SAT DB

T2252_.64.0440a01:
T2252_.64.0440a02: No.2252[cf.No.1558]
T2252_.64.0440a03:
T2252_.64.0440a04: 阿毘達磨倶舍論稽古叙
T2252_.64.0440a05: 昔者唐三藏重譯二倶舍論一之日。其徒光･寶諸
T2252_.64.0440a06: 師各豪傑之資。作二之疏記一以賛揚焉。新論流
T2252_.64.0440a07: 衍於レ是乎爲レ盛矣。諸師之功績可レ謂レ不二淺
T2252_.64.0440a08: 鮮一也。然間有二異解岐分一。俾二後學莫

所二適從一。
T2252_.64.0440a09: 或殆二乎牽強附會之說一者何也。無レ他不レ稽二
T2252_.64.0440a10: 諸古三藏一故也。此乃法幢法師稽古之所二由
T2252_.64.0440a11: 作一也。法師濃州人。姓菅原氏。自レ幼出家遊

T2252_.64.0440a12: 學于京師一者。十

餘年于玆一。慧解絶レ倫。志氣
T2252_.64.0440a13: 不レ凡。欲下博達二大小乘顯密諸敎一。旁通中外家
T2252_.64.0440a14: 儒術藝文上。自號二學一切乘一。是以其學無二偏黨一。
T2252_.64.0440a15: 所レ遇必究二其奧一矣。然以二學有

序。其志學之
T2252_.64.0440a16: 初。先修二毘曇一。倶舍一論最潜レ意焉。而不レ屑二
T2252_.64.0440a17: 後世傳注一。遡自二毘婆沙･順正理一。以及二發智･
T2252_.64.0440a18: 六足之文一。莫レ不二咸對讀而精覈也。猶不二以
T2252_.64.0440a19: 爲

足焉。進入二大藏首把二四阿含重單諸本一。
T2252_.64.0440a20: 孜孜鑚仰。則非二但斯論義趣斯明一。凡諸部對
T2252_.64.0440a21: 法論道。煥乎如レ觀レ火。然偉哉。於レ是乎還視二
T2252_.64.0440a22: 諸注家之說一。是非得失目下瞭然。宛如下遡二原
T2252_.64.0440a23: 泉一者乃辨三流派之所二由出一而無中復所

疑也。
T2252_.64.0440a24: 遂乃所二論著一有二成書一。今撮下其中所レ訂二論載
T2252_.64.0440a25: 經律出處異同一者上。命曰二稽古一。以爲二嚆矢一。則
T2252_.64.0440a26: 屬レ余爲レ序。余也老而且病矣。豈敢當哉。然
T2252_.64.0440a27: 法師嘗遊二名山大刹一。今歳來二此山一。掛二錫于
T2252_.64.0440a28: 小院學舍一。朝夕繼見。則悉二其爲

人。齒尚弱
T2252_.64.0440a29: 年。而大業有二若レ斯者一。雖レ自二其命世之宏才一
T2252_.64.0440b01: 乎。要精修研磨之所致也。凡學者才軼者有二
T2252_.64.0440b02: 躐等之譏一。學勤者有二遺本之患一。才學不二雙全一。
T2252_.64.0440b03: 則奚取焉。兼有レ之者法師乃其人也。嗚呼斯
T2252_.64.0440b04: 論譯出以來。千有餘歳之久。學者何啻千百。
T2252_.64.0440b05: 而靡レ有下一人遡二於阿含海一者上。俾三一法師稽
T2252_.64.0440b06: 古之勤獨出二光･寶諸師之右一者何也。雖レ曰三
T2252_.64.0440b07: 前無二古人一。可矣後生可畏實法師之謂乎。遂
T2252_.64.0440b08: 書焉。寶暦十三年歳次二癸未一九月。高野山金
T2252_.64.0440b09: 剛三昧院快辨。題二于長老房一
T2252_.64.0440b10:
T2252_.64.0440b11:
T2252_.64.0440b12:
T2252_.64.0440b13: 阿毘達磨倶舍論稽古卷首
T2252_.64.0440b14: 　　題言八則
T2252_.64.0440b15: 一倶舍一論。慧學所二至難一。而竊觀下七八百年
T2252_.64.0440b16: 來修二對法一者上。　一唯圓暉頌疏。是依以誘二掖
T2252_.64.0440b17: 後進一。今撿二其書一。唯是首

