大正蔵検索 INBUDS
|
阿毘達磨倶舍論法義 (No. 2251_ 快道撰 ) in Vol. 64 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:有/無] [CITE]
T2251_.64.0279a01: 故亦名レ記。令三彼問者得二正解一故。或有二默然 T2251_.64.0279a02: 於二理得勝。況酬二彼問一而非レ記耶。廣引二外道
T2251_.64.0279a12: 應レ記。雖二復有言以二遮止一故名二置記一。或有二 T2251_.64.0279a13: 默然一。於レ理得レ勝亦名二置記一。如下婆莠羅默然
T2251_.64.0279a17: 對二反詰一非也。寶疏云レ但得二論意一矣。此難者 T2251_.64.0279a18: 謂二雙問一。故云二亦勝亦劣一
T2251_.64.0279a21: 義門一容レ有二二記一。謂一分別記。二反詰記。今 T2251_.64.0279a22: 據二一邊一爲二反詰記一。汝難二應一向記一全不レ知二 T2251_.64.0279a23: 問意一。後解釋文一。然彼問者一向爲二將レ爲レ勝 T2251_.64.0279a24: 將レ爲レ劣問一。不レ爲二亦勝亦劣問一。雖レ有二爲勝爲 T2251_.64.0279a25: 劣二語一而意但各一途。謂爲字所レ顯唯勝唯
T2251_.64.0279a29: 不レ尋二問意一直據二事法一應レ成二分別答一。謂望レ天 T2251_.64.0279b01: 是劣。望レ下是勝。今但欲レ尋二問者所方故。 T2251_.64.0279b02: 反詰言レ爲二何所方一。寶疏得二論意一。然爲下先 T2251_.64.0279b03: 作二反詰一後分別記上者若可レ然也。光記解釋 T2251_.64.0279b04: 大誤也。有云。正理論通二此難一但言二爲勝一 T2251_.64.0279b05: 不レ言レ劣。而言レ説二一爲聲一云レ不二雙問一。準レ彼 T2251_.64.0279b06: 此人問レ爲レ勝。此人問レ爲レ劣。非三一人問二爲勝 T2251_.64.0279b07: 爲劣二一。故論文言二一向爲問。詳曰。泥二正理 T2251_.64.0279b08: 文一。彼爲レ令レ知レ非二一體兩用雙問一但約二爲勝 T2251_.64.0279b09: 一邊一。然非レ不レ問二爲勝爲劣一。雖レ問二爲勝爲劣一 T2251_.64.0279b10: 然是意各別問。若爲レ勝則唯勝。爲レ劣亦爾。 T2251_.64.0279b11: 學者可レ思
T2251_.64.0279b15: 心等一決二二三差別一。今全擧二婆沙義一。然光。寶 T2251_.64.0279b16: 前章爲二毘婆沙義一。此爲二本論師一非也
T2251_.64.0279b19: 初説唯指事別。於レ義不レ違レ經。彼對法師義。 T2251_.64.0279b20: 二三差別難レ辨。倶反詰故。問。亦同唯請レ説 T2251_.64.0279b21: 於二内心一分二直諂一。是唯自立非二經意一。豈一切 T2251_.64.0279b22: 人可レ得下知二内心一答此。故殊論主依二經説一 T2251_.64.0279b23: 斥レ彼。此一段皆是契經文。云二依經一故。舊論
T2251_.64.0279b29: 共説一若使三此賢者一向論不二一向答一者。分 T2251_.64.0279c01: 別論不二分別答一者。詰論不二詰答一者。止論不二 T2251_.64.0279c02: 止答一者。如レ是此賢者不レ得二共説一亦不レ得二共 T2251_.64.0279c03: 論一。若使二此賢者一向論便一向答一者。分別論 T2251_.64.0279c04: 分別答者。詰論詰答者。止論止答者。如レ是此 T2251_.64.0279c05: 賢者得二共説一亦得二共論一。次復處二非處住。所
T2251_.64.0279c08: 四事觀察一而示二四問記一。其相同二此經一。彼多
T2251_.64.0279c17: T2251_.64.0279c18: T2251_.64.0279c19: T2251_.64.0279c20: 豐山寓居上毛沙門快道記 T2251_.64.0279c21: 隨眠品第五之二
T2251_.64.0279c24: 相惑一。後二句約二共相惑一。自相惑中。初二句 T2251_.64.0279c25: 明二過現意相應一。次三句明二未來六識相應。未 T2251_.64.0279c26: 斷言與二能繫言一各通二中間五處一。貪瞋慢言 T2251_.64.0279c27: 與二意五字一能所相應互影發。一若言隨レ應 T2251_.64.0279c28: 通レ下。一未來言流二次二句一
T2251_.64.0280a06: 結。二迷二自相一。謂愛。恚。慢。嫉。慳結。簡レ彼故 T2251_.64.0280a07: 言レ且。諸者。非一義。煩惱六故。故言レ諸。總者。
T2251_.64.0280a12: 散釋明不二別可釋。而釋二未斷一一令三人準二思 T2251_.64.0280a13: 能繫未來等亦如是。故據レ初殊擧二未斷一
T2251_.64.0280a16: 初正明。後所由。已生簡二未生一。未斷簡二已斷一。 T2251_.64.0280a17: 謂前未レ生設生已斷即不レ繫。故於二現在一無二 T2251_.64.0280a18: 未斷言一者。既體現前。約二未斷一者。理在二絶言一。 T2251_.64.0280a19: 故且略レ之。或準二過去一可レ知。故頌文言二未斷 T2251_.64.0280a20: 過現一。舊論曰。過去現在欲瞋慢。是處已起乃
T2251_.64.0280a25: 爲通二此疑一有二所由釋一。一以三貪瞋慢自相惑 T2251_.64.0280a26: 非レ如二共相遍行一故。二雖レ繫二三世一。以レ非下三 T2251_.64.0280a27: 界諸有情決定遍起繫二三世諸有漏法一盡上故。 T2251_.64.0280a28: 是簡二未來遍行一。彼婆沙總説不レ論二盡不盡一 T2251_.64.0280a29: 故不レ言レ遍。是故論唯言三能繫二此事一。與二共相
T2251_.64.0280b03: 世縛下。何以故。非三不見不聞不分別事起二貪 T2251_.64.0280b04: 瞋慢一。何以故。分齊縁故。或時有レ人於レ眼 T2251_.64.0280b05: 生レ貪。非二餘身分一。何以故。自相使故。非下貪等
T2251_.64.0280b08: 來中未盡非レ不レ繋二未來一也。光記於遍存二兩 T2251_.64.0280b09: 種一以簡釋。全非二論意一。此論遍二三世有漏法一 T2251_.64.0280b10: 盡名二遍行一。故言二遍於三世一。能縛三世。遍縛 T2251_.64.0280b11: 三世一。非下唯繫二三世一名中遍行上。何況遍二自境一。寶
T2251_.64.0280b22: 正理一。法寶於レ此所纒二歴六小七大七等多端一 T2251_.64.0280b23: 忘却讀二正理一。光記下引二正理一不レ謬也。問。 T2251_.64.0280b24: 論文於二未來一分二意五一。於レ此不レ爲豈非二通レ六 T2251_.64.0280b25: 文勢常規一。解云。既説レ慢無レ五理在二絶言一。 T2251_.64.0280b26: 故無二意言簡一。又頌云二未來意遍行一。前二句 T2251_.64.0280b27: 即意自顯成。應二依レ義不依レ文。問。是繫二三 T2251_.64.0280b28: 世一於レ文無レ驗何。解云。既言二非定遍一顯三不定 T2251_.64.0280b29: 繫二三世一。又望二下自世及遍行一。是顯示非二自 T2251_.64.0280c01: 世一亦非二遍行一而但繫中三世上。顯宗論二十六
T2251_.64.0280c04: 未斷一。此未斷言應レ成二無用一。無二無用過一。此未 T2251_.64.0280c05: 斷言顯レ有二品別漸次斷一故。即於二此論次下 T2251_.64.0280c06: 文中一。亦説二未來意遍行等一。謂彼貪等九品 T2251_.64.0280c07: 不レ同。修道斷時九品別斷。有下縁二此事一上品 T2251_.64.0280c08: 隨眠已起已滅已得永斷。彼於二此事一尙有二未 T2251_.64.0280c09: 來餘品隨眠未起未滅未得永斷一猶能爲繫。 T2251_.64.0280c10: 是故本論於二此義中一雖レ説二未來愛等所繫一。而 T2251_.64.0280c11: 於二過去一説二未斷言一。故未斷言深成二有用一。然
