大正蔵検索 INBUDS
|
阿毘達磨倶舍論法義 (No. 2251_ 快道撰 ) in Vol. 64 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:有/無] [CITE]
T2251_.64.0279a01: 故亦名レ記。令三彼問者得二正解一故。或有二默然 T2251_.64.0279a02: 於二理得勝。況酬二彼問一而非レ記耶。廣引二外道
T2251_.64.0279a12: 應レ記。雖二復有言以二遮止一故名二置記一。或有二 T2251_.64.0279a13: 默然一。於レ理得レ勝亦名二置記一。如下婆莠羅默然
T2251_.64.0279a17: 對二反詰一非也。寶疏云レ但得二論意一矣。此難者 T2251_.64.0279a18: 謂二雙問一。故云二亦勝亦劣一
T2251_.64.0279a21: 義門一容レ有二二記一。謂一分別記。二反詰記。今 T2251_.64.0279a22: 據二一邊一爲二反詰記一。汝難二應一向記一全不レ知二 T2251_.64.0279a23: 問意一。後解釋文一。然彼問者一向爲二將レ爲レ勝 T2251_.64.0279a24: 將レ爲レ劣問一。不レ爲二亦勝亦劣問一。雖レ有二爲勝爲 T2251_.64.0279a25: 劣二語一而意但各一途。謂爲字所レ顯唯勝唯
T2251_.64.0279a29: 不レ尋二問意一直據二事法一應レ成二分別答一。謂望レ天 T2251_.64.0279b01: 是劣。望レ下是勝。今但欲レ尋二問者所方故。 T2251_.64.0279b02: 反詰言レ爲二何所方一。寶疏得二論意一。然爲下先 T2251_.64.0279b03: 作二反詰一後分別記上者若可レ然也。光記解釋 T2251_.64.0279b04: 大誤也。有云。正理論通二此難一但言二爲勝一 T2251_.64.0279b05: 不レ言レ劣。而言レ説二一爲聲一云レ不二雙問一。準レ彼 T2251_.64.0279b06: 此人問レ爲レ勝。此人問レ爲レ劣。非三一人問二爲勝 T2251_.64.0279b07: 爲劣二一。故論文言二一向爲問。詳曰。泥二正理 T2251_.64.0279b08: 文一。彼爲レ令レ知レ非二一體兩用雙問一但約二爲勝 T2251_.64.0279b09: 一邊一。然非レ不レ問二爲勝爲劣一。雖レ問二爲勝爲劣一 T2251_.64.0279b10: 然是意各別問。若爲レ勝則唯勝。爲レ劣亦爾。 T2251_.64.0279b11: 學者可レ思
T2251_.64.0279b15: 心等一決二二三差別一。今全擧二婆沙義一。然光。寶 T2251_.64.0279b16: 前章爲二毘婆沙義一。此爲二本論師一非也
T2251_.64.0279b19: 初説唯指事別。於レ義不レ違レ經。彼對法師義。 T2251_.64.0279b20: 二三差別難レ辨。倶反詰故。問。亦同唯請レ説 T2251_.64.0279b21: 於二内心一分二直諂一。是唯自立非二經意一。豈一切 T2251_.64.0279b22: 人可レ得下知二内心一答此。故殊論主依二經説一 T2251_.64.0279b23: 斥レ彼。此一段皆是契經文。云二依經一故。舊論
T2251_.64.0279b29: 共説一若使三此賢者一向論不二一向答一者。分 T2251_.64.0279c01: 別論不二分別答一者。詰論不二詰答一者。止論不二 T2251_.64.0279c02: 止答一者。如レ是此賢者不レ得二共説一亦不レ得二共 T2251_.64.0279c03: 論一。若使二此賢者一向論便一向答一者。分別論 T2251_.64.0279c04: 分別答者。詰論詰答者。止論止答者。如レ是此 T2251_.64.0279c05: 賢者得二共説一亦得二共論一。次復處二非處住。所
T2251_.64.0279c08: 四事觀察一而示二四問記一。其相同二此經一。彼多
T2251_.64.0279c17: T2251_.64.0279c18: T2251_.64.0279c19: T2251_.64.0279c20: 豐山寓居上毛沙門快道記 T2251_.64.0279c21: 隨眠品第五之二
T2251_.64.0279c24: 相惑一。後二句約二共相惑一。自相惑中。初二句 T2251_.64.0279c25: 明二過現意相應一。次三句明二未來六識相應。未 T2251_.64.0279c26: 斷言與二能繫言一各通二中間五處一。貪瞋慢言 T2251_.64.0279c27: 與二意五字一能所相應互影發。一若言隨レ應 T2251_.64.0279c28: 通レ下。一未來言流二次二句一
T2251_.64.0280a06: 結。二迷二自相一。謂愛。恚。慢。嫉。慳結。簡レ彼故 T2251_.64.0280a07: 言レ且。諸者。非一義。煩惱六故。故言レ諸。總者。
T2251_.64.0280a12: 散釋明不二別可釋。而釋二未斷一一令三人準二思 T2251_.64.0280a13: 能繫未來等亦如是。故據レ初殊擧二未斷一
T2251_.64.0280a16: 初正明。後所由。已生簡二未生一。未斷簡二已斷一。 T2251_.64.0280a17: 謂前未レ生設生已斷即不レ繫。故於二現在一無二 T2251_.64.0280a18: 未斷言一者。既體現前。約二未斷一者。理在二絶言一。 T2251_.64.0280a19: 故且略レ之。或準二過去一可レ知。故頌文言二未斷 T2251_.64.0280a20: 過現一。舊論曰。過去現在欲瞋慢。是處已起乃
T2251_.64.0280a25: 爲通二此疑一有二所由釋一。一以三貪瞋慢自相惑 T2251_.64.0280a26: 非レ如二共相遍行一故。二雖レ繫二三世一。以レ非下三 T2251_.64.0280a27: 界諸有情決定遍起繫二三世諸有漏法一盡上故。 T2251_.64.0280a28: 是簡二未來遍行一。彼婆沙總説不レ論二盡不盡一 T2251_.64.0280a29: 故不レ言レ遍。是故論唯言三能繫二此事一。與二共相
T2251_.64.0280b03: 世縛下。何以故。非三不見不聞不分別事起二貪 T2251_.64.0280b04: 瞋慢一。何以故。分齊縁故。或時有レ人於レ眼 T2251_.64.0280b05: 生レ貪。非二餘身分一。何以故。自相使故。非下貪等
T2251_.64.0280b08: 來中未盡非レ不レ繋二未來一也。光記於遍存二兩 T2251_.64.0280b09: 種一以簡釋。全非二論意一。此論遍二三世有漏法一 T2251_.64.0280b10: 盡名二遍行一。故言二遍於三世一。能縛三世。遍縛 T2251_.64.0280b11: 三世一。非下唯繫二三世一名中遍行上。何況遍二自境一。寶
T2251_.64.0280b22: 正理一。法寶於レ此所纒二歴六小七大七等多端一 T2251_.64.0280b23: 忘却讀二正理一。光記下引二正理一不レ謬也。問。 T2251_.64.0280b24: 論文於二未來一分二意五一。於レ此不レ爲豈非二通レ六 T2251_.64.0280b25: 文勢常規一。解云。既説レ慢無レ五理在二絶言一。 T2251_.64.0280b26: 故無二意言簡一。又頌云二未來意遍行一。前二句 T2251_.64.0280b27: 即意自顯成。應二依レ義不依レ文。問。是繫二三 T2251_.64.0280b28: 世一於レ文無レ驗何。解云。既言二非定遍一顯三不定 T2251_.64.0280b29: 繫二三世一。又望二下自世及遍行一。是顯示非二自 T2251_.64.0280c01: 世一亦非二遍行一而但繫中三世上。顯宗論二十六
T2251_.64.0280c04: 未斷一。此未斷言應レ成二無用一。無二無用過一。此未 T2251_.64.0280c05: 斷言顯レ有二品別漸次斷一故。即於二此論次下 T2251_.64.0280c06: 文中一。亦説二未來意遍行等一。謂彼貪等九品 T2251_.64.0280c07: 不レ同。修道斷時九品別斷。有下縁二此事一上品 T2251_.64.0280c08: 隨眠已起已滅已得永斷。彼於二此事一尙有二未 T2251_.64.0280c09: 來餘品隨眠未起未滅未得永斷一猶能爲繫。 T2251_.64.0280c10: 是故本論於二此義中一雖レ説二未來愛等所繫一。而 T2251_.64.0280c11: 於二過去一説二未斷言一。故未斷言深成二有用一。然
T2251_.64.0280c16: 引九結婆沙一。令三此段通二六識一。過現意繫二過 T2251_.64.0280c17: 現一等上。依レ義皆思簡
T2251_.64.0280c20: 是過現及未來兩段而非二識五意分莭一。故於 T2251_.64.0280c21: レ此言レ若無二五識上一。未來意地生不生竝皆 T2251_.64.0280c22: 繫二三世一。故言二乃至未斷一。不三別言二已生未斷一。
T2251_.64.0281a03: 唯簡二過現一。以二五若已生唯現量縁一。是故可生 T2251_.64.0281a04: 亦唯未來。可生既唯未來。已生唯現。已滅唯
T2251_.64.0281a07: 去一至レ現亦爾。義准若與二意識一相應可生隨
T2251_.64.0281a12: 諸與二五識一相應隨眠。若定不生亦縛二三世一。 T2251_.64.0281a13: 謂彼境界。或在二未來一。或在二現在一。或在二過去一。 T2251_.64.0281a14: 彼雖三已得二畢竟不生一。而未斷時性能繫縛。
T2251_.64.0281a17: 未來一。次流在レ現。後滅落遮。境已渉二三世一故 T2251_.64.0281a18: 名二繫三世一。由レ是須レ知二縁與レ繫別一。雖二是不 T2251_.64.0281a19: 縁而即能繫。若眼識不レ得二縁闕不生一。隨レ境 T2251_.64.0281a20: 渉二三世一繫二自世一。然得二永不生一。常居二未來一。雖
T2251_.64.0281a23: 參差三世一。如下有二眼識一定縁二靑黃赤色三境一 T2251_.64.0281a24: 而起上。隨闕二一境一識即不レ生。其所闕境。或一 T2251_.64.0281a25: 未來。或一現在。或一過去。故説三五識遍縛二三
T2251_.64.0281a29: 境異時渉歴三世一。後三境同時居二未現過位一。 T2251_.64.0281b01: 詳曰。前解爲レ勝。以二決定一故。後解未也。不定 T2251_.64.0281b02: 而少分。一識同時多境豈是論意
T2251_.64.0281b05: 由準レ前可レ知。現在中言二正縁一者。顯示縁境 T2251_.64.0281b06: T2251_.64.0281b07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281b08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281b09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281b10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281b11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281b12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281b13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281b14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281b15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281b16: [IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0281b19: 爲二生起一。湛惠云。寶疏爲レ優。符順正理及舊
T2251_.64.0281b24: 論レ此。正理亦爾。爲二頌廣顯一於レ前略述。舊論 T2251_.64.0281b25: 却屬二後段一之證。曰毘婆沙師成立一切有爲 T2251_.64.0281b26: 法非二常住一。由下與二行相一相應上故。彼成立此
T2251_.64.0281c02: 必現量。現正縁レ色唯繫二現色事一。若意識現在 T2251_.64.0281c03: 前。正縁二過未境一即繫二過未一。餘一切準レ此應 T2251_.64.0281c04: レ知 T2251_.64.0281c05: T2251_.64.0281c06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281c07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281c08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281c09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281c10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281c11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281c12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281c13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281c14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281c15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281c16: [IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0281c21: 初一有二彼結前一。是幷頌前生起。汝但見二頌前 T2251_.64.0281c22: 片文一可レ笑矣。此中爲レ五。初經部兩關徴責。 T2251_.64.0281c23: 二有部略答。三生起頌文一。四擧レ頌。五長行」
T2251_.64.0281c27: 觀察已。不レ顧二過去色一。不レ欣二未來色一。於二現在 T2251_.64.0281c28: 色一厭離。欲滅寂靜。受想行識亦復如レ是。次 T2251_.64.0281c29: 廣約二三世一説。今現在極成。故但引二過未文一。 T2251_.64.0282a01: 光記作二兩解一。第一爲レ正。順二本經一故。後釋分二 T2251_.64.0282a02: 厭與捨大鑿也。經文既云レ已。又無二求言一故。 T2251_.64.0282a03: 惠暉過去色定共別解脱戒。未來色定道二 T2251_.64.0282a04: 戒。未レ檢二本經一坐以談レ妄。彼總約二五蘊一説。 T2251_.64.0282a05: 定唯戒色
T2251_.64.0282a11: 亦從レ光
T2251_.64.0282a21: 可レ得レ用。彼婆沙前文亦有レ同二此論一。學者得二 T2251_.64.0282a22: 造者意一勿レ纒二他文一
T2251_.64.0282a25: 相上。二以設下二擧レ頌示二所以一。三謂若下正 T2251_.64.0282a26: 簡二別部宗一有レ二。初擧二有部宗一。先擧二所説一。後 T2251_.64.0282a27: 方許下判屬宗一。二若人下擧二相濫一簡別。先 T2251_.64.0282a28: 擧二所説一。後彼可下簡別。此一章文易意難レ探。