鼠光･寶間一。頗爲二刪
T2252_.64.0440b18: 補一。豈足三憑以爲二準繩一哉。則雖レ謂二之七八百
T2252_.64.0440b19: 年來倶舍論弗

行者可也。近有二一二前修一頗
T2252_.64.0440b20: 覺二其非一。始復讀二光･寶二家疏一。遂又有講二及
T2252_.64.0440b21: 其論一。況以下時屬二昇平一宗乘日隆上。　遂乃講帷
T2252_.64.0440b22: 雲列。論鼓雷震。修二對法一者。亦不レ乏二其人一。然
T2252_.64.0440b23: 試扣レ之。則皆依レ樣畫二葫蘆一。間雖レ有二豪傑者一。
T2252_.64.0440b24: 弊風所レ扇。徒汲

汲乎辨二註家之是非一。要光･
T2252_.64.0440b25: 寶之奴隷耳。察二其弊由一。無二他故一焉。匪二直材
T2252_.64.0440b26: 乏一。蓋坐レ不レ讀二古三藏一。夫學者不レ讀二古三藏一。
T2252_.64.0440b27: 則開レ口皆臆說。蓋自二普光･法寶輩一。亦未三嘗
T2252_.64.0440b28: 寓二眼古三藏一。肆然求二諸其臆一而強爲二之解一。
T2252_.64.0440b29: 其說愈繁愈舛。學者不レ知。遂奉レ之以爲二金
T2252_.64.0440c01: 科玉條一。遇二其義或竆一。則依違曲說。漫不二之
T2252_.64.0440c02: 省一。豈不レ悲哉。余生二數千歳之下一。妄不二自揣一
T2252_.64.0440c03: 以爲。三藏雖レ缺乎可レ徴。何區區傍二傳註之籓
T2252_.64.0440c04: 籬一而走爲。乃溯求二三藏一。上焉四阿笈摩。下
T2252_.64.0440c05: 焉諸部對法。日夜研摩十

年于玆一。乃迷罔頓
T2252_.64.0440c06: 開。妙解躍然。不下啻發二伏藏一獲中至寶上也。於
T2252_.64.0440c07: レ是所二論著一成二一帙一。名曰二改觀一。尚未レ脫レ稿。
T2252_.64.0440c08: 今聊抄

出其中所レ訂二凡論載經律數百章出
T2252_.64.0440c09: 處異同一者上。以便二考較一。其所出不レ可二得知一者
T2252_.64.0440c10: 蓋缺如。間有二指擿一。聊亦及レ之爾
T2252_.64.0440c11: 一三藏之文。古未レ載二具多一。師授口誦。是以
T2252_.64.0440c12: 其所レ誦家家殊レ文。大氏讀二三藏一。識三其爲二何
T2252_.64.0440c13: 部所誦一爲レ要。廼如下所二翻傳一四阿含上。中･雜二
T2252_.64.0440c14: 阿含薩婆多部所誦本也。增一阿含大衆部
T2252_.64.0440c15: 所誦本也。長阿含化地部所誦本也。稽一之他
T2252_.64.0440c16: 經律與二阿毘達磨一。可二以知一已。余別有レ考。是
T2252_.64.0440c17: 編所レ徴。中･雜二阿含爲レ主。是其薩婆多家
T2252_.64.0440c18: 所誦本也。學者不レ知二所誦各殊一。槪謂二之小
T2252_.64.0440c19: 乘經一。何其粗也。謂二四阿含皆大衆部所誦本一
T2252_.64.0440c20: 者。其誤亦本二於窺基一。後生不二深考一耳。夫所
T2252_.64.0440c21: 誦宗家且不レ識。尚何問二其義一。苟識二其所誦
T2252_.64.0440c22: 宗家一。乃後讀二三藏一。則左右取レ之無レ不レ逢二其
T2252_.64.0440c23: 原一。是余稽古之所レ作。孰謂二之迂一矣哉
T2252_.64.0440c24: 一小乘諸經文字多二譌舛一。非二大乘經之比一。其
T2252_.64.0440c25: 部帙又錯亂難レ讀非レ一。故是編所レ載。間附二
T2252_.64.0440c26: 鄙見一以加二訂正一。世或有下譏二余僭妄一者上殊不
T2252_.64.0440c27: レ知自二隋唐一而後大乘修多羅盛行。而四阿含
T2252_.64.0440c28: 束二之高閣一不レ講。其對法者流亦舍二古三藏一
T2252_.64.0440c29: 而不顧。以爲此多出二於舊譯之手一不レ足レ採。
T2252_.64.0441a01: 於レ是遂至下辨

