.52.0050a19: 骨血生讐服屬永棄。悖化犯順。無昊天之報。 T2102_.52.0050a20: 五逆不孝不復過此 T2102_.52.0050a21: 滅惑論曰。夫孝理至極道俗同貫。雖内外跡 T2102_.52.0050a22: 殊而神用一揆。若命綴俗因本修教。於儒禮 T2102_.52.0050a23: 運棄道果。同弘孝於梵業。是以諮親出家。 T2102_.52.0050a24: 法華明其義。聽而後學。維摩標其例。豈忘本 T2102_.52.0050a25: 哉。有由然也。彼皆照悟神理鑒燭人世。過 T2102_.52.0050a26: 駟駕於格言。逝川傷於上哲。故知瞑息盡 T2102_.52.0050a27: 養則無濟幽靈。學道拔親則冥苦永滅。審妙 T2102_.52.0050a28: 感之無差。辯勝果之可必。所以輕重相權去 T2102_.52.0050a29: 彼取此。若乃服制所施事由追遠。祀雖因心 T2102_.52.0050b01: 抑亦沿世。昔三皇至治。堯舜所慕。死則衣 T2102_.52.0050b02: 之以薪葬之中野。封樹不修。苴斬無紀。豈 T2102_.52.0050b03: 可謂三皇教民棄於孝乎。爰及五帝服制煥 T2102_.52.0050b04: 然。未聞堯舜執禮追責三皇。三皇無責何獨 T2102_.52.0050b05: 疑佛。佛之無服理由拔苦。三皇廢喪事沿淳 T2102_.52.0050b06: 樸。淳樸不疑而拔苦見尤。所謂朝三暮四而 T2102_.52.0050b07: 喜怒交設者也。明知聖人之教觸感圓通。三 T2102_.52.0050b08: 皇以淳樸無服。五帝以沿情制喪。釋迦拔苦 T2102_.52.0050b09: 故棄俗反眞。檢迹異路而玄化同歸 T2102_.52.0050b10: 第三破曰。入身而破身人生之體。一有毀傷 T2102_.52.0050b11: 之疾。二有髡頭之苦。三有不孝之逆。四有絶 T2102_.52.0050b12: 種之罪。五有生之體。從識唯學不孝。何故 T2102_.52.0050b13: 言哉。誡令不跪父母。便競從之。兒先作沙彌。 T2102_.52.0050b14: 其母後作阿尼。則跪其兒。不禮之教中國絶 T2102_.52.0050b15: 之。何可得從 T2102_.52.0050b16: 滅惑論曰。夫棲形禀識理定前業。入道居俗 T2102_.52.0050b17: 事繋因果。是以釋迦出世化洽天人。御國統 T2102_.52.0050b18: 家並證道跡。未聞世界普同出家。良由縁感 T2102_.52.0050b19: 不一故。名教有二。搢紳沙門所以殊也。但 T2102_.52.0050b20: 始拔塵域。理由戒定。妻者愛累。髮者形飾。愛 T2102_.52.0050b21: 累傷神形飾乖道。所以澄神滅愛修道棄飾。 T2102_.52.0050b22: 理出常均教必翻俗。若乃不跪父母道尊故 T2102_.52.0050b23: 也。父母禮之尊道故也。禮新冠見母其母拜 T2102_.52.0050b24: 之。嘉其備徳故。屈尊禮卑也。介胃之士見 T2102_.52.0050b25: 君不拜。重其秉武故尊不加也。緇弁輕冠本 T2102_.52.0050b26: 無神道。介冑凶器非有至徳。然事應加恭則 T2102_.52.0050b27: 以母拜子。勢宜停敬則臣不跪君。禮典世教 T2102_.52.0050b28: 周孔所制。論其變通不由一軌。況佛道之尊 T2102_.52.0050b29: 標出三界。神教妙本群致玄宗。以此加人實 T2102_.52.0050c01: 尊冠冑。冠冑反禮古今不疑。佛道加敬將欲 T2102_.52.0050c02: 何怪 T2102_.52.0050c03: 三破論云。佛舊經本云。浮屠羅什改爲佛徒。 T2102_.52.0050c04: 知其源惡故也。所以詺爲浮屠。胡人凶惡故。 T2102_.52.0050c05: 老子云。化其始不欲傷其形。故髡其頭名爲 T2102_.52.0050c06: 浮屠。況屠割也。至僧後改爲佛圖。本舊經 T2102_.52.0050c07: 云。喪門喪門由死滅之門。云其法無生之教。 T2102_.52.0050c08: 名曰喪門。至羅什又改爲桑門。僧又改爲 T2102_.52.0050c09: 沙門。沙門由沙汰之法。不足可稱 T2102_.52.0050c10: 滅惑論曰。漢明之世佛經始過。故漢譯言音 T2102_.52.0050c11: 字未正。浮音似佛。桑音似沙。聲之誤也。以 T2102_.52.0050c12: 圖爲屠字之誤也。羅什語通華戎。識兼音義。 T2102_.52.0050c13: 改正三豕固其宜矣。五經世典學不因譯而 T2102_.52.0050c14: 馬鄭注説音字互改。是以於穆不記謬師 T2102_.52.0050c15: 資。於周頌允塞安安乖聖徳。於堯典至教 T2102_.52.0050c16: 之深寧在兩字。得意忘言莊周所領。以文害 T2102_.52.0050c17: 志孟軻所譏。不原大理唯字是求。宋人申束 T2102_.52.0050c18: 豈復過此 T2102_.52.0050c19: 三破論曰。有此三破之法。不施中國。本正 T2102_.52.0050c20: 西域。何言之哉。胡人無二剛強無禮。不異 T2102_.52.0050c21: 禽獸。不信虚無。老子入關故作形像之教化 T2102_.52.0050c22: 之。又云。胡人麁穬欲斷其惡種故。令男不 T2102_.52.0050c23: 娶妻女不嫁。夫一國伏法自然滅盡 T2102_.52.0050c24: 滅惑論曰。雙樹晦跡形像代興。固已理積無 T2102_.52.0050c25: 始而道被無窮者也。按李叟出關。運當周 T2102_.52.0050c26: 季。世閉賢隱故。往而忘歸。接輿避世猶滅其 T2102_.52.0050c27: 迹。況適外域孰見其蹤。於是姦猾祭酒造化 T2102_.52.0050c28: 胡之經。理拙辭鄙。廝隷所傳尋西胡怯弱北 T2102_.52.0050c29: 狄凶熾。若老子滅惡棄徳用形。何愛凶狄而 T2102_.52.0051a01: 反滅弱胡。遂令玁狁横行毒流萬世。豺狼當 T2102_.52.0051a02: 路而狐狸是誅。淪湑爲酷覆載無聞。商鞅之 T2102_.52.0051a03: 法未至此虐。伯陽之道豈其然哉。且未服則 T2102_.52.0051a04: 設像無施。信順則拏戮可息。既服教矣。方加 T2102_.52.0051a05: 極刑。一言失道衆僞可見。東野之語其如理 T2102_.52.0051a06: 何 T2102_.52.0051a07: 三破論云。蓋聞三皇五帝三王之徒。何以學 T2102_.52.0051a08: 道並感應。而未聞佛教。爲是九皇忽之。爲是 T2102_.52.0051a09: 佛教未出。若是佛教未出則爲邪僞不復云 T2102_.52.0051a10: 云 T2102_.52.0051a11: 滅惑論曰。神化變通教體匪一。靈應感會隱 T2102_.52.0051a12: 現無際。若縁在妙化則菩薩弘其道。化在麁 T2102_.52.0051a13: 縁則聖帝演其徳。夫聖帝菩薩隨感現應。殊 T2102_.52.0051a14: 教合契未始非佛。固知三皇以來感滅而名 T2102_.52.0051a15: 隱漢明之教縁應而像現矣。若迺三皇徳化 T2102_.52.0051a16: 五帝仁教。此之謂道。似非太上羲農敷治。未 T2102_.52.0051a17: 聞奏章。堯舜緝政寧肯畫符。湯武禁暴豈 T2102_.52.0051a18: 當餌丹。五經典籍不齒天師。而求援聖帝。 T2102_.52.0051a19: 豈不非哉 T2102_.52.0051a20: 三破論云。道以氣爲宗名爲得一。尋中原人 T2102_.52.0051a21: 士莫不奉道。今中國有奉佛者。必是羌胡之 T2102_.52.0051a22: 種。若言非耶。何以奉佛 T2102_.52.0051a23: 滅惑論曰。至道宗極理歸乎一。妙法眞境本 T2102_.52.0051a24: 固無二。佛之至也。則空玄無形而萬象並應。 T2102_.52.0051a25: 寂滅無心而玄智彌照。幽數潜會莫見其極。 T2102_.52.0051a26: 冥功日用靡識其然。但言象既生假名。遂立 T2102_.52.0051a27: 胡言。菩提漢語曰道。其顯跡也。則金容以 T2102_.52.0051a28: 表聖。應俗也則王宮以現生。拔愚以四禪 T2102_.52.0051a29: 爲始。進慧以十地爲階。總龍鬼而均誘。涵蠢 T2102_.52.0051b01: 動而等慈。權教無方不以道俗乖應。妙化無 T2102_.52.0051b02: 外豈以華戎阻情。是以一音演法殊譯。共解 T2102_.52.0051b03: 一乘敷教異經。同歸經典。由權故孔釋教殊 T2102_.52.0051b04: 而道契解同。由妙故*胡漢語隔而化通。但感 T2102_.52.0051b05: 有精麁故。教分道俗。地有東西故國限内外。 T2102_.52.0051b06: 其彌綸神化陶鑄群生無異也。用能振拔 T2102_.52.0051b07: 六趣總攝大千。