大正蔵検索 INBUDS
|
阿毘達磨倶舍論法義 (No. 2251_ 快道撰 ) in Vol. 64 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:有/無] [CITE]
T2251_.64.0400a01: 色界大種所造清淨天眼一。依二此天眼一。生二淨眼 T2251_.64.0400a02: 識一。依二此淨識一。能遍觀察前後左右上下諸
T2251_.64.0400a05: 所障一故。見二上諸色一者。非二雲霧等所障一故。問 T2251_.64.0400a06: 如レ是天眼能於二一時一頓見二十方諸色境一不。 T2251_.64.0400a07: 有説能見。以二天眼根光明清徹一。自然遍照。 T2251_.64.0400a08: 如三未尼寶遍發二光明一。有説不レ能二一時頓見一。 T2251_.64.0400a09: 法蘊所説天眼諸方無レ障。非レ謂二一時頓見一。謂 T2251_.64.0400a10: 人等眼但能覩見面所レ向色一。欲レ見レ餘方要 T2251_.64.0400a11: 須二迴轉俯仰方見一。天眼不レ爾。面向二一方一。隨 T2251_.64.0400a12: 欲二能見一。不レ須二迴轉一。故説三能見二上下諸方一。非
T2251_.64.0400a19: 二句明二五趣通局一。唯言顯二餘五種容有。初 T2251_.64.0400a20: 言簡二後時一
T2251_.64.0400a29: 事一不レ得二容易一
T2251_.64.0400b03: 唯善二通果無記一。餘生得等五。皆通二善染無 T2251_.64.0400b04: 記三性一。後中此生得等五非レ果。故不レ名レ通。
T2251_.64.0400b07: 唯約二呪藥二一者非也
T2251_.64.0400b11: 一約二人趣一。二約二地獄一。三總指勸餘三趣一。此 T2251_.64.0400b12: 即初也。此中有二正釋通妨一。言レ餘者。生得餘 T2251_.64.0400b13: 修呪等五類。寶疏云二餘趣一非也。通妨中舊論 T2251_.64.0400b14: 曰。唯於二人道一前所説如意成等五。無二生所 T2251_.64.0400b15: 得一。若爾云何。得レ有下自性憶念宿住一人上。此從二 T2251_.64.0400b16: 業差別所作一。生所得舊論。正理。顯宗。光記亦 T2251_.64.0400b17: 爾。婆沙中悉云二生處得一。今論依二得能所一云二 T2251_.64.0400b18: 所得一。婆沙據二生在處一。故云二生處一。竝不二相違一。 T2251_.64.0400b19: 本性生念者。正理。顯宗竝爾。爲レ成レ句。且略二 T2251_.64.0400b20: 智言一。又婆沙悉作二本性念生智一。生念之言彼
T2251_.64.0400b24: 互用互釋レ此。亦無レ失 光記六類五趣配立 T2251_.64.0400b25: 雖二多釋一唯是二解。今示レ圖 T2251_.64.0400b26:
T2251_.64.0400b29: 通二初中後一 T2251_.64.0400c01: T2251_.64.0400c02: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0400c03: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0400c04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0400c05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0400c06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0400c07: [IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0400c10: T2251_.64.0400c11: T2251_.64.0400c12: 八 T2251_.64.0400c13: 豐山寓居上毛沙門釋快道記 T2251_.64.0400c14: 分別定品第八之一 T2251_.64.0400c15: 分別定品 當品大分爲レ二。初明二所依定一。二 T2251_.64.0400c16: 明二能依徳一。初中有レ四。初明二四靜慮一。光記於 T2251_.64.0400c17: レ此大開レ三。第二第三非也。彼正法住世從二 T2251_.64.0400c18: 界品初正宗一來。故彼第三七言頌是流通分。 T2251_.64.0400c19: 何於レ此可レ分。亦科名非也。寶疏於レ此失二科 T2251_.64.0400c20: 文一。而大同レ光。於レ此分レ四亦非也。光記辨二生 T2251_.64.0400c21: 起一兩釋。賢智定三約二果因縁一。記一二十七竝 T2251_.64.0400c22: 倶初説。今別約二智定一作二能所依後釋一。於レ義 T2251_.64.0400c23: 無二大異一。寶疏大同二後解一
T2251_.64.0400c26: 定一。唯諸靜慮能具爲レ依。故於二此中一。先辨二靜 T2251_.64.0400c27: 慮一。或於下先辨二共功徳一中上。已辨二智所成無靜 T2251_.64.0400c28: 等功徳一。餘所成徳。今次當レ辨。於レ中先辨二所
T2251_.64.0401a05: 靜慮。無色。等至。等持。無量。解脱。勝處。通處 T2251_.64.0401a06: 等。於レ中前卷已説二無諍乃至通一。今辨二靜慮 T2251_.64.0401a07: 等一。豈得三總約二諸智一
T2251_.64.0401a10: 性一。四解二靜慮名一。此即初二。如レ文可レ知
T2251_.64.0401a13: 論主難。四有部通。五論主詰。六有部救。七 T2251_.64.0401a14: 叙二經部宗一。此即初四。文易レ見。光寶竝直爲二 T2251_.64.0401a15: 經部一。雖レ無二大害一。疎二於文理一。後別叙二經部宗一
T2251_.64.0401a19: 牒破後念成體救一。四三性心皆一境轉難。此 T2251_.64.0401a20: 即初也
T2251_.64.0401a24: レ然。於二相應法中一。定大地應二無用一。準二此等文一。 T2251_.64.0401a25: 蒙二當念自一境轉破一。彼救而言二第二念用一。破 T2251_.64.0401a26: レ此若言二後念用一。則於二其前時當念相應法