髦大藏一付中之度外上。則其多二譌
T2252_.64.0441a02: 舛一不二亦宜一乎。況以下如二宋刻本一五季兵燹之
T2252_.64.0441a03: 餘。搜索旁求以始成二全藏一。胡元猾レ夏。其本
T2252_.64.0441a04: 又多湮沒。逮レ至二明興一收

摭散帙一。固已非二全
T2252_.64.0441a05: 藏一。屡經二翻刻一愈益差訛。竟無中一人校正者上
T2252_.64.0441a06: 乎。蓋善讀者必自有レ辨焉爾
T2252_.64.0441a07: 一是編所レ錄經律二藏而止。如二其阿毘達磨一。
T2252_.64.0441a08: 學者或知二其所出一故省レ之。然至レ如下夫集異
T2252_.64.0441a09: 門足論。目スルニ以二舍利子親撰一。　施設足論譯
T2252_.64.0441a10: 出已數百年。而却以爲中缺亡上。則知鮮下能讀二
T2252_.64.0441a11: 阿毘達磨一者上矣
T2252_.64.0441a12: 一斯論陳唐兩譯。難三輒定二優劣一。而大氐古今
T2252_.64.0441a13: 學者皆謂。新論之精非二舊論比一也。甚則曰二
T2252_.64.0441a14: 舊論訛譯不

足レ觀。寃哉。是認二玄奘門人之
T2252_.64.0441a15: 黨言一以爲二公論一者也已。舊論不レ可レ不レ讀。是
T2252_.64.0441a16: 編間援以併證者。蓋爲レ此
T2252_.64.0441a17: 一舊論諸疏湮沒弗レ傳。可レ惜哉。至二新論一則
T2252_.64.0441a18: 神泰疏爲二首倡一。是以其說最粗鹵。其書亦殘
T2252_.64.0441a19: 缺。難二得而詳一矣。初學必求二其註解一者。乃光･
T2252_.64.0441a20: 寶二疏具存。雖レ無二神泰一可也。光･寶匹也已
T2252_.64.0441a21: 矣。今所三以特指

擿普光一者。以二其先出之故一
T2252_.64.0441a22: 也。學者或以三其說多出二於三藏相傳一憚レ焉。
T2252_.64.0441a23: 不レ知玄奘者以二新譯一振。雖二自其命世之才一
T2252_.64.0441a24: 乎。要時運使レ然。則其尸祝之間。往往皆多狺
T2252_.64.0441a25: 狺吠レ聲之類也。至レ有下廢二舊譯經論一之議上。則
T2252_.64.0441a26: 其爲レ人亦足レ薄焉。李唐以前經論擧皆謬乎。
T2252_.64.0441a27: 可レ謂二妄誣一。已頼時論執二不可一而不レ果二施行一。
T2252_.64.0441a28: 不幸而試レ之。其禍果何如哉。由レ是觀レ之。其
T2252_.64.0441a29: 門人務排

詆舊譯家一夸

張其門戸一者。實出二
T2252_.64.0441b01: 於其師一者昭昭乎。不レ可レ掩矣。從レ此以後。多下
T2252_.64.0441b02: 眼不レ識二古三藏一者上。皆玄奘作レ俑也。今特指

T2252_.64.0441b03: 擿普光一。蓋爲レ此故。其圓暉以下皆小家數。
T2252_.64.0441b04: 何足二論訐一。況隷二圓暉一者乎。然則二家疏不
T2252_.64.0441b05: レ足レ讀邪。曰否。二家之有レ功二于斯文一。亦弗二淺
T2252_.64.0441b06: 鮮一也。要辨二其眞一不レ眩二其妄一。則不二必廢一可
T2252_.64.0441b07: 也。今所レ議在レ此不レ在レ彼也。然學者先入者
T2252_.64.0441b08: 爲レ主。浸骨淪髓不レ可二得而拔一者。餘不二得而
T2252_.64.0441b09: 知一。讀者察レ諸。是亦難下爲二不レ識レ古者一道上
T2252_.64.0441b10: 一大乘三藏非二今所