道惟至極法惟最尊。然至道 T2102_.52.0051b08: 雖一岐路生迷。九十六種倶號爲道。聽名則 T2102_.52.0051b09: 邪正莫辯。驗法則眞僞自分。案道家立法。厥 T2102_.52.0051b10: 品有三。上標老子。次述神仙。下襲張陵。太上 T2102_.52.0051b11: 爲宗尋柱史嘉遯。實惟大賢。著書論道貴在 T2102_.52.0051b12: 無爲。理歸靜一化本虚柔。然而三世*不紀 T2102_.52.0051b13: 慧業靡聞。斯迺導俗之良書。非出世之妙經 T2102_.52.0051b14: 也。若乃神仙小道名爲五通。福極生天體盡 T2102_.52.0051b15: 飛騰。神通而未免有漏。壽遠而不能無終。功 T2102_.52.0051b16: 非餌藥徳沿業修。於是愚狡方士僞託遂滋。 T2102_.52.0051b17: 張陵米賊述紀昇天。葛玄野竪著傳仙。公愚 T2102_.52.0051b18: 斯惑矣。智可罔歟。今祖述李叟。則教失如 T2102_.52.0051b19: 彼憲章神仙則體劣如此。上中爲妙猶不足 T2102_.52.0051b20: 算。況効陵魯醮事章符。設教五斗。欲拯三界。 T2102_.52.0051b21: 以蚊負山庸詎勝乎。標名大道而教甚於俗。 T2102_.52.0051b22: 擧號太上而法窮下愚。何故知耶。貪壽忌 T2102_.52.0051b23: 夭含識所同。故肉芝石華譎以翻騰。好色觸 T2102_.52.0051b24: 情世所莫異。故黄書御女誑稱地仙。肌革盈 T2102_.52.0051b25: 虚群生共愛。故寶惜涕唾以灌靈根。避災 T2102_.52.0051b26: 苦病民之恒患。故斬縛魑魅以快愚情。憑威 T2102_.52.0051b27: 恃武俗之舊風。故吏兵鉤騎以動淺心。至於 T2102_.52.0051b28: 消災淫術厭勝姦方。理穢辭辱非可筆傳。事 T2102_.52.0051b29: 合泯庶故。比屋歸宗。是以張角李弘毒流 T2102_.52.0051c01: 漢季。盧悚孫恩亂盈晋末。餘波所被寔蕃有 T2102_.52.0051c02: 徒。爵非通侯而輕立民戸。瑞無虎竹而濫求 T2102_.52.0051c03: 租税。糜費産業蠱惑士女。運屯則蝎國。世 T2102_.52.0051c04: 平則蠹民傷政萌亂。豈與佛同。且夫涅槃大 T2102_.52.0051c05: 品寧比玄上大清。金容妙相何羨鬼室空屋。 T2102_.52.0051c06: 降伏天魔不慕幻邪之詐。淨修戒行豈同畢 T2102_.52.0051c07: 券之醜。積弘誓於方寸。孰與藏官將於丹 T2102_.52.0051c08: 田。響洪鍾於梵音。豈若鳴天鼓於脣齒。校以 T2102_.52.0051c09: 形迹精麁已懸。覈以至理眞僞豈隱。若以麁 T2102_.52.0051c10: 笑精以僞謗眞。是瞽對离朱曰我明也
T2102_.52.0051c13: 論云。泥洹是死。未見學死而得長生。此滅 T2102_.52.0051c14: 種之化也 T2102_.52.0051c15: 釋曰。夫生生之厚至於無生。則張毅單豹之 T2102_.52.0051c16: 徒是其匹矣。是以儒家云。人莫不愛其死而 T2102_.52.0051c17: 患其生。老氏云。及吾無身吾有何患。莊周亦 T2102_.52.0051c18: 自病痛其一身。此三者聖達之流。叵以生爲 T2102_.52.0051c19: 患。夫欲求無生莫若泥洹。泥洹者無爲之妙 T2102_.52.0051c20: 稱。談其跡也則有王宮雙樹之文。語其實也 T2102_.52.0051c21: 則有常住常樂之説。子方輪迴五道。何由聞 T2102_.52.0051c22: 涅槃之要。或有三盲摸象。得象耳者。爭云象 T2102_.52.0051c23: 如簸箕。得象鼻者。爭云。象如舂杵。雖獲象 T2102_.52.0051c24: 一方。終不全象之實。子説泥洹是死。眞摸 T2102_.52.0051c25: 象之一盲矣 T2102_.52.0051c26: 論云。太子不廢妻使人斷種 T2102_.52.0051c27: 釋曰。夫聖實湛然。跡有表應。太子納妃於儲 T2102_.52.0051c28: 貳者。蓋欲示人倫之道已足。遂能棄茲大寶。 T2102_.52.0051c29: 忽彼恩愛耳。至如諸天夕降白驥飛城。十號 T2102_.52.0052a01: 之理斯在。何妻子之可有哉。且世之孥孺爲 T2102_.52.0052a02: 累最深。饑寒則生於盜賊。飽暖則發於驕奢。 T2102_.52.0052a03: 是以癘婦夕産急求火照。唯恐似己復更 T2102_.52.0052a04: 爲癘。凡夫之種若癘産焉。經云。一切衆生皆 T2102_.52.0052a05: 有佛性。仰尋此旨則是佛種捨家從道棄癘。 T2102_.52.0052a06: 就佛爲樂爲利。寧復是加子迷。於俗韻滯於 T2102_.52.0052a07: 重惑。夢中之夢何當曉矣 T2102_.52.0052a08: 論云。太子不剃頭使人落髮 T2102_.52.0052a09: 釋曰。在家則有二親之愛。出家則有嚴師之 T2102_.52.0052a10: 重。論其愛也。髮膚爲上。稱其嚴也剪落爲難。 T2102_.52.0052a11: 所以就剃除而欽。若辭父母而長往者。蓋欲 T2102_.52.0052a12: 去此煩惱。即彼無爲髮膚之戀。尚或可棄。外 T2102_.52.0052a13: 物之徒有何可惜哉。不輕髮膚。何以尊道。不 T2102_.52.0052a14: 辭天屬。何用嚴師。譬如喪服出紹大宗。則降 T2102_.52.0052a15: 其本生。隆其所後。將使此子執人宗廟之重。 T2102_.52.0052a16: 割其歸顧之情。還本政自一朞。非恩之薄所 T2102_.52.0052a17: 後。頓申三年實義之厚。禮記云。出必降者 T2102_.52.0052a18: 有受我而厚其例矣。經云。諸天奉刀持髮。 T2102_.52.0052a19: 上天不剃之談。是何言也。子但勇於穿鑿怯 T2102_.52.0052a20: 於尋旨。相爲慨然 T2102_.52.0052a21: 論云。子先出家母後作尼。則敬其子失禮之 T2102_.52.0052a22: 甚 T2102_.52.0052a23: 釋曰。出家之人尊師重法棄俗從道。寧可一 T2102_.52.0052a24: 概而求。且太子就學父王致敬。漢祖善嘉*命 T2102_.52.0052a25: 之言。以太皇爲臣。魏之高貴敬齊王於私 T2102_.52.0052a26: 室。晋之儲后臣厥父於公庭。引此而判則非 T2102_.52.0052a27: 疑矣 T2102_.52.0052a28: 論云。剃頭爲浮圖 T2102_.52.0052a29: 釋曰。經云。浮圖者。聖瑞靈圖浮海而至。故云 T2102_.52.0052b01: 浮圖也。呉中石佛泛海儵來。即其事矣。今 T2102_.52.0052b02: 子毀圖像之圖。爲刑屠之屠。則泰伯端委而 T2102_.52.0052b03: 治故無慚徳。仲雍剪髮文身從俗致化。遭子 T2102_.52.0052b04: 今日必罹吠聲之尤事。有似而非非而似者。 T2102_.52.0052b05: 外書以仲尼爲聖人。内經云。尼者。女也。或有 T2102_.52.0052b06: 謂仲尼爲女子。子豈信之哉。猶如屠圖之相 T2102_.52.0052b07: 類。亦何以殊 T2102_.52.0052b08: 論云。喪門者。死滅之門也 T2102_.52.0052b09: 釋曰。門者本也。明理之所出入。出入從本而 T2102_.52.0052b10: 興焉。釋氏有不二法門。老子有衆妙之門。書 T2102_.52.0052b11: 云。禍福無門。皆是會通之林藪。機妙之淵宅。 T2102_.52.0052b12: 出家之人得其義矣。喪者滅也。滅塵之勞通 T2102_.52.0052b13: 神之解。即喪門也。桑當爲乘字之誤耳。乘門。 T2102_.52.0052b14: 者。即大乘門也。煩想既滅遇物斯乘故。先云 T2102_.52.0052b15: 滅門。末云乘門焉。且八萬四千皆稱法門。奚 T2102_.52.0052b16: 獨喪桑二門哉 T2102_.52.0052b17: 論云。胡人不信虚無。老子入關故作形像之 T2102_.52.0052b18: 化也 T2102_.52.0052b19: 釋曰。原夫形像始立非爲教本之意。當由滅 T2102_.52.0052b20: 度之後。係戀罔己栴檀香像。亦有明文。且仲 T2102_.52.0052b21: 尼既卒。三千之徒永言興慕。以有若之貎。最 T2102_.52.0052b22: 似夫子。坐之講堂之上。令其講演門徒諮 T2102_.52.0052b23: 仰。與往日不殊。曾參勃然而言曰。子起。此非 T2102_.52.0052b24: 子之座。推此而談思仰可知也。羅什法師生 T2102_.52.0052b25: 自外方。聰敏淵博。善談法相。繦負佛經流 T2102_.52.0052b26: 布關輔。詮以眞俗二名。驗以境照雙寂。振無 T2102_.52.0052b27: 爲之高風。