T2251_.64.0280c16: 引九結婆沙一。令三此段通二六識一。過現意繫二過 T2251_.64.0280c17: 現一等上。依レ義皆思簡
T2251_.64.0280c20: 是過現及未來兩段而非二識五意分莭一。故於 T2251_.64.0280c21: レ此言レ若無二五識上一。未來意地生不生竝皆 T2251_.64.0280c22: 繫二三世一。故言二乃至未斷一。不三別言二已生未斷一。
T2251_.64.0281a03: 唯簡二過現一。以二五若已生唯現量縁一。是故可生 T2251_.64.0281a04: 亦唯未來。可生既唯未來。已生唯現。已滅唯
T2251_.64.0281a07: 去一至レ現亦爾。義准若與二意識一相應可生隨
T2251_.64.0281a12: 諸與二五識一相應隨眠。若定不生亦縛二三世一。 T2251_.64.0281a13: 謂彼境界。或在二未來一。或在二現在一。或在二過去一。 T2251_.64.0281a14: 彼雖三已得二畢竟不生一。而未斷時性能繫縛。
T2251_.64.0281a17: 未來一。次流在レ現。後滅落遮。境已渉二三世一故 T2251_.64.0281a18: 名二繫三世一。由レ是須レ知二縁與レ繫別一。雖二是不 T2251_.64.0281a19: 縁而即能繫。若眼識不レ得二縁闕不生一。隨レ境 T2251_.64.0281a20: 渉二三世一繫二自世一。然得二永不生一。常居二未來一。雖
T2251_.64.0281a23: 參差三世一。如下有二眼識一定縁二靑黃赤色三境一 T2251_.64.0281a24: 而起上。隨闕二一境一識即不レ生。其所闕境。或一 T2251_.64.0281a25: 未來。或一現在。或一過去。故説三五識遍縛二三
T2251_.64.0281a29: 境異時渉歴三世一。後三境同時居二未現過位一。 T2251_.64.0281b01: 詳曰。前解爲レ勝。以二決定一故。後解未也。不定 T2251_.64.0281b02: 而少分。一識同時多境豈是論意
T2251_.64.0281b05: 由準レ前可レ知。現在中言二正縁一者。顯示縁境 T2251_.64.0281b06: T2251_.64.0281b07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281b08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281b09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281b10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281b11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281b12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281b13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281b14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281b15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281b16: [IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0281b19: 爲二生起一。湛惠云。寶疏爲レ優。符順正理及舊
T2251_.64.0281b24: 論レ此。正理亦爾。爲二頌廣顯一於レ前略述。舊論 T2251_.64.0281b25: 却屬二後段一之證。曰毘婆沙師成立一切有爲 T2251_.64.0281b26: 法非二常住一。由下與二行相一相應上故。彼成立此
T2251_.64.0281c02: 必現量。現正縁レ色唯繫二現色事一。若意識現在 T2251_.64.0281c03: 前。正縁二過未境一即繫二過未一。餘一切準レ此應 T2251_.64.0281c04: レ知 T2251_.64.0281c05: T2251_.64.0281c06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281c07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281c08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281c09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281c10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281c11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281c12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281c13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281c14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281c15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0281c16: [IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0281c21: 初一有二彼結前一。是幷頌前生起。汝但見二頌前 T2251_.64.0281c22: 片文一可レ笑矣。此中爲レ五。初經部兩關徴責。 T2251_.64.0281c23: 二有部略答。三生起頌文一。四擧レ頌。五長行」
T2251_.64.0281c27: 觀察已。不レ顧二過去色一。不レ欣二未來色一。於二現在 T2251_.64.0281c28: 色一厭離。欲滅寂靜。受想行識亦復如レ是。次 T2251_.64.0281c29: 廣約二三世一説。今現在極成。故但引二過未文一。 T2251_.64.0282a01: 光記作二兩解一。第一爲レ正。順二本經一故。後釋分二 T2251_.64.0282a02: 厭與捨大鑿也。經文既云レ已。又無二求言一故。 T2251_.64.0282a03: 惠暉過去色定共別解脱戒。未來色定道二 T2251_.64.0282a04: 戒。未レ檢二本經一坐以談レ妄。彼總約二五蘊一説。 T2251_.64.0282a05: 定唯戒色
T2251_.64.0282a11: 亦從レ光
T2251_.64.0282a21: 可レ得レ用。彼婆沙前文亦有レ同二此論一。學者得二 T2251_.64.0282a22: 造者意一勿レ纒二他文一
T2251_.64.0282a25: 相上。二以設下二擧レ頌示二所以一。三謂若下正 T2251_.64.0282a26: 簡二別部宗一有レ二。初擧二有部宗一。先擧二所説一。後 T2251_.64.0282a27: 方許下判屬宗一。二若人下擧二相濫一簡別。先 T2251_.64.0282a28: 擧二所説一。後彼可下簡別。此一章文易意難レ探。
T2251_.64.0282b02: 由執説一切有許 釋曰。若人説二一切有一。 T2251_.64.0282b03: 謂過去未來現在虚空擇滅非擇滅。許三彼爲二 T2251_.64.0282b04: 説一切有部一。復有二餘人一。説下現世法必有。過 T2251_.64.0282b05: 去業若未二與果一是有。若過去業已與果。及未 T2251_.64.0282b06: 來無レ果此皆是無上。若如レ是分別故説二三世 T2251_.64.0282b07: 有一。此人非二説一切有部攝一。是説分別部所攝
