大正蔵検索 INBUDS
|
僞書論 (No. 2509_ 恭畏述 ) in Vol. 78 915 916 917 918 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:有/無] [CITE]
T2509_.78.0915b01: T2509_.78.0915b02: No.2509 T2509_.78.0915b03: 僞書論一卷 T2509_.78.0915b04: T2509_.78.0915b05: 恭畏述十三條 T2509_.78.0915b06: 僞書之目録先年雖令書寫之。今度重祖師 T2509_.78.0915b07: 之勘文少少書拔而授與。努努不可有他見 T2509_.78.0915b08: 而已。偏是破邪顯正之謂歟。傍流之族不得 T2509_.78.0915b09: 正流之師傳故。多端以如是之僞書爲實義。 T2509_.78.0915b10: 太以不可也。不可不愼。不可不愼。能知其趣
T2509_.78.0915b13: 淨尊律師相傳重書令傳持之間。定位雖令 T2509_.78.0915b14: 懇望不諍用之間。號故聖尊法親王御傳之
T2509_.78.0915b22: 僧正語云。覺禪阿闍梨ハニクシウツクシ善キ T2509_.78.0915b23: 眞言師也。但一ノ心劣事在之。寶*悉陀羅尼 T2509_.78.0915b24: 經文ヲ今書裏書付之。彼經阿自室生 T2509_.78.0915b25: 堀出ス經ト云テ。世間流布敢テ諸家ノ目録所不載
T2509_.78.0916a11: 頂堂者勝覺・定海・元海三代被修造功訖。然 T2509_.78.0916a12: 間勝覺ノ代ニハ未立兩壇。兩界一壇也。天蓋梵
T2509_.78.0916a18: 一。三旰集事 勝覺記義範・範俊・定賢三師
T2509_.78.0916a26: 間七月ニ爲律師事明白也。此印信正本ノ印信ニ T2509_.78.0916a27: 相違文言等有之。依繁不載之
T2509_.78.0916b19: 月八日迄ハ現存也。證據在之。雖然同年死
T2509_.78.0916b26: 下賜禪定大王御本書寫畢。首尾五帖内。此 T2509_.78.0916b27: 帖者更不可披露之由御口傳ニ蒙誓約畢。權
T2509_.78.0916c01: 王流以之令祕藏之條所致。不知當流根源 T2509_.78.0916c02: 也。可哀可哀 權僧正道快記之
T2509_.78.0916c10: 六月七日補醍醐座主。弘長三年九月六日
T2509_.78.0916c15: 未滿灌頂之大事等不可授他人。旁以謀書
T2509_.78.0917a04: 不審事房玄巨細被記之。披而可悉之
T2509_.78.0917a15: 正文。如守眼精能能可令祕藏也。暦應二年 T2509_.78.0917a16: 四月十九日授貞祐阿闍梨畢。法印定位 T2509_.78.0917a17: 以上十三箇之書。此外在別紙。右僞書之目 T2509_.78.0917a18: 録之内。參差之文證祖師勘記之分。少少拔 T2509_.78.0917a19: 書而授之畢。偏是爲他門之疑難答説也。非 T2509_.78.0917a20: 謗傍流之族。此外眞僞未決之書等多端。唯 T2509_.78.0917a21: 非相傳之重書可有斟酌者也 T2509_.78.0917a22: 寛永六年九月吉日。所授堯辰闍梨如件 T2509_.78.0917a23: 金剛生法子恭畏 T2509_.78.0917a24: T2509_.78.0917a25: T2509_.78.0917a26: T2509_.78.0917a27: T2509_.78.0917a28: T2509_.78.0917a29: T2509_.78.0917b01: T2509_.78.0917b02: T2509_.78.0917c01: T2509_.78.0917c02: T2509_.78.0918a01: T2509_.78.0918b01: T2509_.78.0918c01: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: |