大正蔵検索 INBUDS
|
阿毘達磨倶舍論法義 (No. 2251_ 快道撰 ) in Vol. 64 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:有/無] [CITE]
T2251_.64.0400a01: 色界大種所造清淨天眼一。依二此天眼一。生二淨眼 T2251_.64.0400a02: 識一。依二此淨識一。能遍觀察前後左右上下諸
T2251_.64.0400a05: 所障一故。見二上諸色一者。非二雲霧等所障一故。問 T2251_.64.0400a06: 如レ是天眼能於二一時一頓見二十方諸色境一不。 T2251_.64.0400a07: 有説能見。以二天眼根光明清徹一。自然遍照。 T2251_.64.0400a08: 如三未尼寶遍發二光明一。有説不レ能二一時頓見一。 T2251_.64.0400a09: 法蘊所説天眼諸方無レ障。非レ謂二一時頓見一。謂 T2251_.64.0400a10: 人等眼但能覩見面所レ向色一。欲レ見レ餘方要 T2251_.64.0400a11: 須二迴轉俯仰方見一。天眼不レ爾。面向二一方一。隨 T2251_.64.0400a12: 欲二能見一。不レ須二迴轉一。故説三能見二上下諸方一。非
T2251_.64.0400a19: 二句明二五趣通局一。唯言顯二餘五種容有。初 T2251_.64.0400a20: 言簡二後時一
T2251_.64.0400a29: 事一不レ得二容易一
T2251_.64.0400b03: 唯善二通果無記一。餘生得等五。皆通二善染無 T2251_.64.0400b04: 記三性一。後中此生得等五非レ果。故不レ名レ通。
T2251_.64.0400b07: 唯約二呪藥二一者非也
T2251_.64.0400b11: 一約二人趣一。二約二地獄一。三總指勸餘三趣一。此 T2251_.64.0400b12: 即初也。此中有二正釋通妨一。言レ餘者。生得餘 T2251_.64.0400b13: 修呪等五類。寶疏云二餘趣一非也。通妨中舊論 T2251_.64.0400b14: 曰。唯於二人道一前所説如意成等五。無二生所 T2251_.64.0400b15: 得一。若爾云何。得レ有下自性憶念宿住一人上。此從二 T2251_.64.0400b16: 業差別所作一。生所得舊論。正理。顯宗。光記亦 T2251_.64.0400b17: 爾。婆沙中悉云二生處得一。今論依二得能所一云二 T2251_.64.0400b18: 所得一。婆沙據二生在處一。故云二生處一。竝不二相違一。 T2251_.64.0400b19: 本性生念者。正理。顯宗竝爾。爲レ成レ句。且略二 T2251_.64.0400b20: 智言一。又婆沙悉作二本性念生智一。生念之言彼
T2251_.64.0400b24: 互用互釋レ此。亦無レ失 光記六類五趣配立 T2251_.64.0400b25: 雖二多釋一唯是二解。今示レ圖 T2251_.64.0400b26:
T2251_.64.0400b29: 通二初中後一 T2251_.64.0400c01: T2251_.64.0400c02: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0400c03: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0400c04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0400c05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0400c06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0400c07: [IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0400c10: T2251_.64.0400c11: T2251_.64.0400c12: 八 T2251_.64.0400c13: 豐山寓居上毛沙門釋快道記 T2251_.64.0400c14: 分別定品第八之一 T2251_.64.0400c15: 分別定品 當品大分爲レ二。初明二所依定一。二 T2251_.64.0400c16: 明二能依徳一。初中有レ四。初明二四靜慮一。光記於 T2251_.64.0400c17: レ此大開レ三。第二第三非也。彼正法住世從二 T2251_.64.0400c18: 界品初正宗一來。故彼第三七言頌是流通分。 T2251_.64.0400c19: 何於レ此可レ分。亦科名非也。寶疏於レ此失二科 T2251_.64.0400c20: 文一。而大同レ光。於レ此分レ四亦非也。光記辨二生 T2251_.64.0400c21: 起一兩釋。賢智定三約二果因縁一。記一二十七竝 T2251_.64.0400c22: 倶初説。今別約二智定一作二能所依後釋一。於レ義 T2251_.64.0400c23: 無二大異一。寶疏大同二後解一
T2251_.64.0400c26: 定一。唯諸靜慮能具爲レ依。故於二此中一。先辨二靜 T2251_.64.0400c27: 慮一。或於下先辨二共功徳一中上。已辨二智所成無靜 T2251_.64.0400c28: 等功徳一。餘所成徳。今次當レ辨。於レ中先辨二所
T2251_.64.0401a05: 靜慮。無色。等至。等持。無量。解脱。勝處。通處 T2251_.64.0401a06: 等。於レ中前卷已説二無諍乃至通一。今辨二靜慮 T2251_.64.0401a07: 等一。豈得三總約二諸智一
T2251_.64.0401a10: 性一。四解二靜慮名一。此即初二。如レ文可レ知
T2251_.64.0401a13: 論主難。四有部通。五論主詰。六有部救。七 T2251_.64.0401a14: 叙二經部宗一。此即初四。文易レ見。光寶竝直爲二 T2251_.64.0401a15: 經部一。雖レ無二大害一。疎二於文理一。後別叙二經部宗一
T2251_.64.0401a19: 牒破後念成體救一。四三性心皆一境轉難。此 T2251_.64.0401a20: 即初也
T2251_.64.0401a24: レ然。於二相應法中一。定大地應二無用一。準二此等文一。 T2251_.64.0401a25: 蒙二當念自一境轉破一。彼救而言二第二念用一。破 T2251_.64.0401a26: レ此若言二後念用一。則於二其前時當念相應法
T2251_.64.0401a29: 者非也。寶疏云。若謂下前念等持令中心於二第 T2251_.64.0401b01: 二念一。亦同レ前縁二一境一轉上。此即前心令二其後 T2251_.64.0401b02: 心同一境轉一。後心ト相應スル等持何用。此釋 T2251_.64.0401b03: 雖二詳悉一。然非二論意一。何者當念自轉破之後 T2251_.64.0401b04: 救。何云レ同レ前。又論文居レ今喚レ後。故云二第二 T2251_.64.0401b05: 念一。若破二後念一。應レ言下則於二後倶一等持無用。 T2251_.64.0401b06: 既不レ言レ爾。但云二相應一。破二當念一理決然
T2251_.64.0401b09: 於二第二念一不乙散亂甲故。三摩地別有レ體義成 T2251_.64.0401b10: 立天。破云。寧不乙即由下斯於二相應一等持無レ用 T2251_.64.0401b11: 之道理上。一切心王自於二一境一轉甲。此心自一境 T2251_.64.0401b12: 轉。彼心由二三摩地一。彼此異。因不可得。舊論 T2251_.64.0401b13: 曰。由レ此是三摩提ナラハ是故諸心共縁二一境一。 T2251_.64.0401b14: 汝何故。不レ許二此義一。彼言二是三摩提一。是當二此 T2251_.64.0401b15: 成字一。是故言當二由斯一。諸心言當二心字一。汝何
T2251_.64.0401b18: 貫如レ環。然云レ由二此餘心心所一。此言所指在 T2251_.64.0401b19: レ何。復亦三摩地復由レ誰難。於二一章一全無二起 T2251_.64.0401b20: 盡一。豈非二摸索一。寶疏亦釋二由此一云二由修習一。釋二 T2251_.64.0401b21: 由斯一云二以此修習力一。此亦誤也。修習義從二 T2251_.64.0401b22: 何文一。又所指無レ此。又約二定散通一。與二後難一不
T2251_.64.0401b26: 應レ立三一切心皆成二一類一此亦成レ失
T2251_.64.0401b29: 論云。經部師説。是心同一類故説爲レ定。何以 T2251_.64.0401c01: 故。三摩提者。謂依二心學一。心清淨爲レ勝。經中
T2251_.64.0401c05: 學。増上惠學。何等爲二増上意學一。若比丘離二
T2251_.64.0401c08: 法一。有覺有觀。離レ生二喜樂一。初禪具足住。乃至
T2251_.64.0401c16: 名一。定令二惠生一無二濁亂一故。有説此定持二勝遍 T2251_.64.0401c17: 縁一。如理思惟。故名二靜慮一。勝言簡二欲界一。遍縁 T2251_.64.0401c18: 簡二無色一。如理思惟簡異顛倒一。能持二此定一。是 T2251_.64.0401c19: 妙等持。此妙等持名爲二靜慮一。此言顯示止觀
T2251_.64.0401c26: 復次遍觀遍斷名二靜慮一。欲三摩地雖二遍觀一。 T2251_.64.0401c27: 非二遍斷一。無色定二義倶闕。復次能靜息一切 T2251_.64.0401c28: 煩惱一。及能思慮一切所縁一。名爲二靜慮一。欲三 T2251_.64.0401c29: 摩地雖三思慮一切所縁一。非三靜息一切煩惱一。 T2251_.64.0402a01: 無色定二義都無。復次無色定有レ靜無レ慮。欲 T2251_.64.0402a02: 異三摩地有レ慮無レ靜。色定倶有。故名二靜慮一。
T2251_.64.0402a07: 斷結。應レ名二靜慮一。若能正觀故名二靜慮一。則欲 T2251_.64.0402a08: 界三摩地亦能正觀。應レ名二靜慮一。是則於二三 T2251_.64.0402a09: 摩地一體一。有二能斷正觀二義一。故持業釋。一體 T2251_.64.0402a10: 兩用。問。此今論下云二止觀均行一。是應二持業一 T2251_.64.0402a11: 文何違二婆沙一。答。非二婆沙評家爲是。又止觀 T2251_.64.0402a12: 均行者。如レ次定慧。故是依主。婆沙約二持業一 T2251_.64.0402a13: 故 又大乘有二持業同體依主一。而無二別體一。義
T2251_.64.0402a16: 之靜。二釋竝皆得。問。持業依主何縁差別。 T2251_.64.0402a17: 答。三地地有下令二寂靜正觀一之二用上。故名二靜 T2251_.64.0402a18: 慮一是持業釋 又與レ慧之所依三摩地。故名二 T2251_.64.0402a19: 靜慮一。是依主釋。光記云。馱南此云二靜慮一。舊 T2251_.64.0402a20: 云レ禪。或云二禪那一。或云二持阿那一皆訛也 舊
T2251_.64.0402a24: 言レ定。梵云二馱衍那一
