大正蔵検索


punctuation    Hangul    Eng   

Citation style A:
Citation style B:
()
Citation style C:
()
Citation style D:
()
TextNo.
Vol.
Page

  INBUDS
INBUDS(Bibliographic Database)
  Digital Dictionary of Buddhism
電子佛教辭典
パスワードがない場合は「guest」でログインしてください。
Users who do not have a password can log in with the userID "guest".

本文をドラッグして選択するとDDBの見出し語検索結果が表示されます。

Select a portion of the text by dragging your mouse to view all terms in the text contained in the DDB. ・

Password Access Policies

阿毘達磨大毘婆沙論 (No. 1545_ 五百大阿羅漢玄奘譯 ) in Vol. 27

[First] [Prev+100] [Prev] 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 [Next] [Next+100] [Last] [行番号:/]   [返り点:/] [CITE]

T1545_.27.0221a01:
T1545_.27.0221a02:
T1545_.27.0221a03: 阿毘達磨大毘婆沙論卷第四十
T1545_.27.0221a04:
T1545_.27.0221a05:  五百大阿羅漢等造 
T1545_.27.0221a06:  *三藏法師玄奘奉  詔譯 
T1545_.27.0221a07:   雜蘊第一中思納息第八之二
T1545_.27.0221a08: 知此中有二種三摩地。一染汚。二不染
T1545_.27.0221a09: 汚。染汚者。名三摩地。亦名散亂。不染汚者。
T1545_.27.0221a10: 三摩地。不散亂。故三摩地有十二句
T1545_.27.0221a11: 一有三摩地。一所縁是散亂。二有三摩地。一
T1545_.27.0221a12: 所縁非散亂。三有三摩地。一行相是散亂。
T1545_.27.0221a13: 四有三摩地。一行相非散亂。五有三摩地
T1545_.27.0221a14: 一所縁一行相是散亂。六有三摩地。一所縁
T1545_.27.0221a15: 一行相非散亂。七有三摩地。多所縁是散
T1545_.27.0221a16: 亂。八有三摩地。多所縁非散亂。九有三摩
T1545_.27.0221a17: 多行相是散亂。十有三摩地。多行相非
T1545_.27.0221a18: 散亂。十一有三摩地。多所縁多行相是散亂。
T1545_.27.0221a19: 十二有三摩地。多所縁多行相非散亂。有
T1545_.27.0221a20: 三摩地一所縁是散亂者。如一類。隨於一
T1545_.27.0221a21: 惟不淨。修未純熟。復即於此或觀
T1545_.27.0221a22: 。或觀膖脹。或觀膿爛。或觀破壞。或觀
T1545_.27.0221a23: 。或觀被食。或觀分離。或觀白骨。或觀
T1545_.27.0221a24: 。其心散亂流蕩不住。不一境。由
T1545_.27.0221a25: 因縁前定退失。後定不進。有三摩地一所
T1545_.27.0221a26: 縁非散亂者。如一類。隨於一物
T1545_.27.0221a27: 不淨。修已純熟。復即於此或觀青瘀。廣説
T1545_.27.0221a28: 乃至或觀骨*鎖。心不散亂。不流不蕩。安住
T1545_.27.0221a29: 一。由此因縁前定不失能進後定」有
T1545_.27.0221a30: 摩地一行相是散亂者。如一類。思惟非
T1545_.27.0221b01: 。修未純熟。復即由此。或觀増減。或觀
T1545_.27.0221b02: 。或觀轉變。或觀磨滅。其心散亂流蕩不
T1545_.27.0221b03: 住。不一境。由此因縁前定退失後定不
T1545_.27.0221b04: 進。有三摩地一行相非散亂者。如一類
T1545_.27.0221b05: 惟非常。修已純熟。復即由此或觀増減
T1545_.27.0221b06: 廣説乃至或觀磨滅。心不散亂流不
T1545_.27.0221b07: 安住守一。由此因縁前定不失能進後定
T1545_.27.0221b08: 三摩地一所縁一行相是散亂者。如
T1545_.27.0221b09: 一類。思惟色非常。修未純熟。復即於此由
T1545_.27.0221b10: 此或觀増減。廣説乃至或觀磨滅。其心散
T1545_.27.0221b11: 亂流蕩不住。不一境。由此因縁前定退
T1545_.27.0221b12: 失後定不
T1545_.27.0221b13: 三摩地一所縁一行相非散亂者。如
T1545_.27.0221b14: 一類。思惟色非常。修已純熟。復即於此由
T1545_.27.0221b15: 此或觀増減。廣説乃至或觀磨滅。心不
T1545_.27.0221b16: 。不流不蕩安住守一。由此因縁前定
T1545_.27.0221b17: 失能進後定
T1545_.27.0221b18: 三摩地多所縁是散亂者。如一類。於
T1545_.27.0221b19: 身住循身觀。修未純熟。復於受住循受觀
T1545_.27.0221b20: 心住循心觀。於法住循法觀。其心散亂
T1545_.27.0221b21: 流蕩不住。不一境。由此因縁前定退失
T1545_.27.0221b22: 後定不三摩地多所縁非散亂者。如
T1545_.27.0221b23: 一類。於身住循身觀。修已純熟。復於
T1545_.27.0221b24: 受住循受觀。乃至於法住循法觀。心不
T1545_.27.0221b25: 。不流不蕩安住守一。由此因縁前定不
T1545_.27.0221b26: 失能進後定
T1545_.27.0221b27: 三摩地多行相是散亂者。如一類。思
T1545_.27.0221b28: 非常。修未純熟。復或觀苦。或觀空。或觀
T1545_.27.0221b29: 。其心散亂流蕩不住。不一境。由此因
T1545_.27.0221b30: 前定退失後定不
T1545_.27.0221c01: 三摩地多行相非散亂者。如一類
T1545_.27.0221c02: 惟非常。修已純熟。復或觀苦。或觀空或
T1545_.27.0221c03: 非我。心不散亂。不流不蕩安住守一。由
T1545_.27.0221c04: 此因縁前定不失能進後定
T1545_.27.0221c05: 三摩地。多所縁多行相是散亂者。如
T1545_.27.0221c06: 。思惟身是非常。修未純熟復觀受是苦。
T1545_.27.0221c07: 心是空。法是非我。其心散亂流蕩不住。不
T1545_.27.0221c08: 一境。由此因縁前定退失後定不進」
T1545_.27.0221c09: 三摩地多所縁多行相非散亂者。如
T1545_.27.0221c10: 一類。思惟身是非常。修已純熟。復觀受是苦。
T1545_.27.0221c11: 心是空。法是非我。心不散亂。不流不蕩安
T1545_.27.0221c12: 住守一。由此因縁前定不失能進後定
T1545_.27.0221c13: 云何無明乃至廣説。問何故作此論。答爲
T1545_.27.0221c14: 疑者得決定故。謂契經説不達不
T1545_.27.0221c15: 了知故。名爲無明。不正知亦以不了知
T1545_.27.0221c16: 相。或有疑無明即是不正知性。是則
T1545_.27.0221c17: 二種體無差別。欲彼疑得決定故。顯
T1545_.27.0221c18: 二種其體各別故作斯論。云何無明。答三界
T1545_.27.0221c19: 無智。此説應理。謂三界繋無智具攝諸無
T1545_.27.0221c20: 故。若作是説三界無明者。則
T1545_.27.0221c21: 縁滅道諦二種無明。彼不三界
T1545_.27.0221c22: 故。云何不正知。答非理所引慧。問此中何故
T1545_.27.0221c23: 問少答多。謂不正知唯染汚慧。非理所引
T1545_.27.0221c24: 慧。通染及不染云何知然。如業蘊説。諸意
T1545_.27.0221c25: 惡行皆是非理所引意業。有是非理所引意
T1545_.27.0221c26: 意惡行。謂一切有覆無記意業。及一分
T1545_.27.0221c27: 無覆無記意業。故知非理所引慧名染不
T1545_.27.0221c28: 。答此中非理所引慧者。應知*唯攝諸染
T1545_.27.0221c29: 汚慧。所以者何。非理所引略有二種。一者世
T1545_.27.0222a01: 俗。二者勝義。今説勝義非理所引。故知*唯
T1545_.27.0222a02: 諸染汚慧。*唯染汚法名勝義非理所
T1545_.27.0222a03: 。無覆無記但由世俗彼名故」此後應
T1545_.27.0222a04: 理論者與分別論者。相對問答難通顯不正
T1545_.27.0222a05: 。雖是非理所引慧攝。然有正知而妄語
T1545_.27.0222a06: 義。汝説不正知是非理所引慧耶者。是分別
T1545_.27.0222a07: 論者問。重定前宗。若不他宗他過失
T1545_.27.0222a08: 則不理答如是者是應理論者答。謂前
T1545_.27.0222a09: 所立理無顛倒故言如是。汝何所欲諸有
T1545_.27.0222a10: 正知而妄語者。彼皆失念不正知故而妄語
T1545_.27.0222a11: 耶者。亦是分別論者問。擧妄語復審
T1545_.27.0222a12: 。答如是者亦是應理論者答。謂彼所説稱
T1545_.27.0222a13: 可所宗故言如是。又何所欲無正知
T1545_.27.0222a14: 妄語耶者。是分別論者將欲難反定
T1545_.27.0222a15: 正理。答不爾者是應理論者。遮
T1545_.27.0222a16: 所問理無違。謂雖不正知是非理所引
T1545_.27.0222a17: 。然有正知而妄語義非此義故言不
T1545_.27.0222a18: 爾。應我説。若言不正知是非理所引慧
