大正蔵検索


punctuation    Hangul    Eng   

Citation style A:
Citation style B:
()
Citation style C:
()
Citation style D:
()
TextNo.
Vol.
Page

  INBUDS
INBUDS(Bibliographic Database)
  Digital Dictionary of Buddhism
電子佛教辭典
パスワードがない場合は「guest」でログインしてください。
Users who do not have a password can log in with the userID "guest".

本文をドラッグして選択するとDDBの見出し語検索結果が表示されます。

Select a portion of the text by dragging your mouse to view all terms in the text contained in the DDB. ・

Password Access Policies

大日經疏指心鈔 (No. 2217_ 頼瑜撰 ) in Vol. 59

[First] [Prev+100] [Prev] 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 [Next] [Next+100] [Last] [行番号:有/無]   [返り点:有/無] [CITE]

T2217_.59.0709a01: 也。意云。衆生五根本煩惱心中先貪心一種
T2217_.59.0709a02: 隨二所作事業一而異二二名一也。依二染淨一污二淨
T2217_.59.0709a03: 心一名二貪心一不レ染二善法一故名二無貪心一。故云二
T2217_.59.0709a04: 常依二法隨事異名一也。餘又爾也。次就此二
T2217_.59.0709a05: 中乃至偈中説者於二前貪無貪等一展轉隨レ事
T2217_.59.0709a06: 四反再數成二百六十心也。彼等名相如二大本一
T2217_.59.0709a07: 也爲言復若更約下約二九品一而明下成二八萬
T2217_.59.0709a08: 幷無量一之義上也。可レ合二譬中從此復更等一。法
T2217_.59.0709a09: 譬相順。何煩法中分二兩重一乎。若百六十心
T2217_.59.0709a10: 又約二九品一者不レ順二再數經文一。又約二九品一再
T2217_.59.0709a11: 數五反再數其數可レ増二百六十一矣。故知若更
T2217_.59.0709a12: 前百六十心約二九品等一數乃至成二八萬及無
T2217_.59.0709a13: 量一也爲言
T2217_.59.0709a14: 又如劫初時人等者。頌疏第十二云。劫初時
T2217_.59.0709a15: 人皆如二色界一。諸根無缺形色端嚴。身帶二光
T2217_.59.0709a16: 明一騰空自在。飮食喜樂長壽久住。有二如レ是
T2217_.59.0709a17: 類一。地味漸生。其味甘美其香鬱馥。時有二一
T2217_.59.0709a18: 人一禀性耽レ味馥レ香取食。餘人隨學競取食
T2217_.59.0709a19: レ之。爾時方名三初受二段食一。資二段食一故身漸堅
T2217_.59.0709a20: 重光明隱沒黒闇便生。日月衆星從レ慈出現。
T2217_.59.0709a21: 由二漸耽味地味便隱。從レ斯復有二地皮餅生一。
T2217_.59.0709a22: 競耽食レ之。地餅復隱。爾時復有二林藤出現一。
T2217_.59.0709a23: 競耽食故林藤復隱。爾時有下非二耕種一香稻自
T2217_.59.0709a24: 生上。衆共取レ之以充二所食一。此食麁故殘穢在
T2217_.59.0709a25: レ身。爲レ欲二蠲除一便生二二道一。因レ斯遂復有二男
T2217_.59.0709a26: 女二根生一。由二二根殊一故形相亦異。宿習力
T2217_.59.0709a27: 故便相膽視。因レ此遂生二非理作意一。欲貪
T2217_.59.0709a28: 鬼魅惑亂身心一失レ意猖狂行二非梵行一。人中
T2217_.59.0709a29: 欲鬼初生發二此時一。爾時諸人隨取二香稻一無
T2217_.59.0709b01: レ所二貯積一。後時有レ人禀性嬾惰長取二香稻一貯
T2217_.59.0709b02: 擬二所食一。餘人隨學漸多停貯。由レ此於レ稻生二
T2217_.59.0709b03: 我心一多收無レ厭。隨二收處一無二復再生一。遂共
T2217_.59.0709b04: 分レ田慮二遠盡一於二已分田一生二悋護心一。於二他
T2217_.59.0709b05: 分田一有レ懷二侵奪一。劫偸過起始二於此時一。爲
T2217_.59.0709b06: レ欲二遮防一共取聚評議一僉量衆内一有徳
T2217_.59.0709b07: 人一各以二所レ收六分之一一雇令二防護一封爲二田
T2217_.59.0709b08: 主一。因レ斯故立二刹帝利名一。大衆欽承恩流二率
T2217_.59.0709b09: 土一。故復名二大三未多王一此云共
許王也
自後諸王
T2217_.59.0709b10: 此王爲レ首。時人或有下情厭レ居二樂家一在二空
T2217_.59.0709b11: 閑精修中戒行上。因レ斯故得二波羅門名一。此云
淨志
後
T2217_.59.0709b12: 時有レ王貪悋財物一不レ能三均給國土人民一。故
T2217_.59.0709b13: 貧匱人者多行二賊盜一。王爲二禁止一行二輕重罰一。
T2217_.59.0709b14: 爲二殺害業一始二於此時一。時有二罪人一心怖二刑罰一
T2217_.59.0709b15: 覆藏其罪一異想發言。虚誑語生此時爲レ首
T2217_.59.0709b16: 文私云。頌疏中地味地餅如レ次當二今疏地
T2217_.59.0709b17: 肥地膚一歟。又疏中地肥乃至地膚林藤云云
T2217_.59.0709b18: 乃至言顯何物乎。可レ見二阿含經一矣。問。今一
T2217_.59.0709b19: 段文法譬中何耶。答。或云。法説也。如者指事
T2217_.59.0709b20: 義也。煩惱生起義專是法説。故知法譬後重
T2217_.59.0709b21: 出擧二法説現證一也。或云。譬説中有二兩重一其
T2217_.59.0709b22: 一也。又言。顯レ譬有二二重一。如者譬喩義也。合
T2217_.59.0709b23: 説文中爲此喩者等者此意矣。但以レ法譬レ法
T2217_.59.0709b24: 其例非レ無。嘉祥釋云。法性如二涅槃一文所以
T2217_.59.0709b25: 擧二劫初現證一顯二滅後煩惱生起一。故爲二法譬一
T2217_.59.0709b26: 也。又義云。准二法花三周説一。法譬因縁次第
T2217_.59.0709b27: 歟。謂雖下上以二法譬一明中再數義上而未レ示二無明
T2217_.59.0709b28: 生起等因縁一故又擧二如劫初人一示二彼生起之
T2217_.59.0709b29: 因縁一。例如三善心生起擧二劫初人等一矣。但所
T2217_.59.0709c01: 以爲二此喩一者。喩者曉義。未二必譬喩之義一
T2217_.59.0709c02: *也即曉釋義也。猶如三二教論云二喩曰一耳
T2217_.59.0709c03: 大日經疏指心鈔卷九
T2217_.59.0709c04:
T2217_.59.0709c05:
T2217_.59.0709c06:
T2217_.59.0709c07: 大日經疏指心鈔卷第十
T2217_.59.0709c08:   疏卷第二之三
T2217_.59.0709c09: 若以淨菩提心等者。抄第三云。疏若以淨
T2217_.59.0709c10: 菩提心等者。若言不定之意。此有二二義一。謂
T2217_.59.0709c11: 若以二淨菩提心一爲二出世間心一即是超越三
T2217_.59.0709c12: 劫一瑜祇之行。則出世間心生。出世間心生即
T2217_.59.0709c13: 是淨菩提心。此心出二於一切世間一故。若以二
T2217_.59.0709c14: 佛惠初心一爲二出世間心一即是三阿祇劫成
T2217_.59.0709c15: 佛亦名二出世間心一。今言二三阿僧祇劫一即三種
T2217_.59.0709c16: 妄執。行者若一生越二此三妄執一即一生成佛。
T2217_.59.0709c17: 何見レ有二時分一耶。故云二若以等一文教相抄第
T2217_.59.0709c18: 三述レ意云。此釋心云。於二三妄執斷位一疏心
T2217_.59.0709c19: 有二二義一。謂疏若以淨菩提心等者。若以二初
T2217_.59.0709c20: 地一爲二出世間心一是即地前斷二三妄執一也。若
T2217_.59.0709c21: 依二此義一可言二經所説三瑜祇行皆是地前所
T2217_.59.0709c22: 行一也。疏梵云劫波有二義等下第二義。若以二
T2217_.59.0709c23: 佛果一爲二出世間心一即三妄執至二第十地一盡
T2217_.59.0709c24: レ之。疏心付二第二義一釋二經始終一也文抄第二
T2217_.59.0709c25: 云。今約二因中一具有二麁・細・極細三重妄執一障
T2217_.59.0709c26: 翳菩提一。即以二地前祕密方便一越二初劫一重麁
T2217_.59.0709c27: 妄一名下離二一切障一出世間心生上。見二心明道一
T2217_.59.0709c28: 時淨菩提心始得二顯現一。如レ是練修至二八地一。
T2217_.59.0709c29: 時越二第二劫一重妄執一名レ離二一切障一。其菩
T2217_.59.0710a01: 提心逾勝逾増更益二方便一。乃至二金剛道中一越二
T2217_.59.0710a02: 第三劫極細妄執一名二離一切障一。其菩提心與二
T2217_.59.0710a03: 如來一等。此位但有二四分之一佛地之障一存
T2217_.59.0710a04: 焉。乃至唯佛地障解脱道斷故此乃四分之一
T2217_.59.0710a05: 最後微垢也文又相鈔云。此釋心云。地前唯
T2217_.59.0710a06: 斷二麁妄一。其所以乃至法華儀軌云。若能專注
T2217_.59.0710a07: 無間修習現生則入二初地一。頓集二一大阿僧祗
T2217_.59.0710a08: 劫福智資糧一文故知眞言初地離二一僧祇劫
T2217_.59.0710a09: 所斷麁妄執一證二寂然界一。乃至既地前唯斷二麁
T2217_.59.0710a10: 妄一。故知第二第三妄執定地上所レ除也云云範
T2217_.59.0710a11: 抄云。若以淨菩提心爲出世間心即是超越
T2217_.59.0710a12: 三劫瑜祇行者消經文一之總句也。梵云乃至
T2217_.59.0710a13: 得至佛惠初心故云三劫成佛也者別釋也。
T2217_.59.0710a14: 故以二初地淨菩提心一結二佛惠初心一也。若佛
T2217_.59.0710a15: 地何云二初心一。於二佛地一不レ可レ有二初後一故。又
T2217_.59.0710a16: 疏無二若以佛惠初心文一。上下同云二三祇劫一。仍
T2217_.59.0710a17: 非二別位一歟云云私云。朝譽意依二鈔義一專成二
T2217_.59.0710a18: 地前一劫地上二劫之旨一也。傳法院覺心義
T2217_.59.0710a19: 亦同レ之。本寺道範義高野古徳等多分義也。
T2217_.59.0710a20: 是三劫地前義也。初義意三賢是初僧祇。初
T2217_.59.0710a21: 地乃至七地第二僧祇。八地以上第三僧祇
T2217_.59.0710a22: 之義。諸經論施設。敢以無レ違矣。今宗又爾
T2217_.59.0710a23: 也。故五祕密經云。能變易弟子倶生我執種
T2217_.59.0710a24: 子一應レ時集得身中一大阿僧祇劫所集福徳
T2217_.59.0710a25: 智惠一則爲レ生在佛家一文又觀智儀軌云。若能
T2217_.59.0710a26: 專注無間修習現生即入二初地一頓集二一大
T2217_.59.0710a27: 阿僧祇劫所レ集福徳智惠資糧一文此等文既
T2217_.59.0710a28: 今宗又地前經二一僧祇行一即入二初地一也。又
T2217_.59.0710a29: 今一僧祇妄執是我執故不レ可レ云二第二第三
T2217_.59.0710b01: 劫一。後二劫中唯斷二法執一故。又疏第六釋二經
T2217_.59.0710b02: 八地三昧道文一云。菩薩初度二第七地一時。上
T2217_.59.0710b03: 不レ見二諸佛可求下不レ見二衆生可度。謂三是
T2217_.59.0710b04: 住二大涅槃一於二萬行一休息。爾時十方諸佛以二
T2217_.59.0710b05: 此三昧道一發二起其心一文又疏第二釋二第三劫
T2217_.59.0710b06: 行一云。行者初觀二空性一時覺二一切法皆入二心
T2217_.59.0710b07: 之實際一。下不レ見二衆生可度上不レ見二諸佛可一
T2217_.59.0710b08: レ求。爾時萬行休息謂爲二究竟一。乃至爾時十方
T2217_.59.0710b09: 諸佛同時現前而勸喩之一云云二處文全同。
T2217_.59.0710b10: 應レ知經疏意第三劫在二於八地上一也。又檜尾
T2217_.59.0710b11: 口決中以二儀軌汝之所證處是一道清淨文一
T2217_.59.0710b12: 釋二住八地如幻三昧也一。既地前初劫八地上
T2217_.59.0710b13: 第三劫義其説分明也。若爾初地乃至七地
T2217_.59.0710b14: 第二劫之義其理極成矣。依レ之大師祕藏記
T2217_.59.0710b15: 云。越二三妄執一越二三僧祇劫一即是十地究竟
T2217_.59.0710b16: 也。過レ此修二上上方便一斷二微細妄執一至二佛果一
T2217_.59.0710b17: 故經曰二此四分之一度於信解一文既十地究
T2217_.59.0710b18: 竟斷二三妄一佛地斷二微細一故地上二劫義分明
T2217_.59.0710b19: 者歟。加レ之復慈氏儀軌云。若一生中從二初
T2217_.59.0710b20: 念誦一至三於越二三無數劫行一即證二一生補處
T2217_.59.0710b21: 三莽地一文又疏第三云。乃至爲二一生補處菩
T2217_.59.0710b22: 薩一擇去心中無明父母極細之垢一亦名二治
T2217_.59.0710b23: 地一云云此等文又斷二第三劫妄執一至二因滿位一
T2217_.59.0710b24: 云二佛惠初心一也。然後斷二微細一得レ果故於レ中
T2217_.59.0710b25: 有レ二。一無間道斷レ彼解道得レ果故。故抄云。
T2217_.59.0710b26: 至二金剛定一越二極細妄執一文二佛果斷故。故抄
T2217_.59.0710b27: 云。唯佛地障解脱道斷文此乃依二十一地十
T2217_.59.0710b28: 二地異一故。但因滿位而言二三劫成佛一者。等
T2217_.59.0710b29: 妙二覺一佛二名之故。又密抄第三云。問。第
T2217_.59.0710c01: 三劫滿得二成佛一不。答。若越二三妄執一力即得二
T2217_.59.0710c02: 成佛一。故疏云。復越二一重極細妄執一得レ至二佛
T2217_.59.0710c03: 惠一故文又雜抄第七智證云。越二一百六十心
T2217_.59.0710c04: 麁妄執一即一劫。越二第二重細妄執一即二劫。
T2217_.59.0710c05: 第三重極細妄執即超二第三阿僧祇一至二於佛
T2217_.59.0710c06: 果初心一故云二於成佛時一不レ限二劫數一也。心
T2217_.59.0710c07: 内無明漸漸斷除即超劫之義也文此等釋斷二
T2217_.59.0710c08: 第三劫妄執一即至二佛果一也。故云二故云三劫
T2217_.59.0710c09: 成佛一也。此是佛果初刹那云二佛惠初心一也。
T2217_.59.0710c10: 故釋論云。極解脱道初刹那中一時相翻不
T2217_.59.0710c11: レ能二倶行一文此意微細攝二極細一而不レ開也。依二
T2217_.59.0710c12: 此等釋義一地前初劫地上二劫之義。同二瑜伽
T2217_.59.0710c13: 起信等説一矣。後義意三劫倶是寄對如常一之
T2217_.59.0710c14: 地前位也。故疏下釋二第三劫極無心一云。此
T2217_.59.0710c15: 心望二前二劫一猶如二蓮華盛敷一。若望二後二心一
T2217_.59.0710c16: 果復成レ種文。住心論第九云。望前二劫者指他縁一道
二種住心。後二心者示眞言門根究竟二
T2217_.59.0710c17: 心。
文
又疏云。次生二極無自性心一乃至爾時生二於
T2217_.59.0710c18: 佛家一文。華嚴經云。生在如
來家即得入初地。文
又疏第三云。此空智
T2217_.59.0710c19: 生即是極無自性心生也乃至即是眞言行者
T2217_.59.0710c20: 虚空無垢菩提心也文疏二云。初地菩薩得此虚
空無垢菩提心 云云
T2217_.59.0710c21: 又云。漸次證入者如二初無畏時一以二聲字觀一
T2217_.59.0710c22: 入二漫荼羅行一。乃至第六無畏於二平等心中一修二
T2217_.59.0710c23: 曼荼羅行一。離垢地以去各於二自地觀心中一修二
T2217_.59.0710c24: 漫荼羅行一。略以レ位分レ之已作二十六重深淺
T2217_.59.0710c25: 不同一文私云。既離垢地以上爲十
重。初地同第六無畏也
又住心論第八
T2217_.59.0710c26: 心云。是因是心望二前顯教一極果於二後祕心一
T2217_.59.0710c27: 初心。初發心時便成二正覺一。宜一其然一也云云
T2217_.59.0710c28: 疏二云。此心望前二劫猶如蓮華盛敷。若望後二
心果復成種。故曰如是初心佛説成佛因。云云
 以
T2217_.59.0710c29: 上諸文但以二極無置二初地一矣。又論第八心
T2217_.59.0711a01: 云。經云。此菩薩淨菩提心門名二初法明道一。釋
T2217_.59.0711a02: 云三是明二法身眞如一道無爲之眞理一。佛説一此
T2217_.59.0711a03: 名二初法明道一。智度名二入佛道初門一。於二諸顯
T2217_.59.0711a04: 教一是究竟理智法身。望眞言門一是即初門略
T2217_.59.0711a05: 抄又二教論上云。至レ如二彼百非洞遣四句皆
T2217_.59.0711a06: 亡唯佛與佛乃能究盡一此則顯教關楔。但眞
T2217_.59.0711a07: 言藏家以レ此爲二入道初門一略抄已上二文以二
T2217_.59.0711a08: 第八心文一同二初地一歟。又當卷下釋二初地果
T2217_.59.0711a09: 相一云。從レ此無有二待對一。出過心量一不思議地
T2217_.59.0711a10: 云云此意一道極無倶屬二地前一歟云下從二初地一
T2217_.59.0711a11: 離中待對上故。已上三義若約二能越淨心一。或一
T2217_.59.0711a12: 道地前。極無初地。或二心倶地前。或兩心同
T2217_.59.0711a13: 地上。三説雖レ異若依二所度妄心一者三妄皆在二
T2217_.59.0711a14: 地前一故云二地前三劫一耳。但至三三祇配立違二
T2217_.59.0711a15: 諸經論一者大師釋二此事一云。問。第三僧祇即
T2217_.59.0711a16: 是八地已上。而何言二初心菩薩一耶。答。是初
T2217_.59.0711a17: 心菩薩也。無數劫者三劫之中何劫耶。答。第
T2217_.59.0711a18: 三劫也已下如
先別
此釋既云下眞言初入二淨菩提
T2217_.59.0711a19: 心位一頓具中顯行無數劫功徳上。准知兩軌説又
T2217_.59.0711a20: 於二自宗初地一得二顯行第三劫福智一故云二一
