大正蔵検索 INBUDS
|
阿毘達磨倶舍論法義 (No. 2251_ 快道撰 ) in Vol. 64 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:有/無] [CITE]
T2251_.64.0051a04: T2251_.64.0051a05: T2251_.64.0051a06: T2251_.64.0051a07:
T2251_.64.0051a11: 界品第一之二
T2251_.64.0051a20: 舊論曰。此色易レ可レ顯。如レ言二此色彼色一。一百
T2251_.64.0051a25: 状差別一。所顯示色有二能顯示一。故名二有見一。如二
T2251_.64.0051b02: 義。答。色麁顯勝レ餘故。世友義故。是故僧伽
T2251_.64.0051b05: 者意樂。寶云。略故唯一者竝不レ好。光亦 T2251_.64.0051b06: 約二經部一者。鑿之至也。次問答雜心慧見一。彼
T2251_.64.0051b11: 有二彼礙一。故名二有對一。竝是有財。初自有二於レ他 T2251_.64.0051b12: 被レ障義一故。餘二易レ知。謂顯二其對義一云二障境 T2251_.64.0051b13: 縁一
T2251_.64.0051b17: 境縁爲礙。五應知下示二今相一。六若法下句差 T2251_.64.0051b18: 別。諸論列異正理。顯宗境縁障次。雜心論一
T2251_.64.0051b22: 二一差別分別。後説二障礙一合レ今作レ句。今論等 T2251_.64.0051b23: 意令レ知二正明一特先二障礙一。雜心論等據二寛狹 T2251_.64.0051b24: 次一。謂境法分。十二界全。障有二十色一。縁唯六
T2251_.64.0051b29: 礙有對一。境界有對者。如下眼根等諸有境法 T2251_.64.0051c01: 各於二自境界一有所二拘礙一。如レ是名爲二境界有 T2251_.64.0051c02: 對一。所縁有對者。如下心心所有所縁法各於二自 T2251_.64.0051c03: 所縁一有所二拘礙一。如レ是名爲二所縁有對一
T2251_.64.0051c06: 所領方境一。不レ能レ至二聲等一。餘亦如レ是。此能領
T2251_.64.0051c09: 知唯以二方境分齊定一爲二境界一。婆沙七十六
T2251_.64.0051c16: 彼境界。所縁者根識中唯識等縁執彼境一起。 T2251_.64.0051c17: 故彼法名二所縁一。縁慮爲レ縁。所二縁執一故。故非二 T2251_.64.0051c18: 五根一。此段論文唯説二縁界別一。而非二根識寛狹 T2251_.64.0051c19: 別一。其別下分明説レ之。故於レ縁言二心心所一。顯三 T2251_.64.0051c20: 前通二根識一。然有人云。欲レ分二根識二有對一者。 T2251_.64.0051c21: 於レ識已具二二有對一。何可レ爾。問。心心所二別 T2251_.64.0051c22: 何。答。心心所對レ境。分界所領義爲二境界一。縁 T2251_.64.0051c23: 執境一義爲二所縁一。雖二色等法其體是一一。而於二 T2251_.64.0051c24: 心心所一。縁執之義。領分功能義。差別故成二境
T2251_.64.0051c28: 意一云。心心所執レ境而起同爲二所縁一。取像印 T2251_.64.0051c29: 持等功能別爲二境界一者。未レ曉二二差別一也。印 T2251_.64.0052a01: 持取像即是縁執彼一。何可レ分レ之。終南家之 T2251_.64.0052a02: 業疏中卷。約三心心所初念與二相續一非也。清
T2251_.64.0052a07: 等者非也。思可レ簡也 T2251_.64.0052a08: 問。光三解如何。答。初廣辨二境界所縁二相一。
T2251_.64.0052a11: 未脱二礙爲礙也。如二次論説一。唯於レ餘不レ轉。 T2251_.64.0052a12: 唯於二自境一轉。是拘礙義。而云レ礙二取境縁境
T2251_.64.0052a16: 眼等六識心所於二自所縁一。自者隨レ應各自。自
T2251_.64.0052a19: 光師取二彼同分眼及未來等一。甚違二論意一也 T2251_.64.0052a20: 越彼下答有レ二。初守自義。謂唯於二自所領一 T2251_.64.0052a21: 轉。唯於二自所縁一執縁。不レ能レ逮二他法一故。是 T2251_.64.0052a22: 所二拘礙一。前自境界及所縁云レ彼。次此者約二境 T2251_.64.0052a23: 界一六根六識及心所。若依二所縁一唯心心所。 T2251_.64.0052a24: 後和會義者。相順不レ違言二和會一。謂眼於レ色 T2251_.64.0052a25: 有二功能一。色於眼不レ違。故施設論説。眼定對 T2251_.64.0052a26: レ色。色定對眼 乃至廣説。若所縁眼識於レ色 T2251_.64.0052a27: 有二能縁慮一。色於二眼識一爲二所慮一。如レ是爲二和 T2251_.64.0052a28: 會一。二義別何。初唯約レ能。故云二於自等一。後能 T2251_.64.0052a29: 所合。是二解異。譬如下戀レ色不レ顧二他心一。唯自 T2251_.64.0052b01: 愛レ彼於レ他不レ轉。或男女和會不移二餘事一
T2251_.64.0052b07: 答云。故名二順後一。亦名稱二後句答一。又寶疏次
T2251_.64.0052b10: 句一答。若先將二等無間縁性一。間二所依性一。即是
T2251_.64.0052b13: 句一皎然。然有人。此論且略二所縁有對亦境 T2251_.64.0052b14: 界有對耶一。順レ答影故順二彼後邊一答云二順後 T2251_.64.0052b15: 句答一。麟記約二一問中前後一。違二大小乘論一。下論
T2251_.64.0052b18: 是意識所依性者定是意識等無間。有丁是意 T2251_.64.0052b19: 識等無間非丙與二意識一爲乙所依性甲。謂無間滅
T2251_.64.0052b22: 相問。依止前法一以答二所問一。如二有問云一。若智 T2251_.64.0052b23: 亦所知。設所知亦智耶。此應レ作二順前句答一。 T2251_.64.0052b24: 諸智亦所知。有二所知非智。謂餘法。順後句 T2251_.64.0052b25: 者。謂即二法展轉相問。依止後法一以答二所 T2251_.64.0052b26: 問如二有人問言一。若所取亦能取耶。設能取亦 T2251_.64.0052b27: 所取耶。此應レ作二順後句答一。諸能取亦所取。 T2251_.64.0052b28: 有三所取非二能取一。謂色等五境及法處除二相 T2251_.64.0052b29: 應一。準二此等文一。今論略二所順後句一者。嗚呼悲 T2251_.64.0052c01: 哉未レ曉二以寛問狹之旨一。所纒文相一誤毀二 T2251_.64.0052c02: 正義一讃二邪義一。今須二破斥一。婆沙等中。既言以 T2251_.64.0052c03: レ寛問レ狹爲二順後句一。今若別作二所順句一言二所 T2251_.64.0052c04: 縁亦境界一。即以狹問レ寛。定可二前句一。何可二順 T2251_.64.0052c05: 後句一。亦復不二一問一何得レ云二以レ寛問狹。又演 T2251_.64.0052c06: 祕等中致二兩問一。竝是問二寛狹一之法。何以二相 T2251_.64.0052c07: 對二問。可レ得レ言二以レ寛問狹。亦復彼中標二二 T2251_.64.0052c08: 法一云レ依止後法一。非下所取爲二前法一能取爲中後 T2251_.64.0052c09: 法上耶。又若兩問前後者。不レ可レ言二以レ寛問レ狹 T2251_.64.0052c10: 等一。以下不レ依二法寛狹一唯約中兩問前後上故。又 T2251_.64.0052c11: 初問前法擧レ狹後法擧レ寛。後問返レ之。而順二 T2251_.64.0052c12: 後問一爲二順後句答一。例何在。故知雖三問示二兩 T2251_.64.0052c13: 門一。至レ論二順前順後一。唯據二初問中二法前後一。 T2251_.64.0052c14: 以決定。謂初問云二境界亦所縁一以レ寛問レ狹。 T2251_.64.0052c15: 故知應二順後句答一。若初問言二所縁亦境界一 T2251_.64.0052c16: 以狹問レ寛。故知應二順前句答一。如レ是但於二初 T2251_.64.0052c17: 問前後一。而其答説義已極成。必不レ關二後問一 T2251_.64.0052c18: 也。然正答時。順前句答。順後句答名目。亦必 T2251_.64.0052c19: 依二兩問之前後一。其辭同レ彼。故云二順前一云二順 T2251_.64.0052c20: 後一。如レ是其義決定既在二初問一。故或略二後問一。 T2251_.64.0052c21: 其語反出理在絶言。是故今略。或具示二兩問一 T2251_.64.0052c22: 竝無二相違一。然對法論依二前法一答二所問一者。 T2251_.64.0052c23: 即説二其義決定一。故云レ依止前法一。云レ依止後 T2251_.64.0052c24: 法一。由レ是其義決定。及答説名言。所レ對有レ別。 T2251_.64.0052c25: 偏執者非也
T2251_.64.0053a02: 羅多一。此云二童首一。造二五百論一。經部種族以二此 T2251_.64.0053a03: 所説一爲レ宗。當時猶未レ有二經部一。經部四百年
T2251_.64.0053a24: 事一若遇二異縁一可レ起。心不レ起爲二障礙有對一。是 T2251_.64.0053a25: 亦有レ理。有部不二敢諍一。故簡別云二此是所許一。 T2251_.64.0053a26: 若如二光寶一何彼論不レ破耶。二若朋二經部一。何 T2251_.64.0053a27: 故不レ言二毘婆沙師傳説如レ是此中大徳等一。三 T2251_.64.0053a28: 若違二有部一。正理論師何不二破立一。謂雖三是非二