T2251_.64.0401a29: 者非也。寶疏云。若謂下前念等持令中心於二第 T2251_.64.0401b01: 二念一。亦同レ前縁二一境一轉上。此即前心令二其後 T2251_.64.0401b02: 心同一境轉一。後心ト相應スル等持何用。此釋 T2251_.64.0401b03: 雖二詳悉一。然非二論意一。何者當念自轉破之後 T2251_.64.0401b04: 救。何云レ同レ前。又論文居レ今喚レ後。故云二第二 T2251_.64.0401b05: 念一。若破二後念一。應レ言下則於二後倶一等持無用。 T2251_.64.0401b06: 既不レ言レ爾。但云二相應一。破二當念一理決然
T2251_.64.0401b09: 於二第二念一不乙散亂甲故。三摩地別有レ體義成 T2251_.64.0401b10: 立天。破云。寧不乙即由下斯於二相應一等持無レ用 T2251_.64.0401b11: 之道理上。一切心王自於二一境一轉甲。此心自一境 T2251_.64.0401b12: 轉。彼心由二三摩地一。彼此異。因不可得。舊論 T2251_.64.0401b13: 曰。由レ此是三摩提ナラハ是故諸心共縁二一境一。 T2251_.64.0401b14: 汝何故。不レ許二此義一。彼言二是三摩提一。是當二此 T2251_.64.0401b15: 成字一。是故言當二由斯一。諸心言當二心字一。汝何
T2251_.64.0401b18: 貫如レ環。然云レ由二此餘心心所一。此言所指在 T2251_.64.0401b19: レ何。復亦三摩地復由レ誰難。於二一章一全無二起 T2251_.64.0401b20: 盡一。豈非二摸索一。寶疏亦釋二由此一云二由修習一。釋二 T2251_.64.0401b21: 由斯一云二以此修習力一。此亦誤也。修習義從二 T2251_.64.0401b22: 何文一。又所指無レ此。又約二定散通一。與二後難一不
T2251_.64.0401b26: 應レ立三一切心皆成二一類一此亦成レ失
T2251_.64.0401b29: 論云。經部師説。是心同一類故説爲レ定。何以 T2251_.64.0401c01: 故。三摩提者。謂依二心學一。心清淨爲レ勝。經中
T2251_.64.0401c05: 學。増上惠學。何等爲二増上意學一。若比丘離二
T2251_.64.0401c08: 法一。有覺有觀。離レ生二喜樂一。初禪具足住。乃至
T2251_.64.0401c16: 名一。定令二惠生一無二濁亂一故。有説此定持二勝遍 T2251_.64.0401c17: 縁一。如理思惟。故名二靜慮一。勝言簡二欲界一。遍縁 T2251_.64.0401c18: 簡二無色一。如理思惟簡異顛倒一。能持二此定一。是 T2251_.64.0401c19: 妙等持。此妙等持名爲二靜慮一。此言顯示止觀
T2251_.64.0401c26: 復次遍觀遍斷名二靜慮一。欲三摩地雖二遍觀一。 T2251_.64.0401c27: 非二遍斷一。無色定二義倶闕。復次能靜息一切 T2251_.64.0401c28: 煩惱一。及能思慮一切所縁一。名爲二靜慮一。欲三 T2251_.64.0401c29: 摩地雖三思慮一切所縁一。非三靜息一切煩惱一。 T2251_.64.0402a01: 無色定二義都無。復次無色定有レ靜無レ慮。欲 T2251_.64.0402a02: 異三摩地有レ慮無レ靜。色定倶有。故名二靜慮一。
T2251_.64.0402a07: 斷結。應レ名二靜慮一。若能正觀故名二靜慮一。則欲 T2251_.64.0402a08: 界三摩地亦能正觀。應レ名二靜慮一。是則於二三 T2251_.64.0402a09: 摩地一體一。有二能斷正觀二義一。故持業釋。一體 T2251_.64.0402a10: 兩用。問。此今論下云二止觀均行一。是應二持業一 T2251_.64.0402a11: 文何違二婆沙一。答。非二婆沙評家爲是。又止觀 T2251_.64.0402a12: 均行者。如レ次定慧。故是依主。婆沙約二持業一 T2251_.64.0402a13: 故 又大乘有二持業同體依主一。而無二別體一。義
T2251_.64.0402a16: 之靜。二釋竝皆得。問。持業依主何縁差別。 T2251_.64.0402a17: 答。三地地有下令二寂靜正觀一之二用上。故名二靜 T2251_.64.0402a18: 慮一是持業釋 又與レ慧之所依三摩地。故名二 T2251_.64.0402a19: 靜慮一。是依主釋。光記云。馱南此云二靜慮一。舊 T2251_.64.0402a20: 云レ禪。或云二禪那一。或云二持阿那一皆訛也 舊
T2251_.64.0402a24: 言レ定。梵云二馱衍那一
T2251_.64.0402a27: 此中有レ二。初正明。二由此下釋三影示尋一。文 T2251_.64.0402a28: 有レ四。一標宗。二所由。三喩顯。四簡濫。由レ説 T2251_.64.0402a29: レ具二此伺喜樂一。已不二言説一。明二亦具レ尋義一。何以 T2251_.64.0402b01: 故。尋伺必倶行故。譬如二煙火一。有難云。應三尋 T2251_.64.0402b02: 伺非二必倶行一。如二中間定無尋唯伺一故。今遮二 T2251_.64.0402b03: 此濫一云。無下有二伺喜樂三一之伺離尋。故言二必 T2251_.64.0402b04: 倶一。非レ謂二一切獨伺不離レ尋。故舊論曰。偈曰 T2251_.64.0402b05: 有二觀及喜樂一。釋曰。覺觀喜樂相應喜一類説 T2251_.64.0402b06: 名二初定一。由レ説レ觀。覺即彼説。覺觀如二烟及火 T2251_.64.0402b07: 相應行一故。有二不相離相離一故。無下有レ觀有二喜
T2251_.64.0402b12: レ火必定倶行一者誤也。非伺等簡亂無レ用故。 T2251_.64.0402b13: 違二舊論一故
T2251_.64.0402b17: 内靜一心。無覺無觀。定生二喜樂一得二第二禪一 T2251_.64.0402b18: 成就遊。離二喜欲一捨無レ求。遊二正念正智一。而身 T2251_.64.0402b19: 覺レ樂。得二第三禪一成就遊。樂滅。苦滅。喜憂本 T2251_.64.0402b20: 已滅。不苦。不樂。念清淨。得二第四禪一成就遊
T2251_.64.0402b25: 名レ生。二受生離二地染一時。二種生過倶能離 T2251_.64.0402b26: 故。名レ之爲レ離。湛慧云。此兩師中。光師順二舊 T2251_.64.0402b27: 論文一。彼曰。偈曰。寂離下地生。釋曰。空遍入 T2251_.64.0402b28: 從レ寂二離第四定一生。識遍入從レ寂二離空遍入一
T2251_.64.0402c04: 論非レ證。彼生言。亦約二所離一。無レ有レ妨故 T2251_.64.0402c05: 皆無色故立無色名 第四解。總名有レ二。一 T2251_.64.0402c06: 正釋。二通妨。初正解。釋二第五句一有レ三。初正 T2251_.64.0402c07: 釋。二大衆部等出二不成過一。三有部通二不成 T2251_.64.0402c08: 失一有レ三。一徴責無色立名一。二徴詰有色相一。