T2251_.64.0282b11: 位其體猶有。果イヽ若熟已其體便無。如外種 T2251_.64.0282b12: 子芽未レ生位其體猶有。芽若生已其體更無
T2251_.64.0282b19: 謂尊者法救説二類有異。尊者妙音説二相有 T2251_.64.0282b20: 異。尊者世友説二位有異。尊者覺天説二待
T2251_.64.0282b23: 無レ擧レ名。唯示二所立四別一。諸論竝讃二世友説一 T2251_.64.0282b24: 揑二餘三一。今論亦同レ彼。非二是論主創評決一
T2251_.64.0282b29: 色一。正理。顯宗及鮮本作レ體。詳曰。作レ體爲レ正。 T2251_.64.0282c01: 論主欲レ令二二喩有別改用二金喩一。故舊論曰 T2251_.64.0282c02: レ物。取二二喩一其意應レ知
T2251_.64.0282c06: 能鳴一。或能宣唱故號二能鳴一。準レ彼今就レ體其 T2251_.64.0282c07: 音聲體是妙故
T2251_.64.0282c10: 意。過去相。現在相。未來相爲二一類世相不
T2251_.64.0282c13: 云。相謂相狀。非二生等四相一。爲レ勝也。光記亦 T2251_.64.0282c14: 釋レ合有二兩釋一。後釋非也。一蛇畫二有用無用 T2251_.64.0282c15: 足一故。二未來相有レ用不レ成故
T2251_.64.0282c18: 名也。姬亦女宦也。秩比二二千石一。位次二婕妤 T2251_.64.0282c19: 下一。左傳。以媵二秦穆姬一。杜預曰。送レ女曰レ媵。媵 T2251_.64.0282c20: 送也。寄也。公羊傳云。媵者何。諸侯一國。則二 T2251_.64.0282c21: 國媵レ之以二姪娣一從。釋名云。姪娣曰レ媵。媵承 T2251_.64.0282c22: 也。承事適レ他也。今三品曰レ姬。五品曰レ媵是
T2251_.64.0282c29: 名二現在一。詳曰。婆沙既倶時名二現在一。準レ彼 T2251_.64.0283a01: 現在爲レ本。從二前後一待對。一女喩如レ是。而婆 T2251_.64.0283a02: 沙七十六判二三世差別一有二十七復次一。第十四 T2251_.64.0283a03: 復次全同正理一。竝無レ有レ妨。但是通別遠近 T2251_.64.0283a04: 異
T2251_.64.0283a07: 簡一者非也。是自レ古對法宗評簡如レ是故。此
T2251_.64.0283a10: 婆沙破亦不レ異レ此。彼細述レ理。此總云二數論 T2251_.64.0283a11: 朋一。若欲二爲レ朋所以一應レ如二婆沙一。而文言各別
T2251_.64.0283a14: 歴二三世一時法隱法顯。但説下諸法行二於世一時。 T2251_.64.0283a15: 體相雖レ同而性類異上。此與二尊者世友一分同。
T2251_.64.0283a18: 乳酪喩豈爲レ不レ然。又三世流入而未來有 T2251_.64.0283a19: レ滅過去有二生類一。是同二數論性常用轉變一。何 T2251_.64.0283a20: 云レ不レ同。若言下分同二世友一不可レ破。餘師亦 T2251_.64.0283a21: 有二分同一。謂體不レ異竝同故
T2251_.64.0283a24: 貪現行成就倶有上。雜心云。於二一色一愛著亦行 T2251_.64.0283a25: 亦成就。於レ餘成就而不レ行。是故彼説世亂。 T2251_.64.0283a26: 譬亦相違
T2251_.64.0283a29: 也。光記爲二小科一得。入二前段一不也。寶疏入二後 T2251_.64.0283b01: 段一得。爲二第四一非也。於レ中有レ五。一經部難。 T2251_.64.0283b02: 二有部答。三經部重徴。四有部通。五經部難 T2251_.64.0283b03: 絶。此是初也。此三世實有已具知下有二四師差 T2251_.64.0283b04: 別一。及世友約位爲善。彼世友約レ位義應二更 T2251_.64.0283b05: 復分別思惟而説一。難云。汝去來世應レ名二現 T2251_.64.0283b06: 在一。執二體實有一故。如下正有二作用一時上。如二馬角 T2251_.64.0283b07: 等一或汝去來世應レ非二去來世一。執二體實有一故。 T2251_.64.0283b08: 如二汝現在一
T2251_.64.0283b11: 類因異熟因等既極成能與果。以二能與果一 T2251_.64.0283b12: 應レ許レ有二作用一。如レ是過去有二作用一亦應レ名二 T2251_.64.0283b13: 現在一。若爾世相應二雜亂一。又若救言下彼唯與果 T2251_.64.0283b14: 無レ有二取果一。取與不レ具故非難。已彼過去有二 T2251_.64.0283b15: 取與中與果半作用一。由レ是過去世法無二作用一 T2251_.64.0283b16: 邊名二過去一。有二與果用一邊名二現在一。若爾世相 T2251_.64.0283b17: 應レ雜。有半作用一句是遮レ救。若述レ上文鄭 T2251_.64.0283b18: 重失。既過去作用成。即雜亂故。由レ是舊論
T2251_.64.0283b21: 相一相雜。光記得二論意一。便於二有半作用前一致二 T2251_.64.0283b22: 亦應名現在結一。寶疏未レ得二論意一。替レ既作レ唯。 T2251_.64.0283b23: 以二現在異熟因一添二蛇足一。誤二半作用文一以鑿。 T2251_.64.0283b24: 不レ忍レ視レ之也。若隨二現在法中一。唯或取果或 T2251_.64.0283b25: 與果多有レ之。如何以二彼一一得レ致二雜亂難一。又 T2251_.64.0283b26: 若如二汝言一。彼正理師何不レ救二此理一。彼論五
T2251_.64.0283b29: 何作用一。若謂二彼能取果與果一。是則過去同類 T2251_.64.0283c01: 因等既能與果。應レ有二作用一。有二半作用一世相 T2251_.64.0283c02: 應レ雜。此難都由レ不レ了二法性一。諸法勢力總有二 T2251_.64.0283c03: 二種一。一名二作用一。二謂二功能一。引果功能名爲二 T2251_.64.0283c04: 作用一。非三唯作用總攝二功能一。亦有三功能異二於 T2251_.64.0283c05: 作用一。且闇中眼見レ色功能。爲二闇所違一非レ違二 T2251_.64.0283c06: 作用一。謂有三闇障違二見功能一。故眼闇中不レ能 T2251_.64.0283c07: レ見色。引果作用非二闇所違一。故眼闇中亦能 T2251_.64.0283c08: 引果。無二現在位作用有闕。現在唯依二作用一 T2251_.64.0283c09: 立故。諸作用滅不レ至二無爲一。於二餘性生一能爲二 T2251_.64.0283c10: 因性一。此非二作用一但是功能。唯現在時能引 T2251_.64.0283c11: レ果故。無爲不レ能レ引二自果一故。唯引二自果一名二
T2251_.64.0283c16: レ救。是一己新立今就二功能作用無別毘婆沙 T2251_.64.0283c17: 宗一以加二彈斥一。若如二汝言一違背婆沙百十六
T2251_.64.0283c22: 宗論顚末之法。舊論頌異レ此而長行同。彼十
T2251_.64.0283c27: 中初三句經部破二有部一。終一句有部唱二法性 T2251_.64.0283c28: 難思一。光記用字通二上下一者非也。唯屬レ下不 T2251_.64.0283c29: レ可レ通レ上。義善顯故。若不レ爾者何不レ言二何礙 T2251_.64.0284a01: レ用用何一。故舊論無二用言一。而唯牒釋何礙二 T2251_.64.0284a02: 字一。次牒釋此云何三字一
T2251_.64.0284a11: 正礙力難。三擧二衆縁救一破。此中初應説言 T2251_.64.0284a12: 蒙二能起作用一。故應説下有二若言一。舊論十四