T2251_.64.0053b19: 問答。初中有レ四。一難。二通。三重難。四分別 T2251_.64.0053b20: 答。此第四有二兩説一。初約二別用有無一。後師約二
T2251_.64.0053b24: 性者在二色界一。彼無二摶食性一。以二身微妙一故。香 T2251_.64.0053b25: 味一向摶食性。是故彼無。境界無故。彼識亦 T2251_.64.0053b26: 無
T2251_.64.0053b29: 用一。有レ成二餘用一。所レ謂成レ身。若不レ爾者。大種 T2251_.64.0053c01: 應レ無。則諸所造亦應二非有一。便同二無色一。何名二 T2251_.64.0053c02: 色界一。又於二彼觸一有レ成二外用一。謂成二宮殿及衣 T2251_.64.0053c03: 服等一。雖レ離二食欲一觸有二別用一。香味不レ然。故彼 T2251_.64.0053c04: 非有。正理全同。彼皆約二四大觸一。今論亦云 T2251_.64.0053c05: レ持。是四大能持義也。等等二宮殿等一
T2251_.64.0053c08: 多一。此有餘意。欲界修二色界定一已有レ三。因位 T2251_.64.0053c09: 既爾。故生二色界一此三猶隨逐。以二因果相順一 T2251_.64.0053c10: 立レ義。住此者欲界。依彼色界。舊論云。依止 T2251_.64.0053c11: 定及三摩跋提一。或見レ色聞レ聲與二輕安一相應 T2251_.64.0053c12: 有二觸勝類一。能益二彼身一等。今又靜慮與二等至一
T2251_.64.0053c24: 初似二因明一。則他比量一。不レ爾犯二違教一故。次通 T2251_.64.0053c25: 釋似レ顯二他隨一不成一。然此但依二性相一勿レ約二
T2251_.64.0053c28: 具二諸根一故。諸根展轉相持故。婆沙第九十
T2251_.64.0054a02: 因二段食一有二此根一故。因レ無二慚愧一有二此根一故。 T2251_.64.0054a03: 又女男根彼無レ用故。問。若爾鼻舌彼亦應 T2251_.64.0054a04: レ無。彼無二嗅香甞味事一故。答。鼻舌二根於レ彼
T2251_.64.0054a10: 鼻舌二根一。寶爲二所依色觸一非也
T2251_.64.0054a15: 而致二二根徴一。寶師分科爲レ是。舊論云下非二無 T2251_.64.0054a16: 因可生。此諸根從二何因一生上故。正理闕二初二 T2251_.64.0054a17: 句一故。普光二句屬レ上爲二通妨一。大不レ順二文 T2251_.64.0054a18: 勢一疎二義旨一。若不レ爾。何正理闕如
T2251_.64.0054a21: 然一。二或應下男根例難。初正難。若謂下破レ救
T2251_.64.0054a24: 陋。三又諸下牒二前質義一難 T2251_.64.0054a25: 若爾便違下 十前師顯二違教一。中含三十九
T2251_.64.0054a28: 生二晃昱天一。彼於二其中一妙色意生。一切支節
T2251_.64.0054b02: 等五根一。此具根言依二顯者一説。女男根不レ顯。 T2251_.64.0054b03: 無亦名二具根一。又容レ有者彼皆成就。故説二具 T2251_.64.0054b04: 根一。非二一切有一。勿二憂苦等彼亦有一故
T2251_.64.0054b09: レ定爲レ簡異餘界一。猶如下中辨論。舊云二此中定 T2251_.64.0054b10: 有空一。新云中此中唯有空上。三光寶牒釋長行一 T2251_.64.0054b11: 不レ加二別釋一所以唯字一。然本頌及正理。顯宗 T2251_.64.0054b12: 如レ今作レ有。竝皆寫誤矣。所以知一者。正理長 T2251_.64.0054b13: 行顯二頌唯字意一云。五識唯於二尋伺所レ隨地
T2251_.64.0054b22: 云二有不二不盡一。勒那云二定不二不盡一。是一梵 T2251_.64.0054b23: 通二有與定故。今亦可レ爾妄勿レ改矣。今謂符 T2251_.64.0054b24: 會之甚。若依二正理一。今論何不レ言下兼顯二定義一
T2251_.64.0054c04: 下五識恒相應之所以。四顯義下釋二唯義一簡二
T2251_.64.0054c08: 以致中彈詰上。又五與レ意相望。五麁意細。爲レ簡二 T2251_.64.0054c09: 意外門轉一云二行相麁一。外門言簡二意内門一。行 T2251_.64.0054c10: 相麁之外門故 然普光分爲二二因一。作二倶舍 T2251_.64.0054c11: 救一。猶墮在正理恒不恒混亂迷坑一云云。全 T2251_.64.0054c12: 非二論意一。寶疏妄設二異解一。唯行相麁爲レ因。外
T2251_.64.0054c15: 外門轉一。轉言何不レ視レ之 T2251_.64.0054c16: 無第二尋故 正理破レ之。光寶救最爲二盡理一」
T2251_.64.0054c19: 又達レ三准知故。謂尋是無尋唯伺。准知二伺無
T2251_.64.0054c26: 主意一。尋唯一故是少分。何説レ之乎。又不レ云 T2251_.64.0054c27: レ三應レ云レ四最易。由レ是少分因不レ成二定證一 T2251_.64.0054c28: 也。若言下此無伺唯尋名唯一種。異三餘有二數 T2251_.64.0054c29: 多一故云中少分上。亦不レ爾。名皆是一種。故於レ名 T2251_.64.0055a01: 論二多少一。亦何云二法少一不レ云二多少一
T2251_.64.0055a04: 朋二經部一。故云二傳説一。顯レ不レ信承有部自性分
T2251_.64.0055a07: 其意顯然故。然有人。但顯二婆沙禀承一。非レ表二 T2251_.64.0055a08: 不信一者。若爾諸長行悉應レ言二傳説一。又違二語
T2251_.64.0055a22: 有二所縁一故。如二人有子。所縁所行及與境界 T2251_.64.0055a23: 名義差別。此同體異名。今云。三種有對何。謂
T2251_.64.0055a26: 餘縁名一。如二手縁杖。此等世俗言説。今擧レ一 T2251_.64.0055a27: 也。此中縁者縁慮義。同二所縁有對一。而光記
T2251_.64.0055b01: 相應法縁二一切法一。彼子註曰。謂以二一切法一 T2251_.64.0055b02: 爲レ境耳非二攀縁義一。上眼身識亦同レ此。不相 T2251_.64.0055b03: 應法者。正理。顯宗亦爾。然此不レ局二十四不
T2251_.64.0055b07: 故一。不レ能レ取レ境故名二無所縁一。義不レ言成立。正 T2251_.64.0055b08: 理。顯宗全同二此論一。若准成餘十界一。應二頌不 T2251_.64.0055b09: 説。如二初有見有對一。若依二舊論一頌二七識有縁 T2251_.64.0055b10: 縁法界中有半。無二餘無言一。長行云。法界一 T2251_.64.0055b11: 分與レ心不相應法應レ知無縁縁。彼頌不レ説故
T2251_.64.0055b17: 一邊一故。此中異説。毘婆沙師。五識直縁二極 T2251_.64.0055b18: 微一。故縁二實法一。經部五識不レ縁二實法一。縁二和合
T2251_.64.0055b21: 不レ縁レ假。彼識上無二和合相一故。於レ此衆賢論
T2251_.64.0055b26: 婆多之稱起二於此一。故觀所縁。成唯識。二十論 T2251_.64.0055b27: 等。各別破二正理和集一。正理等者。轉計毘婆 T2251_.64.0055b28: 沙義一。其岐非レ一。是所以以二正理論等一強不 T2251_.64.0055b29: レ可レ解中婆沙等論上。如下前自性受縁境受等。下 T2251_.64.0055c01: 功能作用等上
T2251_.64.0055c04: レ全但云二八界一。故長行云二及法界全一。言レ及者。
T2251_.64.0055c11: 故云二及聲一。或云。小乘皆聲無執爲レ正。衆賢 T2251_.64.0055c12: 釋非二今意一。今及言非レ如二唯義相違一。亦體相 T2251_.64.0055c13: 違。謂前八心法。聲色法。暭按。色心相違 T2251_.64.0055c14: 不レ爾。八之中法界全豈局レ心。又正理説二總 T2251_.64.0055c15: 集一義相違理在二絶言一。故云二前所説七有所縁 T2251_.64.0055c16: 等一。顯二異門一義非二必無之。何。品類足十七
T2251_.64.0055c20: 有執受一。如二服中音等一。心心所法執持等義有 T2251_.64.0055c21: レ之故。依レ之兼顯二其義一。正理師深得二論旨一亦
T2251_.64.0056a07: 依處一。故五根名二有執受一也。舊論云。心及心 T2251_.64.0056a08: 法攝レ彼爲二自依止一。問。前立二聲八種一。今何唯 T2251_.64.0056a09: 無執受。答。前約二所依大種因一。今直論レ聲。全 T2251_.64.0056a10: 非二相違一。問。有執受名義猶未レ曉如何。答。執 T2251_.64.0056a11: 持攝受是心法。五根彼所依故名二有執受一。能
T2251_.64.0056a14: 界不受。聲心法界非二於レ中心心數法止住一
T2251_.64.0056a19: 説一。即諸下同二後説一。即言顯三二義終歸二一致一」
T2251_.64.0056a24: 等一。其大旨同二此覺天一。皞按。雖二人異一其所立
T2251_.64.0056b16: 依二第三出世一盡理上。故此論意。眼之肉團故 T2251_.64.0056b17: 云二不離眼根肉團一。於二其肉團中一有二堅等一故。 T2251_.64.0056b18: 是能所依各別不レ妨二別體義一。於中言簡二外四
T2251_.64.0056b21: 聲一委釋。故彼轉聲義。亦不レ違二此論一。故舊論 T2251_.64.0056b22: 曰。但説下肉丸與二眼根一不中相離上。不レ説二眼根一。 T2251_.64.0056b23: 而約二性相一寄二轉文一爲レ異耳。彼曰。彼言非レ理 T2251_.64.0056b24: 不レ了二契經深意一故。前所引經順二世名想一。故 T2251_.64.0056b25: 作二是説一。謂諸世間。眼肉團中起二眼名想一。此