T1545_.27.0222a19: 諸有正知而妄語。彼皆失念不正知故而妄
T1545_.27.0222a20: 語者則應正知而妄語。若不
T1545_.27.0222a21: 正知而妄語者。則不不正知是非
T1545_.27.0222a22: 理所引慧。諸有正知而妄語。彼皆失念不正
T1545_.27.0222a23: 知故而妄語。作是説倶不理者。是分
T1545_.27.0222a24: 別論者前後兩關翻覆設難。前關顯順宗違
T1545_.27.0222a25: 。後關顯順理違宗。二倶不可故總結言作
T1545_.27.0222a26: 是説倶不理。彼難意言。若不正知即
T1545_.27.0222a27: 是非理所引慧者。諸虚誑語皆是非理所引
T1545_.27.0222a28: 慧。發此語即從不正知起。應説無
T1545_.27.0222a29: 妄語。若説正知妄語。則不説此
T1545_.27.0222b01: 語皆從不正知起故。前違理後復違宗。進
T1545_.27.0222b02: 退推徴二倶有難。應理論者後通意言。諸虚
T1545_.27.0222b03: 誑語雖皆從不正知。而可
T1545_.27.0222b04: 妄語。所以者何。虚誑語者正知彼事
T1545_.27.0222b05: 妄説故。謂彼正知所見等事而顛倒説。是故
T1545_.27.0222b06: 説爲正知妄語。復次虚誑語者正知自想而
T1545_.27.0222b07: 妄説故。謂彼正知見等自想而顛倒説。是故
T1545_.27.0222b08: 説爲正知妄語。復次虚誑語者正知自見而
T1545_.27.0222b09: 妄説故。謂彼正知見等自見而顛倒説。是故
T1545_.27.0222b10: 説爲正知妄語。復次虚誑語者應正知説
T1545_.27.0222b11: 妄説故。謂彼對他王臣等衆正知説
T1545_.27.0222b12: 顛倒説。是故説爲正知妄語。故虚誑語雖
T1545_.27.0222b13: 許皆從不正知起而可説爲正知妄語。若
T1545_.27.0222b14: 此語從不正知起則但名不正知妄語
T1545_.27.0222b15: 正知妄語者。此語亦從十大地法等起。亦
T1545_.27.0222b16: 受等妄語非正知妄語。應理論者此後
T1545_.27.0222b17: 反破分別論者以通前難。三種破中是等彼
T1545_.27.0222b18: 破。三種破義如前已説。然於受等大地等
T1545_.27.0222b19: 。略去初後但擧中間無明。詰彼以通
T1545_.27.0222b20: 彼言。諸無明皆不正知相應耶者是
T1545_.27.0222b21: 應理論者問。審定他宗若不他宗
T1545_.27.0222b22: 過失則不理。答如是者是分別論者答。
T1545_.27.0222b23: 所問理定故言如是。汝何所欲諸有正知而
T1545_.27.0222b24: 妄語者皆無明趣無明所纒。失念不正知故
T1545_.27.0222b25: 而妄語耶者亦是應理論者問。擧妄語
T1545_.27.0222b26: 彼宗。答如是者亦是分別論者答。謂此所
T1545_.27.0222b27: 説稱可彼宗故言如是。又何所欲無
T1545_.27.0222b28: 而妄語耶者是應理論者將欲難反定
T1545_.27.0222b29: 彼宗正理。答不爾者。是分別論者遮
T1545_.27.0222c01: 此所問理無違。謂諸無明雖皆不正知相
T1545_.27.0222c02: 。然有正知而妄語義非此義故言不
T1545_.27.0222c03: 爾。應我説若言一切無明皆不正知相
T1545_.27.0222c04: 應。諸有正知而妄語。皆無明趣無明所纒。失
T1545_.27.0222c05: 念不正知故而妄語者。則應説無正知
T1545_.27.0222c06: 而妄語。若不正知而妄語者則不
T1545_.27.0222c07: 一切無明皆不正知相應。諸有正知而
T1545_.27.0222c08: 妄語皆無明趣無明所纒失念不正知故而妄
T1545_.27.0222c09: 。作是説亦倶不理者。是相應論者
T1545_.27.0222c10: 前後兩關翻覆設難。前關顯順宗違理。後關
T1545_.27.0222c11: 順理違宗。二倶不可故總結言。作
T1545_.27.0222c12: 亦倶不理。此難意言。若諸無明皆不
T1545_.27.0222c13: 正。知相應者。諸虚誑語皆是失念。不正知發
T1545_.27.0222c14: 此語即從無明而起。應説無正知
T1545_.27.0222c15: 語。若説非正知妄語則不此語皆
T1545_.27.0222c16: 無明而起。故前違理後復違宗。進退推
T1545_.27.0222c17: 徴二倶有難分別論者理應通言。諸虚誑語
T1545_.27.0222c18: 皆從無明而起。然可正知妄語
T1545_.27.0222c19: 彼爲無明妄語。應理論者應彼言
T1545_.27.0222c20: 我宗亦爾諸虚誑語雖皆從不正知起而
T1545_.27.0222c21: 正知妄語不正知。故彼非難」
T1545_.27.0222c22: 云何憍。乃至廣説。問何故作此論。答爲
T1545_.27.0222c23: 別契經義故。謂契經説。心憍心慢契經
T1545_.27.0222c24: 是説而不別其義。經是此論所依
T1545_.27.0222c25: 根本。彼不説者今應之故作斯論。云何
T1545_.27.0222c26: 憍。答諸憍醉極醉悶極悶心傲逸心自取是
T1545_.27.0222c27: 憍。此中憍等名雖異而體無別。皆爲
T1545_.27.0222c28: 了憍自性故。云何慢答諸慢已慢當慢心
T1545_.27.0222c29: 擧恃心自取是謂慢。此中慢等名雖異而
T1545_.27.0223a01: 體無別。皆爲了慢自性故。憍慢何差別。
T1545_.27.0223a02: 問何故復作此論。答欲疑者得決定故。
T1545_.27.0223a03: 謂此二法展轉相似。見多憍者世人共言此
T1545_.27.0223a04: 是多慢。見多慢者。世人共言此是多憍。爲
T1545_.27.0223a05: 彼疑得決定故顯憍與慢自性各別故作
T1545_.27.0223a06: 斯論。憍慢何差別。答若不他染著自法心
T1545_.27.0223a07: 傲逸本名憍。若方於他自擧恃相名慢。是
T1545_.27.0223a08: 差別。此中憍者。謂不他但自染著種
T1545_.27.0223a09: 姓色力財位智等心傲逸相。此中慢者。謂方
T1545_.27.0223a10: 於他種姓色力財位智等自擧恃相。問憍以
T1545_.27.0223a11: 何爲自性有作是説。意爲自性。末陀末那
T1545_.27.0223a12: 聲相近故。有餘師説。愛爲自性。此中説
T1545_.27.0223a13: 著自法故。復有説者。慢爲自性。末陀磨那
T1545_.27.0223a14: 聲相近故。然依他轉但名爲慢。不他轉
T1545_.27.0223a15: 説名爲慢。亦名爲憍。評曰。應是説。有
T1545_.27.0223a16: 別心所愛所引起説名爲憍。*唯在意地
T1545_.27.0223a17: *唯修所斷。此憍與慢多種差別。謂慢是煩
T1545_.27.0223a18: 惱。憍非煩惱。慢是結縛隨眠隨煩惱纒。憍非
T1545_.27.0223a19: 結縛隨眠及纒但隨煩惱慢通見修所斷。憍
T1545_.27.0223a20: *唯修所斷。慢非大地等法攝。憍是小煩惱
T1545_.27.0223a21: 地法攝。然慢與憍倶三界繋。問慢方他起。欲
T1545_.27.0223a22: 色二界修所斷慢。可他起外門轉故。無
T1545_.27.0223a23: 色界慢見所斷慢不他起内門轉故。云何
T1545_.27.0223a24: 慢。答且無色界修所斷慢。雖他而
T1545_.27.0223a25: 慢相故亦名慢。復次先在下界他起
T1545_.27.0223a26: 慢由數習力後生無色彼慢現行。有作
T1545_.27.0223a27: 。雖無色慢不現行而在下界亦起
T1545_.27.0223a28: 彼慢。謂二證得無色定者展轉問答所得定
T1545_.27.0223a29: 斯起慢。謂我所得勝於彼定。我能速
T1545_.27.0223b01: 入彼則不能。我能久住彼則不爾。見所斷慢
T1545_.27.0223b02: 他。而住慢相故亦名慢。復次修所
T1545_.27.0223b03: 斷慢方他而起由數習力見所斷慢亦現
T1545_.27.0223b04: 。有作是説。見所斷慢亦方他起。如我見
T1545_.27.0223b05: 者集在一處展轉問答我我見相斯起
T1545_.27.0223b06: 慢。謂己我見勝他我見。評曰。應是説。非
T1545_.27.0223b07: 一切慢要方他起。無始時來數習力故。依
T1545_.27.0223b08: 自相續慢亦現行。如契經言。尊者無滅往
T1545_.27.0223b09: 尊者舍利子所。作是言。我有天眼清淨
T1545_.27.0223b10: 人觀千世界多用力。舍利子言。此是
T1545_.27.0223b11: 汝慢。此慢但依自相續起。然説諸慢方
T1545_.27.0223b12: 者從多分説。多分方他而起慢故」若起
T1545_.27.0223b13: 増上慢我見苦是苦。乃至廣説。問何故作
T1545_.27.0223b14: 。答爲他宗正義故。謂或有執。慢
T1545_.27.0223b15: 所縁。或復有執。慢縁他地。或復有執。慢
T1545_.27.0223b16: 無漏。或復有執。慢縁無爲。或復有執。慢
T1545_.27.0223b17: 他部。爲是種種僻執。顯一切慢皆
T1545_.27.0223b18: 所縁。不他地。不無漏。不無爲
T1545_.27.0223b19: 他部。故作斯論。若起増上慢我見苦
T1545_.27.0223b20: 是苦。或見集是集此何所縁。答如一類
T1545_.27.0223b21: 近善士。聽聞正法如理作意。由此因縁
T1545_.27.0223b22: 諦順忍。苦現觀邊者。於苦忍樂了是
T1545_.27.0223b23: 。集現觀邊者。於集忍樂了是集。彼由
T1545_.27.0223b24: 此忍作意持故。或由中間不作意故見疑不
T1545_.27.0223b25: 行。設行不覺。便作是念。我於苦見是苦。或