T2251_.64.0284a17: 別一。此能成作用亦有二三世一。其去來今誰令二去 T2251_.64.0284a18: 來今一。若有二別作用一令三作用成二去來今一重重 T2251_.64.0284a19: 無窮。舊論別有二頌文一破レ救
T2251_.64.0284a22: 非二去來今一。無二別能成作用一故。而是有非レ無。 T2251_.64.0284a23: 二則無下經部破。若非二去來今一則無爲故應二 T2251_.64.0284a24: 常住一。違二無爲無作用宗一。若言二作用是有一則 T2251_.64.0284a25: 非レ無故是恒有。不レ應レ言二已滅未有一。舊論別 T2251_.64.0284a26: 有レ頌破レ此。此是下救破由漸。應レ屬二後段一。光・ T2251_.64.0284a27: 寶屬二前段一者非也。三若許下有部救釋二無 T2251_.64.0284a28: 異一。四若爾下經部破釋二世便壞一。此中有レ三。 T2251_.64.0284a29: 一正破。二有部反問。三經部示二不成所以一。初 T2251_.64.0284b01: 中有二總破別破總結三莭一如レ文可レ知。何爲 T2251_.64.0284b02: 不成已下。光記總爲二有部救一非也。不レ順二前 T2251_.64.0284b03: 何得有時名爲過未文一故。寶疏但何爲不成 T2251_.64.0284b04: 句爲二反問一爲レ勝也
T2251_.64.0284b07: 若不レ許下諸本無名二未來一。今有名二現在一。有已 T2251_.64.0284b08: 還無名二過去一是則三世義上。應下一切種有爲法
T2251_.64.0284b11: 言可レ在二不成上一。文言便故在レ下。猶如下成唯
T2251_.64.0284b23: 光・寶竝不レ得二論意一。今謂。果之因依主釋。有二 T2251_.64.0284b24: 得レ果之因一故當來可レ有レ果。故未來當有名 T2251_.64.0284b25: レ有。此但未來當有所以不レ關二過去一。故言二果
T2251_.64.0284b28: 果言一
T2251_.64.0284c02: 成中差別上。光可也。寶釋レ倶爲二三世一非也
T2251_.64.0284c05: 謂非下彼外道不レ許二業曾有性一故而今世尊重 T2251_.64.0284c06: 爲レ彼説有。是彼許二曾有性一而不レ許二實有一。故 T2251_.64.0284c07: 今爲レ成二實有一佛重説二此有一。寶疏屬レ下爲二經 T2251_.64.0284c08: 部通釋一。豈字短讀絶二曾有性一。而今已下更牒二 T2251_.64.0284c09: 重説有一爲二通釋基一。謂豈彼外道不レ許二業是 T2251_.64.0284c10: 曾有性一。如レ是許二曾有性一。而今世尊重爲説 T2251_.64.0284c11: レ有者。今詳曰。此論文錯義難二通曉一故致二異
T2251_.64.0284c15: 是有一爲已許。若爾佛何故爲レ彼更説レ有。此 T2251_.64.0284c16: 中佛世尊依下自相續有二宿業功能一。能與中今後
T2251_.64.0284c19: 爾佛何一。則是有部徴。依彼已下經部釋。如レ是 T2251_.64.0284c20: 云レ文云レ義隱暢
T2251_.64.0284c26: 處一。滅時無レ有二去處一。如レ是眼不實而生。生已 T2251_.64.0284c27: 滅盡。是從二所明一立レ名。舊論云二眞實空經一。増
T2251_.64.0285a04: 故。又初唯就二現世言一。後就二本無等言一。是二 T2251_.64.0285a05: 破差別。彼救意有二兩意一。一唯依二現世一。二依二 T2251_.64.0285a06: 現世眼根一。於二破中一。初破三唯依二現世一。故云現 T2251_.64.0285a07: 世性與二彼眼根一體無レ別。舊論曰二世與法義
T2251_.64.0285a10: 汝執二於自體一イヽ未有有上
T2251_.64.0285a13: 論云二此境一故一故。此中四重救破展轉相起。 T2251_.64.0285a14: 謂若縁二彼聲一應二更發聲。更不レ發住二未來一 T2251_.64.0285a15: 故。汝宗立二未來實有一。何云二是無一。雖二實有一去 T2251_.64.0285a16: 來聲無二現在聲一。故云レ無無妨是非レ理。於二三 T2251_.64.0285a17: 世一竝聲體同一故若言下有二少別一非中同一上。我 T2251_.64.0285a18: 本無今有義自成
T2251_.64.0285a29: レ是於レ境得レ有二猶預一。謂我於二此所見境中一。爲二 T2251_.64.0285b01: 是正智一爲二是顛倒一。即由レ此故差別理成。同 T2251_.64.0285b02: 有相中見有レ別。故非二無與レ有少有相同一。如 T2251_.64.0285b03: 何於中得レ有二差別一。唯於二有法一有二差別一故 T2251_.64.0285b04: 但於二有境一覺有二差別一。故唯有境覺有二差別一
T2251_.64.0285b13: 知二妙非妙義一。言二妙非妙一者是無失有失。有 T2251_.64.0285b14: 失是有上。無失是無上。故有上無上顯二妙非 T2251_.64.0285b15: 妙義一。或顯二此妙非妙中有レ勝有劣。故復爲
T2251_.64.0285b18: 故。而即爲二上無上一非也。文既四各別故。後 T2251_.64.0285b19: 釋亦非也。以レ爲二妙非妙中勝劣一故
T2251_.64.0285b22: 實有一。識必有レ境故。如二現在一。是他隨一不成 T2251_.64.0285b23: 因。經部過未世縁レ無識生。不レ許二識必有境 T2251_.64.0285b24: 故
T2251_.64.0285c02: 具如二已辨。若言レ不レ爾。鮮本破言作レ彼何爲。 T2251_.64.0285c03: 由レ是彼正理論。於レ此不指二破我一。即具説下業 T2251_.64.0285c04: 爲レ先相續等生二當果一之相上。即同二我論文一。所 T2251_.64.0285c05: 以是破我別論非二倶舍一。彼師所造無二破我論一 T2251_.64.0285c06: 故不レ能二指示一。故以二破我論意一具釋二於此一也」
T2251_.64.0285c09: 過未實有一破。此有二二失一。初過去業無用失。 T2251_.64.0285c10: 後未來果無體失。二若一下總牒二三世實有 T2251_.64.0285c11: 法體恒有一破。亦有二二失一。初因果不成失。後 T2251_.64.0285c12: 同二外道一失。寶疏總爲二四失一麁也
T2251_.64.0285c21: 未是實有一。故世尊如二其所有一説二有言一。謂現 T2251_.64.0285c22: 實有。過曾有。未當有。於二現中一亦有二實有假 T2251_.64.0285c23: 有一。舊論曰。若如二道理一應レ有必如レ此有。問。二
T2251_.64.0285c26: レ意答レ我。婆羅門於レ意云何。眼是有不。答言 T2251_.64.0285c27: 是有。沙門瞿曇色是有不。答言是有。沙門瞿 T2251_.64.0285c28: 曇婆羅門有色有二眼識一有二眼觸一。有二眼觸因 T2251_.64.0285c29: 縁生レ受若苦若樂不苦不樂一不。答言有。沙門
T2251_.64.0286a06: 以爲二經文一者謬矣。是則文理不レ屬。是亦不 T2251_.64.0286a07: レ讀二經本一故也。今謂。汝却未レ考二論意一也。又 T2251_.64.0286a08: 未レ知下諸註爲二經本一之意上而妄斥破。豈可レ當 T2251_.64.0286a09: 哉。問。經本無量。若應二是一經一。舊論文亦全 T2251_.64.0286a10: 同レ此故。解云不レ爾。以レ何知レ此。顯宗論二十
T2251_.64.0286a13: 顯宗豈可二置不引
T2251_.64.0286a17: 沙名一。眞毘婆沙都無二此語一。又不下如レ彼自率二 T2251_.64.0286a18: 己情一妄説中去來如中現實有上。三世實有性各別 T2251_.64.0286a19: 故。詳二彼意一。欲下爲二聖教災一詭設二虚言一謗中正 T2251_.64.0286a20: 論者上。豈由二如レ是所設謗言一令二我義宗所有 T2251_.64.0286a21: 虧損一寧有。我部諸大論師博究精通聖道正 T2251_.64.0286a22: 理一。具苞二衆徳一。名稱普聞。於二小難中一不レ能二通 T2251_.64.0286a23: 釋一故。於二非處一詭設二謗言一。既率二己情一妄標二 T2251_.64.0286a24: 宗致一。似レ未レ披覽眞毘婆沙一。所設難辭我已