T2251_.64.0056c10: 肉團一字上。後留三意于二於中兩言一。此後解釋古 T2251_.64.0056c11: 今爲レ難。所以不レ辨 T2251_.64.0056c12: 不レ知二實眼根一。於二肉團扶根一立二眼名想一故。佛 T2251_.64.0056c13: 順レ彼總不レ分辨能所造一説レ之。謂此眼名想 T2251_.64.0056c14: 依二大種一。起故。眼肉團言顯二扶根正根一。又顯二 T2251_.64.0056c15: 此二所依大種一。總説二能造所造一。以レ順レ世故。 T2251_.64.0056c16: 若言レ非レ順レ世。肉團言徒然。後義意兩重所
T2251_.64.0056c19: 所依大種。肉團所依大種兩種一也。初於中兩 T2251_.64.0056c20: 重配二二第七一。肉團親依二眼等一起故爲二因第 T2251_.64.0056c21: 七一。大種但依二肉團一止住。非二依レ彼起一。故爲二依 T2251_.64.0056c22: 第七一。二種第七云二由此一。總攝者。二第七於中 T2251_.64.0056c23: 是能攝。眼與二肉團一兩種大種云二一切一。因眼 T2251_.64.0056c24: 所起者。肉團爲二所起一。不離等二句擧二所起肉 T2251_.64.0056c25: 團能造一。是因等二句示二彼能造之所造體一。已 T2251_.64.0056c26: 叙上二於言旨起一。其中下示二中言意一。其者即指下 T2251_.64.0056c27: 因二於眼一所レ起肉團上云レ其。能有肉團所有堅 T2251_.64.0056c28: 等也。此則下示下大種爲二所造眼等一成中五因上。 T2251_.64.0056c29: 何故寄二眼肉團中一説二大種一者。此則爲レ顯下示 T2251_.64.0057a01: 大種是與二眼等一之生因。依因。立因。事因等
T2251_.64.0057a04: 正理初釋一解二此論一。寶師直依二婆沙第三師一 T2251_.64.0057a05: 釋レ論。可レ謂眼目高矣
T2251_.64.0057a10: 胎經二卷出二乎雜事一。義淨鈔出。既類二別生一。
T2251_.64.0057a15: 事一。故知眼等色等造色非レ異二大種一。若所造色 T2251_.64.0057a16: 異二諸大種一。有二何意趣一此經不レ説。通云。此經 T2251_.64.0057a17: 唯説二六界一不レ言レ餘者。有二別意趣一故。謂續生 T2251_.64.0057a18: 時眼等無故。雖下於二此位一亦有中身根上。而猶未 T2251_.64.0057a19: レ能レ覺二冷等觸一。若法有體未レ起二作用一。不レ應三 T2251_.64.0057a20: 立在二有用品中一。又唯六界是諸有情有用本 T2251_.64.0057a21: 事。從二續生心一至二命終心一常有レ用故。二爲顯 T2251_.64.0057a22: 下通釋。此亦有レ三。初立レ義。六界於二受生有 T2251_.64.0057a23: 情一施二強勝作用一。根本法故云二本事一。二彼下 T2251_.64.0057a24: 引餘文一成レ義。謂雖三前説二六界一。復説二眼等六 T2251_.64.0057a25: 觸處一。是能造四大外有二所造六根一也。故彼經 T2251_.64.0057a26: 能造外説二所造色一也。寶疏釋義雖レ是而六觸
T2251_.64.0057a29: 觸一。但約二心所一解二論文一非也。何者。覺天引二六 T2251_.64.0057b01: 界經一。證三唯能造無二所造一。故引二六觸處文一成 T2251_.64.0057b02: レ有二所造一。若約二心所一何不レ引下説二心所一文上。煩 T2251_.64.0057b03: 引二六根文一而取二能依邊一。彼若説二六界一故定 T2251_.64.0057b04: 無二所造色一。若爾説三六界中有二識界一。故於二諸 T2251_.64.0057b05: 有情一心所應レ非レ有。又諸下如レ是返難。故舊
T2251_.64.0057b08: 即是心一是義不レ爾。又諸下返難有レ二。先總 T2251_.64.0057b09: 遮三彼通二前經一。亦不下別破二彼所立宗救一。婆
T2251_.64.0057b12: 即是心之差別。彼何故作二是説一。依二契經一故。
T2251_.64.0057b20: 云レ謂。答。應レ言二能斫及所斫謂唯外四界一。
T2251_.64.0057b27: 問。婆沙二十更有二能所量及能洗所洗門一。何 T2251_.64.0057b28: 不説耶。答。非レ可二擧盡一。擧二一二一爲二思慮基一」
T2251_.64.0057c02: 起一。簡レ根中有二三因一。初非レ可二他分之。次非二 T2251_.64.0057c03: 自體成レ二法一。後離散離レ身時。雖レ似二分義一而 T2251_.64.0057c04: 無二根體一故
T2251_.64.0057c12: 但爲二因名一。故特加レ因言二異熟因一。是第五囀 T2251_.64.0057c13: 依主也。舊論名二果報因一。光記於二異熟一致二多 T2251_.64.0057c14: 釋一。義理亂漫如二寶破一也。論下三釋。具釋二異 T2251_.64.0057c15: 熟二字一故。第二説變異爲レ異。熟通二能所一。 T2251_.64.0057c16: 若能熟者是因功力。能熟功是因故。若所熟 T2251_.64.0057c17: 者所感果。今簡二第三所熟一云二能熟一。異熟二 T2251_.64.0057c18: 字竝屬レ因持業釋。因若不二變異一。不レ能二成熟一。 T2251_.64.0057c19: 如二花落果成一。生言是果。亦從聲依主若依三基
T2251_.64.0057c22: 三説異類爲レ異。故云二別類一。與二因善惡一異類 T2251_.64.0057c23: 無記果故。顯二熟屬果云二所熟一。異熟二字竝 T2251_.64.0057c24: 果名。生亦如レ是。兩重持業可レ知。生是名レ果 T2251_.64.0057c25: 理在二絶言一。故略不レ説。彼言宋本作レ或。寶疏 T2251_.64.0057c26: 所レ擧。神泰釋亦爾也。第四説異三第三釋直異 T2251_.64.0057c27: 熟直爲二果名一。謂異熟從レ本果約二全有財一假 T2251_.64.0057c28: 爲二因名一。名二異熟因一。如於下返例。引證亦 T2251_.64.0057c29: 爾。生言果決定。故不二別釋一。如二次前釋一。若加
T2251_.64.0058a08: 意法。有二六觸處一是先所爲是所造。我説即是 T2251_.64.0058a09: 故業。然誤レ之。且如二普光一者。以二如於下一云二 T2251_.64.0058a10: 派擧得名一。神泰。相從假立分二三四一等。竝陋 T2251_.64.0058a11: 之最矣。正理。顯宗同有二四釋一。竝同二此論一。此 T2251_.64.0058a12: 第三爲レ首列異耳。彼云。離レ因而熟者。離是離
T2251_.64.0058a15: 爲レ別。釋義亂漫不レ足レ評 問。何故迴二第三一 T2251_.64.0058a16: 置レ首。答。彼有レ志也。志者對法諸論依二異類
T2251_.64.0058a19: 色等異熟果一名中異熟上。此無記果從二善不善異
T2251_.64.0058a22: 熟義。謂善不善因以二無記一爲レ果。是熟義如二
T2251_.64.0058a25: 問。若爾此論何爲二第三一。答。今依二義次第一。謂 T2251_.64.0058a26: 總別。別中先レ因後レ果。果中。初自果。後約二有 T2251_.64.0058a27: 財一。而論主不レ懷二取捨一。何責二次列一。有人破三諸 T2251_.64.0058a28: 師爲二四解一。其意。此論文三節但二或言故。 T2251_.64.0058a29: 於二第二一有二業果二一。如レ次依主持業。舊論亦 T2251_.64.0058b01: 但復次有レ二。而無二約レ果文一。正理。顯宗亦 T2251_.64.0058b02: 闕レ約レ果。更加二離因義一。今云。是執レ文失レ義。 T2251_.64.0058b03: 舊論已闕レ文何成レ證。未レ知三正理。顯宗全同 T2251_.64.0058b04: 之一。所レ謂盲目乎。雖レ無二或言一義別爲二四節一 T2251_.64.0058b05: 無レ失。又如レ次依主持業者何謂。二三倶異即 T2251_.64.0058b06: 熟持業。若言レ約二三字一。何云二業果一。業果別約二 T2251_.64.0058b07: 異熟兩言一故
T2251_.64.0058b10: 初中。光記。資助爲二別事一未レ詳。寶疏爲レ勝。 T2251_.64.0058b11: 簡三飮食爲二損害一。故舊論云。飮食將レ養。寢臥。 T2251_.64.0058b12: 三摩提等勝縁所二資益一名二増上生一。有説者。
T2251_.64.0058b21: 故正理。顯宗竝云。既説三聲界無二異熟生一。義
T2251_.64.0058b26: 間一。正理亦擧二有間隨欲二一。今擧レ初餘隨レ應 T2251_.64.0058b27: 可レ取。異説中。初説云二諸大一云二縁撃一。此意 T2251_.64.0058b28: 從レ業生二色聲香味等諸大一。所生大種非レ一故 T2251_.64.0058b29: 云レ諸。其中聲大種有レ縁撃發聲一。無レ縁不レ能二
T2251_.64.0058c03: 爲二助縁一。光師非也。寶亦撃發縁非二造義一者 T2251_.64.0058c04: 非也。後説。業與二異熟一。長養。等流。及聲五番 T2251_.64.0058c05: 展轉。故於二所生一局云二異熟大種等一。若爾下 T2251_.64.0058c06: 論主破二上兩説一。文相正破二初師一兼通二後師一。 T2251_.64.0058c07: 唯云二大種一不レ云レ諸故。不レ云二某大一故。後師 T2251_.64.0058c08: 從二業所生大種一生レ聲故。爲レ顯三破通二後師一。於