激玄流於未悟。所謂遣之至於無 T2102_.52.0052b28: 遣也。子謂。胡人不信虚無。誠非篤論。君子 T2102_.52.0052b29: 自強理有優劣。不係形像。子以形像而語。 T2102_.52.0052c01: 不亦攻乎異端 T2102_.52.0052c02: 論云。剃頭本不求佛爲服凶胡。今中國人不 T2102_.52.0052c03: 以正神自訓。而取頑胡之法 T2102_.52.0052c04: 釋曰。夫六戎五狄四夷八蠻。不識王化。不聞 T2102_.52.0052c05: 佛法者。譬如畜生事均八難。方今聖主隆三 T2102_.52.0052c06: 五之治。闡一乘之法。天人同慶四海訢訢。蚑 T2102_.52.0052c07: 行喙息咸受其頼。喘蠕之蟲自云得所。子脱 T2102_.52.0052c08: 不自思厝言云云。宜急緘其舌。亦何勞提耳 T2102_.52.0052c09: 論云。沙門者。沙汰之謂也 T2102_.52.0052c10: 釋曰。息心達源號曰沙門。此則練神濯穢反 T2102_.52.0052c11: 流歸。潔即沙汰之謂也。子欲毀之。而義愈 T2102_.52.0052c12: 美。眞可仰之彌高。鑚之彌堅者也 T2102_.52.0052c13: 論云。入國破國 T2102_.52.0052c14: 釋曰。夫聖必縁感無往非應。結繩以後民澆 T2102_.52.0052c15: 俗薄。末代王教誕揚堯孔。至如妙法所沾。 T2102_.52.0052c16: 固助俗爲化。不待刑戮而自淳。無假楚撻而 T2102_.52.0052c17: 取正。石主師澄而興國。古王諮勃以隆道。 T2102_.52.0052c18: 破國之文從何取説 T2102_.52.0052c19: 論云。入家破家 T2102_.52.0052c20: 釋曰。釋氏之訓父慈子孝。兄愛弟敬夫和妻 T2102_.52.0052c21: 柔。備有六睦之美。有何不善。而能破家。唯聞 T2102_.52.0052c22: 末學道士有赤章呪咀。發擿陰私行壇被髮。 T2102_.52.0052c23: 呼天引地不問親疏。規相厭殺。此即破家 T2102_.52.0052c24: 之法矣 T2102_.52.0052c25: 論云。入身破身 T2102_.52.0052c26: 釋曰。夫身之爲累甚於桎梏。老氏以形骸爲 T2102_.52.0052c27: 糞土。釋迦以三界爲火宅。出家之士。故宜去 T2102_.52.0052c28: 菁華。棄名利。悟逆旅之難。常希寂滅之爲 T2102_.52.0052c29: 樂。流俗之徒反此以求全。即所謂殺生者不 T2102_.52.0053a01: 死。生生者不生也。近代有好名道士。自云。神 T2102_.52.0053a02: 術過人剋期輕擧。白日登天曾未數丈。横墜 T2102_.52.0053a03: 於地迫而察之。正大鳥之雙翼耳。眞所謂不 T2102_.52.0053a04: 能奮飛者也。驗滅亡於即事不旋踵而受誅。 T2102_.52.0053a05: 漢之張陵誣誷貢高。呼曰米賊。亦被夷剪。 T2102_.52.0053a06: 入身破身。無乃角弓乎 T2102_.52.0053a07: 論曰。歌哭不同者 T2102_.52.0053a08: 釋曰。人哭亦哭。俗内之冥跡。臨喪能歌。方外 T2102_.52.0053a09: 之坦情。原壤喪親登木而歌。孔子過而不非 T2102_.52.0053a10: 者。此亦是名教之一方耳 T2102_.52.0053a11: 論云。不朝宗者 T2102_.52.0053a12: 釋曰。孔子云。儒有上不臣天子下不事公侯。 T2102_.52.0053a13: 儒者俗中之一物。尚能若此。況沙門者方外 T2102_.52.0053a14: 之士乎。昔伯成子高子州支伯且希玄慕 T2102_.52.0053a15: 道。以不近屑人事 T2102_.52.0053a16: 論云。剃頭犯毀傷 T2102_.52.0053a17: 釋曰。髮膚之解具於前答。聊更略而陳之。凡 T2102_.52.0053a18: 言不敢毀傷者。正是防其非僻觸冒憲司。五 T2102_.52.0053a19: 刑所加致有殘缺耳。今沙門者服膺聖師。遠 T2102_.52.0053a20: 求十地。剃除鬚髮被服法衣。立身不乖揚名 T2102_.52.0053a21: 得道。還度天屬。有何不可而入毀傷之義。守 T2102_.52.0053a22: 文之徒未達文外之旨耳。輪扁尚不移術於 T2102_.52.0053a23: 其兒。予何言哉 T2102_.52.0053a24: 論云。出家者未見君子是避役 T2102_.52.0053a25: 釋曰。噫唉。何子之難喩耶。左傳云。言者身之 T2102_.52.0053a26: 文。莊周云。言不廣不足以明道。余欲無言其 T2102_.52.0053a27: 可得乎。夫出家之士皆靈根宿固徳宇淵深。 T2102_.52.0053a28: 湛乎斯照。確乎不拔者也。是以其神凝其心 T2102_.52.0053a29: 道。超然遐想宇宙不能點。其胸懷澹爾無寄 T2102_.52.0053b01: 塵垢。無能攪其方寸。割慈親之重恩。棄 T2102_.52.0053b02: 房槞之歡愛。虚室生白守玄行禪。或投陀林 T2102_.52.0053b03: 野委身餧獸。或靜節蔬餐精心無怠。將勤求 T2102_.52.0053b04: 十力超登無上解脱。天羅銷散地網。兆百福 T2102_.52.0053b05: 於未萌。濟蒼生於萬劫。斯實大丈夫之宏圖。 T2102_.52.0053b06: 非吾子所得開關也。避役之談是何言歟。孔 T2102_.52.0053b07: 子願喙三尺者。雖言出於口。終不以長舌犯 T2102_.52.0053b08: 人。則子之喙三丈矣。何多口之爲異傷人 T2102_.52.0053b09: 之深哉 T2102_.52.0053b10: 論云。三丁二出一何無縁者 T2102_.52.0053b11: 釋曰。無縁即是縁無縁生。有縁即是縁有縁 T2102_.52.0053b12: 起。何以知其然耶。世有闔門入道。故曰縁有 T2102_.52.0053b13: 縁起。有生不識比丘者。故曰縁無縁生。十六 T2102_.52.0053b14: 王子同日出家。隨父入道。是則縁之所牽。闔 T2102_.52.0053b15: 門損至。何其宜出二之有哉。無縁者。自就 T2102_.52.0053b16: 無縁中求反諸己而已矣。子方永墜無間。遑 T2102_.52.0053b17: 復論此。將不欲倒置干戈乎。若能反迷殊副 T2102_.52.0053b18: 所望 T2102_.52.0053b19: 論云。道家之教育徳成國者 T2102_.52.0053b20: 釋曰。道有九十六種。佛爲最尊。梵志之徒蓋 T2102_.52.0053b21: 是培塿爾。假使山川之神能出雲雨者。亦是 T2102_.52.0053b22: 有國有家之所祀焉。其云育徳成國不無多 T2102_.52.0053b23: 少。但廣濟無邊永拔塗炭。我金剛一聖巍 T2102_.52.0053b24: 巍獨雄夫。太極剖判之初*也已自有佛。但于 T2102_.52.0053b25: 時衆生因縁未動。故宜且昧名稱。何以言之。 T2102_.52.0053b26: 推三皇以上何容。都無禮易則乾坤兩卦。履 T2102_.52.0053b27: 豫二爻便當與天地倶生。雖曰倶生。而名不 T2102_.52.0053b28: 倶出者。良由機感不發。施用未形。其理常 T2102_.52.0053b29: 存其跡不著耳。中外二聖其揆一也。故立 T2102_.52.0053c01: 法行云。先遣三賢漸誘俗教。後以佛經革邪 T2102_.52.0053c02: 從正。李老之門釋氏之偏裨矣。經云。處處自 T2102_.52.0053c03: 説名字不同。或爲儒林之宗國師道士。或寂 T2102_.52.0053c04: 寞無爲而作佛事。金口所説合若符契。何 T2102_.52.0053c05: 爲東西跳梁不避高下耶。嗟乎外道籍我智 T2102_.52.0053c06: 慧。資我神力。遂欲撓亂我經文。虔劉我教。訓 T2102_.52.0053c07: 人之無良一至於此也 T2102_.52.0053c08: 論云。道者氣 T2102_.52.0053c09: 釋曰。夫道之名以理爲用。得其理也則於道 T2102_.52.0053c10: 爲備。是故沙門號曰道人。陽平呼曰道士。釋 T2102_.52.0053c11: 聖得道之宗。彭聃居道之未。得道宗者不待 T2102_.52.0053c12: 言道。而道自顯。居道之末者常稱道而道不 T2102_.52.0053c13: 足。譬如仲尼博學不以一事成名。游夏之徒 T2102_.52.0053c14: 全以四科見目。莊周有云。生者氣也。聚而爲 T2102_.52.0053c15: 生散而爲死。就如子言道若是氣。便當有聚 T2102_.52.0053c16: 有散有生有死。則子之道是生滅法。非常住 T2102_.52.0053c17: 也。嘗聞子道又有合氣之事。願子勿言此眞 T2102_.52.0053c18: 辱矣。莊子又云。道在屎溺。此屎尿之道得 T2102_.52.0053c19: 非吾子合氣之道乎 T2102_.52.0053c20: 弘明集卷第八 T2102_.52.0053c21: T2102_.52.0053c22: T2102_.52.0053c23: T2102_.52.0053c24: T2102_.52.0053c25: T2102_.52.0053c26: T2102_.52.0053c27: T2102_.52.0053c28: T2102_.52.0053c29: T2102_.52.0054a01: T2102_.52.0054a02: T2102_.52.0054a03: T2102_.52.0054a04: 梁*楊都建初寺釋僧祐*律師撰
