大正蔵検索 INBUDS
|
阿毘達磨倶舍論法義 (No. 2251_ 快道撰 ) in Vol. 64 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:有/無] [CITE]
T2251_.64.0382a03: 論二生上下地一故。若爾此論亦是通レ上。總辨二 T2251_.64.0382a04: 生上下地一。又解。有漏生レ上不レ修レ下。無漏上
T2251_.64.0382a07: 漏今當レ説。得二阿羅漢果一時。或修二九地善善 T2251_.64.0382a08: 有漏功徳一。乃至或一地。若生二欲界一。得二阿羅 T2251_.64.0382a09: 漢果一。得二盡智一。所修九地善根。若生二初禪一。修二 T2251_.64.0382a10: 八地一。除二欲界一如レ是。乃至非想非非想處。即 T2251_.64.0382a11: 修二彼地善一。此文簡二無漏一切地一。而於二有漏一。 T2251_.64.0382a12: 論二生上下一。依二此義一。今論反顯無漏生レ上亦
T2251_.64.0382a15: 無量刹那善有爲法一。此所修法。初刹那頃。是 T2251_.64.0382a16: 正得修。而非二現在一。在二未來一故。已云二有爲一。 T2251_.64.0382a17: 通二漏無漏一也
T2251_.64.0382a20: 所修是非一。二若先下明二能修是非一。此言二諸所 T2251_.64.0382a21: 言一。顯レ通二現未一。是就二未來得修一。故云二今得一。 T2251_.64.0382a22: 就二現在習修一。故云二今起一。有二現在前而不能 T2251_.64.0382a23: レ修二未來一。故如レ是相對明レ此。光記擧二定蘊文一。
T2251_.64.0382a26: 已衰歇故。已受用故。已作事故。已與果故。復 T2251_.64.0382a27: 次已息故。勢力滅故。復次已得法現前受用
T2251_.64.0382b01: 復次作二功徳一起者。能修二未來一。非下起二曾得法一
T2251_.64.0382b05: 非二現在一。如二修未來初刹那頃一。或有二現在亦 T2251_.64.0382b06: 正修一。如二未曾得道現在前一。或有三非現在亦 T2251_.64.0382b07: 非二正修一。如二道過去及未來已修已息一。與二此 T2251_.64.0382b08: 論一不レ異也。此次有二光記所引文一。彼已分二過 T2251_.64.0382b09: 去未來一遮二過去一。而唯未來名レ修。準三前文未 T2251_.64.0382b10: 來已修已息爲二雙非句一。是定非二已修未來一。必 T2251_.64.0382b11: 是未修未來。依二是義一彼答意言。得二所退果一 T2251_.64.0382b12: 時。所得上果有二過去未來一。過去已得不レ名 T2251_.64.0382b13: レ修。未來未得上果名レ修。於レ此分別過未一。以 T2251_.64.0382b14: 明示二得與レ修差別一。若不レ爾忽與二前文一相違。
T2251_.64.0382b25: 法敵對治道。斷治者。謂斷二煩惱一故修レ道。是
T2251_.64.0382b28: 法爲レ依。立二此二一爲レ斷二煩惱一。起二能對治道一 T2251_.64.0382b29: 故
T2251_.64.0382c03: 習。於二未來世一。必受二樂報一。多聞聖弟子眼見 T2251_.64.0382c04: レ色。不レ取二色相一。不レ取二隨形一。好任三其眼根之 T2251_.64.0382c05: 所二趣向一。常住二律儀一。世間貪憂惡不善法。不 T2251_.64.0382c06: レ漏二其心一。能生二律儀一。善護二眼根一。耳鼻舌意根
T2251_.64.0382c11: 隨二其好惡一。從レ頭至レ足。觀見種種不淨充滿。 T2251_.64.0382c12: 謂此身中有二髮毛爪齒塵網薄膚皮肉筋骨 T2251_.64.0382c13: 心腎肝肺大腸小腸脾胃髆糞腦及腦根涙汗 T2251_.64.0382c14: 涕唾膿血肪髓涎痰小便一
T2251_.64.0382c17: T2251_.64.0382c18: T2251_.64.0382c19: T2251_.64.0382c20: 十七 T2251_.64.0382c21: 豐山寓居上陽沙門快道記 T2251_.64.0382c22: 智品第七之二
T2251_.64.0383a01: 盡智位徳。故云レ且。三何謂下問。四頌曰下頌 T2251_.64.0383a02: 答。五長行釋。長行中初正釋レ頌。後釋二不共
T2251_.64.0383a08: 有レ四。光寶同爲二五科一。無二大失一。而不レ順二列名 T2251_.64.0383a09: 四一。又諸佛同異結前文不レ爾。故理亦不レ親 T2251_.64.0383a10: 也。初六句出體。次四句諸門分別。於レ中有二
T2251_.64.0383a19: 非情境一。與二一切智一皆不二相違一。恐下於二略説少 T2251_.64.0383a20: 功一難悟。故復此中析出餘九一。處與二非處一相 T2251_.64.0383a21: 違釋。智即力持業釋。處非處之智力境第七 T2251_.64.0383a22: 依主。縁二一切法一故。具有二十智一。爲レ簡二餘所 T2251_.64.0383a23: 有智一。殊云二如來十智一
T2251_.64.0383b04: 雜染清淨有爲法一故。雜染法中有二不善一故。 T2251_.64.0383b05: 準レ彼不二唯縁定。亦通縁二障レ定淨レ定之法一。 T2251_.64.0383b06: 正理。顯宗釋レ此。今約レ勝唯説レ定。故十力 T2251_.64.0383b07: 經云。知二若干種解脱無量解脱一。舊婆沙唯
T2251_.64.0383b10: 跋提智力一同レ此。四中舊論云二轉轉根智力一。 T2251_.64.0383b11: 此中根者。正理兩釋。初説爲二信等五根一。後 T2251_.64.0383b12: 爲二意等根一。十力經云。知二他衆生智惠多少一。 T2251_.64.0383b13: 上與レ下相違釋。上下即根持業釋。五中舊論 T2251_.64.0383b14: 云二種種欲智力一。十力經説。知二他衆生心中所
T2251_.64.0383b17: 樂一。而會二解脱名一。云意樂。勝解脱。名差別故。 T2251_.64.0383b18: 若不レ爾者。唯知二心所一勝解一。應二於レ經他心 T2251_.64.0383b19: 智所縁不説二十一對等心一。舊論亦云レ欲。是 T2251_.64.0383b20: 樂欲所念心也。六中界者。舊論作レ性。是性類
T2251_.64.0383b23: 入一。如實知レ之。準二此經意一。如實知二陰界入諸 T2251_.64.0383b24: 法性相差別一。名二種種智力一。雖二三所知一。如レ顯二 T2251_.64.0383b25: 界品一。經文於二餘力一有二衆生言一。處非處及此 T2251_.64.0383b26: 無レ之。定知通二情非情一。正理所引契經。亦復 T2251_.64.0383b27: 如レ是。彼云。又佛説。於二有情種種勝解一。皆如 T2251_.64.0383b28: 實知。又佛説。於二世間種種界一非二一界一。皆如 T2251_.64.0383b29: 實知。顯宗顯二此義一云二志性一隨眠。及諸法 T2251_.64.0383c01: 性一
T2251_.64.0383c05: レ言二二力八智一
T2251_.64.0383c08: 種趣力一者。趣道也。亦渉二能所一無レ妨。舊婆沙 T2251_.64.0383c09: 云二至一切道智力一。法勝論云二至處道智力一。此 T2251_.64.0383c10: 二文能至似レ本。按。西方異説隨レ樂作二譯文一。 T2251_.64.0383c11: 或於レ至存二能所一。亦無レ妨。今此初説但據二能 T2251_.64.0383c12: 趣一。趣謂所趣。行是能趣。趣之行依主。或趣亦 T2251_.64.0383c13: 能趣。趣即行持業釋。是雜心論師義。故彼云。 T2251_.64.0383c14: 向二地獄乃至涅槃一。彼縁起及衆具故名二趣力一。 T2251_.64.0383c15: 光記云。準レ此所趣果唯是滅者非也。無爲非二 T2251_.64.0383c16: 能趣一。故除二滅智一。非二唯是所趣故除此。由レ此 T2251_.64.0383c17: 雜心云レ向二地獄乃至涅槃一。所趣通二一切一也。 T2251_.64.0383c18: 後説不二唯能趣一。亦取二趣所趣一。行能趣相違釋 T2251_.64.0383c19: 所趣。所趣通二五趣及涅槃一。故加二滅智一爲レ十。 T2251_.64.0383c20: 是毘婆沙及甘露味論義。雜心云有説趣。智 T2251_.64.0383c21: 力是十智性一。顯二自義是九智一。此初説婆沙新 T2251_.64.0383c22: 舊等無レ之。唯見二雜心一
T2251_.64.0383c25: 名也。隨即念由二隨念一而知。持業依主可レ知。 T2251_.64.0383c26: 此死彼生。顯二未來義一。先レ死後レ生。十力經云。 T2251_.64.0383c27: 復次如來悉知二一切所趣心之道一。或一生。二 T2251_.64.0383c28: 生。三生。四生。五生。十生。五十生。百生。千生。 T2251_.64.0383c29: 億百千生。無量生。成劫。敗劫。無數成敗劫 T2251_.64.0384a01: 中。我昔生二彼處一名二是字一。是食二如レ此之食一。 T2251_.64.0384a02: 受二其苦樂二壽命長短死レ此生レ彼。彼死生レ此。 T2251_.64.0384a03: 自憶二如レ是無數宿命之事一。復次如來知二衆生 T2251_.64.0384a04: 生死之趣一。以二天眼一觀二衆生之類一。善色惡色。 T2251_.64.0384a05: 善趣惡趣。隨二行所一種。皆悉知レ之。或復衆生 T2251_.64.0384a06: 身口意行レ惡。誹謗賢聖一。造二邪見業一。身壞命 T2251_.64.0384a07: 終。生二地獄中一。或復衆生身口意行レ善。不レ誹 T2251_.64.0384a08: 謗賢聖一。恒行二正見一。身壞命終。生二善處天上一。 T2251_.64.0384a09: 是謂名爲二天眼一。清淨觀二衆生類之所趣之行一
T2251_.64.0384a14: 説。是四智。法智。比智。苦智。等智。尊者瞿沙 T2251_.64.0384a15: 説。是六智。除二盡智。無生智。滅智。他心智一
T2251_.64.0384a18: 人説。是一等智。尊者婆已説。是四智。法智。 T2251_.64.0384a19: 比智。集智。等智。眞實義者。是一等智
T2251_.64.0384a24: 漏盡擇滅一。無二苦集道三諦智一。滅是非レ心。無二 T2251_.64.0384a25: 他心智一。滅諦故有二滅智一。通二上下界一有二類法一。 T2251_.64.0384a26: 佛故有二盡無生一。滅諦後邊有二俗智一。故但六智。 T2251_.64.0384a27: 若縁二擇滅所依相續身中所得法一。通二一切法一 T2251_.64.0384a28: 故。具有二十智一。此兩説。婆沙。雜心竝出。六卷
T2251_.64.0384b02: 九智除二等智一。此異二諸説一。此後三力如レ次。宿 T2251_.64.0384b03: 住通天眼通漏盡通三。顯宗云。然不三別説二他 T2251_.64.0384b04: 心力一者。義已攝在根等力中一。以下他根等中
T2251_.64.0384b08: 所知十二對二十四隻心一故
T2251_.64.0384b12: 二餘力有漏者在二十一地一。無漏者在二九地一。今 T2251_.64.0384b13: 總説云二十一一
T2251_.64.0384b16: 有二二十一門分別一。今以レ圖略示之 T2251_.64.0384b17:
T2251_.64.0384b20: 可轉義。不可覆義。能遍覺義。能荷擔義。堅固
T2251_.64.0384b27: 者見二二千世界一。縁覺不方便見二二千世界一。方 T2251_.64.0384b28: 便見二三千世界一。佛不方便見二三千世界一。方便 T2251_.64.0384b29: 見二無量無邊億百三千世界一
T2251_.64.0384c03: 因縁經第四卷一。鷹所レ逐鴿縁者。婆沙八十三
T2251_.64.0384c06: 不レ止。擧身戰慄。復趣二佛影一。身心坦然。時舍 T2251_.64.0384c07: 利子合掌白レ佛。如何此鳥至二我影中一。猶有二 T2251_.64.0384c08: 恐懼一。纔至二佛影一。心無二驚怖一。身不二戰慄一。世尊 T2251_.64.0384c09: 告言。汝六十劫修二不害意一。我於二三大無數劫 T2251_.64.0384c10: 中一修二不害意一。汝有二害習一。我已永斷。故令レ如
T2251_.64.0384c16: 見二薩婆多論。毘婆沙等論一。而無下觀二前後際一 T2251_.64.0384c17: 文上。獨見二智度論十一一。諸註引以爲レ證。而不 T2251_.64.0384c18: レ知二小乘所誦本有乎否一也。雖レ無レ害二於義一 T2251_.64.0384c19: 乎。其寡陋亦甚矣。今詳曰。唯是世傳詞非二宗 T2251_.64.0384c20: 義所設。設引二大乘經論一。有二何恥一乎。故舊論 T2251_.64.0384c21: 二事並云二曾聞一
T2251_.64.0384c24: 限一。須レ屬二前段一。若屬二後段一者。是何爲乎。非二 T2251_.64.0384c25: 結前一無二已説等言一故。亦非二下標一。心身異故。
T2251_.64.0384c28: 心力如レ是。身力云何偈曰。準レ彼思レ此。蓋文 T2251_.64.0384c29: 有二錯脱一。應レ言二心力已知。云何身力一。又此下 T2251_.64.0385a01: T2251_.64.0385a02: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0385a03: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0385a04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0385a05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0385a06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0385a07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0385a08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0385a09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0385a10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0385a11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0385a12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0385a13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0385a14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0385a15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0385a16: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0385a17: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0385a18: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0385a19: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0385a20: [IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0385b23: 頌曰
T2251_.64.0385b27: 體。或言顯三更有二異説一。等者等二諸神名一
T2251_.64.0385b30: 顯二佛不共一。初中有二三師一。第一師總喩義。謂 T2251_.64.0385c21: 佛身力。總等二那羅延力一。此釋二初句一。第二師 T2251_.64.0385c22: 節喩義。佛節節等二彼力一故。此釋二第二句一。此
T2251_.64.0385d22: 力無邊何齊レ彼。此顯二或言所表一。舊論云二大 T2251_.64.0385d23: 徳一。正理。顯宗替二大徳言一作二理實一。以顯二正義一。 T2251_.64.0385d24: 今雖レ列レ三。意在二大徳一。致二反責一故。婆沙三十