T2217_.59.0711a21: 大阿僧祇一。非レ云二初僧祇一也。倶生我執等者
T2217_.59.0711a22: 實教意於二二障中一不レ分二見修一。地前伏レ現初
T2217_.59.0711a23: 地斷レ種十地除レ習故。極細當二二障種一故。且
T2217_.59.0711a24: 約二煩惱障邊一云二我執種一歟。非レ無二法執種一
T2217_.59.0711a25: 麁惑寄現行
微細同習歟
或又但一煩惱麁云二我執一細法
T2217_.59.0711a26: 執云二種子一。我執之種子歟。次疏第六釋者。疏
T2217_.59.0711a27: 自釋云。復次此中應レ説二初法明門三昧道一。於二
T2217_.59.0711a28: 上品中一已説故不二重言一。又如二上所説一一生
T2217_.59.0711a29: 補處及八地三昧是約二教道法門一作二如レ此
T2217_.59.0711b01: 説一耳。然祕密乘人於二世諦中一即能通二第一
T2217_.59.0711b02: 義諦一者從二初發心一具行二大空三昧一。其謂不
T2217_.59.0711b03: レ然則於一生之中一不レ能三頓滿二諸地一也云云
T2217_.59.0711b04: 此意於二今宗一有二教門實行二意一。若依二教道
T2217_.59.0711b05: 門一准二如常一第三劫在二於八地上一。例如レ云二初
T2217_.59.0711b06: 二三地相同世間四五六地寄同羅漢一也。故
T2217_.59.0711b07: 云二一生補處及八地三昧是約教道法門等一
T2217_.59.0711b08: 也。若依二實行一者初地斷二三妄一故顯行八地
T2217_.59.0711b09: 上行初地得故。云二從初發心即具行大空三
T2217_.59.0711b10: 昧一也。疏二云。然此經宗從二初地一即得レ入二金
T2217_.59.0711b11: 剛寶藏一文即此意矣。或又八地三昧者直指二
T2217_.59.0711b12: 如常八地上第三僧祇一也。教道法門者常途
T2217_.59.0711b13: 教門也。然祕密乘等者眞言門行也。初心菩
T2217_.59.0711b14: 薩頓得二顯行第三劫功徳一故。故云二其謂不然
T2217_.59.0711b15: 乃至不能頓滿諸地一也。次祕藏記釋者越二三
T2217_.59.0711b16: 妄一之後十地究竟也爲言文點云。越二三僧祇一
T2217_.59.0711b17: 越二三妄執一即是十地究竟也。過レ此者過二十
T2217_.59.0711b18: 地位一也。此位亦雖レ斷二微細一且約二盡處一云二果
T2217_.59.0711b19: 位所斷一也。猶如丙根本無明雖下從二初地一斷上此
T2217_.59.0711b20: 云乙佛地所斷甲矣。次慈氏儀軌及疏第三一生
T2217_.59.0711b21: 補處位斷二第三劫妄執一者。疏第六云。如上
T2217_.59.0711b22: 所説一生補處是約二教道法門一文餘釋如レ先
T2217_.59.0711b23: 若約二實行一。是如二尊勝儀軌等一。故彼軌云初
T2217_.59.0711b24: 發心時便越二百六十心一度二三無數劫行一證二
T2217_.59.0711b25: 普賢色身三昧耶一。即是初發心便成二正覺一文
T2217_.59.0711b26: 此又同二疏從初發心具行大空三昧文一矣。故
T2217_.59.0711b27: 知今宗異二餘教一三劫在二地前一十地離二待對一
T2217_.59.0711b28: 也。故大師釋二現世證得歡喜地文一云。非二顯
T2217_.59.0711b29: 教所レ言初地一自家佛乘之初地也云云可レ悉
T2217_.59.0711c01: レ之。又依二初義一會二疏及論文一者。先疏此心望
T2217_.59.0711c02: 前二劫等者抄第四云。第三劫極無自性心
T2217_.59.0711c03: 生時如蓮華盛敷一故云二望前二劫等一。言二若
T2217_.59.0711c04: 望後二心等一者。此心喩八心中第五華種心
T2217_.59.0711c05: 第六成果心。後二心者第七受用種子第八
T2217_.59.0711c06: 嬰童心也。望二此二心一名二果復成種一云云又教
T2217_.59.0711c07: 相抄會二論釋等一云。前二劫者指二初二劫一。極
T2217_.59.0711c08: 無自性是第三劫心。謂八地乃至十地也以二
T2217_.59.0711c09: 此極無心一爲二因句一。以レ蒙二佛警一更増二進心一
T2217_.59.0711c10: 爲二根句一。即金剛心一念也。後以二成正覺心一
T2217_.59.0711c11: 爲究竟句一也。然顯教意今第八地心爲二果
T2217_.59.0711c12: 位一。前二劫顯行滿昇二此地一。故今教以二八地乃
T2217_.59.0711c13: 至十地一爲二成佛因初心佛一矣云云疏第三十
T2217_.59.0711c14: 六重深行者。彼卷下釋云。傳教灌頂是名二阿
T2217_.59.0711c15: 闍梨一乃至若生二極無自性心一得レ入二如上漫荼
T2217_.59.0711c16: 羅海會一名二阿闍梨一。從レ此復有二十重深行一乃
T2217_.59.0711c17: 至於下解二三密一人中上最爲二上首一如二金剛薩埵一。
T2217_.59.0711c18: 是名二阿闍梨。復次毘盧遮那是名二阿闍梨一云
T2217_.59.0711c19: 云抄第四釋下極無自性心名二阿闍梨一已上之
T2217_.59.0711c20: 文上云。如レ是次第從レ下至レ上皆得三名爲二阿
T2217_.59.0711c21: 闍梨一也云云又云。疏從此復有十重等者。十
T2217_.59.0711c22: 重深行即十地也乃至
云云
教相抄云。此文意從二
T2217_.59.0711c23: 傳教一至二極無一。是從レ下至レ上示二阿闍梨位一。謂
T2217_.59.0711c24: 從二地前一至二第十地一也。次從此復有十重等
T2217_.59.0711c25: 者還從レ上至レ下委顯レ有二十重徳行一。謂從二十
T2217_.59.0711c26: 地一至二初地一也。次乃至已下顯下從二初地一至二傳
T2217_.59.0711c27: 教一更有中地前三十心上。故云二乃至一云云或云。
T2217_.59.0711c28: 從レ下至レ上六重如レ先。乃至如金剛薩埵者十
T2217_.59.0711c29: 重從レ上至レ下擧二初地金薩一上九地云二乃至一
T2217_.59.0712a01: 也。又相抄云。疏第二釋二八地已上一云。住是
T2217_.59.0712a02: 地一已善知二諸地障一乃至如レ是等有二衆多十心一
T2217_.59.0712a03: 云云指二此十心一云二十重深行一也取意況復云二
T2217_.59.0712a04: 十重深行一。何入二佛果一。故知前文離垢地指二初
T2217_.59.0712a05: 地一也。虚空無垢菩提心故。凡三劫地前地上
T2217_.59.0712a06: 古來未決。然前義爲レ勝。經疏論釋以二顯教極
T2217_.59.0712a07: 果一爲二眞言初門一故。又望二後二心一會釋非レ理。
T2217_.59.0712a08: 先密抄釋不可。以二三劫一配二十地一時第二劫
T2217_.59.0712a09: 至七地一然配二五六地華果二心一爲此心一而
T2217_.59.0712a10: 七八地二心云二後二心一。理豈然矣。次相抄義
T2217_.59.0712a11: 又非レ理。何者八九十地爲二因句一。長短三心中
T2217_.59.0712a12: 何若短三心則一地内有二三心一長則八地上
T2217_.59.0712a13: 究竟句也。等覺爲レ根。果位爲二究竟一。依二疏何
T2217_.59.0712a14: 文一乎。開二上上方便一雖レ爲二佛果一未レ見二此説一
T2217_.59.0712a15: 也。又八地以上淨菩提心説經疏何文乎。就
T2217_.59.0712a16: レ中十地三句眞言行位也。誰以二八地上究竟
T2217_.59.0712a17: 句一爲二眞言初門一矣。密抄猶淨菩提心初地義
T2217_.59.0712a18: 明鏡故許二地前三劫一義一。然依二彼釋一成二八
T2217_.59.0712a19: 地上菩提心義一。非三啻違二抄釋一害二經疏明文一
T2217_.59.0712a20: 暗違二大師釋論一。誤甚哉。次又十六重深行
T2217_.59.0712a21: 是釋二漸次證入經文一。然作二順逆二科通釋一大
T2217_.59.0712a22: 背二經文一。況復疏第三云。初劫智惠猶與二二
T2217_.59.0712a23: 乘一共行。若二劫智惠尚與二二乘一共聞。第三
T2217_.59.0712a24: 劫等虚空無邊智惠一切二乘不レ能二思議一。堪
T2217_.59.0712a25: レ作二祕密行阿闍梨一也。就二祕密中一又漸次轉
T2217_.59.0712a26: 深。乃至佛爲二十地一説二般若一則九地非二其境
T2217_.59.0712a27: 界一。唯大毘盧遮那得レ名二究竟阿闍梨一也略抄
T2217_.59.0712a28: 此中等虚空心者極無心即初地也。就祕密
T2217_.59.0712a29: 中等者離垢地以去也。既云二漸次轉深一。從レ上
T2217_.59.0712b01: 至レ下豈夫爾乎。前文自地觀心者顯二此祕
T2217_.59.0712b02: 密行義一也。二地已上不レ對二顯行一。是眞言行
T2217_.59.0712b03: 故。故疏二釋二初地果相一云。從レ此無レ有二待對一
T2217_.59.0712b04: 文又既毘盧遮那云二究竟阿闍梨一加二佛地一
T2217_.59.0712b05: 爲二十重一也。但九地非境者。十地十一地開合
T2217_.59.0712b06: 異故。約二合門一云レ爾歟。或等妙二覺一佛二
T2217_.59.0712b07: 名故除二十地一歟。前文擧二金薩大日二種一者
T2217_.59.0712b08: 六無畏十重中各擧二終阿闍梨一顯二前阿闍
T2217_.59.0712b09: 梨體一故云二乃至一也。乃至言流至毘盧遮那
T2217_.59.0712b10: 上一。又八地上十心者不レ合二疏文一。疏釋云二有
T2217_.59.0712b11: 十心無邊智生一即是初地果相也文又深行
T2217_.59.0712b12: 者約二多分一歟。或佛果亦深行所得故云レ爾。
T2217_.59.0712b13: 或微細惑解脱道斷故果位有二對治行相一故
T2217_.59.0712b14: 云レ爾歟。又十六重是阿闍梨支分故傳法阿
T2217_.59.0712b15: 闍梨作二此事業一故。毘盧遮那云二深行一歟。故
T2217_.59.0712b16: 隣二彼釋一云。是故作二最初阿闍梨事業一時即
T2217_.59.0712b17: 須レ觀照自身即金剛薩埵毘盧遮那一文又智
T2217_.59.0712b18: 證大師釋云。有十重深行者從二第二地一至二
T2217_.59.0712b19: 於等覺一也。於二無自性心一當二於初地一也云云
T2217_.59.0712b20: 依二此釋一十重深行無レ違。但違二毘盧遮那阿
T2217_.59.0712b21: 闍梨文一矣。又三祇配位相違者顯密相違文
T2217_.59.0712b22: 義非レ一。何於二此一事一守二顯乘一。就レ中抄釋
T2217_.59.0712b23: 依二初義一許二地前三劫之義一。若三祇配*位決
T2217_.59.0712b24: 定豈許二彼義一乎。況顯教中有下地地經二三祇一
T2217_.59.0712b25: 之義上耳。尋云。微細妄執唯佛果所斷乎。如
T2217_.59.0712b26: 何答。或云。第三極細妄執從二初地一至二因滿一
T2217_.59.0712b27: 斷レ之。次斷二微細妄執一至二佛果一也。故疏下文
T2217_.59.0712b28: 云。復越一劫昇住此地即是初入二此信解地一
T2217_.59.0712b29: 乃至更開二佛地一。爲二上上方便一乃至故曰三此四
T2217_.59.0712c01: 分之一度二於信解一也文此文初地斷二第三極
T2217_.59.0712c02: 細一之後更不レ云レ斷二別惑一而言三佛果位斷二四
T2217_.59.0712c03: 分一微細一故又疏第三卷云三補處菩薩斷二無
T2217_.59.0712c04: 明極細之垢一故。是故成下第三極細妄執至二因
T2217_.59.0712c05: 滿一之義上。故知微細妄執唯佛地所斷也。又義
T2217_.59.0712c06: 云。經云復越二一劫一昇住二此地一。此四分之一
T2217_.59.0712c07: 度二於信解一文此於二第三妄執一開二第四妄執一
T2217_.59.0712c08: 爲二十地所斷一也。謂第三劫終經越諸戲論之
T2217_.59.0712c09: 句疏釋云。越二第三重微細百六十心一文此後
T2217_.59.0712c10: 經復次信解地等説二十地一畢云二復越一劫等一。
T2217_.59.0712c11: 是擧二信解地所斷一也。次此四分之一者此言
T2217_.59.0712c12: 指二前復越一劫文一也。故知十地斷二微細妄
T2217_.59.0712c13: 執一也。或云。今第三妄執有二三重一。一初地所
T2217_.59.0712c14: 斷二十地所斷三佛地所斷。而今復越一劫
T2217_.59.0712c15: 云二三祇一者合二十地所斷一云二極細一也。過此
T2217_.59.0712c16: 修上上方便斷微細妄執者別開二佛地所斷一
T2217_.59.0712c17: 爲二第四一也
T2217_.59.0712c18: 眞言門行者等者。問。三劫倶有一時分妄執義一。
T2217_.59.0712c19: 何第三劫置二眞言門言一耶。答。本經中説二第
T2217_.59.0712c20: 三劫一文云。復次眞言門等文今准レ彼歟。問。
T2217_.59.0712c21: 經初二劫顯二如常顯行一可レ爾。今初二劫又
T2217_.59.0712c22: 約二妄執一。何更云二眞言門一耶。答。三劫皆雖レ通二
T2217_.59.0712c23: 顯密二行一。第三劫能越心即初地淨菩提心
T2217_.59.0712c24: 故。此位顯極密因故。更置二眞言門言一也
T2217_.59.0712c25: 得至佛惠初心者。密抄第三云。第三劫滿得二
T2217_.59.0712c26: 成佛一不。答。若越二三妄執一力即得二成佛一。故
T2217_.59.0712c27: 疏云。復越二一劫極細妄執一得レ至二佛惠一也文
T2217_.59.0712c28: 又雜抄云。第三云レ超二極細妄執一即超二第三
T2217_.59.0712c29: 僧祇一至二於佛果初心一。故云二於成佛時一不
T2217_.59.0713a01: レ限二劫數一也文依二此兩釋一佛*果初心云二佛
T2217_.59.0713a02: 惠初心一。故梵云已下可レ爲二異釋一也。大師陀
T2217_.59.0713a03: 羅尼義云。得至佛惠初心者眞言佛惠初心
T2217_.59.0713a04: 也。約二顯宗一當二圓滿正覺位一也文此意淨菩
T2217_.59.0713a05: 提心云二佛惠初心一也。梵云下別釋已上總標
T2217_.59.0713a06: 也。所謂總標別釋成二三劫地前之旨一也。但
T2217_.59.0713a07: 云二三劫成佛一者。斷二三妄一是初地分證成佛
T2217_.59.0713a08: 故。菩提心義三云。義釋説下超二三重妄執一名
T2217_.59.0713a09: 度中三阿僧祇劫上。過二第三劫一入二佛惠初心一名二
T2217_.59.0713a10: 淨菩提心門一。淨菩提心門以上十住地名二信
T2217_.59.0713a11: 解行地一文私云。此釋雖レ似同大師釋一其意
T2217_.59.0713a12: 異。何者以二別圓初地初住一同二淨菩提心一故。
T2217_.59.0713a13: 故彼釋云。天台圓初住別初地證道同位即
T2217_.59.0713a14: 是眞言佛惠初心淨菩提心門也云云大師以二
T2217_.59.0713a15: 佛惠初心一當二于天台果佛一故。安然意非レ理。
T2217_.59.0713a16: 天台別教地前可レ經二三劫一歟
T2217_.59.0713a17: 若一生度此三妄執等者。鈔第三云。若一生
T2217_.59.0713a18: 度此等者。此宗明レ義但除二妄執一名爲二瑜祇一。
T2217_.59.0713a19: 若一生度二此三妄執一名二一生成佛一文問。今此
T2217_.59.0713a20: 一生成佛與二前祕密釋三劫成佛一全同可レ云
T2217_.59.0713a21: 耶。答。依二一義一非二全同一歟。問。兩釋雖レ異倶
T2217_.59.0713a22: 度二三妄一成佛。所度既同。成佛何異乎。答。今
T2217_.59.0713a23: 文若言起盡顯レ異二前成佛一也。所謂前標二若
T2217_.59.0713a24: 以淨菩提心一結二得至佛惠初心一。是即明二初地
T2217_.59.0713a25: 分證成道一也此中有顯密成佛。顯雖約
究竟且就密成分證義也
今若一
T2217_.59.0713a26: 生度此等者更顯二一生成佛究竟成道一也。分
T2217_.59.0713a27: 滿既殊。前後成佛豈同乎。依レ之大師雜問答
T2217_.59.0713a28: 中釋二三妄義一畢云。問。如レ此等義爾耳。今所二
T2217_.59.0713a29: 建立一不レ歴二三劫一此生即上二菩薩地位一即身
T2217_.59.0713b01: 成之義抑有二依憑一耶。答。證文甚多云云如
T2217_.59.0713b02: レ此問答引二經論等一中引二疏第一所レ引之大
T2217_.59.0713b03: 品文一證二一生二生義一。依二此釋一案二今文一即上
T2217_.59.0713b04: 菩薩位當二於得至佛惠初心一。即身成佛即今
T2217_.59.0713b05: 一生成佛也。但三妄言雖レ同寛狡是別。後
T2217_.59.0713b06: 三妄攝二微細一故。故抄第四云。前言二三劫一不
T2217_.59.0713b07: レ説レ四者合二佛地一障一在二十地一故文仍無レ過。
T2217_.59.0713b08: 問。案二文次第一上釋二時分妄執義一畢而言二即
T2217_.59.0713b09: 一生成佛何論時分耶一之意無レ爭。前常途祕
T2217_.59.0713b10: 密中重簡二時分一成二妄執義一是正釋通妨一義
T2217_.59.0713b11: 也。何云二別義一乎。況後至二文處一釋二第三劫一時
T2217_.59.0713b12: 或釋二舟車神通至到一處一或判二巧拙難易不
T2217_.59.0713b13: 同得寶無異路一云云既云二至到一處一。何別二分
T2217_.59.0713b14: 滿寶所一矣。又兩處三妄言何忽有二寛*狡一乎。
T2217_.59.0713b15: 答。祕密意若分證若究竟皆簡二時分一故結二何
T2217_.59.0713b16: 論時分耶一。今分證究竟即如二一生二生二類一
T2217_.59.0713b17: 故。金剛頂經略釋云。若能受持思修不レ經二
T2217_.59.0713b18: 三大劫一十六大生乃至現生證二如來大覺位一
T2217_.59.0713b19: 文即身義云。諸經論中皆説二三劫成佛一今建
T2217_.59.0713b20: 立即身成佛義一云云此即以二眞言究竟成佛一
T2217_.59.0713b21: 非レ待二顯家時分成佛一乎。或又此即身成佛
T2217_.59.0713b22: 與二一生成佛一有二寛*狡一。一生二生同不レ捨二肉
T2217_.59.0713b23: 身一故即身成佛攝也。又佛惠初心是祕密分
T2217_.59.0713b24: 證義。陀羅尼義釋分明也如先引一生成佛又
T2217_.59.0713b25: 究竟成佛。大師處處判文也。但至二下釋一者
T2217_.59.0713b26: 眞言分證與二顯究竟一一處故云レ爾。非レ謂三祕