T2102_.52.0054a10: 又所未説。聖非智不周近情難用語遠故也。 T2102_.52.0054a11: 是以先代玄儒談遺宿業。後世通辯亦論滯 T2102_.52.0054a12: 來身。非夫天下之極慮。何得而詳焉。故惑者 T2102_.52.0054a13: 聞識神不斷。而全謂之常。聞心念不常而全 T2102_.52.0054a14: 謂之斷。云斷則迷其性常。云常則惑其用斷。 T2102_.52.0054a15: 惑其用斷惑。因用疑本謂在本可滅。因本 T2102_.52.0054a16: 疑用謂在用弗移。莫能精求。互起偏執。乃使 T2102_.52.0054a17: 天然覺性自沒。浮談 T2102_.52.0054a18: 聖主禀以玄符御茲大寶覺。先天垂則觀民 T2102_.52.0054a19: 設化。將恐支離詭辯搆義横流。微敍繁絲伊 T2102_.52.0054a20: 誰能振。釋教遺文其將喪矣。是以著斯雅論。 T2102_.52.0054a21: 以弘至典績。早念身空栖心内教。毎餐法音 T2102_.52.0054a22: 用忘寢食。而闇情難曉觸理多疑。至於佛性 T2102_.52.0054a23: 大義頓迷心路。既天詰遠流預同撫覿。萬 T2102_.52.0054a24: 夜獲開千昏永曙。分除之疑朗然倶徹。竊惟 T2102_.52.0054a25: 事與理亨無物不識。用隨道合奚心不辯。故 T2102_.52.0054a26: 行雲徘徊猶感美音之和。游魚踴躍尚賞清 T2102_.52.0054a27: 絲之韻。況以入神之妙發自天衷。此臣所以 T2102_.52.0054a28: 舞之蹈之而不能自己者也。敢以膚受謹爲 T2102_.52.0054a29: 注釋。豈伊錐管用窮天奧。庶幾固惑所以釋
T2102_.52.0054c23: 衆口日服千人。予意猶有惑焉。聊欲薄其稽 T2102_.52.0054c24: 疑。詢其未悟。論至今所持者形神。所訟者精 T2102_.52.0054c25: T2102_.52.0054c26: T2102_.52.0054c27: T2102_.52.0054c28: T2102_.52.0054c29: T2102_.52.0055a01: 理。若乃春秋孝享爲之宗廟。則以爲聖人神 T2102_.52.0055a02: 道設教立禮防愚。杜伯關弓伯有被介。復謂 T2102_.52.0055a03: 天地之間自有怪物。非人死爲鬼。如此便不 T2102_.52.0055a04: 得。詰以詩書校以往事。唯可於形神之中。 T2102_.52.0055a05: *辯其離合。脱形神一體存滅罔異。則范子 T2102_.52.0055a06: 奮揚蹈厲金湯邈然。如靈質分途興毀區別。 T2102_.52.0055a07: 則予剋敵得俊。能事畢矣。又予雖明有佛而 T2102_.52.0055a08: 體佛不與俗同爾。兼陳本意係之論左焉
T2102_.52.0055a11: 答曰。神即形也。形即神也。是以形存則神存。 T2102_.52.0055a12: 形謝則神滅也 T2102_.52.0055a13: 問曰。形者。無知之稱。神者。有知之名。知與 T2102_.52.0055a14: 無知即事有異。神之與形理不容。一形神相 T2102_.52.0055a15: 即非所聞也 T2102_.52.0055a16: 答曰。形者。神之質。神者。形之用。是則形稱 T2102_.52.0055a17: 其質。神言其用。形之與神不得相異 T2102_.52.0055a18: 難曰。今論形神合體則應有不離之證。而直 T2102_.52.0055a19: 云神即形形即神。形之與神不得相異。此辯 T2102_.52.0055a20: 而無徴有乖篤喩矣。子今據夢以驗形神不 T2102_.52.0055a21: 得共體。當人寢時其形是無知之物。而有見 T2102_.52.0055a22: 焉。此神遊之所接也。神不孤立必憑形器。猶 T2102_.52.0055a23: 人不露處須有居室。但形器是穢闇之質。居 T2102_.52.0055a24: 室是蔽塞之地。神反形内則其識微惛惛。故 T2102_.52.0055a25: 以見爲夢。人歸室中則其神暫壅壅。故以明 T2102_.52.0055a26: 爲昧。夫人或夢上騰玄虚遠適萬里。若非神 T2102_.52.0055a27: 行便是形往耶。形既不往神又不離。復焉 T2102_.52.0055a28: 得如此。若謂是想所見者。及其安寐身似僵 T2102_.52.0055a29: 木氣。若寒灰呼之不聞。撫之無覺即云神與 T2102_.52.0055b01: 形均則是表裏倶倦。既不外接聲音。寧能内 T2102_.52.0055b02: 興思想。此即形靜神馳斷可知矣。又疑凡所
T2102_.52.0055b10: 潜靈外絶覲。覿雖復扶以六夢濟以想因。理 T2102_.52.0055b11: 亦不得然也 T2102_.52.0055b12: 問曰。神故非質。形故非用。不得爲異其義安 T2102_.52.0055b13: 在 T2102_.52.0055b14: 答曰。名殊而體一也 T2102_.52.0055b15: 問曰。名既已殊。體何得一 T2102_.52.0055b16: 答曰。神之於質猶利之於刀。形之於用猶 T2102_.52.0055b17: 刀之於利。利之名非刀也。刀之名非利也。 T2102_.52.0055b18: 然而捨利無刃捨刀無利。未聞刀沒而利存。 T2102_.52.0055b19: 豈容形亡而神在也 T2102_.52.0055b20: 難曰。夫刀之有利砥礪之功。故能水截蛟 T2102_.52.0055b21: 螭。陸斷兕虎。若窮利盡用必摧其鋒鍔。化成 T2102_.52.0055b22: 鈍刃。如此則利滅而刀存。即是神亡而形 T2102_.52.0055b23: 在。何云捨利無刃。名殊而體一耶。刀利既 T2102_.52.0055b24: 不倶滅。形神則不共亡。雖能近取於譬理實 T2102_.52.0055b25: 乖矣 T2102_.52.0055b26: 問曰。刀之與利或如來説形之與神其義不 T2102_.52.0055b27: 然。何以言之。木之質無知也。人之質有知也。 T2102_.52.0055b28: 人既有如木之質。而有異木之知。豈非木有 T2102_.52.0055c01: 其一人有其二耶 T2102_.52.0055c02: 答曰。異哉言乎。人若有如木之質以爲形。又 T2102_.52.0055c03: 有異木之知以爲神。則可如來論也。今人之 T2102_.52.0055c04: 質質有知也。木之質質無知也。人之質非木 T2102_.52.0055c05: 質也。木之質非人質也。安在有如木之質。 T2102_.52.0055c06: 而復有異木之知 T2102_.52.0055c07: 問曰。人之質所以異木質者。以其有知耳。人 T2102_.52.0055c08: 而無知與木何異 T2102_.52.0055c09: 答曰。人無無知之質。猶木無有知之形 T2102_.52.0055c10: 問曰。死者之形骸豈非無知之質耶 T2102_.52.0055c11: 答曰。是無知之質也 T2102_.52.0055c12: 問曰。若然者人果有如木之質。而有異木之 T2102_.52.0055c13: 知矣 T2102_.52.0055c14: 答曰。死者有如木之質。而無異木之知。生者 T2102_.52.0055c15: 有異木之知。而無如木之質 T2102_.52.0055c16: 問曰。死者之骨骸非生者之形骸耶 T2102_.52.0055c17: 答曰。生形之非死形。死形之非生形。區已革 T2102_.52.0055c18: 矣。安有生人之形骸。而有死人之骨骸哉 T2102_.52.0055c19: 問曰。若生者之形骸非死者之骨骸。死者之 T2102_.52.0055c20: 骨骸則應不由生者之形骸。不由生者之形 T2102_.52.0055c21: 骸。則此骨骸從何而至 T2102_.52.0055c22: 答曰。是生者之形骸變爲死者之骨骸也 T2102_.52.0055c23: 問曰。生者之形骸雖變爲死者之骨骸。豈不 T2102_.52.0055c24: 因生而有死。則知死體猶生體也 T2102_.52.0055c25: 答曰。如因榮木變爲枯木。枯木之質寧是榮 T2102_.52.0055c26: 木之體 T2102_.52.0055c27: 問曰。