T2251_.64.0402c11: 約二色根身一。初中光牒。後身語下破。此有レ二。 T2251_.64.0402c12: 一約二能發無一。二約二能造無一。此亦有レ二。初正 T2251_.64.0402c13: 破。後破レ救。先擧レ救。後不爾下。破有レ二。初正 T2251_.64.0402c14: 破。二又彼下依レ經止レ執。第二若許下約二色根 T2251_.64.0402c15: 身一有レ二。一牒レ計。二如何下破有レ四。一正破。 T2251_.64.0402c16: 是自言違失。二破二小身救一。三破二極妙救一。四 T2251_.64.0402c17: 破二妙中極救一。此有レ二。先牒レ救。二破有レ二。一 T2251_.64.0402c18: 唯有頂破。二例難四靜慮一。此有レ三。一正例 T2251_.64.0402c19: 責二無別一。二擧レ救徴レ理。三通釋彼依レ經成二有 T2251_.64.0402c20: 色一。此有レ二。初牒下彼引二四經一成中有色上。二此證 T2251_.64.0402c21: 下有部通有レ三。一總非勸レ思。二且契下別令 T2251_.64.0402c22: レ思。三若謂下破二彼救一。先牒レ救。後此説下破 T2251_.64.0402c23: 有二總破別破一。別破中有レ三。一就二第一經一破。 T2251_.64.0402c24: 二就二第二第三經一破。三又説下就二第四經一破 T2251_.64.0402c25: 有レ二。一正破。二牒レ救破有レ二。一牒下彼引二二 T2251_.64.0402c26: 經一任レ文救上。二則無下有部例二彼救一。亦任二經 T2251_.64.0402c27: 文一。成二無色一有レ三。一正引レ經成二無色一。二然契 T2251_.64.0402c28: 下通二違文一。三又薄下更引レ經遮二有色一。初中 T2251_.64.0402c29: 有レ五。一標立。二引二三經一。三若無下依レ經 T2251_.64.0403a01: 遮二彼執一。四牒破救一。五結レ無レ色。破レ救中。先 T2251_.64.0403a02: 牒。後則於下破有レ三。一段食例破。二靜慮例 T2251_.64.0403a03: 破。三受等例破。此有レ二。初正破。後經既下 T2251_.64.0403a04: 還成二自義一
T2251_.64.0403a07: 等想一。準二舊論文一。世尊於二彼無色定中一。亦遮二 T2251_.64.0403a08: 有色等想一。故不レ可レ言レ有二身語律儀一 中含
T2251_.64.0403a11: 能所造兩釋一。寶疏約二自有部不許解二遮有一。 T2251_.64.0403a12: 竝非二論意一 T2251_.64.0403a13: 水細蟲極微 是約二肉眼不及一。事鈔釋二用蟲 T2251_.64.0403a14: 水戒一云。僧祇云。蟲細者。三重灑。猶有テ捨テ
T2251_.64.0403a17: レ知。且云二水蟲一。據レ實諸蟲有レ細。大集經曰。畜 T2251_.64.0403a18: 生身細。猶如二微塵十分之一一。多論曰。身子天 T2251_.64.0403a19: 眼觀二空中蟲一。如二水邊砂器中粟一。遂斷レ食。佛 T2251_.64.0403a20: 因制云。但肉眼見灑襄所得
T2251_.64.0403a23: 二又生下例難靜慮一。此有レ三。一正例難二無別一。 T2251_.64.0403a24: 二若謂下擧レ救徴レ理。三若謂下牒三依レ經成二 T2251_.64.0403a25: 有色一通釋。此即初二也。例難靜慮一意言。四 T2251_.64.0403a26: 靜慮身下望レ上。漸漸勝妙。清妙中極。有二何 T2251_.64.0403a27: 差別一不レ名二無色一。故正理云。又生二靜慮一所有 T2251_.64.0403a28: 色身由二先功能一。漸漸殊勝。上地望レ下。清妙 T2251_.64.0403a29: 轉増。非三下地根所二能取一故。與レ彼何異不レ名二 T2251_.64.0403b01: 無色一。若見有二名不如レ義故。及見有三名通二 T2251_.64.0403b02: 二義一故。不レ可二如レ名定執義者。則無色界
T2251_.64.0403b11: 設一。所以者何。因レ壽故有レ煖。因レ煖故有レ壽。若 T2251_.64.0403b12: 無レ壽者。則無レ煖。無レ煖者。則無レ壽。猶如下因 T2251_.64.0403b13: レ油因レ炷故得二然燈一。彼中因レ焔故有レ光。因レ光 T2251_.64.0403b14: 故有レ焔。若無レ焔者。則無レ光。無レ光者則無
T2251_.64.0403b17: 亦不レ立。若去二其二一。一亦不レ立。展轉相依。而 T2251_.64.0403b18: 得二竪立一。識縁二名色一。亦復如レ是。展轉相依。而 T2251_.64.0403b19: 得二生長一。舊論。正理。如レ今作二二蘆一。且取二依
T2251_.64.0403b23: 云。於二十二縁生中一説下依レ識名色生。依二名
T2251_.64.0403c02: 喜貪一潤澤生長増廣。於二受想行一亦説如レ是。 T2251_.64.0403c03: 比丘識於レ中若來若去若住若沒若生長。増 T2251_.64.0403c04: 廣比丘若離二色受想行一。識有二若來若去若住 T2251_.64.0403c05: 若坐一者。彼但有二言數一。問已不レ知二増益一生
T2251_.64.0403c08: 有二別證一。離レ色乃至離レ行。由レ撥二識去來一故。 T2251_.64.0403c09: 證二此經一意。離二色等四一。無二識去來一。彼界既有二
T2251_.64.0403c12: 識一。必應レ許レ有二所住色等一
T2251_.64.0403c21: 欲故識不レ住。不二増長一。識不住不増長故。不
T2251_.64.0403c24: レ異。故言下説二四食一如中四識住上。例以破。謂於二 T2251_.64.0403c25: 四識住一既有レ識存レ色。亦於二四食一。於二色無色一。 T2251_.64.0403c26: 既有二識食一。應レ有二色段食一。故舊論云。由三佛説二 T2251_.64.0403c27: 四識住及四食一。於二色無色界一。應レ有二段食及
T2251_.64.0404a01: レ異レ彼故
T2251_.64.0404a09: 界已過二段食一問。若爾以レ何爲レ食。答引二次經一。 T2251_.64.0404a10: 通二此疑
T2251_.64.0404a14: 以二禪定喜樂一爲レ食
T2251_.64.0404a24: 空處成就遊。謂二無量空處天一。是謂二第五識 T2251_.64.0404a25: 住一。舊論加二及有礙想句一。今略レ之。中含四
T2251_.64.0404a29: 色界衆生。及住二無色界一不レ識二滅界一者。還復 T2251_.64.0404b01: 受二諸有一。若斷二於色界一。不レ住二無色界一。滅界心 T2251_.64.0404b02: 解脱。永離二於生死一。今取レ意引。舊論二十一