T1545_.27.0223b26: 集見是集。由此起慢已慢當慢心擧恃
T1545_.27.0223b27: 心自取名増上慢。此即縁苦或即縁集。此
T1545_.27.0223b28: 中如一類者。謂修順決擇分者。親近善
T1545_.27.0223b29: 者。謂親近善友。善友謂佛及佛弟子。令
T1545_.27.0223c01: 善法利樂故。聽聞正法者。毀此流
T1545_.27.0223c02: 歎還滅。引勝行教名爲正法。彼能屬
T1545_.27.0223c03: 耳無倒聽聞。如理作意者。謂厭惡流轉。欣
T1545_.27.0223c04: 樂還滅。正思所聞修勝行。由此因縁
T1545_.27.0223c05: 謂由前三爲加行故。得諦順忍者。謂順決
T1545_.27.0223c06: 擇分善根中忍。此忍隨順四聖諦理。或順
T1545_.27.0223c07: 故。名諦順。苦現觀邊者。於苦忍樂
T1545_.27.0223c08: 是苦者。謂縁苦諦順忍。集現觀邊者。於
T1545_.27.0223c09: 忍樂了是集者。謂縁集諦順忍。忍樂顯
T1545_.27.0223c10: 了是忍異名。皆爲示觀察法忍。現觀者謂
T1545_.27.0223c11: 見道。此忍近彼故名爲邊。此則總顯法隨
T1545_.27.0223c12: 法行。此中具顯四預流支。謂親近善士
T1545_.27.0223c13: 至法隨法行預流向果此爲先故。彼由此忍
T1545_.27.0223c14: 作意持故者。彼瑜伽師由忍觀諦於境作
T1545_.27.0223c15: 意善根持故。能令見疑暫不現行。或由
T1545_.27.0223c16: 間不作意故者。已出前定後定説爲
T1545_.27.0223c17: 中間。非理作意名不作意。或此顯如理
T1545_.27.0223c18: 作意。此則顯後設行不覺見疑不行者。由
T1545_.27.0223c19: 忍作意善根持故。此中見者。謂有身見及戒
T1545_.27.0223c20: 禁取。疑者謂疑。有見者。謂有身邊見戒
T1545_.27.0223c21: 禁取。*唯除邪見。得忍不四聖諦故。西
T1545_.27.0223c22: 方師言。*唯戒禁取此中名見。以得忍者不
T1545_.27.0223c23: 我故。評曰。應是説。彼亦執我。是故此
T1545_.27.0223c24: 中初説爲善。雖暫執我不斷常故。雖
T1545_.27.0223c25: 暫計淨不執爲勝故。然諸煩惱由五因縁
T1545_.27.0223c26: 永斷而不現行。一由奢摩他力。二由
T1545_.27.0223c27: 毘鉢舍那力。三由善師友力。四由好居處
T1545_.27.0223c28: 。五由性薄煩惱力。此中略故但擧前二
T1545_.27.0223c29: 。謂毘鉢舍那作意。謂奢摩他。由二善根所
T1545_.27.0224a01: 任持故見疑不行。設行不覺者煩惱細故。覺
T1545_.27.0224a02: 慧劣故。便作是念乃至廣説者。彼有漏忍觀
T1545_.27.0224a03: 苦集諦。便謂已得無漏眞見。未得謂得名
T1545_.27.0224a04: 上慢。因見苦起者。縁所縁苦。因見集起者
T1545_.27.0224a05: 所縁集。彼有漏忍雖能總別觀苦集諦。而
T1545_.27.0224a06: 増上慢但能別縁。謂見苦所斷者。但縁自地
T1545_.27.0224a07: 見苦所斷法。乃至修所斷者。但縁自地修所
T1545_.27.0224a08: 斷法。問此増上慢亦應能縁苦集忍品心心
T1545_.27.0224a09: 所法。何故但説縁苦集耶。答亦應彼而
T1545_.27.0224a10: 説者。應知此中是有餘説。復次縁忍品者
T1545_.27.0224a11: *唯修所斷。縁苦集者通五部慢。此中但説
T1545_.27.0224a12: 能遍縁者故不忍増上慢。復次有漏忍
T1545_.27.0224a13: 品亦苦集攝。是故此中説縁苦集。縁苦集言
T1545_.27.0224a14: 此慢無所縁執。亦遮此慢能縁他地及
T1545_.27.0224a15: 他部執。有餘師説。縁苦集者縁苦集忍
T1545_.27.0224a16: 苦集。彼説非理。後依滅道増上慢中
T1545_.27.0224a17: 即縁滅或道。故即縁苦集理故」
T1545_.27.0224a18: 若起増上慢我見滅是滅或見道是道此何
T1545_.27.0224a19: 所縁。答如一類近善士。聽聞正法
T1545_.27.0224a20: 如理作意。由此因縁諦順忍。滅現觀邊
T1545_.27.0224a21: 者。於滅忍樂了是滅道。現觀邊者於
T1545_.27.0224a22: 道忍樂了是道。彼由此忍作意持故。或
T1545_.27.0224a23: 中間不作意故見疑不行。設行不覺便作
T1545_.27.0224a24: 是念。我於滅見是滅或於道見是道。由
T1545_.27.0224a25: 此起慢已慢當慢心擧恃心自取名増上慢
T1545_.27.0224a26: 此即縁彼心心所法。此中諸句義如前説
T1545_.27.0224a27: 此即縁彼心心所法者。彼有漏忍觀滅道
T1545_.27.0224a28: 便謂已得無漏眞見。未得謂得名増上
T1545_.27.0224a29: 。因見滅起者。縁能縁滅有漏忍品心心
T1545_.27.0224b01: 所法。因見道起者。縁能縁道有漏忍品
T1545_.27.0224b02: 心心所法。彼有漏忍雖滅道而増上慢
T1545_.27.0224b03: 但縁忍品心心所法。滅道寂靜非慢境故。
T1545_.27.0224b04: 縁心等言。遮此慢無所縁執。亦遮此慢
T1545_.27.0224b05: 能縁無爲及無漏執。問此増上慢爲欲界繋
T1545_.27.0224b06: 色界繋耶。設爾何失。若欲界繋欲界無順
T1545_.27.0224b07: 決擇分忍此何所縁。若色界繋未欲染
T1545_.27.0224b08: 補特伽羅應此慢。有是説。此慢是色
T1545_.27.0224b09: 界繋。問若爾未欲染補特伽羅應
T1545_.27.0224b10: 。答此中略説離欲染者。有説。未
T1545_.27.0224b11: 者亦起未至地増上慢。彼不是説
T1545_.27.0224b12: 下地染者必不上地煩惱故。復有
T1545_.27.0224b13: 説者。此慢亦是欲界繋。問若爾欲界無順決
T1545_.27.0224b14: 擇分忍此何所縁。答欲界雖順決擇分
T1545_.27.0224b15: 而亦有彼相似善根。此増上慢縁彼而起欲
T1545_.27.0224b16: 界具有一切功徳相似法故。若起増上慢
T1545_.27.0224b17: 我生已盡乃至廣説。問何故復作此論。答前
T1545_.27.0224b18: 文*唯説異生所起増上慢。今欲通説異生
T1545_.27.0224b19: 聖者所起増上慢。如異生聖者知未見諦
T1545_.27.0224b20: 已見諦。未現觀已現觀。不定聚正定聚。無聖
T1545_.27.0224b21: 道有聖道亦爾。復次前文*唯説未得果者増
T1545_.27.0224b22: 上慢。今欲通説未得果已得果者増上慢。復
T1545_.27.0224b23: 次前文*唯説見道増上慢。今欲通説
T1545_.27.0224b24: 見修無學道増上慢。復次前文*唯説
T1545_.27.0224b25: 學道増上慢。今欲通説學無學道
T1545_.27.0224b26: 増上慢。復次前文*唯説欲色界増上慢
T1545_.27.0224b27: 今欲通説三界増上慢故作斯論。若起
T1545_.27.0224b28: 上慢我生已盡此何所縁。答如一類
T1545_.27.0224b29: 是念言。此是道此是行。我依此道此行。已遍
T1545_.27.0224b30: 苦。已永斷集已證滅。已修道。我生已盡。
T1545_.27.0224c01: 此起慢已慢當慢心擧恃心自取名増上
T1545_.27.0224c02: 。此即縁生。此中此是道此是行者。隨於何
T1545_.27.0224c03: 道行想已遍知苦乃至已修道者。隨
T1545_.27.0224c04: 於何苦集滅道想。我生已盡者隨
T1545_.27.0224c05: 何蘊作生想。此即縁生者。縁盡生即有
T1545_.27.0224c06: 漏蘊。問此増上慢亦應能縁慢者。所執有漏
T1545_.27.0224c07: 道行何故但説縁所盡生。答亦應彼而
T1545_.27.0224c08: 説者。應知此中是有餘説。復次縁道行
T1545_.27.0224c09: 者*唯修所斷縁所盡生通五部慢。此中但
T1545_.27.0224c10: 能遍縁者。復次有漏道行亦是生攝故説
T1545_.27.0224c11: 縁生。有餘師説。所執道行説名爲生能生
T1545_.27.0224c12: 慢故。此慢但縁能盡生道。彼説非理後依
T1545_.27.0224c13: 梵行已立等慢不縁生故。此慢縁所盡
T1545_.27.0224c14: 生不理故
T1545_.27.0224c15: 若起増上慢我梵行已立此何所縁。答如
T1545_.27.0224c16: 一類是念言。此是道此是行。我依
T1545_.27.0224c17: 此道此行。已遍知苦已永斷集。已證滅。
T1545_.27.0224c18: 已修道。我梵行已立。由此起慢已慢當慢
T1545_.27.0224c19: 心擧恃心自取名増上慢。此即縁彼心心所
T1545_.27.0224c20: 。此中諸句義如前説。我梵行已立者。隨
T1545_.27.0224c21: 於何處梵行想。諸阿羅漢於學道名已
T1545_.27.0224c22: 無學道名今立此即縁彼心心所法
T1545_.27.0224c23: 者。此増上慢縁彼所執有漏道行。無漏梵
T1545_.27.0224c24: 行非彼境故。若起増上慢我所作已辦此
T1545_.27.0224c25: 何所縁。答如一類是念言。此是道此
T1545_.27.0224c26: 是行。我依此道此行。已遍知苦。已永斷集。
T1545_.27.0224c27: 已證滅。已修道。我已斷隨眠。已害煩惱。已
T1545_.27.0224c28: 結。已盡漏。所作已辦。由此起慢已慢當
T1545_.27.0224c29: 慢心擧恃心自取名増上慢。此即縁彼心心
T1545_.27.0225a01: 所法。此中諸句義如前説。已斷隨眠廣説乃
