大正蔵検索


punctuation    Hangul    Eng   

Citation style A:
Citation style B:
()
Citation style C:
()
Citation style D:
()
TextNo.
Vol.
Page

  INBUDS
INBUDS(Bibliographic Database)
  Digital Dictionary of Buddhism
電子佛教辭典
パスワードがない場合は「guest」でログインしてください。
Users who do not have a password can log in with the userID "guest".

本文をドラッグして選択するとDDBの見出し語検索結果が表示されます。

Select a portion of the text by dragging your mouse to view all terms in the text contained in the DDB. ・

Password Access Policies

阿毘達磨順正理論 (No. 1562_ 衆賢玄奘譯 ) in Vol. 29

[First] [Prev+100] [Prev] 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 [Next] [Next+100] [Last] [行番号:/]   [返り点:/] [CITE]

T1562_.29.0746a01: 修無用故不可修
T1562_.29.0746a02: *説一切有部順正理論*卷第七十四
T1562_.29.0746a03:
T1562_.29.0746a04:
T1562_.29.0746a05:
T1562_.29.0746a06: 阿毘達磨順正理論卷第七十五
T1562_.29.0746a07:   尊者衆賢造
T1562_.29.0746a08:  *三藏法師玄奘奉  *詔譯 
T1562_.29.0746a09:   *辯智品第七之三
T1562_.29.0746a10: 如是已辯諸智差別。智所成徳今當顯示。於
T1562_.29.0746a11: 中先*辯佛不共徳。且初成佛盡智位修不共
T1562_.29.0746a12: 佛法有十八種。何謂十八。頌曰
T1562_.29.0746a13:     十八不共法 謂佛十力等
T1562_.29.0746a14: 論曰。佛十力四無畏三念住及大悲。如是合
T1562_.29.0746a15: 名爲十八不共法。唯於諸佛盡智時修。餘聖
T1562_.29.0746a16: 所無。故名不共。且佛十力差別云何。頌曰
T1562_.29.0746a17:     力處非處十 業八除滅道
T1562_.29.0746a18:     定根解界九 遍趣九或十
T1562_.29.0746a19:     宿住死生俗 盡六或十智
T1562_.29.0746a20:     宿住死生智 依靜慮餘通
T1562_.29.0746a21:     贍部男佛身 於境無礙故
T1562_.29.0746a22: 論曰。佛十力者。一處非處智力具以如來十
T1562_.29.0746a23: 智爲性。爲依何義立此力名。佛於經中自作
T1562_.29.0746a24: 是説。苾芻諦聽。如來於處如實知處。如來於
T1562_.29.0746a25: 非處如實知非處。乃至廣説。知一切法自性
T1562_.29.0746a26: 功能理定是有。名爲處智。知一切法自性功
T1562_.29.0746a27: 能理定非有。名非處智。此智通縁情非情
T1562_.29.0746a28: 境。與一切智皆不相違。恐於略説少功難悟。
T1562_.29.0746a29: 故復此中析出餘九。如薄伽梵多界經中自
T1562_.29.0746b01: 廣分別。處非處義身等惡行。感非愛果。定有
T1562_.29.0746b02: 是處。感可愛果。必無是處。乃至廣説。於彼經
T1562_.29.0746b03: 中所未説者我依餘教復略分別。謂諸如來
T1562_.29.0746b04: 猶有誤失。諸應分別而一向記。無力無畏三
T1562_.29.0746b05: 念住等不共功徳。必無是處諸聖猶起見所
T1562_.29.0746b06: 斷惑。覆罪墮惡。必無是處。造無間者現身
T1562_.29.0746b07: 見法墮邪性者現入正性。外道法内有眞沙
T1562_.29.0746b08: 門。有雖受生而無有死。有不還者復欲界
T1562_.29.0746b09: 生。有阿羅漢更受後有。有捨二種識猶現行
T1562_.29.0746b10: 處。有十三界有十九蘊有第六世。有第四諦
T1562_.29.0746b11: 有第五。必無是處。如來所使有能遮遏。世尊
T1562_.29.0746b12: 使者事未究竟。正在慈定滅盡定中。隨信法
T1562_.29.0746b13: 行者有能爲損害。北倶盧死墮惡趣中。及有
T1562_.29.0746b14: 殀。必無是處。諸行不滅涅槃非常。異
T1562_.29.0746b15: 生有能斷有頂惑於一相續二心倶行無漏爲
T1562_.29.0746b16: 因招異熟果。五識得與覺支相應。眠夢位中
T1562_.29.0746b17: 有生有死。得果退等。必無是處。有五識身無
T1562_.29.0746b18: 尋無伺。縁名過未離世爲境。有鼻舌識有覆
T1562_.29.0746b19: 無記。有生上界入現觀者。有耳見色有眼聞
T1562_.29.0746b20: 聲。舌嗅香等。必無是處。如是等類得非處名。
T1562_.29.0746b21: 與此相違皆名是處。豈不處智已知非處。諸
T1562_.29.0746b22: 非處智亦已知處。何勞雙説處非處名。雖理
T1562_.29.0746b23: 實然而雙説者。爲欲遮止無因論故説是處
T1562_.29.0746b24: 名。爲欲遮止惡因論故説非處名。依一智體
T1562_.29.0746b25: 雙説無失。寧知於一處非處力中。恐略難悟
T1562_.29.0746b26: 析出餘九力。以餘皆有此力義故。謂如實知
T1562_.29.0746b27: 惡行能感可愛異熟。妙行能感非愛異熟。必
T1562_.29.0746b28: 無是處。與此相違定有是處又如實知順退
T1562_.29.0746b29: 分定能逮勝徳。順勝進分能引退墮。必無是
T1562_.29.0746c01: 處。與此相違定有是處。又如實知若此品根
T1562_.29.0746c02: 能證此果。此根未滿此界已證。必無是處。與
T1562_.29.0746c03: 此相違定有是處。又如實知下劣勝解。鄙惡
T1562_.29.0746c04: 喜樂能逮勝徳。必無是處。與此相違定有是
T1562_.29.0746c05: 處。又如實知諸有情類界性各別而情契合。
T1562_.29.0746c06: 必無是處。與此相違定有是處。又如實知趣
T1562_.29.0746c07: 生死行能證涅槃。趣涅槃行能招生死必無
T1562_.29.0746c08: 是處。與此相違定有是處。又如實知前際有
T1562_.29.0746c09: 始必無是處。與此相違定有是處。又如實知
T1562_.29.0746c10: 未斷生結死已不生。或彼已生畢竟不死。或
T1562_.29.0746c11: 彼不往善趣惡趣必無是處。與此相違定有
T1562_.29.0746c12: 是處。又如實知非理作意能得漏盡必無是
T1562_.29.0746c13: 處。與此相違定有是處。我於如是一一力中。
T1562_.29.0746c14: 擧方隅顯處非處。若盡其事言論無窮。故
T1562_.29.0746c15: 應皆名處非處力。恐略難悟別立異名。二業
T1562_.29.0746c16: 異熟智力。八智爲性除滅道智。謂善分別如
T1562_.29.0746c17: 是類業。感如是類諸異熟果。無罣礙智名業
T1562_.29.0746c18: 異熟智力。或説名爲自業智力。謂善分別如
T1562_.29.0746c19: 是類果。是自所造業力所招。非妻子等所能
T1562_.29.0746c20: 與奪。如是類業必招自果不可貿易。無罣礙
T1562_.29.0746c21: 智名自業智力。又佛自説此力相言。苾芻諦
T1562_.29.0746c22: 聽。佛於過去未來現在。諸業法受別處別因
T1562_.29.0746c23: 別事別果皆如實知。乃至廣説。諸業有三法
T1562_.29.0746c24: 受有四。業及法受故名爲業。法受或業之法
T1562_.29.0746c25: 故名業法。即是諸業之品類義。此顯如來於
T1562_.29.0746c26: 過去等。諸業品類處等差別。及所受果能如
T1562_.29.0746c27: 實知。此中別處者是別方所義。知於某處造
T1562_.29.0746c28: 如是業。當於某處此業方熟。謂知此業天等
T1562_.29.0746c29: 處造。此業當於人等處熟。是名如實了知別
T1562_.29.0747a01: 處。言別因者。是別縁義。知如是業遇此縁熟。
T1562_.29.0747a02: 或知此業由此縁造。是名如實了知別因。言
T1562_.29.0747a03: 別事者。是別物義。知如是業至成熟時。力能
T1562_.29.0747a04: 引生色等別物。或即知業自性不同名知別
T1562_.29.0747a05: 事。謂知此業此物爲性。餘則不然。是名如實
T1562_.29.0747a06: 了知別事。言果別者。是別異熟義。知如是
T1562_.29.0747a07: 業定感異熟果。此業不定能感異熟。此業異
T1562_.29.0747a08: 熟經爾所時有不爾者。此業異熟尚有所餘
T1562_.29.0747a09: 有無餘者。如是等類異熟差別。極細難了而
T1562_.29.0747a10: 能了知。是名如實了知別果。三靜慮解脱等
T1562_.29.0747a11: 持等至智力。四根上下智力。五種種勝解智
T1562_.29.0747a12: 力。六種種界智力。如是四力皆九智性。唯除
T1562_.29.0747a13: 滅智。謂如實知諸靜慮等自性名得。方便攝
T1562_.29.0747a14: 持味淨無漏。順退住進決擇分等無罣礙智。
T1562_.29.0747a15: 名靜慮等智力。又佛自説此力相言。苾芻諦
T1562_.29.0747a16: 聽。佛於靜慮解脱等持等至。雜染清淨安立
T1562_.29.0747a17: 皆如實知。乃至廣説。靜慮等相定品當辯。
T1562_.29.0747a18: 雜染謂能障證靜慮等。清淨謂即此諸法清
T1562_.29.0747a19: 淨。諸淨法住名爲安立。或順退分名爲雜染。
T1562_.29.0747a20: 順勝進分順決擇分名爲清淨。順住分名安
