大正蔵検索 INBUDS
|
阿毘達磨倶舍論法義 (No. 2251_ 快道撰 ) in Vol. 00 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:有/無] [CITE]
T2251_.64.0319a01: 藍頞部曇閉尸鍵南第四定等者等二卵一。婆
T2251_.64.0319a04: レ開。唯有二息地麁心現前一。雖レ有二三事一。而缺二一 T2251_.64.0319a05: 事一。故息不レ轉。謂要下雖二婆沙息所依身。及 T2251_.64.0319a06: 風道通。毛孔開。入出息地麁心現前四縁一。今 T2251_.64.0319a07: 合爲二三縁一。謂身中息所依身。合二風道毛孔 T2251_.64.0319a08: 開一云二孔隙一。毛孔開必風道通故。第三縁易 T2251_.64.0319a09: レ知。然寶疏云二二縁一未レ及。頌疏分二孔隙一爲 T2251_.64.0319a10: レ二。謂孔風道通。隙毛孔。開是過當。豈可レ分二 T2251_.64.0319a11: 孔隙一。同是空隙義故。故舊論但言二已有空」
T2251_.64.0319a16: 家一。彼初説云。欲レ入二第四定一。息風後出不二復 T2251_.64.0319a17: 更入一。名二已入定。將レ出レ定時。息風先入。息風 T2251_.64.0319a18: 入已。名二已出定一。言第四定本無レ息。故將レ入 T2251_.64.0319a19: レ彼。息最後出已。若又將レ出二彼定一息他來。故 T2251_.64.0319a20: 息先入也
T2251_.64.0319a23: 矣。雖二離レ身出外。而是有情之息風。故云二有
T2251_.64.0319b02: 理云。身増長位息便損減。身損減時息増長 T2251_.64.0319b03: 故。今擧二一邊一。二簡二異熟生一。初總簡。二所由。 T2251_.64.0319b04: 三簡二餘異熟色一。彼不二斷已更相續一故。不レ云二 T2251_.64.0319b05: 刹那實一者。理在二絶言一。相續故非二刹那一。斷已 T2251_.64.0319b06: 後續。是無常法非二無爲實法一故
T2251_.64.0319b09: 非二下地心能縁一。亦非二威儀及反化等心能縁一 T2251_.64.0319b10: 寛政十午天七月於二京兆因幡藥師西之 T2251_.64.0319b11: 坊一此卷五席講訖 快道 T2251_.64.0319b12: 阿毘達磨倶舍論卷二十二終 T2251_.64.0319b13: T2251_.64.0319b14: T2251_.64.0319b15: T2251_.64.0319b16: T2251_.64.0319b17: 豐山上陽沙門快道林常記 T2251_.64.0319b18: 賢聖品第六之二
T2251_.64.0319b21: 形誤。光師科二第三一非也。七加行中。上來明二 T2251_.64.0319b22: 一五停心一畢。自下第二念住。何爲二第三一。又 T2251_.64.0319b23: 不レ順二結前生後論一也
T2251_.64.0319b29: 疏所引文是也。後説光記所引説是也。彼後 T2251_.64.0319c01: 説全同二今文共相一。光爲レ正也。前説身相同大 T2251_.64.0319c02: 種所造。同共相。全異二今論一。然寶疏廣擧レ之。 T2251_.64.0319c03: 是何謂乎其自相竝皆不レ異也
T2251_.64.0319c06: 法。何三餘唯名レ法。答。總即別名如二法處法
T2251_.64.0319c10: 是心念住。受蘊所レ不レ攝無色ト法處トヲ名二法 T2251_.64.0319c11: 念住一
T2251_.64.0319c15: 刹那一。分析所縁一。二善根増。謂依二下生一中。依
T2251_.64.0319c18: 傳説云二彼説一。光無表兩釋。第二爲レ正。順二婆 T2251_.64.0319c19: 沙。雜心。正理一故。無爲兩釋。初釋爲レ正。亦順 T2251_.64.0319c20: レ彼故
T2251_.64.0319c29: 同。小乘唯慧爲二自性一。今大乘者。兼取二法一。
T2251_.64.0320a02: 是自性念住一。依レ之基師示二隣近例一。依二小乘一。 T2251_.64.0320a03: 言二唯慧爲體。以下依二大乘一非中隣近上故。然有
T2251_.64.0320a15: 惱一非レ餘。何故自性不レ能。若離二助伴一。惟慧不 T2251_.64.0320a16: レ能レ斷二煩惱一故。何故所縁不レ能。彼作意普散 T2251_.64.0320a17: 故。唯總略所縁作意。能斷二煩惱一故。何故相雜 T2251_.64.0320a18: 能斷。具二二縁一故謂攝受助伴故。及總略所
T2251_.64.0320a23: 二慧倶一故。由レ此智惠非二相雜攝一。不レ應四唯説三 T2251_.64.0320a24: 相雜念住能斷二煩惱一。理應四具言三自性相雜能
T2251_.64.0320a27: 得二止觀平等運道一。能斷二煩惱一。其理決定。所 T2251_.64.0320a28: 餘一切心心所等有二止品攝一。有二觀品收一。此平 T2251_.64.0320a29: 等時。彼亦平等。由レ是一切相雜理齊。顯二斷 T2251_.64.0320b01: 惑時相雜理齊一。故亦於レ慧立二相雜名一。多於二 T2251_.64.0320b02: 所成一。有二勝能一故。自性念住非レ不三亦能斷二諸 T2251_.64.0320b03: 煩惱一。體是惠故。然名二自性一。謂レ無二所待一。斷二煩 T2251_.64.0320b04: 惱一時。必待二餘法一故。斷二煩惱一位慧立二相雜 T2251_.64.0320b05: 名一。由レ是所言相。雜念住能斷二煩惱一。理善成
T2251_.64.0320b08: 性一。此觀主故。相應助伴名爲二相雜一。與レ慧雜 T2251_.64.0320b09: 住故。非下慧與觸等互相雜故。亦攝レ慧總名中
T2251_.64.0320b12: 故。能縁二境界念處一故。此文唯名二相應一。豈可 T2251_.64.0320b13: レ攝二所相應一。亦復自性唯爲二所與一。其能與獨
T2251_.64.0320b16: 有二混亂失一。慧是亦相雜。亦自性故。豈可レ有二
T2251_.64.0320b20: 云二相應一。云二助伴一。豈可レ攝レ惠。今論亦頌唯云二 T2251_.64.0320b21: 餘相雜一。長行云二惠所餘倶有一。其文義不レ異 T2251_.64.0320b22: 説二所縁一。云下以二惠所縁諸法一爲體。豈惠及所 T2251_.64.0320b23: 縁。若言二惠及所餘一者不レ爾。以レ違レ頌故。又
T2251_.64.0320b27: 應二道理一。答。彼就二中三位一論レ之。非下離二自性 T2251_.64.0320b28: 所縁一獨相雜斷惑。謂於二同時心心所等相雜 T2251_.64.0320b29: 位一。方斷惑功顯。離二彼相雜助伴一。必不レ能故。 T2251_.64.0320c01: 云二唯相雜念住斷惑。如レ是約レ位不レ依レ體。亦 T2251_.64.0320c02: 無レ有レ害。雖二衆賢決斷一。予不レ信。破二法建立一 T2251_.64.0320c03: 故。違二處處文一故。招二雜亂失一故
T2251_.64.0320c10: 畏苦惱一。得二正法一謂四念處。云何爲レ四。觀レ身 T2251_.64.0320c11: 如二身念處一。觀レ覺如二覺念處一。觀レ心如二心念處一。 T2251_.64.0320c12: 觀レ法如二法念處一。廣別説四種一。此中循遍。順 T2251_.64.0320c13: 觀不レ殘。舊論曰。於レ身觀二別通身相一。名二身念 T2251_.64.0320c14: 處一。何法名レ觀智惠。雜心云。如レ説二順身身觀一。 T2251_.64.0320c15: 觀者是慧。今亦但證二觀言一。次自惠鮮本及正 T2251_.64.0320c16: 理作二目惠一爲レ正
T2251_.64.0320c28: 而不二失壞一故。第三説由二念力一故。此瑜伽師 T2251_.64.0320c29: 審記二所縁一。於二所縁境一忘已還憶。故名二念住一
T2251_.64.0321a03: 増故。説名爲レ念。如下四念住惠爲二自性一。然彼 T2251_.64.0321a04: 聚中念力増故。説名爲念。今此中持レ境言 T2251_.64.0321a05: レ持。境界爲レ義。轉者起義。即當住義。對二下文一 T2251_.64.0321a06: 知。斧比レ惠。木喩レ境。楔。舊論音釋先結切 T2251_.64.0321a07: 也。類二念力一。此師從二因念一。立二果惠名一。而住名 T2251_.64.0321a08: レ惠。是從レ因一分隣近釋
T2251_.64.0321a11: 初立義。後所由。此義惠爲二能令一。爲レ因。念爲二 T2251_.64.0321a12: 所令一。爲レ果。念住二字。竝名レ念。是從レ果。全分 T2251_.64.0321a13: 隣近釋。與二前義一有二二別一。因果與二分全一異故。
T2251_.64.0321a27: 隨二身集一觀住。隨二身滅一觀住。隨二身集滅一觀住。 T2251_.64.0321a28: 則無所二依住一。於二諸世間一永無二所取一。如レ是 T2251_.64.0321a29: 觸。名色。憶念。集滅如レ次。受心法集滅廣説」
T2251_.64.0321b06: 正知。如二内身一如レ是。外身内外身。内受。外受。 T2251_.64.0321b07: 内外受。内心。外心。内外心。内法。外法。内外
T2251_.64.0321b10: 縁一。爲二十二種一。故云二食等一。亦是約二所縁一。婆沙
T2251_.64.0321b15: 可レ爾。云レ法非也。普光謂三四念住皆悉約二相
T2251_.64.0321b19: 念住靜慮等一。二顯示如二正斷神足等一。三現觀 T2251_.64.0321b20: 如二四聖諦等一。今此依二生起次第一。此論二十二
T2251_.64.0321b26: 全非二相違一
T2251_.64.0321b29: 倒上。故説二身念住一。對治於レ苦樂想顛倒。於二無 T2251_.64.0321c01: 常一常想顛倒。於二無我一我想顛倒上。説二受心法 T2251_.64.0321c02: 念住一。第二説如レ次對治段ト觸ト識ト思トノ四 T2251_.64.0321c03: 食一。第三説對治色受想行四識住一。第四説對 T2251_.64.0321c04: 治色蘊受蘊識蘊想行蘊五蘊一。如レ次唯説レ四。 T2251_.64.0321c05: 第五説對治四種不修一。謂不修身。不修戒。不 T2251_.64.0321c06: 修心。不修惠。第六説與二四修同法一故説レ四。 T2251_.64.0321c07: 與二修身同法。修戒同法。修心同法。修慧同 T2251_.64.0321c08: 法一故
T2251_.64.0321c11: 由一。然舊論明二雜不雜一。終結曰二四種念處已一。
T2251_.64.0321c20: 蘊及無爲一。名二不雜縁一。若於二五蘊一。或二二縁。 T2251_.64.0321c21: 或三三縁。或四四縁。或五總縁。及無爲名爲二
T2251_.64.0321c24: 念住一。若雜縁法念住。則於二五蘊一。或二二縁。 T2251_.64.0321c25: 或三三縁。或四四縁。或五總縁。二二縁者。謂 T2251_.64.0321c26: 色受縁。色想縁。色行縁。色識縁。受想縁。受
T2251_.64.0321c29: 色想識縁。色行識縁。受想行縁。受想識縁。受
T2251_.64.0322a06: 六説中第四説對治五蘊一故。唯説中四念住上。 T2251_.64.0322a07: 故文中想行二蘊爲二不雜縁一。今對治四倒一 T2251_.64.0322a08: 故。約二身等四一。並不二相違一。然正理。顯宗。前唯 T2251_.64.0322a09: 擧二四倒四食兩説一。而至二雜不雜縁一。方約二五 T2251_.64.0322a10: 蘊一。彼此參差。惠暉云。四法一一別縁名二不雜 T2251_.64.0322a11: 縁一。二二合縁爲二三句一。三三合縁爲二二句一。四 T2251_.64.0322a12: 法合縁爲二一句一。雜縁也。此迷倒之甚。論云二 T2251_.64.0322a13: 唯縁レ法不雜一。何可二四法別縁一。若如レ汝者。於二 T2251_.64.0322a14: 身等四一各有二雜不雜一。違二諸論旨一。亦雜縁句 T2251_.64.0322a15: 數大誤也
T2251_.64.0322a19: 行一。光寶同下文科三第五明二修果久近一者非 T2251_.64.0322a20: 也。至レ下應レ知也
T2251_.64.0322a23: 持息念等一。次説二念住一。次説二三義觀一。次説二七 T2251_.64.0322a24: 處善一。次説二煖頂忍等一。今論何不レ説。答。今論 T2251_.64.0322a25: 説二諸法要一。未レ欲レ盡二婆沙秋毫一。故略レ之。光 T2251_.64.0322a26: 二釋。初釋同レ寶可也。後釋非也。此論何不
T2251_.64.0322b05: 集因縁生滅盡妙離道正迹乘。又法界次第。 T2251_.64.0322b06: 及弘決三云。無常苦空無我集因縁生盡滅 T2251_.64.0322b07: 妙離道正迹乘。具如二下辨一
T2251_.64.0322b13: レ煖。上者名レ頂。諸不可動無留難無斷無慮不 T2251_.64.0322b14: 可退中。下者名レ忍。上者名二世第一一。此兩義
T2251_.64.0322b17: 不二久住一。若無二諸難一。更主二餘山一。若有二諸難一還 T2251_.64.0322b18: 退下上。如レ是至二頂位中一必不二久住一。若無二諸難一。 T2251_.64.0322b19: 進至二忍位一。若有二諸難一。還退住レ煖
T2251_.64.0322b27: 唯持二欲界一。二簡二餘三諦一。唯持二苦諦一。三簡二苦 T2251_.64.0322b28: 下隨レ應餘三行一。唯持二一行一。準レ之煖頂及下 T2251_.64.0322b29: 中二忍。頌中無二唯簡別一。故具觀二三界四諦及
T2251_.64.0322c03: ○減縁減行法義豐山寓居上毛沙門快道記
T2251_.64.0322c06: 但有二二念作意一思惟欲界苦聖諦境一齊レ此 T2251_.64.0322c07: 以前名二中忍位一。從レ此無間起二勝善根一。一行
T2251_.64.0322c10: 諦一。從レ後向レ前。上忍之文雖レ不レ關レ此 爲二對 T2251_.64.0322c11: 了一擧。下皆傚レ之。此有二二門一。初叙二正義一。後 T2251_.64.0322c12: 評二古義一 T2251_.64.0322c13: 初叙二正義一者。有二五門一。一總明二行縁減一。二別 T2251_.64.0322c14: 述二漸略由一。三辨二一行二念一。四叙二留行差別一。 T2251_.64.0322c15: 五通二諸妨難一。初總明二行縁減一者。行謂行相。 T2251_.64.0322c16: 即能縁行。其數有二三十二一。謂觀二苦聖諦一。有二 T2251_.64.0322c17: 四行相一。一非常。二苦。三空。四非我。觀二集聖 T2251_.64.0322c18: 諦一有二四行相一。一因。二集。三生。四縁。觀二滅聖 T2251_.64.0322c19: 諦一。有二四行相一。一滅。二靜。三妙。四離觀二道聖 T2251_.64.0322c20: 諦一有二四行相一。一道。二如。三行。四出。上下二 T2251_.64.0322c21: 界各有二如レ是十六一。故成二三十二一。縁者。所縁。 T2251_.64.0322c22: 其數有レ八。謂欲界苦集滅道四諦。上界亦爾。 T2251_.64.0322c23: 故成二八諦一。此諦爲レ境。作二苦等行解一。故論曰二 T2251_.64.0322c24: 行相所縁一。減相云何。謂觀二欲苦諦一。修二四行 T2251_.64.0322c25: 相一。次觀二上界苦一。修二四行相一。如レ是欲集。上集。 T2251_.64.0322c26: 欲滅。上滅。欲道亦復爾。後觀二上道諦一修二三 T2251_.64.0322c27: 行一。不レ修二出一行一。是爲二減行初一。故正理論
T2251_.64.0323a01: 周一。第二周復觀二欲苦一。乃至觀二上道一修二二行一。 T2251_.64.0323a02: 復不レ修二行一行一。是爲二第二減行一。第三周復 T2251_.64.0323a03: 始二於欲苦一。終至二上道一。修二一行一。復不レ修二如一 T2251_.64.0323a04: 行一。是爲二第三減行一。第四周復始二於欲苦一。終 T2251_.64.0323a05: 修二欲界道四行一。全不レ觀二上道一。稱曰二減縁一。此 T2251_.64.0323a06: 時雖三亦減二道一行一。就レ全言二減縁一不レ言二減 T2251_.64.0323a07: 行一。此據二立名一。若據二義旨一。第四周中有二減縁 T2251_.64.0323a08: 減行二一。所能縁別故。如二上道諦一。如レ是從レ後 T2251_.64.0323a09: 向レ前。次第減二餘七諦一亦爾。但於二欲苦一不 T2251_.64.0323a10: レ減二一縁及一非常行相一。是所レ留一行。有レ行 T2251_.64.0323a11: 必有レ縁。是故總三十一周減行減縁。於レ中二 T2251_.64.0323a12: 十四周減レ行。七周減レ縁。是總明畢。二別述二 T2251_.64.0323a13: 漸略由一者。如二上忍世第一一者。時極短故。不 T2251_.64.0323a14: レ能二漸略一。如二下忍一者。雖二時長一而進續中忍 T2251_.64.0323a15: 具修二十六行一。故不レ得二漸略一。唯此中忍ノミ前 T2251_.64.0323a16: 下忍ヨリ來レハ具修二十六行一。進二後上忍一行一。故 T2251_.64.0323a17: 漸略唯留二一行一。若不レ爾者。以レ不レ能レ連接後 T2251_.64.0323a18: 位一故。故論曰。但思惟欲苦一。名二中忍位一。從レ此 T2251_.64.0323a19: 無間起二勝善根一。一行一刹那名二上忍一。婆沙
T2251_.64.0323a22: 重一。復易二大價寶珠一。持レ此隨レ意。往行者亦爾。 T2251_.64.0323a23: 先廣觀二上下諸諦一。後漸略之一。乃至唯以二一 T2251_.64.0323a24: 刹那心一。觀二欲界苦一。次生二世第一一。次生二苦忍一。 T2251_.64.0323a25: 三辨二一行二念一者。謂一行者。欲界苦下四行 T2251_.64.0323a26: 隨一。何故一行者。後上忍唯一行故。是定一 T2251_.64.0323a27: 行。不レ爾者。不レ能二續接一。故論曰三但有二二念作
T2251_.64.0323b06: 一行一。如二無間解脱二心一。而是審慮決定二心。
T2251_.64.0323b09: 界苦一。一刹那觀察。如二苦法智忍一此名二上忍一。 T2251_.64.0323b10: 此既對三上忍譬二苦忍一。而譬二苦忍智一。明知以二 T2251_.64.0323b11: 審慮決定二心一觀二一行一。正理。顯宗。舊婆沙 T2251_.64.0323b12: 三論。但苦忍智喩二中忍二心一。略無三上忍喩二