T2251_.64.0286a27: 過未實有一。其同法喩是不二現在一而用何爲。 T2251_.64.0286a28: 由二如レ是理一言三如レ現實有二去來一。何得レ言二詭
T2251_.64.0286b02: 世實有非レ無即同二現在一。故言二三世實有一。豈 T2251_.64.0286b03: 可レ言三眞婆沙都無二此語一。何可レ言レ似レ未二披 T2251_.64.0286b04: 覽一。又雖三汝通二諸難一。唯是自情所二他未許。豈 T2251_.64.0286b05: 成二通釋一。故言レ不レ能亦是不レ宜
T2251_.64.0286b08: 位一。於者境聲而流二修位一。是簡二不縁一。初餘言 T2251_.64.0286b09: 廣渉二集滅道修一。故加二遍行一顯二唯集惑一。以二遍 T2251_.64.0286b10: 行惑唯苦集一故。及聲顯二見修界畔一。而亦顯二 T2251_.64.0286b11: 倶是縁レ此猶繫一。猶者尙也。隨眠言流二下餘 T2251_.64.0286b12: 字一。兩種餘字竝是未斷。對二前已斷一故。正理
T2251_.64.0286b16: 縁一者有時非二所縁一。故縁此言定爲二無用一。若 T2251_.64.0286b17: 謂四別説三有レ不二能縁一。則遍行中亦應二簡別一。以 T2251_.64.0286b18: レ有二見集所斷遍行不縁二見苦所斷事一故。經
T2251_.64.0286b21: 應一總分二見修所斷煩惱一以爲二九品一。漸次斷 T2251_.64.0286b22: 除。前品已斷中有二餘未斷遍行煩惱一亦能爲 T2251_.64.0286b23: レ繫。簡下縁二他地一遍行隨眠上。説二縁此言一。可レ成二 T2251_.64.0286b24: 有用一。然於二前説餘遍行中一闕二縁此言一。義不二 T2251_.64.0286b25: 成立一。或應レ以レ後。所説及聲兼顯下前文攝二縁 T2251_.64.0286b26: 此一義上。謂於二前説見苦已斷及此前品已斷事 T2251_.64.0286b27: 中一。皆有二所餘縁レ此猶繫一。若爾此文雜亂。於二 T2251_.64.0286b28: 見位中一餘及遍行應二隨去一。然此煩説闕二
T2251_.64.0286c03: レ之。何爲二縁此言闕一。若餘及遍行隨一煩説 T2251_.64.0286c04: 者。於二顯宗一餘縁此前後兩説。豈非二鄭重一。若 T2251_.64.0286c05: 遍行言無用故除レ此者。何故於二長行一云二遍 T2251_.64.0286c06: 行隨眠一
T2251_.64.0286c12: 漏法境識一。爲下避二文煩一及令中義路明知上。五部
T2251_.64.0286c15: 以示レ圖入二論中一。圖記。冠註等圖有二其不正一 T2251_.64.0286c16: 矚而可レ知
T2251_.64.0286c19: 結前生後。二若別下正明二繫事隨増一。於レ中 T2251_.64.0286c20: 有レ三。一標二去レ廣就略。二且有下略示レ事。 T2251_.64.0286c21: 三準思下勸二思餘法一。此即初也。光記分文不 T2251_.64.0286c22: 可也
T2251_.64.0286c25: 界。有色無色法。有見無見法。有對無對法。有 T2251_.64.0286c26: 漏無漏法。有爲無爲法。過去未現在法。善不 T2251_.64.0286c27: 善無記法。欲界色界無色界繋法。學無學非 T2251_.64.0286c28: 學非無學法。見所斷修所斷無斷法。四諦。四 T2251_.64.0286c29: 靜慮。四無量。四無色。八解脱。八勝處。十遍 T2251_.64.0287a01: 處。八智。三三摩地。三重三摩地。三結。三不 T2251_.64.0287a02: 善根。三漏。四瀑流。四軛。四取。四身繫。五蓋。 T2251_.64.0287a03: 五結。五順下分結。五順上分結。五見。六愛
T2251_.64.0287a10: 示二樂根一一例勸餘一。然諸註。本論等云レ就二二 T2251_.64.0287a11: 十二根一者未二委讀一也。彼唯四十二章之一章 T2251_.64.0287a12: 故 光師釋甚略。寶疏具簡釋
T2251_.64.0287a15: 諸法非一一。今就二樂根一一云レ且。答中有レ三。先 T2251_.64.0287a16: T2251_.64.0287a17: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0287a18: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0287a19: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0287a20: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0287a21: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0287a22: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0287a23: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0287a24: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0287a25: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0287a26: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0287a27: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0287a28: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0287a29: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0287b01: 示二所隨増樂根數一。若不レ知レ此何可レ知二能隨 T2251_.64.0287b02: 増是幾一二簡三無漏非二所隨増一。三此中下正
T2251_.64.0287b05: 三識身相應。此二唯有漏修所斷。第三靜慮 T2251_.64.0287b06: 者意識相應通二有漏無漏一。有漏通二五部一。無漏
T2251_.64.0287b12: 者。通二五部一故云二一切一。若細分別除二見滅中 T2251_.64.0287b13: 無爲縁一。謂邪見。疑。無明。由レ是欲修三惑。苦 T2251_.64.0287b14: 集十一遍使。色界二十八總四十二隨増。寶 T2251_.64.0287b15: 疏不二簡別一云二四十六一非也。問。若爾何不下如二 T2251_.64.0287b16: [IMAGE]下縁識一言中有爲縁上。 T2251_.64.0287b17: [IMAGE]答。一切顯二五部一。有 T2251_.64.0287b18: [IMAGE]爲簡二無爲縁一。文互
T2251_.64.0287b21: [IMAGE]亦細分別。婆沙八