T2217_.59.0713b27: 密中無二分滿一也。故疏第一釋二初地成佛一云。
T2217_.59.0713b28: 然非二究竟大牟尼位一文又三妄言隨レ宜何必
T2217_.59.0713b29: 一同。例如二初劫中三重三妄一也。仍無レ失。又
T2217_.59.0713c01: 義。准二祕記釋一者。初心者因滿望レ果云二初
T2217_.59.0713c02: 心一歟。或佛果初刹那歟。然則究竟成佛。若
T2217_.59.0713c03: 一生下雖三上明二時分妄執三劫成佛一。未レ判二
T2217_.59.0713c04: 勝劣取捨一。故度二三妄一成佛是密即身成佛故
T2217_.59.0713c05: 不レ取二時分一也爲言或又密成佛雖レ非二時分一
T2217_.59.0713c06: 未レ聞隔生即身義一。故即顯二祕密成佛是一
T2217_.59.0713c07: 生成佛一也
T2217_.59.0713c08: 然就第一重内等者。抄第三云。然第一重内
T2217_.59.0713c09: 復有二三重三妄執一。今初出世心生即離二初三
T2217_.59.0713c10: 妄執一。謂世間衆生從二無始一不レ了二我之自性一。
T2217_.59.0713c11: 唯依二諸蘊一執レ有二實我一。由レ執レ我故起二種種
T2217_.59.0713c12: 惑一造二種種業一受二種種報一成二三毒根一。今瑜伽
T2217_.59.0713c13: 行者從二初發心一依二眞言門一了知心相一於二諸
T2217_.59.0713c14: 蘊中一即離相在内外觀レ之皆不可得即離二我
T2217_.59.0713c15: 倒所生三毒根本一。是越二三世間三妄執一也文
T2217_.59.0713c16: 此釋三道似レ云二三毒一矣。教相抄一云。心云
T2217_.59.0713c17: 付二初劫所斷麁妄執一又細分有二三重三妄執一
T2217_.59.0713c18: 第一謂以二貪嗔癡三毒一爲二三妄一。此中攝二經
T2217_.59.0713c19: 所説一重百六十心一。謂付二六十心一於二一一
T2217_.59.0713c20: 心一各有二麁細重重。其中深細攝二乃至極細妄
T2217_.59.0713c21: 執一。其中麁淺此即當二毘曇所レ叙聲聞人見
T2217_.59.0713c22: 道位所斷一也。故住心論第四云。此唯蘊無
T2217_.59.0713c23: 我一句中攝二一切小乘法一盡。故今聲聞乘名二
T2217_.59.0713c24: 唯蘊無我住心一文故知觀唯蘊無我度六十心
T2217_.59.0713c25: 者是*叙二諸部之棟梁毘曇斷惑一也。若爾成
T2217_.59.0713c26: 實等論可レ屬二縁覺智一耳略抄此意六十心通二
T2217_.59.0713c27: 見修一。三妄之中今擧二麁妄中見斷六十心一歟。
T2217_.59.0713c28: 唯蘊無我言雖レ通二三道一。且就レ初得二總名一歟。
T2217_.59.0713c29: 例如二無雲天一。云二最初解了一是顯二見道位一也。
T2217_.59.0714a01: 問。麁妄中既分二三重一。第二第三應二亦爾一耶。
T2217_.59.0714a02: 答。般若寺抄一云。問。其三重三妄執者何有。
T2217_.59.0714a03: 答。毎二三重妄執一各有二三重一。凡九重妄執耳。
T2217_.59.0714a04: 問。爾初重妄執云二三妄執一。何。答。初重妄執
T2217_.59.0714a05: 建立麁妄執・細妄執・極細妄執一也。餘二重
T2217_.59.0714a06: 妄執亦如レ是也。問。於レ劫亦可レ在二九劫一。三劫
T2217_.59.0714a07: 各三劫之故。答。爾云有二何妨一問。爾疏正文
T2217_.59.0714a08: 何。答。説二三重妄執一畢次文云二凡有三重三
T2217_.59.0714a09: 妄執也一云云可レ云二單三妄執復三妄執一耳略抄
T2217_.59.0714a10: 准二此釋一細妄等亦應レ有二三種一歟。此釋初重
T2217_.59.0714a11: 内三種亦立二麁細等名一如レ次可レ配。見修相
T2217_.59.0714a12: 望修惑是細故種子極細義也。但出二疏正文一
T2217_.59.0714a13: 三重三妄云云今本云二三重三妄一。此乃麁妄
T2217_.59.0714a14: 中有二三種三妄一也爲言非二九劫之義一也。然今
T2217_.59.0714a15: 隨義轉用歟。又雜問答云。經云二越世間三妄
T2217_.59.0714a16: 執出世間心生一者。於二妄執一有二多種一。一者百
T2217_.59.0714a17: 六十心三重度故云二三妄執一。二度二世間心一
T2217_.59.0714a18: 離我倒所生三妄一名レ越二三妄執一。三六根六
T2217_.59.0714a19: 境六識制伏此三一故超二三妄執一。四者斷二業
T2217_.59.0714a20: 煩惱無明一故云レ度二三妄執一。問。此四妄執配
T2217_.59.0714a21: レ人云何。答。第二大乘人所斷也。第三三果所
T2217_.59.0714a22: 度也。第四無學所斷也。若隨レ根而論レ之凡
T2217_.59.0714a23: 有二三種三妄執一。問。第一三妄約二何人一耶。答。
T2217_.59.0714a24: 眞言行者略抄此心於二經一文一釋レ有二四妄義一
T2217_.59.0714a25: 歟。就レ中初總釋二三妄一文爲二眞言行者所度一
T2217_.59.0714a26: 以二麁妄中三重一爲二顯乘大小乘人所斷一矣。
T2217_.59.0714a27: 准二此釋一第二第三劫不レ可レ有二三種三妄一歟。
T2217_.59.0714a28: 六十心文可レ局二第一重一歟
T2217_.59.0714a29: 所謂根境界等者。教相抄云。第二三妄執者。
T2217_.59.0714b01: 於二根境識三法一所レ起妄執也。是謂聲聞所斷
T2217_.59.0714b02: 修惑故云二三果學人所留滯一。於二十八界諸法
T2217_.59.0714b03: 自相一所レ起修惑非二須陀所斷故云二三果所
T2217_.59.0714b04: 滯一云云安然釋云。是藏修道三果所斷修惑
T2217_.59.0714b05: 文修道三果者。預流果。是第十六心修道攝
T2217_.59.0714b06: 故。此果進斷二修惑一故云レ爾歟。或此果直雖
T2217_.59.0714b07: レ不レ斷二修惑一修道攝。第十六心是已曾釋
T2217_.59.0714b08: 故所斷言正約二一來不還一歟。前抄云レ非二須
T2217_.59.0714b09: 陀所斷一也。若約レ云二所留滯一三果皆依二後
T2217_.59.0714b10: 惑一故歟。或隨在何道一斷レ惑得二果道一故云二三
T2217_.59.0714b11: 果所斷一歟。問。何故根境識云二修惑一耶。答。惠
T2217_.59.0714b12: 暉疏第一云。十五唯修斷者五根五境及善
T2217_.59.0714b13: 無記心王爲二所依境一修惑爲二能縁一。是所縁
T2217_.59.0714b14: 縛。此能縁惑修道除名二修斷一也文倶舍論云。
T2217_.59.0714b15: 後三界通レ三文光記云。三通三者見斷隨眠
T2217_.59.0714b16: 及相應法迷レ理起故。四相與レ得是彼見惑親
T2217_.59.0714b17: 發起故。皆見所斷乃至諸餘有漏若無色善無
T2217_.59.0714b18: 覆無記是不染污縁縛斷故。若諸煩惱及彼
T2217_.59.0714b19: 相應迷レ事起故四相及得是彼修惑親發起。
T2217_.59.0714b20: 欲及善染無表是修斷心親發起故。又是色
T2217_.59.0714b21: 法縁縛斷故皆修所斷乃至一切無漏非二繋縛一
T2217_.59.0714b22: 故皆非二所斷一文准二此釋一今疏中於二後三果一
T2217_.59.0714b23: 取二修斷邊一故十八界諸法云二三果所斷一也。
T2217_.59.0714b24: 見斷邊攝二第一三妄一故。然此十八界中染心
T2217_.59.0714b25: 王及心所等成二妄執一法皆自性斷也。善無記
T2217_.59.0714b26: 七心・界心所等及五根・五境等所縁縛也。今
T2217_.59.0714b27: 爲二能縁一修惑云二妄執一也。或又若約二眷屬體一
T2217_.59.0714b28: 五根五境等亦妄執攝歟。猶如二第三妄執擧
T2217_.59.0714b29: 業矣。故釋論記釋二執相應染一云。眷屬亦通二
T2217_.59.0714c01: 業及果報一文佛地論又爾也。淹留修行者。淹
T2217_.59.0714c02: 久留滯義也。謂見修相望修道時長故云二淹
T2217_.59.0714c03: 久一也。又前見惑頓斷。今修惑漸斷。前惑斷故
T2217_.59.0714c04: 云二修行一。後惑未レ斷故云二留滯一也。又義。根境
T2217_.59.0714c05: 界三妄是法執也。故下釋二淹留修行一云二法執
T2217_.59.0714c06: 當心一。又大疏抄釋二第一重三妄一云。三妄執自
T2217_.59.0714c07: レ何發起。我執法執無明發起也云云問。以レ何
T2217_.59.0714c08: 可レ知。答。疏云。最初解了唯蘊無我一根・境・
T2217_.59.0714c09: 界淹留修行業・煩惱株杌及無明種子略抄准二
T2217_.59.0714c10: 此釋一三果是法執未斷位故云二淹留修行一也。
T2217_.59.0714c11: 私案。於二十八界諸法一有二體用一。迷レ用是人執
T2217_.59.0714c12: 修惑也。迷レ體是法執也。然前義爲レ勝。所以
T2217_.59.0714c13: 初重三妄皆約二所斷一故。又若約二法執一者設
T2217_.59.0714c14: 聲聞無學設縁覺無學亦應二留滯一。何局二三果一
T2217_.59.0714c15: 乎。又有下不レ示二修斷一之過上故。又下文如二下
T2217_.59.0714c16: 抄一
T2217_.59.0714c17: 如内外十二界等者。或云。如者若義也。謂於二
T2217_.59.0714c18: 根・境・界文一有二二意一。十八界義如レ先。又若内
T2217_.59.0714c19: 外十二界即根・境故境・界合言レ之也爲言問。
T2217_.59.0714c20: 若爾何云二三妄一耶。答。迷二根・境十二界一起二修
T2217_.59.0714c21: 惑三毒一故云二三妄一也。例如三第一重於レ蘊起二
T2217_.59.0714c22: 我倒所生三毒一也。或云二内外十二界一。界字
T2217_.59.0714c23: 通二根・境一歟。或義。初云二唯蘊一擧二五蘊一。今言二
T2217_.59.0714c24: 根・境・界一示二十八界一。此三妄等中未レ明二處門一。
T2217_.59.0714c25: 故釋二十二處一也。十八界中以二六識一合二意根
T2217_.59.0714c26: 界一故成二十二界一也爲言又義。經根・境・界文
T2217_.59.0714c27: 似レ説二處門一。然今釋二界門一故作二此釋一歟。後
T2217_.59.0714c28: 二義意。如者指事義也。或云。義章中依二成
T2217_.59.0714c29: 實意一釋二法入之中分出六識一。此意以二六識一
T2217_.59.0715a01: 可レ合二法處一歟。然大小乘所判皆六識攝二意
T2217_.59.0715a02: 根一成實意未レ審矣
T2217_.59.0715a03: 所謂業煩惱株杌等。問答云。四斷二業・煩惱・
T2217_.59.0715a04: 無明一故云二度三妄執一文今三妄者業及煩惱
T2217_.59.0715a05: 與二無明一云二三妄一也。問。無明煩惱同煩惱攝
T2217_.59.0715a06: 也。何開爲レ二。所生十二因縁何非二其數一。故
T2217_.59.0715a07: 疏第七云。淨除於業生一文又論釋二拔業因
T2217_.59.0715a08: 種一云。業者惡業。因則十二因縁。種者無明種
T2217_.59.0715a09: 子文准二此釋一。煩惱攝二於無明一別立レ因似レ爲二
T2217_.59.0715a10: 三妄一。如何。答。今文既標レ有二三妄一釋二所謂業・
T2217_.59.0715a11: 煩惱株杌及無明種子一。疏釋明鏡者也。但
T2217_.59.0715a12: 至二疏下釋幷論釋一者未二必三妄義一。擧二所斷
T2217_.59.0715a13: 所觀一歟。又煩惱無明別立約二過現一也。故實
T2217_.59.0715a14: 範阿字義云。私案。經言レ業者行・有二支。煩
T2217_.59.0715a15: 惱愛・取。無明初支。生者餘七。七事無明等之
T2217_.59.0715a16: 所生故云レ生也。鈔云。業及煩惱根本無明種
T2217_.59.0715a17: 子所生十二因縁大樹云云當知十二因縁大
T2217_.59.0715a18: 多羅樹無明爲二種子一四支爲二根本一。餘七枝葉
T2217_.59.0715a19: 華菓等也。其中無明等正妄執體也。故疏但
T2217_.59.0715a20: 云二所謂乃至種子一云云問。株杌種子何物耶。
T2217_.59.0715a21: 答。安然菩提心義三云。業・煩惱正使。聲聞所
T2217_.59.0715a22: 斷。無明種子習氣支。佛所斷云云此意業・煩
T2217_.59.0715a23: 惱正使爲二株杌一。正使通二種現一歟。種子是習
T2217_.59.0715a24: 氣也。今謂不レ爾。株杌亦名二習氣一而爲二縁覺
T2217_.59.0715a25: 所斷一也。故論釋二縁覺一云。業惱株杌猶レ此而
T2217_.59.0715a26: 拔。無明種子因レ之而斷云云疏第一云。摧壞
T2217_.59.0715a27: 無明大樹レ拔二其根本一云云此文以二無明現種一
T2217_.59.0715a28: 非レ爲二樹及根一乎。但或以二抄釋一四支爲二根本一
T2217_.59.0715a29: 者其理不可。抄株杌種子爲二聲聞無學所斷一
T2217_.59.0715b01: 故與二今意一是異耳。彼又十二因縁云二大樹一。今
T2217_.59.0715b02: 於二無明一分二樹根一故。疏下釋大師釋懸會矣」
T2217_.59.0715b03: 即是無學聖人等者。抄云。言二即是無學至最
T2217_.59.0715b04: 難斷處一者。即非想地第九品煩惱最極微細
T2217_.59.0715b05: 名爲二難斷處一也文此釋但爲二聲聞無學所斷一
T2217_.59.0715b06: 歟。倶舍云。第九無間道名二金剛喩定一。盡得二
T2217_.59.0715b07: 倶盡智成無學應果一文或通二二乘一歟。至レ下
T2217_.59.0715b08: 作二二釋一矣。然與二大師意一異。未レ辨二聲縁種子
T2217_.59.0715b09: 斷不一故。又安然菩提心義三云。今文業・煩惱
T2217_.59.0715b10: 正使聲聞所斷。種子是習氣。支佛所斷文此
T2217_.59.0715b11: 意今無學雖下置二二乘無學一云中縁覺斷習。又
T2217_.59.0715b12: 與二大師一異。業・煩惱株杌爲二現行一爲二聲聞所
T2217_.59.0715b13: 斷一故。大師意株杌同二習氣一也。最難斷義准
T2217_.59.0715b14: レ抄可レ得レ意歟。又教相抄一云。第三重三妄
T2217_.59.0715b15: 執者是縁覺人無學位所斷也。所斷既越二聲
T2217_.59.0715b16: 聞分齊一故云二最難斷處一。縁覺智惠深二聲聞一
T2217_.59.0715b17: 故。故十住心論第五云。辟支佛智惠深利故
T2217_.59.0715b18: 能以二總別之相一深觀察之一見二一切集法皆
T2217_.59.0715b19: 是滅法一。此與二聲聞一異故。拔二業・煩惱株杌及
T2217_.59.0715b20: 無明種子一文付二三重三妄一。前二聲聞所斷第
T2217_.59.0715b21: 三縁覺所除也。中聲聞所斷云二三果學人
T2217_.59.0715b22: 所滯一不レ擧二無學所斷一縁覺所除云二無學聖
T2217_.59.0715b23: 人所斷一不レ擧二學位所斷一者凡今經所説三瑜
T2217_.59.0715b24: 祇行*者欲レ顯三眞言勝二餘教一。而大小諸乘人
T2217_.59.0715b25: 所修諸行從レ淺至レ深漸次擧レ之以爲二眞宗方
T2217_.59.0715b26: 便一也。故初出二聲聞行一次示二縁覺斷一。然此二
T2217_.59.0715b27: 人倶有二學無學二位一。聲聞擧二其學位一讓二無
T2217_.59.0715b28: 學於縁覺一。縁覺示二其果位一預二學位於聲聞一。
T2217_.59.0715b29: 是則隱顯爲レ義耳。又三果學人者後三果
T2217_.59.0715c01: 也。此人對二縁覺果位一猶有二學處一故云二學
T2217_.59.0715c02: 人一。縁覺不レ擧二學位一者以二聲聞人一爲二縁覺因
T2217_.59.0715c03: 人一也。或又三果學人者前三果也。無學聖
T2217_.59.0715c04: 人者第四果也。然此無學果人有二所斷一者有下
T2217_.59.0715c05: 聲聞無學轉成二獨覺一之義上故。故住心論云。
T2217_.59.0715c06: 以三羅漢等迴心亦二成獨覺一故文誠聲聞無學
T2217_.59.0715c07: 未レ拔二株杌種子一更居二獨覺之學位一能除二彼
T2217_.59.0715c08: 株杌等一方證二中乘極果一。所以云二無學聖人最
T2217_.59.0715c09: 難斷處一矣云云又愚案云。無學聖人者通二二
T2217_.59.0715c10: 乘一總句也。所斷難斷是辨二聲縁淺深一別句
T2217_.59.0715c11: 也。例如二起信論如菩薩地盡等總別二句一。意
T2217_.59.0715c12: 云。株杌及種子縁覺所斷。聲聞難斷處也爲言
T2217_.59.0715c13: 就レ中上但擧二三果學人一。此中無二聲聞應果一。
T2217_.59.0715c14: 可レ闕レ彼故。又云。後三果者第二三妄迷二十
T2217_.59.0715c15: 八界修惑。既爲二彼惑一所二留滯一處。無學果
T2217_.59.0715c16: 豈有二彼義一乎。應レ知今文含説聲聞無學一釋二
T2217_.59.0715c17: 聲聞應果習難斷義一非想第九品修斷義自
T2217_.59.0715c18: 顯也。問。或難云。大師釋云。根・境・界等者三
T2217_.59.0715c19: 果所度也文何云二未斷惑一。應レ知今留滯者望二
T2217_.59.0715c20: 見惑頓斷一修惑漸斷故云レ爾。故光云。見惑
T2217_.59.0715c21: 易レ斷。總立二一果一。修惑難レ斷別立二三果一文爾
T2217_.59.0715c22: 何。答。三果留滯義。後向道惑與二前果一而爲二
T2217_.59.0715c23: 留滯處一故。前三果各進斷二三果修惑一故。云二
T2217_.59.0715c24: 三果所度一也。若不レ爾者無學既無二所斷一。何
T2217_.59.0715c25: 云二三果所度一乎。光釋斷二修惑一而所レ得果故
T2217_.59.0715c26: 與二今留滯一義異耳。但縁覺不レ擧二學位一者聲
T2217_.59.0715c27: 聞四果同二縁覺學位一故。唯識章云。又上必
T2217_.59.0715c28: 兼レ下。聲聞行縁必獨覺法故文建治二年傳法會
談義予始立此義
T2217_.59.0715c29: 矣
T2217_.59.0716a01: 凡有三種三妄執者。或云。第一重麁妄中有二
T2217_.59.0716a02: 人法二執一中。今三種攝二人執見修無學所斷一。
T2217_.59.0716a03: 顯二一重法倒一也。或云。此法倒攝二今業煩惱一
T2217_.59.0716a04: 也。故下文明二法倒一云二業煩惱網一故。凡拔業
T2217_.59.0716a05: 煩惱等文。雖レ通二二執斷一。今約二無學所斷一云二
