大正蔵検索 INBUDS
|
阿毘達磨倶舍論法義 (No. 2251_ 快道撰 ) in Vol. 64
T2251_.64.0292a01: 門一即説二於六境一彼言二不絶一。即我無窮與レ我 T2251_.64.0292a02: 何殊獨言二彼善一。今彈云。汝是三義。我是一 T2251_.64.0292a03: 義。又汝六根。我是六境。又汝流義。我即相續 T2251_.64.0292a04: 不絶義。豈爲二是同一
T2251_.64.0292a07: 善品一。與レ我何別彼獨善哉。今彈云。漂奪義 T2251_.64.0292a08: 與二勢増上義一何可レ不レ同。於レ中勢増上義親二 T2251_.64.0292a09: 暴流名一
T2251_.64.0292a12: 行時一若非二増上一何能令下與二種種苦一合上。如何
T2251_.64.0292a15: 倶立中軛名上。若言三我釋亦同二此過一。此唯非レ理。
T2251_.64.0292a20: レ取故故名爲レ取。彼三由。此但一義。正理破 T2251_.64.0292a21: 曰。所釋取義亦與レ理違。謂若取名唯因レ愛 T2251_.64.0292a22: 者。説二取縁 ![]() ![]() T2251_.64.0292a23: 有。又如二前際後際業縁一亦應レ通 ![]() T2251_.64.0292a24: 惱一。如二縁起中已廣思擇一。今彈云。從二三受一生二 T2251_.64.0292a25: 欲色無色三愛一故説二受縁 ![]() T2251_.64.0292a26: 欲等取一。故説二愛縁 ![]() ![]() T2251_.64.0292a27: 招二後有一業上。故説二取縁 ![]() T2251_.64.0292a28: 爲レ愛。欲等之取名レ取。同愛爲體然其行相 T2251_.64.0292a29: 各別。何妨二因果一。又如二前際後際業縁一唯是 T2251_.64.0292a30: 欲貪必無レ違レ理 T2251_.64.0292a31: 倶舍論法義卷第二十終 T2251_.64.0292b01: T2251_.64.0292b02: T2251_.64.0292b03: 十一 T2251_.64.0292b04: 豐山寓居上毛沙門快道林常記 T2251_.64.0292b05: 分別隨眠品第五之三
T2251_.64.0292b12: 體雖レ未レ説。已説二纒名一爲二漏等及一百八煩 T2251_.64.0292b13: 惱一此釋問本誤。答何可レ正。何以故。此但結下 T2251_.64.0292b14: 以二隨眠及纒一説爲中漏等上。非レ結二即隨眠幷纒一。 T2251_.64.0292b15: 然問者。隨眠上廣説故言二已説一可レ然。纒未 T2251_.64.0292b16: レ説何云二已説一。豈非レ誤哉。答亦從レ彼故非也」
T2251_.64.0292b19: 門一故言二復説一。問。前漏等四門皆説二幷纒一。今 T2251_.64.0292b20: 結等中何言二煩惱一答。煩惱言有二通別一。此通二 T2251_.64.0292b21: 諸惑一故無二相違一。前以二隨眠及纒一説爲二漏等一 T2251_.64.0292b22: 故殊言二隨眠并纒一。今所説中既有レ纒。不レ可二
T2251_.64.0292b28: 説。如二業道名一
T2251_.64.0292c02: 句明二見取二結廢立。後下二行明二嫉慳廢立一。 T2251_.64.0292c03: 此中前一行約二八纒家一。後一行約二十纒家一
T2251_.64.0292c06: 爲二愛結一。餘結皆應二依レ界辨 ![]() T2251_.64.0292c07: 已辨。嫉慳唯欲界修斷故勸示言二當辨一。雜含
![]() T2251_.64.0292c13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0292c14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0292c15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0292c16: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0292c17: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0292c18: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0292c19: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0292c20: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0292c21: [IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0292c24: 見結一。合二二取一爲二取結 ![]() T2251_.64.0292c25: 見結三爲 ![]() T2251_.64.0292c26: 法者。約二五見隨應一。光記云二五見一意通言未 T2251_.64.0292c27: レ足。寶疏爲二二取一非也。依レ答害二問意一也。見 T2251_.64.0292c28: 隨眠者。十隨眠中見隨眠隨レ應隨増。光記亦 T2251_.64.0292c29: 云二五見一言未レ足。寶疏唯云二十隨眠中見隨 T2251_.64.0293a01: 眠一亦言未レ足。答中有レ二。初總示レ法。後彼爲 T2251_.64.0293a02: 下別釋二其相一。此有レ二。初釋二愛結繋一。二非見 T2251_.64.0293a03: 下釋レ非二見結繋一。三然彼下釋二見隨眠隨増一。 T2251_.64.0293a04: 對レ問可レ見。此中二取見隨眠於レ彼隨増故 T2251_.64.0293a05: 者。二隨増中唯相應隨増。以レ標二二取相應
![]()
T2251_.64.0293a13: 斷見取戒相應法愛結繋。以二愛結有漏縁一故 T2251_.64.0293a14: 非二見結一。以二彼一切遍見結斷一故。雖二自種見
T2251_.64.0293a19: レ作二四句一。或有二愛結繋一無二見結繋一。謂集智已 T2251_.64.0293a20: 生滅智未レ生。於二見滅道一所レ斷不相應法。婆
![]() T2251_.64.0293a25: 頌一有レ二。一判 ![]() ![]()
T2251_.64.0293a28: 二有二結相一餘無故。二以レ後顯レ初故。二以二嫉 T2251_.64.0293a29: 與レ慳獨立離 ![]() T2251_.64.0293a30: 者。謂自力現行。離二者謂一向不善。忿覆二 T2251_.64.0293b01: 纒雖二能獨立亦復離 ![]() T2251_.64.0293b02: 相一之所二映奪一其相不レ顯故不レ立レ結。由二此
T2251_.64.0293b06: 雖三復積 ![]() ![]()
T2251_.64.0293b09: 彼第三復次一。既許二十纒一何用二如レ是八纒家 T2251_.64.0293b10: 義一爲。光記云二論主難一。寶疏但云レ難竝未レ詳」
T2251_.64.0293b16: 結相一故。四中亦有二四類一倶是惱レ二。故顯二四 T2251_.64.0293b17: 中差別一於二下三一置二或言一。惱二在家出家一者。婆
![]()
![]() T2251_.64.0293b22: 中有三蘇陀味勝二阿素洛一。阿素洛宮有二端正 T2251_.64.0293b23: 女一勝二彼諸天一。天自慳レ味嫉二他美女一。非天慳 T2251_.64.0293b24: レ女嫉二他美味一。由二嫉慳結一數興二戰鬪一。次二如二
T2251_.64.0293b27: 自他部無二前在家出家等三因一。蓋梵本異
T2251_.64.0293c02: 故正理。顯宗。舊論及頌疏無レ此爲レ正
T2251_.64.0293c05: 可レ知。次二句示二廢立一。次五句通レ妨有二正説 T2251_.64.0293c06: 異説二一
T2251_.64.0293c09: 釋二順下分名一。三釋二次二句一。此即初也。雜含
T2251_.64.0293c16: レ欲亦還 ![]() ![]() T2251_.64.0293c17: 貪瞋爲レ先
T2251_.64.0293c20: 最下云レ下。而三界一分名レ分。亦分亦下持業 T2251_.64.0293c21: 釋。下分之順名二順下分一第三由聲依主釋。此 T2251_.64.0293c22: 順下分帶二五數一是帶數釋
T2251_.64.0293c28: 分結一。謂初二結猶如二獄卒一。後之三結如二防
![]() T2251_.64.0294a03: 閉 ![]() ![]() T2251_.64.0294a04: 復以二慈觀一傷 ![]() T2251_.64.0294a05: 生二初靜慮乃至有頂一。彼有身見。戒禁取。疑還
![]()
![]() T2251_.64.0294a12: 説亦有 ![]() ![]() T2251_.64.0294a13: 頌亦云二有餘一。然正理唯擧二此義一而取二獄卒
T2251_.64.0294a23: 是根本惑。今説二此三根本一攝二餘三根本一。以二
T2251_.64.0294a26: 其次第一隨二有身見。戒禁取。疑三勝根一而得 ![]()
T2251_.64.0294b15: 捨如レ次貪・瞋・癡二種隨増。若異レ此者唯所
T2251_.64.0294b21: 多隨増。故立二三不善根一。餘法不レ爾。百十二
T2251_.64.0294b26: 然非二正明一。爲レ令レ知二所隨一。後復有下正明二隨 T2251_.64.0294b27: 惑一。雖三本得二隨惑名一非二正明 ![]() T2251_.64.0294b28: 名二隨惑一。以顯下隨二此名隨レ心隨惑根本煩惱一 T2251_.64.0294b29: 起即名中今所明隨煩惱上。光記釋得二論旨一。寶疏 T2251_.64.0294b30: 殊異レ光總牒二長行一云レ釋二頌文一。意在三頌此餘 T2251_.64.0294c01: 言爲二相違釋一。若爾非二論意一。隨眠隨煩惱二門
T2251_.64.0294c05: 彼頌唯約二餘小惑一遮二根本一故。又寶疏意。光 T2251_.64.0294c06: 記意ニテ云レ釋二頌文一。非二相違釋一者無レ妨。又解。 T2251_.64.0294c07: 此論頌文唯明二小惑隨煩惱一。如二舊論頌一。今亦 T2251_.64.0294c08: 唯此之餘依主釋。此目近辭。此於二前段隨眠一 T2251_.64.0294c09: 於二長行一爲四兼顯 ![]()
T2251_.64.0294c13: 隨眠一諸餘染汚行蘊心所。復有下正釋二頌文一。 T2251_.64.0294c14: 爲レ異レ前云復。前持業釋。後從聲依主釋。兩 T2251_.64.0294c15: 解中後解爲レ正。光記云下將レ釋二隨惑一先解中本 T2251_.64.0294c16: 惑上者末可也。寶疏總云レ釋二頌文一非也。正理
T2251_.64.0294c21: 煩惱一。即此亦得二隨煩惱名一。以三是圓 ![]() T2251_.64.0294c22: 品一故。由レ此故説三即諸煩惱有二結縛。隨眠。隨 T2251_.64.0294c23: 煩惱。纒義一。所餘染汚心所行蘊。隨二煩惱一起 T2251_.64.0294c24: 隨惱レ心故得二隨煩惱名一。不レ得レ名二煩惱一。以
T2251_.64.0294c27: 煩惱一。及此之餘染心所行蘊。此之餘者顯二相 T2251_.64.0294c28: 屬義一。意顯二若是此所起方可 ![]() ![]()
T2251_.64.0295a01: 及此之餘。詳曰。是鑿説。其相如二前辨一
![]()
T2251_.64.0295a11: 顯欲。不喜足。不恭敬。起惡言。樂惡友。不忍 T2251_.64.0295a12: 耽嗜。遍耽嗜。染貪。非法貪。惡貪。有身見。有
T2251_.64.0295a15: 調性。心昧劣性。種種想。不作意。麁重。觝突。
T2251_.64.0295a21: 受等種種雜説。故名二雜事一。彼中除二六本惑及 T2251_.64.0295a22: 苦受等一。其餘隨應是隨煩惱。非レ謂三彼皆爲二
T2251_.64.0295a25: 及起惡言類。如レ世尊告二婆羅門一言上。有二二十
T2251_.64.0295b04: 屬二前段一非也。寶疏入二後段一爲レ正。此中後字。 T2251_.64.0295b05: 光所見作レ復。云二復次一故。明本及正理。顯宗。 T2251_.64.0295b06: 寶疏竝皆如レ今。然作レ復爲レ勝。以三所明非二後
T2251_.64.0295b11: 後二大煩惱地。爲顯二此地法別一致二幷及言一。 T2251_.64.0295b12: 不レ安レ上者。大不善地從來唯二故
T2251_.64.0295b16: 貪欲纒一縁二貪欲纒一生二心法憂苦一。因二瞋恚。睡 T2251_.64.0295b17: 眠。掉悔。疑一。縁二瞋恚。睡眠。掉悔。疑一生二彼心法
T2251_.64.0295b22: 體一。於二前小煩惱中一讓 ![]()
T2251_.64.0295c04: 八或十。解云。障二諸善品一約レ強立レ纒。忿覆輕二 T2251_.64.0295c05: 於餘八一故唯八。又雖二對レ八是輕一。而望二六垢一 T2251_.64.0295c06: 亦重。故於二小煩惱中一分二輕重一。重四同入レ纒。 T2251_.64.0295c07: 輕六立爲レ垢。是故説二十纒一
![]() T2251_.64.0295c10: 等流者隨惑有レ力與二根本煩惱一齊等流即流 T2251_.64.0295c11: 類。或等即是引。從二根本煩惱一引生也。約二相 T2251_.64.0295c12: 同一名二等流一者二釋竝非也
![]()
T2251_.64.0295c19: 而意顯レ取二第三一。以レ説二所由一故。前二義各是 T2251_.64.0295c20: 偏。故此中據二了知一有知無知對明。非二根智 T2251_.64.0295c21: 愚一故。諸論皆悉作レ知。舊論云二次第ノ如已知 T2251_.64.0295c22: 未知一
T2251_.64.0295c27: 舍利弗毘曇二十一卷一貪。瞋。痴爲二三垢一
T2251_.64.0296a02: 息一故勸諫教誨。而固不レ受。此不受勸諫性。 T2251_.64.0296a03: 不受教誨性。極執性。極取性。左取性。不右取 T2251_.64.0296a04: 性。難勸捨性。拙應對性。師子執性。心蛆螫
T2251_.64.0296a11: 今論取レ要
T2251_.64.0296a14: 繋。此即初也。然光・寶竝爲二大段一。而於レ此分二 T2251_.64.0296a15: 五科一。混二大小科一非也
T2251_.64.0296a18: 起。通云於二無明一有レ二。一自力起。二他力起。 T2251_.64.0296a19: 彼修斷痴他力起。還由二此忿等一方得レ轉故。 T2251_.64.0296a20: 故唯與二彼他力無明一相應。故名二自在一。婆沙
T2251_.64.0296a23: 不レ名二不共一
T2251_.64.0296a26: 應。準二此結前文一。光・寶分文其非顯然
![]()
T2251_.64.0296b23: 心重身重一切結相應。云何眠。心合臥レ出二不 T2251_.64.0296b24: 自在一眠。欲界繋意識相應。云何調。心不善不
T2251_.64.0296b28: 由二如レ是義相同一於二一文一亦互用。謂長含第
T2251_.64.0296c08: 食非食二事擧二經説一。後如是二事下論家釋二 T2251_.64.0296c09: 用同一之辭。下亦傚レ之。此二句將レ擧レ經之辭」