T2251_.64.0385d27: 牛。凡象。香象。大諾健那。鉢羅塞建提七種。 T2251_.64.0385d28: 十十増等二半那羅延力一。此一倍等二菩薩身力一。 T2251_.64.0385d29: 第二説牛象等二十七。一一十倍等二半那
T2251_.64.0386a03: 四説十八大節。一一等二十八那羅延力一。第五 T2251_.64.0386a04: 説菩薩身中大小總有二三百二十節一。其最小 T2251_.64.0386a05: 等二一那*羅力一。其次大節等レ二。漸次大者倍 T2251_.64.0386a06: 倍増。第六説菩薩身力等二千藹羅伐拏龍象
T2251_.64.0386a09: 百二十節。其最小等レ千倍藹羅伐拏龍象王一。
T2251_.64.0386a12: 力一。答。此力世間共所二欽重一。故以爲レ喩。而實 T2251_.64.0386a13: 不レ然。此論初説當二彼初二説一。倶總喩故。此 T2251_.64.0386a14: 第二説當二彼第三四五一。並那羅延節喩故。謂 T2251_.64.0386a15: 依二大節一。當二第三第四一。大小合當二第五一。而今 T2251_.64.0386a16: 綴文親二彼第三一也。彼第六七八三説。此無二 T2251_.64.0386a17: 所當一。非二那羅延力一故。大覺已下文隣二大徳一。 T2251_.64.0386a18: 似レ容レ屬二大徳一。舊論有二何以故徴一故。然此文 T2251_.64.0386a19: 通二上三説一。總以簡對顯二佛不共一。故婆沙三十
T2251_.64.0386a25: 銀輪寶一。王二二洲一者。有二鉢羅塞提力一。有二銅輪 T2251_.64.0386a26: 寶一。王二一洲一者。有二摩訶諾健那力一。有二鐵輪寶一。 T2251_.64.0386a27: 又有情骨節安立有レ異。凡常力者骨節相遠。
T2251_.64.0386b05: 力者骨節相鉤。那羅延力者骨節連鎖。菩薩 T2251_.64.0386b06: 骨節蛟龍相結。如二渇伽角辟支佛一名曰二大
T2251_.64.0386b10: 一正釋レ頌。二叙二異説一三論主評取有説一。初 T2251_.64.0386b11: 二説者正理。顯宗亦同。於二婆沙中一。未レ見二此 T2251_.64.0386b12: 説一。彼第一説雖二半力義一。而名與レ數有レ異也。
T2251_.64.0386b15: 白象王力敵二一摩訶諾那力一。百摩訶諾那力 T2251_.64.0386b16: 敵二一鉢娑建提力一。百鉢娑建提力敵二一娑郎 T2251_.64.0386b17: 伽力一。百娑郎伽力敵二一遮羅力一。百遮羅 T2251_.64.0386b18: 力敵二一那羅延力一。如レ是百百増。詳曰。十百 T2251_.64.0386b19: 梵音相濫。是所誦異。又去二凡象一加二白象一。而 T2251_.64.0386b20: 香象爲レ首。是亦所誦本別。彼婆沙第二説二 T2251_.64.0386b21: 十七牛象等中。有二凡香白等諸象一故。有説 T2251_.64.0386b22: 者。倍二於前師一。於所説中唯多應レ理者。論主 T2251_.64.0386b23: 評取有説一。令二佛力増廣一故。然顯レ非二眞實應 T2251_.64.0386b24: 理一。故云二於所説一。若約二實義一。彼假喩如二大徳一 T2251_.64.0386b25: 然。然光記云。論主評取法救所説一。正理。顯
T2251_.64.0386c04: 所説一。彼正理前既取二大徳義一云二理實一。今亦 T2251_.64.0386c05: 何得レ評取彼大徳義一。前不レ爲二異説一云二理實一。 T2251_.64.0386c06: 故煩重故。而謂下正理亦評取大徳一之文上者
T2251_.64.0386c09: 言何爲
T2251_.64.0386c12: 處一常談有二十一一。四是能造。謂地水火風。七 T2251_.64.0386c13: 是所造。謂滑濕輕重冷饑渇。初説約二能造一。後 T2251_.64.0386c14: 説約二所造一。而異二常談一。顯二論主不欲。特云二有 T2251_.64.0386c15: 説一耳
T2251_.64.0386c25: レ失。第三猶非也。正理擧レ此故。無二簡別一故。是
T2251_.64.0387a04: 即無畏。若正體後得別ナラハ是依主。二盡即永 T2251_.64.0387a05: 漏之永盡。漏永盡即無畏。亦漏永盡之無畏。 T2251_.64.0387a06: 三障即法障法之説。説障法即無畏。四出即 T2251_.64.0387a07: 道出道之説。説出道即無畏
T2251_.64.0387a13: 此四法一故。諸佛於二大衆中一。無二復疑心一故。説
T2251_.64.0387a17: 四唯是利益他事一。能除二説者垢及所説垢一
T2251_.64.0387a21: レ力。果名二無畏一。以下從二智中一生中無畏上故。婆沙
T2251_.64.0387a24: 義一。而無二辨別一。今論主評簡云二理實一。是則論
T2251_.64.0387a27: 星言。沙門瞿曇無レ過二人法一。爲レ制レ彼故説二前 T2251_.64.0387a28: 二無畏一。婆羅婆言。沙門釋種子法我悉知見。 T2251_.64.0387a29: 爲レ制レ彼故説二後二無畏一。復次前二無畏是 T2251_.64.0387b01: 説二自安一。後二無畏是説二安他一。不屈伏義是無 T2251_.64.0387b02: 畏義。離二恐怖一故
T2251_.64.0387b05: 下句一。二釋二念惠二字一。初中初總指二經説一。二 T2251_.64.0387b06: 諸第下別示二經要文一。中含四十二分別六處
T2251_.64.0387b15: 唯念。住即念名二念住一。是加レ三帶數釋。不レ同二
T2251_.64.0387b19: 故不レ云レ唯。今具示。問。豈不二作論者意別一。答。 T2251_.64.0387b20: 不レ爾。中含文云下捨無二所爲一。常念常智上。今文 T2251_.64.0387b21: 云二正念正知一。二法爲レ體。金口明説。雜集論 T2251_.64.0387b22: 云。所有定慧等爲レ體者。約二相雜體一
T2251_.64.0387b25: 子一者。悉皆隨屬世尊一。既有二能屬弟子位一。最 T2251_.64.0387b26: 有二順違倶一。應二甚歡慼一。由レ是佛不レ起二歡慼一。可 T2251_.64.0387b27: レ謂是希奇。如レ是諸弟子既非レ屬二聲聞一。如二彼 T2251_.64.0387b28: 大聲聞一。設不レ起二歡慼一非二希奇一。以レ非レ分故。 T2251_.64.0387b29: 又此二釋奪與異耳。光寶文異意全同
T2251_.64.0387c03: 間。及欲界地。大悲唯在二第四靜慮一。五中又 T2251_.64.0387c04: 云。悲通依二三乘及異生身一。大悲唯依二佛身一。 T2251_.64.0387c05: 六中又云。悲離二欲界乃至第三靜慮染一時得。 T2251_.64.0387c06: 大悲唯離二有頂染一時得。今且據レ初。但云レ欲。 T2251_.64.0387c07: 差別易レ顯故。八中二乘不レ救二無縁一。故不平 T2251_.64.0387c08: 等。然光記云。但拔二欲界有情苦一故。與二前所 T2251_.64.0387c09: 縁異一。何差別哉
T2251_.64.0387c13: レ他共上
T2251_.64.0387c17: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0387c18: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0387c19: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0387c20: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0387c21: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0387c22: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0387c23: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0387c24: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0387c25: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0387c26: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0387c27: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0387c28: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0387c29: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0388a01: T2251_.64.0388a02: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0388a03: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0388a04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0388a05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0388a06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0388a07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0388a08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0388a09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0388a10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0388a11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0388a12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0388a13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0388a14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0388a15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0388a16: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0388a17: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0388a18: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0388a19: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0388a20: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0388a21: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0388a22: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0388a23: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0388a24: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0388a25: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0388a26: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0388a27: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0388a28: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0388a29: [IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0388b05: 初中有レ三。一明二三徳一。二明二徳無邊一。三結歎。 T2251_.64.0388b06: 初中有レ四。一擧二名數一勸發。二徴。三列。四隨
T2251_.64.0388b12: 擇滅。舊論竝云レ滅。然舊論云二一一切解脱障 T2251_.64.0388b13: 滅一。者錯寫。解脱障是下定障攝故。前論二十
T2251_.64.0388b17: 解脱障一。應レ言二煩惱障一也。定障者。是諸不染 T2251_.64.0388b18: 汚無知。二乘及菩薩。雖二分斷一非二一切一故。是 T2251_.64.0388b19: 佛不共。畢竟斷者。前二障永斷不レ退云二畢竟
T2251_.64.0388b22: 習氣。倶永斷。故由レ此獨稱二正等覺者一。舊論 T2251_.64.0388b23: 云二一切智障滅一。若不二畢竟斷一。不レ得二一切智一。 T2251_.64.0388b24: 故竝習斷者。佛滅二一切餘習一故。光記定障斷
T2251_.64.0388c02: 相上。二此行下解レ名釋二無諍一。三此行下出體 T2251_.64.0388c03: 釋二世俗智言一。此即初也。此中有レ五。一觀二昔 T2251_.64.0388c04: 時惑果一。二自知下知二今時勝福田一。三恐他下 T2251_.64.0388c05: 恐二他惑起己。四故思下正發二此智一。五由此
T2251_.64.0388c10: 初説一。諍之無故名二無諍一。依主釋
T2251_.64.0388c14: 名二無諍自性一
T2251_.64.0388c17: 界身一。是不分明行相。是縁二欲界中煩惱一。是法 T2251_.64.0388c18: 念住。是世俗智。是非二三摩地倶一。是捨根相 T2251_.64.0388c19: 應。是墮二三世一。是縁二未來一。是善性。是縁二不善一。 T2251_.64.0388c20: 是縁二欲界繋一。是非學非無學。縁二非二學一。是
T2251_.64.0388c24: 竟聲聞。亦住二無諍一。是離染得。亦加行得。是
T2251_.64.0388c27: 聖道一。斷レ惑證レ果故。是密意説。非レ謂三無諍能 T2251_.64.0388c28: 斷二煩惱一。無諍作二寂靜行一。爲レ寂靜他諸煩惱一 T2251_.64.0388c29: 故
T2251_.64.0389a03: 釋二願智字一。二餘義同二無諍一。釋二第二句一。三但 T2251_.64.0389a04: 所縁下明二所縁一。釋二能遍縁字一。此即初二也。
T2251_.64.0389a11: 下叙二婆沙師異説一。於二諸法中一唯無色。比量
T2251_.64.0389a14: 路之人一知所二從至一。有説。若爾願智應下是比 T2251_.64.0389a15: 量智非二現量智一。應レ作二是説一。此願智不レ觀レ因。 T2251_.64.0389a16: 而知レ果不レ觀レ果。而知レ因故。此智是現量智。 T2251_.64.0389a17: 非二比量智一。然聲聞獨覺有二餘習過患一。故於二 T2251_.64.0389a18: 所願境一。加行乃知。如來餘習過患永盡。故於二 T2251_.64.0389a19: 所願一。擧レ心即知。雜心師但據二無色比知義一
T2251_.64.0389a25: 破。何故殊標二彼義一。云二毘婆沙者説一。解云。雖二 T2251_.64.0389a26: 評家所破一。而亦有レ依信彼一。所謂如二衆賢一其 T2251_.64.0389a27: 類。故殊標別
T2251_.64.0389b01: 此下明二願智果成一。此加行相順逆出二入有心