榮體變爲枯體。枯體即是榮體。如絲體 T2102_.52.0055c28: 變爲縷體。縷體即是絲體。有何咎焉 T2102_.52.0055c29: 答曰。若枯即是榮。榮即是枯。則應榮時凋 T2102_.52.0056a01: 零枯時結實。又榮木不應變爲枯木。以榮即 T2102_.52.0056a02: 是枯故。枯無所復變也。又榮枯是一何不先 T2102_.52.0056a03: 枯後榮。要先榮後枯何耶。絲縷同時不得爲 T2102_.52.0056a04: 喩 T2102_.52.0056a05: 問曰。生形之謝便應豁然都盡。何故方受死 T2102_.52.0056a06: 形綿歴未已耶 T2102_.52.0056a07: 答曰。生滅之體要有其次故也。夫欻而生 T2102_.52.0056a08: 者。必*欻而滅。漸而生者。必漸而滅。*欻而生 T2102_.52.0056a09: 者。飄驟是也。漸而生者。動植是也。有欻有漸 T2102_.52.0056a10: 物之理也 T2102_.52.0056a11: 難曰。論云。人之質有知也。木之質無知也。豈 T2102_.52.0056a12: 不以人識涼燠知痛癢。養之則生。傷之則死 T2102_.52.0056a13: 耶。夫木亦然矣。當春則榮。在秋則悴。樹之 T2102_.52.0056a14: 必生拔之必死。何謂無知。今人之質猶如木 T2102_.52.0056a15: 也。神留則形立。神去則形廢。立也即是榮木。 T2102_.52.0056a16: 廢也即是枯木。子何以*辯。此非神知而謂質 T2102_.52.0056a17: 有知乎。凡萬有皆以神知無以質知者也。但 T2102_.52.0056a18: 草木昆蟲之性。裁覺榮悴生死。生民之識則 T2102_.52.0056a19: 通安危利害。何謂非有如木之質以爲形。又 T2102_.52.0056a20: 有異木之知以爲神耶。此則形神有二居可 T2102_.52.0056a21: 別也。但木禀陰陽之偏風。人含一靈之精 T2102_.52.0056a22: 照。其識或同。其神則異矣。骨骸形骸之論 T2102_.52.0056a23: 死生授受之説。義既前定。事又不經。安用曲 T2102_.52.0056a24: *辯哉 T2102_.52.0056a25: 問曰。形即神者手等亦是神耶 T2102_.52.0056a26: 答曰。皆是神分 T2102_.52.0056a27: 問曰。若皆是神分神應能慮。手等亦應能慮 T2102_.52.0056a28: 也 T2102_.52.0056a29: 答曰。手等有痛癢之知。而無是非之慮 T2102_.52.0056b01: 問曰。知之與慮爲一爲異 T2102_.52.0056b02: 答曰。知即是慮。淺則爲知。深則爲慮 T2102_.52.0056b03: 問曰。若爾應有二慮。慮既有二。神有二乎 T2102_.52.0056b04: 答曰。人體唯一。神何得二 T2102_.52.0056b05: 問曰。若不得二安有痛癢之知而復有是非 T2102_.52.0056b06: 之慮 T2102_.52.0056b07: 答曰。如手足雖異總爲一人。是非痛癢雖復 T2102_.52.0056b08: 有異。亦總爲一神矣 T2102_.52.0056b09: 問曰。是非之慮不關手足。當關何也 T2102_.52.0056b10: 答曰。是非之慮心器所主 T2102_.52.0056b11: 問曰。心器是五藏之心非耶 T2102_.52.0056b12: 答曰。是也 T2102_.52.0056b13: 問曰。五*藏有何殊別。而心獨有是非之慮 T2102_.52.0056b14: 答曰。七竅亦復何殊。而司用不均何也 T2102_.52.0056b15: 問曰。慮思無方。何以知是心器所主 T2102_.52.0056b16: 答曰。心病則思乖。是以知心爲慮本 T2102_.52.0056b17: 問曰。何知不寄在眼等分中耶 T2102_.52.0056b18: 答曰。若慮可寄於眼分。眼何故不寄於耳分 T2102_.52.0056b19: *也 T2102_.52.0056b20: 問曰。慮體無本故可寄之於眼分。眼自有本。 T2102_.52.0056b21: 不假寄於他分 T2102_.52.0056b22: 答曰。眼何故有本而慮無本。苟無本於我形。 T2102_.52.0056b23: 而可遍寄於異地。亦可張甲之情。寄王乙之 T2102_.52.0056b24: 躯。李丙之性。託趙丁之體。然乎哉。不然也」 T2102_.52.0056b25: 難曰。論云。形神不殊手等皆是神分。此則神 T2102_.52.0056b26: 以形爲體。體全即神全。體傷即佛缺矣。神者 T2102_.52.0056b27: 何。識慮也。今人或斷手足殘肌膚。而智思不 T2102_.52.0056b28: 亂。猶孫臏刖趾兵略愈明。盧浮解腕儒道方 T2102_.52.0056b29: 謐。此神與形離。形傷神不害之切證也。但神 T2102_.52.0056c01: 任智以役物。託器以通照。視聽香味各有所 T2102_.52.0056c02: 憑。而思識歸乎心器。譬如人之有宅東閣延 T2102_.52.0056c03: 賢。南軒引景。北牖招風。西櫺映月。主人端 T2102_.52.0056c04: 居中霤以收四事之用焉。若如來論口鼻耳 T2102_.52.0056c05: 目各有神分。一目病即視神毀。二目應倶盲 T2102_.52.0056c06: 矣。一耳疾即聽神傷。兩耳倶應聾矣。今則 T2102_.52.0056c07: 不然。是知神以爲器非以爲體也 T2102_.52.0056c08: 又云。心爲慮本慮不可寄之他分。若在於口 T2102_.52.0056c09: 眼耳鼻。斯論然也。若在於他心則不然矣。耳 T2102_.52.0056c10: 鼻雖共此體。不可以相雜。以其所司不同器。 T2102_.52.0056c11: 器用各異也。他心雖在彼形而可得相渉。以 T2102_.52.0056c12: 其神理均妙識慮齊功也。故書稱。啓爾心沃 T2102_.52.0056c13: 朕心。詩云。他人有心。予忖度之。齊桓師管仲 T2102_.52.0056c14: 之謀。漢祖用張良之策。是皆本之於我形。寄 T2102_.52.0056c15: 之於他分。何云張甲之情不可託王乙之躯。 T2102_.52.0056c16: 李丙之性勿得寄趙丁之體乎 T2102_.52.0056c17: 問曰。聖人之形猶凡人之形。而有凡聖之殊。 T2102_.52.0056c18: 故知形神異矣 T2102_.52.0056c19: 答曰。不然。金之精者能照。穢者不能照。能照 T2102_.52.0056c20: 之精金寧有不照之穢質。又豈有聖人之神。 T2102_.52.0056c21: 而寄凡人之器。亦無凡人之神。而託聖人之 T2102_.52.0056c22: 體。是以八彩重瞳勛華之容。龍顏馬口軒皐 T2102_.52.0056c23: 之状。此形表之異也。比干之心七竅並列。伯 T2102_.52.0056c24: 約之膽其大如拳。此心器之殊也。是以聖人 T2102_.52.0056c25: 區分毎異常品。非唯道革群生。乃亦形超 T2102_.52.0056c26: 萬有。凡聖均體所未敢安 T2102_.52.0056c27: 問曰。子云。聖人之形必異於凡。敢問。陽貨 T2102_.52.0056c28: 類仲尼。項籍似帝舜。舜項孔陽智革形同。 T2102_.52.0056c29: 其故何耶 T2102_.52.0057a01: 答曰。玟似玉而非玉。鶋類鳳而非鳳。物誠 T2102_.52.0057a02: 有之。人故宜爾。項陽貎似而非實。以心器 T2102_.52.0057a03: 不均雖貎無益也 T2102_.52.0057a04: 問曰。凡聖之殊形器不一可也。聖人員極理 T2102_.52.0057a05: 無有二而且殊姿。陽文異状神不係色。於 T2102_.52.0057a06: 此益明 T2102_.52.0057a07: 答曰。聖與聖同。同於聖器而器不必同也。猶 T2102_.52.0057a08: 馬殊毛而齊逸。玉異色而均美。是以晋棘楚 T2102_.52.0057a09: 和等價連城。驎騮盜驪倶致千里 T2102_.52.0057a10: 問曰。形神不二既聞之矣。形謝神滅理固宜 T2102_.52.0057a11: 然。敢問。經云。爲之宗廟以鬼饗之。何謂也 T2102_.52.0057a12: 答曰。聖人之教然也。所以從孝子之心。而厲 T2102_.52.0057a13: 婾薄之意。神而明之。此之謂矣 T2102_.52.0057a14: 問曰。伯有被甲彭生豕見。墳素著其事。寧是 T2102_.52.0057a15: 設教而已耶 T2102_.52.0057a16: 答曰。妖怪茫茫或存或亡理死者衆不皆爲 T2102_.52.0057a17: 鬼。彭生伯有何獨能然。乍人乍豕。未必齊鄭 T2102_.52.0057a18: 之公子也 T2102_.52.0057a19: 問曰。易稱故知鬼神之情状與天地相似而 T2102_.52.0057a20: 不違。