T2217_.59.0716a06: 違世心一也。若依二菩薩法執斷義一。又離二違世一
T2217_.59.0716a07: 矣。猶如三彼如菩薩地盡含二因滿果滿一也。或又
T2217_.59.0716a08: 拔業煩惱句雖レ約二拔二倒一。今約二無學斷一云二
T2217_.59.0716a09: 湛寂一歟。例如三唯識論云二二乘見道唯斷一種
T2217_.59.0716a10: 菩薩見道倶斷二種一耳。若爾何第三劫業・煩
T2217_.59.0716a11: 惱。不レ在二此句中一耶。彼隔二僧祇一故。此一僧祇
T2217_.59.0716a12: 内故。又大疏抄釋下三重三妄各有二麁細極細
T2217_.59.0716a13: 三妄一凡爲中九重妄執上畢云。問。爾疏正文何。
T2217_.59.0716a14: 答。説二三重妄執一畢次文云。凡有二三重三妄
T2217_.59.0716a15: 執一也云云可レ云二單複三妄執一耳云云此釋意。今
T2217_.59.0716a16: 三種三妄者九重妄執義。若爾何局二麁妄一矣」
T2217_.59.0716a17: 學摩訶衍人等者。抄云。謂學二大乘一之人。初
T2217_.59.0716a18: 得二出世初心一。即是越二我倒麁妄執一。名二出世初
T2217_.59.0716a19: 心一。此與二小乘見道預流果一適齊。謂上疏云。
T2217_.59.0716a20: 如下聲聞人初觀二陰・界・入時乃至於二八直道中一
T2217_.59.0716a21: 遠塵離垢眞法眼生一。眞言門菩薩亦復如レ是。
T2217_.59.0716a22: 初觀二陰・界・入一時乃至於二如來大菩提道中一。遠
T2217_.59.0716a23: 塵離垢得二法眼淨一故。云下與二小乘見道一適齊上。
T2217_.59.0716a24: 今言二適齊一者。但相似名レ齊也文教相抄述レ意
T2217_.59.0716a25: 云。前明二二乘智斷一畢。次顯二大乘人行一。此人
T2217_.59.0716a26: 依二顯教大乘一初發心時。聞二心性不生一深信二
T2217_.59.0716a27: 其理一。雖レ然一爲二我見等倒惑一所レ覆未レ得二空觀
T2217_.59.0716a28: 現前一。爾時數數學二觀解一。謂蘊・界・入等集成
T2217_.59.0716a29: 人一。此人者以レ心爲レ主。然蘊・界等是因縁所
T2217_.59.0716b01: 生法。推求其性一不可得也。若心依レ何而住。
T2217_.59.0716b02: 故心即不生。成二此觀一時。離二諸見網一故云二小
T2217_.59.0716b03: 乘見道齊一。然此菩薩雖下與二小乘見道一齊上。不
T2217_.59.0716b04: レ墮二聲聞位一。聲聞觀二陰上無人一。菩薩知二心性
T2217_.59.0716b05: 不生一故。又二乘闕二慈心一。菩薩具二大悲一。依二此
T2217_.59.0716b06: 菩提心勢力一不レ墮二二乘地一也云云私案。抄釋
T2217_.59.0716b07: 以二學大乘人一似レ爲二眞言行者一。合二上疏文一故。
T2217_.59.0716b08: 又以二眞言行者一爲二能寄齊一。是疏前後例也。
T2217_.59.0716b09: 又六無畏段經中但説二所寄齊顯乘一。疏中兼
T2217_.59.0716b10: 示二能寄齊密行一。今又順レ彼故。又淨菩提心少
T2217_.59.0716b11: 分増明文眞言行者菩提心名二淨菩提心一故。
T2217_.59.0716b12: 又云度二無量見網淨心増明一。同下疏第五釋二眞
T2217_.59.0716b13: 言行者三世無障礙戒一云中住二此戒一時無量見
T2217_.59.0716b14: 網皆悉淨除上之故。又今卷下欲レ釋二寂然界一
T2217_.59.0716b15: 云。以行者於二瑜伽中一湛寂之心雖二已明顯一
T2217_.59.0716b16: 等文修二瑜伽一行者。寧非二密人一乎。又義。顯行
T2217_.59.0716b17: 人也。下引二三獸渡河喩一。是三乘共菩薩也。又
T2217_.59.0716b18: 云レ非二如實巧度一。是拙度菩薩也。而下擧二顯
T2217_.59.0716b19: 密二行一云二巧拙難易一故。又云。同以二無言説
T2217_.59.0716b20: 道一得二諸法實相一。三乘倶證二偏眞理一故。又云二
T2217_.59.0716b21: 同共一法中而昇沈有異一。同二智論三乘共十
T2217_.59.0716b22: 地一故具如
下辨
又三獸渡河之喩出二于優婆塞經幷
T2217_.59.0716b23: 寶性論一。彼經論中説二眞言菩薩乎。又下所
T2217_.59.0716b24: レ擧寂然界菩薩。是此菩薩昇進位也。彼既屬二
T2217_.59.0716b25: 偏眞理一顯人也。此何不レ然乎。又修禪定等度
T2217_.59.0716b26: 門云云大師出二顯行一。云二六度爲宗。眞言行是
T2217_.59.0716b27: 三密故。又覺苑師判二通教菩薩一故。又大師
T2217_.59.0716b28: 立二四妄執一時。初劫三妄中第一云二大乘人所
T2217_.59.0716b29: 斷一。此外以二第一三妄一爲二眞言行所度一。故依二
T2217_.59.0716c01: 如レ是等文理一顯人而非二眞言行者一也。二義
T2217_.59.0716c02: 中後義爲レ勝。但至二能寄齊一者非レ爲二密人一。於二
T2217_.59.0716c03: 三乘人一。經中縁覺菩薩但説二極位一也。故縁覺
T2217_.59.0716c04: 擧二無學一云二拔業惱株杌等一。菩薩明下度二法
T2217_.59.0716c05: 倒一之位上。云二彼離違順八心等一之故。上兼レ下
T2217_.59.0716c06: 故。前斷位寄二聲縁斷位一示レ之也。全非二顯密
T2217_.59.0716c07: 相對一也。又六無畏文異二今文一。彼但説二如常一
T2217_.59.0716c08: 顯二密行一。此説レ極顯二淺位一故。若如レ彼學大乘
T2217_.59.0716c09: 人爲二眞言行者一。寂然菩薩顯密中何。若如二六
T2217_.59.0716c10: 無畏一爲二顯人一者。何學大乘人不レ齊レ彼矣。若
T2217_.59.0716c11: 爲二密人一者。寄レ顯明密行一之時。無二所寄齊一而
T2217_.59.0716c12: 直出下眞言行者度二法倒一之位上。況案二六無畏
T2217_.59.0716c13: 寄齊一。以二密人未斷惑位一同二顯人斷證位一。豈
T2217_.59.0716c14: 非レ違二彼例一乎。故知於下證二偏眞理一之顯行三
T2217_.59.0716c15: 乘上。而顯二斷惑異一也。又淨菩提心名何遮レ顯
T2217_.59.0716c16: 矣。如レ云二淨心最初生起一。外種子心猶得二此
T2217_.59.0716c17: 稱一矣。又下釋者度二見網一顯密同故。猶如二大
T2217_.59.0716c18: 小相似一。何以言レ同。云二其體無異矣。又於二瑜
T2217_.59.0716c19: 伽中釋一者。第二劫往昔修瑜伽等文此非レ指二
T2217_.59.0716c20: 顯行一。又釋二順理一云。古昔修瑜伽行者文此豈
T2217_.59.0716c21: 密人耶。故知今菩薩三乘共菩薩非二密人一也。
T2217_.59.0716c22: 況顯行二乘密行菩薩合論成二三乘義一。甚以
T2217_.59.0716c23: 不可矣。問。下文中於二寂然菩薩一作二常途祕
T2217_.59.0716c24: 密二釋一。若此菩薩但顯人。何作二祕密釋一耶。
T2217_.59.0716c25: 依レ之疏第三明二十六重深行一出二寂然界阿
T2217_.59.0716c26: 闍梨一。此豈非二眞言行者一乎。但大師釋約二總
T2217_.59.0716c27: 別義一擧二大乘人所斷一。非レ謂レ不二密人一矣。何。
T2217_.59.0716c28: 答。下釋是寂然界菩薩唯是顯人之證也。何
T2217_.59.0716c29: 者三乘中菩薩。經二一僧祇一證二寂然界一也。今
T2217_.59.0717a01: 祕宗度一一重妄執一同彼也爲言寂*然菩薩亦
T2217_.59.0717a02: 非レ爲二密人一也。寧於二一人一並二顯密二行一乎。
T2217_.59.0717a03: 又雜問答釋約二總別一非レ理。若爾三果學人無
T2217_.59.0717a04: 學聖人。亦眞言行者乎。所以彼釋下立二四妄一
T2217_.59.0717a05: 之所由上云。根機非レ一。所以多種也文若約二總
T2217_.59.0717a06: 別一何云二根機非一一。大乘人非二顯大乘一者。有下
T2217_.59.0717a07: 不レ示二顯大乘機一之過上。根機非一中。無二顯大
T2217_.59.0717a08: 乘機一矣。第三釋者。彼次上釋云。若觀二前人一
T2217_.59.0717a09: 未レ有二深解之機一。則順二常途一隨レ文爲レ釋文故
T2217_.59.0717a10: 知彼且順二常途一顯二眞言行一故云レ爾。寂然菩
T2217_.59.0717a11: 薩即非二密人一也
T2217_.59.0717a12: 然彼行者等者。此下以二學大乘人修惑斷
T2217_.59.0717a13: 位一。與二三果學人位一齊也。教相抄云。心云。菩
T2217_.59.0717a14: 薩前雖下觀二蘊無性一知中心不生上。以二觀解未熟
T2217_.59.0717a15: 故有二法執一。猶愛二禪定智惠等功徳一起二修所
T2217_.59.0717a16: 斷惑一故。亦次觀二定惠等功徳法之無性一。斷二
T2217_.59.0717a17: 無所有處已下地所レ起根・境・識三妄執一。是第
T2217_.59.0717a18: 二重三妄也。此與二小乘三果學人位一齊。然
T2217_.59.0717a19: 不レ墮二聲聞地一義如二前釋一云云此意以二學大乘
T2217_.59.0717a20: 人修惑斷位一似二前三果斷位一也。此修惑愛二
T2217_.59.0717a21: 禪惠等法一。而溜滯故立二法執名一。非二實法執一。
T2217_.59.0717a22: 例如下起信中於二法執一立中人見稱上也。雖不起
T2217_.59.0717a23: 我倒等者。謂此位雖レ不レ起二見惑我倒一。而迷二
T2217_.59.0717a24: 諸法用一起二修惑一也爲言或又法執者擧二所依一
T2217_.59.0717a25: 歟。人執必依二法執一而起故。況此菩薩前出世
T2217_.59.0717a26: 初心。但度二見網一未レ斷二修惑一。修斷非二此位一。何
T2217_.59.0717a27: 耶。又義。法執留滯義也。既云二法執當心一故。
T2217_.59.0717a28: 又不起我倒者。准二下我蘊兩倒之文一。若見若
T2217_.59.0717a29: 修人執煩惱悉可レ云二我倒一。故知雖レ不レ起二人
T2217_.59.0717b01: 我倒一。猶有二法執一而留滯之義也。蘊倒是法執
T2217_.59.0717b02: 故。又不レ能三速至二菩提一云云准二唯識能障菩
T2217_.59.0717b03: 提名所知障之文一。今又障二菩提一故應二法執一
T2217_.59.0717b04: 矣。又三乘中菩薩所入深。若不レ斷二法執一何
T2217_.59.0717b05: 有二此理一矣。又義。此菩薩約二未斷惑一成二留滯
T2217_.59.0717b06: 義一歟。此菩薩湛寂位未レ度二法倒一故。又前後
T2217_.59.0717b07: 位既齊二人執斷位一。中間何明二法執斷義一。又
T2217_.59.0717b08: 非二如實巧度一云云拆法空義同二三藏菩薩一。彼
T2217_.59.0717b09: 教三乘同斷二見思一故。又下疏中拆法但遣二人
T2217_.59.0717b10: 我一故。又所寄齊三果明二法執留滯義一故大疏
抄釋
T2217_.59.0717b11: 意
也
前三義中初義爲レ勝矣。順二前後一故。故下
T2217_.59.0717b12: 段然亦稍離下地三執者。指二今斷位根・境・界
T2217_.59.0717b13: 三妄一也。若下八地云二下地一者。非想地九品業・
T2217_.59.0717b14: 惱等既人執也。即下八地煩惱法執乎。若聲
T2217_.59.0717b15: 聞地云二下地一者。縁覺所斷無明種子。既人執
T2217_.59.0717b16: 習氣也。聲聞所斷分齊何云二法執一乎。故知今
T2217_.59.0717b17: 所斷人執修惑也。若約二法執斷一者違二諸文一。
T2217_.59.0717b18: 故湛寂菩薩類二水中蓮華一。未レ度二法倒一故。若
T2217_.59.0717b19: 約二未斷惑一者。非三啻違二前後例一。亦違二所寄齊
T2217_.59.0717b20: 三妄一故。更出二一解一云。於二經一文一含二大小二
T2217_.59.0717b21: 義一故。疏家作二二釋一也。經中學大乘人出世
T2217_.59.0717b22: 初心。説二唯蘊無我一。是似同小乘見道一故也。
T2217_.59.0717b23: 後二文無寄齊説一。可レ悉レ之
T2217_.59.0717b24: 然亦稍離下地三執等者。此下以二學大乘人
T2217_.59.0717b25: 煩惱障習氣斷位一。同三支佛拔二業惱株杌一也。
T2217_.59.0717b26: 故下文云。行者未レ過二此劫一。與二辟支佛位一齊
T2217_.59.0717b27: 文以レ拔二業煩惱一爲二縁覺一。此文明鏡歟。具如二
T2217_.59.0717b28: 下辨一。抄云。疏然亦稍離下地等者。此同二二
T2217_.59.0717b29: 乘無學一也。謂行者雖下有二法執當心一非中如實
T2217_.59.0717c01: 巧度上。然亦稍離一下之八地三妄執一故。復能
T2217_.59.0717c02: 拔二第九地我執家業及煩惱根本無明種子
T2217_.59.0717c03: 所生十二因縁大樹一。又解。然亦稍離下地三
T2217_.59.0717c04: 妄執者。此同二不還果一也。能拔業煩惱等者。
T2217_.59.0717c05: 此同二無學果一也。行者能知二如レ是甚深實相
T2217_.59.0717c06: 之法。有佛無佛性相常一耳。證二此理一時。退非二
T2217_.59.0717c07: 二乘拆法一。進非二別圓一。乃是三獸渡河共空意
T2217_.59.0717c08: 也文教相抄云。次觀二十二因縁甚深無性理一。
T2217_.59.0717c09: 拔二業・煩惱株杌及無明種子一。是第三重妄執
T2217_.59.0717c10: 也。非想一地惑。屬二第三重妄執一。是無學人所
T2217_.59.0717c11: 斷故。此位與二小乘縁覺一齊。又離下地三執
T2217_.59.0717c12: 者。指二聲聞地一云二下地一。此時與二聲聞所斷一齊
T2217_.59.0717c13: 故云二離下地三執一也能拔業煩惱等者。縁覺
T2217_.59.0717c14: 所斷。此可レ云二上地煩惱一。是即聲聞屬二學地一。
T2217_.59.0717c15: 縁覺屬二無學一故。聲聞云二下地一耳。若依二抄義一
T2217_.59.0717c16: 與レ此別。抄心以二拔業煩惱等一云二聲聞無學
T2217_.59.0717c17: 所斷一。大師以二此心一爲二縁學所住一。又抄心以二
T2217_.59.0717c18: 摩訶衍人一。云下退非二二乘拆法空一進非中別圓
T2217_.59.0717c19: 菩薩上。大師心初若湛寂・若寂然・皆屬縁覺
T2217_.59.0717c20: 智分一而爲二第五住心攝一也取意私云。密抄有二
T2217_.59.0717c21: 二釋一。初釋同二二乘無學一中。縁覺下八地煩惱
T2217_.59.0717c22: 凡位斷故云二稍離下地一。其義然。聲聞未二必
T2217_.59.0717c23: 然一。但超越證不還中有二此類一歟。謂凡位斷二
T2217_.59.0717c24: 欲九品惑一盡。乃至或斷二無所有處煩惱盡後
T2217_.59.0717c25: 入二見道一。斷二遣惑一盡至二道類智一。超證不還
T2217_.59.0717c26: 果一故。此中斷二下八地惑一盡入二見道一證二第三
T2217_.59.0717c27: 果一人。進斷二非想地惑。起二九無間九解脱道一
T2217_.59.0717c28: 證二無學果一故。惠暉疏。聲聞無學十八念者
T2217_.59.0717c29: 指レ此歟。上最難斷處釋二非想第九品一。是約二
T2217_.59.0718a01: 第九無間道所斷一也。*故倶舍云。斷二初定一
T2217_.59.0718a02: 品一至二有頂八品。皆阿羅漢向。第九無間道名二
T2217_.59.0718a03: 金剛喩定文後釋或述レ意云。同不還者。只斷二
T2217_.59.0718a04: 欲界九品修惑一之所得果也云云此意欲界五
T2217_.59.0718a05: 趣地云二下地一歟。今謂不レ爾。前約二九地一分二上
T2217_.59.0718a06: 下一。今約二四果一論二上下一歟。前又通二二乘一。今
T2217_.59.0718a07: 局二聲聞一故異也。今此兩釋皆不レ合二疏意一。今
T2217_.59.0718a08: 段本意。拔二業・*惱株杌一。專知二十二因縁甚深
T2217_.59.0718a09: 法一爲レ宗。此但縁覺智分非二聲聞所知一。故疏
T2217_.59.0718a10: 第七云。如一聲聞極觀察智一。解了唯蘊無我一。
T2217_.59.0718a11: 以二厭怖心重一故。疾斷二煩惱一自證二涅槃一。不レ能下
T2217_.59.0718a12: 分別推求十二因縁實相甲。辟支佛智惠深
T2217_.59.0718a13: 利故。能以二總別之相一深觀察之一。見二一切集
T2217_.59.0718a14: 法皆是滅法一。此與二聲聞一異也。阿含云。十二
T2217_.59.0718a15: 因縁。法有佛無佛法位常住文此釋全同二今
T2217_.59.0718a16: 文一。阿含經法位常住。今性相常爾義也。既判
T2217_.59.0718a17: 爲下此與二聲聞一異上。何背二疏分明釋一。云下或同二
T2217_.59.0718a18: 聲聞無學一或通中聲縁上乎。故知株杌幷種子者
T2217_.59.0718a19: 人執習氣。獨是縁覺所斷故。故疏第七文云。
T2217_.59.0718a20: 辟支佛觀二一切集法皆悉如二涅槃相一。於二種種
T2217_.59.0718a21: 有爲境界中一。皆亦戲論風息文一切集法如涅
T2217_.59.0718a22: 槃相者。性相常爾義也。戲論風息者。知二性相
T2217_.59.0718a23: 常爾義一故斷二習氣一也。故云二戲論息一也。又大
T2217_.59.0718a24: 師住心論中。引二同性經聲聞十地縁覺十地一。
T2217_.59.0718a25: 而證二住心淺深一之中。縁覺有二甚深十二因
T2217_.59.0718a26: 縁地・甚深利智地一。疏釋自契二此經一矣。又聲
T2217_.59.0718a27: 聞第十地立二阿羅漢地一。是約レ斷二正使一歟。縁
T2217_.59.0718a28: 覺第十地出二習氣漸薄地一。是當三今拔二株杌種
T2217_.59.0718a29: 子一。應レ知依二此經意一聲聞十地云二下地一。縁覺
T2217_.59.0718b01: 爲二上地一也。故論第五擧二疏第七釋・今經文・
T2217_.59.0718b02: 同性經三文一。成三縁覺勝二聲聞一。既此意矣。又
T2217_.59.0718b03: 嘉祥釋云。同性經明二縁覺一有二十地一。十地中
T2217_.59.0718b04: 有二習氣薄地一。以二根利鈍一長斷二習氣一名二中
T2217_.59.0718b05: 涅槃一。聲聞不レ斷名二小涅槃一文二師得レ經一全同
T2217_.59.0718b06: 妙至矣。又義。約二智度三乘共十地一已辨地云二
T2217_.59.0718b07: 下地一。支佛地云二中地一。菩薩地云二上地一歟。故