T2251_.64.0389b06: 相一。或作二餘行相一。是縁二一切法一 T2251_.64.0389b07: 是通二四念住一。是性唯俗智。是非二三摩地倶一。 T2251_.64.0389b08: 唯有漏故。是捨根相應。墮二三世一縁二三世及 T2251_.64.0389b09: 離世一。是善性而縁二三性一。唯色界繋而縁二三界 T2251_.64.0389b10: 繋及不繋一。是非二學縁二三學一。是修所斷縁二見 T2251_.64.0389b11: 修非斷一。是通縁二名義一。是非相續通二縁自他非 T2251_.64.0389b12: 相續一。是欲界中人趣三洲男女身起。是聖者 T2251_.64.0389b13: 無學不時解脱。是亦加行得亦離染得。何故 T2251_.64.0389b14: 發二此智一。爲レ益レ他故。謂先起二願智一。觀二諸有情 T2251_.64.0389b15: 意樂差別一。後隨饒益。如下良醫先觀二病者差 T2251_.64.0389b16: 別一。後授藥。又發智云。此智或善。或無記。婆 T2251_.64.0389b17: 沙釋謂。此有二六智一。謂四靜慮善。欲界善無 T2251_.64.0389b18: 記。此實唯第四定。唯善而願智後。同縁起説 T2251_.64.0389b19: 智皆名二願智一。是密意説
T2251_.64.0389b22: 列異レ前。法。義。智類同。故義。辨。依地同故。第 T2251_.64.0389b23: 九句明二得數一第十句餘義同レ前。婆沙百八
T2251_.64.0389b29: 有二四辨一。云何爲レ四。所レ謂義辨法辨辭辨應 T2251_.64.0389c01: 辨。彼云何名爲二義辨一。所レ謂義辨者。彼彼之 T2251_.64.0389c02: 所説。若天龍鬼神之所説。皆能分別其義一。是 T2251_.64.0389c03: 謂名爲二義辨一也。彼云何名爲二法辨一。十二部 T2251_.64.0389c04: 經如來所説。所謂契經。祇夜。本末。偈。因縁。 T2251_.64.0389c05: 授決。已説。造頌。生經。方等。合集。未曾有。及 T2251_.64.0389c06: 諸有爲法。無爲法。有漏法。無漏法。諸法之 T2251_.64.0389c07: 實。不レ可二沮壞一者。是謂名爲二法辨一。彼云何 T2251_.64.0389c08: 名爲二辭辨一。若前衆生長短之語。男語。女語 T2251_.64.0389c09: 佛語。梵志天龍鬼神之語。阿須倫迦留羅甄 T2251_.64.0389c10: 陀羅彼之所説。隨二其根元一。與レ其説法。是謂 T2251_.64.0389c11: 名爲二辭辨一。彼云何名爲二應辨一。當説レ法時。無 T2251_.64.0389c12: レ有二怯弱一。無レ有二畏懼一。能和脱四部之衆一。是謂 T2251_.64.0389c13: 名爲二應辨一。我今當二教勅一。汝當レ如二摩訶絺 T2251_.64.0389c14: 羅。所以然一者。絺羅有二此四辨一。能與二四部 T2251_.64.0389c15: 之衆一。廣分別説。如二我今日一。觀諸衆中一。得二四 T2251_.64.0389c16: 辨才一。無レ有下出二絺羅一者上。若二此四辨。如來之 T2251_.64.0389c17: 所有。是故諸比丘當下求二方便一成中四辨才上。如レ T2251_.64.0389c18: 是諸比丘當レ作二是學一。爾時諸比丘聞二佛所
T2251_.64.0389c22: 有レ二。初正釋レ頌。二證二本論一。兼成二次第一。三 T2251_.64.0389c23: 叙二異説一。四明二前加行一。初正釋中有レ二。一釋二 T2251_.64.0389c24: 初頌一。二釋二第二一行頌一。初中有レ四。一牒二總 T2251_.64.0389c25: 名一標レ數。二列レ名。三隨釋。四結レ意。釋レ名者。 T2251_.64.0389c26: 法是所縁境。下四字能縁。於二法境一無二障礙一。 T2251_.64.0389c27: 無倒解了智名二法無礙解智一。智即解。解智即 T2251_.64.0389c28: 無礙。法之無礙解智持業依主可レ知。餘三亦
T2251_.64.0390a04: 或於二彼彼境一。決斷無礙名二無礙解一。或於二彼 T2251_.64.0390a05: 彼境一。正説無礙名二無礙解一。有餘師説。於レ境
T2251_.64.0390a08: 釋一。設爾何失倶有二過失一。若爲二帶數一。無礙智 T2251_.64.0390a09: 體無レ有二四種一。背三法體挍帶數法一。若爲二依主 T2251_.64.0390a10: 者。名中既有レ數何依主。答。是依主釋。謂四 T2251_.64.0390a11: 者法義詞辨。是所縁境。無礙解者。即唯一不 T2251_.64.0390a12: 退智。以レ非二法體帶數故。勿三必謂二存レ數是帶
T2251_.64.0390a19: レ辨。由レ之四辨經中。作二如レ是説一。有二此四辨一。 T2251_.64.0390a20: 廣分別説。今詳四辨之辨。是辨財義非二辨説一。 T2251_.64.0390a21: 故四辨經説二四辨財一。與レ智言異義同。故舍利 T2251_.64.0390a22: 弗毘曇云。何謂レ辨。辨謂智力。謂勝智。謂金 T2251_.64.0390a23: 剛智。謂無餘智。又總立二四辨名一者。別名立二 T2251_.64.0390a24: 法義辭應一。或名二樂説一。不レ云二辨無礙一。無二總別 T2251_.64.0390a25: 亂一矣。問。次第非二一准一。一四辨經列二義法辭 T2251_.64.0390a26: 應一。二此論。品類足。施設足論。舍利毘曇 T2251_.64.0390a27: 等。法義詞辨次。三法辭樂義。法勝毘曇二 T2251_.64.0390a28: 本。甘露味論等是也。四義應法辭。雜心論 T2251_.64.0390a29: 等是也。五辭法義辨。婆沙第三説是也。是 T2251_.64.0390b01: 等何所以立レ名。解云。法勝論約二智類同一。作二
T2251_.64.0390b04: 二是他悟。故或細麁次。義是非二五識境一。應亦 T2251_.64.0390b05: 有二定惠一。故法辭二聲名句文即麁故。理實一 T2251_.64.0390b06: 得必四。故諸論無レ準。問。契經説二法無礙一。云二 T2251_.64.0390b07: 有漏法無漏法等諸法一。是順レ名可レ然。諸對法 T2251_.64.0390b08: 中。何故云二名句文一。若爾何不レ名二名無礙一。解 T2251_.64.0390b09: 云。經據二所詮法體一。對法就二能詮一。竝非二相違一。 T2251_.64.0390b10: 若與レ義何別。謂所詮義者。是其義理不二法 T2251_.64.0390b11: 體一。問。辨無礙據二所依一。取二定惠一前三亦爾。離二 T2251_.64.0390b12: 彼二一應レ不二成立一。答。實爾。故雜集論十四。四 T2251_.64.0390b13: 辨皆云二定惠一。可二準思一。而約レ勝於レ辨説レ之。 T2251_.64.0390b14: 謂於二衆中一辨論説法。内不レ具二定惠一有二恐怖一。 T2251_.64.0390b15: 不レ能レ説レ此故。名句文身者。正理約二自性一 T2251_.64.0390b16: 解レ身。而古今無下不レ迷二彼釋一者上。今具解レ之
T2251_.64.0390b24: 何第三釋通二七地一也。今詳。寶破非也。雖三未 T2251_.64.0390b25: 至無二別身一。是隨レ本論レ此故。法勝論四卷三
T2251_.64.0390c01: 欲四定五地有二名等一。約二隨身繋一必矣。而寶
T2251_.64.0390c07: 部經有漏法無漏法一故。故雜心十智爲レ本。唯 T2251_.64.0390c08: 涅槃六智爲二有説一。法勝論師唯十智一義。百
T2251_.64.0390c11: 智一。除二盡無生一。以二無礙智見性一故。今論主
T2251_.64.0390c14: 得故
T2251_.64.0390c17: 十
T2251_.64.0390c25: 文有二三此言一。兼以成二次第一。於レ彼無故。下二 T2251_.64.0390c26: 句論主顯二次第義一
T2251_.64.0390c29: 理説及定惠。是其差別。餘二無レ別。故不二更 T2251_.64.0391a01: 述一。舊論曰。方言者以二因レ理釋義。譬如二由レ有 T2251_.64.0391a02: レ礙故。名レ色等言一。於二立破一勝言説名二巧辨一。無二 T2251_.64.0391a03: 有餘師説字一。於二婆沙雜心法勝二本中一。未
T2251_.64.0391a06: 解一。第三了達訓釋言詞一。如下有二變礙一故名レ色 T2251_.64.0391a07: 等上。此達二應理無滯礙説一。有説詞詮二諸法自 T2251_.64.0391a08: 性一。辨辨能顯示諸法差別一。有説於レ法直説名 T2251_.64.0391a09: レ詞。展轉無レ漏。分析名レ辨。縁二此二種一。三四有
T2251_.64.0391a12: 説等二句。或應二全如彼。若不レ爾。此文成二體 T2251_.64.0391a13: 上瘻一義。亦支離。有云。於二現流小乘論中一未
T2251_.64.0391a16: 雜集論説。諸方言音及訓釋諸法一爲レ詞。於二 T2251_.64.0391a17: 諸法差別一無礙爲レ辨。但詞中一分同耳
T2251_.64.0391a21: 二。習二外論一爲二加行一。義辨二習二内論一爲二加行一。 T2251_.64.0391a22: 雜心論主唯據二今傳説義一。問。凡此論云二傳 T2251_.64.0391a23: 説一。必表二不信一。言二理實一則論主評取多説一。或 T2251_.64.0391a24: 自發明義。今理實既婆沙評家。何可レ言二理 T2251_.64.0391a25: 實一。彼既在二婆沙一。前傳説言未レ審。答。傳説言。 T2251_.64.0391a26: 舊論言二餘師説一。後理實言云二有餘師説一。若準 T2251_.64.0391a27: レ彼倶有餘師故無二勝劣一。又正理顯宗傳説云二 T2251_.64.0391a28: 有説一。理實同レ此。今謂。正理爲レ是。傳字謬也。 T2251_.64.0391a29: 應レ作二有説一。次理實者。雖二既是婆沙評家一。義 T2251_.64.0391b01: 彼雜心論以二初義一爲レ論。爲レ簡レ彼特云二理實一。 T2251_.64.0391b02: 是則論主再評取彼一
T2251_.64.0391b05: 除レ詞所以一。上云レ非二彼靜慮所收一。下云レ故故。
T2251_.64.0391b10: 是第四靜慮邊際非レ餘
T2251_.64.0391b13: 一釋二二因一。二如是下結レ名。三此中下別解二
T2251_.64.0391b16: 増進。至二上上一云二増至究竟一。舊論云二至増究 T2251_.64.0391b17: 竟一。於レ増致二能所至異一。此約二次第増進一。故在二 T2251_.64.0391b18: 能至一。彼據二極増一
T2251_.64.0391b21: 品一也。此釋臆度全非二論意一
T2251_.64.0391b26: 世尊亦離染得一有レ二。一明二初得一。二明二後時 T2251_.64.0391b27: 不由二加行一。二乘唯加行。如來通二加行離染一。
T2251_.64.0391c01: 集。殊勝加行得故。皆可レ言二離染得一。離二有頂 T2251_.64.0391c02: 染一。得二盡智一時。得二無畏一故。準レ彼應レ知。然舊
T2251_.64.0391c07: 者。是相翻義。謂彼唯加行得。此亦唯離染得。
T2251_.64.0391c11: 得。三佛獨覺到究竟聲聞離染得。餘聲聞加 T2251_.64.0391c12: 行得。四如是説者。若定應レ得彼離染得。盡智 T2251_.64.0391c13: 時得。故後加行ニテ現在前。佛不二加行一。獨覺下 T2251_.64.0391c14: 加行。聲聞或中。或上。有下願智。無諍。無礙
T2251_.64.0391c18: 加行得一。此釋不レ然。此論言二唯加行得一。何得 T2251_.64.0391c19: レ許二少分不定一。婆沙亦約二定不定一。論二離染加 T2251_.64.0391c20: 行一。有二何理一爲二多少一。今詳。婆沙據下離二有頂 T2251_.64.0391c21: 染一時定得上。爲二離染得一。然是由二從來加行一。故 T2251_.64.0391c22: 彼時得。無二加行一者不レ得。若爾非二實離染得一 T2251_.64.0391c23: 故。此論不レ許レ之。言レ非二皆得一顯二此旨一。理實 T2251_.64.0391c24: 此論爲二盡理一。故正理。顯宗。雖二彼評家一。不レ依 T2251_.64.0391c25: 同レ此
T2251_.64.0391c28: 門。三縁境門。四二得門。五念住門。今依二妙 T2251_.64.0391c29: 音一。不レ據二婆沙評家一。故顯宗改レ頌曰。三身。一
T2251_.64.0392a07: 宿住三通一。今依二婆沙此論一。示レ圖曰 T2251_.64.0392a08:
T2251_.64.0392a13: 釋。神境所變事。智證通能變智。是依主釋。眼 T2251_.64.0392a14: 耳是根。異勝常途一。故稱爲レ天。眼即天耳。即
T2251_.64.0392a17: 大種所造淨色。能無礙視。體不可見眼界。眼 T2251_.64.0392a18: 處。眼根所攝。是謂二天眼一。問。何名二天眼一。答。此 T2251_.64.0392a19: 眼殊勝。故名爲レ天。世於二勝法一有二天言一。故如
T2251_.64.0392a22: 隨是隨應。念即智。同時心所。隨二彼彼事一。念 T2251_.64.0392a23: 力持故名二隨念一。隣二隨念一智證通隣近釋。或 T2251_.64.0392a24: 智隨レ念。知レ境故名二隨念一。宿住之隨念等依
T2251_.64.0392a27: 謂此聚中雖レ有二多法一。而念力増故説二隨念一。 T2251_.64.0392a28: 如下四念住雖二慧爲體。而念力増故名中念住上。 T2251_.64.0392a29: 漏已盡智故名二漏盡智一。漏即盡。漏盡之智。此 T2251_.64.0392b01: T2251_.64.0392b02: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0392b03: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0392b04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0392b05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0392b06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0392b07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0392b08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0392b09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0392b10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0392b11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0392b12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0392b13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0392b14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0392b15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0392b16: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0392b17: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0392b18: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0392b19: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0392b20: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0392b21: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0392b22: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0392b23: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0392b24: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0392b25: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0392b26: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0392b27: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0392b28: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0392b29: [IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0393a03: 境通一往。而不レ能レ見二其色一。故次起二天眼通一 T2251_.64.0393a04: 見。而レ不レ能レ聞二其語一。故次起二天耳通一聞。而 T2251_.64.0393a05: 不レ能レ知二其心一。故次起二他心通一知二彼心一。已未 T2251_.64.0393a06: レ知二宿世曾相遇不一。故後起二宿住通一。世尊依二 T2251_.64.0393a07: 此次第一而説。如是説者。次第無レ定。謂或先 T2251_.64.0393a08: 起二神境通一。乃至或先起二宿住通一。或有三唯得二 T2251_.64.0393a09: 神境通一。如二天授等一。或有三唯得二天眼通一。如二善 T2251_.64.0393a10: 星等一。是故諸通無二順入逆入一。亦無二超越次