T2251_.64.0404b06: 出二本事經三法品一。經於二色界一言二其中所有 T2251_.64.0404b07: 色受想行識如是性皆是無常一。於二無色界一。但 T2251_.64.0404b08: 言二諸有受想行識一
T2251_.64.0404b15: 劫。或六萬劫。或八萬劫。諸色斷已後死還生二 T2251_.64.0404b16: 欲色界界一時。色云何起。若色斷已還得レ起 T2251_.64.0404b17: 者。般涅槃已諸行已斷。亦應三後時還起二諸 T2251_.64.0404b18: 行一。勿レ有二此失一。故無色界決定有レ色。有部通 T2251_.64.0404b19: 云。謂於二三界一。死生往來。或色續レ色。或色續二 T2251_.64.0404b20: 無色一。或無色續二無色一。或無色續レ色故。故不 T2251_.64.0404b21: レ應レ説二諸色斷已復云何起一。無二斷義一故。問。若 T2251_.64.0404b22: 離レ色已。復還生レ色。般涅槃已。應二還起行。 T2251_.64.0404b23: 答。離有二二種一。一暫時離。二究竟離。初者可二 T2251_.64.0404b24: 還生一。後者不二復起一。故不レ應レ難
T2251_.64.0404c01: 見色非色法。亦有二展轉相依起一。故謂心異故。 T2251_.64.0404c02: 色差別生。色根有レ別。識生便異。故從二無色一。 T2251_.64.0404c03: 將レ生レ下時順色生。心相續而住。由二彼勢力一 T2251_.64.0404c04: 引二下色一生。然不レ可レ言二唯從レ彼起一。亦以三先 T2251_.64.0404c05: 世色。倶行心相續爲レ縁。久已滅。色爲二自種 T2251_.64.0404c06: 子一。今色方起。許三同類因通二過現一故
T2251_.64.0404c09: 相續一。論主破レ彼。叙二經部一云。經部師説。無色 T2251_.64.0404c10: 界心等相續。無二別有依。謂若有下因未レ離二色 T2251_.64.0404c11: 愛一引起心等上。所引心等與レ色倶生。依レ色而 T2251_.64.0404c12: 轉。若因於レ色。已得レ離レ愛。厭背色一故。所引
T2251_.64.0404c15: 分命根一。是非二論意一也
T2251_.64.0404c25: 耶。有説。此依二多分一而説。謂有情類法。爾多 T2251_.64.0404c26: 縁二曾所受順境一。生二愛味一故。有説。過去定於二 T2251_.64.0404c27: 相續中一。已作二饒益一。現在定從レ彼而起。追戀 T2251_.64.0404c28: 生レ愛。有説。此中依二入出定一。而爲二問答一。未來 T2251_.64.0404c29: 定未レ名二入出一。現在定名レ入。未レ名レ出。過去定 T2251_.64.0405a01: 名二入已出一。今欲レ顯下於二已出位一。生味。故但説 T2251_.64.0405a02: レ縁二過去一。有餘師説。此中説淨定無間起二味 T2251_.64.0405a03: 相應定一。淨定爲二所味一。是所縁故味相應定是 T2251_.64.0405a04: 能味。是能縁故。全如二前説一。評曰。應レ知初説
T2251_.64.0405a15: 善一類。何以故。住是三摩提別名。故如二經 T2251_.64.0405a16: 言一。何者爲二三摩提一。是心住於二正境一。於二正位一。 T2251_.64.0405a17: 由二此經一故。知住是三摩提別釋
T2251_.64.0405a23: 顯後三定一。初中有二兩説一。初寛狹義。婆沙八
T2251_.64.0405a28: レ彼。餘靜已下法説非二例顯一。理應レ然故。然兩 T2251_.64.0405a29: 文各通。無レ有レ害
T2251_.64.0405b05: 故言二根捨一
T2251_.64.0405b13: 捨念清淨一。答。有二十三復次一釋。一第四定離二 T2251_.64.0405b14: 八擾亂事一故。苦樂憂喜入息出息尋伺名二八 T2251_.64.0405b15: 擾亂一。二離二内外災一故。下三定有二内外災一。不 T2251_.64.0405b16: レ名二清淨一。三第四定所依身器三災不レ及。念 T2251_.64.0405b17: 無二忘失一。捨無二諠雜一故。四第四定離二諸煩惱 T2251_.64.0405b18: 及隨煩惱一故。五第四定所依色身澄潔明淨
T2251_.64.0405b21: 知一
T2251_.64.0405c06: 樂更樂所觸生身心樂善覺。是覺謂二樂覺一 T2251_.64.0405c07: 也
T2251_.64.0405c10: 部引レ經難一。三又第四下由レ理非二輕安宗一。四 T2251_.64.0405c11: 又契下依二教證一立破。五若言下牒二有部難一
T2251_.64.0405c21: 樂受一。以レ無二所順一。雖レ有二輕安一。而不二立名樂。 T2251_.64.0405c22: 由レ此經部以二第三定有樂。以例破。然光記 T2251_.64.0405c23: 云。約二三受一説。言三初二喜名二樂受一也者。是何 T2251_.64.0405c24: 謂
T2251_.64.0405c27: 中有レ二。初相返破。不二損減一。還令二増益一故。後 T2251_.64.0405c28: 殊勝破。第三定輕安勝二初二定輕安一。劣既立 T2251_.64.0405c29: レ支。勝何不レ立
T2251_.64.0406a03: 證得遠離五法一修滿五法上。云何遠離五法。 T2251_.64.0406a04: 謂斷二欲所長養喜一。斷二欲所長養憂一。斷二欲所 T2251_.64.0406a05: 長養捨一。斷二不善所長養喜一。斷二不善所長養 T2251_.64.0406a06: 憂一。是名二五法遠離一。云何修滿五法。謂隨喜。
T2251_.64.0406a09: 定一。言二身作證一。得獲成就初靜慮善五蘊一。言二
T2251_.64.0406a12: 夫情謂談。似而不レ當。大抵如レ是
T2251_.64.0406a17: 應レ成二無漏一。然必無二觸及身識是無漏一。勿下初 T2251_.64.0406a18: 定所立五支中。少分身樂支是有漏。少分餘 T2251_.64.0406a19: 四支是無漏。如レ是一心漏無漏竝起成中違理 T2251_.64.0406a20: 失上。然光記作二三解一。竝非二論意一。寶解似 T2251_.64.0406a21: レ是。而未レ明也
T2251_.64.0406a25: 由二此經一成。是非二經部本意一。光師云二同許一義 T2251_.64.0406a26: 非也