T2251_.64.0402a27: 此中有レ二。初正明。二由此下釋三影示尋一。文 T2251_.64.0402a28: 有レ四。一標宗。二所由。三喩顯。四簡濫。由レ説 T2251_.64.0402a29: レ具二此伺喜樂一。已不二言説一。明二亦具レ尋義一。何以 T2251_.64.0402b01: 故。尋伺必倶行故。譬如二煙火一。有難云。應三尋 T2251_.64.0402b02: 伺非二必倶行一。如二中間定無尋唯伺一故。今遮二 T2251_.64.0402b03: 此濫一云。無下有二伺喜樂三一之伺離尋。故言二必 T2251_.64.0402b04: 倶一。非レ謂二一切獨伺不離レ尋。故舊論曰。偈曰 T2251_.64.0402b05: 有二觀及喜樂一。釋曰。覺觀喜樂相應喜一類説 T2251_.64.0402b06: 名二初定一。由レ説レ觀。覺即彼説。覺觀如二烟及火 T2251_.64.0402b07: 相應行一故。有二不相離相離一故。無下有レ觀有二喜
T2251_.64.0402b12: レ火必定倶行一者誤也。非伺等簡亂無レ用故。 T2251_.64.0402b13: 違二舊論一故
T2251_.64.0402b17: 内靜一心。無覺無觀。定生二喜樂一得二第二禪一 T2251_.64.0402b18: 成就遊。離二喜欲一捨無レ求。遊二正念正智一。而身 T2251_.64.0402b19: 覺レ樂。得二第三禪一成就遊。樂滅。苦滅。喜憂本 T2251_.64.0402b20: 已滅。不苦。不樂。念清淨。得二第四禪一成就遊
T2251_.64.0402b25: 名レ生。二受生離二地染一時。二種生過倶能離 T2251_.64.0402b26: 故。名レ之爲レ離。湛慧云。此兩師中。光師順二舊 T2251_.64.0402b27: 論文一。彼曰。偈曰。寂離下地生。釋曰。空遍入 T2251_.64.0402b28: 從レ寂二離第四定一生。識遍入從レ寂二離空遍入一
T2251_.64.0402c04: 論非レ證。彼生言。亦約二所離一。無レ有レ妨故 T2251_.64.0402c05: 皆無色故立無色名 第四解。總名有レ二。一 T2251_.64.0402c06: 正釋。二通妨。初正解。釋二第五句一有レ三。初正 T2251_.64.0402c07: 釋。二大衆部等出二不成過一。三有部通二不成 T2251_.64.0402c08: 失一有レ三。一徴責無色立名一。二徴詰有色相一。
T2251_.64.0402c11: 約二色根身一。初中光牒。後身語下破。此有レ二。 T2251_.64.0402c12: 一約二能發無一。二約二能造無一。此亦有レ二。初正 T2251_.64.0402c13: 破。後破レ救。先擧レ救。後不爾下。破有レ二。初正 T2251_.64.0402c14: 破。二又彼下依レ經止レ執。第二若許下約二色根 T2251_.64.0402c15: 身一有レ二。一牒レ計。二如何下破有レ四。一正破。 T2251_.64.0402c16: 是自言違失。二破二小身救一。三破二極妙救一。四 T2251_.64.0402c17: 破二妙中極救一。此有レ二。先牒レ救。二破有レ二。一 T2251_.64.0402c18: 唯有頂破。二例難四靜慮一。此有レ三。一正例 T2251_.64.0402c19: 責二無別一。二擧レ救徴レ理。三通釋彼依レ經成二有 T2251_.64.0402c20: 色一。此有レ二。初牒下彼引二四經一成中有色上。二此證 T2251_.64.0402c21: 下有部通有レ三。一總非勸レ思。二且契下別令 T2251_.64.0402c22: レ思。三若謂下破二彼救一。先牒レ救。後此説下破 T2251_.64.0402c23: 有二總破別破一。別破中有レ三。一就二第一經一破。 T2251_.64.0402c24: 二就二第二第三經一破。三又説下就二第四經一破 T2251_.64.0402c25: 有レ二。一正破。二牒レ救破有レ二。一牒下彼引二二 T2251_.64.0402c26: 經一任レ文救上。二則無下有部例二彼救一。亦任二經 T2251_.64.0402c27: 文一。成二無色一有レ三。一正引レ經成二無色一。二然契 T2251_.64.0402c28: 下通二違文一。三又薄下更引レ經遮二有色一。初中 T2251_.64.0402c29: 有レ五。一標立。二引二三經一。三若無下依レ經 T2251_.64.0403a01: 遮二彼執一。四牒破救一。五結レ無レ色。破レ救中。先 T2251_.64.0403a02: 牒。後則於下破有レ三。一段食例破。二靜慮例 T2251_.64.0403a03: 破。三受等例破。此有レ二。初正破。後經既下 T2251_.64.0403a04: 還成二自義一
T2251_.64.0403a07: 等想一。準二舊論文一。世尊於二彼無色定中一。亦遮二 T2251_.64.0403a08: 有色等想一。故不レ可レ言レ有二身語律儀一 中含
T2251_.64.0403a11: 能所造兩釋一。寶疏約二自有部不許解二遮有一。 T2251_.64.0403a12: 竝非二論意一 T2251_.64.0403a13: 水細蟲極微 是約二肉眼不及一。事鈔釋二用蟲 T2251_.64.0403a14: 水戒一云。僧祇云。蟲細者。三重灑。猶有テ捨テ
T2251_.64.0403a17: レ知。且云二水蟲一。據レ實諸蟲有レ細。大集經曰。畜 T2251_.64.0403a18: 生身細。猶如二微塵十分之一一。多論曰。身子天 T2251_.64.0403a19: 眼觀二空中蟲一。如二水邊砂器中粟一。遂斷レ食。佛 T2251_.64.0403a20: 因制云。但肉眼見灑襄所得
T2251_.64.0403a23: 二又生下例難靜慮一。此有レ三。一正例難二無別一。 T2251_.64.0403a24: 二若謂下擧レ救徴レ理。三若謂下牒三依レ經成二 T2251_.64.0403a25: 有色一通釋。此即初二也。例難靜慮一意言。四 T2251_.64.0403a26: 靜慮身下望レ上。漸漸勝妙。清妙中極。有二何 T2251_.64.0403a27: 差別一不レ名二無色一。故正理云。又生二靜慮一所有 T2251_.64.0403a28: 色身由二先功能一。漸漸殊勝。上地望レ下。清妙 T2251_.64.0403a29: 轉増。非三下地根所二能取一故。與レ彼何異不レ名二 T2251_.64.0403b01: 無色一。若見有二名不如レ義故。及見有三名通二 T2251_.64.0403b02: 二義一故。不レ可二如レ名定執義者。則無色界
T2251_.64.0403b11: 設一。所以者何。因レ壽故有レ煖。因レ煖故有レ壽。若 T2251_.64.0403b12: 無レ壽者。則無レ煖。無レ煖者。則無レ壽。猶如下因 T2251_.64.0403b13: レ油因レ炷故得二然燈一。彼中因レ焔故有レ光。因レ光 T2251_.64.0403b14: 故有レ焔。若無レ焔者。則無レ光。無レ光者則無
T2251_.64.0403b17: 亦不レ立。若去二其二一。一亦不レ立。展轉相依。而 T2251_.64.0403b18: 得二竪立一。識縁二名色一。亦復如レ是。展轉相依。而 T2251_.64.0403b19: 得二生長一。舊論。正理。如レ今作二二蘆一。且取二依
T2251_.64.0403b23: 云。於二十二縁生中一説下依レ識名色生。依二名
T2251_.64.0403c02: 喜貪一潤澤生長増廣。於二受想行一亦説如レ是。 T2251_.64.0403c03: 比丘識於レ中若來若去若住若沒若生長。増 T2251_.64.0403c04: 廣比丘若離二色受想行一。識有二若來若去若住 T2251_.64.0403c05: 若坐一者。彼但有二言數一。問已不レ知二増益一生
T2251_.64.0403c08: 有二別證一。離レ色乃至離レ行。由レ撥二識去來一故。 T2251_.64.0403c09: 證二此經一意。離二色等四一。無二識去來一。彼界既有二
T2251_.64.0403c12: 識一。必應レ許レ有二所住色等一
T2251_.64.0403c21: 欲故識不レ住。不二増長一。識不住不増長故。不
T2251_.64.0403c24: レ異。故言下説二四食一如中四識住上。例以破。謂於二 T2251_.64.0403c25: 四識住一既有レ識存レ色。亦於二四食一。於二色無色一。 T2251_.64.0403c26: 既有二識食一。應レ有二色段食一。故舊論云。由三佛説二 T2251_.64.0403c27: 四識住及四食一。於二色無色界一。應レ有二段食及
T2251_.64.0404a01: レ異レ彼故
T2251_.64.0404a09: 界已過二段食一問。若爾以レ何爲レ食。答引二次經一。 T2251_.64.0404a10: 通二此疑
T2251_.64.0404a14: 以二禪定喜樂一爲レ食
T2251_.64.0404a24: 空處成就遊。謂二無量空處天一。是謂二第五識 T2251_.64.0404a25: 住一。舊論加二及有礙想句一。今略レ之。中含四
T2251_.64.0404a29: 色界衆生。及住二無色界一不レ識二滅界一者。還復 T2251_.64.0404b01: 受二諸有一。若斷二於色界一。不レ住二無色界一。滅界心 T2251_.64.0404b02: 解脱。永離二於生死一。今取レ意引。舊論二十一
T2251_.64.0404b06: 出二本事經三法品一。經於二色界一言二其中所有 T2251_.64.0404b07: 色受想行識如是性皆是無常一。於二無色界一。但 T2251_.64.0404b08: 言二諸有受想行識一
T2251_.64.0404b15: 劫。或六萬劫。或八萬劫。諸色斷已後死還生二 T2251_.64.0404b16: 欲色界界一時。色云何起。若色斷已還得レ起 T2251_.64.0404b17: 者。般涅槃已諸行已斷。亦應三後時還起二諸 T2251_.64.0404b18: 行一。勿レ有二此失一。故無色界決定有レ色。有部通 T2251_.64.0404b19: 云。謂於二三界一。死生往來。或色續レ色。或色續二 T2251_.64.0404b20: 無色一。或無色續二無色一。或無色續レ色故。故不 T2251_.64.0404b21: レ應レ説二諸色斷已復云何起一。無二斷義一故。問。若 T2251_.64.0404b22: 離レ色已。復還生レ色。般涅槃已。應二還起行。 T2251_.64.0404b23: 答。離有二二種一。一暫時離。二究竟離。初者可二 T2251_.64.0404b24: 還生一。後者不二復起一。故不レ應レ難
T2251_.64.0404c01: 見色非色法。亦有二展轉相依起一。故謂心異故。 T2251_.64.0404c02: 色差別生。色根有レ別。識生便異。故從二無色一。 T2251_.64.0404c03: 將レ生レ下時順色生。心相續而住。由二彼勢力一 T2251_.64.0404c04: 引二下色一生。然不レ可レ言二唯從レ彼起一。亦以三先 T2251_.64.0404c05: 世色。倶行心相續爲レ縁。久已滅。色爲二自種 T2251_.64.0404c06: 子一。今色方起。許三同類因通二過現一故