T2251_.64.0393a15: 無レ有レ失
T2251_.64.0393a18: 通六智。謂俗。法。類。及苦集道。俗智能了二過 T2251_.64.0393a19: 去俗事一。餘隨二所應一。各縁二自境一。然觀二經意一。唯 T2251_.64.0393a20: 俗智攝。如レ説三隨憶二無量宿住一。謂一生乃至
T2251_.64.0393a23: 家一。施二唯言一
T2251_.64.0393a29: 次少年。次童子。次嬰孩。次羅奢佉。次鍵 T2251_.64.0393b01: 南。次閉尸。次頞部曇。次羯剌藍。次入胎位。 T2251_.64.0393b02: 次中有位。次初受中有位。後憶念前生命終 T2251_.64.0393b03: 位一。爾時此智加行成滿。光記引二婆沙成滿一 T2251_.64.0393b04: 致二三義一。於レ中第二爲レ正也
T2251_.64.0393b09: 依二自相續一。加行成滿。若自前生無色界ナラハ T2251_.64.0393b10: 者。轉依二他相續一。加行成滿。依二他相續一。修二加 T2251_.64.0393b11: 行一者。若他前生欲色界ナラハ者。即依二他相續一。 T2251_.64.0393b12: 加行成滿。若他前生無色界者。轉依二自相續一 T2251_.64.0393b13: 加行成滿。解云。自前生欲色界ナレハ加行顛末 T2251_.64.0393b14: 皆依二自身一。若自前生無色界ナレハ初依レトモ二自 T2251_.64.0393b15: 身一。而最後中有ノ前ノ命終心ノ所依ノ身無レ此。 T2251_.64.0393b16: 故轉依二他心一究竟。次依レ他加行。亦復如レ是。 T2251_.64.0393b17: 然光記約二自前生無色一。而爲下依二自相續一。加
T2251_.64.0393b20: 終心一究竟。此釋誤也。違二諸論一故。按或可言 T2251_.64.0393b21: 應二加行誤一據二婆沙一自前生無色界者。轉依二 T2251_.64.0393b22: 他身一加行成滿故
T2251_.64.0393b26: 者。且約レ勝示二輕觸一。以三神境思二身輕等一故。先 T2251_.64.0393b27: 者。明本。及正理。顯宗。竝如レ今。然光形誤也。
T2251_.64.0393c01: 起光明一。能見二彼色一。此不レ應レ理。不レ得二神通一。 T2251_.64.0393c02: 便應レ不レ能レ修起天眼一。如是説者。初引レ通時。 T2251_.64.0393c03: 若離二光明一。不レ能レ見レ色。若通成滿。設離二光 T2251_.64.0393c04: 明一。亦能見レ色。問。神通。天眼。倶有二光明一。有二 T2251_.64.0393c05: 何差別一。答。神通光明。或自性有。或變化有。 T2251_.64.0393c06: 天眼光明。唯自性有。作二是説一相翻前説一
T2251_.64.0393c13: 支所成一故。非二樂道所攝一故。然光記但釋二未 T2251_.64.0393c14: 至中間一未可也
T2251_.64.0393c19: レ色。與二無色一相翻。故不レ縁不レ待レ言。他心縁 T2251_.64.0393c20: レ心。宿住縁二五蘊一。竝其事在二無色一。故通レ此。若
T2251_.64.0393c25: 千世界一。若作二加行一。能見二中大無數世界一
T2251_.64.0393c28: 界一。據二如レ是次一。言二一二三一。即是小中大。其
T2251_.64.0394a04: 三種差別一。一憶二二萬劫事一。二憶二四萬劫事一。 T2251_.64.0394a05: 三憶二八萬劫事一。復有二別誦一。第三憶知六萬 T2251_.64.0394a06: 劫事一。問。何等常見論者。能憶知二萬劫事一。 T2251_.64.0394a07: 乃至憶知八萬劫事一耶。答。常見論者。根有二 T2251_.64.0394a08: 三品一。下憶二二萬一。中憶二四萬一。上憶二八萬一。復次 T2251_.64.0394a09: 常見論者。能憶知三劫壞事一。若憶二火劫壞 T2251_.64.0394a10: 事一者。彼知二二萬劫一。若憶二水劫壞事一者。彼知二 T2251_.64.0394a11: 四萬劫一。若憶二風劫壞事一者。知二八萬劫一。復次 T2251_.64.0394a12: 常見論者。能憶知三根壞事一。謂喜樂捨。如 T2251_.64.0394a13: レ次知二二四八萬劫一。復次常見論者。有二聲聞 T2251_.64.0394a14: 獨覺佛三乘種性差別一。如レ次憶知二四八萬
T2251_.64.0394a17: 生心一。聲聞知二千界一。支佛知二百千世界一。十住 T2251_.64.0394a18: 第九云。大力聲聞天眼見二小千國土一。小辟支 T2251_.64.0394a19: 佛見二十小千國土一。中辟支佛見二百萬小千土一。 T2251_.64.0394a20: 大力辟支佛見二三千大千一。伽倫記云。云何凡 T2251_.64.0394a21: 夫天眼見二四天下一。梵王見二小千界一。聲聞見二 T2251_.64.0394a22: 二千一。辟支佛見二三千一耶。景云。天眼耳通五 T2251_.64.0394a23: 識中慧故隔二鐵圍一。故見有二遠近一。宿住通意識 T2251_.64.0394a24: 故得二八萬一。有釋。唯菩薩種姓異生知二八萬
T2251_.64.0394a27: 種姓憶二四萬劫一。菩薩種姓憶二八萬劫一
T2251_.64.0394b02: 既如レ是。何況共徳六通。不レ由二加行一。解云。加 T2251_.64.0394b03: 行有二二種一。一總加行。二別加行。總加行者。 T2251_.64.0394b04: 諸善行皆是此加行。別加行者。但別修二其行一。 T2251_.64.0394b05: 如二天耳思聲。天眼思光等一。彼十力以二不共一 T2251_.64.0394b06: 故。就レ總云二加行一。今三乘對説故。就レ別云二不 T2251_.64.0394b07: 由一。以二佛不修二別加行一故
T2251_.64.0394b11: 趣一。或衆生身口意行レ惡。命終生二地獄一。或衆 T2251_.64.0394b12: 生身口意行レ善。命終生二善趣天中一。是謂名三
T2251_.64.0394b16: 亦天眼唯現在。何知二未來善惡趣一。兼等中存二 T2251_.64.0394b17: 此難一
T2251_.64.0394b24: 第五一。如三十力中在二漏盡前一。光記五重問答竝 T2251_.64.0394b25: 爲レ得焉
T2251_.64.0394c03: 經一據レ彼也。正理依二評家一破二此論一。由レ是顯宗
T2251_.64.0394c06: 謬迷之甚。婆沙既約二現修一有二兩説一。今論同二 T2251_.64.0394c07: 彼一説一。何可二得修一。又契經分明説二受苦樂一。 T2251_.64.0394c08: 何勞會二得修一。又若約二得修一。餘通亦渉二餘念 T2251_.64.0394c09: 住一。何不レ説。又何但此有二得修起盡一。妄陋之 T2251_.64.0394c10: 最矣
T2251_.64.0394c13: 道。然起二無間道一。則天眼耳依二四根本地一。其 T2251_.64.0394c14: 解脱道唯欲。初定自地。故不二相違一。正理七十
T2251_.64.0394c17: 無記一之責。若汎依二十大地中定一渉二無記一。此
T2251_.64.0394c22: 沙多文一。成二無記義一也
T2251_.64.0394c25: 足。總云二通謂善惠一。光記。寶疏。竝但牒二眼耳 T2251_.64.0394c26: 無記一。雖二義無害。不レ順三最後施二問答一。何不二 T2251_.64.0394c27: 上四靜慮次一。答。意但似レ就二六通一。以三六通處 T2251_.64.0394c28: 辨二多少勝劣一故有二二釋一。六中二無記。四善 T2251_.64.0394c29: 故約二多分一。或無記。善。對劣勝別故。就レ勝爲
T2251_.64.0395a03: 通達者。謂善慧。此以三一切法爲二所通達一隨二 T2251_.64.0395a04: 其事一。此復云何。謂苦忍苦智通達苦一。集忍集 T2251_.64.0395a05: 智通達集一。滅忍滅智通達滅一。道忍道智通 T2251_.64.0395a06: 達道一。復有二善有漏慧一。通達苦集滅道及虚空 T2251_.64.0395a07: 非擇滅一。故説。通達者。謂善慧。此以二一切法一。 T2251_.64.0395a08: 爲二所通達一。隨二其事一是名二所通達法一。彼説二所 T2251_.64.0395a09: 通達之能通達一。言二通達者謂善慧一。按。彼文非 T2251_.64.0395a10: レ説二六神通一。不レ相關此一也。故婆沙百四十一
T2251_.64.0395a13: 切法皆是所通達一故。此中所説勝慧名レ通。此 T2251_.64.0395a14: 通或善。或是無記。通與二善慧一。得レ作二四句一。有 T2251_.64.0395a15: 通非二善慧一。謂天眼耳通。有善慧非レ通。謂除 T2251_.64.0395a16: レ通餘善慧。有倶是。謂餘四通。有倶非。謂除二
T2251_.64.0395a20: 惠爲二能知通一。以顯二所知及所通法一。雖二諸智 T2251_.64.0395a21: 惠皆能知通一。而且説レ善。勝遍縁故。所知 T2251_.64.0395a22: 所通雖レ無二廣狹一。而能知外有二別能通一故。説二 T2251_.64.0395a23: 所知一已。復説二所通法一。此所レ辨通。唯勝定
T2251_.64.0395a28: 論獨約二六通一未審。亦復非二彼論意一。退按二此 T2251_.64.0395a29: 論一異二婆沙一。通釋問者致二不解問一。故順レ彼約 T2251_.64.0395b01: 六通一。以作二二釋一。是則試驗門。如二婆沙一百
T2251_.64.0395b07: レ是。爲レ欲レ試下後學徒於二品類足一知二當不當一不上 T2251_.64.0395b08: 故。又解。此論就二品類足本意一問答。不二必六 T2251_.64.0395b09: 通一。謂問意六通中。若二無記。四善。於二品類 T2251_.64.0395b10: 足一。總寛明二能通達一。猶應レ説二無記一。何但云二善 T2251_.64.0395b11: 慧一。答。彼總明二能通達諸智一故。應レ説二三性智一。 T2251_.64.0395b12: 然善是勝故。且云二善慧一。由レ此正理亦云。且 T2251_.64.0395b13: 説レ善勝遍縁故。或善惠多。惡無記少。就二多 T2251_.64.0395b14: 分一是二解答意也。光記以二就勝一。令レ同二婆沙
T2251_.64.0395b22: 第二者治二後際愚一。死生智名順二其自性一。雜阿 T2251_.64.0395b23: 含經所説據レ體。今以二天眼一。示二其體一者。是從 T2251_.64.0395b24: レ因故。長含所説是
T2251_.64.0395c05: 樂涅槃一。二見二自前際自衰損事一。見二後際他衰 T2251_.64.0395c06: 損事一厭離。既厭離已欣樂涅槃一。三見二前後 T2251_.64.0395c07: 際蘊處界一厭離。既厭離已欣樂涅槃一。四除二 T2251_.64.0395c08: 常見斷見一。安住中道一。五能引二空無願無相解
T2251_.64.0395c15: 故。順二勝義明一故。引二無漏明一故。是故尊者妙 T2251_.64.0395c16: 音説曰。於二三明中一。惟漏盡智是勝義明。餘二 T2251_.64.0395c17: 能引二勝義明一。故假立二明名一。更有二六復次一
T2251_.64.0395c27: 未レ審。是則説經。教誡奚別。前文已言三智惠 T2251_.64.0395c28: 知二人本意一。則其言二説經一者。寫誤耳。詳曰。有二
T2251_.64.0396a02: 焉
T2251_.64.0396a07: 業釋。三示導者帶數釋。舊論唯云二三導一。神 T2251_.64.0396a08: 是定。變是異變。由レ定起二變異事一。名二神變一依 T2251_.64.0396a09: 主釋。神變即示導持業釋。記是記説。心是他 T2251_.64.0396a10: 心。心之記故名二記心一。記心即神變。教授誡勗 T2251_.64.0396a11: 名一教誡一。亦教亦誡持業釋。又各有二同體依
T2251_.64.0396a14: 巖崖岸等障。身過無礙。如是廣説。乃至梵世 T2251_.64.0396a15: 身自存轉。是名二神變一。示導者。謂有二苾芻一。雖下 T2251_.64.0396a16: 於二多種神變境界一。各別領受上。若不レ令二他知 T2251_.64.0396a17: 見一。但名二神變自在一。不レ名二示導一。若有二苾芻一。能 T2251_.64.0396a18: 於二多種神變境界一。各別領受。亦能令二他知 T2251_.64.0396a19: 見一。名二神變自在一。亦名二示導一。記心示導者。如二 T2251_.64.0396a20: 世尊説一。苾芻當レ知。謂有二一類一。或由二占相一。或 T2251_.64.0396a21: 由二言説一。隨記二他心一。彼意如レ此。彼意如レ此。彼 T2251_.64.0396a22: 意轉變。或隨記二過去。或未來。或現在。小多 T2251_.64.0396a23: 心心所一。一切如實非二不如實一。或有二一類一。不 T2251_.64.0396a24: レ由二占相言説一。然由二天神一。或由二非人一。聞二彼 T2251_.64.0396a25: 聲一故。隨記二他心一如レ前。或有二一類一。不レ由二天 T2251_.64.0396a26: 神及非人一。聞二彼聲一。然由二内心一。知二他有情心 T2251_.64.0396a27: 所尋伺一。隨記二他心一。如レ前或有二一類一。不レ由二内 T2251_.64.0396a28: 心一。然由四現見三他有情住二無尋無伺三摩地一。 T2251_.64.0396a29: 見已念言。如レ是具壽無尋無伺意行微妙。如 T2251_.64.0396b01: レ是具壽從二此定一出。當レ記二如レ此如レ此尋伺諸 T2251_.64.0396b02: 行一。隨記二他心一。一切如實非二不如實一。是名二記 T2251_.64.0396b03: 心一。示導者。謂有二苾芻一。雖二如レ上隨記一。若不 T2251_.64.0396b04: レ令二他知見一。但名二記心自在一。不レ名二示導一。若 T2251_.64.0396b05: 有二苾芻一。如レ上隨記。亦能令二他知見一。名二記心 T2251_.64.0396b06: 自在一。亦名二示導一。教誡示導者。如二世尊説一。苾 T2251_.64.0396b07: 芻當レ知。謂有二苾芻一。爲レ他宣説。此是苦聖諦。 T2251_.64.0396b08: 應二遍知。此是苦集聖諦應二永斷一。此是苦滅聖 T2251_.64.0396b09: 諦應二作證一。此是趣苦滅道聖諦應二修習一。是 T2251_.64.0396b10: 名二教誡一。示導者。謂有二苾芻一。雖二能能説如上 T2251_.64.0396b11: 若他聞已不レ起二諦順忍一。不レ得二現觀邊世俗 T2251_.64.0396b12: 智一。但名二教誡自在一不レ名二示導一。若有二苾芻一。能 T2251_.64.0396b13: 説如レ上。亦能令下他起二諦順忍一得中現觀邊世 T2251_.64.0396b14: 俗知上。名二教誡自在一。亦名二示導一
T2251_.64.0396b19: 道爲二憎背一。不レ好二内外二道一。爲二處中一。雖二相
T2251_.64.0396b22: 法一。決定信者。及不信者。不レ應二爲現一。若不定
T2251_.64.0396b25: 現文一然。今退按此文不審。謂初二文。義無 T2251_.64.0396b26: レ別。故所化生與二憎背處中一是何別。由レ此正
T2251_.64.0396b29: 礙心。未信心。不欲修心。此受化人由二此三一。 T2251_.64.0396c01: 起二歸向心信受心修行心一。故説二此三一爲レ導。 T2251_.64.0396c02: 彼舊論文最爲レ正。由二此理一。正理。顯宗。唯總 T2251_.64.0396c03: 釋略二別釋一。彼曰。唯此三種引二所化生一。令二初
T2251_.64.0396c06: 最爲レ勝故。能示能導得二示導名一。或此能引 T2251_.64.0396c07: 憎二背正法一。及未信心不レ欲レ修者。令下於二佛法一 T2251_.64.0396c08: 如レ次。歸伏。信受。修行上。得二示導名一