T2217_.59.0718b08: 疏下云。故以二三乘上中下出世心一合論一阿
T2217_.59.0718b09: 僧祇劫一。即此意歟。若爾何約二三界九地一。以二
T2217_.59.0718b10: 非想地惑一云二株杌種子一乎。非想九品。亦聲
T2217_.59.0718b11: 聞所レ斷修惑攝故。又義。約二九地一又爲二縁覺
T2217_.59.0718b12: 所斷一無レ違。故住心論五云。或云。明二獨覺一者。
T2217_.59.0718b13: 此有二二種一。一者麟覺二者部行。此二成覺斷二
T2217_.59.0718b14: 見修惑一。都有二一百六十心一。諸縁覺乗法爾皆
T2217_.59.0718b15: 於二凡位時一。無所有處已下諸惑先已斷竟。後
T2217_.59.0718b16: 入二見道一有二十六心一。但法忍法智不レ斷レ惑。可
T2217_.59.0718b17: 知斷二修所斷惑一。上之八地。毎二地地一九品各
T2217_.59.0718b18: 有二二心一。合有二一百三十四心一。通二前見位一。總
T2217_.59.0718b19: 一百六十心耳略抄准二此釋一諸獨覺下八地惑
T2217_.59.0718b20: 凡位斷レ此。故云二然亦稍離下地三執一也。株
T2217_.59.0718b21: 杌及種子。與二非總第九品惑一倶斷歟。故上文
T2217_.59.0718b22: 云二無學聖人所斷一也。所以縁覺一百六十
T2217_.59.0718b23: 心取レ果。一百五十九是向。一心是果故。問。
T2217_.59.0718b24: 下八地惑既凡位斷訖。何起二上七地無間解
T2217_.59.0718b25: 脱一耶。答。凡正理心。除二菩薩一餘人皆無二超越
T2217_.59.0718b26: 功能一故。起二下地道一爲二加行一。起二非想地心一
T2217_.59.0718b27: 也。又婆沙意。麟覺如二菩薩一。三十四心證二獨
T2217_.59.0718b28: 覺菩提一也。又惠*暉疏云。佛麟角三十四心。
T2217_.59.0718b29: 部行獨覺一百六十心。聲聞無學十八念。初
T2217_.59.0718c01: 果十六念。中二果一無間一解脱道也文此釋
T2217_.59.0718c02: 依婆沙意歟。但住心論依二正理論意歟。問。
T2217_.59.0718c03: 若爾何不レ起二欲界道一耶。答。正理云。根本非
T2217_.59.0718c04: レ欲。斷對治故云云此釋難思。若約斷對治一
T2217_.59.0718c05: 者。何起二四法忍四法智及上七地無間解脱一
T2217_.59.0718c06: 耶。又獨覺唯依二第四定一得二菩提一。寧依二彼定一
T2217_.59.0718c07: 起二下三禪斷對治一乎。或云。此獨覺。向中必
T2217_.59.0718c08: 得二不還一故。欲九無間八解脱。是不還向道攝
T2217_.59.0718c09: 故。豈得二勝果道一後還起二劣向道一乎。故不レ起二
T2217_.59.0718c10: 欲界道一也問。若爾何起二法忍法智一耶答。彼
T2217_.59.0718c11: 有二超越功能一菩薩猶起。況獨覺耶。故惠*暉
T2217_.59.0718c12: 疏云。方斷二見惑一以二初起難一。能斷二修惑一非二初
T2217_.59.0718c13: 起一故。麟喩及佛・法智忍爲二方便一引二類智忍一
T2217_.59.0718c14: 也取意問。今文以學大乘人斷惑一同二無學所
T2217_.59.0718c15: 斷一。若此菩薩同レ彼許二凡位斷一者。可レ云二小乘
T2217_.59.0718c16: 三十四心斷結成佛菩薩一歟。又齊二小乘見道
T2217_.59.0718c17: 位一可レ作二此釋一。如何。答。雖二大乘菩薩一。以二人
T2217_.59.0718c18: 執斷位一寄同聲縁斷位一時。聲聞未二必凡位
T2217_.59.0718c19: 斷一。故同二彼見道一未レ出二凡位斷一也。獨覺必凡
T2217_.59.0718c20: 位斷故。齊レ彼時出二凡位斷一也。所以寄二聲聞
T2217_.59.0718c21: 見修二道・獨覺無學道一顯二人執斷位一也。拔二
T2217_.59.0718c22: 業・惱株杌一位。即非二成佛一故。永異二小乘菩薩
T2217_.59.0718c23: 三十四心斷結成佛一也。此菩薩進度二法倒一
T2217_.59.0718c24: 故
T2217_.59.0718c25: 生十二因縁者。問。業・煩惱・無明即十二因縁
T2217_.59.0718c26: 體。何更云レ生二十二因縁一耶。答。實範云。經言
T2217_.59.0718c27: レ業者行・有二支。煩惱愛・取。無明初支。生者
T2217_.59.0718c28: 餘七。七事無明等之所生故云レ生也。故抄云。
T2217_.59.0718c29: 業及煩惱根本無明種子所生十二因縁大樹
T2217_.59.0719a01: 云云當レ知十二因縁大多羅樹。無明爲二種子一。
T2217_.59.0719a02: 四支爲二根本一。餘七枝葉華菓等也。其中無明
T2217_.59.0719a03: 等。正妄執體也云云此意所生雖二是七事一現在
五果
T2217_.59.0719a04: 未來
二果
或言レ總。或帶數云二十二因縁一歟私更讀二
T2217_.59.0719a05: 文點一云。業・煩惱及無明與生レ之十二因縁法
T2217_.59.0719a06: 也。生者名二七事體一。非二詞字一也。*故經具縁
T2217_.59.0719a07: 品云。淨除於業生文又義。株杌種子爲二能生一。
T2217_.59.0719a08: 十二因縁爲二所生一也。上擧二業煩惱無明一。是
T2217_.59.0719a09: 爲レ取二種子習氣一也
T2217_.59.0719a10: 如是甚深之法等者。疏第七云。辟支佛智惠
T2217_.59.0719a11: 深利故。能以二總別之相一深觀察之一。見二一切
T2217_.59.0719a12: 集法皆是滅法一。此與二聲聞一異也。阿含云。十
T2217_.59.0719a13: 二因縁法。有佛無佛法位常住。龍樹亦云。此
T2217_.59.0719a14: 中法位。即是如之別名乃至譬支佛觀三一切集
T2217_.59.0719a15: 法皆悉如二涅槃相一云云智度論第三十二云。
T2217_.59.0719a16: 問曰。聲聞法中何以不レ説二是法性實際。而摩
T2217_.59.0719a17: 訶行法中處處説。答。聲聞法中亦有二説處一
T2217_.59.0719a18: 但少分。如二雜阿含經中説一。有二一比丘一。問レ佛。
T2217_.59.0719a19: 十二因縁此是爲二佛作一爲二是餘人作一。佛告二
T2217_.59.0719a20: 比丘一。不レ作二十二因縁一。亦非二餘人作一。有佛無
T2217_.59.0719a21: 佛諸法如法相法住常有。所謂是事有故是
T2217_.59.0719a22: 事有。是事生故是事生。如二無明因縁一故諸
T2217_.59.0719a23: 行。諸行因縁故識。乃至老死因縁故有二憂悲
T2217_.59.0719a24: 苦惱是事無故是事無。是身滅故是事滅。如
T2217_.59.0719a25: 無明滅故諸行滅。諸行滅故識滅。乃至老
T2217_.59.0719a26: 死滅故憂悲苦惱滅。如レ是生滅法。有佛無佛
T2217_.59.0719a27: 常爾。是處説レ如文嘉祥二諦章中云。一於但
T2217_.59.0719a28: 一者。凡夫顛倒謂二瓶衣等諸法一爲レ有。此瓶
T2217_.59.0719a29: 衣等物。有佛無佛常於二凡夫一是有。如二涅槃經
T2217_.59.0719b01: 云一。十二因縁。有佛無佛性相常住。但小乘釋
T2217_.59.0719b02: 有二二人一。毘婆闥婆提云。是無爲常住法。薩
T2217_.59.0719b03: 婆多彈云。恒有爲レ常。如レ火。有佛無佛常熱。
T2217_.59.0719b04: 不レ可レ言二火有佛熱無佛不契。有佛無佛恒
T2217_.59.0719b05: 熱爲レ常。十二因縁亦爾。今明二世諦一亦如レ此。
T2217_.59.0719b06: 諸法於レ凡常有。常有世諦也文准二論及章釋一。
T2217_.59.0719b07: 性相常爾義通二聲聞一。何疏中云二此與聲聞異一
T2217_.59.0719b08: 耶。復今疏所レ引阿含經者。豈非二論所引經一
T2217_.59.0719b09: 乎。龍樹亦云者。指二今論文一歟。但今所引阿
T2217_.59.0719b10: 含經。全同章所引涅槃經文一也。然章意依二
T2217_.59.0719b11: 舊婆沙説一云二無爲常住法一。依二薩婆多一。有爲
T2217_.59.0719b12: 法恒有云二常住一。二義倶通二聲聞所知一。如何此
T2217_.59.0719b13: 甚難レ解。然於二阿含十二因縁一有二二意一。流轉
T2217_.59.0719b14: 還滅之義通二二乘所觀一。依レ之疏釋二聲聞極觀
T2217_.59.0719b15: 察智一云。從二無明一至二老死一。此有故彼有。此生
T2217_.59.0719b16: 故彼生。乃至輪迴無際云云論云。是事有故
T2217_.59.0719b17: 是事有。是事生故是事生云云又疏云。既見二
T2217_.59.0719b18: 四諦一已背二生死流一隨行聖道一云云論云。是
T2217_.59.0719b19: 事無故是事無。是事滅故是事滅云云已上生
T2217_.59.0719b20: 滅義。疏論同矣。此生滅義通二二乘所觀一也。
T2217_.59.0719b21: 又疏云。見二一切集法皆是滅*法云云此乃阿
T2217_.59.0719b22: 含所説法位常住義也。論云。有佛無佛諸法
T2217_.59.0719b23: 如法相法位常有云云此義但在二縁覺一故。云二
T2217_.59.0719b24: 此與聲聞異一歟。或又准二嘉祥釋一。或無爲法云
T2217_.59.0719b25: レ常。或三世實有法體恒有云二法位常住一。此等
T2217_.59.0719b26: 義通二聲聞一。疏云。一切集法皆悉涅槃相云云
T2217_.59.0719b27: 此義獨局二獨覺一歟。或又智論云二聲聞法中一。
T2217_.59.0719b28: 未二必聲聞人一。縁覺法又聲聞藏故。性相常住
T2217_.59.0719b29: 義擧二縁覺所知一歟。章釋何強苦勞矣。問。法
T2217_.59.0719c01: 相。大乘猶性相別論。未レ談二相常住之義一。何湛
T2217_.59.0719c02: 寂小乘位許二彼義一乎。答。彼未レ談二隨縁眞如
T2217_.59.0719c03: 及攝相歸性等義一故云二性相別論一。今集法有
T2217_.59.0719c04: 爲相・滅法無爲性。倶有佛無佛常有故云レ爾。
T2217_.59.0719c05: 非レ謂二有爲相即無爲常住體一也。故疏云二集
T2217_.59.0719c06: 法如涅槃相一者即此意耳。問。有爲無爲各
T2217_.59.0719c07: 別而言二常有一者。何異二眞宗生住等諸法常恒
T2217_.59.0719c08: 如是生之義一耶。答。彼生住等即性佛性然
T2217_.59.0719c09: 體故云二常住一。此十二因縁生滅義。無常常
T2217_.59.0719c10: 有故。猶如二相續常一也
T2217_.59.0719c11: 長爪梵尼者。或本梵字先字也。是則長爪梵
T2217_.59.0719c12: 志也
T2217_.59.0719c13: 如稻芊等經等者。抄云。彼經云。爾時尊者舍
T2217_.59.0719c14: 利弗問二彌勒一言。今日世尊覩見稻芊一而作二
T2217_.59.0719c15: 是説一乃至見二十二因縁一即是見レ法。見レ法即是
T2217_.59.0719c16: 見レ佛。十二因縁者。無明縁レ行。乃至憂悲苦
T2217_.59.0719c17: 惱乃至如レ是十二因縁。如二多羅樹一。煎滅其
T2217_.59.0719c18: 旨一更不レ得レ生文
T2217_.59.0719c19: 言湛寂等者。抄云。湛即是喩。寂即是法。湛寂
T2217_.59.0719c20: 即是三乘所得但空*之理。證二此空一故。五根
T2217_.59.0719c21: 本煩惱等皆畢竟不生。故名爲レ寂。又此空理
T2217_.59.0719c22: 湛然甚深。如二萬仞*之清潭仞七
尺也
不測二於淺
T2217_.59.0719c23: 深一。建立宗等種種諸計。非二其境界一故不レ能二
T2217_.59.0719c24: 窺度一也文私云。清*潭者青淵也。澄怙者清
T2217_.59.0719c25: 靜義歟。鏡徹者明透義歟
T2217_.59.0719c26: 説云三獸渡河等者。問。今此説云者何經論
T2217_.59.0719c27: 耶。答。基師義林章引二優婆塞經一言。三獸渡
T2217_.59.0719c28: レ河淺深成レ別文又惠沼義燈云。寶性論中猶
T2217_.59.0719c29: 如三一河三獸渡レ水得二淺深異一文又止觀云。
T2217_.59.0720a01: 涅槃名爲二三獸度河一文又寛信抄云。三獸
T2217_.59.0720a02: 渡河譬喩出二涅槃經大智度等一云云指二此
T2217_.59.0720a03: 等經論説一歟。問。如上經論皆大乘也。何以二
T2217_.59.0720a04: 彼文一成二湛寂義一耶。答。抄云。今此初劫文意
T2217_.59.0720a05: 兼得二藏通二教之意一。何以故。有二拆法成空
T2217_.59.0720a06: 之義一故。有二三獸度河之理一故云云疏上釋云。非
如實巧度故
T2217_.59.0720a07: 圓三藏拙度菩薩而爲*拆法空之義也。又
天台以三獸度河爲通義故云通二教之意也
依二此釋一
T2217_.59.0720a08: 者。今此菩薩約下同二通教一之邊上引レ證歟。又抄
T2217_.59.0720a09: 云。證二此理一時退非二二乘*柝法一進非二別圓一。
T2217_.59.0720a10: 乃是三獸度河共空意也文止觀第一云。此
T2217_.59.0720a11: 三番語異倶順二入空一。退非二二乘*拆法一。進二非
T2217_.59.0720a12: 別圓一。乃是三獸度河共空之意也文同第六
T2217_.59.0720a13: 云。擇論形斥三藏一云。餘經多示二人淨法一。
T2217_.59.0720a14: 般若示二人無*淨法一。亦名二如實巧度一。中論云。
T2217_.59.0720a15: 諸法實相三人共得。大品名爲下三乘之人一同
T2217_.59.0720a16: 以二無言説道一斷二煩惱一見中第一義上。亦名二共般
T2217_.59.0720a17: 若一。涅槃爲二三獸度河一。皆是通教四門觀意文
T2217_.59.0720a18: 安然云。唯三獸是通義文准二此等釋一者湛寂
T2217_.59.0720a19: 三乘但同二通教三乘一矣。但抄意兼二藏通菩薩一
T2217_.59.0720a20: 歟。若不レ爾者前後相違故。又安然釋二今疏
T2217_.59.0720a21: 文一云。此明二前藏通三乘及別圓眞空八住八
T2217_.59.0720a22: 信功徳一也文又濟暹云。大小雖レ異義准相似
T2217_.59.0720a23: 云云又惠*暉疏云。無爲理體同二三乘一。證有二淺
T2217_.59.0720a24: 深一。如二三獸渡河一文此文爲二小乘喩異一。故
T2217_.59.0720a25: 知取レ喩隨レ宜。不レ可二局定一耳
T2217_.59.0720a26: 此中有三乘之人等者。此文大同三止觀第六
T2217_.59.0720a27: 出二大品説。如前
引也
抄云。此第一劫中既有二三
T2217_.59.0720a28: 乘之人一。同以レ空爲レ門入二諸*法眞實之性一。二
T2217_.59.0720a29: 乘之人自爲三已得二涅槃一生二滅度想一沈也。菩
T2217_.59.0720b01: 薩以二不住道一發起大悲一昇也。譬如二同坑
T2217_.59.0720b02: 一去一停故昇沈有異也文智覺禪師宗鏡録
T2217_.59.0720b03: 六十五云。三獸渡レ河。同入二於水一三獸有二
T2217_.59.0720b04: 強弱一河水有二底岸一。兎馬力弱。雖レ濟二彼岸一。
T2217_.59.0720b05: 浮淺不レ深又不レ到レ底。大象力強倶得二底岸一。
T2217_.59.0720b06: 三獸喩二三人一。水喩二即空一底喩二不空一。二乘智
T2217_.59.0720b07: 少不レ能二深求一。喩レ如二兎馬一。菩薩深喩レ如二大
T2217_.59.0720b08: 象一。水軟喩レ空。同見二於空一不レ見二不空一。底喩二
T2217_.59.0720b09: 實相一。菩薩獨到。智者見二空及不空一文或云。
T2217_.59.0720b10: 湛寂三乘所斷雖無別諦縁度異故云二昇沈
T2217_.59.0720b11: 有異也。故嘉祥釋云。但取二智優劣一譬二三車
T2217_.59.0720b12: 不同一云云天台釋云。初三藏中諦縁度殊故
T2217_.59.0720b13: 因大異。倶斷二見思一三乘微異。果小同云云
T2217_.59.0720b14: 但同共一法中者。三乘所證同生空理故。私
T2217_.59.0720b15: 案。二乘斷惑有二淺深一故謂下聲聞斷二正使一縁
T2217_.59.0720b16: 覺侵二習氣一菩薩度中法倒上。故天台四教儀高塵
諦觀
T2217_.59.0720b17: 云。次明二通教一者乃至謂三人同以二無言説道一
T2217_.59.0720b18: 體レ色入レ空故名二通教一。依二大品經説一。乾惠等
T2217_.59.0720b19: 十地即是此教位次也。一乾惠他。未レ有二理
T2217_.59.0720b20: 水一故得二其名一。即外凡位。而藏教五停心總別
T2217_.59.0720b21: 等三位齊。二性地。伏二見思惑一即内凡位。與二
T2217_.59.0720b22: 藏教四善根一齊。三八人地。四見地。此二位
T2217_.59.0720b23: 斷二三界見惑一盡見二眞諦理一與二藏教初果一齊。
T2217_.59.0720b24: 五薄地。斷二欲界九品思前六品一與二藏教二果一
T2217_.59.0720b25: 齊。六離欲地。斷二欲界九品思一盡與二藏教三
T2217_.59.0720b26: 果一齊。七已辨地。斷二三界見思惑一盡但斷二正
T2217_.59.0720b27: 使一不レ能レ侵レ習。如二燒レ木成炭。與二藏教四果一
T2217_.59.0720b28: 齊。聲聞位齊レ此。八辟支佛。更侵二習氣一如二
T2217_.59.0720b29: 燒炭成灰一。九菩薩地。正使斷盡與二二乘一同。
T2217_.59.0720c01: 扶習潤生淨二佛國土一。十佛地。以二一念相應
T2217_.59.0720c02: 惠一頓斷二殘習一成佛。正習倶除如二炭灰倶盡一。
T2217_.59.0720c03: 經云。三獸度レ河。謂象馬兎也。論二斷惑不同
T2217_.59.0720c04: 故略抄准二此釋一三獸度河昇沈專可レ依二斷惑
T2217_.59.0720c05: 異一也。當レ知學大乘人出世初心者當二八人見
T2217_.59.0720c06: 地一。然彼下寄二三果一之位當二薄地離欲已辨三
T2217_.59.0720c07: 地一也。然亦下同二無學一之位當二支佛地。寂然
T2217_.59.0720c08: 界位當二佛地一也。菩薩地可レ屬二湛寂一歟。但於二
T2217_.59.0720c09: 通教一有二當通被接二類。故同釋云此教三乘
T2217_.59.0720c10: 因同果異。證果雖レ異同斷二見思一同出二分段一
T2217_.59.0720c11: 同證二偏眞一。然於二菩薩中一有二二種一。謂利鈍。鈍
T2217_.59.0720c12: 則但見二偏空一止成二當教果頭佛一。行因雖レ異
T2217_.59.0720c13: 果與二藏教一齊。若利根菩薩非二但見空兼見二