T2251_.64.0287b24: [IMAGE]在二意識一。通二有漏無 T2251_.64.0287b25: [IMAGE]漏一。有漏者通二五部一。 T2251_.64.0287b26: [IMAGE]及通二一切隨眠一相 T2251_.64.0287b27: [IMAGE]應。故自地一切隨 T2251_.64.0287b28: [IMAGE]眠隨増。故不レ可レ除二 T2251_.64.0287b29: [IMAGE]無爲縁一。又欲界瞋 T2251_.64.0287b30: [IMAGE]雖レ非二相應一所縁隨 T2251_.64.0287c01: 増。如下於二他樂一發中瞋恚上。亦不レ可レ除。問。若爾 T2251_.64.0287c02: 何故單縁等中除二無爲縁一答。彼約二縁識一樂 T2251_.64.0287c03: 非二無爲一故除去。今據二相應一故取不レ除問本 T2251_.64.0287c04: 論已先説二二十二根首眼根一。若示二方隅一何不 T2251_.64.0287c05: レ約レ初。故正理。顯宗改二此論一以二眼根一示二方 T2251_.64.0287c06: 隅一。若約二四十二章隨一一者。何不二十八界及 T2251_.64.0287c07: 五蘊初一。有二何由致一據二根中間一。亦復不二五受 T2251_.64.0287c08: 初憂根一。解云。顯レ無二定準一。以レ示二方隅一。亦復樂 T2251_.64.0287c09: 根以二可愛樂一。今爲二初學一此三品示レ圖以入二 T2251_.64.0287c10: 論中一。圖記及冠註圖有二其不正一。依二婆沙八十
T2251_.64.0287c20: 體名等何。答。隨眠者即五部九十八惑是。心 T2251_.64.0287c21: 者上十六識中前有漏十五心是也。有者由二
T2251_.64.0287c24: 等一名二有隨眠一。且前所言三界各五部十五種 T2251_.64.0287c25: 識名二有隨眠心一。如レ是諸心各有二二種一。謂遍 T2251_.64.0287c26: 非遍行。有漏無漏縁。染不染心有二差別一故
T2251_.64.0288a02: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a03: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a16: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a17: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a18: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a19: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a20: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a21: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a22: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a23: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a24: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a25: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a26: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a27: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a28: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288a29: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0288b01: 心イヽ能有二隨眠一。隨眠之有名二有隨眠一。有隨眠 T2251_.64.0288b02: 即心名二有隨眠心一。有者相應義。於二此相應 T2251_.64.0288b03: 義一即含二隨増助伴二事一
T2251_.64.0288b06: 位。唯有隨眠非二隨増一。現無三惑故即非二隨増一 T2251_.64.0288b07: 而助伴性恒相應故猶有隨眠。助伴性者。所 T2251_.64.0288b08: レ謂染汚習氣即類性謂先來隨眠與レ心倶。今 T2251_.64.0288b09: 雖レ斷二隨眠一。而所相應心非下由二道力一所斷。仍 T2251_.64.0288b10: 名二有隨眠一。如下人前盜賊一。今不レ作二其業一仍名中 T2251_.64.0288b11: 盜賊上。若所縁縛已斷非三唯不二隨増一亦不レ名二 T2251_.64.0288b12: 有隨眠一。何以故。親疎別故。如レ是有隨眠心 T2251_.64.0288b13: 有二兩種一。一有染。四部全。修道一分即染汚 T2251_.64.0288b14: 心。二無染心。修道善無記心。有染心亦有 T2251_.64.0288b15: レ二。一隨増有隨眠心。二不隨増有隨眠心。若 T2251_.64.0288b16: 無染心。唯隨増有隨眠無二不隨増有隨眠心一。 T2251_.64.0288b17: 由レ是示レ圖曰
T2251_.64.0288b20: 頌及明本竝正理。顯宗悉作レ見可レ知。倶是誤 T2251_.64.0288b21: レ形也
T2251_.64.0288b29: 生一故。然有二一類一。煩惱現行前後相牽非レ無二 T2251_.64.0288b30: 次第一。而示二三種次一。一約二一類不善觀察一。身。 T2251_.64.0289a01: T2251_.64.0289a02: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a03: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a16: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a17: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a18: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289a19: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0289b20: 邊。邪。見取。戒禁。疑。貪慢。瞋。癡如レ次生。二 T2251_.64.0289b21: 約二一類禀性愚癡一。癡。疑。身。邊。戒禁。邪。見 T2251_.64.0289b22: 取。貪。慢。瞋如レ次生。三云三復有於此別立二次 T2251_.64.0289b23: 第一擧二此論頌文一述釋。而後云。理實煩惱行 T2251_.64.0289b24: 相無邊。以三所待縁有二差別一故。無下有二決定次 T2251_.64.0289b25: 第一而生上
T2251_.64.0289b28: 舊論同レ此。論主欲レ取二後説一故示二見諦所斷 T2251_.64.0289b29: 等所由一。入論。正。顯竝無二所由一。寶疏以二迷理 T2251_.64.0289c20: 迷事瞋一和會。是雖レ非二理無一。今既明二十惑生 T2251_.64.0289c21: 起。故從レ初約レ諦。故後師爲レ勝。如是等結釋二 T2251_.64.0289c22: 頌如次一。故於二舊論一牒二如次第一有二此結釋一。然 T2251_.64.0289c23: 所由文屬二如次釋一有餘下闕。蓋是錯亂
T2251_.64.0289c26: 若無二惑言一此頌是爲二誰三因一。若或字何不
T2251_.64.0289c29: 音誤。有人云。正理等長行順二或字一。論意各別 T2251_.64.0289c30: 漏等中全不レ攝レ彼。有作二是説一。有漏乃至我 T2251_.64.0289d01: 者非也。正理顚末無下一與二此論頌一有異故。 T2251_.64.0289d02: 然彼長行以二兩義一通レ難故有二二或一。必非下釋二 T2251_.64.0289d03: 頌或言一以致言也。然此句顯レ有下不レ具二三因一 T2251_.64.0289d04: 而惑起上
