大正蔵検索


punctuation    Hangul    Eng   

Citation style A:
Citation style B:
()
Citation style C:
()
Citation style D:
()
TextNo.
Vol.
Page

  INBUDS
INBUDS(Bibliographic Database)
  Digital Dictionary of Buddhism
電子佛教辭典
パスワードがない場合は「guest」でログインしてください。
Users who do not have a password can log in with the userID "guest".

本文をドラッグして選択するとDDBの見出し語検索結果が表示されます。

Select a portion of the text by dragging your mouse to view all terms in the text contained in the DDB. ・

Password Access Policies

因明大疏抄 (No. 2271_ 藏俊撰 ) in Vol. 68

[First] [Prev+100] [Prev] 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 [Next] [Next+100] [Last] [行番号:/]   [返り点:/] [CITE]

T2271_.68.0581a01: 得爲過
T2271_.68.0581a02: 抄云。言或得爲過。意説。共量有他不定可
T2271_.68.0581a03: 爲過。如共量云。聲無常。有質礙故。如瓶。
T2271_.68.0581a04: 外人將極微爲不定過云。爲シハ如瓶。有礙
T2271_.68.0581a05: 即無常。爲シハ如我宗極微。有礙是常耶。此
T2271_.68.0581a06: 亦不然。我不許極微是常故。不定不成。纂
T2271_.68.0581a07: 主言得爲過者錯也
T2271_.68.0581a08:   問。有義同喩可依無義所依耶
T2271_.68.0581a09: 纂云。設爲同喩。便無喩依空花等非爲
T2271_.68.0581a10: 同喩
T2271_.68.0581a11:   尋云。因既通有無之依。喩何不通無耶」
T2271_.68.0581a12: 裏書云。記云。因之所依通有通無。同喩依
T2271_.68.0581a13: 有。異喩依無。因即無過。同喩之依有體。宗
T2271_.68.0581a14: 不通無。空花無體。故爲不可
T2271_.68.0581a15:   嘉應元年維摩會問者聖慶
T2271_.68.0581a16: 問。大乘師對薩婆多立量。云極成之聲
T2271_.68.0581a17: 可識變聲。自許所知性故之時。有共同
T2271_.68.0581a18: 云云薩婆多不立唯識。如何有共同品
T2271_.68.0581a19:
T2271_.68.0581a20: 問。有部心可云獄卒等聲是識所變耶。
T2271_.68.0581a21: 兩方
T2271_.68.0581a22: 斷云。有人約六不定別別作八句有部宗
T2271_.68.0581a23: 不許獄卒是識變者。對經部師終有前過
T2271_.68.0581a24:
T2271_.68.0581a25:   此識變之文也
T2271_.68.0581a26: 下文云。有人云。有唯犯他共非自・倶句云
T2271_.68.0581a27: 經部夢聞聲。有部獄卒叫。倶共異品。何得
T2271_.68.0581a28: 云無
T2271_.68.0581a29:   問
T2271_.68.0581b01: 又云。若云。但對經部且辨因過犯相違
T2271_.68.0581b02: 決定過故
T2271_.68.0581b03:   尋云。其相違決定何*耶
T2271_.68.0581b04: 問。他比量自不定。并共比量他不定。可
T2271_.68.0581b05: 爲眞過耶
T2271_.68.0581b06: 斷云。有人云。共比量ニハ唯他不定ノミ。非不
T2271_.68.0581b07: 定者爲違於他立自・共故
T2271_.68.0581b08: 下文云。復判不定中。句雖有八非過。理
T2271_.68.0581b09: 亦如前
T2271_.68.0581b10:   以上疏纂并斷之釋。引合可沙汰之也。
T2271_.68.0581b11: 共比他不定。他比自不定。爲過數之義。
T2271_.68.0581b12: 尤淄州之所盛立也