T2251_.64.0396c11: 因一。此有二正釋指事一。二又前下釋二後因一。此即 T2251_.64.0396c12: 總釋。人天善果爲レ利。涅槃極果爲レ樂。故下 T2251_.64.0396c13: 文云二利益及安樂一 T2251_.64.0396c14: 如有呪術健馱梨伊刹尼 舊論云二乾陀梨伊
T2251_.64.0396c19: 猶二健馱羅國一是也。伊刹尼叉黠切。此云二占相
T2251_.64.0396c27: 呪一。能觀察他心一。其事反レ此。而新舊婆沙所 T2251_.64.0396c28: レ載。彼經亦同二此論一。從レ多此論爲レ正。顯宗。正 T2251_.64.0396c29: 理亦爾故。或梵土希術。不レ可二得考一。稽古下
T2251_.64.0397a03: レ火。則未也。捫二日月一驅二風雨一。出沒變幻實出二 T2251_.64.0397a04: 意表一矣。神變何足レ爲レ奇哉。神變而盡二伽文一。 T2251_.64.0397a05: 則何貴二於覺一哉。其或以抗二外家一者。因二人之 T2251_.64.0397a06: 所信而導レ之。是又所以般若之使一也。古人 T2251_.64.0397a07: 已具言レ之。如下仲尼識二廟火一辨中萍實上。豈足 T2251_.64.0397a08: レ輕重之一乎。史遷稱二仲尼一。猶或議レ焉。事レ佛 T2251_.64.0397a09: 者何見之淺且小也
T2251_.64.0397a12: 地名レ神。欲等四名レ足。由三四法所二攝受一。令二三 T2251_.64.0397a13: 摩地轉一故。復有説者。三摩地是神。是足。欲 T2251_.64.0397a14: 等四惟足非レ神。如二擇法是覺亦支。餘六惟支 T2251_.64.0397a15: 非覺。彼兩説竝神爲レ定。雖四婆沙中無三正解 T2251_.64.0397a16: 説神境二一。準二神足釋一。以釋二神境一。故言レ依二毘 T2251_.64.0397a17: 婆沙所説道理一。不レ言レ作二是説一。然標別毘婆
T2251_.64.0397a22: レ神。境謂諸變異事。神即境故名二神境一持業 T2251_.64.0397a23: 釋
T2251_.64.0397a28: 或住二此洲一。手捫二日月一。或屈伸臂一頃至二色究 T2251_.64.0397a29: 竟天一。釋レ後云。眼識至二色頂一。或上至二色究竟一。
T2251_.64.0397b03: 三非也。非レ順二身即能至文一。故身至レ彼。是心 T2251_.64.0397b04: 縁時。非二異時一故云レ即。舊論曰。於二最遠處一。由 T2251_.64.0397b05: レ發二一行心一時即至レ彼
T2251_.64.0397b11: 化上。而無下色界成二香味一失上。化作自身一。唯二處 T2251_.64.0397b12: 故。有説亦化レ四。如二衣等不成。彼初説意。異 T2251_.64.0397b13: 界自身唯同二自地一。唯色觸二。準知自界自他 T2251_.64.0397b14: 亦爾。異界他身化レ四。雖レ化不レ成。後説意作二 T2251_.64.0397b15: 欲自他一。皆化レ四。而不レ成二香味一。今論兩説。總 T2251_.64.0397b16: 化二欲界一。四。二。與二正理一義別也。舊論云。如衣
T2251_.64.0397b22: 一第三句明二果同レ依得一。二第四句明二從與 T2251_.64.0397b23: レ生相一。三第五句明二事與レ心同地一。四第六句 T2251_.64.0397b24: 明三化語由二自下地心一。五第七八句明二化人。 T2251_.64.0397b25: 化主語。默。同。不同一。六第九十句明二願力留 T2251_.64.0397b26: レ身令語。七第十一十二句明三死後留二骨身一。 T2251_.64.0397b27: 八第十三十四句明三初心成滿化有二差別一。九 T2251_.64.0397b28: 第十五十六句明二二得三性差別一。長行釋準
T2251_.64.0397c06: 能所起異一。言二神境通果能化心一。二此有下釋二 T2251_.64.0397c07: 初句中十四及第二句一有レ二。初標。二謂依下 T2251_.64.0397c08: 釋。此有二總釋別釋一。依初下即別釋。成レ中有 T2251_.64.0397c09: レ三。一正釋。二諸果下明レ不レ依二下地一。三第二 T2251_.64.0397c10: 下明下下化心由二相望一。亦名勝。謂第二定果 T2251_.64.0397c11: 有二三心一中。下欲界化心對下初定果有二二心一 T2251_.64.0397c12: 中。上地初定化心上。雖二繋地故欲界化故是劣一。 T2251_.64.0397c13: 然由二所依定一。亦勝二於初定化一。所依定第二。 T2251_.64.0397c14: 初定。勝劣故復約レ行。勝二初定化一。何以故。謂 T2251_.64.0397c15: 從二欲界一。行二至第二定一。與三唯行二初定一。勝劣故。 T2251_.64.0397c16: 餘第三定果初禪化。心望二二定果二定化心一 T2251_.64.0397c17: 等。竝皆準レ此。如レ理應レ思故。論兩處云レ等。總 T2251_.64.0397c18: 云二下地上地一
T2251_.64.0397c21: 總釋。二謂從下別釋。三非定下總結。二中有 T2251_.64.0397c22: レ三。一明下從二二心一生上。次此前下明三能生二二 T2251_.64.0397c23: 心一。後故此下結二從生竝二一。總結中有二法譬 T2251_.64.0397c24: 兩段一。門入者喩二初淨定一。門出者比二最後淨 T2251_.64.0397c25: 定一
T2251_.64.0397c28: 釋二由自一。後釋二由下一。是此上下但就二所化人 T2251_.64.0397c29: 處一。不レ約二生身上下一。故若身生二欲初定。若生二 T2251_.64.0398a01: 二定已上一。但起二欲初定化人語一。必由二自地通 T2251_.64.0398a02: 果能化心一。或但起二二定已上化人語一。由二下初 T2251_.64.0398a03: 定能化心一。以三語能化心唯在二初定欲一故。如二
T2251_.64.0398a06: レ得レ令二言説一。若所化人在二上地一。但由二初定心一。 T2251_.64.0398a07: 令二言説一。彼但云二所化一。不レ言二能變身處一
T2251_.64.0398a10: 辨レ同。二約レ佛明二亦有別。初中有レ三。一正 T2251_.64.0398a11: 明。二引證。三結意。此即初也
T2251_.64.0398a17: 坐。而告レ之曰。汝今見二我神變力一不。答曰。唯 T2251_.64.0398a18: 然已見。梵童子曰。我亦修二四神足一。故能如 T2251_.64.0398a19: レ是無數變化。時三十三天各作二是念一。今梵童 T2251_.64.0398a20: 子獨於二我坐一。而説二是語一。而彼梵童一化身 T2251_.64.0398a21: 語。餘化亦語。一化身默餘化亦默。彼是長行 T2251_.64.0398a22: 爲レ異
T2251_.64.0398a25: 問佛答。或佛問彼答。今言音所詮等者。問與 T2251_.64.0398a26: レ答言音別。亦所詮有レ別。而亦有レ同故云レ容。 T2251_.64.0398a27: 義足經曰。佛語化人默然。化人語佛默然。何 T2251_.64.0398a28: 以故。正覺直度正所意故。當レ爲レ證。智論二 T2251_.64.0398a29: 十六云。如二聲聞法一化人説レ法。化主不レ説。化 T2251_.64.0398b01: 主説レ法。化人不レ説。佛則不レ爾。化主化人但 T2251_.64.0398b02: 能説レ法。彼以二別倶一。以爲二劣勝一。相翻此論一。百
T2251_.64.0398b05: 便默。所化語時弟子便默。施設論卷第六文
T2251_.64.0398b08: 倶一判二勝劣一。彼約二用具不具一判二劣勝一。各據二一 T2251_.64.0398b09: 義一。竝不二相違一也
T2251_.64.0398b12: 通難一。光記辨二變化心。通果心二差別一。而破二 T2251_.64.0398b13: 空法師。泰法師等一。寶疏亦辨二寛狹一。其意不 T2251_.64.0398b14: レ異レ光。不レ破二空師等一者。以二光記已標簡一故」
T2251_.64.0398b17: 中文有レ三。一正示。二指事。三明三骨身非二肉
T2251_.64.0398b20: 所レ應レ作者。已究竟故。謂佛所レ應レ度皆已度 T2251_.64.0398b21: 訖。所レ未レ度者。聖弟子度レ之。有説。無レ留二化 T2251_.64.0398b22: 事一。問。若爾迦葉波事。云何得レ有。答。諸信敬 T2251_.64.0398b23: 天神所二住持一故。有説。迦葉波爾時未二般涅 T2251_.64.0398b24: 槃一。慈氏佛時。方取二滅度一。此不レ應レ理。寧可レ説 T2251_.64.0398b25: レ無。不レ説二彼默然多時虚住一。如是説者。有レ留二 T2251_.64.0398b26: 化事一。是故大迦葉波已入二涅槃一。婆沙既評取 T2251_.64.0398b27: 初説一。今亦同レ彼。今命終者。當二迦葉入滅一。而 T2251_.64.0398b28: 婆沙未レ辨二骨肉差別一。今辨別此一。以二肉身期
T2251_.64.0398c02: 第二説。是則不正義。文有二所立通釋二一。大迦 T2251_.64.0398c03: 葉波入二鷄足山一。或曰取二涅槃一。或曰二慈氏佛
T2251_.64.0398c08: 手一。指示迦葉一。告二諸人民一。過去釋迦佛弟子。 T2251_.64.0398c09: 名曰二迦葉一。今日現在。又云。彌勒如來當下取二 T2251_.64.0398c10: 迦葉僧迦梨一著之。是時迦葉身體。奄然星ノ如 T2251_.64.0398c11: 散。是時彌勒復取二種種花香一。供養迦葉一。又
T2251_.64.0398c17: 世一。其壽命將レ終時。入二於山間一。以二神通力一。住 T2251_.64.0398c18: 持此身一。起二如レ此願一。願我此身勿レ令二散壞一。乃 T2251_.64.0398c19: 至三彌勒如來得二阿耨菩提一。見二我身一也。作二是 T2251_.64.0398c20: 思惟一已入二無餘涅槃一。涅槃後二山還合。後彌 T2251_.64.0398c21: 勒世尊廣顯二法教一。憶念是大迦葉舍利一。與二 T2251_.64.0398c22: 無量千衆一至二於彼處一。兩山兩開。爾時彌勒 T2251_.64.0398c23: 見三大迦葉比丘舍利不散不壞唯著二僧伽梨一
T2251_.64.0398c26: 所傳。蓋如レ此。如二増一所云。大衆部所傳爾
T2251_.64.0399a06: レ附二所依一。起二衆多化事一。光解云。所依謂木石
T2251_.64.0399a10: 塊等一。化主方能作二所化事一。有餘師説。若初起 T2251_.64.0399a11: レ通者。所起化事要有二所假。若通慧滿者。無 T2251_.64.0399a12: レ所二依假一。能起二化事一。正理師依二彼第二説一
T2251_.64.0399a15: 變一。二約二生得等一。後中文有レ三。一正明。二如 T2251_.64.0399a16: 天下指事。三於十下辨二處多少一。生得等者。 T2251_.64.0399a17: 等向内等。舊論無二等字一。正理云。總有二二類
T2251_.64.0399a23: 説生得心化惟依二自界身一。修得心化通依二自 T2251_.64.0399a24: 他界身一。今論云二自他身化一者。約二自界一故同二 T2251_.64.0399a25: 後説一
T2251_.64.0399b01: 化。欲界九處。色界七處。今論修得。前已説
T2251_.64.0399b05: 論主通二彼難一。救二婆沙等一也
T2251_.64.0399b08: 闕門。三縁境障不障門
T2251_.64.0399b12: 若有主宰。若無主宰。若水。若陸。若近。若遠。 T2251_.64.0399b13: 而悉觀見。答。主藏臣寶。往昔修因。其事廣 T2251_.64.0399b14: 大。謂於二父母知識及師尊所幷餘沙門婆羅 T2251_.64.0399b15: 門衆一。不レ生二惱害一。而復愛樂不惱害者。又於二 T2251_.64.0399b16: 世間一。普爲二一切癡黒暗冥一作三光明照授與 T2251_.64.0399b17: 燈明及燈明具一。破二諸冥暗一。悉使二明亮一。以二如
T2251_.64.0399b20: 王二一洲一者。面各能見二一倶盧舍一。問。主藏臣 T2251_.64.0399b21: 眼齊レ何能見。答。四洲王臣見二三倶盧舍一。乃至 T2251_.64.0399b22: 三洲王臣見二半倶盧舍一。如二契經説一。輪王有時 T2251_.64.0399b23: 欲レ試二藏臣威力所受。乘レ船遊戲殑伽河中一。 T2251_.64.0399b24: 勅二藏臣一言。吾今須レ寶。藏臣敬諾。請還辨レ之。 T2251_.64.0399b25: 王不レ悦曰。正爾須レ辨。藏臣惶恐即以二兩手一 T2251_.64.0399b26: 㧌攪。水中應レ時。捧出種種珍寶一。以獻レ王。復
T2251_.64.0399c01: 晝夜能見面各踰繕那。問。菩薩所レ成異熟生 T2251_.64.0399c02: 眼。實非二天眼一。何故立二此名一。答。菩薩眼根體
T2251_.64.0399c11: 闕一。義亦不レ異。如生等二句。光記屬レ上爲レ正。
T2251_.64.0399c14: 文既無二能例一。何但所例。又違二舊論一。彼二十
T2251_.64.0399c19: 解順二舊論一者非也
T2251_.64.0399c22: 左右晝夜等一。惠暉云。肉眼見レ近不レ見レ遠。天 T2251_.64.0399c23: 眼遠近皆見。肉眼有二同分彼同分一。天眼唯同 T2251_.64.0399c24: 分。肉眼見レ前不レ見レ後。及不レ見二左右一。天眼前 T2251_.64.0399c25: 後左右皆見。肉眼見二障内一。不レ見二障外一。天眼 T2251_.64.0399c26: 内外皆見。肉眼見レ麁不レ見レ細。天眼二皆見。 T2251_.64.0399c27: 肉眼見レ晝不レ見夜。天眼晝夜皆見。肉眼見 T2251_.64.0399c28: レ明不レ見レ闇。天眼明闇皆見。肉眼有二瞖闕一。天
T2251_.64.0400a02: 識一。依二此淨識一。能遍觀察前後左右上下諸
T2251_.64.0400a05: 所障一故。見二上諸色一者。非二雲霧等所障一故。問 T2251_.64.0400a06: 如レ是天眼能於二一時一頓見二十方諸色境一不。 T2251_.64.0400a07: 有説能見。以二天眼根光明清徹一。自然遍照。 T2251_.64.0400a08: 如三未尼寶遍發二光明一。有説不レ能二一時頓見一。 T2251_.64.0400a09: 法蘊所説天眼諸方無レ障。非レ謂二一時頓見一。謂 T2251_.64.0400a10: 人等眼但能覩見面所レ向色一。欲レ見レ餘方要 T2251_.64.0400a11: 須二迴轉俯仰方見一。天眼不レ爾。面向二一方一。隨 T2251_.64.0400a12: 欲二能見一。不レ須二迴轉一。故説三能見二上下諸方一。非
T2251_.64.0400a19: 二句明二五趣通局一。唯言顯二餘五種容有。初 T2251_.64.0400a20: 言簡二後時一
T2251_.64.0400a29: 事一不レ得二容易一
T2251_.64.0400b03: 唯善二通果無記一。餘生得等五。皆通二善染無 T2251_.64.0400b04: 記三性一。後中此生得等五非レ果。故不レ名レ通。
T2251_.64.0400b07: 唯約二呪藥二一者非也
T2251_.64.0400b11: 一約二人趣一。二約二地獄一。三總指勸餘三趣一。此 T2251_.64.0400b12: 即初也。此中有二正釋通妨一。言レ餘者。生得餘 T2251_.64.0400b13: 修呪等五類。寶疏云二餘趣一非也。通妨中舊論 T2251_.64.0400b14: 曰。唯於二人道一前所説如意成等五。無二生所 T2251_.64.0400b15: 得一。若爾云何。得レ有下自性憶念宿住一人上。此從二 T2251_.64.0400b16: 業差別所作一。生所得舊論。正理。顯宗。光記亦 T2251_.64.0400b17: 爾。婆沙中悉云二生處得一。今論依二得能所一云二 T2251_.64.0400b18: 所得一。婆沙據二生在處一。故云二生處一。竝不二相違一。 T2251_.64.0400b19: 本性生念者。正理。顯宗竝爾。爲レ成レ句。且略二 T2251_.64.0400b20: 智言一。又婆沙悉作二本性念生智一。生念之言彼
T2251_.64.0400b24: 互用互釋レ此。亦無レ失 光記六類五趣配立 T2251_.64.0400b25: 雖二多釋一唯是二解。今示レ圖 T2251_.64.0400b26:
T2251_.64.0400b29: 通二初中後一 T2251_.64.0400c01: T2251_.64.0400c02: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0400c03: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0400c04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0400c05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0400c06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0400c07: [IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0400c10: T2251_.64.0400c11: T2251_.64.0400c12: 八 T2251_.64.0400c13: 豐山寓居上毛沙門釋快道記 T2251_.64.0400c14: 分別定品第八之一 T2251_.64.0400c15: 分別定品 當品大分爲レ二。初明二所依定一。二 T2251_.64.0400c16: 明二能依徳一。初中有レ四。初明二四靜慮一。光記於 T2251_.64.0400c17: レ此大開レ三。第二第三非也。彼正法住世從二 T2251_.64.0400c18: 界品初正宗一來。故彼第三七言頌是流通分。 T2251_.64.0400c19: 何於レ此可レ分。亦科名非也。寶疏於レ此失二科 T2251_.64.0400c20: 文一。而大同レ光。於レ此分レ四亦非也。光記辨二生 T2251_.64.0400c21: 起一兩釋。賢智定三約二果因縁一。記一二十七竝 T2251_.64.0400c22: 倶初説。今別約二智定一作二能所依後釋一。於レ義 T2251_.64.0400c23: 無二大異一。寶疏大同二後解一
T2251_.64.0400c26: 定一。唯諸靜慮能具爲レ依。故於二此中一。先辨二靜 T2251_.64.0400c27: 慮一。或於下先辨二共功徳一中上。已辨二智所成無靜 T2251_.64.0400c28: 等功徳一。餘所成徳。今次當レ辨。於レ中先辨二所
T2251_.64.0401a05: 靜慮。無色。等至。等持。無量。解脱。勝處。通處 T2251_.64.0401a06: 等。於レ中前卷已説二無諍乃至通一。今辨二靜慮 T2251_.64.0401a07: 等一。豈得三總約二諸智一
T2251_.64.0401a10: 性一。四解二靜慮名一。此即初二。如レ文可レ知
T2251_.64.0401a13: 論主難。四有部通。五論主詰。六有部救。七 T2251_.64.0401a14: 叙二經部宗一。此即初四。文易レ見。光寶竝直爲二 T2251_.64.0401a15: 經部一。雖レ無二大害一。疎二於文理一。後別叙二經部宗一
T2251_.64.0401a19: 牒破後念成體救一。四三性心皆一境轉難。此 T2251_.64.0401a20: 即初也
T2251_.64.0401a24: レ然。於二相應法中一。定大地應二無用一。準二此等文一。 T2251_.64.0401a25: 蒙二當念自一境轉破一。彼救而言二第二念用一。破 T2251_.64.0401a26: レ此若言二後念用一。則於二其前時當念相應法
T2251_.64.0401a29: 者非也。寶疏云。若謂下前念等持令中心於二第 T2251_.64.0401b01: 二念一。亦同レ前縁二一境一轉上。此即前心令二其後 T2251_.64.0401b02: 心同一境轉一。後心ト相應スル等持何用。此釋 T2251_.64.0401b03: 雖二詳悉一。然非二論意一。何者當念自轉破之後 T2251_.64.0401b04: 救。何云レ同レ前。又論文居レ今喚レ後。故云二第二 T2251_.64.0401b05: 念一。若破二後念一。應レ言下則於二後倶一等持無用。 T2251_.64.0401b06: 既不レ言レ爾。但云二相應一。破二當念一理決然
T2251_.64.0401b09: 於二第二念一不乙散亂甲故。三摩地別有レ體義成 T2251_.64.0401b10: 立天。破云。寧不乙即由下斯於二相應一等持無レ用 T2251_.64.0401b11: 之道理上。一切心王自於二一境一轉甲。此心自一境 T2251_.64.0401b12: 轉。彼心由二三摩地一。彼此異。因不可得。舊論 T2251_.64.0401b13: 曰。由レ此是三摩提ナラハ是故諸心共縁二一境一。 T2251_.64.0401b14: 汝何故。不レ許二此義一。彼言二是三摩提一。是當二此 T2251_.64.0401b15: 成字一。是故言當二由斯一。諸心言當二心字一。汝何
T2251_.64.0401b18: 貫如レ環。然云レ由二此餘心心所一。此言所指在 T2251_.64.0401b19: レ何。復亦三摩地復由レ誰難。於二一章一全無二起 T2251_.64.0401b20: 盡一。豈非二摸索一。寶疏亦釋二由此一云二由修習一。釋二 T2251_.64.0401b21: 由斯一云二以此修習力一。此亦誤也。修習義從二 T2251_.64.0401b22: 何文一。又所指無レ此。又約二定散通一。與二後難一不
T2251_.64.0401b26: 應レ立三一切心皆成二一類一此亦成レ失
T2251_.64.0401b29: 論云。經部師説。是心同一類故説爲レ定。何以 T2251_.64.0401c01: 故。三摩提者。謂依二心學一。心清淨爲レ勝。經中
T2251_.64.0401c05: 學。増上惠學。何等爲二増上意學一。若比丘離二
T2251_.64.0401c08: 法一。有覺有觀。離レ生二喜樂一。初禪具足住。乃至
T2251_.64.0401c16: 名一。定令二惠生一無二濁亂一故。有説此定持二勝遍 T2251_.64.0401c17: 縁一。如理思惟。故名二靜慮一。勝言簡二欲界一。遍縁 T2251_.64.0401c18: 簡二無色一。如理思惟簡異顛倒一。能持二此定一。是 T2251_.64.0401c19: 妙等持。此妙等持名爲二靜慮一。此言顯示止觀
T2251_.64.0401c26: 復次遍觀遍斷名二靜慮一。欲三摩地雖二遍觀一。 T2251_.64.0401c27: 非二遍斷一。無色定二義倶闕。復次能靜息一切 T2251_.64.0401c28: 煩惱一。及能思慮一切所縁一。名爲二靜慮一。欲三 T2251_.64.0401c29: 摩地雖三思慮一切所縁一。非三靜息一切煩惱一。 T2251_.64.0402a01: 無色定二義都無。復次無色定有レ靜無レ慮。欲 T2251_.64.0402a02: 異三摩地有レ慮無レ靜。色定倶有。故名二靜慮一。
T2251_.64.0402a07: 斷結。應レ名二靜慮一。若能正觀故名二靜慮一。則欲 T2251_.64.0402a08: 界三摩地亦能正觀。應レ名二靜慮一。是則於二三 T2251_.64.0402a09: 摩地一體一。有二能斷正觀二義一。故持業釋。一體 T2251_.64.0402a10: 兩用。問。此今論下云二止觀均行一。是應二持業一 T2251_.64.0402a11: 文何違二婆沙一。答。非二婆沙評家爲是。又止觀 T2251_.64.0402a12: 均行者。如レ次定慧。故是依主。婆沙約二持業一 T2251_.64.0402a13: 故 又大乘有二持業同體依主一。而無二別體一。義
T2251_.64.0402a16: 之靜。二釋竝皆得。問。持業依主何縁差別。 T2251_.64.0402a17: 答。三地地有下令二寂靜正觀一之二用上。故名二靜 T2251_.64.0402a18: 慮一是持業釋 又與レ慧之所依三摩地。故名二 T2251_.64.0402a19: 靜慮一。是依主釋。光記云。馱南此云二靜慮一。舊 T2251_.64.0402a20: 云レ禪。或云二禪那一。或云二持阿那一皆訛也 舊
T2251_.64.0402a24: 言レ定。梵云二馱衍那一
T2251_.64.0402a27: 此中有レ二。初正明。二由此下釋三影示尋一。文 T2251_.64.0402a28: 有レ四。一標宗。二所由。三喩顯。四簡濫。由レ説 T2251_.64.0402a29: レ具二此伺喜樂一。已不二言説一。明二亦具レ尋義一。何以 T2251_.64.0402b01: 故。尋伺必倶行故。譬如二煙火一。有難云。應三尋 T2251_.64.0402b02: 伺非二必倶行一。如二中間定無尋唯伺一故。今遮二 T2251_.64.0402b03: 此濫一云。無下有二伺喜樂三一之伺離尋。故言二必 T2251_.64.0402b04: 倶一。非レ謂二一切獨伺不離レ尋。故舊論曰。偈曰 T2251_.64.0402b05: 有二觀及喜樂一。釋曰。覺觀喜樂相應喜一類説 T2251_.64.0402b06: 名二初定一。由レ説レ觀。覺即彼説。覺觀如二烟及火 T2251_.64.0402b07: 相應行一故。有二不相離相離一故。無下有レ觀有二喜
T2251_.64.0402b12: レ火必定倶行一者誤也。非伺等簡亂無レ用故。 T2251_.64.0402b13: 違二舊論一故
T2251_.64.0402b17: 内靜一心。無覺無觀。定生二喜樂一得二第二禪一 T2251_.64.0402b18: 成就遊。離二喜欲一捨無レ求。遊二正念正智一。而身 T2251_.64.0402b19: 覺レ樂。得二第三禪一成就遊。樂滅。苦滅。喜憂本 T2251_.64.0402b20: 已滅。不苦。不樂。念清淨。得二第四禪一成就遊
T2251_.64.0402b25: 名レ生。二受生離二地染一時。二種生過倶能離 T2251_.64.0402b26: 故。名レ之爲レ離。湛慧云。此兩師中。光師順二舊 T2251_.64.0402b27: 論文一。彼曰。偈曰。寂離下地生。釋曰。空遍入 T2251_.64.0402b28: 從レ寂二離第四定一生。識遍入從レ寂二離空遍入一
T2251_.64.0402c04: 論非レ證。彼生言。亦約二所離一。無レ有レ妨故 T2251_.64.0402c05: 皆無色故立無色名 第四解。總名有レ二。一 T2251_.64.0402c06: 正釋。二通妨。初正解。釋二第五句一有レ三。初正 T2251_.64.0402c07: 釋。二大衆部等出二不成過一。三有部通二不成 T2251_.64.0402c08: 失一有レ三。一徴責無色立名一。二徴詰有色相一。
T2251_.64.0402c11: 約二色根身一。初中光牒。後身語下破。此有レ二。 T2251_.64.0402c12: 一約二能發無一。二約二能造無一。此亦有レ二。初正 T2251_.64.0402c13: 破。後破レ救。先擧レ救。後不爾下。破有レ二。初正 T2251_.64.0402c14: 破。二又彼下依レ經止レ執。第二若許下約二色根 T2251_.64.0402c15: 身一有レ二。一牒レ計。二如何下破有レ四。一正破。 T2251_.64.0402c16: 是自言違失。二破二小身救一。三破二極妙救一。四 T2251_.64.0402c17: 破二妙中極救一。此有レ二。先牒レ救。二破有レ二。一 T2251_.64.0402c18: 唯有頂破。二例難四靜慮一。此有レ三。一正例 T2251_.64.0402c19: 責二無別一。二擧レ救徴レ理。三通釋彼依レ經成二有 T2251_.64.0402c20: 色一。此有レ二。初牒下彼引二四經一成中有色上。二此證 T2251_.64.0402c21: 下有部通有レ三。一總非勸レ思。二且契下別令 T2251_.64.0402c22: レ思。三若謂下破二彼救一。先牒レ救。後此説下破 T2251_.64.0402c23: 有二總破別破一。別破中有レ三。一就二第一經一破。 T2251_.64.0402c24: 二就二第二第三經一破。三又説下就二第四經一破 T2251_.64.0402c25: 有レ二。一正破。二牒レ救破有レ二。一牒下彼引二二 T2251_.64.0402c26: 經一任レ文救上。二則無下有部例二彼救一。亦任二經 T2251_.64.0402c27: 文一。成二無色一有レ三。一正引レ經成二無色一。二然契 T2251_.64.0402c28: 下通二違文一。三又薄下更引レ經遮二有色一。初中 T2251_.64.0402c29: 有レ五。一標立。二引二三經一。三若無下依レ經 T2251_.64.0403a01: 遮二彼執一。四牒破救一。五結レ無レ色。破レ救中。先 T2251_.64.0403a02: 牒。後則於下破有レ三。一段食例破。二靜慮例 T2251_.64.0403a03: 破。三受等例破。此有レ二。初正破。後經既下 T2251_.64.0403a04: 還成二自義一
T2251_.64.0403a07: 等想一。準二舊論文一。世尊於二彼無色定中一。亦遮二 T2251_.64.0403a08: 有色等想一。故不レ可レ言レ有二身語律儀一 中含
T2251_.64.0403a11: 能所造兩釋一。寶疏約二自有部不許解二遮有一。 T2251_.64.0403a12: 竝非二論意一 T2251_.64.0403a13: 水細蟲極微 是約二肉眼不及一。事鈔釋二用蟲 T2251_.64.0403a14: 水戒一云。僧祇云。蟲細者。三重灑。猶有テ捨テ
T2251_.64.0403a17: レ知。且云二水蟲一。據レ實諸蟲有レ細。大集經曰。畜 T2251_.64.0403a18: 生身細。猶如二微塵十分之一一。多論曰。身子天 T2251_.64.0403a19: 眼觀二空中蟲一。如二水邊砂器中粟一。遂斷レ食。佛 T2251_.64.0403a20: 因制云。但肉眼見灑襄所得
T2251_.64.0403a23: 二又生下例難靜慮一。此有レ三。一正例難二無別一。 T2251_.64.0403a24: 二若謂下擧レ救徴レ理。三若謂下牒三依レ經成二 T2251_.64.0403a25: 有色一通釋。此即初二也。例難靜慮一意言。四 T2251_.64.0403a26: 靜慮身下望レ上。漸漸勝妙。清妙中極。有二何 T2251_.64.0403a27: 差別一不レ名二無色一。故正理云。又生二靜慮一所有 T2251_.64.0403a28: 色身由二先功能一。漸漸殊勝。上地望レ下。清妙 T2251_.64.0403a29: 轉増。非三下地根所二能取一故。與レ彼何異不レ名二 T2251_.64.0403b01: 無色一。若見有二名不如レ義故。及見有三名通二 T2251_.64.0403b02: 二義一故。不レ可二如レ名定執義者。則無色界
T2251_.64.0403b11: 設一。所以者何。因レ壽故有レ煖。因レ煖故有レ壽。若 T2251_.64.0403b12: 無レ壽者。則無レ煖。無レ煖者。則無レ壽。猶如下因 T2251_.64.0403b13: レ油因レ炷故得二然燈一。彼中因レ焔故有レ光。因レ光 T2251_.64.0403b14: 故有レ焔。若無レ焔者。則無レ光。無レ光者則無
T2251_.64.0403b17: 亦不レ立。若去二其二一。一亦不レ立。展轉相依。而 T2251_.64.0403b18: 得二竪立一。識縁二名色一。亦復如レ是。展轉相依。而 T2251_.64.0403b19: 得二生長一。舊論。正理。如レ今作二二蘆一。且取二依
T2251_.64.0403b23: 云。於二十二縁生中一説下依レ識名色生。依二名
T2251_.64.0403c02: 喜貪一潤澤生長増廣。於二受想行一亦説如レ是。 T2251_.64.0403c03: 比丘識於レ中若來若去若住若沒若生長。増 T2251_.64.0403c04: 廣比丘若離二色受想行一。識有二若來若去若住 T2251_.64.0403c05: 若坐一者。彼但有二言數一。問已不レ知二増益一生
T2251_.64.0403c08: 有二別證一。離レ色乃至離レ行。由レ撥二識去來一故。 T2251_.64.0403c09: 證二此經一意。離二色等四一。無二識去來一。彼界既有二
T2251_.64.0403c12: 識一。必應レ許レ有二所住色等一
T2251_.64.0403c21: 欲故識不レ住。不二増長一。識不住不増長故。不
T2251_.64.0403c24: レ異。故言下説二四食一如中四識住上。例以破。謂於二 T2251_.64.0403c25: 四識住一既有レ識存レ色。亦於二四食一。於二色無色一。 T2251_.64.0403c26: 既有二識食一。應レ有二色段食一。故舊論云。由三佛説二 T2251_.64.0403c27: 四識住及四食一。於二色無色界一。應レ有二段食及
T2251_.64.0404a01: レ異レ彼故
T2251_.64.0404a09: 界已過二段食一問。若爾以レ何爲レ食。答引二次經一。 T2251_.64.0404a10: 通二此疑
T2251_.64.0404a14: 以二禪定喜樂一爲レ食
T2251_.64.0404a24: 空處成就遊。謂二無量空處天一。是謂二第五識 T2251_.64.0404a25: 住一。舊論加二及有礙想句一。今略レ之。中含四
T2251_.64.0404a29: 色界衆生。及住二無色界一不レ識二滅界一者。還復 T2251_.64.0404b01: 受二諸有一。若斷二於色界一。不レ住二無色界一。滅界心 T2251_.64.0404b02: 解脱。永離二於生死一。今取レ意引。舊論二十一