T2217_.59.0720c14: 不空一。不空即中道。分二二種一。謂但・不但。若見二
T2217_.59.0720c15: 但中一別教來接。若見二不但中一圓教來*接云
T2217_.59.0720c16: 云依二此文一。今寂然菩薩若約下屬二偏眞理一之
T2217_.59.0720c17: 義上雖レ似二當通菩薩一度二法倒一邊異レ彼。但斷二
T2217_.59.0720c18: 見思正習一未二法執一故。又今菩薩不レ可レ云二
T2217_.59.0720c19: 被*接一。彼斷二無明一而見二中道一故。若別*接通
T2217_.59.0720c20: 則第二劫攝。若圓*接通則第三劫攝故。然或
T2217_.59.0720c21: 書判二名別義通次位一時。三乘共十地第十地
T2217_.59.0720c22: 云二佛地一。以二一念相應惠一斷二餘殘習氣一亦斷二
T2217_.59.0720c23: 小分塵沙惑一成二勝應佛一。是同居土佛。又通二
T2217_.59.0720c24: 方便土一也云云今寂然菩薩度二一重法倒一。同
T2217_.59.0720c25: 斷二少分塵沙一矣。塵沙是所知障中障レ事惑故。
T2217_.59.0720c26: 又録中以二大象一喩下見二不空一菩薩上故。或又准三
T2217_.59.0720c27: 淨影執取相爲二法執一今一重法倒者六識相
T2217_.59.0720c28: 應執取相歟若爾龍樹釋中彼判二人執一故不二
T2217_.59.0720c29: 相違一。又但彼天台以二藏通二教一如レ次爲二*拆
T2217_.59.0721a01: 空體空一。若一分不レ斷二法執一。何成二體空之義一
T2217_.59.0721a02: 矣。問。今文釋二湛寂義一引二三獸度河之説一。何
T2217_.59.0721a03: 以二寂然菩薩一爲二湛寂攝乎。答。凡今三乘中
T2217_.59.0721a04: 菩薩者寂然界菩薩也。所以經中明二三乘一時
T2217_.59.0721a05: 上兼レ下故。菩薩人執斷位讓二二乘一而不二別
T2217_.59.0721a06: 説一。然疏家採二經意一以二寂然菩薩人執斷位一
T2217_.59.0721a07: 寄二二乘一顯レ之云二學大乘人一。非レ謂二別人一也。
T2217_.59.0721a08: 若學大乘人別菩薩何經中湛寂位不レ説レ彼
T2217_.59.0721a09: 乎。縁覺亦爾。學位所斷讓二聲聞一而不二別明一。
T2217_.59.0721a10: 依レ之慈恩唯識章云。上必兼レ下。二乘境行必
T2217_.59.0721a11: 菩薩境行故云云又云。又上兼レ下。聲聞行縁
T2217_.59.0721a12: 必獨覺法故云云雖二他宗釋一自契二經疏意一矣。
T2217_.59.0721a13: 在二湛寂文一雖レ引二此喩一意兼二寂然一也。若不
T2217_.59.0721a14: レ爾者何云二昇沈有異一。所以釋三菩薩勝二支佛一
T2217_.59.0721a15: 云二心垢漸除淨心漸現一。此豈非レ度二法倒一乎。
T2217_.59.0721a16: 又云二便得菩提心勢力能以不住道等一。是又
T2217_.59.0721a17: 法執斷方便也。故下釋二寂然菩薩一云。然以二
T2217_.59.0721a18: 菩提心勢力一還能發起悲願一。從レ此以後三乘
T2217_.59.0721a19: 逕路始分云云文義既同。不レ可二異求一。況釋學
T2217_.59.0721a20: 大乘人有二法執一之義云二住禪惠等一。今云二不
T2217_.59.0721a21: 住道等一。定知心垢漸除是度二法倒一之義也。何
T2217_.59.0721a22: 況疏下云二以三乘上中下出世心等一以二寂然一
T2217_.59.0721a23: 爲二三乘隨一一明鏡者歟。依レ之抄云。今此初
T2217_.59.0721a24: 劫文意兼得二藏通二教之意一。何以故。有二*拆
T2217_.59.0721a25: 法成空之義一故。有二三獸度河之理一故。由
T2217_.59.0721a26: レ是疏云。故以二三乘上中下心一合論二一阿僧
T2217_.59.0721a27: 祇劫一文此又以二寂然等三乘一爲二三獸度河之
T2217_.59.0721a28: 意一耳。同以無言説等二句釋二同共一法之義一
T2217_.59.0721a29: 喩二一河一也。然聲聞置二種度門一故釋二昇沈有
T2217_.59.0721b01: 異之義一合三三獸度河有二淺深一也。以二三乘人一
T2217_.59.0721b02: 類二兎馬象一已。同共一法中而昇治有異也
T2217_.59.0721b03: 者結レ上義可レ知矣。天台四教義第三智者云。
T2217_.59.0721b04: 若小乘教門苦諦爲レ初觀二四諦一入レ道。眞無
T2217_.59.0721b05: 漏斷二正使一盡位證二羅漢一乃至現身而入二涅槃一。
T2217_.59.0721b06: 故大智論説レ如下麞在二獵圍一驚怖跳出都不
T2217_.59.0721b07: 顧レ群乃至若縁覺中乘教門集諦爲レ初觀二十
T2217_.59.0721b08: 二因縁一發二眞無漏斷三界結使一盡侵二餘習
T2217_.59.0721b09: 氣一乃至亦於二一世一即入二涅槃一。故大智度論云。
T2217_.59.0721b10: 如鹿在二獵圍一驚跳自出顧眄群一怖不二停待一。
T2217_.59.0721b11: 乃至若大乘菩薩乃至教門以二道諦爲レ初修行
T2217_.59.0721b12: 六度一化二一切衆生一共出二三界一至レ成二佛果一利
T2217_.59.0721b13: 益功力圓入二涅槃一。故大度論云。如下大香
T2217_.59.0721b14: 象在二於獵圍一雖レ遭二刀箭一擁レ群共出上云云此
T2217_.59.0721b15: 釋中麞鹿象喩全同下今疏聲聞厭怖生死一縁
T2217_.59.0721b16: 覺不二甚忩遽一菩薩用二不住道一之義上。准二此釋一
T2217_.59.0721b17: 未下必依二斷惑一判中昇沈上歟。今義中但出二聲縁
T2217_.59.0721b18: 正習斷異一不レ擧二菩薩斷除一。疏中擧二菩薩斷
T2217_.59.0721b19: 惑一未レ顯二二乘斷惑一。然今疏意二乘斷惑淺
T2217_.59.0721b20: 深先顯故今不レ示。天台通教三乘菩薩斷二餘
T2217_.59.0721b21: 殘習氣一異二縁覺一歟。釋籤云。次通教中倶學二
T2217_.59.0721b22: 般若一故因大同。同座二解脱一習盡不レ等故果
T2217_.59.0721b23: 小異云云。但四教義釋三藏
教三乘歟。可決
此釋倶學般若似レ可
T2217_.59.0721b24: レ言二同共一法一矣。塞經智論三獸雖レ異其意
T2217_.59.0721b25: 是同耳
T2217_.59.0721b26: 同以無言説道等者。經第二云。縁覺乃至無言
T2217_.59.0721b27: 説於二一切法證二極滅語言三昧一文又住心論
T2217_.59.0721b28: 釋二縁覺一云。證二三昧於無言一文准二此文一無言
T2217_.59.0721b29: 證理可レ局二縁覺一。何通二三乘一乎。無言證理之
T2217_.59.0721c01: 義雖レ通二三乘一縁覺始終不レ用二言語一故別得二
T2217_.59.0721c02: 極滅語言三昧之稱也。疏第七云。世尊得一無
T2217_.59.0721c03: 礙知見一於レ法自在。能二於無言説法中レ爲作二
T2217_.59.0721c04: 名字轉受二衆生一。辟支佛智惠有レ礙故。是故
T2217_.59.0721c05: 不レ能レ演説一文聲聞雖智惠有礙一不レ遮レ言故
T2217_.59.0721c06: 説法歟
T2217_.59.0721c07: 此宗中説有兩種外道等者。抄云。外道有レ多。
T2217_.59.0721c08: 略爲二二種一。一者離佛法外外道。二者附佛法
T2217_.59.0721c09: 外道。名二内外道一。外外道者本源有レ三。一迦
T2217_.59.0721c10: 毘羅乃至二漚樓僧伽。三勒娑婆乃至二内外
T2217_.59.0721c11: 道者起レ自二犢子部一。如二先已説文此意二十
T2217_.59.0721c12: 部中但犢子云二内外道。若爾餘部亦許下知二無
T2217_.59.0721c13: 量寶王一之義上歟。或云。雜問答云。經云二諸佛
T2217_.59.0721c14: 大祕密外道不能知其外道一者有二二種一。一
T2217_.59.0721c15: 外外道。二内外道。問。何言之耶。答。眞言教
T2217_.59.0721c16: 諸佛自内證教故云二内内一。顯教隨レ機而説故
T2217_.59.0721c17: 云二内外一。外道入而不レ識略抄此意内外道通二
T2217_.59.0721c18: 九種住心一歟。若爾無量寶王似レ指二無盡莊嚴
T2217_.59.0721c19: 寶一矣。謂湛寂位亦有二祕密二乘三昧道等一。是
T2217_.59.0721c20: 萬徳之一門開心實相一之祕寶故云レ爾歟。私
T2217_.59.0721c21: 解云。湛寂是如常小乘偏眞理也。眞言行者
T2217_.59.0721c22: 豈沈二彼理一*耶。故六無畏中湛寂爲二所寄一。
T2217_.59.0721c23: 更擧二密行一。應レ知入而不レ識是三乘中二乘也。
T2217_.59.0721c24: 故第一*云。凡夫二乘兩種外道文無量寶王
T2217_.59.0721c25: 者菩薩所行種種度門非レ一故云二無量一勝二二
T2217_.59.0721c26: 乘諦縁一故云二寶王一也。又云。菩薩淨菩提心
T2217_.59.0721c27: 云二寶王一也。故次上釋云。菩薩悟二如レ是法一時。
T2217_.59.0721c28: 即知二淨心漸現一云云又經第七云。淨菩提心
T2217_.59.0721c29: 如意寶文顯密菩提心雖レ異寶王之義同故引
T2217_.59.0722a01: 證矣。既菩薩但云二即知一。二乘不レ爾。當レ知
T2217_.59.0722a02: 識二無量寶王一是三乘中菩薩也。但雜問答釋
T2217_.59.0722a03: 湛寂教亦隨機説故云レ爾。依又以二今文一證二
T2217_.59.0722a04: 兩種義一。非二全同一歟。或又隨義轉用歟。又依二
T2217_.59.0722a05: 經文一但擧二外外道不知一。然疏中示二入而不
T2217_.59.0722a06: レ知之二乘一。大師又廣通二九種住心一。各據二一
T2217_.59.0722a07: 義一歟。又疏第十九云。今此諸佛之祕一切外
T2217_.59.0722a08: 道所レ不二能知一。然外道有二二種一。一者世間種
T2217_.59.0722a09: 種外道。二謂佛法内有二諸外道一也。以下雖レ入二
T2217_.59.0722a10: 佛法中一。而未丙能知乙如來祕密甲猶是邪見心
T2217_.59.0722a11: 行理外道故。亦名二外道一也。此法乃二種外道
T2217_.59.0722a12: 所不二能知一。此佛法中外道即二乘人也文准二
T2217_.59.0722a13: 此釋内外道如レ先無量寶王祕密寶也。又義。
T2217_.59.0722a14: 三乘倶云二内外道一歟。皆不レ知二祕密寶一故
T2217_.59.0722a15: 唯有此一門等者。抄云。過去諸佛無レ不レ説二
T2217_.59.0722a16: 此一門一。即一種權教三乘也。故法華云下尋
T2217_.59.0722a17: 念過去佛所行方便力一我今所得道亦應レ説二
T2217_.59.0722a18: 三乘一等。又一實教大乘。門謂權教三乘。故法
T2217_.59.0722a19: 華云。開二方便門一示二眞實相一也文初釋一即
T2217_.59.0722a20: 門也。雖二三乘一方便門故後釋一之門也。持
T2217_.59.0722a21: 業依主可レ知矣。私記十一云。應レ知三世諸佛
T2217_.59.0722a22: 誘引諸衆生。三乘方便教中唯有二菩薩乘一
T2217_.59.0722a23: 門一而令三諸子出二三界火宅一。善巧方便門云
T2217_.59.0722a24: 也。問曰。可レ同二法華所レ云唯有一門出於火
T2217_.59.0722a25: 宅義一*耶。答。彼大乘義此小乘義也。雖レ然義
T2217_.59.0722a26: 顯是同意也云云私案。抄義順二經文一湛寂
T2217_.59.0722a27: 三乘倶所レ知故。内外道者但犢子故。記釋
T2217_.59.0722a28: 順二疏釋一。疏前後皆以二二乘一云二内外道一。故然
T2217_.59.0722a29: 上文菩薩云二即知一。無量寶王不レ通二二乘一。故
T2217_.59.0722b01: 知記義勝歟。又法華以二三車一雖レ令レ出火宅一。
T2217_.59.0722b02: 正所レ授是牛車故。又教相抄云。内外道者指二
T2217_.59.0722b03: 小乘部一也。此人雖レ入二一佛法中一不レ信二大乘
T2217_.59.0722b04: 寶王一故文
T2217_.59.0722b05: 種種因量諸師等者。抄云。外道小乘部類不
T2217_.59.0722b06: レ一。名爲二種種一。其中善解二因明比量一之師以二
T2217_.59.0722b07: 因喩次第一於二此理上一欲レ出二其過一終不レ能レ得。
T2217_.59.0722b08: 故曰。種種因量等云云私案。外道所立是邪
T2217_.59.0722b09: 比量故於二佛教一不レ出二其過一。佛子立量是正
T2217_.59.0722b10: 比量故還破二外宗一也。故上文云。西方諸菩
T2217_.59.0722b11: 薩作二種種量一破二宗計一也文小乘又望二大乘一
T2217_.59.0722b12: 猶屬邪歟
T2217_.59.0722b13: 未名眞淨菩提心者。湛寂菩薩雖二淨心漸現一
T2217_.59.0722b14: 未レ斷二法執一故未レ名二眞淨菩提心一也。或又湛
T2217_.59.0722b15: 寂三乘雖下斷二人執一證中人空上未下斷二法執一得中
T2217_.59.0722b16: 法空上故云レ爾也。前心如二水中蓮華一後心如二
T2217_.59.0722b17: 水上蓮華一故云二如蓮華等一也
T2217_.59.0722b18: 以行者於瑜伽中等者。教相抄云*是湛寂心
T2217_.59.0722b19: 有二二種一初明二陰上無人之觀一。尚不レ見蘊等
T2217_.59.0722b20: 性空一故根・塵・識等當レ心不レ現也。次然以已
T2217_.59.0722b21: 下明レ觀二諸法無性一。爲レ治下厭-離有爲一樂中無
T2217_.59.0722b22: 爲之心上修二離著方便一。爲下證二寂然界一之前門上
T2217_.59.0722b23: 也。故湛寂心中有二唯蘊無我諸法無性之二
T2217_.59.0722b24: 心一也。菩提心義第三云。彼出世間心住二蘊
T2217_.59.0722b25: 中一有二如レ是惠隨生一行者未度法性未名眞淨菩提心
蓮華離泥尚未出水。私云。結前
T2217_.59.0722b26: 云云准二此注録一。以行者至二隨生之文重釋二
T2217_.59.0722b27: 上湛寂之義一歟。謂從二以行者一至二明顯一者釋二
T2217_.59.0722b28: 彼出世間心文一。從二然渉一至二無爲法一者釋住二
T2217_.59.0722b29: 於蘊中句一。從二然以一至二他教也一十卷義釋
無也字
者釋二
T2217_.59.0722c01: 如レ是隨生句一也。但上合レ經不レ擧二如レ是等句一
T2217_.59.0722c02: 者粗釋二梗概一合二經文一故具不レ擧歟。應レ知此
T2217_.59.0722c03: 意。如是者指二上湛寂一也。惠者人空智也文點
T2217_.59.0722c04: 云。彼出世間心住二蘊中一有二如レ是惠隨生一云云
T2217_.59.0722c05: 又解云。有如是惠生者。有者或義。如是惠者
T2217_.59.0722c06: 法空智也。即指下下觀二無性空一即空觀上也。故
T2217_.59.0722c07: 知彼出世間心住於蘊中者結レ上也。故合經
T2217_.59.0722c08: 時置二送句也字一矣有如是惠生後文標句也。
T2217_.59.0722c09: 疏以行者至二無爲法一者重擧二湛寂意一而爲二
T2217_.59.0722c10: 寂然來由一也。然以不明二法空智之行相一也。
T2217_.59.0722c11: 又准二經若於蘊等若字起盡一指二上彼於世
T2217_.59.0722c12: 間心一云二如是惠一歟。疏然以菩提心等者示三
T2217_.59.0722c13: 湛寂菩薩勝二二乘一也。非レ爲レ顯二寂然菩薩一歟。
T2217_.59.0722c14: 置二也字一即此意矣。若爾能於蘊等下釋二即空
T2217_.59.0722c15: 觀一也。十卷義釋無二也字一。依レ此文一然以下順
T2217_.59.0722c16: 釋寂然菩薩一改二若字一云二能於蘊等一。有如是
T2217_.59.0722c17: 下似レ明二寂然菩薩一矣
T2217_.59.0722c18: 觀察無性空者。或云。寂然菩薩觀屬二偏眞理一
T2217_.59.0722c19: 故*拆法空歟。故下釋云。然亦所觀人法倶
T2217_.59.0722c20: 空成實諸宗未二甚懸絶一文嘉祥釋二成實*拆法
T2217_.59.0722c21: 空也一。成實既*拆法空。此豈不レ然*耶。又下
T2217_.59.0722c22: 釋云。前劫五喩有泡沫芭蕉乃至此事猶帶二
T2217_.59.0722c23: *拆法レ明二無性空一。然此中幻焔等喩意明二體
T2217_.59.0722c24: 法難解之空一略抄此意初劫爲二拆空一第二劫
T2217_.59.0722c25: 爲二體空一也。私云。今無性空者體法空也。故
T2217_.59.0722c26: 下釋云。達二諸法即空一文若非體空一何云二諸
T2217_.59.0722c27: 法即空矣。故抄意云。謂前劫中有二通教菩
T2217_.59.0722c28: 薩一從二無性門一達二諸法即空此則體法空文既
T2217_.59.0722c29: 以寂然即空一同二通教如幻即空一。體法空義決
T2217_.59.0723a01: 定矣。無性言雖レ通二*拆法一未レ云二既空一。又*拆
T2217_.59.0723a02: 空是爲レ遣二人我一非レ度二法倒一也。故疏第三云。
T2217_.59.0723a03: 謂觀二唯蘊無我一時於二陰・界・入中一種種分*拆
T2217_.59.0723a04: 推求我不可得乃至今五蘊尚從レ縁生都無二
T2217_.59.0723a05: 自性一。何況此積集中而有レ我耶文今無性觀
T2217_.59.0723a06: 門專度二法倒一誰云二*拆空一矣。又湛寂菩薩未
T2217_.59.0723a07: レ度二法倒一云二非如實巧度一。寂然非レ顯二巧度一
T2217_.59.0723a08: 乎。故抄云。今此初劫文意兼得藏通二教
T2217_.59.0723a09: 之意一文此意以二湛寂寂然菩薩一如レ次配二藏通
T2217_.59.0723a10: 菩薩一。藏通如レ次爲二拙度*拆空巧度體空一
T2217_.59.0723a11: 也。但成實諸宗未甚懸絶者偏眞義同レ彼非
T2217_.59.0723a12: レ同二*拆空義一。又淨影成實判二體法空一也。次猶
T2217_.59.0723a13: 帶*拆法者既云レ帶非二當體*拆法一也猶且
T2217_.59.0723a14: 法觀必帶二生空一也。或又此五喩通二二乘所
T2217_.59.0723a15: 觀一故云レ*帶二拆法一歟。故下釋云。聲聞經中雖
T2217_.59.0723a16: レ説二此五喩一而意明二無我一。今此中五喩意明二
T2217_.59.0723a17: 諸蘊性空一文又第二劫云二體法難解空一與二今
T2217_.59.0723a18: 體空一偏眞中道異故。故三重幻即空幻即心
T2217_.59.0723a19: 幻異也。故抄云。此即自性不可得空故與二前