T2271_.68.0581b13: 問。於共不定有多句之中。可有自及
T2271_.68.0581b14: 共不定而非共不定之義耶。有二
T2271_.68.0581b15: 付無云義不明
T2271_.68.0581b16: 斷云。有人云。有犯自他共不定。非倶共不
T2271_.68.0581b17: 定者或可無此。若有自他同品。即共許
T2271_.68.0581b18:
T2271_.68.0581b19:   尋云。以後作法可難之
T2271_.68.0581b20:   縁生故因具三相之事
T2271_.68.0581b21: 又云。此縁生因闕於何相亦廣如前。更
T2271_.68.0581b22: 不重述
T2271_.68.0581b23:   尋云。此因既闕後二相。如何云爾*耶
T2271_.68.0581b24: 卷首表紙裏
T2271_.68.0581b25:   斷云。此廣推徴。如倶舍法師倶舍疏述
T2271_.68.0581b26:
T2271_.68.0581b27:   光師名倶舍師之文也
T2271_.68.0581b28: 因明大疏抄卷第二十一
T2271_.68.0581b29:   癸丑臘月初六日初七日書寫。初八日一校畢
T2271_.68.0581c01:
T2271_.68.0581c02: 因明大疏抄卷第二十二 (第二十
二帖
)
T2271_.68.0581c03:
T2271_.68.0581c04:   諸根互用唯佛取之事又耳根所取以色
名所聞之事
T2271_.68.0581c05: 斷云。有人解不共不定中云。自不共者。如
T2271_.68.0581c06: 佛弟子大乘准佛無非所聞
T2271_.68.0581c07:   尋云。餘義初地或八地可見周記
T2271_.68.0581c08: 又何空云所聞耶
T2271_.68.0581c09: 下文云
T2271_.68.0581c10:   不成不定相並之事
T2271_.68.0581c11: 斷云○又有漏故因亦他一分不得言
T2271_.68.0581c12: 唯他不共
T2271_.68.0581c13:   尋云。不成不定不並之失也。何云如此耶」
T2271_.68.0581c14: 下文云。若云雖是不成亦犯不定以自
T2271_.68.0581c15: 變色等許成事智聞故
T2271_.68.0581c16:   准此文可言。耳識所縁。設雖色等。亦名
T2271_.68.0581c17: 所聞也
T2271_.68.0581c18: 問。比量相違皆可言前邪後正耶
T2271_.68.0581c19: 問。相違決定非前後倶邪之義可有耶
T2271_.68.0581c20: 斷云。問。既爾破他。自解ニハ相違決定與比
T2271_.68.0581c21: 量相違何別。答。如本疏釋。今更助解此釋
T2271_.68.0581c22: 妙窮至理也。故二差別
T2271_.68.0581c23:   尋云。相違決定。前後倶邪者。後三相違
T2271_.68.0581c24: 相違決定。豈前邪後正耶
T2271_.68.0581c25: 又比量相違前邪後正者。諸相違決定皆
T2271_.68.0581c26: 比量相違之文如何。況第八句可正因之
T2271_.68.0581c27: 量。是前正後正也。何可云之耶
T2271_.68.0581c28: 黄私記下卷云。問。比量相違前邪後正。決定
T2271_.68.0581c29: 相違前後倶邪云云然物如何云決定相違必
T2271_.68.0582a01: 比量相違耶。答。云決定相違前後倶邪。約
T2271_.68.0582a02: 單之決定相違云。後三之決定相違前邪後
T2271_.68.0582a03: 正也。問。若爾法自相之決定相違前後倶邪。
T2271_.68.0582a04: 如何名比量相違耶。答。三松傳。其立留宗
T2271_.68.0582a05: 不至因喩。付比量相違是有アレハ。前邪後正
T2271_.68.0582a06: 之義尚有。唯云決定相達因日。前後之量各
T2271_.68.0582a07: 擧因喩。故云倶邪也。問。比量相違擧宗即
T2271_.68.0582a08: 付過。不待因喩。所以云前邪後正。若聲論
T2271_.68.0582a09: 若勝論。前立量宗付比量相違。作顯其能違
T2271_.68.0582a10: 之量。應云前邪後正耶。答。爾也。問。比量相
T2271_.68.0582a11: 違之本量。必立宗因喩具擧。然物如何云比
T2271_.68.0582a12: 量相違擧宗即付過。更不待因喩耶。答。其
T2271_.68.0582a13: 斷師別義也可思之