T2251_.64.0404c09: 相續一。論主破レ彼。叙二經部一云。經部師説。無色 T2251_.64.0404c10: 界心等相續。無二別有依。謂若有下因未レ離二色 T2251_.64.0404c11: 愛一引起心等上。所引心等與レ色倶生。依レ色而 T2251_.64.0404c12: 轉。若因於レ色。已得レ離レ愛。厭背色一故。所引
T2251_.64.0404c15: 分命根一。是非二論意一也
T2251_.64.0404c25: 耶。有説。此依二多分一而説。謂有情類法。爾多 T2251_.64.0404c26: 縁二曾所受順境一。生二愛味一故。有説。過去定於二 T2251_.64.0404c27: 相續中一。已作二饒益一。現在定從レ彼而起。追戀 T2251_.64.0404c28: 生レ愛。有説。此中依二入出定一。而爲二問答一。未來 T2251_.64.0404c29: 定未レ名二入出一。現在定名レ入。未レ名レ出。過去定 T2251_.64.0405a01: 名二入已出一。今欲レ顯下於二已出位一。生味。故但説 T2251_.64.0405a02: レ縁二過去一。有餘師説。此中説淨定無間起二味 T2251_.64.0405a03: 相應定一。淨定爲二所味一。是所縁故味相應定是 T2251_.64.0405a04: 能味。是能縁故。全如二前説一。評曰。應レ知初説
T2251_.64.0405a15: 善一類。何以故。住是三摩提別名。故如二經 T2251_.64.0405a16: 言一。何者爲二三摩提一。是心住於二正境一。於二正位一。 T2251_.64.0405a17: 由二此經一故。知住是三摩提別釋
T2251_.64.0405a23: 顯後三定一。初中有二兩説一。初寛狹義。婆沙八
T2251_.64.0405a28: レ彼。餘靜已下法説非二例顯一。理應レ然故。然兩 T2251_.64.0405a29: 文各通。無レ有レ害
T2251_.64.0405b05: 故言二根捨一
T2251_.64.0405b13: 捨念清淨一。答。有二十三復次一釋。一第四定離二 T2251_.64.0405b14: 八擾亂事一故。苦樂憂喜入息出息尋伺名二八 T2251_.64.0405b15: 擾亂一。二離二内外災一故。下三定有二内外災一。不 T2251_.64.0405b16: レ名二清淨一。三第四定所依身器三災不レ及。念 T2251_.64.0405b17: 無二忘失一。捨無二諠雜一故。四第四定離二諸煩惱 T2251_.64.0405b18: 及隨煩惱一故。五第四定所依色身澄潔明淨
T2251_.64.0405b21: 知一
T2251_.64.0405c06: 樂更樂所觸生身心樂善覺。是覺謂二樂覺一 T2251_.64.0405c07: 也
T2251_.64.0405c10: 部引レ經難一。三又第四下由レ理非二輕安宗一。四 T2251_.64.0405c11: 又契下依二教證一立破。五若言下牒二有部難一
T2251_.64.0405c21: 樂受一。以レ無二所順一。雖レ有二輕安一。而不二立名樂。 T2251_.64.0405c22: 由レ此經部以二第三定有樂。以例破。然光記 T2251_.64.0405c23: 云。約二三受一説。言三初二喜名二樂受一也者。是何 T2251_.64.0405c24: 謂
T2251_.64.0405c27: 中有レ二。初相返破。不二損減一。還令二増益一故。後 T2251_.64.0405c28: 殊勝破。第三定輕安勝二初二定輕安一。劣既立 T2251_.64.0405c29: レ支。勝何不レ立
T2251_.64.0406a03: 證得遠離五法一修滿五法上。云何遠離五法。 T2251_.64.0406a04: 謂斷二欲所長養喜一。斷二欲所長養憂一。斷二欲所 T2251_.64.0406a05: 長養捨一。斷二不善所長養喜一。斷二不善所長養 T2251_.64.0406a06: 憂一。是名二五法遠離一。云何修滿五法。謂隨喜。
T2251_.64.0406a09: 定一。言二身作證一。得獲成就初靜慮善五蘊一。言二
T2251_.64.0406a12: 夫情謂談。似而不レ當。大抵如レ是
T2251_.64.0406a17: 應レ成二無漏一。然必無二觸及身識是無漏一。勿下初 T2251_.64.0406a18: 定所立五支中。少分身樂支是有漏。少分餘 T2251_.64.0406a19: 四支是無漏。如レ是一心漏無漏竝起成中違理 T2251_.64.0406a20: 失上。然光記作二三解一。竝非二論意一。寶解似 T2251_.64.0406a21: レ是。而未レ明也
T2251_.64.0406a25: 由二此經一成。是非二經部本意一。光師云二同許一義 T2251_.64.0406a26: 非也
T2251_.64.0406b01: 義兩宗不レ異。無漏亦爾。身識實非二無漏一。順二 T2251_.64.0406b02: 無漏一。亦名二無漏一。何汝須レ難レ我
T2251_.64.0406b05: 後三界一。依二文相一前十五唯有漏。後三通レ二。
T2251_.64.0406b13: 相一。謂心之麁細。互相違故。必不二倶起一。然執二 T2251_.64.0406b14: 倶起一。汝還非レ理。故於レ我無レ過。後番約二因明一。 T2251_.64.0406b15: 凡因明法不レ問二理是非一。不許爲レ喩成レ過。今 T2251_.64.0406b16: 有部不レ許。當レ成レ過。然是無二不成一。於二前第 T2251_.64.0406b17: 四卷一。已破二尋伺倶起一。成二不倶起一訖。故今爲 T2251_.64.0406b18: レ喩。汝前於二尋伺不倶起一。不レ能レ出レ過。今何
T2251_.64.0406b24: 問也。或應説三字。舊論云二若不爾。蓋今文 T2251_.64.0406b25: 誤也。語不レ便故。光寶強解釋
T2251_.64.0406b29: 義是支義一。謂四靜慮。各有二爾所一。能隨二順法一。
T2251_.64.0406c04: 然各非二古昔賢聖諸軌範師共施設之義一。故 T2251_.64.0406c05: 末資應三審思擇其是非一。故舊論二十一有二諸 T2251_.64.0406c06: 部師一作二如レ是諍論一。宿舊諸師不レ説レ如レ是不二 T2251_.64.0406c07: 隨可知二所有法一立爲二定分一。是故彼執應レ須二
T2251_.64.0406c10: 論意一也。又應審思擇句光寶爲二下句首一非 T2251_.64.0406c11: 也。湛慧所レ迷二光寶一。以二舊論是故彼執已下一。 T2251_.64.0406c12: 屬二下段一者。猶是非也
T2251_.64.0406c17: レ彼。令二心等淨一。如二波浪息水則澄淨一。是故説
T2251_.64.0406c20: 加レ難。然光寶爲二經部一者非也。何者若經部 T2251_.64.0406c21: 者。從レ本無體。何得二難言應レ無二別體一。亦復不 T2251_.64.0406c22: レ立二實事十一一。寧言三何許二實事十一一。明知本 T2251_.64.0406c23: 是有部。既立二實事十一一。而作二此答一。故破難 T2251_.64.0406c24: 來。言二清淨一者。光記所覽本作二清靜一。故釋云二 T2251_.64.0406c25: 清淨寂靜一。下不清淨亦爾。然鮮本。明本。及舊 T2251_.64.0406c26: 論。寶疏如レ今。雖二靜無害。釋レ淨非レ要故今本 T2251_.64.0406c27: 爲レ勝。又有經内等淨作二内靜一。若依二其經一爾。
T2251_.64.0407a04: 切。箝入聲。釋藏如レ此讀。指要鈔云。字彙云。
T2251_.64.0407a09: レ考
T2251_.64.0407a18: 經説相一者。於二初禪定一説言二離生一。是於レ離二自 T2251_.64.0407a19: 地染一生二喜樂一。故知是離染善喜樂爲二禪支一。 T2251_.64.0407a20: 以顯二染非一。第二云二等淨一。簡二染汚濁一故。染信 T2251_.64.0407a21: 非二支攝一。第三中以二正言一。簡二染迷亂一。故染汚 T2251_.64.0407a22: 念惠非二支攝一。第四中以二清淨言一。亦簡二染汚 T2251_.64.0407a23: 非支。安捨二種性是唯善。染言已簡訖。後師 T2251_.64.0407a24: 約二自性一者。謂十八支中但安捨性是善。餘 T2251_.64.0407a25: 通二染汚一。契經約二淨無漏二種一。故言レ正云二清 T2251_.64.0407a26: 淨。又彼離生言。約レ離二欲不善一。内等淨但信 T2251_.64.0407a27: 相爲レ淨。非レ簡レ染。爲レ顯二此別一。説二隨相言一。問。 T2251_.64.0407a28: 依二正理婆沙一。初説若依二此論一。何言亦第二無 T2251_.64.0407a29: レ樂第三無行捨。文中未レ示二其相一故。解云。性 T2251_.64.0407b01: 是大善。理在二不疑一。以レ明二染定一。第二説中云二 T2251_.64.0407b02: 中但無一。顯示於二初説無中一而唯無彼。若爾
T2251_.64.0407b05: 爲レ勝。故爲レ初不レ言二有餘一
T2251_.64.0407b10: 觀。定生喜樂。得二第二禪一。成就遊。是聖説二移 T2251_.64.0407b11: 動一。比丘離二喜欲一。捨無求遊。正念正智。而身 T2251_.64.0407b12: 體樂。得二第三禪一。成就遊。是聖説二移動一。比丘 T2251_.64.0407b13: 樂滅苦滅。喜憂本已滅。不苦不樂。捨念清淨。
T2251_.64.0407b18: 第四定爲二不動一。譬如三内密室無二風燈光一。餘
T2251_.64.0407b21: 加二論依法相一。故正理云。然經唯説。第四靜慮 T2251_.64.0407b22: 不下爲二尋伺喜樂一動上者。經密意説。論依二法相一。 T2251_.64.0407b23: 或準三今文無二唯字及密意等言一。應下如二舊論一 T2251_.64.0407b24: 依レ經釋此。若爾然言。故字誤也。於二喜樂下一 T2251_.64.0407b25: 脱二等言一。寶師別釋云。然契經説至二喜樂所動一。 T2251_.64.0407b26: 述釋餘經不動一也。若通二欲界一兼二息風一説。即 T2251_.64.0407b27: 有レ八。若唯對二色界一。定内心所。即離二尋伺喜
T2251_.64.0407c01: 通釋語一。由レ是彼舊論語勢。覺觀喜樂已下。是 T2251_.64.0407c02: 第二説。不レ爾文致二煩重一。又譬如言不レ易
T2251_.64.0407c05: 能正觀者名爲二靜慮一。欲界三摩地多散亂風 T2251_.64.0407c06: 之搖動如二四衢燈一。此文對レ欲。四禪通喩二密
T2251_.64.0407c12: 是中有二細樂受一。但斷二麁樂一故。説二不苦不樂一。 T2251_.64.0407c13: 如二風動燈。若置二密室一。則名二不動一。是中必有二 T2251_.64.0407c14: 微風一故。然但無二麁風一。故名二不動一。四禪亦爾。 T2251_.64.0407c15: 必有二細樂一。斷二麁苦樂一。故名二不苦不樂一