T2251_.64.0058c11: 縁。謂正能造大種是等流長養。彼業因唯是 T2251_.64.0058c12: 助生縁故無レ妨。或論意順二施設論文一許二異
T2251_.64.0058c15: 光記令二初説第四五轉一。及與二正理二十一對 T2251_.64.0058c16: 挍。又唯破二初説一不レ破レ後者。竝皆違二文義一。全 T2251_.64.0058c17: 不レ可レ依。寶師破二兩説一者爲レ得。而異熟長養 T2251_.64.0058c18: 等流三竝撃發聲一者非也。若爾何可レ説三受 T2251_.64.0058c19: 如レ聲違二正理一。又和會正理二十與二婆沙一。 T2251_.64.0058c20: 約二有對無對一最盡レ理矣。正理論欲下取二第 T2251_.64.0058c21: 三轉一而救難。故不レ云二有説一直示レ義。而身受 T2251_.64.0058c22: 難迴レ初則致レ救。彼欲レ破二後説一故。特標レ有餘 T2251_.64.0058c23: 師一乃致二別難一。若如二此論一同致二身受難一。應下 T2251_.64.0058c24: 如二前師一通釋上故。故別設レ破。此論欲三竝破二
T2251_.64.0058c27: 彼義一可レ通。如下隨欲生第三有説。自存意故先 T2251_.64.0058c28: 説之。二不レ可レ言二有説。三應二能破之後一。光記 T2251_.64.0058c29: 令三初説有二四五轉一非也。似同後説レ故。後解 T2251_.64.0059a01: 爲勝也。問答聲大種一大有二二解一。初獨住義。
T2251_.64.0059a04: 也。三問答違文一中有二二釋一。初各別義。後不 T2251_.64.0059a05: 相違義竝非也。不レ許二獨住一義中。立義爲レ是。 T2251_.64.0059a06: 後問答有レ二。初與二正理一對明兩釋竝非也。 T2251_.64.0059a07: 正理如二寶疏云一約二無對無表一。今有對色故。 T2251_.64.0059a08: 次問答聲能造一中。問有二三關一。第三關異熟 T2251_.64.0059a09: 大爲二助生縁一爲二初師意一。而答文順レ彼。論縁 T2251_.64.0059a10: 言爲レ要通釋。全非二論意一也。初説云レ從。能破 T2251_.64.0059a11: 云二從生一。舊論云下從二霜佉四大一生聲故。述二 T2251_.64.0059a12: 後説意一中。同二正理一令レ有二第四轉一非也。綴文 T2251_.64.0059a13: 各別故。後釋爲二各別一爲レ是。釋二能破一中。論主 T2251_.64.0059a14: 存二後師一。破二初師一者非也。竝破二兩説一故。次 T2251_.64.0059a15: 擧二正理一作レ救中初可也。次破二第三傳救一者 T2251_.64.0059a16: 不レ允。如二寶疏辨一。發造異故。寶疏破三光破二初 T2251_.64.0059a17: 師一者可也。又擧二光救一云。此破未レ得二其意一 T2251_.64.0059a18: 者。光云二初師既破。後師還立一文詳也。破三初 T2251_.64.0059a19: 師其義理被二後師一。爾云二還立一故 T2251_.64.0059a20: 次破二光反破一爲レ得。造發實別故。寶自所立 T2251_.64.0059a21: 者。撃發非二造義一。約二撃發一論主意通二熟長流 T2251_.64.0059a22: 三一。非二唯異熟能撃發一。故兩師倶為二所破一。而 T2251_.64.0059a23: 湛慧法住竝言。寶疏令三論主聲通二異熟生一。全 T2251_.64.0059a24: 非二論主心一者。是大迷二寶疏意一也。而寶師 T2251_.64.0059a25: 全非二論主意一也。何者。云二受如レ聲違理故。 T2251_.64.0059a26: 何可レ許レ通二異熟一。又古兩異説定通二長養等 T2251_.64.0059a27: 流一。今通釋門故任レ問論レ之。爾寶疏等謂三唯 T2251_.64.0059a28: 爲二異熟一者非也。何云レ非二唯異熟一乎。又破二 T2251_.64.0059a29: 諸徳一破レ取二後師一是也。破レ造非也。此論是竝 T2251_.64.0059b01: 皆造義也。聲大種發レ聲。是非レ造爲レ何 又 T2251_.64.0059b02: 以二擧身掉動文一破二古徳一全不レ當。古徳約レ發 T2251_.64.0059b03: 可レ爾故。今約レ造故不レ爾。又證二九十婆沙一 T2251_.64.0059b04: 准レ之。次破二諸徳一可レ爾也。次引二婆沙百三十 T2251_.64.0059b05: 二一破二有人一等。最爲二精當一也
T2251_.64.0059b13: 味一。婆沙七十三廣明二得成就一。無三別有二捨不 T2251_.64.0059b14: 成一。今論全依レ彼故如レ是。而正理論加二捨不
T2251_.64.0059b17: 復爾一。故。皡按。兩論意各別。而結云二得成就 T2251_.64.0059b18: 等一。擧二今得成就一等二次成就眼等一。全非レ等二 T2251_.64.0059b19: 捨不成就一。若不レ爾何故七十三卷不レ例示捨 T2251_.64.0059b20: 不成就一耶。此中諸徳分別得成就不同一。異 T2251_.64.0059b21: 解紛亂有レ是有レ非。今須レ辨レ之。開爲二三門一。一 T2251_.64.0059b22: 出二本説一。二評二諸説一。三示二當文意一。初出二本説一
T2251_.64.0059b25: 得名二成就一。有説。最初得名レ得。後數數得名二 T2251_.64.0059b26: 成就一。有説。先不二成就一而成就名レ得。先成就 T2251_.64.0059b27: 而成就名二成就一。有説。先無二繋屬一而有二繋屬一 T2251_.64.0059b28: 名レ得。先有二繋屬一而有二繋屬一名二成就一。有説。 T2251_.64.0059b29: 初得名レ得。得已不レ斷名二成就一。有説初獲名 T2251_.64.0059c01: レ得。得已不レ失名二成就一。是故得惟在二最初一。成
T2251_.64.0059c07: 不レ爾。必後帶レ初而成就名立。故云レ通二初後一。
T2251_.64.0059c10: 故等上 已上名義差別。若約レ體唯是一得無二
T2251_.64.0059c15: 謂獲成就。獲云何謂得成就。成就云何謂獲 T2251_.64.0059c16: 得。得獲成就。聲雖レ有レ別而義無レ異。二評二 T2251_.64.0059c17: 諸説一者。光記中約二生住滅一辨二得成就不成一。實 T2251_.64.0059c18: 順二婆沙七説一。而約二所得法一伸レ之且爲レ易レ知二 T2251_.64.0059c19: 能得差別一。於二擇非擇一雖レ有二能得一。而無二生
T2251_.64.0059c25: 於二第二念已去一論レ之是故爲レ失。彼初後者 T2251_.64.0059c26: 初念後念通總名二成就一故。次破二古徳新舊
T2251_.64.0059c29: 言レ通二初後一者如二先解一。如レ汝者得已不レ失名二 T2251_.64.0060a01: 成就一文何通。次約二能得一辨レ之。破二光師一是有二
T2251_.64.0060a05: 徳釋一者。古徳意順二婆沙一。全非三如レ汝初念有二 T2251_.64.0060a06: 二名一也。又改二時字一非也。次此論。得時取二
T2251_.64.0060a12: 與レ識。色與レ識。各有レ成有二不成爲二六番一。復 T2251_.64.0060a13: 各有下先成得二不成一。及先不成得中成就上爲二六 T2251_.64.0060a14: 番一。合有二十二番一。前成就三番初後二番各二 T2251_.64.0060a15: 句。中間四句。不成三番亦爾。次先成得不成 T2251_.64.0060a16: 三番竝四句。先不成今得成三番初番二句。
T2251_.64.0060a19: 二番一。今唯擧レ一攝レ餘故云等。更
T2251_.64.0060a24: 非得與レ此相違。今約下未レ得今始得。及得已 T2251_.64.0060a25: 而失今新得名得分別十八界一。故有初四 T2251_.64.0060a26: 句一。依レ之云二先不成就一云二今得成就一。後約下得 T2251_.64.0060a27: 已不レ失第二念以去名中成就上論二十八界一。故 T2251_.64.0060a28: 但言二成就等一無二先今簡一。故婆沙中初邊三十 T2251_.64.0060a29: 六番。後邊三十六番各分別十八界一。是爲二二 T2251_.64.0060b01: 別一。今得成就者。得二於成就一。非レ謂二得而成
T2251_.64.0060b04: 言一。下無レ之。依レ之爲レ別二二門一初爲二得門一。後 T2251_.64.0060b05: 爲二成門一。以レ有二此義一。正理云二得及成就如レ理 T2251_.64.0060b06: 應思。此中竝皆約二能得能成就一分別十八 T2251_.64.0060b07: 界一。非二所得之得一。然光釋寄二所得法一明二能得一 T2251_.64.0060b08: 無レ失 初句中。生欲界者。簡二色界一。彼化生 T2251_.64.0060b09: 故。頓成故。乃顯二先不成一。漸得者。胎中初得 T2251_.64.0060b10: レ根不レ得レ識。漸言簡二化生頓成一。根識具足故 T2251_.64.0060b11: 及無色等者。先居二無色一顯二先不定一。上三 T2251_.64.0060b12: 地者。唯根五識皆無。故顯二今得非識一。第二 T2251_.64.0060b13: 句。上三地五識皆無。先不成明。今新借二下眼 T2251_.64.0060b14: 識一起。今得義顯。從レ本成レ根。故非二先不成今 T2251_.64.0060b15: 得根一。是非眼界。及從彼下。從彼言顯先不 T2251_.64.0060b16: 成一。五識皆無故。生二下初定欲界一則顯二始得 T2251_.64.0060b17: 識。眼耳身二界二地有故。眼根先上三地以 T2251_.64.0060b18: 來已成就非二此句一。故非眼界義立。第三句。 T2251_.64.0060b19: 無色無二根色一無二五識一。故先不成。生二欲初定一 T2251_.64.0060b20: 必今具二眼根眼識一。第四句生二無色界一