T2271_.68.0582a14: 問。聲論師立聲常之宗時。勝論師造比量
T2271_.68.0582a15: 相違云。聲無常。所作性故。猶如瓶等。前聲
T2271_.68.0582a16: 論比量邪。勝論比量正者。相違決定應云前
T2271_.68.0582a17: 後倶邪也。答。其前後之量約宗因喩云
T2271_.68.0582a18: 後倶邪。今約本量只擧宗不擧因喩。能違
T2271_.68.0582a19: 之量宗因喩具擧。云*前邪後正。故非過
T2271_.68.0582a20: 也。問。若爾聲論先立量。勝論前立量。必有
T2271_.68.0582a21: 比量相違之過。然物如何不付比量相違。勞
T2271_.68.0582a22: 云決定相違耶。答。應爾付也。然而今説因
T2271_.68.0582a23: 喩過處。不求宗過。唯顯因喩過已上三松傳
也云云
T2271_.68.0582a24: 又云。問。爾宗中定比量相違之義出來。如何
T2271_.68.0582a25: 不名比量相違。出因失相違決定之失耶。
T2271_.68.0582a26: 答。前後二宗具因三相。不成敵證之決智。
T2271_.68.0582a27: 故攝相違決定疑因。此相違決定トイヘル物。
T2271_.68.0582a28: 兼具比量相違之義之義。止決定。決定相違
T2271_.68.0582a29: 實義也。比量相違兼之義也。故宗不付比量
T2271_.68.0582b01: 相違。攝因過中也。問。以何知決定相違實
T2271_.68.0582b02: 過。比量相違兼過耶。答。疏云。相違決定必
T2271_.68.0582b03: 比量相違也。比量相違必因二不具云云
T2271_.68.0582b04: 擧相違決定付比量相違故。相違決定必
T2271_.68.0582b05: 有比量相違。既具實與兼。次因二不具。現
T2271_.68.0582b06: 瓶等是常之比量相違。如何因具二。若相違
T2271_.68.0582b07: 決定之上セル比量相違。因具二。爲簡其
T2271_.68.0582b08: 云因二不具耳
T2271_.68.0582b09: 又云。問。付初釋。相違決定因過也。比量相
T2271_.68.0582b10: 違是宗之過也云云與本疏釋有何別。如本
T2271_.68.0582b11: 疏釋今更助釋トテ出此二釋耶。答。本疏文
T2271_.68.0582b12: 云彼宗違因。此因違宗。不説比量相違者
T2271_.68.0582b13: 宗過。決定相違者因過。今斷師顯説比量相
T2271_.68.0582b14: 違者宗過。決定相違者因過。故稍別也云云
T2271_.68.0582b15:   尋云。一切比量相違皆前邪後正者不明。
T2271_.68.0582b16: 既云諸相違決定皆比量相違豈非前
T2271_.68.0582b17: 後倶邪之義耶。但義斷前邪後正之釋。可
T2271_.68.0582b18: 言本疏外之別義。何必依彼文定軌轍
T2271_.68.0582b19:
T2271_.68.0582b20: 今案。一切比量相違。可言違正比量因。
T2271_.68.0582b21: 若不違正比量者。何是爲過耶。依之斷・
T2271_.68.0582b22: 纂文。違正量故名比量違若實松先徳
T2271_.68.0582b23: 傳。尤以可翫之矣
T2271_.68.0582b24:   纂有證文。如下抄之
T2271_.68.0582b25: 義心云。問。相違決定與比量相違何別。答。
T2271_.68.0582b26: 相違決定因違他宗。前後倶邪。是其因過。
T2271_.68.0582b27: 比量相違宗違他因。前邪後正。是其宗過。
T2271_.68.0582b28: 由瓶等是常トイフハ無因成立故。但可違
T2271_.68.0582b29: 彼瓶是無常。所作性故因。即初擧宗違彼
T2271_.68.0582c01: 因訖。故名宗過。其相違決定兩宗因喩彼
T2271_.68.0582c02: 此互許。互望其因令宗猶預。故名因過。故
T2271_.68.0582c03: 知比量相違寛。相違決定狹
T2271_.68.0582c04: 纂云。比量相違○有難餘疏云。解違自比
T2271_.68.0582c05: 正違此量云比量相違
T2271_.68.0582c06: 私案以此文可言違正因故名比量相違。
T2271_.68.0582c07:   不正之因雖違。不可名比童相違
T2271_.68.0582c08:
T2271_.68.0582c09: 抄云。言今謂此難至違正因耶。意云。此是眼