T2251_.64.0407c18: 顯二餘差別一故
T2251_.64.0407c28: レ生二下地一。問。何故受生要從二上下一。答。從レ下 T2251_.64.0407c29: 得レ上。二定纔離レ染時即得。是前義攝。非レ待二 T2251_.64.0408a01: 受生一。受之時先已得故。要下以二上下受生一。方 T2251_.64.0408a02: 是受生初得上
T2251_.64.0408a07: 約二加行一。其義可レ爾。然談二欲界一。是何所言。今 T2251_.64.0408a08: 唯定地故
T2251_.64.0408a13: 義。同有漏故。或分段義。煩惱衆多一分故。退 T2251_.64.0408a14: 即分。住即分等。竝持業釋。退分之順等皆依 T2251_.64.0408a15: 主釋。攝者攝在義。淨等至四中一分是此攝 T2251_.64.0408a16: 故。如二得是不相應攝一。順退分即攝。持業得 T2251_.64.0408a17: レ名。餘皆爾。問。婆沙諸文雜心。舊論等。竝無二 T2251_.64.0408a18: 攝言一如何。答。具略隨レ宜。故正理。顯宗如レ今。 T2251_.64.0408a19: 問。此第四與二四善根一爲レ同否。答。寛狹不レ同。 T2251_.64.0408a20: 彼狹此寛。謂彼唯煖頂等四。此不二唯四一。亦通
T2251_.64.0408a23: 法等。三云隨順聖道一。此分或作二聖行相一。或 T2251_.64.0408a24: 作二餘行相一。而向二聖道一。趣二於解脱一。光記十五
T2251_.64.0408a27: 是殊勝一。命終不レ捨
T2251_.64.0408b11: 前問一。準レ此寶疏科名爲レ正。二徴。三釋。四結。
T2251_.64.0408b16: 若異者不レ應レ建立四種一。正理云。此中決定 T2251_.64.0408b17: 義者。謂諸聖道必此無間生。非三此無間必能 T2251_.64.0408b18: 生二聖道一。若異レ此者。是則應レ説三唯世第一法 T2251_.64.0408b19: 名二順決擇分一
T2251_.64.0408b22: 三住レ此多進。四住レ此多入二無漏一。二曰。初與二 T2251_.64.0408b23: 諸惑一相凌相雜。煩惱無間此生此無間煩惱 T2251_.64.0408b24: 生。二觀二下地一爲二麁苦障一。觀二自地一爲二靜妙 T2251_.64.0408b25: 離一。三觀二自地一爲二麁苦障一。觀二上地一爲二靜妙
T2251_.64.0408c01: 第四分不二但四善根一。勿レ容二於疑一
T2251_.64.0408c06: 離自地染一者。起二自地煩惱一有中差別上故。由 T2251_.64.0408c07: レ此故知。彼從二住分一。故婆沙云二住レ此多退レ顯二 T2251_.64.0408c08: 餘亦少退一正理七十八云。若順二煩惱一名二順 T2251_.64.0408c09: 退分一。諸阿羅漢寧有二退理一。非三彼猶有二順退 T2251_.64.0408c10: 分定可令二現在前一。離染捨故雖レ有二此難一。而 T2251_.64.0408c11: 實無レ違。謂順住中有二順レ退者一。亦得三建立順 T2251_.64.0408c12: 退分名一。從レ彼有レ退。如二先已説一。此文亦依二少 T2251_.64.0408c13: 分一説 然寶疏破二正理一。別立二一義一。詳曰。未 T2251_.64.0408c14: レ得レ意而破レ此。其自義亦終不レ異也 T2251_.64.0408c15: 第三生三除順退分 正理。顯宗。婆沙十一
T2251_.64.0408c18: 順次。簡二隔越一故 光兩解後釋爲レ勝
T2251_.64.0408c22: 説一。初同二此論一。後有説同二彼十一一。此論何不 T2251_.64.0408c23: レ同二評家一。據レ何立二唯一一。答。論主以レ理爲レ量。 T2251_.64.0408c24: 不レ依二説人一。第四分既順二聖道一。何可レ生二前分一。 T2251_.64.0408c25: 漏無漏別故。不レ樂二有漏一故。故爲二唯生一。亦 T2251_.64.0408c26: 生二順勝一尚不レ許レ此。況第二分。此淨相生理 T2251_.64.0408c27: 應二隣次一。故於二正理一。第三第四竝異二評家隔越 T2251_.64.0408c28: 案立一。學者應レ思。問。四縁中由二幾縁一生耶。答。 T2251_.64.0408c29: 百六十五具分別。今以レ圖略示。此中具二四 T2251_.64.0409a01: 縁一。必是生。於二三縁中一闕二等無間一。非二此中生一。 T2251_.64.0409a02: 加行。從二此位一後超入諸定一。無レ所二罣礙一乃 T2251_.64.0409a03: T2251_.64.0409a04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a16: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a17: [IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0409a20: 明二能修處人一
T2251_.64.0409a26: 漏間次一開爲レ二。從二有漏初禪一入二無漏第二 T2251_.64.0409a27: 禪一順逆間次。及從二無漏初禪一入二有漏第二 T2251_.64.0409a28: 禪一順逆間次。於二成就中一。亦從二有漏初禪一入二 T2251_.64.0409a29: 無漏第三一順逆間超。及從二無漏初禪一入二有 T2251_.64.0409b01: 若闕二因縁一。亦此中生二縁猶非レ生 T2251_.64.0409b02: T2251_.64.0409b03: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b16: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b17: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b18: 漏第三禪一順逆間超。第三説前來所説皆是 T2251_.64.0409b19: 名二成滿一。今此論文同二彼中説一。而加行中間次 T2251_.64.0409b20: 及成滿。竝文總説。若細説者應レ如二彼説一。若 T2251_.64.0409b21: 依二舊論一。同二彼初説一。舊論總五種而無二漏無 T2251_.64.0409b22: 漏間次文一。於二成就一單具示二順逆間超一故。問。 T2251_.64.0409b23: 三説中何爲レ正。答。婆沙無レ評。彼三説從レ麁 T2251_.64.0409b24: 至レ細。實第三爲レ勝。前二説猶有二退量一。加行 T2251_.64.0409b25: 攝故。問。新舊論兩譯何爲レ是 T2251_.64.0409b26: 答。正理。顯宗同二新翻一。故此論爲レ正。然舊論 T2251_.64.0409b27: 梵本文脱。或後寫脱。誰可レ知レ此。或後人見二 T2251_.64.0409b28: 正理一。加二於今論一耶。亦不レ可レ知
T2251_.64.0409c02: 故上。名爲レ間。不レ超レ地。於二地地一次第。故名レ次。 T2251_.64.0409c03: 又麟云。間次者。如下從二初禪有漏一入中二禪無 T2251_.64.0409c04: 漏上。異類故間不レ超レ地名レ次。後釋爲レ勝。又亦 T2251_.64.0409c05: 可レ有下初禪無漏爲レ先。次入二有漏一間次上。今文 T2251_.64.0409c06: 總説
T2251_.64.0409c09: 所有無漏一。若無漏爲レ創。思應レ知。此間亦超。 T2251_.64.0409c10: 最難レ修故爲二根本一。前住中若間無超。若超 T2251_.64.0409c11: 無レ間。修猶易故爲二加行一。至字明本在レ之。重 T2251_.64.0409c12: 出若見レ頌加レ此乎。如二頌文一者。含二加行一然。 T2251_.64.0409c13: 今唯明レ成何言レ至。若言レ至者。應三上有二加行一。 T2251_.64.0409c14: 既不レ爾無爲レ正。順レ理而成レ句。故由レ此。鮮 T2251_.64.0409c15: 本。及正理。顯宗。頌疏無レ之
T2251_.64.0409c18: 簡レ凡。以二凡無一起故。三爲盡下所爲。問。於二自 T2251_.64.0409c19: 地一何煩惱爲レ餘。答。四自無下所以。此有二二 T2251_.64.0409c20: 因一。舊論曰。於二自地一無故。此熟所悉故。頌疏 T2251_.64.0409c21: 云。以三自有頂無二聖道一故。於二下聖道一欣樂起 T2251_.64.0409c22: 故。五唯無下通妨。何故不レ依二餘地一唯此ナルヤ T2251_.64.0409c23: 故通會。六起彼下結成
T2251_.64.0409c26: 不繋一故。故正理七十八云。以二有漏法是所繋 T2251_.64.0409c27: 事一故。所繋言顯二是三有攝一。第二句明二色界 T2251_.64.0409c28: 淨無漏等至所縁一。對二下無色一不レ説自成。後 T2251_.64.0409c29: 二句明二無色淨無漏等至所縁一。説二不縁一以 T2251_.64.0409c30: 顯二所縁一。根本言顯三近分亦縁二下有漏一。善言 T2251_.64.0410a01: 攝二淨無漏一。倶善性故。前文云。善言具攝二淨 T2251_.64.0410a02: 及無漏一。簡二味定一已説訖故。無色言影示前 T2251_.64.0410a03: 句是色界一。不縁下者顯レ縁二自上諸法一。更言二
T2251_.64.0410a06: 釋云。無色根本淨及無漏不レ縁二下地有漏法一。 T2251_.64.0410a07: 離二色相一故縁二自地及上地一。故説レ非レ下。比智 T2251_.64.0410a08: 品縁二下無漏一。故説レ非二有漏種一。以三方便所攝 T2251_.64.0410a09: 無礙道縁二下地一故説二根本一。味相應縁二自地一。
T2251_.64.0410a13: 上下明二所縁一。述二頌準顯一。此有レ四。一明レ縁二自 T2251_.64.0410a14: 上諸法一。顯二下字影示一。二雖亦下明レ縁二下無 T2251_.64.0410a15: 漏一。顯二有漏言影示一。於レ中有二差別一。無漏不繋 T2251_.64.0410a16: 法。故縁二一地一時。必九地通縁。由レ此縁レ下。雖 T2251_.64.0410a17: レ然唯縁二類智品道一。以二全治一故。不レ縁二法智一。 T2251_.64.0410a18: 不二全治一故。唯滅道法智兼斷二上界修惑一。非二
T2251_.64.0410a22: 滅一。四無色下明二近分亦縁下。顯二根本言影
T2251_.64.0410a25: 偈曰。本善色無色非二有流下境一。釋曰。根本清
T2251_.64.0410b02: 地煩惱對治
T2251_.64.0410b08: 未レ能レ入二勝根本地一。中間定名。別局二大梵處一。