T2251_.64.0060b23: 初中初句成レ根不レ成二眼識一。上三地五根已 T2251_.64.0060b24: 成。五識皆無。猶不下借二眼識一起上。故云二眼識不 T2251_.64.0060b25: 起一。第二句成レ識不レ成レ根。生二欲界一最初。迦 T2251_.64.0060b26: 蘭羅時。定成レ識未レ得レ根也。又雖レ得二眼根一 T2251_.64.0060b27: 遇レ縁壞失無レ根。第三句生レ欲故成レ識。得二根 T2251_.64.0060b28: 不レ失故成レ根。梵世是初定。舊論云二初定一。欲 T2251_.64.0060b29: 界通二四生一。色界唯化生。又欲失不失不定。初 T2251_.64.0060c01: 禪定根識具足。故云レ及。上三地根本有。識 T2251_.64.0060c02: 借起識。舊論亦云二正見色一。正理。婆沙云二眼 T2251_.64.0060c03: 識現起一。其義同。但約二成就一正見言親也。第 T2251_.64.0060c04: 四句生二無色界一。婆沙等如レ是 問。婆沙中 T2251_.64.0060c05: 眼與レ色。眼與レ識。色與レ識。如レ是次第相望。 T2251_.64.0060c06: 今何故擧二中間一。又彼前成就。今何故爲後。 T2251_.64.0060c07: 解云。彼約二根境識次一。眼與レ色等。今擧レ一 T2251_.64.0060c08: 示レ餘約レ勝説二根識相對一。又彼就二義麁細一成 T2251_.64.0060c09: 就爲レ前。謂成就唯一義。得門古今具足故。今 T2251_.64.0060c10: 依下由レ得而成就次第上。竝不二相違一。類勸中。眼 T2251_.64.0060c11: 識與色界者。舊論。正理。顯宗竝爾。然婆沙。色 T2251_.64.0060c12: 界與二眼識一相望。能所與二上下一別。根境識次 T2251_.64.0060c13: 第最可レ爾。然今爲レ顯二義無一別不レ令二法逼迫一。 T2251_.64.0060c14: 特如レ是唯彼初句爲二第二句一爲レ異耳。得成就 T2251_.64.0060c15: 等者。正理云二得及成就一。言レ等者七十二番中。 T2251_.64.0060c16: 上來六番顯等二餘六十六門一。順二今論及婆沙一 T2251_.64.0060c17: 如レ是。若準二正理意。更等二捨不成就一。如二先引 T2251_.64.0060c18: 文。如是所未説者。頌文顯了所レ未レ説。婆沙
T2251_.64.0060c21: 法。意識界。展轉相對亦各有二十二論一。如レ是 T2251_.64.0060c22: 則説三同分對二同分一。若不同分對二不同分一應二
T2251_.64.0060c25: 種三論一。鼻界。香界。鼻識界有二三種三論一。舌 T2251_.64.0060c26: 界。味界。舌識界有二二種三論一。身界。觸界身 T2251_.64.0060c27: 識界有二一種三論一。如レ是一一隨レ相應レ知
T2251_.64.0061a01: 疏據二七十四一爲レ是。今論全依二彼第四有説一。 T2251_.64.0061a02: 故今論作釋引證全同。彼百三十八第二處 T2251_.64.0061a03: 内外全同二七十四初義一。而大異二今文一。光記非 T2251_.64.0061a04: 也。根不兩言明本如レ今。非也。光牒文。及鮮 T2251_.64.0061a05: 本。正理。顯宗作二何有一爲レ正。舊論亦其義。 T2251_.64.0061a06: 我執依止者。諸世間人謂二心作用一執爲レ我。 T2251_.64.0061a07: 我名是謂情。依止是心也。例如下密嚴經第二
T2251_.64.0061a10: 想一佛世尊説レ心爲レ我。此我執依止與二前我 T2251_.64.0061a11: 依名内一各別。上心爲レ我。依是六根。今謂情 T2251_.64.0061a12: 爲レ我。心爲レ依故。已得名與二未得名一別故。又 T2251_.64.0061a13: 今釋二心名レ我之所以一詞也。前是其名故下 T2251_.64.0061a14: 云二此所依一。問。若爾心應レ不レ名レ内。是我而 T2251_.64.0061a15: 能依故。答。我及我所依竝名レ内。下云下爲二 T2251_.64.0061a16: 所依一親近上顯二此義一。謂能所依而親近故。能
T2251_.64.0061a19: 妄見故。舊論云二我慢依止一。又是心世間説爲 T2251_.64.0061a20: レ我。云二心心所一者誤。心所法界攝非二六識界一。 T2251_.64.0061a21: 何界門雜亂又爲二相應義一非也。今約二世間情 T2251_.64.0061a22: 謂一故。第二釋約二我執所縁一中。無漏立二我名一 T2251_.64.0061a23: 非。今所調伏我。何爲二無漏一。第三釋自在義 T2251_.64.0061a24: 爲レ我。執取爲レ執。令レ通二無漏心一。而通二諸心一 T2251_.64.0061a25: 無レ妨自評取。亦非也。且順二世想一立二我依義一。 T2251_.64.0061a26: 何可レ盡レ法。況舊論云二我慢一謂レ之。次破二正 T2251_.64.0061a27: 理一。第三解全無二此論一。何可レ成レ破。況與二正理一
T2251_.64.0061b01: 眼等爲此所依等者。眼等者唯六根。此者假 T2251_.64.0061b02: 説我也。所依六根。我心之依故。六根爲レ内。 T2251_.64.0061b03: 能依所依親近故。我依倶總名レ内。光記爲二眼 T2251_.64.0061b04: 等十二一非也。色等所縁故名レ外。雖下如二我能 T2251_.64.0061b05: 所依同名内。能所縁同可名レ外。而疎遠故 T2251_.64.0061b06: 唯色等。故舊論云。眼等爲二此依止一及親近 T2251_.64.0061b07: 故
T2251_.64.0061b11: 身念處一。蓋梵本來未レ盡也。後滅後聖弟子纂 T2251_.64.0061b12: 集爲二一部一。不レ可三必屬二小乘部一。如二宋譯妙法 T2251_.64.0061b13: 正念處一。可二以見一焉。果小乘所誦則無表中有 T2251_.64.0061b14: 諍何遺二此經一也。諸録屬二小乘部一者未二深考一
T2251_.64.0061b17: 門。五業。三業。二業各引二正法經一。可レ撿也
T2251_.64.0061b20: 三字一明二法界唯同分一。二釋二下七字一明二餘十 T2251_.64.0061b21: 七界通二。初中爲レ三。初總釋。二若境下別 T2251_.64.0061b22: 釋。三是故下總結。別釋中亦爲レ三。初總伸二 T2251_.64.0061b23: 境同分相一。二無一下正示二法唯同分一。三由諸
T2251_.64.0061c02: 法界唯同分非二彼同分一。不レ爾者法界唯同義 T2251_.64.0061c03: 難レ顯。故言レ若顯三六境無二簡別一。境識言亦顯 T2251_.64.0061c04: レ通二六境六識一。若不レ爾何故不レ言三法界與レ意 T2251_.64.0061c05: 定爲二所縁一。梵本本廣通。故舊論如レ是。同偈 T2251_.64.0061c06: 曰。法界等分。長行釋曰。是塵於レ識定爲レ境。 T2251_.64.0061c07: 若識於レ中已生及定生爲レ法。是塵名等分一。
T2251_.64.0061c10: 所縁一。且如二法界一等。如二寶所引一。準レ之顯レ通二 T2251_.64.0061c11: 六境一云二今應先辨等一。而意在二法界一故。次文 T2251_.64.0061c12: 於二通中一且取レ別云二且如法界等一。若局二法界一 T2251_.64.0061c13: 返違二正理論一。何故證二違害文一。應レ知寶疏非 T2251_.64.0061c14: 矣。無邊意識者。若無常觀唯遍二有爲一不レ渉二 T2251_.64.0061c15: 無爲一。空觀等猶狹。唯無我觀遍二有爲無爲一。故 T2251_.64.0061c16: 此能觀心云二無邊意識一。無邊名レ境。無邊之意 T2251_.64.0061c17: 識境第七依主釋
T2251_.64.0061c22: 也。對レ此乾駄邏國有部云二西方師一。又云二外
T2251_.64.0061c28: 論。明本。鮮本全同二此論一。按此十三字後人 T2251_.64.0061c29: 誤。見二舊論一傍付光記一。而後雜入爲二本文一
T2251_.64.0062a03: 一分一。又各自同有下生二觸果一之能上。由レ是名二同 T2251_.64.0062a04: 分一。前二持業。後有財。有二觸分果一同故。彼 T2251_.64.0062a05: 同分。彼指二有用同分一也。分種類義。同是相 T2251_.64.0062a06: 似義。與二彼同分一同見同一處同眼等種類相 T2251_.64.0062a07: 似故名二彼同分一
T2251_.64.0062a10: 見斷言一故。又舊論三種各有二非見諦滅言一。今 T2251_.64.0062a11: 合作レ文故。又舊論異生性色非六生次第而 T2251_.64.0062a12: 釋二第二色一。下曰。身口二業是色故。是故非二 T2251_.64.0062a13: 見諦滅一。何以故。不レ能レ違二四諦理一故。次有二苦
T2251_.64.0062a16: 三義除二異生性一非也
T2251_.64.0062a21: 彼眼識相應慧執自去。既破レ識能和合心所 T2251_.64.0062a22: 何成。故和合義亦遣去
T2251_.64.0062a26: 二非也。下見言成二徒然一故。違二舊論一故。曰有 T2251_.64.0062a27: 染汚無染汚世間。有學無學見
T2251_.64.0062b04: 義準一今特言レ之思レ之。又云二諸餘一諸言指二一 T2251_.64.0062b05: 切一也
T2251_.64.0062b09: 種一。一者識合。二識空。識合者能見。識空者