T2251_.64.0404b06: 出二本事經三法品一。經於二色界一言二其中所有 T2251_.64.0404b07: 色受想行識如是性皆是無常一。於二無色界一。但 T2251_.64.0404b08: 言二諸有受想行識一
T2251_.64.0404b15: 劫。或六萬劫。或八萬劫。諸色斷已後死還生二 T2251_.64.0404b16: 欲色界界一時。色云何起。若色斷已還得レ起 T2251_.64.0404b17: 者。般涅槃已諸行已斷。亦應三後時還起二諸 T2251_.64.0404b18: 行一。勿レ有二此失一。故無色界決定有レ色。有部通 T2251_.64.0404b19: 云。謂於二三界一。死生往來。或色續レ色。或色續二 T2251_.64.0404b20: 無色一。或無色續二無色一。或無色續レ色故。故不 T2251_.64.0404b21: レ應レ説二諸色斷已復云何起一。無二斷義一故。問。若 T2251_.64.0404b22: 離レ色已。復還生レ色。般涅槃已。應二還起行。 T2251_.64.0404b23: 答。離有二二種一。一暫時離。二究竟離。初者可二 T2251_.64.0404b24: 還生一。後者不二復起一。故不レ應レ難
T2251_.64.0404c01: 見色非色法。亦有二展轉相依起一。故謂心異故。 T2251_.64.0404c02: 色差別生。色根有レ別。識生便異。故從二無色一。 T2251_.64.0404c03: 將レ生レ下時順色生。心相續而住。由二彼勢力一 T2251_.64.0404c04: 引二下色一生。然不レ可レ言二唯從レ彼起一。亦以三先 T2251_.64.0404c05: 世色。倶行心相續爲レ縁。久已滅。色爲二自種 T2251_.64.0404c06: 子一。今色方起。許三同類因通二過現一故
T2251_.64.0404c09: 相續一。論主破レ彼。叙二經部一云。經部師説。無色 T2251_.64.0404c10: 界心等相續。無二別有依。謂若有下因未レ離二色 T2251_.64.0404c11: 愛一引起心等上。所引心等與レ色倶生。依レ色而 T2251_.64.0404c12: 轉。若因於レ色。已得レ離レ愛。厭背色一故。所引
T2251_.64.0404c15: 分命根一。是非二論意一也
T2251_.64.0404c25: 耶。有説。此依二多分一而説。謂有情類法。爾多 T2251_.64.0404c26: 縁二曾所受順境一。生二愛味一故。有説。過去定於二 T2251_.64.0404c27: 相續中一。已作二饒益一。現在定從レ彼而起。追戀 T2251_.64.0404c28: 生レ愛。有説。此中依二入出定一。而爲二問答一。未來 T2251_.64.0404c29: 定未レ名二入出一。現在定名レ入。未レ名レ出。過去定 T2251_.64.0405a01: 名二入已出一。今欲レ顯下於二已出位一。生味。故但説 T2251_.64.0405a02: レ縁二過去一。有餘師説。此中説淨定無間起二味 T2251_.64.0405a03: 相應定一。淨定爲二所味一。是所縁故味相應定是 T2251_.64.0405a04: 能味。是能縁故。全如二前説一。評曰。應レ知初説
T2251_.64.0405a15: 善一類。何以故。住是三摩提別名。故如二經 T2251_.64.0405a16: 言一。何者爲二三摩提一。是心住於二正境一。於二正位一。 T2251_.64.0405a17: 由二此經一故。知住是三摩提別釋
T2251_.64.0405a23: 顯後三定一。初中有二兩説一。初寛狹義。婆沙八
T2251_.64.0405a28: レ彼。餘靜已下法説非二例顯一。理應レ然故。然兩 T2251_.64.0405a29: 文各通。無レ有レ害
T2251_.64.0405b05: 故言二根捨一
T2251_.64.0405b13: 捨念清淨一。答。有二十三復次一釋。一第四定離二 T2251_.64.0405b14: 八擾亂事一故。苦樂憂喜入息出息尋伺名二八 T2251_.64.0405b15: 擾亂一。二離二内外災一故。下三定有二内外災一。不 T2251_.64.0405b16: レ名二清淨一。三第四定所依身器三災不レ及。念 T2251_.64.0405b17: 無二忘失一。捨無二諠雜一故。四第四定離二諸煩惱 T2251_.64.0405b18: 及隨煩惱一故。五第四定所依色身澄潔明淨
T2251_.64.0405b21: 知一
T2251_.64.0405c06: 樂更樂所觸生身心樂善覺。是覺謂二樂覺一 T2251_.64.0405c07: 也
T2251_.64.0405c10: 部引レ經難一。三又第四下由レ理非二輕安宗一。四 T2251_.64.0405c11: 又契下依二教證一立破。五若言下牒二有部難一
T2251_.64.0405c21: 樂受一。以レ無二所順一。雖レ有二輕安一。而不二立名樂。 T2251_.64.0405c22: 由レ此經部以二第三定有樂。以例破。然光記 T2251_.64.0405c23: 云。約二三受一説。言三初二喜名二樂受一也者。是何 T2251_.64.0405c24: 謂
T2251_.64.0405c27: 中有レ二。初相返破。不二損減一。還令二増益一故。後 T2251_.64.0405c28: 殊勝破。第三定輕安勝二初二定輕安一。劣既立 T2251_.64.0405c29: レ支。勝何不レ立
T2251_.64.0406a03: 證得遠離五法一修滿五法上。云何遠離五法。 T2251_.64.0406a04: 謂斷二欲所長養喜一。斷二欲所長養憂一。斷二欲所 T2251_.64.0406a05: 長養捨一。斷二不善所長養喜一。斷二不善所長養 T2251_.64.0406a06: 憂一。是名二五法遠離一。云何修滿五法。謂隨喜。
T2251_.64.0406a09: 定一。言二身作證一。得獲成就初靜慮善五蘊一。言二
T2251_.64.0406a12: 夫情謂談。似而不レ當。大抵如レ是
T2251_.64.0406a17: 應レ成二無漏一。然必無二觸及身識是無漏一。勿下初 T2251_.64.0406a18: 定所立五支中。少分身樂支是有漏。少分餘 T2251_.64.0406a19: 四支是無漏。如レ是一心漏無漏竝起成中違理 T2251_.64.0406a20: 失上。然光記作二三解一。竝非二論意一。寶解似 T2251_.64.0406a21: レ是。而未レ明也
T2251_.64.0406a25: 由二此經一成。是非二經部本意一。光師云二同許一義 T2251_.64.0406a26: 非也
T2251_.64.0406b01: 義兩宗不レ異。無漏亦爾。身識實非二無漏一。順二 T2251_.64.0406b02: 無漏一。亦名二無漏一。何汝須レ難レ我
T2251_.64.0406b05: 後三界一。依二文相一前十五唯有漏。後三通レ二。
T2251_.64.0406b13: 相一。謂心之麁細。互相違故。必不二倶起一。然執二 T2251_.64.0406b14: 倶起一。汝還非レ理。故於レ我無レ過。後番約二因明一。 T2251_.64.0406b15: 凡因明法不レ問二理是非一。不許爲レ喩成レ過。今 T2251_.64.0406b16: 有部不レ許。當レ成レ過。然是無二不成一。於二前第 T2251_.64.0406b17: 四卷一。已破二尋伺倶起一。成二不倶起一訖。故今爲 T2251_.64.0406b18: レ喩。汝前於二尋伺不倶起一。不レ能レ出レ過。今何
T2251_.64.0406b24: 問也。或應説三字。舊論云二若不爾。蓋今文 T2251_.64.0406b25: 誤也。語不レ便故。光寶強解釋
T2251_.64.0406b29: 義是支義一。謂四靜慮。各有二爾所一。能隨二順法一。
T2251_.64.0406c04: 然各非二古昔賢聖諸軌範師共施設之義一。故 T2251_.64.0406c05: 末資應三審思擇其是非一。故舊論二十一有二諸 T2251_.64.0406c06: 部師一作二如レ是諍論一。宿舊諸師不レ説レ如レ是不二 T2251_.64.0406c07: 隨可知二所有法一立爲二定分一。是故彼執應レ須二
T2251_.64.0406c10: 論意一也。又應審思擇句光寶爲二下句首一非 T2251_.64.0406c11: 也。湛慧所レ迷二光寶一。以二舊論是故彼執已下一。 T2251_.64.0406c12: 屬二下段一者。猶是非也
T2251_.64.0406c17: レ彼。令二心等淨一。如二波浪息水則澄淨一。是故説
T2251_.64.0406c20: 加レ難。然光寶爲二經部一者非也。何者若經部 T2251_.64.0406c21: 者。從レ本無體。何得二難言應レ無二別體一。亦復不 T2251_.64.0406c22: レ立二實事十一一。寧言三何許二實事十一一。明知本 T2251_.64.0406c23: 是有部。既立二實事十一一。而作二此答一。故破難 T2251_.64.0406c24: 來。言二清淨一者。光記所覽本作二清靜一。故釋云二 T2251_.64.0406c25: 清淨寂靜一。下不清淨亦爾。然鮮本。明本。及舊 T2251_.64.0406c26: 論。寶疏如レ今。雖二靜無害。釋レ淨非レ要故今本 T2251_.64.0406c27: 爲レ勝。又有經内等淨作二内靜一。若依二其經一爾。
T2251_.64.0407a04: 切。箝入聲。釋藏如レ此讀。指要鈔云。字彙云。
T2251_.64.0407a09: レ考
T2251_.64.0407a18: 經説相一者。於二初禪定一説言二離生一。是於レ離二自 T2251_.64.0407a19: 地染一生二喜樂一。故知是離染善喜樂爲二禪支一。 T2251_.64.0407a20: 以顯二染非一。第二云二等淨一。簡二染汚濁一故。染信 T2251_.64.0407a21: 非二支攝一。第三中以二正言一。簡二染迷亂一。故染汚 T2251_.64.0407a22: 念惠非二支攝一。第四中以二清淨言一。亦簡二染汚 T2251_.64.0407a23: 非支。安捨二種性是唯善。染言已簡訖。後師 T2251_.64.0407a24: 約二自性一者。謂十八支中但安捨性是善。餘 T2251_.64.0407a25: 通二染汚一。契經約二淨無漏二種一。故言レ正云二清 T2251_.64.0407a26: 淨。又彼離生言。約レ離二欲不善一。内等淨但信 T2251_.64.0407a27: 相爲レ淨。非レ簡レ染。爲レ顯二此別一。説二隨相言一。問。 T2251_.64.0407a28: 依二正理婆沙一。初説若依二此論一。何言亦第二無 T2251_.64.0407a29: レ樂第三無行捨。文中未レ示二其相一故。解云。性 T2251_.64.0407b01: 是大善。理在二不疑一。以レ明二染定一。第二説中云二 T2251_.64.0407b02: 中但無一。顯示於二初説無中一而唯無彼。若爾
T2251_.64.0407b05: 爲レ勝。故爲レ初不レ言二有餘一
T2251_.64.0407b10: 觀。定生喜樂。得二第二禪一。成就遊。是聖説二移 T2251_.64.0407b11: 動一。比丘離二喜欲一。捨無求遊。正念正智。而身 T2251_.64.0407b12: 體樂。得二第三禪一。成就遊。是聖説二移動一。比丘 T2251_.64.0407b13: 樂滅苦滅。喜憂本已滅。不苦不樂。捨念清淨。
T2251_.64.0407b18: 第四定爲二不動一。譬如三内密室無二風燈光一。餘
T2251_.64.0407b21: 加二論依法相一。故正理云。然經唯説。第四靜慮 T2251_.64.0407b22: 不下爲二尋伺喜樂一動上者。經密意説。論依二法相一。 T2251_.64.0407b23: 或準三今文無二唯字及密意等言一。應下如二舊論一 T2251_.64.0407b24: 依レ經釋此。若爾然言。故字誤也。於二喜樂下一 T2251_.64.0407b25: 脱二等言一。寶師別釋云。然契經説至二喜樂所動一。 T2251_.64.0407b26: 述釋餘經不動一也。若通二欲界一兼二息風一説。即 T2251_.64.0407b27: 有レ八。若唯對二色界一。定内心所。即離二尋伺喜
T2251_.64.0407c01: 通釋語一。由レ是彼舊論語勢。覺觀喜樂已下。是 T2251_.64.0407c02: 第二説。不レ爾文致二煩重一。又譬如言不レ易
T2251_.64.0407c05: 能正觀者名爲二靜慮一。欲界三摩地多散亂風 T2251_.64.0407c06: 之搖動如二四衢燈一。此文對レ欲。四禪通喩二密
T2251_.64.0407c12: 是中有二細樂受一。但斷二麁樂一故。説二不苦不樂一。 T2251_.64.0407c13: 如二風動燈。若置二密室一。則名二不動一。是中必有二 T2251_.64.0407c14: 微風一故。然但無二麁風一。故名二不動一。四禪亦爾。 T2251_.64.0407c15: 必有二細樂一。斷二麁苦樂一。故名二不苦不樂一
T2251_.64.0407c18: 顯二餘差別一故
T2251_.64.0407c28: レ生二下地一。問。何故受生要從二上下一。答。從レ下 T2251_.64.0407c29: 得レ上。二定纔離レ染時即得。是前義攝。非レ待二 T2251_.64.0408a01: 受生一。受之時先已得故。要下以二上下受生一。方 T2251_.64.0408a02: 是受生初得上
T2251_.64.0408a07: 約二加行一。其義可レ爾。然談二欲界一。是何所言。今 T2251_.64.0408a08: 唯定地故
T2251_.64.0408a13: 義。同有漏故。或分段義。煩惱衆多一分故。退 T2251_.64.0408a14: 即分。住即分等。竝持業釋。退分之順等皆依 T2251_.64.0408a15: 主釋。攝者攝在義。淨等至四中一分是此攝 T2251_.64.0408a16: 故。如二得是不相應攝一。順退分即攝。持業得 T2251_.64.0408a17: レ名。餘皆爾。問。婆沙諸文雜心。舊論等。竝無二 T2251_.64.0408a18: 攝言一如何。答。具略隨レ宜。故正理。顯宗如レ今。 T2251_.64.0408a19: 問。此第四與二四善根一爲レ同否。答。寛狹不レ同。 T2251_.64.0408a20: 彼狹此寛。謂彼唯煖頂等四。此不二唯四一。亦通
T2251_.64.0408a23: 法等。三云隨順聖道一。此分或作二聖行相一。或 T2251_.64.0408a24: 作二餘行相一。而向二聖道一。趣二於解脱一。光記十五
T2251_.64.0408a27: 是殊勝一。命終不レ捨
T2251_.64.0408b11: 前問一。準レ此寶疏科名爲レ正。二徴。三釋。四結。
T2251_.64.0408b16: 若異者不レ應レ建立四種一。正理云。此中決定 T2251_.64.0408b17: 義者。謂諸聖道必此無間生。非三此無間必能 T2251_.64.0408b18: 生二聖道一。若異レ此者。是則應レ説三唯世第一法 T2251_.64.0408b19: 名二順決擇分一
T2251_.64.0408b22: 三住レ此多進。四住レ此多入二無漏一。二曰。初與二 T2251_.64.0408b23: 諸惑一相凌相雜。煩惱無間此生此無間煩惱 T2251_.64.0408b24: 生。二觀二下地一爲二麁苦障一。觀二自地一爲二靜妙 T2251_.64.0408b25: 離一。三觀二自地一爲二麁苦障一。觀二上地一爲二靜妙
T2251_.64.0408c01: 第四分不二但四善根一。勿レ容二於疑一
T2251_.64.0408c06: 離自地染一者。起二自地煩惱一有中差別上故。由 T2251_.64.0408c07: レ此故知。彼從二住分一。故婆沙云二住レ此多退レ顯二 T2251_.64.0408c08: 餘亦少退一正理七十八云。若順二煩惱一名二順 T2251_.64.0408c09: 退分一。諸阿羅漢寧有二退理一。非三彼猶有二順退 T2251_.64.0408c10: 分定可令二現在前一。離染捨故雖レ有二此難一。而 T2251_.64.0408c11: 實無レ違。謂順住中有二順レ退者一。亦得三建立順 T2251_.64.0408c12: 退分名一。從レ彼有レ退。如二先已説一。此文亦依二少 T2251_.64.0408c13: 分一説 然寶疏破二正理一。別立二一義一。詳曰。未 T2251_.64.0408c14: レ得レ意而破レ此。其自義亦終不レ異也 T2251_.64.0408c15: 第三生三除順退分 正理。顯宗。婆沙十一
T2251_.64.0408c18: 順次。簡二隔越一故 光兩解後釋爲レ勝
T2251_.64.0408c22: 説一。初同二此論一。後有説同二彼十一一。此論何不 T2251_.64.0408c23: レ同二評家一。據レ何立二唯一一。答。論主以レ理爲レ量。 T2251_.64.0408c24: 不レ依二説人一。第四分既順二聖道一。何可レ生二前分一。 T2251_.64.0408c25: 漏無漏別故。不レ樂二有漏一故。故爲二唯生一。亦 T2251_.64.0408c26: 生二順勝一尚不レ許レ此。況第二分。此淨相生理 T2251_.64.0408c27: 應二隣次一。故於二正理一。第三第四竝異二評家隔越 T2251_.64.0408c28: 案立一。學者應レ思。問。四縁中由二幾縁一生耶。答。 T2251_.64.0408c29: 百六十五具分別。今以レ圖略示。此中具二四 T2251_.64.0409a01: 縁一。必是生。於二三縁中一闕二等無間一。非二此中生一。 T2251_.64.0409a02: 加行。從二此位一後超入諸定一。無レ所二罣礙一乃 T2251_.64.0409a03: T2251_.64.0409a04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a16: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409a17: [IMAGE]
