大正蔵検索


punctuation    Hangul    Eng   

Citation style A:
Citation style B:
()
Citation style C:
()
Citation style D:
()
TextNo.
Vol.
Page

  INBUDS
INBUDS(Bibliographic Database)
  Digital Dictionary of Buddhism
電子佛教辭典
パスワードがない場合は「guest」でログインしてください。
Users who do not have a password can log in with the userID "guest".

本文をドラッグして選択するとDDBの見出し語検索結果が表示されます。

Select a portion of the text by dragging your mouse to view all terms in the text contained in the DDB. ・

Password Access Policies

因明大疏抄 (No. 2271_ 藏俊撰 ) in Vol. 68

[First] [Prev+100] [Prev] 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 [Next] [Next+100] [Last] [行番号:/]   [返り点:/] [CITE]

T2271_.68.0508a01:  去聲。説
文議語也
T2271_.68.0508a02: 何勞長議前記云。此意即説何勞餘長之義
依字錯。應合單作云云
T2271_.68.0508a03: 因明大疏抄卷第十二
T2271_.68.0508a04:   癸丑孟冬念七日念八日書寫。念九夜以寫本一校
T2271_.68.0508a05:
T2271_.68.0508a06:
T2271_.68.0508a07:
T2271_.68.0508a08:
T2271_.68.0508a09: 因明大疏抄卷第十三 (第十三帖)
T2271_.68.0508a10:   問。聲無常之比量可經部耶。進云。
T2271_.68.0508a11: 疏云。對經部等云云之。若爾可
T2271_.68.0508a12: 符過。如何
T2271_.68.0508a13: 疏云。無常之宗異喩必有所依○復結
T2271_.68.0508a14: 云。由是雖對因義成云云
T2271_.68.0508a15: 明詮噵云。若薩婆多立此聲無常量時。異喩
T2271_.68.0508a16: 所依故。若經部師等立此量時。異喩是無。
T2271_.68.0508a17: 喩所依云云
T2271_.68.0508a18:   准此。噵者以有部・經部立者。不
T2271_.68.0508a19: 敵者也。若爾下所引由是雖
T2271_.68.0508a20: 實有太虚空等之文。似無空論師
T2271_.68.0508a21: 敵者。如何
T2271_.68.0508a22: 理門論云。同法者。謂立聲無常。勤勇無間所
T2271_.68.0508a23: 發性故。以諸勤勇無間所發皆見無常。猶
T2271_.68.0508a24: 瓶等。異法者。謂諸有常住見非勤勇無間
T2271_.68.0508a25: 所發。如虚空等○由是雖對實有太
T2271_.68.0508a26: 虚空等。而得示無宗處無因義成
T2271_.68.0508a27: 云云
T2271_.68.0508a28: 定賓疏三云。問。立聲無常意破聲論。何故
T2271_.68.0508a29: 乃言無空論。答。此有二釋。一者。假設論
T2271_.68.0508b01: 之。因明並是之門。不實有此比量。第
T2271_.68.0508b02: 二釋者。聲論本從勝論出。勝論言空是實
T2271_.68.0508b03: 句義。即是有體。聲論之中。別分諸計。一宗
T2271_.68.0508b04: 計云。聲與聲性是有。虚空倶無障礙
T2271_.68.0508b05: 處。聲在中轉。何煩執空云有體性。故亦可
T2271_.68.0508b06: 無空論師。不要佛法經部宗中名無空
T2271_.68.0508b07: 云云
T2271_.68.0508b08: 同四云。然前成立聲是無常因及兩喩。是對
T2271_.68.0508b09: 聲論。聲論多非無空論師。然於其中異計
T2271_.68.0508b10: 云○故有別計聲論師宗亦是無空論師。
T2271_.68.0508b11: 要佛法之中經部等也。若對經部立
T2271_.68.0508b12: 無常。應相符。故不然也云云
T2271_.68.0508b13: 明燈抄云定賓二釋大小二論唯言
T2271_.68.0508b14: 空論。不經部。今疏主意。指經部師
T2271_.68.0508b15: 空論。既有等言。計空無實體皆無空論耳。
T2271_.68.0508b16: 必一定名無空論云云
T2271_.68.0508b17: 下文云。問。今疏主意指經部師無空論
T2271_.68.0508b18: 者。彼經部立聲無常。豈不相符。答。入理
T2271_.68.0508b19: 理門不別名但言無空。疏主隨應。且指
T2271_.68.0508b20: 經部。約作法門。且示異喩。故無過也云云
T2271_.68.0508b21:   問。付同異二喩合離義。且異喩離時。先
T2271_.68.0508b22: 因後宗云諸非所作者見常住。如虚空
T2271_.68.0508b23: 者。有何過耶。進云。若爾應非作
T2271_.68.0508b24: 常住也等云云之。諸非作者者。離所作
T2271_.68.0508b25: 也。見是常者。離宗也。設雖非作
T2271_.68.0508b26: 者見常。何忽以非作因常宗耶。
T2271_.68.0508b27: 況若如此者。先宗後因云諸常者見
T2271_.68.0508b28: 之時。亦以常可非作。如何
T2271_.68.0508b29: 明詮噵云。問。若異喩離。先因後宗而云
T2271_.68.0508c01: 所作者皆是常者。即應非作立常住
T2271_.68.0508c02: 若如是難者。先宗後因而云諸常住者皆
T2271_.68.0508c03: 非作。此亦應常住立非作。若許
T2271_.68.0508c04: 者。無正異喩耶。答以上備説 云云
T2271_.68.0508c05: 又云。意云。諸所作者皆是無常者。以所作
T2271_.68.0508c06: 無常。以此准知。諸非作者皆是常住者。
T2271_.68.0508c07: 非所作空常住。既成虚空是常住故。
T2271_.68.0508c08: 相符過云云
T2271_.68.0508c09: 定賓疏云四云。此中意明。本立宗時。擬
T2271_.68.0508c10: 敵論。違他順己。復爲宗。須所由
T2271_.68.0508c11: 因。是明所由也。今説兩喩。同喩即是
T2271_.68.0508c12: 前因義。故云諸勤勇發皆是無常。釋既已