T2251_.64.0282b02: 由執説一切有許 釋曰。若人説二一切有一。 T2251_.64.0282b03: 謂過去未來現在虚空擇滅非擇滅。許三彼爲二 T2251_.64.0282b04: 説一切有部一。復有二餘人一。説下現世法必有。過 T2251_.64.0282b05: 去業若未二與果一是有。若過去業已與果。及未 T2251_.64.0282b06: 來無レ果此皆是無上。若如レ是分別故説二三世 T2251_.64.0282b07: 有一。此人非二説一切有部攝一。是説分別部所攝
T2251_.64.0282b11: 位其體猶有。果イヽ若熟已其體便無。如外種 T2251_.64.0282b12: 子芽未レ生位其體猶有。芽若生已其體更無
T2251_.64.0282b19: 謂尊者法救説二類有異。尊者妙音説二相有 T2251_.64.0282b20: 異。尊者世友説二位有異。尊者覺天説二待
T2251_.64.0282b23: 無レ擧レ名。唯示二所立四別一。諸論竝讃二世友説一 T2251_.64.0282b24: 揑二餘三一。今論亦同レ彼。非二是論主創評決一
T2251_.64.0282b29: 色一。正理。顯宗及鮮本作レ體。詳曰。作レ體爲レ正。 T2251_.64.0282c01: 論主欲レ令二二喩有別改用二金喩一。故舊論曰 T2251_.64.0282c02: レ物。取二二喩一其意應レ知
T2251_.64.0282c06: 能鳴一。或能宣唱故號二能鳴一。準レ彼今就レ體其 T2251_.64.0282c07: 音聲體是妙故
T2251_.64.0282c10: 意。過去相。現在相。未來相爲二一類世相不
T2251_.64.0282c13: 云。相謂相狀。非二生等四相一。爲レ勝也。光記亦 T2251_.64.0282c14: 釋レ合有二兩釋一。後釋非也。一蛇畫二有用無用 T2251_.64.0282c15: 足一故。二未來相有レ用不レ成故
T2251_.64.0282c18: 名也。姬亦女宦也。秩比二二千石一。位次二婕妤 T2251_.64.0282c19: 下一。左傳。以媵二秦穆姬一。杜預曰。送レ女曰レ媵。媵 T2251_.64.0282c20: 送也。寄也。公羊傳云。媵者何。諸侯一國。則二 T2251_.64.0282c21: 國媵レ之以二姪娣一從。釋名云。姪娣曰レ媵。媵承 T2251_.64.0282c22: 也。承事適レ他也。今三品曰レ姬。五品曰レ媵是
T2251_.64.0282c29: 名二現在一。詳曰。婆沙既倶時名二現在一。準レ彼 T2251_.64.0283a01: 現在爲レ本。從二前後一待對。一女喩如レ是。而婆 T2251_.64.0283a02: 沙七十六判二三世差別一有二十七復次一。第十四 T2251_.64.0283a03: 復次全同正理一。竝無レ有レ妨。但是通別遠近 T2251_.64.0283a04: 異
T2251_.64.0283a07: 簡一者非也。是自レ古對法宗評簡如レ是故。此
T2251_.64.0283a10: 婆沙破亦不レ異レ此。彼細述レ理。此總云二數論 T2251_.64.0283a11: 朋一。若欲二爲レ朋所以一應レ如二婆沙一。而文言各別
T2251_.64.0283a14: 歴二三世一時法隱法顯。但説下諸法行二於世一時。 T2251_.64.0283a15: 體相雖レ同而性類異上。此與二尊者世友一分同。
T2251_.64.0283a18: 乳酪喩豈爲レ不レ然。又三世流入而未來有 T2251_.64.0283a19: レ滅過去有二生類一。是同二數論性常用轉變一。何 T2251_.64.0283a20: 云レ不レ同。若言下分同二世友一不可レ破。餘師亦 T2251_.64.0283a21: 有二分同一。謂體不レ異竝同故
T2251_.64.0283a24: 貪現行成就倶有上。雜心云。於二一色一愛著亦行 T2251_.64.0283a25: 亦成就。於レ餘成就而不レ行。是故彼説世亂。 T2251_.64.0283a26: 譬亦相違
T2251_.64.0283a29: 也。光記爲二小科一得。入二前段一不也。寶疏入二後 T2251_.64.0283b01: 段一得。爲二第四一非也。於レ中有レ五。一經部難。 T2251_.64.0283b02: 二有部答。三經部重徴。四有部通。五經部難 T2251_.64.0283b03: 絶。此是初也。此三世實有已具知下有二四師差 T2251_.64.0283b04: 別一。及世友約位爲善。彼世友約レ位義應二更 T2251_.64.0283b05: 復分別思惟而説一。難云。汝去來世應レ名二現 T2251_.64.0283b06: 在一。執二體實有一故。如下正有二作用一時上。如二馬角 T2251_.64.0283b07: 等一或汝去來世應レ非二去來世一。執二體實有一故。 T2251_.64.0283b08: 如二汝現在一
T2251_.64.0283b11: 類因異熟因等既極成能與果。以二能與果一 T2251_.64.0283b12: 應レ許レ有二作用一。如レ是過去有二作用一亦應レ名二 T2251_.64.0283b13: 現在一。若爾世相應二雜亂一。又若救言下彼唯與果 T2251_.64.0283b14: 無レ有二取果一。取與不レ具故非難。已彼過去有二 T2251_.64.0283b15: 取與中與果半作用一。由レ是過去世法無二作用一 T2251_.64.0283b16: 邊名二過去一。有二與果用一邊名二現在一。若爾世相 T2251_.64.0283b17: 應レ雜。有半作用一句是遮レ救。若述レ上文鄭 T2251_.64.0283b18: 重失。既過去作用成。即雜亂故。由レ是舊論
T2251_.64.0283b21: 相一相雜。光記得二論意一。便於二有半作用前一致二 T2251_.64.0283b22: 亦應名現在結一。寶疏未レ得二論意一。替レ既作レ唯。 T2251_.64.0283b23: 以二現在異熟因一添二蛇足一。誤二半作用文一以鑿。 T2251_.64.0283b24: 不レ忍レ視レ之也。若隨二現在法中一。唯或取果或 T2251_.64.0283b25: 與果多有レ之。如何以二彼一一得レ致二雜亂難一。又 T2251_.64.0283b26: 若如二汝言一。彼正理師何不レ救二此理一。彼論五
T2251_.64.0283b29: 何作用一。若謂二彼能取果與果一。是則過去同類 T2251_.64.0283c01: 因等既能與果。應レ有二作用一。有二半作用一世相 T2251_.64.0283c02: 應レ雜。此難都由レ不レ了二法性一。諸法勢力總有二 T2251_.64.0283c03: 二種一。一名二作用一。二謂二功能一。引果功能名爲二 T2251_.64.0283c04: 作用一。非三唯作用總攝二功能一。亦有三功能異二於 T2251_.64.0283c05: 作用一。且闇中眼見レ色功能。爲二闇所違一非レ違二 T2251_.64.0283c06: 作用一。謂有三闇障違二見功能一。故眼闇中不レ能 T2251_.64.0283c07: レ見色。引果作用非二闇所違一。故眼闇中亦能 T2251_.64.0283c08: 引果。無二現在位作用有闕。現在唯依二作用一 T2251_.64.0283c09: 立故。諸作用滅不レ至二無爲一。於二餘性生一能爲二 T2251_.64.0283c10: 因性一。此非二作用一但是功能。唯現在時能引 T2251_.64.0283c11: レ果故。無爲不レ能レ引二自果一故。唯引二自果一名二
T2251_.64.0283c16: レ救。是一己新立今就二功能作用無別毘婆沙 T2251_.64.0283c17: 宗一以加二彈斥一。若如二汝言一違背婆沙百十六
T2251_.64.0283c22: 宗論顚末之法。舊論頌異レ此而長行同。彼十
T2251_.64.0283c27: 中初三句經部破二有部一。終一句有部唱二法性 T2251_.64.0283c28: 難思一。光記用字通二上下一者非也。唯屬レ下不 T2251_.64.0283c29: レ可レ通レ上。義善顯故。若不レ爾者何不レ言二何礙 T2251_.64.0284a01: レ用用何一。故舊論無二用言一。而唯牒釋何礙二 T2251_.64.0284a02: 字一。次牒釋此云何三字一
T2251_.64.0284a11: 正礙力難。三擧二衆縁救一破。此中初應説言 T2251_.64.0284a12: 蒙二能起作用一。故應説下有二若言一。舊論十四
T2251_.64.0284a17: 別一。此能成作用亦有二三世一。其去來今誰令二去 T2251_.64.0284a18: 來今一。若有二別作用一令三作用成二去來今一重重 T2251_.64.0284a19: 無窮。舊論別有二頌文一破レ救
T2251_.64.0284a22: 非二去來今一。無二別能成作用一故。而是有非レ無。 T2251_.64.0284a23: 二則無下經部破。若非二去來今一則無爲故應二 T2251_.64.0284a24: 常住一。違二無爲無作用宗一。若言二作用是有一則 T2251_.64.0284a25: 非レ無故是恒有。不レ應レ言二已滅未有一。舊論別 T2251_.64.0284a26: 有レ頌破レ此。此是下救破由漸。應レ屬二後段一。光・ T2251_.64.0284a27: 寶屬二前段一者非也。三若許下有部救釋二無 T2251_.64.0284a28: 異一。四若爾下經部破釋二世便壞一。此中有レ三。 T2251_.64.0284a29: 一正破。二有部反問。三經部示二不成所以一。初 T2251_.64.0284b01: 中有二總破別破總結三莭一如レ文可レ知。何爲 T2251_.64.0284b02: 不成已下。光記總爲二有部救一非也。不レ順二前 T2251_.64.0284b03: 何得有時名爲過未文一故。寶疏但何爲不成 T2251_.64.0284b04: 句爲二反問一爲レ勝也
T2251_.64.0284b07: 若不レ許下諸本無名二未來一。今有名二現在一。有已 T2251_.64.0284b08: 還無名二過去一是則三世義上。應下一切種有爲法
T2251_.64.0284b11: 言可レ在二不成上一。文言便故在レ下。猶如下成唯
T2251_.64.0284b23: 光・寶竝不レ得二論意一。今謂。果之因依主釋。有二 T2251_.64.0284b24: 得レ果之因一故當來可レ有レ果。故未來當有名 T2251_.64.0284b25: レ有。此但未來當有所以不レ關二過去一。故言二果
T2251_.64.0284b28: 果言一
T2251_.64.0284c02: 成中差別上。光可也。寶釋レ倶爲二三世一非也
T2251_.64.0284c05: 謂非下彼外道不レ許二業曾有性一故而今世尊重 T2251_.64.0284c06: 爲レ彼説有。是彼許二曾有性一而不レ許二實有一。故 T2251_.64.0284c07: 今爲レ成二實有一佛重説二此有一。寶疏屬レ下爲二經 T2251_.64.0284c08: 部通釋一。豈字短讀絶二曾有性一。而今已下更牒二 T2251_.64.0284c09: 重説有一爲二通釋基一。謂豈彼外道不レ許二業是 T2251_.64.0284c10: 曾有性一。如レ是許二曾有性一。而今世尊重爲説 T2251_.64.0284c11: レ有者。今詳曰。此論文錯義難二通曉一故致二異
T2251_.64.0284c15: 是有一爲已許。若爾佛何故爲レ彼更説レ有。此 T2251_.64.0284c16: 中佛世尊依下自相續有二宿業功能一。能與中今後
T2251_.64.0284c19: 爾佛何一。則是有部徴。依彼已下經部釋。如レ是 T2251_.64.0284c20: 云レ文云レ義隱暢
T2251_.64.0284c26: 處一。滅時無レ有二去處一。如レ是眼不實而生。生已 T2251_.64.0284c27: 滅盡。是從二所明一立レ名。舊論云二眞實空經一。増
T2251_.64.0285a04: 故。又初唯就二現世言一。後就二本無等言一。是二 T2251_.64.0285a05: 破差別。彼救意有二兩意一。一唯依二現世一。二依二 T2251_.64.0285a06: 現世眼根一。於二破中一。初破三唯依二現世一。故云現 T2251_.64.0285a07: 世性與二彼眼根一體無レ別。舊論曰二世與法義
T2251_.64.0285a10: 汝執二於自體一イヽ未有有上
T2251_.64.0285a13: 論云二此境一故一故。此中四重救破展轉相起。 T2251_.64.0285a14: 謂若縁二彼聲一應二更發聲。更不レ發住二未來一 T2251_.64.0285a15: 故。汝宗立二未來實有一。何云二是無一。雖二實有一去 T2251_.64.0285a16: 來聲無二現在聲一。故云レ無無妨是非レ理。於二三 T2251_.64.0285a17: 世一竝聲體同一故若言下有二少別一非中同一上。我 T2251_.64.0285a18: 本無今有義自成
T2251_.64.0285a29: レ是於レ境得レ有二猶預一。謂我於二此所見境中一。爲二 T2251_.64.0285b01: 是正智一爲二是顛倒一。即由レ此故差別理成。同 T2251_.64.0285b02: 有相中見有レ別。故非二無與レ有少有相同一。如 T2251_.64.0285b03: 何於中得レ有二差別一。唯於二有法一有二差別一故 T2251_.64.0285b04: 但於二有境一覺有二差別一。故唯有境覺有二差別一
T2251_.64.0285b13: 知二妙非妙義一。言二妙非妙一者是無失有失。有 T2251_.64.0285b14: 失是有上。無失是無上。故有上無上顯二妙非 T2251_.64.0285b15: 妙義一。或顯二此妙非妙中有レ勝有劣。故復爲
T2251_.64.0285b18: 故。而即爲二上無上一非也。文既四各別故。後 T2251_.64.0285b19: 釋亦非也。以レ爲二妙非妙中勝劣一故
T2251_.64.0285b22: 實有一。識必有レ境故。如二現在一。是他隨一不成 T2251_.64.0285b23: 因。經部過未世縁レ無識生。不レ許二識必有境 T2251_.64.0285b24: 故
T2251_.64.0285c02: 具如二已辨。若言レ不レ爾。鮮本破言作レ彼何爲。 T2251_.64.0285c03: 由レ是彼正理論。於レ此不指二破我一。即具説下業 T2251_.64.0285c04: 爲レ先相續等生二當果一之相上。即同二我論文一。所 T2251_.64.0285c05: 以是破我別論非二倶舍一。彼師所造無二破我論一 T2251_.64.0285c06: 故不レ能二指示一。故以二破我論意一具釋二於此一也」
T2251_.64.0285c09: 過未實有一破。此有二二失一。初過去業無用失。 T2251_.64.0285c10: 後未來果無體失。二若一下總牒二三世實有 T2251_.64.0285c11: 法體恒有一破。亦有二二失一。初因果不成失。後 T2251_.64.0285c12: 同二外道一失。寶疏總爲二四失一麁也
T2251_.64.0285c21: 未是實有一。故世尊如二其所有一説二有言一。謂現 T2251_.64.0285c22: 實有。過曾有。未當有。於二現中一亦有二實有假 T2251_.64.0285c23: 有一。舊論曰。若如二道理一應レ有必如レ此有。問。二
T2251_.64.0285c26: レ意答レ我。婆羅門於レ意云何。眼是有不。答言 T2251_.64.0285c27: 是有。沙門瞿曇色是有不。答言是有。沙門瞿 T2251_.64.0285c28: 曇婆羅門有色有二眼識一有二眼觸一。有二眼觸因 T2251_.64.0285c29: 縁生レ受若苦若樂不苦不樂一不。答言有。沙門
T2251_.64.0286a06: 以爲二經文一者謬矣。是則文理不レ屬。是亦不 T2251_.64.0286a07: レ讀二經本一故也。今謂。汝却未レ考二論意一也。又 T2251_.64.0286a08: 未レ知下諸註爲二經本一之意上而妄斥破。豈可レ當 T2251_.64.0286a09: 哉。問。經本無量。若應二是一經一。舊論文亦全 T2251_.64.0286a10: 同レ此故。解云不レ爾。以レ何知レ此。顯宗論二十
T2251_.64.0286a13: 顯宗豈可二置不引