T2251_.64.0406b01: 義兩宗不レ異。無漏亦爾。身識實非二無漏一。順二 T2251_.64.0406b02: 無漏一。亦名二無漏一。何汝須レ難レ我
T2251_.64.0406b05: 後三界一。依二文相一前十五唯有漏。後三通レ二。
T2251_.64.0406b13: 相一。謂心之麁細。互相違故。必不二倶起一。然執二 T2251_.64.0406b14: 倶起一。汝還非レ理。故於レ我無レ過。後番約二因明一。 T2251_.64.0406b15: 凡因明法不レ問二理是非一。不許爲レ喩成レ過。今 T2251_.64.0406b16: 有部不レ許。當レ成レ過。然是無二不成一。於二前第 T2251_.64.0406b17: 四卷一。已破二尋伺倶起一。成二不倶起一訖。故今爲 T2251_.64.0406b18: レ喩。汝前於二尋伺不倶起一。不レ能レ出レ過。今何
T2251_.64.0406b24: 問也。或應説三字。舊論云二若不爾。蓋今文 T2251_.64.0406b25: 誤也。語不レ便故。光寶強解釋
T2251_.64.0406b29: 義是支義一。謂四靜慮。各有二爾所一。能隨二順法一。
T2251_.64.0406c04: 然各非二古昔賢聖諸軌範師共施設之義一。故 T2251_.64.0406c05: 末資應三審思擇其是非一。故舊論二十一有二諸 T2251_.64.0406c06: 部師一作二如レ是諍論一。宿舊諸師不レ説レ如レ是不二 T2251_.64.0406c07: 隨可知二所有法一立爲二定分一。是故彼執應レ須二
T2251_.64.0406c10: 論意一也。又應審思擇句光寶爲二下句首一非 T2251_.64.0406c11: 也。湛慧所レ迷二光寶一。以二舊論是故彼執已下一。 T2251_.64.0406c12: 屬二下段一者。猶是非也
T2251_.64.0406c17: レ彼。令二心等淨一。如二波浪息水則澄淨一。是故説
T2251_.64.0406c20: 加レ難。然光寶爲二經部一者非也。何者若經部 T2251_.64.0406c21: 者。從レ本無體。何得二難言應レ無二別體一。亦復不 T2251_.64.0406c22: レ立二實事十一一。寧言三何許二實事十一一。明知本 T2251_.64.0406c23: 是有部。既立二實事十一一。而作二此答一。故破難 T2251_.64.0406c24: 來。言二清淨一者。光記所覽本作二清靜一。故釋云二 T2251_.64.0406c25: 清淨寂靜一。下不清淨亦爾。然鮮本。明本。及舊 T2251_.64.0406c26: 論。寶疏如レ今。雖二靜無害。釋レ淨非レ要故今本 T2251_.64.0406c27: 爲レ勝。又有經内等淨作二内靜一。若依二其經一爾。
T2251_.64.0407a04: 切。箝入聲。釋藏如レ此讀。指要鈔云。字彙云。
T2251_.64.0407a09: レ考
T2251_.64.0407a18: 經説相一者。於二初禪定一説言二離生一。是於レ離二自 T2251_.64.0407a19: 地染一生二喜樂一。故知是離染善喜樂爲二禪支一。 T2251_.64.0407a20: 以顯二染非一。第二云二等淨一。簡二染汚濁一故。染信 T2251_.64.0407a21: 非二支攝一。第三中以二正言一。簡二染迷亂一。故染汚 T2251_.64.0407a22: 念惠非二支攝一。第四中以二清淨言一。亦簡二染汚 T2251_.64.0407a23: 非支。安捨二種性是唯善。染言已簡訖。後師 T2251_.64.0407a24: 約二自性一者。謂十八支中但安捨性是善。餘 T2251_.64.0407a25: 通二染汚一。契經約二淨無漏二種一。故言レ正云二清 T2251_.64.0407a26: 淨。又彼離生言。約レ離二欲不善一。内等淨但信 T2251_.64.0407a27: 相爲レ淨。非レ簡レ染。爲レ顯二此別一。説二隨相言一。問。 T2251_.64.0407a28: 依二正理婆沙一。初説若依二此論一。何言亦第二無 T2251_.64.0407a29: レ樂第三無行捨。文中未レ示二其相一故。解云。性 T2251_.64.0407b01: 是大善。理在二不疑一。以レ明二染定一。第二説中云二 T2251_.64.0407b02: 中但無一。顯示於二初説無中一而唯無彼。若爾
T2251_.64.0407b05: 爲レ勝。故爲レ初不レ言二有餘一
T2251_.64.0407b10: 觀。定生喜樂。得二第二禪一。成就遊。是聖説二移 T2251_.64.0407b11: 動一。比丘離二喜欲一。捨無求遊。正念正智。而身 T2251_.64.0407b12: 體樂。得二第三禪一。成就遊。是聖説二移動一。比丘 T2251_.64.0407b13: 樂滅苦滅。喜憂本已滅。不苦不樂。捨念清淨。
T2251_.64.0407b18: 第四定爲二不動一。譬如三内密室無二風燈光一。餘
T2251_.64.0407b21: 加二論依法相一。故正理云。然經唯説。第四靜慮 T2251_.64.0407b22: 不下爲二尋伺喜樂一動上者。經密意説。論依二法相一。 T2251_.64.0407b23: 或準三今文無二唯字及密意等言一。應下如二舊論一 T2251_.64.0407b24: 依レ經釋此。若爾然言。故字誤也。於二喜樂下一 T2251_.64.0407b25: 脱二等言一。寶師別釋云。然契經説至二喜樂所動一。 T2251_.64.0407b26: 述釋餘經不動一也。若通二欲界一兼二息風一説。即 T2251_.64.0407b27: 有レ八。若唯對二色界一。定内心所。即離二尋伺喜
T2251_.64.0407c01: 通釋語一。由レ是彼舊論語勢。覺觀喜樂已下。是 T2251_.64.0407c02: 第二説。不レ爾文致二煩重一。又譬如言不レ易
T2251_.64.0407c05: 能正觀者名爲二靜慮一。欲界三摩地多散亂風 T2251_.64.0407c06: 之搖動如二四衢燈一。此文對レ欲。四禪通喩二密
T2251_.64.0407c12: 是中有二細樂受一。但斷二麁樂一故。説二不苦不樂一。 T2251_.64.0407c13: 如二風動燈。若置二密室一。則名二不動一。是中必有二 T2251_.64.0407c14: 微風一故。然但無二麁風一。故名二不動一。四禪亦爾。 T2251_.64.0407c15: 必有二細樂一。斷二麁苦樂一。故名二不苦不樂一
T2251_.64.0407c18: 顯二餘差別一故
T2251_.64.0407c28: レ生二下地一。問。何故受生要從二上下一。答。從レ下 T2251_.64.0407c29: 得レ上。二定纔離レ染時即得。是前義攝。非レ待二 T2251_.64.0408a01: 受生一。受之時先已得故。要下以二上下受生一。方 T2251_.64.0408a02: 是受生初得上