T2251_.64.0296c12: レ食。謂觸相。於レ彼不正思惟貪欲能令レ増。何等 T2251_.64.0296c13: 爲二瞋恚蓋食一。謂障礙相。於レ彼不正思惟瞋恚 T2251_.64.0296c14: 蓋能令レ増。何等爲二睡眠蓋食一。有二五法一。何等 T2251_.64.0296c15: 爲レ五。微弱。不樂。欠呿。多食。懈怠。於レ彼不正 T2251_.64.0296c16: 思惟睡眠蓋能令レ増。何等爲二掉悔蓋食一。有二四 T2251_.64.0296c17: 法一。何等爲レ四。謂親屬覺。人衆覺。天覺。本所
T2251_.64.0296c20: 有二三世一。何等爲レ三。於二過去一猶預。現在未來 T2251_.64.0296c21: 亦猶預。於彼起二不正思惟一疑蓋能令レ増。何 T2251_.64.0296c22: 等爲二貪欲蓋不食一。謂不淨觀。何等爲二瞋恚蓋 T2251_.64.0296c23: 不食一。彼慈心思惟。何等爲二睡眠蓋不食一。彼明
T2251_.64.0296c27: 一一。故今廣示二經文一。惛眠等二句雖二正不 ![]() T2251_.64.0296c28: 現經一。而是經文。在二作如是説下一故。故舊論
![]() T2251_.64.0297a05: 信。而不喜不愛不樂悵望慘慼。云何嚬申。欠 T2251_.64.0297a06: 呿。謂身低擧手足捲舒名曰二嚬申一。鼻面開蹙 T2251_.64.0297a07: 脣口喎張名曰二欠呿一。云何食不調性。謂以二不 T2251_.64.0297a08: 食或食過レ量或食匪 ![]()
![]() T2251_.64.0297a11: 惛眠蓋得二増益一。光明想者。經云二明照思惟一。 T2251_.64.0297a12: 是則毘鉢舍那慧思惟想。若依二大乘一。伽十一
![]()
![]() T2251_.64.0297a22: 慕上。縁二此等一故尋求。云何國土尋。謂於二所愛
T2251_.64.0297a30: 此擧レ體
T2251_.64.0297b03: 以レ義爲二五蘊一。其義終不レ參。非二各配一故。成實
T2251_.64.0297b06: 不二相違一。然毘婆沙依二五蓋經一。豈以二散説一壞二 T2251_.64.0297b07: 本次一爲
T2251_.64.0297b14: 非レ止。説二掉悔蓋唯奢摩他能治一非觀。此依二 T2251_.64.0297b15: 伏斷一説三觀止門別治二惛眠掉悔二蓋一。若依二 T2251_.64.0297b16: 永斷一此觀止門對 ![]() T2251_.64.0297b17: 此理一故壞二次第一。豈不三契經作二如レ是説一。修二等 T2251_.64.0297b18: 持一者怖 ![]() ![]() T2251_.64.0297b19: 證知。惛眠障レ定掉悔障レ慧。其理必然。理必
T2251_.64.0297b23: 彼法一可レ言レ障レ彼。又若惛眠能障レ定者。則 T2251_.64.0297b24: 應レ許三定イヽ能治二惛眠一。不レ應下契經作二如レ是 T2251_.64.0297b25: 説一説中惛眠對治謂光明相上。掉擧障レ慧爲レ難亦 T2251_.64.0297b26: 然。故彼所言唯陳二自執一。然契經中説下修二等 T2251_.64.0297b27: 持一者怖 ![]() ![]() T2251_.64.0297b28: 別意。謂惛眠蓋相 ![]() T2251_.64.0297b29: 易レ起。故修レ定者怖 ![]() T2251_.64.0297b30: 障 ![]() ![]() T2251_.64.0297c01: 如レ是説一。心昧劣位修定非レ時。心輕躁位修 T2251_.64.0297c02: レ慧非レ時。故知惛眠近能障レ定。掉悔障レ慧理 T2251_.64.0297c03: 必應 ![]() T2251_.64.0297c04: 説下惛眠於二法相中一不レ能簡釋上。是故擇法爲 T2251_.64.0297c05: レ彼近治。惛眠亦能近障二擇法一。故昧劣位修定 T2251_.64.0297c06: 非時。定非二惛眠近對治一故。掉悔於レ慧准レ此 T2251_.64.0297c07: 應レ知。若謂下經説二彼現起位修レ此非時一。故知 T2251_.64.0297c08: 准レ彼但中此障上。則不レ説者障義既無便應 T2251_.64.0297c09: レ非レ蓋。非下不レ障二勝法一而蓋義可 ![]() T2251_.64.0297c10: レ知。倶爲二倶障一倶爲二倶治一其理必然。但於二此 T2251_.64.0297c11: 中一説二近障治一故作二如レ是差別一而説。詳曰。正 T2251_.64.0297c12: 理判訣會レ理順レ經。契經正説二蓋能治一言二惛 T2251_.64.0297c13: 眠非食光明想。掉悔非食奢摩他一。豈得二異求一。 T2251_.64.0297c14: 又能所治能所順等非二必是等次第一。何以二所
T2251_.64.0297c21: 次第。又大乘諸論皆亦如レ是。謂瑜伽十一
![]() T2251_.64.0298a02: 文行相相翻相順。説三惛掉二法麁相通障二定 T2251_.64.0298a03: 之與 ![]() T2251_.64.0298a04: 其體一細得二通障一。今説下行相相順相翻二倶麁
![]() T2251_.64.0298a10: 説何縁名二枉謗佛一。以下彼所説前後相違及與二 T2251_.64.0298a11: 契經理一相違上故。如何彼説前後相違謂若貪 T2251_.64.0298a12: 欲。瞋恚二蓋現起能障二將入定心一。障既現前 T2251_.64.0298a13: 何能入レ定。若別修治伏已入者。則不レ應レ言下 T2251_.64.0298a14: 正入定位於二止及觀不能中正習上。又彼正入 T2251_.64.0298a15: 定言爲二聞思所成一爲二修所成定一。若言下我説二 T2251_.64.0298a16: 聞思所成一名中正入定上。則不レ應レ説下後出定位 T2251_.64.0298a17: 思 ![]() T2251_.64.0298a18: 何待二出時一。若言下我説二修所成定一名中正入定上 T2251_.64.0298a19: 理亦不レ然。修所成心正現前位惛眠。掉悔 T2251_.64.0298a20: 何容二現前一。若不二現前一寧障二止觀一。如何彼 T2251_.64.0298a21: 説經理相違。謂彼所言惛眠。掉悔如二其次 T2251_.64.0298a22: 第一障二奢摩他。毘鉢舍那違二前教理一。故彼 T2251_.64.0298a23: 所説唯立レ五因無有三功能證二蓋唯五一。由レ此 T2251_.64.0298a24: 前説理善可レ依。此徴詰最盡
T2251_.64.0298a27: 二類惑一。二正知斷不齊難。三問二斷因一。第二難 T2251_.64.0298a28: 中有レ二。初以レ斷難二知缺一。後以レ知難二斷缺一。舊 T2251_.64.0298b01: 論此難前却。頌疏曰。解云他界遍行者九上 T2251_.64.0298b02: 縁惑也。此遍行所縁者上界苦集是也。及見 T2251_.64.0298b03: 滅道斷有漏縁諸惑者。謂滅道下貪瞋慢是 T2251_.64.0298b04: 也。謂貪。瞋。慢縁二邪見。疑。無明一起名二有漏 T2251_.64.0298b05: 縁一。此貪等所縁者即邪見。疑。無明也。於彼斷 T2251_.64.0298b06: 位者。若他界遍行斷位者。謂苦集智忍生時 T2251_.64.0298b07: 也。若滅道有漏縁斷位者。謂滅道智忍生時 T2251_.64.0298b08: 也。不知彼所縁者。若斷二他界遍行一時不レ知二 T2251_.64.0298b09: 上界苦集一也。若斷二滅道有漏縁レ時不レ知二彼 T2251_.64.0298b10: 邪見。疑。無明一也。以二滅道智忍但知二滅道一故。 T2251_.64.0298b11: 知彼所縁時而彼不斷者。知二他界遍行所縁一 T2251_.64.0298b12: 者。謂上界苦集類智也。而彼他界遍行不レ斷 T2251_.64.0298b13: 者。謂已斷故不レ斷也。知二滅道下有漏縁惑所 T2251_.64.0298b14: 縁一時者。謂苦集智忍也。以三苦集智忍知二苦 T2251_.64.0298b15: 集一故。彼滅道下邪見。疑。無明體是苦集故苦 T2251_.64.0298b16: 集智忍生能知彼也。而彼邪見等不レ斷者謂
T2251_.64.0298b23: 此苦集一故得 ![]() T2251_.64.0298b24: 未レ斷故。若言下因レ慧見二彼滅道一故得 ![]() T2251_.64.0298b25: 亦不レ然。滅道非二此所縁境一故。准以可レ知 T2251_.64.0298b26: 爲二初歩一示レ圖曰 T2251_.64.0298b27: ![]() T2251_.64.0298b28: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0298b29: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0298c01: ![]() T2251_.64.0298c02: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0298c03: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0298c04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0298c05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0298c06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0298c07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0298c08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0298c09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0298c10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0298c11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0298c12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0298c13: 光記作二三解一。是從レ麁至レ細竝含具義而非二乖 T2251_.64.0298c14: 角三解一。又但就二遍行一設二異解一不レ關二有漏縁一。 T2251_.64.0298c15: 此三解初釋總相釋レ文麁論。而對二後二釋一此 T2251_.64.0298c16: 則單下苦上苦相對論。集諦亦爾。第二釋上 T2251_.64.0298c17: 苦對下縁二上苦一遍行。縁二上集一遍行二上。上集對二 T2251_.64.0298c18: 上苦集一亦爾。是從レ前細也。第三釋上苦對二 T2251_.64.0298c19: 上二一如レ前。更加下縁二上苦一集遍行上。上集亦更 T2251_.64.0298c20: 加下縁二上集一苦遍行上。苦集上縁互縁二上苦集一 T2251_.64.0298c21: 故。如レ是初一對レ一。次一對レ二。後一對レ三。此 T2251_.64.0298c22: 三釋竝是有二一理。然初釋爲レ勝。此中所説其 T2251_.64.0298c23: 理足故。後二釋猶有二微瑕一。謂類智知二上苦一 T2251_.64.0298c24: 時縁二上集一遍行全不二相關預一。不三上苦爲二所 T2251_.64.0298c25: 縁一故。今以レ約レ知二所縁一
T2251_.64.0298c29: 斷。如二見苦集所斷非遍行隨眠一。四隨得對治 T2251_.64.0299a01: 故如二餘隨眠一。餘者見苦集自界遍行。滅道無 T2251_.64.0299a02: 漏縁及修道。又尊者世友立二五因一。此初遍知 T2251_.64.0299a03: 所縁中分爲レ二曰。一見二所縁一故斷。如二無漏 T2251_.64.0299a04: 縁隨眠及縁自界遍行隨眠一。四倶縁斷。謂如二 T2251_.64.0299a05: 見苦集所斷不遍行隨眠一。餘三全同レ此。今於二 T2251_.64.0299a06: 自界縁一不レ分二遍不遍一總爲二初一一
T2251_.64.0299a09: 理論約二欲界自界縁。色無色見苦集自界他 T2251_.64.0299a10: 界所有惑一。而寶疏云三此説二欲界一令三意全 ![]() T2251_.64.0299a11: 正理一者非也。光記意有二麁細二義一。一約レ麁 T2251_.64.0299a12: 三界通説。二約レ細上界中八地遍行。亦各自 T2251_.64.0299a13: 知レ縁斷。而今以レ説レ通攝レ別。最得二論意一。故婆 T2251_.64.0299a14: 沙二十二世友説。亦但云二自他一而無二簡別一。 T2251_.64.0299a15: 雜心四云。一縁知者。見苦見集斷自界縁及 T2251_.64.0299a16: 無漏縁。又此論攝二自界遍行非遍行一。故總云二 T2251_.64.0299a17: 自界縁一。不レ云二遍行一。簡二彼世友五因一。彼云。一 T2251_.64.0299a18: 見二所縁一故斷。如二無漏隨眠及縁自界遍行隨 T2251_.64.0299a19: 眠一。彼以下開二不遍行一爲中倶縁斷別因上有二遍行 T2251_.64.0299a20: 簡別一。問。諸説何縁如レ是不同。答。斷因有二別 T2251_.64.0299a21: 通一。謂對治通二五部一故。設摩達多見苦集自界 T2251_.64.0299a22: 遍行及滅道無漏縁攝二對治一。不レ立二縁知一。見 T2251_.64.0299a23: 苦集所斷非遍行通二能所縁及遍知一。設摩及 T2251_.64.0299a24: 世友爲レ作二倶句一別立爲二能所縁斷一。其無漏 T2251_.64.0299a25: 縁及自界遍行。遍知勝故世友別立爲二一因一。 T2251_.64.0299a26: 如二此論。雜心一者。見苦集自界縁及無漏縁是 T2251_.64.0299a27: 爲二後二因一根本。故總爲二遍知一。如二正理論一者。 T2251_.64.0299a28: 約二上二界智唯是類忍類觀一。故總以二上二界 T2251_.64.0299a29: 一切惑一屬二遍知一。今約二所斷惑三界別一三界 T2251_.64.0299b01: 齊説レ之。問。諸説勝劣如何。答。夫決 ![]() T2251_.64.0299b02: 有レ麁有レ細有レ中。麁則難二通曉一。細則還亂二法 T2251_.64.0299b03: 相一。中則不レ亂易レ曉。又有二紛冗一有二顯著一。紛冗 T2251_.64.0299b04: 則損レ解。顯著則増レ智。然如三彼開二倶縁斷一是 T2251_.64.0299b05: 細亂二法相一。如三遍知屬二對治一是麁難レ曉。如三上 T2251_.64.0299b06: 二界總入二遍知一是紛冗。今此論四因居レ中而 T2251_.64.0299b07: 顯著。離二諸疑難一故。論主諸義中依二雜心師一 T2251_.64.0299b08: 以説レ此。所以者何。如二前所 ![]() T2251_.64.0299b09: 因之基本。斷二此二類惑一則他界縁有漏縁隨 T2251_.64.0299b10: 去。爲レ顯二此義一三界齊等。豈非二顯著一。於二見 T2251_.64.0299b11: 惑一立二三因一盡二法相一。而令二義易 ![]() T2251_.64.0299b12: 麁細失一