T2251_.64.0286a17: 沙名一。眞毘婆沙都無二此語一。又不下如レ彼自率二 T2251_.64.0286a18: 己情一妄説中去來如中現實有上。三世實有性各別 T2251_.64.0286a19: 故。詳二彼意一。欲下爲二聖教災一詭設二虚言一謗中正 T2251_.64.0286a20: 論者上。豈由二如レ是所設謗言一令二我義宗所有 T2251_.64.0286a21: 虧損一寧有。我部諸大論師博究精通聖道正 T2251_.64.0286a22: 理一。具苞二衆徳一。名稱普聞。於二小難中一不レ能二通 T2251_.64.0286a23: 釋一故。於二非處一詭設二謗言一。既率二己情一妄標二 T2251_.64.0286a24: 宗致一。似レ未レ披覽眞毘婆沙一。所設難辭我已
T2251_.64.0286a27: 過未實有一。其同法喩是不二現在一而用何爲。 T2251_.64.0286a28: 由二如レ是理一言三如レ現實有二去來一。何得レ言二詭
T2251_.64.0286b02: 世實有非レ無即同二現在一。故言二三世實有一。豈 T2251_.64.0286b03: 可レ言三眞婆沙都無二此語一。何可レ言レ似レ未二披 T2251_.64.0286b04: 覽一。又雖三汝通二諸難一。唯是自情所二他未許。豈 T2251_.64.0286b05: 成二通釋一。故言レ不レ能亦是不レ宜
T2251_.64.0286b08: 位一。於者境聲而流二修位一。是簡二不縁一。初餘言 T2251_.64.0286b09: 廣渉二集滅道修一。故加二遍行一顯二唯集惑一。以二遍 T2251_.64.0286b10: 行惑唯苦集一故。及聲顯二見修界畔一。而亦顯二 T2251_.64.0286b11: 倶是縁レ此猶繫一。猶者尙也。隨眠言流二下餘 T2251_.64.0286b12: 字一。兩種餘字竝是未斷。對二前已斷一故。正理
T2251_.64.0286b16: 縁一者有時非二所縁一。故縁此言定爲二無用一。若 T2251_.64.0286b17: 謂四別説三有レ不二能縁一。則遍行中亦應二簡別一。以 T2251_.64.0286b18: レ有二見集所斷遍行不縁二見苦所斷事一故。經
T2251_.64.0286b21: 應一總分二見修所斷煩惱一以爲二九品一。漸次斷 T2251_.64.0286b22: 除。前品已斷中有二餘未斷遍行煩惱一亦能爲 T2251_.64.0286b23: レ繫。簡下縁二他地一遍行隨眠上。説二縁此言一。可レ成二 T2251_.64.0286b24: 有用一。然於二前説餘遍行中一闕二縁此言一。義不二 T2251_.64.0286b25: 成立一。或應レ以レ後。所説及聲兼顯下前文攝二縁 T2251_.64.0286b26: 此一義上。謂於二前説見苦已斷及此前品已斷事 T2251_.64.0286b27: 中一。皆有二所餘縁レ此猶繫一。若爾此文雜亂。於二 T2251_.64.0286b28: 見位中一餘及遍行應二隨去一。然此煩説闕二
T2251_.64.0286c03: レ之。何爲二縁此言闕一。若餘及遍行隨一煩説 T2251_.64.0286c04: 者。於二顯宗一餘縁此前後兩説。豈非二鄭重一。若 T2251_.64.0286c05: 遍行言無用故除レ此者。何故於二長行一云二遍 T2251_.64.0286c06: 行隨眠一
T2251_.64.0286c12: 漏法境識一。爲下避二文煩一及令中義路明知上。五部
T2251_.64.0286c15: 以示レ圖入二論中一。圖記。冠註等圖有二其不正一 T2251_.64.0286c16: 矚而可レ知
T2251_.64.0286c19: 結前生後。二若別下正明二繫事隨増一。於レ中 T2251_.64.0286c20: 有レ三。一標二去レ廣就略。二且有下略示レ事。 T2251_.64.0286c21: 三準思下勸二思餘法一。此即初也。光記分文不 T2251_.64.0286c22: 可也
T2251_.64.0286c25: 界。有色無色法。有見無見法。有對無對法。有 T2251_.64.0286c26: 漏無漏法。有爲無爲法。過去未現在法。善不 T2251_.64.0286c27: 善無記法。欲界色界無色界繋法。學無學非 T2251_.64.0286c28: 學非無學法。見所斷修所斷無斷法。四諦。四 T2251_.64.0286c29: 靜慮。四無量。四無色。八解脱。八勝處。十遍 T2251_.64.0287a01: 處。八智。三三摩地。三重三摩地。三結。三不 T2251_.64.0287a02: 善根。三漏。四瀑流。四軛。四取。四身繫。五蓋。 T2251_.64.0287a03: 五結。五順下分結。五順上分結。五見。六愛
T2251_.64.0287a10: 示二樂根一一例勸餘一。然諸註。本論等云レ就二二 T2251_.64.0287a11: 十二根一者未二委讀一也。彼唯四十二章之一章 T2251_.64.0287a12: 故 光師釋甚略。寶疏具簡釋
T2251_.64.0287a15: 諸法非一一。今就二樂根一一云レ且。答中有レ三。先 T2251_.64.0287a16: T2251_.64.0287a17: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0287a18: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0287a19: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0287a20: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0287a21: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0287a22: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0287a23: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0287a24: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0287a25: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0287a26: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0287a27: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0287a28: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0287a29: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0287b01: 示二所隨増樂根數一。若不レ知レ此何可レ知二能隨 T2251_.64.0287b02: 増是幾一二簡三無漏非二所隨増一。三此中下正
T2251_.64.0287b05: 三識身相應。此二唯有漏修所斷。第三靜慮 T2251_.64.0287b06: 者意識相應通二有漏無漏一。有漏通二五部一。無漏
T2251_.64.0287b12: 者。通二五部一故云二一切一。若細分別除二見滅中 T2251_.64.0287b13: 無爲縁一。謂邪見。疑。無明。由レ是欲修三惑。苦 T2251_.64.0287b14: 集十一遍使。色界二十八總四十二隨増。寶 T2251_.64.0287b15: 疏不二簡別一云二四十六一非也。問。若爾何不下如二 T2251_.64.0287b16: [IMAGE]下縁識一言中有爲縁上。 T2251_.64.0287b17: [IMAGE]答。一切顯二五部一。有 T2251_.64.0287b18: [IMAGE]爲簡二無爲縁一。文互
T2251_.64.0287b21: [IMAGE]亦細分別。婆沙八
T2251_.64.0287b24: [IMAGE]在二意識一。通二有漏無 T2251_.64.0287b25: [IMAGE]漏一。有漏者通二五部一。 T2251_.64.0287b26: [IMAGE]及通二一切隨眠一相 T2251_.64.0287b27: [IMAGE]應。故自地一切隨 T2251_.64.0287b28: [IMAGE]眠隨増。故不レ可レ除二 T2251_.64.0287b29: [IMAGE]無爲縁一。又欲界瞋 T2251_.64.0287b30: [IMAGE]雖レ非二相應一所縁隨 T2251_.64.0287c01: 増。如下於二他樂一發中瞋恚上。亦不レ可レ除。問。若爾 T2251_.64.0287c02: 何故單縁等中除二無爲縁一答。彼約二縁識一樂 T2251_.64.0287c03: 非二無爲一故除去。今據二相應一故取不レ除問本 T2251_.64.0287c04: 論已先説二二十二根首眼根一。若示二方隅一何不 T2251_.64.0287c05: レ約レ初。故正理。顯宗改二此論一以二眼根一示二方 T2251_.64.0287c06: 隅一。若約二四十二章隨一一者。何不二十八界及 T2251_.64.0287c07: 五蘊初一。有二何由致一據二根中間一。亦復不二五受 T2251_.64.0287c08: 初憂根一。解云。顯レ無二定準一。以レ示二方隅一。亦復樂 T2251_.64.0287c09: 根以二可愛樂一。今爲二初學一此三品示レ圖以入二 T2251_.64.0287c10: 論中一。圖記及冠註圖有二其不正一。依二婆沙八十
T2251_.64.0287c20: 體名等何。答。隨眠者即五部九十八惑是。心 T2251_.64.0287c21: 者上十六識中前有漏十五心是也。有者由二
T2251_.64.0287c24: 等一名二有隨眠一。且前所言三界各五部十五種 T2251_.64.0287c25: 識名二有隨眠心一。如レ是諸心各有二二種一。謂遍 T2251_.64.0287c26: 非遍行。有漏無漏縁。染不染心有二差別一故
T2251_.64.0288a02: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a03: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a16: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a17: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a18: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a19: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a20: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a21: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a22: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a23: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a24: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a25: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a26: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a27: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a28: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a29: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288b01: 心イヽ能有二隨眠一。隨眠之有名二有隨眠一。有隨眠 T2251_.64.0288b02: 即心名二有隨眠心一。有者相應義。於二此相應 T2251_.64.0288b03: 義一即含二隨増助伴二事一
T2251_.64.0288b06: 位。唯有隨眠非二隨増一。現無三惑故即非二隨増一 T2251_.64.0288b07: 而助伴性恒相應故猶有隨眠。助伴性者。所 T2251_.64.0288b08: レ謂染汚習氣即類性謂先來隨眠與レ心倶。今 T2251_.64.0288b09: 雖レ斷二隨眠一。而所相應心非下由二道力一所斷。仍 T2251_.64.0288b10: 名二有隨眠一。如下人前盜賊一。今不レ作二其業一仍名中 T2251_.64.0288b11: 盜賊上。若所縁縛已斷非三唯不二隨増一亦不レ名二 T2251_.64.0288b12: 有隨眠一。何以故。親疎別故。如レ是有隨眠心 T2251_.64.0288b13: 有二兩種一。一有染。四部全。修道一分即染汚 T2251_.64.0288b14: 心。二無染心。修道善無記心。有染心亦有 T2251_.64.0288b15: レ二。一隨増有隨眠心。二不隨増有隨眠心。若 T2251_.64.0288b16: 無染心。唯隨増有隨眠無二不隨増有隨眠心一。 T2251_.64.0288b17: 由レ是示レ圖曰
T2251_.64.0288b20: 頌及明本竝正理。顯宗悉作レ見可レ知。倶是誤 T2251_.64.0288b21: レ形也
T2251_.64.0288b29: 生一故。然有二一類一。煩惱現行前後相牽非レ無二 T2251_.64.0288b30: 次第一。而示二三種次一。一約二一類不善觀察一。身。 T2251_.64.0289a01: T2251_.64.0289a02: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a03: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a16: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a17: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a18: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a19: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289b20: 邊。邪。見取。戒禁。疑。貪慢。瞋。癡如レ次生。二 T2251_.64.0289b21: 約二一類禀性愚癡一。癡。疑。身。邊。戒禁。邪。見 T2251_.64.0289b22: 取。貪。慢。瞋如レ次生。三云三復有於此別立二次 T2251_.64.0289b23: 第一擧二此論頌文一述釋。而後云。理實煩惱行 T2251_.64.0289b24: 相無邊。以三所待縁有二差別一故。無下有二決定次 T2251_.64.0289b25: 第一而生上
T2251_.64.0289b28: 舊論同レ此。論主欲レ取二後説一故示二見諦所斷 T2251_.64.0289b29: 等所由一。入論。正。顯竝無二所由一。寶疏以二迷理 T2251_.64.0289c20: 迷事瞋一和會。是雖レ非二理無一。今既明二十惑生 T2251_.64.0289c21: 起。故從レ初約レ諦。故後師爲レ勝。如是等結釋二 T2251_.64.0289c22: 頌如次一。故於二舊論一牒二如次第一有二此結釋一。然 T2251_.64.0289c23: 所由文屬二如次釋一有餘下闕。蓋是錯亂
T2251_.64.0289c26: 若無二惑言一此頌是爲二誰三因一。若或字何不