T2251_.64.0323b15: 我行相一。入二正性離生一。著二我所見一者。依二空 T2251_.64.0323b16: 行相一。入二正性離生一。諸愛行者。亦有二二種一。 T2251_.64.0323b17: 我慢増者。依二非常行相一。入二正性離生一。懈怠 T2251_.64.0323b18: 増者。依二苦行相一。入二正性離生一。此文雖二世第 T2251_.64.0323b19: 一位一。從二中忍留行一。不レ動二其行一。進二上忍一。復 T2251_.64.0323b20: 進二世第一一。入二苦忍一。故得レ成レ證。故婆沙五
T2251_.64.0323b23: 以留二此行一。擬二後進修一。五通二諸妨難一者。問。若
T2251_.64.0323b26: レ減二縁諦一。猶縁レ諦故。亦能修二所減行一。若至二減 T2251_.64.0323b27: 縁一。不レ能レ修レ行。以二有レ諦必有レ行。無レ諦必無 T2251_.64.0323b28: 行故。約二得修一言二十六一。問。若約二得修一。一切
T2251_.64.0323c02: 十六。或時十二。或時八。或時四。所以者何。 T2251_.64.0323c03: 如如漸次略二所縁諦一。如是如是略修行相一。由 T2251_.64.0323c04: レ此漸能近二於見道一。答。此論約二具足一略レ餘。婆 T2251_.64.0323c05: 沙盡二一切一。謂四諦具足人是十六。若減レ道者 T2251_.64.0323c06: 十二。減レ縁必無二其行一。故決定十二。若減二滅 T2251_.64.0323c07: 道一即八。唯修二苦集一故。若減二三諦一唯四。問。 T2251_.64.0323c08: 中忍滿不レ如二上忍一念一。何作二二念一耶。答。智 T2251_.64.0323c09: 劣二於上忍一故。漸略觀故。問。修二一行一。是應二一
T2251_.64.0323c12: 如レ是三十二心是名二下忍一。如レ是前後諸品。 T2251_.64.0323c13: 皆是以二一念心一修二一行一。何故今中忍獨作二
T2251_.64.0323c18: 觀二一行一。前後念相續審察。及決定。故論釋二 T2251_.64.0323c19: 上忍一。言下此善根起不二相續一故上。而影顯前忍 T2251_.64.0323c20: 念是相續一。後評二古義一者。分爲二三門一。一辨二行 T2251_.64.0323c21: 縁減迷一。二斥二二行相執一。三彈二二刹那謬解一。 T2251_.64.0323c22: 初辨二行縁減迷一者。西方徳光論師有二兩解一。 T2251_.64.0323c23: 初解就下著我者依二非常行相一等四人上。四行相 T2251_.64.0323c24: 一二三四之次位。諦諦擬議。相當從レ後向レ前 T2251_.64.0323c25: 減レ之。後解約二見行愛行不同一。次第不定。而
T2251_.64.0323c28: レ不レ亂二初觀苦位次一者。是不レ可レ然。於レ苦有 T2251_.64.0323c29: レ留。餘亦豈留。若言二行人樂欲一。苦中可レ然。誰 T2251_.64.0324a01: 知二餘亦是樂欲而相當一。又無二文彼説一。故知是
T2251_.64.0324a05: 舍亦曰二一一聖諦行相所縁漸減漸略一。準二正 T2251_.64.0324a06: 理論一。此漸略亦是次第義。若不レ爾所縁諦。豈
T2251_.64.0324a11: 繋屬一耶。如二我見増者一爲レ治レ我故。起二非我 T2251_.64.0324a12: 行一者。何別理於二滅等下一。偏起二離等行一。先觀二 T2251_.64.0324a13: 滅等諦一耶。今爲二一釋一。從二聞思一觀二四諦一時。 T2251_.64.0324a14: 於二一一諦一皆具二四行一。如二名次第一。於二上道諦 T2251_.64.0324a15: 等一。後起者先減。先起者後減。我見増者。偏 T2251_.64.0324a16: 起二非我一。自餘三行隨レ次而減。中上忍。及第 T2251_.64.0324a17: 一法。同此一行。即以二此行一入二於見道一。於レ理
T2251_.64.0324a20: 同減。從レ縁爲レ名。但名二減縁一。此名同者不レ爾。 T2251_.64.0324a21: 集諦下因行減時。便減レ縁。豈是同レ名。苦諦
T2251_.64.0324a29: 三十二心名二下忍一。於二三十二行中一。略一已後 T2251_.64.0324b01: 乃至於二彼欲苦下一。唯觀二二行一。名二中忍一。此中 T2251_.64.0324b02: 忍中。極多有二其三十一心一。極少二心。欲界苦 T2251_.64.0324b03: 下唯縁二一行一。是名二上忍一。故毘婆沙云。復以二 T2251_.64.0324b04: 一心一。觀二欲界苦一。名二上忍一。此師迷三舊婆沙三 T2251_.64.0324b05: 十二行。各一心即三十二心名二下忍一。以謂二一 T2251_.64.0324b06: 行必是一念一。而判二三忍別一。上忍一念故一行。 T2251_.64.0324b07: 中忍二念故二行。下忍三十二心故是三十 T2251_.64.0324b08: 二行。以謂二善釋一。此違二理教一。謂若留二二行一。應
T2251_.64.0324b11: レ孰進二上位一。又留二一行一。是據二四種人別一。存二二 T2251_.64.0324b12: 行一者。有二何故一。又無二文有之。是違理過也。前 T2251_.64.0324b13: 所レ列諸文。皆唯説爲二一行一。又汝下上二忍 T2251_.64.0324b14: 竝證二婆沙一。而不レ證二中忍一。彼説二但作二心觀 T2251_.64.0324b15: 於一行一。異文故。唯自臆度以可レ觀已。是爲二
T2251_.64.0324b18: 界苦一名爲二中忍滿一。唯有二一行一刹那心一。觀二
T2251_.64.0324b22: 行相。與レ縁同減。故但言レ三。三八二十四名二 T2251_.64.0324b23: 二十四周減行一。理實言レ之。三十一周減レ行。 T2251_.64.0324b24: 謂餘七行減縁攝故。是故但言二二十四一也。既 T2251_.64.0324b25: 云二欲苦下行一留一。又云二三十一周減行。與二 T2251_.64.0324b26: 諸論一不レ爲レ異。然云下減二欲苦下二行一時但有中 T2251_.64.0324b27: 二行上。明知寫誤。應レ言下減二三行一時但有中一行上。 T2251_.64.0324b28: 若不レ爾者。但三十周減行。不レ得レ言二三十一 T2251_.64.0324b29: 周一。復何不レ辨二諸文一行之説一。何不レ破二光解 T2251_.64.0324c01: 釋一。應レ如二對法藏釋名一。既無二此事一。非二寫誤一 T2251_.64.0324c02: 何。設又實爲二二行一。釋總別自參差。背レ文違
T2251_.64.0324c07: 減滿一。即有二二行一。倶舍頌疏云三但有二二行二 T2251_.64.0324c08: 刹那心一。或文誤。次云二但作二心觀於一行一 T2251_.64.0324c09: 故。此正極辨是何謂。正觀設二行ナルモ減滿何 T2251_.64.0324c10: 二行。諸論減滿説二一行一故。續接増上忍一故。 T2251_.64.0324c11: 亦復無三文説二二行一。何穿空至レ此如レ是甚哉。 T2251_.64.0324c12: 彼頌疏非レ證。如二前辨一。後釋文誤者似レ是。而 T2251_.64.0324c13: 證二觀於一行文一。應下改二二行一作中一行上。若爾籤 T2251_.64.0324c14: 文中。上二品差別不レ成。今云。彼文誤二二心一 T2251_.64.0324c15: 作二二行一。應レ言二二心一縁中忍。一心一縁上
T2251_.64.0324c18: 一行一刹那心一名二上忍一。若二行何云二三十一 T2251_.64.0324c19: 周減行。若二行作二一行一。當文差別不レ成。況 T2251_.64.0324c20: 玄文倶舍等。但一行何可レ云二二行一。寫誤理
T2251_.64.0324c24: 修觀位一説。又拆玄云三中忍滿猶有二二行一。東 T2251_.64.0324c25: 大寺秀慧二十有餘年於二此事一窮レ思。而立二 T2251_.64.0324c26: 一義一云。留二苦四行一。四人中唯留二非常一者。二 T2251_.64.0324c27: 行二刹那。餘三行人竝皆一行一刹那。謂留二非
T2251_.64.0325a02: 故云二二行二刹那一。如レ是妄説滿レ岐溢レ苑。不 T2251_.64.0325a03: レ能二具出一。但曉二正義一。其邪曲不レ追而自去焉。
T2251_.64.0325a06: 猶有二上忍。世第一之二念心一。觀二欲界苦一故。 T2251_.64.0325a07: 云二二刹那一。有説。二行二刹那亦無レ妨。習修 T2251_.64.0325a08: 與二得修一故。初一刹那觀二苦一行一。除レ空爲二習 T2251_.64.0325a09: 修一。亦所減行全可レ起故。爲二治定一更一刹那 T2251_.64.0325a10: 觀二苦一行一。是爲二得修一。更有二兩説一。今云。初説 T2251_.64.0325a11: 上忍。世第一爲二二刹那一者。若爾中忍當念心 T2251_.64.0325a12: 豈可レ無。若約レ有二後後心一。猶有二多心一。見修無 T2251_.64.0325a13: 學心非一故。後習修得修義亦非。中忍滿二
T2251_.64.0325a16: 一周已實唯有二一行一刹那一。然諸論云二二刹一 T2251_.64.0325a17: 者。此位猶有二後上忍一念一。約二忍同一論云下有二 T2251_.64.0325a18: 二念作意一思惟欲苦上。正理論二念心喩二見苦 T2251_.64.0325a19: 法忍苦法智一。亦是後上忍加喩也。此義甚非 T2251_.64.0325a20: 也。辨二中上差別一中。豈可レ有二此雜亂説一。論既 T2251_.64.0325a21: 以二二心一念一爲二差別一。釋二上忍唯一念所以一。 T2251_.64.0325a22: 云二不相續故一。顯二前二念故前後相續一。何可
T2251_.64.0325a25: 喩二苦法智忍一一。若加レ後何有二二喩一喩異一。 T2251_.64.0325a26: 又存二後上忍一念一。何不下彼上忍亦加雜世第 T2251_.64.0325a27: 一一念一。説中二念上。若言二忍同故餘不爾。以二同 T2251_.64.0325a28: 有漏同行相同縁一故。餘亦容二合説一。又正理論
T2251_.64.0325b02: 若非二自二心一。何可レ得レ言レ由又。舊婆沙曰二但 T2251_.64.0325b03: 作二心一。作言豈非二現起二心一。又倶舍論曰。 T2251_.64.0325b04: 從二此位一無間起二勝善根一。一行一刹那名二上 T2251_.64.0325b05: 品忍一。從是第五因聲。二念前心即能生。豈可二 T2251_.64.0325b06: 能所混亂一。又彼論明二生起一中。所生心合二能 T2251_.64.0325b07: 生一。説二二心一無二其文一。當下去二穿空之邪執一。歸中 T2251_.64.0325b08: 正旨上。又秀慧妄解如レ前應レ知。所餘邪解。竝 T2251_.64.0325b09: 準レ前除去 T2251_.64.0325b10: 旹天明八龍集戊申紀號秋八月初六日臨二 T2251_.64.0325b11: 倶舍論四善根之文一。法師慈教幸請レ指示減 T2251_.64.0325b12: 縁減行之事一也。雖三聊患二見レ論之進向一。法師 T2251_.64.0325b13: 時時徴問。故應レ請記。以授焉。不レ顧二舊人口 T2251_.64.0325b14: 涎一。偏據レ教依レ理論二其義一。所以命曰二法義一 T2251_.64.0325b15: 矣。釋氏快道記二於大和國豐山以成學舍一
T2251_.64.0325b18: 七囀依主。第與レ一及法竝持業釋。勿レ謂二同體
T2251_.64.0325b25: 一有漏一。生二見道無漏苦忍一。故曰二離同類因一」
T2251_.64.0325c01: 初三諦中有レ二。初約二念住一。後約二行相一。餘皆 T2251_.64.0325c02: 例レ之知。三諦所縁境。法念及行相。竝所修
T2251_.64.0325c06: 現在者。習故。得故。受用故。在レ身故。現前故。 T2251_.64.0325c07: 正作二所作事一故。故名レ修。未來者唯得故。引 T2251_.64.0325c08: 發故。起得故。成就故。如二遥與欲一故。故名レ修。
T2251_.64.0325c11: 因義一故。過去道名レ得非レ修。今於二現在法一。成 T2251_.64.0325c12: 就未來四一。云未來四一。而有二引發義一。故名レ修。 T2251_.64.0325c13: 此中滅諦現與レ未竝唯法念。故別説。以三滅是 T2251_.64.0325c14: 無爲法念中。亦有二無爲一。是故現未倶唯法念。 T2251_.64.0325c15: 縁二三諦一法念廣通二有爲無爲一。故有二現未別一。 T2251_.64.0325c16: 又初總雜法念。後不雜縁法念。同分者。舊論
T2251_.64.0325c23: 六トナル與二彼煖一別。彼未來四念與二一念一別。 T2251_.64.0325c24: 此竝皆四念十六故。何故爾者。以下於二煖位一 T2251_.64.0325c25: 已習上許二未來傍修一。現修初起故不レ許レ之。由二 T2251_.64.0325c26: 此理一以合説。又増位別説。雖二未來ノ邊ハ三ト T2251_.64.0325c27: 滅ト不異。現修邊有レ異。謂於二三諦一修二四念 T2251_.64.0325c28: 隨一一。於レ滅唯法念。何故爾者。以二増位一故。隨 T2251_.64.0325c29: 一起。而滅唯自諦法念。不レ通二有爲一故
T2251_.64.0326a09: 句觀相是也。體謂體性。第十二句出體是也。 T2251_.64.0326a10: 故今本爲レ勝。寶疏。頌疏作二體相一非也
T2251_.64.0326a13: 論意一。光記云三初句標二總名一。意爲二八門一。此有二 T2251_.64.0326a14: 三失一。一違二論文一。長行云三此四名二順決擇分一。 T2251_.64.0326a15: 豈是標名。讀レ文誤也。二前後鉾楯失。謂前卷
T2251_.64.0326a19: 體一。順決擇分四字合レ名。釋名照然。前文唯 T2251_.64.0326a20: 云二息念一。即似二標名一。然疎文爲二釋名一。親文還 T2251_.64.0326a21: 爲二標名一。是豈非二親疎不辨一乎
T2251_.64.0326a24: 名一。二此四下釋二能順名一。三故此下總合釋。初 T2251_.64.0326a25: 中亦三。初釋二決擇一。二釋レ分。三合釋。初中亦 T2251_.64.0326a26: 三。初叙二字義一。次示レ體。後述二得名所由一。諸聖 T2251_.64.0326a27: 道以レ慧爲レ性。有二斷疑能一曰二之決一。亦有二分別 T2251_.64.0326a28: 功一。曰二之擇一。故標二決斷簡擇一。釋二斷疑分別一。是 T2251_.64.0326a29: 一體兩用持業得レ名 諸聖道者。唯呼二見道一。 T2251_.64.0326b01: 苦等四故曰レ諸。總見道名二決擇一。分是一分。
T2251_.64.0326b06: 別四諦一。不レ云二諸善法一。豈非レ簡二修道無學道一。 T2251_.64.0326b07: 亦云二唯是見道一分一。是言指レ分。即見道之一 T2251_.64.0326b08: 分。若不レ爾者。何不レ言二一分見道一。二違二舊論一。
T2251_.64.0326b11: 故一切聖道名二決擇一。分者於二見道中一。隨約二 T2251_.64.0326b12: 一道一。故名爲レ分。如レ是新舊二論一轍。誰可 T2251_.64.0326b13: レ懷レ疑。問。言二見道中一分一者。何爲二一分一。謂 T2251_.64.0326b14: 苦諦。爲レ入二苦忍一之前加行故。故婆沙五
T2251_.64.0326b19: 道一。若爾言二分即見道一。雖レ略二一分言一。意顯二見 T2251_.64.0326b20: 道之分一。不レ爾不レ順二前四諦釋一。故應レ知顯二同 T2251_.64.0326b21: 體依一。唯云二分是見道一。設又彼約二三道中見 T2251_.64.0326b22: 道一。此定是見道中一分道。新舊兩論同顯二其 T2251_.64.0326b23: 旨一故。凡如レ是釋。非三必局二一義一。據レ義有二多 T2251_.64.0326b24: 門一。彼此異竝不二相違一。如二菩薩釋名非一一。決
T2251_.64.0326c03: 主釋。依二八囀一。有二四五兩聲一。從レ此生レ彼。是 T2251_.64.0326c04: 第五囀故。云三此引二決擇分一。又第四囀。故云 T2251_.64.0326c05: レ順益彼一。莫レ謂三第四囀無二依主一。又涼朝舊譯。
T2251_.64.0326c09: 分。故言二達分一。依レ之分若約二分段一。雖二漏無漏 T2251_.64.0326c10: 異一。同善法中一分。故名二達分一。若分因義。入二 T2251_.64.0326c11: 見道一之因故。又更有二異名一。須レ知レ之。婆沙
T2251_.64.0326c14: 治一。爲レ求二聖道一。修治身器一。除去穢惡一。引起 T2251_.64.0326c15: 聖道一故。亦名二善根一。聖道涅槃是眞實善。此 T2251_.64.0326c16: 四與レ彼爲二初基一。爲二安足處一。故名爲レ根。初諦 T2251_.64.0326c17: 之行。後善之根。竝別體依主。中修即治持業。 T2251_.64.0326c18: 唯煖等自名
T2251_.64.0326c23: 品一。下下。下中。頂有二三品一。下上。中下。中中。忍 T2251_.64.0326c24: 有二三品一。中上。上下。上中。世第一唯一品。謂
T2251_.64.0326c28: 中三品。忍有二二品一。上下。上中。世第一有二
T2251_.64.0327a02: 忍有二三品一。謂中上。上下。上中。世第一唯
T2251_.64.0327a07: 説竝皆煩雜難レ分二差別一。彼皆下爲レ首故。今 T2251_.64.0327a08: 上爲レ初。唯總依二三品一分レ之。便上中下下下
T2251_.64.0327a11: 可レ論二上之三品一。若言二世第一上上。忍上中 T2251_.64.0327a12: 故爲レ中爲上者。何以二上中一得二但單云中。彼 T2251_.64.0327a13: 上攝故。又若爾餘七品應レ爲二煖頂一。則彼中 T2251_.64.0327a14: 有二下三品。中三品。上下一。何唯可レ得レ爲レ下。 T2251_.64.0327a15: 故彼釋陋妄。今難云。以二可動可退因一。前二同 T2251_.64.0327a16: 爲レ下。若爾亦以二不可動不可退因一。後二同可