T2217_.59.0723a20: 無性空意一復有レ殊矣文問。五喩中芭蕉釋云。
T2217_.59.0723a21: 乃至分分披*拆之一文是豈非二*拆空義一*耶。
T2217_.59.0723a22: 又成實*拆空斷二法執一。成實存二二空故一。若爾
T2217_.59.0723a23: *拆空何但遣二人我一耶。答。*拆空有レ二。毘曇
T2217_.59.0723a24: *拆空雖レ分折五蘊等一未レ拆二極微一故遣レ我
T2217_.59.0723a25: 也。成實*拆二隣虚一故兼遮二法執一也。或釋云。
T2217_.59.0723a26: 論破二隣虚一數存二隣虚一者此意矣。論者成實。
數者毘曇。
今
T2217_.59.0723a27: 疏意以二隣亦不可得一喩二行本不生一也。未二必
T2217_.59.0723a28: 取二隣虚分*拆之邊一歟。疏第三云。爾時幻焔
T2217_.59.0723a29: 等喩觀察諸蘊即空一得下離二違順八心一證中寂
T2217_.59.0723b01: 然界上文可レ思レ之。問。今無性觀見レ度二法倒一。爾
T2217_.59.0723b02: 者厭有爲著二無爲二種法執倶治歟。若倶治
T2217_.59.0723b03: 者觀二蘊無性一但可レ治二生死實有執一。涅槃實
T2217_.59.0723b04: 有執何遮レ之乎。蘊不レ攝二無爲一之故。答。上
T2217_.59.0723b05: 擧二欣厭二執一其下明二能治觀門一。寧有二所簡一
T2217_.59.0723b06: 矣。謂五蘊無性即本不生義故云通二五蘊一皆
T2217_.59.0723b07: 明二不生義一。此不生即涅槃故涅槃實有執又
T2217_.59.0723b08: 破也。故起信論云。法我見者乃至見有*者五
T2217_.59.0723b09: 陰生滅之法怖畏生死一妄取二涅槃一。云何治。
T2217_.59.0723b10: 以二五陰法自性不生則無有滅本來涅槃一故
T2217_.59.0723b11: 文此爲二良證一耳。問。法華義疏嘉祥云。三藏中
T2217_.59.0723b12: 所三以不レ説二揵城一者。爲三藏不レ説二一切法本
T2217_.59.0723b13: 性空寂一。乾城喩辨二能成之因所成之果本無
T2217_.59.0723b14: 所有一故三藏中不レ説也。而成實論亦有二此
T2217_.59.0723b15: 喩一有引二菩薩藏中譬一就二小乘法中一釋文准二
T2217_.59.0723b16: 此文一成實小乘猶用二乾城喩一而證二諸法空一。
T2217_.59.0723b17: 寂然大乘何不下引二彼喩一而明中無性空上耶。況
T2217_.59.0723b18: 下釋云。然所觀人法倶空與二成實諸宗一未二甚
T2217_.59.0723b19: 懸絶一文何。答。彼乾城是爲レ顯二能成因所
T2217_.59.0723b20: 成果本末空寂一故專大乘所用也。依レ之第
T2217_.59.0723b21: 二劫體法難解之喩始取レ之。但成實中雖レ在二
T2217_.59.0723b22: 此喩一。就二小乘法一釋故。尚顯レ空不レ究。全非二喩
T2217_.59.0723b23: 正旨一纔有二此喩一同レ不レ引也。故龍樹釋云。小
T2217_.59.0723b24: 乘中不レ説二乾闥婆城喩一文又喜祥二諦章下
T2217_.59.0723b25: 云。前破相宗觀法假有二土木城一。雖レ無二空性一
T2217_.59.0723b26: 不レ無二假城一。此宗破相觀法如下似二乾闥婆城一
T2217_.59.0723b27: 非城城喩然。幻化等譬類亦齊等文
T2217_.59.0723b28: 如夏時暴雨水上浮泡者。抄云。謂當二夏時一自
T2217_.59.0723b29: 雨二水中一。隨二渧大小一種種浮泡形類各異。然
T2217_.59.0723c01: 水性一味自爲二因縁一。泡起即是水起。泡滅即
T2217_.59.0723c02: 是水滅。擧體從レ縁。四句求レ之無二別所生之
T2217_.59.0723c03: 法一。此譬下受陰諸苦樂等皆從二情塵和合一故
T2217_.59.0723c04: 生中。苦生即是情生。苦滅即情滅。四句推レ之亦
T2217_.59.0723c05: 無二別法一。即是受陰本不生也文私云。聲聞
T2217_.59.0723c06: 經中用二泡喩一者。此泡雖レ無二實性一以二因縁一猶
T2217_.59.0723c07: 是實。喩二*拆レ蘊遣我歟。今喩意泡起滅全體
T2217_.59.0723c08: 是水無二別所生法一故喩二即空一也。第三劫中
T2217_.59.0723c09: 以三一水生二衆泡一類三行者自心能作二法界不
T2217_.59.0723c10: 思議變化一也
T2217_.59.0723c11: 地氣日光望之如水者。疏第三云。釋論云。以二
T2217_.59.0723c12: 日光風動塵故乃至初見レ之爲レ水云云演祕第
T2217_.59.0723c13: 七云。又如下陽焔於二飄動時一實無レ有レ水而有中
T2217_.59.0723c14: 水覺上文准二此等釋一。今文地氣者塵歟。故知
T2217_.59.0723c15: 熱・風・塵三和合成二焔水一也。今文擧レ二顯レ風
T2217_.59.0723c16: 歟。或處云二熱・空・塵一云云
T2217_.59.0723c17: 至於隣虚亦不可得者。此文似同論破二隣虚
T2217_.59.0723c18: 成實之意一歟。然實異歟。如二先辨一*歟。成實
T2217_.59.0723c19: 論立無品云。一切分皆分*拆壞裂乃至微塵
T2217_.59.0723c20: 以分破。塵終歸二都無一文此文云レ破二微塵一未
T2217_.59.0723c21: レ云二極微一。或又極微立二微塵名一歟
T2217_.59.0723c22: 一微渉於動境等者。抄云。謂從二根本無明一
T2217_.59.0723c23: 念一熏二眞界時即渉動也。展轉能生二諸雜染
T2217_.59.0723c24: 法一淪沒生死一則無二窮已一。故晋遠法師云。一
T2217_.59.0723c25: 毫渉二動境一成二此頽山勢一。即其義矣。此諸法
T2217_.59.0723c26: 皆是縁生。既從二衆縁一則無二自性一。擧體皆空
T2217_.59.0723c27: 即是行本不生也文此釋意無明一念心微細
T2217_.59.0723c28: 故云レ微歟。貪嗔癡等是行陰攝故。若不レ爾
T2217_.59.0723c29: 者何云レ微矣。心法分*拆至二刹那一。色法至二極
T2217_.59.0724a01: 微一故。或又准二遠師釋一。以三無明熏二眞心一初念
T2217_.59.0724a02: 似類一微動境一矣。又倶舍論十二云。衆二縁
T2217_.59.0724a03: 和合法得二自體一頃或有動法一行度一極微一
T2217_.59.0724a04: 文寶師云。二或有二動法一度二一極微一名二一刹
T2217_.59.0724a05: 那一。極微處量促。刹那乃至由レ此故説レ度二一
T2217_.59.0724a06: 極微一名二一刹那一。極微處量促。刹那時量促
T2217_.59.0724a07: 乃至由レ此故説レ度二一極微一名二一刹那一。問曰。
T2217_.59.0724a08: 若諸法得二自體一頃名二一刹那一。得二自體一頃即
T2217_.59.0724a09: 是一念。因レ何仁王般若云下一念有二九十刹
T2217_.59.0724a10: 那一。一刹那有中九百生滅上。答。生滅微細唯佛能
T2217_.59.0724a11: 知。小乘心麁見二生滅一麁。諸佛心細見二生滅一
T2217_.59.0724a12: 細。由レ此不同云云遁隣云。此以下諸法實無二行
T2217_.59.0724a13: 度一相續道中假説動故云云准二此釋一諸法縁
T2217_.59.0724a14: 生不レ過二一刹那一。故云二一微渉動境一。但又雖二
T2217_.59.0724a15: 相反一意可レ同矣。諸法速滅故雖レ無レ動依二相
T2217_.59.0724a16: 績邊一説レ動也。隣釋此意矣。釋論云。因縁有
T2217_.59.0724a17: 法不レ過二一刹那一文又疏下釋云。一念無明等
T2217_.59.0724a18: 文可レ悉レ之。問。何不レ依二仁王説一因下小乘度二
T2217_.59.0724a19: 一微一刹那義上乎。答。今此無性空猶屬二偏眞一
T2217_.59.0724a20: 故隨轉門意歟
T2217_.59.0724a21: 識陰亦爾等者。抄云。識陰亦爾。從二無明縁一
T2217_.59.0724a22: 生。無明盡時行識等盡。當レ知蘊性即空也
T2217_.59.0724a23: 文又云。初出三界等者非二出過一也。但以三無
T2217_.59.0724a24: 明幻起二於識等一在二於三界一。究二其識體一亦本
T2217_.59.0724a25: 不生也文此釋意無明者十二因縁中無明
T2217_.59.0724a26: 支。識陰是識支也。故知於二十二因縁一流轉義
T2217_.59.0724a27: 云二初出三界一還滅義云二本不生一矣
T2217_.59.0724a28: 聲聞經中雖説等者。阿含等中雖レ説二五喩一
T2217_.59.0724a29: 譬二*拆法之義一故意明二人無我一也。疏第三云。
T2217_.59.0724b01: 謂觀二唯蘊無我一時。於二陰・入中一種種分*拆推
T2217_.59.0724b02: 求我不レ可レ得云云又云。聲聞經中以レ受譬二浮
T2217_.59.0724b03: 泡一。乃至雖レ無二實性一而因縁猶是實法文今此
T2217_.59.0724b04: 中五喩譬二體法空一故云二今此中等一也
T2217_.59.0724b05: 六入十二*縁等者。或本六大云云六入者十
T2217_.59.0724b06: 二因縁中六處歟。法華經中六入縁觸等文
T2217_.59.0724b07: 又二本義釋六大云云
T2217_.59.0724b08: 得離一重法倒者。今此倒是第六識惑歟。初
T2217_.59.0724b09: 劫但知二六識唯蘊一拔業分齊故。但法倒者准二
T2217_.59.0724b10: 淨影釋一執取相歟。彼意識中法著我故。龍
T2217_.59.0724b11: 樹釋以レ彼爲二人執一故。云二直是人執品一矣。又
T2217_.59.0724b12: 菩提心論云。但淨二意識一不レ知二其他一文又第
T2217_.59.0724b13: 七識相應智相相續是第二劫所斷故。故知
T2217_.59.0724b14: 今法倒當二執取相一歟。云二人法二空成實諸
T2217_.59.0724b15: 宗未甚懸絶一。淨影又云。利根二乘斷二彼法執一。
T2217_.59.0724b16: 故實是人執。故大師十住心時攝二拔業因種一
T2217_.59.0724b17: 更不レ開。可レ思レ之。又義。當二第七相應智相等一
T2217_.59.0724b18: 歟。湛寂寂然譬二水中水上蓮一故。湛寂是但
T2217_.59.0724b19: 知二六識一證レ寂進斷二末那惑一歟。第二劫釋
T2217_.59.0724b20: 云。始能觀察阿陀那識一云云知二寂然一可レ斷二
T2217_.59.0724b21: 第七惑品一也。故云。漸過二二乘境界一也。今菩
T2217_.59.0724b22: 薩斷二三重三妄一位名二學大乘人一同二二乘湛
T2217_.59.0724b23: 寂心一。智論共地中已菩薩地支佛地也。此菩
T2217_.59.0724b24: 薩進度二一重法倒一云二寂然界一即共地中斷二
T2217_.59.0724b25: 塵沙一菩薩地位也
T2217_.59.0724b26: 爲人天乘齋施等者。准二大師住心一。六心是
T2217_.59.0724b27: 人四心是天也。然齊施善法亦云二天乘行一。據
T2217_.59.0724b28: 通別兼正義門一歟。又上經云。護戒生天第
T2217_.59.0724b29: 七受用種子文是別門意歟
T2217_.59.0724c01: 若三乘初發道意等者。此釋意指二順解脱分
T2217_.59.0724c02: 善一云二初發道意一歟。故上文云。又於二此中一
T2217_.59.0724c03: 殊勝住有下求二解脱一惠生上。思惟觀察生二決定
T2217_.59.0724c04: 想一。從レ此即發二聲聞菩提初種子心一文既從二
T2217_.59.0724c05: 内第十決定心一生二聲聞種子一。寧非二順解脱
T2217_.59.0724c06: 分善一耶。今文上擧二順世一續レ彼而明二違世一。尤
T2217_.59.0724c07: 初發道意可二聲聞種子心一也。復。初發道意
T2217_.59.0724c08: 若指二見道一者與二第一釋一何異矣。問。小乘七
T2217_.59.0724c09: 方便位皆世間有漏心。何云二違世一耶。答。雖二
T2217_.59.0724c10: 有漏心一棄背生死一。向二涅槃一。故云二違世一也。
T2217_.59.0724c11: 雖レ未レ出二世間一有二背レ世之心一故云二違世一也。
T2217_.59.0724c12: 依レ之住心論釋二順解脱分一云。觀二涅槃徳一背二
T2217_.59.0724c13: 生死過一文又疏第七釋二不順行因一云。背二生
T2217_.59.0724c14: 死一隨行聖道一文當レ知出世違世互有二寛狹一
T2217_.59.0724c15: 故可レ作二四句分別一。謂有三違世非二出世一。二乘
T2217_.59.0724c16: 九位也。有二出世非二違世一。寂然已上諸大乘
T2217_.59.0724c17: 也。有二亦出世亦違世一。二乘聖位也。有下非二違
T2217_.59.0724c18: 世一非中出世上。違理心及諸大乘九位也。或可
T2217_.59.0724c19: 下就二聖位一論二違世一。正是出世位故。此釋意
T2217_.59.0724c20: 凡位爲二順世心一歟。雖下肖二生死一向中涅槃上世
T2217_.59.0724c21: 間有漏心故。又義。前釋又於二聖位一論レ之歟。
T2217_.59.0724c22: 初發道意者即見道歟。五位中見道已上得二
T2217_.59.0724c23: 道名一故。但兩釋異者長短八心異故。例如下
T2217_.59.0724c24: 十地位分二長短十心一時位無寛狹上矣。兩義中
T2217_.59.0724c25: 前義爲レ勝。順世者内八心。又求二人天有漏
T2217_.59.0724c26: 果一故云二順世一。今文云。爲二人天乘一行二齋施善
T2217_.59.0724c27: 法一。即此意矣。雖二有漏心一厭二生死一向二涅槃一之
T2217_.59.0724c28: 心何云二順世一乎。但或可釋約二違世義勝一亦
T2217_.59.0724c29: 作レ釋歟。非レ違二凡位一。上文云。從レ此即發二
T2217_.59.0725a01: 聲聞菩提初種子心一乃至三乘一一地皆具二十
T2217_.59.0725a02: 心一文抄云。疏或可就見道等者。上疏云。乃至
T2217_.59.0725a03: 三乘一一地皆具二十心一。乃至故云二或可等一文
T2217_.59.0725a04: 可レ悉レ之。又於二十地長短例一者以二聖位分短
T2217_.59.0725a05: 顯一凡位短八心一故無レ失
T2217_.59.0725a06: 於一切法都無所取等者。體法即空觀故云二
T2217_.59.0725a07: 無所取無所捨一也。不レ同下湛寂心厭二有爲一著二
T2217_.59.0725a08: 無爲一而有中取捨上故。我蘊兩倒者釋二經相續
T2217_.59.0725a09: 二字一歟。謂順世八心我倒未レ離。違世八心蘊
T2217_.59.0725a10: 倒猶存。此兩倒各有二二種業煩惱一歟。此二種
T2217_.59.0725a11: 業煩惱令二生死相續一不レ令レ出。似レ網故云レ網
T2217_.59.0725a12: 歟。實範釋云。兩倒業煩惱者我法二執之所
T2217_.59.0725a13: 生也云云
T2217_.59.0725a14: 依常途解釋等者。教相抄云。心云。寂然界者
T2217_.59.0725a15: 從二無性門一達二蘊等諸法皆空一也。若顯教菩
T2217_.59.0725a16: 薩經二一僧祇劫一方證二此理一。若今宗菩薩雖二
T2217_.59.0725a17: 一生一度二麁妄執一即證二此理一。然寂然界理菩
T2217_.59.0725a18: 薩及最極上根縁覺同證レ之。故疏下云。次以二
T2217_.59.0725a19: 三種三心一拔二業煩惱根本無明種子一。如下以二
T2217_.59.0725a20: 利鐵一去中其麁鑛上。次觀二無縁乘法無我性一如三
T2217_.59.0725a21: 漸至二軟處一云云
乃至
既拔業後無縁乘前不レ出二寂
T2217_.59.0725a22: 然界心一而合レ譬。寂然界與二無縁乘一二心各
T2217_.59.0725a23: 別疏下文分明也。所以用二寂然界一不レ可レ攝二
T2217_.59.0725a24: 無縁心一也。若寂然亦與二拔業心一別者何拔業
T2217_.59.0725a25: 心後不レ出レ之乎。故知寂然界即縁覺心也。故
T2217_.59.0725a26: 今云二行者未過此劫與辟支佛位齊一。又云二與
T2217_.59.0725a27: 成實諸宗未甚懸絶一也。大乘義章二無我義
T2217_.59.0725a28: 云。第二宗中具明二二空一。五陰及生攬レ別成
T2217_.59.0725a29: レ總。是因和合。因和合中空無二定性一名二衆生
T2217_.59.0725b01: 空一乃至苦無常等集成諸法一名二法一和合一。法和
T2217_.59.0725b02: 合中空無定性一。是其法空。第三宗中亦具二二
T2217_.59.0725b03: 空一。言二生空一者。前宗直就因二和合中一虚假無
T2217_.59.0725b04: 性名二衆生空一。不レ空二假生一。今此宗中假生亦
T2217_.59.0725b05: 無故名二生空一。言二法空一者。前宗之中但説二諸
T2217_.59.0725b06: 法苦無常等和合無性一故名二法空一。不レ説レ空
T2217_.59.0725b07: 無假名諸法一。此宗所説假法亦空故云二法空一
T2217_.59.0725b08: 文又云。聲聞人中根有二三品一。謂上中下。此
T2217_.59.0725b09: 三品人聞二第二宗破性之教一。鈍者但能悟解
T2217_.59.0725b10: 生空一中上二人通解二空一聞二第三宗一中下
T2217_.59.0725b11: 二人但解二生空一利人倶解文今疏心可レ准二彼
T2217_.59.0725b12: 釋一。謂彼中聲聞人者此疏縁覺種性也。皆是
T2217_.59.0725b13: 解二諸法無性等空一故。就二此中一解二彼第二宗一
T2217_.59.0725b14: 之人此中證二湛寂一之縁覺也。悟二彼第三宗一
T2217_.59.0725b15: 之人此中證二寂然一之縁覺也。故疏云。證二寂
T2217_.59.0725b16: 然界一菩薩與辟支佛位齊也。成實論聖行品
T2217_.59.0725b17: 云。有二二行一空行無我行。於二五陰中一不レ見二衆
T2217_.59.0725b18: 生一。是名二空行一。見二五陰亦無一是無我行文此
T2217_.59.0725b19: 文從二無性門一觀二蘊等皆空一也。若非二皆空一者
T2217_.59.0725b20: 何云二五陰亦無一乎。故疏云。證二寂然界一人法
T2217_.59.0725b21: 倶空與二成實宗一未二甚懸絶一也。依レ之疏第三
T2217_.59.0725b22: 云。初劫智惠與二二乘一共行非二深般若一文此
T2217_.59.0725b23: 文豈非二明證乎一。問。疏云。證二此寂然界一時漸
T2217_.59.0725b24: 過二二乘境界一文若縁覺與二寂然菩薩一齊者豈
T2217_.59.0725b25: 云レ如レ此乎。又疏云。菩薩從二發心一已來經二一
T2217_.59.0725b26: 大阿僧祇劫一方證二如レ是寂然界一文然縁覺極