T1562_.29.0747a21: 立。若如實知諸有情類能逮勝徳根品差別
T1562_.29.0747a22: 無罣礙智。名根上下智力。又佛自説此力相
T1562_.29.0747a23: 言。苾芻諦聽。佛於有情諸根上下皆如實知。
T1562_.29.0747a24: 乃至廣説。此意顯佛知諸有情諸根勝劣無
T1562_.29.0747a25: 有謬誤。雖有中根而待勝劣。是劣勝攝故不
T1562_.29.0747a26: 別顯。此中根名爲目何法。謂目信等斷善根
T1562_.29.0747a27: 者。總相續中亦有去來信等善法。或目意
T1562_.29.0747a28: 等。若如實知諸有情類喜樂差別無罣礙智。
T1562_.29.0747a29: 名種種勝解智力。又佛自説此力相言。苾芻
T1562_.29.0747b01: 諦聽。佛於有情種種勝解皆如實知。乃至廣
T1562_.29.0747b02: 説。此意顯佛知諸有情喜樂種種品類差別。
T1562_.29.0747b03: 喜樂勝解名差別故。若如實知諸有情類。前
T1562_.29.0747b04: 際無始數習所成。志性隨眠及諸法*性。種種
T1562_.29.0747b05: 差別無罣礙智。名種種界智力。又佛自説此
T1562_.29.0747b06: 力相言。苾芻諦聽。佛於世間種種界非一界
T1562_.29.0747b07: 皆如實知。乃至廣説。種種界者顯各別義。非
T1562_.29.0747b08: 一界者顯衆多義。應知此中界與志性。隨眠
T1562_.29.0747b09: 法*性名之差別。如是四力並縁有爲。故十智
T1562_.29.0747b10: 中唯攝九智。七遍趣行智力。或聲顯此義有
T1562_.29.0747b11: 二途。若謂但縁諸能趣道。九智除滅。若謂兼
T1562_.29.0747b12: 縁道所趣果。十智爲性。謂如實知生死因果。
T1562_.29.0747b13: 及知盡道無罣礙智。名遍趣行智力。又佛自
T1562_.29.0747b14: 説此力相言。苾芻諦聽。佛於一切遍趣行中
T1562_.29.0747b15: 皆如實知。乃至廣説。此意顯佛能如實知趣
T1562_.29.0747b16: 生死行趣涅槃行。趣生死中有趣地獄。乃至
T1562_.29.0747b17: 趣天。趣一一中復有多種。趣涅槃行有三乘
T1562_.29.0747b18: 別。趣一一中復有多種。依總説一遍趣行名。
T1562_.29.0747b19: 八宿住隨念智力。九死生智力。如是二力皆
T1562_.29.0747b20: 俗智性。此二力相有差別故。謂如實知自他
T1562_.29.0747b21: 過去宿住差別無罣礙智。名第八力。若如實
T1562_.29.0747b22: 知諸有情類於未來世諸有續生無罣礙智。
T1562_.29.0747b23: 名第九力。又佛自説此二相言。苾芻諦聽。佛
T1562_.29.0747b24: 於過去種種宿住一生二生。乃至廣説。佛天
T1562_.29.0747b25: 眼淨超過於人見諸有情。乃至廣説。廣*辯此
T1562_.29.0747b26: 二如六通中。十漏盡智力。或聲亦顯義有二
T1562_.29.0747b27: 途。若謂但縁漏盡爲境。六智除道苦集他心。
T1562_.29.0747b28: 若謂兼縁漏盡方便。十智爲性。理應如是以
T1562_.29.0747b29: *辯相中言於盡及爲盡無罣礙。智二種倶名
T1562_.29.0747c01: 漏盡智力。又佛自説此力相言。苾芻諦聽。佛
T1562_.29.0747c02: 漏盡故於諸無漏心慧解脱。自現通達具證
T1562_.29.0747c03: 領受。能正自知我生已盡。乃至廣説。此後三
T1562_.29.0747c04: 力即是三通。以六通中此三殊勝。在無學位
T1562_.29.0747c05: 立爲三明。在如來身亦名爲力。神境天耳設
T1562_.29.0747c06: 在佛身。亦無大用故不名力。且如天眼能見
T1562_.29.0747c07: 有情。善惡趣中異熟差別。由此能引殊勝智
T1562_.29.0747c08: 生。亦正了知能感彼業。由此建立死生智名。
T1562_.29.0747c09: 神境天耳無此大用。是故彼二不立爲力。然
T1562_.29.0747c10: 不別説他心力者。義已攝在根等力中。以他
T1562_.29.0747c11: 根等中有心心所故。又薄伽梵具一切智。於
T1562_.29.0747c12: 工論等亦得自在。而於佛事齊此已成。餘
T1562_.29.0747c13: 智於中無別勝用。是故雖有亦不別説。唯依
T1562_.29.0747c14: 遍覺十種所知。佛所應爲皆圓滿故。何等名
T1562_.29.0747c15: 曰十種所知。謂諸法中因非因義。多分散地
T1562_.29.0747c16: 業果差別。定地功徳品類不同。所化有情根
T1562_.29.0747c17: 解界異。所治能治因果差別。前際後際經歴
T1562_.29.0747c18: 不同。離染不續方便有異。但由覺此佛事已
T1562_.29.0747c19: 成。餘設有無不致益損。故唯十種得名爲力。
T1562_.29.0747c20: 又佛觀察所化有情。設教應機唯須十智。謂
T1562_.29.0747c21: 由初智觀所化生。於諸乘中堪無堪異。由第
T1562_.29.0747c22: 二智觀所化生。於相續中業障差別。由第三
T1562_.29.0747c23: 智觀所化生。於靜慮等有味無味。煩惱爲障
T1562_.29.0747c24: 輕重差別。由知此二因亦知異熟障。由第四
T1562_.29.0747c25: 智觀所化生。趣清淨品功能差別。由第五智
T1562_.29.0747c26: 觀所化生。於證淨品加行差別。由第六智觀
T1562_.29.0747c27: 所化生。於證淨品禀志性別。由第七智觀所
T1562_.29.0747c28: 化生。諸所施爲有益無益。種種差別正
T1562_.29.0747c29: 修止。由第八智觀所化生。過去世中所集差
T1562_.29.0748a01: 別。由第九智觀所化生。當來世中結生差別。
T1562_.29.0748a02: 由第十智觀所化生。所證解脱方便有異。於
T1562_.29.0748a03: 此十智若隨闕一。便不具足化有情事。多復
T1562_.29.0748a04: 無用故不増減。已辯自性依地別者。第八第
T1562_.29.0748a05: 九依四靜慮。餘八通依十一地起。欲四靜慮
T1562_.29.0748a06: 未至中間并四無色。名十一地。諸勝徳地總
T1562_.29.0748a07: 有爾所。已辯依地。依身別者。皆依贍部男子
T1562_.29.0748a08: 佛身。唯此堪爲力所依故。如是十智二乘亦
T1562_.29.0748a09: 有。何故在佛方受力名。夫受力名謂無礙轉。
T1562_.29.0748a10: 佛智於境無礙轉故。得名爲力。餘則不然。以
T1562_.29.0748a11: 諸二乘尚不能見諸有情相續順解脱分善。
T1562_.29.0748a12: 況復能知所餘深細。如舍利子捨求度人。不
T1562_.29.0748a13: 能觀知鷹所逐鴿。前後二際生多少等。大目
T1562_.29.0748a14: 乾連不能觀見。業風所引諸鬼差別。是故二
T1562_.29.0748a15: 乘天眼通等。觀界遠近與佛有殊。非無礙故
T1562_.29.0748a16: 不名爲力。二乘與佛漏盡既同。彼智何縁唯
T1562_.29.0748a17: 佛名力。唯世尊有遍達有情。一切漏盡別相
T1562_.29.0748a18: 智故。謂薄伽梵於諸有情。一切漏盡品類差
T1562_.29.0748a19: 別。智無罣礙。二乘不然。是故力名唯屬於佛。
T1562_.29.0748a20: 又唯諸佛智猛利故。如何猛利。佛智力能速
T1562_.29.0748a21: 斷煩惱并習氣故。如強弱力補特伽羅。執利
T1562_.29.0748a22: 鈍刀斬截草等。諸有情類蘊相無別。佛如何
T1562_.29.0748a23: 觀有種種界。諸有情類蘊相雖同。而於其中
T1562_.29.0748a24: 非無差別。謂彼諸蘊體雖無異。而有無量品
T1562_.29.0748a25: 類不同。佛如量知都無罣礙。故世尊得有種
T1562_.29.0748a26: 種界智力。或諸如來名稱高遠。希有智慧妙
T1562_.29.0748a27: 用無邊。唯佛能知非餘所測。於餘所了無別
T1562_.29.0748a28: 相中。何怪如來能知別相。已辯諸佛心力方
T1562_.29.0748a29: 隅。當辯菩薩時亦所成身力。頌曰
T1562_.29.0748b01:     身那羅延力 或節節皆然
T1562_.29.0748b02:     象等七十増 此觸處爲性
T1562_.29.0748b03: 論曰。佛生身力等那羅延。有餘師言。佛身
T1562_.29.0748b04: 支節一一皆具那羅延力。理實諸佛身力無
T1562_.29.0748b05: 邊猶如心力。能持無上正等菩提大功徳故。
T1562_.29.0748b06: 大覺獨覺及轉輪王。*支節相連如其次第。似
T1562_.29.0748b07: 龍蟠結連鎻相鉤。故三相望力有勝劣。那羅
T1562_.29.0748b08: 延力其量云何。十十倍増象等七力。謂凡
T1562_.29.0748b09: 象。香象。摩訶諾健那。鉢羅塞建提。伐浪伽遮
T1562_.29.0748b10: 怒羅。那羅延。後後力増前前十倍。有説前
T1562_.29.0748b11: 六十十倍増。敵那羅延半身之力。此力一倍
T1562_.29.0748b12: 成那羅延。有餘師説。此量如千藹羅伐拏天
T1562_.29.0748b13: 象王力。此象王力其量云何。三十三天將遊
T1562_.29.0748b14: 戲苑。象王知已化作諸頭種種莊嚴。往天宮
T1562_.29.0748b15: 所。諸天眷屬數有多千。乘已騰空如持樺葉。
T1562_.29.0748b16: 速至戲苑隨意歡娯。天大象王力勢如是。此
T1562_.29.0748b17: 力千倍等那羅延。於諸説中唯多應理。如是
T1562_.29.0748b18: 身力觸處爲性。此應總是諸觸差別。有説。唯
T1562_.29.0748b19: 是大種差別。有説。是造觸離七外有。有説。力
T1562_.29.0748b20: 是重劣者是輕。如是名爲佛生身力。佛四無
T1562_.29.0748b21: 畏相別云何。頌曰
T1562_.29.0748b22:     四無畏如次 初十二七力
T1562_.29.0748b23: 論曰。佛四無畏如經廣説。一正等覺無畏。十
T1562_.29.0748b24: 智爲性。猶如初力。二漏永盡無畏。六十智性。