T2251_.64.0327a19: 得二忍爲中。依レ之世友説爲二盡理一。謂煖唯下 T2251_.64.0327a20: 品最初智力弱故。頂唯中品勝二於前一故。忍 T2251_.64.0327a21: 亘二中上一。下忍爲二中上一。觀行同レ頂。而勝レ前 T2251_.64.0327a22: 故。名爲二中上一。中忍爲二上下一。作二漸略一。唯觀二一 T2251_.64.0327a23: 行一。同二後世第一一。而二念故爲二上下一。上忍爲二 T2251_.64.0327a24: 上中一。同二後位一。一行一念故。而劣二世第一一。故 T2251_.64.0327a25: 爲二上中一。世第一爲二上上一。最頂故 T2251_.64.0327a26:
T2251_.64.0327a29: レ二。初正明二依地一。後兼明二餘門一。此即初也。遮二 T2251_.64.0327b01: T2251_.64.0327b02: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0327b03: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0327b04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0327b05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0327b06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0327b07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0327b08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0327b09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0327b10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0327b11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0327b12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0327b13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0327b14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0327b15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0327b16: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0327b17: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0327b18: 無色一有二二因一。初約二自善根一。此見道親近眷 T2251_.64.0327b19: 屬故。二約二他無能一。謂無色心不レ縁二欲見道一。 T2251_.64.0327b20: 故更叙二不縁所由一。一切人欲界見道先應レ修 T2251_.64.0327b21: 故。知斷且擧二苦集一。顯二滅道證修一。福言鮮本。 T2251_.64.0327b22: 明本。檗本。及正理。顯宗。光。寶。皆作レ遍爲 T2251_.64.0327b23: レ正
T2251_.64.0327b26: 總爲二前科依地門一甚非也。寶爲二餘門一。而有二 T2251_.64.0327b27: 二失一。一爲二大科一失。二唯爲二感果一門一失。婆
T2251_.64.0327c01: レ能。所以者何。厭背有一故。謂此善根厭背諸 T2251_.64.0327c02: 有一。於二衆同分一但能圓滿不レ能二牽引一。有説亦
T2251_.64.0327c08: 所由一
T2251_.64.0327c11: 不レ説二世第一一爲レ異耳。然論二男女爲因一。三論 T2251_.64.0327c12: 有レ異。此論全闕如不レ説。正理云二男女互因一。 T2251_.64.0327c13: 婆沙女非二男因一。此論略無レ文。意難レ知。寶定 T2251_.64.0327c14: 同二正理一。光同二若正理若婆沙一。由レ無二定判一。當 T2251_.64.0327c15: レ令レ同二盡理説一。和二婆沙。正理相違一。光有二四 T2251_.64.0327c16: 釋一。第一約二一道多道一。是全非二正理意一。如二寶 T2251_.64.0327c17: 疏辨一。第二釋約二能所依異一。爲二竝不相違一。是 T2251_.64.0327c18: 亦未レ辨下正理師改二婆沙義一之意上。雖レ似レ無 T2251_.64.0327c19: レ失。如二寶辨一。同レ未レ解也。第三義令二諸論一往 T2251_.64.0327c20: 未盡理一甚非也。第四釋約二現身轉不轉別一。是 T2251_.64.0327c21: 亦臆説。全無レ理。約二現轉一。爲二互爲因一者。有二 T2251_.64.0327c22: 何勝利一。不現轉亦爲レ問爾。二論倶何未レ辨二 T2251_.64.0327c23: 其所以一。寶疏有人三釋者。四釋誤也。寶疏
T2251_.64.0327c26: 女得二二依一。前三理應二互因一。正理不レ依二婆沙 T2251_.64.0327c27: 評家一。不二一處一矣
T2251_.64.0328a01: 論云二此生必定一。起二善根一生云レ此。然光記云二
T2251_.64.0328a04: 當二至レ彼知一。婆沙。正理論二定不定一不レ異レ此。 T2251_.64.0328a05: 示二其所由一各有レ異。謂此論唯一因。正理加二 T2251_.64.0328a06: 利根因一。婆沙約二能所引相反一。辨二此相違一。光 T2251_.64.0328a07: 寶有レ異。解二婆沙一。光約二樂道苦道一。寶約二止觀 T2251_.64.0328a08: 均不均一。湛惠法住竝破レ光依レ寶。今云。光寶
T2251_.64.0328a11: 觀平等故。道依二無色。未至。中間一生名二苦通 T2251_.64.0328a12: 行一。無色觀減シ止増ス。未至中間觀増止減故。 T2251_.64.0328a13: 然謂二各別一。而未レ得二正智一。妄判二是正一。豈非二矯 T2251_.64.0328a14: 者一。判二正理利根故因一。光師大彈斥。前二十
T2251_.64.0328a19: 遲速倶有レ之故。問。此論與二婆沙一同不。答。應 T2251_.64.0328a20: レ同。由二聖道一引二煖等一故。厭レ有猛利。由二煖等一 T2251_.64.0328a21: 引二聖道一故。以レ不二厭レ有猛利一
T2251_.64.0328a24: 辨二失捨別續成不成一。此初中有レ三。初標立。 T2251_.64.0328a25: 二例譬。三所由。例中意取二重得時律儀一。不 T2251_.64.0328a26: レ例二重得之得一。勿二誤讀文。所由有二二因一。可 T2251_.64.0328a27: レ知
T2251_.64.0328b01: 論説一。失捨不レ成二過失一。故得二別法續起一。遇了 T2251_.64.0328b02: 下辨二成不成別一。此人知二先時已得レ煖等位一 T2251_.64.0328b03: 云二了分位一。從本者。上標二已得煖等一。豈可二非 T2251_.64.0328b04: レ煖求餘。光第二釋非也。若有二等言一者不レ爾。
T2251_.64.0328b07: 若遇下明師隨二彼應レ起分齊一説上者。即能起レ頂。 T2251_.64.0328b08: 若不レ爾者。還從レ本起。然能速起非二如レ初修一。 T2251_.64.0328b09: 次頌有二光所引文一。全非二第二義證一也。寶疏 T2251_.64.0328b10: 爲二大科一。而爲二別門一甚非也。但非重得中總 T2251_.64.0328b11: 別爲レ異。故兩處説二若言一
T2251_.64.0328b14: 不過別一。然寶疏不レ依二正釋レ頌出體一。依二因便一 T2251_.64.0328b15: 科節。則此誤也
T2251_.64.0328b21: 處一。一處受二一生一。不三更受二第二生一。故光記頌 T2251_.64.0328b22: 云。作二有等一非也。不レ順二上例一故
T2251_.64.0328b27: 欲二初義爲勝故。評家義云二有餘師一。上來不
T2251_.64.0328c04: レ轉二部行獨覺種性一。準二婆沙正理等一。竝如二聲
T2251_.64.0328c07: 性煖一。如レ説レ煖。説頂亦爾。轉二聲聞忍一。起二獨 T2251_.64.0328c08: 覺忍一。非下轉二聲聞獨覺忍一。起中佛種性忍上。忍違二 T2251_.64.0328c09: 惡趣一等。如二今論一。彼中雖レ如二聲聞説一。而不 T2251_.64.0328c10: レ説三獨覺忍轉起二聲聞一。依レ之見レ之。今文似レ明二
T2251_.64.0328c13: レ爾。彼獨覺煖頂轉起上佛下聲聞一。今云二餘
T2251_.64.0328c19: 獨覺煖頂。唯轉二菩薩一。不レ轉二下聲聞一。轉向約二 T2251_.64.0328c20: 轉勝一故。若成二聲聞一。是則退墮非二轉向一。論主 T2251_.64.0328c21: 欲レ當レ理故。不レ叙二婆沙所説獨覺轉向一。偏擧 T2251_.64.0328c22: レ此印定。問。雖二理可爾有二教證一不。答。有謂。
T2251_.64.0328c25: 義無レ遮。若有人執句。如レ向二明月一。又正理
T2251_.64.0328c28: 麟角喩。二先聲聞。若先聲聞如二聲聞説一。麟角 T2251_.64.0328c29: 及佛倶不レ可レ轉。以二倶一座成菩提一故。彼已 T2251_.64.0329a01: 擧破。豈不二別師一。然正理云二先聲聞一。凡部行 T2251_.64.0329a02: 有二二説一。一聲聞前三果。轉成二部行一。二異生
T2251_.64.0329a05: 師義一云二先聲聞一。若爾正理意。三乘種性唯 T2251_.64.0329a06: 約二麟覺一。不レ依二部行一也。爾婆沙已云三部行如二 T2251_.64.0329a07: 聲聞説一。而云レ轉二獨覺種性煖一。又評家云二部 T2251_.64.0329a08: 行獨覺種性一。定有二部行別種性一。何局爲二先聲 T2251_.64.0329a09: 聞一。問。依二理教一今論文脱乎。答。爾。有餘上應 T2251_.64.0329a10: レ有二若有餘師説四字一。蓋梵本寫脱。又解餘言
T2251_.64.0329a13: 譯時略レ之乎。又今有餘言。指レ人非二用字一。如四
T2251_.64.0329a18: 正明一。是因レ明二轉根一來。故結文云二因便一。應下前
T2251_.64.0329a21: 善根觀等上。今文即第二明二順解脱分差別一爲二
T2251_.64.0329a24: 耶。又此中頌有二四門一。何可三唯爲二修果久近一。 T2251_.64.0329a25: 問。雖二頌文爾一。前問不レ爾。答。且約レ初。但致二
T2251_.64.0329a28: 曰。於二過去生一未レ修二解脱分能善根一。但於二今 T2251_.64.0329a29: 生一作二功力一生二決擇分一
T2251_.64.0329b03: 二次三字三惠門。三次二字業體門。四第四 T2251_.64.0329b04: 句起處門
T2251_.64.0329b07: 説如是句表レ非二自義一。別釋中。初標二三生一。二 T2251_.64.0329b08: 謂初下述釋。有二法譬合三一。順解脱分者。光
T2251_.64.0329b11: 依主。順即因持業。今準二論順決擇分釋名一。謂 T2251_.64.0329b12: 解脱是諸涅槃。分謂分段。乃涅槃有餘。無餘 T2251_.64.0329b13: 中一分有餘。解脱中分。第七同體依主。順順 T2251_.64.0329b14: 益彼解脱分一。故解脱分之順。別體依主。惠暉 T2251_.64.0329b15: 云。順之解脱。順解脱之因依主釋。此中順之 T2251_.64.0329b16: 解脱者。未レ知二主客自體作法一也。順解脱之 T2251_.64.0329b17: 因者。此何謂。順解脱即名二此加行一。又此之 T2251_.64.0329b18: 因ナラハ爲レ名レ何。全不レ知二釋名法一。此中正理論
T2251_.64.0329b21: 依二根本一者。於二前生一起二煖等一。次生入二決擇
T2251_.64.0329b26: 言二傳説如是一。是句末表下第二生起二順決擇是 T2251_.64.0329b27: 他説非中自義上。舊論云二諸師説一。故正理論不三 T2251_.64.0329b28: 標云二經主一。亦非二是毘婆沙義一。正理破故。故
T2251_.64.0329c02: 自義一。謂初生種順解脱分第二生成熟。第三 T2251_.64.0329c03: 生入二順決擇一。此生即入二聖道一。問。是唯他師 T2251_.64.0329c04: 義非二婆沙義一者何知。謂。有二二所由一。一凡經 T2251_.64.0329c05: 論有二其大例一。此論設二傳説言一有二多例一。或爲二 T2251_.64.0329c06: 句頭一。或爲二句末一。或表二婆沙義一。或他師義。若 T2251_.64.0329c07: 爲二句頭一中。約二他師一唯云二傳説如此一。如此是
T2251_.64.0329c22: 令二其成熟一。第三生中即能解脱。舊婆沙五
T2251_.64.0329c25: 第二生云二令其成熟一。是令二其解脱分成熟一 T2251_.64.0329c26: 故。第三生生二順決擇分一。即此生入レ聖。又婆 T2251_.64.0329c27: 沙前已依二根本一現身。何忽可レ違。故非二婆沙 T2251_.64.0329c28: 義一。是謬解二婆沙一者。然光記違二前文一。未レ知二二
T2251_.64.0330a03: 經二四生一。依二未至等一。豈是三生。有人爲二句末一。 T2251_.64.0330a04: 爲二毘婆沙傳説一。亦非也
T2251_.64.0330a09: 師説。惟無二佛法一。若遇二獨覺一。亦能種二此善根一。 T2251_.64.0330a10: 正理同二有餘師一。而光寶謂二別義一。各別標出非 T2251_.64.0330a11: 也
T2251_.64.0330a16: 修無學一爲レ勝。下論四向四果一二三四連説
T2251_.64.0330a19: 道一。光師如レ論。云レ明二現觀一正也
T2251_.64.0330a22: 釋。四例喩。此中標別者。唯云二苦忍一。加行忍 T2251_.64.0330a23: 縁レ苦。故標別彼一。更加二法智言一。法智所生能 T2251_.64.0330a24: 從是果。忍能生所從是因。即第五轉有財釋。 T2251_.64.0330a25: 因有二果名一故。若依二正理意一。苦法言所縁境。
T2251_.64.0330b01: 縁一。名二苦法忍一。謂於二苦法一無始時來。身見所 T2251_.64.0330b02: レ迷執二我我所一。今創見二彼唯苦法性一。忍可現 T2251_.64.0330b03: 前名二苦法忍一。此能引二後苦法智一生。是彼智
T2251_.64.0330b18: 忍是無漏故及前生故一。理亦不レ爾。未レ説二此
T2251_.64.0330b24: 煩惱生一。聖道是能證無漏智。性即正名二正性一。 T2251_.64.0330b25: 生之離名二離生一。證二正性一之離生。名二正性離 T2251_.64.0330b26: 生一。是皆總所入名。若根未熟名レ生。是加行有 T2251_.64.0330b27: 漏人。今至二見道位一。超越彼位一。故名二離生一。加二 T2251_.64.0330b28: 正性涅槃一。亦如レ前。若依三聖道爲二正性一者。生 T2251_.64.0330b29: 之離兩義如レ前。正性即離生持業釋。次釋二決 T2251_.64.0330c01: 定一有二兩釋一。決定此活字爲三決定何物一。趣向 T2251_.64.0330c02: 涅槃一決定。或觀了四諦相一決定。非レ謂二決字 T2251_.64.0330c03: 義是趣是了一。故舊論曰。此中定者。是一向不 T2251_.64.0330c04: レ異義。依二涅槃正性義一。用二此兩釋一。正性之決 T2251_.64.0330c05: 定。能所趣別故。境第七依主。爲レ得二正性涅 T2251_.64.0330c06: 槃一了二四諦一。是第四轉依主釋。若約二聖諦正 T2251_.64.0330c07: 性義一。正性即決定趣向故持業釋。正性所了。 T2251_.64.0330c08: 決定能了相。正性之決定依主釋。然光記決 T2251_.64.0330c09: 了諦相謂正性。即決定者非也 T2251_.64.0330c10:
T2251_.64.0330c13: レ得レ聖。後辨レ捨レ凡。於二得レ聖位一無二異義一。於 T2251_.64.0330c14: レ捨二凡夫性一。有二三義不同一。而光記不二別分節一
T2251_.64.0330c17: 義光記爲二各據一義一。於二婆沙・正理・顯宗一可 T2251_.64.0330c18: レ爾。於レ今不レ爾。如二下辨一。寶疏第一爲二正意一。 T2251_.64.0330c19: 後二爲二異説一。故似レ是而未二辨釋一。若第一釋 T2251_.64.0330c20: 不レ云二有餘一。故不レ釋二異説一耳。意應レ同二光各
T2251_.64.0330c23: 三義一。擧二初二義一。是能成具也。故於二第三義一 T2251_.64.0330c24: 唯成二共義一。不レ云二二ハ其ノ捨相一。論主取レ之知
T2251_.64.0330c27: 今按二論意一不レ爾。應レ作二是説一。此三説。初二各 T2251_.64.0330c28: 有二兼正一。不レ遮二兼捨一。第三無二兼正一。互相資。婆
T2251_.64.0331a02: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0331a03: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0331a04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0331a05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0331a06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0331a07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0331a08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0331a09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0331a10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0331a11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0331a12: [IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0331a19: 故。若以二初二一成二第三一。應レ如二婆沙一。又應三同 T2251_.64.0331a20: 言二有説一。又應二世第一苦忍次第一。順二無間解