關。置而不レ論。註家輒
T2252_.64.0441b11: 采二大乘經義一以飾二其說一者。可レ謂レ不レ知レ類
T2252_.64.0441b12: 也。初學或欲レ知二其異同一。則源信對倶舍存
T2252_.64.0441b13: 焉。其書間多二疎漏一。則讀者自得焉耳
T2252_.64.0441b14: 一文可二兩載一者。錄二其一一而餘略焉。其文繁
T2252_.64.0441b15: 廣者。但曰レ出二某經一以省レ之。可二撿レ彼而得

T2252_.64.0441b16: 此也
T2252_.64.0441b17:
T2252_.64.0441b18:
T2252_.64.0441b19: 阿毘達磨倶舍論稽古卷上
T2252_.64.0441b20: 　　　　　　日本學一切乘沙門法幢著
T2252_.64.0441b21: 　　分別界品第一之一
T2252_.64.0441b22: 大德法救至鄔柁南頌　姚秦竺佛念譯出
T2252_.64.0441b23: 曜經千章法句。宋天息災譯法集要頌經是
T2252_.64.0441b24: 也　普光曰。印度現有二梵本一流行。殊不レ知
T2252_.64.0441b25: 翻傳已久。適見二其陋一已。無常品居レ首。擧レ之
T2252_.64.0441b26: 等

攝餘品一。普光曰。等

空無我等一。可レ謂不レ知
T2252_.64.0441b27: 而解者矣　僧叡出曜序曰。出曜者。婆須密
T2252_.64.0441b28: 舅法救菩薩之　所レ撰也。集

比一千章一。立爲二
T2252_.64.0441b29: 三十三品一。名曰二法句一。錄二其本起一繋而爲レ釋。
T2252_.64.0441c01: 名曰二出曜一。出曜之言。舊名二譬喩一。是或出二於
T2252_.64.0441c02: 譯者之說一。然其本起爲二法救撰一者非矣。經第
T2252_.64.0441c03: 六引二僧伽羅刹修行經一。其文出二修行道地曉
T2252_.64.0441c04: 了食品一。僧伽羅刹去レ佛七百年出。見二佛行經
T2252_.64.0441c05: 序一。故知本起乃後人所二蒐輯一。不レ出二於法救
T2252_.64.0441c06: 之手一者審矣。宋譯本無二本起一。舊婆沙直言二
T2252_.64.0441c07: 法句一。而不レ言二出曜或譬喩一。可二以見一已　呉
T2252_.64.0441c08: 譯法句經。開元錄據二舊婆沙一以爲二法救撰一。
T2252_.64.0441c09: 貞元錄等襲レ之。不稽之甚也。經序言三五部沙
T2252_.64.0441c10: 門各錄二法句一。不レ言二誰某撰一也。何從得レ知二法
T2252_.64.0441c11: 救撰一乎。婆沙所レ引品次不レ同。諸錄混而一
T2252_.64.0441c12: レ之非也。大氐歴代撰録者。襲二傳習之謬一。未
T2252_.64.0441c13: レ曉二其非一。讀者不レ可レ不レ察也。按晋譯法句譬
T2252_.64.0441c14: 喩經。與二呉譯法句經同本。而錄二本起爲レ異。
T2252_.64.0441c15: 註家茫乎不レ識二法救所レ撰何是。故聊此言
T2252_.64.0441c16: 爾
T2252_.64.0441c17: 滅無同類　見二中含五十八法樂尼經一
T2252_.64.0441c18: 苾芻當知至淨色爲性　雜含十三曰。佛告二
T2252_.64.0441c19: 比丘一。眼是内入處四大所造淨色。不可見有
T2252_.64.0441c20: 對耳･鼻･舌･身亦如レ是說。若心意識非色。不
T2252_.64.0441c21: 可見無對。是名二意内入處一
T2252_.64.0441c22: 諸佛出現樂至同修勇進樂　新歳經曰。諸
T2252_.64.0441c23: 佛興出快。說經法亦快。聖衆和同快。和常得二
T2252_.64.0441c24: 安穩一。出曜經十八薩婆多律攝一載二此頌本
T2252_.64.0441c25: 起一
T2252_.64.0441c26: 云何名風至輕等動性　見二中含七象跡喩
T2252_.64.0441c27: 經一
T2252_.64.0441c28: 苾芻當知至即便變壞　雜含二曰。若可礙
T2252_.64.0441c29: 可分。是名二色受陰一。相所礙若手･若石･若杖･

Footnote:

440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:有/無] [CITE]