T1562_.29.0748b25: 如第十力。三説障法無畏。八智爲性。如第二
T1562_.29.0748b26: 力。四説出道無畏。九十智性。如第七力。何縁
T1562_.29.0748b27: 諸佛無畏唯四。但由此量顯佛世尊。自他圓
T1562_.29.0748b28: 徳倶究竟故。謂初無畏顯佛世尊自智圓徳。
T1562_.29.0748b29: 第二無畏顯佛世尊自斷圓徳。此二顯佛自
T1562_.29.0748c01: 利徳滿。爲顯世尊利他圓徳。是故復説後二
T1562_.29.0748c02: 無畏。第三無畏遮行邪道。第四無畏令趍正
T1562_.29.0748c03: 道。謂佛處處爲諸弟子。説障法令斷除即是
T1562_.29.0748c04: 令修斷徳方便。又於處處爲諸弟子。説出道
T1562_.29.0748c05: 令正行。即是令修智徳方便。此二顯佛利他
T1562_.29.0748c06: 徳滿。但由此四隨其所應。顯佛自他智斷圓
T1562_.29.0748c07: 徳。至究竟故唯立四種。如何可説無畏即智。
T1562_.29.0748c08: 應言無畏是智所成。理實應然。但爲顯示無
T1562_.29.0748c09: 畏以智爲親近因。是故就智出無畏體。夫無
T1562_.29.0748c10: 畏者謂不怯懼。由有智故不怯懼他。故智得
T1562_.29.0748c11: 爲無畏因性。唯佛四妙智是四無畏因。謂諸
T1562_.29.0748c12: 如來於一切法一切相妙。智是初無畏因。若
T1562_.29.0748c13: 諸如來一切煩惱并習氣斷妙智。是第二無
T1562_.29.0748c14: 畏因。唯我世尊由具此故。侵毀不慼供讃不
T1562_.29.0748c15: 歡。雖恒違拒而常饒益。雖加斫刺而深憐
T1562_.29.0748c16: 愍。雖有殊勝輔翼神通智慧技能而不傲慢。
T1562_.29.0748c17: 於欲離背不起瞋嫌。於樂親承不偏憐愛。雖
T1562_.29.0748c18: 行攝事不求輔翼。雖行訶責不願乖離。雖暫
T1562_.29.0748c19: 驅擯不以麁語。雖永擯黜不令墮邪。雖無所
T1562_.29.0748c20: 畏而不麁獷。雖常親愛而不生貪。雖顯自徳
T1562_.29.0748c21: 殉名利。雖顯他過不爲恥辱。雖攝門徒不
T1562_.29.0748c22: 成自黨。雖訶邪侶不壞他朋。族望有情數來
T1562_.29.0748c23: 親附。但示正法不與交遊。此等皆由漏盡妙
T1562_.29.0748c24: 智。故此妙智爲第二因。若諸如來知弟子衆。
T1562_.29.0748c25: 有損有益妙智。是後二無畏因。或無畏體即
T1562_.29.0748c26: 四妙智。怯懼名畏。此即於法無所了達。
T1562_.29.0748c27: 恐怖義。智於此畏有近治能。與畏相違故名
T1562_.29.0748c28: 無畏。豈不非無智即是畏體。如何説智體即
T1562_.29.0748c29: 是無畏。此責不然。智與多法爲近治故如即
T1562_.29.0749a01: 無疑。謂智如能近治無智。亦於怖畏有近治
T1562_.29.0749a02: 能。故得智名。亦名無畏。如治無智亦能治疑。
T1562_.29.0749a03: 故得智名。亦名決定。所治無智雖不即疑而
T1562_.29.0749a04: 智無疑。名二體一。如是無智雖與畏殊。而無
T1562_.29.0749a05: 畏名即目智體。一善能斷多惡法故。有説。無
T1562_.29.0749a06: 智亦攝畏體。故於此中不應爲難。力與無畏
T1562_.29.0749a07: 有何差別。此無差別體倶智故。然於智體別
T1562_.29.0749a08: 義名力。復依別義立無畏名。謂不屈因説名
T1562_.29.0749a09: 爲力。不怯懼因説名無畏。或初安立説名爲
T1562_.29.0749a10: 力。立已不動説名無畏。或非他伏説名爲力。
T1562_.29.0749a11: 能摧伏他説名無畏。有餘師説。譬如良醫遍
T1562_.29.0749a12: 達醫方。説名爲力。善療衆疾。説名無畏。有説
T1562_.29.0749a13: 驍健。説名爲力。勇悍不怯。説名無畏。如是二
T1562_.29.0749a14: 種義亦有別。謂成辦事義是力義。不怯憚義
T1562_.29.0749a15: 是無畏義。佛三念住相別云何。頌曰
T1562_.29.0749a16:     三念住念慧 縁順違倶境
T1562_.29.0749a17: 論曰。佛三念住如經廣説。諸弟子衆一向恭
T1562_.29.0749a18: 敬能正受行。如來縁之不生歡喜。捨而安住
T1562_.29.0749a19: 正念正知。是謂如來第一念住。諸弟子衆
T1562_.29.0749a20: 不恭敬不正受行。如來縁之不生憂慼。捨而
T1562_.29.0749a21: 安住正念正知。是謂如來第二念住。諸弟子
T1562_.29.0749a22: 衆一類恭敬能正受行。一類不敬不正受行。
T1562_.29.0749a23: 如來縁之不生欣慼。捨而安住正念正知。是
T1562_.29.0749a24: 謂如來第三念住。雖有所化不敬受行。而佛
T1562_.29.0749a25: 世尊亦雨法雨。由此方便彼於餘時或餘有
T1562_.29.0749a26: 情入正法故。非前説四今復説三。可總説言
T1562_.29.0749a27: 念住有七。今三攝在前四中故。謂在縁外法
T1562_.29.0749a28: 念住攝。然此三種體通念慧。謂由安住正念
T1562_.29.0749a29: 正知。於三境中不生歡慼。不可見有諸大聲
T1562_.29.0749b01: 聞。於三境中不生歡慼。便謂此三種非佛不
T1562_.29.0749b02: 共法。*唯佛於此并習斷故。善達有情種
T1562_.29.0749b03: 別故。或弟子衆隨屬如來。有順違倶應甚歡
T1562_.29.0749b04: 慼。佛能不起可謂希奇。非屬諸聲聞不起非
T1562_.29.0749b05: 奇特。故唯在佛得不共名。諸佛大悲云何相
T1562_.29.0749b06: 別。頌曰
T1562_.29.0749b07:     大悲唯俗智 資糧行相境
T1562_.29.0749b08:     平等上品故 異悲由八因
T1562_.29.0749b09: 論曰。如來大悲俗智爲性。普縁一切有情
T1562_.29.0749b10: 爲境。作苦苦等三行相故。非無漏智有如是
T1562_.29.0749b11: 理。此大悲名依何義立。依五義故此立大名。
T1562_.29.0749b12: 一由資糧故大。謂大福徳智慧資糧所成
T1562_.29.0749b13: 故。二由行相故大。謂此力能於三苦境作行
T1562_.29.0749b14: 相故。三由所縁故大。謂此總以三界有情爲
T1562_.29.0749b15: 所縁故。四由平等故大。謂此等於一切有
T1562_.29.0749b16: 情作利樂故。五由上品故大。謂最上品更無
T1562_.29.0749b17: 餘悲能齊此故。有餘師説。由大加行所證得
T1562_.29.0749b18: 故。唯大士身所成就故。入大功徳珍寶數故。
T1562_.29.0749b19: 能拔有情大苦惱故。立大悲名。悲與大悲有
T1562_.29.0749b20: 何差別。此二差別由八種因。一由自性。無瞋
T1562_.29.0749b21: 無礙自性異故。二由依身通餘。唯佛依身異
T1562_.29.0749b22: 故。三由行相。一苦三苦行相異故。四由所
T1562_.29.0749b23: 縁。一界三界所縁異故。五由依地。通餘第四
T1562_.29.0749b24: 靜慮異故。六由證得。離欲有頂證得異故。又
T1562_.29.0749b25: 悲爲先離染時得。*唯離染得有差別故。七由
T1562_.29.0749b26: 救濟。希望事成救濟異故。八由哀愍。平等
T1562_.29.0749b27: 不等哀愍異故。有餘師説。諸佛大悲遠細遍
T1562_.29.0749b28: 隨。能普饒益。聲聞等類所起悲心。不能悲愍
T1562_.29.0749b29: 色無色界。佛於上界起極悲愍。心過於二乘。
T1562_.29.0749c01: 悲愍無間獄。已*辯佛徳異餘有情。諸佛相望
T1562_.29.0749c02: 法皆等不。頌曰
T1562_.29.0749c03:     由資糧法身 利他佛相似
T1562_.29.0749c04:     壽種姓量等 諸佛有差別
T1562_.29.0749c05: 論曰。由三事故諸佛皆等一。由資糧等圓滿
T1562_.29.0749c06: 故。二由法身等成*辦故。三由利他等究竟
T1562_.29.0749c07: 故。由壽種姓身量等殊。諸佛相望容有差
T1562_.29.0749c08: 別。壽異謂佛壽有短長。種異謂佛生刹帝利
T1562_.29.0749c09: 婆羅門種。姓異謂佛姓喬答摩迦葉波等。量
T1562_.29.0749c10: 異謂佛身有小大等。言顯諸佛法住久近等。
T1562_.29.0749c11: 如是有異。由出世時所化有情機宜別故。諸
T1562_.29.0749c12: 有智者思惟如來三種圓徳深生愛敬。其三
T1562_.29.0749c13: 者何。一因圓徳。二果圓徳。三恩圓徳。初因圓
T1562_.29.0749c14: 徳復有四種。一無餘修。福徳智慧二種資糧
T1562_.29.0749c15: 修無遺故。二長時修。經三大劫阿僧企耶修
T1562_.29.0749c16: 無倦故。三無間修。精勤勇猛刹那刹那修無
T1562_.29.0749c17: 廢故。四尊重修。恭敬所學無所顧惜修無慢
T1562_.29.0749c18: 故。次果圓徳亦有四種。一智圓徳。二斷圓徳。
T1562_.29.0749c19: 三威勢圓徳。四色身圓徳。智圓徳有四種。一
T1562_.29.0749c20: 無師智。二一切智。三一切種智。四無功用智。
T1562_.29.0749c21: 斷圓徳有四種。一一切煩惱斷。二一切定障
T1562_.29.0749c22: 斷。三畢竟斷。四并習斷。威勢圓徳有四種。一
T1562_.29.0749c23: 於外境化變住持自在威勢。二於壽量若促
T1562_.29.0749c24: 若延自在威勢。三於空障極遠速行。小大相
T1562_.29.0749c25: 入自在威勢。四令世間種種本性。法爾轉勝
T1562_.29.0749c26: 希奇威勢。威勢。圓徳復有四種。一難化必能
T1562_.29.0749c27: 化。二答難必決疑。三立教必出離。四惡黨必
T1562_.29.0749c28: 能伏。色身圓徳有四種。一具衆相。二具隨好。
T1562_.29.0749c29: 三具大力。四内身骨堅越金剛。外發神光踰