T2251_.64.0299b17: 治。持對治。遠分對治。色界於二貪等一具二四對 T2251_.64.0299b18: 治一。欲界有レ三除二斷對治一。無色界有レ二謂持
T2251_.64.0299b25: 治。捨對治者。謂此能捨二異生性一故。斷對治 T2251_.64.0299b26: 者。謂此能斷二欲界見苦所斷十隨眠一故。持對 T2251_.64.0299b27: 治者。謂此能持二一切後位諸聖道一故。不作對 T2251_.64.0299b28: 治者。謂此能令三畢竟不レ作二五無間業一故。不 T2251_.64.0299b29: 往對治者。謂此能令三畢竟不レ往二三惡趣一故」
T2251_.64.0299c13: 豈不二曾聞一何煩徴詰。或不定故説不レ在レ前。 T2251_.64.0299c14: 謂彼非レ如三無間道後定有二解脱道一。解脱道後 T2251_.64.0299c15: 方有二勝進一。是故不定。以二加行道一或有起在二 T2251_.64.0299c16: 無間道前一。或有生於二勝進道後一。非二決定一故。 T2251_.64.0299c17: 又不定者。謂或有二一補特伽羅一由二一加行一。乃 T2251_.64.0299c18: 至證 ![]() T2251_.64.0299c19: 定者。無間道等如二前加行一亦能與レ後爲二加 T2251_.64.0299c20: 行一。故不レ可三定言二唯爾所是加行道攝一。説二多 T2251_.64.0299c21: 分言一應レ知爲レ顯下無間解脱勝進道中。縁二苦 T2251_.64.0299c22: 集諦一者亦厭患對治上。彼正理師爲レ救二彼次一 T2251_.64.0299c23: 作二多通釋一。然光。寶等所レ纒二正理一解二此論文一。 T2251_.64.0299c24: 云レ約二多分一。據二不定一陰顯合論等竝非也。以三 T2251_.64.0299c25: 論主不レ云二多分一故。破 ![]() T2251_.64.0299c26: 行一故。正理師於二不定一作二三義一。初者何在二勝 T2251_.64.0299c27: 進後一。若是一類四道畢。第二番與レ後加行。是 T2251_.64.0299c28: 則必無間之前。誰不レ由二加行一得レ起二無間一。次 T2251_.64.0299c29: 者約二一二多一。是亦約二四道相望一必無間前 T2251_.64.0300a01: 義。後者約二相望不定一以二無間等一亦名二加行一。 T2251_.64.0300a02: 是壞二四道分別一。亦復無間道等何厭患。由二厭 T2251_.64.0300a03: 患一而無間等起故。寶疏云。此上次第是婆沙 T2251_.64.0300a04: 本義。詳曰。婆沙處處説斷。持。遠次無レ異。於 T2251_.64.0300a05: レ厭不定。或爲二最後一。或爲二第二一。今依二一途一列 T2251_.64.0300a06: レ之。何可レ云二本義一
T2251_.64.0300a10: 如二餘遠性一。謂見下所餘相遠性等是遠性攝自 T2251_.64.0300a11: 相非レ無。既許二去來是遠性攝一必應 ![]() T2251_.64.0300a12: 相非 ![]()
T2251_.64.0300a15: 彼此岸海等一是相對假非レ有二自相一。則成二異 T2251_.64.0300a16: 品一。遠性攝因犯二不定失一。設不レ許レ此犯二他能 T2251_.64.0300a17: 立不成一。彼處遠性攝二同品一故。亦復此因非二
T2251_.64.0300a20: 以二界攝故一令二無爲無常一。以二有爲攝故一令三無 T2251_.64.0300a21: 漏有二染汚一。又作二違決一云。此成二遠性一非レ有二 T2251_.64.0300a22: 自相一。非レ如レ現故。如二馬角等一。又汝以二性言一成 T2251_.64.0300a23: 立。而此性言是類義非二體性義一
T2251_.64.0300a26: レ退。後時無二再斷義一。斷已復斷則爲二唐捐一。解 T2251_.64.0300a27: 云。若惑得二自對治道一永斷。由二此惑一退墮義 T2251_.64.0300a28: 必無。故云二離退一。此論云二必無一。然光記誤二彼 T2251_.64.0300a29: 文一釋云。若更不レ退必無二後時再斷レ惑義一。唯
![]() T2251_.64.0300b06: 欲貪一諸外道。有下縁二欲界一邪見現行上。毘婆沙 T2251_.64.0300b07: 師釋二彼經義一。起レ見時暫退。如二提婆達多一。準 T2251_.64.0300b08: レ彼光釋爲レ得。
![]() T2251_.64.0300b11: 離繋有二重得一
T2251_.64.0300b14: 目二無間道一。若據三此正證二離繋一目二解脱道一
T2251_.64.0300b19: レ續故。亦能證レ滅引二離繋得一令二正起一故。諸解 T2251_.64.0300b20: 脱道惟名レ證レ滅。與二離繋得一倶現前故。而明二 T2251_.64.0300b21: 滅作證一皆通二無間解脱一。今何不レ爾。解云。彼 T2251_.64.0300b22: 總明二滅證一故爾。今據二重得標別一所 ![]() T2251_.64.0300b23: 解脱一。然正理師令レ通二無間一。蓋混二其門一。問。此 T2251_.64.0300b24: 治生言爲二有漏得一無漏。通ヤレ二。設爾何過。 T2251_.64.0300b25: 三倶有レ過。若唯有漏。唯是超越不レ通二次第一。 T2251_.64.0300b26: 若唯無漏。唯是次第不レ渉二超越一。若通レ二者。 T2251_.64.0300b27: 應二増レ數七一。何説二六時一。解云。應レ爲二分別一。若 T2251_.64.0300b28: 約二次第一是無漏得非レ約二有漏一。謂苦法忍初 T2251_.64.0300b29: 得二離繋一。苦法智時重持二此滅一。若據二超越一有 T2251_.64.0300c01: 漏智斷非レ通二無漏一。凡位無間初得二惑滅一。其 T2251_.64.0300c02: 解脱道持 ![]() T2251_.64.0300c03: レ應有二餘重得一。如レ是據レ人則唯有漏唯無漏 T2251_.64.0300c04: 得。若依二名稱一則通二二種一。以レ通二二種一無レ唯 T2251_.64.0300c05: 偏過一。以二治人別一去二増數難一。然正理師通 ![]() T2251_.64.0300c06: 疑難一。令二當文唯次第證唯無漏得一。更別超越 T2251_.64.0300c07: 立爲二七時一以加二有漏一。詳云。此全非レ理。若於二 T2251_.64.0300c08: 凡位一斷二此品染一得二此斷得一。更無三入レ聖亦斷二 T2251_.64.0300c09: 此品染一。然約二遠厭對治一立二第二治一。於二婆沙 T2251_.64.0300c10: 等一曾無レ此。亦全非二此論意一。然光。寶令三此 T2251_.64.0300c11: 論同二正理一者未可也。治生言光・寶各致レ解 T2251_.64.0300c12: 竝朋二正理一。今云不レ用也
T2251_.64.0300c16: 故説二五時一。何今別開。答。正理云。爲レ顯三練根 T2251_.64.0300c17: 異二斷惑得果一故。得果外説二練根一無レ失
T2251_.64.0300c20: 顯二利根超越相一。初中亦二。此總釋。婆沙九十
T2251_.64.0300c23: 脱道時。曰法忍智忍時。唯證二見所斷法滅一。非 T2251_.64.0300c24: 想非非想處前八無間解脱時。唯證二修所斷 T2251_.64.0300c25: 法滅一。餘七十三時。通證二見修所斷法滅一。解 T2251_.64.0300c26: 云。據二忍害智害一言二見修所斷法一。非レ謂二見修 T2251_.64.0300c27: 道所斷一。彼總明二滅證一故通二無間解脱一。今唯 T2251_.64.0300c28: 明レ重故唯解脱。如二前所 ![]() T2251_.64.0300c29: 九品位一以明二重得一
T2251_.64.0301a03: 亦二。初約二前七忍智一。後約二道類忍智一。約二修 T2251_.64.0301a04: 道中有レ三。初約二一來向果位一。二約二不還向 T2251_.64.0301a05: 果位。三約二阿羅漢向果位一。此文中。亦五時者 T2251_.64.0301a06: 但例レ數耳。下皆如レ是。又除者更加別除故
T2251_.64.0301a09: 道皆是漸進。何唯五時。答。雖レ有二勝進一而是
T2251_.64.0301a14: 此有レ二。初以二利除練一爲レ由。成二前説是鈍一。而 T2251_.64.0301a15: 顯 ![]() T2251_.64.0301a16: 成二前説是次第一。而顯 ![]()
T2251_.64.0301a24: 如二隨信法行一。又細分別於二隨信中一有二次第一 T2251_.64.0301a25: 有二超越一。何故爾者。根勝劣故令レ有二時遲速 T2251_.64.0301a26: 位次超一。若不レ爾者此差異何。故知利鈍相望 T2251_.64.0301a27: 不定。然光師偏被レ封二種利鈍一。強斥二正理一。豈 T2251_.64.0301a28: 非二疎昧一。猶未レ見三超越人有二練根一。設於二隨信一 T2251_.64.0301a29: 有二次第超越一。而於二其超越一有二練根一文何在。 T2251_.64.0301b01: 此論亦初明二鈍根次第一。次明二利根一。於レ中初 T2251_.64.0301b02: 利次第。次超越故。超越有二練根一難レ信
![]() ![]()
T2251_.64.0301b12: 果故亦名二遍知一。如二阿羅漢是解果故亦説名 ![]()
![]()
T2251_.64.0301b19: 修三一。二且三下釋二次三句一別明二見六一。三餘 T2251_.64.0301b20: 三下釋二後兩句一別明二修三一。明二見六一中有レ三。 T2251_.64.0301b21: 一問。二答。三結。答中有レ二。初欲界。次上界。 T2251_.64.0301b22: 初欲界中有レ二。一正釋。二結。正釋中亦二。 T2251_.64.0301b23: 初釋二第一遍知一。先示二立位一。後重釋示二其名一。 T2251_.64.0301b24: 二明二次二遍知一亦有二立位示名二科一。明二上 T2251_.64.0301b25: 界三一中有レ三。初總例顯。次謂色下示二立位一。 T2251_.64.0301b26: 後是見下示レ名結レ數 明二修三一中有二問答結 T2251_.64.0301b27: 三一。答中亦有レ三。三界別故。初欲界中有レ三。 T2251_.64.0301b28: 一示二立位一。二應知下示二其名一。三并前下通 T2251_.64.0301b29: レ妨。次色界中有二立位示名二科一。後無色中亦 T2251_.64.0301c01: 有レ三。一示二立位一。二示二其名一。三通レ妨。此即初 T2251_.64.0301c02: 釋二初句一也
T2251_.64.0301c06: 先已滅故。但知二當諦一各立二遍知一。上界亦爾」
T2251_.64.0301c14: 禁。疑三見道已斷。何名二五下分結盡一。今通二
T2251_.64.0301c17: 爾見惑猶有レ餘。何唯三。答。攝二門根一故擧レ三 T2251_.64.0301c18: 攝レ餘。問。欲修惑亦有二癡慢一。何唯約二貪瞋一名二 T2251_.64.0301c19: 五下結盡一。答。若不レ盡二欲諸惑一不レ得レ名二五下 T2251_.64.0301c20: 結盡一。已得二五下結盡名一。斷二餘惑一理在二絶言一
T2251_.64.0301c25: 斷結盡爲二色愛盡一。今同二評家一。色界一切修惑 T2251_.64.0301c26: 名二色愛一。如三五鈍五利名二愛見一
T2251_.64.0301c29: 云。約二盡處一立雖レ云二無色修道一。然此越界得 T2251_.64.0302a01: 果總幷二前三界見道。及欲色界修道無爲一立 T2251_.64.0302a02: レ此。故名二一切結盡一。此與二上五下結盡一但二
T2251_.64.0302a07: 寶疏意同二光第四解一。據二次第人一説レ六。據二超 T2251_.64.0302a08: 越人一説レ七。竝不二相違一。而廣破 ![]() T2251_.64.0302a09: 解一。其能破甚有二理致一。今詳於レ忍有二六七異一。 T2251_.64.0302a10: 而於レ智唯三無二異説一。若據二忍七義一。其五下 T2251_.64.0302a11: 分結盡遍知通二忍及智果一。以二忍爲レ七智爲 ![]() T2251_.64.0302a12: 三故。若爾五下分中。三忍所害故爲二忍果一。 T2251_.64.0302a13: 二智所害故爲二智果一。若依二超越一爲レ七者。何 T2251_.64.0302a14: 不レ言二智果二一。然於レ智無二異説一。定知依二所害 T2251_.64.0302a15: 別一不レ據二超越一也。問。正不何。答。説レ七者非。 T2251_.64.0302a16: 若約二所害別一一切結盡遍知何不レ通二忍智一。 T2251_.64.0302a17: 彼既約二盡處一定爲二智果一。此第七遍知亦約二 T2251_.64.0302a18: 盡處一定爲二智果一。理爲二最妙一。問。若爾先離欲 T2251_.64.0302a19: 入二見道一。起二道類智一得二五下分結盡遍知一。爲二 T2251_.64.0302a20: 忍果一爲二智果一耶。答。定是智果。何以故。以下凡 T2251_.64.0302a21: 位已斷二欲修惑一故至二此位一時得中第七遍知上 T2251_.64.0302a22: 故。非下忍害二身戒疑一故得中此遍知上。若言レ不 T2251_.64.0302a23: レ爾。次第證人於二道類智一豈可レ得レ此。問。若爾 T2251_.64.0302a24: 次第超越何縁差別。答。唯依二時不同一。謂若次 T2251_.64.0302a25: 第人欲修惑第九品斷時得二此遍知一。若超越
T2251_.64.0302a28: 矣。由レ是雜心。此論及正理。顯宗唯六全不 T2251_.64.0302a29: レ言レ有二七義一。所 ![]() T2251_.64.0302b01: 角兩説者。正理如二餘處文一何不擧耶。又解。 T2251_.64.0302b02: 設據二超越一爲レ七其説有餘。謂顯得之時。雖二 T2251_.64.0302b03: 道類智一論二因果一必是智果。以下先修習智斷二 T2251_.64.0302b04: 欲九品一故今得中此果上故。若強爲二忍果一。先未 T2251_.64.0302b05: レ斷二欲染一至二此位一。何可レ得二此果一。如下彼全離欲 T2251_.64.0302b06: 人至二道類智一得中不還果上。應レ言二忍果一。因果門 T2251_.64.0302b07: 得捨門勿レ混。如二成不成門得捨門別一。又如二 T2251_.64.0302b08: 因果門成就門別一。謂上界道盡因果爲二忍果一。
T2251_.64.0302b11: 果一。而此忍智果同二見修道一故不二別説一。正理
T2251_.64.0302b23: 釋不レ順二同一果言一也
![]() T2251_.64.0302c01: 此五一婆沙有二兩説一。初説除二欲界見三修一一。取二 T2251_.64.0302c02: 上界見三修二一。後説取二第七下分結盡一。除二第 T2251_.64.0302c03: 六上界見道斷遍知一。光記兩説各爲二正義一。此 T2251_.64.0302c04: 論隨同二彼兩説一。寶疏廣以二教理一唯後説爲レ正。