T2271_.68.0582c10: 法師斥軌公義。説軌公比量相違不是。今
T2271_.68.0582c11: 説。離因扶助等。方是比量相違。今纂主斷
T2271_.68.0582c12: 云。眼法師斥他義。雖成能破。然眼公義還
T2271_.68.0582c13: 有過。過者即因有相違過。無同喩但有異
T2271_.68.0582c14: 喩。即有因扶助取果是異喩。以世攝因等
T2271_.68.0582c15: 向異喩轉故。量因既犯相違。如何言宗違
T2271_.68.0582c16: 正因耶。以因犯過不名正故。言違正量
T2271_.68.0582c17: 因者。如論中立瓶是常。所作因。是正量之
T2271_.68.0582c18: 因。今立瓶常故違正量因也。言自共因正
T2271_.68.0582c19: 者。所作因自共皆許是正因。今立常宗。正
T2271_.68.0582c20: 違此量。故名比量相違。即是常宗違他立
T2271_.68.0582c21: 無常宗正因也云云
T2271_.68.0582c22:   問。比量相違可有但立宗不立因喩之
T2271_.68.0582c23: 義可有耶
T2271_.68.0582c24: 斷云。又有人解決定相違與自教相違何
T2271_.68.0582c25:
T2271_.68.0582c26:   尋云。若爾何言彼但擧宗以違因訖耶。
T2271_.68.0582c27: 有人心與本疏同故也。如何
T2271_.68.0582c28: 黄私記上云。問。比量相違擧宗即爲比量之
T2271_.68.0582c29: 道理。違語本極成因。約比量相違。必待因
T2271_.68.0583a01: 喩應云非作能違量耶。答。三松傳應云
T2271_.68.0583a02: 爾。但義斷文破此義也。問。如何破耶。答。斷
T2271_.68.0583a03: 云○如上抄云云師説判。自理前擧。既擧宗
T2271_.68.0583a04: 違正比量之因。必不可應作能違量。何爲
T2271_.68.0583a05: 必須具宗因喩而作能違之量。雖然今斷
T2271_.68.0583a06: 師是云。依應作能違之量言也可思之問。
T2271_.68.0583a07: 爾約比量相違二種應有耶。答。應爾也○
T2271_.68.0583a08: 此義應密之文
T2271_.68.0583a09:   比量相違與自教相違別之事
T2271_.68.0583a10: 斷云。問。若爾比量相違與自教違因即比
T2271_.68.0583a11: 量相違
T2271_.68.0583a12:   先徳云。又違自教不必違因者。初釋也。有
T2271_.68.0583a13: 雖違因必違自教等云下。後釋也
T2271_.68.0583a14:   此釋頗不得心。能能可案之
T2271_.68.0583a15:   尋云。斷文既同纂後釋。若爾可言不正
T2271_.68.0583a16: 義如何
T2271_.68.0583a17: 今案。斷文且會論文以聲無常量不爲
T2271_.68.0583a18: 比量相違之義矣。不云總無比量相違
T2271_.68.0583a19: 之義也
T2271_.68.0583a20: 尋云。比量相違宗違因者。何宗違何因
T2271_.68.0583a21:
T2271_.68.0583a22: 九句義私記云。問。且比量相違宗違因者。
T2271_.68.0583a23: 前宗違後宗。後宗前因違耶。答。謂之古徳
T2271_.68.0583a24: 云云不同也。有云。後宗違前因過也。意云。
T2271_.68.0583a25: 瓶等是常後宗。違立敵極成前因爲言。三修
律師傳也
T2271_.68.0583a26: 有云。前宗違後因過也。意云。瓶等是常宗。
T2271_.68.0583a27: 作能違量時。違後所作性故因爲言也。賢
應大徳傳也
T2271_.68.0583a28: 有云。比量相違宗違因過也。不可求前
T2271_.68.0583a29: 後也。意云。比量相違寛故。作能違量。亦違
T2271_.68.0583b01: 本極成因。倶名比量相違爲言也云云
T2271_.68.0583b02: 黄私記上云。故賢應大徳。貞觀六年。於山階
T2271_.68.0583b03: 寺義燈長講之時。三修大徳問云。宗違因
T2271_.68.0583b04: 名比量相違者。何宗違何因耶。答。前宗違
T2271_.68.0583b05: 後因。名比量相違也。問。其前宗者何宗。後
T2271_.68.0583b06: 因者何因耶。答。前宗者。所違量之瓶等是常
T2271_.68.0583b07: 宗是也。後因者。能違量之初無後無故因。并