T2251_.64.0331a23: 可レ思。然前文不レ成レ證。於二苦忍義一有二兼正一。 T2251_.64.0331a24: 正苦忍。兼世第一。其世第一一刹那已前故。 T2251_.64.0331a25: 但得二異生性非擇滅一。未レ至二正捨一。故爲二兼捨一。 T2251_.64.0331a26: 能如二無間道一。捨二異生性一者。例二見道苦忍一。猶 T2251_.64.0331a27: 如下婆沙増上忍唯一刹那觀二一行一。如中苦法智 T2251_.64.0331a28: 忍上。又無間解脱雖二初二義一。例無レ有レ妨。如二彼 T2251_.64.0331a29: 正理論顯宗一者。前文全同二今論一。至二今文處一。 T2251_.64.0331b01: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0331b02: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0331b03: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0331b04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0331b05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0331b06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0331b07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0331b08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0331b09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0331b10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0331b11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0331b12: [IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0331b17: レ爲三三義無二優劣一。故同標二有説一。又世第一。苦 T2251_.64.0331b18: 忍。二倶次第。莫下鑑二綴文旨一偏執中前文上。又婆 T2251_.64.0331b19: 沙云二正捨一。正理云レ唯。今文無二其語一。知是同二 T2251_.64.0331b20: 婆沙一爲二正捨一。光寶隨レ應可レ簡。又解。論主意 T2251_.64.0331b21: 欲レ有二各理一。故擧以不レ加二難斥一。而隨レ宜用二 T2251_.64.0331b22: 其義一。前用二第三義意一。今明二苦忍一。用二苦忍義一 T2251_.64.0331b23: 爲レ初也。此後解不レ善。於二惠學門一是放逸故。 T2251_.64.0331b24: 違二舊論一故
T2251_.64.0331b27: 四諦觀一。類不二分別一故。從二此上一釋二後二分一。一 T2251_.64.0331b28: 段大爲レ四。一此中下叙二大衆化地部計一。二然 T2251_.64.0331b29: 彼下有部總徴破。三詳諸下正叙二自三現觀一。 T2251_.64.0331c01: 釋二後二句一。此有レ二。初示二體相一。後辨二具不具一。 T2251_.64.0331c02: 四若諸下廣破立大爲レ三。初破二執計一。第二依 T2251_.64.0331c03: 見下有部引レ經成二漸觀一。第三若謂下通二彼引 T2251_.64.0331c04: レ經立義。初破二執計一中。亦有レ三。初破二見頓 T2251_.64.0331c05: 現觀一。二若彼下擧二自在力救一縱之。三若彼下 T2251_.64.0331c06: 擧二苦時具足救一。令レ入二事觀一。初中有レ二。一正 T2251_.64.0331c07: 破二見頓觀一。二若言下破二無我行救一分爲レ四。 T2251_.64.0331c08: 一標レ救。二則不下審定彼所救一。三如是下
T2251_.64.0331c16: 所縁四諦境義一。是即同一能取二所縁一。能縁名二 T2251_.64.0331c17: 縁現觀一。光記兩釋解レ文如二初釋一。得レ意如二後 T2251_.64.0331c18: 釋一。全非二二義一也
T2251_.64.0331c22: 觀中一。彼有二事用一故。亦於レ彼立二現觀名一。如レ是 T2251_.64.0331c23: 應レ知。非相應法唯一現觀。除レ惠所餘心心所 T2251_.64.0331c24: 法有二二現觀一。唯無漏惠具足有レ三
T2251_.64.0331c27: 奪能破一。此無レ理無レ教。何迷亂。次下指レ之 T2251_.64.0331c28: 例レ無失。此自義三現正規也
T2251_.64.0332a05: 言一。以顯二無漏惠見現觀一。故非二經文一
T2251_.64.0332a08: 縱レ之。是於二一諦一得二餘自在一。故名レ頓。非三實 T2251_.64.0332a09: 頓同一時觀二四諦一。故許レ無レ失。三然於下更 T2251_.64.0332a10: 勸二別義一。出觀爲レ起。不出云二不起一。舊論十七
T2251_.64.0332a13: 有部宗見道定不出觀
T2251_.64.0332a16: 須達長者一。此四聖諦漸次無間非二頓無間 T2251_.64.0332a17: 等一。佛告二長者一。若有二説言一。於二苦聖諦一。未二無 T2251_.64.0332a18: 間等一。而於二彼苦集聖諦。苦滅聖諦。苦滅道 T2251_.64.0332a19: 迹聖諦一。無間等者。此説不レ應。所以者何。若 T2251_.64.0332a20: 於二苦聖諦一未二無間等一而於二集滅道聖諦一。無 T2251_.64.0332a21: 間等者。無レ有二是處一。猶如二有レ人兩細樹葉
T2251_.64.0332a25: 蓮花葉一。連合爲レ器盛レ水遊行上有二是處一。如レ是 T2251_.64.0332a26: 長者。於二苦諦一無間等已而欲下於二集滅道聖 T2251_.64.0332a27: 諦一無間等上者。斯有二是處一。次經曰。如二須達長 T2251_.64.0332a28: 者所問一。有二異比丘一。問亦如レ是説。唯譬有二差 T2251_.64.0332a29: 別一。如下有二四階道一陞中於殿堂上。若有二説言一。不 T2251_.64.0332b01: レ登二初階一。而登二第二第三第四階一陞二殿堂一者。 T2251_.64.0332b02: 無レ有二是處一。所以者何。要由二初階一。然後次登二 T2251_.64.0332b03: 第二第三第四階一。得レ陞二殿堂一。如レ是比丘於二 T2251_.64.0332b04: 苦諦一。未二無間等一。而欲下於二集滅道諦一無間等上 T2251_.64.0332b05: 者。無レ有二是處一。次經曰。如二異比丘問一。阿難所 T2251_.64.0332b06: 問亦如レ是説。唯譬差別。不レ由二初隥一。而登二第 T2251_.64.0332b07: 二第三第四隥一。陞二殿堂一者。無レ有二是處一。婆沙
T2251_.64.0332b10: 疏而下皆依レ彼陋之甚。蓋普光未レ檢二本經一。 T2251_.64.0332b11: 只依二先輩所談乎。問。今云。一一別喩而後 T2251_.64.0332b12: 二經喩同何。答。經已云二譬差別一。約二四階一約二 T2251_.64.0332b13: 四隥一是別
T2251_.64.0332b20: 道諦一無レ疑者。則於レ佛無レ疑。於二法僧一無レ疑。
T2251_.64.0332b23: 云。今論佛是餘字。不レ爾不レ成二四諦頓觀義一。
T2251_.64.0332c02: 或先レ諦。或先レ佛。是表二能所説主客之殊一。必 T2251_.64.0332c03: 非二所執異一。亦非二意義無別也。問。此經如何 T2251_.64.0332c04: 成二頓證一。答。婆沙百三彼引レ經而云。既於二四 T2251_.64.0332c05: 諦一。頓無二疑惑一。故知現觀定頓非レ漸。光記科二 T2251_.64.0332c06: 牒レ經通難者未レ詳。又云。佛是道諦攝。故於二 T2251_.64.0332c07: 佛道一。亦無レ疑。無レ惑者。未レ檢二本經一。唯依レ字 T2251_.64.0332c08: 自臆度。不レ爲レ論。通中亦者。對二前宗義不成。 T2251_.64.0332c09: 然前未レ引レ經。恐是經字寫誤。故舊論云二是 T2251_.64.0332c10: 義不然。無二亦言一。依二定不行者。約二同時不現
T2251_.64.0332c13: 諦一。已入二現觀一。無レ有二疑惑一。於二餘三諦所有疑 T2251_.64.0332c14: 惑一。得雖レ未レ斷。而永不レ行。於レ彼已得二非擇 T2251_.64.0332c15: 滅一故。依二必當斷者。約二未來當斷一。此婆沙無 T2251_.64.0332c16: レ之。當是未來。見道漸次無間故。於レ苦無レ疑。 T2251_.64.0332c17: 決定當三於レ餘斷二疑惑一。非レ謂二倶時斷一也
T2251_.64.0332c20: 斷二彼惑得一。令二彼惑得不能二隔礙一。故名二無間 T2251_.64.0332c21: 道一。無間如二無明一。非二六合所釋一。無間即道持
T2251_.64.0332c24: 智。故爲二無間一。無間即道持業同レ之。如レ是有二 T2251_.64.0332c25: 二別一。謂對二惑得一與レ望二後智一。但間隔義與二隔
T2251_.64.0333a03: 道一
T2251_.64.0333a06: 心中。各忍第一。智第二故。又次上云二二次 T2251_.64.0333a07: 第一。彼中第二是智故云二第二一。無間道者。解脱 T2251_.64.0333a08: 道寫誤。何者此文初擧下上智爲二解脱道一釋上。 T2251_.64.0333a09: 難レ應レ不レ起二斷疑智一。次擧二斷疑是忍位通釋一。
T2251_.64.0333a20: 之太。至二此之際一哉。今若謂言有二兩處一。同 T2251_.64.0333a21: 非二是外難一。而一即異計。有二何起盡一。此論一 T2251_.64.0333a22: 部中於二何處一。直言二若謂一有レ擧二異説一。可レ謂未 T2251_.64.0333a23: レ知二大例一也。又今第二言爲二苦類忍一。何理有 T2251_.64.0333a24: レ之。若文若義全無二所由一。若言レ由二無間言一。是 T2251_.64.0333a25: 似二盲人揣摩一。非レ可レ言二有目釋義一。以レ非二是苦 T2251_.64.0333a26: 類忍差別段一故。難者亦苦類忍唯無間道。何 T2251_.64.0333a27: 爲レ他可レ得レ難。是偏輕蔑舊家一。未レ檢之罪也。
T2251_.64.0333b01: 得一倶生上。故致二此難一。謂苦類忍不レ爲二第三位一。 T2251_.64.0333b02: 置二苦法忍後一。爲二第二位一令下與二前忍果離繋 T2251_.64.0333b03: 得一倶生上。可レ有二何過一。破二彼傍難一以二已斷疑 T2251_.64.0333b04: 智一。以二第三位已斷疑忍一。爲二第二位一。唯令二離 T2251_.64.0333b05: 繋倶起一故。應下苦忍後位已斷疑法智。於二此 T2251_.64.0333b06: 位一不得レ生。今不レ爾。外人難三苦法智解脱道 T2251_.64.0333b07: 爲二離繋得倶時起一。令二已斷疑智無一。言二忍能 T2251_.64.0333b08: 斷惑故。此難意令下解脱道有中如二無間道一斷
T2251_.64.0333b11: 斷二煩惱一。非二解脱道不證二彼滅一。彼互存二斷 T2251_.64.0333b12: 證一。由レ之今有二唯言一。而混同證二正理一大非也。 T2251_.64.0333b13: 問。此論無レ答。舊論云二此難不然一何。答。竝 T2251_.64.0333b14: 無レ妨。今無レ答者。次忍能斷文此答。約二展轉 T2251_.64.0333b15: 難一故略レ之。如二舊論一者。總非云二此難不然一。而 T2251_.64.0333b16: 無二所述一。次文成レ答故。而今略レ之者。招二多増 T2251_.64.0333b17: 迷一。若有二彼句一何。光記可レ誤。寶法已下皆襲二 T2251_.64.0333b18: 普光一。竝皆井見臆度之輩也
T2251_.64.0333b21: 所斷結盡。四沙門果攝。或無處。餘七智亦爾。 T2251_.64.0333b22: 修所斷結盡。阿羅漢果。如レ是皆智爲二能斷一。 T2251_.64.0333b23: 故引難。問。舊論。正理。竝云二九結聚一何義。答。 T2251_.64.0333b24: 諸煩惱ヲ唯八智修道ノ九部ノ結ト聚集カ故以 T2251_.64.0333b25: 名
T2251_.64.0333b29: 諸忍所斷名二智所斷一。喩全同レ此
T2251_.64.0333c03: 見道一。如二此文一。惠暉云。經部師第十六心是見 T2251_.64.0333c04: 道攝。因云。以二智攝一故。如二餘七智一。有部是修 T2251_.64.0333c05: 道。因以二果攝一。如二餘修道一。大乘如二雜集第九。
T2251_.64.0333c12: 説。顯揚唯説二見道前一者。據二長時一説。亦不二
T2251_.64.0333c17: 後彼先下辨三此位標二信名一。初中有レ二。初三 T2251_.64.0333c18: 字釋。由レ信二他教示一。隨レ彼行。亦行亦隨。名二隨 T2251_.64.0333c19: 行一。持業釋。信所由故。信之隨行故。名二隨信 T2251_.64.0333c20: 行一。第三轉依主釋。故論曰レ由。後彼有下四字 T2251_.64.0333c21: 釋。此有二兩義一者。是能有約二有財一如二覺者一
T2251_.64.0333c27: 非レ人。義爲レ量非二文句一。了義爲レ量非二不了義一。 T2251_.64.0333c28: 智爲レ量非レ識。云何判二此四一。由二四種人差別一 T2251_.64.0333c29: 故。一由二貢高人差別一故。二由二路柯耶胝柯 T2251_.64.0334a01: 人差別一故。三由二自見取住人差別一故。四由二 T2251_.64.0334a02: 聞勝人差別一故。此中於二貢高一以レ法爲レ量非 T2251_.64.0334a03: レ人。由二共論説思量一。爲二智所得一故。不三但由二 T2251_.64.0334a04: 威儀差別一。復次佛世尊有説レ人。有説レ法。此 T2251_.64.0334a05: 中法爲レ量非レ人。此法有二二種一。文句及義。此 T2251_.64.0334a06: 中義爲レ量非二文句一。由レ不三愛著國土言説一故。 T2251_.64.0334a07: 何以故不レ應レ成レ取二文句一。爲二勝決定一應四思 T2251_.64.0334a08: 量簡擇義一。佛世尊説レ經。有二二種一。有二了義一。 T2251_.64.0334a09: 有二不了義一。若人簡擇義一應下以二了義經一爲 T2251_.64.0334a10: 量。非二不了義一。佛世尊説。隨福行及不動行 T2251_.64.0334a11: 識爲レ生二善道一。説二四諦智一。爲レ至二得涅槃一。若人 T2251_.64.0334a12: 行於レ法似レ法以レ智爲レ量非レ識。復次於二四時 T2251_.64.0334a13: 中一。有失無失故。約二四人一立二四量一。一讀誦時。 T2251_.64.0334a14: 二憶持時。三簡擇時。四修行時。今論全闕略。 T2251_.64.0334a15: 是學佛之徒。要文廣載レ之
T2251_.64.0334a21: 望。初一向不レ斷二修惑一爲二具縛一。義門爲レ異。全 T2251_.64.0334a22: 非二相違一
T2251_.64.0334b01: 二等名一。此必言簡二第二第三超越一。彼是初得。
T2251_.64.0334b10: 雖二信惠具一。就二互偏増一標二別名一。故言二互増一。麟 T2251_.64.0334b11: 記云。今云レ互顯レ不レ具レ二。故言二互増一非レ如二 T2251_.64.0334b12: 東西互見一者誤也。信淨信心所。解勝解心所。 T2251_.64.0334b13: 由レ信解起名二信解一。由聲依主釋。見者慧別 T2251_.64.0334b14: 名。至者來至。由二先見一至二果見一。得二見至名一。若 T2251_.64.0334b15: 見爲二先見一。第三轉依主。若爲二今見一至レ見。故 T2251_.64.0334b16: 云二見至一。見即至持業釋
T2251_.64.0334b21: 乃至無所有處第九品惑至二第十六道類智 T2251_.64.0334b22: 心一。但名二預流一來不還果一。非二一來不還阿羅
T2251_.64.0334b25: 三向一。斷二上七地一非二第四向一。改レ光可レ稱
T2251_.64.0334c01: 勝果道一。修二上地無漏一。得二上地滅一。然後命終。 T2251_.64.0334c02: 如下已離二欲界三四品或七八品染一入中正性離 T2251_.64.0334c03: 生上。彼得果已。必起二勝果道一。修二勝品無漏一。 T2251_.64.0334c04: 得二勝品滅一。然後命終。問。若已離二第三靜慮 T2251_.64.0334c05: 染一。依二第二靜慮及下三地一。信勝解練根作二見 T2251_.64.0334c06: 至一。彼不レ起二後向一。命終往生第四靜慮以上 T2251_.64.0334c07: 諸地一。彼成就何樂根一。答。彼於二上地一。若得二自 T2251_.64.0334c08: 在一。當二練根時一。亦能修二上地無漏樂根一。設 T2251_.64.0334c09: 於二上地一。不レ得二自在一。彼樂果已。亦必起二勝果 T2251_.64.0334c10: 道一。修二上地無漏一。然後命終。是故聖者生二 T2251_.64.0334c11: 遍淨上一。決定成二無漏樂根一。成就喜根一準レ此 T2251_.64.0334c12: 應レ説
T2251_.64.0334c15: 治反對所由一。此有レ二。初約二前後有無一。此有二 T2251_.64.0334c16: 法譬合一。譬有レ二。初麁前細後喩。以顯二上智 T2251_.64.0334c17: 有時上惑已無一。次麁細反對喩。以明二能所下 T2251_.64.0334c18: 上相對一。故二喩別。第二白法下重約二力用強 T2251_.64.0334c19: 劣一辨。舊論曰二何以故一。此中二喩義無レ別。初 T2251_.64.0334c20: 約二内身一。後就二外事一。病比二所治惑一。久時類二惑