T2271_.68.0508c13: 了。宗無常義已得定成。理應異。故標
T2271_.68.0508c14: 以簡本宗。名之爲常。標常既訖。須
T2271_.68.0508c15: 能成之因。以異中所立義無。即是釋
T2271_.68.0508c16: 異之事。不謬説也○夫釋成者。理合
T2271_.68.0508c17: 因釋成其宗故。同喩中先擧能成後明
T2271_.68.0508c18: 所立也。夫簡濫者。理合異然後止因依
T2271_.68.0508c19: 此次第故。非顛倒之失云云
T2271_.68.0508c20: 又云。先釋寛宗遍因者。於其離中。先明
T2271_.68.0508c21: 後説是常。又於合中。先明無常後説
T2271_.68.0508c22: 。並是倒説。此倒説者。望於本宗聲無
T2271_.68.0508c23: 。陳其所由所作因。要假同喩此因
T2271_.68.0508c24: 。今倒説中所明同喩。以其不所作之
T2271_.68.0508c25: 故非因乃是別以無常因成所作
T2271_.68.0508c26: 也。同喩既非因之義。其異喩中所
T2271_.68.0508c27: 離者。亦非濫。以其不釋因之義。乃是
T2271_.68.0508c28: 別以非作因成常住義云云
T2271_.68.0508c29:   明燈抄引此全文
T2271_.68.0509a01: 明燈抄云。今頌文中。爲異喩同喩處
T2271_.68.0509a02: 先説異喩。是倒非正。又將同喩異喩處
T2271_.68.0509a03: 後説同喩。是倒非正。總答意云。因云所作
T2271_.68.0509a04: 性故者。由所作故。故是無常。其同法喩既
T2271_.68.0509a05: 此因無常義。故先標所作後述無常
T2271_.68.0509a06: 其異法喩本爲濫。故先對宗明異。後方
T2271_.68.0509a07: 因非有。若反此者。所作勤勇二因各有
T2271_.68.0509a08: 二種之過故云反覆相例倶爲不可云云
T2271_.68.0509a09:   今案。同喩合之時。云諸所作者皆見
T2271_.68.0509a10: 之時。同喩攝所作。以喩釋因之義。同
T2271_.68.0509a11: 喩既不因之義。准知異喩非止濫之
T2271_.68.0509a12: 。既非止濫。倒云諸非所作者皆見
T2271_.68.0509a13: 之時。豈非非作常宗*耶。若云
T2271_.68.0509a14: 諸常住者。皆見非所作之時。止宗因濫
T2271_.68.0509a15: 故。不常住非所作
T2271_.68.0509a16: 維摩會講師覺雅。問者延嚴
T2271_.68.0509a17: 問。理門論云。應非作證其常。或以
T2271_.68.0509a18: 所作。若爾應所説不遍非樂
T2271_.68.0509a19: 等合離何事*耶
T2271_.68.0509a20: 疏云
T2271_.68.0509a21:   今案疏意云。先對所作因異喩離時。若
T2271_.68.0509a22: 非所作者皆是常者。即以非作因
T2271_.68.0509a23: 虚空常住宗。若爾可本所爭之空
T2271_.68.0509a24: 常宗。又空常云事。立敵共許。若更立之。
T2271_.68.0509a25: 豈非相符*耶。既非本諍返立常宗。若
T2271_.68.0509a26: 爾可所説之宗。合此云若爾應
T2271_.68.0509a27: 所説已上以離類
因後宗之時事也
若同喩合時。
T2271_.68.0509a28: 若云諸無常者皆是所作者。應無常
T2271_.68.0509a29: 聲所作宗。若爾可本諍之聲
T2271_.68.0509b01: 所作宗。又聲所作云事。兩宗本許。若更立
T2271_.68.0509b02: 之。可相符。無常故因。可隨一不
T2271_.68.0509b03: 成。非所説此以合類先宗
後因之時之事也
T2271_.68.0509b04: 又付勤發因二過。一不遍。二非樂。先
T2271_.68.0509b05: 不遍者。若異喩離之時。云非勤發者
T2271_.68.0509b06: 皆見常住。以非勤因常住宗者。非勤
T2271_.68.0509b07: 之因寛。亘空常非勤・電無常非勤。虚空常
T2271_.68.0509b08: 住宗不電非勤因。故云不遍。即以
T2271_.68.0509b09: 勤因空常宗。若爾可本所爭
T2271_.68.0509b10: 空常宗。若合之時。諸無常勤發。以無常
T2271_.68.0509b11: 聲勤發宗者。無常因寛通非勤・電・
T2271_.68.0509b12: 勤・瓶。聲勤發宗不無常中非勤發・電
T2271_.68.0509b13: 。故云不遍。即以無常因勤發宗者。
T2271_.68.0509b14: 本所爭之聲勤發宗。故合此等
T2271_.68.0509b15: 若爾應非所説不遍也。此成非所
T2271_.68.0509b16: 説宗事。同前所作因。其外有不遍義。不
T2271_.68.0509b17: 定過出來。故可又不遍。以頌文略
T2271_.68.0509b18: 又字也。非樂者若離云諸非勤發者
T2271_.68.0509b19: 皆見常住者。此因可電非勤發是常
T2271_.68.0509b20: 住宗。若合云諸無常者皆是勤發者。此
T2271_.68.0509b21: 因可立云電可勤發。無常故。如瓶等。以
T2271_.68.0509b22: 此二宗非樂宗也。此二非樂宗在
T2271_.68.0509b23: 所説宗之外。故異所作因非樂
T2271_.68.0509b24: 疏文・并明燈抄・定賓疏四
T2271_.68.0509b25: 問。不同異二喩之言能立義可
T2271_.68.0509b26: 耶。進云。有云云之。若爾可闕支過
T2271_.68.0509b27: 如何
T2271_.68.0509b28: 疏云。彼又問言。爲要具二時機
T2271_.68.0509b29: 切皆得云云
T2271_.68.0509c01: 定賓疏四云。論曰。爲要具二乃至但隨説一。
T2271_.68.0509c02: 述曰。自下第三辨比量中兩喩具闕也○眞
T2271_.68.0509c03: 喩總有同異二種。爲要具二方爲能立耶。
T2271_.68.0509c04: 眞因雖有二種但隨説一耶。勤發
T2271_.68.0509c05: 所作不同品。或遍同品。爲二眞因也。論
T2271_.68.0509c06: 曰。若就正理乃至不離其因。述曰○若就正理
T2271_.68.0509c07: 者。盡理論之。其理圓正也。由二喩。即顯
T2271_.68.0509c08: 所立聲有法・法不其因。且有法不
T2271_.68.0509c09: 者。遍是宗法性故也。法不因者。謂同喩
T2271_.68.0509c10: 中釋前因義。云諸所作者皆是無常。意明
T2271_.68.0509c11: 瓶上所作無常既不相離。故顯宗中。立
T2271_.68.0509c12: 常法。不因。爲所由義。即顯因第二