又曰。載鬼一車其義云何 T2102_.52.0057a21: 答曰。有禽焉有獸焉。飛走之別也。有人焉有 T2102_.52.0057a22: 鬼焉。幽明之別也。人滅而爲鬼。鬼滅而爲人。 T2102_.52.0057a23: 則吾未知也 T2102_.52.0057a24: 難曰。論云。豈有聖人之神。而寄凡人之器。亦 T2102_.52.0057a25: 無凡人之神。而託聖人之體。今陽貨類仲尼。 T2102_.52.0057a26: 項籍似帝舜。即是凡人之神託聖人之體也。 T2102_.52.0057a27: 玟玉鶋鳳不得爲喩。今玟自名玟玉實名玉。 T2102_.52.0057a28: 鶋號鶢鶋鳳曰神鳳。名既殊稱貎亦爽實。今 T2102_.52.0057a29: 舜重瞳子。項羽亦重瞳子。非有玟玉二名。唯 T2102_.52.0057b01: 覩重瞳相類。又有女媧蛇躯。皐陶馬口。非 T2102_.52.0057b02: 直聖神入於凡器。遂乃託乎蟲畜之體。此 T2102_.52.0057b03: 形神殊別明闇不同。茲益昭顯也。若形神爲 T2102_.52.0057b04: 一理絶前因者。則聖應誕聖。賢必産賢。勇 T2102_.52.0057b05: 怯愚智悉類其本。即形神之所陶甄。一氣之 T2102_.52.0057b06: 所孕育。不得有堯睿朱嚚瞍頑舜聖矣。論又 T2102_.52.0057b07: 云。聖同聖氣而器不必同。猶馬殊毛而齊 T2102_.52.0057b08: 逸。今毛復是逸器耶。馬有同毛色而異駑駿 T2102_.52.0057b09: 者如此。則毛非逸相。由體無聖器矣。人形骸 T2102_.52.0057b10: 無凡聖之別。而有貞脆之異。故遐靈栖於遠 T2102_.52.0057b11: 質。促神寓乎近體。則唯斯而已耳。向所云 T2102_.52.0057b12: 聖人之體旨。直語丘舜之形。不言器有聖 T2102_.52.0057b13: 智。非矛盾之説。勿近於此惑 T2102_.52.0057b14: 問曰。知此神滅有何利用 T2102_.52.0057b15: 答曰。浮屠害政桑門蠹俗風驚霧起馳蕩不 T2102_.52.0057b16: 休。吾哀其弊思拯其溺。夫竭財以赴僧。破 T2102_.52.0057b17: 産以趨佛。而不恤親戚不憐窮匱者何耶。良 T2102_.52.0057b18: 由厚我之情深濟物之意淺。是以圭撮渉於 T2102_.52.0057b19: 貧友。吝情動於顏色。千鍾委於富僧歡懷暢 T2102_.52.0057b20: 於容髮。豈不以僧有多稌之期。友無遺秉之 T2102_.52.0057b21: 報。務施不關周急。立徳必於在己。惑以茫 T2102_.52.0057b22: 昧之言。懼以阿鼻之苦。誘以虚誕之詞。欣 T2102_.52.0057b23: 以兜率之樂。故棄縫掖襲横衣。廢俎豆列瓶 T2102_.52.0057b24: 鉢。家家棄其親愛。人人絶其嗣續。至使兵挫 T2102_.52.0057b25: 於行間。吏空於官府。粟罄於惰游。貨殫於土 T2102_.52.0057b26: 木。所以姦宄佛勝頌聲尚權。惟此之故也。其 T2102_.52.0057b27: 流莫已其病無垠。若知陶甄禀於自然。森羅 T2102_.52.0057b28: 均於獨化。忽焉自有恍爾而無。來也不御。 T2102_.52.0057b29: 去也不追。乘夫天理各安其性。小人甘其壟 T2102_.52.0057c01: 畝。君子保其恬素。耕而食。食不可窮也。蠶以 T2102_.52.0057c02: 衣。衣不可盡也。下有餘以奉其上。上無爲以 T2102_.52.0057c03: 待其下。可以全生可以養親。可以爲己可以 T2102_.52.0057c04: 爲人。可以匡國可以覇君用此道也 T2102_.52.0057c05: 難曰。佛之有無寄於神理存滅。既有往論。且 T2102_.52.0057c06: 欲略言。今指*辯其損益語其利害。以弼夫子 T2102_.52.0057c07: 過正之談。子云。釋氏蠹俗傷化費貨損役。 T2102_.52.0057c08: 或者爲之。非佛之尤也。佛之立教本以好生 T2102_.52.0057c09: 惡殺修善務施。好生非正欲繁育鳥獸。以人 T2102_.52.0057c10: 靈爲重。惡殺豈可得緩宥逋逃。以哀矜斷 T2102_.52.0057c11: 察。修善不必瞻丈六之形。以忠信爲上。務 T2102_.52.0057c12: 施不苟使殫財土木。以周*急爲美。若絶嗣 T2102_.52.0057c13: 續則必法種不傳。如並起浮圖。又亦種殖無 T2102_.52.0057c14: 地。凡且猶知之。況我慈氏寧樂爾乎。今守株 T2102_.52.0057c15: 桑門迷瞀俗士。見寒者不施之短褐。遇飢 T2102_.52.0057c16: 者不錫以糠豆。而競聚無識之僧。爭造衆多 T2102_.52.0057c17: 之佛。親戚棄而不眄。祭祀廢而*不修。良繒 T2102_.52.0057c18: 碎於刹上。丹金縻于塔下。而謂爲福田期以 T2102_.52.0057c19: 報業。此並體佛未深解法不妙。雖呼佛爲佛。 T2102_.52.0057c20: 豈曉歸佛之旨。號僧爲僧寧達依僧之意。此 T2102_.52.0057c21: 亦神不降福。予無取焉。夫六家之術各有流 T2102_.52.0057c22: 弊。儒失於僻。墨失於蔽。法失於峻。名失於 T2102_.52.0057c23: 詐。咸由祖述者。失其傳以致泥溺。今子不 T2102_.52.0057c24: 以僻蔽誅孔墨峻*詐責韓鄧。而獨罪我如 T2102_.52.0057c25: 來貶茲正覺。是忿風濤而毀舟楫也。今逆悖 T2102_.52.0057c26: 之人無頼之子。上罔君親下虚儔類。或不忌 T2102_.52.0057c27: 明憲而乍懼幽司。憚閻羅之猛畏牛頭之酷。 T2102_.52.0057c28: 遂悔其穢惡。化而遷善。此之益也。又罪福 T2102_.52.0057c29: 之理。不應殊於世教背乎人情。若有事君以 T2102_.52.0058a01: 忠。奉親唯孝。與朋友信。如斯人者猶以一眚 T2102_.52.0058a02: 掩徳蔑而棄之。裁犯蟲魚陷于地獄。斯必不 T2102_.52.0058a03: 然矣。夫忠莫踰於伊尹。孝莫尚乎曾參。伊 T2102_.52.0058a04: 公宰一畜以膳湯。曾子烹隻禽以養點。而皆 T2102_.52.0058a05: 同趨炎倶赴鋒樹。是則大功沒於小過。奉 T2102_.52.0058a06: 上反於惠下。昔彌子矯駕猶以義弘免戮。嗚 T2102_.52.0058a07: 呼曾謂靈匠不如衞君乎。故知此爲忍人之 T2102_.52.0058a08: 防。而非仁人之誡也。若能監彼流宕釁不在 T2102_.52.0058a09: 佛。觀此禍福悟教開誘。思息末以尊本。不 T2102_.52.0058a10: 拔本以極末。念忘我以弘法。不後法以利 T2102_.52.0058a11: 我。則雖曰未佛。吾必謂之佛矣
T2102_.52.0058a15: 論曰。神即形也。形即神也。是以形存則神存。 T2102_.52.0058a16: 形謝則神滅也 T2102_.52.0058a17: 難曰。形非即神也。神非即形也。是合而爲用 T2102_.52.0058a18: 者也。而合非即矣。生則合而爲用。死則形留 T2102_.52.0058a19: 而神逝也。何以言之。昔者趙簡子疾五日不 T2102_.52.0058a20: 知人。秦穆公七日乃寤。並神遊於帝所。帝 T2102_.52.0058a21: 賜之鈞天廣樂。此其形留而神遊者乎。若如 T2102_.52.0058a22: 論言形滅則神滅者。斯形之與神。應如影響 T2102_.52.0058a23: 之必倶也。然形既病焉則神亦病也。何以形 T2102_.52.0058a24: 不知人神獨遊帝。而欣歡於鈞天廣樂乎。斯 T2102_.52.0058a25: 其寐也魂交故。神遊於胡蝶。即形與神分 T2102_.52.0058a26: 也。其覺也形開。遽遽然周也。即形與神合 T2102_.52.0058a27: 也。神之與形有分有合。合則共爲一體。分 T2102_.52.0058a28: 則形亡而神逝也。是以延陵喪子而言曰。 T2102_.52.0058a29: 骨肉歸復于土。而魂氣無不之也。斯即形止 T2102_.52.0058b01: 而神不止也。然經史明證灼灼也。如此寧是 T2102_.52.0058b02: 形止而神滅者乎 T2102_.52.0058b03: 論曰。問者曰。經云。爲之宗廟以鬼饗之。通 T2102_.52.0058b04: 云。非有鬼也。斯是聖人之教然也。所以達孝 T2102_.52.0058b05: 子之心。而厲婾薄之意也 T2102_.52.0058b06: 難曰。今論所云皆情言也。而非聖旨。請擧經 T2102_.52.0058b07: 記以證聖人之教。孝經云。昔者周公郊祀后 T2102_.52.0058b08: 稷以配天。宗祀文王於明堂。以配上帝。若形 T2102_.52.0058b09: 神倶滅。復誰配天乎。復誰配帝乎。