T2217_.59.0725b27: 利行不レ過二百大劫一。彼人證二寂然界一而與二菩
T2217_.59.0725b28: 薩一齊者菩薩僧祇行豈非レ劣二二乘一乎。又住
T2217_.59.0725b29: 心論釋二縁覺一云レ游泳湛寂之潭一優遊無爲
T2217_.59.0725c01: 之宮一云云疏釋二湛寂心一云。怖二有爲一故著二無
T2217_.59.0725c02: 爲法一文故知縁覺尚留二湛寂之潭一未レ至二寂
T2217_.59.0725c03: 然之拭一。爾何。答。寂然界心一宗難義末學未
T2217_.59.0725c04: 決。然三文會レ之先漸過。二乘文者二乘智解
T2217_.59.0725c05: 任言レ之只觀二諸法無性一未レ及二即空理一數習二
T2217_.59.0725c06: 諸法即空觀一爰寂然菩薩越二中下二乘一等二上
T2217_.59.0725c07: 根人一故。云二漸過一也。疏云。至二第二僧祇一乃
T2217_.59.0725c08: 與二二乘一異也文此意也。次至二菩薩僧祇行一
T2217_.59.0725c09: 者。縁覺與二菩薩一同雖レ證二此理一根有二利鈍一解
T2217_.59.0725c10: 分二明昧一。謂縁覺根鈍故以二百劫行一謂二所證
T2217_.59.0725c11: 足一。菩薩極別故經二僧祇行一窮二寂然理一。若爾
T2217_.59.0725c12: 百劫薫修僧祇廣行所證雖レ一更不二同日論一
T2217_.59.0725c13: 矣。又縁覺無慈心一故唯求二自出離一故百劫
T2217_.59.0725c14: 行也。菩薩大悲濟レ物利他行故經二僧祇一證二
T2217_.59.0725c15: 寂然界一也。次住心論文者。謂度湛二寂之潭一
T2217_.59.0725c16: 入二寂然界無爲之宮一也。又大師依二大日經一
T2217_.59.0725c17: 立二十住心一。若言上縁覺唯證二湛寂一未レ及中寂然
T2217_.59.0725c18: 界上唯局二菩薩一者。何拔業之後他縁之前不
T2217_.59.0725c19: レ立二一寂然心一。以二此理一故知三寂然界是攝二拔
T2217_.59.0725c20: 業因種之中一也取意勸修寺寛信法務抄云。
T2217_.59.0725c21: 先以二寂然界一即爲二拔業縁覺一不レ可レ爾歟。是
T2217_.59.0725c22: 前後位也其一又未過此劫等文其二與成實諸
T2217_.59.0725c23: 宗未甚懸絶等文其三非二證據一歟已上疏文料
簡如下抄之
T2217_.59.0725c24: 次義章四宗二空者所依經論各別也。於二大
T2217_.59.0725c25: 日經初劫之一段一不レ可レ云二湛寂之文第二宗
T2217_.59.0725c26: 縁覺寂然之句第三宗支佛一。況疏釋二湛寂空一
T2217_.59.0725c27: 引二三獸度河之喩一。出二涅槃經大智論等一。是
T2217_.59.0725c28: 大乘共地也。不レ可レ爲二第二宗心一其四次章第
T2217_.59.0725c29: 二三乘心者二乘共悟二二空一。今疏意聲聞
T2217_.59.0726a01: 唯生空。縁覺悟二二空一。彼此異也。不レ可レ爲レ證
T2217_.59.0726a02: 歟。鈔云。彼章聲聞者此疏縁覺也云云其心
T2217_.59.0726a03: 如何其五次抄云。漸過二乘者。菩薩過二中下
T2217_.59.0726a04: 縁覺一齊二上根之類一。以レ過二中下根一云二漸過一云
T2217_.59.0726a05: 云菩薩與二二乘一相對判二勝劣一者菩薩共可
T2217_.59.0726a06: レ過二縁覺三根一也。此義不レ順二道理幷疏意一。就
T2217_.59.0726a07: レ中三乘共十地者於二大品經一大小相對不
T2217_.59.0726a08: レ依二根上下一也其六愚案云。見二此兩段之文一
T2217_.59.0726a09: 證寂然界者非二二乘之所證一。是共地之中第
T2217_.59.0726a10: 九唯菩薩行也。心者八地以前三乘共以二但
T2217_.59.0726a11: 空觀一斷二煩惱業等一。所行全同。至二第九地一由二
T2217_.59.0726a12: 菩提心勢力一更修二離著方便一成二如幻即空
T2217_.59.0726a13: 觀一斷二煩惱習氣一。八地以前三乘空觀名二違世
T2217_.59.0726a14: 八心一。今此寂然界離二違順二世心一了達諸蘊
T2217_.59.0726a15: 即空一離二前地空執一都無二取捨心一。此地初過二
T2217_.59.0726a16: 二乘地一。故云二漸過二乘一。故非二二乘之觀行一。
T2217_.59.0726a17: 二乘豈得二菩提心勢力一哉。凡疏文説二三獸度
T2217_.59.0726a18: 河之喩一。此是大品共地天台通教也。見二前後
T2217_.59.0726a19: 文一或云下與二見道一齊上。或云下與二辟支佛一齊上。又
T2217_.59.0726a20: 云二偏眞理一皆是彼宗通教之詞也。疏主兼學
T2217_.59.0726a21: 天台一之上經文深叶二其旨一歟。所以共地者七
T2217_.59.0726a22: 地以前齊二聲聞一第八地齊二支佛一。三乘同以二
T2217_.59.0726a23: 無言説道一證二但空理一故云二辟支佛齊時心滯
T2217_.59.0726a24: 無爲法一若失二方便一墮二二乘地一云云齊時者指下
T2217_.59.0726a25: 至二第八地一之時上。無二出假方便一者須レ墮二二乘
T2217_.59.0726a26: 地一也。然以菩提心至二逕路始分一者明三第九
T2217_.59.0726a27: 地出假利生超過二乘地一故云二三乘逕路始
T2217_.59.0726a28: 分也。然所觀以下還釋二三乘所證空觀同一
T2217_.59.0726a29: 也。心者。九十兩地悲願雖レ勝二二乘一猶嗜二二
T2217_.59.0726b01: 空一未レ悟二中道一故云二與成實諸宗乃至一僧祇
T2217_.59.0726b02: 劫一云云玄義四云。雖三菩薩佛名異二二乘通倶
T2217_.59.0726b03: 觀二無生體一。同是無學竭二二涅槃一共歸二灰斷一。
T2217_.59.0726b04: 證果處一。*故稱爲レ通云云其旨與二今疏釋一
T2217_.59.0726b05: 同。至二第二劫一始悟二唯識中道一。故云二至第二
T2217_.59.0726b06: 僧祇乃與二乘異也一云云大師以二寂然界一不
T2217_.59.0726b07: レ立二別住心一。蓋此謂也已上
略抄
私案。古徳義皆
T2217_.59.0726b08: 非レ無二文理一取捨有レ憚歟。然行者未過此劫
T2217_.59.0726b09: 等者寂然・菩薩未レ斷二法倒一而拔二業惱株杌一
T2217_.59.0726b10: 之位云二與支佛齊一也。此乃前同二二乘斷位一
T2217_.59.0726b11: 之中第三位也。猶如三共地中至二支佛地一也。
T2217_.59.0726b12: 前證二此寂然界一時漸過二三乘境界一者。度二一
T2217_.59.0726b13: 重法倒一證二寂然一菩薩故云二漸過一也。猶如二
T2217_.59.0726b14: 共地中九十地一矣。但朝譽引二義章一成レ義不
T2217_.59.0726b15: 可。其破如二法務抄一。又法務義。三乘共義雖
T2217_.59.0726b16: レ可レ然。縁覺悟二二空一者違三經疏幷大師釋二智
T2217_.59.0726b17: 度共地之説一歟。何者經中以二拔業縁覺一屬二
T2217_.59.0726b18: 湛寂極一説二住蘊中一故。疏中譬二水中蓮一未
T2217_.59.0726b19: レ出二水上一故。又湛寂拔業屬二違世一而即空菩
T2217_.59.0726b20: 薩云レ離二違順八心我蘊兩倒一之故。又大師住
T2217_.59.0726b21: 心論等以二菩提心論雖破人執猶有法執之
T2217_.59.0726b22: 文一證二縁覺一故。又智論共地龍樹所説。菩提
T2217_.59.0726b23: 心論既不レ許二縁覺法空一。智論豈成下支佛斷二
T2217_.59.0726b24: 法執一之義上。天台以二彼以彼共地一證通教一時
T2217_.59.0726b25: 支佛地不レ云レ斷二塵沙一故。然依二智論天台釋一
T2217_.59.0726b26: 成二今義一而許二縁覺法空一。文義相違耳。又相
T2217_.59.0726b27: 抄以二優遊無爲之宮而爲二寂然位一。非レ理。謂
T2217_.59.0726b28: 遊泳湛寂之潭者湛寂之心明顯之義也。優
T2217_.59.0726b29: 遊無爲之宮者是著二無爲法一之意也。何以
T2217_.59.0726c01: レ此爲下度二法倒一寂然位上矣。故大師住心論等
T2217_.59.0726c02: 明二此意一畢引二菩提心論雖破人執猶有法執
T2217_.59.0726c03: 之文一成二彼旨一耳。問。上明三寂然菩薩度二一重
T2217_.59.0726c04: 法倒一畢云二行者未過此劫等一。何云下未レ度二法
T2217_.59.0726c05: 倒一之位上。依レ之抄釋二極無言説處一云。我蘊倶
T2217_.59.0726c06: 離故稱爲レ極。語路傾絶名二無言説處一也文應
T2217_.59.0726c07: レ知齊二辟支一行者是寂然菩薩耶。答。上約二常
T2217_.59.0726c08: 途祕密一釋二寂然位一畢。行者下爲二寂然菩薩
T2217_.59.0726c09: 即湛寂菩薩勝進位一。故前學大乘人寄二小乘
T2217_.59.0726c10: 三道一中擧二終位一而爲下至二寂然位一所由上也。若
T2217_.59.0726c11: 不レ爾者何云二心滯無爲法相一。寂然位度二法
T2217_.59.0726c12: 倒一故。故知爾時至二小涅槃一擧三湛寂菩薩同二
T2217_.59.0726c13: 支佛地位一也。然以下述二寂然行相一即當二九
T2217_.59.0726c14: 十地一也。良以此菩薩與二支佛一齊時。但斷二人
T2217_.59.0726c15: 執一證二人空一故云レ滯二無爲法一。更至二寂然位一
T2217_.59.0726c16: 度二法倒一證二二空一故云二與成實諸宗未甚懸
T2217_.59.0726c17: 絶一也。抄釋不レ符二下文一。強不レ可二依用一矣。或
T2217_.59.0726c18: 又准二義釋第七一釋二聲聞眞言一云二涅是大空
T2217_.59.0726c19: 義一。聲聞經中以二法空一爲二大空一。乃至是名二大力
T2217_.59.0726c20: 聲聞一者利根縁覺豈不二法空一乎。故又釋二縁
T2217_.59.0726c21: 覺眞言一云。嚩是語言道斷義。以二辟支佛智惠
T2217_.59.0726c22: 深利一見二一切集法皆是滅法一。故名爲レ證二寂
T2217_.59.0726c23: 然界一。住二此三昧一時觀三諸法如二涅槃相一無レ可二
T2217_.59.0726c24: 宣説一。名爲二極滅語言三昧一文故知與辟支佛
T2217_.59.0726c25: 齊者約二法空同一歟。若爾同二義章意一。何失。問。
T2217_.59.0726c26: 寂然界十住心中何心攝耶。答。朝譽之意縁
T2217_.59.0726c27: 覺寂然同斷二法執一證二法空一故拔業心攝也。
T2217_.59.0726c28: 寛信義縁覺寂然同雖レ得二法空一勝劣玄隔。然
T2217_.59.0726c29: 依二偏眞理同一故攝二第五一也。信證僧正抄云。
T2217_.59.0727a01: 是第一僧祇内三種三妄執如レ次見修無學
T2217_.59.0727a02: 三道所斷也。聲聞・縁覺・證寂然界三乘人各
T2217_.59.0727a03: 經二同三道斷二彼三妄一。然聲聞空レ我故攝二唯
T2217_.59.0727a04: 蘊無我一。縁覺與二證寂然界一空レ法故攝二拔業
T2217_.59.0727a05: 因種一。故疏云。如二聲聞極觀察智一解了唯蘊
T2217_.59.0727a06: 無我一乃至此與二聲聞一異也云云亦云。行者如
T2217_.59.0727a07: レ是觀察時乃至故名二證寂然一云云若分別配二之
T2217_.59.0727a08: 小乘諸部一。薩婆多攝二唯蘊無我一。遮レ我存レ蘊
T2217_.59.0727a09: 故名二是倶舍宗一。經部攝二拔業因種一歟。我
T2217_.59.0727a10: 法倶空故。是稱二成實宗一云云又暹僧都記云。
T2217_.59.0727a11: 他縁乘心有二初分後分二種行位一。以二其初分一
T2217_.59.0727a12: 爲二此寂然界一。五教章云。六諸法但名宗謂二一
T2217_.59.0727a13: 説部一。一切我法唯假名都無レ體。故此通二初教
T2217_.59.0727a14: 之始一。此初教始義者今寂然界也云云或義
T2217_.59.0727a15: 云。此菩薩通二五六二心一也。謂偏眞理邊攝二
T2217_.59.0727a16: 第五心一又法空邊二第六攝一也。例如三犢子通二
T2217_.59.0727a17: 第一第四二心一矣私云。縁覺寂然人法二空
T2217_.59.0727a18: 雖レ異若約二偏眞理同一若依二一僧祇攝一攝二縁
T2217_.59.0727a19: 覺一也。以レ勝攝レ劣。是如下聲聞藏攝二縁覺一菩薩
T2217_.59.0727a20: 藏攝二大覺一梵輔攝中大梵上。問。聲縁雖レ異同是
T2217_.59.0727a21: 湛寂人空理也。寂然菩薩既度二一重法倒一類二
T2217_.59.0727a22: 水上蓮一。何寂然菩薩立二住心一以二縁覺一不レ攝二
T2217_.59.0727a23: 聲聞一耶。依レ之六無畏中唯蘊無我爲二一種一
T2217_.59.0727a24: 攝二縁覺一更寂然別立矣。何。答。大師十住心
T2217_.59.0727a25: 專依二論性相一。經依二別意趣一開二寂然一故。故性
T2217_.59.0727a26: 相釋云素怛覽言因二別意趣一阿毘達摩依二法
T2217_.59.0727a27: 相一説文例亦爾。菩提心論中開二二乘一不レ明二
T2217_.59.0727a28: 寂然一。故大師廢立深存二此意一矣。但至二六無
T2217_.59.0727a29: 畏釋一者出沒隨レ宜。當卷下以二寶珠譬一。統論
T2217_.59.0727b01: 三劫始終一時。拔業心後無縁乘前不レ出二寂
T2217_.59.0727b02: 然界故
T2217_.59.0727b03: 三乘上中下等者。或云。唯蘊無我・湛寂・寂然
T2217_.59.0727b04: 云二上中下心一也。准二十住心次第一。唯蘊無我
T2217_.59.0727b05: 配二聲聞一湛寂當二縁覺一。雖レ有二共事一離分之時
T2217_.59.0727b06: 約レ勝故配二三乘一歟。或云。三乘各有二上中下
T2217_.59.0727b07: 心一。謂唯蘊無我根境界淹留修行拔二業煩惱
T2217_.59.0727b08: 株杌及無明種子一也。私案湛寂中有二聲聞下
T2217_.59.0727b09: 乘縁覺中乘一。同雖二湛寂一三昧分異故。亦故
T2217_.59.0727b10: 三使習氣斷異一故爲二下中一也。寂然菩薩度二
T2217_.59.0727b11: 一重法倒一得二法空一故爲二上根一也。理實湛寂
T2217_.59.0727b12: 三道中見修二道中三乘倶有二無學縁覺菩
T2217_.59.0727b13: 薩一。寂然唯菩薩也。約二勝位一一往配耳
T2217_.59.0727b14:   建治二年七月中旬之比以傳法會
T2217_.59.0727b15:   談義之次記畢 金剛佛子頼瑜生年
五十二
T2217_.59.0727b16:
T2217_.59.0727b17:
T2217_.59.0727b18:
T2217_.59.0727b19: 大日經疏指心鈔卷第十一
T2217_.59.0727b20:   疏卷第二之四
T2217_.59.0727b21: 大乘行發無縁乘心法無我性者。演密鈔第
T2217_.59.0727b22: 三云。疏發無縁乘心等者。此心有レ二。一約二
T2217_.59.0727b23: 眞心一。二約二事心一。今初理運彌載眞心名レ乘。
T2217_.59.0727b24: 謂諸行者解了三界唯心心外更無二一法一故
T2217_.59.0727b25: 名二無縁一。無即一心。則是能遣。縁爲二萬法一。乃
T2217_.59.0727b26: 目二所無一。既了二縁本不生一是諸法無我性。爲二
T2217_.59.0727b27: 斯乘體一。發謂發起。即無發之發。以下諸行者
T2217_.59.0727b28: 乘二此眞心一直至中道場上故曰二發無縁乘心一也。
T2217_.59.0727b29: 二事心者。萬行濟レ物。事心名レ乘。謂行者觀二
T2217_.59.0727c01: 於六道一隨レ縁普利而無二自他能所之相一名
T2217_.59.0727c02: 爲二無縁一。無即淨心。離一冤親一故。縁乃群生。有二
T2217_.59.0727c03: 高下一故既念二平等一縁一普令三同修二萬行一。是
T2217_.59.0727c04: 則六度萬行爲二斯乘體一。發謂興起進策之義。
T2217_.59.0727c05: 以下諸行者乘二此無縁乘心一上中菩提道上故曰二
T2217_.59.0727c06: 無縁乘心一也文私云。眞心・事心者如レ次疏無
T2217_.59.0727c07: 縁他縁義也。眞心者大智證レ理自利行也。事
T2217_.59.0727c08: 心者大悲濟レ物利他行也。即正體後得觀門
T2217_.59.0727c09: 也。或復眞心是眞理。五重唯識中識性唯識。
T2217_.59.0727c10: 即遣相證性識也。故唯識章云。事爲二相用一。遣
T2217_.59.0727c11: 而不レ取。理爲二性體一。應二求作證一文事心即識
T2217_.59.0727c12: 相唯識也。後得智觀門故。前四重唯識中隨
T2217_.59.0727c13: レ應攝也。此釋意。眞心者即覺心不生義也。
T2217_.59.0727c14: 第二劫中不レ分二二重一故。宗家意不レ爾。無縁
T2217_.59.0727c15: 心又事心。法相唯談二有爲識一故。故釋二無縁
T2217_.59.0727c16: 義一云。觀二阿陀那識了二三界唯心一云云異三覺
T2217_.59.0727c17: 心乘如來藏云二阿梨耶一故。故覺自心本不生
T2217_.59.0727c18: 者眞理云二心王一也。二重別故。又義云。大乘
T2217_.59.0727c19: 行等三句通二二種住心一總標也。次釋成中依二
T2217_.59.0727c20: 何以故徴問一作二二重答説一。初如彼往昔乃至
T2217_.59.0727c21: 乾闥婆城者顯二他縁心義一。後彼如是捨無我
T2217_.59.0727c22: 乃至知自心性者明二覺心乘義。是超越二劫瑜
T2217_.59.0727c23: 祇行者總結二心一也。但大師以二總標句屬二
T2217_.59.0727c24: 第六一者。總標屬二前段一。其例非レ一歟。二義中
T2217_.59.0727c25: 前義宜歟。二段文各有二標釋一。何總合成二標
T2217_.59.0727c26: 釋矣。所以二段各總説初置二祕密主言一別説
T2217_.59.0727c27: 初各存二何以故句一
T2217_.59.0727c28: 即是明第二重等者。鈔云。謂初劫中五喩達二
T2217_.59.0727c29: 諸法即空一離二一重法倒一帶二拆法一故合論一
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 

[First] [Prev+100] [Prev] 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 [Next] [Next+100] [Last] [行番号:有/無]   [返り点:有/無] [CITE]