T2251_.64.0289c29: 音誤。有人云。正理等長行順二或字一。論意各別 T2251_.64.0289c30: 漏等中全不レ攝レ彼。有作二是説一。有漏乃至我 T2251_.64.0289d01: 者非也。正理顚末無下一與二此論頌一有異故。 T2251_.64.0289d02: 然彼長行以二兩義一通レ難故有二二或一。必非下釋二 T2251_.64.0289d03: 頌或言一以致言也。然此句顯レ有下不レ具二三因一 T2251_.64.0289d04: 而惑起上
T2251_.64.0289d09: 煩惱已斷故無二未斷隨眠一。意樂淸淨故無二非 T2251_.64.0289d10: 理作意一
T2251_.64.0289d14: 言。有漏者三有漏。謂欲有漏。有有漏。無明有 T2251_.64.0289d15: 漏。長含標二三有漏一云二欲漏。有漏。無明漏一
T2251_.64.0289d21: 在故。由レ是唯説二煩惱一。若纒亦依二界分別一者。
T2251_.64.0289d25: 界亦有二二纒一何不三説爲二有漏一。二品類下違 T2251_.64.0289d26: 教失。亦者示レ有レ體。或對二彼欲漏攝纒。集異
T2251_.64.0290a01: T2251_.64.0290a02: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0290a03: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0290a04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0290a05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0290a06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0290a07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0290b08: 語取中亦攝二諸纒一。品類足説。云何有漏乃至 T2251_.64.0290b09: 是名二有漏一。有瀑流軛及我語取亦應攝纒。 T2251_.64.0290b10: 應レ作二是説一。上界纒少。不自在故不三説爲二有 T2251_.64.0290b11: 漏一。乃至我語取欲界雖レ多而見所斷。不二具 T2251_.64.0290b12: 足一故不自在故但總説二十纒一。不三別説二五部一。 T2251_.64.0290b13: 今且就二有漏一問答。顯二餘亦如是。此中論主。 T2251_.64.0290b14: 欲下如二有作是説一可中據二本論一攝中一切上故。特 T2251_.64.0290b15: 簡別言二迦濕彌羅等一
T2251_.64.0290b20: 由一釋二第七八句一。此即初也。謂準二此欲漏有 T2251_.64.0290b21: 漏三界十五部三十一五十二一。於二無明一亦三 T2251_.64.0290b22: 界十五纒無明自成。又於二欲漏有漏一。既除二無 T2251_.64.0290b23: 明一義准已成立説爲二無明漏一。至言是至理決 T2251_.64.0290b24: 定義。又鮮本。寶疏竝作レ准各義通
T2251_.64.0290b27: 通用二諸煩惱一爲レ體。詳曰。據レ體如二寶疏一有二 T2251_.64.0290b28: 寬狹一。若依二名義一如二光記一其義有レ同。由レ是論
T2251_.64.0290c09: 現行故。如レ説二王行一。非レ無二導從一。王但勝故總
T2251_.64.0290c14: 一句於爲淸上一。莫下唯有二能爲淸淨道無中所
T2251_.64.0290c19: 彼曰。欲取及見取者。是在家出家二部鬪諍 T2251_.64.0290c20: 因故立爲二二取一。在家由レ取二五塵一故與二在家一 T2251_.64.0290c21: 起二鬪諍一。出家由レ取二諸見一各不同故與二出家一 T2251_.64.0290c22: 起二鬪諍一。此二部取定及定果爲二解脱道解脱
T2251_.64.0290d03: 明軛一。彼唯擧レ經無レ有二解釋一。問。集異門是六 T2251_.64.0290d04: 足隨一。薩婆多宗根本依據。彼既但擧二此經一 T2251_.64.0290d05: 以示二四軛一。何故異レ彼攝二諸煩惱一。亦復不二別 T2251_.64.0290d06: 是經部義一。已六足中如レ是故。解云。集異門舍 T2251_.64.0290d07: 利子造。偏依二經説一故示二此經一。與二經部一不 T2251_.64.0290d08: レ異。後門徒起二異見一故致二別宗一。由レ是正理五
T2251_.64.0290d11: 爲二貪自體一非也。後釋爲二五妙欲境一冥二舊論一」
T2251_.64.0290d17: 釋二隨眠一而破二光記一。詳曰寶師判決盡理。婆
T2251_.64.0290d21: 眠義一。何唯爲眼。湛惠云。若准二正理一如二寶疏一。 T2251_.64.0290d22: 然光記非二全無理。睡眠行相不レ易レ知故。由
T2251_.64.0290d26: 故寶疏爲正
T2251_.64.0290d29: 等二句是也。而數下二句通二上二一。正理曰。 T2251_.64.0290d30: 言二隨縛一者極難レ離故。入論上曰。隨縛義謂 T2251_.64.0291a01: 隨二身心相續一而轉。如二空行影水行隨一
T2251_.64.0291a04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291a05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291a06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291a07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291a08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291a09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291a10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291a11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291a12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291a13: [IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0291a16: 初約二生死流轉一釋レ流。後由彼下約二不淨流 T2251_.64.0291a17: 出一釋レ流。諸註未レ曉。如二寶疏一尚致二總別判一
T2251_.64.0291a20: 頂天一至中無間獄上故名爲レ漏。或彼相續於二六
T2251_.64.0291a25: 中淹貯業種一能生二後有一。三流派義。如二泉 T2251_.64.0291a26: 出レ水乳房出乳。如レ是有情從二六處門一諸漏 T2251_.64.0291a27: 流派。四禁持義。如下人爲レ他所二禁持一。故不能三 T2251_.64.0291a28: 隨レ意遊適四方一。如レ是有情爲二煩惱一所二禁持一。 T2251_.64.0291a29: 故循環諸界諸趣諸生一。不レ得三自在趣二涅槃
T2251_.64.0291b04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291b05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291b06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291b07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291b08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291b09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291b10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291b11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291b12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291b13: [IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0291b16: 思上。如レ是有情爲二諸煩惱一所二惑一。故起二身語 T2251_.64.0291b17: 意三種惡行一。六醉亂義。如下人多飮二根莖枝葉 T2251_.64.0291b18: 花菓等酒一。便不レ了二應作不應作事一無慚無愧 T2251_.64.0291b19: 顚倒放逸上。如レ是有情飮二煩惱酒一不レ了二應作 T2251_.64.0291b20: 不應作事一無慚無愧顚倒放逸。聲論者説。阿 T2251_.64.0291b21: 薩臘縛者。薩臘縛是流義。阿是分齊義。如レ言 T2251_.64.0291b22: 天雨二阿波吒梨一。或施二財食一。阿旃荼羅阿言 T2251_.64.0291b23: 顯此。乃至彼義如レ是。煩惱流轉有情乃至二
T2251_.64.0291c01: 諸生一生死流轉上。二騰注義。謂諸煩惱等騰注 T2251_.64.0291c02: 有情一。令下於レ界趣生一生死流轉上。三墜溺義。謂諸 T2251_.64.0291c03: 煩惱等墜溺有情一。令下於二界趣生一生死流轉上」
T2251_.64.0291c06: 漂溺一已復爲二四軛一和合繋礙。便能荷擔生 T2251_.64.0291c07: 死重苦一。如下牽二搖牛一置二之轅軛一勒以二鞦鞅一 T2251_.64.0291c08: 能挽中重擔上。故一切處説二暴流一已即便説レ軛 T2251_.64.0291c09: 義イヽ相隣故
T2251_.64.0291c14: 爲二依因一執取欲見等一故名レ取。與二執取一之依 T2251_.64.0291c15: 因故云二依執一。光四解竝穿空。寶疏云レ執取
T2251_.64.0291c18: 故火得二熾然一。如レ是有二煩惱一故有情業得二生 T2251_.64.0291c19: 長一。又猛利義是取義。或纒裹義是取義。如二蠶 T2251_.64.0291c20: 處レ蠒自纒而死一。如レ是有情四取所纒流轉
T2251_.64.0291c24: レ是釋レ名。應レ不レ有二經部如レ是全釋一
T2251_.64.0291c29: 漏一有中別相續上。由二彼勢力一於レ境泄過。即諸煩 T2251_.64.0291c30: 惱或總或別流注不レ絶得二相續名一。説二於六瘡 T2251_.64.0292a01: 門一即説二於六境一彼言二不絶一。即我無窮與レ我 T2251_.64.0292a02: 何殊獨言二彼善一。今彈云。汝是三義。我是一 T2251_.64.0292a03: 義。又汝六根。我是六境。又汝流義。我即相續 T2251_.64.0292a04: 不絶義。豈爲二是同一
T2251_.64.0292a07: 善品一。與レ我何別彼獨善哉。今彈云。漂奪義 T2251_.64.0292a08: 與二勢増上義一何可レ不レ同。於レ中勢増上義親二 T2251_.64.0292a09: 暴流名一
T2251_.64.0292a12: 行時一若非二増上一何能令下與二種種苦一合上。如何
T2251_.64.0292a15: 倶立中軛名上。若言三我釋亦同二此過一。此唯非レ理。
T2251_.64.0292a20: レ取故故名爲レ取。彼三由。此但一義。正理破 T2251_.64.0292a21: 曰。所釋取義亦與レ理違。謂若取名唯因レ愛 T2251_.64.0292a22: 者。説二取縁有義イヽ如何成。應三但説言二愛縁 T2251_.64.0292a23: 有。又如二前際後際業縁一亦應レ通攝一切煩 T2251_.64.0292a24: 惱一。如二縁起中已廣思擇一。今彈云。從二三受一生二 T2251_.64.0292a25: 欲色無色三愛一故説二受縁愛。從レ欣二受愛一起二 T2251_.64.0292a26: 欲等取一。故説二愛縁取。由二取爲縁積下集種種 T2251_.64.0292a27: 招二後有一業上。故説二取縁有。欲色無色三愛 T2251_.64.0292a28: 爲レ愛。欲等之取名レ取。同愛爲體然其行相 T2251_.64.0292a29: 各別。何妨二因果一。又如二前際後際業縁一唯是 T2251_.64.0292a30: 欲貪必無レ違レ理 T2251_.64.0292a31: 倶舍論法義卷第二十終 T2251_.64.0292b01: T2251_.64.0292b02: T2251_.64.0292b03: 十一 T2251_.64.0292b04: 豐山寓居上毛沙門快道林常記 T2251_.64.0292b05: 分別隨眠品第五之三
T2251_.64.0292b12: 體雖レ未レ説。已説二纒名一爲二漏等及一百八煩 T2251_.64.0292b13: 惱一此釋問本誤。答何可レ正。何以故。此但結下 T2251_.64.0292b14: 以二隨眠及纒一説爲中漏等上。非レ結二即隨眠幷纒一。 T2251_.64.0292b15: 然問者。隨眠上廣説故言二已説一可レ然。纒未 T2251_.64.0292b16: レ説何云二已説一。豈非レ誤哉。答亦從レ彼故非也」
T2251_.64.0292b19: 門一故言二復説一。問。前漏等四門皆説二幷纒一。今 T2251_.64.0292b20: 結等中何言二煩惱一答。煩惱言有二通別一。此通二 T2251_.64.0292b21: 諸惑一故無二相違一。前以二隨眠及纒一説爲二漏等一 T2251_.64.0292b22: 故殊言二隨眠并纒一。今所説中既有レ纒。不レ可二
T2251_.64.0292b28: 説。如二業道名一
T2251_.64.0292c02: 句明二見取二結廢立。後下二行明二嫉慳廢立一。 T2251_.64.0292c03: 此中前一行約二八纒家一。後一行約二十纒家一
T2251_.64.0292c06: 爲二愛結一。餘結皆應二依レ界辨體。其十隨眠前 T2251_.64.0292c07: 已辨。嫉慳唯欲界修斷故勸示言二當辨一。雜含
T2251_.64.0292c13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0292c14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0292c15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0292c16: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0292c17: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0292c18: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0292c19: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0292c20: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0292c21: [IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0292c24: 見結一。合二二取一爲二取結之義言二如是理一。此證二 T2251_.64.0292c25: 見結三爲體。取結二爲二體之理一。問中見相應 T2251_.64.0292c26: 法者。約二五見隨應一。光記云二五見一意通言未 T2251_.64.0292c27: レ足。寶疏爲二二取一非也。依レ答害二問意一也。見 T2251_.64.0292c28: 隨眠者。十隨眠中見隨眠隨レ應隨増。光記亦 T2251_.64.0292c29: 云二五見一言未レ足。寶疏唯云二十隨眠中見隨 T2251_.64.0293a01: 眠一亦言未レ足。答中有レ二。初總示レ法。後彼爲 T2251_.64.0293a02: 下別釋二其相一。此有レ二。初釋二愛結繋一。二非見 T2251_.64.0293a03: 下釋レ非二見結繋一。三然彼下釋二見隨眠隨増一。 T2251_.64.0293a04: 對レ問可レ見。此中二取見隨眠於レ彼隨増故 T2251_.64.0293a05: 者。二隨増中唯相應隨増。以レ標二二取相應