T1545_.27.0225a02: 至已盡漏者此本論師於異名義。得善巧
T1545_.27.0225a03: 故作種種説。文雖異而體無別。皆爲
T1545_.27.0225a04: 示煩惱滅故。斷害吐盡於隨眠等。交互建立
T1545_.27.0225a05: 義並無違。即煩名惱滅爲所作。證之滿足故
T1545_.27.0225a06: 已辦。此即縁彼心心所法者。此増上慢
T1545_.27.0225a07: 彼所執有漏道行。諸煩惱滅非彼境故」
T1545_.27.0225a08: 若起増上慢我不後有。乃至廣説。問何
T1545_.27.0225a09: 故復作此論。答前説時解脱起増上
T1545_.27.0225a10: 。今欲不時解脱起増上慢。復
T1545_.27.0225a11: 次前説依盡智所起増上慢。今欲
T1545_.27.0225a12: 生智所起増上慢故作斯論。若起増上慢
T1545_.27.0225a13: 我不後有此何所縁答如一類
T1545_.27.0225a14: 念言。此是道此是行。我依此道此行。已遍
T1545_.27.0225a15: 苦。已永斷集。已證滅。已修道。我生已
T1545_.27.0225a16: 盡。梵行已立。所作已辦。不後有。由此起
T1545_.27.0225a17: 慢已慢當慢心擧恃心自取名増上慢。此即
T1545_.27.0225a18: 縁有此中諸句義如前説。復説我生已盡等
T1545_.27.0225a19: 者。顯無生智依盡智。如前盡智依道行
T1545_.27.0225a20: 故説道行。不後有者。得無生智
T1545_.27.0225a21: 復退墮受後有故。此即縁有者。此増上慢即
T1545_.27.0225a22: 受有。此中問答如前應知。以
T1545_.27.0225a23: 生義相似故。有本説心心所法
T1545_.27.0225a24: 受後有即是滅道故。問我生已盡何故不然。
T1545_.27.0225a25: 答彼亦應爾但綺互説
T1545_.27.0225a26: 問誰起幾種増上慢耶。有説異生起五種
T1545_.27.0225a27: 増上慢。謂於勝品有漏善根及預流等四沙
T1545_.27.0225a28: 門果。預流起四除第一。一來起三除前二
T1545_.27.0225a29: 不還起二除前三。諸阿羅漢無増上慢。問
T1545_.27.0225a30: 預流等云何於自果慢。答於勝根性
T1545_.27.0225b01: 増上慢。有説異生起九種増上慢。謂於
T1545_.27.0225b02: 品有漏善根。及於無漏四向四果。預流果
T1545_.27.0225b03: 七除前二。一來向起六除前三。一來果
T1545_.27.0225b04: 五除前四。不還向起四除前五。不還
T1545_.27.0225b05: 果起三除前六。阿羅漢向起二除前七。阿
T1545_.27.0225b06: 羅漢果無増上慢。預流向無起増上慢義
T1545_.27.0225b07: 評曰。聖者亦於勝有漏善増上慢。故六
T1545_.27.0225b08: 聖者如前所起各復増一。問異生云何於
T1545_.27.0225b09: 羅漢増上慢。答異生有二種。一愛行者。
T1545_.27.0225b10: 二見行者。若愛行者修不淨觀。伏愛品煩
T1545_.27.0225b11: 現行。彼性不見品煩惱。便自
T1545_.27.0225b12: 阿羅漢果。若見行者修持息念。伏
T1545_.27.0225b13: 見品煩惱現行。彼性不愛品煩惱
T1545_.27.0225b14: 便自謂阿羅漢果。問此増上慢。爲但依
T1545_.27.0225b15: 有處。爲亦依無處耶。答通依二處起。
T1545_.27.0225b16: 謂異生於有漏善増上慢有處起。於
T1545_.27.0225b17: 無漏善起増上慢無處預流果
T1545_.27.0225b18: 預流果及有漏善。起増上慢有處起。
T1545_.27.0225b19: 預流向乃至阿羅漢果。起増上慢
T1545_.27.0225b20: 起。廣説乃至阿羅漢向於阿羅漢向及有
T1545_.27.0225b21: 漏善。起増上慢有處起。於阿羅漢果
T1545_.27.0225b22: 増上慢無處起。問未色無色界根
T1545_.27.0225b23: 本定者亦能起彼増上慢耶。有説不起。以
T1545_.27.0225b24: 彼煩惱繋屬彼地根本定故。應説不定全
T1545_.27.0225b25: 得者必不起。未下染上地煩惱不
T1545_.27.0225b26: 現前故。若已證得而未起者容彼慢。彼
T1545_.27.0225b27: 近分地亦有慢等諸煩惱
T1545_.27.0225b28: 云何自謂卑而起慢乃至廣説。問何故作
T1545_.27.0225b29: 此論。答欲疑者得決定故。謂有
T1545_.27.0225b30: 自高&T020717;物可名爲慢。自卑尊他應
T1545_.27.0225c01: 慢。爲彼疑得決定故顯卑慢自卑
T1545_.27.0225c02: 尊他故作斯論。云何自謂卑而起慢耶。答
T1545_.27.0225c03: 一類他勝己種姓族類財位伎藝
T1545_.27.0225c04: 及田宅等是念言彼少勝我我少劣
T1545_.27.0225c05: 然劣於他多百千倍。由此起慢已慢當慢
T1545_.27.0225c06: 心擧恃心自取。是名自謂卑而起慢。此中
T1545_.27.0225c07: 種謂刹帝利婆羅門等。姓謂迦葉波喬答摩
T1545_.27.0225c08: 等。族謂父族母族。類謂白黒等。財謂金銀
T1545_.27.0225c09: 等。位謂王侯等。*伎謂巧術等。藝謂書數
T1545_.27.0225c10: 等。田謂稼穡生處。宅謂人等居處。等謂等
T1545_.27.0225c11: 餘聰辯等事。於是事他勝己多而謂
T1545_.27.0225c12: 少故成卑慢。若稱量者則不
T1545_.27.0225c13: 復次慢有七種。一慢。二過慢。三慢過慢。四我
T1545_.27.0225c14: 慢。五増上慢。六卑慢。七邪慢。慢者於劣謂
T1545_.27.0225c15: 己勝或於等謂己等。由此起慢已慢當慢
T1545_.27.0225c16: 心擧恃心自取。過慢者於等謂己勝。或於
T1545_.27.0225c17: 己等。由此起慢廣説如前。慢過慢者於
T1545_.27.0225c18: 勝謂己勝。由此起慢廣説如前。我慢者於
T1545_.27.0225c19: 五取蘊我我所此起慢廣説。如前。増
T1545_.27.0225c20: 上慢者於勝功徳未得謂得。未獲謂獲。未
T1545_.27.0225c21: 觸謂觸。未證謂證。由此起慢廣説如前。卑
T1545_.27.0225c22: 慢者於他多勝己少劣。由此起慢廣説
T1545_.27.0225c23: 前邪慢者實自無徳謂己有徳。由此起
T1545_.27.0225c24: 慢廣説如前。問増上慢邪慢倶依未得處
T1545_.27.0225c25: 起云何差別。答増上慢通於有無處起。邪
T1545_.27.0225c26: 慢*唯於無處起。復次増上慢通於已得未
T1545_.27.0225c27: 得處起。邪慢*唯於未得處起。復次増上慢
T1545_.27.0225c28: 等功徳或勝功徳處起。邪慢都無功徳處
T1545_.27.0225c29: 起復次増上慢於似功徳或實功徳處起。邪
T1545_.27.0226a01: 慢都無功徳處起。復次増上慢内外道倶起。
T1545_.27.0226a02: 邪慢*唯外道起。復次増上慢異生聖者倶起。
T1545_.27.0226a03: 邪慢*唯異生起。是謂差別。問如是七慢
T1545_.27.0226a04: 幾見所斷。幾修所斷。有作是説。一*唯見
T1545_.27.0226a05: 所斷。謂我慢。一*唯修所斷謂卑慢。餘五通
T1545_.27.0226a06: 見修所斷。有餘師説。二*唯見所斷謂我慢
T1545_.27.0226a07: 邪慢。一*唯修所斷謂卑慢。餘四通見修所
T1545_.27.0226a08: 。評曰。應是説。七慢皆通見修所斷
T1545_.27.0226a09: 問我慢邪慢云何通修所斷。答有身見及邪
T1545_.27.0226a10: 五部法我我所及撥爲此後。或
T1545_.27.0226a11: 見苦所斷法我慢及邪慢。或乃至縁
T1545_.27.0226a12: 修所斷法我慢及邪慢。故此二慢通
T1545_.27.0226a13: 所斷。問云何卑慢見所斷耶。答如我見者。互
T1545_.27.0226a14: 相問答我見相已。有便知他我見勝已。而
T1545_.27.0226a15: 多勝己少劣遂起卑慢。此等卑慢是
T1545_.27.0226a16: 見所斷問如是七慢幾何界繋。有是説
T1545_.27.0226a17: 欲界具七。上二界*唯有六除卑慢。彼無
T1545_.27.0226a18: 量種姓等故。評曰。色無色界亦具七慢。問彼
T1545_.27.0226a19: 無校量種姓等義寧有卑慢。答彼雖
T1545_.27.0226a20: 種等而有比度定等功徳。復次先在
T1545_.27.0226a21: 他而起。由數習力後生上界起彼
T1545_.27.0226a22: 。有是説。雖上界卑慢不起。而在
T1545_.27.0226a23: 欲界彼卑慢。如二證得上界定者。展轉
T1545_.27.0226a24: 答所得定相。因斯校量有卑慢。評曰。
T1545_.27.0226a25: 是説。非卑慢等要比度他勝劣而起
T1545_.27.0226a26: 無始時來數習力故。雖上界亦有現行
T1545_.27.0226a27: 是故三界皆具七慢
T1545_.27.0226a28: *説一切有部發智大毘婆沙論*卷第四十三
T1545_.27.0226a29:
T1545_.27.0226b01:
T1545_.27.0226b02:
T1545_.27.0226b03:
T1545_.27.0226b04: 阿毘達磨大毘婆沙論卷第四十
T1545_.27.0226b05:
T1545_.27.0226b06:  五百大阿羅漢等造 
T1545_.27.0226b07:  *三藏法師玄奘奉  詔譯 
T1545_.27.0226b08:   雜蘊第一中思納息第八之三
T1545_.27.0226b09: 契經説。若起欲尋恚尋害尋。或自害。或