T2251_.64.0062b12: 眼識了別色一用依レ眼方有上。又如下受等領納 T2251_.64.0062b13: 等用必依中於心上。此亦應レ爾。由二此理趣一。餘識 T2251_.64.0062b14: 行時。眼既識空不レ能レ見レ色。亦無下倶取二一切 T2251_.64.0062b15: 境一失上。以三一相續中無二二心轉一故
T2251_.64.0062b21: 異。此中且説二種類同縁一。以眼爲門爲見色者。 T2251_.64.0062b22: 謂後眼起前眼爲レ縁。爲見色言顯二起有用。
T2251_.64.0062b25: 破二後釋一云。二句二用者。一違二經意一。彼經唯 T2251_.64.0062b26: 問答門義一全非レ餘。何得三下句爲二取境用一。二 T2251_.64.0062b27: 違レ文。既以眼爲門者。必有二能以一。非レ欲レ説三眼 T2251_.64.0062b28: 有二能爲門義一。若不レ爾何故不レ爲二眼是門一。又 T2251_.64.0062b29: 唯者六境不共根境故。各互簡云レ唯。如二心心 T2251_.64.0062c01: 所一以レ眼爲レ門。同時起時必唯見無レ妨也
T2251_.64.0062c20: 云二達磨多羅一。舊云二曇摩多羅一。是有部四大 T2251_.64.0062c21: 論師隨一。識見家。何可レ得レ言レ部。又曇無 T2251_.64.0062c22: 徳部者二十部隨一。出三藏記。翻二曇無徳部一 T2251_.64.0062c23: 云二法藏部。或法護部。或法正部一。今有餘師應 T2251_.64.0062c24: レ如二三藏言一。然太師合二婆沙曇摩多羅一者誤
T2251_.64.0062c29: 義終不レ參。十八部論擧二梵名一云二達磨欝多 T2251_.64.0063a01: 梨耶一。而即舊曇無徳部者誤也。法藏部。法上 T2251_.64.0063a02: 部別部故。以二梵名近一古人多相亂。又天台
T2251_.64.0063a07: 竝爾。三論玄。達摩多羅造二雜心論一。西域記。
T2251_.64.0063a12: 沙一。三結答。四通二前難能見了別一。此初也。此 T2251_.64.0063a13: 意世間同於二眼識一説二能見言一。何以知レ之。由下 T2251_.64.0063a14: 彼眼識生時説二能見色不言レ識レ色故。如レ是 T2251_.64.0063a15: 於二能依識一尚不レ説二能識一。何況於二所依根一可
T2251_.64.0063a19: 間一義立名レ見。云何知。此識生時説二色是所
T2251_.64.0063a22: 識言相違釋也。是見言唯爲レ根。彼言指二前相 T2251_.64.0063a23: 違釋眼根與レ識二一。能見色爲レ根。是符會之 T2251_.64.0063a24: 甚。亦全無二義味一。第二義非二大穿一。而是見言 T2251_.64.0063a25: 爲レ根。能見爲レ根。竝非也。第三第四猶如下改二 T2251_.64.0063a26: 眼識一作中眼根上。如レ是深細決擇何有二相從釋一。 T2251_.64.0063a27: 不レ足二倶言一也。第五義猶預解也。況能見爲 T2251_.64.0063a28: レ根大非也。寶疏無二委釋一
T2251_.64.0063b06: 婆沙中同二世間一根與レ識竝云レ見。不レ可レ致二能 T2251_.64.0063b07: 識難一。能依識既名レ見。不レ名レ識レ之。故所依根
T2251_.64.0063b10: 文一也。又有人意爲レ證二不レ離レ識之根説爲見 T2251_.64.0063b11: 者。此何謂哉。今非レ成二根見義一故
T2251_.64.0063b17: 見色。而今簡別犢子部。經部等。二眼必前 T2251_.64.0063b18: 後見無二倶時一。故特言二倶時一。下句是所由。正 T2251_.64.0063b19: 依二發智一
T2251_.64.0063b22: 遮レ疑。初中除二犢子經部等一於二阿毘達磨論 T2251_.64.0063b23: 師一。或時倶見義無二異諍一。故言二諸師咸言一。或
T2251_.64.0063b26: 識一。開二二眼一時起二淨識一故。今或時一眼一字 T2251_.64.0063b27: 應レ作レ二。鮮本。正理。顯宗如レ是。開一眼應レ閉 T2251_.64.0063b28: 義不レ通故。本論云レ合故。正理。顯宗作レ閉故。
T2251_.64.0063c03: レ一爲レ二。答。此不二決定一。若開二兩眼一觀二諸色一 T2251_.64.0063c04: 時則二倶見。以下開二一眼一按二一眼一時便於二現 T2251_.64.0063c05: 前一見二二月等一。閉レ一按レ一此事則無上。是故有 T2251_.64.0063c06: 時二根倶見。又發智論説二倶見因。謂雙開時
T2251_.64.0063c10: 見二一月一。若必前後見。開觸時既見。何閉觸時 T2251_.64.0063c11: 不レ見。故定知有時同時。此文光寶有レ諍。即
T2251_.64.0063c19: 如下以二手等一按二一目一時。意識便見中第二月現上。 T2251_.64.0063c20: 非三即眼識見二第二月一。第六意識以レ眼爲レ門 T2251_.64.0063c21: 同時明了状如二眼見一實非二眼見一。以三五識中
T2251_.64.0063c27: 等諸見相分皆是所執。皡按。於二大乘一安慧義 T2251_.64.0063c28: 盡理。唯相宗家爲二意識縁一。今小乘宗既約二眼 T2251_.64.0063c29: 根一論レ之。根既無記。由二手按等縁一見二二月等一。 T2251_.64.0064a01: 如下眼鏡現二遠或近一又於レ一現レ多等上。又依二眼 T2251_.64.0064a02: 根一必眼識生。故眼見二二月一。何依レ眼直生一意 T2251_.64.0064a03: 識一。唯令レ識根眼見非二餘位一故。故光記非也。 T2251_.64.0064a04: 寶疏精談最爲レ妙矣
T2251_.64.0064a11: 彼文證二三事和合爲レ觸契經一成二眼等至境一。 T2251_.64.0064a12: 引二獨行遠近等諸經一立二意至境一。外道豈依二
T2251_.64.0064a18: 理一。何者。於二闇中一開レ眼閉レ眼同黒闇不レ見レ色 T2251_.64.0064a19: 故。問。若爾二十色應レ非二皆所見一。答。由二光明 T2251_.64.0064a20: 縁一而見二闇色一。又解。闇中見二闇色一。晝隔レ物不 T2251_.64.0064a21: レ能レ見レ色。闇中亦爾。不レ能レ見レ物是見二闇色一 T2251_.64.0064a22: 故也。夜中開レ目黒闇即意識起謂レ未二明盡一。 T2251_.64.0064a23: 若全黒即謂二夜中一。是初念眼見二闇色一也。而 T2251_.64.0064a24: 闇中開閉同黒闇者。是不レ可レ爾。若レ不レ開レ眼 T2251_.64.0064a25: 明闇未レ辨。開レ眼而知二明闇故。瑜伽倫記一
T2251_.64.0064a28: 假二光明一。況亦肉眼不レ假二光明一。若蝙蝠等等
T2251_.64.0064b03: 中瞳人黒色故反レ前。犬馬瞳人黄色。晝夜無
T2251_.64.0064b06: 伽等障色一亦爾。天眼發レ識不レ假二空明一。解云。 T2251_.64.0064b07: 約レ識明。與レ根稍別。又天眼由二自定力光一故。
T2251_.64.0064b17: 沙師中一。通二相撃發聲難一有二兩意一。一約二極微一 T2251_.64.0064b18: 以二無間生一通。如二次上一。此約二麁色一以二相觸一 T2251_.64.0064b19: 答。於二婆沙中一雖三正無二此通釋一。然准二是觸非 T2251_.64.0064b20: 觸問答一。彼宗於二麁色一。許下有二方分一及相觸和 T2251_.64.0064b21: 合上。故論主得レ旨叙レ之。非レ謂二第二師一。只隔二細 T2251_.64.0064b22: 麁一以鎭二又言一。舊論云復次一。今不レ言二有説有 T2251_.64.0064b23: 餘師或説等一思レ之。又結二婆沙文義善成立一。 T2251_.64.0064b24: 豈是他乎。然麁色有二相觸一亦觸二極微一。極微 T2251_.64.0064b25: 聚成レ麁故。爲レ免二此難一正理師轉計合二此上 T2251_.64.0064b26: 下文一。以爲二有餘師義一。而自不レ許二和合色相 T2251_.64.0064b27: 觸一。還會二彼是觸非觸四句一。爲二別意文一。由二如 T2251_.64.0064b28: レ是等一。彼西天呼稱二新薩婆多一。何以是義本宗
T2251_.64.0064c12: 爾。汝衆賢違二本宗一立二別義一。令二後生迷倒一。其 T2251_.64.0064c13: 罪太也。寶疏其誤甚矣
T2251_.64.0064c20: 極微七重積成二隙遊塵一。何可二非觸一況今簡二 T2251_.64.0064c21: 自他一云二同類相續一。是約二極微前後念相續一。 T2251_.64.0064c22: 以三隙遊塵同類相續遊覆空中一。以例示極微 T2251_.64.0064c23: 同類相續空中散在一。光記等未レ得二論意一
T2251_.64.0064c27: 不二相觸一。撃時應レ散。或應レ無レ聲。答。應作是説。
T2251_.64.0065a01: 諸極微互無二細分一。問。聚色相撃寧不一散耶。 T2251_.64.0065a02: 答。風界攝持。故令レ不レ散。問。豈不二風界能飄 T2251_.64.0065a03: 散一耶。答。有二能飄散一。如二壞劫時一有二能攝持一。 T2251_.64.0065a04: 如二成劫時一。問。若不レ觸者。相撃時云何發レ聲。 T2251_.64.0065a05: 答。即由二此因一故便發レ聲。若相觸者如何發 T2251_.64.0065a06: レ聲。謂諸極微體相觸者。手等相和。體應二相 T2251_.64.0065a07: 糅一。中無二間隙一如何發レ聲。尊者世友作二如是 T2251_.64.0065a08: 説一。若諸極微互相觸者。彼應レ得三住至二後刹 T2251_.64.0065a09: 那一。大徳説言。實不二相觸一。但於二合集無間生 T2251_.64.0065a10: 中一。隨二世俗諦一假名二相觸一。問。諸是觸物爲二是