T1562_.29.0750a01: 百千日。後恩圓徳亦有四種。謂令永解脱三
T1562_.29.0750a02: 惡趣生死。或能安置善趣三乘。總説如來圓
T1562_.29.0750a03: 徳如是。若別分析則有無邊。唯佛世尊能知
T1562_.29.0750a04: 能説。要留命行經多大劫。阿僧企耶説乃可
T1562_.29.0750a05: 盡。如是則顯佛世尊身具有無邊。殊勝奇特
T1562_.29.0750a06: 因果恩徳如大寶山。有諸愚夫自乏衆徳。雖
T1562_.29.0750a07: 聞如是佛功徳山及所説法。不能信重。諸有
T1562_.29.0750a08: 智者聞説如斯。生信重心徹於骨髓。彼由一
T1562_.29.0750a09: 念極信重心。轉滅無邊不定惡業。攝受殊勝
T1562_.29.0750a10: 人天涅槃。故説如來出現於世。爲諸智者無
T1562_.29.0750a11: 上福田。依之引生不空可愛殊勝速疾究竟
T1562_.29.0750a12: 果故。如薄伽梵自説。頌曰
T1562_.29.0750a13:     若於佛福田 能殖少分善
T1562_.29.0750a14:     初獲勝善趣 後必得涅槃
T1562_.29.0750a15: 已説如來不共功徳。共功徳今當*辯。頌曰
T1562_.29.0750a16:     復有餘佛法 共餘聖異生
T1562_.29.0750a17:     謂無諍願智 無礙解等徳
T1562_.29.0750a18: 論曰。世尊復有無量功徳。與餘聖者及異生
T1562_.29.0750a19: 共。謂無諍願智無礙解通。靜慮無色等至等
T1562_.29.0750a20: 持。無量解脱勝處遍處等。隨其所應。謂前三
T1562_.29.0750a21: 門唯共餘聖。通靜慮等亦共異生。雖佛身中
T1562_.29.0750a22: 一切功徳。行相清淨殊勝自在。與聲聞等功
T1562_.29.0750a23: 徳有殊。然依類同説名爲共。且共餘聖。三功
T1562_.29.0750a24: 徳中。無諍云何。頌曰
T1562_.29.0750a25:     無諍世俗智 後靜慮不動
T1562_.29.0750a26:     三洲縁未生 欲界有事惑
T1562_.29.0750a27: 論曰。有阿羅漢憶昔多生。受雜類身發自他
T1562_.29.0750a28: 惑。由斯相續受非愛果。便作是念。有煩惱身
T1562_.29.0750a29: 縁之起惑。尚招苦果。況離煩惱具勝徳身。思
T1562_.29.0750b01: 已發生如是相智。由此方便令他有情。不縁
T1562_.29.0750b02: 己身生貪瞋等。此皆但以俗智爲性。縁他未
T1562_.29.0750b03: 來修斷惑故。非無漏智此行相轉。若無諍體
T1562_.29.0750b04: 是智所攝。如何説習無諍等持。此不相違
T1562_.29.0750b05: 一相應品。有多功徳隨説一故。如一山中有
T1562_.29.0750b06: 種種物。隨擧一種以標山名。理應無諍。是智
T1562_.29.0750b07: 所攝護他相續。當來惑生巧便爲先事方成
T1562_.29.0750b08: 故。然一切諍總有三種。蘊言煩惱有差別故。
T1562_.29.0750b09: 蘊諍謂死。言諍謂鬪。煩惱諍謂百八煩惱。由
T1562_.29.0750b10: 此俗智力。能止息煩惱諍故得無諍名。此智
T1562_.29.0750b11: 但依第四靜慮違苦因故。第四靜慮樂通行
T1562_.29.0750b12: 中最爲勝故。不動應果能起非餘。餘尚不能
T1562_.29.0750b13: 自防起惑。況能止息他身煩惱。此唯依止三
T1562_.29.0750b14: 洲人身。非北及餘性猛利故。縁欲未起有
T1562_.29.0750b15: 惑生。勿令他惑縁我生故。諸無事惑不可遮
T1562_.29.0750b16: 防。内起隨應總縁境故。已*辯無諍。願智云
T1562_.29.0750b17: 何。頌曰
T1562_.29.0750b18:     願智能遍縁 餘如無諍説
T1562_.29.0750b19: 論曰。以願爲先引妙智起。如願而了故名願
T1562_.29.0750b20: 智。此智自性地種性身與無諍同。但所縁別。
T1562_.29.0750b21: 以一切法爲所縁故。如何願智能知未來。審
T1562_.29.0750b22: 觀過現而比知故。如觀稼穡有盛有微。比知
T1562_.29.0750b23: 其田有良有薄。若爾何故立願智名。有學異
T1562_.29.0750b24: 生亦能知故。不爾所知定不定故。而聞傳説
T1562_.29.0750b25: 諸大聲聞。記未來事有不定者。非起願智有
T1562_.29.0750b26: 此謬知。餘俗智觀所記別故。惑彼所記無
T1562_.29.0750b27: 不定失。但觀於始不觀終故。如先降雨未至
T1562_.29.0750b28: 地間。爲羅怙羅之所承棄。先所懷孕其實是
T1562_.29.0750b29: 男。彼於後時轉形成女。王舍城鬼初戰得勝。
T1562_.29.0750c01: 後爲廣嚴諸鬼摧伏。人欲相伐鬼先戰故。或
T1562_.29.0750c02: 實願智方見未來。然加行時先起比智。觀過
T1562_.29.0750c03: 現世准度未來。引願智生方能眞見。即由此
T1562_.29.0750c04: 故能知無色。謂先觀彼因行等流。有比智生
T1562_.29.0750c05: 引眞願智。或觀欲色死生時心。比度而知所
T1562_.29.0750c06: 生從處。引生願智方能實知。或比智知亦無
T1562_.29.0750c07: 有失。以證比智所縁必同。若比不知如何能
T1562_.29.0750c08: 證。是則願智應不可言。力能遍縁三界三世。
T1562_.29.0750c09: 不時解脱諸阿羅漢。欲於彼境正了知時。先
T1562_.29.0750c10: 作要期願我知彼。後入邊際第四靜慮。以
T1562_.29.0750c11: 爲加行。從此無間。如先願力引正智起。於所
T1562_.29.0750c12: 期境皆如實知。邊際定言如後當釋。此願智
T1562_.29.0750c13: 力能知過去。與宿住智差別云何。願智通知
T1562_.29.0750c14: 自相共相。諸宿住智知共非餘。知共相中亦
T1562_.29.0750c15: 有差別。願智明了宿住不然。於現所縁對他
T1562_.29.0750c16: 心智。*辯差別相如理應思
T1562_.29.0750c17: *説一切有部順正理論*卷第七十五
T1562_.29.0750c18:
T1562_.29.0750c19:
T1562_.29.0750c20:
T1562_.29.0750c21: 阿毘達磨順正理論卷第七十六
T1562_.29.0750c22:   尊者衆賢造
T1562_.29.0750c23:  *三藏法師玄奘奉  *詔譯 
T1562_.29.0750c24:   辯智品第七之四
T1562_.29.0750c25: 辯願智。無礙解云何。頌曰
T1562_.29.0750c26:     無癡解有四 謂法義詞辯
T1562_.29.0750c27:     名義言説道 無退智爲性
T1562_.29.0750c28:     法詞唯俗智 五二地爲依
T1562_.29.0750c29:     義十六辯九 皆依一切地
T1562_.29.0751a01:     但得必具四 餘如無諍説
T1562_.29.0751a02: 論曰。諸無礙解總説有四。一法無礙解。二義
T1562_.29.0751a03: 無礙解。三詞無礙解。四辯無礙解。此四總説
T1562_.29.0751a04: 如其次第。以縁名義言及説道。不可退轉智
T1562_.29.0751a05: 爲自性。謂無退智縁能詮法。名句文身立
T1562_.29.0751a06: 爲第一。趣所詮義説之爲名。即是表召法自
T1562_.29.0751a07: 性義。辯所詮義説之爲句。即是辯了法差別
T1562_.29.0751a08: 義。不待義聲獨能爲覺。生所依託説之爲文。
T1562_.29.0751a09: 即是迦遮吒多波等。理應有覺不待義聲。此
T1562_.29.0751a10: 覺不應無所縁境。此所縁境説之爲文。文謂
T1562_.29.0751a11: 不能親目於義。但與名句爲詮義依。此三能
T1562_.29.0751a12: 持諸所詮義。及軌生解。故名爲法。即三自性
T1562_.29.0751a13: 説之爲身。自性體身名差別故。三與聲義極
T1562_.29.0751a14: 相隣雜。爲境生覺別相難知。故説身言顯有
T1562_.29.0751a15: 別體。若無退智縁一切法。所有勝義立爲第
T1562_.29.0751a16: 二。義即諸法自相共相。雖名身等亦是義攝。
T1562_.29.0751a17: 而非勝義。有多想故。謂有如義有不如義。有
T1562_.29.0751a18: 有義有無義。有依假轉。有依實轉。了此無間。
T1562_.29.0751a19: 或於後時諸所度量名爲勝義。爲欲顯示義
T1562_.29.0751a20: 無礙解。所縁之境非語及名。故此所縁説爲
T1562_.29.0751a21: 勝義。謂此但取依語起名。名所顯義非取
T1562_.29.0751a22: 爾。心之所行説名爲義。若無退智縁諸方域。
T1562_.29.0751a23: 俗聖言詞立爲第三。即能了知世語典語。於
T1562_.29.0751a24: 諸方域種種差別。若無退智縁應正理無滯
T1562_.29.0751a25: 礙説。及縁自在定慧二道。立爲第四。即於文
T1562_.29.0751a26: 義能正宣揚。無滯言詞説名爲辯。及諸所有
T1562_.29.0751a27: 已得功徳。不由加行任運現前自在功能。亦
T1562_.29.0751a28: 名爲辯。此能起辯立以辯名。了辯及因智名
T1562_.29.0751a29: 辯無礙解。即前所説能正宣揚。善應物機不
T1562_.29.0751b01: 違勝義。所有言説名應正理。即前所説無滯
T1562_.29.0751b02: 言詞。不待處時及有情等。辯析自在。名無滯
T1562_.29.0751b03: 礙。即上所言已得功徳。不由加行任運現前。
T1562_.29.0751b04: 名爲自在定慧二道。又能所詮相符會智。名
T1562_.29.0751b05: 初二無礙解。謂達此名屬如是義。及達此義
T1562_.29.0751b06: 有如是名。名能所詮相符會智。達時作等加
T1562_.29.0751b07: 行言詞。名第三無礙解。達所樂言説及自在
T1562_.29.0751b08: 道因。名第四無礙解。又色等六所知謂義。即