T1545_.27.0226b10: 害他。或倶害。乃至廣説。問何故作此論。答
T1545_.27.0226b11: 廣分別契經義故。謂契經説佛告苾芻
T1545_.27.0226b12: 我未得三菩提時。或起欲尋恚尋害尋
T1545_.27.0226b13: 或起出離尋。無恚尋無害尋。雖欲尋恚
T1545_.27.0226b14: 尋害尋而不放逸。便作是念。若起欲尋恚
T1545_.27.0226b15: 尋害尋。或自害。或害他。或倶害。契經雖
T1545_.27.0226b16: 是説而不別其義。經是此論所依根本。彼
T1545_.27.0226b17: 説者今應之故作斯論。云何欲尋自
T1545_.27.0226b18: 害答如一類貪纒故。身勞心勞。身燒
T1545_.27.0226b19: 心燒。身熱心熱。身焦心焦。復由此縁
T1545_.27.0226b20: 長夜非愛非樂非喜非悦諸異熟果如是自
T1545_.27.0226b21: 。此中身勞等。顯欲尋等流果貪瞋癡等能
T1545_.27.0226b22: 驅役故。令身心勞如熾火故。能燒身心
T1545_.27.0226b23: 熱令燋當長夜等。顯欲尋異熟果。當
T1545_.27.0226b24: 惡趣非愛果故。云何欲尋害他。答如
T1545_.27.0226b25: 一類貪纒故觀視他妻。彼夫見已心生
T1545_.27.0226b26: 瞋忿結恨愁惱。如是害他。問觀他妻者亦
T1545_.27.0226b27: 苦果倶害。何故説此唯是害他。
T1545_.27.0226b28: 答觀視過輕其夫未現加辱害是故不
T1545_.27.0226b29: 説云何欲尋倶害。答如一類。起貪纒故
T1545_.27.0226c01: 奪他妻。彼夫覺已遂於其妻及於其人
T1545_.27.0226c02: 打縛斷命。或奪財寶是倶害問彼夫害
T1545_.27.0226c03: 他亦招苦果三害何以稱倶。答彼人
T1545_.27.0226c04: 現世不罪罰反被稱譽是故不説。復次
T1545_.27.0226c05: 夫亦是他故名倶害。云何恚尋自害答如
T1545_.27.0226c06: 一類瞋纒故身勞心勞。身燒心燒身
T1545_.27.0226c07: 熱心熱。身焦心焦。復由此縁長夜非
T1545_.27.0226c08: 愛非樂非喜非悦諸異熟果。如是自害此中
T1545_.27.0226c09: 二果如前應知。云何恚尋害他。答如
T1545_.27.0226c10: 類起瞋纒故斷害他命是害他。問斷
T1545_.27.0226c11: 他命者亦招苦果倶害何故説此*唯
T1545_.27.0226c12: 是害他。答斷賊命等。現無責罰更被稱譽
T1545_.27.0226c13: 是故不説。云何恚尋倶害。答如一類。起
T1545_.27.0226c14: 瞋纒故斷害他命。亦復被他斷害其命。如
T1545_.27.0226c15: 是倶害問殺能害者亦招苦果應名三害
T1545_.27.0226c16: 何以稱倶。答誅害他者世共稱譽現無
T1545_.27.0226c17: 是故不説。復次彼亦是他故名倶害。云何
T1545_.27.0226c18: 害尋自害。答如一類害纒故。身勞心
T1545_.27.0226c19: 勞。身燒心燒。身熱心熱。身焦心焦。復由
T1545_.27.0226c20: 長夜非愛非樂非喜非悦諸異熟果
T1545_.27.0226c21: 是自害此中二果如前應知。云何害尋害
T1545_.27.0226c22: 他。答如一類害纒故打縛於他。如
T1545_.27.0226c23: 他。問打縛他者亦招苦果倶害
T1545_.27.0226c24: 何故説此*唯是害他。答打縛惡人世同稱
T1545_.27.0226c25: 讃現不苦是故不説。云何害尋倶害。答如
T1545_.27.0226c26: 一類起害纒故打縛於他。亦復被他之
T1545_.27.0226c27: 打縛是倶害。此中問答如前應知」
T1545_.27.0226c28: 問此三惡尋以何爲自性。答欲尋以欲界
T1545_.27.0226c29: 五部六識身倶貪相應尋自性。恚尋亦
T1545_.27.0227a01: 五部六識身倶瞋相應尋自性害尋有
T1545_.27.0227a02: 説。即瞋一分相應尋爲自性。害即瞋故。問
T1545_.27.0227a03: 若爾恚尋害尋有何差別。答瞋有二種。一
T1545_.27.0227a04: 衆生命。二欲縛衆生。前名爲恚後
T1545_.27.0227a05: 名爲害。復次瞋有二種。一於應瞋處起。二
T1545_.27.0227a06: 不應瞋處起。前名爲恚後名爲害。彼二
T1545_.27.0227a07: 相應尋名恚尋害尋故有差別。有説害尋
T1545_.27.0227a08: 無明一分相應尋爲自性。害即無明故。如
T1545_.27.0227a09: 設論説。何縁故癡増。謂於害界害想害尋。若
T1545_.27.0227a10: 習若修若多所作彼相應尋名爲害尋。評
T1545_.27.0227a11: 曰應是説。有別心所説名爲害。非瞋。
T1545_.27.0227a12: 無明。非隨眠。自性是瞋所引。是瞋等流
T1545_.27.0227a13: 隨。瞋後起。名煩惱垢。*唯修所斷意識相應。
T1545_.27.0227a14: 此相應尋是害尋自性。此三不善故名惡尋
T1545_.27.0227a15: 復次有三善尋一出離尋。二無恚尋。三無
T1545_.27.0227a16: 害尋。問此三善尋以何爲自性。答皆以
T1545_.27.0227a17: 切善心相應尋自性。謂三惡尋一一別起
T1545_.27.0227a18: 自性各異。非一切不善心。此三善尋
T1545_.27.0227a19: 別自性皆與一切善心相應。問若爾此
T1545_.27.0227a20: 三有何差別。答自性無別而義有異。是三
T1545_.27.0227a21: 惡尋近對治故。謂諸善尋違欲尋故名出離
T1545_.27.0227a22: 恚尋故名無恚尋。違害尋故名無害
T1545_.27.0227a23: 。如契經説我未得三菩提時。雖
T1545_.27.0227a24: 欲尋恚尋害尋。而不放逸。問菩薩爾時若不
T1545_.27.0227a25: 放逸如何猶起此三惡尋。尊者世友作
T1545_.27.0227a26: 。菩薩雖此三惡尋而勤修善名不放
T1545_.27.0227a27: 。復次雖惡尋而速能覺知是不善
T1545_.27.0227a28: 不放逸。復次雖起即能厭棄吐捨名不放逸
T1545_.27.0227a29: 復次暫起便能修彼對治不放逸。復次起
T1545_.27.0227b01: 已即能斷因缺依知境過不放逸。復次
T1545_.27.0227b02: 三因縁故煩惱現前。一由因力。二境界力。三
T1545_.27.0227b03: 加行力。菩薩起此三不善尋。但由因力
T1545_.27.0227b04: 餘二不放逸。大徳説曰。菩薩雖起速
T1545_.27.0227b05: 能伏除。如渧水熱鐵上不放逸。脇
T1545_.27.0227b06: 尊者曰。起已速捨如頭然不放逸
T1545_.27.0227b07: 問菩薩何處起三惡尋。脇尊者曰。由因力
T1545_.27.0227b08: 故隨處而起不勞定責。如盲顛蹶愚者昏
T1545_.27.0227b09: 。隨至皆然何定處所。有是説。菩薩棄
T1545_.27.0227b10: 捨轉輪王位。踰城出家求無上覺。尋訪師
T1545_.27.0227b11: 王舍城。於日初分城乞食。百千衆
T1545_.27.0227b12: 生圍遶瞻仰。禮拜讃歎心無厭足。菩薩於
T1545_.27.0227b13: 初起欲尋。衆圍遶故妨廢乞食。飢火所
T1545_.27.0227b14: 復起恚尋。瞋心漸歇害尋復起須臾覺察生
T1545_.27.0227b15: 重慚愧。有餘師説。菩薩棄捨劫比羅城。依
T1545_.27.0227b16: 空閑林無上覺。父王遂遣釋種五人
T1545_.27.0227b17: 逐侍衞。於中有執樂行得淨。初見菩薩修
T1545_.27.0227b18: 苦行時即便捨去中復有執苦行得淨。後見
T1545_.27.0227b19: 菩薩捨苦行亦復辭去。時有難陀難陀
T1545_.27.0227b20: 跋羅二梵志女。因獻乳糜侍者遂住
T1545_.27.0227b21: 供給。女手柔軟摩觸菩薩。菩薩於彼便起
T1545_.27.0227b22: 欲尋。即生念言。先吾左右不我者。豈有
T1545_.27.0227b23: 女人得於我。遂於左右復起恚尋。瞋心
T1545_.27.0227b24: 稍歇害尋復起便自覺悟生大慚愧。或有
T1545_.27.0227b25: 。菩薩未出家時。父王淨飯爲娉五百玉
T1545_.27.0227b26: 以爲妃娣。娯樂菩薩出家。菩薩捨
T1545_.27.0227b27: 之而出家已。諸王遣使索女還國。淨飯王
T1545_.27.0227b28: 曰。我子出家心甚憂惱。見其妃娣時用慰
T1545_.27.0227b29: 今者未其還國。諸王聞已各生忿恚
T1545_.27.0227c01: 共發兵戈來相征罰。父王憂怖遣菩薩
T1545_.27.0227c02: 吾今坐汝致此怨讎。有説天神來告菩薩。菩
T1545_.27.0227c03: 薩聞已於父王所先發欲尋。於五百王恚
T1545_.27.0227c04: 。次起於其軍衆復起害尋。少時覺察深
T1545_.27.0227c05: 慚愧。復有説者。菩薩出家修苦行時。憶
T1545_.27.0227c06: 昔所受五欲樂事於欲尋。後聞壽亂
T1545_.27.0227c07: 己宮室復起恚尋。於彼媒媾復起害尋。須
T1545_.27.0227c08: 臾覺悟生大慚愧。或復有説。菩薩六年修
T1545_.27.0227c09: 時。惡魔隨逐欲留難。或時示現可愛
T1545_.27.0227c10: 色像。菩薩於彼發起欲尋。或時示現可畏色
T1545_.27.0227c11: 。菩薩於彼發起恚尋。或時示現侮弄色
T1545_.27.0227c12: 。菩薩於彼發起害尋。少時追悔深起慚愧
T1545_.27.0227c13: 尊者妙音作是説。菩薩先以欲界聞思所
T1545_.27.0227c14: 生二慧諸煩惱。愛此慧故發起欲尋。須
T1545_.27.0227c15: 臾覺悟此是煩惱増惡此故發起恚尋。漸復
T1545_.27.0227c16: 歇薄發起害尋。於後覺知深生慚愧。大徳