T2251_.64.0408a07: 約二加行一。其義可レ爾。然談二欲界一。是何所言。今 T2251_.64.0408a08: 唯定地故
T2251_.64.0408a13: 義。同有漏故。或分段義。煩惱衆多一分故。退 T2251_.64.0408a14: 即分。住即分等。竝持業釋。退分之順等皆依 T2251_.64.0408a15: 主釋。攝者攝在義。淨等至四中一分是此攝 T2251_.64.0408a16: 故。如二得是不相應攝一。順退分即攝。持業得 T2251_.64.0408a17: レ名。餘皆爾。問。婆沙諸文雜心。舊論等。竝無二 T2251_.64.0408a18: 攝言一如何。答。具略隨レ宜。故正理。顯宗如レ今。 T2251_.64.0408a19: 問。此第四與二四善根一爲レ同否。答。寛狹不レ同。 T2251_.64.0408a20: 彼狹此寛。謂彼唯煖頂等四。此不二唯四一。亦通
T2251_.64.0408a23: 法等。三云隨順聖道一。此分或作二聖行相一。或 T2251_.64.0408a24: 作二餘行相一。而向二聖道一。趣二於解脱一。光記十五
T2251_.64.0408a27: 是殊勝一。命終不レ捨
T2251_.64.0408b11: 前問一。準レ此寶疏科名爲レ正。二徴。三釋。四結。
T2251_.64.0408b16: 若異者不レ應レ建立四種一。正理云。此中決定 T2251_.64.0408b17: 義者。謂諸聖道必此無間生。非三此無間必能 T2251_.64.0408b18: 生二聖道一。若異レ此者。是則應レ説三唯世第一法 T2251_.64.0408b19: 名二順決擇分一
T2251_.64.0408b22: 三住レ此多進。四住レ此多入二無漏一。二曰。初與二 T2251_.64.0408b23: 諸惑一相凌相雜。煩惱無間此生此無間煩惱 T2251_.64.0408b24: 生。二觀二下地一爲二麁苦障一。觀二自地一爲二靜妙 T2251_.64.0408b25: 離一。三觀二自地一爲二麁苦障一。觀二上地一爲二靜妙
T2251_.64.0408c01: 第四分不二但四善根一。勿レ容二於疑一
T2251_.64.0408c06: 離自地染一者。起二自地煩惱一有中差別上故。由 T2251_.64.0408c07: レ此故知。彼從二住分一。故婆沙云二住レ此多退レ顯二 T2251_.64.0408c08: 餘亦少退一正理七十八云。若順二煩惱一名二順 T2251_.64.0408c09: 退分一。諸阿羅漢寧有二退理一。非三彼猶有二順退 T2251_.64.0408c10: 分定可令二現在前一。離染捨故雖レ有二此難一。而 T2251_.64.0408c11: 實無レ違。謂順住中有二順レ退者一。亦得三建立順 T2251_.64.0408c12: 退分名一。從レ彼有レ退。如二先已説一。此文亦依二少 T2251_.64.0408c13: 分一説 然寶疏破二正理一。別立二一義一。詳曰。未 T2251_.64.0408c14: レ得レ意而破レ此。其自義亦終不レ異也 T2251_.64.0408c15: 第三生三除順退分 正理。顯宗。婆沙十一
T2251_.64.0408c18: 順次。簡二隔越一故 光兩解後釋爲レ勝
T2251_.64.0408c22: 説一。初同二此論一。後有説同二彼十一一。此論何不 T2251_.64.0408c23: レ同二評家一。據レ何立二唯一一。答。論主以レ理爲レ量。 T2251_.64.0408c24: 不レ依二説人一。第四分既順二聖道一。何可レ生二前分一。 T2251_.64.0408c25: 漏無漏別故。不レ樂二有漏一故。故爲二唯生一。亦 T2251_.64.0408c26: 生二順勝一尚不レ許レ此。況第二分。此淨相生理 T2251_.64.0408c27: 應二隣次一。故於二正理一。第三第四竝異二評家隔越 T2251_.64.0408c28: 案立一。學者應レ思。問。四縁中由二幾縁一生耶。答。 T2251_.64.0408c29: 百六十五具分別。今以レ圖略示。此中具二四 T2251_.64.0409a01: 縁一。必是生。於二三縁中一闕二等無間一。非二此中生一。 T2251_.64.0409a02: 加行。從二此位一後超入諸定一。無レ所二罣礙一乃 T2251_.64.0409a03: T2251_.64.0409a04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a16: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a17: [IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0409a20: 明二能修處人一
T2251_.64.0409a26: 漏間次一開爲レ二。從二有漏初禪一入二無漏第二 T2251_.64.0409a27: 禪一順逆間次。及從二無漏初禪一入二有漏第二 T2251_.64.0409a28: 禪一順逆間次。於二成就中一。亦從二有漏初禪一入二 T2251_.64.0409a29: 無漏第三一順逆間超。及從二無漏初禪一入二有 T2251_.64.0409b01: 若闕二因縁一。亦此中生二縁猶非レ生 T2251_.64.0409b02: T2251_.64.0409b03: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b16: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b17: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b18: 漏第三禪一順逆間超。第三説前來所説皆是 T2251_.64.0409b19: 名二成滿一。今此論文同二彼中説一。而加行中間次 T2251_.64.0409b20: 及成滿。竝文總説。若細説者應レ如二彼説一。若 T2251_.64.0409b21: 依二舊論一。同二彼初説一。舊論總五種而無二漏無 T2251_.64.0409b22: 漏間次文一。於二成就一單具示二順逆間超一故。問。 T2251_.64.0409b23: 三説中何爲レ正。答。婆沙無レ評。彼三説從レ麁 T2251_.64.0409b24: 至レ細。實第三爲レ勝。前二説猶有二退量一。加行 T2251_.64.0409b25: 攝故。問。新舊論兩譯何爲レ是 T2251_.64.0409b26: 答。正理。顯宗同二新翻一。故此論爲レ正。然舊論 T2251_.64.0409b27: 梵本文脱。或後寫脱。誰可レ知レ此。或後人見二 T2251_.64.0409b28: 正理一。加二於今論一耶。亦不レ可レ知