T2251_.64.0410b14: 至一。如二契經言一。諸有未レ能レ入二初定等一。具足安 T2251_.64.0410b15: 住。而由二聖惠一。於二現法中一得二諸漏盡一。若無二未 T2251_.64.0410b16: 至一。聖惠依レ何。又蘇使摩契經中説。有二惠解 T2251_.64.0410b17: 脱者一不レ依二根本定一。豈不レ依レ定。成二慧解脱一。 T2251_.64.0410b18: 由レ此證知。有二未至定一。有二中間定一。如二契經説一。 T2251_.64.0410b19: 有尋伺等三三摩地經説。初定與二尋伺一倶。第 T2251_.64.0410b20: 二等中。尋伺皆息。若無二中靜慮一。誰有伺無 T2251_.64.0410b21: 尋。以二心心所漸次息一故。理應レ有二定有伺無 T2251_.64.0410b22: 尋一。又大梵王是世界主。離二中間定一。誰爲二勝 T2251_.64.0410b23: 因一。由レ此證知。有二中間定一。然佛不三數説レ有二未 T2251_.64.0410b24: 至中間一。以二二即初靜慮攝一故。説二初靜慮一即
T2251_.64.0410b27: 住レ此已起二愛味一。依二如レ是義一。立二未至名一。非三 T2251_.64.0410b28: 上定邊亦名二未至一。皆乘二先定勢力一引生。及
T2251_.64.0410c02: 徳。未二現前一義
T2251_.64.0410c05: 有説名二中間定一。此二各爲二一義一。爲レ有二別義一。 T2251_.64.0410c06: 有二別義一。何以故。近分是離欲道。偈曰。無覺
T2251_.64.0410c09: 前來近分一。以二中間一問爲二下基本一。猶言三復有二 T2251_.64.0410c10: 別義一。復言起盡屬レ下爲レ正。由レ此正理。顯宗。 T2251_.64.0410c11: 竝全同此論一
T2251_.64.0410c14: 論云。是無レ苦無二樂受一。與二捨根一相應。若言二三 T2251_.64.0410c15: 受門一者。何云レ非二喜相應一。舊論亦云下故不中與二 T2251_.64.0410c16: 喜根一相應上。解云。正依二三受門一。而言二非喜一。以二 T2251_.64.0410c17: 五受門一談二三受門一。無レ有レ妨。問。唯捨相應何 T2251_.64.0410c18: 應二苦通行攝一。忽前後違。復苦唯欲界何是中 T2251_.64.0410c19: 間。答。此義如二四通行中已分別一。何分別。謂
T2251_.64.0410c28: 昧。無覺有觀三昧。無覺無觀三昧
T2251_.64.0411a08: 無相三昧。云何空三昧。所謂觀二一切諸法皆 T2251_.64.0411a09: 悉空虚一。云何無相三昧。所謂於二一切諸法一。都 T2251_.64.0411a10: 無二想念一。亦不レ可レ見。云何無願三昧。所謂於二
T2251_.64.0411a16: 於レ中第五句總判。後句別合二三解脱門一。發智
T2251_.64.0411a22: 持一。是分隣近釋。無相名二涅槃一。離二十相一故。一
T2251_.64.0411a25: 是不レ可レ願法。名爲二無願一。縁レ彼三昧名二無願 T2251_.64.0411a26: 三昧一。亦境第七依主。又解。三竝持業釋。此等 T2251_.64.0411a27: 持與二彼行相一相應。作二空無相無願行相一。故 T2251_.64.0411a28: 以名。若爾何云二縁彼等一。答縁二涅槃及苦等一。 T2251_.64.0411a29: 而作二無相無願等行相一。故契經説。於二諸法一 T2251_.64.0411b01: 無二想念一不二求願一。二解中前解爲レ勝。會二論文一 T2251_.64.0411b02: 順二二論一故。問。何故與二頌前契經次第一異耶。 T2251_.64.0411b03: 答。順二増一契經標釋異一故。復次據二行相少 T2251_.64.0411b04: 多一。謂行相二四十故。復次顯レ非二必一相續三
T2251_.64.0411b09: 不時解脱起一。異生有學亦能起。故不二唯有漏一。 T2251_.64.0411b10: 亦通二無漏一。故顯揚第四説三道諦四行通二三解 T2251_.64.0411b11: 脱一。即三等持重縁之行。是無漏故。如レ理應
T2251_.64.0411b16: 願二一。如レ次取二空非常相一。故對二後言一。而言二重 T2251_.64.0411b17: 二一。故舊論偈曰。二定縁三無學由二空無常相一。
T2251_.64.0411b20: 云。重二者標レ名也。縁無學下正釋釋也。空空
T2251_.64.0411b27: 宗。一一置レ之。本經亦爾
T2251_.64.0411c08: 性一。若習。若修。堅作常作精勤修習。是名二修
T2251_.64.0411c20: 充滿遍。充滿適悦遍。適悦故離生喜樂。於二自
T2251_.64.0411c23: 達。若晝。若夜。無レ有二差別一。若前。若後。無レ有二 T2251_.64.0411c24: 差別一。若下若上無レ有二差別一。開心離蓋修照倶
T2251_.64.0411c27: レ念。非レ不レ住レ念。及善知レ想。善知レ尋。於レ此住
T2251_.64.0412a01: 色滅。此是受想行識。此是受想行識集。此是
T2251_.64.0412a06: 内淨一心無覺不觀。定生喜樂。成就二禪行一。 T2251_.64.0412a07: 離レ喜捨行念正智身受樂。如諸聖人解二捨念 T2251_.64.0412a08: 樂行一成二三禪行一。斷二苦樂一先滅二憂喜一。不苦不
T2251_.64.0412a11: 集異所擧契經一。故會二初靜慮第四靜慮一。而義 T2251_.64.0412a12: 意全附同佛意一。如二舍利弗略所唱契經一。視可 T2251_.64.0412a13: レ知。又解。設無二初靜慮等言一。而云二離生喜樂一。 T2251_.64.0412a14: 云二捨念清淨等一。是初定。第四定故依レ義會
T2251_.64.0412a18: 名爲レ修。若習。若修。若多所作者。顯下於二此定一。 T2251_.64.0412a19: 能得二自在一。能令中證得上。現法樂住者。謂於二此 T2251_.64.0412a20: 定一。若習。若修。若多所作。於二現法中一。證得樂 T2251_.64.0412a21: 住可愛可樂可欣可意一。無レ所二希望一。無レ所二思 T2251_.64.0412a22: 慕一。寂靜安隱故名二樂住一。於二此樂住一。得獲成
T2251_.64.0412a28: 或即依二現樂一。説爲二得言一。如レ言二石子體一。故無
T2251_.64.0412b05: 盛。如レ遊二砂磧一。熱渇疲勞。創飮二濁水一。亦生二勝 T2251_.64.0412b06: 樂一。或聖道樂。此具有故。謂具二一切菩提分法 T2251_.64.0412b07: 四沙門果九斷遍知三界對治一。又諸定首諸 T2251_.64.0412b08: 定樂因是故遍説
T2251_.64.0412b11: 樂一。説二現定樂一。令二其欣樂一。或現樂住是後樂 T2251_.64.0412b12: 依。但説二所依一能依已顯。如二契經説一。先住二此 T2251_.64.0412b13: 間一。入二諸等至一。後方生レ彼。不現正理作二樂現一。 T2251_.64.0412b14: 顯宗作二喜樂現一。竝誤也。今依二寶疏一
T2251_.64.0412b17: 正理論曰。本靜慮中有二遍縁智一。此遍照故立 T2251_.64.0412b18: 以二見名一。見體即知。故名二知見一。眼根名レ見。世
T2251_.64.0412b23: 曰。若修二三界諸加行善及無漏善一。得二分別 T2251_.64.0412b24: 慧一。謂從二欲界一。乃至二有頂一。諸聞思修所成善 T2251_.64.0412b25: 法。及餘無漏有爲。總説名爲二加行善法一。能引 T2251_.64.0412b26: レ慧生。於二諸境中一差別而轉故。言二修此得分
T2251_.64.0412c01: 一切不善慧。非理所引慧。所有不善障礙定 T2251_.64.0412c02: 慧。皆悉破壞。捨置不起。此相違惠。生長堅
T2251_.64.0412c06: 可レ知。由レ依二第四定一時分別故。準レ彼四皆依二 T2251_.64.0412c07: 佛自一説。故於二初修定一。無二別通文一。準レ此可 T2251_.64.0412c08: レ知。正理論釋二知見一云。修二此等持一。即是爲 T2251_.64.0412c09: レ求二決定照義一。此亦善逝。依レ自而説。謂爲レ顯下 T2251_.64.0412c10: 佛以二天眼通一。觀二諸有情死生險難一。方爲二拔 T2251_.64.0412c11: 濟一。起中靜慮等上。故爲二知見一修二天眼通一。新舊竝 T2251_.64.0412c12: 無レ妨 T2251_.64.0412c13: 倶舍論二十八卷法義終 T2251_.64.0412c14: T2251_.64.0412c15: T2251_.64.0412c16: T2251_.64.0412c17: T2251_.64.0412c18: 十九 T2251_.64.0412c19: 豐山寓居上毛沙門快道記 T2251_.64.0412c20: 分別定品第八之二
T2251_.64.0412c26: 等一故。名爲二梵堂一。比丘當レ知。有二梵大梵一名 T2251_.64.0412c27: 千。無與等者。無過上者。統二千國界一。是彼之 T2251_.64.0412c28: 堂故。名爲二梵堂一。比丘此四梵堂所有力勢。能 T2251_.64.0412c29: 觀二此千國界一。是故名爲二梵堂一。是故比丘若 T2251_.64.0413a01: 有二比丘一。欲下度二欲界之天一處中無欲之地上者。彼 T2251_.64.0413a02: 四部之衆當下求二方便一成中此四梵堂上
T2251_.64.0413a05: 無量。後果無量也。以レ縁二無量有情一故。得二無 T2251_.64.0413a06: 量福一。以二無量福一故。得二無量果一。以三此四行 T2251_.64.0413a07: 有二三無量一故名二無量一。光記初從レ境。次從二等 T2251_.64.0413a08: 流果一。後從二異熟果一。詳曰。此三因展轉相成。 T2251_.64.0413a09: 福謂諸福善爲二未來愛果一之因即現在。雖二光
T2251_.64.0413a14: 體依主。初境第七。後二第五轉有財釋。福因 T2251_.64.0413a15: 及果。竝因レ四所レ得之法故。若總云二四無量一。 T2251_.64.0413a16: 四是慈悲喜捨。必非二無量是四一。故無量之四 T2251_.64.0413a17: 有財釋。必無二帶數一。婆沙八十一更有二三釋一
T2251_.64.0413a21: レ中有レ別。慈治二斷命瞋一。悲治二捶打瞋一。後説慈 T2251_.64.0413a22: 以二無瞋一爲レ性。治レ瞋故。悲以二不害一爲レ性。治 T2251_.64.0413a23: レ害故。於レ彼無レ評。今論主依二後説一。何故如レ是。
T2251_.64.0413a28: レ瞋名二貪瞋一依主釋。若依二論主一相違釋。舊論 T2251_.64.0413a29: 云。多行殺害瞋。逼惱瞋。嫉妬瞋。愛起憎瞋。 T2251_.64.0413b01: 彼最後瞋。通渉而讀。按義解謬。終以成二翻 T2251_.64.0413b02: 誤一。或瞋言非二必六惑隨一一。唯憎逼義。亦名爲 T2251_.64.0413b03: レ瞋。若爾無レ失