T2251_.64.0289d09: 煩惱已斷故無二未斷隨眠一。意樂淸淨故無二非 T2251_.64.0289d10: 理作意一
T2251_.64.0289d14: 言。有漏者三有漏。謂欲有漏。有有漏。無明有 T2251_.64.0289d15: 漏。長含標二三有漏一云二欲漏。有漏。無明漏一
T2251_.64.0289d21: 在故。由レ是唯説二煩惱一。若纒亦依二界分別一者。
T2251_.64.0289d25: 界亦有二二纒一何不三説爲二有漏一。二品類下違 T2251_.64.0289d26: 教失。亦者示レ有レ體。或對二彼欲漏攝纒。集異
T2251_.64.0290a01: T2251_.64.0290a02: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0290a03: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0290a04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0290a05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0290a06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0290a07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0290b08: 語取中亦攝二諸纒一。品類足説。云何有漏乃至 T2251_.64.0290b09: 是名二有漏一。有瀑流軛及我語取亦應攝纒。 T2251_.64.0290b10: 應レ作二是説一。上界纒少。不自在故不三説爲二有 T2251_.64.0290b11: 漏一。乃至我語取欲界雖レ多而見所斷。不二具 T2251_.64.0290b12: 足一故不自在故但總説二十纒一。不三別説二五部一。 T2251_.64.0290b13: 今且就二有漏一問答。顯二餘亦如是。此中論主。 T2251_.64.0290b14: 欲下如二有作是説一可中據二本論一攝中一切上故。特 T2251_.64.0290b15: 簡別言二迦濕彌羅等一
T2251_.64.0290b20: 由一釋二第七八句一。此即初也。謂準二此欲漏有 T2251_.64.0290b21: 漏三界十五部三十一五十二一。於二無明一亦三 T2251_.64.0290b22: 界十五纒無明自成。又於二欲漏有漏一。既除二無 T2251_.64.0290b23: 明一義准已成立説爲二無明漏一。至言是至理決 T2251_.64.0290b24: 定義。又鮮本。寶疏竝作レ准各義通
T2251_.64.0290b27: 通用二諸煩惱一爲レ體。詳曰。據レ體如二寶疏一有二 T2251_.64.0290b28: 寬狹一。若依二名義一如二光記一其義有レ同。由レ是論
T2251_.64.0290c09: 現行故。如レ説二王行一。非レ無二導從一。王但勝故總
T2251_.64.0290c14: 一句於爲淸上一。莫下唯有二能爲淸淨道無中所
T2251_.64.0290c19: 彼曰。欲取及見取者。是在家出家二部鬪諍 T2251_.64.0290c20: 因故立爲二二取一。在家由レ取二五塵一故與二在家一 T2251_.64.0290c21: 起二鬪諍一。出家由レ取二諸見一各不同故與二出家一 T2251_.64.0290c22: 起二鬪諍一。此二部取定及定果爲二解脱道解脱
T2251_.64.0290d03: 明軛一。彼唯擧レ經無レ有二解釋一。問。集異門是六 T2251_.64.0290d04: 足隨一。薩婆多宗根本依據。彼既但擧二此經一 T2251_.64.0290d05: 以示二四軛一。何故異レ彼攝二諸煩惱一。亦復不二別 T2251_.64.0290d06: 是經部義一。已六足中如レ是故。解云。集異門舍 T2251_.64.0290d07: 利子造。偏依二經説一故示二此經一。與二經部一不 T2251_.64.0290d08: レ異。後門徒起二異見一故致二別宗一。由レ是正理五
T2251_.64.0290d11: 爲二貪自體一非也。後釋爲二五妙欲境一冥二舊論一」
T2251_.64.0290d17: 釋二隨眠一而破二光記一。詳曰寶師判決盡理。婆
T2251_.64.0290d21: 眠義一。何唯爲眼。湛惠云。若准二正理一如二寶疏一。 T2251_.64.0290d22: 然光記非二全無理。睡眠行相不レ易レ知故。由
T2251_.64.0290d26: 故寶疏爲正
T2251_.64.0290d29: 等二句是也。而數下二句通二上二一。正理曰。 T2251_.64.0290d30: 言二隨縛一者極難レ離故。入論上曰。隨縛義謂 T2251_.64.0291a01: 隨二身心相續一而轉。如二空行影水行隨一
T2251_.64.0291a04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291a05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291a06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291a07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291a08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291a09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291a10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291a11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291a12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291a13: [IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0291a16: 初約二生死流轉一釋レ流。後由彼下約二不淨流 T2251_.64.0291a17: 出一釋レ流。諸註未レ曉。如二寶疏一尚致二總別判一
T2251_.64.0291a20: 頂天一至中無間獄上故名爲レ漏。或彼相續於二六
T2251_.64.0291a25: 中淹貯業種一能生二後有一。三流派義。如二泉 T2251_.64.0291a26: 出レ水乳房出乳。如レ是有情從二六處門一諸漏 T2251_.64.0291a27: 流派。四禁持義。如下人爲レ他所二禁持一。故不能三 T2251_.64.0291a28: 隨レ意遊適四方一。如レ是有情爲二煩惱一所二禁持一。 T2251_.64.0291a29: 故循環諸界諸趣諸生一。不レ得三自在趣二涅槃