T2251_.64.0409a20: 明二能修處人一
T2251_.64.0409a26: 漏間次一開爲レ二。從二有漏初禪一入二無漏第二 T2251_.64.0409a27: 禪一順逆間次。及從二無漏初禪一入二有漏第二 T2251_.64.0409a28: 禪一順逆間次。於二成就中一。亦從二有漏初禪一入二 T2251_.64.0409a29: 無漏第三一順逆間超。及從二無漏初禪一入二有 T2251_.64.0409b01: 若闕二因縁一。亦此中生二縁猶非レ生 T2251_.64.0409b02: T2251_.64.0409b03: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b04: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b05: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b06: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b07: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b08: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b09: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b10: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b11: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b16: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b17: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0409b18: 漏第三禪一順逆間超。第三説前來所説皆是 T2251_.64.0409b19: 名二成滿一。今此論文同二彼中説一。而加行中間次 T2251_.64.0409b20: 及成滿。竝文總説。若細説者應レ如二彼説一。若 T2251_.64.0409b21: 依二舊論一。同二彼初説一。舊論總五種而無二漏無 T2251_.64.0409b22: 漏間次文一。於二成就一單具示二順逆間超一故。問。 T2251_.64.0409b23: 三説中何爲レ正。答。婆沙無レ評。彼三説從レ麁 T2251_.64.0409b24: 至レ細。實第三爲レ勝。前二説猶有二退量一。加行 T2251_.64.0409b25: 攝故。問。新舊論兩譯何爲レ是 T2251_.64.0409b26: 答。正理。顯宗同二新翻一。故此論爲レ正。然舊論 T2251_.64.0409b27: 梵本文脱。或後寫脱。誰可レ知レ此。或後人見二 T2251_.64.0409b28: 正理一。加二於今論一耶。亦不レ可レ知
T2251_.64.0409c02: 故上。名爲レ間。不レ超レ地。於二地地一次第。故名レ次。 T2251_.64.0409c03: 又麟云。間次者。如下從二初禪有漏一入中二禪無 T2251_.64.0409c04: 漏上。異類故間不レ超レ地名レ次。後釋爲レ勝。又亦 T2251_.64.0409c05: 可レ有下初禪無漏爲レ先。次入二有漏一間次上。今文 T2251_.64.0409c06: 總説
T2251_.64.0409c09: 所有無漏一。若無漏爲レ創。思應レ知。此間亦超。 T2251_.64.0409c10: 最難レ修故爲二根本一。前住中若間無超。若超 T2251_.64.0409c11: 無レ間。修猶易故爲二加行一。至字明本在レ之。重 T2251_.64.0409c12: 出若見レ頌加レ此乎。如二頌文一者。含二加行一然。 T2251_.64.0409c13: 今唯明レ成何言レ至。若言レ至者。應三上有二加行一。 T2251_.64.0409c14: 既不レ爾無爲レ正。順レ理而成レ句。故由レ此。鮮 T2251_.64.0409c15: 本。及正理。顯宗。頌疏無レ之
T2251_.64.0409c18: 簡レ凡。以二凡無一起故。三爲盡下所爲。問。於二自 T2251_.64.0409c19: 地一何煩惱爲レ餘。答。四自無下所以。此有二二 T2251_.64.0409c20: 因一。舊論曰。於二自地一無故。此熟所悉故。頌疏 T2251_.64.0409c21: 云。以三自有頂無二聖道一故。於二下聖道一欣樂起 T2251_.64.0409c22: 故。五唯無下通妨。何故不レ依二餘地一唯此ナルヤ T2251_.64.0409c23: 故通會。六起彼下結成
T2251_.64.0409c26: 不繋一故。故正理七十八云。以二有漏法是所繋 T2251_.64.0409c27: 事一故。所繋言顯二是三有攝一。第二句明二色界 T2251_.64.0409c28: 淨無漏等至所縁一。對二下無色一不レ説自成。後 T2251_.64.0409c29: 二句明二無色淨無漏等至所縁一。説二不縁一以 T2251_.64.0409c30: 顯二所縁一。根本言顯三近分亦縁二下有漏一。善言 T2251_.64.0410a01: 攝二淨無漏一。倶善性故。前文云。善言具攝二淨 T2251_.64.0410a02: 及無漏一。簡二味定一已説訖故。無色言影示前 T2251_.64.0410a03: 句是色界一。不縁下者顯レ縁二自上諸法一。更言二
T2251_.64.0410a06: 釋云。無色根本淨及無漏不レ縁二下地有漏法一。 T2251_.64.0410a07: 離二色相一故縁二自地及上地一。故説レ非レ下。比智 T2251_.64.0410a08: 品縁二下無漏一。故説レ非二有漏種一。以三方便所攝 T2251_.64.0410a09: 無礙道縁二下地一故説二根本一。味相應縁二自地一。
T2251_.64.0410a13: 上下明二所縁一。述二頌準顯一。此有レ四。一明レ縁二自 T2251_.64.0410a14: 上諸法一。顯二下字影示一。二雖亦下明レ縁二下無 T2251_.64.0410a15: 漏一。顯二有漏言影示一。於レ中有二差別一。無漏不繋 T2251_.64.0410a16: 法。故縁二一地一時。必九地通縁。由レ此縁レ下。雖 T2251_.64.0410a17: レ然唯縁二類智品道一。以二全治一故。不レ縁二法智一。 T2251_.64.0410a18: 不二全治一故。唯滅道法智兼斷二上界修惑一。非二
T2251_.64.0410a22: 滅一。四無色下明二近分亦縁下。顯二根本言影
T2251_.64.0410a25: 偈曰。本善色無色非二有流下境一。釋曰。根本清
T2251_.64.0410b02: 地煩惱對治
T2251_.64.0410b08: 未レ能レ入二勝根本地一。中間定名。別局二大梵處一。
T2251_.64.0410b14: 至一。如二契經言一。諸有未レ能レ入二初定等一。具足安 T2251_.64.0410b15: 住。而由二聖惠一。於二現法中一得二諸漏盡一。若無二未 T2251_.64.0410b16: 至一。聖惠依レ何。又蘇使摩契經中説。有二惠解 T2251_.64.0410b17: 脱者一不レ依二根本定一。豈不レ依レ定。成二慧解脱一。 T2251_.64.0410b18: 由レ此證知。有二未至定一。有二中間定一。如二契經説一。 T2251_.64.0410b19: 有尋伺等三三摩地經説。初定與二尋伺一倶。第 T2251_.64.0410b20: 二等中。尋伺皆息。若無二中靜慮一。誰有伺無 T2251_.64.0410b21: 尋。以二心心所漸次息一故。理應レ有二定有伺無 T2251_.64.0410b22: 尋一。又大梵王是世界主。離二中間定一。誰爲二勝 T2251_.64.0410b23: 因一。由レ此證知。有二中間定一。然佛不三數説レ有二未 T2251_.64.0410b24: 至中間一。以二二即初靜慮攝一故。説二初靜慮一即
T2251_.64.0410b27: 住レ此已起二愛味一。依二如レ是義一。立二未至名一。非三 T2251_.64.0410b28: 上定邊亦名二未至一。皆乘二先定勢力一引生。及
T2251_.64.0410c02: 徳。未二現前一義
T2251_.64.0410c05: 有説名二中間定一。此二各爲二一義一。爲レ有二別義一。 T2251_.64.0410c06: 有二別義一。何以故。近分是離欲道。偈曰。無覺
T2251_.64.0410c09: 前來近分一。以二中間一問爲二下基本一。猶言三復有二 T2251_.64.0410c10: 別義一。復言起盡屬レ下爲レ正。由レ此正理。顯宗。 T2251_.64.0410c11: 竝全同此論一
T2251_.64.0410c14: 論云。是無レ苦無二樂受一。與二捨根一相應。若言二三 T2251_.64.0410c15: 受門一者。何云レ非二喜相應一。舊論亦云下故不中與二 T2251_.64.0410c16: 喜根一相應上。解云。正依二三受門一。而言二非喜一。以二 T2251_.64.0410c17: 五受門一談二三受門一。無レ有レ妨。問。唯捨相應何 T2251_.64.0410c18: 應二苦通行攝一。忽前後違。復苦唯欲界何是中 T2251_.64.0410c19: 間。答。此義如二四通行中已分別一。何分別。謂
T2251_.64.0410c28: 昧。無覺有觀三昧。無覺無觀三昧
T2251_.64.0411a08: 無相三昧。云何空三昧。所謂觀二一切諸法皆 T2251_.64.0411a09: 悉空虚一。云何無相三昧。所謂於二一切諸法一。都 T2251_.64.0411a10: 無二想念一。亦不レ可レ見。云何無願三昧。所謂於二
T2251_.64.0411a16: 於レ中第五句總判。後句別合二三解脱門一。發智
T2251_.64.0411a22: 持一。是分隣近釋。無相名二涅槃一。離二十相一故。一
T2251_.64.0411a25: 是不レ可レ願法。名爲二無願一。縁レ彼三昧名二無願 T2251_.64.0411a26: 三昧一。亦境第七依主。又解。三竝持業釋。此等 T2251_.64.0411a27: 持與二彼行相一相應。作二空無相無願行相一。故 T2251_.64.0411a28: 以名。若爾何云二縁彼等一。答縁二涅槃及苦等一。 T2251_.64.0411a29: 而作二無相無願等行相一。故契經説。於二諸法一 T2251_.64.0411b01: 無二想念一不二求願一。二解中前解爲レ勝。會二論文一 T2251_.64.0411b02: 順二二論一故。問。何故與二頌前契經次第一異耶。 T2251_.64.0411b03: 答。順二増一契經標釋異一故。復次據二行相少 T2251_.64.0411b04: 多一。謂行相二四十故。復次顯レ非二必一相續三
T2251_.64.0411b09: 不時解脱起一。異生有學亦能起。故不二唯有漏一。 T2251_.64.0411b10: 亦通二無漏一。故顯揚第四説三道諦四行通二三解 T2251_.64.0411b11: 脱一。即三等持重縁之行。是無漏故。如レ理應
T2251_.64.0411b16: 願二一。如レ次取二空非常相一。故對二後言一。而言二重 T2251_.64.0411b17: 二一。故舊論偈曰。二定縁三無學由二空無常相一。
T2251_.64.0411b20: 云。重二者標レ名也。縁無學下正釋釋也。空空
T2251_.64.0411b27: 宗。一一置レ之。本經亦爾
T2251_.64.0411c08: 性一。若習。若修。堅作常作精勤修習。是名二修
T2251_.64.0411c20: 充滿遍。充滿適悦遍。適悦故離生喜樂。於二自
T2251_.64.0411c23: 達。若晝。若夜。無レ有二差別一。若前。若後。無レ有二 T2251_.64.0411c24: 差別一。若下若上無レ有二差別一。開心離蓋修照倶
T2251_.64.0411c27: レ念。非レ不レ住レ念。及善知レ想。善知レ尋。於レ此住
T2251_.64.0412a01: 色滅。此是受想行識。此是受想行識集。此是
T2251_.64.0412a06: 内淨一心無覺不觀。定生喜樂。成就二禪行一。 T2251_.64.0412a07: 離レ喜捨行念正智身受樂。如諸聖人解二捨念 T2251_.64.0412a08: 樂行一成二三禪行一。斷二苦樂一先滅二憂喜一。不苦不
T2251_.64.0412a11: 集異所擧契經一。故會二初靜慮第四靜慮一。而義 T2251_.64.0412a12: 意全附同佛意一。如二舍利弗略所唱契經一。視可 T2251_.64.0412a13: レ知。又解。設無二初靜慮等言一。而云二離生喜樂一。 T2251_.64.0412a14: 云二捨念清淨等一。是初定。第四定故依レ義會
T2251_.64.0412a18: 名爲レ修。若習。若修。若多所作者。顯下於二此定一。 T2251_.64.0412a19: 能得二自在一。能令中證得上。現法樂住者。謂於二此 T2251_.64.0412a20: 定一。若習。若修。若多所作。於二現法中一。證得樂 T2251_.64.0412a21: 住可愛可樂可欣可意一。無レ所二希望一。無レ所二思 T2251_.64.0412a22: 慕一。寂靜安隱故名二樂住一。於二此樂住一。得獲成
T2251_.64.0412a28: 或即依二現樂一。説爲二得言一。如レ言二石子體一。故無
T2251_.64.0412b05: 盛。如レ遊二砂磧一。熱渇疲勞。創飮二濁水一。亦生二勝 T2251_.64.0412b06: 樂一。或聖道樂。此具有故。謂具二一切菩提分法 T2251_.64.0412b07: 四沙門果九斷遍知三界對治一。又諸定首諸 T2251_.64.0412b08: 定樂因是故遍説
T2251_.64.0412b11: 樂一。説二現定樂一。令二其欣樂一。或現樂住是後樂 T2251_.64.0412b12: 依。但説二所依一能依已顯。如二契經説一。先住二此 T2251_.64.0412b13: 間一。入二諸等至一。後方生レ彼。不現正理作二樂現一。 T2251_.64.0412b14: 顯宗作二喜樂現一。竝誤也。今依二寶疏一
T2251_.64.0412b17: 正理論曰。本靜慮中有二遍縁智一。此遍照故立 T2251_.64.0412b18: 以二見名一。見體即知。故名二知見一。眼根名レ見。世
T2251_.64.0412b23: 曰。若修二三界諸加行善及無漏善一。得二分別 T2251_.64.0412b24: 慧一。謂從二欲界一。乃至二有頂一。諸聞思修所成善 T2251_.64.0412b25: 法。及餘無漏有爲。總説名爲二加行善法一。能引 T2251_.64.0412b26: レ慧生。於二諸境中一差別而轉故。言二修此得分
T2251_.64.0412c01: 一切不善慧。非理所引慧。所有不善障礙定 T2251_.64.0412c02: 慧。皆悉破壞。捨置不起。此相違惠。生長堅
T2251_.64.0412c06: 可レ知。由レ依二第四定一時分別故。準レ彼四皆依二 T2251_.64.0412c07: 佛自一説。故於二初修定一。無二別通文一。準レ此可 T2251_.64.0412c08: レ知。正理論釋二知見一云。修二此等持一。即是爲 T2251_.64.0412c09: レ求二決定照義一。此亦善逝。依レ自而説。謂爲レ顯下 T2251_.64.0412c10: 佛以二天眼通一。觀二諸有情死生險難一。方爲二拔 T2251_.64.0412c11: 濟一。起中靜慮等上。故爲二知見一修二天眼通一。新舊竝 T2251_.64.0412c12: 無レ妨 T2251_.64.0412c13: 倶舍論二十八卷法義終 T2251_.64.0412c14: T2251_.64.0412c15: T2251_.64.0412c16: T2251_.64.0412c17: T2251_.64.0412c18: 十九 T2251_.64.0412c19: 豐山寓居上毛沙門快道記 T2251_.64.0412c20: 分別定品第八之二
T2251_.64.0412c26: 等一故。名爲二梵堂一。比丘當レ知。有二梵大梵一名 T2251_.64.0412c27: 千。無與等者。無過上者。統二千國界一。是彼之 T2251_.64.0412c28: 堂故。名爲二梵堂一。比丘此四梵堂所有力勢。能 T2251_.64.0412c29: 觀二此千國界一。是故名爲二梵堂一。是故比丘若 Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:有/無] [CITE] |