T2251_.64.0293a13: 斷見取戒相應法愛結繋。以二愛結有漏縁一故 T2251_.64.0293a14: 非二見結一。以二彼一切遍見結斷一故。雖二自種見
T2251_.64.0293a19: レ作二四句一。或有二愛結繋一無二見結繋一。謂集智已 T2251_.64.0293a20: 生滅智未レ生。於二見滅道一所レ斷不相應法。婆
T2251_.64.0293a25: 頌一有レ二。一判評是非一。後簡擧好解一。答二前
T2251_.64.0293a28: 二有二結相一餘無故。二以レ後顯レ初故。二以二嫉 T2251_.64.0293a29: 與レ慳獨立離二故立爲レ結。餘纒不レ爾。獨立 T2251_.64.0293a30: 者。謂自力現行。離二者謂一向不善。忿覆二 T2251_.64.0293b01: 纒雖二能獨立亦復離二。而似二隨眠一。爲二隨眠 T2251_.64.0293b02: 相一之所二映奪一其相不レ顯故不レ立レ結。由二此
T2251_.64.0293b06: 雖三復積集百千珍財一終不レ能下持二一錢一往至
T2251_.64.0293b09: 彼第三復次一。既許二十纒一何用二如レ是八纒家 T2251_.64.0293b10: 義一爲。光記云二論主難一。寶疏但云レ難竝未レ詳」
T2251_.64.0293b16: 結相一故。四中亦有二四類一倶是惱レ二。故顯二四 T2251_.64.0293b17: 中差別一於二下三一置二或言一。惱二在家出家一者。婆
T2251_.64.0293b22: 中有三蘇陀味勝二阿素洛一。阿素洛宮有二端正 T2251_.64.0293b23: 女一勝二彼諸天一。天自慳レ味嫉二他美女一。非天慳 T2251_.64.0293b24: レ女嫉二他美味一。由二嫉慳結一數興二戰鬪一。次二如二
T2251_.64.0293b27: 自他部無二前在家出家等三因一。蓋梵本異
T2251_.64.0293c02: 故正理。顯宗。舊論及頌疏無レ此爲レ正
T2251_.64.0293c05: 可レ知。次二句示二廢立一。次五句通レ妨有二正説 T2251_.64.0293c06: 異説二一
T2251_.64.0293c09: 釋二順下分名一。三釋二次二句一。此即初也。雜含
T2251_.64.0293c16: レ欲亦還下見爲レ先。二爲レ令レ恐レ久住欲一故 T2251_.64.0293c17: 貪瞋爲レ先
T2251_.64.0293c20: 最下云レ下。而三界一分名レ分。亦分亦下持業 T2251_.64.0293c21: 釋。下分之順名二順下分一第三由聲依主釋。此 T2251_.64.0293c22: 順下分帶二五數一是帶數釋
T2251_.64.0293c28: 分結一。謂初二結猶如二獄卒一。後之三結如二防
T2251_.64.0294a03: 閉置牢獄上。若有二異生一以二不淨觀傷害貪欲一。 T2251_.64.0294a04: 復以二慈觀一傷害瞋恚一。離二欲乃至無所有處一 T2251_.64.0294a05: 生二初靜慮乃至有頂一。彼有身見。戒禁取。疑還
T2251_.64.0294a12: 説亦有理故。故擧。而不レ欲二全正一故非二唯不 T2251_.64.0294a13: 頌亦云二有餘一。然正理唯擧二此義一而取二獄卒
T2251_.64.0294a23: 是根本惑。今説二此三根本一攝二餘三根本一。以二
T2251_.64.0294a26: 其次第一隨二有身見。戒禁取。疑三勝根一而得
T2251_.64.0294b15: 捨如レ次貪・瞋・癡二種隨増。若異レ此者唯所
T2251_.64.0294b21: 多隨増。故立二三不善根一。餘法不レ爾。百十二
T2251_.64.0294b26: 然非二正明一。爲レ令レ知二所隨一。後復有下正明二隨 T2251_.64.0294b27: 惑一。雖三本得二隨惑名一非二正明彼。只兼示三亦 T2251_.64.0294b28: 名二隨惑一。以顯下隨二此名隨レ心隨惑根本煩惱一 T2251_.64.0294b29: 起即名中今所明隨煩惱上。光記釋得二論旨一。寶疏 T2251_.64.0294b30: 殊異レ光總牒二長行一云レ釋二頌文一。意在三頌此餘 T2251_.64.0294c01: 言爲二相違釋一。若爾非二論意一。隨眠隨煩惱二門
T2251_.64.0294c05: 彼頌唯約二餘小惑一遮二根本一故。又寶疏意。光 T2251_.64.0294c06: 記意ニテ云レ釋二頌文一。非二相違釋一者無レ妨。又解。 T2251_.64.0294c07: 此論頌文唯明二小惑隨煩惱一。如二舊論頌一。今亦 T2251_.64.0294c08: 唯此之餘依主釋。此目近辭。此於二前段隨眠一 T2251_.64.0294c09: 於二長行一爲四兼顯示本惑亦從レ義名二隨煩惱一
T2251_.64.0294c13: 隨眠一諸餘染汚行蘊心所。復有下正釋二頌文一。 T2251_.64.0294c14: 爲レ異レ前云復。前持業釋。後從聲依主釋。兩 T2251_.64.0294c15: 解中後解爲レ正。光記云下將レ釋二隨惑一先解中本 T2251_.64.0294c16: 惑上者末可也。寶疏總云レ釋二頌文一非也。正理
T2251_.64.0294c21: 煩惱一。即此亦得二隨煩惱名一。以三是圓滿煩惱 T2251_.64.0294c22: 品一故。由レ此故説三即諸煩惱有二結縛。隨眠。隨 T2251_.64.0294c23: 煩惱。纒義一。所餘染汚心所行蘊。隨二煩惱一起 T2251_.64.0294c24: 隨惱レ心故得二隨煩惱名一。不レ得レ名二煩惱一。以
T2251_.64.0294c27: 煩惱一。及此之餘染心所行蘊。此之餘者顯二相 T2251_.64.0294c28: 屬義一。意顯二若是此所起方可建立隨煩惱
T2251_.64.0295a01: 及此之餘。詳曰。是鑿説。其相如二前辨一
T2251_.64.0295a11: 顯欲。不喜足。不恭敬。起惡言。樂惡友。不忍 T2251_.64.0295a12: 耽嗜。遍耽嗜。染貪。非法貪。惡貪。有身見。有
T2251_.64.0295a15: 調性。心昧劣性。種種想。不作意。麁重。觝突。
T2251_.64.0295a21: 受等種種雜説。故名二雜事一。彼中除二六本惑及 T2251_.64.0295a22: 苦受等一。其餘隨應是隨煩惱。非レ謂三彼皆爲二
T2251_.64.0295a25: 及起惡言類。如レ世尊告二婆羅門一言上。有二二十
T2251_.64.0295b04: 屬二前段一非也。寶疏入二後段一爲レ正。此中後字。 T2251_.64.0295b05: 光所見作レ復。云二復次一故。明本及正理。顯宗。 T2251_.64.0295b06: 寶疏竝皆如レ今。然作レ復爲レ勝。以三所明非二後
T2251_.64.0295b11: 後二大煩惱地。爲顯二此地法別一致二幷及言一。 T2251_.64.0295b12: 不レ安レ上者。大不善地從來唯二故
T2251_.64.0295b16: 貪欲纒一縁二貪欲纒一生二心法憂苦一。因二瞋恚。睡 T2251_.64.0295b17: 眠。掉悔。疑一。縁二瞋恚。睡眠。掉悔。疑一生二彼心法
T2251_.64.0295b22: 體一。於二前小煩惱中一讓出體於此一。故纒垢倶
T2251_.64.0295c04: 八或十。解云。障二諸善品一約レ強立レ纒。忿覆輕二 T2251_.64.0295c05: 於餘八一故唯八。又雖二對レ八是輕一。而望二六垢一 T2251_.64.0295c06: 亦重。故於二小煩惱中一分二輕重一。重四同入レ纒。 T2251_.64.0295c07: 輕六立爲レ垢。是故説二十纒一
T2251_.64.0295c10: 等流者隨惑有レ力與二根本煩惱一齊等流即流 T2251_.64.0295c11: 類。或等即是引。從二根本煩惱一引生也。約二相 T2251_.64.0295c12: 同一名二等流一者二釋竝非也
T2251_.64.0295c19: 而意顯レ取二第三一。以レ説二所由一故。前二義各是 T2251_.64.0295c20: 偏。故此中據二了知一有知無知對明。非二根智 T2251_.64.0295c21: 愚一故。諸論皆悉作レ知。舊論云二次第ノ如已知 T2251_.64.0295c22: 未知一
T2251_.64.0295c27: 舍利弗毘曇二十一卷一貪。瞋。痴爲二三垢一
T2251_.64.0296a02: 息一故勸諫教誨。而固不レ受。此不受勸諫性。 T2251_.64.0296a03: 不受教誨性。極執性。極取性。左取性。不右取 T2251_.64.0296a04: 性。難勸捨性。拙應對性。師子執性。心蛆螫
T2251_.64.0296a11: 今論取レ要
T2251_.64.0296a14: 繋。此即初也。然光・寶竝爲二大段一。而於レ此分二 T2251_.64.0296a15: 五科一。混二大小科一非也
T2251_.64.0296a18: 起。通云於二無明一有レ二。一自力起。二他力起。 T2251_.64.0296a19: 彼修斷痴他力起。還由二此忿等一方得レ轉故。 T2251_.64.0296a20: 故唯與二彼他力無明一相應。故名二自在一。婆沙
T2251_.64.0296a23: 不レ名二不共一
T2251_.64.0296a26: 應。準二此結前文一。光・寶分文其非顯然
T2251_.64.0296b23: 心重身重一切結相應。云何眠。心合臥レ出二不 T2251_.64.0296b24: 自在一眠。欲界繋意識相應。云何調。心不善不
T2251_.64.0296b28: 由二如レ是義相同一於二一文一亦互用。謂長含第
T2251_.64.0296c08: 食非食二事擧二經説一。後如是二事下論家釋二 T2251_.64.0296c09: 用同一之辭。下亦傚レ之。此二句將レ擧レ經之辭」
T2251_.64.0296c12: レ食。謂觸相。於レ彼不正思惟貪欲能令レ増。何等 T2251_.64.0296c13: 爲二瞋恚蓋食一。謂障礙相。於レ彼不正思惟瞋恚 T2251_.64.0296c14: 蓋能令レ増。何等爲二睡眠蓋食一。有二五法一。何等 T2251_.64.0296c15: 爲レ五。微弱。不樂。欠呿。多食。懈怠。於レ彼不正 T2251_.64.0296c16: 思惟睡眠蓋能令レ増。何等爲二掉悔蓋食一。有二四 T2251_.64.0296c17: 法一。何等爲レ四。謂親屬覺。人衆覺。天覺。本所
T2251_.64.0296c20: 有二三世一。何等爲レ三。於二過去一猶預。現在未來 T2251_.64.0296c21: 亦猶預。於彼起二不正思惟一疑蓋能令レ増。何 T2251_.64.0296c22: 等爲二貪欲蓋不食一。謂不淨觀。何等爲二瞋恚蓋 T2251_.64.0296c23: 不食一。彼慈心思惟。何等爲二睡眠蓋不食一。彼明
T2251_.64.0296c27: 一一。故今廣示二經文一。惛眠等二句雖二正不同二 T2251_.64.0296c28: 現經一。而是經文。在二作如是説下一故。故舊論
T2251_.64.0297a05: 信。而不喜不愛不樂悵望慘慼。云何嚬申。欠 T2251_.64.0297a06: 呿。謂身低擧手足捲舒名曰二嚬申一。鼻面開蹙 T2251_.64.0297a07: 脣口喎張名曰二欠呿一。云何食不調性。謂以二不 T2251_.64.0297a08: 食或食過レ量或食匪宜而生二苦受一。云何心昧
T2251_.64.0297a11: 惛眠蓋得二増益一。光明想者。經云二明照思惟一。 T2251_.64.0297a12: 是則毘鉢舍那慧思惟想。若依二大乘一。伽十一
T2251_.64.0297a22: 慕上。縁二此等一故尋求。云何國土尋。謂於二所愛
T2251_.64.0297a30: 此擧レ體
T2251_.64.0297b03: 以レ義爲二五蘊一。其義終不レ參。非二各配一故。成實
T2251_.64.0297b06: 不二相違一。然毘婆沙依二五蓋經一。豈以二散説一壞二 T2251_.64.0297b07: 本次一爲
T2251_.64.0297b14: 非レ止。説二掉悔蓋唯奢摩他能治一非觀。此依二 T2251_.64.0297b15: 伏斷一説三觀止門別治二惛眠掉悔二蓋一。若依二 T2251_.64.0297b16: 永斷一此觀止門對治一切一。用無二差別一。爲レ顯二 T2251_.64.0297b17: 此理一故壞二次第一。豈不三契經作二如レ是説一。修二等 T2251_.64.0297b18: 持一者怖畏惛眠一。修二擇法一者怖畏掉悔一。由レ此 T2251_.64.0297b19: 證知。惛眠障レ定掉悔障レ慧。其理必然。理必
T2251_.64.0297b23: 彼法一可レ言レ障レ彼。又若惛眠能障レ定者。則 T2251_.64.0297b24: 應レ許三定イヽ能治二惛眠一。不レ應下契經作二如レ是 T2251_.64.0297b25: 説一説中惛眠對治謂光明相上。掉擧障レ慧爲レ難亦 T2251_.64.0297b26: 然。故彼所言唯陳二自執一。然契經中説下修二等 T2251_.64.0297b27: 持一者怖畏惛眠一。修二擇法一者怖畏掉悔上。此言 T2251_.64.0297b28: 別意。謂惛眠蓋相順等持一欲レ修二等持一惛眠 T2251_.64.0297b29: 易レ起。故修レ定者怖畏惛眠一。非レ謂二惛眠近能 T2251_.64.0297b30: 障定。怖畏掉悔一準レ此應レ知。若謂下契經作二 T2251_.64.0297c01: 如レ是説一。心昧劣位修定非レ時。心輕躁位修 T2251_.64.0297c02: レ慧非レ時。故知惛眠近能障レ定。掉悔障レ慧理 T2251_.64.0297c03: 必應然。理亦不レ爾。就レ近説故。謂此經意正 T2251_.64.0297c04: 説下惛眠於二法相中一不レ能簡釋上。是故擇法爲 T2251_.64.0297c05: レ彼近治。惛眠亦能近障二擇法一。故昧劣位修定 T2251_.64.0297c06: 非時。定非二惛眠近對治一故。掉悔於レ慧准レ此 T2251_.64.0297c07: 應レ知。若謂下經説二彼現起位修レ此非時一。故知 T2251_.64.0297c08: 准レ彼但中此障上。則不レ説者障義既無便應 T2251_.64.0297c09: レ非レ蓋。非下不レ障二勝法一而蓋義可成。由此應 T2251_.64.0297c10: レ知。倶爲二倶障一倶爲二倶治一其理必然。但於二此 T2251_.64.0297c11: 中一説二近障治一故作二如レ是差別一而説。詳曰。正 T2251_.64.0297c12: 理判訣會レ理順レ經。契經正説二蓋能治一言二惛 T2251_.64.0297c13: 眠非食光明想。掉悔非食奢摩他一。豈得二異求一。 T2251_.64.0297c14: 又能所治能所順等非二必是等次第一。何以二所
T2251_.64.0297c21: 次第。又大乘諸論皆亦如レ是。謂瑜伽十一
T2251_.64.0298a02: 文行相相翻相順。説三惛掉二法麁相通障二定 T2251_.64.0298a03: 之與惠以下通障二定慧一相顯上簡二惛掉二一。然約二 T2251_.64.0298a04: 其體一細得二通障一。今説下行相相順相翻二倶麁