T2271_.68.0509c13: 也。昔雖聲有無常所作
T2271_.68.0509c14: 由所以。今由合故乃得新知也。同喩釋説
T2271_.68.0509c15: 無常已定。故須明離。以離無常。標之爲常。
T2271_.68.0509c16: 其次復更離其所作故。知本宗無常之義
T2271_.68.0509c17: 所作。是故所作不彼無常。而來
T2271_.68.0509c18: 入異中。故云所立不其因。此即顯
T2271_.68.0509c19: 第三相也。論曰。以具顯示乃至相違不定。述
T2271_.68.0509c20: 曰。第二別約因後二相唯明簡似也。此文
T2271_.68.0509c21: 西方有二釋。一者同喩顯因第二相作伴而
T2271_.68.0509c22: 有。正翻相違因同品中無。又異喩顯因第
T2271_.68.0509c23: 三相所離而無。正翻不定因異品中有。故云
T2271_.68.0509c24: 能正對治相違及不定也。第二釋。因後二相
T2271_.68.0509c25: 同中作伴有。異中所離無。通用對治相違・
T2271_.68.0509c26: 不定。以其相違同無異有故也。不定同有
T2271_.68.0509c27: 故也。論曰。若有於此乃至一能顯二。述曰。第
T2271_.68.0509c28: 二就隨宜擧也。謂就利智厭繁之人隨
T2271_.68.0509c29: 宜聞。是故不具説二喩。文中有三。一
T2271_.68.0510a01: 相接説人。二對速悟之人。三對思審之
T2271_.68.0510a02: 。且初人者。聞聲是無常所作性故。其
T2271_.68.0510a03: 敵論者接次問言。諸所作者皆是無常。譬如
T2271_.68.0510a04: 瓶等。此喩有濫不。而立論者即答彼言。汝
T2271_.68.0510a05: 之同喩一分已成。故不説。然亦無濫。何
T2271_.68.0510a06: 以然者。若有是常。見非所作。如虚空故。或
T2271_.68.0510a07: 立論者適説宗因及同喩已。其敵論者接次
T2271_.68.0510a08: 即能廣説異喩。第二文云若如其聲已下。
T2271_.68.0510a09: 立量非一。就中且指聲無常故。云
T2271_.68.0510a10: 如其聲也。兩義同許者。且如聲論。先有
T2271_.68.0510a11: 毎聞聲常分已串習不更別思。今者忽
T2271_.68.0510a12: 佛法智人立聲無常所作性故。其人速悟。
T2271_.68.0510a13: 時即能自立兩喩。是故立者倶不説。
T2271_.68.0510a14: 第三文云或由義准已下。立者善知他心所
T2271_.68.0510a15: 。或立宗因。知彼利智勞説同。故告
T2271_.68.0510a16: 彼云。汝自已知同喩之義。吾但説異。敵者
T2271_.68.0510a17: 異能准知同。釋決定因。或知彼心。聞
T2271_.68.0510a18: 異。自知異喩。是止濫義故。云或由義准
T2271_.68.0510a19: 一能顯二也。上來無明利智之人自有二種
T2271_.68.0510a20: 一不繁。如前文中。要須具説。二者厭
T2271_.68.0510a21: 繁。如此文中。隨樂而説。以隨樂故。不
T2271_.68.0510a22: 闕支之過也。又復前文爲顯説者。大智圓滿
T2271_.68.0510a23: 相。此文爲顯説者。大智隨機相。即陳那菩薩
T2271_.68.0510a24: 上首云云
T2271_.68.0510a25:   明燈抄引此文
T2271_.68.0510a26: 明詮噵云。問。與第二答何別。答。第二意
T2271_.68.0510a27: 者。前已悟一喩竟。爲唯説一喩也。第四意
T2271_.68.0510a28: 者。先未二喩。然今正説一喩時。義准悟
T2271_.68.0510a29: 一喩故。唯説一喩云云
T2271_.68.0510b01: 又云。言顯二者。一言陳喩。二義准喩也云云
T2271_.68.0510b02:   今案。依此文言。諸教之中約立量門
T2271_.68.0510b03: 或立宗因二喩之義。可之也。
T2271_.68.0510b04: 彼攝論破不共無明比量。不同喩
T2271_.68.0510b05:
T2271_.68.0510b06: 又案。或由義准一能顯二之文。依言陳喩
T2271_.68.0510b07: 義准喩之義也。若爾既有義准喩
T2271_.68.0510b08: 所立不成等亦可意許
T2271_.68.0510b09: 問。論云。已説宗等如是多言悟他時。
T2271_.68.0510b10: 説名能立心何
T2271_.68.0510b11: 疏云。若順世親。宗亦能立故於能立總結
T2271_.68.0510b12: 云云
T2271_.68.0510b13:   尋云。何以宗名所立具
T2271_.68.0510b14: 邑記云。問。宗即所立。何名爲具。答。謂前
T2271_.68.0510b15: 云。此中宗者。極成有法極成能別。然此但宗
T2271_.68.0510b16: 依故。故立具。是差別性之具故。又説
T2271_.68.0510b17: 之言所立具。此解順論宗等多言名爲
T2271_.68.0510b18: 能立云云
T2271_.68.0510b19: 明燈抄云。世親之義。宗因喩三名爲能立。故
T2271_.68.0510b20: 宗等。此即能等及所等合名能立。陳那之
T2271_.68.0510b21: 義。即有二解。一云擧宗等三。謂一因兩喩。
T2271_.68.0510b22: 二云。擧宗等三。謂因中三相。此之兩解意。
T2271_.68.0510b23: 所等能等。宗即能等。不其宗
T2271_.68.0510b24: 多言者。亦有兩解。一云。一因兩喩之言。
T2271_.68.0510b25: 二云。因中三相之言。即多相言名爲多言
T2271_.68.0510b26: 言多故名爲多言。如前已解云云
T2271_.68.0510b27:   問。論云。是隨同品言爾者因同品歟。宗
T2271_.68.0510b28: 同品歟。疏有釋。一云。因同品。二云。宗同
T2271_.68.0510b29: 云云第二釋明。既云若是所作。
T2271_.68.0510c01: 彼無常。如瓶等者。豈非因同品之義
T2271_.68.0510c02: *耶。説因宗所隨之文。豈宗同品*耶
T2271_.68.0510c03: 疏云。論若是所作是隨同品言。述曰○
T2271_.68.0510c04: 前同喩後指法云宗同品亦無
T2271_.68.0510c05: 云云
T2271_.68.0510c06:   明燈抄并孝仁意。以爲二釋。若依明詮
T2271_.68.0510c07: 。非別釋歟。噵又同品者之文云。亦
T2271_.68.0510c08: 因同品故云又也云云今案疏問答文。同
T2271_.68.0510c09: 品之言可二因同品及宗同品。非
T2271_.68.0510c10:
T2271_.68.0510c11: 又約自瓶同品文。周記云。自義故云自。
T2271_.68.0510c12: 即屬所立無常宗云云邑記對聲以
T2271_.68.0510c13: 自也云云今案。無常宗望所作他。亦
T2271_.68.0510c14: 同無常故云自歟。可
T2271_.68.0510c15: 明燈抄云
T2271_.68.0510c16:   問。異喩可同喩
T2271_.68.0510c17: 疏云。問。何故離宗之與今以非不
T2271_.68.0510c18: 異性云云
T2271_.68.0510c19: 明燈抄云。初答意云。若是其常者。別離
T2271_.68.0510c20: 也見非所作者。別離因也。前同喩云。諸是
T2271_.68.0510c21: 所作見是無常。爲同喩體。今異喩云。若是
T2271_.68.0510c22: 其常見非所作。爲異喩體。同異喩中各有
T2271_.68.0510c23: 宗因。擧異喩體前同喩。故云合則離喩
T2271_.68.0510c24: 如虚空者。擧依離依。非離宗因。不喩體
T2271_.68.0510c25: 故。故不合則離喩。然同成宗等者。問。
T2271_.68.0510c26: 異喩亦成宗。何故不必須依體耶。答。約
T2271_.68.0510c27: 順成宗以立同喩。是故必須依之與體。止
T2271_.68.0510c28: 宗因濫。以立異喩。遮義已成。濫即自止。故
T2271_.68.0510c29: 必須其喩所依云云
T2271_.68.0511a01:   問。如異喩。可異宗異因耶。進云。
T2271_.68.0511a02: 爾也。付之。若是其常者離宗也。見非
T2271_.68.0511a03: 所作者離因也。若爾可異宗異因。例
T2271_.68.0511a04: 異喩
T2271_.68.0511a05: 疏云。問。何故但名異喩異宗異因之號
T2271_.68.0511a06: 云云
T2271_.68.0511a07: 明燈抄云。後問意云。何故別離宗因
T2271_.68.0511a08: 異。宗因總合離喩名爲異喩。後答意云。喩
T2271_.68.0511a09: 能立所立兩法。宗因各一。説異喩以總
T2271_.68.0511a10: 苞異二而爲失。其失如文。總言異喩。含
T2271_.68.0511a11: 宗因。更不別説。若准此問。前同喩中亦有
T2271_.68.0511a12: 此問。何故但名同喩。不同宗因耶。答。總
T2271_.68.0511a13: 同喩同宗因。不別説同宗同因之號
T2271_.68.0511a14: 云云
T2271_.68.0511a15:   本頌之事
T2271_.68.0511a16: 後記云。彼理門論所引頌者。乃是足目仙人
T2271_.68.0511a17: 所説之頌。問。足目仙人爲内道也。爲外道
T2271_.68.0511a18: 耶。答。無定判文。設縱外道。引證無妨。何
T2271_.68.0511a19: 以然者。因明法遍大小乘及以外道。設外無
T2271_.68.0511a20: 妨。如勝論師對聲生無宗。即是外
T2271_.68.0511a21: 道有因明義云云
T2271_.68.0511a22: 前記云。即足目所造之頌。以足目是根本造
T2271_.68.0511a23: 因明故。所説頌名本頌。以内外共許
T2271_.68.0511a24: 目之論故。引爲證也云云
T2271_.68.0511a25: 邑記云。彼理門引足目所造之頌故言
T2271_.68.0511a26: 云云
T2271_.68.0511a27: 明詮噵云。世親論軌論本頌云云
T2271_.68.0511a28:   師資比量信之事
T2271_.68.0511a29: 疏云。彼引本頌言。如自決定已他解
T2271_.68.0511b01: 云云
T2271_.68.0511b02:   尋云
T2271_.68.0511b03: 明詮引仁云。問。如烟知下有火者。不
T2271_.68.0511b04: 師亦知也。何故云相比量亦在弟子位
T2271_.68.0511b05: 耶。答。雖師。而今新解生故。云
T2271_.68.0511b06: 子位云云
T2271_.68.0511b07: 邑記云。疏自比處在弟子之位者。且約言比
T2271_.68.0511b08: 相比云云
T2271_.68.0511b09: 後記云。自比處在弟子之位者。此中有二。一
T2271_.68.0511b10: 相。二言。相者。但見其相即知其事。言者。要
T2271_.68.0511b11: 師聞自比智起。若自解已轉教餘人。亦得
T2271_.68.0511b12: 師。是師種類。非正師攝。若相比量不
T2271_.68.0511b13: 。在自弟子處。亦通於師。今望他解
T2271_.68.0511b14: 。即在師主。縁而自解但在自比弟子
T2271_.68.0511b15: 。實通自比他比二云云
T2271_.68.0511b16: 定賓疏云
T2271_.68.0511b17:   審察支之事
T2271_.68.0511b18: 疏云。釋餘遠離尚非能立。況餘法耶云云
T2271_.68.0511b19: 定賓疏云。外道小乘及古師等。於立破前
T2271_.68.0511b20: 審察支審察支審定宗徒。且如彼聲
T2271_.68.0511b21: 論師汝立聲爲常耶。婆沙二十七云
T2271_.68.0511b22: 他宗。不其過。是此義也。聲論答
T2271_.68.0511b23: 云。如是。佛法反定他宗云。汝何所欲。汝
T2271_.68.0511b24: 豈不聲是無常。所作性故。如瓶等耶。聲
T2271_.68.0511b25: 論答云。不爾。聲是常住。無觸對故。譬如
T2271_.68.0511b26: 。如是審定。方乃觀察定不定過。佛法自
T2271_.68.0511b27: 比量因定。復知聲論因中不定。從此方
T2271_.68.0511b28: 彼因中不定過失。如是審察。立之爲
T2271_.68.0511b29: 支。陳那所造集量論中。破此繁立云。由
T2271_.68.0511c01: 父母生汝身故。方能立義。或由義及床
T2271_.68.0511c02: 座等。方得論。豈並立支也云云
T2271_.68.0511c03: 明燈抄云。諸外道等將論時。須敵論
T2271_.68.0511c04: 平章宗徒所立義。名爲審察云云 以下
T2271_.68.0511c05: 定賓疏文
T2271_.68.0511c06: 婆沙論二十七云○諸預流者未此愛
T2271_.68.0511c07: 者。是分別論者問。重定前宗。若不他宗
T2271_.68.0511c08: 他過失。則不理。答如是者。是應理論
T2271_.68.0511c09: 者答。謂順契經顛倒義。所立決定故言
T2271_.68.0511c10: 是○豈不要樂耶者。是分別論者將
T2271_.68.0511c11: 難反定所宗正義。答不爾者。
T2271_.68.0511c12: 是應理論者遮彼所問。顯義無違○因明論