T2251_.64.0302c07: 三界惑一位上以建レ此。欲界立二見三修一一。上界 T2251_.64.0302c08: 立二見三修二一合成レ九。第七五分結遍知是於
T2251_.64.0302c11: 後師取二第七一除二第六一者違二正宗一。定知非二正 T2251_.64.0302c12: 義一。若言二超越人爾一者。是亦非レ理。先斷二五下 T2251_.64.0302c13: 分一入二見道一。依二根本地一斷二見惑一。至二道類智一 T2251_.64.0302c14: 時得二五分結遍知一。非下是依二根本地一斷レ惑故 T2251_.64.0302c15: 方得上。何定爲二根本果一。若言下入二根本一心上得 T2251_.64.0302c16: 故爲中彼果上者。是假借非二眞果一。由レ此正理五
![]() T2251_.64.0302c19: 攝煩惱等一故者。簡二欲界見惑修惑一云レ唯。既 T2251_.64.0302c20: 無二所斷惑一。何有二所得第七遍知一。色無色攝煩 T2251_.64.0302c21: 惱者。取二上界一切一。豈得レ除二上界見道盡遍 T2251_.64.0302c22: 知一。猶明説二所簡欲界見三修一一言二欲界繋惑 T2251_.64.0302c23: 唯未至定果一。如レ是能所簡明白不二間容 ![]() T2251_.64.0302c24: 雜心。正理。顯宗亦如レ是。圓暉偏同二初師上 T2251_.64.0302c25: 界見三修二一釋。麻中之蓬。光・寶唯所レ纒二彼 T2251_.64.0302c26: 兩説一未レ檢二當文一。不レ察二至理一也。寶疏所引諸 T2251_.64.0302c27: 文全非レ證。彼超越人所二成就一。非下依二根本一而 T2251_.64.0302c28: 斷二欲修惑一方得上故。何況此論文雜二欲界遍 T2251_.64.0302c29: 知一。實盲哉。光記亦約二體名縱奪一爲二各據一 T2251_.64.0303a01: 義一。實無義之妄論焉。問。彼後説如レ是非義者 T2251_.64.0303a02: 何故擧説。答。有乙約下依二根本一超越上。則準 ![]() T2251_.64.0303a03: 第人一。及俗道所斷下分今聖道力令レ不二永生一 T2251_.64.0303a04: 義甲。故一往致二根本果一。然尋二正宗一者非二眞實一 T2251_.64.0303a05: 不レ言而知。故不レ加レ破。由レ此諸論中一向不 T2251_.64.0303a06: レ擧レ此也
T2251_.64.0303a10: 道上得二斷治一故。亦應レ證乙彼欲見斷法斷無漏 T2251_.64.0303a11: 離繋得甲。寧説三根本唯得二五果一。準レ彼是未來 T2251_.64.0303a12: 修。此道體即欲界四法忍智。又顯宗二十八
T2251_.64.0303a17: 論亦爾也
T2251_.64.0303a20: 故得二第七遍知一。無色近分非二無漏道依止一。 T2251_.64.0303a21: 問。何故不レ依二識處等邊一。答。彼近分唯治二次
T2251_.64.0303a25: レ得二無漏離繋得一故。根本定中。前三依レ何能 T2251_.64.0303a26: 斷二諸惑一故得二第九一。以三有頂地無二自聖道一非二 T2251_.64.0303a27: 斷惑依一。故云二前三一
T2251_.64.0303b01: レ能レ別 ![]() T2251_.64.0303b02: レ能レ斷二有頂一故亦無二第九遍知一
T2251_.64.0303b05: 智。得二後二一可レ爾。法智下界斷智。唯應レ得二第 T2251_.64.0303b06: 七一。何故通二後二一。答。於二見道一如二所問一。分界別
T2251_.64.0303b13: 更加二第七一爲レ六。然後説非二盡理一。何以故。若 T2251_.64.0303b14: 依二超越一雖三類智時得乙第七一。然尋 ![]() T2251_.64.0303b15: 凡位法智力。因果與二得捨時一義門各別。由二 T2251_.64.0303b16: 如レ是非理一雜心論既除二後説一唯依二初説一。由二 T2251_.64.0303b17: 是實爾一此論。正理。顯宗亦復唯同二初説一。光・
T2251_.64.0303b24: 不レ得二遍知名一耶。問意可レ知。八十九品斷位 T2251_.64.0303b25: 言二一一斷。對二唯九位言一可レ觀。光記釋云二斷 T2251_.64.0303b26: 位一。寶疏遮二斷體一。引二正理一。竝皆爲レ是。有人依二 T2251_.64.0303b27: 長行一問斷言含二體位一者非也
T2251_.64.0303c01: 見修次第故度界在二最後一。見道中約二難易次 T2251_.64.0303c02: 第一。初二難レ具故。後二易レ具故。後二中。易故
T2251_.64.0303c05: 論改二次第一者。彼雖レ有レ理而義難二分別一。故今 T2251_.64.0303c06: 從レ具向レ闕漸次列レ此
T2251_.64.0303c09: 相違釋。今詳。非二是相違一。何以故。以下隨二繋事 T2251_.64.0303c10: 量一其體爾所上來未 ![]() T2251_.64.0303c11: 故。據レ體無レ詮故。若爾體是何。謂位即體持 T2251_.64.0303c12: 業釋。顯二其八十九位階位相連不 ![]() T2251_.64.0303c13: 云。體第也。骨肉毛血表裏大小相次第也。於二 T2251_.64.0303c14: 彼體位不レ亂中一。而亦依二次第一立二九位遍知一。 T2251_.64.0303c15: 故特云二體位一
T2251_.64.0303c19: 光・寶從レ垂不也。今顯三有頂五部中隨一斷是 T2251_.64.0303c20: 此縁成。非二必具斷一故殊云レ缺。雜心婆沙。正。
T2251_.64.0303c26: 力一。如三二力士同害二一怨一。一撲置レ地。一令レ不 T2251_.64.0303c27: レ起。不レ爾還起能爲二過患一。既通二二道一云二斷 T2251_.64.0303c28: 結一。今亦此意。況此文云三已得二無漏斷得一。已 T2251_.64.0303c29: 得言是前苦法忍智二道非二今苦類忍一。然光 T2251_.64.0304a01: 記苦類忍位立二斷名一非也。於二餘處一亦有二其 T2251_.64.0304a02: 義一。今不レ爾也。下滅言亦如レ是
T2251_.64.0304a05: 解一從レ麁向レ細。初通二見修一。總五部相望分二自 T2251_.64.0304a06: 他一。遍行言唯約二苦集一。彼十一遍使通縁二五 T2251_.64.0304a07: 部一故。次分二見修一。是細論。文云二他部一意在二遍 T2251_.64.0304a08: 行一。引證如レ是。後釋於二前第二釋修道上一加二 T2251_.64.0304a09: 他部一爲レ異。猶細論。寶疏義全同二光第二一。但 T2251_.64.0304a10: 精密。詳曰。三釋竝未レ盡。修道唯品自他。必 T2251_.64.0304a11: 不レ據レ部故。初後兩釋非也。又修道品自他 T2251_.64.0304a12: 中。前八品隨レ應爲二一因一。正第九品爲二一因一。 T2251_.64.0304a13: 故婆沙中未レ滅二第九品一爲レ不レ滅二雙因一。由レ是 T2251_.64.0304a14: 斷二一因一雖レ非下斷二一因一盡上。一因類故亦爲二一 T2251_.64.0304a15: 因一。未レ斷二後八品一二因未斷。而約二第九強一爲二 T2251_.64.0304a16: 一品未斷一。然光第二釋但分二自他品一。若斷二上 T2251_.64.0304a17: 上品上中品一應レ言レ滅二雙因一。斷二自他兩品一故。 T2251_.64.0304a18: 問。見道二因他部但遍行因。以レ何證。答。婆 T2251_.64.0304a19: 沙中。云下道類智忍滅道類智生時名レ滅二雙 T2251_.64.0304a20: 因一。先滅二見苦集所斷因一。今滅中見道所斷因上。 T2251_.64.0304a21: 除二滅諦先滅中一。明知唯約二苦集遍行一立二片 T2251_.64.0304a22: 因一。所 ![]() T2251_.64.0304a23: 苦集有二遍行惑一互相繋縛。故不レ得二別立一。滅 T2251_.64.0304a24: 道無二遍行惑一故各自立。古徳約二互因一者混三 T2251_.64.0304a25: 釋名與二因縁一。其破如二光斥一。又舊論。雜心云二 T2251_.64.0304a26: 二因一。及舊婆沙云二倶因一何爲二互因一
T2251_.64.0304a29: 非二遍知一。闕二餘二縁一故
T2251_.64.0304b03: 以前一。此中欲レ顯下皆約二今生心一非中已生當生上 T2251_.64.0304b04: 於レ初施二現在言一。雖二苦類忍生一未レ起二苦類智 T2251_.64.0304b05: 解脱道一故爲二未缺有頂一。於二三心中一。若苦法 T2251_.64.0304b06: 忍未レ滅二自他雙因一。若苦法智位。雖レ滅二自部 T2251_.64.0304b07: 欲界同類因一未レ滅二集遍行一。亦爲二未滅雙因一。 T2251_.64.0304b08: 若苦類忍未レ起二智解脱道一故猶未レ滅二上界 T2251_.64.0304b09: 自部苦同類因一。何況他部遍行。亦是不レ滅二雙 T2251_.64.0304b10: 因一
T2251_.64.0304b13: 忍位前位已斷故亦爲二此縁成一。對レ有二無漏斷 T2251_.64.0304b14: 得一言レ亦。苦類智位雖レ滅二上界苦下惑一集惑 T2251_.64.0304b15: 未レ除集法忍位亦已滅二苦下遍行一集法智解 T2251_.64.0304b16: 脱道未レ生。故自部惑未レ去。竝雙因不レ成。婆
T2251_.64.0304b19: 斷因一故。然得二無漏離繋得一。及缺二有頂一。集法 T2251_.64.0304b20: 智忍滅集法智生時名二滅雙因一。先滅二見苦所 T2251_.64.0304b21: 斷因一。今滅二見集所斷因一。光師問答致二三解一。 T2251_.64.0304b22: 何猶預甚。今詳。二論文異義同。彼論過去爲 T2251_.64.0304b23: レ滅現在今生名レ生。何以知者有二理教一故。若 T2251_.64.0304b24: 未來當生爲レ生者。苦類智生時已云レ未レ滅二 T2251_.64.0304b25: 見集所斷因一。然彼苦類智現在前時。應レ言 T2251_.64.0304b26: レ滅二見集所斷因一耶。甚不レ應レ理。然問本誤故
T2251_.64.0304c01: 乃約二上下八諦一以爲二八位一。前二位不レ立二遍知一。 T2251_.64.0304c02: 後六位立レ之。由レ此不レ分二忍智一而對明。然縁 T2251_.64.0304c03: 具闕正在二智位一非據二忍位一。欲レ顯二此義一云二 T2251_.64.0304c04: 忍滅智生一。八位竝皆爾。而其意難二了達一由レ是 T2251_.64.0304c05: 雜心論主欲レ令三明知 ![]() T2251_.64.0304c06: 屬二前門一。雖二苦類忍一與二苦法智一具闕不レ異故。 T2251_.64.0304c07: 今論欲二明著一故順二雜心一以忍入二前位一
T2251_.64.0304c12: 一繋一。他部遍行爲二一繋一修道正第九品爲二一 T2251_.64.0304c13: 繋一。隨レ意前八品爲二一繋一。如二前雙因一。光三釋 T2251_.64.0304c14: 應二如レ前簡一
T2251_.64.0304c17: 中間言レ及。於下見道及修道中。除二三界各最後 T2251_.64.0304c18: 第九品一餘品位上與二雙因一無レ別。於二修道三界 T2251_.64.0304c19: 各最後品一與二越界一無レ別。言レ用者功用。無三雙 T2251_.64.0304c20: 因功用外有二別倶繋用一。何以故。雙因位必倶 T2251_.64.0304c21: 繋。以乙無下滅二雙因一而猶有中倶繋上。無甲下滅二倶繋一 T2251_.64.0304c22: 而猶有中雙因上故。能起爲レ因。結縛爲レ繋。故 T2251_.64.0304c23: 於レ義有レ異。而無二別功用力一故不レ立。正理論
T2251_.64.0304c29: 性一。見集斷惑縛義如レ本。見苦所斷縛義都無。
![]()
T2251_.64.0305a05: 故且説二雙因一。今彈云。義有レ異已許レ此。而功 T2251_.64.0305a06: 力無レ別故不レ許二別立一。汝辨二寬狹一言下非レ滅二雙 T2251_.64.0305a07: 因一即是離中倶繋上。是自新案必定非二毘婆沙宗一。 T2251_.64.0305a08: 毘婆沙宗全無二寬狹一。雙因滅不滅位必倶繋
T2251_.64.0305a11: 見集所斷因一。未レ離二倶繋一。雖レ離二見苦所斷繋一。 T2251_.64.0305a12: 未レ離二見集所斷繋一。苦類忍滅苦類智生時未
T2251_.64.0305a15: 今滅二見集所斷因一。亦離二倶繋一。先離二見苦所 T2251_.64.0305a16: 斷繋一。今離二見集所斷繋一。集類智忍滅集類智
T2251_.64.0305a19: 所斷一品及至八品染一時未レ滅二雙因一。雖レ滅二 T2251_.64.0305a20: 一品乃至八品因一未レ滅二八品乃至一品因一。故 T2251_.64.0305a21: 亦未レ離二倶繋一。雖レ離二一品乃至八品繋一未レ離二 T2251_.64.0305a22: 八品乃至一品繋一。故離二彼第九品染一。無間道 T2251_.64.0305a23: 滅解脱道生時名二滅雙因一。先滅二八品因一。今 T2251_.64.0305a24: 滅二第九品因一。故亦離二倶繋一。先離二八品繋一。今 T2251_.64.0305a25: 離二第九品繋一。故説二四靜慮四無色一竝皆其位 T2251_.64.0305a26: 等。以此應レ知功力無レ別。滅レ因不レ離レ繋於二 T2251_.64.0305a27: 何文一有レ之。又以二無漏縁惑不 ![]() T2251_.64.0305a28: 繋別一是不レ成證。以下滅道惑亦非中令二他起一 T2251_.64.0305a29: 因上故。由レ此若體若義辨二寬狹一實是妄案。然 T2251_.64.0305b01: 光・寶輩恐二正理談訣一以朋二彼義一。於二此論一強 T2251_.64.0305b02: 設二非理救一。未二深考一之所レ爲矣
T2251_.64.0305b05: 標二寬狹一。二示二別立一。三指レ事爲二極成所以一。此 T2251_.64.0305b06: 中依レ位致レ難。難云。諸越界時位。即皆滅雙 T2251_.64.0305b07: 因故不レ可二因外立 ![]() T2251_.64.0305b08: 雙因少分有一。而滅雙因時多分非二越界一。見道 T2251_.64.0305b09: 六果滅雙因時竝非二越界一。修道中四禪四無 T2251_.64.0305b10: 色各下三地六種滅雙因亦未二越界一。故別立二 T2251_.64.0305b11: 越界一。今論且約二修道一云二三地一。光記大科二 T2251_.64.0305b12: 義。第二義通中亦有二二釋一。總是三解。第一 T2251_.64.0305b13: 義約二用無別一作レ難。寶疏同レ此。此釋不レ順二 T2251_.64.0305b14: 論約 ![]() T2251_.64.0305b15: 不レ異二前義一。最通答釋且許二不立一爲レ異。是亦 T2251_.64.0305b16: 非二論意一也
T2251_.64.0305b19: 通二後兩句一。便長行顯レ此。住是能住。是示二其 T2251_.64.0305b20: 人一顯二能成就一。或言現二有無不定一。見道猶有 T2251_.64.0305b21: 無不定。凡位定無不レ言自成。故頌不レ説