且無臣 T2102_.52.0058b10: 而爲有臣。宣尼云。天可欺乎。今稷無神矣。 T2102_.52.0058b11: 而以稷配斯是周旦其欺天乎。果其無稷也。 T2102_.52.0058b12: 而空以配天者。*即其欺天矣。又其欺人也。 T2102_.52.0058b13: 斯是人之教。教以欺妄也。設欺妄以立教 T2102_.52.0058b14: 者。復何達孝子之心。厲*婾薄之意哉。原尋 T2102_.52.0058b15: 論旨。以無鬼爲義。試重詰之曰。孔子菜羹 T2102_.52.0058b16: 苽祭祀其祖禰也。禮云。樂以迎來哀以送 T2102_.52.0058b17: 往。神既無矣迎何所迎。神既無矣送何所送。 T2102_.52.0058b18: 迎來而樂。斯假欣於孔貎。途往而哀。又虚涙 T2102_.52.0058b19: 於丘體。斯則夫子之祭祀也。欺僞滿於方 T2102_.52.0058b20: 寸虚假盈於廟堂。聖人之教其若是乎。而云 T2102_.52.0058b21: 聖人之教然也何哉 T2102_.52.0058b22: 思文啓。竊見范縝神滅論。自爲賓主。遂有三 T2102_.52.0058b23: 十餘條。思文不惟闇蔽聊難論大旨二條而 T2102_.52.0058b24: 已。庶欲以傾其根本。謹冐上聞。但思文情 T2102_.52.0058b25: 用淺匱。懼不能徴折詭經。仰黷天煦伏追 T2102_.52.0058b26: 震悸。謹啓 T2102_.52.0058b27: 所難二條。當別詳覽也 右詔答 T2102_.52.0058b28: 答曹録事難神滅論 T2102_.52.0058b29: 難曰。形非即神也。神非即形也。是合而爲 T2102_.52.0058c01: 用者也。而合非即也 T2102_.52.0058c02: 答曰。若合而爲用者。明不合則無用。如蛩 T2102_.52.0058c03: 巨相資廢一則不可。此乃是滅神之精據。而 T2102_.52.0058c04: 非存神之雅決。子意本欲請戰。而定爲我援 T2102_.52.0058c05: 兵耶 T2102_.52.0058c06: 難曰。昔趙簡子疾五日不知人。秦穆公七日 T2102_.52.0058c07: 乃寤。並神遊於帝所。帝賜之鈞天廣樂。此形 T2102_.52.0058c08: 留而神逝者乎 T2102_.52.0058c09: 答曰。趙簡子之上賓秦穆之上遊帝。既云耳 T2102_.52.0058c10: 聽鈞天。居然口嘗百味。亦可身安廣厦。目悦 T2102_.52.0058c11: 玄黄。或復披文繍之衣。控如龍之轡。故知神 T2102_.52.0058c12: 之須待既不殊人。四肢七竅毎與形等。隻翼 T2102_.52.0058c13: 不可以適遠。故不比不飛。神無所闕。何故 T2102_.52.0058c14: 憑形以自立 T2102_.52.0058c15: 難曰。若如論旨形滅。即神滅者。斯形之與 T2102_.52.0058c16: 神應。如影之必倶也。然形既病焉。則神亦 T2102_.52.0058c17: 病也。何以形不知人。神獨遊帝。答曰。若如 T2102_.52.0058c18: 來意便是形病而神不病也。今傷之則病是 T2102_.52.0058c19: 形痛而神不痛也。惱之則憂是形憂而神不 T2102_.52.0058c20: 憂也。憂慮痛形已得之如此。何用勞神於無
T2102_.52.0058c23: 分也。其覺也形開*遽遽然周也。即形與神合 T2102_.52.0058c24: 也 T2102_.52.0058c25: 答曰。此難可謂窮辯。未可謂窮理也。子謂神 T2102_.52.0058c26: T2102_.52.0058c27: T2102_.52.0058c28: T2102_.52.0058c29: T2102_.52.0059a01: 遊胡蝶是眞作飛蟲耶。若然者或夢爲牛則 T2102_.52.0059a02: 負人轅輈。或夢爲馬則入人跨下。明旦應有 T2102_.52.0059a03: 死牛死馬。而無其物何*耶。又腸繞*昌門此 T2102_.52.0059a04: 人即死。豈有遺其肝肺而可以生哉。又日月 T2102_.52.0059a05: 麗天廣輪千里。無容下從返婦近入懷袖。夢 T2102_.52.0059a06: 幻虚假無有自來矣。一旦實之良足偉也。明 T2102_.52.0059a07: 結想霄坐周天海。神昏於内妄見異物。豈莊 T2102_.52.0059a08: 生實亂南園。趙簡眞登閶闔。郢外弟蕭琛亦 T2102_.52.0059a09: 以夢爲文句甚悉。想孰取視也 T2102_.52.0059a10: 難曰。延陵*喪子而言曰。骨肉歸于上。而 T2102_.52.0059a11: 魂氣無不之也。斯即形止而神不止也 T2102_.52.0059a12: 答曰。人之生也。資氣於天禀形於地。是以形 T2102_.52.0059a13: 銷於下。氣滅於上。氣滅於上。故言無不之。無 T2102_.52.0059a14: 不之者。不測之辭耳。豈必其神興知耶 T2102_.52.0059a15: 難曰。今論所云皆情言也。而非聖旨。請擧經 T2102_.52.0059a16: 記以證聖人之教。孝經云。昔者周公郊祀后 T2102_.52.0059a17: 稷。以配天。宗祀文王於明堂以配上帝。若形 T2102_.52.0059a18: 神倶滅誰配天乎。復誰配帝乎 T2102_.52.0059a19: 答曰。若均是聖達本自無教。教之所設實在 T2102_.52.0059a20: 黔首。黔首之情常貴生而賤死。死而有靈則 T2102_.52.0059a21: 長畏敬之心。死而無知則生慢易之意。聖人 T2102_.52.0059a22: 知其若此。故廟祧壇墠以篤其誠心。肆筵授 T2102_.52.0059a23: 几以全其罔己。尊祖以窮郊天之敬。嚴父以 T2102_.52.0059a24: 配天明堂之享。且忠信之寄心有地強梁 T2102_.52.0059a25: 之子茲焉是懼。所以聲教*煦於上風俗淳于 T2102_.52.0059a26: 下。周此道也。故經云。爲之宗廟以鬼享之。 T2102_.52.0059a27: 言用鬼神之道。致茲孝享也。春秋祭祀以時 T2102_.52.0059a28: 思之。明厲其追遠。不可朝死夕亡也。子貢問 T2102_.52.0059a29: 死而有知。仲尼云。吾欲言死而有知。則孝子 T2102_.52.0059b01: 輕生以殉死。吾欲言死而無知。則不孝之子 T2102_.52.0059b02: 棄而不葬。子路問事鬼神。夫子云。未能事人。 T2102_.52.0059b03: 焉能事鬼。適言以鬼享之。何故不許其事耶。 T2102_.52.0059b04: 死而有知輕生以殉是也。何故不明言其有。 T2102_.52.0059b05: 而作此悠漫以答耶。研求其義死而無知。亦 T2102_.52.0059b06: 已審矣。宗廟郊社皆聖人之教迹。彝倫之道。 T2102_.52.0059b07: 不可得而廢耳 T2102_.52.0059b08: 難曰。且無臣而爲有臣。宣尼云。天可欺乎。今 T2102_.52.0059b09: 稷無神矣。而以稷配斯。是周旦其欺天乎。既 T2102_.52.0059b10: 其欺天。又其欺人。斯是聖人之教以欺妄。 T2102_.52.0059b11: 欺妄以教。何達孝子之心。厲*婾薄之意哉」 T2102_.52.0059b12: 答曰。夫聖人者顯仁藏用窮神盡變。故曰聖 T2102_.52.0059b13: 達節而賢守節也。寧可求之蹄筌局以言教。 T2102_.52.0059b14: 夫欺者。謂傷化敗俗導人非道耳。苟可以安 T2102_.52.0059b15: 上治民移風易俗。三光明於上。黔黎悦於下。 T2102_.52.0059b16: 何欺妄之有乎。請問。湯放桀武伐紂。是殺 T2102_.52.0059b17: 君非耶。而孟子云。聞誅獨夫紂。未聞殺君也。 T2102_.52.0059b18: 子不責聖人放殺之迹。而勤勤於郊稷之妄 T2102_.52.0059b19: 乎。郊丘明堂乃是儒家之淵府也。而非形神 T2102_.52.0059b20: 之滯義。當如此何耶 T2102_.52.0059b21: 難曰。樂以迎來哀以送往。云云 T2102_.52.0059b22: 答曰。此義未通而自釋。不復費辭於無用。禮 T2102_.52.0059b23: 記有斯言多矣。近寫此條小恨未周也 T2102_.52.0059b24: 思文啓。始得范縝答神滅論。猶執先迷。思 T2102_.52.0059b25: 文試料其理致。衝其四證。謹冐奏聞。但思文 T2102_.52.0059b26: 情識愚淺。無以折其鋒鋭。仰塵 T2102_.52.0059b27: 聖鑒伏追震悚。謹啓 T2102_.52.0059b28: 具一二縝既背經以起義。乖理以致談。滅聖 T2102_.52.0059b29: 難以聖責。乖理難以理詰。如此則言語之論 T2102_.52.0059c01: 略成可息 *右詔*答 T2102_.52.0059c02: 重難范中書神滅論 T2102_.52.0059c03: 論曰。若合而爲用者明。不合則無用。