T1562_.29.0751b09: 此善等有爲無爲。色非色等差別謂法。即詮
T1562_.29.0751b10: 此二言説謂詞。三智即前三無礙解。即縁三
T1562_.29.0751b11: 種無罣礙智。名第四無礙解。又達世俗勝義
T1562_.29.0751b12: 二諦。名初二無礙解。此即行者自利圓徳。能
T1562_.29.0751b13: 善宣説如是二諦。名第三無礙解。於此善巧
T1562_.29.0751b14: 問答難通。名第四無礙解。此即行者利他圓
T1562_.29.0751b15: 徳。有説愚癡猶預散亂。是於宣辯有滯礙因。
T1562_.29.0751b16: 由解脱此三得現法樂住。及由此故利他行
T1562_.29.0751b17: 成。此智名爲辯無礙解。若得如是定能宣説。
T1562_.29.0751b18: 符會正理無滯言詞。及得現前自在功徳。又
T1562_.29.0751b19: 於名等勝義言詞。無滯説中各得善巧。如次
T1562_.29.0751b20: 建立四無礙解。前三善巧説名爲因。由境不
T1562_.29.0751b21: 同故有差別。第四名果能説無滯。又由四分
T1562_.29.0751b22: 別他事成。謂巧於文了達於義。妙閑聲韻定
T1562_.29.0751b23: 慧自在。故無礙解建立有四。此即總説無礙
T1562_.29.0751b24: 解體。兼顯四種所縁差別。契經略擧此數及
T1562_.29.0751b25: 名。諸對法中廣顯其相。又經列此先義後法。
T1562_.29.0751b26: 諸對法中先法後義。此爲顯示二智生時。或
T1562_.29.0751b27: 義因名。或名因義。故經與論作差別説。謂聽
T1562_.29.0751b28: 法者先分別名。既正知名次尋其義。正知義
T1562_.29.0751b29: 已欲爲他説。次必應求無滯説智。依此次第
T1562_.29.0751c01: 故名在先。然此四中義智最勝。餘是助伴故
T1562_.29.0751c02: 義在先。謂於義中若正了達。次應方便尋究
T1562_.29.0751c03: 其名。既已知名欲爲他説。次應於説求巧便
T1562_.29.0751c04: 智。是故此四次第如是。辯無礙解若縁説時。
T1562_.29.0751c05: 何異第三詞無礙解。第三了達訓釋言詞。如
T1562_.29.0751c06: 有變礙故名色等。此達應理無滯礙説。有説
T1562_.29.0751c07: 詞詮諸法自性。辯能顯示諸法差別。有説於
T1562_.29.0751c08: 法直説名詞。展轉無滯分析名辯。縁此二種
T1562_.29.0751c09: 三四有別。四中法詞俗智爲性。非無漏智縁
T1562_.29.0751c10: 名身等。及世言詞事境界故。法無礙解通依
T1562_.29.0751c11: 五地。謂依欲界四本靜慮。上地中無名身等
T1562_.29.0751c12: 故。彼不別縁下名等故。詞無礙解唯依二地。
T1562_.29.0751c13: 謂依欲界初本靜慮。上諸地中無尋伺故。彼
T1562_.29.0751c14: 地必無自語言故。此因非理。所以者何。非發
T1562_.29.0751c15: 語智名無礙解。勿無礙解定中無故。由此不
T1562_.29.0751c16: 應作如是説。無尋伺故上地中無。無斯過失。
T1562_.29.0751c17: 因義異故。何謂因義。謂此意言尋伺二法能
T1562_.29.0751c18: 發語故。相不寂靜自性麁動。上無此故寂靜
T1562_.29.0751c19: 微細。詞無礙解縁外言詞。亦不寂靜麁動類
T1562_.29.0751c20: 攝。是故此解上地中無。初靜慮中亦有尋伺。
T1562_.29.0751c21: 故於定内亦有此解。由此極成但依二地。義
T1562_.29.0751c22: 無礙解十六智性。謂若諸法皆名爲義。則十
T1562_.29.0751c23: 智性。若唯涅槃名爲義者則六智性。謂俗法
T1562_.29.0751c24: 類滅盡無生。辯無礙解九智爲性。謂唯除滅
T1562_.29.0751c25: 縁説道故。此二通依一切地起。謂依欲界乃
T1562_.29.0751c26: 至有頂。辯無礙解於説道中。許隨縁一皆得
T1562_.29.0751c27: 起故。通依諸地。亦無有失。然於其中但縁説
T1562_.29.0751c28: 者。唯依二地與第三同。有説盡無生非無礙
T1562_.29.0751c29: 解攝。以無礙解是見性故。彼説第二或四或
T1562_.29.0752a01: 八。第四唯七。准上應知。此四應知如四聖種。
T1562_.29.0752a02: 隨得一種必具得四。非不具四可名爲得。隨
T1562_.29.0752a03: 欲現起或具不具。有餘師言。有不具得無理
T1562_.29.0752a04: 得一必令得四。有説此四無礙解生。如次
T1562_.29.0752a05: 習算計佛語。聲明因明爲前加行。若於四處
T1562_.29.0752a06: 未得善巧。必不能生無礙解故。理實一切無
T1562_.29.0752a07: 礙解生。唯學佛語能爲加行。要待前生久習
T1562_.29.0752a08: 名等。四種善巧今乃能修。無礙解名釋有多
T1562_.29.0752a09: 義。謂於彼彼境領悟無礙名無礙解。或於彼
T1562_.29.0752a10: 彼境決斷無礙名無礙解。或於彼彼境正説
T1562_.29.0752a11: 無礙名無礙解。有餘師説。鉢剌底是助聲目
T1562_.29.0752a12: 現前義。如鉢剌底日火蝩來。是日火蝩現前
T1562_.29.0752a13: 來義。三目無倒毘陀目智。此言意顯於境現
T1562_.29.0752a14: 前。無顛倒智名無礙解。四無礙解三乘倶得。
T1562_.29.0752a15: 何故經説唯我世尊。獨名成就四無礙解。無
T1562_.29.0752a16: 相違失。經自釋故。謂彼經言唯佛無謬。成就
T1562_.29.0752a17: 無上故作是説。聲聞獨覺自分境中。智無退
T1562_.29.0752a18: 故名無礙解。諸佛世尊於一切法。圓滿知故
T1562_.29.0752a19: 名無礙解。有餘師説。無別第四即依前三總
T1562_.29.0752a20: 集建立。此説非理。縁法義詞與縁説道智相
T1562_.29.0752a21: 別故。此四依地自性所縁。與無諍別。前來已
T1562_.29.0752a22: 辯種性依身如無諍説。謂不動種*性依三
T1562_.29.0752a23: 洲人身。如是所説無諍智等。頌曰
T1562_.29.0752a24:     六依邊際得 邊際六後定
T1562_.29.0752a25:     遍順至究竟 佛餘加行得
T1562_.29.0752a26: 論曰。無諍願智四無礙解。六種皆依邊際定
T1562_.29.0752a27: 得。邊際定力所引發故。邊際靜慮體有六種。
T1562_.29.0752a28: 前六除詞餘五少分。及*除此外復更有餘。
T1562_.29.0752a29: 加行所得上品靜慮。名邊際定。故成六種。詞
T1562_.29.0752b01: 無礙解雖依彼得。而體非彼靜慮所攝。邊際
T1562_.29.0752b02: 名但依第四靜慮故。此一切地遍所隨順故。
T1562_.29.0752b03: 増至究竟故得邊際名。由此不應亦通餘地。
T1562_.29.0752b04: 云何此名遍所隨順。謂正修學此靜慮時。從
T1562_.29.0752b05: 初靜慮次第順入乃至有頂。復從有頂次第
T1562_.29.0752b06: 逆入至初靜慮。從初靜慮次第順入。展轉乃
T1562_.29.0752b07: 至第四靜慮。名一切地遍所隨順。云何此名
T1562_.29.0752b08: 増至究竟。謂專修習第四靜慮。從下至中從
T1562_.29.0752b09: 中至上。如是三品復各分三。上上品生名至
T1562_.29.0752b10: 究竟。如是靜慮得邊際名。此中三乘非無差
T1562_.29.0752b11: 別。而各於自得究竟名。此中邊名顯無越義。
T1562_.29.0752b12: 勝無越此故名爲邊際言。爲顯類義極義。如
T1562_.29.0752b13: 説四際及實際言。如是二言顯此靜慮。是最
T1562_.29.0752b14: 勝類定中最極。殊勝功徳多此引生。樂通行
T1562_.29.0752b15: 中此最勝故。有言無諍體即是悲。哀愍有情
T1562_.29.0752b16: 修無諍故。趣入無諍以悲爲門。如何異悲別
T1562_.29.0752b17: 有自體。此説非理。不決定故。謂修無諍非
T1562_.29.0752b18: 定由悲。於諸有情拔苦行相。但爲令彼煩惱
T1562_.29.0752b19: 不生。寂靜思惟爲門而入。設許決定以悲爲
T1562_.29.0752b20: 門。亦不可言以悲爲體。勿慧由定發體即是
T1562_.29.0752b21: 定故。若住無諍能息他惑。則應世尊不住無
T1562_.29.0752b22: 諍氣嘘。指鬘等縁佛生惑故。實非無諍恒現
T1562_.29.0752b23: 在前。以佛世尊具無量徳。隨時所欲起一現
T1562_.29.0752b24: 前。寧一切時偏住無諍。佛於聖住多住於空。
T1562_.29.0752b25: 先由此門入離生故。能引捨故。極微妙故。最
T1562_.29.0752b26: 難修故。是不共故。佛於梵住多住於悲。最能
T1562_.29.0752b27: 濟拔有情苦故。無諍不然。故多不起。世尊對
T1562_.29.0752b28: 彼具壽善現。饒益他志雖勝無邊。而不恒時
T1562_.29.0752b29: 住無諍者。爲欲永拔彼煩惱故。初縱令起後
T1562_.29.0752c01: 方調伏。如是可謂眞實哀愍。願智爲先方起
T1562_.29.0752c02: 無諍。非起願智無諍爲先。謂要先知諸有情
T1562_.29.0752c03: 類。由我安住如是威儀。煩惱便生。餘則不爾。
T1562_.29.0752c04: 然後方起無諍現前。願智無縁由無諍起。雖
T1562_.29.0752c05: 倶邊際靜慮爲先。加行有殊得有差別。有説
T1562_.29.0752c06: 此二展轉相攝。理不應然。行相別故。謂別行
T1562_.29.0752c07: 相爲息他惑。起別行相爲了所知。若加行中
T1562_.29.0752c08: 爲息他惑。後從定起他惑不生。如是即名無
T1562_.29.0752c09: 諍事辦。若加行位爲知所了。後起定時了
T1562_.29.0752c10: 所知境。如是名曰願智事成。行相既殊如何
T1562_.29.0752c11: 相攝。如是所説無諍智等。除佛餘聖唯加行
T1562_.29.0752c12: 得。非離染得。非皆得故唯佛於此。亦離染得。