T2271_.68.0511c13: 中説他義三種路。一猶豫破。二説過
T2271_.68.0511c14: 破。三除違破。佛契經中明破他説亦有
T2271_.68.0511c15: 。一勝彼破。二等彼破。三違宗破。勝彼破
T2271_.68.0511c16: 者。如長爪梵志白佛言。我一切不忍。佛告
T2271_.68.0511c17: 彼曰。汝亦不此自見耶。彼便自伏。等彼
T2271_.68.0511c18: 破者。如波吒梨外道白佛言。喬答摩知
T2271_.68.0511c19: 不。若不知者。非一切智者。智者應是幻惑
T2271_.68.0511c20: 佛告彼言。倶荼邑有惡人。名藍婆鑄荼。破
T2271_.68.0511c21: 戒行惡。汝知之不。彼言我知。佛告彼曰。汝
T2271_.68.0511c22: 亦應是破戒惡人。彼便自伏。違宗破者。如
T2271_.68.0511c23: 鄔波離長者白佛言。身業罪人非意業。佛
T2271_.68.0511c24: 彼曰。彈宅迦林羯凌伽林等。誰之所作。豈
T2271_.68.0511c25: 仙人惡意所作。彼答言爾佛言。身業能作
T2271_.68.0511c26: 此耶。彼言不能。佛告彼曰。汝今豈不
T2271_.68.0511c27: 所言。彼便自伏。於此三中。應理論者依
T2271_.68.0511c28: 彼破以通前難云云
T2271_.68.0511c29: 又云。諸預流者未此愛耶者。是應理者
T2271_.68.0512a01: 問。審定他宗。若不他宗他過失。則
T2271_.68.0512a02: 理。答如是者。是分別論者答。所問理
T2271_.68.0512a03: 定故言
T2271_.68.0512a04:   今案。諸立論之人對敵者立破之前。必
T2271_.68.0512a05: 審察。而古師以之爲能立支。陳那雖
T2271_.68.0512a06: 之。不無審察之義以此思之。外
T2271_.68.0512a07: 道立我宗之時。若審察之時。論神我也。
T2271_.68.0512a08: 我宗者。直就言陳自相過。若審
T2271_.68.0512a09: 察之時。不指言神我者。令假我。可
T2271_.68.0512a10: 意許過也。如是之義尤因明之綱要
T2271_.68.0512a11: 也。不學耳
T2271_.68.0512a12: 問。理門論云。説宗法相應相應者明
T2271_.68.0512a13: 異二喩
T2271_.68.0512a14: 疏云
T2271_.68.0512a15: 定賓疏云
T2271_.68.0512a16:   問。瑜伽論所説八種能立。皆非陳那所説
T2271_.68.0512a17: 云耶。進云皆非親勝。所以不
T2271_.68.0512a18: 之。其中辨因及同類異類。豈非親勝陳
T2271_.68.0512a19: 那之所許耶
T2271_.68.0512a20: 疏云。古師所立八・四・三等過爲増勝故。
T2271_.68.0512a21: 似立云云
T2271_.68.0512a22:   尋云。合結支離因喩別義故不立者。
T2271_.68.0512a23: 亦不無合倒合過
T2271_.68.0512a24: 邑記云。疏古師所立皆非親勝者。雖此三
T2271_.68.0512a25: 相亦在八・四等中。然此三相望所立。義唯
T2271_.68.0512a26: 親唯勝。彼八・四等亦兼勝劣。此言皆者。不
T2271_.68.0512a27: 是當八等中皆非親勝。意説。立八・四等。不
T2271_.68.0512a28: 唯立三相。故説八・四等親勝
T2271_.68.0512a29: 云云
T2271_.68.0512b01: 前記云。問。合結離喩無別體。三支之外不
T2271_.68.0512b02: 支。合結離喩不支。亦應似喩不
T2271_.68.0512b03: 過。答下疏文即是答也。過中増勝故別立也。
T2271_.68.0512b04: 又解。無合倒合體即喩過。離喩之外二無
T2271_.68.0512b05: 。同於合結離喩外無
T2271_.68.0512b06:   明忍已講於春日三十講願超
T2271_.68.0512b07: 問。攝論中。對小乘立量云。不共無明於
T2271_.68.0512b08: 五識中有。無能對治云云
T2271_.68.0512b09: 者正比量歟。答。爾也。付之。既無同喩。豈
T2271_.68.0512b10: 闕減過性*耶。況述異喩離。諸有能治
T2271_.68.0512b11: 者有不共無明云云豈非倒離過*耶
T2271_.68.0512b12: 纂云。有依此論此例非云云
T2271_.68.0512b13:   又尋云
T2271_.68.0512b14: 問。有人意。對法論八種能立中合支。瑜伽
T2271_.68.0512b15: 論同類也云云爾者淄州大師可此義
T2271_.68.0512b16: 耶。進云。不許也。付之。合支即同喩也。何
T2271_.68.0512b17: 之耶
T2271_.68.0512b18: 斷云。有人會對法・瑜伽愛憎與奪何太不
T2271_.68.0512b19: 云云
T2271_.68.0512b20:   尋云
T2271_.68.0512b21: 問。因明論并如實論。可瑜伽支分
T2271_.68.0512b22: 又云。有人自問答云何得本論云云
T2271_.68.0512b23:   尋云。如實論亦爲瑜伽支分者。除何取
T2271_.68.0512b24: 之耶
T2271_.68.0512b25: 問。論云。唯此三分説名能立心何
T2271_.68.0512b26: 尋云。違楞伽經説。如何
T2271_.68.0512b27: 問若遮四等説名唯三。何故楞伽經説
T2271_.68.0512b28: 五分論耶。故彼經云復次大惠一切
T2271_.68.0512b29: 法不生者。菩薩不是宗。何以故。五分
T2271_.68.0512c01: 多過故。彼經佛意。一切法無
T2271_.68.0512c02: 。名無生。非フニハ無生
T2271_.68.0512c03: 。然大惠意。欲ント一切法皆不。佛遮
T2271_.68.0512c04: シテ云。汝如セハ不生。於五分論
T2271_.68.0512c05: ルカ多過故解云。由世多説五分論。佛
T2271_.68.0512c06: 世俗五分名。非是世尊成立有五。故
T2271_.68.0512c07: 三分。不彼經云云五分者。宗・因・
T2271_.68.0512c08: 喩・合・結也
T2271_.68.0512c09:   問。因與二喩別體
T2271_.68.0512c10: 纂云。問。因二品之與トハ異喩
T2271_.68.0512c11: 所依亦同此解云云
T2271_.68.0512c12:   問。樂爲之言可似比量耶。答。通云云
T2271_.68.0512c13:
T2271_.68.0512c14: 疏云。樂爲有二。一當時樂爲今顯
T2271_.68.0512c15: 故名似宗云云