T2251_.64.0305b28: 根本非二欲對治一故無二欲見修四遍知一。問。先離 T2251_.64.0305b29: 欲者。入二正決定一至二苦類智集法忍一時三縁 T2251_.64.0305c01: 具。何不レ立二遍知一。答。雖レ具二三縁一雙因未レ成。 T2251_.64.0305c02: 遍知就二無漏斷得一立レ此。彼於二異生位一雖レ斷二 T2251_.64.0305c03: 欲見苦集等惑一。今唯得二苦下無漏離得一。未 T2251_.64.0305c04: レ得二集下同類因無漏離得一故不レ成二雙因一。光
T2251_.64.0305c10: 前新得門故唯依二智位一。此約二人成就門一。則後 T2251_.64.0305c11: 位不レ捨二前前一而成。是故集法智成レ一集類 T2251_.64.0305c12: 忍成二彼一一。是非レ自新得成一。故以二後忍一屬二前 T2251_.64.0305c13: 智一論レ此
T2251_.64.0305c16: 門ナレハ由レ忍得故以屬レ忍。今成就門約レ位故 T2251_.64.0305c17: 定爲二修位一。問。離欲退者。未二退墮一時唯得二下 T2251_.64.0305c18: 分一一。今退何成レ六。答。下分盡總 ![]() T2251_.64.0305c19: 修諸斷一爲レ一。雖レ一體即七種。今離欲退人。 T2251_.64.0305c20: 捨二下分中欲修一分一而餘有レ六。故無レ妨
T2251_.64.0305c23: 難レ除如二上已辨一
![]() T2251_.64.0305c27: 一切。若約二羅漢一三界見修一切。故竝據二全 T2251_.64.0305c28: 一切一。言二一切斷一。有人通二全分少分一者非也。 T2251_.64.0305c29: 故正理。婆沙竝有二二全言一
T2251_.64.0306a03: 雖二是越界一而非二得果一。又餘位者二義竝闕
T2251_.64.0306a06: 知一。由レ是但捨二見六中前五一。正理論五十六
T2251_.64.0306a09: 未至定一入二見諦一者上。若依二根本一入二見諦一者。 T2251_.64.0306a10: 於二欲界斷一不レ得二無漏離繋得一。故不レ得二欲界
T2251_.64.0306a13: 今即論二遍知得捨一。解脱道智未レ起非二實捨 T2251_.64.0306a14: 實得一。故定於レ智應レ論二得捨一。若言レ不レ爾於二 T2251_.64.0306a15: 集法忍一斷二自同類因一。何不レ許下彼滅二雙因一而
T2251_.64.0306a18: 捨レ五得レ一。婆沙既約二道類智現在前生一言二 T2251_.64.0306a19: 得捨一。豈非レ違二本宗一。光記墮二正理破中一誤云二 T2251_.64.0306a20: 未來生一。其非理如二前已辨一。亦復此論唯云二道 T2251_.64.0306a21: 類智時一。是唯現在無下可レ言二未來一之理上。未至 T2251_.64.0306a22: 簡無者。於二捨五言一自成故。寶疏準二此論文一 T2251_.64.0306a23: 亦談二自舊痾準レ前可レ簡
T2251_.64.0306a28: 於二此中一有二二類一。一無レ捨得レ一。忍果六ト色 T2251_.64.0306a29: 受盡トナリ。謂成 ![]() T2251_.64.0306b01: 得レ一。下分結盡捨レ六得レ一。一切結盡捨レ二 T2251_.64.0306b02: 得レ一。若起越人全離欲道類智時捨レ五得
T2251_.64.0306b05: 六一不二倶時起一。故第八是第七總集故。故無二 T2251_.64.0306b06: 七八九種捨得一前成就門亦爾。問。前成就門 T2251_.64.0306b07: 成二一二三四五一。此中何縁無二三四五一。解云。
T2251_.64.0306b11: 名一。本名便失説名爲レ捨。亦無 ![]() T2251_.64.0306b12: 論。今就レ名言二得捨一。故無二三四五得一。無二彼名 T2251_.64.0306b13: 竝現一故。若作二此解一得與二成就一但名差別。 T2251_.64.0306b14: 亦婆沙一説 T2251_.64.0306b15: 阿毘達磨倶舍論第二十一卷法義終 T2251_.64.0306b16: T2251_.64.0306b17: T2251_.64.0306b18: T2251_.64.0306b19: T2251_.64.0306b20: 義 T2251_.64.0306b21: 豐山上毛沙門快道記 T2251_.64.0306b22: 分別賢聖品第六之一 T2251_.64.0306b23: 分別賢聖品 正理。顯宗。分別爲レ辨。已兩本 T2251_.64.0306b24: 法勝毘曇竝云二賢聖品一。曰於二人天中一應レ受二
T2251_.64.0306c04: 未レ配レ位也。寶寄二所知一。具釋。大乘義章十七
T2251_.64.0306c10: 終一。皆名爲レ賢。竝得レ稱レ聖。二賢聖體別。別有二 T2251_.64.0306c11: 五種一。其第五約レ位分別。見道已前調心離惡。 T2251_.64.0306c12: 名レ之爲レ賢。見諦已上會正名レ聖。故仁王説二 T2251_.64.0306c13: 三賢十聖一。三通局分別。賢通聖局。從レ始至 T2251_.64.0306c14: レ終。皆名爲レ賢。故經説云二賢者一。舍利弗等。見 T2251_.64.0306c15: 諦已上方得レ名レ聖。今約二體別一題二賢聖一。雜心 T2251_.64.0306c16: 文昭昭。又瑜伽釋敬序曰二正智受學聖賢衆一。 T2251_.64.0306c17: 逆次思レ之。而舊論約レ勝略レ賢。但云二聖道果 T2251_.64.0306c18: 人品一。辨二品次一者。光約二漏無漏因果一。寶疏約二 T2251_.64.0306c19: 滅道次第非也。似レ順二結前文一。然前品不二正 T2251_.64.0306c20: 説 ![]() T2251_.64.0306c21: 勞。今云。賢聖差別由二隨眠強弱一。離レ彼不レ能 T2251_.64.0306c22: レ辨レ之。故隨眠次明二此品一。是故法勝毘曇四
T2251_.64.0307a01: 唯聖見道修道所斷。下八地攝。見斷隨眠。聖 T2251_.64.0307a02: 見道斷。凡修道斷。修斷聖凡倶修道斷上。既説二 T2251_.64.0307a03: 見道唯依二聖身一。豈不三已成二唯是無漏一。既説三 T2251_.64.0307a04: 修道通依二凡聖身一。豈不三已成レ通二有漏無漏一。 T2251_.64.0307a05: 是則今説義不レ異レ前。由レ此不レ應二造頌再説一。
![]() T2251_.64.0307a08: レ要二道體一。今正明二其道體一。故言二唯無漏通二一。 T2251_.64.0307a09: 莫三相似義ヲ以壞二義門異一。若言二以レ理推尋。義 T2251_.64.0307a10: 既顯。故煩重一者。是則全不レ爾。依二法相一分 ![]() T2251_.64.0307a11: 法門一。如レ理推レ之。不レ借二多句一。其事已足。而幼 T2251_.64.0307a12: 學徒不レ能二曉了一。是故依二義門異一。各分別示。 T2251_.64.0307a13: 如二諸門分別一。準思去レ執。衆賢論師依二此執一。
T2251_.64.0307a16: 九品一。長行云。見惟無漏。修通二二種一。準レ前已
T2251_.64.0307a19: 道一。前問如レ今唯改レ答。問答乖角。豈成二示南一。
T2251_.64.0307a26: 見惑一故。非二速是因一。故舊論唯云下能對 ![]() T2251_.64.0307a27: 界惑一故上。初約レ寬。亘二三界一後是狹。自地九品 T2251_.64.0307a28: 故。雖レ非二見分レ九斷 ![]() T2251_.64.0307a29: 理。故言二九品一
T2251_.64.0307b05: 列レ之。故答レ不レ爾
T2251_.64.0307b08: 爲一。是説二苦集體一。故正理今文曰。應レ知彼文 T2251_.64.0307b09: 亦已顯レ體。謂除二聖道一。餘有爲法ナリト云ヲ以
![]() T2251_.64.0307b13: 文詞隨順。復次若作二是説一。隨二順説者受者持 T2251_.64.0307b14: 者一。非二餘次第一。復次依二現觀時一。故作二是説一。謂 T2251_.64.0307b15: 次第法。略有二三種一。一生起次第。第二易説次 T2251_.64.0307b16: 第。第三現觀次第。生起次第者。謂四念住。四 T2251_.64.0307b17: 靜慮。四無色等。諸瑜伽師。先起二身念住一。是 T2251_.64.0307b18: 故先説。乃至後起二法念住一。是故後説。靜慮無 T2251_.64.0307b19: 色。廣説亦爾。易説次第者。謂四正勝。四神 T2251_.64.0307b20: 足。五根。五力。七等覺支。八聖道支等。雖二四
T2251_.64.0307b26: 説立二次第一。譬如二八分聖道等一。今説四諦隨
T2251_.64.0307b29: 文一
T2251_.64.0307c03: 於單本一乃誤也
![]() T2251_.64.0307c08: 加行一。比智言二現等覺一。十六行相於二四諦境一 T2251_.64.0307c09: 現前。平等而覺知。是現等覺義
T2251_.64.0307c12: 是苦果。望二未來果一。還爲レ因。能集二諸惑業一。招二 T2251_.64.0307c13: 當果一故。唯依二義邊一異二其名一。故正理五十七
T2251_.64.0307c16: レ亦。對二名爲 ![]()
T2251_.64.0307c22: 諦一。今下云二實見一。是約二聖者通達一。聖人諦通 ![]() T2251_.64.0307c23: 達此四法一。故名二聖諦一。諦約レ境是聖之諦依主 T2251_.64.0307c24: 釋。若諦約二能見一持業釋也。然聖人諦見レ苦。 T2251_.64.0307c25: 見集等故。聖諦之苦依主釋也
T2251_.64.0307c28: 此有レ三。初標立。次是故下結合。後如有下引 T2251_.64.0307c29: 證。若約二體性一。凡聖一切所見皆是諦。諸法體 T2251_.64.0308a01: 性法法住二自性一。悉無倒故。爾依二能見人一有二 T2251_.64.0308a02: 差別一。凡夫顛倒苦見樂。聖者反レ之。夫聖人 T2251_.64.0308a03: 實見會二法自體一。能所無レ差故。特立二聖諦名一。
T2251_.64.0308a06: 名一
T2251_.64.0308a09: レ樂
T2251_.64.0308a12: 爲勝。以下凡夫於二加行一觀中滅道上故。若約二所 T2251_.64.0308a13: 觀一。四諦皆通二凡聖一。有人云 後釋爲レ善。經部 T2251_.64.0308a14: 等不レ立二得成就一故。此釋非也。不レ立二別體一。而 T2251_.64.0308a15: 不レ言二其義一。寶疏亦約二成就一也
T2251_.64.0308a20: 別中有二正示問答徴釋五科一。第五釋中有レ四。 T2251_.64.0308a21: 一正辨三三受爲二三苦一。二如受下例 ![]() T2251_.64.0308a22: 有一。三擧二異説一釋レ名。四應知下辨二三苦寬狹一 T2251_.64.0308a23: 爲レ二。初明二二苦不共一。後明三行苦通二一切一。此 T2251_.64.0308a24: 亦二。初正明。後此唯下簡亂。此有レ三。一標 T2251_.64.0308a25: 立。二引證レ三示下凡夫不レ知二細苦一所以上。此是 T2251_.64.0308a26: 其總釋也。寶疏科二總釋別釋。最順二論文一。謂 T2251_.64.0308a27: 初不レ言二可意等一。唯云二諸有漏一。又三三不二配 T2251_.64.0308a28: 當一。唯云二三種合一。後具。配合等故。光記分二二 T2251_.64.0308a29: 句一科非也
T2251_.64.0308b10: 是則經部。欲三後明二經部義一之基本。先示二經 T2251_.64.0308b11: 部釋名一。彼不レ立二過去未來實有一。故皆持業。 T2251_.64.0308b12: 有部不レ爾。唯苦苦ノミ是持業。餘二竝是別體 T2251_.64.0308b13: 依主。謂由レ壞之苦。由レ行之苦
T2251_.64.0308b16: 辭一故。又本辨二寬狹一。以レ有二疑難一故
T2251_.64.0308b27: 如二諸有漏一
T2251_.64.0308c01: 違不違差別一。是則爲二違決過一。謂道諦非二行苦
T2251_.64.0308c04: 以二此論義一。標爲二餘師一。其例彼論非一也。何 T2251_.64.0308c05: 證三彼云二餘師一。以此論必是餘師
T2251_.64.0308c08: レ貫二無漏有爲一。例レ彼説二一切非常皆是苦一。亦 T2251_.64.0308c09: 是唯約二有漏非常一。此論且但説二能例一。顯二所 T2251_.64.0308c10: 例一故。文中云レ亦。寶疏科二引レ例釋一是也。以二 T2251_.64.0308c11: 終二句一。直約レ苦非也。彼有爲言指二觀諸有 T2251_.64.0308c12: 爲一故。光記直云レ通レ經者誤也
T2251_.64.0308c15: レ苦答。後樂體有無諍。初中有二三師一。一約二多 T2251_.64.0308c16: 分一。二相從義。三凡聖差別。此即初也。是婆沙
T2251_.64.0308c19: 若諸蘊中亦有レ樂者。何故名二苦諦一。而不レ名二 T2251_.64.0308c20: 樂諦一。若諸蘊中全無レ樂者。契經何通。經説
![]() T2251_.64.0308c23: レ爲レ樂。於レ色起レ貪起レ著。以下諸色中有レ苦有 T2251_.64.0308c24: レ樂。亦樂所レ隨。亦生二喜樂一。不 ![]() T2251_.64.0308c25: 爲レ樂。於二諸色中一起レ貪起レ著。乃至於レ識廣説 T2251_.64.0308c26: 亦爾。又説。三受各定建立不二相雜亂一。謂樂及 T2251_.64.0308c27: 苦不苦不樂。又契經説。道依二資糧一。涅槃依 T2251_.64.0308c28: レ道以二道樂一故得二涅槃樂一。道既是樂。如何蘊 T2251_.64.0308c29: 中可レ説レ無レ樂。答。應レ作二是説一。於二諸蘊中一。亦 T2251_.64.0309a01: 有二少樂一。以二諸蘊中苦多樂少少一。從レ多故。但 T2251_.64.0309a02: 名二苦蘊。如三毒瓶中置二一滴蜜一。少從レ多故。但 T2251_.64.0309a03: 名二毒瓶一。有作二是説一。於二諸蘊中一全無レ樂。故但 T2251_.64.0309a04: 名二苦諦一。問。若爾經説當二云何通一。答。相待立 T2251_.64.0309a05: レ名。假説レ有レ樂。謂受二上苦一時。於二中苦一起二樂 T2251_.64.0309a06: 想一。受二中苦一時。於二下苦一。起二樂想一。受二地獄苦一
T2251_.64.0309a09: 依二世間施設一於二諸蘊中一亦説レ有レ樂。謂諸世 T2251_.64.0309a10: 間飢時得レ食。渇時得レ飮。寒時得レ煖等。皆言 T2251_.64.0309a11: レ得レ樂。若依二賢聖施設一。於二諸蘊中一應レ説レ無 T2251_.64.0309a12: レ樂。從二無間獄一乃至二有頂一。諸蘊界處皆等觀 ![]() T2251_.64.0309a13: 見如二熱鐵團一。評曰。應レ知此中初説爲レ善。苦 T2251_.64.0309a14: 多樂少但名二苦諦一。如是三説中。評家義是也。