T1562_.29.0752c13: 諸佛功徳初盡智時。由離染故一切頓得。後
T1562_.29.0752c14: 時隨欲能引現前不由加行。以佛世尊於一
T1562_.29.0752c15: 切法自在轉故。已辯前三唯共餘聖徳。於亦
T1562_.29.0752c16: 共凡徳且應辯通。頌曰
T1562_.29.0752c17:     通六謂神境 天眼耳他心
T1562_.29.0752c18:     宿住漏盡通 解脱道慧攝
T1562_.29.0752c19:     四俗他心五 漏盡通如力
T1562_.29.0752c20:     五依四靜慮 自下地爲境
T1562_.29.0752c21:     聲聞麟喩佛 二三千無數
T1562_.29.0752c22:     未曾由加行 曾修離染得
T1562_.29.0752c23:     念住初三身 他心三餘四
T1562_.29.0752c24:     天眼耳無記 餘四通唯善
T1562_.29.0752c25: 論曰。通有六種。一神境智證通。二天眼智證
T1562_.29.0752c26: 通。三天耳智證通。四他心智證通。五宿住隨
T1562_.29.0752c27: 念智證通。六漏盡智證通。雖六通中第六唯
T1562_.29.0752c28: 聖。然其前五異生亦得。依總相説亦共異生。
T1562_.29.0752c29: 如是六通解脱道攝。慧爲自性如沙門果。解
T1562_.29.0753a01: 脱道言顯出障義。勝進道中亦容有故。如是
T1562_.29.0753a02: 通慧無間道無。此位定遮他心智故。勿阿羅
T1562_.29.0753a03: 漢捨無間道。即名亦捨漏盡通故。品類足説。
T1562_.29.0753a04: 善慧是通二應非通。無記性故。義各別故。
T1562_.29.0753a05: 此彼無違。彼説所知及所通法。擧諸智慧爲
T1562_.29.0753a06: 能知通。以顯所知及所通法。雖諸智慧皆能
T1562_.29.0753a07: 知通。而且説善勝遍縁故。所知所通雖無廣
T1562_.29.0753a08: 陜。而能知外有別能通。故説所知已復説所
T1562_.29.0753a09: 通法。此所辯通唯勝定果。通無記慧。與彼何
T1562_.29.0753a10: 違。又彼但言通謂善慧。不言唯善。故亦無違。
T1562_.29.0753a11: 如説能知謂諸善智。豈惡無記皆非智攝。彼
T1562_.29.0753a12: 此通別應作四句。有彼非此。謂除四通所餘
T1562_.29.0753a13: 善慧。有此非彼。謂解脱道二無記慧。有彼亦
T1562_.29.0753a14: 此。謂即四通。有非彼此。謂除前説。除他心漏
T1562_.29.0753a15: 盡。餘四俗智攝。西方諸師説。宿住通六智。謂
T1562_.29.0753a16: 俗法類及苦集道。俗智能了過去俗事。餘隨
T1562_.29.0753a17: 所應各縁自境。然觀經意唯俗智攝。如説隨
T1562_.29.0753a18: 憶無量宿住。謂或一生乃至廣説。非無漏智
T1562_.29.0753a19: 此行相轉。他心通五智攝。謂法類道世俗他
T1562_.29.0753a20: 心。漏盡通如力説。謂或六或十智。由此已顯
T1562_.29.0753a21: 漏盡智通。依一切地縁一切境。前之五通依
T1562_.29.0753a22: 四靜慮不依無色。近分中間彼無五通所依
T1562_.29.0753a23: 定故。要攝支定是五通依。非漏盡通亦不依
T1562_.29.0753a24: 彼。諸地皆能縁漏盡故。不待觀色爲加行故。
T1562_.29.0753a25: 前三通境無色不能縁。由此三通但別縁色。
T1562_.29.0753a26: 故修他心通色爲門。故修宿住通漸次憶念。
T1562_.29.0753a27: 分位差別方得成滿。於加行中必觀色故。依
T1562_.29.0753a28: 無色地無如是能。若爾中間及五近分。亦容
T1562_.29.0753a29: 縁色應有五通。不爾由前所説因故。謂攝支
T1562_.29.0753b01: 定是五通依。若不攝支等持劣故。又彼止觀
T1562_.29.0753b02: 隨一減故。若爾何縁有漏盡通。樂苦遲速地
T1562_.29.0753b03: 皆能盡漏。故五是別修殊勝功徳。要殊勝地
T1562_.29.0753b04: 方能發起。若宿住通不依無色。應不能憶無
T1562_.29.0753b05: 色界事。契經何故説佛世尊無上法中。言佛
T1562_.29.0753b06: 能憶過去有色無色等事。此是決定比智所
T1562_.29.0753b07: 知。非宿住通。故無有失。謂諸外道。若見有情
T1562_.29.0753b08: 欲色命終不知生處。執有情類死已斷滅。見
T1562_.29.0753b09: 生欲色不知所從。便執有情本無而有。聲聞
T1562_.29.0753b10: 獨覺見彼命終。二萬劫中不見所在。便謂彼
T1562_.29.0753b11: 歿生於空處。而彼或生上不盡壽命終。如是
T1562_.29.0753b12: 乃至八萬劫中不見所在。便謂彼歿生於非想
T1562_.29.0753b13: 非非想處。而或生下地經二三生等。見生欲
T1562_.29.0753b14: 色時謂所從亦爾。世尊觀彼死時生時。如實
T1562_.29.0753b15: 比知所生從處。有盡壽量。有中殀者。雖亦
T1562_.29.0753b16: 比知非不決定。故與餘聖比知有別。修神境
T1562_.29.0753b17: 等前三通時。思輕光聲以爲加行。成已自在
T1562_.29.0753b18: 隨所欲爲。諸有欲修他心通者。先審觀己身
T1562_.29.0753b19: 心二相。前後變異展轉相隨。後復審觀他身
T1562_.29.0753b20: 心相。由此加行漸次得成。成已不觀自心諸
T1562_.29.0753b21: 色。於他心等能如實知。諸有欲修宿住通者。
T1562_.29.0753b22: 先自審察次前滅心。漸復逆觀此生分位。前
T1562_.29.0753b23: 前差別至結生心。乃至能憶知中有前一念。
T1562_.29.0753b24: 名自宿住加行已成。爲憶念他加行亦爾。此
T1562_.29.0753b25: 通初起唯次第知。串習成時亦能超憶諸所
T1562_.29.0753b26: 憶事。要曾領受憶淨居者。昔曾聞故從無色
T1562_.29.0753b27: 歿來生此者。依他相續初起此通。所餘亦依
T1562_.29.0753b28: 自相續起。如是五通境唯自下。且如神境隨
T1562_.29.0753b29: 依何地。於自下地行化自在。於上不然。勢力
T1562_.29.0753c01: 劣故。餘四亦爾。隨其所應。是故無能取無色
T1562_.29.0753c02: 界他心宿住爲二通境。即此五通於世界境。
T1562_.29.0753c03: 作用廣陜諸聖不同。謂大聲聞麟喩大覺不
T1562_.29.0753c04: 極作意。如次能於一二三千諸世界境。起行
T1562_.29.0753c05: 化等自在作用。若極作意如次能於二千三
T1562_.29.0753c06: 千無數世界。如是五通若有殊勝勢用猛利。
T1562_.29.0753c07: 從無始來曾未得者由加行得。若曾串習無
T1562_.29.0753c08: 勝勢用。及彼種類由離染得。若起現前皆由
T1562_.29.0753c09: 加行。佛於一切皆離染得。隨欲現前不由加
T1562_.29.0753c10: 行。三乘聖者後有異生。通得曾得未曾得者。
T1562_.29.0753c11: 所餘異生唯得曾得。約四念住辯六通者。約
T1562_.29.0753c12: 境約體二義有殊。有説二通即天眼耳。所餘
T1562_.29.0753c13: 四種以慧爲性。彼説眼耳通是身念住境。餘
T1562_.29.0753c14: 四皆是法念住境。然實六種皆慧爲性。經説
T1562_.29.0753c15: 皆能了達境故。由此皆是法念住境。若約體
T1562_.29.0753c16: 辯則六通中。前三唯身。但縁色故。謂神境通
T1562_.29.0753c17: 縁外四處。天眼縁色。天耳縁聲。若爾何縁説
T1562_.29.0753c18: 死生智知有情類。由現身中成身語意諸惡
T1562_.29.0753c19: 行等。非天眼通能知此事。有別勝智是通眷
T1562_.29.0753c20: 屬。依聖身起能如是知。是天眼通力所引故。
T1562_.29.0753c21: 與通合立死生智名。他心智通三念住攝。謂
T1562_.29.0753c22: 受心法縁心等故。宿住漏盡經主欲令一一
T1562_.29.0753c23: 皆通四念住攝。通縁五蘊一切境故。而實宿
T1562_.29.0753c24: 住法念住攝。雖契經説念曾領受苦樂等事。
T1562_.29.0753c25: 是憶前生苦樂等受所領衆具。即是雜縁法
T1562_.29.0753c26: 念住攝。漏盡如力或法或四。不應定言四念
T1562_.29.0753c27: 住攝。若約善等分別六通。有餘師言。六皆是
T1562_.29.0753c28: 善而實眼耳唯無記性。餘之四通一向是善。
T1562_.29.0753c29: 經主於此作是釋言。天眼耳通無記性攝。是
T1562_.29.0754a01: 眼耳識相應慧故。若爾寧説依四靜慮。隨根
T1562_.29.0754a02: 説故。亦無有失。謂所依止眼耳二根。由四靜
T1562_.29.0754a03: 慮力所引起即彼地攝。故依四地通依根故
T1562_.29.0754a04: 説依四言。或此依通無間道説。通無間道依
T1562_.29.0754a05: 四地故。此釋不然。六通皆是解脱道攝。眼耳
T1562_.29.0754a06: 二識是解脱道。理不成故。應作是説。四靜慮
T1562_.29.0754a07: 中有定相應。勝無記慧。能引自地勝大種果。
T1562_.29.0754a08: 此慧現前便引自地天眼天耳。令現在前爲
T1562_.29.0754a09: 所依根發眼耳識。故眼耳二識相應慧非通。
T1562_.29.0754a10: 但可説言是通所引。如契經説無學三明。彼
T1562_.29.0754a11: 於六通以何爲性。頌曰
T1562_.29.0754a12:     第五二六明 治三際愚故
T1562_.29.0754a13:     後眞二假説 學有闇非明
T1562_.29.0754a14: 論曰。言三明者。一宿住智證明。二死生智證
T1562_.29.0754a15: 明。三漏盡智證明。如其次第。以無學位。攝第
T1562_.29.0754a16: 五二六通爲其自性。六中三種獨名明者。如
T1562_.29.0754a17: 次對治三際愚故。謂宿住智通治前際愚。死