T1545_.27.0227c17: 説曰。菩薩昔居菩提樹下。初夜魔女來相媚
T1545_.27.0227c18: 亂爾時菩薩暫起欲尋。中夜魔軍總來逼
T1545_.27.0227c19: 菩薩。於彼暫起恚尋。漸復歇薄復起害尋
T1545_.27.0227c20: 須臾覺察即入慈定魔兵衆摧敗墮落
T1545_.27.0227c21: 契經説。菩薩起此三惡尋已。便自了知此
T1545_.27.0227c22: 能自害害他倶害。問云何菩薩所起欲尋恚
T1545_.27.0227c23: 尋害尋能爲三害。答雖害用而依相説。
T1545_.27.0227c24: 惡尋必有三害相故。復次惡尋起時自利事
T1545_.27.0227c25: 遠故名自害。利他事遠故名害他。倶利事
T1545_.27.0227c26: 遠故名倶害復次惡尋起時自利事壞故
T1545_.27.0227c27: 自害。利他事壞故名害他。倶利事壞故
T1545_.27.0227c28: 倶害。復次惡尋起時自利心息故名
T1545_.27.0227c29: 利他心息故名害他。倶利心息故名
T1545_.27.0228a01: 。復次惡尋起時於自相續取果與果故名
T1545_.27.0228a02: 自害。令諸施主雖四事而無大果故名
T1545_.27.0228a03: 害他。即總此二名爲倶害。復次惡尋起時於
T1545_.27.0228a04: 自相續自性愚。及所縁愚故名自害。令
T1545_.27.0228a05: 他施主施無大果故名害他。即總此二名爲
T1545_.27.0228a06: 倶害。復次惡尋起時染自相續故名自害
T1545_.27.0228a07: 他相續故名害他。即總此二名爲倶害
T1545_.27.0228a08: 復次惡尋起時令自相續離賢聖樂故名
T1545_.27.0228a09: 。亦令他離故名害他。即總此二名爲
T1545_.27.0228a10: 。尊者世友説曰。惡尋起時令自相續離繋
T1545_.27.0228a11: 果遠故名自害。令所化者離繋果遠故名
T1545_.27.0228a12: 害他。即總此二名爲倶害。尊者妙音説曰。惡
T1545_.27.0228a13: 尋起時令自相續勝功徳遠故名自害。令
T1545_.27.0228a14: 所化者勝功徳遠故名害他。即總此二名爲
T1545_.27.0228a15: 倶害。大徳説曰。惡尋起時令一切智一切種
T1545_.27.0228a16: 智不速證故名自害。令所化者不疾得
T1545_.27.0228a17: 故名害他。即總此二名爲倶害。脇尊者
T1545_.27.0228a18: 曰。惡尋起時身心熱惱故名自害。失所化
T1545_.27.0228a19: 故名害他。即總此二名爲倶害。尊者覺
T1545_.27.0228a20: 天説曰。惡尋起時身心不適故名自害。天神
T1545_.27.0228a21: 訶責故名害他。即總此二名爲倶害
T1545_.27.0228a22: 契經説。佛告苾芻。我初成佛多起二尋。謂
T1545_.27.0228a23: 安隱尋及遠離尋。問此二尋以何爲自性。答
T1545_.27.0228a24: 安隱尋以出離尋自性。遠離尋以無恚害
T1545_.27.0228a25: 自性。有説翻此。復次安隱尋對治欲
T1545_.27.0228a26: 尋。遠離尋對治恚害尋。有説翻此。復次安隱
T1545_.27.0228a27: 尋無貪善根相應。遠離尋無瞋癡善根相應。
T1545_.27.0228a28: 有説翻此。復次安隱尋對治貪相應尋。遠離
T1545_.27.0228a29: 尋對治瞋癡相應尋。有説翻此。復次安隱尋
T1545_.27.0228b01: 慈悲相應。遠離尋喜捨相應。有説翻此。復
T1545_.27.0228b02: 次安隱尋苦集智相應。遠離尋滅道智相應。
T1545_.27.0228b03: 有説翻此。復次安隱尋空及苦集無願三摩
T1545_.27.0228b04: 地倶。遠離尋無相及道無願三摩地倶。有説
T1545_.27.0228b05: 此。尊者妙音説曰。見流轉過失相應尋
T1545_.27.0228b06: 安隱尋。見還滅功徳相應尋遠離尋
T1545_.27.0228b07: 尊者覺天説曰。見還滅功徳相應尋安隱
T1545_.27.0228b08: 。見流轉過失相應尋遠離尋。大徳説曰。
T1545_.27.0228b09: 無邊利益意相應尋名安隱尋。無邊安樂意
T1545_.27.0228b10: 相應尋名遠離尋。脇尊者曰。無邊安樂意相
T1545_.27.0228b11: 應尋名安隱尋。無邊利益意相應尋名遠離
T1545_.27.0228b12: 。尊者世友説曰。無邊憐慜意樂所起名
T1545_.27.0228b13: 安隱尋。無邊調善意樂所起名遠離尋。問何
T1545_.27.0228b14: 故初成佛已多分起此二尋。答由此二尋是
T1545_.27.0228b15: 阿耨多羅三藐三菩提前行者及淨道故。復
T1545_.27.0228b16: 次爲治昔在家時受欲樂故。初成佛已多
T1545_.27.0228b17: 遠離尋。爲治修苦行時無利苦故。初
T1545_.27.0228b18: 成佛已起安隱尋。復次初成佛已慶自徳
T1545_.27.0228b19: 故多起安隱尋。欲他故多起遠離尋
T1545_.27.0228b20: 智多耶境多耶。乃至廣説。問何故作此論。答
T1545_.27.0228b21: 他宗正義故。謂或有執。有
T1545_.27.0228b22: 無智譬喩者。彼作是説。若縁幻事健達
T1545_.27.0228b23: 縛城及旋火輪鹿愛等智皆縁無境。爲
T1545_.27.0228b24: 一切智皆縁有境。或復有執。有智不
T1545_.27.0228b25: 境有境非智縁。爲彼執一切智皆
T1545_.27.0228b26: 能縁境。顯一切境皆智所縁。復次爲
T1545_.27.0228b27: 道有顛倒故境智相違。及顯内道無顛倒
T1545_.27.0228b28: 故境智相順。復次有説。智多非境以一境
T1545_.27.0228b29: 上有多智故。今欲顯示境多非智由此因
T1545_.27.0228c01: 故作斯論。智多耶境多耶。答境多非智。
T1545_.27.0228c02: 所以者何。智亦境故。謂智唯攝一界一處
T1545_.27.0228c03: 一蘊少分。境攝十八界十二處五蘊。有
T1545_.27.0228c04: 是説。智多非境。所以者何。如非想非非
T1545_.27.0228c05: 想處下下品一刹那受。爲欲界十智知。謂九
T1545_.27.0228c06: 不同分界遍行隨眠相應品智。及善世俗智
T1545_.27.0228c07: 知。爲欲界十智知。乃至無所有處亦爾。爲
T1545_.27.0228c08: 非想非非想處十六智知。謂十一遍行隨眠
T1545_.27.0228c09: 相應品智。及修所斷貪慢無明相應智無覆
T1545_.27.0228c10: 無記善世俗智。如是總有九十六智并無漏
T1545_.27.0228c11: 智九十七智彼一受。餘受餘法如理應
T1545_.27.0228c12: 知。是故當知智多非境。彼説非理。所以者
T1545_.27.0228c13: 何。彼智相應倶有等法及智自性皆是境故。
T1545_.27.0228c14: 設智非境其境尚多況智亦境而境非多。問
T1545_.27.0228c15: 若智亦境智境何別。答能知是智所知是境
T1545_.27.0228c16: 復次智唯非色無見無對有爲相應有所依
T1545_.27.0228c17: 所縁行相。境通色非色有見無見。有
T1545_.27.0228c18: 對無對有爲無爲。相應不相應有所依無所依
T1545_.27.0228c19: 有所縁無所縁。有行相無行相。復次智*唯三
T1545_.27.0228c20: 世三諦所攝。境通三世非世四諦所攝。此等
T1545_.27.0228c21: 名爲境與智別
T1545_.27.0228c22: 智多耶識多耶。乃至廣説。問何故作此論
T1545_.27.0228c23: 答爲他宗正義故。謂或有執。識智
T1545_.27.0228c24: 二法展轉相應忍即智故。爲彼執
T1545_.27.0228c25: 切智與識相應。非一切識與智相應。諸無
T1545_.27.0228c26: 漏忍非智性故。或復有執。智*唯無漏識
T1545_.27.0228c27: 唯有漏。互不相應。爲遮彼執識與
T1545_.27.0228c28: 倶通二種。有相應義。有餘師執。智即是
T1545_.27.0228c29: 識分位差別故。智與識無相應義。爲
T1545_.27.0228c30: 識與智體用各別有相應義。由此因
T1545_.27.0229a01: 故作斯論。智多耶識多耶。答識多非智。
T1545_.27.0229a02: 所以者何。諸智皆識相應。非諸識皆智相應
T1545_.27.0229a03: 忍相應識非智相應故。問諸無漏忍何故非
T1545_.27.0229a04: 智。答於所見境重觀故。謂無始來於
T1545_.27.0229a05: 聖諦無漏眞實慧。今雖創見而未
T1545_.27.0229a06: 重觀故。不智。要同類慧於境重觀方成
T1545_.27.0229a07: 智故。無一有情於一切法。無始時來非
T1545_.27.0229a08: 漏慧數數觀之。故有漏慧皆智所攝。復次忍
T1545_.27.0229a09: 聖諦推度忍可。未究竟故非智所攝。復
T1545_.27.0229a10: 次忍與所斷疑倶故非智所攝。設不
T1545_.27.0229a11: 而是彼類。有漏無間道非眞對治故。雖
T1545_.27.0229a12: 疑得倶而亦是智。由無漏忍非智所攝
T1545_.27.0229a13: 識多。復次識攝七界一處一蘊。智唯一界
T1545_.27.0229a14: 一處一蘊少分所攝是故智少
T1545_.27.0229a15: 有漏行多耶無漏行多耶。乃至廣説。問何故
T1545_.27.0229a16: 此論。答爲他宗正理故。謂或有
T1545_.27.0229a17: 佛生身是無漏。如大衆部彼作是説。經言
T1545_.27.0229a18: 如來生在世間在世間。若行若住不
T1545_.27.0229a19: 世法之所染汚。由此故知如來生身亦是無
T1545_.27.0229a20: 漏。爲彼執佛生身定是有漏。若佛生
T1545_.27.0229a21: 身是無漏者。則於佛身無比女人不