T2271_.68.0583b08: 所作性故因是也。問。比量者。擧宗違比量
T2271_.68.0583b09: 道理本極成因。是則瓶等是常之後宗。違本
T2271_.68.0583b10: 極成之前因。然尤是後宗之違前因。如何可
T2271_.68.0583b11: 言前宗違後因耶。尤是顛倒之説云云答。因
T2271_.68.0583b12: 非無違本極成因之義。雖然立量道理。此
T2271_.68.0583b13: 因違能違之量作顯之時。所違量之瓶等是
T2271_.68.0583b14: 常宗。顯違於能違之因。故云前宗違後因
T2271_.68.0583b15: 也。是即約立量之道理而云也。非不知違
T2271_.68.0583b16: 本極成因義也云云問者不信受。經三十餘
T2271_.68.0583b17: 日。問詰而未止。至于今日亦復尚執也。師
T2271_.68.0583b18: 説判曰光大徳此是三修法師之偏執也。若唯
T2271_.68.0583b19: 違本極成比量道理之因。名比量相違。故
T2271_.68.0583b20: 云後宗違前因。不須作能違量。立者如何
T2271_.68.0583b21: 斷云。未詳此釋又斷文既云。爲正量違
T2271_.68.0583b22: 故。名比量相違若不作顯能違量。如何
T2271_.68.0583b23: 云爲正量違故名比量相違耶。又或處其
T2271_.68.0583b24: 因違不定。而凡取繋比量相違レル
T2271_.68.0583b25: 有。如立第八句應非正因。同品倶故。如
T2271_.68.0583b26: 七・九句也。三松傳并光大徳同云。此第八句
T2271_.68.0583b27: 宗非違極成之因。立比量而破故。云比量
T2271_.68.0583b28: 相違耳。然則如何偏云唯違道理名比量
T2271_.68.0583b29: 相違。違能違量因故不名比量相違耶。是
T2271_.68.0583c01: 尤彼師偏執之甚。可知之
T2271_.68.0583c02: 因明大疏抄卷第二十二
T2271_.68.0583c03:   癸丑臘月初七日書寫。初八下午校正已畢
T2271_.68.0583c04:
T2271_.68.0583c05:
T2271_.68.0583c06:
T2271_.68.0583c07: 因明大疏抄卷第二十三 (第二十
三帖
)
T2271_.68.0583c08:   問。論云。相違有四南寺義昭院。以此
T2271_.68.0583c09: 文證相違之因。爾者其意如何
T2271_.68.0583c10: 黄私記中云。問。能乖返之因有十五類。隨
T2271_.68.0583c11: 因可立十五相違因。何故但云四種相違
T2271_.68.0583c12: 耶。答。因不相違。爲相違宗果作因故。隨
T2271_.68.0583c13: 相違宗有四立。而不立十五名所以文云。
T2271_.68.0583c14: 義顯別因所乖返宗不過此四故。論但説
T2271_.68.0583c15: 有四相違
T2271_.68.0583c16:   今案。依此釋可案義昭之意也
T2271_.68.0583c17:   相違因之事
T2271_.68.0583c18: 文軌疏二云。問。宗亦乖因。豈唯因過。過
T2271_.68.0583c19: 不在宗。何得名相。答。如言父子相生。子
T2271_.68.0583c20: 不生父。亦得名相。此則宗因兩形爲相。因
T2271_.68.0583c21: 反宗故名違。問。常義既反所作。何不宗
T2271_.68.0583c22: 説相違。答。宗言常住。過失未生。因言所
T2271_.68.0583c23: 作。方乖所立。故因説違。宗無此過。又釋。
T2271_.68.0583c24: 如立常爲宗。無常反常。名爲相違。立因
T2271_.68.0583c25: 爲欲成常住宗。其因乃成無常宗義。與相
T2271_.68.0583c26: 違爲因。故名相違因也云云
T2271_.68.0583c27:   明燈抄云。今疏主意與軌法師第二説
T2271_.68.0583c28: 等文
T2271_.68.0583c29:   尋云。爾者疏主雙用此二釋耶
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 

[First] [Prev+100] [Prev] 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 [Next] [Next+100] [Last] [行番号:/]   [返り点:/] [CITE]