T1562_.29.0754a18: 生智通治後際愚。漏盡智通治中際愚。是故
T1562_.29.0754a19: 此三獨標明號。又宿住通憶念前際自他苦
T1562_.29.0754a20: 事。死生智通觀察後際他身苦事。由此厭背
T1562_.29.0754a21: 生死衆苦。起漏盡通觀涅槃樂。故唯三種
T1562_.29.0754a22: 立爲明。又此三通如次能捨常斷有見故立
T1562_.29.0754a23: 爲明。又此能除有有情法三種愚故。偏立爲
T1562_.29.0754a24: 明。有餘師言。宿住能見過去諸蘊。展轉相因
T1562_.29.0754a25: 次第傳來都無作者。由此能引空解脱門。死
T1562_.29.0754a26: 生能觀有情生死。下上旋轉猶如灌輪。故不
T1562_.29.0754a27: 希求三有果報。由此能引無願解脱門。厭離
T1562_.29.0754a28: 爲門歸無相法。故起漏盡無相解脱門。是故
T1562_.29.0754a29: 三通獨標明號。此三皆名無學明者。倶在無
T1562_.29.0754b01: 學身中起故。於中最後容有是眞通無漏故。
T1562_.29.0754b02: 餘二假説體唯非學非無學故。由此最後得
T1562_.29.0754b03: 無學名。自性相續皆無學故。前之二種得無
T1562_.29.0754b04: 學名。但由相續不由自性。如施設論作如是
T1562_.29.0754b05: 言。有等持相應無覆無記慧。不由善故及無
T1562_.29.0754b06: 漏故得立聖名。由聖身中此可得故。説名爲
T1562_.29.0754b07: 聖。此亦應爾。故名無學。有學身中有愚暗故。
T1562_.29.0754b08: 雖有前二不立爲明。雖有暫時伏滅愚暗。後
T1562_.29.0754b09: 還被蔽。不可立明。要暗永無。方名明故。契
T1562_.29.0754b10: 經中説示導有三。彼於六通以何爲性。頌曰
T1562_.29.0754b11:     第一四六導 教誡導爲尊
T1562_.29.0754b12:     定由通所成 引利樂果故
T1562_.29.0754b13: 論曰。三示導者。一神變示導。二記心示導。三
T1562_.29.0754b14: 教誡示導。如其次第。以六通中第一四六。爲
T1562_.29.0754b15: 其自性。唯此三種引所化生。令初發心最爲
T1562_.29.0754b16: 勝故。能示能導立示導名。三示導中教誡最
T1562_.29.0754b17: 勝。定由通所成故。定引利樂果故。謂前二導
T1562_.29.0754b18: 呪等亦能。不但由通故非決定。如有呪術名
T1562_.29.0754b19: 健馱梨。持此便能騰空自在。或有藥草具勝
T1562_.29.0754b20: 功能。若服若持飛行自在。復有呪術名伊刹
T1562_.29.0754b21: 尼。持此便能知他心念。或由觀相聽彼言音。
T1562_.29.0754b22: 亦能了知他心所念。教誡示導。除漏盡通。餘
T1562_.29.0754b23: 不能爲。故是決定。或前二導外道亦能。第三
T1562_.29.0754b24: 不然。故名決定。又前二導有但令他暫時迴
T1562_.29.0754b25: 心。不能引得畢竟利益及安樂果。教誡示導
T1562_.29.0754b26: 亦定令他引當利益及安樂果。以能如實方
T1562_.29.0754b27: 便説故。由此教誡最勝非餘。神境二言爲目
T1562_.29.0754b28: 何義。頌曰
T1562_.29.0754b29:     神體謂等持 境二謂行化
T1562_.29.0754c01:     行三意勢佛 運身勝解通
T1562_.29.0754c02:     化二謂欲色 四二外處性
T1562_.29.0754c03:     此各有二種 謂似自他身
T1562_.29.0754c04: 論曰。神名所目唯勝等持。由此能爲神變事
T1562_.29.0754c05: 故。而契經説。神果名神。意爲擧麁以顯細故。
T1562_.29.0754c06: 又顯勝等持是彼近因故。然神變事體實非
T1562_.29.0754c07: 神。此廣如前覺分中辨。諸神變事説名爲
T1562_.29.0754c08: 境。此有二種。謂行及化。行復三種。一者運
T1562_.29.0754c09: 身。謂乘空行猶如飛鳥。二者勝解。謂極遠方
T1562_.29.0754c10: 作近思惟便能速至。若於極遠色究竟天。作
T1562_.29.0754c11: 近思惟即便能至。本無來去。何謂速行。此實
T1562_.29.0754c12: 行但由近解。行極速故得勝解名。或世
T1562_.29.0754c13: 尊言。靜慮境界不思議故。唯佛能了。三者意
T1562_.29.0754c14: 勢。謂極遠方擧心縁時。身即能至。此勢如
T1562_.29.0754c15: 意得意勢名。如心取境頃至色究竟故。於此
T1562_.29.0754c16: 三中意勢唯佛。運身勝解亦通餘乘。謂我世
T1562_.29.0754c17: 尊神通迅速。隨方遠近擧心即至。由此世尊
T1562_.29.0754c18: 作如是説。諸佛境界不可思議。如日舒光蘊
T1562_.29.0754c19: 流亦爾。能頓至遠故説爲行。若謂不然此沒
T1562_.29.0754c20: 彼出。中間既斷行義應無。或佛威神不思議
T1562_.29.0754c21: 故。擧心即至不可測量。故意勢行唯世尊有。
T1562_.29.0754c22: 勝解兼餘聖運身并異生。化復二種。謂欲色
T1562_.29.0754c23: 界。若欲界化外四處除聲。若色界化唯二謂
T1562_.29.0754c24: 色觸。以色界中無香味故。此二界化各有二
T1562_.29.0754c25: 種。謂屬自身他身別故。身在欲界化有四種。
T1562_.29.0754c26: 在色亦然。故總成八。雖生在色作欲界化。而
T1562_.29.0754c27: 無色界成香味失。化作自身唯二處故。有説
T1562_.29.0754c28: 亦化四如衣等不成。非神境通能起化事。要
T1562_.29.0754c29: 此通果諸能化心。此能化心有幾何相。頌曰
T1562_.29.0755a01:     能化心十四 定果二至五
T1562_.29.0755a02:     如所依定得 從淨自生二
T1562_.29.0755a03:     化事由自地 語通由自下
T1562_.29.0755a04:     化身與化主 語必倶非佛
T1562_.29.0755a05:     先立願留身 後起餘心語
T1562_.29.0755a06:     有死留堅體 餘説無留義
T1562_.29.0755a07:     初多心一化 成滿此相違
T1562_.29.0755a08:     修得無記攝 餘得通三性
T1562_.29.0755a09: 論曰。能變化心總有十四。謂依根本四靜慮
T1562_.29.0755a10: 生。初靜慮生唯有二種。一欲界攝。二初靜慮。
T1562_.29.0755a11: 第二第三第四靜慮。如其次第有三四五。無
T1562_.29.0755a12: 上依下。下地劣故。上下地繋一靜慮果。所依
T1562_.29.0755a13: 行等地有勝劣。一地繋上下靜慮果。地雖等
T1562_.29.0755a14: 所依行勝劣。下繋上果下果上繋。如次地劣
T1562_.29.0755a15: 勝所依行勝劣如得靜慮化心亦然。果與所
T1562_.29.0755a16: 依倶時得故。然得靜慮總有三時。離染受
T1562_.29.0755a17: 生加行異故。謂離下染得上靜慮時。亦得
T1562_.29.0755a18: 定所引化心果。從上地歿生色界時。及由
T1562_.29.0755a19: 加行起勝功徳。但有新得所依靜慮。亦兼得
T1562_.29.0755a20: 彼所引化心。依欲界身得阿羅漢。及練根位
T1562_.29.0755a21: 得應果時。十四化心一時總得。乃至身在第
T1562_.29.0755a22: 四靜慮。得阿羅漢得五化心。無從化心直出
T1562_.29.0755a23: 觀義。此從淨定及自類生。能無間生自類淨
T1562_.29.0755a24: 定。故唯從二生二非餘。唯自地化心起自地
T1562_.29.0755a25: 化事。化所發語由自下心。謂欲初定化唯
T1562_.29.0755a26: 自地心語。上化起語由初定心。彼地自無起
T1562_.29.0755a27: 表心故。若生欲界第二定等。化事轉時如何
T1562_.29.0755a28: 起表。非威儀路工巧處心。依異界身而可現
T1562_.29.0755a29: 起。彼必依止自界身故。此無有過。引彼界攝
T1562_.29.0755b01: 大種現前爲所依故。謂引色界大種現前。與
T1562_.29.0755b02: 欲界身密合而住。依之起彼能發表心。無定
T1562_.29.0755b03: 地表心依散地身過。或起依定能發表心。如
T1562_.29.0755b04: 依定生天眼耳識。若一化主起多化身。要化
T1562_.29.0755b05: 主語時諸化身方語。言音詮表一切皆同。故
T1562_.29.0755b06: 有伽他作如是説
T1562_.29.0755b07:     一化主語時 諸所化皆語
T1562_.29.0755b08:     一化主若默 諸所化亦然
T1562_.29.0755b09: 此但説餘。佛則不爾。諸佛定力最自在故。與
T1562_.29.0755b10: 所化語容不倶時。言音所詮亦容有別。若上
T1562_.29.0755b11: 三地所化語時。初定表心現前發者。此心起
T1562_.29.0755b12: 位已出化心。應無化身化如何語。由先願力
T1562_.29.0755b13: 留所化身。後起餘心發語表業。故無化語闕
T1562_.29.0755b14: 所依過。非唯化主命現在時。能留化身令久
T1562_.29.0755b15: 時住。亦有令住至命終後。即如尊者大迦葉
T1562_.29.0755b16: 波。留骨鎖身至慈尊世。唯堅實體可得久
T1562_.29.0755b17: 留。異此飮光應留肉等。有餘師説。願力留身
T1562_.29.0755b18: 必無有能令至死後。聖大迦葉留骨*鎖身。由
T1562_.29.0755b19: 諸天神持令久住。初習業者由多化心。要附
T1562_.29.0755b20: 所依起一化事。習成滿者由一化心。能不附
T1562_.29.0755b21: 所依起衆多化事。總有二類能變化心。一修
T1562_.29.0755b22: 所成。二生得等。所起化果亦如彼説。修所成
T1562_.29.0755b23: 化攝處如前。不能化爲有情身故。生所得等。
T1562_.29.0755b24: 於欲界中化爲九處。色界化七依不離根。言