T2251_.64.0413b06: 量一。亦斷二欲貪一。此二何別。答有二四復次一。一淫 T2251_.64.0413b07: 欲貪。境界貪。如レ次不淨ト捨トノ對治。二顯色 T2251_.64.0413b08: 貪。形色貪。三細觸貪。容儀貪。四形貌貪。有
T2251_.64.0413b12: 逆於味一。有説不淨想對治婬貪一。厭食想對治 T2251_.64.0413b13: 食貪一。準二此等文一。毘婆沙還同二理實義一如何。
T2251_.64.0413b18: 形貌觸威儀欲一故。母父及兒親等欲對治是 T2251_.64.0413b19: 捨
T2251_.64.0413b23: 會兩釋後義爲レ勝。又頌釋和會兩釋。是亦後 T2251_.64.0413b24: 爲レ勝。若言三不害似二無瞋一。何一無瞋言可レ含二 T2251_.64.0413b25: 眞似一
T2251_.64.0413c05: 彼所起心不相應行皆名爲レ喜。豈有二喜受與 T2251_.64.0413c06: レ受相應一。答。彼文應レ説二謂喜及喜相應想行 T2251_.64.0413c07: 識一。不レ可レ言レ受。而言レ受者。是誦者謬。復次彼 T2251_.64.0413c08: 論總説三五蘊爲二喜無量自性一。雖三喜受與レ受 T2251_.64.0413c09: 不二相應一。而餘心心所法與レ受相應。故作二是
T2251_.64.0413c12: 與レ心相應。有説欣在二喜根相應聚中一可レ得。 T2251_.64.0413c13: 有作是説。喜根後生レ欣。由三喜力所二引起一故。 T2251_.64.0413c14: 若作二是説一。此喜無量與レ受相應。亦不レ違レ理
T2251_.64.0413c23: 由二思擇力一。内所二發起一。色界定善心欣極欣現 T2251_.64.0413c24: 前。極欣欣性欣類。適意悦意喜性喜類。和合 T2251_.64.0413c25: 不二別離一。歡欣悦預有二堪任性一。踊躍踊躍性。 T2251_.64.0413c26: 歡喜歡喜性。總名爲レ喜。復次與レ喜相應受想 T2251_.64.0413c27: 行識。及所等起身語二業。不相應行。亦名爲
T2251_.64.0414a04: 古師説二喜即喜受一。何縁觀行者。其時喜受生。 T2251_.64.0414a05: 若縁二與樂一。與レ慈無レ異。若縁二拔苦一。應二與レ悲 T2251_.64.0414a06: 同一。又契經言二欣故生喜。喜即喜受。如二先已 T2251_.64.0414a07: 辨一。此喜行相與二彼欣一同。喜故生レ喜義有二何 T2251_.64.0414a08: 異一。若言二下上義有異者。輕安與レ樂。義亦應 T2251_.64.0414a09: レ然。差別因縁不レ可レ得。故又違二本論一。云何名 T2251_.64.0414a10: レ喜。謂喜。喜相應受想行識等。此中意顯喜ト T2251_.64.0414a11: 倶ナル品ノ法ハ喜カ増上カ故。總立二喜名一。非二受ト T2251_.64.0414a12: 受ト倶一。其理決定。若喜即喜受。何言二與レ受倶一。 T2251_.64.0414a13: 若言四對法以レ理爲レ量應レ如三無レ過誦二本論文一。 T2251_.64.0414a14: 此亦不レ然。理爲レ量。論要有二經證一。方可レ定 T2251_.64.0414a15: レ文。若與レ經違。理必可レ壞。不レ應三隨レ意輒改二 T2251_.64.0414a16: 論文一。是故此喜定非二喜受一。以レ欣爲レ體。或即 T2251_.64.0414a17: 無貪。謂別有レ貪。是惡心所。於二有情類一。作二是 T2251_.64.0414a18: 思惟一。云何當レ令三諸有樂彼不レ能レ得皆屬二於 T2251_.64.0414a19: 我一。喜能治レ彼。故是無貪。此與二喜根一必倶行 T2251_.64.0414a20: 故。三地可レ得。如二悔憂倶一。喜亦無貪。分明相 T2251_.64.0414a21: 者。於二他盛事一心不二貪著一。知二他獲得一。深生二欣 T2251_.64.0414a22: 慰一。心熱對治。説名爲レ喜。故知此喜亦無貪性
T2251_.64.0414a26: レ依二欲染想一。又契經欣故生レ喜者。是説二由レ相 T2251_.64.0414a27: 顯體。謂欣悦故生二此喜無量一。生是生成義。 T2251_.64.0414a28: 又不レ違二本論一。已善通故。又以レ欣爲二自性一理 T2251_.64.0414a29: 未レ盡。欣厭別有レ體否。未レ定如二世親論主一者。
T2251_.64.0414b03: 適意悦意喜性喜類一。竝是喜樂行相。何偏定 T2251_.64.0414b04: レ欣。又無貪爲レ性。實是臆度無二文説一。亦無レ有 T2251_.64.0414b05: レ理。諸經論竝皆於二慰樂一。説二喜無量一故。又違三 T2251_.64.0414b06: 經説治二不欣慰一。何不レ言レ治レ貪。又喜無量。初
T2251_.64.0414b09: 地。應二無貪唯三地一。若與レ喜相應故者。若爾 T2251_.64.0414b10: 者喜根定現前。何得レ致二前難一。亦復決定與 T2251_.64.0414b11: レ喜倶無貪爲レ性。全無二理教一。憂悔之例不成。 T2251_.64.0414b12: 彼二唯欲故。問。喜受爲レ性。應レ治二憂慼一。何云二 T2251_.64.0414b13: 不欣慰一。答。嫉妬不欣慰是憂慼。行相似故。理 T2251_.64.0414b14: 實治二憂慼一。若依二大乘一。雜集十三四無量竝 T2251_.64.0414b15: 以二定惠一爲レ體。若依二顯揚第四一。無瞋。不害。不 T2251_.64.0414b16: 嫉。及無貪。無瞋。如レ次大同二論主解一
T2251_.64.0414b20: 依レ境判。二自意樂本是善非レ倒。如實意樂 T2251_.64.0414b21: 故。三勝解心所謂二相應唯是自修善行一。不 T2251_.64.0414b22: レ執二有情實得一故
T2251_.64.0414b27: 自體非レ倒
T2251_.64.0414c02: 三四方四維上下普周一切一。心與レ慈倶。無 T2251_.64.0414c03: 結。無怨。無恚。無諍。極廣甚大。無量善修。遍 T2251_.64.0414c04: 滿一切世間一。成就遊。如レ是悲喜心與レ捨倶。 T2251_.64.0414c05: 無結。無怨。無恚。無諍。極廣甚大。無量善修。
T2251_.64.0414c11: 三一。此有二兩説一。三通レ四叙二異説一。婆沙八十一
T2251_.64.0414c15: 悲無量一。有二勝喜受一。歡行轉故。悲慼行故。歡 T2251_.64.0414c16: 慼何竝轉。評曰。初二定有二悲無量一。有二至教一 T2251_.64.0414c17: 故。如二定蘊中説一。初二靜慮攝二初二靜慮四無 T2251_.64.0414c18: 量一等。今論初三説於レ彼未レ見。通二十地一説者。 T2251_.64.0414c19: 喜無量ハ欲ト初二定ト餘ハ通二十地一。故云二隨應一
T2251_.64.0415a01: 説一如二此論一
T2251_.64.0415a04: 一正明二不斷一。二示二伏治一。釋二前文一此亦有レ二。 T2251_.64.0415a05: 初正明二伏治一。後因便明二初修相一。此文正明二
T2251_.64.0415a08: 行相。能斷二煩惱一。無量非二彼行相一。四行相是 T2251_.64.0415a09: 無量。斷二煩惱一不レ以二此行相一故。復次無量是 T2251_.64.0415a10: 勝解作意。惟眞實作意。能斷二煩惱一。復次無量 T2251_.64.0415a11: 是増益作意。惟不増益作意。能斷二煩惱一。復次 T2251_.64.0415a12: 無量惟縁二現在一。要縁二三世或無爲一。道能斷二 T2251_.64.0415a13: 煩惱一。復次無量縁二有情一。要法想能斷二煩惱一。 T2251_.64.0415a14: 復次無量縁二一分境一。非レ縁二一分境一。道能斷二 T2251_.64.0415a15: 煩惱一。復次無間道能斷二煩惱一。無量是解脱道
T2251_.64.0415a18: 有漏根本靜慮攝故。此因有レ失。不レ應レ説三三
T2251_.64.0415a21: 根本一下惑必斷上。有漏根本尚不レ斷レ惑。中間 T2251_.64.0415a22: 不レ斷。理在二絶言一。故不二別簡一
T2251_.64.0415a25: 中有レ問有レ答。答中有レ二。一正明二初修一。二分 T2251_.64.0415a26: 別能修人一。初中亦二。初明二修縁一。二便作下正 T2251_.64.0415a27: 明二修願一。此中亦有。初約二煩惱非増人一。二若 T2251_.64.0415a28: 彼下約二煩惱増盛人一。此中文有レ三。一標二不 T2251_.64.0415a29: 能一。二應於下示二縁境品別一。三先於下正明二修 T2251_.64.0415b01: 相一。此亦有レ二。一修觀七品有情一。二修此下
T2251_.64.0415b06: レ唯。然光法師令レ同二正理中品分三。後釋非 T2251_.64.0415b07: 也 T2251_.64.0415b08: 怨亦分レ三謂下中上 從レ易向レ難。故於二親 T2251_.64.0415b09: 友一上中下次。於二怨三品一列二下中上一
T2251_.64.0415b12: 所以者何。阿羅漢等欲レ求二其失一。亦可レ得故。 T2251_.64.0415b13: 彼於二先時一。亦有二瑕隙一故。令三我等今輕毀之一。 T2251_.64.0415b14: 誰能於レ彼作二饒益事一。若於二有情一。樂求徳一者。 T2251_.64.0415b15: 於二四無量一。多分能修。所以者何。斷二善根一者。 T2251_.64.0415b16: 欲レ求二其徳一。亦可レ得故。彼於二先時一。多修二善 T2251_.64.0415b17: 業一故。今感得尊貴家生。形貌端嚴衆所樂 T2251_.64.0415b18: 見。言詞威肅聞皆敬受一。智惠多聞人皆推仰。 T2251_.64.0415b19: 我應三於レ彼作二饒益事一。今亦約レ多故。不レ言レ唯 T2251_.64.0415b20: 也
T2251_.64.0415b23: 起。偈曰。人道生。光記云二現起分別一未可也。 T2251_.64.0415b24: 二成具門。初二定得レ一必成レ四。第三已上成
T2251_.64.0415b27: 故。慈悲捨與二喜樂捨三根一相應。喜不二與レ受 T2251_.64.0415b28: 相應一。若兼二眷屬一。亦與二喜根一相應。皆通二三世一。 T2251_.64.0415b29: 唯是善而縁二三性一。欲色界繋唯縁二欲界一。唯非 T2251_.64.0415c01: 二學而縁二非二學一。唯修所斷縁二見修所斷一。通 T2251_.64.0415c02: 縁二名義一。唯縁二他相續一。皆通二加行得離染得一。