T2251_.64.0065a13: レ觸耶。答。依二世俗一説。不レ依二勝義一。謂世共説。 T2251_.64.0065a14: 身所受境名二可觸一。復次縁生二身識一故。此是 T2251_.64.0065a15: 勝義。了別境一心。此所縁名二觸處一。尊者世友 T2251_.64.0065a16: 説。極微若觸即應三住至二第二刹那一。大徳説曰。 T2251_.64.0065a17: 一切極微實不二相觸一。但由二無間一。假立二觸名一。 T2251_.64.0065a18: 有作是説。極微展轉實不二相觸一。亦非二無間一。 T2251_.64.0065a19: 但和合住。彼此相近。假立二觸名一。今論大徳文 T2251_.64.0065a20: 同二七十三一。舊論同二百三十二一。彼曰。大徳説。 T2251_.64.0065a21: 隣虚不レ相觸一。於二無間中一世間。假立二觸名一。然 T2251_.64.0065a22: 今論如二舊論一義不レ異。始終依二百三十二卷一。 T2251_.64.0065a23: 故假立言顯レ順二世俗一。問。三師何別。答。初師 T2251_.64.0065a24: 但由二方分有無一成二觸非觸一。大徳約二無間假 T2251_.64.0065a25: 立一。世友異二此二義一。故唯是散住。雖二文但示一 T2251_.64.0065a26: 結難異二餘師一。故理可レ爾。大徳但言簡二初師 T2251_.64.0065a27: 方分有無由一故。婆沙兩文竝殊安レ之。正理師
T2251_.64.0065b02: 故因一云レ但立二無間由一。別二世友散住有間一言二 T2251_.64.0065b03: 一切極微一。簡二和合色一通二勝義諦不觸一。會二處 T2251_.64.0065b04: 處説觸經文一立二順世假立義一。依レ之無二諸妨 T2251_.64.0065b05: 難一。故取レ之。若異下破二餘義一有レ三。先破二世 T2251_.64.0065b06: 友一。世友所立雖レ不二詳悉一。異レ餘別義。極微散
T2251_.64.0065b11: 破二和合觸義一。全二極微一成レ麁。麁外無微。故非 T2251_.64.0065b12: 理。如可變礙此亦可レ爾者。例レ許レ麁色可變 T2251_.64.0065b13: 礙。極微亦可變礙一。成二麁是觸微亦觸難一。前第
T2251_.64.0065b20: 故。此中初設難。次正難。謂若許二極微有分一。 T2251_.64.0065b21: 若觸若不觸竝皆應レ成二有分失一。若爾極微無二 T2251_.64.0065b22: 方分一時許レ相觸一。何可レ有二斯有分失一。故汝方 T2251_.64.0065b23: 分有無爲レ由。其義不レ成
T2251_.64.0065b26: 簡二餘不定一。准顯二餘三根不定一。應知言正勸
T2251_.64.0065c03: 言二唯取等量一。以レ非下鼻等三根極微於一香等 T2251_.64.0065c04: 微一能取中過量上故。説三唯能取二等量境一。非レ無三 T2251_.64.0065c05: 少分三根極微亦能取二於少分三境一。隨二境微
T2251_.64.0065c10: 齊何。謂知二其分齊一當レ辨二等不等一。不レ爾終墮二 T2251_.64.0065c11: 虚妄一。故言下如二根微量一境微亦然上
T2251_.64.0065c15: 根微爲レ大。望二蒲萄果一云レ等。知是以眼中黒
T2251_.64.0065c25: 理一。後釋爲二向外等一。等二琴聲一。二釋竝欲レ具二小 T2251_.64.0065c26: 大均三一。今云。兩釋竝非也。違二小大音聲文一 T2251_.64.0065c27: 故。不レ順二舊論一故。均等准知不レ擧唯結文言 T2251_.64.0065c28: レ之。正理欲レ具故加二琴聲一。作者意別。綴文異。
T2251_.64.0066a03: 等量傍註亂入乎。語便煩故
T2251_.64.0066a07: 不レ散。若前後住者。云何前不レ障レ後耶。有作 T2251_.64.0066a08: 是説。黒瞳子上傍布而住。對二外色境一如二胡 T2251_.64.0066a09: 荽華一。或如二滿器水上散麨。問。若爾何縁風 T2251_.64.0066a10: 吹不レ散。答。淨色覆持故吹不レ散。有餘師説。 T2251_.64.0066a11: 黒瞳子中前後而住。問。若爾何故前不レ障 T2251_.64.0066a12: レ後。答。體清淨故不二相障礙一。謂如レ是類所造 T2251_.64.0066a13: 淨色雖二多積集一。而不二相障一。如下秋池水以二澄 T2251_.64.0066a14: 淨一故。細針墮レ中而亦可見。耳根極微住二耳 T2251_.64.0066a15: 孔中一。鼻根極微住二鼻孔中一。如レ是三根繞レ頭 T2251_.64.0066a16: 而住。如二冠華曼一。舌根極微住在舌上一。猶如二
T2251_.64.0066a19: 有餘師以レ喩顯示諸根極微住相一。眼根極微 T2251_.64.0066a20: 黒瞳子上如二藥杵頭一。耳根極微住二耳孔中一。猶 T2251_.64.0066a21: 如二燈器一。鼻根極微住二鼻孔中一。猶如二人爪一。舌 T2251_.64.0066a22: 根極微住在舌上一。猶如二剃刀一。身根極微隨 T2251_.64.0066a23: レ身而住。猶如二戟矟一。女根極微住二女形中一。猶 T2251_.64.0066a24: 如二鼓顙一。男根極微住二男形上一。猶如二指環一。佛
T2251_.64.0066a29: 其上一。顯レ非二竪重一。香花者應レ作レ今作レ荽
T2251_.64.0066b04: 而根多レ鬚。綏綏然也。張騫使二西域一始得レ種 T2251_.64.0066b05: 歸故名二胡荽一。今俗呼爲二蒝荽一。立夏後開二細
T2251_.64.0066b08: 清徹下通レ妨膜顯宗如レ今從レ肉。正理從レ目 T2251_.64.0066b09: 作レ瞙。而音釋云目不レ明也。膜末各切。説文。 T2251_.64.0066b10: 肉間脈膜也。廣勻肉膜也。若作レ膜目瞖謂 T2251_.64.0066b11: レ瞙。是亦覆義。若依レ膜令二目上膜微覆不散。
T2251_.64.0066b20: 難云。二根不レ取二外香味等一。隔二清映一故等者 T2251_.64.0066b21: 不レ然。何者根微是根清映力覆持。豈可下混二 T2251_.64.0066b22: 根境一致難。亦復準二鼻舌一後説爲レ善者誤之 T2251_.64.0066b23: 甚。彼樺皮卷雙爪喩唯取二形貌一。全不レ取二重
T2251_.64.0066b26: 於二有部宗一。多初説用也。非レ謂二正不一
T2251_.64.0066b29: 奭曰。皮上有二紫黒花匂者一。裹二鞍弓鎧一。時珍 T2251_.64.0066c01: 曰。樺木生二遼東及臨洮河洲西北諸地一。其木 T2251_.64.0066c02: 色黄。有二小班點一。紅色能牧二肥一。其皮厚而 T2251_.64.0066c03: 輕。唐軟耎皮。匠家用襯二鞾裹一。及爲二刀靶之 T2251_.64.0066c04: 類一。謂二之暖皮一。胡人尤重レ之。以レ皮レ卷レ蝋。可二 T2251_.64.0066c05: 作レ燭點一。應レ知猶如二此方櫻皮一實爾也
T2251_.64.0066c08: 扶根一住。扶根有二高下一能依何無。故婆沙但 T2251_.64.0066c09: 云三繞頭住如二冠花鬘一。今約レ無レ有下如レ舌高下上 T2251_.64.0066c10: 言二無高下一。非レ無二少高下一也。冠華鬘者。玄音。 T2251_.64.0066c11: 冠猶レ著也。案。西國結鬘師。後用二蘇摩那花一。 T2251_.64.0066c12: 行列結レ之。以爲二條貫一。無レ問二男女貴賎一。皆此 T2251_.64.0066c13: 莊嚴或首或身一。以爲レ飾好。則諸經中有二花
T2251_.64.0066c18: 今改云二傳説一。舊論云二彼説一。舌中何可レ有二微 T2251_.64.0066c19: 不レ遍。故不信也
T2251_.64.0066c24: 腰鼓顙一。補遺云。今取二杖鼓顙一。故曰二腰鼓顙一。 T2251_.64.0066c25: 腰鼓如今杖鼓一。繋著腰中一者。顙則皷之匡 T2251_.64.0066c26: 也。腰鼓之顙兩。頭濶中英狹。今按。女根相内 T2251_.64.0066c27: 外並廣中間漸狹。故以類。然神太疏。外小
T2251_.64.0067a03: 分是同分。一分是彼同分。必無二一切是同分 T2251_.64.0067a04: 時一。今唯擧二全無一顯二餘二句一。準レ前可レ知。又 T2251_.64.0067a05: 云。問。若擧レ身入二冷水池中。或湯中一。若在二 T2251_.64.0067a06: 地獄一。山所二磑磨一。身如二爛葉一。或十三種猛焔 T2251_.64.0067a07: 纒レ身。爾時豈非二一切同分一。答。爾時亦有二彼 T2251_.64.0067a08: 同分者一。假使三一切身根極微皆生二身識一。身便
T2251_.64.0067a15: 可見一。慧眼境故。對法諸師説。極微當レ言二不 T2251_.64.0067a16: 可見一。非三肉天眼所二能見一故。此中不下依二慧眼一 T2251_.64.0067a17: 作問。以下於二諸法一無レ差別上故。今擧二不可見一
T2251_.64.0067a20: 乘履搏掣一。非レ長非レ短。非レ方非レ圓。非二正不 T2251_.64.0067a21: 正一。非レ高非レ下。無レ有二細分一。不レ可二分析一。不レ可二 T2251_.64.0067a22: 視見一。不レ可二聽聞一。不レ可二嗅甞一。不レ可二摩觸一。此 T2251_.64.0067a23: 七極微成二一微塵一。是眼眼識所取色中最微 T2251_.64.0067a24: 細者。此但三種眼見。一天眼。二轉輪王。三住