![]() T2251_.64.0309a19: 爲二苦因一故。光寶竝云二經部鳩摩羅多一者。誤 T2251_.64.0309a20: 之太矣。彼不レ許二蘊中樂一。諸師共許故。然舊
T2251_.64.0309a23: 從二果苦一。二約二相雜一。集是雜集義。不レ爾與二初 T2251_.64.0309a24: 因一何別。故舊論曰。由二衆若雜一故。韻會集雜 T2251_.64.0309a25: 也。孟子是集義。所生者。註集雜也。光寶不 T2251_.64.0309a26: レ辨未レ足也。三果樂從二因苦一。初後全有財。中 T2251_.64.0309a27: 隣近釋也
T2251_.64.0309b03: レ言下就二有部一述中正解上。此約二凡夫一爲レ樂。而依二 T2251_.64.0309b04: 聖人一皆苦。如二次上釋一。此有レ三。此初正叙二自 T2251_.64.0309b05: 義一
T2251_.64.0309b08: 破有二總別一。別破有レ三。一苦集混亂失。二於二 T2251_.64.0309b09: 上界一不成失。三行苦無用失。此第三因彼計二 T2251_.64.0309b10: 苦。因故爲 ![]() T2251_.64.0309b11: レ苦。故成二無用一。由レ之我由二非常一。樂爲レ苦。而
T2251_.64.0309b17: 依二對法師一遂破。初中有二總標徴釋一。別引レ教
T2251_.64.0309b23: 廣立二教理一。竝皆如レ彼。光寶竝云二經部大衆 T2251_.64.0309b24: 部等一。此未レ審。若經部ナラハ論應レ言二經部一。其諍
T2251_.64.0309b27: 解。成實多同二經部一。故諸師無レ妨
T2251_.64.0309c03: レ樂。或苦樂不増不減。平等亦非二苦因一。何偏 T2251_.64.0309c04: 非レ樂以爲レ苦。通云。雖レ爾今但由二非時一。普光
T2251_.64.0309c08: 易レ肩。及疲勞止息一。世間由レ此苦 脱二彼苦一 T2251_.64.0309c09: 亦然。舊論曰。譬如二重擔易 ![]()
T2251_.64.0309c12: 初擧レ經略辨。二若由下廣辨レ不レ由二苦自體一。 T2251_.64.0309c13: 此亦有レ二。初正辨下反 ![]() ![]()
T2251_.64.0309c17: 禪思念言。如二世尊説一三受。樂受苦受不苦不 T2251_.64.0309c18: 樂受。又説二一切諸受悉皆是苦一。此有二何義一。 T2251_.64.0309c19: 佛告二阿難一。我以二一切行無常一切行變易法一 T2251_.64.0309c20: 故。説二諸有受皆是苦一。又復阿難我以二諸行漸 T2251_.64.0309c21: 次寂滅一故説。以二諸行漸次止息一故。説二一切
T2251_.64.0309c29: 若ノミナラハ無常言ニテ足。更安二及字一。不レ可レ言二反
T2251_.64.0310a03: レ不レ依二苦苦一。表二行壞二一。四違二正理一。對二苦苦一 T2251_.64.0310a04: 云二二苦一。豈是不二各頭一。通云二彼行中變壞無 T2251_.64.0310a05: 常行苦一者。何謂乎。既云レ二。彼二是何物。亦 T2251_.64.0310a06: 爲二變壞無常一義一。契經及言爲レ何。次壞苦唯 T2251_.64.0310a07: 樂。不レ通二苦捨一之難。豈勿二彼義恐怖一。約二共不 T2251_.64.0310a08: 共二門一。攝二一切一故。謂一切無常邊。共門亙二 T2251_.64.0310a09: 樂捨苦一。反壞不共門。是樂受壞苦。世尊欲下 T2251_.64.0310a10: 顯 ![]() T2251_.64.0310a11: 特別云二一切行變壞一。然亡二於佛意一。背二諸教 T2251_.64.0310a12: 理一。臆度揣摩。新家舊蔽最可レ歎焉。又寶疏 T2251_.64.0310a13: 依レ義。不レ違二我義一也
T2251_.64.0310a16: 苦觀意一。此有レ二。初叙二苦樂損益一。後佛以下。 T2251_.64.0310a17: 正通二經意一。三如何下成二樂自體一。有レ難有レ答」
T2251_.64.0310a21: 正覺之所知。此頌不レ言三性是苦故説二皆苦一。 T2251_.64.0310a22: 故知有二樂自性一
T2251_.64.0310a25: 初總釋。後別釋。總釋中諸有者。二十五有。舊 T2251_.64.0310a26: 論云二生處一。是亦苦多樂少。一分樂中言貫二上
![]() T2251_.64.0310a29: 文林釋自釋一故
T2251_.64.0310b03: 順俗救一。此中先擧レ救。次總非。後別依レ經。示二 T2251_.64.0310b04: 非理一有レ二。初擧二密説經一。顯三三受是了義非中 T2251_.64.0310b05: 順俗上。後依二如實言一。顯レ非二順俗説 ![]() T2251_.64.0310b06: 後引レ經示レ相。此有二二經一。初引三五根爲二三受一。 T2251_.64.0310b07: 意欲レ令レ知二下五根言是受根一。後正引二如實
T2251_.64.0310b10: 無レ樂。云何説二三受一。答曰。似下以二苦差別中一 T2251_.64.0310b11: 名爲中樂相上。今破レ之
T2251_.64.0310b14: 牒。後破。有二總破別破總結三一。別破大有レ四。 T2251_.64.0310b15: 第一以レ樂例責。此中唯言簡二苦捨一。彼亦起二 T2251_.64.0310b16: 苦捨一故。光記第二釋爲レ善。寶疏亦爾也。第 T2251_.64.0310b17: 二又受下。下苦不成難。第三又下下。下中品 T2251_.64.0310b18: 相反不成失。第四又下三下。定苦相對非理 T2251_.64.0310b19: 失。後故不下總結。寶疏總科二五難一。入二下違 T2251_.64.0310b20: 教一分科非也
T2251_.64.0310b24: 因レ此而生二樂著一。摩訶男以下色非二一向是苦一 T2251_.64.0310b25: 非二樂隨レ樂樂所長養一不 ![]() T2251_.64.0310b26: レ色染著。染著故繋。繋故有レ惱。説二受想行識一 T2251_.64.0310b27: 文。無二秋毫異一。然若色下非字。及樂隨樂上非
T2251_.64.0310c01: 是樂非レ苦。非二隨苦一。非二憂苦長養一。離レ苦者。衆 T2251_.64.0310c02: 生不レ應三因レ色而生二厭離一。摩訶男以下色非二一 T2251_.64.0310c03: 向樂一。是苦隨苦憂苦長養不 ![]() T2251_.64.0310c04: 厭 ![]() T2251_.64.0310c05: 行識一文。亦同。又婆沙六十引レ此。無二二非字一
T2251_.64.0310c08: 一向一故。故婆沙六十引レ此。云二亦是樂一。又八
T2251_.64.0310c17: レ有二一分樂一。故不二多言一
T2251_.64.0310c20: 不二但惟塵一。若至二此依止位差別一。諸塵必成二 T2251_.64.0310c21: 樂因一。無二時至 ![]() T2251_.64.0310c22: 因一爲 ![]() ![]() T2251_.64.0310c23: 爲二美熟因一。此火勢即是美熟因。若至二此應 T2251_.64.0310c24: レ熟飮食位差別一。必成二美熟因一。無二時至 ![]() T2251_.64.0310c25: レ成二美熟因一
T2251_.64.0310c28: 火至下此所二煮炙一如レ是分位上。爲二美熟因一。未二嘗 T2251_.64.0310c29: 至 ![]()
T2251_.64.0311a06: 本。明本。作二因彼故一爲レ正
T2251_.64.0311a09: 爲レ正
T2251_.64.0311a14: 有愛内六處。眼處。耳鼻身意處。於レ中若有 T2251_.64.0311a15: 愛。有膩。有染。有著者。是名爲レ集。諸賢多聞 T2251_.64.0311a16: 聖弟子知我如是知。此法如是見。如是了。如 T2251_.64.0311a17: 是觀。如是覺。是謂二愛集苦集聖諦一光寶倶 T2251_.64.0311a18: 云二經部申 ![]() T2251_.64.0311a19: 現有愛貪二現在果一。二後有愛即貪二未來果一。三 T2251_.64.0311a20: 與レ喜倶行愛。即已得物上轉。四彼彼隨行愛。 T2251_.64.0311a21: 即未得物上轉。前二縁二内心一起故。後二縁二
![]() T2251_.64.0311a29: 蓋臆度自分別。復今論不レ云二有餘部一。不三對 T2251_.64.0311b01: 言二對法師一。何不レ思レ之。只是爲レ通二違文一假 ![]()
T2251_.64.0311b04: 思レ之
![]() T2251_.64.0311b09: 及與摩那婆一。亦餘衆多想。皆因苦陰生。諸業
T2251_.64.0311b15: 謂根種子。莖種子。節種子。自落種子。實種子。 T2251_.64.0311b16: 此五種子不斷不壞不腐不中風新熟堅實。 T2251_.64.0311b17: 有二地界一而無二水界一。彼種子不二生長増廣一。若
T2251_.64.0311b21: 腐不中風有二地水界一。彼種子生長増廣。比丘 T2251_.64.0311b22: 彼五種子者譬二取陰倶識一。地界者譬二四識住一。
T2251_.64.0311b29: 種種子。此諸種子不斷不破不腐不傷不穿。 T2251_.64.0311c01: 堅新得二地界一。不レ得二水界一。彼種不二生長増廣一。 T2251_.64.0311c02: 得二水界一。不レ得二地界一。亦不レ得二生長一。長得二地水 T2251_.64.0311c03: 界一。得二生長増廣一。如レ是業。煩惱。有二愛見一慢。 T2251_.64.0311c04: 無明而生レ行。若有レ業而無二煩惱愛見無明一
T2251_.64.0311c08: 後説爲レ正。而云二經中不 ![]() T2251_.64.0311c09: 本經一故。致二如レ是誤一也。又今文既云二別名一。四 T2251_.64.0311c10: 識住類二地界一。何五種子不レ約二根莖等一穿レ之。
T2251_.64.0311c20: 有二正示出據二科一。後釋二第二經意一。後問答決 T2251_.64.0311c21: 擇。此有レ二。初問 ![]() ![]() T2251_.64.0311c22: 此即初也。由二各自業一。由二善惡別一。界趣等果 T2251_.64.0311c23: 趣出生。生之因名二生因一。愛是潤二後有一。勝力 T2251_.64.0311c24: 後有起名レ起。起之因亦依主。故舊論起因皆
T2251_.64.0311c27: 明一。諸業ト惑トノ有漏莫レ不レ由二無明因一。生ト T2251_.64.0311c28: 起トノ因之因故云二因因一。故論特云レ彼。光二 T2251_.64.0311c29: 釋。初唯約レ業非也第二取二業愛一爲レ勝。順二論
T2251_.64.0312a04: 何等爲二眼因眼縁眼縛一。謂眼業因トシ業ヲ縁トシ T2251_.64.0312a05: 業ヲ縛トシ。業有レ因有レ縁有レ縛。謂業ハ愛ヲ因トシ T2251_.64.0312a06: 愛ヲ縁トシ愛ヲ縛トス。愛有レ因有レ縁有レ縛。謂愛 T2251_.64.0312a07: 無明ヲ因トシ無明ヲ縁トシ無明ヲ縛トス。無明有レ因 T2251_.64.0312a08: 有レ縁有レ縛。謂無明ハ不正思惟ヲ因トシ不正 T2251_.64.0312a09: 思惟ヲ縁トシ不正思惟ヲ縛トス。不正思惟有レ因 T2251_.64.0312a10: 有レ縁有レ縛。謂縁二眼ト色トヲ一生二不正思惟一生二 T2251_.64.0312a11: 於癡一。彼癡是無明。癡求レ欲名爲レ愛。愛所作 T2251_.64.0312a12: 名爲レ業。如レ是比丘不正思惟因二無明一。無明 T2251_.64.0312a13: 因レ愛。愛因トナリテ爲レ業。業因トナリテ爲レ眼。耳鼻 T2251_.64.0312a14: 舌身意亦如レ是説。是名二有因有縁有縛法經一
T2251_.64.0312a17: 縁有由法門經一。竝是指二雜含一。又中含二十四
T2251_.64.0312a22: 死由レ生縁レ生有二老死一。廣説下餘生由レ有縁レ有
T2251_.64.0312a25: 第一故。如レ是雜含曰二因縁縛一。法本經曰二因縁 T2251_.64.0312a26: 由一。中含曰二因習本縁一。長含曰二由縁一。舊論曰二 T2251_.64.0312a27: 因縁發起一。今曰二因縁緖一。緖是基緖義。故亦云二 T2251_.64.0312a28: 發起一。云レ由是由緖義。縛亦繋縛令レ不レ散。是 T2251_.64.0312a29: 由緖義按十二支縁起。順逆引結。而起必不二 T2251_.64.0312b01: 孤起一。皆互具二如レ是親疎多因一。故或説レ一。但 T2251_.64.0312b02: 云レ縁。或説レ二。若説レ三。若説レ四。初引經其文
T2251_.64.0312b05: 答。十二支皆雖レ具レ之。互是有二親疎一。故成レ證。
![]() ![]() T2251_.64.0312b10: 必起。二心相續趣。三執著無雙。光釋如二論 T2251_.64.0312b11: 文一。寶疏一指事釋。二引例釋。三以レ勝釋竝非 T2251_.64.0312b12: 也。三皆勝故。初二竝示二現事一故。第二何故 T2251_.64.0312b13: 爲レ例
T2251_.64.0312b24: 破與レ析大別也。如二假四大一色香味等四塵 T2251_.64.0312b25: 爲レ體。分 ![]()
![]() T2251_.64.0312b28: 觸一別有中瓶名上。是故名二等事一。如レ是一切分別 T2251_.64.0312b29: 無レ所レ捨。是則第一義。就二此二諦一。婆沙七
T2251_.64.0312c03: 中皆有レ俗。唯空非我理爲レ眞。四評家四諦
T2251_.64.0312c06: 爲レ俗。順二賢聖所説名一爲レ眞。三大徳云。説二瓶 T2251_.64.0312c07: 衣等事一爲レ俗。説二縁起等理爲レ眞。四達磨達 T2251_.64.0312c08: 多名自性爲レ俗。是苦集少分。義自性爲レ眞。 T2251_.64.0312c09: 苦集少分。及餘二諦二無爲。義林二末二
T2251_.64.0312c12: 十一。二諦義擧二二十三家一。梁昭明太子爲レ首。 T2251_.64.0312c13: 光宅爲レ終。又嘉祥二諦義等具辨示。南海傳
T2251_.64.0312c17: 及正顯亦爾。恐レ亂二破析一特加レ除。不レ同三前析 T2251_.64.0312c18: 餘鮮本誤作二析除一。更有二味等言一故。然光記 T2251_.64.0312c19: 作二析餘一者。守株之失。愛者受形誤。正。顯。舊 T2251_.64.0312c20: 論。及鮮本。光作レ受爲レ正。明本。寶疏如レ今非 T2251_.64.0312c21: 也
![]() T2251_.64.0312c26: 説一。以知非二經部一。論主意信二此義一也
T2251_.64.0313a01: 岸一。舊論云二浮物一
T2251_.64.0313a10: 也
T2251_.64.0313a13: 失一。今就二依第七一分辨。故無二相亂一。是義同二成