T2251_.64.0298a10: 説何縁名二枉謗佛一。以下彼所説前後相違及與二 T2251_.64.0298a11: 契經理一相違上故。如何彼説前後相違謂若貪 T2251_.64.0298a12: 欲。瞋恚二蓋現起能障二將入定心一。障既現前 T2251_.64.0298a13: 何能入レ定。若別修治伏已入者。則不レ應レ言下 T2251_.64.0298a14: 正入定位於二止及觀不能中正習上。又彼正入 T2251_.64.0298a15: 定言爲二聞思所成一爲二修所成定一。若言下我説二 T2251_.64.0298a16: 聞思所成一名中正入定上。則不レ應レ説下後出定位 T2251_.64.0298a17: 思擇法一時上。聞思所成有分別故。即思二擇法一 T2251_.64.0298a18: 何待二出時一。若言下我説二修所成定一名中正入定上 T2251_.64.0298a19: 理亦不レ然。修所成心正現前位惛眠。掉悔 T2251_.64.0298a20: 何容二現前一。若不二現前一寧障二止觀一。如何彼 T2251_.64.0298a21: 説經理相違。謂彼所言惛眠。掉悔如二其次 T2251_.64.0298a22: 第一障二奢摩他。毘鉢舍那違二前教理一。故彼 T2251_.64.0298a23: 所説唯立レ五因無有三功能證二蓋唯五一。由レ此 T2251_.64.0298a24: 前説理善可レ依。此徴詰最盡
T2251_.64.0298a27: 二類惑一。二正知斷不齊難。三問二斷因一。第二難 T2251_.64.0298a28: 中有レ二。初以レ斷難二知缺一。後以レ知難二斷缺一。舊 T2251_.64.0298b01: 論此難前却。頌疏曰。解云他界遍行者九上 T2251_.64.0298b02: 縁惑也。此遍行所縁者上界苦集是也。及見 T2251_.64.0298b03: 滅道斷有漏縁諸惑者。謂滅道下貪瞋慢是 T2251_.64.0298b04: 也。謂貪。瞋。慢縁二邪見。疑。無明一起名二有漏 T2251_.64.0298b05: 縁一。此貪等所縁者即邪見。疑。無明也。於彼斷 T2251_.64.0298b06: 位者。若他界遍行斷位者。謂苦集智忍生時 T2251_.64.0298b07: 也。若滅道有漏縁斷位者。謂滅道智忍生時 T2251_.64.0298b08: 也。不知彼所縁者。若斷二他界遍行一時不レ知二 T2251_.64.0298b09: 上界苦集一也。若斷二滅道有漏縁レ時不レ知二彼 T2251_.64.0298b10: 邪見。疑。無明一也。以二滅道智忍但知二滅道一故。 T2251_.64.0298b11: 知彼所縁時而彼不斷者。知二他界遍行所縁一 T2251_.64.0298b12: 者。謂上界苦集類智也。而彼他界遍行不レ斷 T2251_.64.0298b13: 者。謂已斷故不レ斷也。知二滅道下有漏縁惑所 T2251_.64.0298b14: 縁一時者。謂苦集智忍也。以三苦集智忍知二苦 T2251_.64.0298b15: 集一故。彼滅道下邪見。疑。無明體是苦集故苦 T2251_.64.0298b16: 集智忍生能知彼也。而彼邪見等不レ斷者謂
T2251_.64.0298b23: 此苦集一故得斷者其理不レ然。見二苦集一時此 T2251_.64.0298b24: 未レ斷故。若言下因レ慧見二彼滅道一故得斷者理 T2251_.64.0298b25: 亦不レ然。滅道非二此所縁境一故。准以可レ知 T2251_.64.0298b26: 爲二初歩一示レ圖曰 T2251_.64.0298b27: T2251_.64.0298b28: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0298b29: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0298c01: T2251_.64.0298c02: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0298c03: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0298c04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0298c05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0298c06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0298c07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0298c08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0298c09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0298c10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0298c11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0298c12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0298c13: 光記作二三解一。是從レ麁至レ細竝含具義而非二乖 T2251_.64.0298c14: 角三解一。又但就二遍行一設二異解一不レ關二有漏縁一。 T2251_.64.0298c15: 此三解初釋總相釋レ文麁論。而對二後二釋一此 T2251_.64.0298c16: 則單下苦上苦相對論。集諦亦爾。第二釋上 T2251_.64.0298c17: 苦對下縁二上苦一遍行。縁二上集一遍行二上。上集對二 T2251_.64.0298c18: 上苦集一亦爾。是從レ前細也。第三釋上苦對二 T2251_.64.0298c19: 上二一如レ前。更加下縁二上苦一集遍行上。上集亦更 T2251_.64.0298c20: 加下縁二上集一苦遍行上。苦集上縁互縁二上苦集一 T2251_.64.0298c21: 故。如レ是初一對レ一。次一對レ二。後一對レ三。此 T2251_.64.0298c22: 三釋竝是有二一理。然初釋爲レ勝。此中所説其 T2251_.64.0298c23: 理足故。後二釋猶有二微瑕一。謂類智知二上苦一 T2251_.64.0298c24: 時縁二上集一遍行全不二相關預一。不三上苦爲二所 T2251_.64.0298c25: 縁一故。今以レ約レ知二所縁一
T2251_.64.0298c29: 斷。如二見苦集所斷非遍行隨眠一。四隨得對治 T2251_.64.0299a01: 故如二餘隨眠一。餘者見苦集自界遍行。滅道無 T2251_.64.0299a02: 漏縁及修道。又尊者世友立二五因一。此初遍知 T2251_.64.0299a03: 所縁中分爲レ二曰。一見二所縁一故斷。如二無漏 T2251_.64.0299a04: 縁隨眠及縁自界遍行隨眠一。四倶縁斷。謂如二 T2251_.64.0299a05: 見苦集所斷不遍行隨眠一。餘三全同レ此。今於二 T2251_.64.0299a06: 自界縁一不レ分二遍不遍一總爲二初一一
T2251_.64.0299a09: 理論約二欲界自界縁。色無色見苦集自界他 T2251_.64.0299a10: 界所有惑一。而寶疏云三此説二欲界一令三意全同 T2251_.64.0299a11: 正理一者非也。光記意有二麁細二義一。一約レ麁 T2251_.64.0299a12: 三界通説。二約レ細上界中八地遍行。亦各自 T2251_.64.0299a13: 知レ縁斷。而今以レ説レ通攝レ別。最得二論意一。故婆 T2251_.64.0299a14: 沙二十二世友説。亦但云二自他一而無二簡別一。 T2251_.64.0299a15: 雜心四云。一縁知者。見苦見集斷自界縁及 T2251_.64.0299a16: 無漏縁。又此論攝二自界遍行非遍行一。故總云二 T2251_.64.0299a17: 自界縁一。不レ云二遍行一。簡二彼世友五因一。彼云。一 T2251_.64.0299a18: 見二所縁一故斷。如二無漏隨眠及縁自界遍行隨 T2251_.64.0299a19: 眠一。彼以下開二不遍行一爲中倶縁斷別因上有二遍行 T2251_.64.0299a20: 簡別一。問。諸説何縁如レ是不同。答。斷因有二別 T2251_.64.0299a21: 通一。謂對治通二五部一故。設摩達多見苦集自界 T2251_.64.0299a22: 遍行及滅道無漏縁攝二對治一。不レ立二縁知一。見 T2251_.64.0299a23: 苦集所斷非遍行通二能所縁及遍知一。設摩及 T2251_.64.0299a24: 世友爲レ作二倶句一別立爲二能所縁斷一。其無漏 T2251_.64.0299a25: 縁及自界遍行。遍知勝故世友別立爲二一因一。 T2251_.64.0299a26: 如二此論。雜心一者。見苦集自界縁及無漏縁是 T2251_.64.0299a27: 爲二後二因一根本。故總爲二遍知一。如二正理論一者。 T2251_.64.0299a28: 約二上二界智唯是類忍類觀一。故總以二上二界 T2251_.64.0299a29: 一切惑一屬二遍知一。今約二所斷惑三界別一三界 T2251_.64.0299b01: 齊説レ之。問。諸説勝劣如何。答。夫決擇性相一 T2251_.64.0299b02: 有レ麁有レ細有レ中。麁則難二通曉一。細則還亂二法 T2251_.64.0299b03: 相一。中則不レ亂易レ曉。又有二紛冗一有二顯著一。紛冗 T2251_.64.0299b04: 則損レ解。顯著則増レ智。然如三彼開二倶縁斷一是 T2251_.64.0299b05: 細亂二法相一。如三遍知屬二對治一是麁難レ曉。如三上 T2251_.64.0299b06: 二界總入二遍知一是紛冗。今此論四因居レ中而 T2251_.64.0299b07: 顯著。離二諸疑難一故。論主諸義中依二雜心師一 T2251_.64.0299b08: 以説レ此。所以者何。如二前所辨。遍知是後二 T2251_.64.0299b09: 因之基本。斷二此二類惑一則他界縁有漏縁隨 T2251_.64.0299b10: 去。爲レ顯二此義一三界齊等。豈非二顯著一。於二見 T2251_.64.0299b11: 惑一立二三因一盡二法相一。而令二義易解。是中離二 T2251_.64.0299b12: 麁細失一
T2251_.64.0299b17: 治。持對治。遠分對治。色界於二貪等一具二四對 T2251_.64.0299b18: 治一。欲界有レ三除二斷對治一。無色界有レ二謂持
T2251_.64.0299b25: 治。捨對治者。謂此能捨二異生性一故。斷對治 T2251_.64.0299b26: 者。謂此能斷二欲界見苦所斷十隨眠一故。持對 T2251_.64.0299b27: 治者。謂此能持二一切後位諸聖道一故。不作對 T2251_.64.0299b28: 治者。謂此能令三畢竟不レ作二五無間業一故。不 T2251_.64.0299b29: 往對治者。謂此能令三畢竟不レ往二三惡趣一故」
T2251_.64.0299c13: 豈不二曾聞一何煩徴詰。或不定故説不レ在レ前。 T2251_.64.0299c14: 謂彼非レ如三無間道後定有二解脱道一。解脱道後 T2251_.64.0299c15: 方有二勝進一。是故不定。以二加行道一或有起在二 T2251_.64.0299c16: 無間道前一。或有生於二勝進道後一。非二決定一故。 T2251_.64.0299c17: 又不定者。謂或有二一補特伽羅一由二一加行一。乃 T2251_.64.0299c18: 至證得阿羅漢果一。或二或多。是故不定。又不 T2251_.64.0299c19: 定者。無間道等如二前加行一亦能與レ後爲二加 T2251_.64.0299c20: 行一。故不レ可三定言二唯爾所是加行道攝一。説二多 T2251_.64.0299c21: 分言一應レ知爲レ顯下無間解脱勝進道中。縁二苦 T2251_.64.0299c22: 集諦一者亦厭患對治上。彼正理師爲レ救二彼次一 T2251_.64.0299c23: 作二多通釋一。然光。寶等所レ纒二正理一解二此論文一。 T2251_.64.0299c24: 云レ約二多分一。據二不定一陰顯合論等竝非也。以三 T2251_.64.0299c25: 論主不レ云二多分一故。破斥彼一故。雜心約二加 T2251_.64.0299c26: 行一故。正理師於二不定一作二三義一。初者何在二勝 T2251_.64.0299c27: 進後一。若是一類四道畢。第二番與レ後加行。是 T2251_.64.0299c28: 則必無間之前。誰不レ由二加行一得レ起二無間一。次 T2251_.64.0299c29: 者約二一二多一。是亦約二四道相望一必無間前 T2251_.64.0300a01: 義。後者約二相望不定一以二無間等一亦名二加行一。 T2251_.64.0300a02: 是壞二四道分別一。亦復無間道等何厭患。由二厭 T2251_.64.0300a03: 患一而無間等起故。寶疏云。此上次第是婆沙 T2251_.64.0300a04: 本義。詳曰。婆沙處處説斷。持。遠次無レ異。於 T2251_.64.0300a05: レ厭不定。或爲二最後一。或爲二第二一。今依二一途一列 T2251_.64.0300a06: レ之。何可レ云二本義一
T2251_.64.0300a10: 如二餘遠性一。謂見下所餘相遠性等是遠性攝自 T2251_.64.0300a11: 相非レ無。既許二去來是遠性攝一必應許二彼自 T2251_.64.0300a12: 相非無。説二自相無一而名二遠性一故。彼偏與二正
T2251_.64.0300a15: 彼此岸海等一是相對假非レ有二自相一。則成二異 T2251_.64.0300a16: 品一。遠性攝因犯二不定失一。設不レ許レ此犯二他能 T2251_.64.0300a17: 立不成一。彼處遠性攝二同品一故。亦復此因非二
T2251_.64.0300a20: 以二界攝故一令二無爲無常一。以二有爲攝故一令三無 T2251_.64.0300a21: 漏有二染汚一。又作二違決一云。此成二遠性一非レ有二 T2251_.64.0300a22: 自相一。非レ如レ現故。如二馬角等一。又汝以二性言一成 T2251_.64.0300a23: 立。而此性言是類義非二體性義一
T2251_.64.0300a26: レ退。後時無二再斷義一。斷已復斷則爲二唐捐一。解 T2251_.64.0300a27: 云。若惑得二自對治道一永斷。由二此惑一退墮義 T2251_.64.0300a28: 必無。故云二離退一。此論云二必無一。然光記誤二彼 T2251_.64.0300a29: 文一釋云。若更不レ退必無二後時再斷レ惑義一。唯
T2251_.64.0300b06: 欲貪一諸外道。有下縁二欲界一邪見現行上。毘婆沙 T2251_.64.0300b07: 師釋二彼經義一。起レ見時暫退。如二提婆達多一。準 T2251_.64.0300b08: レ彼光釋爲レ得。
T2251_.64.0300b11: 離繋有二重得一
T2251_.64.0300b14: 目二無間道一。若據三此正證二離繋一目二解脱道一