T2251_.64.0334c24: 牽滅上
T2251_.64.0334c29: 釋二極七返字一。第二諸無下釋二預流名一。第三此 T2251_.64.0335a01: 預下明二所目義一。此亦爲レ四。一雙關難。二依二 T2251_.64.0335a02: 初關一答。三重問。四約二三義具足一答。第四彼 T2251_.64.0335a03: 從下別明二七生相一。此中有二七科一。一所立宗 T2251_.64.0335a04: 義。二難。三通。四重難。五答。六徴レ證。七擧レ證 T2251_.64.0335a05: 答。第五若於下明二極七返滿處一。第六何縁下 T2251_.64.0335a06: 明二有局七。第七中間下。明二中間聖道起一。第 T2251_.64.0335a07: 八至第下辨三最後無二佛法時一。第九云何下釋三 T2251_.64.0335a08: 經名二無退墮一。第十經説下。釋二經最後作苦邊 T2251_.64.0335a09: 際句一。第十一餘位下辨二餘位七返一
T2251_.64.0335a12: 正向二三菩提一。七有二天人往生一。究竟苦邊一。次 T2251_.64.0335a13: 頌曰。極至二於七有一。天人來往。生盡二一切諸
T2251_.64.0335a25: 間一。或天上人間受二七有生一。已得レ盡二苦際一
T2251_.64.0335b11: 翻名二修無漏一。如二涅槃説一。須名二無漏一。陀洹修 T2251_.64.0335b12: 習。以レ修二無漏一。名二須陀洹一。二隨レ義傍翻名爲二 T2251_.64.0335b13: 逆流一。逆二生死流一。三途生死永不レ受故。三隨 T2251_.64.0335b14: レ義傍翻亦名二觸債一。將拒二三途因一。而不レ受レ果。 T2251_.64.0335b15: 故曰二觸債一。今按。基疏正釋。全同二義林五末
T2251_.64.0335b18: 聖道一。不レ言二聖之流類一。此論已約二流趣義一。是 T2251_.64.0335b19: 違文又理亦不レ穩。次破レ他誤者。須陀洹梵音 T2251_.64.0335b20: 有下逆二生死一。而入二聖道一義上。依レ之約二所厭一是 T2251_.64.0335b21: 逆流。約二所求一是預流。故涅槃經北本三十六
T2251_.64.0335b24: 義一。一生死流。須陀洹人逆二此流一故。生死順 T2251_.64.0335b25: レ之。二逆流。須陀洹人順入此流一。故小般若
T2251_.64.0335b28: 見諦故。最初證得逆流行果一。又瑜伽八十三
T2251_.64.0335c03: 苦忍已生。世第一。増上忍。及忍法。頂。與レ煖。 T2251_.64.0335c04: 念住。不淨觀。竝順解脱分生位。初義苦忍已 T2251_.64.0335c05: 上。同二涅槃瑜伽顯揚一。豈妄可レ得レ云二舊乃非一 T2251_.64.0335c06: 將偏拒二舊家一。不レ量違二玄奘等所譯諸聖教一。 T2251_.64.0335c07: 背二至理一何不レ愼乎。問。諸教説二生死流轉一。流 T2251_.64.0335c08: 言何可レ爲二聖道一。答。流是趣向義。隨レ所レ求往
T2251_.64.0335c15: 唯依二智論意一是何謂。又此論次三因。竝簡二 T2251_.64.0335c16: 前十五心向道一。彼唯向。此向果具足。彼唯見。 T2251_.64.0335c17: 此見修具。彼十五行。此十六行滿。是故舊論 T2251_.64.0335c18: 云。於二道類智中一。是故此人得二須陀洹名一向 T2251_.64.0335c19: 人則非。已對三道類智云二向人一。豈非三全同二婆 T2251_.64.0335c20: 沙一
T2251_.64.0335c24: 故。總二下通妨。故舊論曰。云何説二七生一爲
T2251_.64.0336a01: 八有一。是外難。光第二釋云二彌沙塞部難一。彼漢
T2251_.64.0336a09: 具足成滿人
T2251_.64.0336a17: レ引二二經證一誤矣。以二契經説一。天七及人二句 T2251_.64.0336a18: 言レ有二依據一。而有宗所レ誦本不二分明一故援二飮 T2251_.64.0336a19: 光部經一。以爲二確證一。不レ爾分明字不レ安。舊論 T2251_.64.0336a20: 語勢又實一經也。忘二文理一巧造レ説者。烏足二
T2251_.64.0336a24: 天中總七生死故有レ生必有レ死。七死言亦非
T2251_.64.0336b05: 既説二及言一。定知各七。又必應レ爾。飮光部經 T2251_.64.0336b06: 分明別説二各受七故。汝欲二眼目是博是廣一。 T2251_.64.0336b07: 而未レ臨二正理ノ此文一。憶度妄謂招二多過一矣。於
T2251_.64.0336b11: 而其義安二及言一故各七義。何却以二分明字一。
T2251_.64.0336b15: 七生人中。流轉往來。作二苦邊際一。擧二如レ T2251_.64.0336b16: 是經一。一一次第牒釋。其文分明。故於二婆沙一
T2251_.64.0336b20: 爲二不分明一。更證二他部一耶。二雜中二含諸文。 T2251_.64.0336b21: 説二人天七往來一。如二一來果是一往來。人一天 T2251_.64.0336b22: 一極成一。非二往天七來レ人七一。更證二別文一耶。
T2251_.64.0336b27: 引二施設論一破二前説一。今亦同二彼正義一。除二得果
T2251_.64.0336c01: 應レ知約二十四生一。人趣得還レ人涅槃。謂除二初 T2251_.64.0336c02: 得果生一以二異生攝一故。次生天趣至二人趣一。成二 T2251_.64.0336c03: 十四一故。然近世人云。已破二因執一説二此文一。叙二 T2251_.64.0336c04: 經文二十八生意一。非二別科一。普光法寶等竝誤 T2251_.64.0336c05: 矣。若人趣得果必天涅槃者中間三六生等一 T2251_.64.0336c06: 何令レ爾。此甚麁見。未レ思之深。讀二婆沙一有二何 T2251_.64.0336c07: 疑一。又今約二極七一。以二中間一不レ可レ疑。又云レ叙二 T2251_.64.0336c08: 經二十八生意一者。何狂言
T2251_.64.0336c11: 力一。三約二有餘結一。異熟依身爲二相續一。相續成 T2251_.64.0336c12: 滿云二成熟一。光記云二聖道成熟一誤也。正理云二 T2251_.64.0336c13: 相續必熟一舊論曰。如レ此量時相續成熟故。故 T2251_.64.0336c14: 限二此七有一。相續成滿故。何故成滿。彼業力盡
T2251_.64.0336c17: 云レ又。舊論曰二復次一。然光寶等唯謂二二義一非 T2251_.64.0336c18: 也。婆沙曰。復次彼異熟因。但有下爾所感二異 T2251_.64.0336c19: 熟果一勢力在上故。復次彼業力故。能受二七有一。
T2251_.64.0336c27: 七歩蛇喩會取。令レ同二正理師法爾義一。七結義 T2251_.64.0336c28: 於二婆沙一無レ之。云レ破二彼異説一未可也。又此論 T2251_.64.0336c29: 但叙二有部多解一。不二自立義者。是何謂。一論 T2251_.64.0337a01: 顛末不レ當二自樂一。或云二傳説一。或加二破斥一。或別 T2251_.64.0337a02: 立二自義一不レ爾而非二自所欲文何在。論主既 T2251_.64.0337a03: 於二婆沙多義中一。唯採標二義一。更加二餘義一。豈 T2251_.64.0337a04: 爲レ不二自欲一。正理不レ言二經主一。以三論主非二案 T2251_.64.0337a05: 立一故。正理破二初因一曰。若謂下齊二此時一相續必 T2251_.64.0337a06: 熟故上。此亦不レ然。無二定因一故。謂有二何等決定 T2251_.64.0337a07: 因縁一。於二第七生一。爲下盡二諸漏一根未熟上者。至二
T2251_.64.0337a10: 無二此業一者。業力劣故。如下菩薩由二善業一越二九 T2251_.64.0337a11: 十一劫一。感レ彼業無異熟必熟上。釋二次難一者。聖 T2251_.64.0337a12: 道力令レ如レ是。如二七歩蛇毒勢力一。若不レ得二聖 T2251_.64.0337a13: 道一無二此事一。如下不二蛇所螫而不死。何得下以二 T2251_.64.0337a14: 壽量定者過レ此住一難上。彼雖レ所レ螫。其毒不レ遍 T2251_.64.0337a15: 故爾。非二是實所一螫。如二大天得果雖レ言非實 T2251_.64.0337a16: 故。寶師墮負。會令レ同二法爾一。全非二此論。正理。 T2251_.64.0337a17: 婆沙意一。釋二後難一者。雖二上分不引二欲界生一。而 T2251_.64.0337a18: 引二上界生一。今人天經生故合成。與二下分二一 T2251_.64.0337a19: 同有レ之。故爲レ因。如二虚空一。次二難以二唯上分一 T2251_.64.0337a20: 難二下上總聚一。全不二相當一。近世人論主第二 T2251_.64.0337a21: 爲二不正一者。是有二何起盡一。預流唯受二一生一。如二 T2251_.64.0337a22: 光寶辨一。彼神泰唯執レ文盲レ義焉。増一二十
T2251_.64.0337a25: 道類智位預流一生。豈是一來。又婆沙文對二 T2251_.64.0337a26: 人天等齊七一。明二人天生異一。故標レ有二人天生 T2251_.64.0337a27: 別一天七至レ二。人五至レ一對明。而不レ説二人天 T2251_.64.0337a28: 均六乃至均一一。準二等七生一可レ知故。未レ曉二 T2251_.64.0337a29: 婆沙文意一妄證。還是成レ違。光寶婆沙通釋未 T2251_.64.0337b01: レ詳也。次證二涅槃成實一。還是一生準證。何者 T2251_.64.0337b02: 對二利根現身一。鈍根云二二三生等一。彼現生入二 T2251_.64.0337b03: 七數一。由レ之現身爲二一生一。如レ言二一生成佛一故。
T2251_.64.0337b07: 部義一。彼第二是此一生。唯封レ文之失。大卒 T2251_.64.0337b08: 如レ是者哉。如二光寶一只無二分別一。不レ了遮遣 T2251_.64.0337b09: 可レ笑也
T2251_.64.0337b17: レ初。彼第二爲二後説一。顯レ非二善説一。云二有言一。舊 T2251_.64.0337b18: 論曰二有餘師一。婆沙。正理同破二後説一曰。無學 T2251_.64.0337b19: 不レ受二外道相一故。今但言二得苾芻形相一。不レ言二
T2251_.64.0337b26: 立二五因一。不レ造二新業一故。設無二新業一。可レ有二古 T2251_.64.0337b27: 業一。彼無二與果能一故。何無二功能一。強盛無漏善 T2251_.64.0337b28: 根力爲二所鎭一故。何所鎭耶。因力加行。及意 T2251_.64.0337b29: 樂清淨故。設雖レ爾未レ得二無學一可レ退。不レ爾忍 T2251_.64.0337c01: 尚不レ墮。況此位。初因不レ造下招二惡趣一新業上 T2251_.64.0337c02: 故。第二因約三舊業無二功能一。寶疏最爲レ善。光 T2251_.64.0337c03: 雖レ略意同二寶師一。有人云。光寶爲二別義一。寶約二 T2251_.64.0337c04: 業新舊一非也。光唯約二業果二一爲レ正。今云誤
T2251_.64.0337c07: 中一。無二復功能一故。寶疏全同レ之
T2251_.64.0337c11: レ頌示レ喩。今云不レ爾。舊論設引證頌皆如レ是。 T2251_.64.0337c12: 正理論亦曰二故有頌言一。故言何レ之爲
T2251_.64.0337c15: 最後説二作苦邊際一。故殊決擇。然或説二究竟一。
T2251_.64.0337c18: 後問答一。能障レ得二於彼涅槃一。言二彼得障一。以 T2251_.64.0337c19: レ不レ言二彼障得一。普光後釋不レ順光記於二得障一 T2251_.64.0337c20: 有二兩釋一。後惑得障義。不レ順二論文一。不レ云二彼 T2251_.64.0337c21: 障得一故。此兩説雖二婆沙正理此論無評。初 T2251_.64.0337c22: 齊二此生一義盡理。邊際言不レ順二苦外涅槃一故。
T2251_.64.0338a01: 文化三丙寅年二月二十七日於江府深川 T2251_.64.0338a02: 靈巖寺智燈寮講此卷訖其讀席五筵也 T2251_.64.0338a03: 倶舍論卷二十三終 T2251_.64.0338a04: T2251_.64.0338a05: T2251_.64.0338a06: T2251_.64.0338a07: T2251_.64.0338a08: T2251_.64.0338a09: T2251_.64.0338a10: T2251_.64.0338a11: T2251_.64.0338a12: T2251_.64.0338a13: T2251_.64.0338a14: T2251_.64.0338a15: T2251_.64.0338a16: T2251_.64.0338a17: T2251_.64.0338a18: T2251_.64.0338a19: T2251_.64.0338a20: T2251_.64.0338a21: T2251_.64.0338a22: T2251_.64.0338a23: T2251_.64.0338a24: T2251_.64.0338a25: T2251_.64.0338a26: T2251_.64.0338a27: T2251_.64.0338a28: T2251_.64.0338a29: T2251_.64.0338b01: T2251_.64.0338b02: T2251_.64.0338b03: T2251_.64.0338b04: T2251_.64.0338b05: T2251_.64.0338b06: T2251_.64.0338b07: T2251_.64.0338b08: T2251_.64.0338b09: T2251_.64.0338b10: T2251_.64.0338b11: T2251_.64.0338b12: T2251_.64.0338b13: T2251_.64.0338b14: T2251_.64.0338b15: T2251_.64.0338b16: T2251_.64.0338b17: T2251_.64.0338b18: T2251_.64.0338b19: T2251_.64.0338b20: T2251_.64.0338b21: T2251_.64.0338b22: T2251_.64.0338b23: T2251_.64.0338b24: T2251_.64.0338b25: T2251_.64.0338b26: T2251_.64.0338b27: T2251_.64.0338b28: T2251_.64.0338b29: T2251_.64.0338c01: T2251_.64.0338c02: T2251_.64.0338c03: T2251_.64.0338c04: T2251_.64.0338c05: T2251_.64.0338c06: T2251_.64.0338c07: T2251_.64.0338c08: T2251_.64.0338c09: T2251_.64.0338c10: T2251_.64.0338c11: T2251_.64.0338c12: T2251_.64.0338c13: T2251_.64.0338c14: T2251_.64.0338c15: T2251_.64.0338c16: T2251_.64.0338c17: T2251_.64.0338c18: T2251_.64.0338c19: T2251_.64.0338c20: T2251_.64.0338c21: T2251_.64.0338c22: T2251_.64.0338c23: T2251_.64.0338c24: T2251_.64.0338c25: T2251_.64.0338c26: T2251_.64.0338c27: T2251_.64.0338c28: T2251_.64.0338c29: T2251_.64.0339a01: T2251_.64.0339a02: T2251_.64.0339a03: T2251_.64.0339a04: 豐山沙門快道記 T2251_.64.0339a05: 分別賢聖品第六之三
T2251_.64.0339a08: 句正明レ向。頌疏云。上兩句明二家家一。下兩句 T2251_.64.0339a09: 明二向果一。此各有レ理。光約二相似一。頌疏約二實 T2251_.64.0339a10: 論一。凡於二四向四果一。義門非一。若約下具經二四 T2251_.64.0339a11: 果一人上有二二門一。一向果別立門。謂見道十五 T2251_.64.0339a12: 心爲二預流向一。道類智爲二預流果一。從レ斷二欲一 T2251_.64.0339a13: 品一至レ五爲二一來向一。斷二第六一爲二一來果一。斷二 T2251_.64.0339a14: 七八品一爲二不還向一。斷二第九品一。爲二不還果一。從二 T2251_.64.0339a15: 初定一品一至二非想第八品一斷爲二羅漢向一。斷二 T2251_.64.0339a16: 第九品一爲二羅漢果一。故契經云二八輩聖人一。一 T2251_.64.0339a17: 攝向合果門。後後向道攝二前前果道一。但預流 T2251_.64.0339a18: 向無二所レ攝前果道一。是一向四果。約レ此從二道 T2251_.64.0339a19: 類智一至レ斷二欲第四品一。爲二預流果一。餘準レ之可 T2251_.64.0339a20: レ知。若據下不三具經二四果一般涅槃人上。攝在不定。 T2251_.64.0339a21: 謂如二家家一者。斷二三四品一。則如下次第人斷二三 T2251_.64.0339a22: 四品一。是一來向上。故今論標結一來向果一。於 T2251_.64.0339a23: レ中説二家家一。又唯斷二三四品一不レ至二一來果一。而 T2251_.64.0339a24: 入二寂滅一無下向二一來一之義上。則爲二預流果攝一。故
T2251_.64.0339b02: 義上故。是故今論別明二家家一。次云。從レ一至レ五。 T2251_.64.0339b03: 次第相續。斷爲二一來向一。而標結言二一來向 T2251_.64.0339b04: 果一者。約二次第人一。令三滿足順次向果一。就レ中 T2251_.64.0339b05: 亦辨二家家一間等一也。古今不レ辨レ之。莫二走行一 T2251_.64.0339b06: 矣
T2251_.64.0339b10: 上下。彼説二家家一。正理云。或於二先異生位一斷。 T2251_.64.0339b11: 或今預流進二修位一斷。今論且約二次第一。云二預 T2251_.64.0339b12: 流進一。問。有漏斷人非レ闕二成根一。答。至二道類智一。 T2251_.64.0339b13: 必起二後勝果道一。其時得二先所斷離繋得一。故