T2251_.64.0409c02: 故上。名爲レ間。不レ超レ地。於二地地一次第。故名レ次。 T2251_.64.0409c03: 又麟云。間次者。如下從二初禪有漏一入中二禪無 T2251_.64.0409c04: 漏上。異類故間不レ超レ地名レ次。後釋爲レ勝。又亦 T2251_.64.0409c05: 可レ有下初禪無漏爲レ先。次入二有漏一間次上。今文 T2251_.64.0409c06: 總説
T2251_.64.0409c09: 所有無漏一。若無漏爲レ創。思應レ知。此間亦超。 T2251_.64.0409c10: 最難レ修故爲二根本一。前住中若間無超。若超 T2251_.64.0409c11: 無レ間。修猶易故爲二加行一。至字明本在レ之。重 T2251_.64.0409c12: 出若見レ頌加レ此乎。如二頌文一者。含二加行一然。 T2251_.64.0409c13: 今唯明レ成何言レ至。若言レ至者。應三上有二加行一。 T2251_.64.0409c14: 既不レ爾無爲レ正。順レ理而成レ句。故由レ此。鮮 T2251_.64.0409c15: 本。及正理。顯宗。頌疏無レ之
T2251_.64.0409c18: 簡レ凡。以二凡無一起故。三爲盡下所爲。問。於二自 T2251_.64.0409c19: 地一何煩惱爲レ餘。答。四自無下所以。此有二二 T2251_.64.0409c20: 因一。舊論曰。於二自地一無故。此熟所悉故。頌疏 T2251_.64.0409c21: 云。以三自有頂無二聖道一故。於二下聖道一欣樂起 T2251_.64.0409c22: 故。五唯無下通妨。何故不レ依二餘地一唯此ナルヤ T2251_.64.0409c23: 故通會。六起彼下結成
T2251_.64.0409c26: 不繋一故。故正理七十八云。以二有漏法是所繋 T2251_.64.0409c27: 事一故。所繋言顯二是三有攝一。第二句明二色界 T2251_.64.0409c28: 淨無漏等至所縁一。對二下無色一不レ説自成。後 T2251_.64.0409c29: 二句明二無色淨無漏等至所縁一。説二不縁一以 T2251_.64.0409c30: 顯二所縁一。根本言顯三近分亦縁二下有漏一。善言 T2251_.64.0410a01: 攝二淨無漏一。倶善性故。前文云。善言具攝二淨 T2251_.64.0410a02: 及無漏一。簡二味定一已説訖故。無色言影示前 T2251_.64.0410a03: 句是色界一。不縁下者顯レ縁二自上諸法一。更言二
T2251_.64.0410a06: 釋云。無色根本淨及無漏不レ縁二下地有漏法一。 T2251_.64.0410a07: 離二色相一故縁二自地及上地一。故説レ非レ下。比智 T2251_.64.0410a08: 品縁二下無漏一。故説レ非二有漏種一。以三方便所攝 T2251_.64.0410a09: 無礙道縁二下地一故説二根本一。味相應縁二自地一。
T2251_.64.0410a13: 上下明二所縁一。述二頌準顯一。此有レ四。一明レ縁二自 T2251_.64.0410a14: 上諸法一。顯二下字影示一。二雖亦下明レ縁二下無 T2251_.64.0410a15: 漏一。顯二有漏言影示一。於レ中有二差別一。無漏不繋 T2251_.64.0410a16: 法。故縁二一地一時。必九地通縁。由レ此縁レ下。雖 T2251_.64.0410a17: レ然唯縁二類智品道一。以二全治一故。不レ縁二法智一。 T2251_.64.0410a18: 不二全治一故。唯滅道法智兼斷二上界修惑一。非二
T2251_.64.0410a22: 滅一。四無色下明二近分亦縁下。顯二根本言影
T2251_.64.0410a25: 偈曰。本善色無色非二有流下境一。釋曰。根本清
T2251_.64.0410b02: 地煩惱對治
T2251_.64.0410b08: 未レ能レ入二勝根本地一。中間定名。別局二大梵處一。
T2251_.64.0410b14: 至一。如二契經言一。諸有未レ能レ入二初定等一。具足安 T2251_.64.0410b15: 住。而由二聖惠一。於二現法中一得二諸漏盡一。若無二未 T2251_.64.0410b16: 至一。聖惠依レ何。又蘇使摩契經中説。有二惠解 T2251_.64.0410b17: 脱者一不レ依二根本定一。豈不レ依レ定。成二慧解脱一。 T2251_.64.0410b18: 由レ此證知。有二未至定一。有二中間定一。如二契經説一。 T2251_.64.0410b19: 有尋伺等三三摩地經説。初定與二尋伺一倶。第 T2251_.64.0410b20: 二等中。尋伺皆息。若無二中靜慮一。誰有伺無 T2251_.64.0410b21: 尋。以二心心所漸次息一故。理應レ有二定有伺無 T2251_.64.0410b22: 尋一。又大梵王是世界主。離二中間定一。誰爲二勝 T2251_.64.0410b23: 因一。由レ此證知。有二中間定一。然佛不三數説レ有二未 T2251_.64.0410b24: 至中間一。以二二即初靜慮攝一故。説二初靜慮一即
T2251_.64.0410b27: 住レ此已起二愛味一。依二如レ是義一。立二未至名一。非三 T2251_.64.0410b28: 上定邊亦名二未至一。皆乘二先定勢力一引生。及
T2251_.64.0410c02: 徳。未二現前一義
T2251_.64.0410c05: 有説名二中間定一。此二各爲二一義一。爲レ有二別義一。 T2251_.64.0410c06: 有二別義一。何以故。近分是離欲道。偈曰。無覺
T2251_.64.0410c09: 前來近分一。以二中間一問爲二下基本一。猶言三復有二 T2251_.64.0410c10: 別義一。復言起盡屬レ下爲レ正。由レ此正理。顯宗。 T2251_.64.0410c11: 竝全同此論一
T2251_.64.0410c14: 論云。是無レ苦無二樂受一。與二捨根一相應。若言二三 T2251_.64.0410c15: 受門一者。何云レ非二喜相應一。舊論亦云下故不中與二 T2251_.64.0410c16: 喜根一相應上。解云。正依二三受門一。而言二非喜一。以二 T2251_.64.0410c17: 五受門一談二三受門一。無レ有レ妨。問。唯捨相應何 T2251_.64.0410c18: 應二苦通行攝一。忽前後違。復苦唯欲界何是中 T2251_.64.0410c19: 間。答。此義如二四通行中已分別一。何分別。謂
T2251_.64.0410c28: 昧。無覺有觀三昧。無覺無觀三昧
T2251_.64.0411a08: 無相三昧。云何空三昧。所謂觀二一切諸法皆 T2251_.64.0411a09: 悉空虚一。云何無相三昧。所謂於二一切諸法一。都 T2251_.64.0411a10: 無二想念一。亦不レ可レ見。云何無願三昧。所謂於二
T2251_.64.0411a16: 於レ中第五句總判。後句別合二三解脱門一。發智