T2251_.64.0300b19: レ續故。亦能證レ滅引二離繋得一令二正起一故。諸解 T2251_.64.0300b20: 脱道惟名レ證レ滅。與二離繋得一倶現前故。而明二 T2251_.64.0300b21: 滅作證一皆通二無間解脱一。今何不レ爾。解云。彼 T2251_.64.0300b22: 總明二滅證一故爾。今據二重得標別一所以簡言二 T2251_.64.0300b23: 解脱一。然正理師令レ通二無間一。蓋混二其門一。問。此 T2251_.64.0300b24: 治生言爲二有漏得一無漏。通ヤレ二。設爾何過。 T2251_.64.0300b25: 三倶有レ過。若唯有漏。唯是超越不レ通二次第一。 T2251_.64.0300b26: 若唯無漏。唯是次第不レ渉二超越一。若通レ二者。 T2251_.64.0300b27: 應二増レ數七一。何説二六時一。解云。應レ爲二分別一。若 T2251_.64.0300b28: 約二次第一是無漏得非レ約二有漏一。謂苦法忍初 T2251_.64.0300b29: 得二離繋一。苦法智時重持二此滅一。若據二超越一有 T2251_.64.0300c01: 漏智斷非レ通二無漏一。凡位無間初得二惑滅一。其 T2251_.64.0300c02: 解脱道持證其滅一。此爲二重得初一。此已後隨 T2251_.64.0300c03: レ應有二餘重得一。如レ是據レ人則唯有漏唯無漏 T2251_.64.0300c04: 得。若依二名稱一則通二二種一。以レ通二二種一無レ唯 T2251_.64.0300c05: 偏過一。以二治人別一去二増數難一。然正理師通釋 T2251_.64.0300c06: 疑難一。令二當文唯次第證唯無漏得一。更別超越 T2251_.64.0300c07: 立爲二七時一以加二有漏一。詳云。此全非レ理。若於二 T2251_.64.0300c08: 凡位一斷二此品染一得二此斷得一。更無三入レ聖亦斷二 T2251_.64.0300c09: 此品染一。然約二遠厭對治一立二第二治一。於二婆沙 T2251_.64.0300c10: 等一曾無レ此。亦全非二此論意一。然光。寶令三此 T2251_.64.0300c11: 論同二正理一者未可也。治生言光・寶各致レ解 T2251_.64.0300c12: 竝朋二正理一。今云不レ用也
T2251_.64.0300c16: 故説二五時一。何今別開。答。正理云。爲レ顯三練根 T2251_.64.0300c17: 異二斷惑得果一故。得果外説二練根一無レ失
T2251_.64.0300c20: 顯二利根超越相一。初中亦二。此總釋。婆沙九十
T2251_.64.0300c23: 脱道時。曰法忍智忍時。唯證二見所斷法滅一。非 T2251_.64.0300c24: 想非非想處前八無間解脱時。唯證二修所斷 T2251_.64.0300c25: 法滅一。餘七十三時。通證二見修所斷法滅一。解 T2251_.64.0300c26: 云。據二忍害智害一言二見修所斷法一。非レ謂二見修 T2251_.64.0300c27: 道所斷一。彼總明二滅證一故通二無間解脱一。今唯 T2251_.64.0300c28: 明レ重故唯解脱。如二前所辨。而今亦約二八十 T2251_.64.0300c29: 九品位一以明二重得一
T2251_.64.0301a03: 亦二。初約二前七忍智一。後約二道類忍智一。約二修 T2251_.64.0301a04: 道中有レ三。初約二一來向果位一。二約二不還向 T2251_.64.0301a05: 果位。三約二阿羅漢向果位一。此文中。亦五時者 T2251_.64.0301a06: 但例レ數耳。下皆如レ是。又除者更加別除故
T2251_.64.0301a09: 道皆是漸進。何唯五時。答。雖レ有二勝進一而是
T2251_.64.0301a14: 此有レ二。初以二利除練一爲レ由。成二前説是鈍一。而 T2251_.64.0301a15: 顯成利根除レ練。後以下超除二預流一等上爲レ由。 T2251_.64.0301a16: 成二前説是次第一。而顯成超越隨レ應除二預流
T2251_.64.0301a24: 如二隨信法行一。又細分別於二隨信中一有二次第一 T2251_.64.0301a25: 有二超越一。何故爾者。根勝劣故令レ有二時遲速 T2251_.64.0301a26: 位次超一。若不レ爾者此差異何。故知利鈍相望 T2251_.64.0301a27: 不定。然光師偏被レ封二種利鈍一。強斥二正理一。豈 T2251_.64.0301a28: 非二疎昧一。猶未レ見三超越人有二練根一。設於二隨信一 T2251_.64.0301a29: 有二次第超越一。而於二其超越一有二練根一文何在。 T2251_.64.0301b01: 此論亦初明二鈍根次第一。次明二利根一。於レ中初 T2251_.64.0301b02: 利次第。次超越故。超越有二練根一難レ信
T2251_.64.0301b12: 果故亦名二遍知一。如二阿羅漢是解果故亦説名
T2251_.64.0301b19: 修三一。二且三下釋二次三句一別明二見六一。三餘 T2251_.64.0301b20: 三下釋二後兩句一別明二修三一。明二見六一中有レ三。 T2251_.64.0301b21: 一問。二答。三結。答中有レ二。初欲界。次上界。 T2251_.64.0301b22: 初欲界中有レ二。一正釋。二結。正釋中亦二。 T2251_.64.0301b23: 初釋二第一遍知一。先示二立位一。後重釋示二其名一。 T2251_.64.0301b24: 二明二次二遍知一亦有二立位示名二科一。明二上 T2251_.64.0301b25: 界三一中有レ三。初總例顯。次謂色下示二立位一。 T2251_.64.0301b26: 後是見下示レ名結レ數 明二修三一中有二問答結 T2251_.64.0301b27: 三一。答中亦有レ三。三界別故。初欲界中有レ三。 T2251_.64.0301b28: 一示二立位一。二應知下示二其名一。三并前下通 T2251_.64.0301b29: レ妨。次色界中有二立位示名二科一。後無色中亦 T2251_.64.0301c01: 有レ三。一示二立位一。二示二其名一。三通レ妨。此即初 T2251_.64.0301c02: 釋二初句一也
T2251_.64.0301c06: 先已滅故。但知二當諦一各立二遍知一。上界亦爾」
T2251_.64.0301c14: 禁。疑三見道已斷。何名二五下分結盡一。今通二
T2251_.64.0301c17: 爾見惑猶有レ餘。何唯三。答。攝二門根一故擧レ三 T2251_.64.0301c18: 攝レ餘。問。欲修惑亦有二癡慢一。何唯約二貪瞋一名二 T2251_.64.0301c19: 五下結盡一。答。若不レ盡二欲諸惑一不レ得レ名二五下 T2251_.64.0301c20: 結盡一。已得二五下結盡名一。斷二餘惑一理在二絶言一
T2251_.64.0301c25: 斷結盡爲二色愛盡一。今同二評家一。色界一切修惑 T2251_.64.0301c26: 名二色愛一。如三五鈍五利名二愛見一
T2251_.64.0301c29: 云。約二盡處一立雖レ云二無色修道一。然此越界得 T2251_.64.0302a01: 果總幷二前三界見道。及欲色界修道無爲一立 T2251_.64.0302a02: レ此。故名二一切結盡一。此與二上五下結盡一但二
T2251_.64.0302a07: 寶疏意同二光第四解一。據二次第人一説レ六。據二超 T2251_.64.0302a08: 越人一説レ七。竝不二相違一。而廣破斥光記初三 T2251_.64.0302a09: 解一。其能破甚有二理致一。今詳於レ忍有二六七異一。 T2251_.64.0302a10: 而於レ智唯三無二異説一。若據二忍七義一。其五下 T2251_.64.0302a11: 分結盡遍知通二忍及智果一。以二忍爲レ七智爲 T2251_.64.0302a12: 三故。若爾五下分中。三忍所害故爲二忍果一。 T2251_.64.0302a13: 二智所害故爲二智果一。若依二超越一爲レ七者。何 T2251_.64.0302a14: 不レ言二智果二一。然於レ智無二異説一。定知依二所害 T2251_.64.0302a15: 別一不レ據二超越一也。問。正不何。答。説レ七者非。 T2251_.64.0302a16: 若約二所害別一一切結盡遍知何不レ通二忍智一。 T2251_.64.0302a17: 彼既約二盡處一定爲二智果一。此第七遍知亦約二 T2251_.64.0302a18: 盡處一定爲二智果一。理爲二最妙一。問。若爾先離欲 T2251_.64.0302a19: 入二見道一。起二道類智一得二五下分結盡遍知一。爲二 T2251_.64.0302a20: 忍果一爲二智果一耶。答。定是智果。何以故。以下凡 T2251_.64.0302a21: 位已斷二欲修惑一故至二此位一時得中第七遍知上 T2251_.64.0302a22: 故。非下忍害二身戒疑一故得中此遍知上。若言レ不 T2251_.64.0302a23: レ爾。次第證人於二道類智一豈可レ得レ此。問。若爾 T2251_.64.0302a24: 次第超越何縁差別。答。唯依二時不同一。謂若次 T2251_.64.0302a25: 第人欲修惑第九品斷時得二此遍知一。若超越
T2251_.64.0302a28: 矣。由レ是雜心。此論及正理。顯宗唯六全不 T2251_.64.0302a29: レ言レ有二七義一。所以實非理一。若於二毘婆沙宗一牛 T2251_.64.0302b01: 角兩説者。正理如二餘處文一何不擧耶。又解。 T2251_.64.0302b02: 設據二超越一爲レ七其説有餘。謂顯得之時。雖二 T2251_.64.0302b03: 道類智一論二因果一必是智果。以下先修習智斷二 T2251_.64.0302b04: 欲九品一故今得中此果上故。若強爲二忍果一。先未 T2251_.64.0302b05: レ斷二欲染一至二此位一。何可レ得二此果一。如下彼全離欲 T2251_.64.0302b06: 人至二道類智一得中不還果上。應レ言二忍果一。因果門 T2251_.64.0302b07: 得捨門勿レ混。如二成不成門得捨門別一。又如二 T2251_.64.0302b08: 因果門成就門別一。謂上界道盡因果爲二忍果一。
T2251_.64.0302b11: 果一。而此忍智果同二見修道一故不二別説一。正理
T2251_.64.0302b23: 釋不レ順二同一果言一也
T2251_.64.0302c01: 此五一婆沙有二兩説一。初説除二欲界見三修一一。取二 T2251_.64.0302c02: 上界見三修二一。後説取二第七下分結盡一。除二第 T2251_.64.0302c03: 六上界見道斷遍知一。光記兩説各爲二正義一。此 T2251_.64.0302c04: 論隨同二彼兩説一。寶疏廣以二教理一唯後説爲レ正。
T2251_.64.0302c07: 三界惑一位上以建レ此。欲界立二見三修一一。上界 T2251_.64.0302c08: 立二見三修二一合成レ九。第七五分結遍知是於
T2251_.64.0302c11: 後師取二第七一除二第六一者違二正宗一。定知非二正 T2251_.64.0302c12: 義一。若言二超越人爾一者。是亦非レ理。先斷二五下 T2251_.64.0302c13: 分一入二見道一。依二根本地一斷二見惑一。至二道類智一 T2251_.64.0302c14: 時得二五分結遍知一。非下是依二根本地一斷レ惑故 T2251_.64.0302c15: 方得上。何定爲二根本果一。若言下入二根本一心上得 T2251_.64.0302c16: 故爲中彼果上者。是假借非二眞果一。由レ此正理五
T2251_.64.0302c19: 攝煩惱等一故者。簡二欲界見惑修惑一云レ唯。既 T2251_.64.0302c20: 無二所斷惑一。何有二所得第七遍知一。色無色攝煩 T2251_.64.0302c21: 惱者。取二上界一切一。豈得レ除二上界見道盡遍 T2251_.64.0302c22: 知一。猶明説二所簡欲界見三修一一言二欲界繋惑 T2251_.64.0302c23: 唯未至定果一。如レ是能所簡明白不二間容髮。 T2251_.64.0302c24: 雜心。正理。顯宗亦如レ是。圓暉偏同二初師上 T2251_.64.0302c25: 界見三修二一釋。麻中之蓬。光・寶唯所レ纒二彼 T2251_.64.0302c26: 兩説一未レ檢二當文一。不レ察二至理一也。寶疏所引諸 T2251_.64.0302c27: 文全非レ證。彼超越人所二成就一。非下依二根本一而 T2251_.64.0302c28: 斷二欲修惑一方得上故。何況此論文雜二欲界遍 T2251_.64.0302c29: 知一。實盲哉。光記亦約二體名縱奪一爲二各據一 T2251_.64.0303a01: 義一。實無義之妄論焉。問。彼後説如レ是非義者 T2251_.64.0303a02: 何故擧説。答。有乙約下依二根本一超越上。則準擬次 T2251_.64.0303a03: 第人一。及俗道所斷下分今聖道力令レ不二永生一 T2251_.64.0303a04: 義甲。故一往致二根本果一。然尋二正宗一者非二眞實一 T2251_.64.0303a05: 不レ言而知。故不レ加レ破。由レ此諸論中一向不 T2251_.64.0303a06: レ擧レ此也
T2251_.64.0303a10: 道上得二斷治一故。亦應レ證乙彼欲見斷法斷無漏 T2251_.64.0303a11: 離繋得甲。寧説三根本唯得二五果一。準レ彼是未來 T2251_.64.0303a12: 修。此道體即欲界四法忍智。又顯宗二十八
T2251_.64.0303a17: 論亦爾也
T2251_.64.0303a20: 故得二第七遍知一。無色近分非二無漏道依止一。 T2251_.64.0303a21: 問。何故不レ依二識處等邊一。答。彼近分唯治二次
T2251_.64.0303a25: レ得二無漏離繋得一故。根本定中。前三依レ何能 T2251_.64.0303a26: 斷二諸惑一故得二第九一。以三有頂地無二自聖道一非二 T2251_.64.0303a27: 斷惑依一。故云二前三一
T2251_.64.0303b01: レ能レ別斷三界見惑故非二忍六一。又有漏智不 T2251_.64.0303b02: レ能レ斷二有頂一故亦無二第九遍知一
T2251_.64.0303b05: 智。得二後二一可レ爾。法智下界斷智。唯應レ得二第 T2251_.64.0303b06: 七一。何故通二後二一。答。於二見道一如二所問一。分界別
T2251_.64.0303b13: 更加二第七一爲レ六。然後説非二盡理一。何以故。若 T2251_.64.0303b14: 依二超越一雖三類智時得乙第七一。然尋求其因一是 T2251_.64.0303b15: 凡位法智力。因果與二得捨時一義門各別。由二 T2251_.64.0303b16: 如レ是非理一雜心論既除二後説一唯依二初説一。由二 T2251_.64.0303b17: 是實爾一此論。正理。顯宗亦復唯同二初説一。光・
T2251_.64.0303b24: 不レ得二遍知名一耶。問意可レ知。八十九品斷位 T2251_.64.0303b25: 言二一一斷。對二唯九位言一可レ觀。光記釋云二斷 T2251_.64.0303b26: 位一。寶疏遮二斷體一。引二正理一。竝皆爲レ是。有人依二 T2251_.64.0303b27: 長行一問斷言含二體位一者非也
T2251_.64.0303c01: 見修次第故度界在二最後一。見道中約二難易次 T2251_.64.0303c02: 第一。初二難レ具故。後二易レ具故。後二中。易故
T2251_.64.0303c05: 論改二次第一者。彼雖レ有レ理而義難二分別一。故今 T2251_.64.0303c06: 從レ具向レ闕漸次列レ此
T2251_.64.0303c09: 相違釋。今詳。非二是相違一。何以故。以下隨二繋事 T2251_.64.0303c10: 量一其體爾所上來未明故。問起不レ依二自體一 T2251_.64.0303c11: 故。據レ體無レ詮故。若爾體是何。謂位即體持 T2251_.64.0303c12: 業釋。顯二其八十九位階位相連不亂。釋名 T2251_.64.0303c13: 云。體第也。骨肉毛血表裏大小相次第也。於二 T2251_.64.0303c14: 彼體位不レ亂中一。而亦依二次第一立二九位遍知一。 T2251_.64.0303c15: 故特云二體位一
T2251_.64.0303c19: 光・寶從レ垂不也。今顯三有頂五部中隨一斷是 T2251_.64.0303c20: 此縁成。非二必具斷一故殊云レ缺。雜心婆沙。正。