T2251_.64.0415c07: 雖レ初非レ具レ喜故。二治二非梵一故。非梵謂欲界。 T2251_.64.0415c08: 初定近治二欲界一故。三治二非梵行一故。婬欲事 T2251_.64.0415c09: 名二非梵行一。初定近治レ彼故。四修二梵行一者身 T2251_.64.0415c10: 中可レ得故。五梵謂世尊。此四無量佛所二施 T2251_.64.0415c11: 設一故名二梵住一。六梵謂梵音。此四梵音所説 T2251_.64.0415c12: 故。七修二此四一生二梵天一。爲二大梵王一故。八以下四 T2251_.64.0415c13: 無量於二梵福中一最勝上故。又問。梵住無量有二 T2251_.64.0415c14: 何差別一有二多釋一。有作是説。無二差別一。有説有二 T2251_.64.0415c15: 多復次一。一名既有二差別一。二治二非梵一。治二戲論一 T2251_.64.0415c16: 別故。三治二非梵行一。治二戲論一異故。四非梵行 T2251_.64.0415c17: 者。戲論者。身中可レ得。有レ異故。五治二不信一 T2251_.64.0415c18: 梵。治二放逸一無量。六在二梵世一。在二上地一。有レ殊 T2251_.64.0415c19: 故。七在二未至及梵世一。在二上地一不同故。八在二 T2251_.64.0415c20: 上地一唯無量。在二未至梵世一亦名二梵住一。九外 T2251_.64.0415c21: 道所得唯名二梵住一。内道所得亦得二無量名一。十 T2251_.64.0415c22: 共所得梵住。不共得無量。十一妙音云。共二異 T2251_.64.0415c23: 生一是梵住。不共聖者是無量
T2251_.64.0415c26: 超二諸色想一。滅二有對想一。不三思惟種種想一。入二無 T2251_.64.0415c27: 邊空一。空無邊處具足住解脱。五超二一切空無 T2251_.64.0415c28: 邊處一。入二無邊識一。識無邊處具足住解脱。六 T2251_.64.0415c29: 超二一切識無邊處一。入二無所有無所有處一。具足 T2251_.64.0416a01: 住解脱。七超二一切無所有處一。入二非想非非想
T2251_.64.0416a10: 解脱三解脱。度色想滅瞋恚想住空處四解 T2251_.64.0416a11: 脱。度空處住識處五解脱。度識處住不用處 T2251_.64.0416a12: 六解脱。度不用處住有想無想處七解脱。度 T2251_.64.0416a13: 有想無想處住想知滅八解脱。同第八衆集
T2251_.64.0416a22: 云二諸色一。據二十上經一言二外色一。爲レ治二内色想 T2251_.64.0416a23: 貪一或觀二外色不淨。或内外諸色一故。甘露味
T2251_.64.0416a26: 云二諸色一。具應レ言二外諸色一。二文互現。故八十
T2251_.64.0416a29: 色一釋二外色一。故知外諸色名二諸色一。問。名義如 T2251_.64.0416b01: 何。棄背義名二解脱一。廣如二婆沙一。別釋レ名者。於二 T2251_.64.0416b02: 内色身一有二色想貪一。此所斷貪名二内有色想一。 T2251_.64.0416b03: 内簡レ外。有是能有レ身。色是所有身有レ色。故 T2251_.64.0416b04: 言二有色一有財釋。有色之想依主釋。内即有有 T2251_.64.0416b05: 色想。内之有色想持業。及同體依主釋。觀外 T2251_.64.0416b06: 色者。觀是能觀。外色即所觀。謂觀二外青瘀膿 T2251_.64.0416b07: 爛等一。外色之觀境第七依主。故名二觀外色一。與 T2251_.64.0416b08: レ除二内有色想貪一。觀二外色一以棄背彼一。故名二解 T2251_.64.0416b09: 脱一。内有色想之觀外色。第四轉依主釋。此觀 T2251_.64.0416b10: 即解脱持業釋。或同體依主釋。二中内無色 T2251_.64.0416b11: 想者。約二所依一説。謂呼二前已斷一。觀外色者。約二 T2251_.64.0416b12: 所縁一説。謂雖二已除一貪爲二堅固一故。更觀二外不 T2251_.64.0416b13: 淨青瘀等一。令三貪不二還生一。内無色想之觀外色
T2251_.64.0416b16: 淨相一。彼治二色貪一。此治二不淨觀一。是爲二差別一。上
T2251_.64.0416b20: 三名一諸説異諍。且依二婆沙一如二前辨一。若依二甘
T2251_.64.0416b23: 解脱。分別觀三内外色一切淨色一。是第三解脱
T2251_.64.0416b26: 爲レ顯下通二内外諸色一觀中淨相上。但云二淨解脱一。又
T2251_.64.0416b29: 中説二内無色想觀外色一。以レ破二内色一故。言二内 T2251_.64.0416c01: 無色想一故。知行者。於二初解脱中一漸壞二身色一。 T2251_.64.0416c02: 至二第二解脱中一。内色已壞但有二外色一。第三解
T2251_.64.0416c19: 伴一。總言二五蘊一故。婆沙百四十一亦云。若幷二 T2251_.64.0416c20: 助伴一。即五蘊性。然彼八十四約二隨轉一説。故 T2251_.64.0416c21: 云二欲界四蘊一。以三欲無二隨轉色一故。然光記云。 T2251_.64.0416c22: 此論據レ勝。婆沙兼據レ似説者。未レ得二兩論意一 T2251_.64.0416c23: 也。又婆沙論二界地一者。不レ言二欲界一者。必不
T2251_.64.0416c26: 界一。從二依地一云二色界一。而光記亦約二弱強等一者 T2251_.64.0416c27: 非也
T2251_.64.0417a01: 心。故所縁言二可見色一
T2251_.64.0417a07: 性唯是善非二無記染一。今等二依地三性等一。八十
T2251_.64.0417a12: 受滅解脱一。二據レ實而論滅二一切心心所一。故有 T2251_.64.0417a13: 經總言二滅盡定解脱一。後有説約二倶解脱一。謂諸 T2251_.64.0417a14: 羅得二滅定一者名二倶解脱一。由二慧定力一。解脱煩
T2251_.64.0417a20: 非レ可レ厭二道諦一故。無漏觀則自體是故。不レ縁二 T2251_.64.0417a21: 法智一者。無色於レ欲四遠故。問。何故不レ明二第 T2251_.64.0417a22: 八所縁一。答。滅二心心所一。既無二能縁一。誰可レ縁
T2251_.64.0417a26: 中。無二眼識所引貪一故。於二第三定一無二初二不 T2251_.64.0417a27: 淨解脱一。第三定自地ニハ意地ノ妙樂所二動亂一
T2251_.64.0417b03: 故。遍處亦無。勝處爲レ門。入二遍處一故。兼顯示
T2251_.64.0417b06: 如レ有二眼識所引貪一故。初禪立二解脱一。二禪既 T2251_.64.0417b07: 無二眼識所引貪一故。三禪不レ立。有章本云二三 T2251_.64.0417b08: 禪一者非也。准レ論是二禪故。又論云。初二解 T2251_.64.0417b09: 脱一一通依二初二靜慮一。能治二欲界初靜慮中 T2251_.64.0417b10: 顯色貪一故。既不レ言レ治二二禪一。故知是二禪無二 T2251_.64.0417b11: 眼識引貪一。若爾第三禪既無二眼識引貪一。何故 T2251_.64.0417b12: 四禪立二解脱一。解云。第四禪立二解脱一者。由二先 T2251_.64.0417b13: 離貪。方於二彼地一觀二淨解脱一。不下由レ治二識所 T2251_.64.0417b14: 引貪一立上
T2251_.64.0417b18: レ令二攝持一故。又欲二自觀知所二堪能一作二是念一。 T2251_.64.0417b19: 以二不淨觀一不レ起二煩惱一未タシヤ。是爲レ奇。淨觀 T2251_.64.0417b20: 不レ起乃爲レ奇。又現三善根有二所堪能一故
T2251_.64.0417c02: 五曰。淨於二大種造色一邊際故。第八於二心心 T2251_.64.0417c03: 所一邊際故。六曰。淨雖レ取二色淨一。而不レ起二煩 T2251_.64.0417c04: 惱一。以二殊勝一故。立二身證名一。第八以二無心一故。 T2251_.64.0417c05: 身力所起故説二身證一。七曰。經説二八解脱身作 T2251_.64.0417c06: 證一者。皆以二此二解一故。得レ名二身證一。今依二第 T2251_.64.0417c07: 一第三一。若依二舊論一。曰レ在二界地窮際一。亦攝二彼 T2251_.64.0417c08: 第四説一
T2251_.64.0417c17: 觀勝レ彼。故名二勝處一。處之勝依主釋。又百四
T2251_.64.0417c23: 境等同二前三解脱一。故下三句指同以顯レ此。準 T2251_.64.0417c24: レ此應レ知。前第三淨是内無色想觀外色。集異
T2251_.64.0418a02: 如二婆羅痆斯深染青衣。若青青顯青現青光一。 T2251_.64.0418a03: 内無色想觀外諸色。若青青顯青現青光。亦
T2251_.64.0418a06: 華一。或如二婆羅痆斯深染黄衣若黄黄顯黄現
T2251_.64.0418a09: 痆斯喩。及法合等。準レ前可レ知。而彼一一牒
T2251_.64.0418a13: 有漏。以レ空破レ色。則名二無漏一。此是行者所貪 T2251_.64.0418a14: 著處。是故佛爲二弟子一。説名二勝處一。示レ勝此縁 T2251_.64.0418a15: 故
T2251_.64.0418a18: 三小大無量。四因果通二。五能有二棄背一。能 T2251_.64.0418a19: 勝二伏境一。能廣二所縁一。六唯作二勝解一。能伏二煩惱一。 T2251_.64.0418a20: 於レ境無二無量。七如二次下論次第從入差別一。 T2251_.64.0418a21: 今依二彼五六二復次一。唯棄背影顯唯作二勝 T2251_.64.0418a22: 解一
T2251_.64.0418a26: 此論一。西方誦本別乎
T2251_.64.0418b01: 量火處。無量風處。無量青處。無量黄處。無量 T2251_.64.0418b02: 赤處。無量白處。無量空處。無量識處。第十修 T2251_.64.0418b03: 一思惟上下諸方不二。衆生如是樂二一切處一。
T2251_.64.0418b10: 如下地等隨二世想一名上。風亦顯形。故言二亦爾一。如三 T2251_.64.0418b11: 世間説二黒風團風一。此用二顯形一。表示風一故。 T2251_.64.0418b12: 前文即風界爲レ初。假立爲二或説一。今風界爲二
T2251_.64.0418b15: 可レ言三亦縁二色處一。此難非レ理。以三諸世間亦説二 T2251_.64.0418b16: 黒風團風等一故
T2251_.64.0418b19: 必已得二勝處遍處一。若得二勝處一。必已得二解脱一。 T2251_.64.0418b20: 未三必已得二遍處一。若得二遍處一。必得二已得解脱 T2251_.64.0418b21: 及勝處一。所以者何。從二解脱一入二勝處一。從二勝處一
T2251_.64.0418b25: 云。初二句答二初問一者麁也。於二無色一立。若解 T2251_.64.0418b26: 脱。若遍處。皆依二三界一。故總言三無色依二三界一。 T2251_.64.0418b27: 不二別標簡一