T2251_.64.0339b18: 道一。得二家家道一。何縁名二家家一。謂家家者。是所 T2251_.64.0339b19: 生處。其處彼家。此家異故。是家家義。此人 T2251_.64.0339b20: 以三家家爲二生處一。名二家家一。有財釋。法勝毘曇
T2251_.64.0339b24: 舊生死一。異家受レ生。故云二家家一。瑜伽倫記六 T2251_.64.0339b25: 下云。聖人厭二於生死一故。於二一家處一單不二重 T2251_.64.0339b26: 生一。從レ一至レ一家コトニ受二二生三生一。但易二父 T2251_.64.0339b27: 母一。不二肯重生一。不レ廢二同姓一。張處二東西一。二張
T2251_.64.0339c09: 簡二色無色一云二欲有一。唯局レ欲故。爲レ顯下斷二三 T2251_.64.0339c10: 品一人受二三生一。斷二四品一人受中二生上。逆言二三 T2251_.64.0339c11: 二一
T2251_.64.0339c14: 已成故。謂已進斷二三四品惑一。決定餘有二三生 T2251_.64.0339c15: 二生一。故説二家家相一。不二圓滿一。則應下於三頌更 T2251_.64.0339c16: 説二等聲一。方具收中家家三相上。或應レ不レ説二三二 T2251_.64.0339c17: 生言一。通全同レ之。
T2251_.64.0339c20: 一句擧レ名。謂欲下從二所生處一判二差別一。大有二 T2251_.64.0339c21: 二別一。約二人家一。約二洲處一。總家家所依處。從レ寛 T2251_.64.0339c22: 至レ狹有二四別一。謂。界。趣。處。家。別故。界謂唯 T2251_.64.0339c23: 欲界。此通二人天家家一。趣者若約二天家家一。唯 T2251_.64.0339c24: 欲天趣。非二餘天趣及餘四趣一。故云二欲天趣一。 T2251_.64.0339c25: 處者欲天有レ六。若一天處中。受二三二生一。若 T2251_.64.0339c26: 二天處。若三天處。家者於二彼一二三天處中一。 T2251_.64.0339c27: 或一家。或二家。人家家例レ之可レ知。今顯二同 T2251_.64.0339c28: 父母不二重生一。故不レ云二一人家一天家一。婆沙
T2251_.64.0340a02: 往レ人來レ天往來。爲二局レ人局天。答。天家家 T2251_.64.0340a03: 唯於二天趣一往來。人家家準レ之。是大小乘經 T2251_.64.0340a04: 論一同。然至二滅後九百年一。正理論師創立二人 T2251_.64.0340a05: 天往來義一。先標破彼義一。後當レ辨二正義一。初標
T2251_.64.0340a09: 般涅槃名二一來果一。過レ此以二後更無生故。即 T2251_.64.0340a10: 由二此義一證。家家中。若天家家。受二三生一者。人 T2251_.64.0340a11: 間受レ二。天上受レ三。受二二生一者。人一天二。如 T2251_.64.0340a12: レ應例釋人中家家一。若謂レ不レ然彼一來果。有三
T2251_.64.0340a15: 來名二一來果一。證知家家亦人天往來一。然非 T2251_.64.0340a16: レ如二極七反人天等七生一。其生數不レ等。從二其 T2251_.64.0340a17: 多一立レ名。以或名二天家家一。或名二人家家一。若謂下
T2251_.64.0340a20: 不別失上。同人天一往來故。由レ有二此文一普光
T2251_.64.0340a24: 理一者。大有二二罪一。一人天往來罪。二生數不
T2251_.64.0340b01: 或三天處。受二二三生一。或一天家。或二天家。 T2251_.64.0340b02: 或三天家。受二二三生一。人家家者。謂於二人中一。
T2251_.64.0340b05: 上一。於是依聲依處。局二天上一必矣。釋相中。亦 T2251_.64.0340b06: 唯約レ天。全無二來レ人之相一。人家家文亦爾。舊
T2251_.64.0340b12: 曇兩譯。竝合作レ文。其義縱容也。若於二大乘一。
T2251_.64.0340b17: レ家。若往若來證二苦邊際一。二人家家者。謂於二
T2251_.64.0340b20: 焉。三背二立名旨一。謂既唯於二一趣一。從レ家至レ家。 T2251_.64.0340b21: 不レ渉二餘趣一。故簡別名二天家家一。名二人家家一。若 T2251_.64.0340b22: 人天二趣往來セハ何特可レ得二此名一。四違二前後 T2251_.64.0340b23: 例一。謂七人天往來名二七反有一。一往來名二一來 T2251_.64.0340b24: 果一。今亦人天往來セハ應下名二極三反有。極二 T2251_.64.0340b25: 反有一。不レ名中人家家天家家上。已顯二人天往來 T2251_.64.0340b26: 罪一。當レ辨二生數不等罪一。謂其罪亦有二多失一。一 T2251_.64.0340b27: 何故不等而不レ等。若言二樂欲故一。何故不レ樂二 T2251_.64.0340b28: 等生一。若言二七反一來等生別故一。若爾七反中。 T2251_.64.0340b29: 何故有二不等生一。若言二惑品令然者不レ然。前 T2251_.64.0340c01: 惑有二等不等一。後惑亦有二等不等大小一。中間
T2251_.64.0340c05: 等一。三闕縁之失。若不等者。應レ非レ具二生縁。於二 T2251_.64.0340c06: 生中一有二闕減一故。若言下雖二一生半生異一。倶是
T2251_.64.0340c10: 天七人六等。既以二不等一不レ入二七生數一。今亦 T2251_.64.0340c11: 何不等可レ得レ名二三生二生一。四違二諸聖教一。謂
T2251_.64.0340c19: 等生一。云二二三生往來一。全無二不等説一。是爲二生
T2251_.64.0340c24: 師云。人天二趣。若往。若來。戒賢論師云。二 T2251_.64.0340c25: 生家家唯於二天上一。二生往來。三生準レ之。本
T2251_.64.0340c28: 宗同二小乘諸論一。豈爲レ不レ然。然於二正法藏下一。 T2251_.64.0340c29: 受法稟承。奘三藏未審。爲レ同二師宗一。將異耶。 T2251_.64.0341a01: 應三是背レ師同二難陀謬執一。以レ何知レ之。三藏門 T2251_.64.0341a02: 人基泰光寶等。竝皆迷二正理臆説一。而傳襲彌 T2251_.64.0341a03: 布。悉廢莫レ依矣。基略章云。於レ中有レ四。一 T2251_.64.0341a04: 從レ人至レ人。二從レ天至レ天。三從レ人至レ天。四 T2251_.64.0341a05: 從レ天至レ人。廣章擧二二種一。謂人天往來。普光
T2251_.64.0341a08: 如レ是等義解人不レ得二倶言之。何況從レ之而 T2251_.64.0341a09: 下。問。準二預流天七人六等不等生一。豈無下斷二 T2251_.64.0341a10: 三四品一不等生上。答。誰言レ無レ之。彼不レ具二三縁一。 T2251_.64.0341a11: 唯是預流果攝。問。斷二三四品一。爲二人天往來一 T2251_.64.0341a12: 不。答。雖レ無二文説一。理應レ説レ有。若爾攝レ何。答。 T2251_.64.0341a13: 預流果攝非二一來向一。以レ不レ向レ彼故。然光記
T2251_.64.0341a16: 生一。亦攝二七生一者。應レ言レ攝二預流一。何極七反 T2251_.64.0341a17: 中。可レ攝二未滿者一。設攝レ彼於レ此莫レ攝。彼既 T2251_.64.0341a18: 云レ極。顯レ有二未滿者一。今唯言二家家一。不レ言レ極
T2251_.64.0341a21: 成二道跡一。問。斷二三四品一中。如二所言一者。大有二 T2251_.64.0341a22: 四類一。一唯天中往來受二二生三生一。人中亦爾。 T2251_.64.0341a23: 二唯天中不レ滿二二三生一。唯人亦爾。三人天往 T2251_.64.0341a24: 來受二三二生一。四未レ滿。此四中縁レ何。唯約二三 T2251_.64.0341a25: 縁一據二初門一。立二家家名一廢二餘三一。答。唯於レ天 T2251_.64.0341a26: 唯於レ人受二三二生一。異二餘例一故特立レ之。唯天 T2251_.64.0341a27: 唯人未滿準レ之可レ知。又人天往來準二前後一 T2251_.64.0341a28: 可レ知。故不レ立レ之。問。準レ斷二三四品一有中唯天 T2251_.64.0341a29: 唯人及人天往來上。於二極七反一。應二唯天中七 T2251_.64.0341b01: 反一耶。答。應 T2251_.64.0341b02: レ無。諸經説二人[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b03: 天往來一故。又[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b04: 解。應レ有機類[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b05: 非レ一故。經約二[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b06: 趣別一。且言二人[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b07: 天往來一。依二此[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b08: 義一。家家亦有二[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b09: 人天往來一。互[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b10: 影發故。問。欲[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b11: 界九品惑増[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b12: 損生一其相何。[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b13: 答。古今有二兩[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b14: 義一。一九品別[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b15: 潤義。二九品[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b16: 共潤義。寶疏[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b17: 別潤爲二假立一。[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b18: 共潤爲二實義一。[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b19: 是寔爾也。爾[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b20: 爲レ遮下闇二法相一[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b21: 愚上。亦別潤假[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b22: 立門。不レ可二強[IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0341b26: 唯一義。今爲二[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b27: 初歩一。示レ圖曰。[IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b28: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341b29: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c01: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c02: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c03: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c16: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c17: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c18: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c19: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c20: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c21: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c22: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c23: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c24: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c25: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c26: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c27: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c28: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0341c29: [IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0342a05: 相資。但由二道漸上時。惑漸斷盡。生自然少一。 T2251_.64.0342a06: 非三品定二損益一。故有下斷二一品二品五品一家家上。 T2251_.64.0342a07: 於レ理無レ爽。瑜伽但言レ有二天人家家一。不レ同下小
T2251_.64.0342a12: 三四一未レ滿二三二生一。而入レ寂名爲向。無下向二 T2251_.64.0342a13: 一來果一義上故。若不レ爾何但不レ言レ斷二第五一」
T2251_.64.0342a18: 含一。來至此世一。盡二於苦際一。若小遲者。來至此 T2251_.64.0342a19: 世一。盡二於苦際一。若勇猛者即於二此間一。盡二於苦
T2251_.64.0342a28: 有二餘惑別一。無二受生異一如二前數論一。第三句此 T2251_.64.0342a29: 字指レ斷二七八一。非レ謂二一間一。以三一間人非二其 T2251_.64.0342b01: 向一。是故長行更云二斷修惑七八品一
T2251_.64.0342b08: 以下彼有二一有種子一。名中一間上故
T2251_.64.0342b13: 體唯是一故。名二一間一帶數得レ名。是即能障 T2251_.64.0342b14: 法。而行人所有物。故以レ彼呼レ人。是全分有 T2251_.64.0342b15: 財也。不レ可レ謂下有二數字一故。是帶數。自他倶 T2251_.64.0342b16: 三種別即是唯他帶數釋上。具如二六合釋精義
T2251_.64.0342b22: レ云二一種子一。然此中説二翳迦鼻指迦一。此云二一
T2251_.64.0342c01: 於二天上一。唯受二一生一。六欲天中。隨レ應受二一生一。 T2251_.64.0342c02: 人一間者。謂於二人中一。唯受二一生一。三洲隨レ應。
T2251_.64.0342c07: 名曰二家家一間一。治レ彼無漏根。爾時方得故」
T2251_.64.0342c13: 有漏斷一故。次第人於二見道一斷二身戒疑三一。竝 T2251_.64.0342c14: 是從レ斷二第九品一先時。故曰二必先一。二人斷時。 T2251_.64.0342c15: 別故曰二或或一。於二此位中一五數畢故。言二總集
T2251_.64.0342c18: 集斷一。密作二是説一。必無二五結倶時斷理一。或二 T2251_.64.0342c19: 或三。先已斷故。理實應レ説下於二此位中一。斷二二 T2251_.64.0342c20: 或三一得中不還果上
T2251_.64.0342c23: 句明二現般不還一。初中初二句明二四不還一。次一 T2251_.64.0342c24: 行明二上流一。初此言指二不還體一。最後句此指二 T2251_.64.0342c25: 欲界一。顯二現般一。簡二色無色一
T2251_.64.0342c28: 經一之失。豈云レ非三是定爲二涅槃一。若不レ爾次下
T2251_.64.0343a07: 頌文已如レ是。故長行列名釋名亦順レ彼。而論
T2251_.64.0343a12: 前是通レ二。復於二第三以下一無二簡釋一。準知如二 T2251_.64.0343a13: 第二一。寶判決爲レ允
T2251_.64.0343a16: 道一。約二此二道有無一。辨二三種次第一
T2251_.64.0343a24: 者。得二生般涅槃一。彼地未二等覺一者。得二無行般 T2251_.64.0343a25: 槃一。彼地未二等覺一者。得二有行般涅槃一。彼地
T2251_.64.0343a29: 無行般一得二有行般一。若不レ得二有行般一得二上流
T2251_.64.0343b14: 不レ爾。有行爲レ先不レ當レ理。彼經誦者誤也
T2251_.64.0343b19: 利根一故。或有下生已諸無漏道。自然在前不レ加二 T2251_.64.0343b20: 勤行一。而入中涅槃上。是不行滅。以二根中一故。或有下 T2251_.64.0343b21: 生已深畏二受身一。勤修行道一。及入中涅槃上。是名二 T2251_.64.0343b22: 行滅一。以二根鈍一故。初二句標二速進有無一後以二 T2251_.64.0343b23: 二因一釋。初約二所成一。後約下得二涅槃一有用無用上。 T2251_.64.0343b24: 謂由レ無レ行有二速進道一義而成立。由レ有レ行無二。 T2251_.64.0343b25: 速進道一義而成立。不レ由二功用一得二涅槃一。故是 T2251_.64.0343b26: 速進道。由二功用一得二涅槃一。故是無二速進道一普
T2251_.64.0343b29: 故滅不レ由二功用一得。由二功用一得