T2251_.64.0303c26: 力一。如三二力士同害二一怨一。一撲置レ地。一令レ不 T2251_.64.0303c27: レ起。不レ爾還起能爲二過患一。既通二二道一云二斷 T2251_.64.0303c28: 結一。今亦此意。況此文云三已得二無漏斷得一。已 T2251_.64.0303c29: 得言是前苦法忍智二道非二今苦類忍一。然光 T2251_.64.0304a01: 記苦類忍位立二斷名一非也。於二餘處一亦有二其 T2251_.64.0304a02: 義一。今不レ爾也。下滅言亦如レ是
T2251_.64.0304a05: 解一從レ麁向レ細。初通二見修一。總五部相望分二自 T2251_.64.0304a06: 他一。遍行言唯約二苦集一。彼十一遍使通縁二五 T2251_.64.0304a07: 部一故。次分二見修一。是細論。文云二他部一意在二遍 T2251_.64.0304a08: 行一。引證如レ是。後釋於二前第二釋修道上一加二 T2251_.64.0304a09: 他部一爲レ異。猶細論。寶疏義全同二光第二一。但 T2251_.64.0304a10: 精密。詳曰。三釋竝未レ盡。修道唯品自他。必 T2251_.64.0304a11: 不レ據レ部故。初後兩釋非也。又修道品自他 T2251_.64.0304a12: 中。前八品隨レ應爲二一因一。正第九品爲二一因一。 T2251_.64.0304a13: 故婆沙中未レ滅二第九品一爲レ不レ滅二雙因一。由レ是 T2251_.64.0304a14: 斷二一因一雖レ非下斷二一因一盡上。一因類故亦爲二一 T2251_.64.0304a15: 因一。未レ斷二後八品一二因未斷。而約二第九強一爲二 T2251_.64.0304a16: 一品未斷一。然光第二釋但分二自他品一。若斷二上 T2251_.64.0304a17: 上品上中品一應レ言レ滅二雙因一。斷二自他兩品一故。 T2251_.64.0304a18: 問。見道二因他部但遍行因。以レ何證。答。婆 T2251_.64.0304a19: 沙中。云下道類智忍滅道類智生時名レ滅二雙 T2251_.64.0304a20: 因一。先滅二見苦集所斷因一。今滅中見道所斷因上。 T2251_.64.0304a21: 除二滅諦先滅中一。明知唯約二苦集遍行一立二片 T2251_.64.0304a22: 因一。所以立二雙因一者。欲三苦集合爲二一遍知一。謂 T2251_.64.0304a23: 苦集有二遍行惑一互相繋縛。故不レ得二別立一。滅 T2251_.64.0304a24: 道無二遍行惑一故各自立。古徳約二互因一者混三 T2251_.64.0304a25: 釋名與二因縁一。其破如二光斥一。又舊論。雜心云二 T2251_.64.0304a26: 二因一。及舊婆沙云二倶因一何爲二互因一
T2251_.64.0304a29: 非二遍知一。闕二餘二縁一故
T2251_.64.0304b03: 以前一。此中欲レ顯下皆約二今生心一非中已生當生上 T2251_.64.0304b04: 於レ初施二現在言一。雖二苦類忍生一未レ起二苦類智 T2251_.64.0304b05: 解脱道一故爲二未缺有頂一。於二三心中一。若苦法 T2251_.64.0304b06: 忍未レ滅二自他雙因一。若苦法智位。雖レ滅二自部 T2251_.64.0304b07: 欲界同類因一未レ滅二集遍行一。亦爲二未滅雙因一。 T2251_.64.0304b08: 若苦類忍未レ起二智解脱道一故猶未レ滅二上界 T2251_.64.0304b09: 自部苦同類因一。何況他部遍行。亦是不レ滅二雙 T2251_.64.0304b10: 因一
T2251_.64.0304b13: 忍位前位已斷故亦爲二此縁成一。對レ有二無漏斷 T2251_.64.0304b14: 得一言レ亦。苦類智位雖レ滅二上界苦下惑一集惑 T2251_.64.0304b15: 未レ除集法忍位亦已滅二苦下遍行一集法智解 T2251_.64.0304b16: 脱道未レ生。故自部惑未レ去。竝雙因不レ成。婆
T2251_.64.0304b19: 斷因一故。然得二無漏離繋得一。及缺二有頂一。集法 T2251_.64.0304b20: 智忍滅集法智生時名二滅雙因一。先滅二見苦所 T2251_.64.0304b21: 斷因一。今滅二見集所斷因一。光師問答致二三解一。 T2251_.64.0304b22: 何猶預甚。今詳。二論文異義同。彼論過去爲 T2251_.64.0304b23: レ滅現在今生名レ生。何以知者有二理教一故。若 T2251_.64.0304b24: 未來當生爲レ生者。苦類智生時已云レ未レ滅二 T2251_.64.0304b25: 見集所斷因一。然彼苦類智現在前時。應レ言 T2251_.64.0304b26: レ滅二見集所斷因一耶。甚不レ應レ理。然問本誤故
T2251_.64.0304c01: 乃約二上下八諦一以爲二八位一。前二位不レ立二遍知一。 T2251_.64.0304c02: 後六位立レ之。由レ此不レ分二忍智一而對明。然縁 T2251_.64.0304c03: 具闕正在二智位一非據二忍位一。欲レ顯二此義一云二 T2251_.64.0304c04: 忍滅智生一。八位竝皆爾。而其意難二了達一由レ是 T2251_.64.0304c05: 雜心論主欲レ令三明知解此旨一。即分二忍智一忍 T2251_.64.0304c06: 屬二前門一。雖二苦類忍一與二苦法智一具闕不レ異故。 T2251_.64.0304c07: 今論欲二明著一故順二雜心一以忍入二前位一
T2251_.64.0304c12: 一繋一。他部遍行爲二一繋一修道正第九品爲二一 T2251_.64.0304c13: 繋一。隨レ意前八品爲二一繋一。如二前雙因一。光三釋 T2251_.64.0304c14: 應二如レ前簡一
T2251_.64.0304c17: 中間言レ及。於下見道及修道中。除二三界各最後 T2251_.64.0304c18: 第九品一餘品位上與二雙因一無レ別。於二修道三界 T2251_.64.0304c19: 各最後品一與二越界一無レ別。言レ用者功用。無三雙 T2251_.64.0304c20: 因功用外有二別倶繋用一。何以故。雙因位必倶 T2251_.64.0304c21: 繋。以乙無下滅二雙因一而猶有中倶繋上。無甲下滅二倶繋一 T2251_.64.0304c22: 而猶有中雙因上故。能起爲レ因。結縛爲レ繋。故 T2251_.64.0304c23: 於レ義有レ異。而無二別功用力一故不レ立。正理論
T2251_.64.0304c29: 性一。見集斷惑縛義如レ本。見苦所斷縛義都無。
T2251_.64.0305a05: 故且説二雙因一。今彈云。義有レ異已許レ此。而功 T2251_.64.0305a06: 力無レ別故不レ許二別立一。汝辨二寬狹一言下非レ滅二雙 T2251_.64.0305a07: 因一即是離中倶繋上。是自新案必定非二毘婆沙宗一。 T2251_.64.0305a08: 毘婆沙宗全無二寬狹一。雙因滅不滅位必倶繋
T2251_.64.0305a11: 見集所斷因一。未レ離二倶繋一。雖レ離二見苦所斷繋一。 T2251_.64.0305a12: 未レ離二見集所斷繋一。苦類忍滅苦類智生時未
T2251_.64.0305a15: 今滅二見集所斷因一。亦離二倶繋一。先離二見苦所 T2251_.64.0305a16: 斷繋一。今離二見集所斷繋一。集類智忍滅集類智
T2251_.64.0305a19: 所斷一品及至八品染一時未レ滅二雙因一。雖レ滅二 T2251_.64.0305a20: 一品乃至八品因一未レ滅二八品乃至一品因一。故 T2251_.64.0305a21: 亦未レ離二倶繋一。雖レ離二一品乃至八品繋一未レ離二 T2251_.64.0305a22: 八品乃至一品繋一。故離二彼第九品染一。無間道 T2251_.64.0305a23: 滅解脱道生時名二滅雙因一。先滅二八品因一。今 T2251_.64.0305a24: 滅二第九品因一。故亦離二倶繋一。先離二八品繋一。今 T2251_.64.0305a25: 離二第九品繋一。故説二四靜慮四無色一竝皆其位 T2251_.64.0305a26: 等。以此應レ知功力無レ別。滅レ因不レ離レ繋於二 T2251_.64.0305a27: 何文一有レ之。又以二無漏縁惑不繋二他聚一成二因 T2251_.64.0305a28: 繋別一是不レ成證。以下滅道惑亦非中令二他起一 T2251_.64.0305a29: 因上故。由レ此若體若義辨二寬狹一實是妄案。然 T2251_.64.0305b01: 光・寶輩恐二正理談訣一以朋二彼義一。於二此論一強 T2251_.64.0305b02: 設二非理救一。未二深考一之所レ爲矣
T2251_.64.0305b05: 標二寬狹一。二示二別立一。三指レ事爲二極成所以一。此 T2251_.64.0305b06: 中依レ位致レ難。難云。諸越界時位。即皆滅雙 T2251_.64.0305b07: 因故不レ可二因外立界。答云。雖二越界時即滅 T2251_.64.0305b08: 雙因少分有一。而滅雙因時多分非二越界一。見道 T2251_.64.0305b09: 六果滅雙因時竝非二越界一。修道中四禪四無 T2251_.64.0305b10: 色各下三地六種滅雙因亦未二越界一。故別立二 T2251_.64.0305b11: 越界一。今論且約二修道一云二三地一。光記大科二 T2251_.64.0305b12: 義。第二義通中亦有二二釋一。總是三解。第一 T2251_.64.0305b13: 義約二用無別一作レ難。寶疏同レ此。此釋不レ順二 T2251_.64.0305b14: 論約位。第二釋作レ難爲レ是。約レ位故。通釋 T2251_.64.0305b15: 不レ異二前義一。最通答釋且許二不立一爲レ異。是亦 T2251_.64.0305b16: 非二論意一也
T2251_.64.0305b19: 通二後兩句一。便長行顯レ此。住是能住。是示二其 T2251_.64.0305b20: 人一顯二能成就一。或言現二有無不定一。見道猶有 T2251_.64.0305b21: 無不定。凡位定無不レ言自成。故頌不レ説
T2251_.64.0305b28: 根本非二欲對治一故無二欲見修四遍知一。問。先離 T2251_.64.0305b29: 欲者。入二正決定一至二苦類智集法忍一時三縁 T2251_.64.0305c01: 具。何不レ立二遍知一。答。雖レ具二三縁一雙因未レ成。 T2251_.64.0305c02: 遍知就二無漏斷得一立レ此。彼於二異生位一雖レ斷二 T2251_.64.0305c03: 欲見苦集等惑一。今唯得二苦下無漏離得一。未 T2251_.64.0305c04: レ得二集下同類因無漏離得一故不レ成二雙因一。光
T2251_.64.0305c10: 前新得門故唯依二智位一。此約二人成就門一。則後 T2251_.64.0305c11: 位不レ捨二前前一而成。是故集法智成レ一集類 T2251_.64.0305c12: 忍成二彼一一。是非レ自新得成一。故以二後忍一屬二前 T2251_.64.0305c13: 智一論レ此
T2251_.64.0305c16: 門ナレハ由レ忍得故以屬レ忍。今成就門約レ位故 T2251_.64.0305c17: 定爲二修位一。問。離欲退者。未二退墮一時唯得二下 T2251_.64.0305c18: 分一一。今退何成レ六。答。下分盡總集欲界見 T2251_.64.0305c19: 修諸斷一爲レ一。雖レ一體即七種。今離欲退人。 T2251_.64.0305c20: 捨二下分中欲修一分一而餘有レ六。故無レ妨
T2251_.64.0305c23: 難レ除如二上已辨一
T2251_.64.0305c27: 一切。若約二羅漢一三界見修一切。故竝據二全 T2251_.64.0305c28: 一切一。言二一切斷一。有人通二全分少分一者非也。 T2251_.64.0305c29: 故正理。婆沙竝有二二全言一
T2251_.64.0306a03: 雖二是越界一而非二得果一。又餘位者二義竝闕
T2251_.64.0306a06: 知一。由レ是但捨二見六中前五一。正理論五十六
T2251_.64.0306a09: 未至定一入二見諦一者上。若依二根本一入二見諦一者。 T2251_.64.0306a10: 於二欲界斷一不レ得二無漏離繋得一。故不レ得二欲界
T2251_.64.0306a13: 今即論二遍知得捨一。解脱道智未レ起非二實捨 T2251_.64.0306a14: 實得一。故定於レ智應レ論二得捨一。若言レ不レ爾於二 T2251_.64.0306a15: 集法忍一斷二自同類因一。何不レ許下彼滅二雙因一而
T2251_.64.0306a18: 捨レ五得レ一。婆沙既約二道類智現在前生一言二 T2251_.64.0306a19: 得捨一。豈非レ違二本宗一。光記墮二正理破中一誤云二 T2251_.64.0306a20: 未來生一。其非理如二前已辨一。亦復此論唯云二道 T2251_.64.0306a21: 類智時一。是唯現在無下可レ言二未來一之理上。未至 T2251_.64.0306a22: 簡無者。於二捨五言一自成故。寶疏準二此論文一 T2251_.64.0306a23: 亦談二自舊痾準レ前可レ簡
T2251_.64.0306a28: 於二此中一有二二類一。一無レ捨得レ一。忍果六ト色 T2251_.64.0306a29: 受盡トナリ。謂成就前前一。而新得レ一故二捨而 T2251_.64.0306b01: 得レ一。下分結盡捨レ六得レ一。一切結盡捨レ二 T2251_.64.0306b02: 得レ一。若起越人全離欲道類智時捨レ五得
T2251_.64.0306b05: 六一不二倶時起一。故第八是第七總集故。故無二 T2251_.64.0306b06: 七八九種捨得一前成就門亦爾。問。前成就門 T2251_.64.0306b07: 成二一二三四五一。此中何縁無二三四五一。解云。
T2251_.64.0306b11: 名一。本名便失説名爲レ捨。亦無有レ過。前依レ體 T2251_.64.0306b12: 論。今就レ名言二得捨一。故無二三四五得一。無二彼名 T2251_.64.0306b13: 竝現一故。若作二此解一得與二成就一但名差別。 T2251_.64.0306b14: 亦婆沙一説 T2251_.64.0306b15: 阿毘達磨倶舍論第二十一卷法義終 T2251_.64.0306b16: T2251_.64.0306b17: T2251_.64.0306b18: T2251_.64.0306b19: T2251_.64.0306b20: 義 T2251_.64.0306b21: 豐山上毛沙門快道記 T2251_.64.0306b22: 分別賢聖品第六之一 T2251_.64.0306b23: 分別賢聖品 正理。顯宗。分別爲レ辨。已兩本 T2251_.64.0306b24: 法勝毘曇竝云二賢聖品一。曰於二人天中一應レ受二
T2251_.64.0306c04: 未レ配レ位也。寶寄二所知一。具釋。大乘義章十七
T2251_.64.0306c10: 終一。皆名爲レ賢。竝得レ稱レ聖。二賢聖體別。別有二 T2251_.64.0306c11: 五種一。其第五約レ位分別。見道已前調心離惡。 T2251_.64.0306c12: 名レ之爲レ賢。見諦已上會正名レ聖。故仁王説二 T2251_.64.0306c13: 三賢十聖一。三通局分別。賢通聖局。從レ始至 T2251_.64.0306c14: レ終。皆名爲レ賢。故經説云二賢者一。舍利弗等。見 T2251_.64.0306c15: 諦已上方得レ名レ聖。今約二體別一題二賢聖一。雜心 T2251_.64.0306c16: 文昭昭。又瑜伽釋敬序曰二正智受學聖賢衆一。 T2251_.64.0306c17: 逆次思レ之。而舊論約レ勝略レ賢。但云二聖道果 T2251_.64.0306c18: 人品一。辨二品次一者。光約二漏無漏因果一。寶疏約二 T2251_.64.0306c19: 滅道次第非也。似レ順二結前文一。然前品不二正 T2251_.64.0306c20: 説斷。豈可レ爲二所以一。亦前已明二滅諦一。重説煩 T2251_.64.0306c21: 勞。今云。賢聖差別由二隨眠強弱一。離レ彼不レ能 T2251_.64.0306c22: レ辨レ之。故隨眠次明二此品一。是故法勝毘曇四
Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:有/無] [CITE] |