T2271_.68.0512c16: 明詮噵云。雖樂成立者。當時樂爲。今成立
T2271_.68.0512c17: 故。由與現量等者。後時樂爲。由更可成立
T2271_.68.0512c18: 云云
T2271_.68.0512c19: 明燈抄云。疏上卷云。又於宗内樂爲言
T2271_.68.0512c20: 似周訖。因喩略之。若准彼説。因喩亦
T2271_.68.0512c21: 是樂所成立。豈是徳收。眞因喩等當時立故。
T2271_.68.0512c22: 諸過故。此即徳中亦有失也。義兼徳失。
T2271_.68.0512c23: 其言虚也。然上卷文且擧傍説。非是正義
T2271_.68.0512c24: 故前後文理不相違云云
T2271_.68.0512c25:   尋云。由現量等相違故名似立宗者。
T2271_.68.0512c26: 其似宗總明九似宗歟。若言似宗九過
T2271_.68.0512c27: 者。論疏云現量等相違之文如
T2271_.68.0512c28:
T2271_.68.0512c29: 若非九似宗者。既云似立宗。列九過
T2271_.68.0513a01: 文云。已説似宗。亦亘九似宗*耶。依
T2271_.68.0513a02: 之文軌師如此釋耶
T2271_.68.0513a03: 文軌疏上云。樂所成立義該眞似。雖復樂
T2271_.68.0513a04: 爲所立之宗。然與現量等九義相違故。似非
T2271_.68.0513a05: 眞也云云
T2271_.68.0513a06: 明燈抄云。玄應師云。以義應言。由現量
T2271_.68.0513a07: 相違等故。説名似宗。以所等中後四非
T2271_.68.0513a08: 相違義故。此言有理。如何今云若與現量
T2271_.68.0513a09: 相違故。所等後四豈有相違義。故今解
T2271_.68.0513a10: 云。列名有二。初隨古列。後隨今列。隨古列
T2271_.68.0513a11: 者。現量相違等五是也。陳那唯立此五。故理
T2271_.68.0513a12: 門云非彼相違義能遣。隨今列者。能列不極
T2271_.68.0513a13: 成等四是也。天主更加餘四。今論文云
T2271_.68.0513a14: 與現量等相違故者。且隨古意去似宗
T2271_.68.0513a15: 是故唯取五種相違。不後四。以義應言。
T2271_.68.0513a16: 現量等五相違。説名似宗。後之四種
T2271_.68.0513a17: 既非相違。所以略之。天主宗過不但相違
T2271_.68.0513a18: 故加後四。今天主意不古旨。且擧五違
T2271_.68.0513a19: 似立宗。若隨今簡。且標九過。應
T2271_.68.0513a20: 。人多不古今別意。説現等九義
T2271_.68.0513a21: 者。不但乖論主之旨。亦違翻譯之家。文
T2271_.68.0513a22: 旨幽深。應劬勞云云
T2271_.68.0513a23: 略纂二云。樂爲所立義苞眞似。樂所成宗與
T2271_.68.0513a24: 現量等九相違故。名似立宗云云
T2271_.68.0513a25:   問
T2271_.68.0513a26: 疏云。初顯法。次顯有。後顯云云
T2271_.68.0513a27: 明燈抄云。今云。初顯法者。初五相違。乖
T2271_.68.0513a28: 者違也。法者。現・比・教詮・俗理・語言。名
T2271_.68.0513a29: 法。五種似宗乖違五法。故云云云
T2271_.68.0513b01: 又云。案云。是遣諸法自相門故。釋初五
T2271_.68.0513b02: 相違所由。宗之有法名爲自相。局附自體
T2271_.68.0513b03: 他故。立敵證智名之爲門。由能照
T2271_.68.0513b04: 法自相故。立法有法。擬他順智。今標
T2271_.68.0513b05: 。他智解返生。異智既生。正解不起。無
T2271_.68.0513b06: 解所宗義故。名爲遣門云云
T2271_.68.0513b07:   已上五相違了
T2271_.68.0513b08: 又云。次顯有者。次三不成。所依非有。宗
T2271_.68.0513b09: 義不成。故云非有云云
T2271_.68.0513b10: 上文云。不成者。宗依無過。宗可成。
T2271_.68.0513b11: 依既不成。更須成立。故所立宗不成也。
T2271_.68.0513b12: 故似宗内立次三過云云
T2271_.68.0513b13:   已上三不成了
T2271_.68.0513b14: 又云。後顯功者。相符過也云云
T2271_.68.0513b15: 上文云。立無果者。果謂果利。對敵申宗。
T2271_.68.0513b16: 本諍先競。返順他義。所立無果。由此相符
T2271_.68.0513b17: 亦爲過失云云
T2271_.68.0513b18: 下文云。夫論之樂爲邪義異宗。聲
T2271_.68.0513b19: 之所聞主賓咸許。所見既等。豈藉言成。故
T2271_.68.0513b20: 此立宗有相符過云云
T2271_.68.0513b21:   已上相符了
T2271_.68.0513b22: 自他共失不失之事
T2271_.68.0513b23: 疏云。乖法有二。自教・自語故此五違皆是
T2271_.68.0513b24: 過攝云云
T2271_.68.0513b25:   尋云。違教失豈不共教耶。如大乘異
T2271_.68.0513b26: 師相符成立敵
T2271_.68.0513b27: 又云。宗非兩許依若不成。宗依何立云云
T2271_.68.0513b28: 明詮噵云。言乖法有二者。一者自教・自語。
T2271_.68.0513b29: 唯違自爲失。意云。唯依自教而立。不
T2271_.68.0513c01: 他教。唯依自語而立。不他語。故唯以
T2271_.68.0513c02: 自爲失。不他共失也。二者現・比・
T2271_.68.0513c03: 世間三相違者。唯以自共失。不以違
T2271_.68.0513c04: 他爲失也。本立量意欲違他故。能別所別
T2271_.68.0513c05: 倶不三種不成。並皆違自他共失。由
T2271_.68.0513c06: 他共極成方成能別等故。以違他亦爲失。
T2271_.68.0513c07: 故唯識比量云。若他方佛色立爲唯識。有
T2271_.68.0513c08: 一分所別不成過。若後身菩薩染汚色立爲
T2271_.68.0513c09: 唯識。即有自一分所別不成過。故以極成
T2271_.68.0513c10: 簡別也云云
T2271_.68.0513c11: 明燈抄云
T2271_.68.0513c12:   問。付現量相違全分四句。且佛弟子對
T2271_.68.0513c13: 量云。覺樂欲嗔應非我現境云云
T2271_.68.0513c14: 爾者此量宗可自能別不成過耶。答有
T2271_.68.0513c15: 云云
T2271_.68.0513c16: 疏云。有違他現今此但違他現量
T2271_.68.0513c17: 云云