T2251_.64.0313a16: 故名爲レ惠。如二經中説一。羅睺羅今能成 ![]() T2251_.64.0313a17: 解脱惠一。雖レ聞二韋陀等世俗經典一。以レ不レ能レ生二 T2251_.64.0313a18: 無漏惠一故。不レ名二聞惠一。若能思 ![]() T2251_.64.0313a19: 義一。是名二思惠一。如レ説行者聞レ法思 ![]() T2251_.64.0313a20: 又説行者聞レ法思 ![]() T2251_.64.0313a21: 現前知見是名二修惠一。如レ説下行者於二定心中一 T2251_.64.0313a22: 見中五陰生滅上。如二諸經中説一。汝等比丘修二習 T2251_.64.0313a23: 禪定一。當レ得二如實現前知見一。乃至廣引二三惠
![]() T2251_.64.0313a26: 三藏及師友説一。是名爲レ聞。因二此聞一。依二此聞一。 T2251_.64.0313a27: 由二此聞一。建立故名二聞所成惠一。餘二亦準レ之。而 T2251_.64.0313a28: 示レ要如有レ一。如理思 ![]() T2251_.64.0313a29: 業一名レ思。如有レ一。方便善巧修二離染道一。由レ此 T2251_.64.0313b01: 離二欲惡不善法一。入二初定乃至第四定一。具足住 T2251_.64.0313b02: 名レ思。因依由五七三聲具如レ上。未レ約二名義一。 T2251_.64.0313b03: 今且依二三轉中依一也。彼復修惠次云。有作二 T2251_.64.0313b04: 是説一。如レ此亦是思所成惠。所以者何。唯依二 T2251_.64.0313b05: 佛法不共所修一。乃可三名爲二修所成惠一。今此義 T2251_.64.0313b06: 中依二諸等引所起寂靜惠一。皆名二修所成惠一。義
![]() T2251_.64.0313b12: 謂論主意依二縁境門一。不四必遮三竝縁二名義一。今 T2251_.64.0313b13: 約二三種差別門一中。毘婆沙師約二縁境一。故致二 T2251_.64.0313b14: 雜亂難一。以二彼難一。推量二自義一。豈非二混亂一。又婆 T2251_.64.0313b15: 沙諸門分別總論二所縁一。彼差別門依二名義離 T2251_.64.0313b16: 不離一。辨レ別如二修惠一。離レ名縁レ義。故而非二一向 T2251_.64.0313b17: 不 ![]() T2251_.64.0313b18: 招二二無別反難一。故基釋定誤也
T2251_.64.0313b21: レ成之惠依主釋。思是思數。依二相應思一所成 T2251_.64.0313b22: 惠隣近釋。亦依主釋。修是證義。明證レ境故。 T2251_.64.0313b23: 體是定數。隣近依主準レ前。問。何故唯不レ言二 T2251_.64.0313b24: 聞惠等一。加二所成言一。答。恐レ亂二持業一故。謂約二 T2251_.64.0313b25: 互用一竝是應二持業一。故特言二所成一。顯二三因所
T2251_.64.0313b29: 論曰。此二遠離於二何人一可レ易二善成一。正理釋 T2251_.64.0313c01: 易レ了
T2251_.64.0313c05: 欲。復樂。復求。是謂二不喜足一。如レ是差別。婆沙
T2251_.64.0313c10: 等一更別欣 ![]() T2251_.64.0313c11: 足甲。如何説二二差別不一成。若爾所言有二何意 T2251_.64.0313c12: 趣一。謂於下已得足二能治 ![]() T2251_.64.0313c13: 中一顯下等倍勝更希欲恨三先不レ得二此衣服等 T2251_.64.0313c14: 倍妙倍多一名中不喜足上。於三已獲得足二能治 ![]() T2251_.64.0313c15: 更倍希求。方能障レ定。非下於三已得未二能治 ![]() T2251_.64.0313c16: 更倍希求。便能障 ![]() T2251_.64.0313c17: 或不喜足雖二更希求一。與二大欲一殊。故無レ有レ失。 T2251_.64.0313c18: 謂先已得諸資生具無レ所二乏少一。而更希求。 T2251_.64.0313c19: 如レ是希求從二於已得心不喜足一。所二引生一故。 T2251_.64.0313c20: 果受二因名一。名二不喜足一。於二先未 ![]() T2251_.64.0313c21: 心無所レ顧。過レ量希求。如是希求。名爲二大欲一。 T2251_.64.0313c22: 二種差別其相如レ是。此兩釋。初釋意於二已得 T2251_.64.0313c23: 法辨 ![]() T2251_.64.0313c24: 而對法者不レ言二更多希求一。今反破云。婆沙 T2251_.64.0313c25: 中雖レ有下唯言中於二已得一不レ爲レ喜是不喜足上。 T2251_.64.0313c26: 今即破二發智復希求説。婆沙更復尋求説一。 T2251_.64.0313c27: 豈可レ言レ不レ言二更求一。依二後釋諾以通。是亦 T2251_.64.0313c28: 有レ理。約二起從心別一爲二二種差別一。設如三論主 T2251_.64.0313c29: 所言悵 ![]() T2251_.64.0314a01: 心起故。是故二種竝亘二現未一。而但約二起從 T2251_.64.0314a02: 心親一別レ之。謂不喜足對二未得妙多一。於二已得 T2251_.64.0314a03: 法一悵恨不レ歡。大欲對二已得不妙不多一。希 ![]() T2251_.64.0314a04: 未來妙多一。然對法者更多求言判二差別一中。 T2251_.64.0314a05: 實招二相亂失一。故不レ成レ救也
T2251_.64.0314a09: レ苦。悵望不レ歡。若都未レ得レ能レ治レ苦物希求得 T2251_.64.0314a10: 者此不レ障レ定。有二何過失一。此別二辨用不辨用一。 T2251_.64.0314a11: 以破二文總相一。實似レ未二細簡一。然婆沙等論中 T2251_.64.0314a12: 未二曾細簡一。今但論二兩種別一。非レ判二不喜足中 T2251_.64.0314a13: 失不失一。汝還破二本論師一。及混二義門一
T2251_.64.0314a18: 者即是佛獨覺聲聞。彼從レ此生。相續不レ斷。 T2251_.64.0314a19: 故名二聖種一
T2251_.64.0314a23: 足一。非レ爲レ衣故。求滿二其意一。若未レ得レ衣不二憂 T2251_.64.0314a24: 悒一。不二啼泣一。不二搥胸一。不二癡惑一。若得レ衣者。 T2251_.64.0314a25: 不染不著不欲不貪知二出要一。而用レ衣如レ此。 T2251_.64.0314a26: 事利不二懈怠一。而正知者。是謂レ止 ![]() T2251_.64.0314a27: 種一。如レ是食ト住處ト欲レ斷樂レ斷欲レ修樂レ修。彼 T2251_.64.0314a28: 因二欲斷樂斷欲修樂修一。故不二自貴一。不レ賤レ他。 T2251_.64.0314a29: 如レ是事利不二懈怠一。而正知者。是謂レ止 ![]() T2251_.64.0314b01: 聖種一。阿難此四聖種。汝當下爲二諸少年比丘一。 T2251_.64.0314b02: 説以教 ![]() ![]() T2251_.64.0314b03: 種一者。彼便得二前隱一。得レ力得レ樂。身心不二煩
T2251_.64.0314b08: 者。謂床座氈褥眠單臥被 T2251_.64.0314b09: 橙等。故竝不レ違
T2251_.64.0314b14: 釋。是違 ![]() T2251_.64.0314b15: 修樂修一故。又集異門云。四有二苾芻一愛レ斷樂 T2251_.64.0314b16: レ斷。精勤勤隨學。於レ斷愛樂。愛レ修樂修。精勤隨 T2251_.64.0314b17: 學。於レ修愛樂
T2251_.64.0314b23: 欲界。而合二有無有愛一。後釋有對二無貪一。欲即 T2251_.64.0314b24: 貪。兩重持業釋。今云後釋爲レ善。初穿空。有 T2251_.64.0314b25: 欲貪對二無欲貪一之詞也。今只總示レ治レ貪。何 T2251_.64.0314b26: 可レ得二鑿空一。問。四依中藥不レ爲二聖種一耶。答。
T2251_.64.0314b29: 第四生二放逸一立レ之。藥能除レ病。故不レ立二聖 T2251_.64.0314c01: 種一。第五一切處。一切人。一切時。受用者立二
T2251_.64.0314c04: 三同二婆沙第四説一。第四五開 ![]()
![]() ![]()
T2251_.64.0314c09: 服一。故便起レ愛。由二乞食一故便起レ愛。由二床座一 T2251_.64.0314c10: 故便起レ愛。由二醫藥一故便起レ愛。正理師豈可レ T2251_.64.0314c11: 云三不レ説二於レ彼有愛生一。復中含雖三略レ藥二説樂
T2251_.64.0314c14: 衣服知レ足得レ好不レ喜。遇レ惡不レ憂。不染不著 T2251_.64.0314c15: 如レ所二禁忌一。精勤成 ![]() T2251_.64.0314c16: 第一知足住賢聖族一。從レ本至レ今。未二常惱亂一。 T2251_.64.0314c17: 諸天魔梵等人無二能毀罵一。飯食。床褥臥具。病 T2251_.64.0314c18: 痩醫藥。皆悉知足。亦復如レ是。依レ之大乘義
T2251_.64.0314c26: 蘊。即色受想行識取蘊。無有者。謂此五取蘊。
T2251_.64.0314c29: 後五蘊斷滅。於二有無有一諸貪。等貪執藏防護 T2251_.64.0315a01: 堅著染愛。是名下因二有無有一愛生上。依レ之現在 T2251_.64.0315a02: 五取蘊云レ有。未來五取蘊爲二無有一。未來中。
T2251_.64.0315a05: 分。謂願三當爲二藹羅筏挐大龍王等一。準レ之現 T2251_.64.0315a06: 未反レ前。而彼三界非二有常一。故云二無有一。貪之
T2251_.64.0315a09: 乎。則貪慕焉。大抵爲レ凡者之情爲レ爾。其厚 T2251_.64.0315a10: 薄雖二則異一。聖者亦猶病レ諸故。曰有與二無有一 T2251_.64.0315a11: 各有二愛生一。經義如レ此。普光所レ云。止レ謂二有愛 T2251_.64.0315a12: 無有愛一耳。此意得二此四物一名レ有。於レ無レ不 T2251_.64.0315a13: レ得。貪求云二無有一。自臆度妄解不レ足レ評矣。雖 T2251_.64.0315a14: レ爲二兩解一前釋爲レ勝。下文契經説二欲愛有愛 T2251_.64.0315a15: 無有愛三一中兩種。今除二前三一。餘一切愛名二 T2251_.64.0315a16: 有無有愛一。其義路別也
T2251_.64.0315a19: 又判爲三我與二我所一。又有二寛狹一。前三各治二一 T2251_.64.0315a20: 愛一。第四通治二四愛一。是故爲二異門一。有無有愛 T2251_.64.0315a21: 是愛二五取蘊積集我身一。故爲二我事一也。正理
T2251_.64.0315a25: レ有レ殊義無レ別故。由レ此我部毘婆沙師更約二 T2251_.64.0315a26: 異門一。釋二此文句一。我所ト我トノ執立以二欲名一。謂 T2251_.64.0315a27: 爲三暫息二我所執一故世尊説二前三聖種一。即於二 T2251_.64.0315a28: 衣等一。所生喜及彼増上所引聖道。爲二永滅除。 T2251_.64.0315a29: 及我事執一故。世尊説二第四聖種一。即樂二斷修一 T2251_.64.0315b01: 及彼増上所引聖道。皆名二聖種一。此門意顯
T2251_.64.0315b04: レ欲。何曲爲二有身見一
T2251_.64.0315b07: 別釋一。別中亦有レ二。不淨息念。息念中亦有 T2251_.64.0315b08: レ二。初正示。二有餘下明二治レ尋所以一。雖三修入 T2251_.64.0315b09: 門有二無量一。今約二極略一。故言二要門一。婆沙七十
T2251_.64.0315b15: 中無二不淨治 ![]() T2251_.64.0315b16: 表釋。不淨所簡故。又次第異レ前故。是故舊論 T2251_.64.0315b17: 依二何以故徴一。有二此兩師一。而光寶但云レ叙二異 T2251_.64.0315b18: 説一。未レ精無二所對本説一故。此兩師初約二縁多
T2251_.64.0315b23: 所治能治三科一。後中初正釋レ頌。後明二伏非 ![]() T2251_.64.0315b24: 斷。初中先釋二初句一。故應下釋二第二句一。文中 T2251_.64.0315b25: 瘀者。説文血積也。被食者。舊論曰。胮脹被食 T2251_.64.0315b26: 分散。鮮本作二彼食一非也。蛆者集韻千餘切。 T2251_.64.0315b27: 説文蠅乳肉中蟲也。本草云。蛆蠅之子。凡物 T2251_.64.0315b28: 敗臭則生レ之簡二子魚切音苴類篇螂蛆一。音釋 T2251_.64.0315b29: 特擧レ之。云二七徐切一。應音亦擧二此字一。云二肉中 T2251_.64.0315c01: 虫一。而彼作レ胆。字書音義同也。螂蛆者。爾雅 T2251_.64.0315c02: 註似レ蝗。而腹大長角能食二蛇腦一。故應者。上 T2251_.64.0315c03: 雙二通別一中。通治其益大。故云二故應一。且者對二 T2251_.64.0315c04: 別治一。寶疏分二文故應一非也
T2251_.64.0315c07: 者作意自在有二已熟未熟差別一。所縁亦有二自 T2251_.64.0315c08: 身小至レ海廣不同一。互相望即成二四句一。已熟人 T2251_.64.0315c09: 作意自在無量。故爲レ非二自在小一。未熟反レ之。 T2251_.64.0315c10: 唯縁二自身一。是所縁小。若乃至偏レ海所縁廣。 T2251_.64.0315c11: 已熟等四如レ次是四句。於二所縁中一唯擧二自 T2251_.64.0315c12: 身至海二一。次第是兩讀。配二上四一。光記作意 T2251_.64.0315c13: 爲二四位一。所縁爲レ二者非也。若約レ人作意亦 T2251_.64.0315c14: 唯二。謂已未故。若約二四句法一所縁亦成二四 T2251_.64.0315c15: 別一故。寶疏辨レ之。云下具足作レ文應 ![]()
![]() T2251_.64.0315c18: 作意中。二種亦同。何爲具作レ文。今云。作意 T2251_.64.0315c19: 雖二體同一。而次第殊。故具擧。亦令レ知三四句爲二 T2251_.64.0315c20: 四句一故。所縁非二唯二類同一。亦其次第同。故 T2251_.64.0315c21: 特略レ之。作意四定所縁可二兩讀一。理在二絶言一。 T2251_.64.0315c22: 寶釋未レ爲二其有 ![]() T2251_.64.0315c23: 相上故。頌疏述二四句一。第三第四句反倒可レ簡。
T2251_.64.0315c28: 單如レ次言者。今疏逆次寫誤。今論婆沙等即 T2251_.64.0315c29: 然。然光記第四句第二單句初。第一句後寶 T2251_.64.0316a01: 疏倶是倶非竝反倒。頌疏四句皆反倒。且第 T2251_.64.0316a02: 一句非二自在小一所縁小。是等竝皆疎略。若寫
![]() T2251_.64.0316a09: 倶是倶非決定。何者依二義兩偏。倶及絶一。以 T2251_.64.0316a10: 曉二法差別一故。若次第不定其義難レ曉。此爲二 T2251_.64.0316a11: 理證一。復此論已熟未熟。未熟已熟爲二四句一。若 T2251_.64.0316a12: 非二定兩單倶是倶非一。唯如レ是示レ法。何可レ成二
T2251_.64.0316a15: ○第二句○第三句○第四句。此亦唯擧二第 T2251_.64.0316a16: 一句詞一。若無二定法一。何令レ爾。此爲二教證一
T2251_.64.0316a21: 下合釋
![]() T2251_.64.0316a24: 安那般那念一。多修習者得二身止息及心止息一。 T2251_.64.0316a25: 有覺有觀。寂滅純一明分想。修習滿足。又