T2251_.64.0343c03: 由二最速進道一故。由レ得二最上品道一故。由二煩惱 T2251_.64.0343c04: 最劣一故。此中能斷智爲二上品一。隨眠劣是微細 T2251_.64.0343c05: 故。如下以二上上智一斷中下下惑上。舊論云。能運載 T2251_.64.0343c06: 道。及最上品道。今亦無レ行得二涅槃一。例レ彼此 T2251_.64.0343c07: 亦勝二有行一。由レ有二速進道一。光記爲二因便釋一誤 T2251_.64.0343c08: 也。寶爲レ是
T2251_.64.0343c11: 十三處一。有中差別上故。竝是非レ全名レ半
T2251_.64.0343c20: 有行無行上流一。此中上流亦有二全半遍三一。謂 T2251_.64.0343c21: 四無色中。超二中二一全超。超レ一半超。四皆受 T2251_.64.0343c22: 生遍沒。準レ前可レ知。唯總言二生無色一不レ細。婆
T2251_.64.0344a10: 此中起者。中有名。生者生有名。如二論第十
T2251_.64.0344a13: 順起一。順即業故名二順起業一。餘二準レ之。造者 T2251_.64.0344a14: 造作。是先在二欲界一造作古業。聖人必不レ作二 T2251_.64.0344a15: 新業一。正理所引契經誠説。非二但造一。令二増長一 T2251_.64.0344a16: 故。云レ造二増長業一
T2251_.64.0344a19: 皆其業同故。不二由レ彼言一。上流雖レ有二起。生。及 T2251_.64.0344a20: 順次。順後業一。前三竝無レ異。同受二中有生有一。 T2251_.64.0344a21: 同由二順次業一。生二梵衆一故。唯色界第二生後
T2251_.64.0344a25: 雖レ有レ理背二論差別旨一。故論以二起生後不共一。 T2251_.64.0344a26: 成二三別一故
T2251_.64.0344a29: 三及上流七善人一。舊論云二七種賢聖人行一
T2251_.64.0344b03: 無レ別義。文勢明。寶疏屬レ下爲レ答。頌疏似レ依 T2251_.64.0344b04: レ彼。此有二三不可一。一加二雖言一失。義無二所出一 T2251_.64.0344b05: 故。二云二與レ凡無別失。所對凡夫無二所從來一 T2251_.64.0344b06: 故。三餘即不然一句唐捐失。然有人云三寶解 T2251_.64.0344b07: 順二文勢一者。所謂非中非也
T2251_.64.0344b10: 學一難二前釋一。有人云。光不レ辨二正不一。寶疏判談。
T2251_.64.0344b13: 故下答中有二二故一。又擧二二由一已云二故獨結 T2251_.64.0344b14: 通二故。謂七善士趣名中。前就二善士言一云二
T2251_.64.0344b17: 行一故。七善士經云二比丘行當レ如レ是。乃至廣 T2251_.64.0344b18: 説。何以レ彼難。光釋實穩暢。按此論脱二一由一。
T2251_.64.0344b22: 餘聖人一皆無。是故偈曰。善惡行不行 由三往 T2251_.64.0344b23: 不二更還一。釋曰。故於二上流一。立二七賢聖行一。於レ餘
T2251_.64.0344b26: 此七皆能行レ善。不レ行二不善一。餘則不レ然。又唯 T2251_.64.0344b27: 此七往二上界一。生不二復還來一。餘則不レ爾
T2251_.64.0344c03: 無色界一。所以者何。若在二欲界一經生聖者必 T2251_.64.0344c04: 無二三事一。一者不レ退。二者不二轉根一。三者不レ生二 T2251_.64.0344c05: 色無色界一。聖道久住相續中極堅牢故。恐下上 T2251_.64.0344c06: 二界有二長時苦一同中欲界上故。今但加二從レ欲上 T2251_.64.0344c07: 生一爲レ異耳
T2251_.64.0344c13: 不愚癡入レ胎 隨二我意所樂一 T2251_.64.0344c14: 得二身具足一已 速質直正道一 T2251_.64.0344c15: 行具足梵行一 常樂於乞食一 T2251_.64.0344c16: 學レ智。學レ智已若得レ知者。便得二究竟智一。得二究 T2251_.64.0344c17: 竟邊學智一。學智已。若得レ智不レ得二究竟智一者。 T2251_.64.0344c18: 當レ作二最上妙天一。諸天聞レ名二色究竟天一。往生 T2251_.64.0344c19: 彼中一。大仙人願當レ得二阿那含一。大仙人我今定
T2251_.64.0344c22: 故作二是説一。問。彼對二佛前一作二違理語一。世尊何 T2251_.64.0344c23: 故不レ訶制之一。答。佛知下彼言雖二復違理。而 T2251_.64.0344c24: 不障レ道。故不二訶制一。後入二法性一。自當二解了一」
T2251_.64.0344c27: 身極殊勝。婆沙云。彼相續中極堅牢故。光
T2251_.64.0345a01: 此二義一。無二練根及退事一
T2251_.64.0345a04: 初因云。答欲界是不二定界一。非二修地一。非二離染 T2251_.64.0345a05: 地一。多二諸過失災横留難一。住二本有位一。尚難レ得 T2251_.64.0345a06: レ果。況住二中有微劣身一耶。此爲二今初因一。故正
T2251_.64.0345a09: 法極難越故二句應レ入二毘婆沙上一。何者婆沙 T2251_.64.0345a10: 既有二十二因一。若擧二彼初因一。則次第可レ擧二四 T2251_.64.0345a11: 因一。何大爲レ二。於二後中一得。開二三因一。何況於二 T2251_.64.0345a12: 婆沙下一。有二標釋結一。又初論主釋安二彼言二示二 T2251_.64.0345a13: 四因一。次云二彼尚一。若此句別師義者。何無二彼
T2251_.64.0345a16: 善無記二種結一。得二若二若三沙門果一。越度三
T2251_.64.0345a19: 眠惑非二劣品一故。欲界難二出離一故。毘婆沙師 T2251_.64.0345a20: 説レ如レ此。此人所應作事甚多。一應レ滅二惡無記 T2251_.64.0345a21: 性煩惱一。二應レ至得第二第三沙門果一。三應三 T2251_.64.0345a22: 出離三界一。若在二中陰一。不レ能レ成就如レ此事一。 T2251_.64.0345a23: 既標二此人一。云二一二三一。唯局二三因一文勢明。今 T2251_.64.0345a24: 論是亂寫定爾矣。如二正理一者。不レ叙二兩義一。隨 T2251_.64.0345a25: レ思無レ違。若二若三者。光記兩釋。有人云。後
T2251_.64.0345b01: 字一。置二同本舊論明明文一。如二縱容正理一何。況 T2251_.64.0345b02: 彼無二若言一乎
T2251_.64.0345b10: 行一。三乃至最後下明二近加行成滿一。四次後唯 T2251_.64.0345b11: 從下。明二根本成就一正釋二第二句一。此有レ二。初 T2251_.64.0345b12: 正釋。後配二二道一。五如是雜修下。明三第四後 T2251_.64.0345b13: 修二下三定一。六先於下明二起處先後一。此小乘 T2251_.64.0345b14: 宗前無漏中。有漏後無漏雜修。若大乘者。瑜
T2251_.64.0345b17: 顯宗作二旋環一
T2251_.64.0345b21: 靜慮一。頌疏亦云。中間有漏。前後無漏。舊論
T2251_.64.0345b26: 煩天一。漸次倍二三心一。光二釋。初釋爲レ勝。自亦 T2251_.64.0345b27: 取レ初。眞諦及寶師同二初釋一。實會二論意一。後釋
T2251_.64.0345c07: 有一。豈可レ造二新業一。今論熏修有漏一。令レ感二淨 T2251_.64.0345c08: 居一者。約下増益故業一。能感之縁上也。光次證二婆 T2251_.64.0345c09: 沙一。未レ檢二明文一。而彼亦約二古業一無レ妨。光記從
T2251_.64.0345c14: 淨居一。曰亦由二業力一。亦由二雜修靜慮一。謂雖レ有二 T2251_.64.0345c15: 思業現前一。若不レ雜修靜慮一。則不レ得レ生レ彼。雖 T2251_.64.0345c16: レ有レ雜修靜慮一。若無二思業現前一。亦不レ得レ生 T2251_.64.0345c17: レ彼。是故要有二思業牽引雜修靜慮一。令二其決
T2251_.64.0345c26: レ理。故兼擧レ之
T2251_.64.0345c29: 脱一。而有二身證一。云何比丘而有二身證一。若有二比 T2251_.64.0346a01: 丘一。八解脱身觸成就遊。不三以レ惠見證漏已
T2251_.64.0346a05: 言教。亦復不レ信。但任二已性一而遊。是謂三名爲二
T2251_.64.0346a08: 魔。若魔天沙門婆羅門中一。自身作證。爲二他 T2251_.64.0346a09: 人一説二上中下言一。皆悉眞正義味。此佛名二身 T2251_.64.0346a10: 證一也
T2251_.64.0346a24: 能思相一。三如是下釋レ名。此釋名中。初正釋。 T2251_.64.0346a25: 後所由。此義身屬二所證一。證是能證。屬レ身之 T2251_.64.0346a26: 證。第六轉依主。故得下皆置二身言一。又前説 T2251_.64.0346a27: 定中得レ名。此出定而立レ名。是爲二二別一。得及 T2251_.64.0346a28: 智者。身寂靜之能得爲レ得。智者思所成智即 T2251_.64.0346a29: 思惠。光第二釋爲レ勝。順二及言一故。初釋非也。 T2251_.64.0346b01: 文中於二滅定一。不レ施二得言一故。亦復云二從起一。何
T2251_.64.0346b06: 非三唯彼位方得二身證名一。先後二時倶得レ名 T2251_.64.0346b07: 故。由レ此設無下縁二滅定一智上。得勢力故立二身證 T2251_.64.0346b08: 名一。是故前説於レ理爲レ勝。擧二後邊一故。唯作二是 T2251_.64.0346b09: 言一。得二滅定一不還轉名爲二身證一。理實身證於二 T2251_.64.0346b10: 八解脱一無レ不二具足一。由二身證住一。以下滅盡定用二 T2251_.64.0346b11: 餘解脱一爲レ門而入上故。今反破云。身是唯所 T2251_.64.0346b12: 依。何可レ爲二能證一。亦復前後二時倶得レ名者 T2251_.64.0346b13: 不レ爾。能所異故。舊論無二是一段一。梵本寫脱 T2251_.64.0346b14: 乎。若譯後闕文乎
T2251_.64.0346b21: 家家。一種。前三向及果。中等五不還。九無 T2251_.64.0346b22: 學
T2251_.64.0346b25: 作二無漏一。舊論作二無流一。爲レ正也。舊論云二三 T2251_.64.0346b26: 種無流學一。及無流學果一。此四法與二聖人一亦 T2251_.64.0346b27: 爲レ依。亦爲レ因。故云二依因一
T2251_.64.0346c06: 別未至所攝有二一千四百九十二一。今第三無 T2251_.64.0346c07: レ之。起二此定一所依地即九地。故云二通依九地一。 T2251_.64.0346c08: 謂未至中間根本下三無色無漏九地。能 T2251_.64.0346c09: 治道依地故。欲界非二定地一故。有頂非二無漏一
T2251_.64.0346c12: 阿羅漢一。非二一人起多。如二婆沙二十八説一」
T2251_.64.0346c15: 者。苦集竝厭行相。不レ可三厭レ下斷二上惑一故。 T2251_.64.0346c16: 問。何故不レ取二二法智一。答。法智縁レ欲智。唯斷二 T2251_.64.0346c17: 麁惑一力。無下斷二細惑一之殊勝力上故
T2251_.64.0346c20: 智一思惟欲界滅道一。作二四行相一隨一行相得中 T2251_.64.0346c21: 阿羅漢果上。問。法智苦集不レ取。何故特取レ之。 T2251_.64.0346c22: 答。滅道是斷證行相。縁二欲界一勝レ縁二上二界
T2251_.64.0346c25: 滅道勝二上界一故
T2251_.64.0347a02: レ妨
T2251_.64.0347a08: 便通二同類一。以二諸地道互相因一故
T2251_.64.0347a13: 問。此三説是非云何。答。光記第三爲レ正。
T2251_.64.0347a17: 有人云。光寶但以二餘論一決。於二此論前
T2251_.64.0347a20: 三説爲レ正。評家義故。此論無二簡別一故。次第 T2251_.64.0347a21: 亦同レ彼故。光記實得二論旨一。何以二正理一。可レ決二 T2251_.64.0347a22: 論主意一。其相違非二一條一故。今云。論主意初 T2251_.64.0347a23: 説爲レ正。何以故。文勢分明故。謂初説不レ標二
T2251_.64.0347a26: 執言一顯二不正義一。是其一論大例焉。舊論却爲
T2251_.64.0347a29: 無二其所以一。如レ是顯示勝劣是非一。聖教大例
T2251_.64.0347b06: レ理。故正理論師得二此論意一。初説中云下滅唯 T2251_.64.0347b07: 別縁。道則總縁。於二隨眠品一已具成立上。又破二 T2251_.64.0347b08: 後二師一云。彼倶非レ理。道必總縁。滅唯別縁。
T2251_.64.0347b12: 言一。可レ呵可レ去。近人亦愛著普光一。妄諍是二彼 T2251_.64.0347b13: 非一。至レ所レ不レ能レ救。而言二雖レ謬亦復其謬非 T2251_.64.0347b14: 無レ理。豈非レ背二依レ法不レ依レ人。依レ義不レ依レ文 T2251_.64.0347b15: 金言一乎。寶法唯擧二正理判決一。未レ辨二此論起 T2251_.64.0347b16: 盡一。唯偏信二正理一之舊蔽。未レ得二此論旨一。誰爲 T2251_.64.0347b17: レ不レ然乎。更難二第二師一。道互爲二因果一必總縁。 T2251_.64.0347b18: 滅自地各別無二互因果一。何混同同爲二別縁一。 T2251_.64.0347b19: 難二第三師一。謂滅類智各別無二因義一。何可二合 T2251_.64.0347b20: 縁一。若彼合縁道尚應二合縁一。同類相因故。又唯 T2251_.64.0347b21: 別縁能斷二其惑一。有二何不足一用二合縁一爲 T2251_.64.0347b22: 金剛喩定依二九地一多數三師異説圖 論
T2251_.64.0347b27: 九品惑滅離至得一。倶起智名二盡智一。光初釋爲 T2251_.64.0347b28: レ善。寶亦如レ是。第二釋盡得與二倶行盡智一。約 T2251_.64.0347b29: 相違釋一。違二新舊論一也
T2251_.64.0347c18: 應中更學上故。故正理云。諸自利行。修學已成。 T2251_.64.0347c19: 唯應レ作二他利益事一故。次應供義約二所供養一。
T2251_.64.0347c23: 無レ有二相違一
T2251_.64.0347c27: 學一。故名爲レ學。尸婆白レ佛。何所レ學。佛告二尸 T2251_.64.0347c28: 婆一。隨レ時學二増上戒一。學二増上意一。學二増上慧一。舊
T2251_.64.0348a01: T2251_.64.0348a02: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a03: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a16: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a17: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a18: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a19: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a20: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a21: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a22: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a23: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a24: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a25: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a26: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a27: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a28: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0348a29: [IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0348b05: 亦是物也。是亦坐レ不レ讀二本經一耳。今云。所レ云 T2251_.64.0348b06: 三學云二無漏正法一。光次文云レ學二正所學無漏 T2251_.64.0348b07: 戒等一。漏無漏爲二邪正一。實是本意。還汝未レ了二 T2251_.64.0348b08: 經意一。求二志於彈斥一。亡二於光次文一。設雖レ無二次 T2251_.64.0348b09: 文一。聖人所學戒定慧云二無漏正法一。有二何妨一。
T2251_.64.0348b12: 正定一。成就是名レ學。何等爲二無學一。無學正見成 T2251_.64.0348b13: 就無學正志乃至正定成就。是名二無學一
T2251_.64.0348b16: 預流等住二本性一。不二進修一應レ不二有學一。婆沙百
T2251_.64.0348b19: 但説下不二進修一名中住本性上。謂預流者不レ進修
T2251_.64.0348b22: 除遣。以二邪正相對一故
T2251_.64.0348b29: 乃至七爲レ證得阿羅漢果一行二於道一。八證得 T2251_.64.0349a01: T2251_.64.0349a02: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349a03: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349a04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349a05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349a06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349a07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349a08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349a09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349a10: 阿羅漢果一