T2271_.68.0513c18: 邑記云。疏雖此亦有自能別不成違他現
T2271_.68.0513c19: 者。佛弟子雖我。豈不我現
T2271_.68.0513c20: 耶。而云自能別不成者。未其意
T2271_.68.0513c21: 云云
T2271_.68.0513c22: 明燈抄云。佛法不神我故。能別不成
T2271_.68.0513c23: 云云
T2271_.68.0513c24:   以此等文。可四分建立法差別有
T2271_.68.0513c25: 宗過之義
T2271_.68.0513c26: 問。違自一分現他句體何物耶
T2271_.68.0513c27: 疏云。有違自一分現他。如勝論説一
T2271_.68.0513c28: 切違自一分云云
T2271_.68.0513c29: 明詮噵云。三極微眼不得。三麁大眼根得者。
T2271_.68.0514a01: 唯據色塵也。基意亦同云云
T2271_.68.0514a02:   尋云
T2271_.68.0514a03: 明燈抄云。第一句中。風大及三極微非
T2271_.68.0514a04: 。三麁可得者。風大麁細非眼根得。地水
T2271_.68.0514a05: 火三麁眼根得。細非根得。是此疏意。唯識疏
T2271_.68.0514a06: 云實句之中。地水火風父母極微非現量得
T2271_.68.0514a07: 子微以上是現量得。下破順世及勝論中云。
T2271_.68.0514a08: 極微聚集足根境。何用果爲。故知耳也。
T2271_.68.0514a09: 二文何違。今會通云。此文別委。彼文總也。彼
T2271_.68.0514a10: 子微以上現量得者。具而應子微以
T2271_.68.0514a11: 上除風餘三是現量得。若不爾者。違彼宗
T2271_.68.0514a12: 云云
T2271_.68.0514a13: 後記云
T2271_.68.0514a14:   現量體之事
T2271_.68.0514a15: 疏云。現量體者。立敵親證現量相違
T2271_.68.0514a16: 云云
T2271_.68.0514a17:   尋云。何以耳根爲現量體
T2271_.68.0514a18: 前記云。疏耳爲現體等者。顯現名現。耳亦名
T2271_.68.0514a19: 現。現量名現。唯是其識。今言其耳名
T2271_.68.0514a20: 。現量具故。亦名現量云云
T2271_.68.0514a21: 邑記云。疏耳爲現體等者。問。現量體者。謂
T2271_.68.0514a22: 自相智。云何色根名爲現體。答。如瑜伽
T2271_.68.0514a23: 第十五説是現量誰所有耶。答。略説四
T2271_.68.0514a24: 種所有。一色根現量。二意受現量。三世間現
T2271_.68.0514a25: 量。四清淨現量。色根現量者。謂五色根所行
T2271_.68.0514a26: 境界○既云色根現量謂五色根所行境界
T2271_.68.0514a27: 故知色根得現體。非唯智云云
T2271_.68.0514a28:   問。於現量相違一分四句。爾者自他
T2271_.68.0514a29: 倶不一分句體何物耶
T2271_.68.0514b01: 疏云。倶不一分彼教。非現量
T2271_.68.0514b02: 云云
T2271_.68.0514b03: 明詮噵云。然數論及佛弟子。不自性及我
T2271_.68.0514b04: 現量得。故云倶不違一分云云
T2271_.68.0514b05: 後記云。自性我體皆轉變無常者。自他皆不
T2271_.68.0514b06: 現量也。故言倶不違一分。問。是全不
T2271_.68.0514b07: 違。何者一分。答。雖全不違。亦得倶不
T2271_.68.0514b08: 違一分。以全分故也云云
T2271_.68.0514b09:   比量相違之事
T2271_.68.0514b10: 疏云。比量體者。謂證敵者故所立宗名
T2271_.68.0514b11: 量相違云云
T2271_.68.0514b12:   今案。比量者。敵證者依立者立因
T2271_.68.0514b13: 立宗正智也。宗與因相順之時。敵證正智
T2271_.68.0514b14: 生。宗既違因。敵證他智返起。故所立宗
T2271_.68.0514b15: 比量相違。意因比量境故。相從名
T2271_.68.0514b16: 。今違此因故云比量相違歟。故理門
T2271_.68.0514b17: 論云。是近及遠比度因故。倶名比量
T2271_.68.0514b18: 敵證正智。名比量相違。所謂初無
T2271_.68.0514b19: 後無故正因。生瓶等無常比知正智。而
T2271_.68.0514b20: 瓶等是常宗違彼因。敵證之智返起。令
T2271_.68.0514b21: 智不起之當。即名比量相違追可
T2271_.68.0514b22: 明燈抄云
T2271_.68.0514b23:   問。十地菩薩現量心可第七識
T2271_.68.0514b24: 疏云。有違他比眼根等。爲六依
T2271_.68.0514b25: 云云
T2271_.68.0514b26: 前記云。疏如小乘對大乘爲六依者。此意
T2271_.68.0514b27: 即末那識唯現量知有。所以捨之。捨者
T2271_.68.0514b28: 除也。餘並知有。現等五識即依眼等根。第
T2271_.68.0514b29: 六意識即依第七。即此第七爲第六所依。即
T2271_.68.0514c01: 第六所依也。比量相違者。違大乘比量也。
T2271_.68.0514c02: 量云。第六識必有倶生不共依等量也云云
T2271_.68.0514c03:   尋云。妙觀察智豈不第七識
T2271_.68.0514c04: 明燈抄云。第二句中。如眼根等六依
T2271_.68.0514c05: 者。如唯識云。眼等五根非現量得。以能發
T2271_.68.0514c06: 識比知是有。以之例云。第七末那非現量
T2271_.68.0514c07: 。以意識知是有云云
T2271_.68.0514c08: 明詮引仁云。大乘在因位亦雖現量知。而
T2271_.68.0514c09: 今對小乘比量信故。云佛等
T2271_.68.0514c10: 云云
T2271_.68.0514c11:   問。付勝論六句義。爾者除和合句義
T2271_.68.0514c12: 皆現量得可云耶
T2271_.68.0514c13: 疏云。有違自一分比和合一句比量
T2271_.68.0514c14: 知故云云
T2271_.68.0514c15: 明燈抄云。第一句中。彼説前五現量所得等
T2271_.68.0514c16: 者。唯識疏云。總言業・有・倶分三唯現得。異・
T2271_.68.0514c17: 及和合・有能・無能・無説五非現得。餘二通
T2271_.68.0514c18: 二。案云。前五句中。業句大有・同異性三唯
T2271_.68.0514c19: 現得。和合句義非現量得。實句徳句通現及