T2251_.64.0418c02: 得。非二異生能起一。初起唯在二人中一。後復依二色 T2251_.64.0418c03: 界身一修起
T2251_.64.0418c06: 起一。唯無所所有。亦依二上地一
T2251_.64.0418c09: 力劣無二聖教一故。治二貪欲一故。上二界無。有説 T2251_.64.0418c10: 初起唯在二人趣一。要由二教力一。所二引起一故。人中 T2251_.64.0418c11: 有レトモレ教天趣中無ヲ以設有二著樂一。不レ能二初起一。 T2251_.64.0418c12: 故人初起。退生二欲天一。由二宿習力一。有二後起義一
T2251_.64.0418c18: 爲二數修一。此二竝爲二因力一。唯順後業爲二業力一。 T2251_.64.0418c19: 其不定業非三必定爲二因力業力一。故此不レ説。 T2251_.64.0418c20: 雖二順現受等竝是業一。而分二親疎近遠一。以爲二 T2251_.64.0418c21: 二力一。寶疏論順後受。更加二順生受一。違二理教 T2251_.64.0418c22: 二一。違レ理者。濫二因力一故。違レ教者。此及舊論。 T2251_.64.0418c23: 正理。顯宗竝唯云二順後受業一故。麟云。准二此 T2251_.64.0418c24: 及論一。唯順後受業。以二順生是因力攝一故。若 T2251_.64.0418c25: 寶法師通取二生後二業一。彼意者。謂先得レ定。 T2251_.64.0418c26: 由二此定力一。感二上界順生一。後由二退失一。由二先定
T2251_.64.0419a02: 分科竝非也。如二首卷辨一。寶疏非亦爾也
T2251_.64.0419a05: 出體。明レ證中。舊論曰。正修得者。謂阿地伽 T2251_.64.0419a06: 摩。此是三乘人。所修菩提助法。及三乘果。今 T2251_.64.0419a07: 擧レ因以影レ果。於二菩提分一前二十二通二漏無 T2251_.64.0419a08: 漏一。餘十五種唯是無漏。今非二有漏一。故百八十
T2251_.64.0419a15: 擧レ經辨二住世數量一。初中有レ三。一明下隨二持説 T2251_.64.0419a16: 二人一。世俗教法住上。二有能下明下隨二修行者一 T2251_.64.0419a17: 勝義證法住上。三故隨下結勸。然寶疏二明二能 T2251_.64.0419a18: 持人一者非也。爲レ明二法住一而明レ人。何爲二大 T2251_.64.0419a19: 科一。亦復不二是唯明人。明述二法住一故。上來不 T2251_.64.0419a20: レ論二住世年數一。唯明下有二能持人一其法必住上
T2251_.64.0419a27: レ住二千年一。今失二五百歳一。餘有二五百年一。五分律
T2251_.64.0419b03: 諸者。行者。毘奈耶。説我之正法應レ住二千歳一。 T2251_.64.0419b04: 或復過レ此。由下度二女人一出家上。更減二五百一。世尊 T2251_.64.0419b05: 雖下於二處處一説中正法言上。而不三分別云何正法一。 T2251_.64.0419b06: 契經是此論所依根本。彼所未説者。今應レ説 T2251_.64.0419b07: レ之。故作二斯論一。以可二準例一。然光寶竝爲二兩説一。 T2251_.64.0419b08: 初教證倶唯千年義。後説教法至二千歳之後一。 T2251_.64.0419b09: 此釋誤也。光記契經等二句總屬レ上。以爲二一 T2251_.64.0419b10: 説一。若爾何故。正理。顯宗全無二契經已下文一 T2251_.64.0419b11: 耶。舊論云。有餘師説。佛般涅槃後一千年。正 T2251_.64.0419b12: 法得レ住。此説約二正修得一。不レ約二阿含一。若約二阿 T2251_.64.0419b13: 含一。則有二多時一。何以故。於二末世中一。若能此正 T2251_.64.0419b14: 法諸人有二二種諸天一。一隨聞得信。二隨正解 T2251_.64.0419b15: 得レ信。皆擁護彼人一。令三阿含及正修得於レ世 T2251_.64.0419b16: 不二速隱沒一。是故於レ中。如レ文如レ義。應三急修二 T2251_.64.0419b17: 正行一。準二舊論一。於二有餘師後一。擧レ經以分別。豈
T2251_.64.0419b20: 教證。倶爲二千年一。故言二總言一。此雖レ不レ違レ義。 T2251_.64.0419b21: 疎二於文勢一。又忽違二舊論一。問。今云二有釋一。舊論 T2251_.64.0419b22: 云二有餘師一。應三必對二本説一何。答。本説者。如二 T2251_.64.0419b23: 頌下二句一。不レ論二時數一。但隨二能持人有一。對レ此
T2251_.64.0419b26: 此有釋一
T2251_.64.0419b29: 當二流通分一。光寶分文科目非也。正理論曰。阿 T2251_.64.0419c01: 毘達磨此論所依。此攝二彼中眞實要義一。彼論 T2251_.64.0419c02: 中義。釋有二多途一。今此論中。依二何義一釋。頌曰
T2251_.64.0419c05: 顯一。爲レ如二毘婆沙中所顯一。準三正理顯宗倶言二 T2251_.64.0419c06: 眞實要義一。前界品初正理言二諸堅實義。皆 T2251_.64.0419c07: 入レ此攝一者。眞實誤誰可レ容レ疑
T2251_.64.0419c10: 讓レ佛。論主所造二十唯識終頌曰。我已隨二自 T2251_.64.0419c11: 能一。略成二唯識義一。此中一切種。難思佛所行。 T2251_.64.0419c12: 與レ此意同。正理頌同レ此。釋二多言一曰。顯三少 T2251_.64.0419c13: 有二異途一。謂形像色去來世等。由レ是顯宗改作 T2251_.64.0419c14: レ唯。而釋下唯言爲レ顯。更無二異途一。一切皆依中毘 T2251_.64.0419c15: 婆沙上故。少者對レ多。去來世等義。以二經部義一 T2251_.64.0419c16: 貶量有部所立一。是爲二我失一。顯宗改レ此。作下或 T2251_.64.0419c17: 有二差違一是我失上
T2251_.64.0419c20: レ依二婆沙一。故舊論曰。罽賓國毘婆沙師二證ヲ T2251_.64.0419c21: 以所二成就一。此阿毘達磨。我今多隨二彼義一説」
T2251_.64.0419c26: 爲レ量。本論非レ量。壞レ之何咎。故世尊言。當 T2251_.64.0419c27: レ依二經量一。今亦頌云二牟尼一。善會二前來一。然長行二 T2251_.64.0419c28: 云及大聖弟子一。蓋應レ畫二蛇足一。或及言應レ作 T2251_.64.0419c29: レ非。由レ是舊論曰。離レ證能正判二正法一。唯佛世 T2251_.64.0420a01: 尊爲二最勝量一。何以故。由三證見一切法一故。若 T2251_.64.0420a02: 佛聖弟子離二阿含及道理一。判二正法一亦非二中 T2251_.64.0420a03: 量一。準二彼論一理前後附爲二最善一。今論文錯誤 T2251_.64.0420a04: 必矣。又正理論曰。諸法正理廣大甚深。要昔 T2251_.64.0420a05: 曾於二無量佛所一親近修習。眞智資糧方於二智 T2251_.64.0420a06: 境一。一切無レ惑。麟喩獨覺尚於二法相一。不レ能二決 T2251_.64.0420a07: 判一。況諸聲聞。彼所證法。隨二他教一故。由レ此決
T2251_.64.0420a12: 二乘凡夫一。然寶疏云。六足發智是大弟子之 T2251_.64.0420a13: 所造。故不二商略一者何。但執レ文未レ觀二前後應 T2251_.64.0420a14: 承等一。光記亦隨二錯本一釋非也。倶舍論序正流 T2251_.64.0420a15: 通三分已訖。自下大師世眼等頌。已下是破 T2251_.64.0420a16: 我論文。如三首卷立二八理一證一。當下至二彼論一解 T2251_.64.0420a17: 釋上。普光等多釋竝妄陋。悉如二首卷評簡一。於 T2251_.64.0420a18: レ此且息
T2251_.64.0420a21: T2251_.64.0420a22: T2251_.64.0420a23: T2251_.64.0420a24: T2251_.64.0420a25: T2251_.64.0420a26: T2251_.64.0420a27: T2251_.64.0420a28: T2251_.64.0420a29: T2251_.64.0420b01: T2251_.64.0420b02: T2251_.64.0420b03: T2251_.64.0420b04: T2251_.64.0420b05: T2251_.64.0420b06: T2251_.64.0420b07: T2251_.64.0420b08: T2251_.64.0420b09: T2251_.64.0420b10: T2251_.64.0420b11: T2251_.64.0420b12: T2251_.64.0420b13: T2251_.64.0420b14: T2251_.64.0420b15: T2251_.64.0420b16: T2251_.64.0420b17: T2251_.64.0420b18: T2251_.64.0420b19: T2251_.64.0420b20: T2251_.64.0420b21: T2251_.64.0420b22: T2251_.64.0420b23: T2251_.64.0420b24: T2251_.64.0420b25: T2251_.64.0420b26: T2251_.64.0420b27: T2251_.64.0420b28: T2251_.64.0420b29: T2251_.64.0420c01: T2251_.64.0420c02: T2251_.64.0420c03: T2251_.64.0420c04: T2251_.64.0420c05: T2251_.64.0420c06: T2251_.64.0420c07: T2251_.64.0420c08: T2251_.64.0420c09: T2251_.64.0420c10: T2251_.64.0420c11: T2251_.64.0420c12: T2251_.64.0420c13: T2251_.64.0420c14: T2251_.64.0420c15: T2251_.64.0420c16: T2251_.64.0420c17: T2251_.64.0420c18: T2251_.64.0420c19: T2251_.64.0420c20: T2251_.64.0420c21: T2251_.64.0420c22: T2251_.64.0420c23: T2251_.64.0420c24: T2251_.64.0420c25: T2251_.64.0420c26: T2251_.64.0420c27: T2251_.64.0420c28: T2251_.64.0420c29: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:有/無] [CITE] |