如蛩巨 T2102_.52.0059c04: 之相資廢一則不可。此乃是滅神之精據。而 T2102_.52.0059c05: 非存神之雅決。子意本欲請戰。而定爲我援 T2102_.52.0059c06: 兵也。論又云。形之於神猶*刀之於利。未聞 T2102_.52.0059c07: *刀沒而利存。豈形止而神在。又申延陵之 T2102_.52.0059c08: 言。即形消於下神滅於上。故云無之也。又 T2102_.52.0059c09: 云。以稷配天非欺天也。猶湯放武伐非殺君 T2102_.52.0059c10: 也。子不責聖人放殺之迹。而勤勤於郊稷之 T2102_.52.0059c11: 妄耶。難曰。蛩蛩巨虚是合用之證耳。而非 T2102_.52.0059c12: 形滅即神滅之據也。何以言之。蛩非*虚也 T2102_.52.0059c13: *虚非蛩也。今滅蛩蛩而駏驉不死。斬駏驉而 T2102_.52.0059c14: 蛩蛩不亡。非相即也。今引此以爲形神倶滅 T2102_.52.0059c15: 之精據。又爲救兵之良援。斯倒戈授人而欲 T2102_.52.0059c16: 求長存也。悲夫。斯*即形滅而神不滅之證一 T2102_.52.0059c17: 也。論云。形之與神猶*刀之於利。未聞*刀沒 T2102_.52.0059c18: 而利存。豈容形亡而神在。雅論據形神之倶 T2102_.52.0059c19: 滅。唯此一證而已。愚有惑焉。何者。神之與形 T2102_.52.0059c20: 是二物之合用。即論所引蛩巨相資也。是 T2102_.52.0059c21: 今*刀之於利是一物之兩名耳。然一物兩名 T2102_.52.0059c22: 者。故捨*刀則無利也。二物之合用者。故形 T2102_.52.0059c23: 亡則神逝也。今引一物之二名。徴二物之合 T2102_.52.0059c24: 用。斯差若毫釐者何千里之遠也。斯又是形 T2102_.52.0059c25: 滅而神不滅之證二也。又申延陵之言曰。即 T2102_.52.0059c26: 是形消於下神滅於上。論云。形神是一體之 T2102_.52.0059c27: 相即。即今形滅於此。即應神滅於形中。何 T2102_.52.0059c28: 得云形消於下。神滅於上。而云無不之乎。斯 T2102_.52.0059c29: 又是形滅而神不滅之證三也。又云。以稷配 T2102_.52.0060a01: 天非欺天也。猶湯放桀武伐紂非殺君也。即 T2102_.52.0060a02: 是權假以除惡乎。然唐虞之君無放伐之患 T2102_.52.0060a03: 矣。若乃運非太平世値三季權假立教以救 T2102_.52.0060a04: 一時。故權稷以配天假父以配帝。則可也。 T2102_.52.0060a05: 然有虞氏之王天下也。禘黄而郊嚳。祖顓而 T2102_.52.0060a06: 宗堯。既淳風未殄。時非權假而今欺天罔帝 T2102_.52.0060a07: 也何乎。引證若斯。斯又是形滅而神不滅之 T2102_.52.0060a08: 證四也。斯四證既立而根本自傾。餘枝葉庶 T2102_.52.0060a09: 不待風而靡也 T2102_.52.0060a10: 論曰。樂以迎來哀以送往。此義不假通而自 T2102_.52.0060a11: 釋。不復費於無用。禮記有言多矣。又云。夫 T2102_.52.0060a12: 言欺者。謂傷化敗俗耳。苟可以安上治民。復 T2102_.52.0060a13: 何欺妄之有乎 T2102_.52.0060a14: 難曰。前難云。迎來而樂。是假欣於孔貎。送往 T2102_.52.0060a15: 而哀。又虚涙於丘體。斯實鄙難之雲梯。弱義 T2102_.52.0060a16: 之鋒的。在此言也。而答者曾不惠解。唯云 T2102_.52.0060a17: 不假通而自釋。請重之曰。依如論旨既已許 T2102_.52.0060a18: 孔是假欣而虚涙也。又許稷之配天。是指無 T2102_.52.0060a19: 以爲有也。宣尼云。亡而爲有虚而爲盈。爻 T2102_.52.0060a20: 象之所不占。而格言之所攸棄。用此風以扇 T2102_.52.0060a21: 也。何得不傷。茲俗於何不敗。而云可以安 T2102_.52.0060a22: 上治民也。慈化何哉。論云。已通而昧者未 T2102_.52.0060a23: 悟。聊重往諮側聞提耳 T2102_.52.0060a24: 弘明集卷第九 T2102_.52.0060a25: T2102_.52.0060a26: T2102_.52.0060a27: T2102_.52.0060a28: T2102_.52.0060a29: T2102_.52.0060b01: T2102_.52.0060b02: T2102_.52.0060b03: T2102_.52.0060b04: 梁*楊都建初寺釋僧祐*律師撰 T2102_.52.0060b05: 大梁皇帝勅答臣下神滅論
T2102_.52.0060b08: 位現致論要當有體。欲談無佛應設賓主。標 T2102_.52.0060b09: 其宗旨辯其短長。來就佛理以屈佛理。則有 T2102_.52.0060b10: 佛之義既躓。神滅之論自行。豈有不求他意。 T2102_.52.0060b11: 妄作異端。運其隔心鼓其騰口。虚畫瘡疣空 T2102_.52.0060b12: 致詆呵。篤時之蟲驚疑於往來。滯甃之蛙河 T2102_.52.0060b13: 漢於遠大。其故何也。淪蒙怠而爭一息。抱 T2102_.52.0060b14: 孤陋而守井幹。豈知天地之長久溟海之壯 T2102_.52.0060b15: 闊。孟軻有云。人之所知不如人之所不知。信 T2102_.52.0060b16: 哉。觀三聖設教。皆云不滅。其文浩博難可具 T2102_.52.0060b17: 載。止擧二事試以爲言。祭義云。惟孝子爲 T2102_.52.0060b18: 能饗親。禮運云。三日齋必見所祭。若謂饗 T2102_.52.0060b19: 非所饗。見非所見。違經背親言誠可息。神 T2102_.52.0060b20: 滅之論朕所未詳 T2102_.52.0060b21: 莊嚴寺法雲法師與公王朝貴書 T2102_.52.0060b22: 主上答臣下審神滅論。今遣相呈。夫神妙寂 T2102_.52.0060b23: 寥可知而不可説。義經丘而未曉。理渉旦而 T2102_.52.0060b24: 猶昏 T2102_.52.0060b25: 主上凝天照本襲道赴機。垂答臣下。旨訓周 T2102_.52.0060b26: 審。孝享之禮既彰。桀懷曾史之慕。三世之 T2102_.52.0060b27: 言復闡。紂協波崙之情。預非草木。誰不歌歎。 T2102_.52.0060b28: 希同挹風猷共加讃也。釋法雲呈 T2102_.52.0060b29: 臨川王答 T2102_.52.0060c01: 得所送勅答神滅論。伏覽淵旨理精辭詣。二 T2102_.52.0060c02: 教道協於當年。三世棟梁於今日。足使迷途 T2102_.52.0060c03: 自反。妙趣愈光。遲近寫對更具披析。蕭宏和 T2102_.52.0060c04: 南 T2102_.52.0060c05: 建安王答 T2102_.52.0060c06: 辱告惠示。勅答臣下審神滅論。天識昭遠聖 T2102_.52.0060c07: 情淵發。伏覽玄微實曉庸昧。猥能存示深 T2102_.52.0060c08: 承篤顧。偉和南 T2102_.52.0060c09: 長沙王答 T2102_.52.0060c10: 惠示勅答臣下審神滅論。睿旨淵凝機照深 T2102_.52.0060c11: 邈。可以筌蹄惑見訓誘蒙心。鑚仰周環洗滌 T2102_.52.0060c12: 塵慮。遂能存示戢眷良深。蕭淵業和南 T2102_.52.0060c13: 尚書令沈約答 T2102_.52.0060c14: 神本不滅久所伏膺。神滅之談良用駭惕。近 T2102_.52.0060c15: 約法師殿内出。亦蒙勅答臣下一本歡受頂 T2102_.52.0060c16: 戴尋覽忘疲。豈徒伏斯外道。可以永摧魔衆。 T2102_.52.0060c17: 孔釋兼弘。於是乎在。實不刊之妙旨。萬代之 T2102_.52.0060c18: 舟航。弟子亦即彼論。微歴疑覈比展具以呈 T2102_.52.0060c19: 也。沈約和南 T2102_.52.0060c20: 光祿領太子右率范岫答 T2102_.52.0060c21: 岫和南。伏見詔旨答臣下審神滅論。叡照 T2102_.52.0060c22: 淵深動鑒機切。敷引外典弘茲内教。發蒙啓 T2102_.52.0060c23: 滯訓誘未悟。方使四海禀仰十方讃抃。異見 T2102_.52.0060c24: 杜口道俗同欣。謹加習誦寤寐書紳。惠以逮 T2102_.52.0060c25: 示深承眷憶。范岫和南 T2102_.52.0060c26: T2102_.52.0060c27: T2102_.52.0060c28: T2102_.52.0060c29: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:無/有] [CITE] |