T2251_.64.0067b05: レ下。謂是故當二説如是。不レ爾五事論。由斯故 T2251_.64.0067b06: 説。如何可レ消
T2251_.64.0067b10: 取レ之爲二眼識因一。論主巧旨也
T2251_.64.0067b16: 識上。問。但一經爾。餘一切經何不レ説二色識一耶。 T2251_.64.0067b17: 答。眼是内故名二眼識一。色是外故不レ名二色識一。 T2251_.64.0067b18: 復次眼是所依故名。色所縁故不レ名。復次眼
T2251_.64.0067b21: 共故不レ名。復次諸立名者皆就二所依一顯三所 T2251_.64.0067b22: 立名有二差別一故。如下依レ鼓起名二鼓聲一。依レ具起 T2251_.64.0067b23: 名中具聲上。乃至出二世友尊者八義一。一眼是眼識 T2251_.64.0067b24: 所依故。二眼是眼識勝縁故。三惟墮二自相續一 T2251_.64.0067b25: 故。四眼唯在レ近故。五眼唯内故。六眼不共 T2251_.64.0067b26: 故。七眼唯有執受故。八眼有二損益一。識隨損益 T2251_.64.0067b27: 故。色並皆不レ爾故。今長行攝二依與レ根二義一 T2251_.64.0067b28: 云二根是依一。釋二不共一云二自眼識一。是攝二不共。自 T2251_.64.0067b29: 相續一。又云二所依勝一攝二勝縁義一。後擧レ喩攝三隨 T2251_.64.0067c01: レ依顯二差別簡亂一。一體多義故如レ是爾耳。五
T2251_.64.0067c04: 殊云レ及。光記二喩各通二依不共一非也。又大 T2251_.64.0067c05: 乘從レ境名二色識乃至法識一。隨レ根立レ名有二五 T2251_.64.0067c06: 種勝相一。謂依・發・屬・助・如・根。具如二成唯識
T2251_.64.0067c13: 故論文。生欲界生初定並云二四皆同地一而顯二 T2251_.64.0067c14: 餘是悉異地一。婆沙。正理並爾。餘准可レ知。此
T2251_.64.0067c17:
T2251_.64.0067c20: 非根一。初中亦二。初引レ經定二根體一。後配攝界一。 T2251_.64.0067c21: 初中亦二。先正擧レ經。後辨二列次一。何故引レ經 T2251_.64.0067c22: 者。十八界中。根唯六。根境識三六故。爾今頌 T2251_.64.0067c23: 示二法一分内十二非二長途一。故今引レ經定二根體一。
T2251_.64.0067c28: 根後即説二意根一。阿毘達磨諸大論師迴二此意 T2251_.64.0067c29: 根一置二命根後一。無・有所縁次第説故。諸門分 T2251_.64.0068a01: 別易二顯了一故
T2251_.64.0068a09: 根是七心界攝。何故後三無漏根一分意根 T2251_.64.0068a10: 唯是意意識二攝。答前六處中意根。故於二界 T2251_.64.0068a11: T2251_.64.0068a12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a16: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a17: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a18: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a19: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a20: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a21: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a22: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a23: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a24: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a25: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a26: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a27: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a28: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068a29: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b01: 門一是七心界也。三無漏根中意唯是見道所 T2251_.64.0068b02: レ修心故。無二五識一故。但意意識二也 T2251_.64.0068b03: T2251_.64.0068b04: T2251_.64.0068b05: T2251_.64.0068b06: T2251_.64.0068b07: 豐山寓居上陽沙門釋常快道記
T2251_.64.0068b12: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b13: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b14: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b15: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b16: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b17: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b18: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b19: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b20: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b21: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b22: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b23: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b24: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b25: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b26: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b27: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b28: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068b29: [IMAGE] T2251_.64.0068c01: 初後通名二行品一。有二四十四頌一。彼初三十六頌 T2251_.64.0068c02: 説二倶有法及因縁一。當二此論根中後四品一。二
T2251_.64.0068c05: 最後一品極微ト字ト刹那等差別一。未レ説二有情 T2251_.64.0068c06: 器世間成壞等一。不レ得レ名レ世。故總約二有爲法
T2251_.64.0068c10: 根體相一。是依二發智。婆沙等根蘊一。故殊置レ初 T2251_.64.0068c11: 立二根名一。以顯レ不レ同二雜心一。準以顯三餘不レ全 T2251_.64.0068c12: 信彼一。於二二十二根中五一根眼等是色。命是不 T2251_.64.0068c13: 相應。餘皆心心所。後四品總明二色心心所不 T2251_.64.0068c14: 相體相一。兼與二根名一有レ便。故別不レ立二行品名一。 T2251_.64.0068c15: 又此論渉二五品一廣説二二世間體相一。因レ彼説二 T2251_.64.0068c16: 極微字刹那等三分齊一。故立二世間品名一。如レ是 T2251_.64.0068c17: 離分彼行品一不レ立二行名一。正理論名二差別品一 T2251_.64.0068c18: 此品廣辨二有爲差別一。故根名局不レ通レ餘。故 T2251_.64.0068c19: 改レ之作論意別各有二其理一。然未レ盡レ理。何者。 T2251_.64.0068c20: 未レ得二論主名意一。但欲レ約レ初故改レ之。若但約 T2251_.64.0068c21: レ初何迴レ後不レ名二行品一。論主深意學者思レ之。 T2251_.64.0068c22: 光寶辨不也
T2251_.64.0068c25: 此初也。字界字縁光記具。正理擧二兩種一。今初
T2251_.64.0068c28: 不レ依二界縁一云。又解。根體勝故名二最勝一。根用 T2251_.64.0068c29: 勝故名爲二自在一。體用勝故名爲二光顯一。此増上
Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: Footnote: 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 [行番号:有/無] [返り点:有/無] [CITE] |