T2251_.64.0316a28: 譽一。成二大果一。諸善普具得二甘露味一。至二無爲處一。 T2251_.64.0316a29: 一法者。謂念安般。廣説二觀相一。此略云二念安
T2251_.64.0316b04: 那者持去。亦名二阿濕婆娑一。阿濕婆娑念者憶
T2251_.64.0316b10: 是出息。泰云。唐云二持息來持息去一故。婆沙
T2251_.64.0316b13: レ風入レ内名二持來一。引風出レ外名二持出一。舊婆沙
T2251_.64.0316b16: 一遣字誤也。當レ作レ持。然如二圓暉一未レ考。而妄 T2251_.64.0316b17: 謂下論云二令入令出一。光記遣是令義上。改二上持一
T2251_.64.0316b20: 波那云二出息一是也。此約レ義云二數息一。數二從レ一 T2251_.64.0316b21: 至 ![]() T2251_.64.0316b22: 息一。是亦就二法體一之義翻。準二上泰釋一。可レ知非二
T2251_.64.0316b25: 名二身行一。按諸師依二雜心文一。以譯二持來持去一。 T2251_.64.0316b26: 雖レ非二大遠一。而不二近親一。今云二持息念一。舊論擧 T2251_.64.0316b27: レ梵。云二阿那波那念一。今又云。阿那謂持息入。 T2251_.64.0316b28: 阿波那謂持息出。依レ之應レ翻二持息入持息 T2251_.64.0316b29: 出一也。持是念作用。次下云二念力持一是也。顯
T2251_.64.0316c03: 者。謂能持去。此言意顯三入息出息有二能持
T2251_.64.0316c08: 息念一學。準レ之亦是念持義。應レ言二持息入持
T2251_.64.0316c11: 即縮 ![]()
T2251_.64.0316c14: 風。謂諸有情處二胎卵位一。先於二臍處一業生レ風。 T2251_.64.0316c15: 起穿レ身成レ穴。如二藕根莖一。最初有レ風。來 ![]() T2251_.64.0316c16: 内一。乘二茲口鼻下。餘風續入。此初及後名二入息 T2251_.64.0316c17: 風一。此入息風適至二身内一。有レ風續出名二出息
T2251_.64.0316c20: 已按レ之。其風還出。入息出息次第亦然。理實 T2251_.64.0316c21: 此風無レ入無レ出。但如レ是轉能損 ![]() T2251_.64.0316c22: 道中。假名二入出一。入息轉位能逐二身中腐敗汚 T2251_.64.0316c23: 垢諸臭穢物一。増 ![]() T2251_.64.0316c24: 時。能除二欝蒸一。損 ![]() T2251_.64.0316c25: 者。謂有二別風一。是欲爲レ先。展轉所レ引。發語心
T2251_.64.0316c28: 鼓 ![]() ![]() T2251_.64.0316c29: 顯二名句文一造色自性上。此居二口内一。名二語亦業一。 T2251_.64.0317a01: 流 ![]()
![]() T2251_.64.0317a04: レ有二慈心一。貪引レ火生焚二身等一故。除棄風者。謂 T2251_.64.0317a05: 有二別風一。隨二便路一行。能蠲二二穢一。由二穢内逼一。 T2251_.64.0317a06: 有二苦受生一。由二苦受生一。發二除棄欲一。由二除棄欲一。 T2251_.64.0317a07: 引二起レ風心一。此心起レ風。成二除棄業一。又此風力
T2251_.64.0317a10: 不レ依レ心。但依二業力一。隨二身孔隙一。自然流行。 T2251_.64.0317a11: 由レ此能除下依二孔隙一住腐敗汚垢諸臭穢物上。 T2251_.64.0317a12: 動身風者。謂有二別風一。能撃二動身一。引 ![]() T2251_.64.0317a13: 應レ知此起以レ心爲レ因。遍二諸身支一。能爲二撃動一。 T2251_.64.0317a14: 因レ顯二風義一。乘辨二六風一。然於二此中一。正明二二
![]() ![]() T2251_.64.0317a18: 至心胸一。復至二臍輪一。復漸漸遍二諸肢節一。有説
T2251_.64.0317a21: 不レ能レ開二毛孔一故。應レ作二是説一。有レ業生レ風開二
T2251_.64.0317a26: 囀助勢一。念力者。念有レ力。能持レ息故。慧觀二此 T2251_.64.0317a27: 念所レ持息一。爲レ境云二觀此爲境一。是則念因時。 T2251_.64.0317a28: 増勝法。故名二持息念一。不レ稱二持息惠一。以下無二念 T2251_.64.0317a29: 助力一。則無二明記一故。不 ![]() T2251_.64.0317a30: 云レ釋二自性一非也
T2251_.64.0317b03: 持者。念能持レ息。由レ此慧於レ境所作成。光師
![]()
T2251_.64.0317b08: 故。二背二次上持息念名一故。三所例念住有二
T2251_.64.0317b12: レ性。應レ名二慧住一。而名二念住一。故今具辨二得名所 T2251_.64.0317b13: 以一。持能持。息息風。所持依二所持息一。息之持 T2251_.64.0317b14: 依主。持息即念持業釋。是他念名。今取以名 T2251_.64.0317b15: レ慧。是全取隣近釋也
T2251_.64.0317b20: 捨故顯レ非二上三根本一。後謂苦下別示。此有 T2251_.64.0317b21: レ二。初明下與二欲界苦樂一不中相應上。此何故知二欲 T2251_.64.0317b22: 界文一。雖二尋欲界初定一。以二苦唯欲界一故。後喜 T2251_.64.0317b23: 樂下明下與二色界喜樂一不 ![]() ![]() T2251_.64.0317b24: 色界三根本一。色界無二憂苦一故。前明二欲界一依二 T2251_.64.0317b25: 三受門一。云二苦樂。攝二憂喜一。今依二五受門一云二喜 T2251_.64.0317b26: 樂一。初二定是喜無レ樂第三定意地樂故。殊 T2251_.64.0317b27: 云二喜樂一。問。一雙所由。一三受門。一五受門。 T2251_.64.0317b28: 何忽相雜。不レ云二喜樂一。應レ言二色界樂受一。退按二 T2251_.64.0317b29: 論旨一。光寶等依二現文一。致二欲色辨一。然於二論文一 T2251_.64.0317c01: 全無二其語一。何況忽可レ雜二二法相一。正理。顯宗 T2251_.64.0317c02: 唯約二尋治一因一。若爾唯依二三受門一説二二因一。 T2251_.64.0317c03: 隨レ應簡別。此中喜字。苦誤也。故舊論十六
T2251_.64.0317c06: 此中約レ苦
T2251_.64.0317c09: 不レ異二寶疏一。猶如二前段不淨觀光寶一爾。見レ寶
T2251_.64.0317c12: 次内門轉故。復次内地轉故。復次極寂靜故。 T2251_.64.0317c13: 息反レ之則不レ轉。二世友云。第四上得二轉依一。 T2251_.64.0317c14: 故所依身微妙大種令二諸毛孔一切密合一無二 T2251_.64.0317c15: 竅隙一。故非二息所依一。三大徳云。入二第四靜慮一。 T2251_.64.0317c16: 心便不レ轉。身亦不レ轉。是故息不二復轉一。四尊 T2251_.64.0317c17: 者妙音説第四定一切麁重。皆息滅。故息不二 T2251_.64.0317c18: 復轉一
T2251_.64.0317c27: 倒一故。又如是觀顯下於二生死一先入後出上。非二顛 T2251_.64.0317c28: 倒一故。又如二寶所引正理一
T2251_.64.0318a03: 散謂亂。散謂二其廣逸一。舊論曰。畏二心略及亂一。 T2251_.64.0318a04: 是故不レ少不レ多。恣鮮本。及正理。顯宗。竝作 T2251_.64.0318a05: レ恐爲レ正。舊論等如レ次可レ知
T2251_.64.0318a08: 無二次第一。故云二亂數一。雜心。正理。亦取二第二説一。 T2251_.64.0318a09: 同二此論一。問。名既雜亂。約二入出一。是息體非レ數。
T2251_.64.0318a13: 數。此三種今三失。五淨數。文如二上引一。今正 T2251_.64.0318a14: 數
T2251_.64.0318a20: 彼彼切。股外曰二 T2251_.64.0318a21: 切一。 T2251_.64.0318a22: 也 T2251_.64.0318a23: 一磔一尋 應音云。磔知格切。通俗文張申 T2251_.64.0318a24: 曰レ磔。廣雅張也。開也。婆沙二十六。舊倶舍 T2251_.64.0318a25: 十六音釋。竝曰二陟格切。張申曰 ![]() T2251_.64.0318a26: 正理六十音釋。曰二側格切一。側應二
T2251_.64.0318b01: 禮地官註曰。八尺曰レ尋。倍レ尋曰レ常。小爾雅 T2251_.64.0318b02: 四尺謂二之仞一。倍レ仞謂二之尋一
T2251_.64.0318b05: 山間風。眞諦師云。言二吠嵐一者。此云二恒起一。即 T2251_.64.0318b06: 是運 ![]() T2251_.64.0318b07: 作二毘藍婆一。或旋藍婆。或鞞嵐婆。或隨藍婆。 T2251_.64.0318b08: 皆梵之楚夏。此云二迅猛風一也。瑜倫記此云二 T2251_.64.0318b09: 旋風一。即是蘇迷盧山間旋嵐猛風也。正理彈二
![]() T2251_.64.0318b13: 爲二一貫一。如何支離。謂一觀息住身句。不レ順二 T2251_.64.0318b14: 上義一。既結云二安止其心一。此句徒然。二珠中縷 T2251_.64.0318b15: 喩。全不レ曉二隨處安止一。鼻眉足等是不定。中 T2251_.64.0318b16: 縷是一貫故。三爲冷等二句。全非二止義一。無二 T2251_.64.0318b17: 止相一故。依レ之思レ之。觀息住身等法喩二句。 T2251_.64.0318b18: 於二是止中一示二異説一。故結外更有二此標一。是念一三 T2251_.64.0318b19: 息遍二身中一。如三縷遍二珠中一。如レ是而文義法譬 T2251_.64.0318b20: 順曉。於二觀息上一寫 ![]()
T2251_.64.0318b23: 住レ心觀三息遍二住身中一。如二珠中縷一。舊婆沙二
T2251_.64.0318b26: 止義一。以レ何知レ之。婆沙釋レ觀曰。觀者謂此息 T2251_.64.0318b27: 風。若至二口鼻一。能審觀察若至二咽喉一。亦審觀 T2251_.64.0318b28: 察。如レ是展轉乃至足指。亦審觀察。觀二息風一 T2251_.64.0318b29: 已。復作二是念一。此風聚中有二四大一。能生二諸造 T2251_.64.0318c01: 色一。此造色是心心所所依止一。如レ是於二兼觀一 T2251_.64.0318c02: 有二觀相一。於二正觀一應三必有二觀相一。故此爲冷等。
![]() T2251_.64.0318c05: 不下但以二風大一爲レ境。四大。及所造色。心。及心
T2251_.64.0318c08: 本一改 ![]()
T2251_.64.0318c16: 故。未二名爲一淨。盡智起後方名爲レ淨。此三説 T2251_.64.0318c17: 中。初説順決擇已上爲レ淨。已下爲轉。第二 T2251_.64.0318c18: 説約二漏無漏位一分レ之。第三説約二煩惱有無一。 T2251_.64.0318c19: 未レ得二盡智一已來煩惱不二斷盡一。移轉昇進非二 T2251_.64.0318c20: 極淨一故。今擧二後兩説一。初説不レ應レ理。故不レ擧 T2251_.64.0318c21: レ之。轉淨差別不レ成故
T2251_.64.0318c27: レ三。初標立次以生下擧二不轉四事一爲レ由。後 T2251_.64.0318c28: 謂要下明下由二三縁一息轉上成二上義一。此中轉者
T2251_.64.0319a04: レ開。唯有二息地麁心現前一。雖レ有二三事一。而缺二一 T2251_.64.0319a05: 事一。故息不レ轉。謂要下雖二婆沙息所依身。及 T2251_.64.0319a06: 風道通。毛孔開。入出息地麁心現前四縁一。今 T2251_.64.0319a07: 合爲二三縁一。謂身中息所依身。合二風道毛孔 T2251_.64.0319a08: 開一云二孔隙一。毛孔開必風道通故。第三縁易 T2251_.64.0319a09: レ知。然寶疏云二二縁一未レ及。頌疏分二孔隙一爲 T2251_.64.0319a10: レ二。謂孔風道通。隙毛孔。開是過當。豈可レ分二 T2251_.64.0319a11: 孔隙一。同是空隙義故。故舊論但言二已有 ![]()
T2251_.64.0319a16: 家一。彼初説云。欲レ入二第四定一。息風後出不二復 T2251_.64.0319a17: 更入一。名二已入 ![]() T2251_.64.0319a18: 入已。名二已出定一。言第四定本無レ息。故將レ入 T2251_.64.0319a19: レ彼。息最後出已。若又將レ出二彼定一息他來。故 T2251_.64.0319a20: 息先入也
T2251_.64.0319a23: 矣。雖二離レ身出 ![]()
![]()
T2251_.64.0319b02: 理云。身増長位息便損減。身損減時息増長 T2251_.64.0319b03: 故。今擧二一邊一。二簡二異熟生一。初總簡。二所由。 T2251_.64.0319b04: 三簡二餘異熟色一。彼不二斷已更相續一故。不レ云二 T2251_.64.0319b05: 刹那實一者。理在二絶言一。相續故非二刹那一。斷已 T2251_.64.0319b06: 後續。是無常法非二無爲實法一故
T2251_.64.0319b09: 非二下地心能縁一。亦非二威儀及反化等心能縁一 T2251_.64.0319b10: 寛政十午天七月於二京兆因幡藥師西之 T2251_.64.0319b11: 坊一此卷五席講訖 快道 T2251_.64.0319b12: 阿毘達磨倶舍論卷二十二終 T2251_.64.0319b13: T2251_.64.0319b14: T2251_.64.0319b15: T2251_.64.0319b16: T2251_.64.0319b17: 豐山上陽沙門快道林常記 T2251_.64.0319b18: 賢聖品第六之二
T2251_.64.0319b21: 形誤。光師科二第三一非也。七加行中。上來明二 T2251_.64.0319b22: 一五停心一畢。自下第二念住。何爲二第三一。又 T2251_.64.0319b23: 不レ順二結前生後論一也
T2251_.64.0319b29: 疏所引文是也。後説光記所引説是也。彼後 T2251_.64.0319c01: 説全同二今文共相一。光爲レ正也。前説身相同大 T2251_.64.0319c02: 種所造。同共相。全異二今論一。然寶疏廣擧レ之。 T2251_.64.0319c03: 是何謂乎其自相竝皆不レ異也
T2251_.64.0319c06: 法。何三餘唯名レ法。答。總即別名如二法處法
T2251_.64.0319c10: 是心念住。受蘊所レ不レ攝無色ト法處トヲ名二法 T2251_.64.0319c11: 念住一
![]() T2251_.64.0319c15: 刹那一。分 ![]()
T2251_.64.0319c18: 傳説云二彼説一。光無表兩釋。第二爲レ正。順二婆 T2251_.64.0319c19: 沙。雜心。正理一故。無爲兩釋。初釋爲レ正。亦順 T2251_.64.0319c20: レ彼故
T2251_.64.0319c29: 同。小乘唯慧爲二自性一。今大乘者。兼 ![]()
Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote:
|