T2251_.64.0291b04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291b05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291b06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291b07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291b08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291b09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291b10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291b11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291b12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0291b13: [IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0291b16: 思上。如レ是有情爲二諸煩惱一所二惑一。故起二身語 T2251_.64.0291b17: 意三種惡行一。六醉亂義。如下人多飮二根莖枝葉 T2251_.64.0291b18: 花菓等酒一。便不レ了二應作不應作事一無慚無愧 T2251_.64.0291b19: 顚倒放逸上。如レ是有情飮二煩惱酒一不レ了二應作 T2251_.64.0291b20: 不應作事一無慚無愧顚倒放逸。聲論者説。阿 T2251_.64.0291b21: 薩臘縛者。薩臘縛是流義。阿是分齊義。如レ言 T2251_.64.0291b22: 天雨二阿波吒梨一。或施二財食一。阿旃荼羅阿言 T2251_.64.0291b23: 顯此。乃至彼義如レ是。煩惱流轉有情乃至二
T2251_.64.0291c01: 諸生一生死流轉上。二騰注義。謂諸煩惱等騰注 T2251_.64.0291c02: 有情一。令下於レ界趣生一生死流轉上。三墜溺義。謂諸 T2251_.64.0291c03: 煩惱等墜溺有情一。令下於二界趣生一生死流轉上」
T2251_.64.0291c06: 漂溺一已復爲二四軛一和合繋礙。便能荷擔生 T2251_.64.0291c07: 死重苦一。如下牽二搖牛一置二之轅軛一勒以二鞦鞅一 T2251_.64.0291c08: 能挽中重擔上。故一切處説二暴流一已即便説レ軛 T2251_.64.0291c09: 義イヽ相隣故
T2251_.64.0291c14: 爲二依因一執取欲見等一故名レ取。與二執取一之依 T2251_.64.0291c15: 因故云二依執一。光四解竝穿空。寶疏云レ執取
T2251_.64.0291c18: 故火得二熾然一。如レ是有二煩惱一故有情業得二生 T2251_.64.0291c19: 長一。又猛利義是取義。或纒裹義是取義。如二蠶 T2251_.64.0291c20: 處レ蠒自纒而死一。如レ是有情四取所纒流轉
T2251_.64.0291c24: レ是釋レ名。應レ不レ有二經部如レ是全釋一
T2251_.64.0291c29: 漏一有中別相續上。由二彼勢力一於レ境泄過。即諸煩 T2251_.64.0291c30: 惱或總或別流注不レ絶得二相續名一。説二於六瘡 T2251_.64.0292a01: 門一即説二於六境一彼言二不絶一。即我無窮與レ我 T2251_.64.0292a02: 何殊獨言二彼善一。今彈云。汝是三義。我是一 T2251_.64.0292a03: 義。又汝六根。我是六境。又汝流義。我即相續 T2251_.64.0292a04: 不絶義。豈爲二是同一
T2251_.64.0292a07: 善品一。與レ我何別彼獨善哉。今彈云。漂奪義 T2251_.64.0292a08: 與二勢増上義一何可レ不レ同。於レ中勢増上義親二 T2251_.64.0292a09: 暴流名一
T2251_.64.0292a12: 行時一若非二増上一何能令下與二種種苦一合上。如何
T2251_.64.0292a15: 倶立中軛名上。若言三我釋亦同二此過一。此唯非レ理。
T2251_.64.0292a20: レ取故故名爲レ取。彼三由。此但一義。正理破 T2251_.64.0292a21: 曰。所釋取義亦與レ理違。謂若取名唯因レ愛 T2251_.64.0292a22: 者。説二取縁有義イヽ如何成。應三但説言二愛縁 T2251_.64.0292a23: 有。又如二前際後際業縁一亦應レ通攝一切煩 T2251_.64.0292a24: 惱一。如二縁起中已廣思擇一。今彈云。從二三受一生二 T2251_.64.0292a25: 欲色無色三愛一故説二受縁愛。從レ欣二受愛一起二 T2251_.64.0292a26: 欲等取一。故説二愛縁取。由二取爲縁積下集種種 T2251_.64.0292a27: 招二後有一業上。故説二取縁有。欲色無色三愛 T2251_.64.0292a28: 爲レ愛。欲等之取名レ取。同愛爲體然其行相 T2251_.64.0292a29: 各別。何妨二因果一。又如二前際後際業縁一唯是 T2251_.64.0292a30: 欲貪必無レ違レ理 T2251_.64.0292a31: 倶舍論法義卷第二十終 T2251_.64.0292b01: T2251_.64.0292b02: T2251_.64.0292b03: 十一 T2251_.64.0292b04: 豐山寓居上毛沙門快道林常記 T2251_.64.0292b05: 分別隨眠品第五之三
T2251_.64.0292b12: 體雖レ未レ説。已説二纒名一爲二漏等及一百八煩 T2251_.64.0292b13: 惱一此釋問本誤。答何可レ正。何以故。此但結下 T2251_.64.0292b14: 以二隨眠及纒一説爲中漏等上。非レ結二即隨眠幷纒一。 T2251_.64.0292b15: 然問者。隨眠上廣説故言二已説一可レ然。纒未 T2251_.64.0292b16: レ説何云二已説一。豈非レ誤哉。答亦從レ彼故非也」
T2251_.64.0292b19: 門一故言二復説一。問。前漏等四門皆説二幷纒一。今 T2251_.64.0292b20: 結等中何言二煩惱一答。煩惱言有二通別一。此通二 T2251_.64.0292b21: 諸惑一故無二相違一。前以二隨眠及纒一説爲二漏等一 T2251_.64.0292b22: 故殊言二隨眠并纒一。今所説中既有レ纒。不レ可二
T2251_.64.0292b28: 説。如二業道名一
T2251_.64.0292c02: 句明二見取二結廢立。後下二行明二嫉慳廢立一。 T2251_.64.0292c03: 此中前一行約二八纒家一。後一行約二十纒家一
T2251_.64.0292c06: 爲二愛結一。餘結皆應二依レ界辨體。其十隨眠前 T2251_.64.0292c07: 已辨。嫉慳唯欲界修斷故勸示言二當辨一。雜含
T2251_.64.0292c13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0292c14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0292c15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0292c16: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0292c17: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0292c18: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0292c19: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0292c20: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0292c21: [IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0292c24: 見結一。合二二取一爲二取結之義言二如是理一。此證二 T2251_.64.0292c25: 見結三爲體。取結二爲二體之理一。問中見相應 T2251_.64.0292c26: 法者。約二五見隨應一。光記云二五見一意通言未 T2251_.64.0292c27: レ足。寶疏爲二二取一非也。依レ答害二問意一也。見 T2251_.64.0292c28: 隨眠者。十隨眠中見隨眠隨レ應隨増。光記亦 T2251_.64.0292c29: 云二五見一言未レ足。寶疏唯云二十隨眠中見隨 Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:有/無] [CITE] |