T1545_.27.0229a22: 愛。指鬘不瞋。傲士不慢。隖盧頻
T1545_.27.0229a23: 螺不癡。既縁起愛及瞋慢癡故佛生
T1545_.27.0229a24: 身定非無漏。問若爾彼部所引契經當云何
T1545_.27.0229a25: 。答彼依法身故作是説。經言如來生
T1545_.27.0229a26: 世間在世間者依生身説。若行若住不
T1545_.27.0229a27: 世法之所染汚者依法身説。故不相違
T1545_.27.0229a28: 復次依不隨順故説不染。謂世八法隨
T1545_.27.0229a29: 世間。諸有情類亦隨順彼故説染汚。世間八
T1545_.27.0229b01: 法隨順如來。佛不之故説不染。復次如
T1545_.27.0229b02: 來生身雖是有漏而超八法故説不染。問
T1545_.27.0229b03: 利等八法如來亦有何故言超。利謂哀*慜勇
T1545_.27.0229b04: 長者故一日受彼三億具衣。衰謂入彼大
T1545_.27.0229b05: 羅村乞食不得空鉢而返。毀謂戰遮婆羅門
T1545_.27.0229b06: 女及孫陀利謗佛聲遍十六大國。譽謂如來
T1545_.27.0229b07: 生時聲徹他化自在。成佛聲至色究竟天。轉
T1545_.27.0229b08: 法輪時聲至梵世。稱謂跋羅墮闍梵志以
T1545_.27.0229b09: 百頌現前讃佛。論力外道塢波離等諸大
T1545_.27.0229b10: 論師。以百千頌瞻仰讃佛。具壽阿難合掌
T1545_.27.0229b11: 佛諸希有法。尊者舍利子恭敬讃佛諸無
T1545_.27.0229b12: 上法。如是一切。譏謂跋羅墮闍梵志先五百
T1545_.27.0229b13: 頌現前罵佛。苦謂如來有時背痛。礫石毒刺
T1545_.27.0229b14: 足指等。樂謂如來有輕安樂。及生死中
T1545_.27.0229b15: 最勝受樂。如何世尊超世八法。答如來雖
T1545_.27.0229b16: 利等四法而不於高歡喜愛。如來雖
T1545_.27.0229b17: 衰等四法而不於下慼憂恚。由此名
T1545_.27.0229b18: 超故稱不染。非無漏立不染名。如妙高
T1545_.27.0229b19: 山住金輪上。八方猛風不傾動諸佛亦
T1545_.27.0229b20: 爾。住淨尸羅。世間八法不傾動。是故爲
T1545_.27.0229b21: 他宗異執顯示正理故作斯論。有漏行
T1545_.27.0229b22: 多耶無漏行多耶。答有漏行多非無漏行。所
T1545_.27.0229b23: 以者何。有漏行攝十處二處少分。無漏行唯
T1545_.27.0229b24: 二處少分故。有是説。無漏行多非
T1545_.27.0229b25: 漏行。所以者何。如欲界繋下下品攝。一刹那
T1545_.27.0229b26: 色定爲四種無漏慧縁。一苦法智忍。二苦法
T1545_.27.0229b27: 智。三集法智忍。四集法智。餘色餘法如
T1545_.27.0229b28: 知。復有此餘諸無漏法故無漏行決定爲
T1545_.27.0229b29: 多。有餘師説。有漏行多。所以者何。如一無
T1545_.27.0229c01: 漏行爲四有漏縁。一邪見。二疑。三無明。四
T1545_.27.0229c02: 善世俗智。餘無漏行如理應知。復有此餘
T1545_.27.0229c03: 諸有漏法。故有漏行決定爲多。評曰應
T1545_.27.0229c04: 是説。有漏無漏行雖倶無邊。而此本論師且
T1545_.27.0229c05: 處攝有漏多非無漏行
T1545_.27.0229c06: 復次此本論師雖答有爲無爲諸法多
T1545_.27.0229c07: 。而義應問有爲法多耶無爲法多耶。
T1545_.27.0229c08: 答有爲法多非無爲法。所以者何。有爲法
T1545_.27.0229c09: 十一處一處少分。無爲法唯攝一處少分
T1545_.27.0229c10: 故。評曰應是説。無爲法多非有爲法。所
T1545_.27.0229c11: 以者何。隨有漏法爾所體擇滅無爲數
T1545_.27.0229c12: 量亦爾。隨無漏道爾所體。非擇滅無爲
T1545_.27.0229c13: 數量亦爾。復有此餘隨有漏法體量多少。諸
T1545_.27.0229c14: 非擇滅及虚空無爲故。無爲法多非有爲法
T1545_.27.0229c15: 然准前門且依處説故説無爲其數是少
T1545_.27.0229c16: 云何行圓滿乃至廣説。問何故作此論。答
T1545_.27.0229c17: 別契經義故。謂契經説。佛弟子
T1545_.27.0229c18: 衆。尸羅圓滿。等持圓滿。般若圓滿。行圓滿。
T1545_.27.0229c19: 護圓滿。契經雖是説。而不別其義
T1545_.27.0229c20: 云何行護圓滿。經是此論所依根本。彼不
T1545_.27.0229c21: 説者今欲之故作斯論。云何行圓滿答
T1545_.27.0229c22: 無學身律儀語律儀命清淨。問學及非學非
T1545_.27.0229c23: 無學亦有律儀。何故此中*唯説無學答依
T1545_.27.0229c24: 勝説故。謂若法若補特伽羅。倶無學勝是故
T1545_.27.0229c25: 偏説。復次若有律儀不律儀所損壞者
T1545_.27.0229c26: 此中説之。學等不爾。無學身業名身律儀
T1545_.27.0229c27: 無學語業名語律儀。無學身語業總名命清
T1545_.27.0229c28: 。即是正業正語正命。契經説戒。或名尸羅
T1545_.27.0229c29: 或名爲行。或名爲足。或名爲篋。言尸羅
T1545_.27.0230a01: 是清涼義。謂惡能令身心熱惱。戒能安適故
T1545_.27.0230a02: 清涼。又惡能招惡趣熱惱。戒招善趣
T1545_.27.0230a03: 清涼。又尸羅者是安眠義。謂持戒者得
T1545_.27.0230a04: 隱眠常得善夢故曰尸羅。又尸羅者是數
T1545_.27.0230a05: 習義常習善法故曰尸羅。又尸羅者是得定
T1545_.27.0230a06: 義謂持戒者心易得定故曰尸羅。又尸羅者
T1545_.27.0230a07: &T006979;蹬義。如伽他説
T1545_.27.0230a08:     佛法池清涼 尸羅爲&T006979;*蹬
T1545_.27.0230a09:     聖浴不身 逮彼岸功徳
T1545_.27.0230a10: 又尸羅者是嚴具義。有莊嚴具幼爲
T1545_.27.0230a11: 壯老年。有莊嚴具壯爲好非幼老年
T1545_.27.0230a12: 莊嚴具老爲好非幼壯年。尸羅嚴身
T1545_.27.0230a13: 三時常好。如伽他説
T1545_.27.0230a14:     尸羅嚴身具 幼壯老咸宜
T1545_.27.0230a15:     住信慧爲珍 福無能盜者
T1545_.27.0230a16: 又尸羅者是明鏡義。如鏡明淨像現其中
T1545_.27.0230a17: 淨尸羅無我像現。又尸羅者是階陛義。
T1545_.27.0230a18: 尊者無滅言。我蹈尸羅階無上慧殿
T1545_.27.0230a19: 又尸羅者是増上義。佛於三千大千世界
T1545_.27.0230a20: 威勢者皆尸羅力。昔此迦濕彌羅國中有
T1545_.27.0230a21: 毒龍。名無怯懼。禀性暴惡多爲損害。去
T1545_.27.0230a22: 遠有毘訶羅數爲彼龍之所嬈惱。寺有
T1545_.27.0230a23: 五百大阿羅漢。共議入定欲彼龍
T1545_.27.0230a24: 神力而不遣。有阿羅漢外而來。諸舊
T1545_.27.0230a25: 住僧爲上事。時外來者至龍住處。彈指
T1545_.27.0230a26: 語言。賢面遠去。龍聞其聲即便遠去。諸阿
T1545_.27.0230a27: 羅漢怪而問言。汝遣此龍是何定力。彼答衆
T1545_.27.0230a28: 曰。我不入定亦不通。但護尸羅故有
T1545_.27.0230a29: 此力。我護輕罪重禁故使惡龍驚怖
T1545_.27.0230b01: 而去。由此尸羅是増上義。又尸羅者是頭首
T1545_.27.0230b02: 義。如頭首。即能見色聞聲嗅香甞
T1545_.27.0230b03: 觸知法。有尸羅者。即能見四聖諦色
T1545_.27.0230b04: 未曾有名身等聲。嗅三十七覺分花香
T1545_.27.0230b05: 出家遠離三菩提寂靜味。覺靜慮解脱等
T1545_.27.0230b06: 持等至觸。知蘊處界自相共相法。是故尸羅
T1545_.27.0230b07: 是頭首義。契經説。戒名爲行者以諸世間
T1545_.27.0230b08: 戒名行故。諸世間見持戒者彼有行
T1545_.27.0230b09: 破戒者彼無行。又淨持戒是衆行本
T1545_.27.0230b10: 能至涅槃故名爲行。契經説戒名爲足者。
T1545_.27.0230b11: 能往善趣涅槃故。如足者能避
T1545_.27.0230b12: 安隱處。有淨戒者能越惡趣天人
T1545_.27.0230b13: 。或超生死涅槃岸故名爲足。契經説。
T1545_.27.0230b14: 戒名爲篋者。任持一切功徳法故。謂持戒
T1545_.27.0230b15: 者任持功徳退散。如篋持寶。尊者妙
T1545_.27.0230b16: 音作是説。戒名不壞。所以者何。如足不
T1545_.27.0230b17: 壞則能自在往安隱處。具淨戒者亦復如
T1545_.27.0230b18: 是能至涅槃。此中無學身語淨戒名行圓滿
T1545_.27.0230b19: 行中極故。云何護圓滿。答無學根律儀。應
T1545_.27.0230b20: 此中根是所護。由念慧力眼等根
T1545_.27.0230b21: 境起諸過患。如鉤制象不奔逸。是故
T1545_.27.0230b22: 無學正念正知名護圓滿。如伽他説
T1545_.27.0230b23:     世間諸瀑流 正念能防護
T1545_.27.0230b24:     若令畢竟斷 其功*唯正知
T1545_.27.0230b25: 問根律儀根不律儀。各以何爲自性。答根律
T1545_.27.0230b26: 儀以正念正知自性。根不律儀以失念
T1545_.27.0230b27: 不正知自性。云何知然。經爲量故。如