T2251_.64.0349a16: 前攝レ果之名一同一上。而其事體與レ彼二物。釋二 T2251_.64.0349a17: 此句一初釋與寶同。約二非レ攝相一如二初釋一。尋二 T2251_.64.0349a18: 所由一如二後釋一。竝存可也
T2251_.64.0349a21: 無二近分一。易レ了不レ具。後約二自不治レ自。此相 T2251_.64.0349a22: 難レ曉具釋。初標立。二自地煩惱下所由。三 T2251_.64.0349a23: 故自下結。其所由中初總釋。後若彼下別釋。 T2251_.64.0349a24: 初順釋・後若此下反顯。光云。復正理云。若彼
T2251_.64.0349a28: 煩惱甲。以四順二生長彼煩惱一故。此二十四字脱 T2251_.64.0349a29: 應レ加レ之 T2251_.64.0349b01: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349b02: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349b03: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349b04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349b05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349b06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349b07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349b08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0349b09: [IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0349b14: 世一。捨レ惑不レ應故。有頂半解脱如二上生一不レ應。
T2251_.64.0349b18: 三定近分離二第二定一不上。能離二初定染一
T2251_.64.0349b21: 明。後下三下辨二所以一。初總標二能所治一中。初 T2251_.64.0349b22: 總擧二能治所依一。後總擧二所離一。是爲レ明三近分
T2251_.64.0349b25: 色定。此中從二欲界離欲一。乃至二第二定離欲一。名二 T2251_.64.0349b26: 三地勝一。於二此三地中一。最後解脱道。或從二近 T2251_.64.0349b27: 分定一起。或從二根本定一起。既云レ標二一切衆生一。 T2251_.64.0349b28: 簡別云二此中一。總別之異。由漸正釋差別炳然。 T2251_.64.0349b29: 今亦云二諸道一。有漏無漏諸道依地。故云レ諸。
T2251_.64.0349c03: 宗。竝全同二此論一。今此正所明唯有漏。而唯離 T2251_.64.0349c04: レ下。故前問。及頌。長行。悉云二離下一。然普光不 T2251_.64.0349c05: レ設二分節一。亂解致二二釋一。竝皆違二論旨一。初釋應 T2251_.64.0349c06: レ言二離レ八謂除二有頂一者。未レ曉三總擧二所離一。而 T2251_.64.0349c07: 正二論文一。非中之非也。後釋雖レ非レ無レ理。而全 T2251_.64.0349c08: 謬二今正所明一。謂唯有漏加二無漏一。唯離下加二 T2251_.64.0349c09: 離上一。剩通二釋頌文一。云レ約二多分一。令二初人迷一其 T2251_.64.0349c10: 罪大矣
T2251_.64.0349c13: 唯云二解脱道及滅一
T2251_.64.0349c16: 漏一。此示レ體
T2251_.64.0349c21: 煩熱苦報生老病死因一。是謂二沙門一。問。此經唯 T2251_.64.0349c22: 息惡義。無二勤苦修行一。答。息二煩熱一。必有二勤行一。 T2251_.64.0349c23: 故云二勤勞一。非二相違一。舊論云。如二經言一。此人能 T2251_.64.0349c24: 寂靜多種惡法。不應慧法。染汚法。隨下順生
T2251_.64.0350a01: 惱永斷
T2251_.64.0350a08: 諸過失一故。由レ此異生雖三能已斷二無所有處 T2251_.64.0350a09: 染一。而非二眞沙門一。以二諸過失尚有餘故。暫時 T2251_.64.0350a10: 靜息。非二究竟一故。寶疏唯擧二正理一。實得二論意一。 T2251_.64.0350a11: 然有人此論與二正理一稍異。寶疏直用二正理一 T2251_.64.0350a12: 未者。却泥レ文也
T2251_.64.0350a15: 阿那含果。阿羅漢果。中含二十六師子吼經
T2251_.64.0350a23: 中爲レ二。初釋二八十九相一。二諸無下辨二寛狹一。 T2251_.64.0350a24: 是即四句意。初第一單句。次第三雙亦句。後 T2251_.64.0350a25: 第二單句。就二亦是言一。寶疏二釋。初釋亦二無 T2251_.64.0350a26: 爲性一者謬之甚。以三解脱道非二無爲一故。違三互
T2251_.64.0350a30: 也。無二離レ斷別道位一故
T2251_.64.0350b04: 薄。何等爲二阿那含果一。謂五下分結盡。何等 T2251_.64.0350b05: 爲二阿羅漢果一。謂貪恚癡永盡。一切煩惱永盡。
T2251_.64.0350b09: 此中亦有レ二。初總通二見修一。示二梵輪名一。二後 T2251_.64.0350b10: 一頌。別就二見道一。示二法輪名一。於中者。正理 T2251_.64.0350b11: 釋二梵輪中一。光記爲レ得。寶疏總爲二沙門性中一 T2251_.64.0350b12: 義疎遠。然光記初一頌異名。後一頌明二法 T2251_.64.0350b13: 輪一。豈可レ不二後一頌是異名一。云二於中一云二説名一 T2251_.64.0350b14: 故
T2251_.64.0350b17: 然一者。我即是沙門諸有奉持沙門戒律。我皆 T2251_.64.0350b18: 已得。如レ今欲レ論二婆羅門一者。亦我身是。所以 T2251_.64.0350b19: 然一者。我即是婆羅門也。諸過去婆羅門所持
T2251_.64.0350b22: 之婆羅門。同二沙門一。同二婆羅門一。沙門義婆羅
T2251_.64.0350b25: 法一。名爲二梵志一。更説二異名一。亦名爲二刹利一。以 T2251_.64.0350b26: レ斷二其婬怒癡一故。亦名爲二沐浴一。以三其洗二二十 T2251_.64.0350b27: 一結一故。亦名爲レ覺。以三其覺了愚法慧法一故。 T2251_.64.0350b28: 亦名爲二彼岸一。以下其從二此岸一至中彼岸上故。中含
T2251_.64.0350c01: 生老病死因一。是謂二梵志一。更有下聖與二淨浴一名上」
T2251_.64.0350c05: 輪故名二梵輪一。依主釋。簡二世間初定之假梵 T2251_.64.0350c06: 王一。故云レ眞。問。今沙門性異名。豈佛獨名レ梵。 T2251_.64.0350c07: 何成二異名一。答。約二所懷持一。是佛徳。約二能懷持一
T2251_.64.0350c10: 業佛圖澄一。澄姓帛氏。安以ク師莫レ過二釋文一。乃 T2251_.64.0350c11: 以レ釋稱。人有二議者一。後増一阿含譯出。始服二 T2251_.64.0350c12: 其懸解一云。當時已有二法海經一。西晋法炬譯。 T2251_.64.0350c13: 其經具言レ之。不レ待二増一一。古今鮮下能讀二三藏一
T2251_.64.0350c18: 按四有字。考二之餘經一者字誤。亦字又者草 T2251_.64.0350c19: 誤。今云。不二必然一。約二能有一云。佛具二諸梵徳一 T2251_.64.0350c20: 云二梵有一。有二何妨一。亦字分二熱煩一爲二二義一。故 T2251_.64.0350c21: 特云レ亦。非二草誤一也。有云。此所引經三名。 T2251_.64.0350c22: 後二名同文故來。今云。初總名。後二梵所 T2251_.64.0350c23: 有義。故特證レ之。非二同文故來一。故舊論云。 T2251_.64.0350c24: 如二經中説一。世尊是夫嵐摩。如レ此寂靜。如レ此
T2251_.64.0351a02: 初標立。即釋二次二句一。二如世下明下與二輪名一 T2251_.64.0351a03: 所以上。亦二。初約二五種相似一。後約二輻等ノ相ノ T2251_.64.0351a04: 相似一。此二義竝爲二法喩一。如二輪之法一。故名二法
T2251_.64.0351a07: 即法之輪故依主釋。此意佛法能斷レ疑。是輪 T2251_.64.0351a08: 徳故持業也。依主中能所相反應レ言二輪之法一 T2251_.64.0351a09: 也。又輪釋二四義一。一圓滿義。以レ離二缺減一故。二 T2251_.64.0351a10: 具徳義。具二轂輻輞等一故。三有用義。摧輾惑 T2251_.64.0351a11: 障一故。四轉動義。從レ此至レ彼。即從レ佛至二衆 T2251_.64.0351a12: 生一。亦從レ彼向レ此。從二衆生一至二佛果一故。玄賛
T2251_.64.0351a15: 也。動宣言教一。顯揚妙理一。運二聖道一。於二聲前一 T2251_.64.0351a16: 起二眞智一。於二言後一圓摧二煩惱一。名二轉法輪一。義
T2251_.64.0351a27: 有二迴轉義一。今五相中。總不レ離二迴轉一。故不二別 T2251_.64.0351a28: 立一。論主意。若約二一相一義。偏不レ圓。故合集正 T2251_.64.0351a29: 理顯宗亦如レ今。此中有二捨取一故者。婆沙云。 T2251_.64.0351b01: 捨二苦現觀一。趣二集現觀一。乃至捨二滅現觀一。趣二道 T2251_.64.0351b02: 現觀一
T2251_.64.0351b06: 道一。展轉和合。一時至二他相續中一。轉故名二法輪一。 T2251_.64.0351b07: 此八支道。見道位勝。是故見道。獨名二法輪一」 T2251_.64.0351b08: 彼唯以二移轉義一釋レ輪也。彼六説示レ圖曰 T2251_.64.0351b09: T2251_.64.0351b10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0351b11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0351b12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0351b13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0351b14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0351b15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0351b16: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0351b17: 舊論。正理。顯宗竝同二此論一。今配當全同二彼
T2251_.64.0351b22: 道在二見道一。七覺支在二修道一。有餘師。經部。大
T2251_.64.0351c02: 天摩梵沙門婆羅門聞法衆中一爲二解脱一爲レ出 T2251_.64.0351c03: 爲離。亦不三自證二阿耨多羅三藐三菩提一。我 T2251_.64.0351c04: 已於二四聖諦三轉十二行一。生二眼智明覺一故。 T2251_.64.0351c05: 於二諸天摩梵沙門婆羅門聞法衆中一。得レ出得 T2251_.64.0351c06: レ脱。自證得阿耨多羅三藐三菩提一。乃至憍陳 T2251_.64.0351c07: 如。拘隣知法已。地神擧レ聲唱言。諸仁者世尊 T2251_.64.0351c08: 於二婆羅那一三轉十二行法輪。聞二虚空神一。謂 T2251_.64.0351c09: 六欲天。展轉聞二梵天一。乘レ聲唱言。諸仁者世
T2251_.64.0351c15: 正義一。後規二諸師誤一。辨一正義一者。自下爲レ決二法 T2251_.64.0351c16: 輪在位一。論二三轉十二行一。此問也
T2251_.64.0351c19: 此初也。此中麁分爲レ五。一叙二三轉一。二示二十 T2251_.64.0351c20: 二行一。三通二數妨一。四配二三道一。五結レ宗。初中此 T2251_.64.0351c21: 苦聖諦。初轉約二見道一。此應遍知第二轉。約二 T2251_.64.0351c22: 修道一。此已遍知約二無學道一。故下三轉如レ次 T2251_.64.0351c23: 爲二三道一 T2251_.64.0351c24: 規二諸師誤一者。光寶竝因便明者。全不レ得二論 T2251_.64.0351c25: 意一。何者下論主示二正解一中。兩釋倶法輪名爲 T2251_.64.0351c26: レ本故。又釋二三轉一。光約二三道一爲レ是。寶疏約二示 T2251_.64.0351c27: 勸證一。唯就二見道一。釋背二論意一。及違二文勢一也
T2251_.64.0352a01: 言爲二眼肝一。謂渉二三道一。非二唯見一。唯見非二三道一 T2251_.64.0352a02: 故。依レ之正理救釋。必不二成立一。如二下具辨一
T2251_.64.0352a05: 道一。後倶約二三道一。故竝不二且吾一也。此初義也。 T2251_.64.0352a06: 此中爲レ三。初正示三三轉教名二法輪一。二明二三 T2251_.64.0352a07: 轉十二行相一。三叙二轉義一。初中是故者。承二上 T2251_.64.0352a08: 難一起二下正義一。即示二有レ過故改義。唯者簡二修 T2251_.64.0352a09: 無學二道屬二三轉一。即此言唯前唯見道爲二法 T2251_.64.0352a10: 輪一之義。見道三轉十二行教門名二法輪一也。
T2251_.64.0352a13: 云二三轉一。答曰。一見道三周轉故。三轉義成。 T2251_.64.0352a14: 若爾應二三轉三行一。何具二十二一。答。雖二見一道一。 T2251_.64.0352a15: 有二苦集滅道四一。三四十二行成立。別釋約二示 T2251_.64.0352a16: 勸證一可レ知。明二轉義一中。若教門名レ轉。轉義 T2251_.64.0352a17: 何。謂自悟法説往二他身一。令二彼教義證悟一。故 T2251_.64.0352a18: 轉義成。問。此義以レ何知二轉法輪倶唯見道一。 T2251_.64.0352a19: 答。異二第二釋三道法輪一故。云二三周一故。一法 T2251_.64.0352a20: 再二故云レ周。三道別何可レ云レ周。如二減縁減 T2251_.64.0352a21: 行一。云二四聖諦一故。不レ通二已轉契經一故。問。若 T2251_.64.0352a22: 爾於二後二道一。無二三轉十二行一乎。答。世尊所 T2251_.64.0352a23: 説且唯約二見道一。云二已轉一故。若後二道準レ之。 T2251_.64.0352a24: 亦作レ之無レ有レ妨。或諸下第二約二三道一爲二法 T2251_.64.0352a25: 輪一。舊論云二復次一。是亦異三有部爲二唯見道一。三 T2251_.64.0352a26: 轉同レ彼。爲二三道一不二別釋一。而於レ通二已轉言一。 T2251_.64.0352a27: 自成立故。此中爲レ三。初三道爲二法輪一。二 T2251_.64.0352a28: 釋二轉義一。三通釋已轉言一。後辨二先英是非一。
T2251_.64.0352b02: 光約二三道一者誤。若同レ前三道ナラハ何別可二問
T2251_.64.0352b05: レ當如何。是故引レ彼須レ設二反破一。若正師約二通 T2251_.64.0352b06: 中初一。何得レ云レ唯。既云レ唯。其救不レ成。寶疏
T2251_.64.0352b09: 標爲二有説一而加二能破一。彼上下其類非一也。 T2251_.64.0352b10: 又擧二正理此但等能破一。不レ破者非也。次但 T2251_.64.0352b11: 約二示勸證一。不レ言二見修等一。似二無失一。而初
T2251_.64.0352b14: 取乙三道甲。若爾初釋爲二見道一乎。次引二正理
T2251_.64.0352b17: 名二法輪一。是婆沙本意ナラハ何得レ言二唯見道一。言 T2251_.64.0352b18: レ唯故所レ設二難詰一。故種種通釋。竝皆歸二虚妄一。 T2251_.64.0352b19: 汝曲二婆沙師意一致レ救。豈可レ爲レ順二本宗一。又
T2251_.64.0352b22: 法輪方便。即是眞法輪。諸法談義。豈可レ言
T2251_.64.0352b25: 經部宗一。破二薩婆多一言上。又擧二今難詰已下兩
T2251_.64.0352b29: 正義一云。牟尼説。見道速疾名二法輪一。倶舍復 T2251_.64.0352c01: 言。或諸道皆是法輪等。此是薩婆多師本意。 T2251_.64.0352c02: 故顯宗云。毘婆沙本意。總説二一切聖道一。皆 T2251_.64.0352c03: 名二法輪一。以レ説二三輪三道攝一故。於二他相續一見 T2251_.64.0352c04: 道生時已至二轉初一。故名二已轉一。非下唯見道以二 T2251_.64.0352c05: 八支聖道一獨名中法輪上。妙音所説非二正義一故。 T2251_.64.0352c06: 基師不レ破也。今云。依二經部宗一者未レ詳。後有 T2251_.64.0352c07: 釋甚非也。若非二有部正義一。何頌云二唯見道一。
T2251_.64.0352c10: 義一。倶舍第二釋。是論主改正義。全非二有部 T2251_.64.0352c11: 義一。何可レ爲二有部本義一。證二顯宗一練磨不レ足矣。 T2251_.64.0352c12: 彼蒙二論主難一。衆賢致二如レ是轉救一。而毘婆沙 T2251_.64.0352c13: 師云二唯見道一。故終不レ成レ救。然豈爲レ證。可
T2251_.64.0352c19: 覺一。即十二轉四十八行。而云二三轉十六行一。四
T2251_.64.0352c22: 依三界身 問。無色無レ有レ色。何云レ身。答。心 T2251_.64.0352c23: 心所聚義爲レ身。或約二多分一也
T2251_.64.0352c26: 究竟者至二得阿羅漢果一。由二此經一故知。於二上
Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:有/無] [CITE] |