T1562_.29.0755b25: 化九等理實無有能化作根。修果無心餘化
T1562_.29.0755b26: 容有。修果起表由化主心。餘容自心起身語
T1562_.29.0755b27: 表。修果飮食若爲資身。必在化主身中消化。
T1562_.29.0755b28: 若爲餘事呑金石等。或即住彼化事身中。或
T1562_.29.0755b29: 隨所宜置在別處。餘化飮食隨住所依。修果
T1562_.29.0755c01: 化心唯無記性。餘通三性。謂善惡等。如天
T1562_.29.0755c02: 龍等能變化心。彼亦能爲自他身化。天眼耳
T1562_.29.0755c03: 言爲目何義。爲目慧體。爲目色根。若慧不應
T1562_.29.0755c04: 名天眼耳。若色根者不應名通。此前已説前
T1562_.29.0755c05: 何所説。謂説根本四靜慮中。有定相應勝無
T1562_.29.0755c06: 記慧。名爲天眼及天耳通。此所引生勝大種
T1562_.29.0755c07: 果名天眼耳。其體是何。頌曰
T1562_.29.0755c08:     天眼耳謂根 即定地淨色
T1562_.29.0755c09:     恒同分無缺 取障細遠等
T1562_.29.0755c10: 論曰。此體即是天眼耳根。謂縁聲光爲加行
T1562_.29.0755c11: 故。依四靜慮於眼耳邊。引起彼地微妙大種。
T1562_.29.0755c12: 所造淨色眼耳二根。見色聞聲名天眼耳。如
T1562_.29.0755c13: 是眼耳何故名天。體即是天。定地攝故。極
T1562_.29.0755c14: 清淨故。立以天名。由此經言。天眼耳者無有
T1562_.29.0755c15: 皮肉筋纒血塗。唯妙大種所造淨色。然天眼
T1562_.29.0755c16: 耳種類有三。一修得天。即如前説。二者生得。
T1562_.29.0755c17: 謂生天中。三者似天。謂生餘趣由勝業等之
T1562_.29.0755c18: 所引生。能遠見聞似天眼耳。如藏臣寶菩
T1562_.29.0755c19: 薩輪王。諸龍鬼神及中有等。修得眼耳過現
T1562_.29.0755c20: 當生恒是同分。以至現在必與識倶。能見聞
T1562_.29.0755c21: 故處所必具無翳無缺。如生色界一切有情。
T1562_.29.0755c22: 能隨所應取彼障隔。極細遠等諸方色聲。故
T1562_.29.0755c23: 於此中有如是頌
T1562_.29.0755c24:     肉眼於諸方 被障細遠色
T1562_.29.0755c25:     無能見功用 天眼見無遺
T1562_.29.0755c26: 前説化心修餘得異。神境等五各有異耶。亦
T1562_.29.0755c27: 有。云何。頌曰
T1562_.29.0755c28:     神境五修生 呪藥業成故
T1562_.29.0755c29:     他心修生呪 又加占相成
T1562_.29.0756a01:     三修生業成 除修皆三性
T1562_.29.0756a02:     人唯無生得 地獄初能知
T1562_.29.0756a03: 論曰。神境智類總有五種。一修得。二生得。三
T1562_.29.0756a04: 呪成。四藥成。五業成。曼馱多王及中有等。諸
T1562_.29.0756a05: 神境智是業成攝。有餘師説。神境有四。即
T1562_.29.0756a06: 前行三變化爲一。言變化者。如契經言。分一
T1562_.29.0756a07: 爲多。乃至廣説。他心智類總有四種。前三如
T1562_.29.0756a08: 上加占相成。餘三各三。謂修生業。除修所得
T1562_.29.0756a09: 皆通善等。非定果故不得通名。人中都無生
T1562_.29.0756a10: 所得者。餘皆容有。隨其所應本性生念業所
T1562_.29.0756a11: 成攝。人由先業能憶過去。於地獄趣初受生
T1562_.29.0756a12: 時。唯以生得他心宿住知他心等。及過去生
T1562_.29.0756a13: 苦受逼已更無知義。彼憶過去以何證知。如
T1562_.29.0756a14: 契經言。彼自憶念。我等過去曾聞他説諸欲
T1562_.29.0756a15: 過失。而不厭離。故於今時。受斯劇苦。彼唯能
T1562_.29.0756a16: 憶次前一生。餘趣隨應恒有知義。傍生知過
T1562_.29.0756a17: 去。如&T045006;聲狗等鬼知過去。如有頌言
T1562_.29.0756a18:     我昔集衆財 以法或非法
T1562_.29.0756a19:     他今受富樂 我獨受貧苦
T1562_.29.0756a20: 天知過去。如有頌言
T1562_.29.0756a21:     我施逝多林 蒙大法王住
T1562_.29.0756a22:     賢聖僧受用 故我心歡喜
T1562_.29.0756a23: 又契經説。諸生天者初生必起三種念言。我
T1562_.29.0756a24: 從何歿今生何處。乘何業故來生此間
T1562_.29.0756a25: *説一切有部順正理論*卷第七十六
T1562_.29.0756a26:
T1562_.29.0756a27:
T1562_.29.0756a28:
T1562_.29.0756a29:
T1562_.29.0756b01:
T1562_.29.0756b02:
T1562_.29.0756b03: 阿毘達磨順正理論卷第七十七
T1562_.29.0756b04:   尊者衆賢造
T1562_.29.0756b05:  *三藏法師玄奘奉  *詔譯 
T1562_.29.0756b06:   *辯定品第八之一
T1562_.29.0756b07: 如是已辯諸智差別。次當分別智所依定。唯
T1562_.29.0756b08: 諸靜慮能具爲依。故於此中先辯靜慮。或於
T1562_.29.0756b09: 先辯共功徳中。已辯智所成無諍等功徳。餘
T1562_.29.0756b10: 所成徳今次當辯。於中先辯所依止定。且諸
T1562_.29.0756b11: 定内靜慮云何。頌曰
T1562_.29.0756b12:     靜慮四各二 於中生已説
T1562_.29.0756b13:     定謂善一境 并伴五蘊性
T1562_.29.0756b14:     初具伺喜樂 後漸離前支
T1562_.29.0756b15: 論曰。一切功徳多依靜慮。故應先辯靜慮差
T1562_.29.0756b16: 別。此總有四種。謂初二三四。豈諸靜慮無如
T1562_.29.0756b17: 慈等不共名想。而今但説初等四數建立別
T1562_.29.0756b18: 名。此中非無不共名想。然無唯遍攝一地名。
T1562_.29.0756b19: 以諸靜慮各有二種。謂定及生有差別故。諸
T1562_.29.0756b20: 生靜慮如先已説。謂第四八前三各三。無有
T1562_.29.0756b21: 別名總詮一地。諸定靜慮總相無別。謂此四
T1562_.29.0756b22: 體總而言之。皆善性攝。心一境性以善等持
T1562_.29.0756b23: 爲自性故。若并助伴五蘊爲性。此二既同難
T1562_.29.0756b24: 知差別。相雖無別而地有異。爲顯地異就數
T1562_.29.0756b25: 標名。故説爲初乃至第四。此中經主自興問
T1562_.29.0756b26: 答。何名一境性。謂專一所縁。彼答非理。眼意
T1562_.29.0756b27: 二識若同一所縁應名一境性。故於此處應求
T1562_.29.0756b28: 別理。謂若依止一所依根。專一所縁名一境
T1562_.29.0756b29: 性。豈不一念無易所縁。應一切心中皆有一
T1562_.29.0756c01: 境性。理實皆有。一一刹那。心心所法一境轉
T1562_.29.0756c02: 故。然非一切皆得定名。以於此中説一境性。
T1562_.29.0756c03: 但爲顯示由勝等持。令善心心所相續而轉
T1562_.29.0756c04: 故。若爾即心依一根轉。引縁自境餘心續生。
T1562_.29.0756c05: 此即名爲心一境性。應離心外無別等持。此
T1562_.29.0756c06: 難不然。前已説故。謂先廣辯心所法中。已辯
T1562_.29.0756c07: 等持離心別有。謂若心體即三摩地。令心作
T1562_.29.0756c08: 等亦應無別。差別因縁不可得故。如是等難
T1562_.29.0756c09: 具顯如前。故非即心名三摩地。依何義故
T1562_.29.0756c10: 立靜慮名。由依此寂靜方能審慮故。審慮即
T1562_.29.0756c11: 是實了知義。如説心在定能如實了知。審慮
T1562_.29.0756c12: 義中置地界故。此論宗審慮定以慧爲體。依
T1562_.29.0756c13: 訓釋理此是凝寂。思度境處得靜慮名。定令
T1562_.29.0756c14: 慧生。無濁亂故。有説此定持勝遍縁。如理思
T1562_.29.0756c15: 惟故名靜慮。勝言簡欲界。遍縁簡無色。如理
T1562_.29.0756c16: 思惟。簡異顛倒。能持此定。是妙等持。此妙等
T1562_.29.0756c17: 持名爲靜慮。此言顯示止觀均行。無倒等持
T1562_.29.0756c18: 方名靜慮。若爾染汚寧得此名。由彼亦能邪
T1562_.29.0756c19: 審慮故。於相似處亦立此名。如世間言朽敗
T1562_.29.0756c20: 種等。故無一切名靜慮失。若善性攝心一境
T1562_.29.0756c21: 性。并伴立爲四靜慮者。依何相立初二三四。
T1562_.29.0756c22: 具伺喜樂建立爲初。謂若位中善一境性。具
T1562_.29.0756c23: 與尋伺喜樂相應。如是等持名初靜慮。頌中
T1562_.29.0756c24: 但説與伺相應。已顯與尋亦相應義。以若有
T1562_.29.0756c25: 伺與喜樂倶。必無與尋不相應故。爲顯第二
T1562_.29.0756c26: 除伺建立。故頌但説具伺非尋。異此應言具
T1562_.29.0756c27: 尋喜樂。擧尋有伺不説自成。漸離前支立二
T1562_.29.0756c28: 三四。離伺有二離二有樂。具離三種如其次
T1562_.29.0756c29: 第。故一境性分爲四種。已辯靜慮。無色云何。
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 

[First] [Prev+100] [Prev] 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 [Next] [Next+100] [Last] [行番号:/]   [返り点:/] [CITE]