T1545_.27.0230b28: 經説。天告苾芻。汝今不自開瘡漏。苾芻
T1545_.27.0230b29: 答曰。我當之。天復語言。瘡漏非小以
T1545_.27.0230c01: 能覆。苾芻答曰。我當覆以正念正知。天曰善
T1545_.27.0230c02: 哉。此爲眞覆。故知此二是根律儀覆護律儀。
T1545_.27.0230c03: 義相似故根不律儀翻前而立故是失念及
T1545_.27.0230c04: 不正知。問若正念正知是根律儀者。契經所
T1545_.27.0230c05: 説當云何通。如説念慧圓滿故根律儀圓滿。
T1545_.27.0230c06: 豈説自性圓滿故自性圓滿耶。答念慧有
T1545_.27.0230c07: 。一因性。二果性。因性者名念慧。果性者
T1545_.27.0230c08: 根律儀。復次念慧有二種。一生得善。二
T1545_.27.0230c09: 加行善。生得善者名念慧。加行善者名根律
T1545_.27.0230c10: 。復次念慧有二種。一不定善。二定善。不
T1545_.27.0230c11: 定善者名念慧。定善者名根律儀。復次念慧
T1545_.27.0230c12: 二種。一世間善。二出世間善。世間善者
T1545_.27.0230c13: 念慧。出世間善者。名根律儀。復次念慧
T1545_.27.0230c14: 二種。一學。二無學。學者名念慧。無學者
T1545_.27.0230c15: 根律儀。復次念慧有二種。一鈍根種性。
T1545_.27.0230c16: 二利根種性。鈍根種性名念慧。利根種性名
T1545_.27.0230c17: 根律儀故與契經相違害。有作是説。根
T1545_.27.0230c18: 律儀以不放逸自性。根不律儀以放逸
T1545_.27.0230c19: 自性。有餘師説。根律儀以六恒住法
T1545_.27.0230c20: 自性。根不律儀以此所對治諸煩惱業
T1545_.27.0230c21: 。或有説者。根律儀以於六根已斷已遍知
T1545_.27.0230c22: 法不成就性。及彼對治道成就性自性。根
T1545_.27.0230c23: 不律儀以於六根未斷未遍知法成就性。及
T1545_.27.0230c24: 彼對治道不成就性自性。復有説者。根
T1545_.27.0230c25: 律儀以於六根已斷已遍知時。所有妙行善
T1545_.27.0230c26: 根生長廣大自性。根不律儀以六根未
T1545_.27.0230c27: 斷未遍知時。所有惡行不善根生長廣大
T1545_.27.0230c28: 自性。有是言。根律儀以一切善法
T1545_.27.0230c29: 。根不律儀以一切染汚法自性。復有
T1545_.27.0231a01: 説言。根律儀以一切善法及順善無覆無記
T1545_.27.0231a02: 自性。根不律儀以一切染汚法及順染
T1545_.27.0231a03: 無覆無記法自性。昔此迦濕彌羅國中有
T1545_.27.0231a04: 毘訶羅吉祥胤。二阿羅漢曾住其中。倶
T1545_.27.0231a05: 三明。具八解脱。得無礙解。是説法師是
T1545_.27.0231a06: 親兄弟。父名難提婆羅門種。倶作是説。根
T1545_.27.0231a07: 律儀根不律儀。皆以無覆無記不相應行蘊
T1545_.27.0231a08: 中律儀不律儀自性。問若此倶是無覆無
T1545_.27.0231a09: 記心不相應行蘊攝者。此二自性有何差別
T1545_.27.0231a10: 答隨順染汚者名不律儀。隨順清淨者名
T1545_.27.0231a11: 。是謂差別。評曰此諸説中初説爲善。經
T1545_.27.0231a12: 念慧能護根故
T1545_.27.0231a13: 復次即此念慧有位亦得斷律儀名。隨
T1545_.27.0231a14: 差別立多種。且説有漏斷律儀者。謂
T1545_.27.0231a15: 欲界見修所斷法。以未至地能離欲界有
T1545_.27.0231a16: 。九無間道中念慧二法爲斷律儀。若初
T1545_.27.0231a17: 靜慮見修所斷法。以第二靜慮近分地
T1545_.27.0231a18: 初靜慮。九無間道中念慧二法爲斷律儀
T1545_.27.0231a19: 乃至無所有處見修所斷法。以非想非非想
T1545_.27.0231a20: 處近分地能離無所有處。九無間道中念
T1545_.27.0231a21: 慧二法爲斷律儀。若説無漏斷律儀者。謂
T1545_.27.0231a22: 欲界見修所斷法。以未至地能離欲界。無
T1545_.27.0231a23: 漏諸無間道中念慧二法爲斷律儀。若初靜
T1545_.27.0231a24: 慮見修所斷法。以未至靜慮中間及初靜
T1545_.27.0231a25: 能離初靜慮三地。無漏諸無間道中
T1545_.27.0231a26: 念慧二法爲斷律儀。第二靜慮見修所斷法。
T1545_.27.0231a27: 前三地及第二靜慮能離第二靜慮。四
T1545_.27.0231a28: 無漏諸無間道中念慧二法爲斷律儀
T1545_.27.0231a29: 第三靜慮見修所斷法以前四地及第三靜
T1545_.27.0231b01: 能離第三靜慮五地。無漏諸無間道中念
T1545_.27.0231b02: 慧二法爲斷律儀。第四靜慮見修所斷法。及
T1545_.27.0231b03: 無色界見所斷法。以前五地及第四靜慮
T1545_.27.0231b04: 第四靜慮等。六地無漏諸無間道中念慧
T1545_.27.0231b05: 二法爲斷律儀。空無邊處修所斷法。以前六
T1545_.27.0231b06: 地及空無邊處能離空無邊處。七地無漏九
T1545_.27.0231b07: 無間道中念慧二法爲斷律儀。識無邊處修
T1545_.27.0231b08: 所斷法。以前七地及識無邊處能離識無邊
T1545_.27.0231b09: 處八地無漏九無間道中念慧二法爲斷律
T1545_.27.0231b10: 。無所有處及非想非非想處修所斷法。以
T1545_.27.0231b11: 前八地及無所有處能離二地九地。無漏九
T1545_.27.0231b12: 無間道中念慧二法爲斷律儀
T1545_.27.0231b13: *説一切有部發智大毘婆沙論*卷第四十四
T1545_.27.0231b14:
T1545_.27.0231b15:
T1545_.27.0231b16: 阿毘達磨大毘婆沙論卷第四十
T1545_.27.0231b17:
T1545_.27.0231b18:  五百大阿羅漢等造 
T1545_.27.0231b19:  *三藏法師玄奘奉  詔譯 
T1545_.27.0231b20:   雜蘊第一中思納息第八之四
T1545_.27.0231b21: 云何異生性。乃至廣説。問何故作此論。答
T1545_.27.0231b22: 他宗正義故。謂或有執欲界見苦
T1545_.27.0231b23: 所斷十隨眠是異生性。如犢子部。彼説異生
T1545_.27.0231b24: 性是欲界繋。是染汚性是見所斷。是相應行
T1545_.27.0231b25: 蘊攝。爲彼執異生性是三界繋。是修
T1545_.27.0231b26: 所斷。是不染汚。是不相應行蘊所攝。或復有
T1545_.27.0231b27: 執。異生性無實體。如譬喩者彼執
T1545_.27.0231b28: 異生性自體實有。爲此等諸部異執
T1545_.27.0231b29: 示正理故作斯論。此本論中説異生性
T1545_.27.0231c01: 品類足論説異生法。如説。云何異生法。謂
T1545_.27.0231c02: 地獄傍生鬼界比倶盧洲無想天。彼業彼生
T1545_.27.0231c03: 是謂異生法。問何故此本論中。説異生性非
T1545_.27.0231c04: 異生法。品類足論。説異生法非異生性耶。
T1545_.27.0231c05: 答是作論者意欲爾故。復次此彼皆是有
T1545_.27.0231c06: 故。復次此彼二論各説一種互相顯故。
T1545_.27.0231c07: 復次異生性勝。非異生法。此本論中且就
T1545_.27.0231c08: 説。此論已説異生性。故品類足論不重説
T1545_.27.0231c09: 之。此論未異生法故。品類足論説異生
T1545_.27.0231c10: 。此顯彼論在此後。有是説。彼論已
T1545_.27.0231c11: 異生法故此不重説。彼論未異生性
T1545_.27.0231c12: 故此論説之。此顯彼論在此先。問何故
T1545_.27.0231c13: 異生性。尊者世友作是説。能令有情
T1545_.27.0231c14: 異類見異類煩惱異類業。受異類果
T1545_.27.0231c15: 異類生故。名異生性。復次能令有情墮
T1545_.27.0231c16: 故。往異趣故。受異生故。名異生性。復
T1545_.27.0231c17: 次能令有情信異師故。作異相故。受
T1545_.27.0231c18: 故。行異行故。求異果故。名異生性。大
T1545_.27.0231c19: 徳説曰。能令有情依止異類界趣生有。發
T1545_.27.0231c20: 起種種顛倒煩惱。造作増長感後有。輪
T1545_.27.0231c21: 轉生死分限故。名異生性。阿毘達磨諸
T1545_.27.0231c22: 論師言。異生分故異生體故名異生性。尊者
T1545_.27.0231c23: 妙音作是説。異生類故名異生性。脇尊
T1545_.27.0231c24: 者言。異生依故障聖性故。名異生性。問何
T1545_.27.0231c25: 故名異生法。答諸異生者有此法故。名
T1545_.27.0231c26: 生法。譬如世間王法臣法。問諸異生法。聖者
T1545_.27.0231c27: 亦有。何故但立異生法名。答諸異生法聖者
T1545_.27.0231c28: 多無。設有少者不聖法。以聖者於彼得
T1545_.27.0231c29: 而不身成就不現前故。唯異生於彼得
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 
Footnote:
 

[First] [Prev+100] [Prev] 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 [Next] [Next+100] [Last] [行番号:/]   [返り点:/] [CITE]