T2271_.68.0514c20: 。且實句中。地水風父母極微非現量得。子
T2271_.68.0514c21: 微以上是現量得。餘空・時・方・我意。此五實
T2271_.68.0514c22: 句非現量得。徳句之中。聲・覺・樂・苦・欲・嗔・
T2271_.68.0514c23: 勤勇・重。此八徳句唯現量得。法非法全・行少
T2271_.68.0514c24: 分二徳半。唯非。此行即是行中念因。
T2271_.68.0514c25: 全取行。故是半也。色・味・香・觸・數・量・別
T2271_.68.0514c26: 性・合・離・彼性・此性・液性・潤・及勢用十三徳
T2271_.68.0514c27: 半。並通二種。此中勢用即行作因。非全取
T2271_.68.0514c28: 行。故是半也。今此疏云前五現量所得。即
T2271_.68.0514c29: 唯識疏文。何會之也。今會通云。實・徳二
T2271_.68.0515a01: 句唯取現。不比。總對和合
T2271_.68.0515a02: 五現。若言前五唯現量得。可此違。既
T2271_.68.0515a03: 唯故不違也。雖此通。義猶難
T2271_.68.0515a04: 云云
T2271_.68.0515a05:   問
T2271_.68.0515a06: 疏云。有違他一分比佛已外皆比
T2271_.68.0515a07: 得故云云
T2271_.68.0515a08: 明燈抄云。第二句中。彼説五根除佛已外皆
T2271_.68.0515a09: 比得故者。色等五塵世間共見。現量所得。眼
T2271_.68.0515a10: 等五根非現量得。若依大乘。雖第八識縁
T2271_.68.0515a11: 及如來等縁是現量得。世不共信。餘散心中
T2271_.68.0515a12: 現量得。以但能有識之用。比知是有
T2271_.68.0515a13: 此非他心及凡六識現量所得。問。對一切
T2271_.68.0515a14: 者。所對敵者是小乘也。如來小乘許亦現
T2271_.68.0515a15: 量得。如何今云佛已外耶。答。雖如來小
T2271_.68.0515a16: 乘亦許現量得。而非世共許。故不證。然
T2271_.68.0515a17: 此句意。除佛所縁小乘宗。根唯比得。不
T2271_.68.0515a18: 現量。大乘之中。除佛餘位五根並通
T2271_.68.0515a19: 比所得。望爲根是比量得。望第八識
T2271_.68.0515a20: 量所得。故不自五根比得云云
T2271_.68.0515a21:   問。付比量相違一分四句。爾者違共一分
T2271_.68.0515a22: 作法如何
T2271_.68.0515a23: 疏云。有違共一分比。如明論師他全。自宗
T2271_.68.0515a24: 一分云云
T2271_.68.0515a25: 後記云。問。明論聲常。自立一切聲皆是常
T2271_.68.0515a26: 自宗一分比量。對佛法立。佛法全是
T2271_.68.0515a27: 無常。何言一分。答。若論生滅以解無常。佛
T2271_.68.0515a28: 果法中聲亦無常。以有爲法皆生滅故。今
T2271_.68.0515a29: 無常色得常色。是色收可常也。
T2271_.68.0515b01: 果位故。言共一分比量云云
T2271_.68.0515b02:   明燈抄心同
T2271_.68.0515b03: 邑記云。疏有違共一分比如明論師對佛法
T2271_.68.0515b04: 等者。疏中應聲論。彼許内聲常。外聲及
T2271_.68.0515b05: 音闇聲皆無常故。可一分。或對勝論。彼
T2271_.68.0515b06: 聲性常。餘聲無常。皆無理。今對佛法。乃
T2271_.68.0515b07: 是他全。非四句攝。又明論聲。佛法全不
T2271_.68.0515b08: 有。不其常與無常。餘一分聲定是無
T2271_.68.0515b09: 常。約此名爲共一分。義可通也云云
T2271_.68.0515b10: 明詮噵引備説云。問。佛法云。明論聲及餘
T2271_.68.0515b11: 一切聲並皆無常。此即違他全分比也。何故
T2271_.68.0515b12: 今云違共一分比耶。答。且除明論聲。約
T2271_.68.0515b13: 而云違一分比也。據實言之。第二説是
T2271_.68.0515b14: 正義。謂違他全比自宗一分比
T2271_.68.0515b15: 卷首書皮裏
T2271_.68.0515b16:   問。聲論師出家爲僧時。聲常宗不立。爲
T2271_.68.0515b17: 當如何。答。出家時尚立聲常宗。故四分戒
T2271_.68.0515b18: 本末。説七滅諍中言諍云。如聲論師。出
T2271_.68.0515b19: 家爲僧。仍執舊法聲爲常。無質礙故。
T2271_.68.0515b20: 猶如瓶等。然聲事一。無常理立敵無諍。
T2271_.68.0515b21: 是諍體云云
T2271_.68.0515b22: 因明大疏抄卷第十三
T2271_.68.0515b23:   癸丑冬十一月初三日晩課時。以原本校正已畢
T2271_.68.0515b24:
T2271_.68.0515b25:
T2271_.68.0515b26:
T2271_.68.0515b27:
T2271_.68.0515b28:
T2271_.68.0515b29:
T2271_.68.0515c01:
T2271_.68.0515c02:
T2271_.68.0515c03:
T2271_.68.0515c04:
T2271_.68.0515c05:
T2271_.68.0515c06:
T2271_.68.0515c07:
T2271_.68.0515c08:
T2271_.68.0515c09:
T2271_.68.0515c10:
T2271_.68.0515c11:
T2271_.68.0515c12:
T2271_.68.0515c13:
T2271_.68.0515c14:
T2271_.68.0515c15:
T2271_.68.0515c16:
T2271_.68.0515c17:
T2271_.68.0515c18:
T2271_.68.0515c19:
T2271_.68.0515c20:
T2271_.68.0515c21:
T2271_.68.0515c22:
T2271_.68.0515c23:
T2271_.68.0515c24:
T2271_.68.0515c25:
T2271_.68.0515c26:
T2271_.68.0515c27:
T2271_.68.0515c28:
T2271_.68.0515c29:
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 

[First] [Prev+100] [Prev] 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 [Next] [Next+100] [Last] [行番号:/]   [返り点:/] [CITE]