T2251_.64.0411a22: 持一。是分隣近釋。無相名二涅槃一。離二十相一故。一
T2251_.64.0411a25: 是不レ可レ願法。名爲二無願一。縁レ彼三昧名二無願 T2251_.64.0411a26: 三昧一。亦境第七依主。又解。三竝持業釋。此等 T2251_.64.0411a27: 持與二彼行相一相應。作二空無相無願行相一。故 T2251_.64.0411a28: 以名。若爾何云二縁彼等一。答縁二涅槃及苦等一。 T2251_.64.0411a29: 而作二無相無願等行相一。故契經説。於二諸法一 T2251_.64.0411b01: 無二想念一不二求願一。二解中前解爲レ勝。會二論文一 T2251_.64.0411b02: 順二二論一故。問。何故與二頌前契經次第一異耶。 T2251_.64.0411b03: 答。順二増一契經標釋異一故。復次據二行相少 T2251_.64.0411b04: 多一。謂行相二四十故。復次顯レ非二必一相續三
T2251_.64.0411b09: 不時解脱起一。異生有學亦能起。故不二唯有漏一。 T2251_.64.0411b10: 亦通二無漏一。故顯揚第四説三道諦四行通二三解 T2251_.64.0411b11: 脱一。即三等持重縁之行。是無漏故。如レ理應
T2251_.64.0411b16: 願二一。如レ次取二空非常相一。故對二後言一。而言二重 T2251_.64.0411b17: 二一。故舊論偈曰。二定縁三無學由二空無常相一。
T2251_.64.0411b20: 云。重二者標レ名也。縁無學下正釋釋也。空空
T2251_.64.0411b27: 宗。一一置レ之。本經亦爾
T2251_.64.0411c08: 性一。若習。若修。堅作常作精勤修習。是名二修
T2251_.64.0411c20: 充滿遍。充滿適悦遍。適悦故離生喜樂。於二自
T2251_.64.0411c23: 達。若晝。若夜。無レ有二差別一。若前。若後。無レ有二 T2251_.64.0411c24: 差別一。若下若上無レ有二差別一。開心離蓋修照倶
T2251_.64.0411c27: レ念。非レ不レ住レ念。及善知レ想。善知レ尋。於レ此住
T2251_.64.0412a01: 色滅。此是受想行識。此是受想行識集。此是
T2251_.64.0412a06: 内淨一心無覺不觀。定生喜樂。成就二禪行一。 T2251_.64.0412a07: 離レ喜捨行念正智身受樂。如諸聖人解二捨念 T2251_.64.0412a08: 樂行一成二三禪行一。斷二苦樂一先滅二憂喜一。不苦不
T2251_.64.0412a11: 集異所擧契經一。故會二初靜慮第四靜慮一。而義 T2251_.64.0412a12: 意全附同佛意一。如二舍利弗略所唱契經一。視可 T2251_.64.0412a13: レ知。又解。設無二初靜慮等言一。而云二離生喜樂一。 T2251_.64.0412a14: 云二捨念清淨等一。是初定。第四定故依レ義會
T2251_.64.0412a18: 名爲レ修。若習。若修。若多所作者。顯下於二此定一。 T2251_.64.0412a19: 能得二自在一。能令中證得上。現法樂住者。謂於二此 T2251_.64.0412a20: 定一。若習。若修。若多所作。於二現法中一。證得樂 T2251_.64.0412a21: 住可愛可樂可欣可意一。無レ所二希望一。無レ所二思 T2251_.64.0412a22: 慕一。寂靜安隱故名二樂住一。於二此樂住一。得獲成
T2251_.64.0412a28: 或即依二現樂一。説爲二得言一。如レ言二石子體一。故無
T2251_.64.0412b05: 盛。如レ遊二砂磧一。熱渇疲勞。創飮二濁水一。亦生二勝 T2251_.64.0412b06: 樂一。或聖道樂。此具有故。謂具二一切菩提分法 T2251_.64.0412b07: 四沙門果九斷遍知三界對治一。又諸定首諸 T2251_.64.0412b08: 定樂因是故遍説
T2251_.64.0412b11: 樂一。説二現定樂一。令二其欣樂一。或現樂住是後樂 T2251_.64.0412b12: 依。但説二所依一能依已顯。如二契經説一。先住二此 T2251_.64.0412b13: 間一。入二諸等至一。後方生レ彼。不現正理作二樂現一。 T2251_.64.0412b14: 顯宗作二喜樂現一。竝誤也。今依二寶疏一
T2251_.64.0412b17: 正理論曰。本靜慮中有二遍縁智一。此遍照故立 T2251_.64.0412b18: 以二見名一。見體即知。故名二知見一。眼根名レ見。世
T2251_.64.0412b23: 曰。若修二三界諸加行善及無漏善一。得二分別 T2251_.64.0412b24: 慧一。謂從二欲界一。乃至二有頂一。諸聞思修所成善 T2251_.64.0412b25: 法。及餘無漏有爲。總説名爲二加行善法一。能引 T2251_.64.0412b26: レ慧生。於二諸境中一差別而轉故。言二修此得分
T2251_.64.0412c01: 一切不善慧。非理所引慧。所有不善障礙定 T2251_.64.0412c02: 慧。皆悉破壞。捨置不起。此相違惠。生長堅
T2251_.64.0412c06: 可レ知。由レ依二第四定一時分別故。準レ彼四皆依二 T2251_.64.0412c07: 佛自一説。故於二初修定一。無二別通文一。準レ此可 T2251_.64.0412c08: レ知。正理論釋二知見一云。修二此等持一。即是爲 T2251_.64.0412c09: レ求二決定照義一。此亦善逝。依レ自而説。謂爲レ顯下 T2251_.64.0412c10: 佛以二天眼通一。觀二諸有情死生險難一。方爲二拔 T2251_.64.0412c11: 濟一。起中靜慮等上。故爲二知見一修二天眼通一。新舊竝 T2251_.64.0412c12: 無レ妨 T2251_.64.0412c13: 倶舍論二十八卷法義終 T2251_.64.0412c14: T2251_.64.0412c15: T2251_.64.0412c16: T2251_.64.0412c17: T2251_.64.0412c18: 十九 T2251_.64.0412c19: 豐山寓居上毛沙門快道記 T2251_.64.0412c20: 分別定品第八之二
T2251_.64.0412c26: 等一故。名爲二梵堂一。比丘當レ知。有二梵大梵一名 T2251_.64.0412c27: 千。無與等者。無過上者。統二千國界一。是彼之 T2251_.64.0412c28: 堂故。名爲二梵堂一。比丘此四梵堂所有力勢。能 T2251_.64.0412c29: 觀二此千國界一。是故名爲二梵堂一。是故比丘若 Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:有/無] [CITE] |